Discussion:
-- RHETORICAL ARTIFICE OF REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM NOTED: Fuck You
(zu alt für eine Antwort)
dolf
2018-08-27 01:14:20 UTC
Permalink
In addition to electronically serving upon you a copy of this document
"#123 - DIVINE JUDGMENT BY #509 - YAHAD (JEWISH / CHRISTIAN PROSELYTES)
AGAINST JEWISH HATRED DUE [TO] STEREOTYPICAL *SHEM* (#72) *HAMPHORASCH*
DEMENTIA BY BLASPHEMY BEING NOW A #481 - *CURSE* UPON THEM"

I've lodged an email copy of such complaint to the local *PROJECTS*
office for the *JEWISH* *ANTI*-*DEFAMATION* *LEAGUE* antidef.org.au and
to my friends at the MIKDASH EDUCATIONAL CENTER SITUATED WITHIN
JERUSALEM (as the JEWISH TEMPLE COIN depicted therein I have purchased
from them) ...

American Support for Israel, Inc.
P.O. Box 3263
Washington, DC 20010

THEY WON'T HAVE ANY NEED TO REPLY BECAUSE THEY RECOGNIZE THE PLURALITY
OF JEWISH BELIEF WHICH INCLUDES #509 - YAHAD (MENTIONED IN BOTH THE OLD
/ NEW TESTAMENTS OF THE BIBLE) AS PROSELYTES IS CLEARLY CONVEYED AS
GOD'S ELECT AND CHOSEN COMMUNITY.

IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT THEN PROVIDE A DETAILED AND REASONED
REPLY BEYOND ENGAGING WITHIN A *RHETORICAL* *A8RTIFICE* *OF* *REDUCTIO*
*AD* *HITLERUM* NOTED: Fuck You AND IGNORANCE AS A #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL.

IF NOT, I FOREWARN YOU THAT WE ARE BUILDING CAPACITY TO PURSUE IN A
COURT OF LAW YOU FOR IRRATIONAL HATRED DRIVEN PREJUDICE CONVEYING ACTS
OF DEHUMANISATION BEING CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND CONSTITUTING A WAR
CRIME WHICH IS SUBJECT TO A UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION ...

OH FATHER DON'T FORGIVE THEM BECAUSE THEY KNOW WHAT THEY DO...
This is horse-shit exponented. I will explain.
(horse-shit)x3 = Three times the horse-shit that was here before
Time for a break, you assclown.
-- (DRAFT: 26 AUGUST 2018): 2 - THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL
PHILOSOPHY

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 26 August, 2018

Immanuel Kant (22 April 1724 to 12 February 1804) whom was initially
educated within theology as ostensibly the Pythagorean binomial
perennialist (Latin) school of thought and note worthy are his second
(1756) and third (1755) dissertations:

The Employment in Natural Philosophy of Metaphysics Combined with
Geometry—also known as the Monodologia Physica which contrasted the
Newtonian methods of thinking with those employed in the philosophy then
prevailing in German universities;

In a third dissertation, "New Elucidation of the First Principles of
Metaphysical Cognition", Kant analyzed especially the principle of
sufficient reason, which in Wolff’s formulation asserts that for
everything there is a sufficient reason why it should be rather than not
be. Although critical, Kant was cautious and still a long way from
challenging the assumptions of Leibnizian metaphysics.

And of his criticism of Leibnizian rationalism Kant's principal work of
this period was published by 1764 as "An Inquiry into the Distinctness
of the Fundamental Principles of Natural Theology and Morals". Within
this work he attacked the claim of Leibnizian philosophy that philosophy
should model itself on mathematics and aim at constructing a chain of
demonstrated truths based on self-evident premises. Kant argued that
mathematics proceeds from definitions that are arbitrary, by means of
operations that are clearly and sharply defined, upon concepts that can
be exhibited in concrete form. In contrast with this method, he argued
that philosophy must begin with concepts that are already given, “though
confusedly or insufficiently determined,” so that philosophers cannot
begin with definitions without thereby shutting themselves up within a
circle of words. Philosophy cannot, like mathematics, proceed
synthetically; it must analyze and clarify. The importance of the moral
order, which he had learned from Rousseau, reinforced the conviction
received from his study of Newton that a synthetic philosophy is empty
and false.

Within 1770 he became a full professor at the University of Konigsberg,
teaching metaphysics and logic. The Inaugural Dissertation of 1770 that
he delivered on *ASSUMING* *HIS* *NEW* *POSITION* *ALREADY* *CONTAINED*
*MANY* *OF* *THE* *IMPORTANT* *ELEMENTS* *OF* *HIS* *MATURE*
*PHILOSOPHY*. As indicated in its title, De Mundi Sensibilis atque
Intelligibilis Forma et Principiis: Dissertatio (“On the Form and
Principles of the Sensible and Intelligible Worlds”), the implicit
dualism of the Träume is made explicit, and it is made so on the basis
of a wholly un-Leibnizian interpretation of the distinction between
sense and understanding. Sense is not, as Leibniz had supposed, a
confused form of thinking but a source of knowledge in its own right,
although the objects so known are still only “appearances”—the term that
Leibniz also used. They are appearances because all sensing is
conditioned by the presence, in sensibility, of the forms of time and
space, which are not objective characteristics or frameworks of things
but “pure intuitions.” But though all knowledge of things sensible is
thus of phenomena, it does not follow that nothing is known of things as
they are in themselves. Certainly, humans have no intuition, or direct
insight, into an intelligible world, but the presence in them of certain
“pure intellectual concepts”—such as those of possibility, existence,
necessity, substance, and cause—enables them to have some descriptive
knowledge of it. By means of these concepts they can arrive at an
exemplar that provides them with “the common measure of all other things
as far as real.” This exemplar gives them an idea of perfection for both
the theoretical and practical orders: in the first, it is that of the
Supreme Being, God; in the latter, that of moral perfection. [cf:
Britannia Encyclopaedia]

After the Dissertation, Kant published virtually nothing for 11 years
until 1781, Immanuel Kant disseminated the first edition to Critique of
Pure Reason with the second in 1787, as an enormous work and one of the
most important on Western thought. Although the adolescent Kant loathed
his Pietist as Lutheran schooling, he had deep respect and admiration
for his parents, especially his mother, whose “genuine religiosity” he
described as “not at all enthusiastic.” According to his biographer,
Manfred Kuehn, Kant’s parents probably influenced him much less through
their Pietism than through their artisan values of “hard work, honesty,
cleanliness, and independence,” which they taught him by example. [cf:
Kuehn 2001, 38, 44. See also 54]

Thus in the consideration given to Kantian appeal for a pure moral
philosophy as beginning with a reference to the usefulness of the
division of labor. Here Kant raises the question whether philosophy
would not also benefit from such a division. Ultimately, he is not
concerned with whether the burden of elaborating philosophical theories
should be distributed among the shoulders of a multitude of persons.[Page 6]

We would however contend against this notion as being an impotent
chimeric {ie. a thing which is hoped for but is illusory or impossible
to achieve} of idealism {ie. the unrealistic belief in or pursuit of
perfection} such that one may declare "the economic sovereignty you
claim to defend is a chimera".

And thusly, it is in and of itself an oblique contradiction of Kant's
own characteristic position development where he emphasizes that an
adequate form of moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from
all empirical elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings as
well as free from rational concepts of perfection:

“And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #342)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 20 (#26); Ego: 14 (#20),
@3: Sup: 42 (#68); Ego: 22 (#42),
@4: Sup: 72 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY (%14); I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER (%16)); Ego: 30 (#72),
@5: Sup: 29 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
(%18)); Ego: 38 (#110),
@6: Sup: 75 (#244); Ego: 46 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS (%21)),
@7: Sup: 48 (#292); Ego: 54 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND (%30)),
@8: Sup: 29 (#321); Ego: 62 (#272),
@9: Sup: 18 (#339); Ego: 70 (#342),
Male: #339; Feme: #342
} // #342

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #369)@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 33 (#49); Ego: 17 (#33),
@3: Sup: 51 (#100); Ego: 18 (#51),
@4: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 40 (#91),
@5: Sup: 51 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES (%9)); Ego: 41 (#132),
@6: Sup: 12 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST (%27)); Ego:
42 (#174),
@7: Sup: 76 (#249); Ego: 64 (#238),
@8: Sup: 60 (#309); Ego: 65 (#303),
@9: Sup: 45 (#354); Ego: 66 (#369),
Male: #354; Feme: #369
} // #369

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he
rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God
blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had
rested from all his work which God created and made.” [Genesis 1:31-2:3
(KJV)]

Thusly if the Sabbath as a sacred principle of nature which is the
ultimate good as perfection: “And he said unto them, The sabbath was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath.” [Mark 2:27 (KJV)]

It’s meritorious purpose as a benefit to humankind is found firstly
within the ACT TO WILL by VOLUNTĀTIS {ie. MENTALISM {#41}: #1 - WILL,
FREE WILL, CHOICE as to engage within actions that endeavour to #1 - BE
SOCIALLY BENEFICIAL (the Artificial Intelligence equivalent of 'DO NO
EVIL'?); {*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}} by it’s remembrance and
then the voluntary avoidance of *LABOURING* as the absence of any WILL
TO ACT.

H2257@{
   @1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
   @2: Sup: 10 (#18); Ego: 2 (#10),
   @3: Sup: 40 (#58); Ego: 30 (#40),
   @4: Sup: 41 (#99); Ego: 1 (#41),
   Male: #99; Feme: #41
} // #41

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #40 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;

THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.

