Discussion:
— Grapple Beta Update: Question - Is the SEPTET DRIVER as ENTELECHY an equivalent to the Medical Caduceus?
(zu alt für eine Antwort)
dolf
2018-01-24 20:12:58 UTC
Permalink
I’m planning on providing this as a gift later today accompanying some
chapter draft when I have my final consultation visit with my special
orthopaedic surgeon with the caveat that he ought to look beyond the
semantics of opportunism which are provided by the Hebrew / Greek lexicon
by which I can demonstrate the proof of conception truth of the 1784
noumena theory as an impossibly articulated by Immanuel Kantian within
“Critique of Pure Reason” by my #231 appraisal of a certain 1941 narrative
which was a certain shocking import.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Budgie.pdf>

IDEA @52 ON EVENING 25 October 1941 - JEWS RESPONSIBLE FOR TWO WORLD WARS —
HOW PAST CIVILISATIONS ARE EFFACED — THE REWRITING OF HISTORY — THE
LIBRARIES OF ANTIQUITY — CHRISTIANITY AND BOLSHEVISM, AIM AT DESTRUCTION —
NERO DID NOT BURN ROME {AD 64} —PROTESTANT HYPOCRISY — THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
THRIVES ON SIN — ACCOUNTS TO BE SETTLED — THE MODERNIST MOVEMENT — THE
PROBLEM OF THE CONVENTS:

SPECIAL GUESTS: REICHSFUEHRER SS HIMMLER AND *SS* *GENERAL*
(*OBERGRUPPENFUEHRER*) *HEYDRICH* (*HIGH*-*RANKING* *GERMAN* *NAZI*
*OFFICIAL* *DURING* *WORLD* *WAR* *II*, *AND* *A* *MAIN* *ARCHITECT* *OF*
*THE* *HOLOCAUST*)

PAGE #87 - RUMOURS OF EXTERMINATION OF JEWS

From the rostrum of the Reichstag I prophesied to Jewry that, in the event
of war's proving inevitable, the Jew would disappear from Europe. That race
of criminals has on its conscience the two million dead of the first World
War, and now already hundreds of thousands more. Let nobody tell me that
all the same we can't park them in the marshy parts of Russia! Who's
worrying about our troops? It's not a bad idea, by the way, that public
rumour attributes to us a plan to exterminate the Jews. Terror is a
salutary thing.

*THE* *ATTEMPT* *TO* *CREATE* *A* *JEWISH* *STATE* *WILL* *BE* *A*
*FAILURE*.

The book that contains the reflections of the Emperor Julian should be
circulated in millions. What wonderful intelligence, what discernment, all
the wisdom of antiquity! It's extra- ordinary.

ACCORDING TO WIKIPEDIA: Julian (Latin: Flavius Claudius Iulianus
Augustus[a]; Greek: Φλάβιος Κλαύδιος Ἰουλιανὸς Αὔγουστος; 331/332 – 26
June 363), also known as Julian the Apostate, was Roman Emperor from 361 to
363, as well as a notable philosopher and author in Greek.

A member of the Constantinian dynasty, Julian became Caesar over the
western provinces by order of Constantius II in 355, and in this role he
campaigned successfully against the Alamanni and Franks. Most notable was
his crushing victory over the Alamanni at the Battle of Argentoratum
(Strasbourg) in 357, leading his 13,000 men against a Germanic army three
times larger.

In 360 Julian was proclaimed Augustus by his soldiers at Lutetia (Paris),
sparking a civil war with Constantius. However, Constantius died before the
two could face each other in battle, and named Julian as his successor.

In 363, Julian embarked on an ambitious campaign against the Sassanid
Empire. The campaign was initially successful, securing a victory outside
Ctesiphon, but during a skirmish Julian was mortally wounded, leaving his
army trapped in Persian territory. Following his death, the Roman forces
were obliged to cede territory in order to escape, including the fortress
city of Nisibis.

Julian was a man of unusually complex character: he was "the military
commander, the theosophist, the social reformer, and the man of letters".
*HE* *WAS* *THE* *LAST* *NON*-*CHRISTIAN* *RULER* *OF* *THE* *ROMAN*
*EMPIRE*, *AND* *HE* *BELIEVED* *THAT* *IT* *WAS* *NECESSARY* *TO*
*RESTORE* *THE* *EMPIRE'S* *ANCIENT* *ROMAN* *VALUES* *AND* *TRADITIONS* {

ACCORDING TO 'HITLER'S TABLE TALK': IDEA @I / PAGE #3 THE *FASCIST*
*MOVEMENT* *IS* *A* *SPONTANEOUS* *RETURN* *TO* *THE* *TRADITIONS* *OF*
*ANCIENT* *ROME* {strength}

} *IN* *ORDER* *TO* *SAVE* *IT* *FROM* *DISSOLUTION*. [Athanassiadi,
'Julian and Hellenism', p. 88]

He purged the top-heavy state bureaucracy, and attempted to revive
traditional Roman religious practices at the expense of Christianity.
Julian also forbade the Christians from teaching classical texts and
learning. His rejection of the Christianity imposed on him in his youth,
and his *promotion* *of* *Neoplatonic* *Hellenism* {ie. Pythagorean
binomial theory of number} in its place caused him to be remembered as
Julian the Apostate by the church.
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_(emperor)>]

PAGE #89 - CATHOLICS AND PROTESTANTS

Christianity set itself systematically to destroy ancient culture.

What came to us was passed down by chance, or else it was a product of
Roman liberal writers. Perhaps we are entirely ignorant of humanity's most
precious spiritual treasures. Who can know what was there?

The Papacy was faithful to these tactics even during recorded history. How
did people behave, during the age of the great explorations, towards the
spiritual riches of Central America?

*IN* *OUR* *PARTS* *OF* *THE* *WORLD*, *THE* *JEWS* *WOULD* *HAVE*
*IMMEDIATELY* *ELIMINATED* *SCHOPENHAUER*, *NIETZSCHE* *AND* *KANT* {

HOWEVER WITHIN IDEA @233 ON PAGES #513 - GERMAN BIBLE TRANSLATION CONDEMNED
/ PAGE #514 - THE VALUE OF ASTRONOMY, ADOLF HITLER DOES NOT CONSIDER THE
POSSIBILITY OF A THEORETICAL NOTION AS KANT POSTULATES OF A NOUMENON: "*AS*
*A* *SANE* *GERMAN*, *ONE* *IS* *FLABBERGASTED* *TO* *THINK* *THAT*
*GERMAN* *HUMAN* *BEINGS* *COULD* *HAVE* *LET* *THEMSELVES* *BE* *BROUGHT*
*TO* *SUCH* *A* *PASS* *BY* *JEWISH* *FILTH* *AND* *PRIESTLY* *TWADDLE*,
that they were little different from the howling dervish of the Turks and
the negroes, at whom we laugh so scornfully. It angers one to think that,
while in other parts of the globe religious teaching like that of
Confucius, Buddha and Mohammed offers an undeniably broad basis for the
religious-minded, Germans should have been duped by a theological
exposition devoid of all honest depth.

When one seeks reasons for these *PHENOMENA*, *ONE* *IS* *IMMEDIATELY*
*STRUCK* *BY* *THE* *EXTENT* *TO* *WHICH* *THE* *HUMAN* *BRAIN* *REACTS*
*TO* *EXTERNAL* *INFLUENCE*."

I QUOTE: "In the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be applied
to data provided by sensibility in order to provide cognition, and because
the data of sensibility are structured by the transcenden­tally ideal forms
of intuition, the categories give us knowledge only of things as they
appear with sensibility ("phenomena," literally "that which appears").

Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of objects
independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can never cognize
them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that which is
thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of Kant's use of
the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of "noumena" is not,
since it literally means not "things as they are in­ dependently of
appearing to us" but something more like "things as they are understood by
pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human understanding can
comprehend things in the latter way."

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>

*THUS* *I* *AM* *PROFFERING* *AN* *INFORMED* *AND* *REASONED* *OPINION*
*AS* *THAT* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL* *KANT* *STATES* *IS* *AN* *IMPOSSIBILITY*
*FOR* *A* *HUMAN* *BEING* *TO* *ACCOMPLISH* *BY* *TRANSCENDENT*
*SAPIENTIAL* *THOUGHT* *AND* *CAPABLY* *DEMONSTRATE* *IT'S* *TEMPORAL*
*CONGRUENCE* *AS* *COHERENCE* *BY* *A* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL*
*NOUMENON* *AS* *AN* *INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL* *KANT*
*HIMSELF* *CALLS* *NOUMENA* *AS* *THE* *PROOF* *OF* *A* *VALID* *AND*
*RATIONAL* *CONCEPT* *ATTAINED* *BY* *PURE* *THOUGHT* *BUT* *MY*
*ANTAGONIST'S* *OPINIONS* *ARE* *ONLY* *A* *SELF*-*INFATUATION* *WITH*
*DELUSION* *AND* *MORE* *PROPERLY* *UNDERSTOOD* *IN* *TERMS* *OF*
*PSYCHOSIS*.

}. If the Bolsheviks had dominion over us for two hundred years, what works
of our past would be handed on to posterity? Our great men would fall into
oblivion, or else they'd be presented to future generations as criminals
and bandits.

I don't believe at all in the truth of certain mental pictures that many
people have of the Roman emperors. I'm sure that Nero didn't set fire to
Rome {68 AD}. It was the Christian-Bolsheviks who did that, just as the
Commune set fire to Paris in 1871 and the Communists set fire to the
Reichstag in 1932.

There is a form of hypocrisy, typically Protestant, that is impudence
itself. Catholicism has this much good about it, that it ignores the moral
strictness of the Evangelicals. In Catholic regions life is more endurable,
for the priest himself succumbs more easily to human weaknesses. So he
permits his flock not to dramatise sin. How would the Church earn her
living, if not by the sins of the faithful? She declares herself satisfied
if one goes to confession. Indulgence, at a tariff, supplies the Church
with her daily bread. As for the fruits of sin, the soul that fears limbo
is a candidate for baptism, that is to say, another customer, and so
business goes on! It is a fact that in Catholic parts of the world there
are many more illegitimate births than in Protestant parts.

In Austria, Protestantism was free of all bigotry. It was truly a movement
of protest against Catholicism. Moreover, these Protestants were entirely
devoted to the German cause.

A scandal is that, when a believer leaves a particular faith, he is
compelled to pay the ecclesiastical tax for another year. A simple
statement should be enough to free him at once from owing anything further.
We'll put all that right as soon as we have peace again.

-----------

IRREPARABLE HARM DONE TO A CERTAIN CULT OF PERSONALITY
We haven’t yet by 7 January 2018, finished what is only a superficial two
day analysis of Hitler’s Table Talk and I have undertaken the task
reluctantly, being without any infatuation directed towards the individual
as impetus and within the obstructions as the restraints of inadequacy and
resourcefulness which is my education. Or rather a lack thereof. Which,
if I sought such further opportunities in particular that of psychology,
would greatly assist my cursory and informal as haphazard approach to the
project.

But it ought to be remembered, that I by reasonable thought, invented the
very tool which is prerequisite to an undertaking of my analysis and has
yielded such fertile consequence. I would therefore provisionally conclude
from the #231 preliminary assessment which we disclose below, as to it
being associated to a systematic and insidious assertion made upon the MIND
of the population.

However given this cult of personality which he has clearly exhibited as
most apparent even within the short duration of our attention to the matter
as the process of informing and the knowing, also had exhibited an
immutable and an irrational aggression towards the biblical narrative
itself wherein my entire (excepting for the Dao as the Mother of
Governance) trinomial mathematical paradigm of sapient MIND as theoretical
noumenon by which I appraised him, is embedded.

That the maxim: “a house divided by itself would most certainly have
fallen.”

Is a truism if ever there was one so uttered.

I’m at the stage of writing this attention point, currently up-to #150
pages and I anticipate finishing our introduction into a proof of concept
in the existence of what is Immanuel Kant’s meaning of the term "noumena"
as not which is self evident, since it literally means not "things as they
are in dependently of appearing to us" but something more like "things as
they are understood by pure thought."
“And I have seen wonders.
And I have seen miracles
Oh, I have seen some things...”

Yet Kant appears to deny that the human understanding can comprehend things
in the latter way."

I’m not as advanced on the next revision of the Grapple prototype as I had
desired to be since I have been more focussed upon writing such narrative
as above for the past little while as that which dispels decades of *FAKE*
*NEWS* promulgated by the Papal Authority itself.

ROSA FLORES (CNN) @ 2245 HOURS ON 24 JANUARY 2018: “POPE WARNS AGAINST
'FAKE NEWS' AND LIKENS IT TO 'CRAFTY SERPENT' IN GENESIS:

Pope Francis released a message condemning "fake news," saying that it's a
"sign of intolerant and hypersensitive attitudes, and leads only to the
spread of arrogance and hatred."

The Vatican says the message is part of the Pope's World Communications
Day, but some at St. Peter's Square say the Pope was probably sending a
message to Donald Trump and other world leaders who have been using the
phrase "fake news."

The tragic history of human sin, the Pope says in his message, is the first
"fake news" and it dates back to the book of Genesis, when the "crafty
serpent" lied to the woman. In present day, according to the Pope's message
the fast digital world helps fuel the spread of "fake news" -- which he
defines as "the spreading of disinformation on line or in the traditional
media."

"Spreading fake news can serve to advance specific goals, influence
political decisions and serve economic interests," the Pope said.

The Pope's message blames the difficulty in unmasking and eliminating fake
news to people interacting with homogeneous news environments rather than
listening to differing perspectives and opinions.

"Disinformation thus thrives on the absence of healthy confrontation with
other sources of information that could effectively challenge prejudices
and generate constructive dialogue; instead, it risks turning people into
unwilling accomplices in spreading biased and baseless ideas," the Pope's
message said.

POPE ON HOW TO COMBAT FAKE NEWS
Journalism that seeks the truth, the Pope's message says, is the way to
overcome this "fake news" phenomenon. And hence his dedication of World Day
of Communication to "'The truth will set you free'. Fake news and
journalism for peace."

"I would like to contribute to our shared commitment to stemming the spread
of fake news and to rediscovering the dignity of journalism and the
personal responsibility of journalists to communicate the truth.

"Praiseworthy efforts are being made to create educational programs aimed
at helping people to interpret and assess information provided by the
media, and teaching them to take an active part in unmasking falsehoods,
rather than unwittingly contributing to the spread of disinformation."

Catholics have been observing World Communication day since 1967. The
Pope's message is traditionally published on January 24 during the day of
the feast of St. Francis de Sales, the patron saint of journalists.
Catholics don't celebrate World Communication Day until May 13, but the
announcement is made early to give bishops and priests time to prepare for
local and national celebrations.

Pope Francis has fallen victim to fake news himself. First when a fake news
site falsely reported the Pope endorsed Hillary Clinton for President. And
then again, when another fake news site falsely reported he endorsed Donald
Trump for President.”

<http://edition.cnn.com/2018/01/24/world/pope-condemns-fake-news/index.html>

Waking up during the night (as you can appreciate of such maelstrom
reality) so as to newsgroup post doesn’t lend itself to a frame of mind
fruitful for programming.

But I have decided now make incremental releases of the developer progress
updates with this link:

<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html>

I’m still to trace through the debugging of the .jackNote span function()
which isn’t yet finished it’s testing phase as it presently clearly gives
the wrong values for the @memeBrain bubble cascades.

But I will work on it as I can as I imagine my narrative output will
diminish for the next few months.

However I have partially implemented an update of the TAXONOMY() and the
calcTelos() functions which may still be micro modified and have enabled
the possibility of the @memeBrain elements being displayed individually as
either SUPER (MALE) or EGO (FEMALE) and this is in preparation for the
IDEA:{} object to be conveyed as either.

I envisioned an additional search option such as:

?CATEGORY:MALE&IDEA:{331}&IDEA:{237} &IDEA:{333}

or perhaps:

?IDEA:{331,M}&IDEA:{237,F}&IDEA:{333}

We shall see which is the better approach, but at this point I favour the
latter.

But what we have done within our written narrative is demonstrate that
there is no basis to the Sovereignty which the Vatican City-State claims of
itself (*THAT* *IT* *IS* *BY* *ITS* *GRECO*-*ROMAN* #231 *ROOTS*
*IDENTICAL* *TO* *GERMAN* *FASCISM* *DESPITE* *PAPAL* *ATTEMPTS* *TO*
**OTHERWISE* * CONVEY* *SUCH* *SIN* *OF* *FAKE* *NEWS*, and the Letters
Patent to the Federation of the Australian Commonwealth 1901 are not only a
valid basis (if not the only means) to define Sovereignty of a nation but
it’s ternary technological sapient basis is an exceptional globalisation
paradigm framework for all sorts agreements including trade, taxation,
science, knowledge sapient services, personalistics, defence (etc) as
having not only a linguistic basis but a technological foundation of an
exponential growth potential.

Such a framework {ie. in my view the SEPTET DRIVER as ENTELECHY with
INFINITE POTENTIAL rather than the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH’S ANKH as the #72
ANTHROPIC TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE sinisterly provided within the
Greco-Roman magic square (as we have shown) as transformative prototype is
perhaps a better equivalent to the Medical Caduceus
<Loading Image...>} as the means for
provisioning transactional and sapient services proving thereby by its very
use would be an enabler for a revenue stream (of which I estimate from its
global perspective be $10 billion a day in yet untapped fiscal well of
opportunity—but I leave such dreams of mine to the experts in any sapient
field) would thereby solve Britain’s National Health Service (NHS) woes,
but it will take some investment and time to implement.

The cognitive hypothesis as the theoretical obvious concern of this
dialectic correspondence with this SEPTET driver to the mathematical
theoretical noumenon which provides by an equitable distribution of
trinomial number an ontological basis for the entelechy:

- the realization of potential.
- the supposed vital principle that guides the development and functioning
of an organism or other system or organization.
- such self-organization requires a special biological force which is known
as entelechy.
- the soul for the spiritus.
- the mathematical / electronic equivalent of stem cells is for others to
decide.

It therefore may be considered as quintessentially the 'INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS' of an unencumbered will and ought to conform with the
following dialectic which chronicles the: levels / phases / stages /
duration / milestone of any perennial cycle as the dispensational
governance basis of LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA OF 1901 represented by a theoretical mathematical trinomial
MENTALISM: #1 - Will, free will, choice / Remember the Sabbath Day
CORRESPONDENCE: #2 - desire, inclination / Honour Parents
VIBRATION: #3 - disposition towards (something or someone) / Do Not Kill
POLARITY: #4 - favour, affection / Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid
Heteronomy Against Autonomy)
RHYTHM: #5 - last will, testament / Do Not Steal
CAUSE AND EFFECT: #6 - goal, object, purpose, intention / Do Not Bear False
Witness
ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE: #7 - signification, import / Do Not Covet [LATIN
definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
The NOLUNTĀTIS is then a consequence of an opposition as consideration
being a question of relativity as the interoperability by mutuality on what
#8 - TRANSFORMATIVE prototype is to be deployed where the default is the
#8 as TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE: #1 - unwillingness;
But this is in my view a matter of protocol selection which can be
identified by the classification duality of both the cryptographic # and
the vRUDOLPH DATE being determined by a cosmogonic observation as
computation of rational 22/7 from #0 of Equinox on Wednesday of 20 March
1996 associated to any EVENT as slider dispersal from calendar to the
noumenon.
The Autonomous Prototype is then the source amalgamation of the binomial,
trinomial and chrononomial (#YEAR, #DECADE, #CENTENARY and #MILLENNIUM
#9 as MIRRORED AUTONOMOUS PROTOTYPE OF EACH OTHER'S SOVEREIGN AUTONOMY: #2
NOLUNTĀTIS]
There are more Intelligent people than me who can appraise that
consideration as solution to their problems.
The greatest success of the NHS threatens to overwhelm it. Modern medicine
has been hugely successful at keeping people alive, as the death rates from
heart disease halve in a decade and cancer survival improves. Yet the
result is an ever-growing number of people who not only need continuing
treatment for these conditions, but now live long enough to get dementia or
another disease on top.
NHS leaders know what they need to do: the service must change from one
centred on hospitals to one that makes better use of local clinics and
modern technology to control long-term conditions. If an older person needs
a hospital bed, that should not be the start of treatment, but a sign that
it has already failed.
Yet despite…”
<https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/solutions-are-obvious-but-painful-8xvxt6c7w>
*IMPORTANT* *NOTE*: That if this trinomial HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER a
priori as PARADIGM already has a conception of an INTELLECTUAL TETRAD {#8 -
Transformation Prototype} which as CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY was associated
to a LUNAR event upon the midnight solstice of 21 December 103 BCE and
published in 4 BCE is equivalent to the later implementation of PYTHAGOREAN
binomial HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER as the basis for the Julian calendar and
VIRTUE as MIND: {1 + 2 = #3} +
TOOLS as SCIENCE: {3 + 4 = #7} +
POSITION as OPINION: {5 + 6 = #11} +
TIME as SENSE: {7 + 8 = #15}
= #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law +
H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity)
6x6 = #36 / #111 / #666 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}
Whilst it may continue to function as an acceptable METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI
TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} with an encapsulated sphere of
operation {
41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE}
42 2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}
43 3 59
51 35 19
11 67 27 = #105 / #315 {#THREE}
44 4 60
52 36 20
12 68 28 = #108 / #324 {#FOUR}
74 81 76
79 77 75
78 73 80 = #231 - #108 = #123 / #693 - #369 = #324 {#TEN} AS RETURN TO
GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE BEING ITSELF
}, it is entirely a specious notion to declare it is the root and causal
basis of the perennialist philosophical tradition.
ANGEL CORRESPONDENCES TO SUN (#111)
45 5 61
53 37 21*
13*69 29 = #111 / #333 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}
<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{111}&idea:{333}>
#5 (9) - MAHASHYAH (Seraphim-Virtues) = #5
#13 (8) - YEZLEL (Cherubim-Virtues) = #18
#21 (7) - NELKEL (Throne-Virtues) = #39
#29 (6) - RYIEL (Dominion-Virtues) = #68
#37 (5) - ANIEL (Powers-Virtues) = #105
<http://www.grapple369.com/gematria.html?umbra:{105}>
"aw-done'", 'lemma' : ["אָדוֹן"], 'link' : null, 'info' : "Or (shortened)
אָדֹן; from an unused root (meaning to rule); sovereign, i.e. controller
(human or divine); lord, master, owner. Compare also names beginning with
'Adoni-'.", 'gematria' : {'61' : [1, 4, 6, 50], '711' : [1, 4, 6, 700]},
'umbra' : {'91' : [20, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6], '100' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 5],
'101' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6],
'105' : [40, 1, 4, 50, 10],
'111' : [40, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6],
[1, 4, 50, 10, 500], '595' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 500], '670' : [5, 1, 4, 50,
10, 600], '671' : [1, 4, 6, 50, 10, 600], '676' : [1, 4, 6, 50, 10, 5,
600], '685' : [1, 4, 50, 10, 20, 600], '700' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 5, 600],
'741' : [30, 1, 4, 6, 700], '747' : [6, 30, 1, 4, 6, 700]}},
#45 (4) - SELYAH (Virtues-Virtues) = #150
#53 (3) - NANAEL (Principalities-Virtues) = #203
#61 (2) - OUMBEL (Archangels-Virtues) = #264
#69 (1) - RAHEL (Angels-Virtues) = #333
USURPER: #1 {First Number in the Square}
GUIDE: #36 (6x6) {Last Number in the Square}
MYSTERY: #37 {First Number + Last Number}
ADJUSTER: #111 {Total Sum of a Row}
LEADER: #666 {Total Value of All Rows}
REGULATOR: #777 {Total Sum of a Row + Total Sum of All Rows}
GENERAL GOVERNOR: #1554 {(Total Sum of a Row Total Sum of All Rows) x 2}
HIGH OVERSEER: #55944 {((Total Sum of a Row Total Sum of All Rows) x 2) x
Last Number in the Square}
#1 - Executive Positions
#2 - Jewelers
#3 - Goldsmiths
#4 - Judges
#5 - Public Servants
#6 - Acting
#7 - Monarchs
#8 - Leaders
#9 - Populace (?)
*LIVE* *LONG* *AND* *PROSPER*

YOUTUBE: “The Birth Of ‘LIVE LONG AND PROSPER’"



*IT* *IS* *ONLY* *THE^ *FAILURE* *OF* *HUMANITY’S* *IMAGINATION* *WHICH*
*GROUNDS* *US* *AS* *LIMITS*.

- dolf
--
SEE ALSO: *INVALIDATING* *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC*
*CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND*
*FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May,
2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an
Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-01-24 21:28:49 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT) LIVE LONG AND PROSPER: GRAPPLE BETA UPDATE QUESTION - IS THE
SEPTET DRIVER AS ENTELECHY AN EQUIVALENT TO THE MEDICAL CADUCEUS?

(c) 2017 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 25 January, 2018

Nous: #3
Time: 20:15 hrs
Date: 2018.1.24
Torah: #6 #40 #2 %81 = #48
Dao: Political Prescriptions, Quietude
Tetra: #8 - Opposition
I-Ching: H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending

Latin: Facies {God above all things} Alt: Anael {Ship of God} {

1. SERVES TO OBTAIN THE FRIENDSHIP OF A PERSON
2. ASTRONOMY & PHYSICS
3. THE SENSITIVITY OF THE HEART
4. Ptiau
}

#34 CE

Transformative Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#274 / #333 IN BEING #FIVE AS
#CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME *AS* *MY* INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* } /
HETEROS {#304 / #348 *AS* *DISTINCT* *TO* *THAT* *OF* *THE* *FASCIST*
*VATICAN* *CITY* *STATE*}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:8,col:7,nous:3&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS&LEXICON:BIBLE&idea:{97}&idea:{274}&idea:{92}&idea:{333}>

***@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 7, nous: 3 [Date: 2018.1.24, Super: #274
/ #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching: H8 - Closeness,
Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra: 33 -
Closeness, Ego: #333 / #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching:
H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition]

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #70 -
Difficulty in Knowing How, Obtuse; I-Ching: H53 - Gradual Advance,
Development (gradual progress), Infiltrating, Advancement; Tetra: 14 -
Penetration / INNER: #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening} #70 has 16 Categories:

#6, #2, #1, #2, #50, #9 = 'abnet (H73): {#0 as #62} 1) girdle, sash; 1a)
of high priest; 1b) of other priests; 1c) of high official; #20, #1, #4,
#40, #5 = 'Admah (H126): {#1 as #50} 1) city in the Siddim valley; #30,
#2, #30, #3, #5 = Bilgah (H1083): {#2 as #40} 1) a priest of the 15th
course, in David's time; 2) a priest accompanying Zerubbabel; #5, #4,
#6, #4, #1, #10, #40 = duwday (H1736): {#3 as #24} 1) mandrake,
love-apple; 1a) as exciting sexual desire, and favouring procreation;
#7, #2, #10, #50, #1 = Zebiyna' (H2081): {#4 as #70} 1) a son of Nebo
who took a foreign wife in the time of Ezra;

#6, #20, #8, #6, #30 = chowl (H2344): {#5 as #44} 1) *SAND*;

This document represents by an articulation of the AUTONOMOUS
HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY {ie. *SANDGLASS*} being a notion of the
AUSTRALIAN HERITAGE AND THE LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE
COMMONWEALTH AND ITS CONSTITUTION of 1901 which resolves the problem
proposed by the German Philosopher Friedrich Hegel (August 27, 1770 –
November 14, 1831) as the hypothesis:

§ 46

If the principle of regard for the individual will is recognised as the
only basis of political liberty, viz., that nothing should be done by or
for the State to which all the members of the body politic have not
given their sanction, we have, properly speaking, no Constitution. The
only arrangement that would be necessary, would be, first, a centre
having no will of its own but which should take into consideration what
appeared to be the necessities of the State; and, secondly, a
contrivance for calling the members of the State together, for taking
the votes, and for performing the arithmetical operations of reckoning
and comparing the number of votes for the different propositions, and
thereby deciding upon them. The State is an abstraction, having even its
generic existence in its citizens; but it is an actuality, and its
simply generic existence must embody itself in individual will and
activity. The want of government and political administration in general
is felt; this necessitates the selection and separation from the rest of
those who have to take the helm in political affairs, to decide,
concerning them, and to give orders to other citizens, with a view to
the execution of their plans. If, e.g., even the people in a Democracy
resolve on a war, a general must head the army. It is only by a
Constitution that the abstraction – the State – attains life and
reality; but this involves the distinction between those who command and
those who obey. – Yet obedience seems inconsistent with liberty, and
those who command appear to do the very opposite of that which the
fundamental idea of the State, viz. that of Freedom, requires. It is,
however, urged that, – though the distinction between commanding and
obeying is absolutely necessary, because affairs could not go on without
it – and indeed this seems only a compulsory limitation, external to and
even contravening freedom in the abstract – the constitution should be
at least so framed, that the citizens may obey as little as possible,
and the smallest modicum of free volition be left to the commands of the
superiors; – that the substance of that for which subordination is
necessary, even in its most important bearings, should be decided and
resolved on by the People – by the will of many or of all the citizens;
though it is supposed to be thereby provided that the State should be
possessed of vigour and strength as a reality – an individual unity. –
The primary consideration is, then, the distinction between the
governing and the governed, and political constitutions in the abstract
have been rightly divided into Monarchy, Aristocracy, and Democracy;
which gives occasion, however, to the remark that Monarchy itself must
be further divided into Despotism and Monarchy proper; that in all the
divisions to which the leading Idea gives rise, only the generic
character is to be made prominent, – it being not intended thereby that
the particular category under review should be exhausted as a Form,
Order, or Kind in its concrete development. But especially it must be
observed, that the above-mentioned divisions admit of a multitude of
particular modifications, – not only such as lie within the limits of
those classes themselves, – but also such as are mixtures of several of
these essentially distinct classes, and which are consequently
misshapen, unstable, and inconsistent forms. In such a collision, the
concerning question is, what is the best constitution; that is, by what
arrangement, organisation or mechanism of the power of the State its
object can be most surely attained. This object may indeed be variously
understood; for instance, as the calm enjoyment of life on the part of
the citizens, or as Universal Happiness. Such aims have suggested the
so-called Ideals of Constitution, and, – as a particular branch of the
subject, – Ideals of the Education of Princes (Fenelon), or of the
governing body – the aristocracy at large (Plato); for the chief point
they treat of is the condition of those subjects who stand at the head
of affairs; and in these ideals the concrete details of political
organisation are not at all considered. The inquiry into the best
constitution is frequently treated as if not only the theory were an
affair of subjective independent conviction, but as if the introduction
of a constitution recognised as the best, – or as superior to others, –
could be the result of a resolve adopted in this theoretical manner; as
if the form of a constitution were a matter of free choice, determined
by nothing else but reflection. Of this artless fashion was that
deliberation, – not indeed of the Persian people, but of the Persian
grandees, who had conspired to overthrow the pseudo-Smerdis and the
Magi, after their undertaking had succeeded, and when there was no scion
of the royal family living, – as to what constitution they should
introduce into Persia; and Herodotus gives an equally naive account of
this deliberation.

§ 47

In the present day, the Constitution of a country and people is not
represented as so entirely dependent on free and deliberate choice. The
fundamental but abstractly (and therefore imperfectly) entertained
conception of Freedom, has resulted in the Republic being very generally
regarded – in theory – as the only just and true political constitution.
Many even, who occupy elevated official positions under monarchical
constitutions – so far from being opposed to this idea – are actually
its supporters; only they see that such a constitution, though the best,
cannot be realised under all circumstances; and that – while men are
what they are – we must be satisfied with less freedom; the monarchical
constitution – under the given circumstances, and the present moral
condition of the people – being even regarded as the most advantageous.
In this view also, the necessity of a particular constitution is made to
depend on the condition of the people in such a way as if the latter
were non-essential and accidental. This representation is founded on the
distinction which the reflective understanding makes between an idea and
the corresponding reality; holding to an abstract and consequently
untrue idea; not grasping it in its completeness, or – which is
virtually, though not in point of form, the same – not taking a concrete
view of a people and a state. We shall have to show further on that the
constitution adopted by a people makes one substance – one spirit – with
its religion, its art and philosophy, or, at least, with its conceptions
and thoughts – its culture generally; not to expatiate upon the
additional influences, ab extrâ, of climate, of neighbours, of its place
in the world. A State is an individual totality, of which you cannot
select any particular side, although a supremely important one, such as
its political constitution; and deliberate and decide respecting it in
that isolated form. Not only is that constitution most intimately
connected with and dependent on those other spiritual forces; but the
form of the entire moral and intellectual individuality – comprising all
the forces it embodies – is only a step in the development of the grand
Whole, – with its place pre-appointed in the process: a fact which gives
the highest sanction to the constitution in question, and establishes
its absolute necessity. -The origin of a State involves imperious
lordship on the one hand, instinctive submission on the other. But even
obedience – lordly power, and the fear inspired by a ruler – in itself
implies some degree of voluntary connection. Even in barbarous states
this is the case; it is not the isolated will of individuals that
prevails; individual pretensions are relinquished, and the general will
is the essential bond of political union. This unity of the general and
the particular is the Idea itself, manifesting itself as a State, and
which subsequently undergoes further development within itself. The
abstract yet necessitated process in the development of truly
independent states is as follows: – They begin with regal power, whether
of patriarchal or military origin. In the next phase, particularity and
individuality assert themselves in the form of Aristocracy and
Democracy. Lastly, we have the subjection of these separate interests to
a single power; but which can be absolutely none other than one outside
of which those spheres have an independent position, viz., the
Monarchical. Two phases of royalty, therefore, must be distinguished, –
a primary and a secondary one. This process is necessitated, so that the
form of government assigned to a particular stage of development must
present itself: it is therefore no matter of choice, but is that form
which is adapted to the spirit of the people.

§ 48

In a Constitution the main feature of interest is the self-development
of the rational, that is, the political condition of a people; the
setting free of the successive elements of the Idea: so that the several
powers in the State manifest themselves as separate, – attain their
appropriate and special perfection, – and yet in this independent
condition, work together for one object, and are held together by it –
i.e., form an organic whole. The State is thus the embodiment of
rational freedom, realising and recognising itself in an objective form.
For its objectivity consists in this, – that its successive stages are
not merely ideal, but are present in an appropriate reality; and that in
their separate and several working, they are absolutely merged in that
agency by which the totality – the soul – the individual unity – is
produced, and of which it is the result.

