Discussion:
-- (DRAFT #5: 3 SEPTEMBER 2018) DUTCH BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS BLAAST CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF
(zu alt für eine Antwort)
dolf
2018-09-03 02:56:55 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT: 3 SEPTEMBER 2018) DUTCH BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS BLAAST
CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 3 September, 2018

YOUTUBE: "Adventure Of A Lifetime (Coldplay)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtXby3twMmI>

"Give ear, O my people, to my law: incline your ears to the words of my
mouth. I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings of
old: Which we have heard and known, and our fathers have told us. We
will not hide them from their children, showing to the generation to
come the praises of the LORD, and his strength, and his wonderful works
that he hath done. For he established a testimony in Jacob {THAT
SUPPLANTS, UNDERMINES; THE HEEL}, and appointed a law in Israel {WHO
PREVAILS WITH GOD}, which he commanded our fathers, that they should
make them known to their children: That the generation to come might
know them, even the children which should be born; who should arise and
declare them to their children: That they might set their hope in God,
and not forget the works of God, but keep his commandments: And might
not be as their fathers, a stubborn and rebellious generation; a
generation that set not their heart aright, and whose spirit was not
stedfast with God." [Psalm 78:1-8 (KJV)]

VERONICA STRACQUALURSI (CNN) @ 0805 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018:
"Washington: Former President Barack Obama lauded John McCain's efforts
to push the nation to rise above "*MEAN* *AND* *PETTY*" politics in his
tribute Saturday 1 September 2018 to the Arizona Republican, who served
for more than three decades in the Senate.

"SO MUCH OF OUR POLITICS, OUR PUBLIC LIFE, OUR PUBLIC DISCOURSE CAN SEEM
SMALL AND *MEAN* *AND* *PETTY*, TRAFFICKING IN BOMBAST AND INSULT, AND
PHONEY CONTROVERSIES, AND MANUFACTURED OUTRAGE. IT'S A POLITICS THAT
PRETENDS TO BE BRAVE AND TOUGH, BUT IN FACT IS BORN OF FEAR {

FEAR@{
@1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
@2: Sup: 3 (#17); Ego: 70 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 5 (#22); Ego: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#35); Ego: 8 (#94),
@5: Sup: 22 (#57); Ego: 9 (#103),
@6: Sup: 30 (#87); Ego: 8 (#111),
@7: Sup: 6 (#93); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
@8: Sup: 11 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 5 (#173 - I AM
NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
Male: #104; Feme: #173
} // #902

#902 as [#500, #70, #2, #8, #9, #8, #300, #5] = phobetron (G5400): 1)
Neuter of a derivative of φοβέω; a frightening thing, ie. terrific
portent:--fearful sight

}," OBAMA SAID IN A EULOGY FOR MCCAIN AT A MEMORIAL SERVICE AT
WASHINGTON NATIONAL CATHEDRAL. "JOHN CALLED ON US TO BE BIGGER THAN
THAT. HE CALLED ON US TO BE BETTER THAN THAT."

H2000@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 21 (#43); Ego: 5 (#21),
@4: Sup: 61 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 40 (#61),
@5: Sup: 13 (#117); Ego: 33 (#94),
Male: #117; Feme: #94
} // #101

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #101 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;

THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.

#VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
#TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
#POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
#TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
#CANON: #180

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
@3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
@4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180

#101 as [#6, #10, #5, #40, #600] = hamam (H2000): {UMBRA: #36 as #101 %
#41 = #19} 1) to move noisily, confuse, make a noise, discomfit, break,
*CONSUME*, *CRUSH*, *DESTROY*, *TROUBLE*, *VEX*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to move
noisily; 1a2) *TO* *CONFUSE*, *DISCOMFIT*, *VEX*;

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/dolf_or_geert_by_kiger8kiger.jpg>

[IMAGE: This CARTOON is supposed to be a characterisation (Dutch Raven /
Hitler / Napoleon Emperor) named dolf as being either the Dutch
politician GEERT BE WILDERS or of myself.

The fraternity PI (#80) KAPPA (#20) ALPHA (#1) = (#101) best known for
raping girls.
The most bad ass fraternity ever. A lot of alpha males that drag their
balls 🎱 🏈⚾️ behind them as they walk to class if they go.
They enjoy dirty house music more then anything else. Especially the
ZETA GAMMA chapter

#492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {#41 = #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} -
#391 - *HOMOIOS* *FRATERNITY* =
#101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT'

MANDALAY_SWAY@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
@5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
@6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
@7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
@8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
Male: #218; Feme: #98
}

YOUTUBE: "[OFFICIAL VIDEO] Bohemian Rhapsody – Pentatonix"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojRj2JK5oCI>

#260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
#60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
*COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;

SEE ALSO: "REFUTATION OF SCORN: IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF
PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.6%20A%20METHODOLOGICAL%20NEW%20BEGINNING.pdf>

And is considered by some to be the tag line for a globalist campaign of
criminalised amorality of *PIKE* as having a violent psychosexual as
malice aforethought against the dignity and person of another]

YOUTUBE: "The Bad Touch (Bloodhound Gang)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xat1GVnl8-k>

HOWEVER [JOHN MCCAIN] UNDERSTOOD THAT SOME PRINCIPLES {

PRINCIPLES@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 20 (#21); Ego: 19 (#20),
@3: Sup: 53 (#74); Ego: 33 (#53),
@4: Sup: 54 (#128); Ego: 1 (#54),
@5: Sup: 11 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%13}); Ego: 38 (#92),
Male: #139; Feme: #92
}

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #712 % #41 = #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of
Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning;
Tetra: 1 - Centre;

THOTH MEASURE: #15 - Oh Lord of Righteousness, who makest thine
appearance in the place of Righteousness; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A*
*LAND*-*GRABBER*.

#VIRTUE: With Reach (no. #15), dailys increasing its kind.
#TOOLS: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily depleting its type.
#POSITION: With Resistance (no. #22), intolerance, but
#TIME: With Unity (no. #54), magnanimity.
#CANON: #146

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_146@{
@1: Sup: 15 (#15); Ego: 15 (#15),
@2: Sup: 70 (#85); Ego: 55 (#70),
@3: Sup: 11 (#96); Ego: 22 (#92),
@4: Sup: 65 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 54 (#146 -
I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
Male: #161; Feme: #146
} // #146

#902 as [#1, #100, #600, #1, #200] = arche (G746): {#44 as #712 % #41 =
#15} 1) beginning, origin; 2) the person or thing that commences, the
first person or thing in a series, the leader; 3) that by which anything
begins to be, the origin, the active cause; 4) the extremity of a thing;
5) *THE* *FIRST* *PLACE*, *PRINCIPALITY*, *RULE*, *MAGISTRACY*; 4a) of
the corners of a sail; 5a) of angels and demons;

} TRANSCEND POLITICS, THAT SOME VALUES TRANSCEND PARTY. HE CONSIDERED IT
PART OF HIS DUTY TO UPHOLD THOSE PRINCIPLES AND UPHOLD THOSE VALUES.
JOHN CARED ABOUT THE INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT, OUR CONSTITUTION,
OUR BILL OF RIGHTS, *RULE* *OF* *LAW* {#22 x #41 = #902}, SEPARATION OF
POWERS, EVEN THE ARCANE RULES AND PROCEDURES OF THE SENATE. HE KNEW THAT
IN A NATION AS BIG AND BOISTEROUS AND DIVERSE AS OURS, THOSE
INSTITUTIONS, THOSE RULES, THOSE NORMS ARE WHAT BIND US TOGETHER {

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*

}. THEY GIVE *SHAPE* {

H1254@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 7 (#12); Ego: 2 (#7),
@3: Sup: 45 (#57); Ego: 38 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@4: Sup: 46 (#103); Ego: 1 (#46),
@5: Sup: 79 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
Ego: 33 (#79),
Male: #182; Feme: #79
} // #248 <-- MAIS NOUS FAISONS DE NOTRE MIEUX

#248 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #40] / #808 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #600] =
bara' (H1254): {#0 as #248 % #41 = #2} 1) to create, shape, form; 2) to
be fat; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *SHAPE*, *FASHION*, *CREATE* (*ALWAYS* *WITH*
*GOD* *AS* *SUBJECT*); 1a1) of heaven and earth; 1a2) of individual man;
1a3) of new conditions and circumstances; 1a4) of transformations; 1b)
(Niphal) to be created; 1b1) of heaven and earth; 1b2) of birth; 1b3) of
something new; 1b4) of miracles; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) *TO* *CUT* *DOWN*;
1c2) *TO* *CUT* *OUT*; 2a) (Hiphil) to make yourselves fat;

} AND ORDER TO OUR COMMON LIFE, EVEN WHEN WE DISAGREE. ESPECIALLY WHEN
WE DISAGREE.

JOHN BELIEVED IN HONEST ARGUMENT AND HEARING OTHER VIEWS. HE UNDERSTOOD
THAT IF WE GET IN THE HABIT OF BENDING THE TRUTH TO SUIT POLITICAL
EXPEDIENCY OR PARTY ORTHODOXY, OUR DEMOCRACY WILL NOT WORK. THAT'S WHY
HE WAS WILLING TO BUCK HIS OWN PARTY AT TIMES, OCCASIONALLY WORK ACROSS
THE AISLE ON CAMPAIGN-FINANCE REFORM AND IMMIGRATION REFORM. THAT'S WHY
HE CHAMPIONED A FREE AND INDEPENDENT PRESS AS VITAL TO OUR DEMOCRATIC
DEBATE. AND THE FACT THAT IT EARNED HIM SOME GOOD COVERAGE DIDN'T HURT
EITHER.

JOHN UNDERSTOOD, AS JFK UNDERSTOOD, AS RONALD REAGAN UNDERSTOOD, THAT
PART OF WHAT MAKES OUR COUNTRY GREAT IS THAT OUR MEMBERSHIP IS BASED NOT
ON OUR BLOODLINE, NOT ON WHAT WE LOOK LIKE, WHAT OUR LAST NAMES ARE,
IT'S NOT BASED ON WHERE OUR PARENTS OR GRANDPARENTS CAME FROM, OR HOW
RECENTLY THEY ARRIVED, BUT ON ADHERENCE TO A COMMON CREED: *THAT* *ALL*
*OF* *US* *ARE* *CREATED* *EQUAL*, *ENDOWED* {#492 - *FREEDOM* *OF*
*WILL* / #41 = #12 as #9 - Autonomous Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL*
*NECESSITY*} *BY* *OUR* *CREATOR* {

COVENANT@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
@5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
@6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
@7: Sup: 42 (#183); Ego: 71 (#123),
@8: Sup: 11 (#194); Ego: 50 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL
LUST {%27}),
Male: #194; Feme: #173
}

#902 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #800, #50] / #260 as [#4, #10, #1,
#9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a
disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one wishes to be valid, the
last disposition which one makes of his earthly possessions after his
death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A* *COVENANT*, *A*
*TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;

} *WITH* *CERTAIN* *INALIENABLE* *RIGHTS*. IT HAS BEEN MENTIONED TODAY,
AND WE'VE SEEN FOOTAGE THIS WEEK JOHN PUSHING BACK AGAINST SUPPORTERS
WHO CHALLENGED MY PATRIOTISM DURING THE 2008 CAMPAIGN. I WAS GRATEFUL,
BUT I WASN'T SURPRISED. AS JOE LIEBERMAN SAID, THAT WAS JOHN'S INSTINCT.
I NEVER SAW JOHN TREAT ANYONE DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE OF THEIR RACE OR
RELIGION OR GENDER. AND I'M CERTAIN THAT IN THOSE MOMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN
REFERRED TO DURING THE CAMPAIGN, HE SAW HIMSELF AS DEFENDING AMERICA'S
CHARACTER, NOT JUST MINE. FOR HE CONSIDERED IT THE IMPERATIVE OF EVERY
CITIZEN WHO LOVES THIS COUNTRY TO TREAT ALL PEOPLE FAIRLY.

AND FINALLY, WHILE JOHN AND I DISAGREED ON ALL KINDS OF FOREIGN-POLICY
ISSUES, WE STOOD TOGETHER ON AMERICA'S ROLE AS THE ONE INDISPENSABLE
NATION, BELIEVING THAT WITH GREAT POWER AND GREAT BLESSINGS COMES GREAT
RESPONSIBILITY. THAT BURDEN IS BORNE MOST HEAVILY BY OUR MEN AND WOMEN
IN UNIFORM, SERVICE MEMBERS LIKE DOUG, JIMMY, AND JACK WHO FOLLOWED
THEIR FATHER'S FOOTSTEPS, AS WELL AS THE FAMILIES WHO SERVE ALONGSIDE
OUR TROOPS. BUT JOHN UNDERSTOOD THAT OUR SECURITY AND OUR INFLUENCE WAS
WON NOT JUST BY OUR MILITARY MIGHT, NOT JUST BY OUR WEALTH, NOT JUST BY
OUR ABILITY TO BEND OTHERS TO OUR WILL {#9 x #41 = #369}, BUT FROM OUR
CAPACITY TO INSPIRE OTHERS WITH OUR ADHERENCE TO A SET OF UNIVERSAL
VALUES, LIKE *RULE* *OF* *LAW* {#22 x #41 = #902} *AND* *HUMAN* *RIGHTS*
{#12 x #41 = #492 as #9 - Autonomous Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL*
*NECESSITY*}, AND AN INSISTENCE ON THE GOD-GIVEN DIGNITY OF EVERY HUMAN
BEING.

OF COURSE, JOHN WAS THE FIRST TO TELL US THAT HE WAS NOT PERFECT. LIKE
ALL OF US WHO GO INTO PUBLIC SERVICE, HE DID HAVE AN EGO. LIKE ALL OF
US, THERE WAS NO DOUBT SOME VOTES HE CAST, SOME COMPROMISES HE STRUCK,
SOME DECISIONS HE MADE THAT HE WISHED HE COULD HAVE BACK. IT'S NO
SECRET—IT'S BEEN MENTIONED—THAT HE HAD A TEMPER, AND WHEN IT FLARED UP,
IT WAS A FORCE OF NATURE, A WONDER TO BEHOLD. HIS JAW GRINDING, HIS FACE
REDDENING, HIS EYES BORING A HOLE RIGHT THROUGH YOU—NOT THAT I EVER
EXPERIENCED IT FIRSTHAND, MIND YOU. BUT TO KNOW JOHN WAS TO KNOW THAT AS
QUICK AS HIS PASSIONS MIGHT FLARE, HE WAS JUST AS QUICK TO FORGIVE AND
ASK FOR FORGIVENESS. HE KNEW MORE THAN MOST HIS OWN FLAWS, AND HIS BLIND
SPOTS, AND HE KNEW HOW TO LAUGH AT HIMSELF. AND THAT SELF-AWARENESS MADE
HIM ALL THE MORE COMPELLING.

WE DIDN'T ADVERTISE IT, BUT EVERY SO OFTEN OVER THE COURSE {

COURSE@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
@3: Sup: 75 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
76 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
@4: Sup: 4 (#189); Ego: 10 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
@5: Sup: 6 (#195); Ego: 2 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
@6: Sup: 1 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 76 (#244),
@7: Sup: 11 (#207); Ego: 10 (#254),
Male: #207; Feme: #254
}

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #462 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
Tetra: 33 - Closeness;

THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
appearance in Amenta; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SLUGGISH*.

#VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
#TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
#POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
#TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
#CANON: #166

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_166@{
@1: Sup: 11 (#11); Ego: 11 (#11),
@2: Sup: 62 (#73); Ego: 51 (#62),
@3: Sup: 5 (#78); Ego: 24 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@4: Sup: 4 (#82); Ego: 80 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
Male: #82; Feme: #166
} // #166

#902 as [#30, #50, #400, #10, #2, #400, #10] / #467 as [#50, #400, #10,
#2, #5] = nathiyb (H5410): {#7 as #462 % #41 = #11} 1) *TRODDEN* *WITH*
*THE* *FEET*, *PATH*, *PATHWAY*; 2) path, pathway, traveller;

} OF MY PRESIDENCY, JOHN WOULD COME OVER TO THE WHITE HOUSE AND WE'D
JUST SIT AND TALK IN THE OVAL OFFICE, JUST THE TWO OF US. AND WE'D TALK
ABOUT POLICY AND WE'D TALK ABOUT FAMILY AND WE'D TALK ABOUT THE STATE OF
OUR POLITICS. AND OUR DISAGREEMENTS DIDN'T GO AWAY DURING THESE PRIVATE
CONVERSATIONS. THOSE WERE REAL AND THEY WERE OFTEN DEEP.

BUT WE ENJOYED {

JOY@{
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
@2: Sup: 34 (#67); Ego: 1 (#34),
@3: Sup: 53 (#120); Ego: 19 (#53),
@4: Sup: 54 (#174); Ego: 1 (#54),
@5: Sup: 11 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
38 (#92),
Male: #185; Feme: #92
}

#902 as [#600, #1, #100#1, #200] = chara (G5479): {#25 as #702 % #41 =
#5} 1) joy, gladness; 1a) the joy received from you; 1b) the cause or
occasion of joy; 1b1) *OF* *PERSONS* *WHO* *ARE* *ONE'S* *JOY*;

YOUTUBE: "Joy to the World (Mormon Tabernacle Choir)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLT9dSt8cwg>

} THE TIME WE SHARED AWAY FROM THE BRIGHT LIGHTS {

LIGHT@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 53 (#54); Ego: 52 (#53),
@3: Sup: 54 (#108); Ego: 1 (#54),
@4: Sup: 11 (#119); Ego: 38 (#92),
Male: #119; Feme: #92
} // #902

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #109 % #41 = #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure;

THOTH MEASURE: #27 - Oh thou whose face is behind thee, and who makest
thine appearance at thy cavern; *I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *UNNATURAL*
*LUST*.

#VIRTUE: With Duties (no. #27), esteem for activity.
#TOOLS: With Darkening (no. #67), esteem for rest.
#POSITION: With Mired (no. #3), plucked out from calamity.
#TIME: With Aggravation (no. #76), lacking any pardons.
#CANON: #173

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_173@{
@1: Sup: 27 (#27); Ego: 27 (#27),
@2: Sup: 13 (#40); Ego: 67 (#94),
@3: Sup: 16 (#56); Ego: 3 (#97),
@4: Sup: 11 (#67); Ego: 76 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
Male: #67; Feme: #173
} // #173

LIGHT@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 53 (#54); Ego: 52 (#53),
@3: Sup: 54 (#108); Ego: 1 (#54),
@4: Sup: 11 (#119); Ego: 38 (#92),
Male: #119; Feme: #92
}

#902 as [#1, #700, #1, #200] = hapto (G681): {#0 as #396 % #41 = #27} 1)
A primary verb; properly, to fasten to, ie. (specially) to set on
fire:--kindle, light

}. AND WE LAUGHED WITH EACH OTHER. AND WE LEARNED FROM EACH OTHER. AND
WE NEVER DOUBTED THE OTHER MAN'S SINCERITY OR THE OTHER MAN'S
PATRIOTISM, OR THAT WHEN ALL WAS SAID AND DONE, WE WERE ON THE SAME
TEAM. WE NEVER DOUBTED WE WERE ON THE SAME TEAM. FOR ALL OF OUR
DIFFERENCES, WE SHARED A FIDELITY TO THE IDEALS FOR WHICH GENERATIONS OF
AMERICANS HAVE MARCHED AND FOUGHT AND SACRIFICED AND GIVEN THEIR LIVES.
WE CONSIDERED OUR POLITICAL BATTLES A PRIVILEGE, AN OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE
AS STEWARDS OF THOSE IDEALS HERE AT HOME AND TO DO OUR BEST TO ADVANCE
THEM AROUND THE WORLD. WE SAW THIS COUNTRY AS A PLACE WHERE ANYTHING IS
POSSIBLE, AND CITIZENSHIP IS AN OBLIGATION TO ENSURE IT FOREVER REMAINS
THAT WAY.

AND MORE THAN ONCE DURING HIS CAREER, JOHN DREW COMPARISONS TO TEDDY
ROOSEVELT. AND I AM SURE IT HAS BEEN NOTED THAT ROOSEVELT'S "MAN IN THE
ARENA" ORATION SEEMS TAILORED TO JOHN. MOST OF YOU KNOW IT. ROOSEVELT
SPEAKS OF THOSE WHO STRIVE, WHO DARE TO DO GREAT THINGS, WHO SOMETIMES
WIN AND SOMETIMES COME UP SHORT, BUT ALWAYS RELISH A GOOD FIGHT—A
CONTRAST TO THOSE COLD, TIMID SOULS {

SOUL@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 49 (#99); Ego: 80 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
@3: Sup: 25 (#124); Ego: 57 (#187),
@4: Sup: 31 (#155); Ego: 6 (#193),
@5: Sup: 26 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}); Ego: 76
(#269),
@6: Sup: 36 (#217); Ego: 10 (#279),
@7: Sup: 5 (#222); Ego: 50 (#329),
@8: Sup: 11 (#233); Ego: 6 (#335),
Male: #233; Feme: #335
}
#902 as [#50, #80, #300, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6] = nephesh (H5315): {#18
as #430 % #41 = #20} 1) *SOUL*, *SELF*, *LIFE*, *CREATURE*, *PERSON*,
*APPETITE*, *MIND*, *LIVING* *BEING*, *DESIRE*, *EMOTION*, *PASSION*;
1a) that which breathes, the breathing substance or being, soul, the
inner being of man; 1b) living being; 1c) living being (with life in the
blood); 1d) the man himself, self, person or individual; 1e) seat of the
appetites; 1f) seat of emotions and passions; 1g) activity of mind; 1g1)
dubious; 1h) activity of the will; 1h1) dubious; 1i) activity of the
character; 1i1) dubious;

} WHO KNOW NEITHER VICTORY NOR DEFEAT. ISN'T THAT THE SPIRIT WE
CELEBRATE THIS WEEK? THAT STRIVING TO BE BETTER, TO DO BETTER, TO BE
WORTHY OF THE GREAT INHERITANCE {

INHERITANCE@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 50 (#70); Ego: 30 (#50),
@3: Sup: 58 (#128); Ego: 8 (#58),
@4: Sup: 77 (#205); Ego: 19 (#77),
@5: Sup: 66 (#271); Ego: 70 (#147),
@6: Sup: 35 (#306); Ego: 50 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
@7: Sup: 24 (#330); Ego: 70 (#267),
@8: Sup: 64 (#394); Ego: 40 (#307),
@9: Sup: 72 (#466); Ego: 8 (#315),
@10: Sup: 29 (#495); Ego: 38 (#353),
@11: Sup: 30 (#525); Ego: 1 (#354),
@12: Sup: 6 (#531); Ego: 57 (#411),
@13: Sup: 11 (#542); Ego: 5 (#416),
Male: #542; Feme: #416
}

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #614 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;

THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.

#VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
#TOOLS: Labouring (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
strenuous efforts.
#POSITION: With Duties (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
#TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
#CANON: #228

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
@3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
@4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228

#902 as [#20, #30, #8, #100, #70, #50, #70, #40, #8, #200, #1, #300, #5]
= kleronomeo (G2816): {#31 as #614 % #41 = #40} 1) to receive a lot,
receive by lot; 2) to receive the portion assigned to one, receive an
allotted portion, receive as one's own or as a possession; 3) to become
partaker of, to obtain; 1a) esp. to receive a part of an inheritance,
receive as an inheritance, *OBTAIN* *BY* *RIGHT* *OF* *INHERITANCE*; 1b)
to be an heir, to inherit;

} THAT OUR FOUNDERS BESTOWED.

TODAY IS ONLY ONE DAY IN ALL THE DAYS THAT WILL EVER BE. BUT WHAT WILL
HAPPEN IN ALL THE OTHER DAYS THAT WILL EVER COME CAN DEPEND ON WHAT YOU
DO TODAY." WHAT BETTER WAY TO HONOR JOHN MCCAIN'S LIFE OF SERVICE THAN,
AS BEST WE CAN, FOLLOW HIS EXAMPLE. TO PROVE THAT THE WILLINGNESS TO GET
IN THE ARENA AND FIGHT FOR THIS COUNTRY IS NOT RESERVED FOR THE FEW, IT
IS OPEN TO ALL OF US, AND IN FACT IT IS DEMANDED OF ALL OF US AS
CITIZENS OF THIS GREAT REPUBLIC. THAT'S PERHAPS HOW WE HONOR HIM BEST,
BY RECOGNIZING THAT THERE ARE SOME THINGS BIGGER THAN PARTY OR AMBITION
OR MONEY OR FAME OR POWER. THAT THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT ARE WORTH
RISKING EVERYTHING FOR: PRINCIPLES THAT ARE ETERNAL, TRUTHS THAT ARE
ABIDING. AT HIS BEST, JOHN SHOWED US WHAT THAT MEANS. FOR THAT, WE ARE
ALL DEEPLY IN HIS DEBT.

MAY GOD BLESS JOHN MCCAIN. MAY GOD BLESS THIS COUNTRY HE SERVED SO WELL.

<https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/01/politics/obama-eulogy-john-mccain-funeral/index.html>

3. THE METHOD AND THE RELATION OF THE GROUNDWORK TO THE METAPHYSICS OF
MORALS (GMS, 391,16-392)
At this point, Kant departs from his general reflections on a theory to
be provided “SOMEDAY” (GMS, 391,16) and dedicates himself to the work
that follows. His remarks are extremely terse and without a total
interpretation of the Groundwork almost impossible to comprehend. In
particular, his comments on the method he uses are hardly understandable
for a reader who is not already familiar with the work. [Horn &
Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 16]

DOLF @ 2012 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "There is the analytic/synthetic
distinction and the a priori/a posteriori distinction. These two
distinctions form four types of knowledge:

#1) ANALYTIC A PRIORI
#2) SYNTHETIC A PRIORI
#3) ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI
#4) SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI

According to the facsimile of the 1687 edition on the History of
Philosophy / Pythagoras and His Life Teachings, Hebrews express this
ANALYTIC A PRIORI by a Point, which mark (as well amongst the
Barbarians, as in Latin) denotes One. Hitherto allude the Pythagorean
symbols One and Two. Zaratas (the Master of Pythagoras) used these as
the names of propagation—one the father; two the mother. One and two (in
the divine essence) producing four, the TETRACTYS, the idea of all
things, which are consummated in the number Ten. This Pythagoras styles:

Eternal Nature's fountain—

This is the *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *THINGS* *IN* *THE* *DIVINE* *MIND*
*OPERATING* *INTELLECTUALLY*. From this fountain of Eternal Nature,
flows down the Pythagorean numbers *ONE* and *TWO*--which from Eternity,
in the fountain of the immense Ocean, was, shall be, or rather always
is, abundantly streaming. This *ONE* was by the Ancients termed [“Zeus”]
as Jupiter; *TWO* as [“Hera”]

G1520@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 55 (#60); Ego: 50 (#55),
@3: Sup: 44 (#104); Ego: 70 (#125),
@4: Sup: 1 (#105); Ego: 38 (#163),
Male: #105; Feme: #163
} // #325


T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #215 % #41 = #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?; I-Ching:
H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net; Tetra:
41 - Response;

THOTH MEASURE: #10 - Oh thou who orderest the flame, who makest thine
appearance in Memphis; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *FOOD*.

#VIRTUE: With Defectiveness (no. #10), selfishness and crookedness.
#TOOLS: With Vastness (no. #50), fairmindedness and desirelessness.
#POSITION: As to Branching Out (no. #9), it is the advance.
#TIME: As to Holding Back (no. #17), it is the retreat.
#CANON: #86 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *JUDGES* / *ELOHYM*

#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis (G1520):
{#12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*;

At this stage of appraisal, Kant appears to be procrastinatory {ie. as
the habitual/intentional delay of starting or finishing a task despite
its negative consequences} and conveys the ambiguous thought on ANALYTIC
A POSTERIORI that it was self-contradictory by nature. But, some other
philosophers treated it as valid. But what are examples of ANALYTIC A
POSTERIORI knowledge?

Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology
of 364 days an example of “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI” knowledge?

364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126

Is defining the TELOS as #6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with a #41 as
ONTIC necessity of the *APEIRON* also an example of “ANALYTIC A
POSTERIORI” knowledge?

#0 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he supplants,
That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 4000 BCE

... [THE APEIRON] ...

#8800 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he
supplants, That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 8800 CE

APEIRON@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 81 (#82); Ego: 80 (#81),
@3: Sup: 5 (#87); Ego: 5 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@4: Sup: 15 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 10 (#96),
@5: Sup: 34 (#136); Ego: 19 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@6: Sup: 23 (#159); Ego: 70 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN
BEHAVIOUR {%25}),
@7: Sup: 73 (#232); Ego: 50 (#235),
Male: #232; Feme: #235
} // #316

APEIRON (ἄπειρον) is a Greek word meaning "(that which is) unlimited,"
"boundless", "infinite", or "indefinite"[1] from ἀ- a-, "without" and
πεῖραρ peirar, "end, limit", "boundary",[2] the Ionic Greek form of
πέρας peras, "end, limit, boundary". It is akin to Persian piramon,
meaning "*BOUNDARY*, *CIRCUMFERENCE*, *SURROUNDING*".

My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
doesn’t fully conceive any “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI” possibility and it’s
notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate but as a
recursive enumeration giving forth a trinomial #NUMBER definition as
process of “SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI” by it's as formulation of
progression. This dialectic is then in turn consistent with Kant's
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE as rationalism being an intellectual conception:

+ 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law {@1}
+ 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity {@2}
+ 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy {@3}
+ 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression {@4}

Thus the ANALYTIC {YANG CH’I} A PRIORI given by the alternative HOMOIOS
mathematical notion of #NUMBER with the recursive necessity of an #41 -
ONTIC {NORMA OBLIGANS} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism:
REMEMBER THE SABBATH and it’s SYNCRETIC {YIN CH’I} A PRIORI such as
beIng SAPIENT with the recursive necessity of an #82 - ONTIC
{MANIFESTING NORM} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism:
HONOUR PARENTS is a conception of fecundity by its capacity in producing
or capable of producing offspring, fruit, vegetation, etc., in
abundance; prolific; fruitful: fecund parents; fecund farmland and hence
its equinox
association.

It also conveys a sapient propensity in being very productive or
creative intellectually: the fecund years of the Italian Renaissance.

One must therefore ask on the basis of an analytic a posteriori why Kant
withheld such knowledge given the words had their origin: 1375–1425;
late Middle English < Latin fēcundus, equivalent to fē- (see fetus) +
-cundus adj. suffix; replacing late Middle English fecounde < Anglo-French

And the most probable answer is that such idea which Kant conveys by
APRIORITY PROTOTYPES is that they are tectonic shifts with a cataclysmic
consequence which is made against the prevailing Latin binomial world
order constituted by its NATURE bifurcations by means of another
ethereal construct: @1 / @5.

Furthermore is Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
consideration of *VOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin voluntās f (genitive
voluntātis):
- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
as mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
the natural world.

And consideration of *NOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin nōluntās f (genitive
nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
natural world.

Are these then considered a priori as to the enumeration of an autonomy
of will by which apperception is circumscribed as an ANALYTIC A
POSTERIORI of PUPIL with the recursive necessity of an #123 - ONTIC
{DISCRIMINATING
NORM} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism: DO NOT KILL as its
ontological utility as reciprocality {#369: 9(9²+1)/2 A POSTERIORI as
enumeration function of equation n(n²+1)/2 — *NEED* *TO* *THINK* *ABOUT*
*THIS*

#1 + #41 + #81 = #123 + #369 = #492 (#451 + #41) as *FREEWILL* being #12
x #41 as ONTIC necessity

#YOD (#10) as CENTRE
#MEM (#40) as DELIMITATION
#TAU (#400) as CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH (#1) as STREAMING {23 CHROMOSOMES} = #451

AS BIFURCATION: #TAU x #41 = #902 / #2 = #451

} the syncretic process eventually occurs as SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI
progression being then genitive of a self declaration as an heteronomous
{ie subject to law external to itself} and autonomous reality.

In such a circumstance, what is then the *PROBITY* of utilising an EGO
defensive mechanism constituted by a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL of
IGNORANCE against any further progression of this #41 - *ONTIC*
NECESSITY = #492 (#451 + #41) AS *FREEWILL* being #12 x #41 of
ANTHROPOCENTRIC (CIRCULAR) REALITY?

Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between descriptive statements which present an account of
how the world is being analogous to the LIMITED {#9 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS / SEMINAL REASON
GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative statements presenting
an evaluative account, or an account of how the syncretic world should
be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in
being optimally something that should be lived up to; or that should be
pursued.

“JESUS ANSWERED, *ARE* *THERE* *NOT* *TWELVE* *HOURS* *IN* *THE* *DAY*
{ie. 24 x 60 minutes = #1440 / #72 = 20 minutes allocations}? *IF* *ANY*
*MAN* *WALK* *IN* *THE* *DAY*, *HE* *STUMBLETH* *NOT*, *BECAUSE* *HE*
*SEETH* *THE* *LIGHT* *OF* *THIS* *WORLD*-*KOSMOS*.

BUT IF A MAN WALK IN THE NIGHT, HE STUMBLETH, BECAUSE THERE IS NO LIGHT
IN HIM.” [John 11:9-10 (KJV)]

At the center of a philosophical doctrine of nature, there would then
stand general descriptive judgments; that means, more precisely,
statements of law that describe how objects of nature act. And at the
center of a doctrine of morals there would stand normative judgments
that exhibit a comparable degree of generality and modal status. I will
later address more thoroughly what it could mean that some normative
judgments exhibit a comparable modal status to statements of law in the
natural sciences. Such a parallel is far from trivial. On the contrary,
it is one of the critical challenges for the interpretation of Kant’s
ethical writings. The first step toward a unified interpretation of the
two kinds of laws consists in seeing both kinds equally as
propositionally structured entities that demonstrate a clearly
identifiable logical form. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 5]

And to illustrate the ontological significances of this, I'm considering
on the proviso that there is sufficient time for its inclusion within
this initial draft document, a summary of Kant’s broad description of
the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE before then using the noumena to examine the
historical event occurring upon 25 December 1770 when Captain Cook
sought repairs in Batavia and a sailor absconded as worthy example.

But I will have to do some preliminary research and prudently consider
the semantical terms which are not common usage to our present
sensibility, before that occurs."

DANIEL60 [SHORT A DIGIT: +1 = #61 / % #41 = #20]
(***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2154 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "My
question for the day would have to be "What the hell does '*REFUTATION*'
{ie. the action of proving a statement or theory to be wrong or false}
mean??" Sounds like a made-up word! Or a 'WORD' used by someone trying
to sound edu-ma-cated, in the vein of 'BULLSHIT BAFFLES THE BRAINLESS'!!"

NOMEN NESCIO [LATIN: I DON'T KNOW THE NAME] (***@DIZUM.COM) @ 2022
HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "DOLF CAN PEEL AND EAT BANANAS USING HIS TOES:

N.B. Harry Houdini never did this, but other primates can."

FRAN SNORTELUS (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1157 HOURS ON 2
SEPTEMBER 2018: "It's a perfectly valid word and can be found in the
OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY. It means the action of refuting or
disproving a statement/fact and probably also a theory.

But it IS a valid word and it IS used by people who ARE educated!"

DOLF @ 0658 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018: "NOMEN NESCIO’S [LATIN: I DON'T
KNOW THE NAME] NEO-NAZISM AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION IS TO BE DRIVEN
FROM OUR LAND WITH ALL THE ZEAL IN FREEDOM OF VOLUNTARY WILL WHICH WAS
AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE AND THE FRENCH ENLIGHTENMENT AS REVOLUTION:

Whom are you as #41 - ONTIC necessity that we ought consider any
ontological regard?

The Australian Catholic Church by rejecting calls for priests to report
child abuses confession and instead making an economy of such by an
appeal to so called Papal Authority against counsel of the Royal
Commission established by Letters Patent (DIEU ET MON DROIT) as powers
and Authority given Royal Assent on 8 August 1902.

Validates our authority of intended purpose in having #8 Papal Bulls
within our prudent determination as legal recourse and we are going to
first assist others in their recompense and then we will take the rest...

And I swear by Almighty God that what has been ordained to be so shall be.

THE END OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM BABOONERY MASQUERADING PIETY AS THE
CLAMOURING FOR ‘N ORT AND WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A CAT-O-NINE TAILS TO
YOUR IMPERTINENT HIDE AND TEACH YOU FIRSTLY A PROTOCOL OF CONFESSION AND
THEN THE DIGNITY OF SILENCE.

The *TRINOMIAL* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL* *NOUMENON* *AS* *MATERIA*
*PRIMA* is a savant endowment as capacity of MIND which is attributed to
the *SOVEREIGN* but not *CHIMPANZEES* as being savages since you don’t
have the mind development excepting to use *DEIFIED* *IGNORANCE* as
#231- JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL which is otherwise incapable for such
sapient existence:

G2233@{
#1: Sup: 8; Ego: 8,
#2: Sup: 11; Ego: 3,
#3: Sup: 19; Ego: 8,
#4: Sup: 57; Ego: 38,
#5: Sup: 58; Ego: 1,
#6: Sup: 15; Ego: 38,
#7: Sup: 24; Ego: 9,
#8: Sup: 29; Ego: 5,
Male: #221; Feme: #110
} // #434

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #137 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 -
Branching Out;

THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
Mabit; *I* *DEAL* *NOT* *FRAUDULENTLY*.

#VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
#TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
#POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
#TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
#CANON: #140

#434 as [#8, #3, #8, #200, #1, #200, #9, #5] = hegeomai (G2233): {#6 as
#137 % #41 = #14} 1) to lead; 2) to consider, deem, account, think; 1a)
to go before; 1b) to be a leader; 1b1) *TO* *RULE*, command; 1b2) to
have authority over; 1b3) *A* *PRINCE*, *OF* *REGAL* *POWER*, governor,
viceroy, chief, leading as respects influence, *CONTROLLING* *IN*
*COUNSEL*, overseers or leaders of the churches; 1b4) used of any kind
of leader, chief, commander; 1b5) the leader in speech, chief, spokesman;

“FOR THIS CORRUPTIBLE MUST PUT ON INCORRUPTION, AND THIS MORTAL MUST PUT
ON IMMORTALITY.

SO WHEN THIS CORRUPTIBLE SHALL HAVE PUT ON INCORRUPTION, AND THIS MORTAL
SHALL HAVE PUT ON IMMORTALITY, THEN SHALL BE BROUGHT TO PASS THE SAYING
THAT IS WRITTEN, *DEATH* {#902 as [#400, #40, #6, #400, #6, #50] = muwth
(H4191): {#451 % #41 = #41} 1) A primitive root; to die (literally or
figuratively); causatively, to kill; [idiom] at all, [idiom] crying,
(be) dead (body, man, one), (put to, worthy of) *DEATH*, destroy(-er),
(cause to, be like to, must) die, kill, necro(-mancer), [idiom] must
needs, slay, [idiom] surely, [idiom] very suddenly, [idiom] in (no) wise.

} *IS* *SWALLOWED* *UP* *IN* *VICTORY*.

EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 WHICH CONVEYS AN EQUIVALENT MAGIC
ROW SUM TO THE FIRST MAGIC SQUARE THE EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {

#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}

INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114; Feme: #108
} // #270

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
same light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
*GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 -
TORAH} - Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
each other {Latin CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:

Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).

*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
sovereign dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus}
Empire Governance]

THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]

O DEATH, WHERE IS THY STING? *O* *GRAVE*, *WHERE* *IS* *THY* *VICTORY*?

THE STING OF DEATH IS SIN; AND THE STRENGTH OF SIN IS THE LAW [OF
METEMPIRICAL CONTORTIONS AS NORMATIVE DECEPTIONS SUCH AS YOURS].”
[1Corinthians 15:54-56 (KJV)

Kant assigns three transitions to the three sections of the work
although it is unclear whether the sections also contain the starting
points and termini named in the title or whether they ultimately have
only the transitions themselves as topics. Kant’s mention of an
initially “ANALYTICALLY” and subsequently “SYNTHETICALLY” proceeding is
also unclear and disputed among interpreters (GMS, 392,19-22). A
possible interpretation consists in directly connecting the expressions
“ANALYTICALLY” and “SYNTHETICALLY” to the word “METHOD.” This would mean
that Kant refers here to the two different methods of instruction
(“Lehrarten”) mentioned in the Prolegomena, which appeared in 1783. In
the two-year older work, this process is explained "THE ANALYTICAL
METHOD [. ..] SIGNIFIES [. . .] THAT WE START FROM WHAT IS SOUGHT, AS IT
WERE GIVEN, AND ASCEND TO THE ONLY CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH IS POSSIBLE”
(AA IV, 276 note). Kant expressly emphasizes that the analytical method
has nothing to do with the procedure of conceptual analysis, but
concerns only the method (“Lehrart”): “THE ANALYTIC; METHOD, INSOFAR AS
IT IS OPPOSED TO THE SYNTHETICAL, IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM AN AGGREGATE OF
ANALYTIC PROPOSITIONS” (ibid).

BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 0453 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "GEERT BE
WILDERS BLAAST CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF:

It was also a item on the news. GEERT did not think it worth all those
threats. Still its interesting to see how many madmen live in Pakistan
and the rest of the world."

PANDORA'S BOX (***@KNOWARE.NL) @ 0611 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Why
don't they announce with fanfare a cartoon contest in which Jesus
ridiculed."

BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 0632 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Then nothing
happens. At most a little sputtering."

EDMUND (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1650 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Yes, you
are right, hundreds of people are killed immediately burned flags,
praised prizes to kill bp people.

Oh wait oh no, nothing happens at all.

Look up:

YOUTUBE: "The Life Of Brian - The People's Front of Judea"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WboggjN_G-4>

or

YOUTUBE: "Monty Python And The Holy Grail - The Black Knight - Tis But A
Scratch"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmInkxbvlCs>

An excellent example of the difference between those backward ones
barbarians and the normally developed world.

Feel free to make the same MONTY PYTHON film about the Quran, that is
laughing man."

BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 2110 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "By the way,
who's talking about ridiculous?"

DOLF @ 2143 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "This implication of 18 August
1811, Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte (1804 - 1814) issuing a decree, based
on French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is
that a large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman
Empire Governance and therefore did not have any authenticated notion of
Sophia as wisdom which is derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science.

That portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be
regarded as *BARBARIANS* and enlightenment was like the price of tulip
🌷 bulbs a decadent societal entitlement and status.

— CONDOMS GALORE —
[Amsterdam Pride 3 August 2018]

“HEINZ DAUGHTER.
LOOKING FOR SOUP.
WANDERING AFTER.
PARADING TROUPE.

A FATHER TO BE.
BY SIDEWALK HOPE.
EVERYONE IS FREE.
NO NEED TO ELOPE.”

TURKEY-BASTER@{
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 20 (#32); Ego: 29 (#53),
@3: Sup: 47 (#79); Ego: 31 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@4: Sup: 21 (#100); Ego: 46 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
@5: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 66 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
@6: Sup: 65 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 11 (#207),
@7: Sup: 10 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
56 (#263),
@8: Sup: 79 (#264); Ego: 72 (#335),
@9: Sup: 54 (#318); Ego: 37 (#372),
Male: #318; Feme: #372
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{318}&idea:{372}>

H2658@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 37 (#105); Ego: 80 (#118),
@4: Sup: 75 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 38 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
Male: #180; Feme: #156
} // #318

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #288 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;

THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.

#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_45@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 2 (#3); Ego: 1 (#2),
@3: Sup: 43 (#46); Ego: 41 (#43),
@4: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 2 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
Male: #91; Feme: #45
} // #45

#318 as [#30, #8, #80, #200] = chaphar (H2658): {UMBRA: #1 as #288 % #41
= #1} 1) to dig, search for; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to dig; 1a2) *TO* *SEARCH*,
*SEARCH* *OUT*, *EXPLORE*;

H3366@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 31 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}); Ego: 19 (#31),
@4: Sup: 69 (#114); Ego: 38 (#69),
@5: Sup: 75 (#189); Ego: 6 (#75),
Male: #189; Feme: #75
} // #318

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
Tetra: 26 - Endeavour;

THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
appearance in Urit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *HOT* *OF* *SPEECH*.

#VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
#TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
#POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
#TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
#CANON: #158

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
@1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
@2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
@4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I
AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
Male: #156; Feme: #158
} // #158 <-- *ONTIC* *VALUE* *FOR* *2ND* *NOVICHOK* *POISONING* *EVENT*

#318 as [#2, #10, #100, #200, #6] = yeqar (H3366): {UMBRA: #3 as #310 %
#41 = #23} 1) *PRICE*, *VALUE*, *PRECIOUSNESS*, *HONOUR*, *SPLENDOUR*,
*POMP*; 1a) preciousness; 1b) price; 1c) honour, esteem;

G3120@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 41 (#81); Ego: 1 (#41),
@3: Sup: 71 (#152); Ego: 30 (#71),
@4: Sup: 72 (#224); Ego: 1 (#72),
@5: Sup: 11 (#235); Ego: 20 (#92),
@6: Sup: 81 (#316); Ego: 70 (#162),
@7: Sup: 10 (#326); Ego: 10 (#172),
@8: Sup: 48 (#374); Ego: 38 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #374; Feme: #210
} // #372

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #362 % #41 = #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has
been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;

THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in
Memphis; I am neither a liar nor a doer of mischief.

#VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
#TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
#POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
#TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
#CANON: #215

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_215@{
@1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
@2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
@3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
Male: #134; Feme: #215
} // #215 <— *NOTE* *ALIGNMENT* *WITH* ADOLF HITLER’S TABLE TALK IDEA
AND ELOHYM AS #86 - ALMIGHTY GOD (SEE ABOVE)


#372 as [#40, #1, #30, #1, #20, #70, #10, #200] = malakos (G3120):
{UMBRA: #12 as #362 % #41 = #34} 1) soft, soft to the touch; 2)
metaphor: in a bad sense; 2a) effeminate; 2a1) of a catamite; 2a2) of a
boy kept for homosexual relations with a man; 2a3) of a male who submits
his body to unnatural lewdness; 2a4) of a male prostitute;

I would therefore take issue with your claim made of the normative
descriptor *BARBARIANS* which is a term of relative association and
according to my perspective of the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY published
within 4BCE by YANG HSIUNG whom determines the #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY
{POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} AS DERIVED FROM THE I CHING
AS 8x8 {#260 - COMPATIBLE TO PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL NOTION OF NUMBER} =
H64 BINOMIAL {MALE: YANG CH'I / FEME: YIN CH'I) BY MEANS OF A MAPPED
ASSOCIATION WITH THE TETRAGRAMMATON {#1 + #41 + #81 = #123}: "Since
neither the content nor the structure of the Changes implies a temporal
sequence, the Mystery follows generally a proposed rearrangement of the
hexagrams put forward by the HAN Dynasty 206 BCE-220 CE Changes {H64
elements} master, CHING FANG (77-33 BC). YANG HSIUNG improved upon
CHING FANG’S approach to symmetry in the cyclic structure he was
creating. He avoided, for example, certain inelegances of CHING FANG’S
schema (which involved only 60 hexagrams) when he incorporated
references to all 64 HEXAGRAMS in his arrangement of TETRAGRAMS and also
substituted the winter solstice for FANG’S artificial point of departure
(the new moon of the tenth civil month as GRAND INCEPTION determined
midnight of 21 DECEMBER 103 BCE), so that his cycle starts at the point
which marked the actual beginning of the tropical year for the HAN
astronomer.

Each pair of *HEXAGRAMS* separated by six months (for example: H19 -
APPROACH / TETRA: #9 - BRANCHING OUT {#65 CE - SOLDIER / 27-31 JANUARY}
and H33 - RETREAT / TETRA: #49 - FLIGHT {26-30 JULY}) are LINE-BY-LINE
POLAR OPPOSITIONS and together with the corresponding schema of
INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES produces *ONTIC* NECESSITY a REVERSE
TRANSCRIPTASE inhibitor as TETRACYTS being *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *THINGS*
*IN* *THE* *DIVINE* *MIND* *OPERATING* *INTELLECTUALLY*:

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #91 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; I am not a teller of lies.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

Each of these twelve “waxing and waning” hexagrams, along with 48 other
hexagrams, also correspond to equal intervals of 6 7/80 days (in other
words, 1/60 of the solar year of 365 1/4 days). The remaining four
hexagrams found in the Changes, called “standard hexagrams,” correspond
to the solstices and equinoxes and thus to the four cardinal points of
the sun’s path. They are not segments of the cycle, then, but points
fixed in space, which move back and forth in time. The sun may pass
through one of them on any day of the lunar month in which it is
located. From the astronomer’s point of view, it is the new moons that
move back and forth around them. [Nylan, 15-16]

And on TETRA: #45 - *GREATNESS* which then made of the #POSITION as
comprising an ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI determinism within, YANG HSIUNG
comments: The truly *WISE* {

H7069@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 69 (#88); Ego: 50 (#69),
@3: Sup: 74 (#162); Ego: 5 (#74),
@4: Sup: 80 (#242); Ego: 6 (#80),
Male: #242; Feme: #80
} // #161

#161 as [#100, #50, #5, #6] = qanah (H7069): {UMBRA: #14 as #161 % #41 =
#38} 1) to get, acquire, create, buy, possess; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to get,
acquire, obtain; 1a1a) of God originating, creating, redeeming His
people; 1a1a1) possessor; 1a1b) of Eve acquiring; 1a1c) of *ACQUIRING*
*KNOWLEDGE*, *WISDOM*; 1a2) to buy; 1b) (Niphal) to be bought; 1c)
(Hiphil) to *CAUSE* *TO* *POSSESS*;

} PAYS CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE FIRST SMALL *SIGNS* *OF* *CHANGE* {

H5927@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
@3: Sup: 45 (#107); Ego: 70 (#126),
@4: Sup: 75 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
Ego: 30 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
@5: Sup: 80 (#262); Ego: 5 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #262; Feme: #161
} // #161

#161 as [#6, #50, #70, #30, #5] = `alah (H5927): {UMBRA: #4 as #161 %
#41 = #38} 1) to go up, ascend, climb; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to go up, ascend;
1a2) to meet, visit, follow, depart, withdraw, retreat; 1a3) to go up,
come up (of animals); 1a4) to spring up, grow, shoot forth (of
vegetation); 1a5) to go up, go up over, *RISE* (*OF* *NATURAL*
*PHENOMENON*); 1a6) to come up (before God); 1a7) to go up, go up over,
*EXTEND* (*OF* *BOUNDARY*); 1a8) *TO* *EXCEL*, *BE* *SUPERIOR* *TO*; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be taken up, be brought up, be taken away; 1b2) to
take oneself away; 1b3) to be exalted; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to bring up,
cause to ascend or climb, cause to go up; 1c2) to bring up, bring
against, take away; 1c3) to bring up, draw up, train; 1c4) to cause to
ascend; 1c5) to rouse, stir up (mentally); 1c6) to offer, bring up (of
gifts); 1c7) to exalt; 1c8) to cause to ascend, offer; 1d) (Hophal);
1d1) to be carried away, be led up; 1d2) to be taken up into, be
inserted in; 1d3) to be offered; 1e) (Hithpael) to lift oneself;

}, since no one [*POSSESSES*] sufficient strength to singlehandedly
defeat a well-developed trend. The sage looks at small details
overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation of his
visionary rule. Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of
knowledge which is here conveyed as impetus of gnomic imperative
purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being validated by
experiential reality:

The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}

The commentators unanimously prefer a different reading, however:

The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.

Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)

APPRAISAL 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
FATHOMING 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.

Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit
the construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by
high rank by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes
public display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards
internal reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this,
he fails to focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are
far from *CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country

The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to
frame good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also
symbolizes *MONEY* since certain coins were minted in its image {

H3702@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
@3: Sup: 79 (#179); Ego: 80 (#160),
@4: Sup: 80 (#259); Ego: 1 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #259; Feme: #161
} // #161

#161 as [#20, #60, #80, #1] = kecaph (H3702): {UMBRA: #39 as #161 % #41
= #38} 1) silver; 1a) as metal; 1b) as *MONEY*;

} Here the house lacks either the incisive thinking or the material
resources it needs to flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before
too long, its reputation will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an
equivalence to the mystical cabalistic interpretation given to the
Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15 magic square and its gematria value:

H5014@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 52 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 2 (#52),
@3: Sup: 58 (#160); Ego: 6 (#58),
@4: Sup: 60 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 2 (#60),
Male: #220; Feme: #60
} // #60

#60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab (H5014): {UMBRA: #12 as #60 % #41 =
#19} 1) (Qal) TO *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED* (PARTICIPLE);

APPRAISAL 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
FATHOMING 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the *NINE* *BARBARIANS*.

Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with
humaneness, the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT
MARRIAGE AS PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT
HUMANENESS as having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting
the minimum of pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have
a civilizing effect on people.

ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}

And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION
VIII as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING*
unto Our said Governor General:

VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
*OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
*PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
*GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.

} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*,
or 'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomising what is *CENTRAL*, the true
sage eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the
earth. The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things
revolve. In return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal
presence {ie. The sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL*
transformation. If he would do Viewing of what he himself is, he should
do Viewing of the people who themselves are morally transformed by their
viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.

APPRAISAL 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
FATHOMING 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.

If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will
eventually grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave
overwhelms tiny ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first
signs of disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation,
he can both adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the
Good. This is no less true in the private world of the soul than in the
public world of the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45, page #288]

— NOW I SEE —

"YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.

ONE THING IS CLEAR.
DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
THE MIRROR TO PEER.
YOUR WIFE HAS A ***@NT."

MICHAEL CHRIST: "I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to
speak like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.

Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.

To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
encyclopedias.

My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
personally, and inspirationally.

[Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
'listening'.

Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.

So, I must say, thank you.

And thank you, again.

However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.

Amen."

DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
touch with scripture."

MILOCH ITCHY KOALA: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.

Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something
out of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
'pillar of salt'?

And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk
and finally resigned from his ministry.

Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!

go Warriors!"

— PRELAPSARIAN —

"OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.

SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."

*PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
- characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
prelapsarian youth.
- Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
- Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com

ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "Trump and
Kushner are going down...

George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is
shocked and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are
defending Donald Trump and his actions."

DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."

ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "We have courts
to decided that.."

DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
presumed innocent until proven otherwise."

ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "DICK Painter
went on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will
stand up in a court of law.

The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...

I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and
if there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up
in a dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."

DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"

ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "Obstruction of
justice."

DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."

— BISCUIT EUPHORIA —

"LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.

SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
PISS OFF YOU ***@CKER.
OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."

And these APPRAISALS AS ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI AND FATHOMING AS SYNTHETIC
A POSTERIORI then as systematically comprise the INTELLECTUAL DECAD as
being equivalent to the Pythagoreans understanding of TEN as the
greatest number, as well for that it is the TETRACTYS, by that it
comprehends all arithmetical and harmonical proportions. Pythagoras
said, that TEN is the NATURE of NUMBER: because all Nations, Greeks,
[the *ARABS*] and *BARBARIANS*, reckon to it; and when they arrive at
it, return to the MONAD: as therefore compliant with the Chinese
perspective of the GRAND INCEPTION determined midnight of 21 DECEMBER
103 BCE.' [Chapter XIV, Pythagoras: His Life Teachings, Ninth Section
1687 edition of The History of Philosophy, p 529]

As the basis of the historical citation made within within the Epistle
to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist syncretic perennialist
philosophers whom published counterfactual works on the Religious
Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery the
reference to the nine *BARBARIANS* appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited
/ unlimited: “I AM DEBTOR BOTH TO THE GREEKS, AND TO THE *BARBARIANS* {

G915@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 3 (#5); Ego: 1 (#3),
@3: Sup: 22 (#27); Ego: 19 (#22),
@4: Sup: 24 (#51); Ego: 2 (#24),
@5: Sup: 25 (#76); Ego: 1 (#25),
@6: Sup: 44 (#120); Ego: 19 (#44),
@7: Sup: 33 (#153); Ego: 70 (#114),
@8: Sup: 43 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 10 (#124),
@9: Sup: 81 (#277); Ego: 38 (#162),
Male: #277; Feme: #162
} // #486

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #476 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
Distortion;

THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *BOISTEROUS* *IN* *BEHAVIOUR*.

#VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
#TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
#TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
#CANON: #185

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_185@{
@1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
@2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
@3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
@4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
Male: #108; Feme: #185
} // #185

#486 as [#2, #1, #100, #2, #1, #100, #70, #10, #200] = barbaros (G915):
{UMBRA: #18 as #476 % #41 = #25} 1) one whose speech is rude, rough and
harsh; 2) one who speaks a foreign or strange language which is not
understood by another; 3) *USED* *BY* *THE* *GREEKS* *OF* *ANY*
*FOREIGNER* *IGNORANT* *OF* *THE* *GREEK* *LANGUAGE*, *WHETHER* *MENTAL*
*OR* *MORAL*, with the added notion after the Persian war, of rudeness
and brutality. *THE* *WORD* *IS* *USED* *IN* *THE* *NEW* *TESTAMENT*
*WITHOUT* THE* *IDEA* *OF* *REPROACHFULNESS*;

} BOTH TO THE WISE, AND TO THE UNWISE. SO, AS MUCH AS IN ME IS, I AM
READY TO PREACH THE GOSPEL TO YOU THAT ARE AT ROME {power; strength}
ALSO.” [Romans 1:14]

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] {

HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH
AS DEFINED

} ...

@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...

#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - Remember the
Sabbath]) ...

#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
Honour your parents]) ...

#65 (@2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
- Do not kill]) ...

#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...

#175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- Do not steal]) ...

#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
Bear no false witness]) ...

#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - Covet Not])

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Chinese naming conventions such as is exemplar by:

MAO ZE DONG

or

XI JIN PIN

“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]

DANIEL60 [SHORT A DIGIT: +1 = #61 / % #41 = #20]
(***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2117 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Ah!
Well, there you go!! Now I am more edu-ma-cated!! :)"

FRAN SNORTELUS (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 2128 HOURS ON 2
SEPTEMBER 2018: "The power of usenet..... Now if we could only get the
PRETZEL to learn..... "

A second possible interpretation consists in referring the expressions
“ANALYTICALLY” and “SYNTHETICALLY,” as they are used here, neither
directly to the expression “METHOD” nor, consequently, to the concept of
method in the Prolegomena. Indeed, in the Preface to the Groundwork,
Kant says only that he wants “TO TAKE THE WAY” first ANALYTICALLY and
then SYNTHETICALLY. This leaves the possibility open to read the
expressions in a conceptual-analytical or conceptual-synthetical sense.
If one follows this interpretation, the outcome of the first two
sections is constituted in the “SEARCH” (GMS, 392,3) for the supreme
principle of morality. The goal of this “SEARCH” is an exact formulation
of the [#41 - *ONTIC* *NECESSITY* to] CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE. The
procedure Kant uses for this is that of conceptual analysis. The formula
of the categorical imperative can be found through the analytical
process, but its validity cannot yet be proven. For this reason, Kant
shifts to the CONCEPTUAL-SYNTHETICAL procedure in the third section and
therewith to the “ESTABLISHMENT” (GMS, 392,4) of the principle. In the
first two sections, it is, accordingly, solely a matter of ANALYTICAL
JUDGMENTS. In contrast, SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS, with which the proof of
validity can be achieved, would stand at the centre of the third
section. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 17-18]

DOLF @ 0436 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I am (being surnamed BOEK
self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical appeal to either
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *TRUMPIUM* for taking an obstinate or negative dialectic
disposition (ie. ) as is implied by the title of this chapter 'DUTCH
BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS' and then spiralling downwards into
forfeiture of decency by recourse to *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* until
one reaches a consequential depravity *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* (eg:
Hitler was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are you), .

However, if ADOLF HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK as IDEA @1
expressed on Saturday 5 JULY 1941 that "THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A
SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME" as deploying the
NUMBER @1 / @5 PROTOTYPE as the basis of Roman Empire Governance by
which it was then an authenticated notion of *SOPHIA* *AS* *WISDOM* as
derived from Pythagorean binomial {#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as
[#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis (G1520): {#12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*}
nomenclature as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE
A CHOOK AS CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?

#541 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #300, #5, #50, #5, #10] = apokteino (G615):
{#60 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to kill in any way whatever; 2) metaphor: to
extinguish, abolish; 1a) to destroy, to allow to perish; 2a) to inflict
mortal death; 2b) *TO* *DEPRIVE* *OF* *SPIRITUAL* *LIFE* *AND* *PROCURE*
*ETERNAL* *MISERY* *IN* *HELL*

#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
dispensation;

#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460 %
#41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b)
like: ie. corresponding to a thing;

#541 as [#20, #300, #1, #200, #9, #1, #10] = ktaomai (G2932): {#63 as
#541 % #41 = #8} 1) to acquire, get, or procure a thing for one's self,
to possess; 1a) to marry a wife;

#541 as [#5, #80, #10, #200, #20, #10, #1, #200, #5, #10] = episkiazo
(G1982): {#55 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *TO* *THROW* *A* *SHADOW* *UPON*,
*TO* *ENVELOP* *IN* *A* *SHADOW*, *TO* *OVERSHADOW* from a vaporous
cloud that casts a shadow the word is transferred to a shining cloud
surrounding and enveloping persons with brightness. Used of the Holy
Spirit exerting creative energy upon the womb of the virgin Mary and
impregnating it (a use of the word which seems to have been drawn from
the familiar Old Testament idea of a cloud as symbolising the immediate
presence and power of God);

#541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
dispensation;

SEE ALSO: "REFUTATION OF SCORN: IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF
PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.6%20A%20METHODOLOGICAL%20NEW%20BEGINNING.pdf>

In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument
that attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably
leads to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove
one by showing that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or
impossible.

Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
(Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.

The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a
range of forms, as these examples show:

The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off
the edge.

There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were,
then it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.

The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is
a "smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).

<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>

Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY in being
normative description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted
{ie. #391} and what causality {#541} it had within and upon the populace.

The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) which was competed within 1631
is a Reformed church within Dutch Protestant church in central
Amsterdam, Netherlands. It lies in the most western part of the
Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum borough), next to the Jordaan,
between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.

The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three
main canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting
canal belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the
west and south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
Prinsengracht .

Furthermore as an instance of *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* is this your
quantitative statement: "An excellent example of the difference between
those backward *BARBARIANS* and the normally developed world. The
difference between *MORE* *AND* *LESS* secularized societies.

If one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
enlightenment, then one is espousing scientific endeavour and any
conveyance of such is framed by conceptions of NUMBER.

Thusly, to convey any difference on the basis of “*MORE* *OR* *LESS*”,
then one is making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished
otherwise) to at least as a starting point of Aristotelian (384–322 BCE)
understanding given of the binomial NATURE OF NUMBER as the earlier
ANALYTIC A PRIORI / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI conception of it enumerated by
the PYTHAGOREAN (c. 570 – c. 495 BCE) where there was both:

LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and

MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something
could be done well.

So then, there is a prudent contradiction (ie. IT DOESN'T CUT THE
MUSTARD) by a paucity of the rhetorical contrivance concerning the
necessity about the reality of secularised societies: *DUTCH* *OR*
*OTHERWISE*.

The modern sense of the idiom is 'to succeed; to have the ability to do
something; to come up to expectations' as to arouse amusement or
derision; ridiculous in being an absurdity.

WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?

Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.

[WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]"

GEERT BE WILDERS@{
@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
@3: Sup: 46 (#124); Ego: 47 (#116),
@4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55
(#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
@5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
@6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
@7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
Male: #288 - *UMBRA* *CONTIVANCE*; Feme: #265
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>

H2438@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
@4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
Male: #166; Feme: #126
} // #288

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
Tetra: 25 - Contention;

THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.

#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148

#288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258
% #41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to
Jerusalem to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon;
2) the chief architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King
Hiram to Solomon;

H142@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
@3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
@4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
Ego: 38 (#93),
@5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
Male: #190; Feme: #103
} // #265

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
*OWN* *PROPERTY*.

#VIRTUE:
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 %
#41 = #41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a)
(Niphal) majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;

H1396@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
@3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #245; Feme: #103
} // #265

#265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 %
#41 = #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be
mighty, be great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail;
1b) (Piel) to make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm,
give strength; 1c2) to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to
show oneself mighty; 1d2) to act proudly (toward God);

SEE ALSO: "(TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND
CAPACITY AS A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE /
#312 - RESISTANCE)"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>

— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
[PUBLISHED @ 0457 HOURS ON 1 OCTOBER 2017]

"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"

YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hotdog Commercial (1977)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOeJ4rmDTvg>

YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hot Dog 1990s Commercial Ad on Beach"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OO2PYAnxQSo>

*CANT* (noun):
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious,
or political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded
with disparagement: thieves' cant.

ETHICAL_SPORTS_SLEDGE@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
ITS FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 -
*ONTIC* VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION,
CONTRARINESS, ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,302}&idea:{f,546}>

#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA:
#5 as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;

#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546
% #41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the
commandment (of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1604 HOURS
ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "That's like saying, "a surname name". Tautology and
repetition is *ONE* reason you make no sense."

DOLF @ 1729 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Your constipated turd 💩 opinion
whilst a sensualism as anal retentive declaration given self bestowal
through proscription of a grunt is no more substantial an entitlement
than a FANNY excretion of pustulant tripe which is enamoured by it’s
prolapsed existence though laborious in it’s eventuality as a shrivelled
spud with no viability as a snag {ie. *BAG* *OF* ****@T*: a despicable
person}.


— ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —

“PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.

WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.

WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”

ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard'
(strong or brave) meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'.
The name's common female equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}

BE WILDERS ANTHEM@{
@1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
@3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 3 (#50),
@4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
@5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
@6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
@7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
@8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
@10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
@11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
@12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
@13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
@14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
Male: #727; Feme: #356
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>

STICKYBEAK:
- (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.

CLARION:
- (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
- (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.

FOOTLE:
- (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
- (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.

THRASONICAL:
- (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.

FESTSCHRIFT:
- (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors
in honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of
retirement, an important anniversary, or the like. [Courtesy: Words of
Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]

H8454@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
@4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
@5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
Male: #231; Feme: #160
} // #727

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;

THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.

#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_210@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
@3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #110; Feme: #210
} // #210 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #SIX: #114 / #342 AND TORAH
PROTOTYPES #FIVE: #114 / #342

#727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) *WISDOM*, *SOUND* *KNOWLEDGE*, *SUCCESS*, *SOUND*
*OR* *EFFICIENT* *WISDOM*, *ABIDING* *SUCCESS*; 1a) sound or efficient
wisdom; 1b) abiding success (of the effect of sound wisdom);

H2803@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
@4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
@5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
@6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
@7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
Male: #302; Feme: #160
} // #727

#727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6
as #727 % #41 = #30} 1) *TO* *THINK*, *PLAN*, *ESTEEM*, *CALCULATE*,
*INVENT*, *MAKE* *A* *JUDGMENT*, *IMAGINE*, *COUNT*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
think, account; 1a2) to plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute,
reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value, regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal);
1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be
reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to think upon, consider,
be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise, plan; 1c3) to count, reckon;
1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;


— 👽👽👽👽👽👽👽 —

"THE *WATCHERS* WE ARE,
SO DO NOT DARE.
THOUGH IT BE FAR.
IT'S LIKE WE'RE THERE."

DOLF @ 1752 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "We have established a temporal
neural linguistic interface with you so that we can cure you of this
disease of ignorance as #335 - *MORAL* *BLINDNESS*:

G52@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
@3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
@4: Sup: 43 (#102); Ego: 70 (#124),
@5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
@6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135 - *ISLAMIC* STOICHEION
TRANSFORMATION *ONTIC* / *CANONICAL* PROTOTYPE OF AN #45 ARRAY WHERE
EACH ROW IS TOTALLING #135),
@7: Sup: 11 (#220); Ego: 38 (#173),
Male: #220; Feme: #173
} // #335

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
Tetra: 25 - Contention;

THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.

#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148

#335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {#9 as #135 %
#41 = #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine things;
1b) of *MORAL* blindness;

YOUTUBE: "2000 - Star Trek: Voyager - Unimatrix Zero"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwDTtXpG--I>

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;

THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
at Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.

#VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
#TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
#POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
#TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
#CANON: #115

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
@3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
@4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
Male: #118; Feme: #115
} // #115

#316 as [#50, #3, #7, #200, #50, #6] = gazar (H1504): {#0 as #210 % #41
= #5} 1) to cut, divide, cut down, cut off, cut in two, snatch, decree;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to cut in two, divide; 1a2) to cut down; 1a3) to cut
off, destroy, exterminate; 1a4) to decree; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be cut
off, separated, excluded; 1b2) to be destroyed, cut off; 1b3) to be decreed;

H3336@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
@5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
Male: #144; Feme: #113
} // #356

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as
Book of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2)
graven image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) *PURPOSE*,
*IMAGINATION*, *DEVICE* (*INTELLECTUAL* *FRAMEWORK*);

"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
every imagination {#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336):
imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
[Genesis 6:5 (KJV)]

To what degree Kant’s proceedings in the Groundwork actually are to be
related to the Prolegomena is disputed among interpreters. In the end,
only an exact reconstruction of the entire line of argumentation through
the three sections of the work can provide insight into Kant’s method in
the Groundwork. His remarks in the Preface offer little assistance in
this endeavour. In the following section, therefore, I will not deal
with these questions any further. Instead, I inquire briefly into a
cluster of interpretation problems that the last section raises. This
cluster revolves around the question of the relation of the metaphysics
of morals to the Groundwork.

(a) The first problem arises from the fact that Kant thinks two types of
a “groundwork” for a pure moral philosophy are possible: on the one
hand, a “critique of pure practical reason,” and on the other hand, the
present work. Although he claims there is “really no other foundation”
than a “critique” (GMS, 391,17 f.), he believes that one can do without
such a critique and lists three reasons for this (see GMS,
391,20-392,2). It remains nevertheless unclear how the relation of the
Groundwork to the intimated critique of practical of reason is to be
defined.

(b) Equally unclear is the precise relation of the Groundwork to the
envisioned metaphysics of morals. Is the “groundwork” of a theory itself
to be considered a part of this theory or is what Kant calls the
“preliminary work of laying the ground” (GMS, 391,37) a part separate
from the actual metaphysics? Undoubtedly, the parts of the theory
developed in the Groundwork raise the claim of being independent of
empirical knowledge and therefore belong to a pure moral philosophy.
Thus, at least parts of the Groundwork have to be identical with parts
of a metaphysics of morals.

(c) Making matters more difficult in the identification of the relation
between the Groundwork, a metaphysics of morals, and the mentioned
“critique of pure practical reason” is the fact that Kant later
published monographs with these or slightly modified titles. In any
case, it may not simply be assumed that the later produced works
actually deal with the types of theories mentioned in the Preface to the
Groundwork.

How can the relations of these types of theory to each other be more
precisely defined? Is Kant’s expression “metaphysics of morals” a
unified concept or are there different meanings combined here in opaque
ways?

An approach toward the resolution of these difficulties offers perhaps a
more precise interpretation of what Kant understands by a “metaphysics
of morals.” In the opening passages of the Preface, Kant had defined the
metaphysics of morals with the help of three criteria: first of all, it
is a theory that is not purely formal but refers to particular objects.
It refers, secondly, to objects insofar as these are under “LAWS OF
FREEDOM.” {#492 - *FREEDOM* *OF* *WILL* / #41 = #12 as #9 - Autonomous
Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL* *NECESSITY*} And thirdly, it is perfectly
free of empirical content. Therefore, a metaphysics of morals is a “pure
moral philosophy.” One question, however, remains unanswered. What
actually is a moral philosophy? Or articulated more precisely: what is
the ontological status of such a theory?

Kant’s arguments for the practical use or the necessity of such a
philosophy offer a suggestion for answering this question. A moral
philosophy is not only an object for the scientific discipline of
"philosophy." Rather, according to Kant, every rational being, even if
at times confused, carries in itself a moral philosophy. That raises the
question about what conception of “theory” can fulfil both of these
functions simultaneously.

For the clarification of this question I believe the conceptual
distinction between a theory, understood as an abstract system of
ordered propositions, and the presentation of such a theory, for example
in the form of a philosophical text, can be of further assistance. A
moral theory, understood as a system of propositions that stand in a
particular relation of grounding to each other and whose #41 - #CENTRE
is made up of ethical principles, is an abstract object, which can
simultaneously fulfill both functions. On the one hand, such a system
can be brought to expression with the help of a philosophical text. On
the other hand it is also possible to carry such a system “IN ONESELF,”
that is, to accept, the corresponding propositions.

If one takes such a conception of theory as a basis, the confusing
terminologies and exact relations of the types of theories mentioned by
Kant could be newly formulated and made transparent in the following
way: (i) A metaphysics of morals or a pure moral philosophy is an
abstract object, a system of propositions complete in itself and
containing all a priori judgments that are concerned with the laws of
freedom. (ii) A work with the title “Metaphysics of Morals” contains a
presentation of this system. The text expresses the corresponding
propositions and their connections. (iii) If a person carries such a
moral philosophy in herself, it means that she accepts the corresponding
propositions and their connections. And if this person is rational, the
propositions accepted by her will comprise the grounds of her action.
(iv) A work with the title “Critique of Pure Practical Reason” could be
a philosophical presentation of parts of this system of propositions
(and for this reason is suitable as a kind of “groundwork”). But it
contains additionally a presentation that relies on philosophical
theories on other spheres of investigation. In Kant’s words, “IN PART I
REQUIRE FOR A CRITIQUE A PURE PRACTICAL REASON THAT IF IT IS TO BE
COMPLETED, ITS UNITY WITH THE SPECULATIVE IN A COMMON PRINCIPLE MUST AT
THE SAME TIME BE EXHIBITED” (GMS, 391,24-27). (iv) In contrast, a work
with the title “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals” can restrict
itself entirely to the presentation and mediation of the foundational
part of the metaphysics of morals. This contains, as Kant expresses it,
“nothing more than the search for and the establishment of the supreme
principle of morality” (GMS, 392,3 f.). [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 18-21]

SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF AN AGREEMENT AS POLITICAL
INTERFERENCE / DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE CAPABLE OF
DEPLOYING THE LEST WE FORGET ODE FOR ITS OWN ENDS

— MANDALAY SWAY POEM —

@5: Sup: 51 (#218 - OR DEATH ITS SWAY); Ego: 34 (#160) <— ANALYTICAL
JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION OF COGNITIVE
PROPOSITION

#492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {#41 = #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} -
#391 - *HOMOIOS* *FRATERNITY* =
#101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT'

MANDALAY_SWAY@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
@5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
@6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
@7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
@8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
Male: #218; Feme: #98
} // #260 <— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF
AN AGREEMENT OF CONCLUSION

#260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
#60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
*COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;

— LEST WE FORGET ODE —

"{@1} THEY SHALL GROW NOT OLD, {@2} AS WE THAT ARE LEFT GROW OLD;
{@3} AGE SHALL NOT WEARY THEM, {@4} NOR THE YEARS CONDEMN.
{@5 - #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} AT THE GOING DOWN OF THE SUN AND IN
THE MORNING
{@6} WE WILL REMEMBER THEM."