    #VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
    #TOOLS: *LABOURING* (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
strenuous efforts.
    #POSITION: With *DUTIES* (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
    #TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
    #CANON: #228

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
   @3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
   @4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
   Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228

#41 as [#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): {UMBRA: #6 as #40 %
#41 = #40} 1) *HURT*, *DAMAGE*, *INJURY*;

"Take heed now that ye fail not to do this: why should damage {#41 as
[#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): hurt} grow to the hurt of
the kings?" [Ezra 4:22]

Rather Kant, with this rhetorical consideration, introduces an
explicitly methodological train of thought. He asks “whether the nature
of the science {ie. ‘OTH CYCLE of 6D x #364 = #2184 days x 49J (based
seven number) = #294 x #364 = 107,016 days / 293 as TROPICAL YEARS =
365.242321 days} does not require the empirical part always to be
carefully separated from the rational [of the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS (ie. voluntary will)]:

"And God said, Let us make {ie.

*APPOINT* AS HAVING INCEPTION OF 22 / 7 WITH A GENESIS {DAO OF NATURE
(CHINESE: ZIRAN) / COURSE (GREEK: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (GREEK: GENESIS)}
REPRISE UPON EQUINOX OF WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 / #0 - NEW MOON OF
THURSDAY 21 MARCH 1996

} man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over
the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle,
and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon
the earth.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;
male and female created he them." [Genesis 1:26-27 (KJV)]

And he confines this question to the sub-question "Whether one is not of
the opinion that it: is of the utmost necessity to work out once a pure
moral philosophy which is fully cleansed of everything that might be in
any way empirical and belong to anthropology“

The passage that is introduced by this question contains, at the same
time, a positive response — the thesis that there must be a “pure moral
philosophy” is “self evident." And indeed for Kant this evidence arises
“out of the common idea of *DUTY* and the moral law” (ibid.). Kant’s
cursory argumentation for this thesis is difficult to grasp.
Undoubtedly, it constitutes one of the key argumentative passages of the
Groundwork. [Page 6]

It is perhaps presumptuous of us at only page #6 of #323 to already be
taking issue with the robustness of Kant's otherwise cogent thesis that
there must be a “pure moral philosophy” which is “self evident" given
that there are seven day designates within our understanding of the
cosmology which is understood universally as an implicit law of nature.

GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1633 HOURS ON 25 AUGUST
2018: “The Kantian appeal for a pure moral philosophy begins with a
reference to the usefulness of the division of labor. Kant raises ... a
glass and...

YOUTUBE: “The Philosopher’s Song (Monty Python)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=2m51s&v=PtgKkifJ0Pw>

'IMMANUEL KANT WAS A REAL PISSANT
WHO WAS VERY RARELY STABLE.
HEIDEGGER, HEIDEGGER WAS A BOOZY BEGGAR
WHO COULD THINK YOU UNDER THE TABLE.
DAVID HUME COULD OUT CONSUME
SCHOPENHAUER AND HEGEL,
AND WITTGENSTEIN WAS A BEERY SWINE
WHO WAS JUST AS SLOSHED AS SCHLEGEL.

THERE'S NOTHING NIETZSCHE COULDN'T TEACH YA
'BOUT THE RAISIN' OF THE WRIST.
SOCRATES HIMSELF WAS PERMANENTLY PISSED.

JOHN STUART MILL, OF HIS OWN FREE WILL,
AFTER HALF A PINT OF SHANDY WAS PARTICULARLY ILL.
PLATO, THEY SAY, COULD STICK IT AWAY,
'ALF A CRATE OF WHISKEY EVERY DAY!
ARISTOTLE, ARISTOTLE WAS A BUGGER FOR THE BOTTLE,
AND HOBBES WAS FOND OF HIS DRAM.
AND RENE DESCARTES WAS A DRUNKEN FART:
"I DRINK, THEREFORE I AM."

YES, SOCRATES HIMSELF IS PARTICULARLY MISSED;
A LOVELY LITTLE THINKER, BUT A BUGGER WHEN HE'S PISSED.'

24 beers in a carton. 24 hours in a day. Hmmmm......."

DOLF @ 0812 HOURS ON 26 AUGUST 2018: “It may have escaped your notice,
as is self-evident from your burlesque constipated turd 💩 haemorrhoidal
opinion that the subject we are contending with is a consideration of
profound intellectual accomplishments conveyed by a book which
articulates the merit as collective mind of no fewer than FOURTEEN {#14}
eminent university professors:

THE COUNTRIES MOST ANTICIPATED LEGAL ADVICE HAS ARRIVED

Yes indeed my appraisal by Christoph HORN and Dieter SCHÖNECKER (Eds.)
of Immanuel KANT’s GROUNDWORK FOR METAPHYSICS OF MORALS (1785) has
arrived at my doorstep this morning of 24 August 2108 courtesy of
Australia Post.

It will be my task to read it this weekend in the hope that probity and
decorum will return to the governance of this Commonwealth given its
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE:

DIEU ET MON DROIT

Whilst it is prudent to establish the starting point of necessity as to
any premises for the continuity of enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance
with respect to the learned as the educated and the gravitas of the
subject matter to say nothing of those whom may have given their lives
as something other than marsupial roadkill as RECTUS for the
foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and in a sturdy
and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
self-entitlement which you bestow."

Yet for Kant this anthropological evidence arises “out of the common
idea of *DUTY* and the moral law” which is also certainly self evidently
a contradiction of his initial postulate that any adequate form of moral
philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical elements
of interest, self-love, and natural feelings in the dutiful display of
filial affection by VOLUNTĀTIS {CORRESPONDENCE {#82}: #2 - desire,
inclination as to engaged within actions that #2 - Don't introduce
biases; {*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}} relating to the “honour bestowed
upon one's matrimonial or common law parents” which is due from a son or
daughter:

H3513@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#138); Ego: 20 (#76),
   @4: Sup: 78 (#216); Ego: 2 (#78),
   @5: Sup: 1 (#217); Ego: 4 (#82),
   Male: #217; Feme: #82
} // #82

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #82 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
*OWN* *PROPERTY*.

    #VIRTUE:
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
   @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513): {UMBRA: #37 as #82 % #41
= #41} 1) to be heavy, be weighty, be grievous, be hard, be rich, be
honourable, be glorious, be burdensome, be honoured; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
be heavy; 1a2) to be heavy, be insensible, be dull; 1a3) *TO* *BE*
*HONOURED*; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made heavy, be honoured, enjoy
honour, be made abundant; 1b2) to get oneself glory or honour, gain
glory; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to make heavy, make dull, make insensible; 1c2)
to make honourable, honour, glorify; 1d) (Pual) to be made honourable,
be honoured; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to make heavy; 1e2) to make heavy, make
dull, make unresponsive; 1e3) to cause to be honoured; 1f) (Hithpael);
1f1) to make oneself heavy, make oneself dense, make oneself numerous;
1f2) to honour oneself;

"And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom {their secret; their
cement} and Gomorrah {rebellious people} is great, and because their sin
is very grievous {#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513):
honour};" [Genesis 18:20]

5. (MOTHER) FORMULA OF HUMANITY AS HEAD OF STATE / *HONOUR* *PARENTS*

PYTHAGOREAN TETRAD: #1 + #2 = #3 as #MIND WHETHER AS FORMULA OF HETEROS
PROGRESSION / THESIS ON IT'S HOMOIOS BASIS

MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE: {ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT)
/ SERAPHIM {Heb. Saraph Gk. Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively)
poisonous (serpent); specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical
creature (from their copper color))} {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {1 + 2 + 3 + 4
= 10}

TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}

PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat,
throne)}

+ 0, H9, H18 {ie. System’s Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}

Thusly in summation, as to the problem of discernment and knowledge
assimilation into a coherent syncretism, at this juncture in our
ingestion of Kant’s acumen as thesis, we ought to prudently reserve our
further conjectures upon any rhetorical artifices which he may of
necessity deploy until we have fully considered what are the nominative
descriptions applied as their grounding in explanations and the explicit
nature of the underlying dialectic as its capacity and means by which
Kant conveys any such postulates.

For instance, Karl Marx (5 May 1818 – 14 March 1883) and Friedrich
Engels (28 November 1820 – 5 August 1895) proposed that Georg Hegel's
(27 August 1770 – 14 November 1831) subsequent dialectic was too
abstract. The dialect which HEGEL proposes is:

#1 - THESIS
#2 - ANTI-THESIS
#3 - SYNTHESIS
#4 - PROGRESSION

This concept of dialectics was given new life by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Hegel as a proponent of German Idealism has been seen in the 20th
century as the originator but as an explicit phrase it originated with
Johann Gottlieb Fichte (28 November 1820 – 5 August 1895), whose
dialectically synthetic model of nature and of history made it, as it
were, a fundamental aspect of the nature of reality instead of regarding
the contradictions into which dialectics leads as a sign of the
sterility of the dialectical method, as Immanuel Kant was considered by
many to have tended to do within his Critique of Pure Reason.
[Nicholson, J. A. (1950). Philosophy of religion. New York: Ronald Press
Co. Page 108]

As Walter Kaufmann (1 July 1921 – 4 September 1980) astutely affirms of
Hegel's criticism of the triad model commonly misattributed to him,
adding that "the only place where Hegel uses the three terms together
occurs in his lectures on the history of philosophy, on the last page
but one of the section on Kant—where Hegel roundly reproaches Kant for
having 'EVERYWHERE POSITED THESIS, ANTITHESIS, SYNTHESIS'"

In contradiction to this Hegelian idealism, Marx presented his own
dialectic method as an anthropological consideration and SENSIBILITY of
the world, which he claims to be "direct opposite" of Hegel's method:
'My dialectic method is not only different from the Hegelian, but is its
direct opposite.' To Hegel, the life-process of the human brain, ie.
the process of thinking, which, under the name of 'the Idea', he even
transforms into an independent subject, is the demiurgos {ie.