§ 49

The State is the Idea of Spirit in the external manifestation of human
Will and its Freedom. It is to the State, therefore, that change in the
aspect of History indissolubly attaches itself; and the successive
phases of the Idea manifest themselves in it as distinct political
principles. The Constitutions under which World-Historical peoples have
reached their culmination, are peculiar to them; and therefore do not
present a generally applicable political basis. Were it otherwise, the
differences of similar constitutions would consist only in a peculiar
method of expanding and developing that generic basis; whereas they
really originate in diversity of principle. From the comparison
therefore of the political institutions of the ancient World-Historical
peoples, it so happens, that for the most recent principle of a
Constitution – for the principle of our own times – nothing (so to
speak) can be learned. In science and art it is quite otherwise; e. g.,
the ancient philosophy is so decidedly the basis of the modern, that it
is inevitably contained in the latter, and constitutes its basis. In
this case the relation is that of a continuous development of the same
structure, whose foundation-stone, walls, and roof have remained what
they were. In Art, the Greek itself, in its original form, furnishes us
the best models. But in regard to political constitution, it is quite
otherwise: here the Ancient and the Modern have not their essential
principle in common. Abstract definitions and dogmas respecting just
government, – importing that intelligence and virtue ought to bear sway
– are, indeed, common to both. But nothing is so absurd as to look to
Greeks, Romans, or Orientals, for models for the political arrangements
of our time. From the East may be derived beautiful pictures of a
patriarchal condition, of paternal government, and of devotion to it on
the part of peoples; from Greeks and Romans, descriptions of popular
liberty. Among the latter we find the idea of a Free Constitution
admitting all the citizens to a share in deliberations and resolves
respecting the affairs and laws of the Commonwealth. In our times, too,
this is its general acceptation; only with this modification, that –
since our States are so large, and there are so many of “the Many,” the
latter, – direct action being impossible, – should by the indirect
method of elective substitution express their concurrence with resolves
affecting the common weal; that is, that for legislative purposes
generally, the people should be represented by deputies. The so-called
Representative Constitution is that form of government with which we
connect the idea of a free constitution, and this notion has become a
rooted prejudice. On this theory People and Government are separated.
But there is a perversity in this antithesis; an ill-intentioned ruse
designed to insinuate that the People are the totality of the State.
Besides, the basis of this view is the principle of isolated
individuality – the absolute validity of the subjective will – a dogma
which we have already investigated. The great point is, that Freedom in
its Ideal conception has not subjective will and caprice for its
principle, but the recognition of the universal will; and that the
process by which Freedom is realised is the free development of its
successive stages. The subjective will is a merely formal determination
– a carte blanche – not including what it is that is willed. Only the
rational will is that universal principle which independently determines
and unfolds its own being, and develops its successive elemental phases
as organic members. Of this Gothic-cathedral architecture the ancients
knew nothing.

§ 50 / PAGE #48

At an earlier stage of the discussion, we established the two elemental
considerations: first, the idea of freedom as the absolute and final
aim; secondly, the means for realising it, i.e. the subjective side of
knowledge and will, with its life, movement, and activity. We then
recognised the State as the moral Whole and the Reality of Freedom, and
consequently as the objective unity of these two elements. For although
we make this distinction into two aspects for our consideration, it must
be remarked that they are intimately connected; and that their
connection is involved in the idea of each when examined separately. We
have, on the one hand, recognised the Idea in the definite form of
Freedom conscious of and willing itself, – having itself alone as its
object: involving at the same time, the pure and simple Idea of Reason,
and likewise, that which we have called subject – self-consciousness –
Spirit actually existing in the World. If, on the other hand, we
consider Subjectivity, we find that subjective knowledge and will is
Thought. But by the very act of thoughtful cognition and volition, I
will the universal object – the substance of absolute Reason. We
observe, therefore, an essential union between the objective side – the
Idea, – and the subjective side – the personality that conceives and
wills it. – The objective existence of this union is the State, which is
therefore the basis and centre of the other concrete elements of the
life of a people, – of Art, of Law, of Morals, of Religion, of Science.
All the activity of Spirit has only this object – the becoming conscious
of this union, i.e., of its own Freedom. Among the forms of this
conscious union Religion occupies the highest position. In it, Spirit –
rising above the limitations of temporal and secular existence – becomes
conscious of the Absolute Spirit, and in this consciousness of the
self-existent Being, renounces its individual interest; it lays this
aside in Devotion – a state of mind in which it refuses to occupy itself
any longer with the limited and particular. By Sacrifice man expresses
his renunciation of his property, his will, his individual feelings. The
religious concentration of the soul appears in the form of feeling; it
nevertheless passes also into reflection; a form of worship (cultus) is
a result of reflection. The second form of the union of the objective
and subjective in the human spirit is Art. This advances farther into
the realm of the actual and sensuous than Religion. In its noblest walk
it is occupied with representing, not indeed, the Spirit of God, but
certainly the Form of God; and in its secondary aims, that which is
divine and spiritual generally. Its office is to render visible the
Divine; presenting it to the imaginative and intuitive faculty. But the
True is the object not only of conception and feeling, as in Religion, –
and of Intuition, as in Art, – but also of the thinking faculty; and
this gives us the third form of the union in question – Philosophy. This
is consequently the highest, freest, and wisest phase. Of course we are
not intending to investigate these three phases here; they have only
suggested themselves in virtue of their occupying the same general
ground as the object here considered – the State.

§ 51 / PAGE #50

The general principle which manifests itself and becomes an object of
consciousness in the State, – the form under which all that the State
includes is brought, is the whole of that cycle of phenomena which
constitutes the culture of a nation. But the definite substance that
receives the form of universality, and exists in that concrete reality
which is the State, – is the Spirit of the People itself. The actual
State is animated by this spirit, in all its particular affairs – its
Wars, Institutions, &c. But man must also attain a conscious realisation
of this his Spirit and essential nature, and of his original identity
with it. For we said that morality is the identity of the subjective or
personal with the universal will. Now the mind must give itself an
express consciousness of this; and the focus of this knowledge is
Religion. Art and Science are only various aspects and forms of the same
substantial being. In considering Religion, the chief point of enquiry
is whether it recognises the True – the Idea – only in its separate,
abstract form, or in its true unity; in separation – God being
represented in an abstract form as the Highest Being, Lord of Heaven and
Earth, living in a remote region far from human actualities, – or in its
unity, – God, as Unity of the Universal and Individual; the Individual
itself assuming the aspect of positive and real existence in the idea of
the Incarnation. Religion is the sphere in which a nation gives itself
the definition of that which it regards as the True. A definition
contains everything that belongs to the essence of an object; reducing
its nature to its simple characteristic predicate, as a mirror for every
predicate, – the generic soul Pervading all its details. The conception
of God, therefore, constitutes the general basis of a people’s character.

§ 52

In this aspect, religion stands in the closest connection with the
political principle. Freedom can exist only where Individuality is
recognised as having its positive and real existence in the Divine
Being. The connection may be further explained thus: – Secular
existence, as merely temporal – occupied with particular interests – is
consequently only relative and unauthorised; and receives its validity
only in as far as the universal soul that pervades it – its principle –
receives absolute validity; which it cannot have unless it is recognised
as the definite manifestation, the phenomenal existence of the Divine
Essence. On this account it is that the State rests on Religion.

PAGE #51

We hear this often repeated in our times, though for the most part
nothing further is meant than that individual subjects as God-fearing
men would be more disposed and ready to perform their duty; since
obedience to King and Law so naturally follows in the train of reverence
for God. This reverence, indeed, since it exalts the general over the
special, may even turn upon the latter, – become fanatical, – and work
with incendiary and destructive violence against the State, its
institutions, and arrangements. Religious feeling, therefore, it is
thought, should be sober – kept in a certain degree of coolness, – that
it may not storm against and bear down that which should be defended and
preserved by it. The possibility of such a catastrophe is at least
latent in it.

§ 53

While, however, the correct sentiment is adopted, that the State is
based on Religion, the position thus assigned to Religion supposes the
State already to exist; and that subsequently, in order to maintain it,
Religion must be brought into it – buckets and bushels as it were – and
impressed upon people’s hearts. It is quite true that men must be
trained to religion, but not as to something whose existence has yet to
begin. For in affirming that the State is based on Religion – that it
has its roots in it – we virtually assert that the former has proceeded
from the latter; and that this derivation is going on now and will
always continue; i.e., the principles of the State must be regarded as
valid in and for themselves, which can only be in so far as they are
recognised as determinate manifestations of the Divine Nature. The form
of Religion, therefore, decides that of the State and its constitution.
The latter actually originated in the particular religion adopted by the
nation; so that, in fact, the Athenian or the Roman State was possible
only in connection with the specific form of Heathenism existing among
the respective peoples; just as a Catholic State has a spirit and
constitution different from that of a Protestant one.

§ 54

If that outcry – that urging and striving for the implantation of
Religion in the community – were an utterance of anguish and a call for
help, as it often seems to be, expressing the danger of religion having
vanished, or being about to vanish entirely from the State, – that would
be fearful indeed – worse in fact than this outcry supposes; for it
implies the belief in a resource against the evil, viz., the
implantation and inculcation of religion; whereas religion is by no
means a thing to be so produced; its self-production (and there can be
no other) lies much deeper.

§ 55 / PAGE #52

“Another and opposite folly which we meet with in our time is that of
pretending to invent and carry out political constitutions independently
of religion.

The Catholic confession, although sharing the Christian name with the
Protestant, does not concede to the State an inherent Justice and
Morality, – a concession which in the Protestant principle is
fundamental. This tearing away of the political morality of the
Constitution from its natural connection, is necessary to the genius of
that religion, inasmuch as it does not recognise Justice and Morality as
independent and substantial. But thus excluded from intrinsic worth, –
torn away from their last refuge – the sanctuary of conscience – the
calm retreat where religion has its abode, – the principles and
institutions of political legislation are destitute of a real centre, to
the same decree as they are compelled to remain abstract and indefinite.

Another and opposite folly which we meet with in our time is that of
pretending to invent and carry out political constitutions independently
of religion. The Catholic confession, although sharing the Christian
name with the Protestant, does not concede to the State an inherent
Justice and Morality, – a concession which in the Protestant principle
is fundamental. This tearing away of the political morality of the
Constitution from its natural connection, is necessary to the genius of
that religion, inasmuch as it does not recognise Justice and Morality as
independent and substantial. But thus excluded from intrinsic worth, –
torn away from their last refuge – the sanctuary of conscience – the
calm retreat where religion has its abode, – the principles and
institutions of political legislation are destitute of a real centre, to
the same decree as they are compelled to remain abstract and indefinite.

§ 56

Summing up what has been said of the State, we find that we have been
led to call its vital principle, as actuating the individuals who
compose it, – Morality. The State, its laws, its arrangements,
constitute the rights of its members; its natural features, its
mountains, air, and waters, are their country, their fatherland, their
outward material property; the history of this State, their deeds; what
their ancestors have produced, belongs to them and lives in their
memory. All is their possession, just as they are possessed by it; for
it constitutes their existence, their being.

§ 57

Their imagination is occupied with the ideas thus presented, while the
adoption of these laws, and of a fatherland so conditioned is the
expression of their will. It is this matured totality which thus
constitutes one Being, the spirit of one People. To it the individual
members belong; each unit is the Son of his Nation, and at the same time
– in as far as the State to which he belongs is undergoing development –
the Son of his Age. None remains behind it, still less advances beyond
it. This spiritual Being (the Spirit of his Time) is his; he is a
representative of it; it is that in which he originated, and in which he
lives. Among the Athenians the word Athens had a double import;
suggesting primarily, a complex of Political institutions, but no less,
in the second place, that Goddess who represented the Spirit of the
People and its unity. This Spirit of a People is a determinate and
particular Spirit, and is, as just stated, further modified by the
degree of its historical development. This Spirit, then, constitutes the
basis and substance of those other forms of a nation’s consciousness,
which have been noticed. For Spirit in its self-consciousness must
become a object of contemplation to itself, and objectivity involves, in
the first instance, the rise of differences which make up a total of
distinct spheres of objective spirit; in the same way as the Soul exists
only as the complex of its faculties, which in their form of
concentration in a simple unity produce that Soul. It is thus One
Individuality which, presented in its essence as God, is honoured and
enjoyed in Religion; which is exhibited as an object of sensuous
contemplation in Art; and is apprehended as an intellectual conception
in Philosophy. In virtue of the original identity of their essence,
purport, and object, these various forms are inseparably united with the
Spirit of the State. Only in connection with this particular religion
can this particular political constitution exist; just as in such or
such a State, such or such a Philosophy or order of Art." [Georg Wilhelm
Friedrich Hegel. Hegel (27 August 1770 – 14 November 1831) Philosophy of
History, III. Philosophic History, ii. The Essential Destiny of Reason,
(3) The Embodiment Spirit Assumes – the State]

<https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/hi/history4.htm>

#1, #9, #10, #30, #20 = tuwl (H2904): {#6 as #45} 1) to hurl, cast; 1a)
(Pilpel) to throw away, carry away, hurl; 1b) (Hiphil) to throw, cast,
cast out; 1c) (Hophal); 1c1) to be hurled, hurled down; 1c2) to be cast,
be thrown, be cast out, be thrown down; #9, #10, #50, #1 = tiyn
(Aramaic) (H2917): {#7 as #69} 1) clay; #10, #30, #30 = yelel (H3214):
{#8 as #70} 1) a howling (of beasts); #6, #2, #40, #8, #6, #3, #5 =
mechuwgah (H4230): {#9 as #62} 1) circle-instrument, compass; #40, #20,
#10 = Makiy (H4352): {#10 as #70} 1) father of Geuel the Gadite who was
one of the 12 spies of Israel; #10, #50, #6, #2, #2 = nuwb (H5107): {#11
as #58} 1) to bear fruit; 1a) (Qal) to bear fruit; 1b) (Pilel) to make
to flourish (fig.); #6, #50, #6, #8 = nuwach (H5118): {#12 as #64} 1)
resting place; #50, #8, #2, #10 = Nachbiy (H5147): {#13 as #70} 1) son
of Vophsi, a Naphtalite, and one of the 12 spies sent to spy out the
promised land; #6, #50, #10, #4 = niyd (H5205): {#14 as #64} 1)
quivering (motion) of lips; #4, #5, #10, #50, #1 = deina (G1170): {#15
as #70} 1) such a one, a certain one, ie. one whose name I cannot call
on the instant, or whose name it is of no importance to mention;

EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #13 -
Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending,
Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back / INNER: #13 - Status,
Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back} #13 has 10 Categories:

#1, #5, #6, #1 = 'Ahava' (H163): {#0 as #13} 1) town or area in
Babylonia {incongruity; confusion; mixture}; #1, #7, #4, #1 = 'azad
(Aramaic) (H230): {#1 as #12} 1) (P'al) to be gone; #2, #3, #6, #2 = Gob
(H1359): {#2 as #5} 1) a place which was the scene of two encounters
between David's {well-beloved, dear} warriors and the Philistines {those
who dwell in villages} (also Gezer {dividing, sentence}); #3, #2, #8 =
gibbeach (H1371): {#3 as #13} 1) to be high, bald (in the forehead),
having a bald forehead; #3, #4, #6 = gedad (Aramaic) (H1414): {#4 as
#11} 1) to cut down, hew down;

#3, #5, #5 = gehah (H1456): {#5 as #13} 1) *A* *CURE*, *A* *HEALING*;

#6, #5, #2 = Vaheb (H2052): {#6 as #13} 1) a place in Moab, site
unknown; #7, #2, #4 = zebed (H2065): {#7 as #13} 1) endowment, gift; #7,
#6 = zuw (H2098): {#8 as #13} 1) this, such rel pron; 2) (of) which,
(of) whom; #5, #3, #5 = yagah (H3014): {#9 as #18} 1) (Hiphil) to repel,
thrust away, push away;

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:8,col:7,nous:3&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS&LEXICON:BIBLE&idea:{97}&idea:{274}&idea:{92}&idea:{333}>

I’m planning on providing this update discussion as a gift later today
accompanying some chapter drafts when I have my final consultation visit
with my special orthopaedic surgeon with the caveat that he ought to
look beyond the semantics of opportunism which are provided by the
Hebrew / Greek lexicon by which I can demonstrate the proof of
conception truth of the 1784 noumena theory as an impossibly articulated
by Immanuel Kantian within “Critique of Pure Reason” by my #231
appraisal of a certain 1941 narrative which was a certain shocking import.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Budgie.pdf>

IDEA @52 ON EVENING 25 October 1941 - JEWS RESPONSIBLE FOR TWO WORLD
WARS — HOW PAST CIVILISATIONS ARE EFFACED — THE REWRITING OF HISTORY —
THE LIBRARIES OF ANTIQUITY — CHRISTIANITY AND BOLSHEVISM, AIM AT
DESTRUCTION — NERO DID NOT BURN ROME {AD 64} —PROTESTANT HYPOCRISY — THE
CATHOLIC CHURCH THRIVES ON SIN — ACCOUNTS TO BE SETTLED —  THE MODERNIST
MOVEMENT — THE PROBLEM OF THE CONVENTS:

SPECIAL GUESTS: REICHSFUEHRER SS HIMMLER AND *SS* *GENERAL*
(*OBERGRUPPENFUEHRER*) *HEYDRICH* (*HIGH*-*RANKING* *GERMAN* *NAZI*
*OFFICIAL* *DURING* *WORLD* *WAR* *II*, *AND* *A* *MAIN* *ARCHITECT*
*OF* *THE* *HOLOCAUST*)

PAGE #87 - RUMOURS OF EXTERMINATION OF JEWS

From the rostrum of the Reichstag I prophesied to Jewry that, in the
event of war's proving inevitable, the Jew would disappear from Europe.
That race of criminals has on its conscience the two million dead of the
first World War, and now already hundreds of thousands more. Let nobody
tell me that all the same we can't park them in the marshy parts of
Russia! Who's worrying about our troops? It's not a bad idea, by the
way, that public rumour attributes to us a plan to exterminate the Jews.
Terror is a salutary thing.

*THE* *ATTEMPT* *TO* *CREATE* *A* *JEWISH* *STATE* *WILL* *BE* *A*
*FAILURE*.

The book that contains the reflections of the Emperor Julian should be
circulated in millions. What wonderful intelligence, what discernment,
all the wisdom of antiquity! It's extra- ordinary.

ACCORDING TO WIKIPEDIA: Julian (Latin: Flavius Claudius Iulianus
Augustus[a]; Greek: Φλάβιος Κλαύδιος Ἰουλιανὸς Αὔγουστος; 331/332  – 26
June 363), also known as Julian the Apostate, was Roman Emperor from 361
to 363, as well as a notable philosopher and author in Greek.

A member of the Constantinian dynasty, Julian became Caesar over the
western provinces by order of Constantius II in 355, and in this role he
campaigned successfully against the Alamanni and Franks. Most notable
was his crushing victory over the Alamanni at the Battle of Argentoratum
(Strasbourg) in 357, leading his 13,000 men against a Germanic army
three times larger.

In 360 Julian was proclaimed Augustus by his soldiers at Lutetia
(Paris), sparking a civil war with Constantius. However, Constantius
died before the two could face each other in battle, and named Julian as
his successor.

In 363, Julian embarked on an ambitious campaign against the Sassanid
Empire. The campaign was initially successful, securing a victory
outside Ctesiphon, but during a skirmish Julian was mortally wounded,
leaving his army trapped in Persian territory. Following his death, the
Roman forces were obliged to cede territory in order to escape,
including the fortress city of Nisibis.

Julian was a man of unusually complex character: he was "the military
commander, the theosophist, the social reformer, and the man of
letters". *HE* *WAS* *THE* *LAST* *NON*-*CHRISTIAN* *RULER* *OF* *THE*
*ROMAN* *EMPIRE*, *AND* *HE* *BELIEVED* *THAT* *IT* *WAS* *NECESSARY*
*TO* *RESTORE* *THE* *EMPIRE'S* *ANCIENT* *ROMAN* *VALUES* *AND*
*TRADITIONS* {

ACCORDING TO 'HITLER'S TABLE TALK': IDEA @I / PAGE #3 THE *FASCIST*
*MOVEMENT* *IS* *A* *SPONTANEOUS* *RETURN* *TO* *THE* *TRADITIONS* *OF*
*ANCIENT* *ROME* {strength}

} *IN* *ORDER* *TO* *SAVE* *IT* *FROM* *DISSOLUTION*. [Athanassiadi,
'Julian and Hellenism', p. 88]

He purged the top-heavy state bureaucracy, and attempted to revive
traditional Roman religious practices at the expense of Christianity.
Julian also forbade the Christians from teaching classical texts and
learning. His rejection of the Christianity imposed on him in his youth,
and his *promotion* *of* *Neoplatonic* *Hellenism* {ie. Pythagorean
binomial theory of number} in its place caused him to be remembered as
Julian the Apostate by the church.
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_(emperor)>]

PAGE #89 - CATHOLICS AND PROTESTANTS

Christianity set itself systematically to destroy ancient culture.

What came to us was passed down by chance, or else it was a product of
Roman liberal writers. Perhaps we are entirely ignorant of humanity's
most precious spiritual treasures. Who can know what was there?

The Papacy was faithful to these tactics even during recorded history.
How did people behave, during the age of the great explorations, towards
the spiritual riches of Central America?

*IN* *OUR* *PARTS* *OF* *THE* *WORLD*, *THE* *JEWS* *WOULD* *HAVE*
*IMMEDIATELY* *ELIMINATED* *SCHOPENHAUER*, *NIETZSCHE* *AND* *KANT* {

HOWEVER WITHIN IDEA @233 ON PAGES #513 - GERMAN BIBLE TRANSLATION
CONDEMNED / PAGE #514 - THE VALUE OF ASTRONOMY, ADOLF HITLER DOES NOT
CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY OF A THEORETICAL NOTION AS KANT POSTULATES OF A
NOUMENON: "*AS* *A* *SANE* *GERMAN*, *ONE* *IS* *FLABBERGASTED* *TO*
*THINK* *THAT* *GERMAN* *HUMAN* *BEINGS* *COULD* *HAVE* *LET*
*THEMSELVES* *BE* *BROUGHT* *TO* *SUCH* *A* *PASS* *BY* *JEWISH* *FILTH*
*AND* *PRIESTLY* *TWADDLE*, that they were little different from the
howling dervish of the Turks and the negroes, at whom we laugh so
scornfully. It angers one to think that, while in other parts of the
globe religious teaching like that of Confucius, Buddha and Mohammed
offers an undeniably broad basis for the religious-minded, Germans
should have been duped by a theological exposition devoid of all honest
depth.

When one seeks reasons for these *PHENOMENA*, *ONE* *IS* *IMMEDIATELY*
*STRUCK* *BY* *THE* *EXTENT* *TO* *WHICH* *THE* *HUMAN* *BRAIN* *REACTS*
*TO* *EXTERNAL* *INFLUENCE*."

I QUOTE: "In the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be
applied to data provided by sensibility in order to provide cognition,
and because the data of sensibility are structured by the
transcenden­tally ideal forms of intuition, the categories give us
knowledge only of things as they appear with sensibility ("phenomena,"
literally "that which appears").

Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of
objects independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can never
cognize them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that
which is thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of
Kant's use of the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of
"noumena" is not, since it literally means not "things as they are in­
dependently of appearing to us" but something more like "things as they
are understood by pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human
understanding can comprehend things in the latter way."

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>

*THUS* *I* *AM* *PROFFERING* *AN* *INFORMED* *AND* *REASONED* *OPINION*
*AS* *THAT* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL* *KANT* *STATES* *IS* *AN* *IMPOSSIBILITY*
*FOR* *A* *HUMAN* *BEING* *TO* *ACCOMPLISH* *BY* *TRANSCENDENT*
*SAPIENTIAL* *THOUGHT* *AND* *CAPABLY* *DEMONSTRATE* *IT'S* *TEMPORAL*
*CONGRUENCE* *AS* *COHERENCE* *BY* *A* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL*
*NOUMENON* *AS* *AN*  *INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL*
*KANT* *HIMSELF* *CALLS* *NOUMENA* *AS* *THE* *PROOF* *OF* *A* *VALID*
*AND* *RATIONAL* *CONCEPT* *ATTAINED* *BY* *PURE* *THOUGHT* *BUT* *MY*
*ANTAGONIST'S* *OPINIONS* *ARE* *ONLY* *A* *SELF*-*INFATUATION* *WITH*
*DELUSION* *AND* *MORE* *PROPERLY* *UNDERSTOOD* *IN* *TERMS* *OF*
*PSYCHOSIS*.

}. If the Bolsheviks had dominion over us for two hundred years, what
works of our past would be handed on to posterity? Our great men would
fall into oblivion, or else they'd be presented to future generations as
criminals and bandits.

I don't believe at all in the truth of certain mental pictures that many
people have of the Roman emperors. I'm sure that Nero didn't set fire to
Rome {68 AD}. It was the Christian-Bolsheviks who did that, just as the
Commune set fire to Paris in 1871 and the Communists set fire to the
Reichstag in 1932.

There is a form of hypocrisy, typically Protestant, that is impudence
itself. Catholicism has this much good about it, that it ignores the
moral strictness of the Evangelicals. In Catholic regions life is more
endurable, for the priest himself succumbs more easily to human
weaknesses. So he permits his flock not to dramatise sin. How would the
Church earn her living, if not by the sins of the faithful? She declares
herself satisfied if one goes to confession. Indulgence, at a tariff,
supplies the Church with her daily bread. As for the fruits of sin, the
soul that fears limbo is a candidate for baptism, that is to say,
another customer, and so business goes on! It is a fact that in Catholic
parts of the world there are many more illegitimate births than in
Protestant parts.

In Austria, Protestantism was free of all bigotry. It was truly a
movement of protest against Catholicism. Moreover, these Protestants
were entirely devoted to the German cause.

A scandal is that, when a believer leaves a particular faith, he is
compelled to pay the ecclesiastical tax for another year. A simple
statement should be enough to free him at once from owing anything
further. We'll put all that right as soon as we have peace again.

-----------

IRREPARABLE HARM DONE TO A CERTAIN CULT OF PERSONALITY
We haven’t yet by 7 January 2018, finished what is only a superficial
two day analysis of Hitler’s Table Talk and I have undertaken the task
reluctantly, being without any infatuation directed towards the
individual as impetus and within the obstructions as the restraints of
inadequacy and resourcefulness which is my education.   Or rather a lack
thereof.  Which, if I sought such further opportunities in particular
that of psychology, would greatly assist my cursory and informal as
haphazard approach to the project.

But it ought to be remembered, that I by reasonable thought, invented
the very tool which is prerequisite to an undertaking of my analysis and
has yielded such fertile consequence. I would therefore provisionally
conclude from the #231 preliminary assessment which we disclose below,
as to it being associated to a systematic and insidious assertion made
upon the MIND of the population.

However given this cult of personality which he has clearly exhibited as
most apparent even within the short duration of our attention to the
matter as the process of informing and the knowing, also had exhibited
an immutable and an irrational aggression towards the biblical narrative
itself wherein my entire (excepting for the Dao as the Mother of
Governance) trinomial mathematical paradigm of sapient MIND as
theoretical noumenon by which I appraised him, is embedded.

That the maxim: “a house divided by itself would most certainly have
fallen.”

Is a truism if ever there was one so uttered.

I’m at the stage of writing this attention point, currently up-to #150
pages and I anticipate finishing our introduction into a proof of
concept in the existence of what is Immanuel Kant’s meaning of the term
"noumena" as not which is self evident, since it literally means not
"things as they are in dependently of appearing to us" but something
more like "things as they are understood by pure thought."


“And I have seen wonders.
And I have seen miracles
Oh, I have seen some things...”

Yet Kant appears to deny that the human understanding can comprehend
things in the latter way."

I’m not as advanced on the next revision of the Grapple prototype as I
had desired to be since I have been more focussed upon writing such
narrative as above for the past little while as that which dispels
decades of *FAKE* *NEWS* promulgated by the Papal Authority itself.

ROSA FLORES (CNN) @ 2245 HOURS ON 24 JANUARY 2018: “POPE WARNS AGAINST
'FAKE NEWS' AND LIKENS IT TO 'CRAFTY SERPENT' IN GENESIS:

Pope Francis released a message condemning "fake news," saying that it's
a "sign of intolerant and hypersensitive attitudes, and leads only to
the spread of arrogance and hatred."

The Vatican says the message is part of the Pope's World Communications
Day, but some at St. Peter's Square say the Pope was probably sending a
message to Donald Trump and other world leaders who have been using the
phrase "fake news."

The tragic history of human sin, the Pope says in his message, is the
first "fake news" and it dates back to the book of Genesis, when the
"crafty serpent" lied to the woman. In present day, according to the
Pope's message the fast digital world helps fuel the spread of "fake
news" -- which he defines as "the spreading of disinformation on line or
in the traditional media."

"Spreading fake news can serve to advance specific goals, influence
political decisions and serve economic interests," the Pope said.

The Pope's message blames the difficulty in unmasking and eliminating
fake news to people interacting with homogeneous news environments
rather than listening to differing perspectives and opinions.

"Disinformation thus thrives on the absence of healthy confrontation
with other sources of information that could effectively challenge
prejudices and generate constructive dialogue; instead, it risks turning
people into unwilling accomplices in spreading biased and baseless
ideas," the Pope's message said.

POPE ON HOW TO COMBAT FAKE NEWS
Journalism that seeks the truth, the Pope's message says, is the way to
overcome this "fake news" phenomenon. And hence his dedication of World
Day of Communication to "'The truth will set you free'. Fake news and
journalism for peace."

"I would like to contribute to our shared commitment to stemming the
spread of fake news and to rediscovering the dignity of journalism and
the personal responsibility of journalists to communicate the truth.

"Praiseworthy efforts are being made to create educational programs
aimed at helping people to interpret and assess information provided by
the media, and teaching them to take an active part in unmasking
falsehoods, rather than unwittingly contributing to the spread of
disinformation."

Catholics have been observing World Communication day since 1967. The
Pope's message is traditionally published on January 24 during the day
of the feast of St. Francis de Sales, the patron saint of journalists.
Catholics don't celebrate World Communication Day until May 13, but the
announcement is made early to give bishops and priests time to prepare
for local and national celebrations.

Pope Francis has fallen victim to fake news himself. First when a fake
news site falsely reported the Pope endorsed Hillary Clinton for
President. And then again, when another fake news site falsely reported
he endorsed Donald Trump for President.”

<http://edition.cnn.com/2018/01/24/world/pope-condemns-fake-news/index.html>

Nous: #10
Time: 16:30 hrs
Date: 2018.11.30
Torah: #20 #30 #10 %81 = #60
Dao: Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?
Tetra: #41 - Response
I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net

Latin: Assistens {God prompt to grant} Alt: Menqel {Libation Bowl of God} {

1. SERVES TO MAKE KNOWN THE TRUTH. AIDS THE TRIUMPH OF INNOCENCE
2. PROMPT HELP IN TRIALS
3. WITNESSES
4. Tepisatosoa
}

Solar Eclipse: 13 (UTC) / 14 November 2012 (AEST)

Nahor {Snorting, Hoarse; dry; hot}

Transformative Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#371 / #393} / HETEROS {#287 / #432}


<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:7,col:4,nous:10&idea:{82}&idea:{371}&idea:{83}&idea:{393}>

***@zen: 3, row: 7, col: 4, nous: 10 [Super: #371 / #2 - Contrast
of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 - Peace, Pervading, Greatness;
Tetra: 16 - Contact, Ego: #393 / #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be
Done?; I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire,
The net; Tetra: 41 - Response]

HERE'S WHY AUSTRALIA'S PARLIAMENT USES SANDGLASSES WHEN THERE'S A
DIVISION IN THE HOUSE:

“Australia’s parliamentary traditions and conventions change over time.
For example, when a vote (or ‘division’) {

#371 as #8, #80, #5, #10, #9, #8, #200, #1, #50 = apeitheo (G544): {#10
as #910} 1) not to allow one's self to be persuaded; 2) not to comply
with; 1a) to refuse or withhold belief; 1b) to refuse belief and obedience

} is called, senators have four minutes to get to the chamber {

#371 as #30, #40, #100, #200, #1 = miqra' (H4744): {#4 as #341} 1)
convocation, convoking, reading, a calling together; 1a) convocation,
sacred assembly; 1b) convoking; 1c) reading; / #6, #70, #90, #200, #5 =
`atsarah (H6116): {#5 as #365} 1) assembly, solemn assembly; 1a)
assembly (sacred or festive meeting); 1b) assemblage, company, group}.

Back in 1975 that increased from two minutes to three, when a new
extension to Old Parliament House made the journey {

#371 as #6, #10, #200, #40, #60, #50, #5 = ramac (H7429): {#8 as #300}
1) to trample; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to trample; 1a2) trampler (participle);
1b) (Niphal) to be trampled

} from committee rooms to the chamber a little longer. The current
four-minute limit was introduced in 1988, when Australian democracy
moved up the hill to to the much bigger, current Parliament House.

The time given to MPs {

#371 as #20, #1, #50, #300 = 'enash (Aramaic) (H606): {#0 as #351} 1)
man, human being; 2) mankind (collective)

} is necessary, but the way the gap is timed – with a sandglass {

#371 as #20, #1, #200, #90, #20, #40 = 'erets (H776): {#2 as #291} 1)
land, earth; lands, countries; 1a) earth; 1a1) whole earth (as opposed
to a part); 1a2) earth (as opposed to heaven); 1a3) earth (inhabitants);
1b) land; 1b1) country, territory; 1b2) district, region; 1b3) tribal
territory; 1b4) piece of ground; 1b5) land of Canaan, Israel; 1b6)
inhabitants of land; 1b7) Sheol, land without return, (under) world;
1b8) city (-state); 1c) ground, surface of the earth; 1c1) ground; 1c2)
soil; 1d) (in phrases); 1d1) people of the land; 1d2) space or distance
of country (in measurements of distance); 1d3) level or plain country;
1d4) land of the living; 1d5) end(s) of the earth; 1e) (almost wholly
late in usage); 1e1a) often in contrast to Canaan

} – doesn’t seem necessary at all. And it turns out the sandglasses are
not just ornamental. They’re really used for timekeeping (but with a
catch). The parliament’s website explains:

Until 1989, it [the Annotated Standing Orders] contained references to a
sand-glass kept on the Table for the purpose of timing divisions. The
Clerk was responsible for turning the sand-glass and the time was taken
to have elapsed when the sand-glass so indicated. References to this
antique but reliable technology were removed in the course of the 1989
revision to free the principle from reliance on any particular technology.

Although sand-glasses continue to be used as the primary means of timing
the division or quorum bells {

#393 as #300, #10, #7, #70, #6 = zuwa` (H2111): {#0 as #83} 1) to
tremble, quiver, quake, be in terror; 1a) (Qal) to tremble, quake; 1b)
(Pilpel); 1b1) to shake violently; 1b2) to cause to tremble;

"In the day when the keepers of the house shall tremble {zuwa`-moved
[H2111]: #393}, and the strong men shall bow themselves, and the
grinders cease because they are few, and those that look out of the
windows be darkened..." [Ecclesiastes 12:3 (KJV)]

"Shall they not rise up suddenly that shall bite thee, and awake that
shall vex {zuwa`-moved [H2111]: #393} thee, and thou shalt be for
booties unto them?" [Habakkuk 2:7 (KJV)]

#393 as #8, #90, #90, #200, #5 = chatsotserah (H2689): {#2 as #399} 1)
trumpet, clarion

}, they are now used in conjunction with the digital speech timer. An
advantage of the latter is that it enables a time signal to be broadcast
on the House Monitoring Service which shows senators how much time
remains for them to reach the chamber. In practice, the Chair takes
whichever methodology expires last as a signal to call for the doors to
be locked.