@5: Sup: 74 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
*IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 12 (#206) <— ANALYTICAL JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC
A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION AS IDEA EXISTENCE OF JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL ASSOCIATED WITH THE ODE

INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
} // #270

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
same light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
*GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 -
TORAH} - Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
each other {Latin: CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.

*FOR* (*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the
interests of a given perspective or for the benefit of any small
powerful or influential #123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION /
FIELD / CLIQUE which places a prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 /
#342} within the pious construct {#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288
- UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
*IN* *THE* *MORNING*} by conduct of #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} -
DETRUDE.

H7750@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 63 (#69); Ego: 57 (#63),
@3: Sup: 72 (#141); Ego: 9 (#72),
@4: Sup: 1 (#142); Ego: 10 (#82),
Male: #142; Feme: #82
} // #325

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #315 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#6, #300, #9, #10] = suwt (H7750):
{UMBRA: #9 as #315 % #41 = #28} 1) to swerve, fall away; 2) *TO*
*THRUST* *OR* *FORCE* *DOWN*, *OUT*, *OR* *AWAY*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
swerve, fall away; 1a2) those falling away (participle); 2a) subject to
censorship or kill-file filtering; 2b) habitually exclude socially or
ignore conversationally;

<— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF AN
AGREEMENT OF POLITICAL INTERFERENCE / DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY
INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE CAPABLE OF DEPLOYING THE LEST WE FORGET ODE FOR
ITS OWN ENDS

THUS WE CONVEY A COGNITIVE PROCESS DEPLOYING DIALECTIC WHICH IS CAPABLE
OF CONVEYING IDEAS WHILST DERIVED FROM SUCH AS PARENT-CHILD HAVE NO
INHERENT GEMATRIA CORRESPONDENCE AND THEREFORE EXHIBIT A HIGHER LEVEL OF
CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH THEN HAS INTEGRITY WITH THE EVOLUTIONARY PEER
EQUIVALENT CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING

THEREFORE THE INTERDICTION: “GOD SAVE THE QUEEN FROM YOU FASCISTS”
expressed as *CARPE* *DIEM* at a distance of some 40 to 60 metres within
the street to passing persons whom paused and laughed with absolute
conviction as derision by means of #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} -
DETRUDE BY MALFEASANCE (noun): (LAW) the performance by a public
official of an act that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to
law; wrongdoing used especially of an act in violation of a public
trust; Word of the Day for 1 March 2017; www.dictionary.com

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS
INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING
AND RATIONALITY."

Were engaging within allegedly #288 - BEERSHEBA commemorations of a
PRIVATE NATURE INCLUSIVE OF ROMAN CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS BEING BY PARTIALITY
OF AS DISRESPECT SHOWN TO BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS UPON SUNDAY
PROXIMITY TO 31 MAY, THEREBY AN IMPOSITION OF AN ABHORRENT AND
BLASPHEMOUS RELIGIOUS BELIEF, DISBELIEF, NON-BELIEF CONSTITUTING
UNLAWFUL BREACHES OF SECTION #116 OF THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION UPON
SATURDAY 28 OCTOBER 2017, has in light of a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
as implicit breaches made against the SOVEREIGN CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
“DIEU ET MON DROIT” was an entirely of a propitious characteristic as
conformity to probity and within bounds of decorum as ontological
pacifist (ie. #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY) values which were compliant with
the SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE principles of a $50 valued LEST WE FORGET
badge purchased the year prior before Remembrance Day of 11 November
2016 and was not simply an action of nostalgia by fanciful decoration
being only a contrived dignity.

TO BE CONTINUED ...

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 2 September 2018

#ANALYTICAL #SYNTHETICAL #KORPPIONOIKEUS #FREEWILL


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-09-03 16:42:28 UTC
Permalink
I have an attendance at court later today so there will not be much
finalising of this chapter which is already at 60 pages however here is an
explanation of *REDUCTIO* *AD* *TRUMPIUM* by which the Dutch define
themselves as *BARBARIC*.

DOLF @ 0436 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I am (being surnamed BOEK
self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical appeal to either *REDUCTIO*
*AD* *TRUMPIUM* for taking an obstinate or negative dialectic disposition
{ie. Shall we not discuss the elephant in the room: Dutch directness by
which they define themselves a *BARBARIC*.

Direct to the point of shocking at times. Direct to the point of “what the
f@#$ did he just say to me?!?} as is implied by the title of this chapter
'DUTCH BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS' and then spiralling downwards into
forfeiture of decency by recourse to *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* until one
reaches a consequential depravity *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* (eg: Hitler
was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are you), .

This Dutch trait has gone by many names; call it what you will – abrupt,
bad-mannered, *BARBARIC*, blunt, brusque, cheeky, crude, curt, direct,
discourteous, forthright, frank, graceless, gruff, honest, ignorant,
impolite, inconsiderate, insulting, intrusive, matter-of-fact, open,
outspoken, plain, point-blank, raw, refreshing, rude, sincere,
straightforward, surprising, uncouth or unmannerly. Essentially, the bottom
line remains: the Dutch speak their minds.