Substance of thing (materia, substantia: #15CE ... #34CE ... #65CE ...
#111CE ... #175CE ... #260CE ... 369CE), is the means to purvey the
binary distillation so as to derive the notion of gender and spermatic
attributions as bifurcated elements, so then convey the proof of its
SCIENTIFIC essence of a thing (essentia, ousia: #260 ... #175 ... #65
... #34 ... #369 ... #111 ... #15)

} of the real world, and the real world is only the external, phenomenal
form of 'the Idea'. With me, on the contrary, the idea is nothing else
than the material world reflected by the human mind {#260}, and
translated into forms of thought {#15}. [Marx, Karl. "Afterword (Second
German Ed.)". Capital. 1: 14. Retrieved 28 December 2014]

That it not only shares an organisational / institutional orbital
association to other regimes which are constituted by Pythagorean
Perennialist / A-U-M belief systems, furthermore it has a connection to
a vassal perspective {ie. *AS* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *#AIDING*, *#WILLINGLY*
*OR* *#UNWILLINGLY* *THE* *DISSOLUTION* *OF* *THE* *STATE*} as
subjugation to the mechanised autonomic transformative gnostic process
of extrusion as the "different substance or hypostasis" impetus for
Roman Imperial / Religious Empire Governance which pervaded throughout
Europe as the world created and ruled by a lesser divinity, the demiurge
as oligarch. That the oligarchy ("the rule of the few") or the
ecclesiastical hierarchy adopted by Islam, the Vatican City / State and
German Fascism, have often become instruments of transformation, by
insisting upon monarchs ("the rule of the one") or dictators share power
or giving credibility and impetus to that process of change, such as
occurred by the 20 July 1933 signing of the Concordat with the German
Reich, thereby opening the door to governance by other 'party' elements
of society.

Where the dialectical method is itself an anthropological construct,
which is at base an OPINE {ie. hold and state as one's opinion; origin
late Middle English: from Latin opinari think, believe} as
existentialism purveying a characteristic mode of quantitative
expression in being essentially idiomatic:

'I THINK THEREFORE I AM'

But when, as occurs in the distillation of vodka which at a high proof
is devoid of SENSIBILITY where all taste and odour has been eliminated
making vodka a neutral spirit begging for self-entitlement, it is then
sublimated into its superlative form as substantially an epitaph of
merit in valedictory acceptability by an occasion of agreeability as an
opportune expression of a truism, where it is formerly inducted into a
Hall of Fame as a maxim life. As OSTENSIBLY being a discourse between
two or more people holding different points of view about a subject but
wishing to establish the truth through reasoned arguments as its imperative:

#1 - PROGRESS
#2 - SYNTHESIS
#3 - ANTI-THESIS
#4 - THESIS

YOUTUBE: "The Script - Hall of Fame (Official Video)"



Dialectical materialism accepts the evolution of the natural world and
the emergence of new qualities of being at new stages of evolution. As
Zbigniew Antoni Jordan (11 August 1911 - 6 October 1977), notes, "Engels
made constant use of the metaphysical insight that the higher level of
existence emerges from and has its roots in the lower; that the higher
level constitutes a new order of being with its irreducible laws; and
that this process of evolutionary advance is governed by laws of
development which reflect basic properties of 'matter in motion as a
whole'." [The Evolution of Dialectical Materialism: A Philosophical and
Sociological Analysis (London: Macmillan, 1967), p 167]

Marx criticized classical materialism as another idealist
philosophy—idealist because of its transhistorical understanding of
material contexts. The Young Hegelian Ludwig Feuerbach had rejected
Hegel's idealistic philosophy and advocated materialism. Despite being
strongly influenced by Feuerbach, Marx rejected Feuerbach's version of
materialism as inconsistent. The writings of Engels, especially
Anti-Dühring (1878) and Dialectics of Nature (1875–82), were the source
of the main doctrines of dialectical materialism.

Marx's own writings are almost exclusively concerned with understanding
human history in terms of systemic processes, based on modes of
production (broadly speaking, the ways in which societies are organized
to employ their technological powers to interact with their material
surroundings). This is called historical materialism. More narrowly,
within the framework of this general theory of history, most of Marx's
writing is devoted to an analysis of the specific structure and
development of the capitalist economy.

Other scholars have argued that despite Marx's insistence that humans
are natural beings in an evolving, mutual relationship with the rest of
nature, Marx's own writings pay inadequate attention to the ways in
which human agency is constrained by such factors as biology, geography,
and ecology.

Dialectical materialism adapts the Hegelian dialectic for traditional
materialism, which examines the subjects of the world in relation to
each other within a dynamic, evolutionary environment, in contrast to
metaphysical materialism, which examines parts of the world within a
static, isolated environment.

For his part, Engels applies a "dialectical" approach to the natural
world in general, arguing that contemporary science is increasingly
recognizing the necessity of viewing natural processes in terms of
interconnectedness, development, and transformation. Some scholars have
doubted that Engels's "dialectics of nature" is a legitimate extension
of Marx's approach to social processes.

Engels exemplifies this quintessential characteristic of Pythagorean
methodology of sophistry by postulating three laws of dialectics from
his reading of Hegel's Science of Logic. Engels elucidated these laws as
the materialist dialectic in his work Dialectics of Nature:

THE LAW OF THE UNITY AND CONFLICT OF OPPOSITES {MIND: #1 + #2 = #3
(PENTAD) - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat,
throne)}}

THE LAW OF THE PASSAGE OF QUANTITATIVE {ie. measure by having magnitude
or spatial extent} CHANGES INTO QUALITATIVE {ie. determine comparative
size, appearance, value and superlative forms} CHANGES {SCIENCE: #3 + #4
= #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {ZAYIN /
*PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. *EXOUSIA* - (in the sense of ability); privilege,
that is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity, competency, freedom, or
(objectively) mastery (concretely magistrate, superhuman, potentate,
*token* *of* *control*), delegated influence:—authority, jurisdiction,
liberty, power, right, strength)}}

THE LAW OF THE NEGATION OF THE NEGATION {OPINION: #5 + #6 = #11 (HEPTAD)
- TRANSFORMING NATURE: {KAF (DOUBLE - #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE
{#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE}) / Government & Non-Government Organisations}}

That the dialectic method is therefore understood as being a process of
determined SENSIBILITY where the product is "enlightenment, whereby the
philosopher is educated so as to achieve knowledge of the supreme good,
the Form of the Good." {SENSE: #7 + #8 = #15 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE:
{SAMEK}}

Accordingly dialectical materialism is understood as an aspect of the
broader subject of materialism, which asserts the primacy of the
material world: in short, matter precedes thought. Materialism is a
realist philosophy of science, which holds that the world is material;
that all phenomena in the universe consist of "matter in motion,"
wherein all things are interdependent and interconnected and develop
according to natural law; that the world exists outside us and
independently of our perception of it; that thought is a reflection of
the material world in the brain, and that the world is in principle
knowable.

However within the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be
applied to data provided by SENSIBILITY in order to provide cognition,
and because the data of SENSIBILITY are structured by the
transcenden­tally ideal forms of intuition, the categories give us
knowledge only of things as they appear with sensibility ("phenomena,"
literally "that which appears").

Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of
objects independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can never
cognize them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that
which is thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of
Kant's use of the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of
"noumena" is not, since it literally means not "things as they are in­
dependently of appearing to us" but something more like "things as they
are understood by pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human
understanding can comprehend things in the latter way."

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>

Thus I am proffering an informed and reasoned opinion as that which
Immanuel Kant states is an impossibility for a human being to accomplish
by transcendent sapiential thought and capably demonstrate it's temporal
congruence as coherence by a mathematical theoretical noumenon as an
Intellectual Property which Immanuel Kant himself calls noumena as the
proof of a valid and rational concept attained by pure thought.

Whilst the HOMOIOS ternary conception of the THEORY OF NUMBER is in all
probability a SENSIBILITY of which Immanuel Kant appears cognisant and
that is exemplified by the conveyance of them as explicit meta-prototype
descriptors within the formative construct of his CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
postulates {#1 - Formula of Universal Law / #2 - Formula of Humanity /
#3 - Formula of Autonomy} conveyed within his Groundwork for the
Metaphysics of Morals (1785) / Critique of Pure Reason (1781 / 1787) it
is then a conundrum as to commensurability of his articulation in
rationally deriving the purest and logical essence of being and whether
his anthropocentric reality still deploys a counterfactual and
impractical intuition which is provisioned by the genitive prescriptive
or the biological normative propositions as imposition made by an
encapsulated dialectic:

PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal)
+ 0, H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature)
below + GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above], H54 - GUIMEI
[*MARRYING* *MAID* / DUI (ie. #7 - Engendering Nature) below + ZHEN (ie.
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) above] {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven
- Formula of Universal Law}

SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon)
+ 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature)
below + SUN (ie. #4- Nature Amended in its Nature) above], H18 - GU
[Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4- Nature Amended in its Nature) below +
GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as
Earth - Formula of Humanity}

ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood)
+ 0, H3 - ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature)
below + KAN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains Nature) above] as 'fundamentality
[yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy [zhen]', H6 - SONG
/ *JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains Nature) below +
QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) above] {ie. Self identity as Sea -
Formula of Autonomy}

THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also
refers to the Sun)
+ H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) above +
QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN [Pure
Yin / KUN (ie. #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature) above + KUN (ie. #2
- Nature Rejoices in its Nature) below] as FEMALE, H3 - *TRIAD*: ZHUN
[Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) below + KAN (ie.
#1 - Nature Contains Nature) above] {ie. Fountains as Formula of
Progression of individual phenomena}

= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}

The consideration is then one of criteria basis upon which the
anthropological conceptional notion of its sapient freedom {Humanity /
Autonomy} is formulated as either a binomial methodology by a
TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE applied as an encapsulation of an anti-thetical
anthropocentric identity

JEWISH VIEW: H54 - GUIMEI [Marrying Maid / DUI (ie. #7 - Engendering
Nature) below + ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) above] {ie.
Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law} + H18 - GU
[Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature) below +
GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as
Earth - Formula of Humanity} = #72 - Self-Love, Holding Oneself Dear;
I-Ching: H39 - Adversity, Obstacles, Limping, Obstruction, Afoot; Tetra:
79 - Difficulties)

GENTILE VIEW: H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts
Nature) below + GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. Realm of
its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law} + H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser
Domestication / QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) below + SUN (ie. #4 -
Nature is Amended in its Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth
- Formula of Humanity} = H36 - MINGYI [Suppression of the Light / LI
(ie. #9 - Autonomous Nature) below + KUN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains
Nature) above])"

Nevertheless when this trinomial HOMOIOS {#81 bits} ontological
conception of #NUMBER deploys a binomial {64 bits} encapsulation as
artifice it then introduces a logical contradiction {H54 + H18 + H6 + H3
= #81} within it’s DISCRIMINATING NORM and the SOCIETAL ORDER of things
by an incommensurability made against the proprietary, propriety and
probity as the viability of SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE which properly is
the paradigmatic providence and *ONTIC* necessity {H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 =
#41} as a SOVEREIGN and central characteristic within the Formula of
Autonomy by its purveyance of permissibility only within the construct
of an INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMY in deployment of a TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE
AS CANON OF TRANSPOSITION within the bifurcated HETEROS {@1 - GENDER
{MARRIAGE} / @5 - PHALLUS {HERITAGE} conception of #NUMBER as the
philosophical basis to its methodology since the MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF
PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED is not homoiotic as
anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”.

Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between such Formula of Universal Law descriptive statements
made against the Formula of Humanity which present an account on how the
cosmology of world is being similarly analogous to the LIMITED {#9 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS /
SEMINAL REASON GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative
statements presenting an evaluative account, or an account of how the
syncretic world should be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in being optimally something that should be
lived up to; or that should be pursued.

Thusly having given a preliminary definition to our anthropocentric
criteria as impetus for enquiry, we will now consider the practicality
of Kant's reasoning and whether his Categorical Imperative is truly free
of the strictures which is the Latin worldview of perennial biological
duality as the HETEROS viability of things "independently of their
appearing to us" and whether there is to be deduced by a HOMOIOS noumena
modality as the vital basis for a singularity of existence by which
humanity is rationally capable of conceiving "things as they are
understood by pure thought."

- dolf

SEE ALSO: "(SYNCRETIC DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018) WHAT IS A METAPHYSICS OF
MORALS: #56 - TARGETED RELIGIOUS #312 - HATRED, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
THEFT AND SLANDER BY MISNOMERED PIETY WITHIN SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE
AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Augustus.pdf>

Initial Post: 25 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-27 03:15:31 UTC
Permalink
I rather think that you ought to be struck out from the BOOK OF LIFE
{#419 - KILL THE SOUL} and any prospect of Eternity which is also within
my ordained domain of providence.

“And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to #419 - KILL
THE SOUL but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and
body in hell.” [Matthew 10:28 (KJV)]

As you wish as I am more pious than you, so it will be done for turning
a blind eye to Jewish slander as by their email address “NEFESH BAR
YOCHAI” associated with your religious community.


Nous: #57
Time: 13:05 hrs
Date: 2018.10.10
Torah:

Dao: Laissez Faire Politics, Simplicity In Habits
Tetra: #39 - Residence
I-Ching: H37 - The Family (the clan), Dwelling People, Family members

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#268 / #431} / HETEROS {#356 / #394} / TORAH {#256
/ #425}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:5,col:2,nous:57&idea:{m,74}&idea:{f,106}&idea:{m,268}&idea:{f,431}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 5, col: 2, nous: 57 [Date: 2018.10.10, Time:
13:05 hrs, Super: #268 / #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the
Mysterious; I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small
Exceeding, Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 -
Defectiveness, Distortion, Ego: #431 / #57 - Laissez Faire Politics,
Simplicity In Habits; I-Ching: H37 - The Family (the clan), Dwelling
People, Family members; Tetra: 39 - Residence]
Please remove me from your list
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018, 17:20
Post by dolf
In addition to electronically serving upon you a copy of this document
"#123 - DIVINE JUDGMENT BY #509 - YAHAD (JEWISH / CHRISTIAN PROSELYTES)
AGAINST JEWISH HATRED DUE [TO] STEREOTYPICAL *SHEM* (#72) *HAMPHORASCH*
DEMENTIA BY BLASPHEMY BEING NOW A #481 - *CURSE* UPON THEM"
I've lodged an email copy of such complaint to the local *PROJECTS*
office for the *JEWISH* *ANTI*-*DEFAMATION* *LEAGUE* antidef.org.au and
to my friends at the MIKDASH EDUCATIONAL CENTER SITUATED WITHIN
JERUSALEM (as the JEWISH TEMPLE COIN depicted therein I have purchased
from them) ...
American Support for Israel, Inc.
P.O. Box 3263
Washington, DC 20010
THEY WON'T HAVE ANY NEED TO REPLY BECAUSE THEY RECOGNIZE THE PLURALITY
OF JEWISH BELIEF WHICH INCLUDES #509 - YAHAD (MENTIONED IN BOTH THE OLD
/ NEW TESTAMENTS OF THE BIBLE) AS PROSELYTES IS CLEARLY CONVEYED AS
GOD'S ELECT AND CHOSEN COMMUNITY.
IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT THEN PROVIDE A DETAILED AND REASONED
REPLY BEYOND ENGAGING WITHIN A *RHETORICAL* *A8RTIFICE* *OF* *REDUCTIO*
*AD* *HITLERUM* NOTED: Fuck You AND IGNORANCE AS A #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL.
IF NOT, I FOREWARN YOU THAT WE ARE BUILDING CAPACITY TO PURSUE IN A
COURT OF LAW YOU FOR IRRATIONAL HATRED DRIVEN PREJUDICE CONVEYING ACTS
OF DEHUMANISATION BEING CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND CONSTITUTING A WAR
CRIME WHICH IS SUBJECT TO A UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION ...
OH FATHER DON'T FORGIVE THEM BECAUSE THEY KNOW WHAT THEY DO...
YOUT
Jeezus is the Yid shit thick here! Little wonder the mindless and
leaderless Goys follow the likes of you(yours).
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-27 04:41:12 UTC
Permalink
Ah so you have moved on from deploying a RHETORICAL ARTIFICE OF REDUCTIO AD
HITLERUM which was NOTED: Fuck You

And now utilising an ego defensive mechanism of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL of IGNORANCE

Piaget writes that within logic, juxtaposition is a logical fallacy on the
part of the observer, where two items placed next to each other imply a
correlation, when none is actually claimed. For example, an illustration of
a politician and Adolf Hitler on the same page would imply that the
politician had a common ideology with Hitler. Similarly, saying "Hitler was
in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are you" would have the
same effect.

This particular rhetorical device is common enough to have its own name,
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM*.

Thus we can factually convey without prejudice that:

#1) your recourse to a particular “rhetorical device”,
#2) reliance upon ignorance as #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL,
#3) murderous disdain {ie. #417 - slaughter upon your altar} for Bible
Students as HITLERS’s IDEA @215 and
#4) propensity for hymenealiam as misnomered piety .

That by such a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE you indistinguishable from neo-Nazi
identity and you cannot argue against it—WHAT AN ABOMINATION YOU ARE.

YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"



TOO BAD THAT YOU ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE AND CANNOT ENJOY THE BATTLE HYMN OF
THE REPUBLIC.

— POUTING SNOUT —

“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”

YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”



WHAT SAY YE THAT WE HAVE IT FOR OURS SINCE ITS NO VALUE OR USE TO YOU AS
JUST LIPSTICK 👄 ON A PIG 🐷 TO YOU?

- dolf
(dolf wrote:) More bullshit.
We haven't yet by 7 January 2018, finished what is only a superficial two
day analysis of Hitler's Table Talk and I have undertaken the task
reluctantly, being without any infatuation directed towards the individual
as impetus and within the obstructions as the restraints of inadequacy and
resourcefulness which is my education. Or rather a lack thereof. Which,
if I sought such further opportunities in particular that of psychology,
would greatly assist my cursory and informal as haphazard approach to the
project.

But it ought to be remembered, that I by reasonable thought, invented the
very tool which is prerequisite to an undertaking of my analysis and has
yielded such fertile consequence. I would therefore provisionally conclude
from the #231 preliminary assessment which we disclose above, as to it
being associated to a systematic and insidious assertion made upon the MIND
of the population.

THE FUEHRER EXPRESSED HIMSELF AS FOLLOWS:

A child {

YOUTUBE: "Children [Robert Miles d. (9 May 2017)]"



Y-M-T-A IDEA: #325 as #50, #5, #70, #200 = neos (G3501): {#18 as #325} 1)
recently born, *YOUNG*, youthful; 2) new;

}, for example, who in its very early years has been frightened {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #30, #200, #1 = yare' (H3372): {#17 as #231} 1) *TO*
*FEAR*, *REVERE*, *BE* *AFRAID*; 2) (TWOT) to shoot, pour; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3) to fear,
reverence, honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) *TO* *BE* *FEARFUL*, *BE*
DREADFUL*, *BE* *FEARED*; 1b2) to cause astonishment and awe, be held in
awe; 1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c) (Piel) *TO* *MAKE*
*AFRAID*, *TERRIFY*;

} with the threat {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #20, #4, #2, #200, #5 = dabar (H1696): {#3 as #231}
1) to speak, declare, converse, command, promise, warn, *THREATEN*, sing;
1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one another, talk; 1c)
(Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to be spoken; 1e)
(Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to flight;

} of the bogey-man in the dark, will frequently retain {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #10, #40, #50, #70, #50, #5 = mana` (H4513): {#34
as #231} 1) to withhold, hold back, keep back, refrain, deny, keep
restrain, hinder; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *WITHHOLD*; 1b) (Niphal) to be withheld;

} throughout all the years of its development a fear of entering a dark
room, a cellar or the like; among women a fear of this nature inculcated in
early youth {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #5 = bachuwr (H970): {#49 as
#231} 1) *YOUTH*, young man; 2) *HITLER* *YOUTH*