Note “antique but reliable”, but also references to using it were
removed in 1989 “to free the principle from reliance on any particular
technology”.

Justin Baker, assistant director of the Chamber Research Office in the
Department of the House of Representatives, explained to Business
Insider why they continue to use what looks like a giant egg timer.

Hansard records reveal a reference to a sandglass being used for
divisions back in 1901 “so they have likely been a feature of the
parliament since Federation”.

When the Central Table for the new Parliament House was commissioned, a
pair of sandglasses was included in the brief by the Parliament amongst
other items, such as bronze brackets to support the Mace, pigeon hole
book stands, digital clocks, call bells and microphones.

“A stand with a wooden base and green felt underneath for the
sandglasses was purpose built for the Clerk’s desk within the Chamber,”
Baker said. “In 1998, a new stand and glasses were designed and
manufactured to accommodate an additional sandglass.”

That’s right – they bought another one.

<https://www.businessinsider.com.au/heres-why-australias-parliament-uses-sandglasses-when-theres-a-division-in-the-house-2015-6>

Waking up during the night (as you can appreciate of such maelstrom
reality) so as to newsgroup post doesn’t lend itself to a frame of mind
fruitful for programming.

But I have decided now make incremental releases of the developer
progress updates with this link:

<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html>

I’m still to trace through the debugging of the .jackNote span
function() which isn’t yet finished it’s testing phase as it presently
clearly gives the wrong values for the @memeBrain bubble cascades.

But I will work on it as I can as I imagine my narrative output will
diminish for the next few months.

However I have partially implemented an update of the TAXONOMY() and the
calcTelos() functions which may still be micro modified and have enabled
the possibility of the @memeBrain elements being displayed individually
as either SUPER (MALE) or EGO (FEMALE) and this is in preparation for
the IDEA:{} object to be conveyed as either.

I envisioned an additional search option such as:

?CATEGORY:MALE&IDEA:{331}&IDEA:{237} &IDEA:{333}

or perhaps:

?IDEA:{331,M}&IDEA:{237,F}&IDEA:{333}

We shall see which is the better approach, but at this point I favour
the latter.

But what we have done within our written narrative is demonstrate that
there is no basis to the Sovereignty which the Vatican City-State claims
of itself (*THAT* *IT* *IS* *BY* *ITS* *GRECO*-*ROMAN* #231 *ROOTS*
*IDENTICAL* *TO* *GERMAN* *FASCISM* *DESPITE* *PAPAL* *ATTEMPTS* *TO*
**OTHERWISE* * CONVEY* *SUCH* *SIN* *OF* *FAKE* *NEWS*, and the Letters
Patent to the Federation of the Australian Commonwealth 1901 are not
only a valid basis (if not the only means) to define Sovereignty of a
nation but it’s ternary technological sapient basis is an exceptional
globalisation paradigm framework for all sorts agreements including
trade, taxation, science, knowledge sapient services, personalistics,
defence (etc) as having not only a linguistic basis but a technological
foundation of an exponential growth potential.

Such a framework {ie. in my view the SEPTET DRIVER as ENTELECHY with
INFINITE POTENTIAL rather than the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH’S ANKH as the
#72 ANTHROPIC TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE sinisterly provided within the
Greco-Roman magic square (as we have shown) as transformative prototype
is perhaps a better equivalent to the Medical Caduceus
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Medical_Caduceus.png>} as the means
for provisioning transactional and sapient services proving thereby by
its very use would be an enabler for a revenue stream (of which I
estimate from its global perspective be $10 billion a day in yet
untapped fiscal well of opportunity—but I leave such dreams of mine to
the experts in any sapient field) would thereby solve Britain’s National
Health Service (NHS) woes, but it will take some investment and time to
implement.

The cognitive hypothesis as the theoretical obvious concern of this
dialectic correspondence with this SEPTET driver to the mathematical
theoretical noumenon which provides by an equitable distribution of
trinomial number an ontological basis for the entelechy:

- the realization of potential.
- the supposed vital principle that guides the development and
functioning of an organism or other system or organization.
- such self-organization requires a special biological force which is
known as entelechy.
- the soul for the spiritus.
- the mathematical / electronic equivalent of stem cells is for others
to decide.

It therefore may be considered as quintessentially the 'INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS' of an unencumbered will and ought to conform
with the
following dialectic which chronicles the: levels / phases / stages /
duration / milestone of any perennial cycle as the dispensational
governance basis of LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA OF 1901 represented by a theoretical mathematical trinomial
MENTALISM: #1 - Will, free will, choice / Remember the Sabbath Day
CORRESPONDENCE: #2 - desire, inclination / Honour Parents
VIBRATION: #3 - disposition towards (something or someone) / Do Not Kill
POLARITY: #4 - favour, affection / Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid
Heteronomy Against Autonomy)
RHYTHM: #5 - last will, testament / Do Not Steal
CAUSE AND EFFECT: #6 - goal, object, purpose, intention / Do Not Bear
False
Witness
ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE: #7 - signification, import / Do Not Covet [LATIN
definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
The NOLUNTĀTIS is then a consequence of an opposition as consideration
being a question of relativity as the interoperability by mutuality
on what
#8 - TRANSFORMATIVE prototype is to be deployed where the default is the
#8 as TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE: #1 - unwillingness;
But this is in my view a matter of protocol selection which can be
identified by the classification duality of both the cryptographic # and
the vRUDOLPH DATE being determined by a cosmogonic observation as
computation of rational 22/7 from #0 of Equinox on Wednesday of 20 March
1996 associated to any EVENT as slider dispersal from calendar to the
noumenon.
The Autonomous Prototype is then the source amalgamation of the binomial,
trinomial and chrononomial (#YEAR, #DECADE, #CENTENARY and #MILLENNIUM
#9 as MIRRORED AUTONOMOUS PROTOTYPE OF EACH OTHER'S SOVEREIGN
AUTONOMY: #2
NOLUNTĀTIS]
There are more Intelligent people than me who can appraise that
consideration as solution to their problems.
TO THE
The greatest success of the NHS threatens to overwhelm it. Modern
medicine
has been hugely successful at keeping people alive, as the death
rates from
heart disease halve in a decade and cancer survival improves. Yet the
result is an ever-growing number of people who not only need continuing
treatment for these conditions, but now live long enough to get
dementia or
another disease on top.
NHS leaders know what they need to do: the service must change from one
centred on hospitals to one that makes better use of local clinics and
modern technology to control long-term conditions. If an older person
needs
a hospital bed, that should not be the start of treatment, but a sign
that
it has already failed.
Yet despite…”
<https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/solutions-are-obvious-but-painful-8xvxt6c7w>
*IMPORTANT* *NOTE*: That if this trinomial HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER a
priori as PARADIGM already has a conception of an INTELLECTUAL TETRAD
{#8 -
Transformation Prototype} which as CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY was
associated
to a LUNAR event upon the midnight solstice of 21 December 103 BCE and
published in 4 BCE is equivalent to the later implementation of
PYTHAGOREAN
binomial HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER as the basis for the Julian
calendar and
VIRTUE as MIND: {1 + 2 = #3} +
TOOLS as SCIENCE: {3 + 4 = #7} +
POSITION as OPINION: {5 + 6 = #11} +
TIME as SENSE: {7 + 8 = #15}
= #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal
Law +
H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity)
6x6 = #36 / #111 / #666 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}
Whilst it may continue to function as an acceptable METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI
TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} with an encapsulated sphere of
operation {
41  1 57
49 33 17
  9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE}
42  2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}
43  3 59
51 35 19
11 67 27 = #105 / #315 {#THREE}
44  4 60
52 36 20
12 68 28 = #108 / #324 {#FOUR}
74 81 76
79 77 75
78 73 80 = #231 - #108 = #123 / #693 - #369 = #324 {#TEN} AS RETURN TO
GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE BEING ITSELF
}, it is entirely a specious notion to declare it is the root and causal
basis of the perennialist philosophical tradition.
ANGEL CORRESPONDENCES TO SUN (#111)
45   5 61
53 37 21*
13*69 29 = #111 / #333 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}
<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{111}&idea:{333}>
#5 (9) - MAHASHYAH (Seraphim-Virtues) = #5
#13 (8) - YEZLEL (Cherubim-Virtues) = #18
#21 (7) - NELKEL (Throne-Virtues) = #39
#29 (6) - RYIEL (Dominion-Virtues) = #68
#37 (5) - ANIEL (Powers-Virtues) = #105
<http://www.grapple369.com/gematria.html?umbra:{105}>
'H113' : {'xlit' : "ʼâdôwn", 'lingo' : 0, 'strongs' : "H113",
"aw-done'", 'lemma' : ["אָדוֹן"], 'link' : null, 'info' : "Or (shortened)
אָדֹן; from an unused root (meaning to rule); sovereign, i.e. controller
(human or divine); lord, master, owner. Compare also names beginning with
'Adoni-'.", 'gematria' : {'61' : [1, 4, 6, 50], '711' : [1, 4, 6, 700]},
'umbra' : {'91' : [20, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6], '100' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 5],
'101' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6],
'105' : [40, 1, 4, 50, 10],
'111' : [40, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6],
[1, 4, 50, 10, 500], '595' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 500], '670' : [5, 1,
4, 50,
10, 600], '671' : [1, 4, 6, 50, 10, 600], '676' : [1, 4, 6, 50, 10, 5,
600], '685' : [1, 4, 50, 10, 20, 600], '700' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 5,
600],
'741' : [30, 1, 4, 6, 700], '747' : [6, 30, 1, 4, 6, 700]}},
#45 (4) - SELYAH (Virtues-Virtues) = #150
#53 (3) - NANAEL (Principalities-Virtues) = #203
#61 (2) - OUMBEL (Archangels-Virtues) = #264
#69 (1) - RAHEL (Angels-Virtues) = #333
USURPER: #1 {First Number in the Square}
GUIDE: #36 (6x6) {Last Number in the Square}
MYSTERY: #37 {First Number + Last Number}
ADJUSTER: #111 {Total Sum of a Row}
LEADER: #666 {Total Value of All Rows}
REGULATOR: #777 {Total Sum of a Row + Total Sum of All Rows}
GENERAL GOVERNOR: #1554 {(Total Sum of a Row Total Sum of All Rows) x 2}
HIGH OVERSEER: #55944 {((Total Sum of a Row Total Sum of All Rows) x 2) x
Last Number in the Square}
#1 - Executive Positions
#2 - Jewelers
#3 - Goldsmiths
#4 - Judges
#5 - Public Servants
#6 - Acting
#7 - Monarchs
#8 - Leaders
#9 - Populace (?)
*LIVE* *LONG* *AND* *PROSPER* [Leonard Simon Nimoy, 26 March 1931 - 27
February 2015 (RIP)]

YOUTUBE: “The Birth Of ‘LIVE LONG AND PROSPER’"

http://youtu.be/UdYbpMkH_XQ

*IT* *IS* *ONLY* *THE* *FAILURE* *OF* *HUMANITY’S* *IMAGINATION* *WHICH*
*GROUNDS* *US* *AS* *LIMITS*.

- dolf

A REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF DOCUMENT FROM THIS URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Prosper.pdf>
--
SEE ALSO: *INVALIDATING* *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC*
*CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND*
*FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS
INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING
AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]
as EXISTENCE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD/TETRACTYS

Initial Post: 24 January 2018

#LIVE #LONG #PROSPER
dolf
2018-01-24 23:33:15 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT) LIVE LONG AND PROSPER: GRAPPLE BETA UPDATE QUESTION - IS THE
SEPTET DRIVER AS ENTELECHY AN EQUIVALENT TO THE MEDICAL CADUCEUS?

(c) 2017 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 25 January, 2018

Nous: #3
Time: 20:15 hrs
Date: 2018.1.24
Torah: #6 #40 #2 %81 = #48
Dao: Political Prescriptions, Quietude
Tetra: #8 - Opposition
I-Ching: H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending

Latin: Facies {God above all things} Alt: Anael {Ship of God} {

1. SERVES TO OBTAIN THE FRIENDSHIP OF A PERSON
2. ASTRONOMY & PHYSICS
3. THE SENSITIVITY OF THE HEART
4. Ptiau
}

#34 CE

Transformative Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#274 / #333 IN BEING #FIVE AS
#CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME *AS* *MY* INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* } /
HETEROS {#304 / #348 *AS* *DISTINCT* *TO* *THAT* *OF* *THE* *FASCIST*
*VATICAN* *CITY* *STATE*}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:8,col:7,nous:3&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS&LEXICON:BIBLE&idea:{97}&idea:{274}&idea:{92}&idea:{333}>

***@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 7, nous: 3 [Date: 2018.1.24, Super: #274
/ #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching: H8 - Closeness,
Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra: 33 -
Closeness, Ego: #333 / #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching:
H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition]

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #70 -
Difficulty in Knowing How, Obtuse; I-Ching: H53 - Gradual Advance,
Development (gradual progress), Infiltrating, Advancement; Tetra: 14 -
Penetration / INNER: #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening} #70 has 16 Categories:

#6, #2, #1, #2, #50, #9 = 'abnet (H73): {#0 as #62} 1) girdle, sash; 1a)
of high priest; 1b) of other priests; 1c) of high official; #20, #1, #4,
#40, #5 = 'Admah (H126): {#1 as #50} 1) city in the Siddim valley; #30,
#2, #30, #3, #5 = Bilgah (H1083): {#2 as #40} 1) a priest of the 15th
course, in David's time; 2) a priest accompanying Zerubbabel; #5, #4,
#6, #4, #1, #10, #40 = duwday (H1736): {#3 as #24} 1) mandrake,
love-apple; 1a) as exciting sexual desire, and favouring procreation;
#7, #2, #10, #50, #1 = Zebiyna' (H2081): {#4 as #70} 1) a son of Nebo
who took a foreign wife in the time of Ezra;

#6, #20, #8, #6, #30 = chowl (H2344): {#5 as #44} 1) *SAND*;

This document represents by an articulation of the AUTONOMOUS
HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY {ie. *SANDGLASS*} being a notion of the
AUSTRALIAN HERITAGE AND THE LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE
COMMONWEALTH AND ITS CONSTITUTION of 1901 which resolves the problem
proposed by the German Philosopher Friedrich Hegel (August 27, 1770 –
November 14, 1831) as the hypothesis:

§ 46

If the principle of regard for the individual will {ie. *INTELLECTUS*
*AS* *GENITIVE* *VOLUNTĀTUS*} is recognised as the only basis of
political liberty, viz., that nothing should be done by or for the State
to which all the members of the body politic have not given their
sanction, we have, properly speaking, no Constitution. The only
arrangement that would be necessary, would be, first, a centre having no
will of its own but which should take into consideration what appeared
to be the necessities of the State; and, secondly, a contrivance for
calling the members of the State together, for taking the votes, and for
performing the arithmetical operations of reckoning and comparing the
number of votes for the different propositions, and thereby deciding
upon them. The State is an abstraction, having even its generic
existence in its citizens; but it is an actuality, and its simply
generic existence must embody itself in individual will and activity.
The want of government and political administration in general is felt;
this necessitates the selection and separation from the rest of those
who have to take the helm in political affairs, to decide, concerning
them, and to give orders to other citizens, with a view to the execution
of their plans. If, e.g., even the people in a Democracy resolve on a
war, a general must head the army. It is only by a Constitution that the
abstraction – the State – attains life and reality; but this involves
the distinction between those who command and those who obey. – Yet
obedience seems inconsistent with liberty, and those who command appear
to do the very opposite of that which the fundamental idea of the State,
viz. that of Freedom, requires. It is, however, urged that, – though the
distinction between commanding and obeying is absolutely necessary,
because affairs could not go on without it – and indeed this seems only
a compulsory limitation, external to and even contravening freedom in
the abstract – the constitution should be at least so framed, that the
citizens may obey as little as possible, and the smallest modicum of
free volition be left to the commands of the superiors; – that the
substance of that for which subordination is necessary, even in its most
important bearings, should be decided and resolved on by the People – by
the will of many or of all the citizens; though it is supposed to be
thereby provided that the State should be possessed of vigour and
strength as a reality – an individual unity. – The primary consideration
is, then, the distinction between the governing and the governed, and
political constitutions in the abstract have been rightly divided into
Monarchy, Aristocracy, and Democracy; which gives occasion, however, to
the remark that Monarchy itself must be further divided into Despotism
and Monarchy proper; that in all the divisions to which the leading Idea
gives rise, only the generic character is to be made prominent, – it
being not intended thereby that the particular category under review
should be exhausted as a Form, Order, or Kind in its concrete
development. But especially it must be observed, that the
above-mentioned divisions admit of a multitude of particular
modifications, – not only such as lie within the limits of those classes
themselves, – but also such as are mixtures of several of these
essentially distinct classes, and which are consequently misshapen,
unstable, and inconsistent forms. In such a collision, the concerning
question is, what is the best constitution; that is, by what
arrangement, organisation or mechanism of the power of the State its
object can be most surely attained. This object may indeed be variously
understood; for instance, as the calm enjoyment of life on the part of
the citizens, or as Universal Happiness. Such aims have suggested the
so-called Ideals of Constitution, and, – as a particular branch of the
subject, – Ideals of the Education of Princes (Fenelon), or of the
governing body – the aristocracy at large (Plato); for the chief point
they treat of is the condition of those subjects who stand at the head
of affairs; and in these ideals the concrete details of political
organisation are not at all considered. The inquiry into the best
constitution is frequently treated as if not only the theory were an
affair of subjective independent conviction, but as if the introduction
of a constitution recognised as the best, – or as superior to others, –
could be the result of a resolve adopted in this theoretical manner; as
if the form of a constitution were a matter of free choice, determined
by nothing else but reflection. Of this artless fashion was that
deliberation, – not indeed of the Persian people, but of the Persian
grandees, who had conspired to overthrow the pseudo-Smerdis and the
Magi, after their undertaking had succeeded, and when there was no scion
of the royal family living, – as to what constitution they should
introduce into Persia; and Herodotus gives an equally naive account of
this deliberation.

§ 47

In the present day, the Constitution of a country and people is not
represented as so entirely dependent on free and deliberate choice. The
fundamental but abstractly (and therefore imperfectly) entertained
conception of Freedom, has resulted in the Republic being very generally
regarded – in theory – as the only just and true political constitution.
Many even, who occupy elevated official positions under monarchical
constitutions – so far from being opposed to this idea – are actually
its supporters; only they see that such a constitution, though the best,
cannot be realised under all circumstances; and that – while men are
what they are – we must be satisfied with less freedom; the monarchical
constitution – under the given circumstances, and the present moral
condition of the people – being even regarded as the most advantageous.
In this view also, the necessity of a particular constitution is made to
depend on the condition of the people in such a way as if the latter
were non-essential and accidental. This representation is founded on the
distinction which the reflective understanding makes between an idea and
the corresponding reality; holding to an abstract and consequently
untrue idea; not grasping it in its completeness, or – which is
virtually, though not in point of form, the same – not taking a concrete
view of a people and a state. We shall have to show further on that the
constitution adopted by a people makes one substance – one spirit – with
its religion, its art and philosophy, or, at least, with its conceptions
and thoughts – its culture generally; not to expatiate upon the
additional influences, ab extrâ, of climate, of neighbours, of its place
in the world. A State is an individual totality, of which you cannot
select any particular side, although a supremely important one, such as
its political constitution; and deliberate and decide respecting it in
that isolated form. Not only is that constitution most intimately
connected with and dependent on those other spiritual forces; but the
form of the entire moral and intellectual individuality – comprising all
the forces it embodies – is only a step in the development of the grand
Whole, – with its place pre-appointed in the process: a fact which gives
the highest sanction to the constitution in question, and establishes
its absolute necessity. -The origin of a State involves imperious
lordship on the one hand, instinctive submission on the other. But even
obedience – lordly power, and the fear inspired by a ruler – in itself
implies some degree of voluntary connection. Even in barbarous states
this is the case; it is not the isolated will of individuals that
prevails; individual pretensions are relinquished, and the general will
is the essential bond of political union. This unity of the general and
the particular is the Idea itself, manifesting itself as a State, and
which subsequently undergoes further development within itself. The
abstract yet necessitated process in the development of truly
independent states is as follows: – They begin with regal power, whether
of patriarchal or military origin. In the next phase, particularity and
individuality assert themselves in the form of Aristocracy and
Democracy. Lastly, we have the subjection of these separate interests to
a single power; but which can be absolutely none other than one outside
of which those spheres have an independent position, viz., the
Monarchical. Two phases of royalty, therefore, must be distinguished, –
a primary and a secondary one. This process is necessitated, so that the
form of government assigned to a particular stage of development must
present itself: it is therefore no matter of choice, but is that form
which is adapted to the spirit of the people.

§ 48

In a Constitution the main feature of interest is the self-development
of the rational, that is, the political condition of a people; the
setting free of the successive elements of the Idea: so that the several
powers in the State manifest themselves as separate, – attain their
appropriate and special perfection, – and yet in this independent
condition, work together for one object, and are held together by it –
i.e., form an organic whole. The State is thus the embodiment of
rational freedom, realising and recognising itself in an objective form.
For its objectivity consists in this, – that its successive stages are
not merely ideal, but are present in an appropriate reality; and that in
their separate and several working, they are absolutely merged in that
agency by which the totality – the soul – the individual unity – is
produced, and of which it is the result.

§ 49

The State is the Idea of Spirit in the external manifestation of human
Will and its Freedom. It is to the State, therefore, that change in the
aspect of History indissolubly attaches itself; and the successive
phases of the Idea manifest themselves in it as distinct political
principles. The Constitutions under which World-Historical peoples have
reached their culmination, are peculiar to them; and therefore do not
present a generally applicable political basis. Were it otherwise, the
differences of similar constitutions would consist only in a peculiar
method of expanding and developing that generic basis; whereas they
really originate in diversity of principle. From the comparison
therefore of the political institutions of the ancient World-Historical
peoples, it so happens, that for the most recent principle of a
Constitution – for the principle of our own times – nothing (so to
speak) can be learned. In science and art it is quite otherwise; e. g.,
the ancient philosophy is so decidedly the basis of the modern, that it
is inevitably contained in the latter, and constitutes its basis. In
this case the relation is that of a continuous development of the same
structure, whose foundation-stone, walls, and roof have remained what
they were. In Art, the Greek itself, in its original form, furnishes us
the best models. But in regard to political constitution, it is quite
otherwise: here the Ancient and the Modern have not their essential
principle in common. Abstract definitions and dogmas respecting just
government, – importing that intelligence and virtue ought to bear sway
– are, indeed, common to both. But nothing is so absurd as to look to
Greeks, Romans, or Orientals, for models for the political arrangements
of our time. From the East may be derived beautiful pictures of a
patriarchal condition, of paternal government, and of devotion to it on
the part of peoples; from Greeks and Romans, descriptions of popular
liberty. Among the latter we find the idea of a Free Constitution
admitting all the citizens to a share in deliberations and resolves
respecting the affairs and laws of the Commonwealth. In our times, too,
this is its general acceptation; only with this modification, that –
since our States are so large, and there are so many of “the Many,” the
latter, – direct action being impossible, – should by the indirect
method of elective substitution express their concurrence with resolves
affecting the common weal; that is, that for legislative purposes
generally, the people should be represented by deputies. The so-called
Representative Constitution is that form of government with which we
connect the idea of a free constitution, and this notion has become a
rooted prejudice. On this theory People and Government are separated.
But there is a perversity in this antithesis; an ill-intentioned ruse
designed to insinuate that the People are the totality of the State.
Besides, the basis of this view is the principle of isolated
individuality – the absolute validity of the subjective will – a dogma
which we have already investigated. The great point is, that Freedom in
its Ideal conception has not subjective will and caprice for its
principle, but the recognition of the universal will; and that the
process by which Freedom is realised is the free development of its
successive stages. The subjective will is a merely formal determination
– a carte blanche – not including what it is that is willed. Only the
rational will is that universal principle which independently determines
and unfolds its own being, and develops its successive elemental phases
as organic members. Of this Gothic-cathedral architecture the ancients
knew nothing.

§ 50 / PAGE #48

At an earlier stage of the discussion, we established the two elemental
considerations: first, the idea of freedom as the absolute and final
aim; secondly, the means for realising it, i.e. the subjective side of
knowledge and will, with its life, movement, and activity. We then
recognised the State as the moral Whole and the Reality of Freedom, and
consequently as the objective unity of these two elements. For although
we make this distinction into two aspects for our consideration, it must
be remarked that they are intimately connected; and that their
connection is involved in the idea of each when examined separately. We
have, on the one hand, recognised the Idea in the definite form of
Freedom conscious of and willing itself, – having itself alone as its
object: involving at the same time, the pure and simple Idea of Reason,
and likewise, that which we have called subject – self-consciousness –
Spirit actually existing in the World. If, on the other hand, we
consider Subjectivity, we find that subjective knowledge and will is
Thought. But by the very act of thoughtful cognition and volition, I
will the universal object – the substance of absolute Reason. We
observe, therefore, an essential union between the objective side – the
Idea, – and the subjective side – the personality that conceives and
wills it. – The objective existence of this union is the State, which is
therefore the basis and centre of the other concrete elements of the
life of a people, – of Art, of Law, of Morals, of Religion, of Science.
All the activity of Spirit has only this object – the becoming conscious
of this union, i.e., of its own Freedom. Among the forms of this
conscious union Religion occupies the highest position. In it, Spirit –
rising above the limitations of temporal and secular existence – becomes
conscious of the Absolute Spirit, and in this consciousness of the
self-existent Being, renounces its individual interest; it lays this
aside in Devotion – a state of mind in which it refuses to occupy itself
any longer with the limited and particular. By Sacrifice man expresses
his renunciation of his property, his will, his individual feelings. The
religious concentration of the soul appears in the form of feeling; it
nevertheless passes also into reflection; a form of worship (cultus) is
a result of reflection. The second form of the union of the objective
and subjective in the human spirit is Art. This advances farther into
the realm of the actual and sensuous than Religion. In its noblest walk
it is occupied with representing, not indeed, the Spirit of God, but
certainly the Form of God; and in its secondary aims, that which is
divine and spiritual generally. Its office is to render visible the
Divine; presenting it to the imaginative and intuitive faculty. But the
True is the object not only of conception and feeling, as in Religion, –
and of Intuition, as in Art, – but also of the thinking faculty; and
this gives us the third form of the union in question – Philosophy. This
is consequently the highest, freest, and wisest phase. Of course we are
not intending to investigate these three phases here; they have only
suggested themselves in virtue of their occupying the same general
ground as the object here considered – the State.

§ 51 / PAGE #50

The general principle which manifests itself and becomes an object of
consciousness in the State, – the form under which all that the State
includes is brought, is the whole of that cycle of phenomena which
constitutes the culture of a nation. But the definite substance that
receives the form of universality, and exists in that concrete reality
which is the State, – is the Spirit of the People itself. The actual
State is animated by this spirit, in all its particular affairs – its
Wars, Institutions, &c. But man must also attain a conscious realisation
of this his Spirit and essential nature, and of his original identity
with it. For we said that morality is the identity of the subjective or
personal with the universal will. Now the mind must give itself an
express consciousness of this; and the focus of this knowledge is
Religion. Art and Science are only various aspects and forms of the same
substantial being. In considering Religion, the chief point of enquiry
is whether it recognises the True – the Idea – only in its separate,
abstract form, or in its true unity; in separation – God being
represented in an abstract form as the Highest Being, Lord of Heaven and
Earth, living in a remote region far from human actualities, – or in its
unity, – God, as Unity of the Universal and Individual; the Individual
itself assuming the aspect of positive and real existence in the idea of
the Incarnation. Religion is the sphere in which a nation gives itself
the definition of that which it regards as the True. A definition
contains everything that belongs to the essence of an object; reducing
its nature to its simple characteristic predicate, as a mirror for every
predicate, – the generic soul Pervading all its details. The conception
of God, therefore, constitutes the general basis of a people’s character.

§ 52

In this aspect, religion stands in the closest connection with the
political principle. Freedom can exist only where Individuality is
recognised as having its positive and real existence in the Divine
Being. The connection may be further explained thus: – Secular
existence, as merely temporal – occupied with particular interests – is
consequently only relative and unauthorised; and receives its validity
only in as far as the universal soul that pervades it – its principle –
receives absolute validity; which it cannot have unless it is recognised
as the definite manifestation, the phenomenal existence of the Divine
Essence. On this account it is that the State rests on Religion.

PAGE #51

We hear this often repeated in our times, though for the most part
nothing further is meant than that individual subjects as God-fearing
men would be more disposed and ready to perform their duty; since
obedience to King and Law so naturally follows in the train of reverence
for God. This reverence, indeed, since it exalts the general over the
special, may even turn upon the latter, – become fanatical, – and work
with incendiary and destructive violence against the State, its
institutions, and arrangements. Religious feeling, therefore, it is
thought, should be sober – kept in a certain degree of coolness, – that
it may not storm against and bear down that which should be defended and
preserved by it. The possibility of such a catastrophe is at least
latent in it.

§ 53

While, however, the correct sentiment is adopted, that the State is
based on Religion, the position thus assigned to Religion supposes the
State already to exist; and that subsequently, in order to maintain it,
Religion must be brought into it – buckets and bushels as it were – and
impressed upon people’s hearts. It is quite true that men must be
trained to religion, but not as to something whose existence has yet to
begin. For in affirming that the State is based on Religion – that it
has its roots in it – we virtually assert that the former has proceeded
from the latter; and that this derivation is going on now and will
always continue; i.e., the principles of the State must be regarded as
valid in and for themselves, which can only be in so far as they are
recognised as determinate manifestations of the Divine Nature. The form
of Religion, therefore, decides that of the State and its constitution.
The latter actually originated in the particular religion adopted by the
nation; so that, in fact, the Athenian or the Roman State was possible
only in connection with the specific form of Heathenism existing among
the respective peoples; just as a Catholic State has a spirit and
constitution different from that of a Protestant one.

§ 54

If that outcry – that urging and striving for the implantation of
Religion in the community – were an utterance of anguish and a call for
help, as it often seems to be, expressing the danger of religion having
vanished, or being about to vanish entirely from the State, – that would
be fearful indeed – worse in fact than this outcry supposes; for it
implies the belief in a resource against the evil, viz., the
implantation and inculcation of religion; whereas religion is by no
means a thing to be so produced; its self-production (and there can be
no other) lies much deeper.

§ 55 / PAGE #52

“*ANOTHER* *AND* *OPPOSITE* *FOLLY* *WHICH* *WE* *MEET* *WITH* *IN*
*OUR* *TIME* *IS* *THAT* *OF* *PRETENDING* *TO* *INVENT* *AND* *CARRY*
*OUT* *POLITICAL* *CONSTITUTIONS* *INDEPENDENTLY* *OF* *RELIGION*.

Whilst it may continue to function as an acceptable METHODOLOGY {ARCH
KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} with an encapsulated sphere of
operation {

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE} <-- *AS* *THE* *FOUNDATION* *STONE*
(*USURPING* @1 = *SOVEREIGN* / #CENTRE @5 = *LAST* *WILL*, *TESTAMENT*
*OF* #INR *BEING* *THE* *BINDING* *NORM* (*NORMA* *OBLIGANS* ) *ON* #33
AD) *MAGIC* *SQUARE*

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{99}&idea:{297}>

#1 (9) - OUHOUYAH (King-Seraphim) = #1
#9 (8) - HAZIEL (King-Cherubim) = #10
#17 (7) - LEVYAH (King-Throne) = #27
#25 (6) - NETEHYAH (King-Dominion) = #52 <-- *THEY* *ARE* *AS* *THE
*SONS* *OF* *DARKNESS* *NOT* *THE* *SONS* *OF* *LIGHT* / *GOD* *AS* #123

#33 (5) - YHOUYAH (King-Powers) = #85
#41 (4) - HEHAHEL (King-Virtues) = #126
#49 (3) - OHOUEL (King-Principalities) = #175 <-- *VENUS* (7x7 = #49 /
#175) *USE* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *AS* *AN* *ANTHROPIC* *PROTOTYPE*

#57 (2) - NEMAMYAH (King-Archangels) = #232
#65 (1) - DAMBYAN (King-Angels) = #297

42 2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}

43 3 59
51 35 19
11 67 27 = #105 / #315 {#THREE}

44 4 60
52 36 20
12 68 28 = #108 / #324 {#FOUR}

74 81 76
79 77 75
78 73 80 = #231 - #108 = #123 / #693 - #369 = #324 {#TEN} AS RETURN TO
GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE BEING ITSELF

}, it is entirely a specious notion to declare it is the root and causal
basis of the perennialist philosophical tradition.

45 5 61
53 37 21
13 69 29

= #111 / #333 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}"

*THE* *CATHOLIC* *CONFESSION*, *ALTHOUGH* *SHARING* *THE* *CHRISTIAN*
*NAME* *WITH* *THE* *PROTESTANT*, *DOES* *NOT* *CONCEDE* *TO* *THE*
*STATE* *AN* *INHERENT* *JUSTICE* *AND* *MORALITY*, – *A* *CONCESSION*
*WHICH* *IN* *THE* *PROTESTANT* *PRINCIPLE* *IS* *FUNDAMENTAL*. This
tearing away of the political morality of the Constitution from its
natural connection, is necessary to the genius of that religion,
inasmuch as it does not recognise Justice and Morality as independent
and substantial. But thus excluded from intrinsic worth, – torn away
from their last refuge – the sanctuary of conscience – the calm retreat
where religion has its abode, – the principles and institutions of
political legislation are destitute of a real centre, to the same decree
as they are compelled to remain abstract and indefinite.

§ 56

Summing up what has been said of the State, we find that we have been
led to call its vital principle, as actuating the individuals who
compose it, – Morality. The State, its laws, its arrangements,
constitute the rights of its members; its natural features, its
mountains, air, and waters, are their country, their fatherland, their
outward material property; the history of this State, their deeds; what
their ancestors have produced, belongs to them and lives in their
memory. All is their possession, just as they are possessed by it; for
it constitutes their existence, their being.