<https://stuffdutchpeoplelike.com/2011/05/28/dutch-directness/>

dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> -- (DRAFT: 3 SEPTEMBER 2018) DUTCH BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS BLAAST
> CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF
>
> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 3 September, 2018
>
> YOUTUBE: "Adventure Of A Lifetime (Coldplay)"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtXby3twMmI>
>
> "Give ear, O my people, to my law: incline your ears to the words of my
> mouth. I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings of
> old: Which we have heard and known, and our fathers have told us. We
> will not hide them from their children, showing to the generation to
> come the praises of the LORD, and his strength, and his wonderful works
> that he hath done. For he established a testimony in Jacob {THAT
> SUPPLANTS, UNDERMINES; THE HEEL}, and appointed a law in Israel {WHO
> PREVAILS WITH GOD}, which he commanded our fathers, that they should
> make them known to their children: That the generation to come might
> know them, even the children which should be born; who should arise and
> declare them to their children: That they might set their hope in God,
> and not forget the works of God, but keep his commandments: And might
> not be as their fathers, a stubborn and rebellious generation; a
> generation that set not their heart aright, and whose spirit was not
> stedfast with God." [Psalm 78:1-8 (KJV)]
>
> VERONICA STRACQUALURSI (CNN) @ 0805 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018:
> "Washington: Former President Barack Obama lauded John McCain's efforts
> to push the nation to rise above "*MEAN* *AND* *PETTY*" politics in his
> tribute Saturday 1 September 2018 to the Arizona Republican, who served
> for more than three decades in the Senate.
>
> "SO MUCH OF OUR POLITICS, OUR PUBLIC LIFE, OUR PUBLIC DISCOURSE CAN SEEM
> SMALL AND *MEAN* *AND* *PETTY*, TRAFFICKING IN BOMBAST AND INSULT, AND
> PHONEY CONTROVERSIES, AND MANUFACTURED OUTRAGE. IT'S A POLITICS THAT
> PRETENDS TO BE BRAVE AND TOUGH, BUT IN FACT IS BORN OF FEAR {
>
> FEAR@{
> @1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
> @2: Sup: 3 (#17); Ego: 70 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
> @3: Sup: 5 (#22); Ego: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
> @4: Sup: 13 (#35); Ego: 8 (#94),
> @5: Sup: 22 (#57); Ego: 9 (#103),
> @6: Sup: 30 (#87); Ego: 8 (#111),
> @7: Sup: 6 (#93); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
> ANY {%26}),
> @8: Sup: 11 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 5 (#173 - I AM
> NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
> Male: #104; Feme: #173
> } // #902
>
> #902 as [#500, #70, #2, #8, #9, #8, #300, #5] = phobetron (G5400): 1)
> Neuter of a derivative of φοβέω; a frightening thing, ie. terrific
> portent:--fearful sight
>
> }," OBAMA SAID IN A EULOGY FOR MCCAIN AT A MEMORIAL SERVICE AT
> WASHINGTON NATIONAL CATHEDRAL. "JOHN CALLED ON US TO BE BIGGER THAN
> THAT. HE CALLED ON US TO BE BETTER THAN THAT."
>
> H2000@{
> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
> @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
> @3: Sup: 21 (#43); Ego: 5 (#21),
> @4: Sup: 61 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 40 (#61),
> @5: Sup: 13 (#117); Ego: 33 (#94),
> Male: #117; Feme: #94
> } // #101
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #101 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
> Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
> Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
> Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.
>
> #VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
> #TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
> #POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
> #TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
> #CANON: #180
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
> @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
> @2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
> @3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
> @4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
> ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
> Male: #135; Feme: #180
> } // #180
>
> #101 as [#6, #10, #5, #40, #600] = hamam (H2000): {UMBRA: #36 as #101 %
> #41 = #19} 1) to move noisily, confuse, make a noise, discomfit, break,
> *CONSUME*, *CRUSH*, *DESTROY*, *TROUBLE*, *VEX*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to move
> noisily; 1a2) *TO* *CONFUSE*, *DISCOMFIT*, *VEX*;
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/dolf_or_geert_by_kiger8kiger.jpg>
>
> [IMAGE: This CARTOON is supposed to be a characterisation (Dutch Raven /
> Hitler / Napoleon Emperor) named dolf as being either the Dutch
> politician GEERT BE WILDERS or of myself.
>
> The fraternity PI (#80) KAPPA (#20) ALPHA (#1) = (#101) best known for
> raping girls.
> The most bad ass fraternity ever. A lot of alpha males that drag their
> balls 🎱 🏈⚾️ behind them as they walk to class if they go.
> They enjoy dirty house music more then anything else. Especially the
> ZETA GAMMA chapter
>
> #492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {#41 = #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} -
> #391 - *HOMOIOS* *FRATERNITY* =
> #101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT'
>
> MANDALAY_SWAY@{
> @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
> @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
> @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
> @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
> @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
> @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
> @7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
> @8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
> Male: #218; Feme: #98
> }
>
> YOUTUBE: "[OFFICIAL VIDEO] Bohemian Rhapsody – Pentatonix"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojRj2JK5oCI>
>
> #260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
> #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
> wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
> possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
> *COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>
> SEE ALSO: "REFUTATION OF SCORN: IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF
> PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?"
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.6%20A%20METHODOLOGICAL%20NEW%20BEGINNING.pdf>
>
> And is considered by some to be the tag line for a globalist campaign of
> criminalised amorality of *PIKE* as having a violent psychosexual as
> malice aforethought against the dignity and person of another]
>
> YOUTUBE: "The Bad Touch (Bloodhound Gang)"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xat1GVnl8-k>
>
> HOWEVER [JOHN MCCAIN] UNDERSTOOD THAT SOME PRINCIPLES {
>
> PRINCIPLES@{
> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
> @2: Sup: 20 (#21); Ego: 19 (#20),
> @3: Sup: 53 (#74); Ego: 33 (#53),
> @4: Sup: 54 (#128); Ego: 1 (#54),
> @5: Sup: 11 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
> {%13}); Ego: 38 (#92),
> Male: #139; Feme: #92
> }
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #712 % #41 = #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of
> Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning;
> Tetra: 1 - Centre;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #15 - Oh Lord of Righteousness, who makest thine
> appearance in the place of Righteousness; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A*
> *LAND*-*GRABBER*.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Reach (no. #15), dailys increasing its kind.
> #TOOLS: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily depleting its type.
> #POSITION: With Resistance (no. #22), intolerance, but
> #TIME: With Unity (no. #54), magnanimity.
> #CANON: #146
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_146@{
> @1: Sup: 15 (#15); Ego: 15 (#15),
> @2: Sup: 70 (#85); Ego: 55 (#70),
> @3: Sup: 11 (#96); Ego: 22 (#92),
> @4: Sup: 65 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 54 (#146 -
> I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
> Male: #161; Feme: #146
> } // #146
>
> #902 as [#1, #100, #600, #1, #200] = arche (G746): {#44 as #712 % #41 =
> #15} 1) beginning, origin; 2) the person or thing that commences, the
> first person or thing in a series, the leader; 3) that by which anything
> begins to be, the origin, the active cause; 4) the extremity of a thing;
> 5) *THE* *FIRST* *PLACE*, *PRINCIPALITY*, *RULE*, *MAGISTRACY*; 4a) of
> the corners of a sail; 5a) of angels and demons;
>
> } TRANSCEND POLITICS, THAT SOME VALUES TRANSCEND PARTY. HE CONSIDERED IT
> PART OF HIS DUTY TO UPHOLD THOSE PRINCIPLES AND UPHOLD THOSE VALUES.
> JOHN CARED ABOUT THE INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT, OUR CONSTITUTION,
> OUR BILL OF RIGHTS, *RULE* *OF* *LAW* {#22 x #41 = #902}, SEPARATION OF
> POWERS, EVEN THE ARCANE RULES AND PROCEDURES OF THE SENATE. HE KNEW THAT
> IN A NATION AS BIG AND BOISTEROUS AND DIVERSE AS OURS, THOSE
> INSTITUTIONS, THOSE RULES, THOSE NORMS ARE WHAT BIND US TOGETHER {
>
> 7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
> (G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
> without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
> 1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
> *WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*
>
> }. THEY GIVE *SHAPE* {
>
> H1254@{
> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
> @2: Sup: 7 (#12); Ego: 2 (#7),
> @3: Sup: 45 (#57); Ego: 38 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
> @4: Sup: 46 (#103); Ego: 1 (#46),
> @5: Sup: 79 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
> Ego: 33 (#79),
> Male: #182; Feme: #79
> } // #248 <-- MAIS NOUS FAISONS DE NOTRE MIEUX
>
> #248 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #40] / #808 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #600] =
> bara' (H1254): {#0 as #248 % #41 = #2} 1) to create, shape, form; 2) to
> be fat; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *SHAPE*, *FASHION*, *CREATE* (*ALWAYS* *WITH*
> *GOD* *AS* *SUBJECT*); 1a1) of heaven and earth; 1a2) of individual man;
> 1a3) of new conditions and circumstances; 1a4) of transformations; 1b)
> (Niphal) to be created; 1b1) of heaven and earth; 1b2) of birth; 1b3) of
> something new; 1b4) of miracles; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) *TO* *CUT* *DOWN*;
> 1c2) *TO* *CUT* *OUT*; 2a) (Hiphil) to make yourselves fat;
>
> } AND ORDER TO OUR COMMON LIFE, EVEN WHEN WE DISAGREE. ESPECIALLY WHEN
> WE DISAGREE.
>
> JOHN BELIEVED IN HONEST ARGUMENT AND HEARING OTHER VIEWS. HE UNDERSTOOD
> THAT IF WE GET IN THE HABIT OF BENDING THE TRUTH TO SUIT POLITICAL
> EXPEDIENCY OR PARTY ORTHODOXY, OUR DEMOCRACY WILL NOT WORK. THAT'S WHY
> HE WAS WILLING TO BUCK HIS OWN PARTY AT TIMES, OCCASIONALLY WORK ACROSS
> THE AISLE ON CAMPAIGN-FINANCE REFORM AND IMMIGRATION REFORM. THAT'S WHY
> HE CHAMPIONED A FREE AND INDEPENDENT PRESS AS VITAL TO OUR DEMOCRATIC
> DEBATE. AND THE FACT THAT IT EARNED HIM SOME GOOD COVERAGE DIDN'T HURT
> EITHER.
>
> JOHN UNDERSTOOD, AS JFK UNDERSTOOD, AS RONALD REAGAN UNDERSTOOD, THAT
> PART OF WHAT MAKES OUR COUNTRY GREAT IS THAT OUR MEMBERSHIP IS BASED NOT
> ON OUR BLOODLINE, NOT ON WHAT WE LOOK LIKE, WHAT OUR LAST NAMES ARE,
> IT'S NOT BASED ON WHERE OUR PARENTS OR GRANDPARENTS CAME FROM, OR HOW
> RECENTLY THEY ARRIVED, BUT ON ADHERENCE TO A COMMON CREED: *THAT* *ALL*
> *OF* *US* *ARE* *CREATED* *EQUAL*, *ENDOWED* {#492 - *FREEDOM* *OF*
> *WILL* / #41 = #12 as #9 - Autonomous Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL*
> *NECESSITY*} *BY* *OUR* *CREATOR* {
>
> COVENANT@{
> @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
> @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
> @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
> @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
> @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
> @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
> @7: Sup: 42 (#183); Ego: 71 (#123),
> @8: Sup: 11 (#194); Ego: 50 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL
> LUST {%27}),
> Male: #194; Feme: #173
> }
>
> #902 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #800, #50] / #260 as [#4, #10, #1,
> #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a
> disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one wishes to be valid, the
> last disposition which one makes of his earthly possessions after his
> death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A* *COVENANT*, *A*
> *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>
> } *WITH* *CERTAIN* *INALIENABLE* *RIGHTS*. IT HAS BEEN MENTIONED TODAY,
> AND WE'VE SEEN FOOTAGE THIS WEEK JOHN PUSHING BACK AGAINST SUPPORTERS
> WHO CHALLENGED MY PATRIOTISM DURING THE 2008 CAMPAIGN. I WAS GRATEFUL,
> BUT I WASN'T SURPRISED. AS JOE LIEBERMAN SAID, THAT WAS JOHN'S INSTINCT.
> I NEVER SAW JOHN TREAT ANYONE DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE OF THEIR RACE OR
> RELIGION OR GENDER. AND I'M CERTAIN THAT IN THOSE MOMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN
> REFERRED TO DURING THE CAMPAIGN, HE SAW HIMSELF AS DEFENDING AMERICA'S
> CHARACTER, NOT JUST MINE. FOR HE CONSIDERED IT THE IMPERATIVE OF EVERY
> CITIZEN WHO LOVES THIS COUNTRY TO TREAT ALL PEOPLE FAIRLY.
>
> AND FINALLY, WHILE JOHN AND I DISAGREED ON ALL KINDS OF FOREIGN-POLICY
> ISSUES, WE STOOD TOGETHER ON AMERICA'S ROLE AS THE ONE INDISPENSABLE
> NATION, BELIEVING THAT WITH GREAT POWER AND GREAT BLESSINGS COMES GREAT
> RESPONSIBILITY. THAT BURDEN IS BORNE MOST HEAVILY BY OUR MEN AND WOMEN
> IN UNIFORM, SERVICE MEMBERS LIKE DOUG, JIMMY, AND JACK WHO FOLLOWED
> THEIR FATHER'S FOOTSTEPS, AS WELL AS THE FAMILIES WHO SERVE ALONGSIDE
> OUR TROOPS. BUT JOHN UNDERSTOOD THAT OUR SECURITY AND OUR INFLUENCE WAS
> WON NOT JUST BY OUR MILITARY MIGHT, NOT JUST BY OUR WEALTH, NOT JUST BY
> OUR ABILITY TO BEND OTHERS TO OUR WILL {#9 x #41 = #369}, BUT FROM OUR
> CAPACITY TO INSPIRE OTHERS WITH OUR ADHERENCE TO A SET OF UNIVERSAL
> VALUES, LIKE *RULE* *OF* *LAW* {#22 x #41 = #902} *AND* *HUMAN* *RIGHTS*
> {#12 x #41 = #492 as #9 - Autonomous Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL*
> *NECESSITY*}, AND AN INSISTENCE ON THE GOD-GIVEN DIGNITY OF EVERY HUMAN
> BEING.
>
> OF COURSE, JOHN WAS THE FIRST TO TELL US THAT HE WAS NOT PERFECT. LIKE
> ALL OF US WHO GO INTO PUBLIC SERVICE, HE DID HAVE AN EGO. LIKE ALL OF
> US, THERE WAS NO DOUBT SOME VOTES HE CAST, SOME COMPROMISES HE STRUCK,
> SOME DECISIONS HE MADE THAT HE WISHED HE COULD HAVE BACK. IT'S NO
> SECRET—IT'S BEEN MENTIONED—THAT HE HAD A TEMPER, AND WHEN IT FLARED UP,
> IT WAS A FORCE OF NATURE, A WONDER TO BEHOLD. HIS JAW GRINDING, HIS FACE
> REDDENING, HIS EYES BORING A HOLE RIGHT THROUGH YOU—NOT THAT I EVER
> EXPERIENCED IT FIRSTHAND, MIND YOU. BUT TO KNOW JOHN WAS TO KNOW THAT AS
> QUICK AS HIS PASSIONS MIGHT FLARE, HE WAS JUST AS QUICK TO FORGIVE AND
> ASK FOR FORGIVENESS. HE KNEW MORE THAN MOST HIS OWN FLAWS, AND HIS BLIND
> SPOTS, AND HE KNEW HOW TO LAUGH AT HIMSELF. AND THAT SELF-AWARENESS MADE
> HIM ALL THE MORE COMPELLING.
>
> WE DIDN'T ADVERTISE IT, BUT EVERY SO OFTEN OVER THE COURSE {
>
> COURSE@{
> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
> @2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
> @3: Sup: 75 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
> 76 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
> @4: Sup: 4 (#189); Ego: 10 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
> @5: Sup: 6 (#195); Ego: 2 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
> ANY {%26}),
> @6: Sup: 1 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 76 (#244),
> @7: Sup: 11 (#207); Ego: 10 (#254),
> Male: #207; Feme: #254
> }
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #462 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
> H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
> Tetra: 33 - Closeness;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
> appearance in Amenta; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SLUGGISH*.
>
> #VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
> #TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
> #POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
> #TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
> #CANON: #166
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_166@{
> @1: Sup: 11 (#11); Ego: 11 (#11),
> @2: Sup: 62 (#73); Ego: 51 (#62),
> @3: Sup: 5 (#78); Ego: 24 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
> @4: Sup: 4 (#82); Ego: 80 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
> Male: #82; Feme: #166
> } // #166
>
> #902 as [#30, #50, #400, #10, #2, #400, #10] / #467 as [#50, #400, #10,
> #2, #5] = nathiyb (H5410): {#7 as #462 % #41 = #11} 1) *TRODDEN* *WITH*
> *THE* *FEET*, *PATH*, *PATHWAY*; 2) path, pathway, traveller;
>
> } OF MY PRESIDENCY, JOHN WOULD COME OVER TO THE WHITE HOUSE AND WE'D
> JUST SIT AND TALK IN THE OVAL OFFICE, JUST THE TWO OF US. AND WE'D TALK
> ABOUT POLICY AND WE'D TALK ABOUT FAMILY AND WE'D TALK ABOUT THE STATE OF
> OUR POLITICS. AND OUR DISAGREEMENTS DIDN'T GO AWAY DURING THESE PRIVATE
> CONVERSATIONS. THOSE WERE REAL AND THEY WERE OFTEN DEEP.
>
> BUT WE ENJOYED {
>
> JOY@{
> @1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
> @2: Sup: 34 (#67); Ego: 1 (#34),
> @3: Sup: 53 (#120); Ego: 19 (#53),
> @4: Sup: 54 (#174); Ego: 1 (#54),
> @5: Sup: 11 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
> 38 (#92),
> Male: #185; Feme: #92
> }
>
> #902 as [#600, #1, #100#1, #200] = chara (G5479): {#25 as #702 % #41 =
> #5} 1) joy, gladness; 1a) the joy received from you; 1b) the cause or
> occasion of joy; 1b1) *OF* *PERSONS* *WHO* *ARE* *ONE'S* *JOY*;
>
> YOUTUBE: "Joy to the World (Mormon Tabernacle Choir)"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLT9dSt8cwg>
>
> } THE TIME WE SHARED AWAY FROM THE BRIGHT LIGHTS {
>
> LIGHT@{
> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
> @2: Sup: 53 (#54); Ego: 52 (#53),
> @3: Sup: 54 (#108); Ego: 1 (#54),
> @4: Sup: 11 (#119); Ego: 38 (#92),
> Male: #119; Feme: #92
> } // #902
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #109 % #41 = #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
> I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
> Closure;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #27 - Oh thou whose face is behind thee, and who makest
> thine appearance at thy cavern; *I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *UNNATURAL*
> *LUST*.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Duties (no. #27), esteem for activity.
> #TOOLS: With Darkening (no. #67), esteem for rest.
> #POSITION: With Mired (no. #3), plucked out from calamity.
> #TIME: With Aggravation (no. #76), lacking any pardons.
> #CANON: #173
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_173@{
> @1: Sup: 27 (#27); Ego: 27 (#27),
> @2: Sup: 13 (#40); Ego: 67 (#94),
> @3: Sup: 16 (#56); Ego: 3 (#97),
> @4: Sup: 11 (#67); Ego: 76 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
> {%27}),
> Male: #67; Feme: #173
> } // #173
>
> LIGHT@{
> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
> @2: Sup: 53 (#54); Ego: 52 (#53),
> @3: Sup: 54 (#108); Ego: 1 (#54),
> @4: Sup: 11 (#119); Ego: 38 (#92),
> Male: #119; Feme: #92
> }
>
> #902 as [#1, #700, #1, #200] = hapto (G681): {#0 as #396 % #41 = #27} 1)
> A primary verb; properly, to fasten to, ie. (specially) to set on
> fire:--kindle, light
>
> }. AND WE LAUGHED WITH EACH OTHER. AND WE LEARNED FROM EACH OTHER. AND
> WE NEVER DOUBTED THE OTHER MAN'S SINCERITY OR THE OTHER MAN'S
> PATRIOTISM, OR THAT WHEN ALL WAS SAID AND DONE, WE WERE ON THE SAME
> TEAM. WE NEVER DOUBTED WE WERE ON THE SAME TEAM. FOR ALL OF OUR
> DIFFERENCES, WE SHARED A FIDELITY TO THE IDEALS FOR WHICH GENERATIONS OF
> AMERICANS HAVE MARCHED AND FOUGHT AND SACRIFICED AND GIVEN THEIR LIVES.
> WE CONSIDERED OUR POLITICAL BATTLES A PRIVILEGE, AN OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE
> AS STEWARDS OF THOSE IDEALS HERE AT HOME AND TO DO OUR BEST TO ADVANCE
> THEM AROUND THE WORLD. WE SAW THIS COUNTRY AS A PLACE WHERE ANYTHING IS
> POSSIBLE, AND CITIZENSHIP IS AN OBLIGATION TO ENSURE IT FOREVER REMAINS
> THAT WAY.
>
> AND MORE THAN ONCE DURING HIS CAREER, JOHN DREW COMPARISONS TO TEDDY
> ROOSEVELT. AND I AM SURE IT HAS BEEN NOTED THAT ROOSEVELT'S "MAN IN THE
> ARENA" ORATION SEEMS TAILORED TO JOHN. MOST OF YOU KNOW IT. ROOSEVELT
> SPEAKS OF THOSE WHO STRIVE, WHO DARE TO DO GREAT THINGS, WHO SOMETIMES
> WIN AND SOMETIMES COME UP SHORT, BUT ALWAYS RELISH A GOOD FIGHT—A
> CONTRAST TO THOSE COLD, TIMID SOULS {
>
> SOUL@{
> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
> @2: Sup: 49 (#99); Ego: 80 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
> @3: Sup: 25 (#124); Ego: 57 (#187),
> @4: Sup: 31 (#155); Ego: 6 (#193),
> @5: Sup: 26 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
> RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}); Ego: 76
> (#269),
> @6: Sup: 36 (#217); Ego: 10 (#279),
> @7: Sup: 5 (#222); Ego: 50 (#329),
> @8: Sup: 11 (#233); Ego: 6 (#335),
> Male: #233; Feme: #335
> }
> #902 as [#50, #80, #300, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6] = nephesh (H5315): {#18
> as #430 % #41 = #20} 1) *SOUL*, *SELF*, *LIFE*, *CREATURE*, *PERSON*,
> *APPETITE*, *MIND*, *LIVING* *BEING*, *DESIRE*, *EMOTION*, *PASSION*;
> 1a) that which breathes, the breathing substance or being, soul, the
> inner being of man; 1b) living being; 1c) living being (with life in the
> blood); 1d) the man himself, self, person or individual; 1e) seat of the
> appetites; 1f) seat of emotions and passions; 1g) activity of mind; 1g1)
> dubious; 1h) activity of the will; 1h1) dubious; 1i) activity of the
> character; 1i1) dubious;
>
> } WHO KNOW NEITHER VICTORY NOR DEFEAT. ISN'T THAT THE SPIRIT WE
> CELEBRATE THIS WEEK? THAT STRIVING TO BE BETTER, TO DO BETTER, TO BE
> WORTHY OF THE GREAT INHERITANCE {
>
> INHERITANCE@{
> @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
> @2: Sup: 50 (#70); Ego: 30 (#50),
> @3: Sup: 58 (#128); Ego: 8 (#58),
> @4: Sup: 77 (#205); Ego: 19 (#77),
> @5: Sup: 66 (#271); Ego: 70 (#147),
> @6: Sup: 35 (#306); Ego: 50 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
> @7: Sup: 24 (#330); Ego: 70 (#267),
> @8: Sup: 64 (#394); Ego: 40 (#307),
> @9: Sup: 72 (#466); Ego: 8 (#315),
> @10: Sup: 29 (#495); Ego: 38 (#353),
> @11: Sup: 30 (#525); Ego: 1 (#354),
> @12: Sup: 6 (#531); Ego: 57 (#411),
> @13: Sup: 11 (#542); Ego: 5 (#416),
> Male: #542; Feme: #416
> }
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #614 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
> Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
> Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
> cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.
>
> #VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
> #TOOLS: Labouring (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
> strenuous efforts.
> #POSITION: With Duties (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
> #TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
> #CANON: #228
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
> @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
> @2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
> @3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
> @4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
> Male: #211; Feme: #228
> } // #228
>
> #902 as [#20, #30, #8, #100, #70, #50, #70, #40, #8, #200, #1, #300, #5]
> = kleronomeo (G2816): {#31 as #614 % #41 = #40} 1) to receive a lot,
> receive by lot; 2) to receive the portion assigned to one, receive an
> allotted portion, receive as one's own or as a possession; 3) to become
> partaker of, to obtain; 1a) esp. to receive a part of an inheritance,
> receive as an inheritance, *OBTAIN* *BY* *RIGHT* *OF* *INHERITANCE*; 1b)
> to be an heir, to inherit;
>
> } THAT OUR FOUNDERS BESTOWED.
>
> TODAY IS ONLY ONE DAY IN ALL THE DAYS THAT WILL EVER BE. BUT WHAT WILL
> HAPPEN IN ALL THE OTHER DAYS THAT WILL EVER COME CAN DEPEND ON WHAT YOU
> DO TODAY." WHAT BETTER WAY TO HONOR JOHN MCCAIN'S LIFE OF SERVICE THAN,
> AS BEST WE CAN, FOLLOW HIS EXAMPLE. TO PROVE THAT THE WILLINGNESS TO GET
> IN THE ARENA AND FIGHT FOR THIS COUNTRY IS NOT RESERVED FOR THE FEW, IT
> IS OPEN TO ALL OF US, AND IN FACT IT IS DEMANDED OF ALL OF US AS
> CITIZENS OF THIS GREAT REPUBLIC. THAT'S PERHAPS HOW WE HONOR HIM BEST,
> BY RECOGNIZING THAT THERE ARE SOME THINGS BIGGER THAN PARTY OR AMBITION
> OR MONEY OR FAME OR POWER. THAT THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT ARE WORTH
> RISKING EVERYTHING FOR: PRINCIPLES THAT ARE ETERNAL, TRUTHS THAT ARE
> ABIDING. AT HIS BEST, JOHN SHOWED US WHAT THAT MEANS. FOR THAT, WE ARE
> ALL DEEPLY IN HIS DEBT.
>
> MAY GOD BLESS JOHN MCCAIN. MAY GOD BLESS THIS COUNTRY HE SERVED SO WELL.
>
> <https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/01/politics/obama-eulogy-john-mccain-funeral/index.html>
>
> 3. THE METHOD AND THE RELATION OF THE GROUNDWORK TO THE METAPHYSICS OF
> MORALS (GMS, 391,16-392)
> At this point, Kant departs from his general reflections on a theory to
> be provided “SOMEDAY” (GMS, 391,16) and dedicates himself to the work
> that follows. His remarks are extremely terse and without a total
> interpretation of the Groundwork almost impossible to comprehend. In
> particular, his comments on the method he uses are hardly understandable
> for a reader who is not already familiar with the work. [Horn &
> Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 16]
>
> DOLF @ 2012 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "There is the analytic/synthetic
> distinction and the a priori/a posteriori distinction. These two
> distinctions form four types of knowledge:
>
> #1) ANALYTIC A PRIORI
> #2) SYNTHETIC A PRIORI
> #3) ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI
> #4) SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI
>
> According to the facsimile of the 1687 edition on the History of
> Philosophy / Pythagoras and His Life Teachings, Hebrews express this
> ANALYTIC A PRIORI by a Point, which mark (as well amongst the
> Barbarians, as in Latin) denotes One. Hitherto allude the Pythagorean
> symbols One and Two. Zaratas (the Master of Pythagoras) used these as
> the names of propagation—one the father; two the mother. One and two (in
> the divine essence) producing four, the TETRACTYS, the idea of all
> things, which are consummated in the number Ten. This Pythagoras styles:
>
> Eternal Nature's fountain—
>
> This is the *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *THINGS* *IN* *THE* *DIVINE* *MIND*
> *OPERATING* *INTELLECTUALLY*. From this fountain of Eternal Nature,
> flows down the Pythagorean numbers *ONE* and *TWO*--which from Eternity,
> in the fountain of the immense Ocean, was, shall be, or rather always
> is, abundantly streaming. This *ONE* was by the Ancients termed [“Zeus”]
> as Jupiter; *TWO* as [“Hera”]
>
> G1520@{
> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
> @2: Sup: 55 (#60); Ego: 50 (#55),
> @3: Sup: 44 (#104); Ego: 70 (#125),
> @4: Sup: 1 (#105); Ego: 38 (#163),
> Male: #105; Feme: #163
> } // #325
>
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #215 % #41 = #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?; I-Ching:
> H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net; Tetra:
> 41 - Response;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #10 - Oh thou who orderest the flame, who makest thine
> appearance in Memphis; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *FOOD*.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Defectiveness (no. #10), selfishness and crookedness.
> #TOOLS: With Vastness (no. #50), fairmindedness and desirelessness.
> #POSITION: As to Branching Out (no. #9), it is the advance.
> #TIME: As to Holding Back (no. #17), it is the retreat.
> #CANON: #86 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *JUDGES* / *ELOHYM*
>
> #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis (G1520):
> {#12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*;
>
> At this stage of appraisal, Kant appears to be procrastinatory {ie. as
> the habitual/intentional delay of starting or finishing a task despite
> its negative consequences} and conveys the ambiguous thought on ANALYTIC
> A POSTERIORI that it was self-contradictory by nature. But, some other
> philosophers treated it as valid. But what are examples of ANALYTIC A
> POSTERIORI knowledge?
>
> Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology
> of 364 days an example of “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI” knowledge?
>
> 364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126
>
> Is defining the TELOS as #6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with a #41 as
> ONTIC necessity of the *APEIRON* also an example of “ANALYTIC A
> POSTERIORI” knowledge?
>
> #0 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he supplants,
> That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 4000 BCE
>
> ... [THE APEIRON] ...
>
> #8800 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he
> supplants, That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 8800 CE
>
> APEIRON@{
> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
> @2: Sup: 81 (#82); Ego: 80 (#81),
> @3: Sup: 5 (#87); Ego: 5 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
> @4: Sup: 15 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 10 (#96),
> @5: Sup: 34 (#136); Ego: 19 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
> @6: Sup: 23 (#159); Ego: 70 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN
> BEHAVIOUR {%25}),
> @7: Sup: 73 (#232); Ego: 50 (#235),
> Male: #232; Feme: #235
> } // #316
>
> APEIRON (ἄπειρον) is a Greek word meaning "(that which is) unlimited,"
> "boundless", "infinite", or "indefinite"[1] from ἀ- a-, "without" and
> πεῖραρ peirar, "end, limit", "boundary",[2] the Ionic Greek form of
> πέρας peras, "end, limit, boundary". It is akin to Persian piramon,
> meaning "*BOUNDARY*, *CIRCUMFERENCE*, *SURROUNDING*".
>
> My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
> that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
> doesn’t fully conceive any “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI” possibility and it’s
> notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate but as a
> recursive enumeration giving forth a trinomial #NUMBER definition as
> process of “SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI” by it's as formulation of
> progression. This dialectic is then in turn consistent with Kant's
> CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE as rationalism being an intellectual conception:
>
> + 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law {@1}
> + 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity {@2}
> + 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy {@3}
> + 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression {@4}
>
> Thus the ANALYTIC {YANG CH’I} A PRIORI given by the alternative HOMOIOS
> mathematical notion of #NUMBER with the recursive necessity of an #41 -
> ONTIC {NORMA OBLIGANS} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism:
> REMEMBER THE SABBATH and it’s SYNCRETIC {YIN CH’I} A PRIORI such as
> beIng SAPIENT with the recursive necessity of an #82 - ONTIC
> {MANIFESTING NORM} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism:
> HONOUR PARENTS is a conception of fecundity by its capacity in producing
> or capable of producing offspring, fruit, vegetation, etc., in
> abundance; prolific; fruitful: fecund parents; fecund farmland and hence
> its equinox
> association.
>
> It also conveys a sapient propensity in being very productive or
> creative intellectually: the fecund years of the Italian Renaissance.
>
> One must therefore ask on the basis of an analytic a posteriori why Kant
> withheld such knowledge given the words had their origin: 1375–1425;
> late Middle English < Latin fēcundus, equivalent to fē- (see fetus) +
> -cundus adj. suffix; replacing late Middle English fecounde < Anglo-French
>
> And the most probable answer is that such idea which Kant conveys by
> APRIORITY PROTOTYPES is that they are tectonic shifts with a cataclysmic
> consequence which is made against the prevailing Latin binomial world
> order constituted by its NATURE bifurcations by means of another
> ethereal construct: @1 / @5.
>
> Furthermore is Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
> consideration of *VOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin voluntās f (genitive
> voluntātis):
> - (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
> creation, etc.
> - *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
> reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
> as mountains and dwellings.
> - (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
> philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
> the natural world.
>
> And consideration of *NOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin nōluntās f (genitive
> nōluntātis).
> - (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
> destruction, etc.
> - *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
> in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
> *MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
> - (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
> philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
> natural world.
>
> Are these then considered a priori as to the enumeration of an autonomy
> of will by which apperception is circumscribed as an ANALYTIC A
> POSTERIORI of PUPIL with the recursive necessity of an #123 - ONTIC
> {DISCRIMINATING
> NORM} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism: DO NOT KILL as its
> ontological utility as reciprocality {#369: 9(9²+1)/2 A POSTERIORI as
> enumeration function of equation n(n²+1)/2 — *NEED* *TO* *THINK* *ABOUT*
> *THIS*
>
> #1 + #41 + #81 = #123 + #369 = #492 (#451 + #41) as *FREEWILL* being #12
> x #41 as ONTIC necessity
>
> #YOD (#10) as CENTRE
> #MEM (#40) as DELIMITATION
> #TAU (#400) as CIRCUMSCRIBING
> #ALEPH (#1) as STREAMING {23 CHROMOSOMES} = #451
>
> AS BIFURCATION: #TAU x #41 = #902 / #2 = #451
>
> } the syncretic process eventually occurs as SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI
> progression being then genitive of a self declaration as an heteronomous
> {ie subject to law external to itself} and autonomous reality.
>
> In such a circumstance, what is then the *PROBITY* of utilising an EGO
> defensive mechanism constituted by a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL of
> IGNORANCE against any further progression of this #41 - *ONTIC*
> NECESSITY = #492 (#451 + #41) AS *FREEWILL* being #12 x #41 of
> ANTHROPOCENTRIC (CIRCULAR) REALITY?
>
> Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
> distinction between descriptive statements which present an account of
> how the world is being analogous to the LIMITED {#9 - JUXTAPOSITION
> CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS / SEMINAL REASON
> GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative statements presenting
> an evaluative account, or an account of how the syncretic world should
> be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in
> being optimally something that should be lived up to; or that should be
> pursued.
>
> “JESUS ANSWERED, *ARE* *THERE* *NOT* *TWELVE* *HOURS* *IN* *THE* *DAY*
> {ie. 24 x 60 minutes = #1440 / #72 = 20 minutes allocations}? *IF* *ANY*
> *MAN* *WALK* *IN* *THE* *DAY*, *HE* *STUMBLETH* *NOT*, *BECAUSE* *HE*
> *SEETH* *THE* *LIGHT* *OF* *THIS* *WORLD*-*KOSMOS*.
>
> BUT IF A MAN WALK IN THE NIGHT, HE STUMBLETH, BECAUSE THERE IS NO LIGHT
> IN HIM.” [John 11:9-10 (KJV)]
>
> At the center of a philosophical doctrine of nature, there would then
> stand general descriptive judgments; that means, more precisely,
> statements of law that describe how objects of nature act. And at the
> center of a doctrine of morals there would stand normative judgments
> that exhibit a comparable degree of generality and modal status. I will
> later address more thoroughly what it could mean that some normative
> judgments exhibit a comparable modal status to statements of law in the
> natural sciences. Such a parallel is far from trivial. On the contrary,
> it is one of the critical challenges for the interpretation of Kant’s
> ethical writings. The first step toward a unified interpretation of the
> two kinds of laws consists in seeing both kinds equally as
> propositionally structured entities that demonstrate a clearly
> identifiable logical form. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 5]
>
> And to illustrate the ontological significances of this, I'm considering
> on the proviso that there is sufficient time for its inclusion within
> this initial draft document, a summary of Kant’s broad description of
> the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE before then using the noumena to examine the
> historical event occurring upon 25 December 1770 when Captain Cook
> sought repairs in Batavia and a sailor absconded as worthy example.
>
> But I will have to do some preliminary research and prudently consider
> the semantical terms which are not common usage to our present
> sensibility, before that occurs."
>
> DANIEL60 [SHORT A DIGIT: +1 = #61 / % #41 = #20]
> (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2154 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "My
> question for the day would have to be "What the hell does '*REFUTATION*'
> {ie. the action of proving a statement or theory to be wrong or false}
> mean??" Sounds like a made-up word! Or a 'WORD' used by someone trying
> to sound edu-ma-cated, in the vein of 'BULLSHIT BAFFLES THE BRAINLESS'!!"
>
> NOMEN NESCIO [LATIN: I DON'T KNOW THE NAME] (***@DIZUM.COM) @ 2022
> HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "DOLF CAN PEEL AND EAT BANANAS USING HIS TOES:
>
> N.B. Harry Houdini never did this, but other primates can."
>
> FRAN SNORTELUS (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1157 HOURS ON 2
> SEPTEMBER 2018: "It's a perfectly valid word and can be found in the
> OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY. It means the action of refuting or
> disproving a statement/fact and probably also a theory.
>
> But it IS a valid word and it IS used by people who ARE educated!"
>
> DOLF @ 0658 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018: "NOMEN NESCIO’S [LATIN: I DON'T
> KNOW THE NAME] NEO-NAZISM AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION IS TO BE DRIVEN
> FROM OUR LAND WITH ALL THE ZEAL IN FREEDOM OF VOLUNTARY WILL WHICH WAS
> AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE AND THE FRENCH ENLIGHTENMENT AS REVOLUTION:
>
> Whom are you as #41 - ONTIC necessity that we ought consider any
> ontological regard?
>
> The Australian Catholic Church by rejecting calls for priests to report
> child abuses confession and instead making an economy of such by an
> appeal to so called Papal Authority against counsel of the Royal
> Commission established by Letters Patent (DIEU ET MON DROIT) as powers
> and Authority given Royal Assent on 8 August 1902.
>
> Validates our authority of intended purpose in having #8 Papal Bulls
> within our prudent determination as legal recourse and we are going to
> first assist others in their recompense and then we will take the rest...
>
> And I swear by Almighty God that what has been ordained to be so shall be.
>
> THE END OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM BABOONERY MASQUERADING PIETY AS THE
> CLAMOURING FOR ‘N ORT AND WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A CAT-O-NINE TAILS TO
> YOUR IMPERTINENT HIDE AND TEACH YOU FIRSTLY A PROTOCOL OF CONFESSION AND
> THEN THE DIGNITY OF SILENCE.
>
> The *TRINOMIAL* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL* *NOUMENON* *AS* *MATERIA*
> *PRIMA* is a savant endowment as capacity of MIND which is attributed to
> the *SOVEREIGN* but not *CHIMPANZEES* as being savages since you don’t
> have the mind development excepting to use *DEIFIED* *IGNORANCE* as
> #231- JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL which is otherwise incapable for such
> sapient existence:
>
> G2233@{
> #1: Sup: 8; Ego: 8,
> #2: Sup: 11; Ego: 3,
> #3: Sup: 19; Ego: 8,
> #4: Sup: 57; Ego: 38,
> #5: Sup: 58; Ego: 1,
> #6: Sup: 15; Ego: 38,
> #7: Sup: 24; Ego: 9,
> #8: Sup: 29; Ego: 5,
> Male: #221; Feme: #110
> } // #434
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #137 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
> I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 -
> Branching Out;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
> Mabit; *I* *DEAL* *NOT* *FRAUDULENTLY*.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
> #TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
> #POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
> #TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
> #CANON: #140
>
> #434 as [#8, #3, #8, #200, #1, #200, #9, #5] = hegeomai (G2233): {#6 as
> #137 % #41 = #14} 1) to lead; 2) to consider, deem, account, think; 1a)
> to go before; 1b) to be a leader; 1b1) *TO* *RULE*, command; 1b2) to
> have authority over; 1b3) *A* *PRINCE*, *OF* *REGAL* *POWER*, governor,
> viceroy, chief, leading as respects influence, *CONTROLLING* *IN*
> *COUNSEL*, overseers or leaders of the churches; 1b4) used of any kind
> of leader, chief, commander; 1b5) the leader in speech, chief, spokesman;
>
> “FOR THIS CORRUPTIBLE MUST PUT ON INCORRUPTION, AND THIS MORTAL MUST PUT
> ON IMMORTALITY.
>
> SO WHEN THIS CORRUPTIBLE SHALL HAVE PUT ON INCORRUPTION, AND THIS MORTAL
> SHALL HAVE PUT ON IMMORTALITY, THEN SHALL BE BROUGHT TO PASS THE SAYING
> THAT IS WRITTEN, *DEATH* {#902 as [#400, #40, #6, #400, #6, #50] = muwth
> (H4191): {#451 % #41 = #41} 1) A primitive root; to die (literally or
> figuratively); causatively, to kill; [idiom] at all, [idiom] crying,
> (be) dead (body, man, one), (put to, worthy of) *DEATH*, destroy(-er),
> (cause to, be like to, must) die, kill, necro(-mancer), [idiom] must
> needs, slay, [idiom] surely, [idiom] very suddenly, [idiom] in (no) wise.
>
> } *IS* *SWALLOWED* *UP* *IN* *VICTORY*.
>
> EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 WHICH CONVEYS AN EQUIVALENT MAGIC
> ROW SUM TO THE FIRST MAGIC SQUARE THE EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE
> GOVERNANCE
>
> 41 1 57
> 49 33 17
> 9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}
>
> "AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
> JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {
>
> #I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
> SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
> #N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
> Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
> #R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
> THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
> Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
> IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
> SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
> #I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
> which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}
>
> INRI@{
> @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
> @2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
> @3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
> @4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
> Male: #114; Feme: #108
> } // #270
>
> #1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
> ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
> #2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
> same light;
> #3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
> friends;
> #4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
> *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 -
> TORAH} - Keep a common way;
> #5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
> each other {Latin CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
>
> [IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:
>
> Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).
>
> *ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
> sovereign dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus}
> Empire Governance]
>
> THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
> CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
> AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
> THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
> ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]
>
> O DEATH, WHERE IS THY STING? *O* *GRAVE*, *WHERE* *IS* *THY* *VICTORY*?
>
> THE STING OF DEATH IS SIN; AND THE STRENGTH OF SIN IS THE LAW [OF
> METEMPIRICAL CONTORTIONS AS NORMATIVE DECEPTIONS SUCH AS YOURS].”
> [1Corinthians 15:54-56 (KJV)
>
> Kant assigns three transitions to the three sections of the work
> although it is unclear whether the sections also contain the starting
> points and termini named in the title or whether they ultimately have
> only the transitions themselves as topics. Kant’s mention of an
> initially “ANALYTICALLY” and subsequently “SYNTHETICALLY” proceeding is
> also unclear and disputed among interpreters (GMS, 392,19-22). A
> possible interpretation consists in directly connecting the expressions
> “ANALYTICALLY” and “SYNTHETICALLY” to the word “METHOD.” This would mean
> that Kant refers here to the two different methods of instruction
> (“Lehrarten”) mentioned in the Prolegomena, which appeared in 1783. In
> the two-year older work, this process is explained "THE ANALYTICAL
> METHOD [. ..] SIGNIFIES [. . .] THAT WE START FROM WHAT IS SOUGHT, AS IT
> WERE GIVEN, AND ASCEND TO THE ONLY CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH IS POSSIBLE”
> (AA IV, 276 note). Kant expressly emphasizes that the analytical method
> has nothing to do with the procedure of conceptual analysis, but
> concerns only the method (“Lehrart”): “THE ANALYTIC; METHOD, INSOFAR AS
> IT IS OPPOSED TO THE SYNTHETICAL, IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM AN AGGREGATE OF
> ANALYTIC PROPOSITIONS” (ibid).
>
> BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 0453 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "GEERT BE
> WILDERS BLAAST CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF:
>
> It was also a item on the news. GEERT did not think it worth all those
> threats. Still its interesting to see how many madmen live in Pakistan
> and the rest of the world."
>
> PANDORA'S BOX (***@KNOWARE.NL) @ 0611 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Why
> don't they announce with fanfare a cartoon contest in which Jesus
> ridiculed."
>
> BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 0632 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Then nothing
> happens. At most a little sputtering."
>
> EDMUND (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1650 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Yes, you
> are right, hundreds of people are killed immediately burned flags,
> praised prizes to kill bp people.
>
> Oh wait oh no, nothing happens at all.
>
> Look up:
>
> YOUTUBE: "The Life Of Brian - The People's Front of Judea"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WboggjN_G-4>
>
> or
>
> YOUTUBE: "Monty Python And The Holy Grail - The Black Knight - Tis But A
> Scratch"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmInkxbvlCs>
>
> An excellent example of the difference between those backward ones
> barbarians and the normally developed world.
>
> Feel free to make the same MONTY PYTHON film about the Quran, that is
> laughing man."
>
> BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 2110 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "By the way,
> who's talking about ridiculous?"
>
> DOLF @ 2143 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "This implication of 18 August
> 1811, Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte (1804 - 1814) issuing a decree, based
> on French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is
> that a large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman
> Empire Governance and therefore did not have any authenticated notion of
> Sophia as wisdom which is derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
> as the basis of science.
>
> That portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be
> regarded as *BARBARIANS* and enlightenment was like the price of tulip
> 🌷 bulbs a decadent societal entitlement and status.
>
> — CONDOMS GALORE —
> [Amsterdam Pride 3 August 2018]
>
> “HEINZ DAUGHTER.
> LOOKING FOR SOUP.
> WANDERING AFTER.
> PARADING TROUPE.
>
> A FATHER TO BE.
> BY SIDEWALK HOPE.
> EVERYONE IS FREE.
> NO NEED TO ELOPE.”
>
> TURKEY-BASTER@{
> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 24 (#24),
> @2: Sup: 20 (#32); Ego: 29 (#53),
> @3: Sup: 47 (#79); Ego: 31 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
> @4: Sup: 21 (#100); Ego: 46 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
> @5: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 66 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
> @6: Sup: 65 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 11 (#207),
> @7: Sup: 10 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
> 56 (#263),
> @8: Sup: 79 (#264); Ego: 72 (#335),
> @9: Sup: 54 (#318); Ego: 37 (#372),
> Male: #318; Feme: #372
> }
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{318}&idea:{372}>
>
> H2658@{
> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
> @2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
> DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
> @3: Sup: 37 (#105); Ego: 80 (#118),
> @4: Sup: 75 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
> {%19}); Ego: 38 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
> Male: #180; Feme: #156
> } // #318
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #288 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
> I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
> in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.
>
> #VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
> #TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
> #POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
> #TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
> #CANON: #45
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_45@{
> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
> @2: Sup: 2 (#3); Ego: 1 (#2),
> @3: Sup: 43 (#46); Ego: 41 (#43),
> @4: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 2 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
> Male: #91; Feme: #45
> } // #45
>
> #318 as [#30, #8, #80, #200] = chaphar (H2658): {UMBRA: #1 as #288 % #41
> = #1} 1) to dig, search for; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to dig; 1a2) *TO* *SEARCH*,
> *SEARCH* *OUT*, *EXPLORE*;
>
> H3366@{
> @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
> @2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
> @3: Sup: 31 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}); Ego: 19 (#31),
> @4: Sup: 69 (#114); Ego: 38 (#69),
> @5: Sup: 75 (#189); Ego: 6 (#75),
> Male: #189; Feme: #75
> } // #318
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
> Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
> Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
> Tetra: 26 - Endeavour;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
> appearance in Urit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *HOT* *OF* *SPEECH*.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
> #TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
> #POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
> #TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
> #CANON: #158
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
> @1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
> @2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
> @3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
> @4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I
> AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
> Male: #156; Feme: #158
> } // #158 <-- *ONTIC* *VALUE* *FOR* *2ND* *NOVICHOK* *POISONING* *EVENT*
>
> #318 as [#2, #10, #100, #200, #6] = yeqar (H3366): {UMBRA: #3 as #310 %
> #41 = #23} 1) *PRICE*, *VALUE*, *PRECIOUSNESS*, *HONOUR*, *SPLENDOUR*,
> *POMP*; 1a) preciousness; 1b) price; 1c) honour, esteem;
>
> G3120@{
> @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
> @2: Sup: 41 (#81); Ego: 1 (#41),
> @3: Sup: 71 (#152); Ego: 30 (#71),
> @4: Sup: 72 (#224); Ego: 1 (#72),
> @5: Sup: 11 (#235); Ego: 20 (#92),
> @6: Sup: 81 (#316); Ego: 70 (#162),
> @7: Sup: 10 (#326); Ego: 10 (#172),
> @8: Sup: 48 (#374); Ego: 38 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
> Male: #374; Feme: #210
> } // #372
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #362 % #41 = #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
> H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has
> been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in
> Memphis; I am neither a liar nor a doer of mischief.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
> #TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
> #POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
> #TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
> #CANON: #215
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_215@{
> @1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
> @2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
> @3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
> OF GRAIN {%6}),
> @4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
> OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
> Male: #134; Feme: #215
> } // #215 <— *NOTE* *ALIGNMENT* *WITH* ADOLF HITLER’S TABLE TALK IDEA
> AND ELOHYM AS #86 - ALMIGHTY GOD (SEE ABOVE)
>
>
> #372 as [#40, #1, #30, #1, #20, #70, #10, #200] = malakos (G3120):
> {UMBRA: #12 as #362 % #41 = #34} 1) soft, soft to the touch; 2)
> metaphor: in a bad sense; 2a) effeminate; 2a1) of a catamite; 2a2) of a
> boy kept for homosexual relations with a man; 2a3) of a male who submits
> his body to unnatural lewdness; 2a4) of a male prostitute;
>
> I would therefore take issue with your claim made of the normative
> descriptor *BARBARIANS* which is a term of relative association and
> according to my perspective of the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY published
> within 4BCE by YANG HSIUNG whom determines the #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY
> {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} AS DERIVED FROM THE I CHING
> AS 8x8 {#260 - COMPATIBLE TO PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL NOTION OF NUMBER} =
> H64 BINOMIAL {MALE: YANG CH'I / FEME: YIN CH'I) BY MEANS OF A MAPPED
> ASSOCIATION WITH THE TETRAGRAMMATON {#1 + #41 + #81 = #123}: "Since
> neither the content nor the structure of the Changes implies a temporal
> sequence, the Mystery follows generally a proposed rearrangement of the
> hexagrams put forward by the HAN Dynasty 206 BCE-220 CE Changes {H64
> elements} master, CHING FANG (77-33 BC). YANG HSIUNG improved upon
> CHING FANG’S approach to symmetry in the cyclic structure he was
> creating. He avoided, for example, certain inelegances of CHING FANG’S
> schema (which involved only 60 hexagrams) when he incorporated
> references to all 64 HEXAGRAMS in his arrangement of TETRAGRAMS and also
> substituted the winter solstice for FANG’S artificial point of departure
> (the new moon of the tenth civil month as GRAND INCEPTION determined
> midnight of 21 DECEMBER 103 BCE), so that his cycle starts at the point
> which marked the actual beginning of the tropical year for the HAN
> astronomer.
>
> Each pair of *HEXAGRAMS* separated by six months (for example: H19 -
> APPROACH / TETRA: #9 - BRANCHING OUT {#65 CE - SOLDIER / 27-31 JANUARY}
> and H33 - RETREAT / TETRA: #49 - FLIGHT {26-30 JULY}) are LINE-BY-LINE
> POLAR OPPOSITIONS and together with the corresponding schema of
> INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES produces *ONTIC* NECESSITY a REVERSE
> TRANSCRIPTASE inhibitor as TETRACYTS being *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *THINGS*
> *IN* *THE* *DIVINE* *MIND* *OPERATING* *INTELLECTUALLY*:
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #91 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
> Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
> Sutenhunen; I am not a teller of lies.
>
> #VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
> #TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
> #POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
> #TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
> #CANON: #161
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
> @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
> @2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
> @3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
> @4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
> {%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
> Male: #169; Feme: #161
> } // #161
>
> Each of these twelve “waxing and waning” hexagrams, along with 48 other
> hexagrams, also correspond to equal intervals of 6 7/80 days (in other
> words, 1/60 of the solar year of 365 1/4 days). The remaining four
> hexagrams found in the Changes, called “standard hexagrams,” correspond
> to the solstices and equinoxes and thus to the four cardinal points of
> the sun’s path. They are not segments of the cycle, then, but points
> fixed in space, which move back and forth in time. The sun may pass
> through one of them on any day of the lunar month in which it is
> located. From the astronomer’s point of view, it is the new moons that
> move back and forth around them. [Nylan, 15-16]
>
> And on TETRA: #45 - *GREATNESS* which then made of the #POSITION as
> comprising an ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI determinism within, YANG HSIUNG
> comments: The truly *WISE* {
>
> H7069@{
> @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
> @2: Sup: 69 (#88); Ego: 50 (#69),
> @3: Sup: 74 (#162); Ego: 5 (#74),
> @4: Sup: 80 (#242); Ego: 6 (#80),
> Male: #242; Feme: #80
> } // #161
>
> #161 as [#100, #50, #5, #6] = qanah (H7069): {UMBRA: #14 as #161 % #41 =
> #38} 1) to get, acquire, create, buy, possess; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to get,
> acquire, obtain; 1a1a) of God originating, creating, redeeming His
> people; 1a1a1) possessor; 1a1b) of Eve acquiring; 1a1c) of *ACQUIRING*
> *KNOWLEDGE*, *WISDOM*; 1a2) to buy; 1b) (Niphal) to be bought; 1c)
> (Hiphil) to *CAUSE* *TO* *POSSESS*;
>
> } PAYS CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE FIRST SMALL *SIGNS* *OF* *CHANGE* {
>
> H5927@{
> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
> @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
> @3: Sup: 45 (#107); Ego: 70 (#126),
> @4: Sup: 75 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
> Ego: 30 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
> @5: Sup: 80 (#262); Ego: 5 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
> Male: #262; Feme: #161
> } // #161
>
> #161 as [#6, #50, #70, #30, #5] = `alah (H5927): {UMBRA: #4 as #161 %
> #41 = #38} 1) to go up, ascend, climb; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to go up, ascend;
> 1a2) to meet, visit, follow, depart, withdraw, retreat; 1a3) to go up,
> come up (of animals); 1a4) to spring up, grow, shoot forth (of
> vegetation); 1a5) to go up, go up over, *RISE* (*OF* *NATURAL*
> *PHENOMENON*); 1a6) to come up (before God); 1a7) to go up, go up over,
> *EXTEND* (*OF* *BOUNDARY*); 1a8) *TO* *EXCEL*, *BE* *SUPERIOR* *TO*; 1b)
> (Niphal); 1b1) to be taken up, be brought up, be taken away; 1b2) to
> take oneself away; 1b3) to be exalted; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to bring up,
> cause to ascend or climb, cause to go up; 1c2) to bring up, bring
> against, take away; 1c3) to bring up, draw up, train; 1c4) to cause to
> ascend; 1c5) to rouse, stir up (mentally); 1c6) to offer, bring up (of
> gifts); 1c7) to exalt; 1c8) to cause to ascend, offer; 1d) (Hophal);
> 1d1) to be carried away, be led up; 1d2) to be taken up into, be
> inserted in; 1d3) to be offered; 1e) (Hithpael) to lift oneself;
>
> }, since no one [*POSSESSES*] sufficient strength to singlehandedly
> defeat a well-developed trend. The sage looks at small details
> overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation of his
> visionary rule. Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of
> knowledge which is here conveyed as impetus of gnomic imperative
> purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being validated by
> experiential reality:
>
> The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}
>
> The commentators unanimously prefer a different reading, however:
>
> The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
> It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
> The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
> Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
>
> Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
>
> APPRAISAL 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
> He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
> Such fame is empty.
> FATHOMING 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
> Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
>
> Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit
> the construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by
> high rank by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes
> public display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards
> internal reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this,
> he fails to focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are
> far from *CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
>
> The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
> resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to
> frame good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also
> symbolizes *MONEY* since certain coins were minted in its image {
>
> H3702@{
> @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
> @2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
> @3: Sup: 79 (#179); Ego: 80 (#160),
> @4: Sup: 80 (#259); Ego: 1 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
> Male: #259; Feme: #161
> } // #161
>
> #161 as [#20, #60, #80, #1] = kecaph (H3702): {UMBRA: #39 as #161 % #41
> = #38} 1) silver; 1a) as metal; 1b) as *MONEY*;
>
> } Here the house lacks either the incisive thinking or the material
> resources it needs to flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before
> too long, its reputation will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an
> equivalence to the mystical cabalistic interpretation given to the
> Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15 magic square and its gematria value:
>
> H5014@{
> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
> @2: Sup: 52 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 2 (#52),
> @3: Sup: 58 (#160); Ego: 6 (#58),
> @4: Sup: 60 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 2 (#60),
> Male: #220; Feme: #60
> } // #60
>
> #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab (H5014): {UMBRA: #12 as #60 % #41 =
> #19} 1) (Qal) TO *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED* (PARTICIPLE);
>
> APPRAISAL 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
> Into his realm, and so is victorious.
> FATHOMING 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
> Means: He oversees the *NINE* *BARBARIANS*.
>
> Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with
> humaneness, the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT
> MARRIAGE AS PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT
> HUMANENESS as having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting
> the minimum of pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have
> a civilizing effect on people.
>
> ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
> NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
>
> And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
> Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION
> VIII as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING*
> unto Our said Governor General:
>
> VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
> *OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
> *OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
> *OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
> or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
> such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
> *PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
> *GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.
>
> } agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*,
> or 'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomising what is *CENTRAL*, the true
> sage eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the
> earth. The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things
> revolve. In return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal
> presence {ie. The sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL*
> transformation. If he would do Viewing of what he himself is, he should
> do Viewing of the people who themselves are morally transformed by their
> viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
>
> APPRAISAL 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
> The many, because of the few.
> FATHOMING 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
> Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
>
> If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
> beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will
> eventually grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave
> overwhelms tiny ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first
> signs of disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation,
> he can both adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the
> Good. This is no less true in the private world of the soul than in the
> public world of the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45, page #288]
>
> — NOW I SEE —
>
> "YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
> CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
> PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
> YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.
>
> ONE THING IS CLEAR.
> DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
> THE MIRROR TO PEER.
> YOUR WIFE HAS A ***@NT."
>
> MICHAEL CHRIST: "I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to
> speak like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.
>
> Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.
>
> To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
> encyclopedias.
>
> My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
> personally, and inspirationally.
>
> [Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
> 'listening'.
>
> Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.
>
> So, I must say, thank you.
>
> And thank you, again.
>
> However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.
>
> Amen."
>
> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
> touch with scripture."
>
> MILOCH ITCHY KOALA: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
> out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.
>
> Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something
> out of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
> 'pillar of salt'?
>
> And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk
> and finally resigned from his ministry.
>
> Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!
>
> go Warriors!"
>
> — PRELAPSARIAN —
>
> "OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
> ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
> JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
> AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
> MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.
>
> SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
> E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
> THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
> SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
> THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."
>
> *PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
> - characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
> prelapsarian youth.
> - Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
> - Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
>
> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "Trump and
> Kushner are going down...
>
> George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is
> shocked and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are
> defending Donald Trump and his actions."
>
> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."
>
> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "We have courts
> to decided that.."
>
> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
> presumed innocent until proven otherwise."
>
> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "DICK Painter
> went on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will
> stand up in a court of law.
>
> The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...
>
> I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and
> if there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up
> in a dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."
>
> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"
>
> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "Obstruction of
> justice."
>
> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."
>
> — BISCUIT EUPHORIA —
>
> "LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
> STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
> SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
> GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.
>
> SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
> AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
> PISS OFF YOU ***@CKER.
> OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."
>
> And these APPRAISALS AS ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI AND FATHOMING AS SYNTHETIC
> A POSTERIORI then as systematically comprise the INTELLECTUAL DECAD as
> being equivalent to the Pythagoreans understanding of TEN as the
> greatest number, as well for that it is the TETRACTYS, by that it
> comprehends all arithmetical and harmonical proportions. Pythagoras
> said, that TEN is the NATURE of NUMBER: because all Nations, Greeks,
> [the *ARABS*] and *BARBARIANS*, reckon to it; and when they arrive at
> it, return to the MONAD: as therefore compliant with the Chinese
> perspective of the GRAND INCEPTION determined midnight of 21 DECEMBER
> 103 BCE.' [Chapter XIV, Pythagoras: His Life Teachings, Ninth Section
> 1687 edition of The History of Philosophy, p 529]
>
> As the basis of the historical citation made within within the Epistle
> to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist syncretic perennialist
> philosophers whom published counterfactual works on the Religious
> Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery the
> reference to the nine *BARBARIANS* appears equitable to the Pythagorean
> binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited
> / unlimited: “I AM DEBTOR BOTH TO THE GREEKS, AND TO THE *BARBARIANS* {
>
> G915@{
> @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
> @2: Sup: 3 (#5); Ego: 1 (#3),
> @3: Sup: 22 (#27); Ego: 19 (#22),
> @4: Sup: 24 (#51); Ego: 2 (#24),
> @5: Sup: 25 (#76); Ego: 1 (#25),
> @6: Sup: 44 (#120); Ego: 19 (#44),
> @7: Sup: 33 (#153); Ego: 70 (#114),
> @8: Sup: 43 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 10 (#124),
> @9: Sup: 81 (#277); Ego: 38 (#162),
> Male: #277; Feme: #162
> } // #486
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #476 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
> I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
> Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
> Distortion;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
> Unsit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *BOISTEROUS* *IN* *BEHAVIOUR*.
>
> #VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
> #TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
> #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
> #TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
> #CANON: #185
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_185@{
> @1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
> @2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
> @3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
> @4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
> {%25}),
> Male: #108; Feme: #185
> } // #185
>
> #486 as [#2, #1, #100, #2, #1, #100, #70, #10, #200] = barbaros (G915):
> {UMBRA: #18 as #476 % #41 = #25} 1) one whose speech is rude, rough and
> harsh; 2) one who speaks a foreign or strange language which is not
> understood by another; 3) *USED* *BY* *THE* *GREEKS* *OF* *ANY*
> *FOREIGNER* *IGNORANT* *OF* *THE* *GREEK* *LANGUAGE*, *WHETHER* *MENTAL*
> *OR* *MORAL*, with the added notion after the Persian war, of rudeness
> and brutality. *THE* *WORD* *IS* *USED* *IN* *THE* *NEW* *TESTAMENT*
> *WITHOUT* THE* *IDEA* *OF* *REPROACHFULNESS*;
>
> } BOTH TO THE WISE, AND TO THE UNWISE. SO, AS MUCH AS IN ME IS, I AM
> READY TO PREACH THE GOSPEL TO YOU THAT ARE AT ROME {power; strength}
> ALSO.” [Romans 1:14]
>
> According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
> concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
> that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
> WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
> that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {
>
> @1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] {
>
> HOMOIOS
> HETEROS
> KABBALAH
> AS DEFINED
>
> } ...
>
> @5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
> Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
>
> #15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - Remember the
> Sabbath]) ...
>
> #34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
> Honour your parents]) ...
>
> #65 (@2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
> - Do not kill]) ...
>
> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
> [#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
>
> #175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
> - Do not steal]) ...
>
> #260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
> Bear no false witness]) ...
>
> #369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - Covet Not])
>
> } of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
> argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
> trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
> Chinese naming conventions such as is exemplar by:
>
> MAO ZE DONG
>
> or
>
> XI JIN PIN
>
> “FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
> ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
> [Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
>
> DANIEL60 [SHORT A DIGIT: +1 = #61 / % #41 = #20]
> (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2117 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Ah!
> Well, there you go!! Now I am more edu-ma-cated!! :)"
>
> FRAN SNORTELUS (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 2128 HOURS ON 2
> SEPTEMBER 2018: "The power of usenet..... Now if we could only get the
> PRETZEL to learn..... "
>
> A second possible interpretation consists in referring the expressions
> “ANALYTICALLY” and “SYNTHETICALLY,” as they are used here, neither
> directly to the expression “METHOD” nor, consequently, to the concept of
> method in the Prolegomena. Indeed, in the Preface to the Groundwork,
> Kant says only that he wants “TO TAKE THE WAY” first ANALYTICALLY and
> then SYNTHETICALLY. This leaves the possibility open to read the
> expressions in a conceptual-analytical or conceptual-synthetical sense.
> If one follows this interpretation, the outcome of the first two
> sections is constituted in the “SEARCH” (GMS, 392,3) for the supreme
> principle of morality. The goal of this “SEARCH” is an exact formulation
> of the [#41 - *ONTIC* *NECESSITY* to] CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE. The
> procedure Kant uses for this is that of conceptual analysis. The formula
> of the categorical imperative can be found through the analytical
> process, but its validity cannot yet be proven. For this reason, Kant
> shifts to the CONCEPTUAL-SYNTHETICAL procedure in the third section and
> therewith to the “ESTABLISHMENT” (GMS, 392,4) of the principle. In the
> first two sections, it is, accordingly, solely a matter of ANALYTICAL
> JUDGMENTS. In contrast, SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS, with which the proof of
> validity can be achieved, would stand at the centre of the third
> section. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 17-18]
>
> DOLF @ 0436 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I am (being surnamed BOEK
> self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical appeal to either
> *REDUCTIO* *AD* *TRUMPIUM* for taking an obstinate or negative dialectic
> disposition (ie. ) as is implied by the title of this chapter 'DUTCH
> BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS' and then spiralling downwards into
> forfeiture of decency by recourse to *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* until
> one reaches a consequential depravity *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* (eg:
> Hitler was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are you), .
>
> However, if ADOLF HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK as IDEA @1
> expressed on Saturday 5 JULY 1941 that "THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A
> SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME" as deploying the
> NUMBER @1 / @5 PROTOTYPE as the basis of Roman Empire Governance by
> which it was then an authenticated notion of *SOPHIA* *AS* *WISDOM* as
> derived from Pythagorean binomial {#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as
> [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis (G1520): {#12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*}
> nomenclature as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE
> A CHOOK AS CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
>
> #541 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #300, #5, #50, #5, #10] = apokteino (G615):
> {#60 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to kill in any way whatever; 2) metaphor: to
> extinguish, abolish; 1a) to destroy, to allow to perish; 2a) to inflict
> mortal death; 2b) *TO* *DEPRIVE* *OF* *SPIRITUAL* *LIFE* *AND* *PROCURE*
> *ETERNAL* *MISERY* *IN* *HELL*
>
> #391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
> (G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
> *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
> management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
> office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
> dispensation;
>
> #391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460 %
> #41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b)
> like: ie. corresponding to a thing;
>
> #541 as [#20, #300, #1, #200, #9, #1, #10] = ktaomai (G2932): {#63 as
> #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to acquire, get, or procure a thing for one's self,
> to possess; 1a) to marry a wife;
>
> #541 as [#5, #80, #10, #200, #20, #10, #1, #200, #5, #10] = episkiazo
> (G1982): {#55 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *TO* *THROW* *A* *SHADOW* *UPON*,
> *TO* *ENVELOP* *IN* *A* *SHADOW*, *TO* *OVERSHADOW* from a vaporous
> cloud that casts a shadow the word is transferred to a shining cloud
> surrounding and enveloping persons with brightness. Used of the Holy
> Spirit exerting creative energy upon the womb of the virgin Mary and
> impregnating it (a use of the word which seems to have been drawn from
> the familiar Old Testament idea of a cloud as symbolising the immediate
> presence and power of God);
>
> #541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
> (G3622): {#56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
> *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
> management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
> office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
> dispensation;
>
> SEE ALSO: "REFUTATION OF SCORN: IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF
> PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?"
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.6%20A%20METHODOLOGICAL%20NEW%20BEGINNING.pdf>
>
> In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
> argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument
> that attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably
> leads to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove
> one by showing that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or
> impossible.
>
> Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
> (Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
> 62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
> mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
>
> The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a
> range of forms, as these examples show:
>
> The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off
> the edge.
>
> There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were,
> then it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
>
> The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
> ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
> example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
> denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is
> a "smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
>
> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
>
> Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY in being
> normative description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted
> {ie. #391} and what causality {#541} it had within and upon the populace.
>
> The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) which was competed within 1631
> is a Reformed church within Dutch Protestant church in central
> Amsterdam, Netherlands. It lies in the most western part of the
> Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum borough), next to the Jordaan,
> between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
>
> The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three
> main canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting
> canal belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the
> west and south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
> Prinsengracht .
>
> Furthermore as an instance of *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* is this your
> quantitative statement: "An excellent example of the difference between
> those backward *BARBARIANS* and the normally developed world. The
> difference between *MORE* *AND* *LESS* secularized societies.
>
> If one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
> enlightenment, then one is espousing scientific endeavour and any
> conveyance of such is framed by conceptions of NUMBER.
>
> Thusly, to convey any difference on the basis of “*MORE* *OR* *LESS*”,
> then one is making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished
> otherwise) to at least as a starting point of Aristotelian (384–322 BCE)
> understanding given of the binomial NATURE OF NUMBER as the earlier
> ANALYTIC A PRIORI / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI conception of it enumerated by
> the PYTHAGOREAN (c. 570 – c. 495 BCE) where there was both:
>
> LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
> something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
>
> MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something
> could be done well.
>
> So then, there is a prudent contradiction (ie. IT DOESN'T CUT THE
> MUSTARD) by a paucity of the rhetorical contrivance concerning the
> necessity about the reality of secularised societies: *DUTCH* *OR*
> *OTHERWISE*.
>
> The modern sense of the idiom is 'to succeed; to have the ability to do
> something; to come up to expectations' as to arouse amusement or
> derision; ridiculous in being an absurdity.
>
> WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
>
> Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
>
> [WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]"
>
> GEERT BE WILDERS@{
> @1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
> @2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
> @3: Sup: 46 (#124); Ego: 47 (#116),
> @4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55
> (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
> @5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
> @6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
> @7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
> Male: #288 - *UMBRA* *CONTIVANCE*; Feme: #265
> }
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
>
> H2438@{
> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
> @2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
> DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
> @3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
> @4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
> @5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
> Male: #166; Feme: #126
> } // #288
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
> from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
> Tetra: 25 - Contention;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
> appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
> #TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
> #POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
> #TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
> #CANON: #148
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
> @2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
> @3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
> @4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
> Male: #222; Feme: #148
> } // #148
>
> #288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258
> % #41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to
> Jerusalem to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon;
> 2) the chief architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King
> Hiram to Solomon;
>
> H142@{
> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
> @2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
> @3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
> @4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
> Ego: 38 (#93),
> @5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
> Male: #190; Feme: #103
> } // #265
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
> I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
> Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
> energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
> at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
> *OWN* *PROPERTY*.
>
> #VIRTUE:
> #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
> #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
> #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
> #CANON: #157
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
> @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
> @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
> @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
> {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
> Male: #179; Feme: #157
> } // #157
>
> #265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 %
> #41 = #41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a)
> (Niphal) majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
>
> H1396@{
> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
> @2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
> @3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
> @4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
> @5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
> Male: #245; Feme: #103
> } // #265
>
> #265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 %
> #41 = #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be
> mighty, be great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail;
> 1b) (Piel) to make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm,
> give strength; 1c2) to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to
> show oneself mighty; 1d2) to act proudly (toward God);
>
> SEE ALSO: "(TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND
> CAPACITY AS A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE /
> #312 - RESISTANCE)"
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
>
> — LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
> [PUBLISHED @ 0457 HOURS ON 1 OCTOBER 2017]
>
> "GRISTLE AND BUNT.
> SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
> DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
> SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
> MUSTARD WEASEL.
> VALOUR DIVORCE.
> DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
>
> YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hotdog Commercial (1977)"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOeJ4rmDTvg>
>
> YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hot Dog 1990s Commercial Ad on Beach"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OO2PYAnxQSo>
>
> *CANT* (noun):
> - hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious,
> or political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
> - language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded
> with disparagement: thieves' cant.
>
> ETHICAL_SPORTS_SLEDGE@{
> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
> @2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
> {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
> @3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
> ITS FLOW {%36}),
> @4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
> @5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
> #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 -
> *ONTIC* VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION,
> CONTRARINESS, ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
> @6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
> @7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
> @8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
> Male: #302; Feme: #536
> }
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,302}&idea:{f,546}>
>
> #302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA:
> #5 as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
>
> #546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546
> % #41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the
> commandment (of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
>
> LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1604 HOURS
> ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "That's like saying, "a surname name". Tautology and
> repetition is *ONE* reason you make no sense."
>
> DOLF @ 1729 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Your constipated turd 💩 opinion
> whilst a sensualism as anal retentive declaration given self bestowal
> through proscription of a grunt is no more substantial an entitlement
> than a FANNY excretion of pustulant tripe which is enamoured by it’s
> prolapsed existence though laborious in it’s eventuality as a shrivelled
> spud with no viability as a snag {ie. *BAG* *OF* ****@T*: a despicable
> person}.
>
>
> — ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
>
> “PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
> SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
> HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
> THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
>
> WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
> OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
> THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
> WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
>
> WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
> IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
> THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
> ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
>
> ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard'
> (strong or brave) meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'.
> The name's common female equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
>
> BE WILDERS ANTHEM@{
> @1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
> @2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
> @3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
> {%32}); Ego: 3 (#50),
> @4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
> @5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
> @6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
> @7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
> @8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
> @9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
> @10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
> @11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
> @12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
> @13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
> @14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
> Male: #727; Feme: #356
> }
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
>
> STICKYBEAK:
> - (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
>
> CLARION:
> - (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
> - (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
>
> FOOTLE:
> - (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
> - (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
>
> THRASONICAL:
> - (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
>
> FESTSCHRIFT:
> - (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors
> in honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of
> retirement, an important anniversary, or the like. [Courtesy: Words of
> Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
>
> H8454@{
> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
> @2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
> @3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
> @4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
> @5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
> @6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
> Male: #231; Feme: #160
> } // #727
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
> I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
> (massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
> thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
> #TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
> #POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
> #TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
> #CANON: #210
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_210@{
> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
> @2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
> @3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
> @4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
> Male: #110; Feme: #210
> } // #210 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
> *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #SIX: #114 / #342 AND TORAH
> PROTOTYPES #FIVE: #114 / #342
>
> #727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
> #727 % #41 = #30} 1) *WISDOM*, *SOUND* *KNOWLEDGE*, *SUCCESS*, *SOUND*
> *OR* *EFFICIENT* *WISDOM*, *ABIDING* *SUCCESS*; 1a) sound or efficient
> wisdom; 1b) abiding success (of the effect of sound wisdom);
>
> H2803@{
> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
> @2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
> @3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
> @4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
> @5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
> @6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
> @7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
> Male: #302; Feme: #160
> } // #727
>
> #727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6
> as #727 % #41 = #30} 1) *TO* *THINK*, *PLAN*, *ESTEEM*, *CALCULATE*,
> *INVENT*, *MAKE* *A* *JUDGMENT*, *IMAGINE*, *COUNT*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
> think, account; 1a2) to plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute,
> reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value, regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal);
> 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be
> reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to think upon, consider,
> be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise, plan; 1c3) to count, reckon;
> 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
>
>
> — 👽👽👽👽👽👽👽 —
>
> "THE *WATCHERS* WE ARE,
> SO DO NOT DARE.
> THOUGH IT BE FAR.
> IT'S LIKE WE'RE THERE."
>
> DOLF @ 1752 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "We have established a temporal
> neural linguistic interface with you so that we can cure you of this
> disease of ignorance as #335 - *MORAL* *BLINDNESS*:
>
> G52@{
> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
> @2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
> @3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
> @4: Sup: 43 (#102); Ego: 70 (#124),
> @5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
> @6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135 - *ISLAMIC* STOICHEION
> TRANSFORMATION *ONTIC* / *CANONICAL* PROTOTYPE OF AN #45 ARRAY WHERE
> EACH ROW IS TOTALLING #135),
> @7: Sup: 11 (#220); Ego: 38 (#173),
> Male: #220; Feme: #173
> } // #335
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
> from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
> Tetra: 25 - Contention;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
> appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
> #TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
> #POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
> #TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
> #CANON: #148
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
> @2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
> @3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
> @4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
> Male: #222; Feme: #148
> } // #148
>
> #335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {#9 as #135 %
> #41 = #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine things;
> 1b) of *MORAL* blindness;
>
> YOUTUBE: "2000 - Star Trek: Voyager - Unimatrix Zero"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwDTtXpG--I>
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
> I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
> Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
> at Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.
>
> #VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
> #TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
> #POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
> #TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
> #CANON: #115
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
> @2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
> @3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
> @4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
> Male: #118; Feme: #115
> } // #115
>
> #316 as [#50, #3, #7, #200, #50, #6] = gazar (H1504): {#0 as #210 % #41
> = #5} 1) to cut, divide, cut down, cut off, cut in two, snatch, decree;
> 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to cut in two, divide; 1a2) to cut down; 1a3) to cut
> off, destroy, exterminate; 1a4) to decree; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be cut
> off, separated, excluded; 1b2) to be destroyed, cut off; 1b3) to be decreed;
>
> H3336@{
> @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
> @2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
> @3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
> @4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
> @5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
> Male: #144; Feme: #113
> } // #356
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
> Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
> the Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
> #TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
> #POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
> #TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
> #CANON: #139
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
> @1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
> @2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
> @3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
> @4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
> SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
> Male: #211; Feme: #139
> } // #139
>
> #356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
> #41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as
> Book of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2)
> graven image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) *PURPOSE*,
> *IMAGINATION*, *DEVICE* (*INTELLECTUAL* *FRAMEWORK*);
>
> "And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
> every imagination {#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336):
> imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
> [Genesis 6:5 (KJV)]
>
> To what degree Kant’s proceedings in the Groundwork actually are to be
> related to the Prolegomena is disputed among interpreters. In the end,
> only an exact reconstruction of the entire line of argumentation through
> the three sections of the work can provide insight into Kant’s method in
> the Groundwork. His remarks in the Preface offer little assistance in
> this endeavour. In the following section, therefore, I will not deal
> with these questions any further. Instead, I inquire briefly into a
> cluster of interpretation problems that the last section raises. This
> cluster revolves around the question of the relation of the metaphysics
> of morals to the Groundwork.
>
> (a) The first problem arises from the fact that Kant thinks two types of
> a “groundwork” for a pure moral philosophy are possible: on the one
> hand, a “critique of pure practical reason,” and on the other hand, the
> present work. Although he claims there is “really no other foundation”
> than a “critique” (GMS, 391,17 f.), he believes that one can do without
> such a critique and lists three reasons for this (see GMS,
> 391,20-392,2). It remains nevertheless unclear how the relation of the
> Groundwork to the intimated critique of practical of reason is to be
> defined.
>
> (b) Equally unclear is the precise relation of the Groundwork to the
> envisioned metaphysics of morals. Is the “groundwork” of a theory itself
> to be considered a part of this theory or is what Kant calls the
> “preliminary work of laying the ground” (GMS, 391,37) a part separate
> from the actual metaphysics? Undoubtedly, the parts of the theory
> developed in the Groundwork raise the claim of being independent of
> empirical knowledge and therefore belong to a pure moral philosophy.
> Thus, at least parts of the Groundwork have to be identical with parts
> of a metaphysics of morals.
>
> (c) Making matters more difficult in the identification of the relation
> between the Groundwork, a metaphysics of morals, and the mentioned
> “critique of pure practical reason” is the fact that Kant later
> published monographs with these or slightly modified titles. In any
> case, it may not simply be assumed that the later produced works
> actually deal with the types of theories mentioned in the Preface to the
> Groundwork.
>
> How can the relations of these types of theory to each other be more
> precisely defined? Is Kant’s expression “metaphysics of morals” a
> unified concept or are there different meanings combined here in opaque
> ways?
>
> An approach toward the resolution of these difficulties offers perhaps a
> more precise interpretation of what Kant understands by a “metaphysics
> of morals.” In the opening passages of the Preface, Kant had defined the
> metaphysics of morals with the help of three criteria: first of all, it
> is a theory that is not purely formal but refers to particular objects.
> It refers, secondly, to objects insofar as these are under “LAWS OF
> FREEDOM.” {#492 - *FREEDOM* *OF* *WILL* / #41 = #12 as #9 - Autonomous
> Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL* *NECESSITY*} And thirdly, it is perfectly
> free of empirical content. Therefore, a metaphysics of morals is a “pure
> moral philosophy.” One question, however, remains unanswered. What
> actually is a moral philosophy? Or articulated more precisely: what is
> the ontological status of such a theory?
>
> Kant’s arguments for the practical use or the necessity of such a
> philosophy offer a suggestion for answering this question. A moral
> philosophy is not only an object for the scientific discipline of
> "philosophy." Rather, according to Kant, every rational being, even if
> at times confused, carries in itself a moral philosophy. That raises the
> question about what conception of “theory” can fulfil both of these
> functions simultaneously.
>
> For the clarification of this question I believe the conceptual
> distinction between a theory, understood as an abstract system of
> ordered propositions, and the presentation of such a theory, for example
> in the form of a philosophical text, can be of further assistance. A
> moral theory, understood as a system of propositions that stand in a
> particular relation of grounding to each other and whose #41 - #CENTRE
> is made up of ethical principles, is an abstract object, which can
> simultaneously fulfill both functions. On the one hand, such a system
> can be brought to expression with the help of a philosophical text. On
> the other hand it is also possible to carry such a system “IN ONESELF,”
> that is, to accept, the corresponding propositions.
>
> If one takes such a conception of theory as a basis, the confusing
> terminologies and exact relations of the types of theories mentioned by
> Kant could be newly formulated and made transparent in the following
> way: (i) A metaphysics of morals or a pure moral philosophy is an
> abstract object, a system of propositions complete in itself and
> containing all a priori judgments that are concerned with the laws of
> freedom. (ii) A work with the title “Metaphysics of Morals” contains a
> presentation of this system. The text expresses the corresponding
> propositions and their connections. (iii) If a person carries such a
> moral philosophy in herself, it means that she accepts the corresponding
> propositions and their connections. And if this person is rational, the
> propositions accepted by her will comprise the grounds of her action.
> (iv) A work with the title “Critique of Pure Practical Reason” could be
> a philosophical presentation of parts of this system of propositions
> (and for this reason is suitable as a kind of “groundwork”). But it
> contains additionally a presentation that relies on philosophical
> theories on other spheres of investigation. In Kant’s words, “IN PART I
> REQUIRE FOR A CRITIQUE A PURE PRACTICAL REASON THAT IF IT IS TO BE
> COMPLETED, ITS UNITY WITH THE SPECULATIVE IN A COMMON PRINCIPLE MUST AT
> THE SAME TIME BE EXHIBITED” (GMS, 391,24-27). (iv) In contrast, a work
> with the title “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals” can restrict
> itself entirely to the presentation and mediation of the foundational
> part of the metaphysics of morals. This contains, as Kant expresses it,
> “nothing more than the search for and the establishment of the supreme
> principle of morality” (GMS, 392,3 f.). [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
> Groundwork, Page 18-21]
>
> SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF AN AGREEMENT AS POLITICAL
> INTERFERENCE / DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE CAPABLE OF
> DEPLOYING THE LEST WE FORGET ODE FOR ITS OWN ENDS
>
> — MANDALAY SWAY POEM —
>
> @5: Sup: 51 (#218 - OR DEATH ITS SWAY); Ego: 34 (#160) <— ANALYTICAL
> JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION OF COGNITIVE
> PROPOSITION
>
> #492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {#41 = #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} -
> #391 - *HOMOIOS* *FRATERNITY* =
> #101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT'
>
> MANDALAY_SWAY@{
> @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
> @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
> @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
> @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
> @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
> @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
> @7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
> @8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
> Male: #218; Feme: #98
> } // #260 <— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF
> AN AGREEMENT OF CONCLUSION
>
> #260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
> #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
> wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
> possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
> *COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>
> — LEST WE FORGET ODE —
>
> "{@1} THEY SHALL GROW NOT OLD, {@2} AS WE THAT ARE LEFT GROW OLD;
> {@3} AGE SHALL NOT WEARY THEM, {@4} NOR THE YEARS CONDEMN.
> {@5 - #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} AT THE GOING DOWN OF THE SUN AND IN
> THE MORNING
> {@6} WE WILL REMEMBER THEM."
>
> @5: Sup: 74 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
> *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 12 (#206) <— ANALYTICAL JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC
> A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION AS IDEA EXISTENCE OF JUXTAPOSITION
> CONTROL ASSOCIATED WITH THE ODE
>
> INRI@{
> @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
> @2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
> @3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
> @4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
> Male: #114; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
> } // #270
>
> #1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
> ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
> #2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
> same light;
> #3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
> friends;
> #4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
> *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 -
> TORAH} - Keep a common way;
> #5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
> each other {Latin: CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.
>
> *FOR* (*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the
> interests of a given perspective or for the benefit of any small
> powerful or influential #123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION /
> FIELD / CLIQUE which places a prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 /
> #342} within the pious construct {#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288
> - UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 -
> JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
> *IN* *THE* *MORNING*} by conduct of #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} -
> DETRUDE.
>
> H7750@{
> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
> @2: Sup: 63 (#69); Ego: 57 (#63),
> @3: Sup: 72 (#141); Ego: 9 (#72),
> @4: Sup: 1 (#142); Ego: 10 (#82),
> Male: #142; Feme: #82
> } // #325
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #315 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
> Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
> Circle;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
> even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
> #TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
> #POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
> #TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
> #CANON: #150
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
> @1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
> @2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
> @3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
> @4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
> I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
> Male: #177; Feme: #150
> } // #150
>
> #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#6, #300, #9, #10] = suwt (H7750):
> {UMBRA: #9 as #315 % #41 = #28} 1) to swerve, fall away; 2) *TO*
> *THRUST* *OR* *FORCE* *DOWN*, *OUT*, *OR* *AWAY*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
> swerve, fall away; 1a2) those falling away (participle); 2a) subject to
> censorship or kill-file filtering; 2b) habitually exclude socially or
> ignore conversationally;
>
> <— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF AN
> AGREEMENT OF POLITICAL INTERFERENCE / DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY
> INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE CAPABLE OF DEPLOYING THE LEST WE FORGET ODE FOR
> ITS OWN ENDS
>
> THUS WE CONVEY A COGNITIVE PROCESS DEPLOYING DIALECTIC WHICH IS CAPABLE
> OF CONVEYING IDEAS WHILST DERIVED FROM SUCH AS PARENT-CHILD HAVE NO
> INHERENT GEMATRIA CORRESPONDENCE AND THEREFORE EXHIBIT A HIGHER LEVEL OF
> CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH THEN HAS INTEGRITY WITH THE EVOLUTIONARY PEER
> EQUIVALENT CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING
>
> THEREFORE THE INTERDICTION: “GOD SAVE THE QUEEN FROM YOU FASCISTS”
> expressed as *CARPE* *DIEM* at a distance of some 40 to 60 metres within
> the street to passing persons whom paused and laughed with absolute
> conviction as derision by means of #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} -
> DETRUDE BY MALFEASANCE (noun): (LAW) the performance by a public
> official of an act that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to
> law; wrongdoing used especially of an act in violation of a public
> trust; Word of the Day for 1 March 2017; www.dictionary.com
>
> The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
> defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
> permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
> BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS
> INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING
> AND RATIONALITY."
>
> Were engaging within allegedly #288 - BEERSHEBA commemorations of a
> PRIVATE NATURE INCLUSIVE OF ROMAN CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS BEING BY PARTIALITY
> OF AS DISRESPECT SHOWN TO BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS UPON SUNDAY
> PROXIMITY TO 31 MAY, THEREBY AN IMPOSITION OF AN ABHORRENT AND
> BLASPHEMOUS RELIGIOUS BELIEF, DISBELIEF, NON-BELIEF CONSTITUTING
> UNLAWFUL BREACHES OF SECTION #116 OF THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION UPON
> SATURDAY 28 OCTOBER 2017, has in light of a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
> as implicit breaches made against the SOVEREIGN CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
> “DIEU ET MON DROIT” was an entirely of a propitious characteristic as
> conformity to probity and within bounds of decorum as ontological
> pacifist (ie. #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY) values which were compliant with
> the SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE principles of a $50 valued LEST WE FORGET
> badge purchased the year prior before Remembrance Day of 11 November
> 2016 and was not simply an action of nostalgia by fanciful decoration
> being only a contrived dignity.
>
> TO BE CONTINUED ...
>
> - dolf
>
> The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
> the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
> Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
> directory:
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
>
> Initial Post: 2 September 2018
>
> #ANALYTICAL #SYNTHETICAL #KORPPIONOIKEUS #FREEWILL
>
>