} often persists for a lifetime. On the other hand, there are dangers
which, not ever having come to his notice {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #1, #20, #10, #200 = nakar (H5234): {#31 as #231} 1)
to recognise, acknowledge, know, respect, discern, regard; 2) to act or
treat as foreign or strange, disguise, misconstrue; 1a) (Niphal) to be
recognised; 1b) (Piel) to regard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to regard, observe,
pay attention to, pay regard to, *NOTICE*; 1c2) to recognise (as formerly
known), perceive; 1c3) to be willing to recognise or acknowledge,
acknowledge with honour; 1c4) to be acquainted with; 1c5) to distinguish,
understand; 1d) (Hithpael) to make oneself known; 2a) (Niphal) to disguise
oneself; 2b) (Piel); 2b1) to treat as foreign (profane); 2b2) to
misconstrue; 2c) (Hithpael); 2c1) to act as alien; 2c2) to disguise
oneself;

}, a man {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #5 = bachuwr (H970): {#49 as
#231} 1) *YOUTH*, young man; 2) *HITLER* *YOUTH*

} completely ignores. A child living in an area exposed to bombing and to
whom the dangers of a bombardment {

Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #8, #200, #10, #2, #6 = charab (H2717): {#20 as
#231} 1) *TO* *BE* *WASTE*, *LAY* *WASTE*, *MAKE* *DESOLATE*, *BE*
*DESOLATE*, *BE* *IN* *RUINS*; 2) to be dry, be dried up; 3) *TO* *ATTACK*,
*SMITE* *DOWN*, *SLAY*, *FIGHT*; 1a) (Qal) to be waste, be desolate; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be made desolate; 1b2) desolate (participle); 1c)
(Hiphil) to lay waste, make desolate; 1d) (Hophal) to be laid waste; 2a)
(Qal) to be dried, be dried up; 2b) (Pual) to be dried; 2c) (Hiphil) to dry
up; 2d) (Hophal) to be dried up;

} have not been explained, will regard an enemy air attack as a noisy
firework display, and will not as a rule show the slightest sign of fear."
[ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK (1941-1944), IDEA @233 / PAGE #514]

However given this cult of personality which he has clearly exhibited as
most apparent even within the short duration of our attention to the matter
as the process of informing and the knowing, also had exhibited an
immutable and an irrational aggression towards the biblical narrative
itself wherein my entire (excepting for the Dao as the Mother of
Governance) trinomial mathematical paradigm of sapient MIND as theoretical
noumenon by which I appraised him, is embedded.

That the maxim: "a house divided by itself would most certainly have
fallen."

Is a truism if ever there was one so uttered.

What history would have been if someone had some 70 years ago, slimed his
credibility in such comprehensive manner as the cause for irreparable self
harm done against this persona—more effective than an assassination.

In visual perception, juxtaposition is the absence of relations between
details; syncretism is a vision of the whole which creates a vague but
all-inclusive schema, supplanting the details. In verbal intelligence
juxtaposition is the absence of relations between the various terms of a
sentence; syncretism is the all-round understanding which makes the
sentence into a whole. In logic juxtaposition leads to an absence of
implication and reciprocal justification between the successive judgments;
syncretism creates a tendency to bind everything together and to justify by
means of the most ingenious or the most facetious devices.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Juxtaposition>

"THEN SAID HE TO THE MULTITUDE THAT CAME FORTH TO BE BAPTIZED OF HIM, O
GENERATION OF VIPERS {ie.

METAL (金 jīn) as PROGRESSION: {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 (#WEST / #METAL) AS
CHESED (LOVE AND MERCY: #34 {#136}}

G2191@{
   #1: Sup: 5; Ego: 5,
   #2: Sup: 38; Ego: 33,
   #3: Sup: 48; Ego: 10,
   #4: Sup: 52; Ego: 4,
   #5: Sup: 21; Ego: 50,
   #6: Sup: 22; Ego: 1,
   Male: #186; Feme: #103
} // #670

#670 as [#5, #600, #10, #4, #50, #1] = echidna (G2191): {#51 as #670} 1) a
viper, offspring of vipers; 1a) addressed to cunning, malignant, wicked
men;

H3803@{
   #1: Sup: 40; Ego: 40,
   #2: Sup: 60; Ego: 20,
   #3: Sup: 55; Ego: 76,
   #4: Sup: 65; Ego: 10,
   #5: Sup: 22; Ego: 38,
   Male: #242; Feme: #184
} // #670

#670 as [#40, #20, #400, #10, #200] = kathar (H3803): {#34 as #670} 1) to
surround; 1a) (Piel) to surround; 1b) (Hiphil) to surround, encircle;

G4771@{
   #1: Sup: 38; Ego: 38,
   #2: Sup: 27; Ego: 70,
   #3: Sup: 22; Ego: 76,
   Male: #87; Feme: #184 *AS* *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #TEN: #231 / #693
} // #670

#670 as [#200, #70, #400] = su (G4771): {#35 as #670} 1) you;

74 81 76
79 77 75
78 73 80 = #231 - #123 = #108 / #693 - #369 = #324 {#TEN} AS RETURN TO
GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE BEING ITSELF

@9 (81) = #81
@8 (78) = #159
@7 (75) = #234

JEWISH TORAH AGAINST THE NAME OF YHWH: Y'QaBaDEL = Yod (#10) + Qoph (#100)
+ Beth (#2) + Daleth (#4) + Aleph (#1) + Lamed (#30)

27 1 50
49 26 3
2 51 25 = #78 as Yod (#10) + Nun (#50) + Gimel (#3) + Yod (#10) + He (#5)
/ #234 as FIRE (-)

30 4 53
52 29 6
5 54 28 = #87 as Yod (#10) + Mem (#40) + Vav (#6) + Aleph (#1) + Lamed
(#30) / #261 as FIRE (+) being an impost on the name of GOD ALMIGHTY:

#87 + #78 = #165

@6 (80) = #314
@5 (77) = #391 <-- THE POINT OF OBSERVATION HERE IS A HETEROS / HOMOIOS
THEORY OF NUMBER IMPLICIT CONTENTION and that the #391 - management of
one's household is a HOMOIOS model for the governance of the STATE /
COMMONWEALTH which is then understandably the deferential empirical cause
for a later adoption of the Calendar (New Style) Act 1750 which by such
legislation introduced the Gregorian calendar reforms of 1582 to the
British Empire, then brought Britain and the North American colonies into
line with most of Western Europe.

#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#11 as #341} 1) the management of a household or of household
affairs; 1a) specifically, the management, oversight, administration, of
other's property; 1b) the office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c)
administration, dispensation;

#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460} 1)
like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b) like: ie.
corresponding to a thing;

@4 (74) = #465 <-- CURING THE DISEASE OF JIHADIST IDEAS AND DETERMINING
{#345 / #465} WHEN ISLAMISTS ARE SAFE FOR ASSIMILATION INTO CIVIL SOCIETY

44 49 42
43 45 47
48 41 46 = #135 / #405 {AIR - *ACCORDING* *TO* *ISLAMIC* *BELIEF* AS SOUTH}

[#49, #48, #47, #46, #45, #44, #43, #42, #41] = #405

#AIR@{
#1: Sup: 49; Ego: 49,
#2: Sup: 16; Ego: 48,
#3: Sup: 63; Ego: 47,
#4: Sup: 28; Ego: 46,
#5: Sup: 73; Ego: 45,
#6: Sup: 36; Ego: 44,
#7: Sup: 79; Ego: 43,
#8: Sup: 40; Ego: 42,
#9: Sup: 81; Ego: 41,
Male: #465; Feme: #405
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?telos:465>

@3 (79) = #544
@2 (76) = #620
@1 (73) = #693

G2378@{
   #1: Sup: 9; Ego: 9,
   #2: Sup: 4; Ego: 76,
   #3: Sup: 42; Ego: 38,
   #4: Sup: 52; Ego: 10,
   #5: Sup: 53; Ego: 1,
   #6: Sup: 22; Ego: 50,
   Male: #182; Feme: #184 *AS* *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #TWO: #102 / #306
} // #670

#670 as [#9, #400, #200, #10, #1, #50 ]= thusia (G2378): {#36 as #670} 1) a
sacrifice, victim;

42 2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}

4. Oh Eater of the Shadow, (12) who makest thine appearance at Elephantine;
I am not *RAPACIOUS*.

#VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
#TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbors.
#POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
#TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
#CANON: #102

#5 as #PHALLUS = #360 / #72 or #365 MOD #70 = (3x3 =) #15 ... 5x5 = #25 /
#65 / Usurper: @1 / Mystery: #26 {*YHWH*} / Leader: #325 / Regulator: #390
/ General Governor: #780 / 2 = #390 as [#1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200] as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) *RAPACIOUS*, ravenous; 2) *A*
*EXTORTIONER*, *A* *ROBBER* or #365 / #5 = #73}

@9 (2) = #2
@8 (10) = #12
@7 (18) = #30
@6 (26) = #56
@5 (34) = #90
@4 (42) = #132

JEWISH TORAH AGAINST THE NAME OF YHWH: H'RaLaZEL = He (#5) + Resh (#200) +
Lamed (#30) + Zayin (#7) + Aleph (#1) + Lamed (#30)

45 19 68
67 44 21
20 69 43 = #132 as He (#5) + Qoph (#100) + Yod (#10) + Lamed (#30) + Yod
(#10) + He (#5) / #396 as WATER (-)

48 22 71
70 47 24
23 72 47 = #141 as He (#5) + Qoph (#100) + He (#5) + Aleph (#1) + Lamed
(#30) / #423 as WATER (+) being an impost upon the name of GOD ALMIGHTY:

#141 + #132 = #273

YOUTUBE: "The Water of Life (DUNE)"