§ 57

Their imagination is occupied with the ideas thus presented, while the
adoption of these laws, and of a fatherland so conditioned is the
expression of their will. It is this matured totality which thus
constitutes one Being, the spirit of one People. To it the individual
members belong; each unit is the Son of his Nation, and at the same time
– in as far as the State to which he belongs is undergoing development –
the Son of his Age. None remains behind it, still less advances beyond
it. This spiritual Being (the Spirit of his Time) is his; he is a
representative of it; it is that in which he originated, and in which he
lives. Among the Athenians the word Athens had a double import;
suggesting primarily, a complex of Political institutions, but no less,
in the second place, that Goddess who represented the Spirit of the
People and its unity {ie. #49 (3) - OHOUEL (King-Principalities) = #175
<-- *VENUS* (7x7 = #49 / #175) *USE* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *AS* *AN*
*ANTHROPIC* *PROTOTYPE*}. This Spirit of a People is a determinate and
particular Spirit, and is, as just stated, further modified by the
degree of its historical development. This Spirit, then, constitutes the
basis and substance of those other forms of a nation’s consciousness,
which have been noticed. For Spirit in its self-consciousness must
become a object of contemplation to itself, and objectivity involves, in
the first instance, the rise of differences which make up a total of
distinct spheres of objective spirit; in the same way as the Soul exists
only as the complex of its faculties, which in their form of
concentration in a simple unity produce that Soul. It is thus One
Individuality which, presented in its essence as God, is honoured and
enjoyed in Religion; which is exhibited as an object of sensuous
contemplation in Art; and is apprehended as an intellectual conception
in Philosophy. In virtue of the original identity of their essence,
purport, and object, these various forms are inseparably united with the
Spirit of the State. Only in connection with this particular religion
can this particular political constitution exist; just as in such or
such a State, such or such a Philosophy or order of Art." [Georg Wilhelm
Friedrich Hegel. Hegel (27 August 1770 – 14 November 1831) Philosophy of
History, III. Philosophic History, ii. The Essential Destiny of Reason,
(3) The Embodiment Spirit Assumes – the State]

<https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/hi/history4.htm>

#1, #9, #10, #30, #20 = tuwl (H2904): {#6 as #45} 1) to hurl, cast; 1a)
(Pilpel) to throw away, carry away, hurl; 1b) (Hiphil) to throw, cast,
cast out; 1c) (Hophal); 1c1) to be hurled, hurled down; 1c2) to be cast,
be thrown, be cast out, be thrown down; #9, #10, #50, #1 = tiyn
(Aramaic) (H2917): {#7 as #69} 1) clay; #10, #30, #30 = yelel (H3214):
{#8 as #70} 1) a howling (of beasts); #6, #2, #40, #8, #6, #3, #5 =
mechuwgah (H4230): {#9 as #62} 1) circle-instrument, compass; #40, #20,
#10 = Makiy (H4352): {#10 as #70} 1) father of Geuel the Gadite who was
one of the 12 spies of Israel; #10, #50, #6, #2, #2 = nuwb (H5107): {#11
as #58} 1) to bear fruit; 1a) (Qal) to bear fruit; 1b) (Pilel) to make
to flourish (fig.); #6, #50, #6, #8 = nuwach (H5118): {#12 as #64} 1)
resting place; #50, #8, #2, #10 = Nachbiy (H5147): {#13 as #70} 1) son
of Vophsi, a Naphtalite, and one of the 12 spies sent to spy out the
promised land; #6, #50, #10, #4 = niyd (H5205): {#14 as #64} 1)
quivering (motion) of lips; #4, #5, #10, #50, #1 = deina (G1170): {#15
as #70} 1) such a one, a certain one, ie. one whose name I cannot call
on the instant, or whose name it is of no importance to mention;

EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #13 -
Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending,
Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back / INNER: #13 - Status,
Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back} #13 has 10 Categories:

#1, #5, #6, #1 = 'Ahava' (H163): {#0 as #13} 1) town or area in
Babylonia {incongruity; confusion; mixture}; #1, #7, #4, #1 = 'azad
(Aramaic) (H230): {#1 as #12} 1) (P'al) to be gone; #2, #3, #6, #2 = Gob
(H1359): {#2 as #5} 1) a place which was the scene of two encounters
between David's {well-beloved, dear} warriors and the Philistines {those
who dwell in villages} (also Gezer {dividing, sentence}); #3, #2, #8 =
gibbeach (H1371): {#3 as #13} 1) to be high, bald (in the forehead),
having a bald forehead; #3, #4, #6 = gedad (Aramaic) (H1414): {#4 as
#11} 1) to cut down, hew down;

#3, #5, #5 = gehah (H1456): {#5 as #13} 1) *A* *CURE*, *A* *HEALING*;

#6, #5, #2 = Vaheb (H2052): {#6 as #13} 1) a place in Moab, site
unknown; #7, #2, #4 = zebed (H2065): {#7 as #13} 1) endowment, gift; #7,
#6 = zuw (H2098): {#8 as #13} 1) this, such rel pron; 2) (of) which,
(of) whom; #5, #3, #5 = yagah (H3014): {#9 as #18} 1) (Hiphil) to repel,
thrust away, push away;

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:8,col:7,nous:3&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS&LEXICON:BIBLE&idea:{97}&idea:{274}&idea:{92}&idea:{333}>

I’m planning on providing this update discussion as a gift later today
accompanying some chapter drafts when I have my final consultation visit
with my special orthopaedic surgeon with the caveat that he ought to
look beyond the semantics of opportunism which are provided by the
Hebrew / Greek lexicon by which I can demonstrate the proof of
conception truth of the 1784 noumena theory as an impossibly articulated
by Immanuel Kantian within “Critique of Pure Reason” by my #231
appraisal of a certain 1941 narrative which was a certain shocking import.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Budgie.pdf>

IDEA @52 ON EVENING 25 October 1941 - JEWS RESPONSIBLE FOR TWO WORLD
WARS — HOW PAST CIVILISATIONS ARE EFFACED — THE REWRITING OF HISTORY —
THE LIBRARIES OF ANTIQUITY — CHRISTIANITY AND BOLSHEVISM, AIM AT
DESTRUCTION — NERO DID NOT BURN ROME {AD 64} —PROTESTANT HYPOCRISY — THE
CATHOLIC CHURCH THRIVES ON SIN — ACCOUNTS TO BE SETTLED — THE MODERNIST
MOVEMENT — THE PROBLEM OF THE CONVENTS:

SPECIAL GUESTS: REICHSFUEHRER SS HIMMLER AND *SS* *GENERAL*
(*OBERGRUPPENFUEHRER*) *HEYDRICH* (*HIGH*-*RANKING* *GERMAN* *NAZI*
*OFFICIAL* *DURING* *WORLD* *WAR* *II*, *AND* *A* *MAIN* *ARCHITECT*
*OF* *THE* *HOLOCAUST*)

PAGE #87 - RUMOURS OF EXTERMINATION OF JEWS

From the rostrum of the Reichstag I prophesied to Jewry that, in the
event of war's proving inevitable, the Jew would disappear from Europe.
That race of criminals has on its conscience the two million dead of the
first World War, and now already hundreds of thousands more. Let nobody
tell me that all the same we can't park them in the marshy parts of
Russia! Who's worrying about our troops? It's not a bad idea, by the
way, that public rumour attributes to us a plan to exterminate the Jews.
Terror is a salutary thing.

*THE* *ATTEMPT* *TO* *CREATE* *A* *JEWISH* *STATE* *WILL* *BE* *A*
*FAILURE*.

The book that contains the reflections of the Emperor Julian should be
circulated in millions. What wonderful intelligence, what discernment,
all the wisdom of antiquity! It's extra- ordinary.

ACCORDING TO WIKIPEDIA: Julian (Latin: Flavius Claudius Iulianus
Augustus[a]; Greek: Φλάβιος Κλαύδιος Ἰουλιανὸς Αὔγουστος; 331/332 – 26
June 363), also known as Julian the Apostate, was Roman Emperor from 361
to 363, as well as a notable philosopher and author in Greek.

A member of the Constantinian dynasty, Julian became Caesar over the
western provinces by order of Constantius II in 355, and in this role he
campaigned successfully against the Alamanni and Franks. Most notable
was his crushing victory over the Alamanni at the Battle of Argentoratum
(Strasbourg) in 357, leading his 13,000 men against a Germanic army
three times larger.

In 360 Julian was proclaimed Augustus by his soldiers at Lutetia
(Paris), sparking a civil war with Constantius. However, Constantius
died before the two could face each other in battle, and named Julian as
his successor.

In 363, Julian embarked on an ambitious campaign against the Sassanid
Empire. The campaign was initially successful, securing a victory
outside Ctesiphon, but during a skirmish Julian was mortally wounded,
leaving his army trapped in Persian territory. Following his death, the
Roman forces were obliged to cede territory in order to escape,
including the fortress city of Nisibis.

Julian was a man of unusually complex character: he was "the military
commander, the theosophist, the social reformer, and the man of
letters". *HE* *WAS* *THE* *LAST* *NON*-*CHRISTIAN* *RULER* *OF* *THE*
*ROMAN* *EMPIRE*, *AND* *HE* *BELIEVED* *THAT* *IT* *WAS* *NECESSARY*
*TO* *RESTORE* *THE* *EMPIRE'S* *ANCIENT* *ROMAN* *VALUES* *AND*
*TRADITIONS* {

ACCORDING TO 'HITLER'S TABLE TALK': IDEA @I / PAGE #3 THE *FASCIST*
*MOVEMENT* *IS* *A* *SPONTANEOUS* *RETURN* *TO* *THE* *TRADITIONS* *OF*
*ANCIENT* *ROME* {strength}

} *IN* *ORDER* *TO* *SAVE* *IT* *FROM* *DISSOLUTION*. [Athanassiadi,
'Julian and Hellenism', p. 88]

He purged the top-heavy state bureaucracy, and attempted to revive
traditional Roman religious practices at the expense of Christianity.
Julian also forbade the Christians from teaching classical texts and
learning. His rejection of the Christianity imposed on him in his youth,
and his *promotion* *of* *Neoplatonic* *Hellenism* {ie. Pythagorean
binomial theory of number} in its place caused him to be remembered as
Julian the Apostate by the church.
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_(emperor)>]

PAGE #89 - CATHOLICS AND PROTESTANTS

Christianity set itself systematically to destroy ancient culture.

What came to us was passed down by chance, or else it was a product of
Roman liberal writers. Perhaps we are entirely ignorant of humanity's
most precious spiritual treasures. Who can know what was there?

The Papacy was faithful to these tactics even during recorded history.
How did people behave, during the age of the great explorations, towards
the spiritual riches of Central America?

*IN* *OUR* *PARTS* *OF* *THE* *WORLD*, *THE* *JEWS* *WOULD* *HAVE*
*IMMEDIATELY* *ELIMINATED* *SCHOPENHAUER*, *NIETZSCHE* *AND* *KANT* {

HOWEVER WITHIN IDEA @233 ON PAGES #513 - GERMAN BIBLE TRANSLATION
CONDEMNED / PAGE #514 - THE VALUE OF ASTRONOMY, ADOLF HITLER DOES NOT
CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY OF A THEORETICAL NOTION AS KANT POSTULATES OF A
NOUMENON: "*AS* *A* *SANE* *GERMAN*, *ONE* *IS* *FLABBERGASTED* *TO*
*THINK* *THAT* *GERMAN* *HUMAN* *BEINGS* *COULD* *HAVE* *LET*
*THEMSELVES* *BE* *BROUGHT* *TO* *SUCH* *A* *PASS* *BY* *JEWISH* *FILTH*
*AND* *PRIESTLY* *TWADDLE*, that they were little different from the
howling dervish of the Turks and the negroes, at whom we laugh so
scornfully. It angers one to think that, while in other parts of the
globe religious teaching like that of Confucius, Buddha and Mohammed
offers an undeniably broad basis for the religious-minded, Germans
should have been duped by a theological exposition devoid of all honest
depth.

When one seeks reasons for these *PHENOMENA*, *ONE* *IS* *IMMEDIATELY*
*STRUCK* *BY* *THE* *EXTENT* *TO* *WHICH* *THE* *HUMAN* *BRAIN* *REACTS*
*TO* *EXTERNAL* *INFLUENCE*."

I QUOTE: "In the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be
applied to data provided by sensibility in order to provide cognition,
and because the data of sensibility are structured by the
transcenden­tally ideal forms of intuition, the categories give us
knowledge only of things as they appear with sensibility ("phenomena,"
literally "that which appears").

Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of
objects independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can never
cognize them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that
which is thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of
Kant's use of the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of
"noumena" is not, since it literally means not "things as they are in­
dependently of appearing to us" but something more like "things as they
are understood by pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human
understanding can comprehend things in the latter way."

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>

*THUS* *I* *AM* *PROFFERING* *AN* *INFORMED* *AND* *REASONED* *OPINION*
*AS* *THAT* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL* *KANT* *STATES* *IS* *AN* *IMPOSSIBILITY*
*FOR* *A* *HUMAN* *BEING* *TO* *ACCOMPLISH* *BY* *TRANSCENDENT*
*SAPIENTIAL* *THOUGHT* *AND* *CAPABLY* *DEMONSTRATE* *IT'S* *TEMPORAL*
*CONGRUENCE* *AS* *COHERENCE* *BY* *A* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL*
*NOUMENON* *AS* *AN* *INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL*
*KANT* *HIMSELF* *CALLS* *NOUMENA* *AS* *THE* *PROOF* *OF* *A* *VALID*
*AND* *RATIONAL* *CONCEPT* *ATTAINED* *BY* *PURE* *THOUGHT* *BUT* *MY*
*ANTAGONIST'S* *OPINIONS* *ARE* *ONLY* *A* *SELF*-*INFATUATION* *WITH*
*DELUSION* *AND* *MORE* *PROPERLY* *UNDERSTOOD* *IN* *TERMS* *OF*
*PSYCHOSIS*.

}. If the Bolsheviks had dominion over us for two hundred years, what
works of our past would be handed on to posterity? Our great men would
fall into oblivion, or else they'd be presented to future generations as
criminals and bandits.

I don't believe at all in the truth of certain mental pictures that many
people have of the Roman emperors. I'm sure that Nero didn't set fire to
Rome {68 AD}. It was the Christian-Bolsheviks who did that, just as the
Commune set fire to Paris in 1871 and the Communists set fire to the
Reichstag in 1932.

There is a form of hypocrisy, typically Protestant, that is impudence
itself. Catholicism has this much good about it, that it ignores the
moral strictness of the Evangelicals. In Catholic regions life is more
endurable, for the priest himself succumbs more easily to human
weaknesses. So he permits his flock not to dramatise sin. How would the
Church earn her living, if not by the sins of the faithful? She declares
herself satisfied if one goes to confession. Indulgence, at a tariff,
supplies the Church with her daily bread. As for the fruits of sin, the
soul that fears limbo is a candidate for baptism, that is to say,
another customer, and so business goes on! It is a fact that in Catholic
parts of the world there are many more illegitimate births than in
Protestant parts.

In Austria, Protestantism was free of all bigotry. It was truly a
movement of protest against Catholicism. Moreover, these Protestants
were entirely devoted to the German cause.

A scandal is that, when a believer leaves a particular faith, he is
compelled to pay the ecclesiastical tax for another year. A simple
statement should be enough to free him at once from owing anything
further. We'll put all that right as soon as we have peace again.

-----------

IRREPARABLE HARM DONE TO A CERTAIN CULT OF PERSONALITY
We haven’t yet by 7 January 2018, finished what is only a superficial
two day analysis of Hitler’s Table Talk and I have undertaken the task
reluctantly, being without any infatuation directed towards the
individual as impetus and within the obstructions as the restraints of
inadequacy and resourcefulness which is my education. Or rather a lack
thereof. Which, if I sought such further opportunities in particular
that of psychology, would greatly assist my cursory and informal as
haphazard approach to the project.

But it ought to be remembered, that I by reasonable thought, invented
the very tool which is prerequisite to an undertaking of my analysis and
has yielded such fertile consequence. I would therefore provisionally
conclude from the #231 preliminary assessment which we disclose below,
as to it being associated to a systematic and insidious assertion made
upon the MIND of the population.

However given this cult of personality which he has clearly exhibited as
most apparent even within the short duration of our attention to the
matter as the process of informing and the knowing, also had exhibited
an immutable and an irrational aggression towards the biblical narrative
itself wherein my entire (excepting for the Dao as the Mother of
Governance) trinomial mathematical paradigm of sapient MIND as
theoretical noumenon by which I appraised him, is embedded.

That the maxim: “a house divided by itself would most certainly have
fallen.”

Is a truism if ever there was one so uttered.

I’m at the stage of writing this attention point, currently up-to #150
pages and I anticipate finishing our introduction into a proof of
concept in the existence of what is Immanuel Kant’s meaning of the term
"noumena" as not which is self evident, since it literally means not
"things as they are in dependently of appearing to us" but something
more like "things as they are understood by pure thought."


“And I have seen wonders.
And I have seen miracles
Oh, I have seen some things...”

Yet Kant appears to deny that the human understanding can comprehend
things in the latter way."

I’m not as advanced on the next revision of the Grapple prototype as I
had desired to be since I have been more focussed upon writing such
narrative as above for the past little while as that which dispels
decades of *FAKE* *NEWS* promulgated by the Papal Authority itself.

ROSA FLORES (CNN) @ 2245 HOURS ON 24 JANUARY 2018: “POPE WARNS AGAINST
'FAKE NEWS' AND LIKENS IT TO 'CRAFTY SERPENT' IN GENESIS:

Pope Francis released a message condemning "fake news," saying that it's
a "sign of intolerant and hypersensitive attitudes, and leads only to
the spread of arrogance and hatred."

The Vatican says the message is part of the Pope's World Communications
Day, but some at St. Peter's Square say the Pope was probably sending a
message to Donald Trump and other world leaders who have been using the
phrase "fake news."

The tragic history of human sin, the Pope says in his message, is the
first "fake news" and it dates back to the book of Genesis, when the
"crafty serpent" lied to the woman. In present day, according to the
Pope's message the fast digital world helps fuel the spread of "fake
news" -- which he defines as "the spreading of disinformation on line or
in the traditional media."

"Spreading fake news can serve to advance specific goals, influence
political decisions and serve economic interests," the Pope said.

The Pope's message blames the difficulty in unmasking and eliminating
fake news to people interacting with homogeneous news environments
rather than listening to differing perspectives and opinions.

"Disinformation thus thrives on the absence of healthy confrontation
with other sources of information that could effectively challenge
prejudices and generate constructive dialogue; instead, it risks turning
people into unwilling accomplices in spreading biased and baseless
ideas," the Pope's message said.

POPE ON HOW TO COMBAT FAKE NEWS
Journalism that seeks the truth, the Pope's message says, is the way to
overcome this "fake news" phenomenon. And hence his dedication of World
Day of Communication to "'The truth will set you free'. Fake news and
journalism for peace."

"I would like to contribute to our shared commitment to stemming the
spread of fake news and to rediscovering the dignity of journalism and
the personal responsibility of journalists to communicate the truth.

"Praiseworthy efforts are being made to create educational programs
aimed at helping people to interpret and assess information provided by
the media, and teaching them to take an active part in unmasking
falsehoods, rather than unwittingly contributing to the spread of
disinformation."

Catholics have been observing World Communication day since 1967. The
Pope's message is traditionally published on January 24 during the day
of the feast of St. Francis de Sales, the patron saint of journalists.
Catholics don't celebrate World Communication Day until May 13, but the
announcement is made early to give bishops and priests time to prepare
for local and national celebrations.

Pope Francis has fallen victim to fake news himself. First when a fake
news site falsely reported the Pope endorsed Hillary Clinton for
President. And then again, when another fake news site falsely reported
he endorsed Donald Trump for President.”

<http://edition.cnn.com/2018/01/24/world/pope-condemns-fake-news/index.html>

Nous: #10
Time: 16:30 hrs
Date: 2018.11.30
Torah: #20 #30 #10 %81 = #60
Dao: Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?
Tetra: #41 - Response
I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net

Latin: Assistens {God prompt to grant} Alt: Menqel {Libation Bowl of God} {

1. SERVES TO MAKE KNOWN THE TRUTH. AIDS THE TRIUMPH OF INNOCENCE
2. PROMPT HELP IN TRIALS
3. WITNESSES
4. Tepisatosoa
}

Solar Eclipse: 13 (UTC) / 14 November 2012 (AEST)

Nahor {Snorting, Hoarse; dry; hot}

Transformative Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#371 / #393} / HETEROS {#287 / #432}


<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:7,col:4,nous:10&idea:{82}&idea:{371}&idea:{83}&idea:{393}>

***@zen: 3, row: 7, col: 4, nous: 10 [Super: #371 / #2 - Contrast
of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 - Peace, Pervading, Greatness;
Tetra: 16 - Contact, Ego: #393 / #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be
Done?; I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire,
The net; Tetra: 41 - Response]

HERE'S WHY AUSTRALIA'S PARLIAMENT USES SANDGLASSES WHEN THERE'S A
DIVISION IN THE HOUSE:

“Australia’s parliamentary traditions and conventions change over time.
For example, when a vote (or ‘division’) {

#371 as #8, #80, #5, #10, #9, #8, #200, #1, #50 = apeitheo (G544): {#10
as #910} 1) not to allow one's self to be persuaded; 2) not to comply
with; 1a) to refuse or withhold belief; 1b) to refuse belief and obedience

} is called, senators have four minutes to get to the chamber {

#371 as #30, #40, #100, #200, #1 = miqra' (H4744): {#4 as #341} 1)
convocation, convoking, reading, a calling together; 1a) convocation,
sacred assembly; 1b) convoking; 1c) reading; / #6, #70, #90, #200, #5 =
`atsarah (H6116): {#5 as #365} 1) assembly, solemn assembly; 1a)
assembly (sacred or festive meeting); 1b) assemblage, company, group}.

Back in 1975 that increased from two minutes to three, when a new
extension to Old Parliament House made the journey {

#371 as #6, #10, #200, #40, #60, #50, #5 = ramac (H7429): {#8 as #300}
1) to trample; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to trample; 1a2) trampler (participle);
1b) (Niphal) to be trampled

} from committee rooms to the chamber a little longer. The current
four-minute limit was introduced in 1988, when Australian democracy
moved up the hill to to the much bigger, current Parliament House.

The time given to MPs {

#371 as #20, #1, #50, #300 = 'enash (Aramaic) (H606): {#0 as #351} 1)
man, human being; 2) mankind (collective)

} is necessary, but the way the gap is timed – with a sandglass {

#371 as #20, #1, #200, #90, #20, #40 = 'erets (H776): {#2 as #291} 1)
land, earth; lands, countries; 1a) earth; 1a1) whole earth (as opposed
to a part); 1a2) earth (as opposed to heaven); 1a3) earth (inhabitants);
1b) land; 1b1) country, territory; 1b2) district, region; 1b3) tribal
territory; 1b4) piece of ground; 1b5) land of Canaan, Israel; 1b6)
inhabitants of land; 1b7) Sheol, land without return, (under) world;
1b8) city (-state); 1c) ground, surface of the earth; 1c1) ground; 1c2)
soil; 1d) (in phrases); 1d1) people of the land; 1d2) space or distance
of country (in measurements of distance); 1d3) level or plain country;
1d4) land of the living; 1d5) end(s) of the earth; 1e) (almost wholly
late in usage); 1e1a) often in contrast to Canaan

} – doesn’t seem necessary at all. And it turns out the sandglasses are
not just ornamental. They’re really used for timekeeping (but with a
catch). The parliament’s website explains:

Until 1989, it [the Annotated Standing Orders] contained references to a
sand-glass kept on the Table for the purpose of timing divisions. The
Clerk was responsible for turning the sand-glass and the time was taken
to have elapsed when the sand-glass so indicated. References to this
antique but reliable technology were removed in the course of the 1989
revision to free the principle from reliance on any particular technology.

Although sand-glasses continue to be used as the primary means of timing
the division or quorum bells {

#393 as #300, #10, #7, #70, #6 = zuwa` (H2111): {#0 as #83} 1) to
tremble, quiver, quake, be in terror; 1a) (Qal) to tremble, quake; 1b)
(Pilpel); 1b1) to shake violently; 1b2) to cause to tremble;

"In the day when the keepers of the house shall tremble {zuwa`-moved
[H2111]: #393}, and the strong men shall bow themselves, and the
grinders cease because they are few, and those that look out of the
windows be darkened..." [Ecclesiastes 12:3 (KJV)]

"Shall they not rise up suddenly that shall bite thee, and awake that
shall vex {zuwa`-moved [H2111]: #393} thee, and thou shalt be for
booties unto them?" [Habakkuk 2:7 (KJV)]

#393 as #8, #90, #90, #200, #5 = chatsotserah (H2689): {#2 as #399} 1)
trumpet, clarion

}, they are now used in conjunction with the digital speech timer. An
advantage of the latter is that it enables a time signal to be broadcast
on the House Monitoring Service which shows senators how much time
remains for them to reach the chamber. In practice, the Chair takes
whichever methodology expires last as a signal to call for the doors to
be locked.

Note “antique but reliable”, but also references to using it were
removed in 1989 “to free the principle from reliance on any particular
technology”.

Justin Baker, assistant director of the Chamber Research Office in the
Department of the House of Representatives, explained to Business
Insider why they continue to use what looks like a giant egg timer.

Hansard records reveal a reference to a sandglass being used for
divisions back in 1901 “so they have likely been a feature of the
parliament since Federation”.

When the Central Table for the new Parliament House was commissioned, a
pair of sandglasses was included in the brief by the Parliament amongst
other items, such as bronze brackets to support the Mace, pigeon hole
book stands, digital clocks, call bells and microphones.

“A stand with a wooden base and green felt underneath for the
sandglasses was purpose built for the Clerk’s desk within the Chamber,”
Baker said. “In 1998, a new stand and glasses were designed and
manufactured to accommodate an additional sandglass.”

That’s right – they bought another one.

<https://www.businessinsider.com.au/heres-why-australias-parliament-uses-sandglasses-when-theres-a-division-in-the-house-2015-6>

Waking up during the night (as you can appreciate of such maelstrom
reality) so as to newsgroup post doesn’t lend itself to a frame of mind
fruitful for programming.

But I have decided now make incremental releases of the developer
progress updates with this link:

<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html>

I’m still to trace through the debugging of the .jackNote span
function() which isn’t yet finished it’s testing phase as it presently
clearly gives the wrong values for the @memeBrain bubble cascades.

But I will work on it as I can as I imagine my narrative output will
diminish for the next few months.

However I have partially implemented an update of the TAXONOMY() and the
calcTelos() functions which may still be micro modified and have enabled
the possibility of the @memeBrain elements being displayed individually
as either SUPER (MALE) or EGO (FEMALE) and this is in preparation for
the IDEA:{} object to be conveyed as either.

I envisioned an additional search option such as:

?CATEGORY:MALE&IDEA:{331}&IDEA:{237} &IDEA:{333}

or perhaps:

?IDEA:{331,M}&IDEA:{237,F}&IDEA:{333}

We shall see which is the better approach, but at this point I favour
the latter.

But what we have done within our written narrative is demonstrate that
there is no basis to the Sovereignty which the Vatican City-State claims
of itself (*THAT* *IT* *IS* *BY* *ITS* *GRECO*-*ROMAN* #231 *ROOTS*
*IDENTICAL* *TO* *GERMAN* *FASCISM* *DESPITE* *PAPAL* *ATTEMPTS* *TO*
**OTHERWISE* * CONVEY* *SUCH* *SIN* *OF* *FAKE* *NEWS*, and the Letters
Patent to the Federation of the Australian Commonwealth 1901 are not
only a valid basis (if not the only means) to define Sovereignty of a
nation but it’s ternary technological sapient basis is an exceptional
globalisation paradigm framework for all sorts agreements including
trade, taxation, science, knowledge sapient services, personalistics,
defence (etc) as having not only a linguistic basis but a technological
foundation of an exponential growth potential.

Such a framework {ie. in my view the SEPTET DRIVER as ENTELECHY with
INFINITE POTENTIAL rather than the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH’S ANKH as the
#72 ANTHROPIC TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE sinisterly provided within the
Greco-Roman magic square (as we have shown) as transformative prototype
is perhaps a better equivalent to the Medical Caduceus
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Medical_Caduceus.png>} as the means
for provisioning transactional and sapient services proving thereby by
its very use would be an enabler for a revenue stream (of which I
estimate from its global perspective be $10 billion a day in yet
untapped fiscal well of opportunity—but I leave such dreams of mine to
the experts in any sapient field) would thereby solve Britain’s National
Health Service (NHS) woes, but it will take some investment and time to
implement.

The cognitive hypothesis as the theoretical obvious concern of this
dialectic correspondence with this SEPTET driver to the mathematical
theoretical noumenon which provides by an equitable distribution of
trinomial number an ontological basis for the entelechy:

- the realization of potential.
- the supposed vital principle that guides the development and
functioning of an organism or other system or organization.
- such self-organization requires a special biological force which is
known as entelechy.
- the soul for the spiritus.
- the mathematical / electronic equivalent of stem cells is for others
to decide.

It therefore may be considered as quintessentially the 'INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS' of an unencumbered will and ought to conform
with the
following dialectic which chronicles the: levels / phases / stages /
duration / milestone of any perennial cycle as the dispensational
governance basis of LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA OF 1901 represented by a theoretical mathematical trinomial
MENTALISM: #1 - Will, free will, choice / Remember the Sabbath Day
CORRESPONDENCE: #2 - desire, inclination / Honour Parents
VIBRATION: #3 - disposition towards (something or someone) / Do Not Kill
POLARITY: #4 - favour, affection / Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid
Heteronomy Against Autonomy)
RHYTHM: #5 - last will, testament / Do Not Steal
CAUSE AND EFFECT: #6 - goal, object, purpose, intention / Do Not Bear
False
Witness
ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE: #7 - signification, import / Do Not Covet [LATIN
definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
The NOLUNTĀTIS is then a consequence of an opposition as consideration
being a question of relativity as the interoperability by mutuality
on what
#8 - TRANSFORMATIVE prototype is to be deployed where the default is the
#8 as TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE: #1 - unwillingness;
But this is in my view a matter of protocol selection which can be
identified by the classification duality of both the cryptographic # and
the vRUDOLPH DATE being determined by a cosmogonic observation as
computation of rational 22/7 from #0 of Equinox on Wednesday of 20 March
1996 associated to any EVENT as slider dispersal from calendar to the
noumenon.
The Autonomous Prototype is then the source amalgamation of the binomial,
trinomial and chrononomial (#YEAR, #DECADE, #CENTENARY and #MILLENNIUM
#9 as MIRRORED AUTONOMOUS PROTOTYPE OF EACH OTHER'S SOVEREIGN
AUTONOMY: #2
NOLUNTĀTIS]
There are more Intelligent people than me who can appraise that
consideration as solution to their problems.
TO THE
The greatest success of the NHS threatens to overwhelm it. Modern
medicine
has been hugely successful at keeping people alive, as the death
rates from
heart disease halve in a decade and cancer survival improves. Yet the
result is an ever-growing number of people who not only need continuing
treatment for these conditions, but now live long enough to get
dementia or
another disease on top.
NHS leaders know what they need to do: the service must change from one
centred on hospitals to one that makes better use of local clinics and
modern technology to control long-term conditions. If an older person
needs
a hospital bed, that should not be the start of treatment, but a sign
that
it has already failed.
Yet despite…”
<https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/solutions-are-obvious-but-painful-8xvxt6c7w>
*IMPORTANT* *NOTE*: That if this trinomial HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER a
priori as PARADIGM already has a conception of an INTELLECTUAL TETRAD
{#8 -
Transformation Prototype} which as CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY was
associated
to a LUNAR event upon the midnight solstice of 21 December 103 BCE and
published in 4 BCE is equivalent to the later implementation of
PYTHAGOREAN
binomial HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER as the basis for the Julian
calendar and
VIRTUE as MIND: {1 + 2 = #3} +
TOOLS as SCIENCE: {3 + 4 = #7} +
POSITION as OPINION: {5 + 6 = #11} +
TIME as SENSE: {7 + 8 = #15}
= #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal
Law +
H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity)
6x6 = #36 / #111 / #666 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}
Whilst it may continue to function as an acceptable METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI
TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} with an encapsulated sphere of
operation {
41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE}
42 2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}
43 3 59
51 35 19
11 67 27 = #105 / #315 {#THREE}
44 4 60
52 36 20
12 68 28 = #108 / #324 {#FOUR}
74 81 76
79 77 75
78 73 80 = #231 - #108 = #123 / #693 - #369 = #324 {#TEN} AS RETURN TO
GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE BEING ITSELF
}, it is entirely a specious notion to declare it is the root and causal
basis of the perennialist philosophical tradition.
ANGEL CORRESPONDENCES TO SUN (#111)
45 5 61
53 37 21*
13*69 29 = #111 / #333 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}
<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{111}&idea:{333}>
#5 (9) - MAHASHYAH (Seraphim-Virtues) = #5
#13 (8) - YEZLEL (Cherubim-Virtues) = #18
#21 (7) - NELKEL (Throne-Virtues) = #39
#29 (6) - RYIEL (Dominion-Virtues) = #68
#37 (5) - ANIEL (Powers-Virtues) = #105
<http://www.grapple369.com/gematria.html?umbra:{105}>
'H113' : {'xlit' : "ʼâdôwn", 'lingo' : 0, 'strongs' : "H113",
"aw-done'", 'lemma' : ["אָדוֹן"], 'link' : null, 'info' : "Or (shortened)
אָדֹן; from an unused root (meaning to rule); sovereign, i.e. controller
(human or divine); lord, master, owner. Compare also names beginning with
'Adoni-'.", 'gematria' : {'61' : [1, 4, 6, 50], '711' : [1, 4, 6, 700]},
'umbra' : {'91' : [20, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6], '100' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 5],
'101' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6],
'105' : [40, 1, 4, 50, 10],
'111' : [40, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6],
[1, 4, 50, 10, 500], '595' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 500], '670' : [5, 1,
4, 50,
10, 600], '671' : [1, 4, 6, 50, 10, 600], '676' : [1, 4, 6, 50, 10, 5,
600], '685' : [1, 4, 50, 10, 20, 600], '700' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 5,
600],
'741' : [30, 1, 4, 6, 700], '747' : [6, 30, 1, 4, 6, 700]}},
#45 (4) - SELYAH (Virtues-Virtues) = #150
#53 (3) - NANAEL (Principalities-Virtues) = #203
#61 (2) - OUMBEL (Archangels-Virtues) = #264
#69 (1) - RAHEL (Angels-Virtues) = #333
USURPER: #1 {First Number in the Square}
GUIDE: #36 (6x6) {Last Number in the Square}
MYSTERY: #37 {First Number + Last Number}
ADJUSTER: #111 {Total Sum of a Row}
LEADER: #666 {Total Value of All Rows}
REGULATOR: #777 {Total Sum of a Row + Total Sum of All Rows}
GENERAL GOVERNOR: #1554 {(Total Sum of a Row Total Sum of All Rows) x 2}
HIGH OVERSEER: #55944 {((Total Sum of a Row Total Sum of All Rows) x 2) x
Last Number in the Square}
#1 - Executive Positions
#2 - Jewelers
#3 - Goldsmiths
#4 - Judges
#5 - Public Servants
#6 - Acting
#7 - Monarchs
#8 - Leaders
#9 - Populace (?)
*LIVE* *LONG* *AND* *PROSPER* [Leonard Simon Nimoy, 26 March 1931 - 27
February 2015 (RIP)]

YOUTUBE: “The Birth Of ‘LIVE LONG AND PROSPER’"

http://youtu.be/UdYbpMkH_XQ

*IT* *IS* *ONLY* *THE* *FAILURE* *OF* *HUMANITY’S* *IMAGINATION* *WHICH*
*GROUNDS* *US* *AS* *LIMITS*.