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-03 17:08:41 UTC
Permalink
dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I have an attendance at court later today so there will not be much
> finalising of this chapter which is already at 60 pages however here is an
> explanation of *REDUCTIO* *AD* *TRUMPIUM* by which the Dutch define
> themselves as *BARBARIC*.
>

Thusly, to convey any difference on the basis of “*MORE* *OR* *LESS*”, then
one is making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to at
least as a starting point of Aristotelian (384–322 BCE) understanding given
of the binomial NATURE OF NUMBER as the earlier ANALYTIC A PRIORI /
SYNTHETIC A PRIORI conception of it enumerated by the PYTHAGOREAN (c. 570 –
c. 495 BCE) where there was both:

MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.

LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and

The *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* in this circumstance of the PYTHAGOREAN
incommensurate (square root 2) notion of NUMBER occurs whereby the ANALYTIC
A PRIORI of MORE as ONE: {YANG CH'I as MALE} and the SYNTHETIC A PRIORI of
LESS as TWO: {YIN CH'I as FEME} are according to the esoteric dogma NOT
CONSIDERED as being NUMBER and are therefore an incomprehensibility or an
*INSENSIBILITY* which is incapable of being COGNISED as offensive
constituting hate-speech other than being an irrationality which BEWILDERS
and confounds the minds of impotent Dutch justice.