@3 (50) = #182

6. Oh thou of Lion form, (13) who makest thine appearance in Heaven; I am
not fraudulent in measures of grain.

#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182

@2 (58) = #240
@1 (66) = #306

G3775@{
   #1: Sup: 70; Ego: 70,
   #2: Sup: 65; Ego: 76,
   #3: Sup: 22; Ego: 38,
   Male: #157; Feme: #184
} // #670

#670 as [#70, #400, #200] = ous (G3775): {#37 as #670} 1) the ear; 2)
metaphor: the faculty of perceiving with the mind, the faculty of
understanding and knowing;

G1410@{
   #1: Sup: 4; Ego: 4,
   #2: Sup: 80; Ego: 76,
   #3: Sup: 49; Ego: 50,
   #4: Sup: 50; Ego: 1,
   #5: Sup: 9; Ego: 40,
   #6: Sup: 14; Ego: 5,
   #7: Sup: 64; Ego: 50,
   #8: Sup: 53; Ego: 70,
   #9: Sup: 22; Ego: 50,
   Male: #345; Feme: #346
} // #670

#670 as [#4, #400, #50, #1, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50] = dunamai (G1410): {#38
as #670} 1) *TO* *BE* *ABLE*, *HAVE* *POWER* *WHETHER* *BY* *VIRTUE* *OF*
*ONE'S* *OWN* *ABILITY* *AND* *RESOURCES*, *OR* *OF* *A* *STATE* *OF*
*MIND*, *OR* *THROUGH* *FAVOURABLE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*, *OR* *BY* *PERMISSION*
*OF* *LAW* *OR* *CUSTOM*; 2) to be able to do something; 3) to be capable,
strong and powerful;

G2192@{
   #1: Sup: 5; Ego: 5,
   #2: Sup: 38; Ego: 33,
   #3: Sup: 43; Ego: 5,
   #4: Sup: 53; Ego: 10,
   #5: Sup: 22; Ego: 50,
   Male: #161; Feme: #103
} // #670

#670 as [#5, #600, #5, #10, #50] = echo (G2192): {#39 as #670} 1) to have,
i.e. to hold; 2) to have i.e. own, possess; 3) to hold one's self or find
one's self so and so, to be in such or such a condition; 4) to hold one's
self to a thing, to lay hold of a thing, to adhere or cling to; 1a) to have
(hold) in the hand, in the sense of wearing, to have (hold) possession of
the mind (refers to alarm, agitating emotions, etc.), to hold fast keep, to
have or comprise or involve, to regard or consider or hold as; 2a) external
things such as pertain to property or riches or furniture or utensils or
goods or food etc.; 2b) *USED* *OF* *THOSE* *JOINED* *TO* *ANY* *ONE* *BY*
*THE* *BONDS* *OF* *NATURAL* *BLOOD* *OR* *MARRIAGE* *OR* *FRIENDSHIP* *OR*
*DUTY* *OR* *LAW* *ETC*, *OF* *ATTENDANCE* *OR* *COMPANIONSHIP*; 4a) *TO*
*BE* *CLOSELY* *JOINED* *TO* *A* *PERSON* *OR* *A* *THING*;

G2933@{
   #1: Sup: 20; Ego: 20,
   #2: Sup: 77; Ego: 57,
   #3: Sup: 4; Ego: 8,
   #4: Sup: 44; Ego: 40,
   #5: Sup: 45; Ego: 1,
   #6: Sup: 21; Ego: 57,
   #7: Sup: 22; Ego: 1,
   Male: #233; Feme: #184
} // #670

#670 as [#20, #300, #8, #40, #1, #300, #1] = ktema (G2933): {#40 as #670}
1) a possession; 1a) of property, lands, estates;

G5158@{
   #1: Sup: 57; Ego: 57,
   #2: Sup: 76; Ego: 19,
   #3: Sup: 65; Ego: 70,
   #4: Sup: 64; Ego: 80,
   #5: Sup: 53; Ego: 70,
   #6: Sup: 22; Ego: 50,
   Male: #337; Feme: #346
} // #670

#670 as [#300, #100, #70, #80, #70, #50] = tropos (G5158): {#41 as #670} 1)
a manner, way, fashion; 2) manner of life, character, deportment; 1a) as,
even as, like as; 3) derived from tropē (G5157): a turn (trope) that is
revolution (figuratively variation); 3a) a turning of the heavenly body;

G5140@{
   #1: Sup: 57; Ego: 57,
   #2: Sup: 76; Ego: 19,
   #3: Sup: 5; Ego: 10,
   #4: Sup: 43; Ego: 38,
   #5: Sup: 53; Ego: 10,
   #6: Sup: 22; Ego: 50,
   Male: #256; Feme: #184 *AS* *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #FOUR: #108 / #324
} // #670

#670 as [#300, #100, #10, #200, #10, #50] = treis (G5140): {#42 as #670} 1)
three;

44 4 60
52 36 20
12 68 28 = #108 / #324 {#FOUR}

#419 as [#2, #1, #6, #400, #10] = 'avvah (H185): {#0 as #12 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH*/ *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #FOUR: #108 / #324} 1) desire, lust, will (not necessarily
evil);

@9 = #4
@8 = #16
@7 = #36
@6 = #64
@5 = #100
@4 = #144
@3 = #196

37. Oh Striker, (26) who makest thine appearance in Heaven; I am not one of
loud voice.

#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject's preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
#CANON: #196

@2 = #256
@1 = #324

G4103@{
   #1: Sup: 80; Ego: 80,
   #2: Sup: 9; Ego: 10,
   #3: Sup: 47; Ego: 38,
   #4: Sup: 23; Ego: 57,
   #5: Sup: 12; Ego: 70,
   #6: Sup: 22; Ego: 10,
   Male: #193; Feme: #265
} // #670

#670 as [#80, #10, #200, #300, #70, #10] = pistos (G4103): {#43 as #670} 1)
trusty, faithful; 2) easily persuaded; 1a) *OF* *PERSONS* *WHO* *SHOW*
*THEMSELVES* *FAITHFUL* *IN* *THE* *TRANSACTION* *OF* *BUSINESS*, *THE*
*EXECUTION* *OF* *COMMANDS*, *OR* *THE* *DISCHARGE* *OF* *OFFICIAL*
*DUTIES*; 1b) one who kept his plighted faith, worthy of trust; 1c) that
can be relied on; 2a) believing, confiding, trusting; 2b) in the NT one who
trusts in God's promises; 2b1) one who is convinced that Jesus has been
raised from the dead; 2b2) one who has become convinced that Jesus is the
Messiah and author of salvation;

G2147@{
   #1: Sup: 5; Ego: 5,
   #2: Sup: 81; Ego: 76,
   #3: Sup: 19; Ego: 19,
   #4: Sup: 8; Ego: 70,
   #5: Sup: 48; Ego: 40,
   #6: Sup: 53; Ego: 5,
   #7: Sup: 22; Ego: 50,
   Male: #236; Feme: #265 <-- *PAIRING*
} // #670

#670 as [#5, #400, #100, #70, #40, #5, #50] = heurisko (G2147): {#44 as
#670} 1) to come upon, hit upon, to meet with; 2) to find by enquiry,
thought, examination, scrutiny, observation, to find out by practice and
experience; 3) to find out for one's self, to acquire, get, obtain,
procure; 1a) after searching, to find a thing sought; 1b) without previous
search, to find (by chance), to fall in with; 1c) those who come or return
to a place; 2a) to see, learn, discover, understand; 2b) to be found i.e.
to be seen, be present; 2c) to be discovered, recognised, detected, to show
one's self out, of one's character or state as found out by others (men,
God, or both); 2d) to get knowledge of, come to know, God;
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-27 04:49:30 UTC
Permalink
-- #123 - DIVINE JUDGMENT BY #509 - YAHAD (JEWISH / CHRISTIAN PROSELYTES)
AGAINST JEWISH HATRED DUE [TO] STEREOTYPICAL *SHEM* (#72) *HAMPHORASCH*
DEMENTIA BY BLASPHEMY BEING NOW A #481 - *CURSE* UPON THEM

You are not subscribed to any list you lunatic son of #351 - BELIAL.

I notice that you use #41 within your email address and I ought to say that
I know the mind {#41 x 9} of him who said: “I am from above {#41 - Remember
the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 -
Avoid heteronomy against autonomy ... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear
false witness ... #287 - Covert Not ... #328 ... #369}: ye are of this
world; I am not of this world.”

It’s my Intellectual Property which is not going to be wasted on you.