- dolf

A REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF DOCUMENT FROM THIS URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Prosper.pdf>
--
SEE ALSO: *INVALIDATING* *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC*
*CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND*
*FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS
INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING
AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]
as EXISTENCE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD/TETRACTYS

Initial Post: 24 January 2018

#LIVE #LONG #PROSPER
--
SEE ALSO: *INVALIDATING* *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC*
*CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND*
*FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-01-24 23:56:51 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT) LIVE LONG AND PROSPER: GRAPPLE BETA UPDATE QUESTION - IS THE
SEPTET DRIVER AS ENTELECHY AN EQUIVALENT TO THE MEDICAL CADUCEUS?

(c) 2017 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 25 January, 2018

Nous: #3
Time: 20:15 hrs
Date: 2018.1.24
Torah: #6 #40 #2 %81 = #48
Dao: Political Prescriptions, Quietude
Tetra: #8 - Opposition
I-Ching: H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending

Latin: Facies {God above all things} Alt: Anael {Ship of God} {

1. SERVES TO OBTAIN THE FRIENDSHIP OF A PERSON
2. ASTRONOMY & PHYSICS
3. THE SENSITIVITY OF THE HEART
4. Ptiau
}

#34 CE

Transformative Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#274 / #333 IN BEING #FIVE AS
#CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME *AS* *MY* INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* } /
HETEROS {#304 / #348 *AS* *DISTINCT* *TO* *THAT* *OF* *THE* *FASCIST*
*VATICAN* *CITY* *STATE*}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:8,col:7,nous:3&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS&LEXICON:BIBLE&idea:{97}&idea:{274}&idea:{92}&idea:{333}>

***@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 7, nous: 3 [Date: 2018.1.24, Super: #274
/ #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching: H8 - Closeness,
Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra: 33 -
Closeness, Ego: #333 / #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching:
H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition]

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #70 -
Difficulty in Knowing How, Obtuse; I-Ching: H53 - Gradual Advance,
Development (gradual progress), Infiltrating, Advancement; Tetra: 14 -
Penetration / INNER: #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening} #70 has 16 Categories:

#6, #2, #1, #2, #50, #9 = 'abnet (H73): {#0 as #62} 1) girdle, sash; 1a)
of high priest; 1b) of other priests; 1c) of high official; #20, #1, #4,
#40, #5 = 'Admah (H126): {#1 as #50} 1) city in the Siddim valley; #30,
#2, #30, #3, #5 = Bilgah (H1083): {#2 as #40} 1) a priest of the 15th
course, in David's time; 2) a priest accompanying Zerubbabel; #5, #4,
#6, #4, #1, #10, #40 = duwday (H1736): {#3 as #24} 1) mandrake,
love-apple; 1a) as exciting sexual desire, and favouring procreation;
#7, #2, #10, #50, #1 = Zebiyna' (H2081): {#4 as #70} 1) a son of Nebo
who took a foreign wife in the time of Ezra;

#6, #20, #8, #6, #30 = chowl (H2344): {#5 as #44} 1) *SAND*;

This document represents by an articulation of the AUTONOMOUS
HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY {ie. *SANDGLASS*} being a notion of the
AUSTRALIAN HERITAGE AND THE LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE
COMMONWEALTH AND ITS CONSTITUTION of 1901 which resolves the problem
proposed by the German Philosopher Friedrich Hegel (August 27, 1770 –
November 14, 1831) as the hypothesis:

§ 46

If the principle of regard for the individual will {ie. *INTELLECTUS*
*AS* *GENITIVE* *VOLUNTĀTUS*} is recognised as the only basis of
political liberty, viz., that nothing should be done by or for the State
to which all the members of the body politic have not given their
sanction, we have, properly speaking, no Constitution. The only
arrangement that would be necessary, would be, first, a centre having no
will of its own but which should take into consideration what appeared
to be the necessities of the State; and, secondly, a contrivance for
calling the members of the State together, for taking the votes, and for
performing the arithmetical operations of reckoning and comparing the
number of votes for the different propositions, and thereby deciding
upon them. The State is an abstraction, having even its generic
existence in its citizens; but it is an actuality, and its simply
generic existence must embody itself in individual will and activity.
The want of government and political administration in general is felt;
this necessitates the selection and separation from the rest of those
who have to take the helm in political affairs, to decide, concerning
them, and to give orders to other citizens, with a view to the execution
of their plans. If, e.g., even the people in a Democracy resolve on a
war, a general must head the army. It is only by a Constitution that the
abstraction – the State – attains life and reality; but this involves
the distinction between those who command and those who obey. – Yet
obedience seems inconsistent with liberty, and those who command appear
to do the very opposite of that which the fundamental idea of the State,
viz. that of Freedom, requires. It is, however, urged that, – though the
distinction between commanding and obeying is absolutely necessary,
because affairs could not go on without it – and indeed this seems only
a compulsory limitation, external to and even contravening freedom in
the abstract – the constitution should be at least so framed, that the
citizens may obey as little as possible, and the smallest modicum of
free volition be left to the commands of the superiors; – that the
substance of that for which subordination is necessary, even in its most
important bearings, should be decided and resolved on by the People – by
the will of many or of all the citizens; though it is supposed to be
thereby provided that the State should be possessed of vigour and
strength as a reality – an individual unity. – The primary consideration
is, then, the distinction between the governing and the governed, and
political constitutions in the abstract have been rightly divided into
Monarchy, Aristocracy, and Democracy; which gives occasion, however, to
the remark that Monarchy itself must be further divided into Despotism
and Monarchy proper; that in all the divisions to which the leading Idea
gives rise, only the generic character is to be made prominent, – it
being not intended thereby that the particular category under review
should be exhausted as a Form, Order, or Kind in its concrete
development. But especially it must be observed, that the
above-mentioned divisions admit of a multitude of particular
modifications, – not only such as lie within the limits of those classes
themselves, – but also such as are mixtures of several of these
essentially distinct classes, and which are consequently misshapen,
unstable, and inconsistent forms. In such a collision, the concerning
question is, what is the best constitution; that is, by what
arrangement, organisation or mechanism of the power of the State its
object can be most surely attained. This object may indeed be variously
understood; for instance, as the calm enjoyment of life on the part of
the citizens, or as Universal Happiness. Such aims have suggested the
so-called Ideals of Constitution, and, – as a particular branch of the
subject, – Ideals of the Education of Princes (Fenelon), or of the
governing body – the aristocracy at large (Plato); for the chief point
they treat of is the condition of those subjects who stand at the head
of affairs; and in these ideals the concrete details of political
organisation are not at all considered. The inquiry into the best
constitution is frequently treated as if not only the theory were an
affair of subjective independent conviction, but as if the introduction
of a constitution recognised as the best, – or as superior to others, –
could be the result of a resolve adopted in this theoretical manner; as
if the form of a constitution were a matter of free choice, determined
by nothing else but reflection. Of this artless fashion was that
deliberation, – not indeed of the Persian people, but of the Persian
grandees, who had conspired to overthrow the pseudo-Smerdis and the
Magi, after their undertaking had succeeded, and when there was no scion
of the royal family living, – as to what constitution they should
introduce into Persia; and Herodotus gives an equally naive account of
this deliberation.

§ 47

In the present day, the Constitution of a country and people is not
represented as so entirely dependent on free and deliberate choice. The
fundamental but abstractly (and therefore imperfectly) entertained
conception of Freedom, has resulted in the Republic being very generally
regarded – in theory – as the only just and true political constitution.
Many even, who occupy elevated official positions under monarchical
constitutions – so far from being opposed to this idea – are actually
its supporters; only they see that such a constitution, though the best,
cannot be realised under all circumstances; and that – while men are
what they are – we must be satisfied with less freedom; the monarchical
constitution – under the given circumstances, and the present moral
condition of the people – being even regarded as the most advantageous.
In this view also, the necessity of a particular constitution is made to
depend on the condition of the people in such a way as if the latter
were non-essential and accidental. This representation is founded on the
distinction which the reflective understanding makes between an idea and
the corresponding reality; holding to an abstract and consequently
untrue idea; not grasping it in its completeness, or – which is
virtually, though not in point of form, the same – not taking a concrete
view of a people and a state. We shall have to show further on that the
constitution adopted by a people makes one substance – one spirit – with
its religion, its art and philosophy, or, at least, with its conceptions
and thoughts – its culture generally; not to expatiate upon the
additional influences, ab extrâ, of climate, of neighbours, of its place
in the world. A State is an individual totality, of which you cannot
select any particular side, although a supremely important one, such as
its political constitution; and deliberate and decide respecting it in
that isolated form. Not only is that constitution most intimately
connected with and dependent on those other spiritual forces; but the
form of the entire moral and intellectual individuality – comprising all
the forces it embodies – is only a step in the development of the grand
Whole, – with its place pre-appointed in the process: a fact which gives
the highest sanction to the constitution in question, and establishes
its absolute necessity. -The origin of a State involves imperious
lordship on the one hand, instinctive submission on the other. But even
obedience – lordly power, and the fear inspired by a ruler – in itself
implies some degree of voluntary connection. Even in barbarous states
this is the case; it is not the isolated will of individuals that
prevails; individual pretensions are relinquished, and the general will
is the essential bond of political union. This unity of the general and
the particular is the Idea itself, manifesting itself as a State, and
which subsequently undergoes further development within itself. The
abstract yet necessitated process in the development of truly
independent states is as follows: – They begin with regal power, whether
of patriarchal or military origin. In the next phase, particularity and
individuality assert themselves in the form of Aristocracy and
Democracy. Lastly, we have the subjection of these separate interests to
a single power; but which can be absolutely none other than one outside
of which those spheres have an independent position, viz., the
Monarchical. Two phases of royalty, therefore, must be distinguished, –
a primary and a secondary one. This process is necessitated, so that the
form of government assigned to a particular stage of development must
present itself: it is therefore no matter of choice, but is that form
which is adapted to the spirit of the people.

§ 48

In a Constitution the main feature of interest is the self-development
of the rational, that is, the political condition of a people; the
setting free of the successive elements of the Idea: so that the several
powers in the State manifest themselves as separate, – attain their
appropriate and special perfection, – and yet in this independent
condition, work together for one object, and are held together by it –
i.e., form an organic whole. The State is thus the embodiment of
rational freedom, realising and recognising itself in an objective form.
For its objectivity consists in this, – that its successive stages are
not merely ideal, but are present in an appropriate reality; and that in
their separate and several working, they are absolutely merged in that
agency by which the totality – the soul – the individual unity – is
produced, and of which it is the result.

§ 49

The State is the Idea of Spirit in the external manifestation of human
Will and its Freedom. It is to the State, therefore, that change in the
aspect of History indissolubly attaches itself; and the successive
phases of the Idea manifest themselves in it as distinct political
principles. The Constitutions under which World-Historical peoples have
reached their culmination, are peculiar to them; and therefore do not
present a generally applicable political basis. Were it otherwise, the
differences of similar constitutions would consist only in a peculiar
method of expanding and developing that generic basis; whereas they
really originate in diversity of principle. From the comparison
therefore of the political institutions of the ancient World-Historical
peoples, it so happens, that for the most recent principle of a
Constitution – for the principle of our own times – nothing (so to
speak) can be learned. In science and art it is quite otherwise; e. g.,
the ancient philosophy is so decidedly the basis of the modern, that it
is inevitably contained in the latter, and constitutes its basis. In
this case the relation is that of a continuous development of the same
structure, whose foundation-stone, walls, and roof have remained what
they were. In Art, the Greek itself, in its original form, furnishes us
the best models. But in regard to political constitution, it is quite
otherwise: here the Ancient and the Modern have not their essential
principle in common. Abstract definitions and dogmas respecting just
government, – importing that intelligence and virtue ought to bear sway
– are, indeed, common to both. But nothing is so absurd as to look to
Greeks, Romans, or Orientals, for models for the political arrangements
of our time. From the East may be derived beautiful pictures of a
patriarchal condition, of paternal government, and of devotion to it on
the part of peoples; from Greeks and Romans, descriptions of popular
liberty. Among the latter we find the idea of a Free Constitution
admitting all the citizens to a share in deliberations and resolves
respecting the affairs and laws of the Commonwealth. In our times, too,
this is its general acceptation; only with this modification, that –
since our States are so large, and there are so many of “the Many,” the
latter, – direct action being impossible, – should by the indirect
method of elective substitution express their concurrence with resolves
affecting the common weal; that is, that for legislative purposes
generally, the people should be represented by deputies. The so-called
Representative Constitution is that form of government with which we
connect the idea of a free constitution, and this notion has become a
rooted prejudice. On this theory People and Government are separated.
But there is a perversity in this antithesis; an ill-intentioned ruse
designed to insinuate that the People are the totality of the State.
Besides, the basis of this view is the principle of isolated
individuality – the absolute validity of the subjective will – a dogma
which we have already investigated. The great point is, that Freedom in
its Ideal conception has not subjective will and caprice for its
principle, but the recognition of the universal will; and that the
process by which Freedom is realised is the free development of its
successive stages. The subjective will is a merely formal determination
– a carte blanche – not including what it is that is willed. Only the
rational will is that universal principle which independently determines
and unfolds its own being, and develops its successive elemental phases
as organic members. Of this Gothic-cathedral architecture the ancients
knew nothing.

§ 50 / PAGE #48

At an earlier stage of the discussion, we established the two elemental
considerations: first, the idea of freedom as the absolute and final
aim; secondly, the means for realising it, i.e. the subjective side of
knowledge and will, with its life, movement, and activity. We then
recognised the State as the moral Whole and the Reality of Freedom, and
consequently as the objective unity of these two elements. For although
we make this distinction into two aspects for our consideration, it must
be remarked that they are intimately connected; and that their
connection is involved in the idea of each when examined separately. We
have, on the one hand, recognised the Idea in the definite form of
Freedom conscious of and willing itself, – having itself alone as its
object: involving at the same time, the pure and simple Idea of Reason,
and likewise, that which we have called subject – self-consciousness –
Spirit actually existing in the World. If, on the other hand, we
consider Subjectivity, we find that subjective knowledge and will is
Thought. But by the very act of thoughtful cognition and volition, I
will the universal object – the substance of absolute Reason. We
observe, therefore, an essential union between the objective side – the
Idea, – and the subjective side – the personality that conceives and
wills it. – The objective existence of this union is the State, which is
therefore the basis and centre of the other concrete elements of the
life of a people, – of Art, of Law, of Morals, of Religion, of Science.
All the activity of Spirit has only this object – the becoming conscious
of this union, i.e., of its own Freedom. Among the forms of this
conscious union Religion occupies the highest position. In it, Spirit –
rising above the limitations of temporal and secular existence – becomes
conscious of the Absolute Spirit, and in this consciousness of the
self-existent Being, renounces its individual interest; it lays this
aside in Devotion – a state of mind in which it refuses to occupy itself
any longer with the limited and particular. By Sacrifice man expresses
his renunciation of his property, his will, his individual feelings. The
religious concentration of the soul appears in the form of feeling; it
nevertheless passes also into reflection; a form of worship (cultus) is
a result of reflection. The second form of the union of the objective
and subjective in the human spirit is Art. This advances farther into
the realm of the actual and sensuous than Religion. In its noblest walk
it is occupied with representing, not indeed, the Spirit of God, but
certainly the Form of God; and in its secondary aims, that which is
divine and spiritual generally. Its office is to render visible the
Divine; presenting it to the imaginative and intuitive faculty. But the
True is the object not only of conception and feeling, as in Religion, –
and of Intuition, as in Art, – but also of the thinking faculty; and
this gives us the third form of the union in question – Philosophy. This
is consequently the highest, freest, and wisest phase. Of course we are
not intending to investigate these three phases here; they have only
suggested themselves in virtue of their occupying the same general
ground as the object here considered – the State.

§ 51 / PAGE #50

The general principle which manifests itself and becomes an object of
consciousness in the State, – the form under which all that the State
includes is brought, is the whole of that cycle of phenomena which
constitutes the culture of a nation. But the definite substance that
receives the form of universality, and exists in that concrete reality
which is the State, – is the Spirit of the People itself. The actual
State is animated by this spirit, in all its particular affairs – its
Wars, Institutions, &c. But man must also attain a conscious realisation
of this his Spirit and essential nature, and of his original identity
with it. For we said that morality is the identity of the subjective or
personal with the universal will. Now the mind must give itself an
express consciousness of this; and the focus of this knowledge is
Religion. Art and Science are only various aspects and forms of the same
substantial being. In considering Religion, the chief point of enquiry
is whether it recognises the True – the Idea – only in its separate,
abstract form, or in its true unity; in separation – God being
represented in an abstract form as the Highest Being, Lord of Heaven and
Earth, living in a remote region far from human actualities, – or in its
unity, – God, as Unity of the Universal and Individual; the Individual
itself assuming the aspect of positive and real existence in the idea of
the Incarnation. Religion is the sphere in which a nation gives itself
the definition of that which it regards as the True. A definition
contains everything that belongs to the essence of an object; reducing
its nature to its simple characteristic predicate, as a mirror for every
predicate, – the generic soul Pervading all its details. The conception
of God, therefore, constitutes the general basis of a people’s character.

§ 52

In this aspect, religion stands in the closest connection with the
political principle. Freedom can exist only where Individuality is
recognised as having its positive and real existence in the Divine
Being. The connection may be further explained thus: – Secular
existence, as merely temporal – occupied with particular interests – is
consequently only relative and unauthorised; and receives its validity
only in as far as the universal soul that pervades it – its principle –
receives absolute validity; which it cannot have unless it is recognised
as the definite manifestation, the phenomenal existence of the Divine
Essence. On this account it is that the State rests on Religion.

PAGE #51

We hear this often repeated in our times, though for the most part
nothing further is meant than that individual subjects as God-fearing
men would be more disposed and ready to perform their duty; since
obedience to King and Law so naturally follows in the train of reverence
for God. This reverence, indeed, since it exalts the general over the
special, may even turn upon the latter, – become fanatical, – and work
with incendiary and destructive violence against the State, its
institutions, and arrangements. Religious feeling, therefore, it is
thought, should be sober – kept in a certain degree of coolness, – that
it may not storm against and bear down that which should be defended and
preserved by it. The possibility of such a catastrophe is at least
latent in it.

§ 53

While, however, the correct sentiment is adopted, that the State is
based on Religion, the position thus assigned to Religion supposes the
State already to exist; and that subsequently, in order to maintain it,
Religion must be brought into it – buckets and bushels as it were – and
impressed upon people’s hearts. It is quite true that men must be
trained to religion, but not as to something whose existence has yet to
begin. For in affirming that the State is based on Religion – that it
has its roots in it – we virtually assert that the former has proceeded
from the latter; and that this derivation is going on now and will
always continue; i.e., the principles of the State must be regarded as
valid in and for themselves, which can only be in so far as they are
recognised as determinate manifestations of the Divine Nature. The form
of Religion, therefore, decides that of the State and its constitution.
The latter actually originated in the particular religion adopted by the
nation; so that, in fact, the Athenian or the Roman State was possible
only in connection with the specific form of Heathenism existing among
the respective peoples; just as a Catholic State has a spirit and
constitution different from that of a Protestant one.

§ 54

If that outcry – that urging and striving for the implantation of
Religion in the community – were an utterance of anguish and a call for
help, as it often seems to be, expressing the danger of religion having
vanished, or being about to vanish entirely from the State, – that would
be fearful indeed – worse in fact than this outcry supposes; for it
implies the belief in a resource against the evil, viz., the
implantation and inculcation of religion; whereas religion is by no
means a thing to be so produced; its self-production (and there can be
no other) lies much deeper.

§ 55 / PAGE #52

“*ANOTHER* *AND* *OPPOSITE* *FOLLY* *WHICH* *WE* *MEET* *WITH* *IN*
*OUR* *TIME* *IS* *THAT* *OF* *PRETENDING* *TO* *INVENT* *AND* *CARRY*
*OUT* *POLITICAL* *CONSTITUTIONS* *INDEPENDENTLY* *OF* *RELIGION*.

Whilst it may continue to function as an acceptable METHODOLOGY {ARCH
KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} with an encapsulated sphere of
operation {

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE} <-- *AS* *THE* *FOUNDATION* *STONE*
(*USURPING* @1 = *SOVEREIGN* / #CENTRE @5 = *LAST* *WILL*, *TESTAMENT*
*OF* #INR *BEING* *THE* *BINDING* *NORM* (*NORMA* *OBLIGANS* ) *ON* #33
AD) *MAGIC* *SQUARE*

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{99}&idea:{297}>

#1 (9) - OUHOUYAH (King-Seraphim) = #1
#9 (8) - HAZIEL (King-Cherubim) = #10
#17 (7) - LEVYAH (King-Throne) = #27
#25 (6) - NETEHYAH (King-Dominion) = #52 <-- *THEY* *ARE* *AS* *THE
*SONS* *OF* *DARKNESS* *NOT* *THE* *SONS* *OF* *LIGHT* / *GOD* *AS* #123

#33 (5) - YHOUYAH (King-Powers) = #85
#41 (4) - HEHAHEL (King-Virtues) = #126
#49 (3) - OHOUEL (King-Principalities) = #175 <-- *VENUS* (7x7 = #49 /
#175) *USE* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *AS* *AN* *ANTHROPIC* *PROTOTYPE*

#57 (2) - NEMAMYAH (King-Archangels) = #232
#65 (1) - DAMBYAN (King-Angels) = #297

42 2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}

43 3 59
51 35 19
11 67 27 = #105 / #315 {#THREE}

44 4 60
52 36 20
12 68 28 = #108 / #324 {#FOUR}

74 81 76
79 77 75
78 73 80 = #231 - #108 = #123 / #693 - #369 = #324 {#TEN} AS RETURN TO
GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE BEING ITSELF

}, it is entirely a specious notion to declare it is the root and causal
basis of the perennialist philosophical tradition.

45 5 61
53 37 21
13 69 29

= #111 / #333 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}"

*THE* *CATHOLIC* *CONFESSION*, *ALTHOUGH* *SHARING* *THE* *CHRISTIAN*
*NAME* *WITH* *THE* *PROTESTANT*, *DOES* *NOT* *CONCEDE* *TO* *THE*
*STATE* *AN* *INHERENT* *JUSTICE* *AND* *MORALITY*, – *A* *CONCESSION*
*WHICH* *IN* *THE* *PROTESTANT* *PRINCIPLE* *IS* *FUNDAMENTAL*. This
tearing away of the political morality of the Constitution from its
natural connection, is necessary to the genius of that religion,
inasmuch as it does not recognise Justice and Morality as independent
and substantial. But thus excluded from intrinsic worth, – torn away
from their last refuge – the sanctuary of conscience – the calm retreat
where religion has its abode, – the principles and institutions of
political legislation are destitute of a real centre, to the same decree
as they are compelled to remain abstract and indefinite.

§ 56

Summing up what has been said of the State, we find that we have been
led to call its vital principle, as actuating the individuals who
compose it, – Morality. The State, its laws, its arrangements,
constitute the rights of its members; its natural features, its
mountains, air, and waters, are their country, their fatherland, their
outward material property; the history of this State, their deeds; what
their ancestors have produced, belongs to them and lives in their
memory. All is their possession, just as they are possessed by it; for
it constitutes their existence, their being.

§ 57

Their imagination is occupied with the ideas thus presented, while the
adoption of these laws, and of a fatherland so conditioned is the
expression of their will. It is this matured totality which thus
constitutes one Being, the spirit of one People. To it the individual
members belong; each unit is the Son of his Nation, and at the same time
– in as far as the State to which he belongs is undergoing development –
the Son of his Age. None remains behind it, still less advances beyond
it. This spiritual Being (the Spirit of his Time) is his; he is a
representative of it; it is that in which he originated, and in which he
lives. Among the Athenians the word Athens had a double import;
suggesting primarily, a complex of Political institutions, but no less,
in the second place, that Goddess who represented the Spirit of the
People and its unity {ie. #49 (3) - OHOUEL (King-Principalities) = #175
<-- *VENUS* (7x7 = #49 / #175) *USE* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *AS* *AN*
*ANTHROPIC* *PROTOTYPE*}. This Spirit of a People is a determinate and
particular Spirit, and is, as just stated, further modified by the
degree of its historical development. This Spirit, then, constitutes the
basis and substance of those other forms of a nation’s consciousness,
which have been noticed. For Spirit in its self-consciousness must
become a object of contemplation to itself, and objectivity involves, in
the first instance, the rise of differences which make up a total of
distinct spheres of objective spirit; in the same way as the Soul exists
only as the complex of its faculties, which in their form of
concentration in a simple unity produce that Soul. It is thus One
Individuality which, presented in its essence as God, is honoured and
enjoyed in Religion; which is exhibited as an object of sensuous
contemplation in Art; and is apprehended as an intellectual conception
in Philosophy. In virtue of the original identity of their essence,
purport, and object, these various forms are inseparably united with the
Spirit of the State. Only in connection with this particular religion
can this particular political constitution exist; just as in such or
such a State, such or such a Philosophy or order of Art." [Georg Wilhelm
Friedrich Hegel. Hegel (27 August 1770 – 14 November 1831) Philosophy of
History, III. Philosophic History, ii. The Essential Destiny of Reason,
(3) The Embodiment Spirit Assumes – the State]

<https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/hi/history4.htm>

#1, #9, #10, #30, #20 = tuwl (H2904): {#6 as #45} 1) to hurl, cast; 1a)
(Pilpel) to throw away, carry away, hurl; 1b) (Hiphil) to throw, cast,
cast out; 1c) (Hophal); 1c1) to be hurled, hurled down; 1c2) to be cast,
be thrown, be cast out, be thrown down; #9, #10, #50, #1 = tiyn
(Aramaic) (H2917): {#7 as #69} 1) clay; #10, #30, #30 = yelel (H3214):
{#8 as #70} 1) a howling (of beasts); #6, #2, #40, #8, #6, #3, #5 =
mechuwgah (H4230): {#9 as #62} 1) circle-instrument, compass; #40, #20,
#10 = Makiy (H4352): {#10 as #70} 1) father of Geuel the Gadite who was
one of the 12 spies of Israel; #10, #50, #6, #2, #2 = nuwb (H5107): {#11
as #58} 1) to bear fruit; 1a) (Qal) to bear fruit; 1b) (Pilel) to make
to flourish (fig.); #6, #50, #6, #8 = nuwach (H5118): {#12 as #64} 1)
resting place; #50, #8, #2, #10 = Nachbiy (H5147): {#13 as #70} 1) son
of Vophsi, a Naphtalite, and one of the 12 spies sent to spy out the
promised land; #6, #50, #10, #4 = niyd (H5205): {#14 as #64} 1)
quivering (motion) of lips; #4, #5, #10, #50, #1 = deina (G1170): {#15
as #70} 1) such a one, a certain one, ie. one whose name I cannot call
on the instant, or whose name it is of no importance to mention;

EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #13 -
Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending,
Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back / INNER: #13 - Status,
Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back} #13 has 10 Categories:

#1, #5, #6, #1 = 'Ahava' (H163): {#0 as #13} 1) town or area in
Babylonia {incongruity; confusion; mixture}; #1, #7, #4, #1 = 'azad
(Aramaic) (H230): {#1 as #12} 1) (P'al) to be gone; #2, #3, #6, #2 = Gob
(H1359): {#2 as #5} 1) a place which was the scene of two encounters
between David's {well-beloved, dear} warriors and the Philistines {those
who dwell in villages} (also Gezer {dividing, sentence}); #3, #2, #8 =
gibbeach (H1371): {#3 as #13} 1) to be high, bald (in the forehead),
having a bald forehead; #3, #4, #6 = gedad (Aramaic) (H1414): {#4 as
#11} 1) to cut down, hew down;

#3, #5, #5 = gehah (H1456): {#5 as #13} 1) *A* *CURE*, *A* *HEALING*;

#6, #5, #2 = Vaheb (H2052): {#6 as #13} 1) a place in Moab, site
unknown; #7, #2, #4 = zebed (H2065): {#7 as #13} 1) endowment, gift; #7,
#6 = zuw (H2098): {#8 as #13} 1) this, such rel pron; 2) (of) which,
(of) whom; #5, #3, #5 = yagah (H3014): {#9 as #18} 1) (Hiphil) to repel,
thrust away, push away;

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:8,col:7,nous:3&PROTOTYPE:HETEROS&LEXICON:AUM&idea:{97}&idea:{304}&idea:{92}&idea:{348}>

***@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 7, nous: 3 [Date: 2018.1.24, Super: #304
/ #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching: H8 - Closeness,
Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra: 33 -
Closeness, Ego: #348 / #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching:
H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition]

SUPER (MALE) A-U-M HETEROS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #61 - Virtuous
Humility at Using 'Beneath'; I-Ching: H64 - Ferrying Incomplete, Before
Completion, Not Yet Fording, Not yet completed; Tetra: 78 - On the Verge
/ INNER: #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable Maid/Maiden,
Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner} #304 has 7 Categories:

#4, #100, #200 = To bore through, pierce, stab; curse, condemn; n.
Swordsman; #4, #200, #100 = To hasten; #7, #200, #7, #10, #80 = A heavy
shower; #8, #90, #6, #200 = n. Enclosed Place, Castle; #8, #90, #200, #6
= n. Blooming; #8, #200, #6, #90 = *DITCH* *OR* *FOSSE* *(*OF* *A*
*FORTRESS*); *A* *DECISION* *OR* *JUDGMENT*; *GOLD*; *ACTIVE*, *EAGER*;
*INDUSTRIOUS*, *STRENUOUS*; *SHARP*, *POINTED*; *A* *POINTED* *SHARD*
*OR* *SHARP* *STONE*; #8, #200, #40, #6, #50 = n. Mountain Peak;

EGO (FEMALE) A-U-M HETEROS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #24 -
Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting /
INNER: #20 - Left without Language, Different From the Vulgar; I-Ching:
H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 50 -
Vastness/Wasting} #348 has 14 Categories: 

#2, #90, #200, #6, #50 =
Citadel, fortress; #8, #40, #300 = *TO* *BE* *SHARP*, *BOLD*, *STRONG*;
*TO* *ARM* *THE* *LOINS*; *TO* *ARM* *ONESELF*; *FIVE*; *LOINS*,
*WAIST*; *A* *FIFTH*, *TO* *TAX* *ONE* *FIFTH*; #8, #90, #200, #10, #40
= Trumpeters; #8, #200, #90, #50 = Grape seeds; sour grapes; #8, #300,
#40 = To be bright, to be affluent; alert; #40, #2, #6, #300 = The parts
of shame; penis; #40, #6, #300, #2 = A seat; a site or situation; a
sitting or session; a dwelling; a tarrying or stay; dwellers,
inhabitants; #40, #8, #100, #200 = Exploration, a hidden or deep place,
inmost recess; #40, #200, #8, #100 = Remoteness, distance; #40, #200,
#100, #8 = Perfume, aromatic herb; #40, #300, #3, #5 = *A* *MISLEADER*
*OR* *DECEIVER*; #40, #300, #3, #5 = *AN* *ERROR*; #40, #300, #8 = To
streak or spread over, to paint; to consecrate by unction, to anoint;
#40, #300, #8 = To measure or portion out;

I’m planning on providing this update discussion as a gift later today
accompanying some chapter drafts when I have my final consultation visit
with my special orthopaedic surgeon with the caveat that he ought to
look beyond the semantics of opportunism which are provided by the
Hebrew / Greek lexicon by which I can demonstrate the proof of
conception truth of the 1784 noumena theory as an impossibly articulated
by Immanuel Kantian within “Critique of Pure Reason” by my #231
appraisal of a certain 1941 narrative which had a most shocking import.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Budgie.pdf>

IDEA @52 ON EVENING 25 October 1941 - JEWS RESPONSIBLE FOR TWO WORLD
WARS — HOW PAST CIVILISATIONS ARE EFFACED — THE REWRITING OF HISTORY —
THE LIBRARIES OF ANTIQUITY — CHRISTIANITY AND BOLSHEVISM, AIM AT
DESTRUCTION — NERO DID NOT BURN ROME {AD 64} —PROTESTANT HYPOCRISY — THE
CATHOLIC CHURCH THRIVES ON SIN — ACCOUNTS TO BE SETTLED —  THE MODERNIST
MOVEMENT — THE PROBLEM OF THE CONVENTS:

SPECIAL GUESTS: REICHSFUEHRER SS HIMMLER AND *SS* *GENERAL*
(*OBERGRUPPENFUEHRER*) *HEYDRICH* (*HIGH*-*RANKING* *GERMAN* *NAZI*
*OFFICIAL* *DURING* *WORLD* *WAR* *II*, *AND* *A* *MAIN* *ARCHITECT*
*OF* *THE* *HOLOCAUST*)

PAGE #87 - RUMOURS OF EXTERMINATION OF JEWS

From the rostrum of the Reichstag I prophesied to Jewry that, in the
event of war's proving inevitable, the Jew would disappear from Europe.
That race of criminals has on its conscience the two million dead of the
first World War, and now already hundreds of thousands more. Let nobody
tell me that all the same we can't park them in the marshy parts of
Russia! Who's worrying about our troops? It's not a bad idea, by the
way, that public rumour attributes to us a plan to exterminate the Jews.
Terror is a salutary thing.

*THE* *ATTEMPT* *TO* *CREATE* *A* *JEWISH* *STATE* *WILL* *BE* *A*
*FAILURE*.

The book that contains the reflections of the Emperor Julian should be
circulated in millions. What wonderful intelligence, what discernment,
all the wisdom of antiquity! It's extra- ordinary.

ACCORDING TO WIKIPEDIA: Julian (Latin: Flavius Claudius Iulianus
Augustus[a]; Greek: Φλάβιος Κλαύδιος Ἰουλιανὸς Αὔγουστος; 331/332  – 26
June 363), also known as Julian the Apostate, was Roman Emperor from 361
to 363, as well as a notable philosopher and author in Greek.

A member of the Constantinian dynasty, Julian became Caesar over the
western provinces by order of Constantius II in 355, and in this role he
campaigned successfully against the Alamanni and Franks. Most notable
was his crushing victory over the Alamanni at the Battle of Argentoratum
(Strasbourg) in 357, leading his 13,000 men against a Germanic army
three times larger.

In 360 Julian was proclaimed Augustus by his soldiers at Lutetia
(Paris), sparking a civil war with Constantius. However, Constantius
died before the two could face each other in battle, and named Julian as
his successor.

In 363, Julian embarked on an ambitious campaign against the Sassanid
Empire. The campaign was initially successful, securing a victory
outside Ctesiphon, but during a skirmish Julian was mortally wounded,
leaving his army trapped in Persian territory. Following his death, the
Roman forces were obliged to cede territory in order to escape,
including the fortress city of Nisibis.