- dolf

> DOLF @ 0436 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I am (being surnamed BOEK
> self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical appeal to either *REDUCTIO*
> *AD* *TRUMPIUM* for taking an obstinate or negative dialectic disposition
> {ie. Shall we not discuss the elephant in the room: Dutch directness by
> which they define themselves a *BARBARIC*.
>
> Direct to the point of shocking at times. Direct to the point of “what the
> f@#$ did he just say to me?!?} as is implied by the title of this chapter
> 'DUTCH BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS' and then spiralling downwards into
> forfeiture of decency by recourse to *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* until one
> reaches a consequential depravity *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* (eg: Hitler
> was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are you), .
>
> This Dutch trait has gone by many names; call it what you will – abrupt,
> bad-mannered, *BARBARIC*, blunt, brusque, cheeky, crude, curt, direct,
> discourteous, forthright, frank, graceless, gruff, honest, ignorant,
> impolite, inconsiderate, insulting, intrusive, matter-of-fact, open,
> outspoken, plain, point-blank, raw, refreshing, rude, sincere,
> straightforward, surprising, uncouth or unmannerly. Essentially, the bottom
> line remains: the Dutch speak their minds.
>
> <https://stuffdutchpeoplelike.com/2011/05/28/dutch-directness/>
>
> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> -- (DRAFT: 3 SEPTEMBER 2018) DUTCH BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS BLAAST
>> CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF
>>
>> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 3 September, 2018
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Adventure Of A Lifetime (Coldplay)"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtXby3twMmI>
>>
>> "Give ear, O my people, to my law: incline your ears to the words of my
>> mouth. I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings of
>> old: Which we have heard and known, and our fathers have told us. We
>> will not hide them from their children, showing to the generation to
>> come the praises of the LORD, and his strength, and his wonderful works
>> that he hath done. For he established a testimony in Jacob {THAT
>> SUPPLANTS, UNDERMINES; THE HEEL}, and appointed a law in Israel {WHO
>> PREVAILS WITH GOD}, which he commanded our fathers, that they should
>> make them known to their children: That the generation to come might
>> know them, even the children which should be born; who should arise and
>> declare them to their children: That they might set their hope in God,
>> and not forget the works of God, but keep his commandments: And might
>> not be as their fathers, a stubborn and rebellious generation; a
>> generation that set not their heart aright, and whose spirit was not
>> stedfast with God." [Psalm 78:1-8 (KJV)]
>>
>> VERONICA STRACQUALURSI (CNN) @ 0805 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018:
>> "Washington: Former President Barack Obama lauded John McCain's efforts
>> to push the nation to rise above "*MEAN* *AND* *PETTY*" politics in his
>> tribute Saturday 1 September 2018 to the Arizona Republican, who served
>> for more than three decades in the Senate.
>>
>> "SO MUCH OF OUR POLITICS, OUR PUBLIC LIFE, OUR PUBLIC DISCOURSE CAN SEEM
>> SMALL AND *MEAN* *AND* *PETTY*, TRAFFICKING IN BOMBAST AND INSULT, AND
>> PHONEY CONTROVERSIES, AND MANUFACTURED OUTRAGE. IT'S A POLITICS THAT
>> PRETENDS TO BE BRAVE AND TOUGH, BUT IN FACT IS BORN OF FEAR {
>>
>> FEAR@{
>> @1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
>> @2: Sup: 3 (#17); Ego: 70 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
>> @3: Sup: 5 (#22); Ego: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @4: Sup: 13 (#35); Ego: 8 (#94),
>> @5: Sup: 22 (#57); Ego: 9 (#103),
>> @6: Sup: 30 (#87); Ego: 8 (#111),
>> @7: Sup: 6 (#93); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
>> ANY {%26}),
>> @8: Sup: 11 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 5 (#173 - I AM
>> NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
>> Male: #104; Feme: #173
>> } // #902
>>
>> #902 as [#500, #70, #2, #8, #9, #8, #300, #5] = phobetron (G5400): 1)
>> Neuter of a derivative of φοβέω; a frightening thing, ie. terrific
>> portent:--fearful sight
>>
>> }," OBAMA SAID IN A EULOGY FOR MCCAIN AT A MEMORIAL SERVICE AT
>> WASHINGTON NATIONAL CATHEDRAL. "JOHN CALLED ON US TO BE BIGGER THAN
>> THAT. HE CALLED ON US TO BE BETTER THAN THAT."
>>
>> H2000@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
>> @3: Sup: 21 (#43); Ego: 5 (#21),
>> @4: Sup: 61 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 40 (#61),
>> @5: Sup: 13 (#117); Ego: 33 (#94),
>> Male: #117; Feme: #94
>> } // #101
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #101 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
>> Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
>> Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
>> Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
>> #TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
>> #POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
>> #TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
>> #CANON: #180
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
>> @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
>> @2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
>> @3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
>> @4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
>> ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
>> Male: #135; Feme: #180
>> } // #180
>>
>> #101 as [#6, #10, #5, #40, #600] = hamam (H2000): {UMBRA: #36 as #101 %
>> #41 = #19} 1) to move noisily, confuse, make a noise, discomfit, break,
>> *CONSUME*, *CRUSH*, *DESTROY*, *TROUBLE*, *VEX*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to move
>> noisily; 1a2) *TO* *CONFUSE*, *DISCOMFIT*, *VEX*;
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/dolf_or_geert_by_kiger8kiger.jpg>
>>
>> [IMAGE: This CARTOON is supposed to be a characterisation (Dutch Raven /
>> Hitler / Napoleon Emperor) named dolf as being either the Dutch
>> politician GEERT BE WILDERS or of myself.
>>
>> The fraternity PI (#80) KAPPA (#20) ALPHA (#1) = (#101) best known for
>> raping girls.
>> The most bad ass fraternity ever. A lot of alpha males that drag their
>> balls 🎱 🏈⚾️ behind them as they walk to class if they go.
>> They enjoy dirty house music more then anything else. Especially the
>> ZETA GAMMA chapter
>>
>> #492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {#41 = #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} -
>> #391 - *HOMOIOS* *FRATERNITY* =
>> #101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT'
>>
>> MANDALAY_SWAY@{
>> @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
>> @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
>> @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
>> @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
>> @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
>> @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
>> @7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
>> @8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
>> Male: #218; Feme: #98
>> }
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "[OFFICIAL VIDEO] Bohemian Rhapsody – Pentatonix"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojRj2JK5oCI>
>>
>> #260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
>> #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
>> wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
>> possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
>> *COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>>
>> SEE ALSO: "REFUTATION OF SCORN: IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF
>> PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?"
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.6%20A%20METHODOLOGICAL%20NEW%20BEGINNING.pdf>
>>
>> And is considered by some to be the tag line for a globalist campaign of
>> criminalised amorality of *PIKE* as having a violent psychosexual as
>> malice aforethought against the dignity and person of another]
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "The Bad Touch (Bloodhound Gang)"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xat1GVnl8-k>
>>
>> HOWEVER [JOHN MCCAIN] UNDERSTOOD THAT SOME PRINCIPLES {
>>
>> PRINCIPLES@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 20 (#21); Ego: 19 (#20),
>> @3: Sup: 53 (#74); Ego: 33 (#53),
>> @4: Sup: 54 (#128); Ego: 1 (#54),
>> @5: Sup: 11 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
>> {%13}); Ego: 38 (#92),
>> Male: #139; Feme: #92
>> }
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #712 % #41 = #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of
>> Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning;
>> Tetra: 1 - Centre;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #15 - Oh Lord of Righteousness, who makest thine
>> appearance in the place of Righteousness; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A*
>> *LAND*-*GRABBER*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Reach (no. #15), dailys increasing its kind.
>> #TOOLS: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily depleting its type.
>> #POSITION: With Resistance (no. #22), intolerance, but
>> #TIME: With Unity (no. #54), magnanimity.
>> #CANON: #146
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_146@{
>> @1: Sup: 15 (#15); Ego: 15 (#15),
>> @2: Sup: 70 (#85); Ego: 55 (#70),
>> @3: Sup: 11 (#96); Ego: 22 (#92),
>> @4: Sup: 65 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 54 (#146 -
>> I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
>> Male: #161; Feme: #146
>> } // #146
>>
>> #902 as [#1, #100, #600, #1, #200] = arche (G746): {#44 as #712 % #41 =
>> #15} 1) beginning, origin; 2) the person or thing that commences, the
>> first person or thing in a series, the leader; 3) that by which anything
>> begins to be, the origin, the active cause; 4) the extremity of a thing;
>> 5) *THE* *FIRST* *PLACE*, *PRINCIPALITY*, *RULE*, *MAGISTRACY*; 4a) of
>> the corners of a sail; 5a) of angels and demons;
>>
>> } TRANSCEND POLITICS, THAT SOME VALUES TRANSCEND PARTY. HE CONSIDERED IT
>> PART OF HIS DUTY TO UPHOLD THOSE PRINCIPLES AND UPHOLD THOSE VALUES.
>> JOHN CARED ABOUT THE INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT, OUR CONSTITUTION,
>> OUR BILL OF RIGHTS, *RULE* *OF* *LAW* {#22 x #41 = #902}, SEPARATION OF
>> POWERS, EVEN THE ARCANE RULES AND PROCEDURES OF THE SENATE. HE KNEW THAT
>> IN A NATION AS BIG AND BOISTEROUS AND DIVERSE AS OURS, THOSE
>> INSTITUTIONS, THOSE RULES, THOSE NORMS ARE WHAT BIND US TOGETHER {
>>
>> 7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
>> (G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
>> without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
>> 1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
>> *WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*
>>
>> }. THEY GIVE *SHAPE* {
>>
>> H1254@{
>> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>> @2: Sup: 7 (#12); Ego: 2 (#7),
>> @3: Sup: 45 (#57); Ego: 38 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
>> @4: Sup: 46 (#103); Ego: 1 (#46),
>> @5: Sup: 79 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
>> Ego: 33 (#79),
>> Male: #182; Feme: #79
>> } // #248 <-- MAIS NOUS FAISONS DE NOTRE MIEUX
>>
>> #248 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #40] / #808 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #600] =
>> bara' (H1254): {#0 as #248 % #41 = #2} 1) to create, shape, form; 2) to
>> be fat; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *SHAPE*, *FASHION*, *CREATE* (*ALWAYS* *WITH*
>> *GOD* *AS* *SUBJECT*); 1a1) of heaven and earth; 1a2) of individual man;
>> 1a3) of new conditions and circumstances; 1a4) of transformations; 1b)
>> (Niphal) to be created; 1b1) of heaven and earth; 1b2) of birth; 1b3) of
>> something new; 1b4) of miracles; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) *TO* *CUT* *DOWN*;
>> 1c2) *TO* *CUT* *OUT*; 2a) (Hiphil) to make yourselves fat;
>>
>> } AND ORDER TO OUR COMMON LIFE, EVEN WHEN WE DISAGREE. ESPECIALLY WHEN
>> WE DISAGREE.
>>
>> JOHN BELIEVED IN HONEST ARGUMENT AND HEARING OTHER VIEWS. HE UNDERSTOOD
>> THAT IF WE GET IN THE HABIT OF BENDING THE TRUTH TO SUIT POLITICAL
>> EXPEDIENCY OR PARTY ORTHODOXY, OUR DEMOCRACY WILL NOT WORK. THAT'S WHY
>> HE WAS WILLING TO BUCK HIS OWN PARTY AT TIMES, OCCASIONALLY WORK ACROSS
>> THE AISLE ON CAMPAIGN-FINANCE REFORM AND IMMIGRATION REFORM. THAT'S WHY
>> HE CHAMPIONED A FREE AND INDEPENDENT PRESS AS VITAL TO OUR DEMOCRATIC
>> DEBATE. AND THE FACT THAT IT EARNED HIM SOME GOOD COVERAGE DIDN'T HURT
>> EITHER.
>>
>> JOHN UNDERSTOOD, AS JFK UNDERSTOOD, AS RONALD REAGAN UNDERSTOOD, THAT
>> PART OF WHAT MAKES OUR COUNTRY GREAT IS THAT OUR MEMBERSHIP IS BASED NOT
>> ON OUR BLOODLINE, NOT ON WHAT WE LOOK LIKE, WHAT OUR LAST NAMES ARE,
>> IT'S NOT BASED ON WHERE OUR PARENTS OR GRANDPARENTS CAME FROM, OR HOW
>> RECENTLY THEY ARRIVED, BUT ON ADHERENCE TO A COMMON CREED: *THAT* *ALL*
>> *OF* *US* *ARE* *CREATED* *EQUAL*, *ENDOWED* {#492 - *FREEDOM* *OF*
>> *WILL* / #41 = #12 as #9 - Autonomous Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL*
>> *NECESSITY*} *BY* *OUR* *CREATOR* {
>>
>> COVENANT@{
>> @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
>> @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
>> @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
>> @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
>> @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
>> @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
>> @7: Sup: 42 (#183); Ego: 71 (#123),
>> @8: Sup: 11 (#194); Ego: 50 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL
>> LUST {%27}),
>> Male: #194; Feme: #173
>> }
>>
>> #902 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #800, #50] / #260 as [#4, #10, #1,
>> #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a
>> disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one wishes to be valid, the
>> last disposition which one makes of his earthly possessions after his
>> death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A* *COVENANT*, *A*
>> *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>>
>> } *WITH* *CERTAIN* *INALIENABLE* *RIGHTS*. IT HAS BEEN MENTIONED TODAY,
>> AND WE'VE SEEN FOOTAGE THIS WEEK JOHN PUSHING BACK AGAINST SUPPORTERS
>> WHO CHALLENGED MY PATRIOTISM DURING THE 2008 CAMPAIGN. I WAS GRATEFUL,
>> BUT I WASN'T SURPRISED. AS JOE LIEBERMAN SAID, THAT WAS JOHN'S INSTINCT.
>> I NEVER SAW JOHN TREAT ANYONE DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE OF THEIR RACE OR
>> RELIGION OR GENDER. AND I'M CERTAIN THAT IN THOSE MOMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN
>> REFERRED TO DURING THE CAMPAIGN, HE SAW HIMSELF AS DEFENDING AMERICA'S
>> CHARACTER, NOT JUST MINE. FOR HE CONSIDERED IT THE IMPERATIVE OF EVERY
>> CITIZEN WHO LOVES THIS COUNTRY TO TREAT ALL PEOPLE FAIRLY.
>>
>> AND FINALLY, WHILE JOHN AND I DISAGREED ON ALL KINDS OF FOREIGN-POLICY
>> ISSUES, WE STOOD TOGETHER ON AMERICA'S ROLE AS THE ONE INDISPENSABLE
>> NATION, BELIEVING THAT WITH GREAT POWER AND GREAT BLESSINGS COMES GREAT
>> RESPONSIBILITY. THAT BURDEN IS BORNE MOST HEAVILY BY OUR MEN AND WOMEN
>> IN UNIFORM, SERVICE MEMBERS LIKE DOUG, JIMMY, AND JACK WHO FOLLOWED
>> THEIR FATHER'S FOOTSTEPS, AS WELL AS THE FAMILIES WHO SERVE ALONGSIDE
>> OUR TROOPS. BUT JOHN UNDERSTOOD THAT OUR SECURITY AND OUR INFLUENCE WAS
>> WON NOT JUST BY OUR MILITARY MIGHT, NOT JUST BY OUR WEALTH, NOT JUST BY
>> OUR ABILITY TO BEND OTHERS TO OUR WILL {#9 x #41 = #369}, BUT FROM OUR
>> CAPACITY TO INSPIRE OTHERS WITH OUR ADHERENCE TO A SET OF UNIVERSAL
>> VALUES, LIKE *RULE* *OF* *LAW* {#22 x #41 = #902} *AND* *HUMAN* *RIGHTS*
>> {#12 x #41 = #492 as #9 - Autonomous Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL*
>> *NECESSITY*}, AND AN INSISTENCE ON THE GOD-GIVEN DIGNITY OF EVERY HUMAN
>> BEING.
>>
>> OF COURSE, JOHN WAS THE FIRST TO TELL US THAT HE WAS NOT PERFECT. LIKE
>> ALL OF US WHO GO INTO PUBLIC SERVICE, HE DID HAVE AN EGO. LIKE ALL OF
>> US, THERE WAS NO DOUBT SOME VOTES HE CAST, SOME COMPROMISES HE STRUCK,
>> SOME DECISIONS HE MADE THAT HE WISHED HE COULD HAVE BACK. IT'S NO
>> SECRET—IT'S BEEN MENTIONED—THAT HE HAD A TEMPER, AND WHEN IT FLARED UP,
>> IT WAS A FORCE OF NATURE, A WONDER TO BEHOLD. HIS JAW GRINDING, HIS FACE
>> REDDENING, HIS EYES BORING A HOLE RIGHT THROUGH YOU—NOT THAT I EVER
>> EXPERIENCED IT FIRSTHAND, MIND YOU. BUT TO KNOW JOHN WAS TO KNOW THAT AS
>> QUICK AS HIS PASSIONS MIGHT FLARE, HE WAS JUST AS QUICK TO FORGIVE AND
>> ASK FOR FORGIVENESS. HE KNEW MORE THAN MOST HIS OWN FLAWS, AND HIS BLIND
>> SPOTS, AND HE KNEW HOW TO LAUGH AT HIMSELF. AND THAT SELF-AWARENESS MADE
>> HIM ALL THE MORE COMPELLING.
>>
>> WE DIDN'T ADVERTISE IT, BUT EVERY SO OFTEN OVER THE COURSE {
>>
>> COURSE@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>> @2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
>> @3: Sup: 75 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
>> 76 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
>> @4: Sup: 4 (#189); Ego: 10 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
>> @5: Sup: 6 (#195); Ego: 2 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
>> ANY {%26}),
>> @6: Sup: 1 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 76 (#244),
>> @7: Sup: 11 (#207); Ego: 10 (#254),
>> Male: #207; Feme: #254
>> }
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #462 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
>> H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
>> Tetra: 33 - Closeness;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
>> appearance in Amenta; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SLUGGISH*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
>> #TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
>> #POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
>> #TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
>> #CANON: #166
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_166@{
>> @1: Sup: 11 (#11); Ego: 11 (#11),
>> @2: Sup: 62 (#73); Ego: 51 (#62),
>> @3: Sup: 5 (#78); Ego: 24 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @4: Sup: 4 (#82); Ego: 80 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
>> Male: #82; Feme: #166
>> } // #166
>>
>> #902 as [#30, #50, #400, #10, #2, #400, #10] / #467 as [#50, #400, #10,
>> #2, #5] = nathiyb (H5410): {#7 as #462 % #41 = #11} 1) *TRODDEN* *WITH*
>> *THE* *FEET*, *PATH*, *PATHWAY*; 2) path, pathway, traveller;
>>
>> } OF MY PRESIDENCY, JOHN WOULD COME OVER TO THE WHITE HOUSE AND WE'D
>> JUST SIT AND TALK IN THE OVAL OFFICE, JUST THE TWO OF US. AND WE'D TALK
>> ABOUT POLICY AND WE'D TALK ABOUT FAMILY AND WE'D TALK ABOUT THE STATE OF
>> OUR POLITICS. AND OUR DISAGREEMENTS DIDN'T GO AWAY DURING THESE PRIVATE
>> CONVERSATIONS. THOSE WERE REAL AND THEY WERE OFTEN DEEP.
>>
>> BUT WE ENJOYED {
>>
>> JOY@{
>> @1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
>> @2: Sup: 34 (#67); Ego: 1 (#34),
>> @3: Sup: 53 (#120); Ego: 19 (#53),
>> @4: Sup: 54 (#174); Ego: 1 (#54),
>> @5: Sup: 11 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
>> 38 (#92),
>> Male: #185; Feme: #92
>> }
>>
>> #902 as [#600, #1, #100#1, #200] = chara (G5479): {#25 as #702 % #41 =
>> #5} 1) joy, gladness; 1a) the joy received from you; 1b) the cause or
>> occasion of joy; 1b1) *OF* *PERSONS* *WHO* *ARE* *ONE'S* *JOY*;
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Joy to the World (Mormon Tabernacle Choir)"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLT9dSt8cwg>
>>
>> } THE TIME WE SHARED AWAY FROM THE BRIGHT LIGHTS {
>>
>> LIGHT@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 53 (#54); Ego: 52 (#53),
>> @3: Sup: 54 (#108); Ego: 1 (#54),
>> @4: Sup: 11 (#119); Ego: 38 (#92),
>> Male: #119; Feme: #92
>> } // #902
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #109 % #41 = #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
>> I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
>> Closure;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #27 - Oh thou whose face is behind thee, and who makest
>> thine appearance at thy cavern; *I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *UNNATURAL*
>> *LUST*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Duties (no. #27), esteem for activity.
>> #TOOLS: With Darkening (no. #67), esteem for rest.
>> #POSITION: With Mired (no. #3), plucked out from calamity.
>> #TIME: With Aggravation (no. #76), lacking any pardons.
>> #CANON: #173
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_173@{
>> @1: Sup: 27 (#27); Ego: 27 (#27),
>> @2: Sup: 13 (#40); Ego: 67 (#94),
>> @3: Sup: 16 (#56); Ego: 3 (#97),
>> @4: Sup: 11 (#67); Ego: 76 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
>> {%27}),
>> Male: #67; Feme: #173
>> } // #173
>>
>> LIGHT@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 53 (#54); Ego: 52 (#53),
>> @3: Sup: 54 (#108); Ego: 1 (#54),
>> @4: Sup: 11 (#119); Ego: 38 (#92),
>> Male: #119; Feme: #92
>> }
>>
>> #902 as [#1, #700, #1, #200] = hapto (G681): {#0 as #396 % #41 = #27} 1)
>> A primary verb; properly, to fasten to, ie. (specially) to set on
>> fire:--kindle, light
>>
>> }. AND WE LAUGHED WITH EACH OTHER. AND WE LEARNED FROM EACH OTHER. AND
>> WE NEVER DOUBTED THE OTHER MAN'S SINCERITY OR THE OTHER MAN'S
>> PATRIOTISM, OR THAT WHEN ALL WAS SAID AND DONE, WE WERE ON THE SAME
>> TEAM. WE NEVER DOUBTED WE WERE ON THE SAME TEAM. FOR ALL OF OUR
>> DIFFERENCES, WE SHARED A FIDELITY TO THE IDEALS FOR WHICH GENERATIONS OF
>> AMERICANS HAVE MARCHED AND FOUGHT AND SACRIFICED AND GIVEN THEIR LIVES.
>> WE CONSIDERED OUR POLITICAL BATTLES A PRIVILEGE, AN OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE
>> AS STEWARDS OF THOSE IDEALS HERE AT HOME AND TO DO OUR BEST TO ADVANCE
>> THEM AROUND THE WORLD. WE SAW THIS COUNTRY AS A PLACE WHERE ANYTHING IS
>> POSSIBLE, AND CITIZENSHIP IS AN OBLIGATION TO ENSURE IT FOREVER REMAINS
>> THAT WAY.
>>
>> AND MORE THAN ONCE DURING HIS CAREER, JOHN DREW COMPARISONS TO TEDDY
>> ROOSEVELT. AND I AM SURE IT HAS BEEN NOTED THAT ROOSEVELT'S "MAN IN THE
>> ARENA" ORATION SEEMS TAILORED TO JOHN. MOST OF YOU KNOW IT. ROOSEVELT
>> SPEAKS OF THOSE WHO STRIVE, WHO DARE TO DO GREAT THINGS, WHO SOMETIMES
>> WIN AND SOMETIMES COME UP SHORT, BUT ALWAYS RELISH A GOOD FIGHT—A
>> CONTRAST TO THOSE COLD, TIMID SOULS {
>>
>> SOUL@{
>> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>> @2: Sup: 49 (#99); Ego: 80 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
>> @3: Sup: 25 (#124); Ego: 57 (#187),
>> @4: Sup: 31 (#155); Ego: 6 (#193),
>> @5: Sup: 26 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
>> RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}); Ego: 76
>> (#269),
>> @6: Sup: 36 (#217); Ego: 10 (#279),
>> @7: Sup: 5 (#222); Ego: 50 (#329),
>> @8: Sup: 11 (#233); Ego: 6 (#335),
>> Male: #233; Feme: #335
>> }
>> #902 as [#50, #80, #300, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6] = nephesh (H5315): {#18
>> as #430 % #41 = #20} 1) *SOUL*, *SELF*, *LIFE*, *CREATURE*, *PERSON*,
>> *APPETITE*, *MIND*, *LIVING* *BEING*, *DESIRE*, *EMOTION*, *PASSION*;
>> 1a) that which breathes, the breathing substance or being, soul, the
>> inner being of man; 1b) living being; 1c) living being (with life in the
>> blood); 1d) the man himself, self, person or individual; 1e) seat of the
>> appetites; 1f) seat of emotions and passions; 1g) activity of mind; 1g1)
>> dubious; 1h) activity of the will; 1h1) dubious; 1i) activity of the
>> character; 1i1) dubious;
>>
>> } WHO KNOW NEITHER VICTORY NOR DEFEAT. ISN'T THAT THE SPIRIT WE
>> CELEBRATE THIS WEEK? THAT STRIVING TO BE BETTER, TO DO BETTER, TO BE
>> WORTHY OF THE GREAT INHERITANCE {
>>
>> INHERITANCE@{
>> @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
>> @2: Sup: 50 (#70); Ego: 30 (#50),
>> @3: Sup: 58 (#128); Ego: 8 (#58),
>> @4: Sup: 77 (#205); Ego: 19 (#77),
>> @5: Sup: 66 (#271); Ego: 70 (#147),
>> @6: Sup: 35 (#306); Ego: 50 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
>> @7: Sup: 24 (#330); Ego: 70 (#267),
>> @8: Sup: 64 (#394); Ego: 40 (#307),
>> @9: Sup: 72 (#466); Ego: 8 (#315),
>> @10: Sup: 29 (#495); Ego: 38 (#353),
>> @11: Sup: 30 (#525); Ego: 1 (#354),
>> @12: Sup: 6 (#531); Ego: 57 (#411),
>> @13: Sup: 11 (#542); Ego: 5 (#416),
>> Male: #542; Feme: #416
>> }
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #614 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
>> Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
>> Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
>> cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
>> #TOOLS: Labouring (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
>> strenuous efforts.
>> #POSITION: With Duties (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
>> #TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
>> #CANON: #228
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
>> @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
>> @2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
>> @3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
>> @4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
>> Male: #211; Feme: #228
>> } // #228
>>
>> #902 as [#20, #30, #8, #100, #70, #50, #70, #40, #8, #200, #1, #300, #5]
>> = kleronomeo (G2816): {#31 as #614 % #41 = #40} 1) to receive a lot,
>> receive by lot; 2) to receive the portion assigned to one, receive an
>> allotted portion, receive as one's own or as a possession; 3) to become
>> partaker of, to obtain; 1a) esp. to receive a part of an inheritance,
>> receive as an inheritance, *OBTAIN* *BY* *RIGHT* *OF* *INHERITANCE*; 1b)
>> to be an heir, to inherit;
>>
>> } THAT OUR FOUNDERS BESTOWED.
>>
>> TODAY IS ONLY ONE DAY IN ALL THE DAYS THAT WILL EVER BE. BUT WHAT WILL
>> HAPPEN IN ALL THE OTHER DAYS THAT WILL EVER COME CAN DEPEND ON WHAT YOU
>> DO TODAY." WHAT BETTER WAY TO HONOR JOHN MCCAIN'S LIFE OF SERVICE THAN,
>> AS BEST WE CAN, FOLLOW HIS EXAMPLE. TO PROVE THAT THE WILLINGNESS TO GET
>> IN THE ARENA AND FIGHT FOR THIS COUNTRY IS NOT RESERVED FOR THE FEW, IT
>> IS OPEN TO ALL OF US, AND IN FACT IT IS DEMANDED OF ALL OF US AS
>> CITIZENS OF THIS GREAT REPUBLIC. THAT'S PERHAPS HOW WE HONOR HIM BEST,
>> BY RECOGNIZING THAT THERE ARE SOME THINGS BIGGER THAN PARTY OR AMBITION
>> OR MONEY OR FAME OR POWER. THAT THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT ARE WORTH
>> RISKING EVERYTHING FOR: PRINCIPLES THAT ARE ETERNAL, TRUTHS THAT ARE
>> ABIDING. AT HIS BEST, JOHN SHOWED US WHAT THAT MEANS. FOR THAT, WE ARE
>> ALL DEEPLY IN HIS DEBT.
>>
>> MAY GOD BLESS JOHN MCCAIN. MAY GOD BLESS THIS COUNTRY HE SERVED SO WELL.
>>
>> <https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/01/politics/obama-eulogy-john-mccain-funeral/index.html>
>>
>> 3. THE METHOD AND THE RELATION OF THE GROUNDWORK TO THE METAPHYSICS OF
>> MORALS (GMS, 391,16-392)
>> At this point, Kant departs from his general reflections on a theory to
>> be provided “SOMEDAY” (GMS, 391,16) and dedicates himself to the work
>> that follows. His remarks are extremely terse and without a total
>> interpretation of the Groundwork almost impossible to comprehend. In
>> particular, his comments on the method he uses are hardly understandable
>> for a reader who is not already familiar with the work. [Horn &
>> Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 16]
>>
>> DOLF @ 2012 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "There is the analytic/synthetic
>> distinction and the a priori/a posteriori distinction. These two
>> distinctions form four types of knowledge:
>>
>> #1) ANALYTIC A PRIORI
>> #2) SYNTHETIC A PRIORI
>> #3) ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI
>> #4) SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI
>>
>> According to the facsimile of the 1687 edition on the History of
>> Philosophy / Pythagoras and His Life Teachings, Hebrews express this
>> ANALYTIC A PRIORI by a Point, which mark (as well amongst the
>> Barbarians, as in Latin) denotes One. Hitherto allude the Pythagorean
>> symbols One and Two. Zaratas (the Master of Pythagoras) used these as
>> the names of propagation—one the father; two the mother. One and two (in
>> the divine essence) producing four, the TETRACTYS, the idea of all
>> things, which are consummated in the number Ten. This Pythagoras styles:
>>
>> Eternal Nature's fountain—
>>
>> This is the *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *THINGS* *IN* *THE* *DIVINE* *MIND*
>> *OPERATING* *INTELLECTUALLY*. From this fountain of Eternal Nature,
>> flows down the Pythagorean numbers *ONE* and *TWO*--which from Eternity,
>> in the fountain of the immense Ocean, was, shall be, or rather always
>> is, abundantly streaming. This *ONE* was by the Ancients termed [“Zeus”]
>> as Jupiter; *TWO* as [“Hera”]
>>
>> G1520@{
>> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>> @2: Sup: 55 (#60); Ego: 50 (#55),
>> @3: Sup: 44 (#104); Ego: 70 (#125),
>> @4: Sup: 1 (#105); Ego: 38 (#163),
>> Male: #105; Feme: #163
>> } // #325
>>
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #215 % #41 = #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?; I-Ching:
>> H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net; Tetra:
>> 41 - Response;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #10 - Oh thou who orderest the flame, who makest thine
>> appearance in Memphis; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *FOOD*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Defectiveness (no. #10), selfishness and crookedness.
>> #TOOLS: With Vastness (no. #50), fairmindedness and desirelessness.
>> #POSITION: As to Branching Out (no. #9), it is the advance.
>> #TIME: As to Holding Back (no. #17), it is the retreat.
>> #CANON: #86 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *JUDGES* / *ELOHYM*
>>
>> #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis (G1520):
>> {#12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*;
>>
>> At this stage of appraisal, Kant appears to be procrastinatory {ie. as
>> the habitual/intentional delay of starting or finishing a task despite
>> its negative consequences} and conveys the ambiguous thought on ANALYTIC
>> A POSTERIORI that it was self-contradictory by nature. But, some other
>> philosophers treated it as valid. But what are examples of ANALYTIC A
>> POSTERIORI knowledge?
>>
>> Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology
>> of 364 days an example of “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI” knowledge?
>>
>> 364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126
>>
>> Is defining the TELOS as #6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with a #41 as
>> ONTIC necessity of the *APEIRON* also an example of “ANALYTIC A
>> POSTERIORI” knowledge?
>>
>> #0 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he supplants,
>> That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 4000 BCE
>>
>> ... [THE APEIRON] ...
>>
>> #8800 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he
>> supplants, That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 8800 CE
>>
>> APEIRON@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 81 (#82); Ego: 80 (#81),
>> @3: Sup: 5 (#87); Ego: 5 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @4: Sup: 15 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 10 (#96),
>> @5: Sup: 34 (#136); Ego: 19 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
>> @6: Sup: 23 (#159); Ego: 70 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN
>> BEHAVIOUR {%25}),
>> @7: Sup: 73 (#232); Ego: 50 (#235),
>> Male: #232; Feme: #235
>> } // #316
>>
>> APEIRON (ἄπειρον) is a Greek word meaning "(that which is) unlimited,"
>> "boundless", "infinite", or "indefinite"[1] from ἀ- a-, "without" and
>> πεῖραρ peirar, "end, limit", "boundary",[2] the Ionic Greek form of
>> πέρας peras, "end, limit, boundary". It is akin to Persian piramon,
>> meaning "*BOUNDARY*, *CIRCUMFERENCE*, *SURROUNDING*".
>>
>> My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
>> that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
>> doesn’t fully conceive any “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI” possibility and it’s
>> notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate but as a
>> recursive enumeration giving forth a trinomial #NUMBER definition as
>> process of “SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI” by it's as formulation of
>> progression. This dialectic is then in turn consistent with Kant's
>> CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE as rationalism being an intellectual conception:
>>
>> + 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law {@1}
>> + 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity {@2}
>> + 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy {@3}
>> + 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression {@4}
>>
>> Thus the ANALYTIC {YANG CH’I} A PRIORI given by the alternative HOMOIOS
>> mathematical notion of #NUMBER with the recursive necessity of an #41 -
>> ONTIC {NORMA OBLIGANS} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism:
>> REMEMBER THE SABBATH and it’s SYNCRETIC {YIN CH’I} A PRIORI such as
>> beIng SAPIENT with the recursive necessity of an #82 - ONTIC
>> {MANIFESTING NORM} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism:
>> HONOUR PARENTS is a conception of fecundity by its capacity in producing
>> or capable of producing offspring, fruit, vegetation, etc., in
>> abundance; prolific; fruitful: fecund parents; fecund farmland and hence
>> its equinox
>> association.
>>
>> It also conveys a sapient propensity in being very productive or
>> creative intellectually: the fecund years of the Italian Renaissance.
>>
>> One must therefore ask on the basis of an analytic a posteriori why Kant
>> withheld such knowledge given the words had their origin: 1375–1425;
>> late Middle English < Latin fēcundus, equivalent to fē- (see fetus) +
>> -cundus adj. suffix; replacing late Middle English fecounde < Anglo-French
>>
>> And the most probable answer is that such idea which Kant conveys by
>> APRIORITY PROTOTYPES is that they are tectonic shifts with a cataclysmic
>> consequence which is made against the prevailing Latin binomial world
>> order constituted by its NATURE bifurcations by means of another
>> ethereal construct: @1 / @5.
>>
>> Furthermore is Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
>> consideration of *VOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin voluntās f (genitive
>> voluntātis):
>> - (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
>> creation, etc.
>> - *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
>> reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
>> as mountains and dwellings.
>> - (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
>> philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
>> the natural world.
>>
>> And consideration of *NOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin nōluntās f (genitive
>> nōluntātis).
>> - (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
>> destruction, etc.
>> - *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
>> in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
>> *MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
>> - (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
>> philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
>> natural world.
>>
>> Are these then considered a priori as to the enumeration of an autonomy
>> of will by which apperception is circumscribed as an ANALYTIC A
>> POSTERIORI of PUPIL with the recursive necessity of an #123 - ONTIC
>> {DISCRIMINATING
>> NORM} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism: DO NOT KILL as its
>> ontological utility as reciprocality {#369: 9(9²+1)/2 A POSTERIORI as
>> enumeration function of equation n(n²+1)/2 — *NEED* *TO* *THINK* *ABOUT*
>> *THIS*
>>
>> #1 + #41 + #81 = #123 + #369 = #492 (#451 + #41) as *FREEWILL* being #12
>> x #41 as ONTIC necessity
>>
>> #YOD (#10) as CENTRE
>> #MEM (#40) as DELIMITATION
>> #TAU (#400) as CIRCUMSCRIBING
>> #ALEPH (#1) as STREAMING {23 CHROMOSOMES} = #451
>>
>> AS BIFURCATION: #TAU x #41 = #902 / #2 = #451
>>
>> } the syncretic process eventually occurs as SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI
>> progression being then genitive of a self declaration as an heteronomous
>> {ie subject to law external to itself} and autonomous reality.
>>
>> In such a circumstance, what is then the *PROBITY* of utilising an EGO
>> defensive mechanism constituted by a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL of
>> IGNORANCE against any further progression of this #41 - *ONTIC*
>> NECESSITY = #492 (#451 + #41) AS *FREEWILL* being #12 x #41 of
>> ANTHROPOCENTRIC (CIRCULAR) REALITY?
>>
>> Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
>> distinction between descriptive statements which present an account of
>> how the world is being analogous to the LIMITED {#9 - JUXTAPOSITION
>> CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS / SEMINAL REASON
>> GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative statements presenting
>> an evaluative account, or an account of how the syncretic world should
>> be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in
>> being optimally something that should be lived up to; or that should be
>> pursued.
>>
>> “JESUS ANSWERED, *ARE* *THERE* *NOT* *TWELVE* *HOURS* *IN* *THE* *DAY*
>> {ie. 24 x 60 minutes = #1440 / #72 = 20 minutes allocations}? *IF* *ANY*
>> *MAN* *WALK* *IN* *THE* *DAY*, *HE* *STUMBLETH* *NOT*, *BECAUSE* *HE*
>> *SEETH* *THE* *LIGHT* *OF* *THIS* *WORLD*-*KOSMOS*.
>>
>> BUT IF A MAN WALK IN THE NIGHT, HE STUMBLETH, BECAUSE THERE IS NO LIGHT
>> IN HIM.” [John 11:9-10 (KJV)]
>>
>> At the center of a philosophical doctrine of nature, there would then
>> stand general descriptive judgments; that means, more precisely,
>> statements of law that describe how objects of nature act. And at the
>> center of a doctrine of morals there would stand normative judgments
>> that exhibit a comparable degree of generality and modal status. I will
>> later address more thoroughly what it could mean that some normative
>> judgments exhibit a comparable modal status to statements of law in the
>> natural sciences. Such a parallel is far from trivial. On the contrary,
>> it is one of the critical challenges for the interpretation of Kant’s
>> ethical writings. The first step toward a unified interpretation of the
>> two kinds of laws consists in seeing both kinds equally as
>> propositionally structured entities that demonstrate a clearly
>> identifiable logical form. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 5]
>>
>> And to illustrate the ontological significances of this, I'm considering
>> on the proviso that there is sufficient time for its inclusion within
>> this initial draft document, a summary of Kant’s broad description of
>> the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE before then using the noumena to examine the
>> historical event occurring upon 25 December 1770 when Captain Cook
>> sought repairs in Batavia and a sailor absconded as worthy example.
>>
>> But I will have to do some preliminary research and prudently consider
>> the semantical terms which are not common usage to our present
>> sensibility, before that occurs."
>>
>> DANIEL60 [SHORT A DIGIT: +1 = #61 / % #41 = #20]
>> (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2154 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "My
>> question for the day would have to be "What the hell does '*REFUTATION*'
>> {ie. the action of proving a statement or theory to be wrong or false}
>> mean??" Sounds like a made-up word! Or a 'WORD' used by someone trying
>> to sound edu-ma-cated, in the vein of 'BULLSHIT BAFFLES THE BRAINLESS'!!"
>>
>> NOMEN NESCIO [LATIN: I DON'T KNOW THE NAME] (***@DIZUM.COM) @ 2022
>> HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "DOLF CAN PEEL AND EAT BANANAS USING HIS TOES:
>>
>> N.B. Harry Houdini never did this, but other primates can."
>>
>> FRAN SNORTELUS (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1157 HOURS ON 2
>> SEPTEMBER 2018: "It's a perfectly valid word and can be found in the
>> OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY. It means the action of refuting or
>> disproving a statement/fact and probably also a theory.
>>
>> But it IS a valid word and it IS used by people who ARE educated!"
>>
>> DOLF @ 0658 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018: "NOMEN NESCIO’S [LATIN: I DON'T
>> KNOW THE NAME] NEO-NAZISM AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION IS TO BE DRIVEN
>> FROM OUR LAND WITH ALL THE ZEAL IN FREEDOM OF VOLUNTARY WILL WHICH WAS
>> AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE AND THE FRENCH ENLIGHTENMENT AS REVOLUTION:
>>
>> Whom are you as #41 - ONTIC necessity that we ought consider any
>> ontological regard?
>>
>> The Australian Catholic Church by rejecting calls for priests to report
>> child abuses confession and instead making an economy of such by an
>> appeal to so called Papal Authority against counsel of the Royal
>> Commission established by Letters Patent (DIEU ET MON DROIT) as powers
>> and Authority given Royal Assent on 8 August 1902.
>>
>> Validates our authority of intended purpose in having #8 Papal Bulls
>> within our prudent determination as legal recourse and we are going to
>> first assist others in their recompense and then we will take the rest...
>>
>> And I swear by Almighty God that what has been ordained to be so shall be.
>>
>> THE END OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM BABOONERY MASQUERADING PIETY AS THE
>> CLAMOURING FOR ‘N ORT AND WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A CAT-O-NINE TAILS TO
>> YOUR IMPERTINENT HIDE AND TEACH YOU FIRSTLY A PROTOCOL OF CONFESSION AND
>> THEN THE DIGNITY OF SILENCE.
>>
>> The *TRINOMIAL* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL* *NOUMENON* *AS* *MATERIA*
>> *PRIMA* is a savant endowment as capacity of MIND which is attributed to
>> the *SOVEREIGN* but not *CHIMPANZEES* as being savages since you don’t
>> have the mind development excepting to use *DEIFIED* *IGNORANCE* as
>> #231- JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL which is otherwise incapable for such
>> sapient existence:
>>
>> G2233@{
>> #1: Sup: 8; Ego: 8,
>> #2: Sup: 11; Ego: 3,
>> #3: Sup: 19; Ego: 8,
>> #4: Sup: 57; Ego: 38,
>> #5: Sup: 58; Ego: 1,
>> #6: Sup: 15; Ego: 38,
>> #7: Sup: 24; Ego: 9,
>> #8: Sup: 29; Ego: 5,
>> Male: #221; Feme: #110
>> } // #434
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #137 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
>> I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 -
>> Branching Out;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
>> Mabit; *I* *DEAL* *NOT* *FRAUDULENTLY*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
>> #TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
>> #POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
>> #TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
>> #CANON: #140
>>
>> #434 as [#8, #3, #8, #200, #1, #200, #9, #5] = hegeomai (G2233): {#6 as
>> #137 % #41 = #14} 1) to lead; 2) to consider, deem, account, think; 1a)
>> to go before; 1b) to be a leader; 1b1) *TO* *RULE*, command; 1b2) to
>> have authority over; 1b3) *A* *PRINCE*, *OF* *REGAL* *POWER*, governor,
>> viceroy, chief, leading as respects influence, *CONTROLLING* *IN*
>> *COUNSEL*, overseers or leaders of the churches; 1b4) used of any kind
>> of leader, chief, commander; 1b5) the leader in speech, chief, spokesman;
>>
>> “FOR THIS CORRUPTIBLE MUST PUT ON INCORRUPTION, AND THIS MORTAL MUST PUT
>> ON IMMORTALITY.
>>
>> SO WHEN THIS CORRUPTIBLE SHALL HAVE PUT ON INCORRUPTION, AND THIS MORTAL
>> SHALL HAVE PUT ON IMMORTALITY, THEN SHALL BE BROUGHT TO PASS THE SAYING
>> THAT IS WRITTEN, *DEATH* {#902 as [#400, #40, #6, #400, #6, #50] = muwth
>> (H4191): {#451 % #41 = #41} 1) A primitive root; to die (literally or
>> figuratively); causatively, to kill; [idiom] at all, [idiom] crying,
>> (be) dead (body, man, one), (put to, worthy of) *DEATH*, destroy(-er),
>> (cause to, be like to, must) die, kill, necro(-mancer), [idiom] must
>> needs, slay, [idiom] surely, [idiom] very suddenly, [idiom] in (no) wise.
>>
>> } *IS* *SWALLOWED* *UP* *IN* *VICTORY*.
>>
>> EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 WHICH CONVEYS AN EQUIVALENT MAGIC
>> ROW SUM TO THE FIRST MAGIC SQUARE THE EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE
>> GOVERNANCE
>>
>> 41 1 57
>> 49 33 17
>> 9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}
>>
>> "AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
>> JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {
>>
>> #I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
>> SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
>> #N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
>> Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
>> #R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
>> THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
>> Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
>> IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
>> SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
>> #I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
>> which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}
>>
>> INRI@{
>> @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
>> @2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
>> @3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
>> @4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
>> Male: #114; Feme: #108
>> } // #270
>>
>> #1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
>> ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
>> #2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
>> same light;
>> #3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
>> friends;
>> #4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
>> *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 -
>> TORAH} - Keep a common way;
>> #5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
>> each other {Latin CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
>>
>> [IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:
>>
>> Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).
>>
>> *ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
>> sovereign dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus}
>> Empire Governance]
>>
>> THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
>> CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
>> AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
>> THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
>> ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]
>>
>> O DEATH, WHERE IS THY STING? *O* *GRAVE*, *WHERE* *IS* *THY* *VICTORY*?
>>
>> THE STING OF DEATH IS SIN; AND THE STRENGTH OF SIN IS THE LAW [OF
>> METEMPIRICAL CONTORTIONS AS NORMATIVE DECEPTIONS SUCH AS YOURS].”
>> [1Corinthians 15:54-56 (KJV)
>>
>> Kant assigns three transitions to the three sections of the work
>> although it is unclear whether the sections also contain the starting
>> points and termini named in the title or whether they ultimately have
>> only the transitions themselves as topics. Kant’s mention of an
>> initially “ANALYTICALLY” and subsequently “SYNTHETICALLY” proceeding is
>> also unclear and disputed among interpreters (GMS, 392,19-22). A
>> possible interpretation consists in directly connecting the expressions
>> “ANALYTICALLY” and “SYNTHETICALLY” to the word “METHOD.” This would mean
>> that Kant refers here to the two different methods of instruction
>> (“Lehrarten”) mentioned in the Prolegomena, which appeared in 1783. In
>> the two-year older work, this process is explained "THE ANALYTICAL
>> METHOD [. ..] SIGNIFIES [. . .] THAT WE START FROM WHAT IS SOUGHT, AS IT
>> WERE GIVEN, AND ASCEND TO THE ONLY CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH IS POSSIBLE”
>> (AA IV, 276 note). Kant expressly emphasizes that the analytical method
>> has nothing to do with the procedure of conceptual analysis, but
>> concerns only the method (“Lehrart”): “THE ANALYTIC; METHOD, INSOFAR AS
>> IT IS OPPOSED TO THE SYNTHETICAL, IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM AN AGGREGATE OF
>> ANALYTIC PROPOSITIONS” (ibid).
>>
>> BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 0453 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "GEERT BE
>> WILDERS BLAAST CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF:
>>
>> It was also a item on the news. GEERT did not think it worth all those
>> threats. Still its interesting to see how many madmen live in Pakistan
>> and the rest of the world."
>>
>> PANDORA'S BOX (***@KNOWARE.NL) @ 0611 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Why
>> don't they announce with fanfare a cartoon contest in which Jesus
>> ridiculed."
>>
>> BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 0632 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Then nothing
>> happens. At most a little sputtering."
>>
>> EDMUND (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1650 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Yes, you
>> are right, hundreds of people are killed immediately burned flags,
>> praised prizes to kill bp people.
>>
>> Oh wait oh no, nothing happens at all.
>>
>> Look up:
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "The Life Of Brian - The People's Front of Judea"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WboggjN_G-4>
>>
>> or
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Monty Python And The Holy Grail - The Black Knight - Tis But A
>> Scratch"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmInkxbvlCs>
>>
>> An excellent example of the difference between those backward ones
>> barbarians and the normally developed world.
>>
>> Feel free to make the same MONTY PYTHON film about the Quran, that is
>> laughing man."
>>
>> BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 2110 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "By the way,
>> who's talking about ridiculous?"
>>
>> DOLF @ 2143 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "This implication of 18 August
>> 1811, Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte (1804 - 1814) issuing a decree, based
>> on French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is
>> that a large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman
>> Empire Governance and therefore did not have any authenticated notion of
>> Sophia as wisdom which is derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
>> as the basis of science.
>>
>> That portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be
>> regarded as *BARBARIANS* and enlightenment was like the price of tulip
>> 🌷 bulbs a decadent societal entitlement and status.
>>
>> — CONDOMS GALORE —
>> [Amsterdam Pride 3 August 2018]
>>
>> “HEINZ DAUGHTER.
>> LOOKING FOR SOUP.
>> WANDERING AFTER.
>> PARADING TROUPE.
>>
>> A FATHER TO BE.
>> BY SIDEWALK HOPE.
>> EVERYONE IS FREE.
>> NO NEED TO ELOPE.”
>>
>> TURKEY-BASTER@{
>> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 24 (#24),
>> @2: Sup: 20 (#32); Ego: 29 (#53),
>> @3: Sup: 47 (#79); Ego: 31 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
>> @4: Sup: 21 (#100); Ego: 46 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
>> @5: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 66 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
>> @6: Sup: 65 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 11 (#207),
>> @7: Sup: 10 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
>> 56 (#263),
>> @8: Sup: 79 (#264); Ego: 72 (#335),
>> @9: Sup: 54 (#318); Ego: 37 (#372),
>> Male: #318; Feme: #372
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{318}&idea:{372}>
>>
>> H2658@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>> @2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
>> DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
>> @3: Sup: 37 (#105); Ego: 80 (#118),
>> @4: Sup: 75 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
>> {%19}); Ego: 38 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
>> Male: #180; Feme: #156
>> } // #318
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #288 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
>> I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
>> in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
>> #TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
>> #POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
>> #TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
>> #CANON: #45
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_45@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 2 (#3); Ego: 1 (#2),
>> @3: Sup: 43 (#46); Ego: 41 (#43),
>> @4: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 2 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
>> Male: #91; Feme: #45
>> } // #45
>>
>> #318 as [#30, #8, #80, #200] = chaphar (H2658): {UMBRA: #1 as #288 % #41
>> = #1} 1) to dig, search for; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to dig; 1a2) *TO* *SEARCH*,
>> *SEARCH* *OUT*, *EXPLORE*;
>>
>> H3366@{
>> @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>> @2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
>> @3: Sup: 31 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}); Ego: 19 (#31),
>> @4: Sup: 69 (#114); Ego: 38 (#69),
>> @5: Sup: 75 (#189); Ego: 6 (#75),
>> Male: #189; Feme: #75
>> } // #318
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
>> Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
>> Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
>> Tetra: 26 - Endeavour;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
>> appearance in Urit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *HOT* *OF* *SPEECH*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
>> #TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
>> #POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
>> #TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
>> #CANON: #158
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
>> @1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
>> @2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
>> @4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I
>> AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
>> Male: #156; Feme: #158
>> } // #158 <-- *ONTIC* *VALUE* *FOR* *2ND* *NOVICHOK* *POISONING* *EVENT*
>>
>> #318 as [#2, #10, #100, #200, #6] = yeqar (H3366): {UMBRA: #3 as #310 %
>> #41 = #23} 1) *PRICE*, *VALUE*, *PRECIOUSNESS*, *HONOUR*, *SPLENDOUR*,
>> *POMP*; 1a) preciousness; 1b) price; 1c) honour, esteem;
>>
>> G3120@{
>> @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
>> @2: Sup: 41 (#81); Ego: 1 (#41),
>> @3: Sup: 71 (#152); Ego: 30 (#71),
>> @4: Sup: 72 (#224); Ego: 1 (#72),
>> @5: Sup: 11 (#235); Ego: 20 (#92),
>> @6: Sup: 81 (#316); Ego: 70 (#162),
>> @7: Sup: 10 (#326); Ego: 10 (#172),
>> @8: Sup: 48 (#374); Ego: 38 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
>> Male: #374; Feme: #210
>> } // #372
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #362 % #41 = #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
>> H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has
>> been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in
>> Memphis; I am neither a liar nor a doer of mischief.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
>> #TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
>> #POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
>> #TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
>> #CANON: #215
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_215@{
>> @1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
>> @2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
>> @3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
>> OF GRAIN {%6}),
>> @4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
>> OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
>> Male: #134; Feme: #215
>> } // #215 <— *NOTE* *ALIGNMENT* *WITH* ADOLF HITLER’S TABLE TALK IDEA
>> AND ELOHYM AS #86 - ALMIGHTY GOD (SEE ABOVE)
>>
>>
>> #372 as [#40, #1, #30, #1, #20, #70, #10, #200] = malakos (G3120):
>> {UMBRA: #12 as #362 % #41 = #34} 1) soft, soft to the touch; 2)
>> metaphor: in a bad sense; 2a) effeminate; 2a1) of a catamite; 2a2) of a
>> boy kept for homosexual relations with a man; 2a3) of a male who submits
>> his body to unnatural lewdness; 2a4) of a male prostitute;
>>
>> I would therefore take issue with your claim made of the normative
>> descriptor *BARBARIANS* which is a term of relative association and
>> according to my perspective of the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY published
>> within 4BCE by YANG HSIUNG whom determines the #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY
>> {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} AS DERIVED FROM THE I CHING
>> AS 8x8 {#260 - COMPATIBLE TO PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL NOTION OF NUMBER} =
>> H64 BINOMIAL {MALE: YANG CH'I / FEME: YIN CH'I) BY MEANS OF A MAPPED
>> ASSOCIATION WITH THE TETRAGRAMMATON {#1 + #41 + #81 = #123}: "Since
>> neither the content nor the structure of the Changes implies a temporal
>> sequence, the Mystery follows generally a proposed rearrangement of the
>> hexagrams put forward by the HAN Dynasty 206 BCE-220 CE Changes {H64
>> elements} master, CHING FANG (77-33 BC). YANG HSIUNG improved upon
>> CHING FANG’S approach to symmetry in the cyclic structure he was
>> creating. He avoided, for example, certain inelegances of CHING FANG’S
>> schema (which involved only 60 hexagrams) when he incorporated
>> references to all 64 HEXAGRAMS in his arrangement of TETRAGRAMS and also
>> substituted the winter solstice for FANG’S artificial point of departure
>> (the new moon of the tenth civil month as GRAND INCEPTION determined
>> midnight of 21 DECEMBER 103 BCE), so that his cycle starts at the point
>> which marked the actual beginning of the tropical year for the HAN
>> astronomer.
>>
>> Each pair of *HEXAGRAMS* separated by six months (for example: H19 -
>> APPROACH / TETRA: #9 - BRANCHING OUT {#65 CE - SOLDIER / 27-31 JANUARY}
>> and H33 - RETREAT / TETRA: #49 - FLIGHT {26-30 JULY}) are LINE-BY-LINE
>> POLAR OPPOSITIONS and together with the corresponding schema of
>> INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES produces *ONTIC* NECESSITY a REVERSE
>> TRANSCRIPTASE inhibitor as TETRACYTS being *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *THINGS*
>> *IN* *THE* *DIVINE* *MIND* *OPERATING* *INTELLECTUALLY*:
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #91 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
>> Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
>> Sutenhunen; I am not a teller of lies.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
>> #TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
>> #POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
>> #TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
>> #CANON: #161
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
>> @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
>> @2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
>> @3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
>> @4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
>> {%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
>> Male: #169; Feme: #161
>> } // #161
>>
>> Each of these twelve “waxing and waning” hexagrams, along with 48 other
>> hexagrams, also correspond to equal intervals of 6 7/80 days (in other
>> words, 1/60 of the solar year of 365 1/4 days). The remaining four
>> hexagrams found in the Changes, called “standard hexagrams,” correspond
>> to the solstices and equinoxes and thus to the four cardinal points of