Save us both the bother by not replying any further as I am too holy for
you to do so:

49215961@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 2 (#2),
Male: #38; Feme: #2
}

#2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 - Peace, Pervading,
Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;

#38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching: H62 - Minor
Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of the small,
Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;


On 27 Aug 2018, at 13:35, Pesach Aceman <***@gmail.com> wrote:

Please remove me from the list to which I never subscribed.
Post by dolf
Ah so you have moved on from deploying a RHETORICAL ARTIFICE OF REDUCTIO AD
HITLERUM which was NOTED: Fuck You
And now utilising an ego defensive mechanism of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL of IGNORANCE
Piaget writes that within logic, juxtaposition is a logical fallacy on the
part of the observer, where two items placed next to each other imply a
correlation, when none is actually claimed. For example, an illustration of
a politician and Adolf Hitler on the same page would imply that the
politician had a common ideology with Hitler. Similarly, saying "Hitler was
in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are you" would have the
same effect.
This particular rhetorical device is common enough to have its own name,
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM*.
#1) your recourse to a particular “rhetorical device”,
#2) reliance upon ignorance as #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL,
#3) murderous disdain {ie. #419 - slaughter upon your altar} for Bible
#4) propensity for hymenealiam as misnomered piety .
That by such a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE you indistinguishable from neo-Nazi
identity and you cannot argue against it—WHAT AN ABOMINATION YOU ARE.
YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"
http://youtu.be/Jy6AOGRsR80
TOO BAD THAT YOU ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE AND CANNOT ENJOY THE BATTLE HYMN OF
THE REPUBLIC.
— POUTING SNOUT —
“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”
YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”
http://youtu.be/rjQtzV9IZ0Q
WHAT SAY YE THAT WE HAVE IT FOR OURS SINCE ITS NO VALUE OR USE TO YOU AS
JUST LIPSTICK 👄 ON A PIG 🐷 TO YOU?
- dolf
(dolf wrote:) More bullshit.
We haven't yet by 7 January 2018, finished what is only a superficial two
day analysis of Hitler's Table Talk and I have undertaken the task
reluctantly, being without any infatuation directed towards the individual
as impetus and within the obstructions as the restraints of inadequacy and
resourcefulness which is my education. Or rather a lack thereof. Which,
if I sought such further opportunities in particular that of psychology,
would greatly assist my cursory and informal as haphazard approach to the
project.
But it ought to be remembered, that I by reasonable thought, invented the
very tool which is prerequisite to an undertaking of my analysis and has
yielded such fertile consequence. I would therefore provisionally conclude
from the #231 preliminary assessment which we disclose above, as to it
being associated to a systematic and insidious assertion made upon the MIND
of the population.
A child {
YOUTUBE: "Children [Robert Miles d. (9 May 2017)]"
http://youtu.be/r-fZ1PQJrZc
Y-M-T-A IDEA: #325 as #50, #5, #70, #200 = neos (G3501): {#18 as #325} 1)
recently born, *YOUNG*, youthful; 2) new;
}, for example, who in its very early years has been frightened {
Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #30, #200, #1 = yare' (H3372): {#17 as #231} 1) *TO*
*FEAR*, *REVERE*, *BE* *AFRAID*; 2) (TWOT) to shoot, pour; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3) to fear,
reverence, honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) *TO* *BE* *FEARFUL*, *BE*
DREADFUL*, *BE* *FEARED*; 1b2) to cause astonishment and awe, be held in
awe; 1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c) (Piel) *TO* *MAKE*
*AFRAID*, *TERRIFY*;
} with the threat {
Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #20, #4, #2, #200, #5 = dabar (H1696): {#3 as #231}
1) to speak, declare, converse, command, promise, warn, *THREATEN*, sing;
1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one another, talk; 1c)
(Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to be spoken; 1e)
(Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to flight;
} of the bogey-man in the dark, will frequently retain {
Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #6, #10, #40, #50, #70, #50, #5 = mana` (H4513): {#34
as #231} 1) to withhold, hold back, keep back, refrain, deny, keep
restrain, hinder; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *WITHHOLD*; 1b) (Niphal) to be withheld;
} throughout all the years of its development a fear of entering a dark
room, a cellar or the like; among women a fear of this nature inculcated in
early youth {
Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #5 = bachuwr (H970): {#49 as
#231} 1) *YOUTH*, young man; 2) *HITLER* *YOUTH*
} often persists for a lifetime. On the other hand, there are dangers
which, not ever having come to his notice {
Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #1, #20, #10, #200 = nakar (H5234): {#31 as #231} 1)
to recognise, acknowledge, know, respect, discern, regard; 2) to act or
treat as foreign or strange, disguise, misconstrue; 1a) (Niphal) to be
recognised; 1b) (Piel) to regard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to regard, observe,
pay attention to, pay regard to, *NOTICE*; 1c2) to recognise (as formerly
known), perceive; 1c3) to be willing to recognise or acknowledge,
acknowledge with honour; 1c4) to be acquainted with; 1c5) to distinguish,
understand; 1d) (Hithpael) to make oneself known; 2a) (Niphal) to disguise
oneself; 2b) (Piel); 2b1) to treat as foreign (profane); 2b2) to
misconstrue; 2c) (Hithpael); 2c1) to act as alien; 2c2) to disguise
oneself;
}, a man {
Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #5 = bachuwr (H970): {#49 as
#231} 1) *YOUTH*, young man; 2) *HITLER* *YOUTH*
} completely ignores. A child living in an area exposed to bombing and to
whom the dangers of a bombardment {
Y-M-T-A IDEA: #231 as #5, #8, #200, #10, #2, #6 = charab (H2717): {#20 as
#231} 1) *TO* *BE* *WASTE*, *LAY* *WASTE*, *MAKE* *DESOLATE*, *BE*
*DESOLATE*, *BE* *IN* *RUINS*; 2) to be dry, be dried up; 3) *TO* *ATTACK*,
*SMITE* *DOWN*, *SLAY*, *FIGHT*; 1a) (Qal) to be waste, be desolate; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be made desolate; 1b2) desolate (participle); 1c)
(Hiphil) to lay waste, make desolate; 1d) (Hophal) to be laid waste; 2a)
(Qal) to be dried, be dried up; 2b) (Pual) to be dried; 2c) (Hiphil) to dry
up; 2d) (Hophal) to be dried up;
} have not been explained, will regard an enemy air attack as a noisy
firework display, and will not as a rule show the slightest sign of fear."
However given this cult of personality which he has clearly exhibited as
most apparent even within the short duration of our attention to the matter
as the process of informing and the knowing, also had exhibited an
immutable and an irrational aggression towards the biblical narrative
itself wherein my entire (excepting for the Dao as the Mother of
Governance) trinomial mathematical paradigm of sapient MIND as theoretical
noumenon by which I appraised him, is embedded.
That the maxim: "a house divided by itself would most certainly have
fallen."
Is a truism if ever there was one so uttered.
What history would have been if someone had some 70 years ago, slimed his
credibility in such comprehensive manner as the cause for irreparable self
harm done against this persona—more effective than an assassination.
In visual perception, juxtaposition is the absence of relations between
details; syncretism is a vision of the whole which creates a vague but
all-inclusive schema, supplanting the details. In verbal intelligence
juxtaposition is the absence of relations between the various terms of a
sentence; syncretism is the all-round understanding which makes the
sentence into a whole. In logic juxtaposition leads to an absence of
implication and reciprocal justification between the successive judgments;
syncretism creates a tendency to bind everything together and to justify by
means of the most ingenious or the most facetious devices.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Juxtaposition>
"THEN SAID HE TO THE MULTITUDE THAT CAME FORTH TO BE BAPTIZED OF HIM, O
GENERATION OF VIPERS {ie.
METAL (金 jīn) as PROGRESSION: {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 (#WEST / #METAL) AS
CHESED (LOVE AND MERCY: #34 {#136}}
   #1: Sup: 5; Ego: 5,
   #2: Sup: 38; Ego: 33,
   #3: Sup: 48; Ego: 10,
   #4: Sup: 52; Ego: 4,
   #5: Sup: 21; Ego: 50,
   #6: Sup: 22; Ego: 1,
   Male: #186; Feme: #103
} // #670
#670 as [#5, #600, #10, #4, #50, #1] = echidna (G2191): {#51 as #670} 1) a
viper, offspring of vipers; 1a) addressed to cunning, malignant, wicked
men;
   #1: Sup: 40; Ego: 40,
   #2: Sup: 60; Ego: 20,
   #3: Sup: 55; Ego: 76,
   #4: Sup: 65; Ego: 10,
   #5: Sup: 22; Ego: 38,
   Male: #242; Feme: #184
} // #670
#670 as [#40, #20, #400, #10, #200] = kathar (H3803): {#34 as #670} 1) to
surround; 1a) (Piel) to surround; 1b) (Hiphil) to surround, encircle;
   #1: Sup: 38; Ego: 38,
   #2: Sup: 27; Ego: 70,
   #3: Sup: 22; Ego: 76,
   Male: #87; Feme: #184 *AS* *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #TEN: #231 / #693
} // #670