Julian was a man of unusually complex character: he was "the military
commander, the theosophist, the social reformer, and the man of
letters". *HE* *WAS* *THE* *LAST* *NON*-*CHRISTIAN* *RULER* *OF* *THE*
*ROMAN* *EMPIRE*, *AND* *HE* *BELIEVED* *THAT* *IT* *WAS* *NECESSARY*
*TO* *RESTORE* *THE* *EMPIRE'S* *ANCIENT* *ROMAN* *VALUES* *AND*
*TRADITIONS* {

ACCORDING TO 'HITLER'S TABLE TALK': IDEA @I / PAGE #3 THE *FASCIST*
*MOVEMENT* *IS* *A* *SPONTANEOUS* *RETURN* *TO* *THE* *TRADITIONS* *OF*
*ANCIENT* *ROME* {strength}

} *IN* *ORDER* *TO* *SAVE* *IT* *FROM* *DISSOLUTION*. [Athanassiadi,
'Julian and Hellenism', p. 88]

He purged the top-heavy state bureaucracy, and attempted to revive
traditional Roman religious practices at the expense of Christianity.
Julian also forbade the Christians from teaching classical texts and
learning. His rejection of the Christianity imposed on him in his youth,
and his *promotion* *of* *Neoplatonic* *Hellenism* {ie. Pythagorean
binomial theory of number} in its place caused him to be remembered as
Julian the Apostate by the church.
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_(emperor)>]

PAGE #89 - CATHOLICS AND PROTESTANTS

Christianity set itself systematically to destroy ancient culture.

What came to us was passed down by chance, or else it was a product of
Roman liberal writers. Perhaps we are entirely ignorant of humanity's
most precious spiritual treasures. Who can know what was there?

The Papacy was faithful to these tactics even during recorded history.
How did people behave, during the age of the great explorations, towards
the spiritual riches of Central America?

*IN* *OUR* *PARTS* *OF* *THE* *WORLD*, *THE* *JEWS* *WOULD* *HAVE*
*IMMEDIATELY* *ELIMINATED* *SCHOPENHAUER*, *NIETZSCHE* *AND* *KANT* {

HOWEVER WITHIN IDEA @233 ON PAGES #513 - GERMAN BIBLE TRANSLATION
CONDEMNED / PAGE #514 - THE VALUE OF ASTRONOMY, ADOLF HITLER DOES NOT
CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY OF A THEORETICAL NOTION AS KANT POSTULATES OF A
NOUMENON: "*AS* *A* *SANE* *GERMAN*, *ONE* *IS* *FLABBERGASTED* *TO*
*THINK* *THAT* *GERMAN* *HUMAN* *BEINGS* *COULD* *HAVE* *LET*
*THEMSELVES* *BE* *BROUGHT* *TO* *SUCH* *A* *PASS* *BY* *JEWISH* *FILTH*
*AND* *PRIESTLY* *TWADDLE*, that they were little different from the
howling dervish of the Turks and the negroes, at whom we laugh so
scornfully. It angers one to think that, while in other parts of the
globe religious teaching like that of Confucius, Buddha and Mohammed
offers an undeniably broad basis for the religious-minded, Germans
should have been duped by a theological exposition devoid of all honest
depth.

When one seeks reasons for these *PHENOMENA*, *ONE* *IS* *IMMEDIATELY*
*STRUCK* *BY* *THE* *EXTENT* *TO* *WHICH* *THE* *HUMAN* *BRAIN* *REACTS*
*TO* *EXTERNAL* *INFLUENCE*."

I QUOTE: "In the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be
applied to data provided by sensibility in order to provide cognition,
and because the data of sensibility are structured by the
transcenden­tally ideal forms of intuition, the categories give us
knowledge only of things as they appear with sensibility ("phenomena,"
literally "that which appears").

Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of
objects independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can never
cognize them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that
which is thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of
Kant's use of the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of
"noumena" is not, since it literally means not "things as they are in­
dependently of appearing to us" but something more like "things as they
are understood by pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human
understanding can comprehend things in the latter way."

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>

*THUS* *I* *AM* *PROFFERING* *AN* *INFORMED* *AND* *REASONED* *OPINION*
*AS* *THAT* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL* *KANT* *STATES* *IS* *AN* *IMPOSSIBILITY*
*FOR* *A* *HUMAN* *BEING* *TO* *ACCOMPLISH* *BY* *TRANSCENDENT*
*SAPIENTIAL* *THOUGHT* *AND* *CAPABLY* *DEMONSTRATE* *IT'S* *TEMPORAL*
*CONGRUENCE* *AS* *COHERENCE* *BY* *A* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL*
*NOUMENON* *AS* *AN*  *INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL*
*KANT* *HIMSELF* *CALLS* *NOUMENA* *AS* *THE* *PROOF* *OF* *A* *VALID*
*AND* *RATIONAL* *CONCEPT* *ATTAINED* *BY* *PURE* *THOUGHT* *BUT* *MY*
*ANTAGONIST'S* *OPINIONS* *ARE* *ONLY* *A* *SELF*-*INFATUATION* *WITH*
*DELUSION* *AND* *MORE* *PROPERLY* *UNDERSTOOD* *IN* *TERMS* *OF*
*PSYCHOSIS*.

}. If the Bolsheviks had dominion over us for two hundred years, what
works of our past would be handed on to posterity? Our great men would
fall into oblivion, or else they'd be presented to future generations as
criminals and bandits.

I don't believe at all in the truth of certain mental pictures that many
people have of the Roman emperors. I'm sure that Nero didn't set fire to
Rome {68 AD}. It was the Christian-Bolsheviks who did that, just as the
Commune set fire to Paris in 1871 and the Communists set fire to the
Reichstag in 1932.

There is a form of hypocrisy, typically Protestant, that is impudence
itself. Catholicism has this much good about it, that it ignores the
moral strictness of the Evangelicals. In Catholic regions life is more
endurable, for the priest himself succumbs more easily to human
weaknesses. So he permits his flock not to dramatise sin. How would the
Church earn her living, if not by the sins of the faithful? She declares
herself satisfied if one goes to confession. Indulgence, at a tariff,
supplies the Church with her daily bread. As for the fruits of sin, the
soul that fears limbo is a candidate for baptism, that is to say,
another customer, and so business goes on! It is a fact that in Catholic
parts of the world there are many more illegitimate births than in
Protestant parts.

In Austria, Protestantism was free of all bigotry. It was truly a
movement of protest against Catholicism. Moreover, these Protestants
were entirely devoted to the German cause.

A scandal is that, when a believer leaves a particular faith, he is
compelled to pay the ecclesiastical tax for another year. A simple
statement should be enough to free him at once from owing anything
further. We'll put all that right as soon as we have peace again.

-----------

IRREPARABLE HARM DONE TO A CERTAIN CULT OF PERSONALITY
We haven’t yet by 7 January 2018, finished what is only a superficial
two day analysis of Hitler’s Table Talk and I have undertaken the task
reluctantly, being without any infatuation directed towards the
individual as impetus and within the obstructions as the restraints of
inadequacy and resourcefulness which is my education.   Or rather a lack
thereof.  Which, if I sought such further opportunities in particular
that of psychology, would greatly assist my cursory and informal as
haphazard approach to the project.

But it ought to be remembered, that I by reasonable thought, invented
the very tool which is prerequisite to an undertaking of my analysis and
has yielded such fertile consequence. I would therefore provisionally
conclude from the #231 preliminary assessment which we disclose below,
as to it being associated to a systematic and insidious assertion made
upon the MIND of the population.

However given this cult of personality which he has clearly exhibited as
most apparent even within the short duration of our attention to the
matter as the process of informing and the knowing, also had exhibited
an immutable and an irrational aggression towards the biblical narrative
itself wherein my entire (excepting for the Dao as the Mother of
Governance) trinomial mathematical paradigm of sapient MIND as
theoretical noumenon by which I appraised him, is embedded.

That the maxim: “a house divided by itself would most certainly have
fallen.”

Is a truism if ever there was one so uttered.

I’m at the stage of writing this attention point, currently up-to #150
pages and I anticipate finishing our introduction into a proof of
concept in the existence of what is Immanuel Kant’s meaning of the term
"noumena" as not which is self evident, since it literally means not
"things as they are in dependently of appearing to us" but something
more like "things as they are understood by pure thought."


“And I have seen wonders.
And I have seen miracles
Oh, I have seen some things...”

Yet Kant appears to deny that the human understanding can comprehend
things in the latter way."

I’m not as advanced on the next revision of the Grapple prototype as I
had desired to be since I have been more focussed upon writing such
narrative as above for the past little while as that which dispels
decades of *FAKE* *NEWS* promulgated by the Papal Authority itself.

ROSA FLORES (CNN) @ 2245 HOURS ON 24 JANUARY 2018: “POPE WARNS AGAINST
'FAKE NEWS' AND LIKENS IT TO 'CRAFTY SERPENT' IN GENESIS:

Pope Francis released a message condemning "fake news," saying that it's
a "sign of intolerant and hypersensitive attitudes, and leads only to
the spread of arrogance and hatred."

The Vatican says the message is part of the Pope's World Communications
Day, but some at St. Peter's Square say the Pope was probably sending a
message to Donald Trump and other world leaders who have been using the
phrase "fake news."

The tragic history of human sin, the Pope says in his message, is the
first "fake news" and it dates back to the book of Genesis, when the
"crafty serpent" lied to the woman. In present day, according to the
Pope's message the fast digital world helps fuel the spread of "fake
news" -- which he defines as "the spreading of disinformation on line or
in the traditional media."

"Spreading fake news can serve to advance specific goals, influence
political decisions and serve economic interests," the Pope said.

The Pope's message blames the difficulty in unmasking and eliminating
fake news to people interacting with homogeneous news environments
rather than listening to differing perspectives and opinions.

"Disinformation thus thrives on the absence of healthy confrontation
with other sources of information that could effectively challenge
prejudices and generate constructive dialogue; instead, it risks turning
people into unwilling accomplices in spreading biased and baseless
ideas," the Pope's message said.

POPE ON HOW TO COMBAT FAKE NEWS
Journalism that seeks the truth, the Pope's message says, is the way to
overcome this "fake news" phenomenon. And hence his dedication of World
Day of Communication to "'The truth will set you free'. Fake news and
journalism for peace."

"I would like to contribute to our shared commitment to stemming the
spread of fake news and to rediscovering the dignity of journalism and
the personal responsibility of journalists to communicate the truth.

"Praiseworthy efforts are being made to create educational programs
aimed at helping people to interpret and assess information provided by
the media, and teaching them to take an active part in unmasking
falsehoods, rather than unwittingly contributing to the spread of
disinformation."

Catholics have been observing World Communication day since 1967. The
Pope's message is traditionally published on January 24 during the day
of the feast of St. Francis de Sales, the patron saint of journalists.
Catholics don't celebrate World Communication Day until May 13, but the
announcement is made early to give bishops and priests time to prepare
for local and national celebrations.

Pope Francis has fallen victim to fake news himself. First when a fake
news site falsely reported the Pope endorsed Hillary Clinton for
President. And then again, when another fake news site falsely reported
he endorsed Donald Trump for President.”

<http://edition.cnn.com/2018/01/24/world/pope-condemns-fake-news/index.html>

Nous: #10
Time: 16:30 hrs
Date: 2018.11.30
Torah: #20 #30 #10 %81 = #60
Dao: Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?
Tetra: #41 - Response
I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net

Latin: Assistens {God prompt to grant} Alt: Menqel {Libation Bowl of God} {

1. SERVES TO MAKE KNOWN THE TRUTH. AIDS THE TRIUMPH OF INNOCENCE
2. PROMPT HELP IN TRIALS
3. WITNESSES
4. Tepisatosoa
}

Solar Eclipse: 13 (UTC) / 14 November 2012 (AEST)

Nahor {Snorting, Hoarse; dry; hot}

Transformative Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#371 / #393} / HETEROS {#287 / #432}


<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:7,col:4,nous:10&idea:{82}&idea:{371}&idea:{83}&idea:{393}>

***@zen: 3, row: 7, col: 4, nous: 10 [Super: #371 / #2 - Contrast
of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 - Peace, Pervading, Greatness;
Tetra: 16 - Contact, Ego: #393 / #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be
Done?; I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire,
The net; Tetra: 41 - Response]

HERE'S WHY AUSTRALIA'S PARLIAMENT USES SANDGLASSES WHEN THERE'S A
DIVISION IN THE HOUSE:

“Australia’s parliamentary traditions and conventions change over time.
For example, when a vote (or ‘division’) {

#371 as #8, #80, #5, #10, #9, #8, #200, #1, #50 = apeitheo (G544): {#10
as #910} 1) not to allow one's self to be persuaded; 2) not to comply
with; 1a) to refuse or withhold belief; 1b) to refuse belief and obedience

} is called, senators have four minutes to get to the chamber {

#371 as #30, #40, #100, #200, #1 = miqra' (H4744): {#4 as #341} 1)
convocation, convoking, reading, a calling together; 1a) convocation,
sacred assembly; 1b) convoking; 1c) reading; / #6, #70, #90, #200, #5 =
`atsarah (H6116): {#5 as #365} 1) assembly, solemn assembly; 1a)
assembly (sacred or festive meeting); 1b) assemblage, company, group}.

Back in 1975 that increased from two minutes to three, when a new
extension to Old Parliament House made the journey {

#371 as #6, #10, #200, #40, #60, #50, #5 = ramac (H7429): {#8 as #300}
1) to trample; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to trample; 1a2) trampler (participle);
1b) (Niphal) to be trampled

} from committee rooms to the chamber a little longer. The current
four-minute limit was introduced in 1988, when Australian democracy
moved up the hill to to the much bigger, current Parliament House.

The time given to MPs {

#371 as #20, #1, #50, #300 = 'enash (Aramaic) (H606): {#0 as #351} 1)
man, human being; 2) mankind (collective)

} is necessary, but the way the gap is timed – with a sandglass {

#371 as #20, #1, #200, #90, #20, #40 = 'erets (H776): {#2 as #291} 1)
land, earth; lands, countries; 1a) earth; 1a1) whole earth (as opposed
to a part); 1a2) earth (as opposed to heaven); 1a3) earth (inhabitants);
1b) land; 1b1) country, territory; 1b2) district, region; 1b3) tribal
territory; 1b4) piece of ground; 1b5) land of Canaan, Israel; 1b6)
inhabitants of land; 1b7) Sheol, land without return, (under) world;
1b8) city (-state); 1c) ground, surface of the earth; 1c1) ground; 1c2)
soil; 1d) (in phrases); 1d1) people of the land; 1d2) space or distance
of country (in measurements of distance); 1d3) level or plain country;
1d4) land of the living; 1d5) end(s) of the earth; 1e) (almost wholly
late in usage); 1e1a) often in contrast to Canaan

} – doesn’t seem necessary at all. And it turns out the sandglasses are
not just ornamental. They’re really used for timekeeping (but with a
catch). The parliament’s website explains:

Until 1989, it [the Annotated Standing Orders] contained references to a
sand-glass kept on the Table for the purpose of timing divisions. The
Clerk was responsible for turning the sand-glass and the time was taken
to have elapsed when the sand-glass so indicated. References to this
antique but reliable technology were removed in the course of the 1989
revision to free the principle from reliance on any particular technology.

Although sand-glasses continue to be used as the primary means of timing
the division or quorum bells {

#393 as #300, #10, #7, #70, #6 = zuwa` (H2111): {#0 as #83} 1) to
tremble, quiver, quake, be in terror; 1a) (Qal) to tremble, quake; 1b)
(Pilpel); 1b1) to shake violently; 1b2) to cause to tremble;

"In the day when the keepers of the house shall tremble {zuwa`-moved
[H2111]: #393}, and the strong men shall bow themselves, and the
grinders cease because they are few, and those that look out of the
windows be darkened..." [Ecclesiastes 12:3 (KJV)]

"Shall they not rise up suddenly that shall bite thee, and awake that
shall vex {zuwa`-moved [H2111]: #393} thee, and thou shalt be for
booties unto them?" [Habakkuk 2:7 (KJV)]

#393 as #8, #90, #90, #200, #5 = chatsotserah (H2689): {#2 as #399} 1)
trumpet, clarion

}, they are now used in conjunction with the digital speech timer. An
advantage of the latter is that it enables a time signal to be broadcast
on the House Monitoring Service which shows senators how much time
remains for them to reach the chamber. In practice, the Chair takes
whichever methodology expires last as a signal to call for the doors to
be locked.

Note “antique but reliable”, but also references to using it were
removed in 1989 “to free the principle from reliance on any particular
technology”.

Justin Baker, assistant director of the Chamber Research Office in the
Department of the House of Representatives, explained to Business
Insider why they continue to use what looks like a giant egg timer.

Hansard records reveal a reference to a sandglass being used for
divisions back in 1901 “so they have likely been a feature of the
parliament since Federation”.

When the Central Table for the new Parliament House was commissioned, a
pair of sandglasses was included in the brief by the Parliament amongst
other items, such as bronze brackets to support the Mace, pigeon hole
book stands, digital clocks, call bells and microphones.

“A stand with a wooden base and green felt underneath for the
sandglasses was purpose built for the Clerk’s desk within the Chamber,”
Baker said. “In 1998, a new stand and glasses were designed and
manufactured to accommodate an additional sandglass.”

That’s right – they bought another one.

<https://www.businessinsider.com.au/heres-why-australias-parliament-uses-sandglasses-when-theres-a-division-in-the-house-2015-6>

Waking up during the night (as you can appreciate of such maelstrom
reality) so as to newsgroup post doesn’t lend itself to a frame of mind
fruitful for programming.

But I have decided now make incremental releases of the developer
progress updates with this link:

<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html>

I’m still to trace through the debugging of the .jackNote span
function() which isn’t yet finished it’s testing phase as it presently
clearly gives the wrong values for the @memeBrain bubble cascades.

But I will work on it as I can as I imagine my narrative output will
diminish for the next few months.

However I have partially implemented an update of the TAXONOMY() and the
calcTelos() functions which may still be micro modified and have enabled
the possibility of the @memeBrain elements being displayed individually
as either SUPER (MALE) or EGO (FEMALE) and this is in preparation for
the IDEA:{} object to be conveyed as either.

I envisioned an additional search option such as:

?CATEGORY:MALE&IDEA:{331}&IDEA:{237} &IDEA:{333}

or perhaps:

?IDEA:{331,M}&IDEA:{237,F}&IDEA:{333}

We shall see which is the better approach, but at this point I favour
the latter.

But what we have done within our written narrative is demonstrate that
there is no basis to the Sovereignty which the Vatican City-State claims
of itself (*THAT* *IT* *IS* *BY* *ITS* *GRECO*-*ROMAN* #231 *ROOTS*
*IDENTICAL* *TO* *GERMAN* *FASCISM* *DESPITE* *PAPAL* *ATTEMPTS* *TO*
**OTHERWISE* * CONVEY* *SUCH* *SIN* *OF* *FAKE* *NEWS*, and the Letters
Patent to the Federation of the Australian Commonwealth 1901 are not
only a valid basis (if not the only means) to define Sovereignty of a
nation but it’s ternary technological sapient basis is an exceptional
globalisation paradigm framework for all sorts agreements including
trade, taxation, science, knowledge sapient services, personalistics,
defence (etc) as having not only a linguistic basis but a technological
foundation of an exponential growth potential.

Such a framework {ie. in my view the SEPTET DRIVER as ENTELECHY with
INFINITE POTENTIAL rather than the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH’S ANKH as the
#72 ANTHROPIC TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE sinisterly provided within the
Greco-Roman magic square (as we have shown) as transformative prototype
is perhaps a better equivalent to the Medical Caduceus
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Medical_Caduceus.png>} as the means
for provisioning transactional and sapient services proving thereby by
its very use would be an enabler for a revenue stream (of which I
estimate from its global perspective be $10 billion a day in yet
untapped fiscal well of opportunity—but I leave such dreams of mine to
the experts in any sapient field) would thereby solve Britain’s National
Health Service (NHS) woes, but it will take some investment and time to
implement.

The cognitive hypothesis as the theoretical obvious concern of this
dialectic correspondence with this SEPTET driver to the mathematical
theoretical noumenon which provides by an equitable distribution of
trinomial number an ontological basis for the entelechy:

- the realization of potential.
- the supposed vital principle that guides the development and
functioning of an organism or other system or organization.
- such self-organization requires a special biological force which is
known as entelechy.
- the soul for the spiritus.
- the mathematical / electronic equivalent of stem cells is for others
to decide.

It therefore may be considered as quintessentially the 'INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS' of an unencumbered will and ought to conform
with the
following dialectic which chronicles the: levels / phases / stages /
duration / milestone of any perennial cycle as the dispensational
governance basis of LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA OF 1901 represented by a theoretical mathematical trinomial
MENTALISM: #1 - Will, free will, choice / Remember the Sabbath Day
CORRESPONDENCE: #2 - desire, inclination / Honour Parents
VIBRATION: #3 - disposition towards (something or someone) / Do Not Kill
POLARITY: #4 - favour, affection / Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid
Heteronomy Against Autonomy)
RHYTHM: #5 - last will, testament / Do Not Steal
CAUSE AND EFFECT: #6 - goal, object, purpose, intention / Do Not Bear
False
Witness
ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE: #7 - signification, import / Do Not Covet [LATIN
definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
The NOLUNTĀTIS is then a consequence of an opposition as consideration
being a question of relativity as the interoperability by mutuality
on what
#8 - TRANSFORMATIVE prototype is to be deployed where the default is the
#8 as TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE: #1 - unwillingness;
But this is in my view a matter of protocol selection which can be
identified by the classification duality of both the cryptographic # and
the vRUDOLPH DATE being determined by a cosmogonic observation as
computation of rational 22/7 from #0 of Equinox on Wednesday of 20 March
1996 associated to any EVENT as slider dispersal from calendar to the
noumenon.
The Autonomous Prototype is then the source amalgamation of the binomial,
trinomial and chrononomial (#YEAR, #DECADE, #CENTENARY and #MILLENNIUM
#9 as MIRRORED AUTONOMOUS PROTOTYPE OF EACH OTHER'S SOVEREIGN
AUTONOMY: #2
NOLUNTĀTIS]
There are more Intelligent people than me who can appraise that
consideration as solution to their problems.
TO THE
The greatest success of the NHS threatens to overwhelm it. Modern
medicine
has been hugely successful at keeping people alive, as the death
rates from
heart disease halve in a decade and cancer survival improves. Yet the
result is an ever-growing number of people who not only need continuing
treatment for these conditions, but now live long enough to get
dementia or
another disease on top.
NHS leaders know what they need to do: the service must change from one
centred on hospitals to one that makes better use of local clinics and
modern technology to control long-term conditions. If an older person
needs
a hospital bed, that should not be the start of treatment, but a sign
that
it has already failed.
Yet despite…”
<https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/solutions-are-obvious-but-painful-8xvxt6c7w>
*IMPORTANT* *NOTE*: That if this trinomial HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER a
priori as PARADIGM already has a conception of an INTELLECTUAL TETRAD
{#8 -
Transformation Prototype} which as CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY was
associated
to a LUNAR event upon the midnight solstice of 21 December 103 BCE and
published in 4 BCE is equivalent to the later implementation of
PYTHAGOREAN
binomial HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER as the basis for the Julian
calendar and
VIRTUE as MIND: {1 + 2 = #3} +
TOOLS as SCIENCE: {3 + 4 = #7} +
POSITION as OPINION: {5 + 6 = #11} +
TIME as SENSE: {7 + 8 = #15}
= #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal
Law +
H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity)
6x6 = #36 / #111 / #666 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}
Whilst it may continue to function as an acceptable METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI
TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} with an encapsulated sphere of
operation {
41  1 57
49 33 17
  9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE}
42  2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}
43  3 59
51 35 19
11 67 27 = #105 / #315 {#THREE}
44  4 60
52 36 20
12 68 28 = #108 / #324 {#FOUR}
74 81 76
79 77 75
78 73 80 = #231 - #108 = #123 / #693 - #369 = #324 {#TEN} AS RETURN TO
GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE BEING ITSELF
}, it is entirely a specious notion to declare it is the root and causal
basis of the perennialist philosophical tradition.
ANGEL CORRESPONDENCES TO SUN (#111)
45   5 61
53 37 21*
13*69 29 = #111 / #333 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}
<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{111}&idea:{333}>
#5 (9) - MAHASHYAH (Seraphim-Virtues) = #5
#13 (8) - YEZLEL (Cherubim-Virtues) = #18
#21 (7) - NELKEL (Throne-Virtues) = #39
#29 (6) - RYIEL (Dominion-Virtues) = #68
#37 (5) - ANIEL (Powers-Virtues) = #105
<http://www.grapple369.com/gematria.html?umbra:{105}>
'H113' : {'xlit' : "ʼâdôwn", 'lingo' : 0, 'strongs' : "H113",
"aw-done'", 'lemma' : ["אָדוֹן"], 'link' : null, 'info' : "Or (shortened)
אָדֹן; from an unused root (meaning to rule); sovereign, i.e. controller
(human or divine); lord, master, owner. Compare also names beginning with
'Adoni-'.", 'gematria' : {'61' : [1, 4, 6, 50], '711' : [1, 4, 6, 700]},
'umbra' : {'91' : [20, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6], '100' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 5],
'101' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6],
'105' : [40, 1, 4, 50, 10],
'111' : [40, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6],
[1, 4, 50, 10, 500], '595' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 500], '670' : [5, 1,
4, 50,
10, 600], '671' : [1, 4, 6, 50, 10, 600], '676' : [1, 4, 6, 50, 10, 5,
600], '685' : [1, 4, 50, 10, 20, 600], '700' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 5,
600],
'741' : [30, 1, 4, 6, 700], '747' : [6, 30, 1, 4, 6, 700]}},
#45 (4) - SELYAH (Virtues-Virtues) = #150
#53 (3) - NANAEL (Principalities-Virtues) = #203
#61 (2) - OUMBEL (Archangels-Virtues) = #264
#69 (1) - RAHEL (Angels-Virtues) = #333
USURPER: #1 {First Number in the Square}
GUIDE: #36 (6x6) {Last Number in the Square}
MYSTERY: #37 {First Number + Last Number}
ADJUSTER: #111 {Total Sum of a Row}
LEADER: #666 {Total Value of All Rows}
REGULATOR: #777 {Total Sum of a Row + Total Sum of All Rows}
GENERAL GOVERNOR: #1554 {(Total Sum of a Row Total Sum of All Rows) x 2}
HIGH OVERSEER: #55944 {((Total Sum of a Row Total Sum of All Rows) x 2) x
Last Number in the Square}
#1 - Executive Positions
#2 - Jewelers
#3 - Goldsmiths
#4 - Judges
#5 - Public Servants
#6 - Acting
#7 - Monarchs
#8 - Leaders
#9 - Populace (?)
*LIVE* *LONG* *AND* *PROSPER* [Leonard Simon Nimoy, 26 March 1931 - 27
February 2015 (RIP)]

YOUTUBE: “The Birth Of ‘LIVE LONG AND PROSPER’"

http://youtu.be/UdYbpMkH_XQ

*IT* *IS* *ONLY* *THE* *FAILURE* *OF* *HUMANITY’S* *IMAGINATION* *WHICH*
*GROUNDS* *US* *AS* *LIMITS*.

- dolf

A REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF DOCUMENT FROM THIS URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Prosper.pdf>
--
SEE ALSO: *INVALIDATING* *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC*
*CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND*
*FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS
INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING
AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]
as EXISTENCE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD/TETRACTYS

Initial Post: 24 January 2018

#LIVE #LONG #PROSPER
dolf
2018-01-25 00:49:13 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT) LIVE LONG AND PROSPER: GRAPPLE BETA UPDATE QUESTION - IS THE
SEPTET DRIVER AS ENTELECHY AN EQUIVALENT TO THE MEDICAL CADUCEUS?

(c) 2017 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 25 January, 2018

Nous: #3
Time: 20:15 hrs
Date: 2018.1.24
Torah: #6 #40 #2 %81 = #48
Dao: Political Prescriptions, Quietude
Tetra: #8 - Opposition
I-Ching: H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending

Latin: Facies {God above all things} Alt: Anael {Ship of God} {

1. SERVES TO OBTAIN THE FRIENDSHIP OF A PERSON
2. ASTRONOMY & PHYSICS
3. THE SENSITIVITY OF THE HEART
4. Ptiau
}

#34 CE

Transformative Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#274 / #333 IN BEING #FIVE AS
#CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME *AS* *MY* INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* } /
HETEROS {#304 / #348 *AS* *DISTINCT* *TO* *THAT* *OF* *THE* *FASCIST*
*VATICAN* *CITY* *STATE*}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:8,col:7,nous:3&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS&LEXICON:BIBLE&idea:{97}&idea:{274}&idea:{92}&idea:{333}>

***@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 7, nous: 3 [Date: 2018.1.24, Super: #274
/ #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching: H8 - Closeness,
Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra: 33 -
Closeness, Ego: #333 / #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching:
H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition]

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #31 -
Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 - Perseverance,
Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy / INNER: #28 -
Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 -
Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full Circle} #274 has 9
Categories: 

#5, #1, #8, #10, #200, #40, #10 = 'Achiyramiy (H298): {#0
as #269} 1) one of the clan of Ahiram; #3, #6, #200, #10, #5, #50 = guwr
(H1482): {#1 as #209} 1) cub, whelp, young; #5, #5, #3, #200, #10, #1,
#10, #40 = Hagriy (H1905): {#2 as #218} 1) a people dwelling to the east
of Palestine, with whom the tribes of Reuben made war in the time of
Saul adj patr; 2) of one of David's servants Haggeri = 'wanderer'; 3)
father of Mibhar and one of David's mighty warriors; #6, #30, #10, #6,
#10, #200, #10, #2 = Yowyariyb (H3114): {#3 as #238} 1) the head of the
1st of the 24 courses of priests in David's time; 2) a teacher in the
time of Ezra; 3) a Judaite in the time of Nehemiah; #40, #10, #200, #10,
#8, #6 = Yeriychow (H3405): {#4 as #224} 1) a city 5 miles (8 km) west
of the Jordan and 7 miles (11.5 km) north of the Dead Sea and the first
city conquered by the Israelites upon entering the promised land of
Canaan; #6, #60, #200, #8 = cerach (H5629): {#5 as #268} 1) excess,
overhanging; #200, #10, #8, #50, #6 = reyach (H7381): {#6 as #218} 1)
scent, fragrance, aroma, odour; 1a) scent, odour; 1b) odour of soothing
(technical term for sacrifice to God); #3, #5, #50, #5, #1, #10, #200 =
genea (G1074): {#7 as #64} 1) fathered, birth, nativity; 2) that which
has been begotten, men of the same stock, a family; 3) the whole
multitude of men living at the same time; 4) an age (ie. the time
ordinarily occupied be each successive generation), a space of 30 - 33
years; 2a) the several ranks of natural descent, the successive members
of a genealogy; 2b) metaph. a race of men very like each other in
endowments, pursuits, character; 2b1) esp. in a bad sense, a perverse
race; #4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #10, #70, #50 = dokimion (G1383): {#8 as
#274} 1) the proving; 2) that by which something is tried or proved, a test;

EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #9 -
Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The
Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion / INNER: #5 - Natural
Guidance, Function of Emptiness; I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete,
Completion & After, Already Fording; Tetra: 73 - Already Fording,
Completion} #333 has 12 Categories:

#30, #2, #100, #200, #1 = beqar (Aramaic) (H1240): {#0 as #302} 1) to
seek, enquire; 1a) (Pael) to enquire; 1b) (Ithpael) to let search be
made; #6, #7, #200, #70, #10, #40 = zerowa` (H2220): {#1 as #283} 1)
arm, forearm, shoulder, strength; 1a) arm; 1b) arm (as symbol of
strength); 1c) forces (political and military); 1d) shoulder (of animal
sacrificed); #30, #5, #8, #200, #10, #40, #40 = charam (H2763): {#2 as
#248} 1) to ban, devote, destroy utterly, completely destroy, dedicate
for destruction, exterminate; 2) to split, slit, mutilate (a part of the
body); 1a) (Hiphil); 1a1) to prohibit (for common use), ban; 1a2) to
consecrate, devote, dedicate for destruction; 1a3) to exterminate,
completely destroy; 1b) (Hophal); 1b1) to be put under the ban, be
devoted to destruction; 1b2) to be devoted, be forfeited; 1b3) to be
completely destroyed; 2a) (Qal) to mutilate; 2b) (Hiphil) to divide; #5,
#10, #7, #200, #70, #1, #30, #10 = Yizre`e'liy (H3158): {#3 as #328} 1)
an inhabitant of Jezreel; #6, #40, #5, #70, #7, #200, #5 = `azarah
(H5835): {#4 as #282} 1) enclosure; 1a) ledge (surrounding Ezekiel's
altar); 1b) court (outer one of temple); #6, #5, #70, #200, #2, #10, #40
= `oreb (H6158): {#5 as #272} 1) raven; #5, #70, #200, #2, #6, #50 =
`arabown (H6162): {#6 as #328} 1) pledge, security; #30, #200, #8, #90,
#5 = rachats (H7364): {#7 as #298} 1) to wash, wash off, wash away,
bathe; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to wash, wash off, wash away; 1a2) to wash, bathe
(oneself); 1b) (Pual) to be washed; 1c) (Hithpael) to wash oneself; #5,
#30, #30, #8, #50, #10, #200 = Hellenis (G1674): {#8 as #333} 1) a Greek
women; 2) a Gentile women, not a Jewess; #5, #9, #1, #40, #2, #8, #9,
#8, #200, #1, #50 = thambeo (G2284): {#9 as #857} 1) to be astonished;
2) to astonish, terrify; 2a) to be amazed; 2b) to be frightened; #70,
#100, #3, #10, #30, #70, #50 = orgilos (G3711): {#10 as #483} 1) prone
to anger, irascible; #5, #80, #30, #1, #200, #9, #8 = plasso (G4111):
{#11 as #1311} 1) to form, mould (something from clay, wax, etc.); 1a)
used of a potter;

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:8,col:7,nous:3&PROTOTYPE:HETEROS&LEXICON:AUM&idea:{97}&idea:{304}&idea:{92}&idea:{348}>

***@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 7, nous: 3 [Date: 2018.1.24, Super: #304
/ #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching: H8 - Closeness,
Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra: 33 -
Closeness, Ego: #348 / #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching:
H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition]

SUPER (MALE) A-U-M HETEROS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #61 - Virtuous
Humility at Using 'Beneath'; I-Ching: H64 - Ferrying Incomplete, Before
Completion, Not Yet Fording, Not yet completed; Tetra: 78 - On the Verge
/ INNER: #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable Maid/Maiden,
Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner} #304 has 7 Categories:

#4, #100, #200 = To bore through, pierce, stab; curse, condemn; n.
Swordsman; #4, #200, #100 = To hasten; #7, #200, #7, #10, #80 = A heavy
shower; #8, #90, #6, #200 = n. Enclosed Place, Castle; #8, #90, #200, #6
= n. Blooming; #8, #200, #6, #90 = *DITCH* *OR* *FOSSE* *(*OF* *A*
*FORTRESS*); *A* *DECISION* *OR* *JUDGMENT*; *GOLD*; *ACTIVE*, *EAGER*;
*INDUSTRIOUS*, *STRENUOUS*; *SHARP*, *POINTED*; *A* *POINTED* *SHARD*
*OR* *SHARP* *STONE*; #8, #200, #40, #6, #50 = n. Mountain Peak;

EGO (FEMALE) A-U-M HETEROS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #24 -
Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting /
INNER: #20 - Left without Language, Different From the Vulgar; I-Ching:
H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 50 -
Vastness/Wasting} #348 has 14 Categories: 

#2, #90, #200, #6, #50 =
Citadel, fortress; #8, #40, #300 = *TO* *BE* *SHARP*, *BOLD*, *STRONG*;
*TO* *ARM* *THE* *LOINS*; *TO* *ARM* *ONESELF*; *FIVE*; *LOINS*,
*WAIST*; *A* *FIFTH*, *TO* *TAX* *ONE* *FIFTH*; #8, #90, #200, #10, #40
= Trumpeters; #8, #200, #90, #50 = Grape seeds; sour grapes; #8, #300,
#40 = To be bright, to be affluent; alert; #40, #2, #6, #300 = The parts
of shame; penis; #40, #6, #300, #2 = A seat; a site or situation; a
sitting or session; a dwelling; a tarrying or stay; dwellers,
inhabitants; #40, #8, #100, #200 = Exploration, a hidden or deep place,
inmost recess; #40, #200, #8, #100 = Remoteness, distance; #40, #200,
#100, #8 = Perfume, aromatic herb; #40, #300, #3, #5 = *A* *MISLEADER*
*OR* *DECEIVER*; #40, #300, #3, #5 = *AN* *ERROR*; #40, #300, #8 = To
streak or spread over, to paint; to consecrate by unction, to anoint;
#40, #300, #8 = To measure or portion out;

I’m planning on providing this update discussion as a gift later today
accompanying some chapter drafts when I have my final consultation visit
with my special orthopaedic surgeon with the caveat that he ought to
look beyond the semantics of opportunism which are provided by the
Hebrew / Greek lexicon by which I can demonstrate the proof of
conception truth of the 1784 noumena theory as an impossibly articulated
by Immanuel Kantian within “Critique of Pure Reason” by my #231
appraisal of a certain 1941 narrative which had a most shocking import.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Budgie.pdf>

IDEA @52 ON EVENING 25 October 1941 - JEWS RESPONSIBLE FOR TWO WORLD
WARS — HOW PAST CIVILISATIONS ARE EFFACED — THE REWRITING OF HISTORY —
THE LIBRARIES OF ANTIQUITY — CHRISTIANITY AND BOLSHEVISM, AIM AT
DESTRUCTION — NERO DID NOT BURN ROME {AD 64} —PROTESTANT HYPOCRISY — THE
CATHOLIC CHURCH THRIVES ON SIN — ACCOUNTS TO BE SETTLED —  THE MODERNIST
MOVEMENT — THE PROBLEM OF THE CONVENTS:

SPECIAL GUESTS: REICHSFUEHRER SS HIMMLER AND *SS* *GENERAL*
(*OBERGRUPPENFUEHRER*) *HEYDRICH* (*HIGH*-*RANKING* *GERMAN* *NAZI*
*OFFICIAL* *DURING* *WORLD* *WAR* *II*, *AND* *A* *MAIN* *ARCHITECT*
*OF* *THE* *HOLOCAUST*)

PAGE #87 - RUMOURS OF EXTERMINATION OF JEWS

From the rostrum of the Reichstag I prophesied to Jewry that, in the
event of war's proving inevitable, the Jew would disappear from Europe.
That race of criminals has on its conscience the two million dead of the
first World War, and now already hundreds of thousands more. Let nobody
tell me that all the same we can't park them in the marshy parts of
Russia! Who's worrying about our troops? It's not a bad idea, by the
way, that public rumour attributes to us a plan to exterminate the Jews.
Terror is a salutary thing.