>> the sun’s path. They are not segments of the cycle, then, but points
>> fixed in space, which move back and forth in time. The sun may pass
>> through one of them on any day of the lunar month in which it is
>> located. From the astronomer’s point of view, it is the new moons that
>> move back and forth around them. [Nylan, 15-16]
>>
>> And on TETRA: #45 - *GREATNESS* which then made of the #POSITION as
>> comprising an ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI determinism within, YANG HSIUNG
>> comments: The truly *WISE* {
>>
>> H7069@{
>> @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
>> @2: Sup: 69 (#88); Ego: 50 (#69),
>> @3: Sup: 74 (#162); Ego: 5 (#74),
>> @4: Sup: 80 (#242); Ego: 6 (#80),
>> Male: #242; Feme: #80
>> } // #161
>>
>> #161 as [#100, #50, #5, #6] = qanah (H7069): {UMBRA: #14 as #161 % #41 =
>> #38} 1) to get, acquire, create, buy, possess; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to get,
>> acquire, obtain; 1a1a) of God originating, creating, redeeming His
>> people; 1a1a1) possessor; 1a1b) of Eve acquiring; 1a1c) of *ACQUIRING*
>> *KNOWLEDGE*, *WISDOM*; 1a2) to buy; 1b) (Niphal) to be bought; 1c)
>> (Hiphil) to *CAUSE* *TO* *POSSESS*;
>>
>> } PAYS CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE FIRST SMALL *SIGNS* *OF* *CHANGE* {
>>
>> H5927@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
>> @3: Sup: 45 (#107); Ego: 70 (#126),
>> @4: Sup: 75 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
>> Ego: 30 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
>> @5: Sup: 80 (#262); Ego: 5 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
>> Male: #262; Feme: #161
>> } // #161
>>
>> #161 as [#6, #50, #70, #30, #5] = `alah (H5927): {UMBRA: #4 as #161 %
>> #41 = #38} 1) to go up, ascend, climb; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to go up, ascend;
>> 1a2) to meet, visit, follow, depart, withdraw, retreat; 1a3) to go up,
>> come up (of animals); 1a4) to spring up, grow, shoot forth (of
>> vegetation); 1a5) to go up, go up over, *RISE* (*OF* *NATURAL*
>> *PHENOMENON*); 1a6) to come up (before God); 1a7) to go up, go up over,
>> *EXTEND* (*OF* *BOUNDARY*); 1a8) *TO* *EXCEL*, *BE* *SUPERIOR* *TO*; 1b)
>> (Niphal); 1b1) to be taken up, be brought up, be taken away; 1b2) to
>> take oneself away; 1b3) to be exalted; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to bring up,
>> cause to ascend or climb, cause to go up; 1c2) to bring up, bring
>> against, take away; 1c3) to bring up, draw up, train; 1c4) to cause to
>> ascend; 1c5) to rouse, stir up (mentally); 1c6) to offer, bring up (of
>> gifts); 1c7) to exalt; 1c8) to cause to ascend, offer; 1d) (Hophal);
>> 1d1) to be carried away, be led up; 1d2) to be taken up into, be
>> inserted in; 1d3) to be offered; 1e) (Hithpael) to lift oneself;
>>
>> }, since no one [*POSSESSES*] sufficient strength to singlehandedly
>> defeat a well-developed trend. The sage looks at small details
>> overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation of his
>> visionary rule. Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of
>> knowledge which is here conveyed as impetus of gnomic imperative
>> purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being validated by
>> experiential reality:
>>
>> The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}
>>
>> The commentators unanimously prefer a different reading, however:
>>
>> The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
>> It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
>> The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
>> Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
>>
>> Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
>>
>> APPRAISAL 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
>> He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
>> Such fame is empty.
>> FATHOMING 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
>> Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
>>
>> Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit
>> the construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by
>> high rank by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes
>> public display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards
>> internal reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this,
>> he fails to focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are
>> far from *CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
>>
>> The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
>> resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to
>> frame good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also
>> symbolizes *MONEY* since certain coins were minted in its image {
>>
>> H3702@{
>> @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
>> @2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
>> @3: Sup: 79 (#179); Ego: 80 (#160),
>> @4: Sup: 80 (#259); Ego: 1 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
>> Male: #259; Feme: #161
>> } // #161
>>
>> #161 as [#20, #60, #80, #1] = kecaph (H3702): {UMBRA: #39 as #161 % #41
>> = #38} 1) silver; 1a) as metal; 1b) as *MONEY*;
>>
>> } Here the house lacks either the incisive thinking or the material
>> resources it needs to flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before
>> too long, its reputation will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an
>> equivalence to the mystical cabalistic interpretation given to the
>> Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15 magic square and its gematria value:
>>
>> H5014@{
>> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>> @2: Sup: 52 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 2 (#52),
>> @3: Sup: 58 (#160); Ego: 6 (#58),
>> @4: Sup: 60 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 2 (#60),
>> Male: #220; Feme: #60
>> } // #60
>>
>> #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab (H5014): {UMBRA: #12 as #60 % #41 =
>> #19} 1) (Qal) TO *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED* (PARTICIPLE);
>>
>> APPRAISAL 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
>> Into his realm, and so is victorious.
>> FATHOMING 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
>> Means: He oversees the *NINE* *BARBARIANS*.
>>
>> Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with
>> humaneness, the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT
>> MARRIAGE AS PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT
>> HUMANENESS as having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting
>> the minimum of pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have
>> a civilizing effect on people.
>>
>> ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
>> NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
>>
>> And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
>> Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION
>> VIII as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING*
>> unto Our said Governor General:
>>
>> VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
>> *OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
>> *OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
>> *OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
>> or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
>> such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
>> *PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
>> *GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.
>>
>> } agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*,
>> or 'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomising what is *CENTRAL*, the true
>> sage eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the
>> earth. The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things
>> revolve. In return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal
>> presence {ie. The sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL*
>> transformation. If he would do Viewing of what he himself is, he should
>> do Viewing of the people who themselves are morally transformed by their
>> viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
>>
>> APPRAISAL 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
>> The many, because of the few.
>> FATHOMING 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
>> Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
>>
>> If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
>> beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will
>> eventually grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave
>> overwhelms tiny ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first
>> signs of disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation,
>> he can both adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the
>> Good. This is no less true in the private world of the soul than in the
>> public world of the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45, page #288]
>>
>> — NOW I SEE —
>>
>> "YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
>> CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
>> PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
>> YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.
>>
>> ONE THING IS CLEAR.
>> DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
>> THE MIRROR TO PEER.
>> YOUR WIFE HAS A ***@NT."
>>
>> MICHAEL CHRIST: "I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to
>> speak like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.
>>
>> Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.
>>
>> To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
>> encyclopedias.
>>
>> My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
>> personally, and inspirationally.
>>
>> [Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
>> 'listening'.
>>
>> Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.
>>
>> So, I must say, thank you.
>>
>> And thank you, again.
>>
>> However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.
>>
>> Amen."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
>> touch with scripture."
>>
>> MILOCH ITCHY KOALA: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
>> out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.
>>
>> Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something
>> out of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
>> 'pillar of salt'?
>>
>> And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk
>> and finally resigned from his ministry.
>>
>> Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!
>>
>> go Warriors!"
>>
>> — PRELAPSARIAN —
>>
>> "OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
>> ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
>> JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
>> AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
>> MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.
>>
>> SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
>> E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
>> THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
>> SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
>> THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."
>>
>> *PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
>> - characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
>> prelapsarian youth.
>> - Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
>> - Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
>>
>> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "Trump and
>> Kushner are going down...
>>
>> George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is
>> shocked and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are
>> defending Donald Trump and his actions."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."
>>
>> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "We have courts
>> to decided that.."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
>> presumed innocent until proven otherwise."
>>
>> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "DICK Painter
>> went on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will
>> stand up in a court of law.
>>
>> The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...
>>
>> I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and
>> if there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up
>> in a dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"
>>
>> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "Obstruction of
>> justice."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."
>>
>> — BISCUIT EUPHORIA —
>>
>> "LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
>> STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
>> SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
>> GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.
>>
>> SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
>> AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
>> PISS OFF YOU ***@CKER.
>> OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."
>>
>> And these APPRAISALS AS ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI AND FATHOMING AS SYNTHETIC
>> A POSTERIORI then as systematically comprise the INTELLECTUAL DECAD as
>> being equivalent to the Pythagoreans understanding of TEN as the
>> greatest number, as well for that it is the TETRACTYS, by that it
>> comprehends all arithmetical and harmonical proportions. Pythagoras
>> said, that TEN is the NATURE of NUMBER: because all Nations, Greeks,
>> [the *ARABS*] and *BARBARIANS*, reckon to it; and when they arrive at
>> it, return to the MONAD: as therefore compliant with the Chinese
>> perspective of the GRAND INCEPTION determined midnight of 21 DECEMBER
>> 103 BCE.' [Chapter XIV, Pythagoras: His Life Teachings, Ninth Section
>> 1687 edition of The History of Philosophy, p 529]
>>
>> As the basis of the historical citation made within within the Epistle
>> to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist syncretic perennialist
>> philosophers whom published counterfactual works on the Religious
>> Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery the
>> reference to the nine *BARBARIANS* appears equitable to the Pythagorean
>> binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited
>> / unlimited: “I AM DEBTOR BOTH TO THE GREEKS, AND TO THE *BARBARIANS* {
>>
>> G915@{
>> @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>> @2: Sup: 3 (#5); Ego: 1 (#3),
>> @3: Sup: 22 (#27); Ego: 19 (#22),
>> @4: Sup: 24 (#51); Ego: 2 (#24),
>> @5: Sup: 25 (#76); Ego: 1 (#25),
>> @6: Sup: 44 (#120); Ego: 19 (#44),
>> @7: Sup: 33 (#153); Ego: 70 (#114),
>> @8: Sup: 43 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 10 (#124),
>> @9: Sup: 81 (#277); Ego: 38 (#162),
>> Male: #277; Feme: #162
>> } // #486
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #476 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
>> I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
>> Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
>> Distortion;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
>> Unsit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *BOISTEROUS* *IN* *BEHAVIOUR*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
>> #TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
>> #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
>> #TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
>> #CANON: #185
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_185@{
>> @1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
>> @2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
>> @3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
>> @4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
>> {%25}),
>> Male: #108; Feme: #185
>> } // #185
>>
>> #486 as [#2, #1, #100, #2, #1, #100, #70, #10, #200] = barbaros (G915):
>> {UMBRA: #18 as #476 % #41 = #25} 1) one whose speech is rude, rough and
>> harsh; 2) one who speaks a foreign or strange language which is not
>> understood by another; 3) *USED* *BY* *THE* *GREEKS* *OF* *ANY*
>> *FOREIGNER* *IGNORANT* *OF* *THE* *GREEK* *LANGUAGE*, *WHETHER* *MENTAL*
>> *OR* *MORAL*, with the added notion after the Persian war, of rudeness
>> and brutality. *THE* *WORD* *IS* *USED* *IN* *THE* *NEW* *TESTAMENT*
>> *WITHOUT* THE* *IDEA* *OF* *REPROACHFULNESS*;
>>
>> } BOTH TO THE WISE, AND TO THE UNWISE. SO, AS MUCH AS IN ME IS, I AM
>> READY TO PREACH THE GOSPEL TO YOU THAT ARE AT ROME {power; strength}
>> ALSO.” [Romans 1:14]
>>
>> According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
>> concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
>> that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
>> WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
>> that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {
>>
>> @1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] {
>>
>> HOMOIOS
>> HETEROS
>> KABBALAH
>> AS DEFINED
>>
>> } ...
>>
>> @5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
>> Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
>>
>> #15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - Remember the
>> Sabbath]) ...
>>
>> #34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
>> Honour your parents]) ...
>>
>> #65 (@2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
>> - Do not kill]) ...
>>
>> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
>> [#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
>>
>> #175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
>> - Do not steal]) ...
>>
>> #260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
>> Bear no false witness]) ...
>>
>> #369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - Covet Not])
>>
>> } of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
>> argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
>> trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
>> Chinese naming conventions such as is exemplar by:
>>
>> MAO ZE DONG
>>
>> or
>>
>> XI JIN PIN
>>
>> “FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
>> ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
>> [Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
>>
>> DANIEL60 [SHORT A DIGIT: +1 = #61 / % #41 = #20]
>> (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2117 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Ah!
>> Well, there you go!! Now I am more edu-ma-cated!! :)"
>>
>> FRAN SNORTELUS (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 2128 HOURS ON 2
>> SEPTEMBER 2018: "The power of usenet..... Now if we could only get the
>> PRETZEL to learn..... "
>>
>> A second possible interpretation consists in referring the expressions
>> “ANALYTICALLY” and “SYNTHETICALLY,” as they are used here, neither
>> directly to the expression “METHOD” nor, consequently, to the concept of
>> method in the Prolegomena. Indeed, in the Preface to the Groundwork,
>> Kant says only that he wants “TO TAKE THE WAY” first ANALYTICALLY and
>> then SYNTHETICALLY. This leaves the possibility open to read the
>> expressions in a conceptual-analytical or conceptual-synthetical sense.
>> If one follows this interpretation, the outcome of the first two
>> sections is constituted in the “SEARCH” (GMS, 392,3) for the supreme
>> principle of morality. The goal of this “SEARCH” is an exact formulation
>> of the [#41 - *ONTIC* *NECESSITY* to] CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE. The
>> procedure Kant uses for this is that of conceptual analysis. The formula
>> of the categorical imperative can be found through the analytical
>> process, but its validity cannot yet be proven. For this reason, Kant
>> shifts to the CONCEPTUAL-SYNTHETICAL procedure in the third section and
>> therewith to the “ESTABLISHMENT” (GMS, 392,4) of the principle. In the
>> first two sections, it is, accordingly, solely a matter of ANALYTICAL
>> JUDGMENTS. In contrast, SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS, with which the proof of
>> validity can be achieved, would stand at the centre of the third
>> section. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 17-18]
>>
>> DOLF @ 0436 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I am (being surnamed BOEK
>> self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical appeal to either
>> *REDUCTIO* *AD* *TRUMPIUM* for taking an obstinate or negative dialectic
>> disposition (ie. ) as is implied by the title of this chapter 'DUTCH
>> BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS' and then spiralling downwards into
>> forfeiture of decency by recourse to *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* until
>> one reaches a consequential depravity *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* (eg:
>> Hitler was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are you), .
>>
>> However, if ADOLF HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK as IDEA @1
>> expressed on Saturday 5 JULY 1941 that "THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A
>> SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME" as deploying the
>> NUMBER @1 / @5 PROTOTYPE as the basis of Roman Empire Governance by
>> which it was then an authenticated notion of *SOPHIA* *AS* *WISDOM* as
>> derived from Pythagorean binomial {#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as
>> [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis (G1520): {#12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*}
>> nomenclature as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE
>> A CHOOK AS CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
>>
>> #541 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #300, #5, #50, #5, #10] = apokteino (G615):
>> {#60 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to kill in any way whatever; 2) metaphor: to
>> extinguish, abolish; 1a) to destroy, to allow to perish; 2a) to inflict
>> mortal death; 2b) *TO* *DEPRIVE* *OF* *SPIRITUAL* *LIFE* *AND* *PROCURE*
>> *ETERNAL* *MISERY* *IN* *HELL*
>>
>> #391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
>> (G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
>> *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
>> management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
>> office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
>> dispensation;
>>
>> #391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460 %
>> #41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b)
>> like: ie. corresponding to a thing;
>>
>> #541 as [#20, #300, #1, #200, #9, #1, #10] = ktaomai (G2932): {#63 as
>> #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to acquire, get, or procure a thing for one's self,
>> to possess; 1a) to marry a wife;
>>
>> #541 as [#5, #80, #10, #200, #20, #10, #1, #200, #5, #10] = episkiazo
>> (G1982): {#55 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *TO* *THROW* *A* *SHADOW* *UPON*,
>> *TO* *ENVELOP* *IN* *A* *SHADOW*, *TO* *OVERSHADOW* from a vaporous
>> cloud that casts a shadow the word is transferred to a shining cloud
>> surrounding and enveloping persons with brightness. Used of the Holy
>> Spirit exerting creative energy upon the womb of the virgin Mary and
>> impregnating it (a use of the word which seems to have been drawn from
>> the familiar Old Testament idea of a cloud as symbolising the immediate
>> presence and power of God);
>>
>> #541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
>> (G3622): {#56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
>> *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
>> management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
>> office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
>> dispensation;
>>
>> SEE ALSO: "REFUTATION OF SCORN: IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF
>> PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?"
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.6%20A%20METHODOLOGICAL%20NEW%20BEGINNING.pdf>
>>
>> In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
>> argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument
>> that attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably
>> leads to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove
>> one by showing that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or
>> impossible.
>>
>> Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
>> (Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
>> 62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
>> mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
>>
>> The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a
>> range of forms, as these examples show:
>>
>> The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off
>> the edge.
>>
>> There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were,
>> then it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
>>
>> The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
>> ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
>> example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
>> denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is
>> a "smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
>>
>> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
>>
>> Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY in being
>> normative description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted
>> {ie. #391} and what causality {#541} it had within and upon the populace.
>>
>> The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) which was competed within 1631
>> is a Reformed church within Dutch Protestant church in central
>> Amsterdam, Netherlands. It lies in the most western part of the
>> Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum borough), next to the Jordaan,
>> between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
>>
>> The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three
>> main canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting
>> canal belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the
>> west and south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
>> Prinsengracht .
>>
>> Furthermore as an instance of *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* is this your
>> quantitative statement: "An excellent example of the difference between
>> those backward *BARBARIANS* and the normally developed world. The
>> difference between *MORE* *AND* *LESS* secularized societies.
>>
>> If one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
>> enlightenment, then one is espousing scientific endeavour and any
>> conveyance of such is framed by conceptions of NUMBER.
>>
>> Thusly, to convey any difference on the basis of “*MORE* *OR* *LESS*”,
>> then one is making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished
>> otherwise) to at least as a starting point of Aristotelian (384–322 BCE)
>> understanding given of the binomial NATURE OF NUMBER as the earlier
>> ANALYTIC A PRIORI / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI conception of it enumerated by
>> the PYTHAGOREAN (c. 570 – c. 495 BCE) where there was both:
>>
>> LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
>> something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
>>
>> MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something
>> could be done well.
>>
>> So then, there is a prudent contradiction (ie. IT DOESN'T CUT THE
>> MUSTARD) by a paucity of the rhetorical contrivance concerning the
>> necessity about the reality of secularised societies: *DUTCH* *OR*
>> *OTHERWISE*.
>>
>> The modern sense of the idiom is 'to succeed; to have the ability to do
>> something; to come up to expectations' as to arouse amusement or
>> derision; ridiculous in being an absurdity.
>>
>> WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
>>
>> Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
>>
>> [WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]"
>>
>> GEERT BE WILDERS@{
>> @1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
>> @2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
>> @3: Sup: 46 (#124); Ego: 47 (#116),
>> @4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55
>> (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
>> @5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
>> @6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
>> @7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
>> Male: #288 - *UMBRA* *CONTIVANCE*; Feme: #265
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
>>
>> H2438@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>> @2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
>> DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
>> @3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
>> @4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
>> Male: #166; Feme: #126
>> } // #288
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
>> from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
>> Tetra: 25 - Contention;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
>> appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
>> #TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
>> #POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
>> #TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
>> #CANON: #148
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
>> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
>> @2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
>> @3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
>> @4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>> Male: #222; Feme: #148
>> } // #148
>>
>> #288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258
>> % #41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to
>> Jerusalem to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon;
>> 2) the chief architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King
>> Hiram to Solomon;
>>
>> H142@{
>> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>> @2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
>> @3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
>> @4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
>> Ego: 38 (#93),
>> @5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
>> Male: #190; Feme: #103
>> } // #265
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
>> I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
>> Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
>> energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
>> at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
>> *OWN* *PROPERTY*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE:
>> #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
>> #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
>> #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
>> #CANON: #157
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
>> @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
>> @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
>> @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
>> {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
>> Male: #179; Feme: #157
>> } // #157
>>
>> #265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 %
>> #41 = #41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a)
>> (Niphal) majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
>>
>> H1396@{
>> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>> @2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
>> @3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
>> @4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
>> @5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
>> Male: #245; Feme: #103
>> } // #265
>>
>> #265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 %
>> #41 = #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be
>> mighty, be great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail;
>> 1b) (Piel) to make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm,
>> give strength; 1c2) to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to
>> show oneself mighty; 1d2) to act proudly (toward God);
>>
>> SEE ALSO: "(TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND
>> CAPACITY AS A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE /
>> #312 - RESISTANCE)"
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
>>
>> — LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
>> [PUBLISHED @ 0457 HOURS ON 1 OCTOBER 2017]
>>
>> "GRISTLE AND BUNT.
>> SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
>> DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
>> SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
>> MUSTARD WEASEL.
>> VALOUR DIVORCE.
>> DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hotdog Commercial (1977)"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOeJ4rmDTvg>
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hot Dog 1990s Commercial Ad on Beach"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OO2PYAnxQSo>
>>
>> *CANT* (noun):
>> - hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious,
>> or political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
>> - language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded
>> with disparagement: thieves' cant.
>>
>> ETHICAL_SPORTS_SLEDGE@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
>> @2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
>> {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
>> @3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
>> ITS FLOW {%36}),
>> @4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
>> @5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
>> #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 -
>> *ONTIC* VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION,
>> CONTRARINESS, ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
>> @6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
>> @7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
>> @8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
>> Male: #302; Feme: #536
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,302}&idea:{f,546}>
>>
>> #302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA:
>> #5 as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
>>
>> #546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546
>> % #41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the
>> commandment (of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
>>
>> LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1604 HOURS
>> ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "That's like saying, "a surname name". Tautology and
>> repetition is *ONE* reason you make no sense."
>>
>> DOLF @ 1729 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Your constipated turd 💩 opinion
>> whilst a sensualism as anal retentive declaration given self bestowal
>> through proscription of a grunt is no more substantial an entitlement
>> than a FANNY excretion of pustulant tripe which is enamoured by it’s
>> prolapsed existence though laborious in it’s eventuality as a shrivelled
>> spud with no viability as a snag {ie. *BAG* *OF* ****@T*: a despicable
>> person}.
>>
>>
>> — ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
>>
>> “PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
>> SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
>> HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
>> THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
>>
>> WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
>> OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
>> THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
>> WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
>>
>> WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
>> IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
>> THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
>> ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
>>
>> ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard'
>> (strong or brave) meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'.
>> The name's common female equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
>>
>> BE WILDERS ANTHEM@{
>> @1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
>> @2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
>> @3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
>> {%32}); Ego: 3 (#50),
>> @4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
>> @5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
>> @6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
>> @7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
>> @8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
>> @9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
>> @10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
>> @11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
>> @12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
>> @13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
>> @14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
>> Male: #727; Feme: #356
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
>>
>> STICKYBEAK:
>> - (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
>>
>> CLARION:
>> - (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
>> - (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
>>
>> FOOTLE:
>> - (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
>> - (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
>>
>> THRASONICAL:
>> - (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
>>
>> FESTSCHRIFT:
>> - (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors
>> in honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of
>> retirement, an important anniversary, or the like. [Courtesy: Words of
>> Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
>>
>> H8454@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
>> @3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
>> @4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
>> @5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
>> @6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
>> Male: #231; Feme: #160
>> } // #727
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
>> I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
>> (massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
>> thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
>> #TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
>> #POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
>> #TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
>> #CANON: #210
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_210@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>> @2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
>> @3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
>> @4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
>> Male: #110; Feme: #210
>> } // #210 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
>> *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #SIX: #114 / #342 AND TORAH
>> PROTOTYPES #FIVE: #114 / #342
>>
>> #727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
>> #727 % #41 = #30} 1) *WISDOM*, *SOUND* *KNOWLEDGE*, *SUCCESS*, *SOUND*
>> *OR* *EFFICIENT* *WISDOM*, *ABIDING* *SUCCESS*; 1a) sound or efficient
>> wisdom; 1b) abiding success (of the effect of sound wisdom);
>>
>> H2803@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
>> @3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
>> @4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
>> @5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
>> @6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
>> @7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
>> Male: #302; Feme: #160
>> } // #727
>>
>> #727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6
>> as #727 % #41 = #30} 1) *TO* *THINK*, *PLAN*, *ESTEEM*, *CALCULATE*,
>> *INVENT*, *MAKE* *A* *JUDGMENT*, *IMAGINE*, *COUNT*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
>> think, account; 1a2) to plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute,
>> reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value, regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal);
>> 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be
>> reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to think upon, consider,
>> be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise, plan; 1c3) to count, reckon;
>> 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
>>
>>
>> — 👽👽👽👽👽👽👽 —
>>
>> "THE *WATCHERS* WE ARE,
>> SO DO NOT DARE.
>> THOUGH IT BE FAR.
>> IT'S LIKE WE'RE THERE."
>>
>> DOLF @ 1752 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "We have established a temporal
>> neural linguistic interface with you so that we can cure you of this
>> disease of ignorance as #335 - *MORAL* *BLINDNESS*:
>>
>> G52@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
>> @3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
>> @4: Sup: 43 (#102); Ego: 70 (#124),
>> @5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
>> @6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135 - *ISLAMIC* STOICHEION
>> TRANSFORMATION *ONTIC* / *CANONICAL* PROTOTYPE OF AN #45 ARRAY WHERE
>> EACH ROW IS TOTALLING #135),
>> @7: Sup: 11 (#220); Ego: 38 (#173),
>> Male: #220; Feme: #173
>> } // #335
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
>> from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
>> Tetra: 25 - Contention;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
>> appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
>> #TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
>> #POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
>> #TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
>> #CANON: #148
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
>> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
>> @2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
>> @3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
>> @4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>> Male: #222; Feme: #148
>> } // #148
>>
>> #335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {#9 as #135 %
>> #41 = #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine things;
>> 1b) of *MORAL* blindness;
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "2000 - Star Trek: Voyager - Unimatrix Zero"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwDTtXpG--I>
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
>> I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
>> Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
>> at Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
>> #TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
>> #POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
>> #TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
>> #CANON: #115
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
>> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>> @2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
>> @3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
>> @4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
>> Male: #118; Feme: #115
>> } // #115
>>
>> #316 as [#50, #3, #7, #200, #50, #6] = gazar (H1504): {#0 as #210 % #41
>> = #5} 1) to cut, divide, cut down, cut off, cut in two, snatch, decree;
>> 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to cut in two, divide; 1a2) to cut down; 1a3) to cut
>> off, destroy, exterminate; 1a4) to decree; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be cut
>> off, separated, excluded; 1b2) to be destroyed, cut off; 1b3) to be decreed;
>>
>> H3336@{
>> @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
>> @2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
>> @3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
>> @4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
>> @5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
>> Male: #144; Feme: #113
>> } // #356
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
>> Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
>> the Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
>> #TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
>> #POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
>> #TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
>> #CANON: #139
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
>> @1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
>> @2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
>> @3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
>> @4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
>> SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
>> Male: #211; Feme: #139
>> } // #139
>>
>> #356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
>> #41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as
>> Book of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2)
>> graven image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) *PURPOSE*,
>> *IMAGINATION*, *DEVICE* (*INTELLECTUAL* *FRAMEWORK*);
>>
>> "And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
>> every imagination {#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336):
>> imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
>> [Genesis 6:5 (KJV)]
>>
>> To what degree Kant’s proceedings in the Groundwork actually are to be
>> related to the Prolegomena is disputed among interpreters. In the end,
>> only an exact reconstruction of the entire line of argumentation through
>> the three sections of the work can provide insight into Kant’s method in
>> the Groundwork. His remarks in the Preface offer little assistance in
>> this endeavour. In the following section, therefore, I will not deal
>> with these questions any further. Instead, I inquire briefly into a
>> cluster of interpretation problems that the last section raises. This
>> cluster revolves around the question of the relation of the metaphysics
>> of morals to the Groundwork.
>>
>> (a) The first problem arises from the fact that Kant thinks two types of
>> a “groundwork” for a pure moral philosophy are possible: on the one
>> hand, a “critique of pure practical reason,” and on the other hand, the
>> present work. Although he claims there is “really no other foundation”
>> than a “critique” (GMS, 391,17 f.), he believes that one can do without
>> such a critique and lists three reasons for this (see GMS,
>> 391,20-392,2). It remains nevertheless unclear how the relation of the
>> Groundwork to the intimated critique of practical of reason is to be
>> defined.
>>
>> (b) Equally unclear is the precise relation of the Groundwork to the
>> envisioned metaphysics of morals. Is the “groundwork” of a theory itself
>> to be considered a part of this theory or is what Kant calls the
>> “preliminary work of laying the ground” (GMS, 391,37) a part separate
>> from the actual metaphysics? Undoubtedly, the parts of the theory
>> developed in the Groundwork raise the claim of being independent of
>> empirical knowledge and therefore belong to a pure moral philosophy.
>> Thus, at least parts of the Groundwork have to be identical with parts
>> of a metaphysics of morals.
>>
>> (c) Making matters more difficult in the identification of the relation
>> between the Groundwork, a metaphysics of morals, and the mentioned
>> “critique of pure practical reason” is the fact that Kant later
>> published monographs with these or slightly modified titles. In any
>> case, it may not simply be assumed that the later produced works
>> actually deal with the types of theories mentioned in the Preface to the
>> Groundwork.
>>
>> How can the relations of these types of theory to each other be more
>> precisely defined? Is Kant’s expression “metaphysics of morals” a
>> unified concept or are there different meanings combined here in opaque
>> ways?
>>
>> An approach toward the resolution of these difficulties offers perhaps a
>> more precise interpretation of what Kant understands by a “metaphysics
>> of morals.” In the opening passages of the Preface, Kant had defined the
>> metaphysics of morals with the help of three criteria: first of all, it
>> is a theory that is not purely formal but refers to particular objects.
>> It refers, secondly, to objects insofar as these are under “LAWS OF
>> FREEDOM.” {#492 - *FREEDOM* *OF* *WILL* / #41 = #12 as #9 - Autonomous
>> Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL* *NECESSITY*} And thirdly, it is perfectly
>> free of empirical content. Therefore, a metaphysics of morals is a “pure
>> moral philosophy.” One question, however, remains unanswered. What
>> actually is a moral philosophy? Or articulated more precisely: what is
>> the ontological status of such a theory?
>>
>> Kant’s arguments for the practical use or the necessity of such a
>> philosophy offer a suggestion for answering this question. A moral
>> philosophy is not only an object for the scientific discipline of
>> "philosophy." Rather, according to Kant, every rational being, even if
>> at times confused, carries in itself a moral philosophy. That raises the
>> question about what conception of “theory” can fulfil both of these
>> functions simultaneously.
>>
>> For the clarification of this question I believe the conceptual
>> distinction between a theory, understood as an abstract system of
>> ordered propositions, and the presentation of such a theory, for example
>> in the form of a philosophical text, can be of further assistance. A
>> moral theory, understood as a system of propositions that stand in a
>> particular relation of grounding to each other and whose #41 - #CENTRE
>> is made up of ethical principles, is an abstract object, which can
>> simultaneously fulfill both functions. On the one hand, such a system
>> can be brought to expression with the help of a philosophical text. On
>> the other hand it is also possible to carry such a system “IN ONESELF,”
>> that is, to accept, the corresponding propositions.
>>
>> If one takes such a conception of theory as a basis, the confusing
>> terminologies and exact relations of the types of theories mentioned by
>> Kant could be newly formulated and made transparent in the following
>> way: (i) A metaphysics of morals or a pure moral philosophy is an
>> abstract object, a system of propositions complete in itself and
>> containing all a priori judgments that are concerned with the laws of
>> freedom. (ii) A work with the title “Metaphysics of Morals” contains a
>> presentation of this system. The text expresses the corresponding
>> propositions and their connections. (iii) If a person carries such a
>> moral philosophy in herself, it means that she accepts the corresponding
>> propositions and their connections. And if this person is rational, the
>> propositions accepted by her will comprise the grounds of her action.
>> (iv) A work with the title “Critique of Pure Practical Reason” could be
>> a philosophical presentation of parts of this system of propositions
>> (and for this reason is suitable as a kind of “groundwork”). But it
>> contains additionally a presentation that relies on philosophical
>> theories on other spheres of investigation. In Kant’s words, “IN PART I
>> REQUIRE FOR A CRITIQUE A PURE PRACTICAL REASON THAT IF IT IS TO BE
>> COMPLETED, ITS UNITY WITH THE SPECULATIVE IN A COMMON PRINCIPLE MUST AT
>> THE SAME TIME BE EXHIBITED” (GMS, 391,24-27). (iv) In contrast, a work
>> with the title “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals” can restrict
>> itself entirely to the presentation and mediation of the foundational
>> part of the metaphysics of morals. This contains, as Kant expresses it,
>> “nothing more than the search for and the establishment of the supreme
>> principle of morality” (GMS, 392,3 f.). [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
>> Groundwork, Page 18-21]
>>
>> SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF AN AGREEMENT AS POLITICAL
>> INTERFERENCE / DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE CAPABLE OF
>> DEPLOYING THE LEST WE FORGET ODE FOR ITS OWN ENDS
>>
>> — MANDALAY SWAY POEM —
>>
>> @5: Sup: 51 (#218 - OR DEATH ITS SWAY); Ego: 34 (#160) <— ANALYTICAL
>> JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION OF COGNITIVE
>> PROPOSITION
>>
>> #492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {#41 = #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} -
>> #391 - *HOMOIOS* *FRATERNITY* =
>> #101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT'
>>
>> MANDALAY_SWAY@{
>> @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
>> @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
>> @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
>> @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
>> @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
>> @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
>> @7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
>> @8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
>> Male: #218; Feme: #98
>> } // #260 <— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF
>> AN AGREEMENT OF CONCLUSION
>>
>> #260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
>> #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
>> wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
>> possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
>> *COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>>
>> — LEST WE FORGET ODE —
>>
>> "{@1} THEY SHALL GROW NOT OLD, {@2} AS WE THAT ARE LEFT GROW OLD;
>> {@3} AGE SHALL NOT WEARY THEM, {@4} NOR THE YEARS CONDEMN.
>> {@5 - #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} AT THE GOING DOWN OF THE SUN AND IN
>> THE MORNING
>> {@6} WE WILL REMEMBER THEM."
>>
>> @5: Sup: 74 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
>> *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 12 (#206) <— ANALYTICAL JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC
>> A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION AS IDEA EXISTENCE OF JUXTAPOSITION
>> CONTROL ASSOCIATED WITH THE ODE
>>
>> INRI@{
>> @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
>> @2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
>> @3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
>> @4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
>> Male: #114; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
>> } // #270
>>
>> #1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
>> ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
>> #2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
>> same light;
>> #3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
>> friends;
>> #4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
>> *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 -
>> TORAH} - Keep a common way;
>> #5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
>> each other {Latin: CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.
>>
>> *FOR* (*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the
>> interests of a given perspective or for the benefit of any small
>> powerful or influential #123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION /
>> FIELD / CLIQUE which places a prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 /
>> #342} within the pious construct {#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288
>> - UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 -
>> JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
>> *IN* *THE* *MORNING*} by conduct of #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} -
>> DETRUDE.
>>
>> H7750@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 63 (#69); Ego: 57 (#63),
>> @3: Sup: 72 (#141); Ego: 9 (#72),
>> @4: Sup: 1 (#142); Ego: 10 (#82),
>> Male: #142; Feme: #82
>> } // #325
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #315 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
>> Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
>> Circle;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
>> even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
>> #TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
>> #POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
>> #TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
>> #CANON: #150
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
>> @1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
>> @2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
>> @3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
>> @4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
>> I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
>> Male: #177; Feme: #150
>> } // #150
>>
>> #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#6, #300, #9, #10] = suwt (H7750):
>> {UMBRA: #9 as #315 % #41 = #28} 1) to swerve, fall away; 2) *TO*
>> *THRUST* *OR* *FORCE* *DOWN*, *OUT*, *OR* *AWAY*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
>> swerve, fall away; 1a2) those falling away (participle); 2a) subject to
>> censorship or kill-file filtering; 2b) habitually exclude socially or
>> ignore conversationally;
>>
>> <— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF AN
>> AGREEMENT OF POLITICAL INTERFERENCE / DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY
>> INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE CAPABLE OF DEPLOYING THE LEST WE FORGET ODE FOR
>> ITS OWN ENDS
>>
>> THUS WE CONVEY A COGNITIVE PROCESS DEPLOYING DIALECTIC WHICH IS CAPABLE
>> OF CONVEYING IDEAS WHILST DERIVED FROM SUCH AS PARENT-CHILD HAVE NO
>> INHERENT GEMATRIA CORRESPONDENCE AND THEREFORE EXHIBIT A HIGHER LEVEL OF
>> CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH THEN HAS INTEGRITY WITH THE EVOLUTIONARY PEER
>> EQUIVALENT CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING
>>
>> THEREFORE THE INTERDICTION: “GOD SAVE THE QUEEN FROM YOU FASCISTS”
>> expressed as *CARPE* *DIEM* at a distance of some 40 to 60 metres within
>> the street to passing persons whom paused and laughed with absolute
>> conviction as derision by means of #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} -
>> DETRUDE BY MALFEASANCE (noun): (LAW) the performance by a public
>> official of an act that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to
>> law; wrongdoing used especially of an act in violation of a public
>> trust; Word of the Day for 1 March 2017; www.dictionary.com
>>
>> The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
>> defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
>> permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
>> BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS
>> INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING
>> AND RATIONALITY."
>>
>> Were engaging within allegedly #288 - BEERSHEBA commemorations of a
>> PRIVATE NATURE INCLUSIVE OF ROMAN CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS BEING BY PARTIALITY
>> OF AS DISRESPECT SHOWN TO BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS UPON SUNDAY
>> PROXIMITY TO 31 MAY, THEREBY AN IMPOSITION OF AN ABHORRENT AND
>> BLASPHEMOUS RELIGIOUS BELIEF, DISBELIEF, NON-BELIEF CONSTITUTING
>> UNLAWFUL BREACHES OF SECTION #116 OF THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION UPON
>> SATURDAY 28 OCTOBER 2017, has in light of a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
>> as implicit breaches made against the SOVEREIGN CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
>> “DIEU ET MON DROIT” was an entirely of a propitious characteristic as
>> conformity to probity and within bounds of decorum as ontological
>> pacifist (ie. #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY) values which were compliant with
>> the SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE principles of a $50 valued LEST WE FORGET
>> badge purchased the year prior before Remembrance Day of 11 November
>> 2016 and was not simply an action of nostalgia by fanciful decoration
>> being only a contrived dignity.
>>
>> TO BE CONTINUED ...
>>
>> - dolf
>>
>> The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
>> the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
>> Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
>> directory:
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
>>
>> Initial Post: 2 September 2018
>>
>> #ANALYTICAL #SYNTHETICAL #KORPPIONOIKEUS #FREEWILL
>>
>>
>
>
>