#670 as [#200, #70, #400] = su (G4771): {#35 as #670} 1) you;
74 81 76
79 77 75
78 73 80 = #231 - #123 = #108 / #693 - #369 = #324 {#TEN} AS RETURN TO
GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE BEING ITSELF
@9 (81) = #81
@8 (78) = #159
@7 (75) = #234
JEWISH TORAH AGAINST THE NAME OF YHWH: Y'QaBaDEL = Yod (#10) + Qoph (#100)
+ Beth (#2) + Daleth (#4) + Aleph (#1) + Lamed (#30)
27 1 50
49 26 3
2 51 25 = #78 as Yod (#10) + Nun (#50) + Gimel (#3) + Yod (#10) + He (#5)
/ #234 as FIRE (-)
30 4 53
52 29 6
5 54 28 = #87 as Yod (#10) + Mem (#40) + Vav (#6) + Aleph (#1) + Lamed
#87 + #78 = #165
@6 (80) = #314
@5 (77) = #391 <-- THE POINT OF OBSERVATION HERE IS A HETEROS / HOMOIOS
THEORY OF NUMBER IMPLICIT CONTENTION and that the #391 - management of
one's household is a HOMOIOS model for the governance of the STATE /
COMMONWEALTH which is then understandably the deferential empirical cause
for a later adoption of the Calendar (New Style) Act 1750 which by such
legislation introduced the Gregorian calendar reforms of 1582 to the
British Empire, then brought Britain and the North American colonies into
line with most of Western Europe.
#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#11 as #341} 1) the management of a household or of household
affairs; 1a) specifically, the management, oversight, administration, of
other's property; 1b) the office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c)
administration, dispensation;
#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460} 1)
like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b) like: ie.
corresponding to a thing;
@4 (74) = #465 <-- CURING THE DISEASE OF JIHADIST IDEAS AND DETERMINING
{#345 / #465} WHEN ISLAMISTS ARE SAFE FOR ASSIMILATION INTO CIVIL SOCIETY
44 49 42
43 45 47
48 41 46 = #135 / #405 {AIR - *ACCORDING* *TO* *ISLAMIC* *BELIEF* AS SOUTH}
[#49, #48, #47, #46, #45, #44, #43, #42, #41] = #405
#1: Sup: 49; Ego: 49,
#2: Sup: 16; Ego: 48,
#3: Sup: 63; Ego: 47,
#4: Sup: 28; Ego: 46,
#5: Sup: 73; Ego: 45,
#6: Sup: 36; Ego: 44,
#7: Sup: 79; Ego: 43,
#8: Sup: 40; Ego: 42,
#9: Sup: 81; Ego: 41,
Male: #465; Feme: #405
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?telos:465>
@3 (79) = #544
@2 (76) = #620
@1 (73) = #693
   #1: Sup: 9; Ego: 9,
   #2: Sup: 4; Ego: 76,
   #3: Sup: 42; Ego: 38,
   #4: Sup: 52; Ego: 10,
   #5: Sup: 53; Ego: 1,
   #6: Sup: 22; Ego: 50,
   Male: #182; Feme: #184 *AS* *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #TWO: #102 / #306
} // #670
#670 as [#9, #400, #200, #10, #1, #50 ]= thusia (G2378): {#36 as #670} 1) a
sacrifice, victim;
42 2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}
4. Oh Eater of the Shadow, (12) who makest thine appearance at Elephantine;
I am not *RAPACIOUS*.
#VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
#TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbors.
#POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
#TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
#CANON: #102
#5 as #PHALLUS = #360 / #72 or #365 MOD #70 = (3x3 =) #15 ... 5x5 = #25 /
/ General Governor: #780 / 2 = #390 as [#1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200] as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) *RAPACIOUS*, ravenous; 2) *A*
*EXTORTIONER*, *A* *ROBBER* or #365 / #5 = #73}
@9 (2) = #2
@8 (10) = #12
@7 (18) = #30
@6 (26) = #56
@5 (34) = #90
@4 (42) = #132
JEWISH TORAH AGAINST THE NAME OF YHWH: H'RaLaZEL = He (#5) + Resh (#200) +
Lamed (#30) + Zayin (#7) + Aleph (#1) + Lamed (#30)
45 19 68
67 44 21
20 69 43 = #132 as He (#5) + Qoph (#100) + Yod (#10) + Lamed (#30) + Yod
(#10) + He (#5) / #396 as WATER (-)
48 22 71
70 47 24
23 72 47 = #141 as He (#5) + Qoph (#100) + He (#5) + Aleph (#1) + Lamed
#141 + #132 = #273
YOUTUBE: "The Water of Life (DUNE)"
http://youtu.be/WAmjkr4RISU
@3 (50) = #182
6. Oh thou of Lion form, (13) who makest thine appearance in Heaven; I am
not fraudulent in measures of grain.
#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182
@2 (58) = #240
@1 (66) = #306
   #1: Sup: 70; Ego: 70,
   #2: Sup: 65; Ego: 76,
   #3: Sup: 22; Ego: 38,
   Male: #157; Feme: #184
} // #670
#670 as [#70, #400, #200] = ous (G3775): {#37 as #670} 1) the ear; 2)
metaphor: the faculty of perceiving with the mind, the faculty of
understanding and knowing;
   #1: Sup: 4; Ego: 4,
   #2: Sup: 80; Ego: 76,
   #3: Sup: 49; Ego: 50,
   #4: Sup: 50; Ego: 1,
   #5: Sup: 9; Ego: 40,
   #6: Sup: 14; Ego: 5,
   #7: Sup: 64; Ego: 50,
   #8: Sup: 53; Ego: 70,
   #9: Sup: 22; Ego: 50,
   Male: #345; Feme: #346
} // #670
#670 as [#4, #400, #50, #1, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50] = dunamai (G1410): {#38
as #670} 1) *TO* *BE* *ABLE*, *HAVE* *POWER* *WHETHER* *BY* *VIRTUE* *OF*
*ONE'S* *OWN* *ABILITY* *AND* *RESOURCES*, *OR* *OF* *A* *STATE* *OF*
*MIND*, *OR* *THROUGH* *FAVOURABLE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*, *OR* *BY* *PERMISSION*
*OF* *LAW* *OR* *CUSTOM*; 2) to be able to do something; 3) to be capable,
strong and powerful;
   #1: Sup: 5; Ego: 5,
   #2: Sup: 38; Ego: 33,
   #3: Sup: 43; Ego: 5,
   #4: Sup: 53; Ego: 10,
   #5: Sup: 22; Ego: 50,
   Male: #161; Feme: #103
} // #670
#670 as [#5, #600, #5, #10, #50] = echo (G2192): {#39 as #670} 1) to have,
i.e. to hold; 2) to have i.e. own, possess; 3) to hold one's self or find
one's self so and so, to be in such or such a condition; 4) to hold one's
self to a thing, to lay hold of a thing, to adhere or cling to; 1a) to have
(hold) in the hand, in the sense of wearing, to have (hold) possession of
the mind (refers to alarm, agitating emotions, etc.), to hold fast keep, to
have or comprise or involve, to regard or consider or hold as; 2a) external
things such as pertain to property or riches or furniture or utensils or
goods or food etc.; 2b) *USED* *OF* *THOSE* *JOINED* *TO* *ANY* *ONE* *BY*
*THE* *BONDS* *OF* *NATURAL* *BLOOD* *OR* *MARRIAGE* *OR* *FRIENDSHIP* *OR*
*DUTY* *OR* *LAW* *ETC*, *OF* *ATTENDANCE* *OR* *COMPANIONSHIP*; 4a) *TO*
*BE* *CLOSELY* *JOINED* *TO* *A* *PERSON* *OR* *A* *THING*;
   #1: Sup: 20; Ego: 20,
   #2: Sup: 77; Ego: 57,
   #3: Sup: 4; Ego: 8,
   #4: Sup: 44; Ego: 40,
   #5: Sup: 45; Ego: 1,
   #6: Sup: 21; Ego: 57,
   #7: Sup: 22; Ego: 1,
   Male: #233; Feme: #184
} // #670
#670 as [#20, #300, #8, #40, #1, #300, #1] = ktema (G2933): {#40 as #670}
1) a possession; 1a) of property, lands, estates;
   #1: Sup: 57; Ego: 57,
   #2: Sup: 76; Ego: 19,
   #3: Sup: 65; Ego: 70,
   #4: Sup: 64; Ego: 80,
   #5: Sup: 53; Ego: 70,
   #6: Sup: 22; Ego: 50,
   Male: #337; Feme: #346
} // #670
#670 as [#300, #100, #70, #80, #70, #50] = tropos (G5158): {#41 as #670} 1)
a manner, way, fashion; 2) manner of life, character, deportment; 1a) as,
even as, like as; 3) derived from tropē (G5157): a turn (trope) that is
revolution (figuratively variation); 3a) a turning of the heavenly body;
   #1: Sup: 57; Ego: 57,
   #2: Sup: 76; Ego: 19,
   #3: Sup: 5; Ego: 10,
   #4: Sup: 43; Ego: 38,
   #5: Sup: 53; Ego: 10,
   #6: Sup: 22; Ego: 50,
   Male: #256; Feme: #184 *AS* *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #FOUR: #108 / #324
} // #670
#670 as [#300, #100, #10, #200, #10, #50] = treis (G5140): {#42 as #670} 1)
three;
44 4 60
52 36 20
12 68 28 = #108 / #324 {#FOUR}
#419 as [#2, #1, #6, #400, #10] = 'avvah (H185): {#0 as #12 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH*/ *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #FOUR: #108 / #324} 1) desire, lust, will (not necessarily
evil);
@9 = #4
@8 = #16
@7 = #36
@6 = #64
@5 = #100
@4 = #144
@3 = #196
37. Oh Striker, (26) who makest thine appearance in Heaven; I am not one of
loud voice.
#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject's preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
#CANON: #196
@2 = #256
@1 = #324
   #1: Sup: 80; Ego: 80,
   #2: Sup: 9; Ego: 10,
   #3: Sup: 47; Ego: 38,
   #4: Sup: 23; Ego: 57,
   #5: Sup: 12; Ego: 70,
   #6: Sup: 22; Ego: 10,
   Male: #193; Feme: #265
} // #670
#670 as [#80, #10, #200, #300, #70, #10] = pistos (G4103): {#43 as #670} 1)
trusty, faithful; 2) easily persuaded; 1a) *OF* *PERSONS* *WHO* *SHOW*
*THEMSELVES* *FAITHFUL* *IN* *THE* *TRANSACTION* *OF* *BUSINESS*, *THE*
*EXECUTION* *OF* *COMMANDS*, *OR* *THE* *DISCHARGE* *OF* *OFFICIAL*
*DUTIES*; 1b) one who kept his plighted faith, worthy of trust; 1c) that
can be relied on; 2a) believing, confiding, trusting; 2b) in the NT one who
trusts in God's promises; 2b1) one who is convinced that Jesus has been
raised from the dead; 2b2) one who has become convinced that Jesus is the
Messiah and author of salvation;
   #1: Sup: 5; Ego: 5,
   #2: Sup: 81; Ego: 76,
   #3: Sup: 19; Ego: 19,
   #4: Sup: 8; Ego: 70,
   #5: Sup: 48; Ego: 40,
   #6: Sup: 53; Ego: 5,
   #7: Sup: 22; Ego: 50,
   Male: #236; Feme: #265 <-- *PAIRING*
} // #670
#670 as [#5, #400, #100, #70, #40, #5, #50] = heurisko (G2147): {#44 as
#670} 1) to come upon, hit upon, to meet with; 2) to find by enquiry,
thought, examination, scrutiny, observation, to find out by practice and
experience; 3) to find out for one's self, to acquire, get, obtain,
procure; 1a) after searching, to find a thing sought; 1b) without previous
search, to find (by chance), to fall in with; 1c) those who come or return
to a place; 2a) to see, learn, discover, understand; 2b) to be found i.e.
to be seen, be present; 2c) to be discovered, recognised, detected, to show
one's self out, of one's character or state as found out by others (men,
God, or both); 2d) to get knowledge of, come to know, God;
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Loading...