*THE* *ATTEMPT* *TO* *CREATE* *A* *JEWISH* *STATE* *WILL* *BE* *A*
*FAILURE*.

The book that contains the reflections of the Emperor Julian should be
circulated in millions. What wonderful intelligence, what discernment,
all the wisdom of antiquity! It's extra- ordinary.

ACCORDING TO WIKIPEDIA: Julian (Latin: Flavius Claudius Iulianus
Augustus[a]; Greek: Φλάβιος Κλαύδιος Ἰουλιανὸς Αὔγουστος; 331/332  – 26
June 363), also known as Julian the Apostate, was Roman Emperor from 361
to 363, as well as a notable philosopher and author in Greek.

A member of the Constantinian dynasty, Julian became Caesar over the
western provinces by order of Constantius II in 355, and in this role he
campaigned successfully against the Alamanni and Franks. Most notable
was his crushing victory over the Alamanni at the Battle of Argentoratum
(Strasbourg) in 357, leading his 13,000 men against a Germanic army
three times larger.

In 360 Julian was proclaimed Augustus by his soldiers at Lutetia
(Paris), sparking a civil war with Constantius. However, Constantius
died before the two could face each other in battle, and named Julian as
his successor.

In 363, Julian embarked on an ambitious campaign against the Sassanid
Empire. The campaign was initially successful, securing a victory
outside Ctesiphon, but during a skirmish Julian was mortally wounded,
leaving his army trapped in Persian territory. Following his death, the
Roman forces were obliged to cede territory in order to escape,
including the fortress city of Nisibis.

Julian was a man of unusually complex character: he was "the military
commander, the theosophist, the social reformer, and the man of
letters". *HE* *WAS* *THE* *LAST* *NON*-*CHRISTIAN* *RULER* *OF* *THE*
*ROMAN* *EMPIRE*, *AND* *HE* *BELIEVED* *THAT* *IT* *WAS* *NECESSARY*
*TO* *RESTORE* *THE* *EMPIRE'S* *ANCIENT* *ROMAN* *VALUES* *AND*
*TRADITIONS* {

ACCORDING TO HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @I / PAGE #3: *THE* *FASCIST*
*MOVEMENT* *IS* *A* *SPONTANEOUS* *RETURN* *TO* *THE* *TRADITIONS* *OF*
*ANCIENT* *ROME* {strength}

} *IN* *ORDER* *TO* *SAVE* *IT* *FROM* *DISSOLUTION*. [Athanassiadi,
'Julian and Hellenism', p. 88]

He purged the top-heavy state bureaucracy, and attempted to revive
traditional Roman religious practices at the expense of Christianity.
Julian also forbade the Christians from teaching classical texts and
learning. His rejection of the Christianity imposed on him in his youth,
and his *promotion* *of* *Neoplatonic* *Hellenism* {ie. Pythagorean
binomial theory of number} in its place caused him to be remembered as
Julian the Apostate by the church.
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_(emperor)>]

PAGE #89 - CATHOLICS AND PROTESTANTS

Christianity set itself systematically to destroy ancient culture.

What came to us was passed down by chance, or else it was a product of
Roman liberal writers. Perhaps we are entirely ignorant of humanity's
most precious spiritual treasures. Who can know what was there?

The Papacy was faithful to these tactics even during recorded history.
How did people behave, during the age of the great explorations, towards
the spiritual riches of Central America?

*IN* *OUR* *PARTS* *OF* *THE* *WORLD*, *THE* *JEWS* *WOULD* *HAVE*
*IMMEDIATELY* *ELIMINATED* *SCHOPENHAUER*, *NIETZSCHE* *AND* *KANT* {

HOWEVER WITHIN IDEA @233 ON PAGES #513 - GERMAN BIBLE TRANSLATION
CONDEMNED / PAGE #514 - THE VALUE OF ASTRONOMY, ADOLF HITLER DOES NOT
CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY OF A THEORETICAL NOTION AS KANT POSTULATES OF A
NOUMENON: "*AS* *A* *SANE* *GERMAN*, *ONE* *IS* *FLABBERGASTED* *TO*
*THINK* *THAT* *GERMAN* *HUMAN* *BEINGS* *COULD* *HAVE* *LET*
*THEMSELVES* *BE* *BROUGHT* *TO* *SUCH* *A* *PASS* *BY* *JEWISH* *FILTH*
*AND* *PRIESTLY* *TWADDLE*, that they were little different from the
howling dervish of the Turks and the negroes, at whom we laugh so
scornfully. It angers one to think that, while in other parts of the
globe religious teaching like that of Confucius, Buddha and Mohammed
offers an undeniably broad basis for the religious-minded, Germans
should have been duped by a theological exposition devoid of all honest
depth.

When one seeks reasons for these *PHENOMENA*, *ONE* *IS* *IMMEDIATELY*
*STRUCK* *BY* *THE* *EXTENT* *TO* *WHICH* *THE* *HUMAN* *BRAIN* *REACTS*
*TO* *EXTERNAL* *INFLUENCE*."

I QUOTE: "In the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be
applied to data provided by sensibility in order to provide cognition,
and because the data of sensibility are structured by the
transcenden­tally ideal forms of intuition, the categories give us
knowledge only of things as they appear with sensibility ("phenomena,"
literally "that which appears").

Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of
objects independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can never
cognize them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that
which is thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of
Kant's use of the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of
"noumena" is not, since it literally means not "things as they are in­
dependently of appearing to us" but something more like "things as they
are understood by pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human
understanding can comprehend things in the latter way."

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>

*THUS* *I* *AM* *PROFFERING* *AN* *INFORMED* *AND* *REASONED* *OPINION*
*AS* *THAT* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL* *KANT* *STATES* *IS* *AN* *IMPOSSIBILITY*
*FOR* *A* *HUMAN* *BEING* *TO* *ACCOMPLISH* *BY* *TRANSCENDENT*
*SAPIENTIAL* *THOUGHT* *AND* *CAPABLY* *DEMONSTRATE* *IT'S* *TEMPORAL*
*CONGRUENCE* *AS* *COHERENCE* *BY* *A* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL*
*NOUMENON* *AS* *AN*  *INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* *WHICH* *IMMANUEL*
*KANT* *HIMSELF* *CALLS* *NOUMENA* *AS* *THE* *PROOF* *OF* *A* *VALID*
*AND* *RATIONAL* *CONCEPT* *ATTAINED* *BY* *PURE* *THOUGHT* *BUT* *MY*
*ANTAGONIST'S* *OPINIONS* *ARE* *ONLY* *A* *SELF*-*INFATUATION* *WITH*
*DELUSION* *AND* *MORE* *PROPERLY* *UNDERSTOOD* *IN* *TERMS* *OF*
*PSYCHOSIS*.

}. If the Bolsheviks had dominion over us for two hundred years, what
works of our past would be handed on to posterity? Our great men would
fall into oblivion, or else they'd be presented to future generations as
criminals and bandits.

I don't believe at all in the truth of certain mental pictures that many
people have of the Roman emperors. I'm sure that Nero didn't set fire to
Rome {68 AD}. It was the Christian-Bolsheviks who did that, just as the
Commune set fire to Paris in 1871 and the Communists set fire to the
Reichstag in 1932.

There is a form of hypocrisy, typically Protestant, that is impudence
itself. Catholicism has this much good about it, that it ignores the
moral strictness of the Evangelicals. In Catholic regions life is more
endurable, for the priest himself succumbs more easily to human
weaknesses. So he permits his flock not to dramatise sin. How would the
Church earn her living, if not by the sins of the faithful? She declares
herself satisfied if one goes to confession. Indulgence, at a tariff,
supplies the Church with her daily bread. As for the fruits of sin, the
soul that fears limbo is a candidate for baptism, that is to say,
another customer, and so business goes on! It is a fact that in Catholic
parts of the world there are many more illegitimate births than in
Protestant parts.

In Austria, Protestantism was free of all bigotry. It was truly a
movement of protest against Catholicism. Moreover, these Protestants
were entirely devoted to the German cause.

A scandal is that, when a believer leaves a particular faith, he is
compelled to pay the ecclesiastical tax for another year. A simple
statement should be enough to free him at once from owing anything
further. We'll put all that right as soon as we have peace again.

-----------

IRREPARABLE HARM DONE TO A CERTAIN CULT OF PERSONALITY
We haven’t yet by 7 January 2018, finished what is only a superficial
two day analysis of Hitler’s Table Talk and I have undertaken the task
reluctantly, being without any infatuation directed towards the
individual as impetus and within the obstructions as the restraints of
inadequacy and resourcefulness which is my education.   Or rather a lack
thereof.  Which, if I sought such further opportunities in particular
that of psychology, would greatly assist my cursory and informal as
haphazard approach to the project.

But it ought to be remembered, that I by reasonable thought, invented
the very tool which is prerequisite to an undertaking of my analysis and
has yielded such fertile consequence. I would therefore provisionally
conclude from the #231 preliminary assessment which we disclose below,
as to it being associated to a systematic and insidious assertion made
upon the MIND of the population.

However given this cult of personality which he has clearly exhibited as
most apparent even within the short duration of our attention to the
matter as the process of informing and the knowing, also had exhibited
an immutable and an irrational aggression towards the biblical narrative
itself wherein my entire (excepting for the Dao as the Mother of
Governance) trinomial mathematical paradigm of sapient MIND as
theoretical noumenon by which I appraised him, is embedded.

That the maxim: “a house divided by itself would most certainly have
fallen.”

Is a truism if ever there was one so uttered.

I’m at the stage of writing this attention point, currently up-to #150
pages and I anticipate finishing our introduction into a proof of
concept in the existence of what is Immanuel Kant’s meaning of the term
"noumena" as not which is self evident, since it literally means not
"things as they are in dependently of appearing to us" but something
more like "things as they are understood by pure thought."


“And I have seen wonders.
And I have seen miracles
Oh, I have seen some things...”

Yet Kant appears to deny that the human understanding can comprehend
things in the latter way."

I’m not as advanced on the next revision of the Grapple prototype as I
had desired to be since I have been more focussed upon writing such
narrative as above for the past little while as that which dispels
decades of *FAKE* *NEWS* promulgated by the Papal Authority itself.

ROSA FLORES (CNN) @ 2245 HOURS ON 24 JANUARY 2018: “POPE WARNS AGAINST
'FAKE NEWS' AND LIKENS IT TO 'CRAFTY SERPENT' IN GENESIS:

Pope Francis released a message condemning "fake news," saying that it's
a "sign of intolerant and hypersensitive attitudes, and leads only to
the spread of arrogance and hatred."

The Vatican says the message is part of the Pope's World Communications
Day, but some at St. Peter's Square say the Pope was probably sending a
message to Donald Trump and other world leaders who have been using the
phrase "fake news."

The tragic history of human sin, the Pope says in his message, is the
first "fake news" and it dates back to the book of Genesis, when the
"crafty serpent" lied to the woman. In present day, according to the
Pope's message the fast digital world helps fuel the spread of "fake
news" -- which he defines as "the spreading of disinformation on line or
in the traditional media."

"Spreading fake news can serve to advance specific goals, influence
political decisions and serve economic interests," the Pope said.

The Pope's message blames the difficulty in unmasking and eliminating
fake news to people interacting with homogeneous news environments
rather than listening to differing perspectives and opinions.

"Disinformation thus thrives on the absence of healthy confrontation
with other sources of information that could effectively challenge
prejudices and generate constructive dialogue; instead, it risks turning
people into unwilling accomplices in spreading biased and baseless
ideas," the Pope's message said.

POPE ON HOW TO COMBAT FAKE NEWS
Journalism that seeks the truth, the Pope's message says, is the way to
overcome this "fake news" phenomenon. And hence his dedication of World
Day of Communication to "'The truth will set you free'. Fake news and
journalism for peace."

"I would like to contribute to our shared commitment to stemming the
spread of fake news and to rediscovering the dignity of journalism and
the personal responsibility of journalists to communicate the truth.

"Praiseworthy efforts are being made to create educational programs
aimed at helping people to interpret and assess information provided by
the media, and teaching them to take an active part in unmasking
falsehoods, rather than unwittingly contributing to the spread of
disinformation."

Catholics have been observing World Communication day since 1967. The
Pope's message is traditionally published on January 24 during the day
of the feast of St. Francis de Sales, the patron saint of journalists.
Catholics don't celebrate World Communication Day until May 13, but the
announcement is made early to give bishops and priests time to prepare
for local and national celebrations.

Pope Francis has fallen victim to fake news himself. First when a fake
news site falsely reported the Pope endorsed Hillary Clinton for
President. And then again, when another fake news site falsely reported
he endorsed Donald Trump for President.”
[<http://edition.cnn.com/2018/01/24/world/pope-condemns-fake-news/index.html>]

Nous: #10
Time: 16:30 hrs
Date: 2018.11.30
Torah: #20 #30 #10 %81 = #60
Dao: Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?
Tetra: #41 - Response
I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net

Latin: Assistens {God prompt to grant} Alt: Menqel {Libation Bowl of God} {

1. SERVES TO MAKE KNOWN THE TRUTH. AIDS THE TRIUMPH OF INNOCENCE
2. PROMPT HELP IN TRIALS
3. WITNESSES
4. Tepisatosoa
}

Solar Eclipse: 13 (UTC) / 14 November 2012 (AEST)

Nahor {Snorting, Hoarse; dry; hot}

Transformative Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#371 / #393} / HETEROS {#287 / #432}


<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:7,col:4,nous:10&idea:{82}&idea:{371}&idea:{83}&idea:{393}>

***@zen: 3, row: 7, col: 4, nous: 10 [Super: #371 / #2 - Contrast
of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 - Peace, Pervading, Greatness;
Tetra: 16 - Contact, Ego: #393 / #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be
Done?; I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire,
The net; Tetra: 41 - Response]

— ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE AS AUTONOMOUS HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY
THEORY {ANIMUS: *SANDGLASS*} —

#1 = Position {#558}
#2 = Poise {#244} / Pause {#476}
#3 = Purpose {#695}
#4 = Process {#428}
#5 = Pairing {#236} / DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE)
#6 = Perspicacity {#1260} / BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS)
#7 = Probability {#1173} / Prosperous {#945} / MANIFESTING NORM (NORMA
DENUNTIANS)
#8 = Propriety {#1294} / TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE
#9 = Persona {#376} / AUTONOMOUS PARADIGM

YOUTUBE: "Days of our Lives Full Music Theme"



#10 / #10 = Totality of Nature {#7 - Engendering Nature} / SOVEREIGNTY
#11 / #8 = Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in it's
Nature {#7 - Engendering Nature}} / GOVERNMENT & NON-GOVERNMENT
ORGANISATIONS
#12 / #9 = Autonomous Nature / GENERAL POPULACE
— STRAWBERRIES —

"CALIGULA'S ARMY {#100 as #1, #3, #80, #10, #6 = 'aggaph (H102): {#2 as
#84} 1) wing (of an army), band, *ARMY*, hordes / #224 as #6, #8, #200,
#4, #6 = charad (H2729): {#48 as #224} 1) to tremble, quake, move about,
be afraid, be startled, be terrified; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to tremble, quake
(of a mountain); 1a2) to tremble (of people); 1a3) to be anxiously
careful; 1a4) to go or come trembling (with prep); 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to
cause to tremble; 1b2) *TO* *DRIVE* *IN* *TERROR*, *ROUT* (*AN* *ARMY*)}
MARCHES, {#1}
ALL ACROSS THE LAND. {#2}
THE TRIUMPHANT ARCHES. {#3}
WITH BASKETS {#100 as #60, #30, #10 = cal (H5536): {#38 as #90} 1)
*basket* / #80 as #9, #50, #1, #20 = tene' (H2935): {#8 as #60} 1)
*basket*} IN HAND. {#4}

LIKE A LITTLE SMURF, {#5}
THEY'RE HARD TO FIND. {#6}
FROM MOUNT TO SURF. {#7}
IT'S SUCH A GRIND. {#8}

KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. {#9}
TIME IS MONEY. {#10}
IT'S OFF TO TRUMP TOWER. {#11}
TRY NOT TO BE FUNNY. {#12}

SPIT THE DUMMY. {#13}
SO MUCH TO COUNT. {#14}
PEE {#100 as #40, #10, #40, #10 = mayim (H4325): {#32 as #90} 1) water,
waters; 1a) water; 1b) water of the feet, urine; 1c) of danger,
violence, transitory things, refreshment (fig.)} A PENNY {#224 as #4,
#70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10 = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as #224} 1)
accepted, particularly of coins and money.; 2) accepted, pleasing,
acceptable}. {#15}
MORE TO MOUNT." {#16}

YOUTUBE: "I am, you are, we are Australian"



THEORY OF *P*

@memeBrain [Telos: #70, Super: #70 - Difficulty in Knowing How, Obtuse;
I-Ching: H53 - Gradual Advance, Development (gradual progress),
Infiltrating, Advancement; Tetra: 14 - Penetration, Ego: #70 -
Difficulty in Knowing How, Obtuse; I-Ching: H53 - Gradual Advance,
Development (gradual progress), Infiltrating, Advancement; Tetra: 14 -
Penetration]

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #70 -
Difficulty in Knowing How, Obtuse; I-Ching: H53 - Gradual Advance,
Development (gradual progress), Infiltrating, Advancement; Tetra: 14 -
Penetration / INNER: #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening} #70 has 16 Categories:

#6, #2, #1, #2, #50, #9 = 'abnet (H73): {#0 as #62} 1) girdle, sash; 1a)
of high priest; 1b) of other priests; 1c) of high official; #20, #1, #4,
#40, #5 = 'Admah (H126): {#1 as #50} 1) city in the Siddim valley; #30,
#2, #30, #3, #5 = Bilgah (H1083): {#2 as #40} 1) a priest of the 15th
course, in David's time; 2) a priest accompanying Zerubbabel; #5, #4,
#6, #4, #1, #10, #40 = duwday (H1736): {#3 as #24} 1) mandrake,
love-apple; 1a) as exciting sexual desire, and favouring procreation;
#7, #2, #10, #50, #1 = Zebiyna' (H2081): {#4 as #70} 1) a son of Nebo
who took a foreign wife in the time of Ezra;

#6, #20, #8, #6, #30 = chowl (H2344): {#5 as #44} 1) *SAND*;

This document represents by an articulation of the AUTONOMOUS
HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY {ie. *SANDGLASS*} being a notion of the
AUSTRALIAN HERITAGE AND THE LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE
COMMONWEALTH AND ITS CONSTITUTION of 1901 which resolves the problem
proposed by the German Philosopher Friedrich Hegel (August 27, 1770 –
November 14, 1831) as the hypothesis:

§ 46

If the principle of regard for the individual will {ie. *INTELLECTUS*
*AS* *GENITIVE* *VOLUNTĀTUS*} is recognised as the only basis of
political liberty, viz., that nothing should be done by or for the State
to which all the members of the body politic have not given their
sanction, we have, properly speaking, no Constitution. The only
arrangement that would be necessary, would be, first, a centre having no
will of its own but which should take into consideration what appeared
to be the necessities of the State; and, secondly, a contrivance for
calling the members of the State together, for taking the votes, and for
performing the arithmetical operations of reckoning and comparing the
number of votes for the different propositions, and thereby deciding
upon them. The State is an abstraction, having even its generic
existence in its citizens; but it is an actuality, and its simply
generic existence must embody itself in individual will and activity.
The want of government and political administration in general is felt;
this necessitates the selection and separation from the rest of those
who have to take the helm in political affairs, to decide, concerning
them, and to give orders to other citizens, with a view to the execution
of their plans. If, e.g., even the people in a Democracy resolve on a
war, a general must head the army. It is only by a Constitution that the
abstraction – the State – attains life and reality; but this involves
the distinction between those who command and those who obey. – Yet
obedience seems inconsistent with liberty, and those who command appear
to do the very opposite of that which the fundamental idea of the State,
viz. that of Freedom, requires. It is, however, urged that, – though the
distinction between commanding and obeying is absolutely necessary,
because affairs could not go on without it – and indeed this seems only
a compulsory limitation, external to and even contravening freedom in
the abstract – the constitution should be at least so framed, that the
citizens may obey as little as possible, and the smallest modicum of
free volition be left to the commands of the superiors; – that the
substance of that for which subordination is necessary, even in its most
important bearings, should be decided and resolved on by the People – by
the will of many or of all the citizens; though it is supposed to be
thereby provided that the State should be possessed of vigour and
strength as a reality – an individual unity. – The primary consideration
is, then, the distinction between the governing and the governed, and
political constitutions in the abstract have been rightly divided into
Monarchy, Aristocracy, and Democracy; which gives occasion, however, to
the remark that Monarchy itself must be further divided into Despotism
and Monarchy proper; that in all the divisions to which the leading Idea
gives rise, only the generic character is to be made prominent, – it
being not intended thereby that the particular category under review
should be exhausted as a Form, Order, or Kind in its concrete
development. But especially it must be observed, that the
above-mentioned divisions admit of a multitude of particular
modifications, – not only such as lie within the limits of those classes
themselves, – but also such as are mixtures of several of these
essentially distinct classes, and which are consequently misshapen,
unstable, and inconsistent forms. In such a collision, the concerning
question is, what is the best constitution; that is, by what
arrangement, organisation or mechanism of the power of the State its
object can be most surely attained. This object may indeed be variously
understood; for instance, as the calm enjoyment of life on the part of
the citizens, or as Universal Happiness. Such aims have suggested the
so-called Ideals of Constitution, and, – as a particular branch of the
subject, – Ideals of the Education of Princes (Fenelon), or of the
governing body – the aristocracy at large (Plato); for the chief point
they treat of is the condition of those subjects who stand at the head
of affairs; and in these ideals the concrete details of political
organisation are not at all considered. The inquiry into the best
constitution is frequently treated as if not only the theory were an
affair of subjective independent conviction, but as if the introduction
of a constitution recognised as the best, – or as superior to others, –
could be the result of a resolve adopted in this theoretical manner; as
if the form of a constitution were a matter of free choice, determined
by nothing else but reflection. Of this artless fashion was that
deliberation, – not indeed of the Persian people, but of the Persian
grandees, who had conspired to overthrow the pseudo-Smerdis and the
Magi, after their undertaking had succeeded, and when there was no scion
of the royal family living, – as to what constitution they should
introduce into Persia; and Herodotus gives an equally naive account of
this deliberation.

§ 47

In the present day, the Constitution of a country and people is not
represented as so entirely dependent on free and deliberate choice. The
fundamental but abstractly (and therefore imperfectly) entertained
conception of Freedom, has resulted in the Republic being very generally
regarded – in theory – as the only just and true political constitution.
Many even, who occupy elevated official positions under monarchical
constitutions – so far from being opposed to this idea – are actually
its supporters; only they see that such a constitution, though the best,
cannot be realised under all circumstances; and that – while men are
what they are – we must be satisfied with less freedom; the monarchical
constitution – under the given circumstances, and the present moral
condition of the people – being even regarded as the most advantageous.
In this view also, the necessity of a particular constitution is made to
depend on the condition of the people in such a way as if the latter
were non-essential and accidental. This representation is founded on the
distinction which the reflective understanding makes between an idea and
the corresponding reality; holding to an abstract and consequently
untrue idea; not grasping it in its completeness, or – which is
virtually, though not in point of form, the same – not taking a concrete
view of a people and a state. We shall have to show further on that the
constitution adopted by a people makes one substance – one spirit – with
its religion, its art and philosophy, or, at least, with its conceptions
and thoughts – its culture generally; not to expatiate upon the
additional influences, ab extrâ, of climate, of neighbours, of its place
in the world. A State is an individual totality, of which you cannot
select any particular side, although a supremely important one, such as
its political constitution; and deliberate and decide respecting it in
that isolated form. Not only is that constitution most intimately
connected with and dependent on those other spiritual forces; but the
form of the entire moral and intellectual individuality – comprising all
the forces it embodies – is only a step in the development of the grand
Whole, – with its place pre-appointed in the process: a fact which gives
the highest sanction to the constitution in question, and establishes
its absolute necessity. -The origin of a State involves imperious
lordship on the one hand, instinctive submission on the other. But even
obedience – lordly power, and the fear inspired by a ruler – in itself
implies some degree of voluntary connection. Even in barbarous states
this is the case; it is not the isolated will of individuals that
prevails; individual pretensions are relinquished, and the general will
is the essential bond of political union. This unity of the general and
the particular is the Idea itself, manifesting itself as a State, and
which subsequently undergoes further development within itself. The
abstract yet necessitated process in the development of truly
independent states is as follows: – They begin with regal power, whether
of patriarchal or military origin. In the next phase, particularity and
individuality assert themselves in the form of Aristocracy and
Democracy. Lastly, we have the subjection of these separate interests to
a single power; but which can be absolutely none other than one outside
of which those spheres have an independent position, viz., the
Monarchical. Two phases of royalty, therefore, must be distinguished, –
a primary and a secondary one. This process is necessitated, so that the
form of government assigned to a particular stage of development must
present itself: it is therefore no matter of choice, but is that form
which is adapted to the spirit of the people.

§ 48

In a Constitution the main feature of interest is the self-development
of the rational, that is, the political condition of a people; the
setting free of the successive elements of the Idea: so that the several
powers in the State manifest themselves as separate, – attain their
appropriate and special perfection, – and yet in this independent
condition, work together for one object, and are held together by it –
i.e., form an organic whole. The State is thus the embodiment of
rational freedom, realising and recognising itself in an objective form.
For its objectivity consists in this, – that its successive stages are
not merely ideal, but are present in an appropriate reality; and that in
their separate and several working, they are absolutely merged in that
agency by which the totality – the soul – the individual unity – is
produced, and of which it is the result.

§ 49

The State is the Idea of Spirit in the external manifestation of human
Will and its Freedom. It is to the State, therefore, that change in the
aspect of History indissolubly attaches itself; and the successive
phases of the Idea manifest themselves in it as distinct political
principles. The Constitutions under which World-Historical peoples have
reached their culmination, are peculiar to them; and therefore do not
present a generally applicable political basis. Were it otherwise, the
differences of similar constitutions would consist only in a peculiar
method of expanding and developing that generic basis; whereas they
really originate in diversity of principle. From the comparison
therefore of the political institutions of the ancient World-Historical
peoples, it so happens, that for the most recent principle of a
Constitution – for the principle of our own times – nothing (so to
speak) can be learned. In science and art it is quite otherwise; e. g.,
the ancient philosophy is so decidedly the basis of the modern, that it
is inevitably contained in the latter, and constitutes its basis. In
this case the relation is that of a continuous development of the same
structure, whose foundation-stone, walls, and roof have remained what
they were. In Art, the Greek itself, in its original form, furnishes us
the best models. But in regard to political constitution, it is quite
otherwise: here the Ancient and the Modern have not their essential
principle in common. Abstract definitions and dogmas respecting just
government, – importing that intelligence and virtue ought to bear sway
– are, indeed, common to both. But nothing is so absurd as to look to
Greeks, Romans, or Orientals, for models for the political arrangements
of our time. From the East may be derived beautiful pictures of a
patriarchal condition, of paternal government, and of devotion to it on
the part of peoples; from Greeks and Romans, descriptions of popular
liberty. Among the latter we find the idea of a Free Constitution
admitting all the citizens to a share in deliberations and resolves
respecting the affairs and laws of the Commonwealth. In our times, too,
this is its general acceptation; only with this modification, that –
since our States are so large, and there are so many of “the Many,” the
latter, – direct action being impossible, – should by the indirect
method of elective substitution express their concurrence with resolves
affecting the common weal; that is, that for legislative purposes
generally, the people should be represented by deputies. The so-called
Representative Constitution is that form of government with which we
connect the idea of a free constitution, and this notion has become a
rooted prejudice. On this theory People and Government are separated.
But there is a perversity in this antithesis; an ill-intentioned ruse
designed to insinuate that the People are the totality of the State.
Besides, the basis of this view is the principle of isolated
individuality – the absolute validity of the subjective will – a dogma
which we have already investigated. The great point is, that Freedom in
its Ideal conception has not subjective will and caprice for its
principle, but the recognition of the universal will; and that the
process by which Freedom is realised is the free development of its
successive stages. The subjective will is a merely formal determination
– a carte blanche – not including what it is that is willed. Only the
rational will is that universal principle which independently determines
and unfolds its own being, and develops its successive elemental phases
as organic members. Of this Gothic-cathedral architecture the ancients
knew nothing.

§ 50 / PAGE #48

At an earlier stage of the discussion, we established the two elemental
considerations: first, the idea of freedom as the absolute and final
aim; secondly, the means for realising it, i.e. the subjective side of
knowledge and will, with its life, movement, and activity. We then
recognised the State as the moral Whole and the Reality of Freedom, and
consequently as the objective unity of these two elements. For although
we make this distinction into two aspects for our consideration, it must
be remarked that they are intimately connected; and that their
connection is involved in the idea of each when examined separately. We
have, on the one hand, recognised the Idea in the definite form of
Freedom conscious of and willing itself, – having itself alone as its
object: involving at the same time, the pure and simple Idea of Reason,
and likewise, that which we have called subject – self-consciousness –
Spirit actually existing in the World. If, on the other hand, we
consider Subjectivity, we find that subjective knowledge and will is
Thought. But by the very act of thoughtful cognition and volition, I
will the universal object – the substance of absolute Reason. We
observe, therefore, an essential union between the objective side – the
Idea, – and the subjective side – the personality that conceives and
wills it. – The objective existence of this union is the State, which is
therefore the basis and centre of the other concrete elements of the
life of a people, – of Art, of Law, of Morals, of Religion, of Science.
All the activity of Spirit has only this object – the becoming conscious
of this union, i.e., of its own Freedom. Among the forms of this
conscious union Religion occupies the highest position. In it, Spirit –
rising above the limitations of temporal and secular existence – becomes
conscious of the Absolute Spirit, and in this consciousness of the
self-existent Being, renounces its individual interest; it lays this
aside in Devotion – a state of mind in which it refuses to occupy itself
any longer with the limited and particular. By Sacrifice man expresses
his renunciation of his property, his will, his individual feelings. The
religious concentration of the soul appears in the form of feeling; it
nevertheless passes also into reflection; a form of worship (cultus) is
a result of reflection. The second form of the union of the objective
and subjective in the human spirit is Art. This advances farther into
the realm of the actual and sensuous than Religion. In its noblest walk
it is occupied with representing, not indeed, the Spirit of God, but
certainly the Form of God; and in its secondary aims, that which is
divine and spiritual generally. Its office is to render visible the
Divine; presenting it to the imaginative and intuitive faculty. But the
True is the object not only of conception and feeling, as in Religion, –
and of Intuition, as in Art, – but also of the thinking faculty; and
this gives us the third form of the union in question – Philosophy. This
is consequently the highest, freest, and wisest phase. Of course we are
not intending to investigate these three phases here; they have only
suggested themselves in virtue of their occupying the same general
ground as the object here considered – the State.

§ 51 / PAGE #50

The general principle which manifests itself and becomes an object of
consciousness in the State, – the form under which all that the State
includes is brought, is the whole of that cycle of phenomena which
constitutes the culture of a nation. But the definite substance that
receives the form of universality, and exists in that concrete reality
which is the State, – is the Spirit of the People itself. The actual
State is animated by this spirit, in all its particular affairs – its
Wars, Institutions, &c. But man must also attain a conscious realisation
of this his Spirit and essential nature, and of his original identity
with it. For we said that morality is the identity of the subjective or
personal with the universal will. Now the mind must give itself an
express consciousness of this; and the focus of this knowledge is
Religion. Art and Science are only various aspects and forms of the same
substantial being. In considering Religion, the chief point of enquiry
is whether it recognises the True – the Idea – only in its separate,
abstract form, or in its true unity; in separation – God being
represented in an abstract form as the Highest Being, Lord of Heaven and
Earth, living in a remote region far from human actualities, – or in its
unity, – God, as Unity of the Universal and Individual; the Individual
itself assuming the aspect of positive and real existence in the idea of
the Incarnation. Religion is the sphere in which a nation gives itself
the definition of that which it regards as the True. A definition
contains everything that belongs to the essence of an object; reducing
its nature to its simple characteristic predicate, as a mirror for every
predicate, – the generic soul Pervading all its details. The conception
of God, therefore, constitutes the general basis of a people’s character.

§ 52

In this aspect, religion stands in the closest connection with the
political principle. Freedom can exist only where Individuality is
recognised as having its positive and real existence in the Divine
Being. The connection may be further explained thus: – Secular
existence, as merely temporal – occupied with particular interests – is
consequently only relative and unauthorised; and receives its validity
only in as far as the universal soul that pervades it – its principle –
receives absolute validity; which it cannot have unless it is recognised
as the definite manifestation, the phenomenal existence of the Divine
Essence. On this account it is that the State rests on Religion.

PAGE #51

We hear this often repeated in our times, though for the most part
nothing further is meant than that individual subjects as God-fearing
men would be more disposed and ready to perform their duty; since
obedience to King and Law so naturally follows in the train of reverence
for God. This reverence, indeed, since it exalts the general over the
special, may even turn upon the latter, – become fanatical, – and work
with incendiary and destructive violence against the State, its
institutions, and arrangements. Religious feeling, therefore, it is
thought, should be sober – kept in a certain degree of coolness, – that
it may not storm against and bear down that which should be defended and
preserved by it. The possibility of such a catastrophe is at least
latent in it.

§ 53

While, however, the correct sentiment is adopted, that the State is
based on Religion, the position thus assigned to Religion supposes the
State already to exist; and that subsequently, in order to maintain it,
Religion must be brought into it – buckets and bushels as it were – and
impressed upon people’s hearts. It is quite true that men must be
trained to religion, but not as to something whose existence has yet to
begin. For in affirming that the State is based on Religion – that it
has its roots in it – we virtually assert that the former has proceeded
from the latter; and that this derivation is going on now and will
always continue; i.e., the principles of the State must be regarded as
valid in and for themselves, which can only be in so far as they are
recognised as determinate manifestations of the Divine Nature. The form
of Religion, therefore, decides that of the State and its constitution.
The latter actually originated in the particular religion adopted by the
nation; so that, in fact, the Athenian or the Roman State was possible
only in connection with the specific form of Heathenism existing among
the respective peoples; just as a Catholic State has a spirit and
constitution different from that of a Protestant one.

§ 54

If that outcry – that urging and striving for the implantation of
Religion in the community – were an utterance of anguish and a call for
help, as it often seems to be, expressing the danger of religion having
vanished, or being about to vanish entirely from the State, – that would
be fearful indeed – worse in fact than this outcry supposes; for it
implies the belief in a resource against the evil, viz., the
implantation and inculcation of religion; whereas religion is by no
means a thing to be so produced; its self-production (and there can be
no other) lies much deeper.

§ 55 / PAGE #52

“*ANOTHER* *AND* *OPPOSITE* *FOLLY* *WHICH* *WE* *MEET* *WITH* *IN*
*OUR* *TIME* *IS* *THAT* *OF* *PRETENDING* *TO* *INVENT* *AND* *CARRY*
*OUT* *POLITICAL* *CONSTITUTIONS* *INDEPENDENTLY* *OF* *RELIGION*.

Whilst it may continue to function as an acceptable METHODOLOGY {ARCH
KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} with an encapsulated sphere of
operation {

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE} <-- *AS* *THE* *FOUNDATION* *STONE*
(*USURPING* @1 = *SOVEREIGN* / #CENTRE @5 = *LAST* *WILL*, *TESTAMENT*
*OF* #INR *BEING* *THE* *BINDING* *NORM* (*NORMA* *OBLIGANS* ) *ON* #33
AD) *MAGIC* *SQUARE*

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{99}&idea:{297}>

#1 (9) - OUHOUYAH (King-Seraphim) = #1
#9 (8) - HAZIEL (King-Cherubim) = #10
#17 (7) - LEVYAH (King-Throne) = #27
#25 (6) - NETEHYAH (King-Dominion) = #52 <-- *THEY* *ARE* *AS* *THE
*SONS* *OF* *DARKNESS* *NOT* *THE* *SONS* *OF* *LIGHT* / *GOD* *AS* #123

#33 (5) - YHOUYAH (King-Powers) = #85
#41 (4) - HEHAHEL (King-Virtues) = #126
#49 (3) - OHOUEL (King-Principalities) = #175 <-- *VENUS* (7x7 = #49 /
#175) *USE* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *AS* *AN* *ANTHROPIC* *PROTOTYPE*

#57 (2) - NEMAMYAH (King-Archangels) = #232
#65 (1) - DAMBYAN (King-Angels) = #297

42 2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}

43 3 59
51 35 19
11 67 27 = #105 / #315 {#THREE}

44 4 60
52 36 20
12 68 28 = #108 / #324 {#FOUR}

74 81 76
79 77 75
78 73 80 = #231 - #108 = #123 / #693 - #369 = #324 {#TEN} AS RETURN TO
GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE BEING ITSELF

}, it is entirely a specious notion to declare it is the root and causal
basis of the perennialist philosophical tradition.

45 5 61
53 37 21
13 69 29

= #111 / #333 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}"

*THE* *CATHOLIC* *CONFESSION*, *ALTHOUGH* *SHARING* *THE* *CHRISTIAN*
*NAME* *WITH* *THE* *PROTESTANT*, *DOES* *NOT* *CONCEDE* *TO* *THE*
*STATE* *AN* *INHERENT* *JUSTICE* *AND* *MORALITY*, – *A* *CONCESSION*
*WHICH* *IN* *THE* *PROTESTANT* *PRINCIPLE* *IS* *FUNDAMENTAL*. This
tearing away of the political morality of the Constitution from its
natural connection, is necessary to the genius of that religion,
inasmuch as it does not recognise Justice and Morality as independent
and substantial. But thus excluded from intrinsic worth, – torn away
from their last refuge – the sanctuary of conscience – the calm retreat
where religion has its abode, – the principles and institutions of
political legislation are destitute of a real centre, to the same decree
as they are compelled to remain abstract and indefinite.

§ 56

Summing up what has been said of the State, we find that we have been
led to call its vital principle, as actuating the individuals who
compose it, – Morality. The State, its laws, its arrangements,
constitute the rights of its members; its natural features, its
mountains, air, and waters, are their country, their fatherland, their
outward material property; the history of this State, their deeds; what
their ancestors have produced, belongs to them and lives in their
memory. All is their possession, just as they are possessed by it; for
it constitutes their existence, their being.

§ 57

Their imagination is occupied with the ideas thus presented, while the
adoption of these laws, and of a fatherland so conditioned is the
expression of their will. It is this matured totality which thus
constitutes one Being, the spirit of one People. To it the individual
members belong; each unit is the Son of his Nation, and at the same time
– in as far as the State to which he belongs is undergoing development –
the Son of his Age. None remains behind it, still less advances beyond
it. This spiritual Being (the Spirit of his Time) is his; he is a
representative of it; it is that in which he originated, and in which he
lives. Among the Athenians the word Athens had a double import;
suggesting primarily, a complex of Political institutions, but no less,
in the second place, that Goddess who represented the Spirit of the
People and its unity {ie. #49 (3) - OHOUEL (King-Principalities) = #175
<-- *VENUS* (7x7 = #49 / #175) *USE* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *AS* *AN*
*ANTHROPIC* *PROTOTYPE*}. This Spirit of a People is a determinate and
particular Spirit, and is, as just stated, further modified by the
degree of its historical development. This Spirit, then, constitutes the
basis and substance of those other forms of a nation’s consciousness,
which have been noticed. For Spirit in its self-consciousness must
become a object of contemplation to itself, and objectivity involves, in
the first instance, the rise of differences which make up a total of
distinct spheres of objective spirit; in the same way as the Soul exists
only as the complex of its faculties, which in their form of
concentration in a simple unity produce that Soul. It is thus One
Individuality which, presented in its essence as God, is honoured and
enjoyed in Religion; which is exhibited as an object of sensuous
contemplation in Art; and is apprehended as an intellectual conception
in Philosophy. In virtue of the original identity of their essence,
purport, and object, these various forms are inseparably united with the
Spirit of the State. Only in connection with this particular religion
can this particular political constitution exist; just as in such or
such a State, such or such a Philosophy or order of Art." [Georg Wilhelm
Friedrich Hegel. Hegel (27 August 1770 – 14 November 1831) Philosophy of
History, III. Philosophic History, ii. The Essential Destiny of Reason,
(3) The Embodiment Spirit Assumes – the State]

<https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/hi/history4.htm>

#1, #9, #10, #30, #20 = tuwl (H2904): {#6 as #45} 1) to hurl, cast; 1a)
(Pilpel) to throw away, carry away, hurl; 1b) (Hiphil) to throw, cast,
cast out; 1c) (Hophal); 1c1) to be hurled, hurled down; 1c2) to be cast,
be thrown, be cast out, be thrown down; #9, #10, #50, #1 = tiyn
(Aramaic) (H2917): {#7 as #69} 1) clay; #10, #30, #30 = yelel (H3214):
{#8 as #70} 1) a howling (of beasts); #6, #2, #40, #8, #6, #3, #5 =
mechuwgah (H4230): {#9 as #62} 1) circle-instrument, compass; #40, #20,
#10 = Makiy (H4352): {#10 as #70} 1) father of Geuel the Gadite who was
one of the 12 spies of Israel; #10, #50, #6, #2, #2 = nuwb (H5107): {#11
as #58} 1) to bear fruit; 1a) (Qal) to bear fruit; 1b) (Pilel) to make
to flourish (fig.); #6, #50, #6, #8 = nuwach (H5118): {#12 as #64} 1)
resting place; #50, #8, #2, #10 = Nachbiy (H5147): {#13 as #70} 1) son
of Vophsi, a Naphtalite, and one of the 12 spies sent to spy out the
promised land; #6, #50, #10, #4 = niyd (H5205): {#14 as #64} 1)
quivering (motion) of lips; #4, #5, #10, #50, #1 = deina (G1170): {#15
as #70} 1) such a one, a certain one, ie. one whose name I cannot call
on the instant, or whose name it is of no importance to mention;

HERE'S WHY AUSTRALIA'S PARLIAMENT USES SANDGLASSES WHEN THERE'S A
DIVISION IN THE HOUSE:

“Australia’s parliamentary traditions and conventions change over time.
For example, when a vote (or ‘division’) {

#371 as #8, #80, #5, #10, #9, #8, #200, #1, #50 = apeitheo (G544): {#10
as #910} 1) not to allow one's self to be persuaded; 2) not to comply
with; 1a) to refuse or withhold belief; 1b) to refuse belief and obedience

} is called, senators have four minutes to get to the chamber {

#371 as #30, #40, #100, #200, #1 = miqra' (H4744): {#4 as #341} 1)
convocation, convoking, reading, a calling together; 1a) convocation,
sacred assembly; 1b) convoking; 1c) reading; / #6, #70, #90, #200, #5 =
`atsarah (H6116): {#5 as #365} 1) assembly, solemn assembly; 1a)
assembly (sacred or festive meeting); 1b) assemblage, company, group}.

Back in 1975 that increased from two minutes to three, when a new
extension to Old Parliament House made the journey {

#371 as #6, #10, #200, #40, #60, #50, #5 = ramac (H7429): {#8 as #300}
1) to trample; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to trample; 1a2) trampler (participle);
1b) (Niphal) to be trampled

} from committee rooms to the chamber a little longer. The current
four-minute limit was introduced in 1988, when Australian democracy
moved up the hill to to the much bigger, current Parliament House.

The time given to MPs {

#371 as #20, #1, #50, #300 = 'enash (Aramaic) (H606): {#0 as #351} 1)
man, human being; 2) mankind (collective)

} is necessary, but the way the gap is timed – with a sandglass {

#371 as #20, #1, #200, #90, #20, #40 = 'erets (H776): {#2 as #291} 1)
land, earth; lands, countries; 1a) earth; 1a1) whole earth (as opposed
to a part); 1a2) earth (as opposed to heaven); 1a3) earth (inhabitants);
1b) land; 1b1) country, territory; 1b2) district, region; 1b3) tribal
territory; 1b4) piece of ground; 1b5) land of Canaan, Israel; 1b6)
inhabitants of land; 1b7) Sheol, land without return, (under) world;
1b8) city (-state); 1c) ground, surface of the earth; 1c1) ground; 1c2)
soil; 1d) (in phrases); 1d1) people of the land; 1d2) space or distance
of country (in measurements of distance); 1d3) level or plain country;
1d4) land of the living; 1d5) end(s) of the earth; 1e) (almost wholly
late in usage); 1e1a) often in contrast to Canaan

} – doesn’t seem necessary at all. And it turns out the sandglasses are
not just ornamental. They’re really used for timekeeping (but with a
catch). The parliament’s website explains:

Until 1989, it [the Annotated Standing Orders] contained references to a
sand-glass kept on the Table for the purpose of timing divisions. The
Clerk was responsible for turning the sand-glass and the time was taken
to have elapsed when the sand-glass so indicated. References to this
antique but reliable technology were removed in the course of the 1989
revision to free the principle from reliance on any particular technology.

Although sand-glasses continue to be used as the primary means of timing
the division or quorum bells {

#393 as #300, #10, #7, #70, #6 = zuwa` (H2111): {#0 as #83} 1) to
tremble, quiver, quake, be in terror; 1a) (Qal) to tremble, quake; 1b)
(Pilpel); 1b1) to shake violently; 1b2) to cause to tremble;

"In the day when the keepers of the house shall tremble {zuwa`-moved
[H2111]: #393}, and the strong men shall bow themselves, and the
grinders cease because they are few, and those that look out of the
windows be darkened..." [Ecclesiastes 12:3 (KJV)]

"Shall they not rise up suddenly that shall bite thee, and awake that
shall vex {zuwa`-moved [H2111]: #393} thee, and thou shalt be for
booties unto them?" [Habakkuk 2:7 (KJV)]

#393 as #8, #90, #90, #200, #5 = chatsotserah (H2689): {#2 as #399} 1)
trumpet, clarion

}, they are now used in conjunction with the digital speech timer. An
advantage of the latter is that it enables a time signal to be broadcast
on the House Monitoring Service which shows senators how much time
remains for them to reach the chamber. In practice, the Chair takes
whichever methodology expires last as a signal to call for the doors to
be locked.

Note “antique but reliable”, but also references to using it were
removed in 1989 “to free the principle from reliance on any particular
technology”.

Justin Baker, assistant director of the Chamber Research Office in the
Department of the House of Representatives, explained to Business
Insider why they continue to use what looks like a giant egg timer.

Hansard records reveal a reference to a sandglass being used for
divisions back in 1901 “so they have likely been a feature of the
parliament since Federation”.

When the Central Table for the new Parliament House was commissioned, a
pair of sandglasses was included in the brief by the Parliament amongst
other items, such as bronze brackets to support the Mace, pigeon hole
book stands, digital clocks, call bells and microphones.

“A stand with a wooden base and green felt underneath for the
sandglasses was purpose built for the Clerk’s desk within the Chamber,”
Baker said. “In 1998, a new stand and glasses were designed and
manufactured to accommodate an additional sandglass.”

That’s right – they bought another one.

<https://www.businessinsider.com.au/heres-why-australias-parliament-uses-sandglasses-when-theres-a-division-in-the-house-2015-6>

----------

Waking up during the night (as you can appreciate of such maelstrom
reality) so as to newsgroup post doesn’t lend itself to a frame of mind
fruitful for programming.

But I have decided now make incremental releases of the developer
progress updates with this link:

<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html>

I’m still to trace through the debugging of the .jackNote span
function() which isn’t yet finished it’s testing phase as it presently
clearly gives the wrong values for the @memeBrain bubble cascades.

But I will work on it as I can as I imagine my narrative output will
diminish for the next few months.

However I have partially implemented an update of the TAXONOMY() and the
calcTelos() functions which may still be micro modified and have enabled
the possibility of the @memeBrain elements being displayed individually
as either SUPER (MALE) or EGO (FEMALE) and this is in preparation for
the IDEA:{} object to be conveyed as either.

I envisioned an additional search option such as:

?CATEGORY:MALE&IDEA:{331}&IDEA:{237} &IDEA:{333}

or perhaps:

?IDEA:{331,M}&IDEA:{237,F}&IDEA:{333}

We shall see which is the better approach, but at this point I favour
the latter.

But what we have done within our written narrative is demonstrate that
there is no basis to the Sovereignty which the Vatican City-State claims
of itself (*THAT* *IT* *IS* *BY* *ITS* *GRECO*-*ROMAN* #231 *ROOTS*
*IDENTICAL* *TO* *GERMAN* *FASCISM* *DESPITE* *PAPAL* *ATTEMPTS* *TO*
**OTHERWISE* * CONVEY* *SUCH* *SIN* *OF* *FAKE* *NEWS*, and the Letters
Patent to the Federation of the Australian Commonwealth 1901 are not
only a valid basis (if not the only means) to define Sovereignty of a
nation but it’s ternary technological sapient basis is an exceptional
globalisation paradigm framework for all sorts agreements including
trade, taxation, science, knowledge sapient services, personalistics,
defence (etc) as having not only a linguistic basis but a technological
foundation of an exponential growth potential.

Such a framework {ie. in my view the SEPTET DRIVER as ENTELECHY with
INFINITE POTENTIAL rather than the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH’S ANKH as the
#72 ANTHROPIC TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE sinisterly provided within the
Greco-Roman magic square (as we have shown) as transformative prototype
is perhaps a better equivalent to the Medical Caduceus
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Medical_Caduceus.png>} as the means
for provisioning transactional and sapient services proving thereby by
its very use would be an enabler for a revenue stream (of which I
estimate from its global perspective be $10 billion a day in yet
untapped fiscal well of opportunity—but I leave such dreams of mine to
the experts in any sapient field) would thereby solve Britain’s National
Health Service (NHS) woes, but it will take some investment and time to
implement.

The cognitive hypothesis as the theoretical obvious concern of this
dialectic correspondence with this SEPTET driver to the mathematical
theoretical noumenon which provides by an equitable distribution of
trinomial number an ontological basis for the entelechy:

- the realization of potential.
- the supposed vital principle that guides the development and
functioning of an organism or other system or organization.
- such self-organization requires a special biological force which is
known as entelechy.
- the soul for the spiritus.
- the mathematical / electronic equivalent of stem cells is for others
to decide.

It therefore may be considered as quintessentially the 'INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS' of an unencumbered will and ought to conform with
the following dialectic which chronicles the: levels / phases / stages /
duration / milestone of any perennial cycle as the dispensational
governance basis of LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH
OF AUSTRALIA OF 1901 represented by a theoretical mathematical trinomial
noumenon as an Intellectual Property:

— TETRAD {#8 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE v’s PAPAL BULLS} FOR ANY GENII
THESIS {SPIRITUS} AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION —

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Medical_Caduceus.png>

JOIN THE #DOTS ON THE REAL SON OF GOD AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF DIVINE
WILL {INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} AND CHILDREN OF ABRAHAM {#123}:

#13 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 -
Form of Nature]

MENTALISM: 1 x #41 = #41 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free
will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum
{#1 - Every perfect gift} (1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day},

#14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

CORRESPONDENCE: 2 x #41 = #82 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire,
inclination: Milites Templi {#2 - Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) /
TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents},

#15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 /#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature]

VIBRATION: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition
towards (something or someone): Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145
CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do Not Kill},

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123} 1) son, grandson, child, member of
a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and
female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons
(as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or
sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of
lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a
guild, order, class;

#16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 /#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature]

POLARITY: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour,
affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 - Pastoral Pre-eminence to
monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR / Do Not Commit Adultery
(ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John 5:39-47 (KJV)]

#17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming
Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

RHYTHM: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will,
testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 - Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) /
CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not Steal},

#18 / #6 - Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

CAUSE AND EFFECT: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL*
GABRIEL [Luke 1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad
providam {#6 - To Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION:
HETEROS (binomial / bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False
Witness}, and a

#19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 - Autonomous Nature]

ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE: 7 x #41 = #287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 -
signification, import: Vox in excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE)
/ LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet}.

7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]

<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA OF 1901 Represented by a Theoretical Mathematical Trinomial
Noumenon as Intellectual Property]

YOUTUBE: “My Name Is Ruin (Gary Numan)”



The NOLUNTĀTIS is then a consequence of an opposition as consideration
being a question of relativity as the interoperability by mutuality on
what #8 - TRANSFORMATIVE prototype is to be deployed where the default
is the
hetero-square spirogyra order:

#8 as TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE: #1 - unwillingness;

But this is in my view a matter of protocol selection which can be
identified by the classification duality of both the cryptographic # and
the vRUDOLPH DATE being determined by a cosmogonic observation as
computation of rational 22/7 from #0 of Equinox on Wednesday of 20 March
1996 associated to any EVENT as slider dispersal from calendar to the
noumenon.

The Autonomous Prototype is then the source amalgamation of the
binomial, trinomial and chrononomial (#YEAR, #DECADE, #CENTENARY and
#MILLENNIUM orientation) meta descriptor prototypes for each MIRRORED
reality:

#9 as MIRRORED AUTONOMOUS PROTOTYPE OF EACH OTHER'S SOVEREIGN AUTONOMY:
#2 - ill will, negative disposition (toward something) [LATIN
definition: NOLUNTĀTIS]

There are more Intelligent people than me who can appraise that
consideration as solution to their problems.

CHRIS SMYTH (THE TIMES) @ 1201 HOURS ON 24 JANUARY 2018: “SOLUTIONS TO
THE NHS CRISIS ARE OBVIOUS BUT PAINFUL:

The greatest success of the NHS threatens to overwhelm it. Modern
medicine has been hugely successful at keeping people alive, as the
death rates from heart disease halve in a decade and cancer survival
improves. Yet the
result is an ever-growing number of people who not only need continuing
treatment for these conditions, but now live long enough to get dementia
or another disease on top.

NHS leaders know what they need to do: the service must change from one
centred on hospitals to one that makes better use of local clinics and
modern technology to control long-term conditions. If an older person needs
a hospital bed, that should not be the start of treatment, but a sign
that it has already failed.

Yet despite…”

<https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/solutions-are-obvious-but-painful-8xvxt6c7w>

*IMPORTANT* *NOTE*: That if this trinomial HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER a
priori as PARADIGM already has a conception of an INTELLECTUAL TETRAD
{#8 - Transformation Prototype} which as CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY was
associated to a LUNAR event upon the midnight solstice of 21 December
103 BCE and published in 4 BCE is equivalent to the later implementation
of PYTHAGOREAN binomial HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER as the basis for the
Julian calendar and the subsequent Roman Empire Governance:

VIRTUE as MIND: {#1 + #2 = #3} +
TOOLS as SCIENCE: {#3 + #4 = #7} +
POSITION as OPINION: {#5 + #6 = #11} +
TIME as SENSE: {#7 + #8 = #15}

= #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal
Law + H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity)

6x6 = #36 / #111 / #666 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}

Whilst it may continue to function as an acceptable METHODOLOGY {ARCH
KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} with an encapsulated sphere of
operation {

41  1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE}

42  2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}

43  3 59
51 35 19
11 67 27 = #105 / #315 {#THREE}

44  4 60
52 36 20
12 68 28 = #108 / #324 {#FOUR}

74 81 76
79 77 75
78 73 80 = #231 - #108 = #123 / #693 - #369 = #324 {#TEN} AS RETURN TO
GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE BEING ITSELF

}, it is entirely a specious notion to declare it is the root and causal
basis of the perennialist philosophical tradition.

THE HOMOIOS PROTOTYPE UTILIZES THE HETERO SPIROGYRA ORDER SQUARE WHEREAS
THE HETEROS ('CHRIST MURDEROUS') PROTOTYPE UTILIZES THE GRECO-ROMAN
MAGIC SQUARE.

As they produce different categories of understanding associated with
the temporal reality, *PLEASE* *ENSURE* *THAT* *YOU* *DO* *NOT* *BREACH*
*MY* *INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY* *BY* *IMPROPERLY* *ASSIGNING* *TO*
*YOURSELVES* *AN* *ENTITLEMENT* *TO* *USE* *MY* *INTELLECTUAL*
*PROPERTY* *AS* *A* *WEAPON* *AGAINST* *ME*.

I WOULD REASONABLY CONCLUDE BY SUCH #123 / #231 CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING (AND ESPECIALLY THE LATER) THAT FROM A BRIEF ANALYSIS OF
DIARY ENTRIES FROM 2 to 23 June 1942 WITHIN ADOLF HITLER’S BOOK TITLED
“TABLE TALK” WAS STEEPED WITHIN FREEMASONRY AND HAS A KNOWLEDGE OF THE
EGYPTIAN ANKH ASSOCIATED TO THE GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE AND THE ROMAN
CATHOLIC CHURCH ET AL.

ANGEL CORRESPONDENCES TO SUN (#111)

45   5 61
53 37 21*
13*69 29 = #111 / #333 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{111}&idea:{333}>

#5 (9) - MAHASHYAH (Seraphim-Virtues) = #5
#13 (8) - YEZLEL (Cherubim-Virtues) = #18
#21 (7) - NELKEL (Throne-Virtues) = #39
#29 (6) - RYIEL (Dominion-Virtues) = #68
#37 (5) - ANIEL (Powers-Virtues) = #105

<http://www.grapple369.com/gematria.html?umbra:{105}>

'H113' : {
'xlit' : "ʼâdôwn",
'lingo' : 0,
'strongs' : "H113",
'pronounce' : "aw-done'",
'lemma' : ["אָדוֹן"],
'link' : null,
'info' : "Or (shortened) אָדֹן; from an unused root (meaning to rule);
sovereign, i.e. controller (human or divine); lord, master, owner.
Compare also names beginning with 'Adoni-'.",
'gematria' : {
'61' : [1, 4, 6, 50],
'711' : [1, 4, 6, 700]
},
'umbra' : {
'91' : [20, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6],
'100' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 5],
'101' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6],

'105' : [40, 1, 4, 50, 10],
'111' : [40, 1, 4, 50, 10, 6],

'121' : [1, 4, 50, 10, 50, 6],
'127' : [1, 4, 6, 50, 10, 50, 6],
'565' : [1, 4, 50, 10, 500],
'595' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 500],
'670' : [5, 1, 4, 50, 10, 600],
'671' : [1, 4, 6, 50, 10, 600], <--- DEFINES* *THE* @5 *CANONICAL*
*PRINCIPLE* *EQUILIBRIUM* *CHARACTERISTIC*
'676' : [1, 4, 6, 50, 10, 5, 600],
'685' : [1, 4, 50, 10, 20, 600],
'700' : [30, 1, 4, 50, 10, 5, 600],
'741' : [30, 1, 4, 6, 700],
'747' : [6, 30, 1, 4, 6, 700]
}
},

#45 (4) - SELYAH (Virtues-Virtues) = #150
#53 (3) - NANAEL (Principalities-Virtues) = #203
#61 (2) - OUMBEL (Archangels-Virtues) = #264
#69 (1) - RAHEL (Angels-Virtues) = #333

USURPER: #1 {First Number in the Square}
GUIDE: #36 (6x6) {Last Number in the Square}
MYSTERY: #37 {First Number + Last Number}
ADJUSTER: #111 {Total Sum of a Row}
LEADER: #666 {Total Value of All Rows}
REGULATOR: #777 {Total Sum of a Row + Total Sum of All Rows}
GENERAL GOVERNOR: #1554 {(Total Sum of a Row Total Sum of All Rows) x 2}
HIGH OVERSEER: #55944 {((Total Sum of a Row Total Sum of All Rows) x 2) x
Last Number in the Square}

#1 - Executive Positions
#2 - Jewelers
#3 - Goldsmiths
#4 - Judges
#5 - Public Servants
#6 - Acting
#7 - Monarchs
#8 - Leaders
#9 - Populace (?)

— IMPELEMENTATION {GRAVITAS PRINCIPLES} —

#20 / #8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]

22/7 as 3W1D ...

- PURPLE FORBIDDEN ENCLOSURE (紫微垣) / MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS
NATURE: {#ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT) / SERAPHIM (Heb. Saraph Gk.
Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively) poisonous (serpent);
specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical creature (from their copper
color))} ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: {1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10}

THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of*
*priests* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days:

"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]

And whereas We did on the 17th day of September, 1900, by and with the
advice of Our Privy Council declare by proclamation that, on and after
the 1st day of January, 1901, the people of New South Wales, Victoria,
South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania and also Western Australia,
should be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia: And whereas by
the said recited Act certain *POWERS*, *FUNCTIONS*, *and* *AUTHORITIES*
*were* *declared* to be vested in the Governor General: And whereas We
are *desirous* *of* *making* *effectual* *and* *permanent* *provision*
for the office of Governor General and Commander in chief in and over
Our said Commonwealth of Australia, without making new Letters Patent on
each demise of the said office. *Now* *know* *ye* *that* *We* *have*
*thought* *fit* *to* *constitute*, *ORDER*, *and* *DECLARE*, *and* *do*
*by* *these* *PRESENTS* *CONSTITUTE* *ORDER*, *and* *DECLARE*, that
there shall be a Governor General and *Commander* *in* *Chief*
(hereinafter called the Governor General) in and over Our Commonwealth
of Australia (hereinafter called Our said Commonwealth), and that the
person who shall fill the said office of *Governor* *General* *shall*
*be* *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME* *APPOINTED* by Commission under Our Sign
Manual and Signet.

It was said that the white tiger (western mansions) would only appear
when the emperor ruled with absolute virtue, or if there was peace
throughout the world)

*DEFINE* *THE* @1 *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE* *CHARACTERISTIC* *HERE*

SUPER (MALE) / EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA:
{OUTER: #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity;
I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In / INNER: #13 - Status, Loathing
Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving;
Tetra: 17 - Holding Back}

VIII - And We do hereby REQUIRE and COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND
MINISTERS, CIVIL AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS of Our said
Commonwealth TO BE OBEDIENT, AIDING, AND ASSISTING unto Our said
Governor General, or, in the event of his death, INCAPACITY, or absence,
to such person or persons as may, FROM TIME TO TIME, under the
PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER THE GOVERNMENT of Our
said Commonwealth.

- SUPREME PALACE ENCLOSURE (太微垣) / DUAD - #13 - *NATURE* *CONTAINS*
*NATURE*: {#MEM / *MOTHER* - *THE* *TONGUE* *OF* *DECREE* *DECIDING*
*BETWEEN* *THEM*: 10 paragraphs of the Letters Patent of the Australian
Constitution 1 January 1901}

THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of
20 March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;

AS BEING A LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY;

"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]

I - And *we* *do* *hereby* *authorize* *and* *command* *Our* *said*
*Governor* *General* *to* *do* *and* *execute*, *in* *due* *manner*,
*all* *things* *that* *shall* *belong* *to* *his* *said* *command*,
*and* *to* *the* *trust* *We* *have* *reposed* *in* *him*, *according*
*to* *the* *several* *POWER* and *AUTHORITIES* *granted* *or*
*APPOINTED* *him* *by* *VIRTUE* of 'The Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act, 1900', *and* *of* *these* *present* *Letters* *Patent*
and of such Commission as may be issued to him under Our Sign Manual and
Signet, or by Order in Our Privy Council, or by Us through one of Our
Principal Secretaries of State, and to such laws as shall hereafter be
in *FORCE* in Our said Commonwealth.

#21 / #9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability / GRAVITAS}
[#671 / #5 - Act of Nature]

*DEFINE* *THE* @5 *CANONICAL* *PRINCIPLE* *EQUILIBRIUM* *CHARACTERISTIC*
*HERE*

SUPER (MALE) / EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA:
{OUTER: #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence;
I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on
what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 26 - Endeavour /
INNER: #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of Virtue; I-Ching:
H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning; Tetra: 1 - Centre}

- HEAVENLY MARKET ENCLOSURE (天市垣) / TRIAD - #21 - *AUTONOMOUS* *NATURE*:
{#SHIN / *MOTHER* - *SCALES* *OF* *LIABILITY*: bequeathed in perpetuity
to its sovereign descendants)

THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.

AS BEING A SUBJECTIVE GROUNDING OF INFINITY AS ETERNITY.

"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]

IX - And We do hereby *reserve* *to* *Ourselves* *Our* *heirs* *and*
*SUCCESSORS*, *FULL* *POWER* *AND* *AUTHORITY* *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*
*TO* *REVOKE*, *ALTER*, *OR* *AMEND* *these* *Our* *Letters* *Patent*,
*as* *to* Us or *THEM* *SHALL* *SEEM* *MEET*.

#22 / #10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 -
Totality of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]

SUPER (MALE) / EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA:
{OUTER: #60 - Skill Rulership, Maintain One's Place; I-Ching: H15 -
Modesty, Humbling; Tetra: 5 - Keeping Small / INNER: #9 - Inconstancy of
Achievement, Practicing Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading,
Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion}

X - And We do further direct and enjoin that these Our Letters Patent
shall be read and proclaimed at such place or places as Our said
Governor General shall think fit within Our said Commonwealth of Australia.

[In witness whereof We have caused these Our Letters to be made Patent
Witness Ourself at Westminster the 29th October, 1900: 64th year of Our
reign (Queen Victoria)]

*LIVE* *LONG* *AND* *PROSPER* [Leonard Simon Nimoy, 26 March 1931 - 27
February 2015 (RIP)]

YOUTUBE: “The Birth Of ‘LIVE LONG AND PROSPER’"

http://youtu.be/UdYbpMkH_XQ

*IT* *IS* *ONLY* *THE* *FAILURE* *OF* *HUMANITY’S* *IMAGINATION* *WHICH*
*GROUNDS* *US* *AS* *LIMITS*.

- dolf

A REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF DOCUMENT FROM THIS URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Prosper.pdf>
--
SEE ALSO: *INVALIDATING* *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC*
*CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND*
*FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS
INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING
AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]
as EXISTENCE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD/TETRACTYS

Initial Post: 24 January 2018

#LIVE #LONG #PROSPER
Loading...