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-03 17:19:36 UTC
Permalink
dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I have an attendance at court later today so there will not be much
> finalising of this chapter which is already at 60 pages however here is an
> explanation of *REDUCTIO* *AD* *TRUMPIUM* by which the Dutch define
> themselves as *BARBARIC*.
>

Thusly, to convey any difference on the basis of “*MORE* *OR* *LESS*”, then
one is making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to at
least as a starting point of Aristotelian (384–322 BCE) understanding given
of the binomial NATURE OF NUMBER as the earlier ANALYTIC A PRIORI /
SYNTHETIC A PRIORI conception of it enumerated by the PYTHAGOREAN (c. 570 –
c. 495 BCE) where there was both:

MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.

LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and

The *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* in this circumstance of the PYTHAGOREAN
incommensurate (square root 2) notion of NUMBER occurs whereby the ANALYTIC
A PRIORI of MORE as ONE: {YANG CH'I as MALE} and the SYNTHETIC A PRIORI of
LESS as TWO: {YIN CH'I as FEME} are according to the esoteric dogma NOT
CONSIDERED as being NUMBER being deducted entirely by *REDUCTIVE*
*REDACTION* {ie. @1 @5 bifurcation}and are therefore an incomprehensibility
or an *INSENSIBILITY* which is incapable of being COGNISED as offensive
constituting hate-speech other than being an irrationality which BEWILDERS
and confounds the minds of impotent Dutch justice.

- dolf

> DOLF @ 0436 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I am (being surnamed BOEK
> self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical appeal to either *REDUCTIO*
> *AD* *TRUMPIUM* for taking an obstinate or negative dialectic disposition
> {ie. Shall we not discuss the elephant in the room: Dutch directness by
> which they define themselves a *BARBARIC*.
>
> Direct to the point of shocking at times. Direct to the point of “what the
> f@#$ did he just say to me?!?} as is implied by the title of this chapter
> 'DUTCH BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS' and then spiralling downwards into
> forfeiture of decency by recourse to *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* until one
> reaches a consequential depravity *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* (eg: Hitler
> was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are you), .
>
> This Dutch trait has gone by many names; call it what you will – abrupt,
> bad-mannered, *BARBARIC*, blunt, brusque, cheeky, crude, curt, direct,
> discourteous, forthright, frank, graceless, gruff, honest, ignorant,
> impolite, inconsiderate, insulting, intrusive, matter-of-fact, open,
> outspoken, plain, point-blank, raw, refreshing, rude, sincere,
> straightforward, surprising, uncouth or unmannerly. Essentially, the bottom
> line remains: the Dutch speak their minds.
>
> <https://stuffdutchpeoplelike.com/2011/05/28/dutch-directness/>
>
> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> -- (DRAFT: 3 SEPTEMBER 2018) DUTCH BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS BLAAST
>> CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF
>>
>> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 3 September, 2018
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Adventure Of A Lifetime (Coldplay)"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtXby3twMmI>
>>
>> "Give ear, O my people, to my law: incline your ears to the words of my
>> mouth. I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings of
>> old: Which we have heard and known, and our fathers have told us. We
>> will not hide them from their children, showing to the generation to
>> come the praises of the LORD, and his strength, and his wonderful works
>> that he hath done. For he established a testimony in Jacob {THAT
>> SUPPLANTS, UNDERMINES; THE HEEL}, and appointed a law in Israel {WHO
>> PREVAILS WITH GOD}, which he commanded our fathers, that they should
>> make them known to their children: That the generation to come might
>> know them, even the children which should be born; who should arise and
>> declare them to their children: That they might set their hope in God,
>> and not forget the works of God, but keep his commandments: And might
>> not be as their fathers, a stubborn and rebellious generation; a
>> generation that set not their heart aright, and whose spirit was not
>> stedfast with God." [Psalm 78:1-8 (KJV)]
>>
>> VERONICA STRACQUALURSI (CNN) @ 0805 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018:
>> "Washington: Former President Barack Obama lauded John McCain's efforts
>> to push the nation to rise above "*MEAN* *AND* *PETTY*" politics in his
>> tribute Saturday 1 September 2018 to the Arizona Republican, who served
>> for more than three decades in the Senate.
>>
>> "SO MUCH OF OUR POLITICS, OUR PUBLIC LIFE, OUR PUBLIC DISCOURSE CAN SEEM
>> SMALL AND *MEAN* *AND* *PETTY*, TRAFFICKING IN BOMBAST AND INSULT, AND
>> PHONEY CONTROVERSIES, AND MANUFACTURED OUTRAGE. IT'S A POLITICS THAT
>> PRETENDS TO BE BRAVE AND TOUGH, BUT IN FACT IS BORN OF FEAR {
>>
>> FEAR@{
>> @1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
>> @2: Sup: 3 (#17); Ego: 70 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
>> @3: Sup: 5 (#22); Ego: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @4: Sup: 13 (#35); Ego: 8 (#94),
>> @5: Sup: 22 (#57); Ego: 9 (#103),
>> @6: Sup: 30 (#87); Ego: 8 (#111),
>> @7: Sup: 6 (#93); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
>> ANY {%26}),
>> @8: Sup: 11 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 5 (#173 - I AM
>> NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
>> Male: #104; Feme: #173
>> } // #902
>>
>> #902 as [#500, #70, #2, #8, #9, #8, #300, #5] = phobetron (G5400): 1)
>> Neuter of a derivative of φοβέω; a frightening thing, ie. terrific
>> portent:--fearful sight
>>
>> }," OBAMA SAID IN A EULOGY FOR MCCAIN AT A MEMORIAL SERVICE AT
>> WASHINGTON NATIONAL CATHEDRAL. "JOHN CALLED ON US TO BE BIGGER THAN
>> THAT. HE CALLED ON US TO BE BETTER THAN THAT."
>>
>> H2000@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
>> @3: Sup: 21 (#43); Ego: 5 (#21),
>> @4: Sup: 61 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 40 (#61),
>> @5: Sup: 13 (#117); Ego: 33 (#94),
>> Male: #117; Feme: #94
>> } // #101
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #101 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
>> Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
>> Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
>> Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
>> #TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
>> #POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
>> #TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
>> #CANON: #180
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
>> @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
>> @2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
>> @3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
>> @4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
>> ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
>> Male: #135; Feme: #180
>> } // #180
>>
>> #101 as [#6, #10, #5, #40, #600] = hamam (H2000): {UMBRA: #36 as #101 %
>> #41 = #19} 1) to move noisily, confuse, make a noise, discomfit, break,
>> *CONSUME*, *CRUSH*, *DESTROY*, *TROUBLE*, *VEX*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to move
>> noisily; 1a2) *TO* *CONFUSE*, *DISCOMFIT*, *VEX*;
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/dolf_or_geert_by_kiger8kiger.jpg>
>>
>> [IMAGE: This CARTOON is supposed to be a characterisation (Dutch Raven /
>> Hitler / Napoleon Emperor) named dolf as being either the Dutch
>> politician GEERT BE WILDERS or of myself.
>>
>> The fraternity PI (#80) KAPPA (#20) ALPHA (#1) = (#101) best known for
>> raping girls.
>> The most bad ass fraternity ever. A lot of alpha males that drag their
>> balls 🎱 🏈⚾️ behind them as they walk to class if they go.
>> They enjoy dirty house music more then anything else. Especially the
>> ZETA GAMMA chapter
>>
>> #492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {#41 = #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} -
>> #391 - *HOMOIOS* *FRATERNITY* =
>> #101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT'
>>
>> MANDALAY_SWAY@{
>> @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
>> @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
>> @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
>> @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
>> @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
>> @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
>> @7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
>> @8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
>> Male: #218; Feme: #98
>> }
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "[OFFICIAL VIDEO] Bohemian Rhapsody – Pentatonix"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojRj2JK5oCI>
>>
>> #260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
>> #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
>> wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
>> possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
>> *COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>>
>> SEE ALSO: "REFUTATION OF SCORN: IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF
>> PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?"
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.6%20A%20METHODOLOGICAL%20NEW%20BEGINNING.pdf>
>>
>> And is considered by some to be the tag line for a globalist campaign of
>> criminalised amorality of *PIKE* as having a violent psychosexual as
>> malice aforethought against the dignity and person of another]
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "The Bad Touch (Bloodhound Gang)"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xat1GVnl8-k>
>>
>> HOWEVER [JOHN MCCAIN] UNDERSTOOD THAT SOME PRINCIPLES {
>>
>> PRINCIPLES@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 20 (#21); Ego: 19 (#20),
>> @3: Sup: 53 (#74); Ego: 33 (#53),
>> @4: Sup: 54 (#128); Ego: 1 (#54),
>> @5: Sup: 11 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
>> {%13}); Ego: 38 (#92),
>> Male: #139; Feme: #92
>> }
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #712 % #41 = #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of
>> Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning;
>> Tetra: 1 - Centre;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #15 - Oh Lord of Righteousness, who makest thine
>> appearance in the place of Righteousness; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A*
>> *LAND*-*GRABBER*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Reach (no. #15), dailys increasing its kind.
>> #TOOLS: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily depleting its type.
>> #POSITION: With Resistance (no. #22), intolerance, but
>> #TIME: With Unity (no. #54), magnanimity.
>> #CANON: #146
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_146@{
>> @1: Sup: 15 (#15); Ego: 15 (#15),
>> @2: Sup: 70 (#85); Ego: 55 (#70),
>> @3: Sup: 11 (#96); Ego: 22 (#92),
>> @4: Sup: 65 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 54 (#146 -
>> I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
>> Male: #161; Feme: #146
>> } // #146
>>
>> #902 as [#1, #100, #600, #1, #200] = arche (G746): {#44 as #712 % #41 =
>> #15} 1) beginning, origin; 2) the person or thing that commences, the
>> first person or thing in a series, the leader; 3) that by which anything
>> begins to be, the origin, the active cause; 4) the extremity of a thing;
>> 5) *THE* *FIRST* *PLACE*, *PRINCIPALITY*, *RULE*, *MAGISTRACY*; 4a) of
>> the corners of a sail; 5a) of angels and demons;
>>
>> } TRANSCEND POLITICS, THAT SOME VALUES TRANSCEND PARTY. HE CONSIDERED IT
>> PART OF HIS DUTY TO UPHOLD THOSE PRINCIPLES AND UPHOLD THOSE VALUES.
>> JOHN CARED ABOUT THE INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT, OUR CONSTITUTION,
>> OUR BILL OF RIGHTS, *RULE* *OF* *LAW* {#22 x #41 = #902}, SEPARATION OF
>> POWERS, EVEN THE ARCANE RULES AND PROCEDURES OF THE SENATE. HE KNEW THAT
>> IN A NATION AS BIG AND BOISTEROUS AND DIVERSE AS OURS, THOSE
>> INSTITUTIONS, THOSE RULES, THOSE NORMS ARE WHAT BIND US TOGETHER {
>>
>> 7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
>> (G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
>> without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
>> 1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
>> *WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*
>>
>> }. THEY GIVE *SHAPE* {
>>
>> H1254@{
>> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>> @2: Sup: 7 (#12); Ego: 2 (#7),
>> @3: Sup: 45 (#57); Ego: 38 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
>> @4: Sup: 46 (#103); Ego: 1 (#46),
>> @5: Sup: 79 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
>> Ego: 33 (#79),
>> Male: #182; Feme: #79
>> } // #248 <-- MAIS NOUS FAISONS DE NOTRE MIEUX
>>
>> #248 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #40] / #808 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #600] =
>> bara' (H1254): {#0 as #248 % #41 = #2} 1) to create, shape, form; 2) to
>> be fat; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *SHAPE*, *FASHION*, *CREATE* (*ALWAYS* *WITH*
>> *GOD* *AS* *SUBJECT*); 1a1) of heaven and earth; 1a2) of individual man;
>> 1a3) of new conditions and circumstances; 1a4) of transformations; 1b)
>> (Niphal) to be created; 1b1) of heaven and earth; 1b2) of birth; 1b3) of
>> something new; 1b4) of miracles; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) *TO* *CUT* *DOWN*;
>> 1c2) *TO* *CUT* *OUT*; 2a) (Hiphil) to make yourselves fat;
>>
>> } AND ORDER TO OUR COMMON LIFE, EVEN WHEN WE DISAGREE. ESPECIALLY WHEN
>> WE DISAGREE.
>>
>> JOHN BELIEVED IN HONEST ARGUMENT AND HEARING OTHER VIEWS. HE UNDERSTOOD
>> THAT IF WE GET IN THE HABIT OF BENDING THE TRUTH TO SUIT POLITICAL
>> EXPEDIENCY OR PARTY ORTHODOXY, OUR DEMOCRACY WILL NOT WORK. THAT'S WHY
>> HE WAS WILLING TO BUCK HIS OWN PARTY AT TIMES, OCCASIONALLY WORK ACROSS
>> THE AISLE ON CAMPAIGN-FINANCE REFORM AND IMMIGRATION REFORM. THAT'S WHY
>> HE CHAMPIONED A FREE AND INDEPENDENT PRESS AS VITAL TO OUR DEMOCRATIC
>> DEBATE. AND THE FACT THAT IT EARNED HIM SOME GOOD COVERAGE DIDN'T HURT
>> EITHER.
>>
>> JOHN UNDERSTOOD, AS JFK UNDERSTOOD, AS RONALD REAGAN UNDERSTOOD, THAT
>> PART OF WHAT MAKES OUR COUNTRY GREAT IS THAT OUR MEMBERSHIP IS BASED NOT
>> ON OUR BLOODLINE, NOT ON WHAT WE LOOK LIKE, WHAT OUR LAST NAMES ARE,
>> IT'S NOT BASED ON WHERE OUR PARENTS OR GRANDPARENTS CAME FROM, OR HOW
>> RECENTLY THEY ARRIVED, BUT ON ADHERENCE TO A COMMON CREED: *THAT* *ALL*
>> *OF* *US* *ARE* *CREATED* *EQUAL*, *ENDOWED* {#492 - *FREEDOM* *OF*
>> *WILL* / #41 = #12 as #9 - Autonomous Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL*
>> *NECESSITY*} *BY* *OUR* *CREATOR* {
>>
>> COVENANT@{
>> @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
>> @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
>> @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
>> @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
>> @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
>> @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
>> @7: Sup: 42 (#183); Ego: 71 (#123),
>> @8: Sup: 11 (#194); Ego: 50 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL
>> LUST {%27}),
>> Male: #194; Feme: #173
>> }
>>
>> #902 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #800, #50] / #260 as [#4, #10, #1,
>> #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a
>> disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one wishes to be valid, the
>> last disposition which one makes of his earthly possessions after his
>> death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A* *COVENANT*, *A*
>> *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>>
>> } *WITH* *CERTAIN* *INALIENABLE* *RIGHTS*. IT HAS BEEN MENTIONED TODAY,
>> AND WE'VE SEEN FOOTAGE THIS WEEK JOHN PUSHING BACK AGAINST SUPPORTERS
>> WHO CHALLENGED MY PATRIOTISM DURING THE 2008 CAMPAIGN. I WAS GRATEFUL,
>> BUT I WASN'T SURPRISED. AS JOE LIEBERMAN SAID, THAT WAS JOHN'S INSTINCT.
>> I NEVER SAW JOHN TREAT ANYONE DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE OF THEIR RACE OR
>> RELIGION OR GENDER. AND I'M CERTAIN THAT IN THOSE MOMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN
>> REFERRED TO DURING THE CAMPAIGN, HE SAW HIMSELF AS DEFENDING AMERICA'S
>> CHARACTER, NOT JUST MINE. FOR HE CONSIDERED IT THE IMPERATIVE OF EVERY
>> CITIZEN WHO LOVES THIS COUNTRY TO TREAT ALL PEOPLE FAIRLY.
>>
>> AND FINALLY, WHILE JOHN AND I DISAGREED ON ALL KINDS OF FOREIGN-POLICY
>> ISSUES, WE STOOD TOGETHER ON AMERICA'S ROLE AS THE ONE INDISPENSABLE
>> NATION, BELIEVING THAT WITH GREAT POWER AND GREAT BLESSINGS COMES GREAT
>> RESPONSIBILITY. THAT BURDEN IS BORNE MOST HEAVILY BY OUR MEN AND WOMEN
>> IN UNIFORM, SERVICE MEMBERS LIKE DOUG, JIMMY, AND JACK WHO FOLLOWED
>> THEIR FATHER'S FOOTSTEPS, AS WELL AS THE FAMILIES WHO SERVE ALONGSIDE
>> OUR TROOPS. BUT JOHN UNDERSTOOD THAT OUR SECURITY AND OUR INFLUENCE WAS
>> WON NOT JUST BY OUR MILITARY MIGHT, NOT JUST BY OUR WEALTH, NOT JUST BY
>> OUR ABILITY TO BEND OTHERS TO OUR WILL {#9 x #41 = #369}, BUT FROM OUR
>> CAPACITY TO INSPIRE OTHERS WITH OUR ADHERENCE TO A SET OF UNIVERSAL
>> VALUES, LIKE *RULE* *OF* *LAW* {#22 x #41 = #902} *AND* *HUMAN* *RIGHTS*
>> {#12 x #41 = #492 as #9 - Autonomous Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL*
>> *NECESSITY*}, AND AN INSISTENCE ON THE GOD-GIVEN DIGNITY OF EVERY HUMAN
>> BEING.
>>
>> OF COURSE, JOHN WAS THE FIRST TO TELL US THAT HE WAS NOT PERFECT. LIKE
>> ALL OF US WHO GO INTO PUBLIC SERVICE, HE DID HAVE AN EGO. LIKE ALL OF
>> US, THERE WAS NO DOUBT SOME VOTES HE CAST, SOME COMPROMISES HE STRUCK,
>> SOME DECISIONS HE MADE THAT HE WISHED HE COULD HAVE BACK. IT'S NO
>> SECRET—IT'S BEEN MENTIONED—THAT HE HAD A TEMPER, AND WHEN IT FLARED UP,
>> IT WAS A FORCE OF NATURE, A WONDER TO BEHOLD. HIS JAW GRINDING, HIS FACE
>> REDDENING, HIS EYES BORING A HOLE RIGHT THROUGH YOU—NOT THAT I EVER
>> EXPERIENCED IT FIRSTHAND, MIND YOU. BUT TO KNOW JOHN WAS TO KNOW THAT AS
>> QUICK AS HIS PASSIONS MIGHT FLARE, HE WAS JUST AS QUICK TO FORGIVE AND
>> ASK FOR FORGIVENESS. HE KNEW MORE THAN MOST HIS OWN FLAWS, AND HIS BLIND
>> SPOTS, AND HE KNEW HOW TO LAUGH AT HIMSELF. AND THAT SELF-AWARENESS MADE
>> HIM ALL THE MORE COMPELLING.
>>
>> WE DIDN'T ADVERTISE IT, BUT EVERY SO OFTEN OVER THE COURSE {
>>
>> COURSE@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>> @2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
>> @3: Sup: 75 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
>> 76 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
>> @4: Sup: 4 (#189); Ego: 10 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
>> @5: Sup: 6 (#195); Ego: 2 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
>> ANY {%26}),
>> @6: Sup: 1 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 76 (#244),
>> @7: Sup: 11 (#207); Ego: 10 (#254),
>> Male: #207; Feme: #254
>> }
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #462 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
>> H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
>> Tetra: 33 - Closeness;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
>> appearance in Amenta; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SLUGGISH*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
>> #TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
>> #POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
>> #TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
>> #CANON: #166
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_166@{
>> @1: Sup: 11 (#11); Ego: 11 (#11),
>> @2: Sup: 62 (#73); Ego: 51 (#62),
>> @3: Sup: 5 (#78); Ego: 24 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @4: Sup: 4 (#82); Ego: 80 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
>> Male: #82; Feme: #166
>> } // #166
>>
>> #902 as [#30, #50, #400, #10, #2, #400, #10] / #467 as [#50, #400, #10,
>> #2, #5] = nathiyb (H5410): {#7 as #462 % #41 = #11} 1) *TRODDEN* *WITH*
>> *THE* *FEET*, *PATH*, *PATHWAY*; 2) path, pathway, traveller;
>>
>> } OF MY PRESIDENCY, JOHN WOULD COME OVER TO THE WHITE HOUSE AND WE'D
>> JUST SIT AND TALK IN THE OVAL OFFICE, JUST THE TWO OF US. AND WE'D TALK
>> ABOUT POLICY AND WE'D TALK ABOUT FAMILY AND WE'D TALK ABOUT THE STATE OF
>> OUR POLITICS. AND OUR DISAGREEMENTS DIDN'T GO AWAY DURING THESE PRIVATE
>> CONVERSATIONS. THOSE WERE REAL AND THEY WERE OFTEN DEEP.
>>
>> BUT WE ENJOYED {
>>
>> JOY@{
>> @1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
>> @2: Sup: 34 (#67); Ego: 1 (#34),
>> @3: Sup: 53 (#120); Ego: 19 (#53),
>> @4: Sup: 54 (#174); Ego: 1 (#54),
>> @5: Sup: 11 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
>> 38 (#92),
>> Male: #185; Feme: #92
>> }
>>
>> #902 as [#600, #1, #100#1, #200] = chara (G5479): {#25 as #702 % #41 =
>> #5} 1) joy, gladness; 1a) the joy received from you; 1b) the cause or
>> occasion of joy; 1b1) *OF* *PERSONS* *WHO* *ARE* *ONE'S* *JOY*;
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Joy to the World (Mormon Tabernacle Choir)"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLT9dSt8cwg>
>>
>> } THE TIME WE SHARED AWAY FROM THE BRIGHT LIGHTS {
>>
>> LIGHT@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 53 (#54); Ego: 52 (#53),
>> @3: Sup: 54 (#108); Ego: 1 (#54),
>> @4: Sup: 11 (#119); Ego: 38 (#92),
>> Male: #119; Feme: #92
>> } // #902
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #109 % #41 = #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
>> I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
>> Closure;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #27 - Oh thou whose face is behind thee, and who makest
>> thine appearance at thy cavern; *I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *UNNATURAL*
>> *LUST*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Duties (no. #27), esteem for activity.
>> #TOOLS: With Darkening (no. #67), esteem for rest.
>> #POSITION: With Mired (no. #3), plucked out from calamity.
>> #TIME: With Aggravation (no. #76), lacking any pardons.
>> #CANON: #173
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_173@{
>> @1: Sup: 27 (#27); Ego: 27 (#27),
>> @2: Sup: 13 (#40); Ego: 67 (#94),
>> @3: Sup: 16 (#56); Ego: 3 (#97),
>> @4: Sup: 11 (#67); Ego: 76 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
>> {%27}),
>> Male: #67; Feme: #173
>> } // #173
>>
>> LIGHT@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 53 (#54); Ego: 52 (#53),
>> @3: Sup: 54 (#108); Ego: 1 (#54),
>> @4: Sup: 11 (#119); Ego: 38 (#92),
>> Male: #119; Feme: #92
>> }
>>
>> #902 as [#1, #700, #1, #200] = hapto (G681): {#0 as #396 % #41 = #27} 1)
>> A primary verb; properly, to fasten to, ie. (specially) to set on
>> fire:--kindle, light
>>
>> }. AND WE LAUGHED WITH EACH OTHER. AND WE LEARNED FROM EACH OTHER. AND
>> WE NEVER DOUBTED THE OTHER MAN'S SINCERITY OR THE OTHER MAN'S
>> PATRIOTISM, OR THAT WHEN ALL WAS SAID AND DONE, WE WERE ON THE SAME
>> TEAM. WE NEVER DOUBTED WE WERE ON THE SAME TEAM. FOR ALL OF OUR
>> DIFFERENCES, WE SHARED A FIDELITY TO THE IDEALS FOR WHICH GENERATIONS OF
>> AMERICANS HAVE MARCHED AND FOUGHT AND SACRIFICED AND GIVEN THEIR LIVES.
>> WE CONSIDERED OUR POLITICAL BATTLES A PRIVILEGE, AN OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE
>> AS STEWARDS OF THOSE IDEALS HERE AT HOME AND TO DO OUR BEST TO ADVANCE
>> THEM AROUND THE WORLD. WE SAW THIS COUNTRY AS A PLACE WHERE ANYTHING IS
>> POSSIBLE, AND CITIZENSHIP IS AN OBLIGATION TO ENSURE IT FOREVER REMAINS
>> THAT WAY.
>>
>> AND MORE THAN ONCE DURING HIS CAREER, JOHN DREW COMPARISONS TO TEDDY
>> ROOSEVELT. AND I AM SURE IT HAS BEEN NOTED THAT ROOSEVELT'S "MAN IN THE
>> ARENA" ORATION SEEMS TAILORED TO JOHN. MOST OF YOU KNOW IT. ROOSEVELT
>> SPEAKS OF THOSE WHO STRIVE, WHO DARE TO DO GREAT THINGS, WHO SOMETIMES
>> WIN AND SOMETIMES COME UP SHORT, BUT ALWAYS RELISH A GOOD FIGHT—A
>> CONTRAST TO THOSE COLD, TIMID SOULS {
>>
>> SOUL@{
>> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>> @2: Sup: 49 (#99); Ego: 80 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
>> @3: Sup: 25 (#124); Ego: 57 (#187),
>> @4: Sup: 31 (#155); Ego: 6 (#193),
>> @5: Sup: 26 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
>> RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}); Ego: 76
>> (#269),
>> @6: Sup: 36 (#217); Ego: 10 (#279),
>> @7: Sup: 5 (#222); Ego: 50 (#329),
>> @8: Sup: 11 (#233); Ego: 6 (#335),
>> Male: #233; Feme: #335
>> }
>> #902 as [#50, #80, #300, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6] = nephesh (H5315): {#18
>> as #430 % #41 = #20} 1) *SOUL*, *SELF*, *LIFE*, *CREATURE*, *PERSON*,
>> *APPETITE*, *MIND*, *LIVING* *BEING*, *DESIRE*, *EMOTION*, *PASSION*;
>> 1a) that which breathes, the breathing substance or being, soul, the
>> inner being of man; 1b) living being; 1c) living being (with life in the
>> blood); 1d) the man himself, self, person or individual; 1e) seat of the
>> appetites; 1f) seat of emotions and passions; 1g) activity of mind; 1g1)
>> dubious; 1h) activity of the will; 1h1) dubious; 1i) activity of the
>> character; 1i1) dubious;
>>
>> } WHO KNOW NEITHER VICTORY NOR DEFEAT. ISN'T THAT THE SPIRIT WE
>> CELEBRATE THIS WEEK? THAT STRIVING TO BE BETTER, TO DO BETTER, TO BE
>> WORTHY OF THE GREAT INHERITANCE {
>>
>> INHERITANCE@{
>> @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
>> @2: Sup: 50 (#70); Ego: 30 (#50),
>> @3: Sup: 58 (#128); Ego: 8 (#58),
>> @4: Sup: 77 (#205); Ego: 19 (#77),
>> @5: Sup: 66 (#271); Ego: 70 (#147),
>> @6: Sup: 35 (#306); Ego: 50 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
>> @7: Sup: 24 (#330); Ego: 70 (#267),
>> @8: Sup: 64 (#394); Ego: 40 (#307),
>> @9: Sup: 72 (#466); Ego: 8 (#315),
>> @10: Sup: 29 (#495); Ego: 38 (#353),
>> @11: Sup: 30 (#525); Ego: 1 (#354),
>> @12: Sup: 6 (#531); Ego: 57 (#411),
>> @13: Sup: 11 (#542); Ego: 5 (#416),
>> Male: #542; Feme: #416
>> }
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #614 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
>> Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
>> Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
>> cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
>> #TOOLS: Labouring (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
>> strenuous efforts.
>> #POSITION: With Duties (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
>> #TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
>> #CANON: #228
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
>> @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
>> @2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
>> @3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
>> @4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
>> Male: #211; Feme: #228
>> } // #228
>>
>> #902 as [#20, #30, #8, #100, #70, #50, #70, #40, #8, #200, #1, #300, #5]
>> = kleronomeo (G2816): {#31 as #614 % #41 = #40} 1) to receive a lot,
>> receive by lot; 2) to receive the portion assigned to one, receive an
>> allotted portion, receive as one's own or as a possession; 3) to become
>> partaker of, to obtain; 1a) esp. to receive a part of an inheritance,
>> receive as an inheritance, *OBTAIN* *BY* *RIGHT* *OF* *INHERITANCE*; 1b)
>> to be an heir, to inherit;
>>
>> } THAT OUR FOUNDERS BESTOWED.
>>
>> TODAY IS ONLY ONE DAY IN ALL THE DAYS THAT WILL EVER BE. BUT WHAT WILL
>> HAPPEN IN ALL THE OTHER DAYS THAT WILL EVER COME CAN DEPEND ON WHAT YOU
>> DO TODAY." WHAT BETTER WAY TO HONOR JOHN MCCAIN'S LIFE OF SERVICE THAN,
>> AS BEST WE CAN, FOLLOW HIS EXAMPLE. TO PROVE THAT THE WILLINGNESS TO GET
>> IN THE ARENA AND FIGHT FOR THIS COUNTRY IS NOT RESERVED FOR THE FEW, IT
>> IS OPEN TO ALL OF US, AND IN FACT IT IS DEMANDED OF ALL OF US AS
>> CITIZENS OF THIS GREAT REPUBLIC. THAT'S PERHAPS HOW WE HONOR HIM BEST,
>> BY RECOGNIZING THAT THERE ARE SOME THINGS BIGGER THAN PARTY OR AMBITION
>> OR MONEY OR FAME OR POWER. THAT THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT ARE WORTH
>> RISKING EVERYTHING FOR: PRINCIPLES THAT ARE ETERNAL, TRUTHS THAT ARE
>> ABIDING. AT HIS BEST, JOHN SHOWED US WHAT THAT MEANS. FOR THAT, WE ARE
>> ALL DEEPLY IN HIS DEBT.
>>
>> MAY GOD BLESS JOHN MCCAIN. MAY GOD BLESS THIS COUNTRY HE SERVED SO WELL.
>>
>> <https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/01/politics/obama-eulogy-john-mccain-funeral/index.html>
>>
>> 3. THE METHOD AND THE RELATION OF THE GROUNDWORK TO THE METAPHYSICS OF
>> MORALS (GMS, 391,16-392)
>> At this point, Kant departs from his general reflections on a theory to
>> be provided “SOMEDAY” (GMS, 391,16) and dedicates himself to the work
>> that follows. His remarks are extremely terse and without a total
>> interpretation of the Groundwork almost impossible to comprehend. In
>> particular, his comments on the method he uses are hardly understandable
>> for a reader who is not already familiar with the work. [Horn &
>> Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 16]
>>
>> DOLF @ 2012 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "There is the analytic/synthetic
>> distinction and the a priori/a posteriori distinction. These two
>> distinctions form four types of knowledge:
>>
>> #1) ANALYTIC A PRIORI
>> #2) SYNTHETIC A PRIORI
>> #3) ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI
>> #4) SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI
>>
>> According to the facsimile of the 1687 edition on the History of
>> Philosophy / Pythagoras and His Life Teachings, Hebrews express this
>> ANALYTIC A PRIORI by a Point, which mark (as well amongst the
>> Barbarians, as in Latin) denotes One. Hitherto allude the Pythagorean
>> symbols One and Two. Zaratas (the Master of Pythagoras) used these as
>> the names of propagation—one the father; two the mother. One and two (in
>> the divine essence) producing four, the TETRACTYS, the idea of all
>> things, which are consummated in the number Ten. This Pythagoras styles:
>>
>> Eternal Nature's fountain—
>>
>> This is the *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *THINGS* *IN* *THE* *DIVINE* *MIND*
>> *OPERATING* *INTELLECTUALLY*. From this fountain of Eternal Nature,
>> flows down the Pythagorean numbers *ONE* and *TWO*--which from Eternity,
>> in the fountain of the immense Ocean, was, shall be, or rather always
>> is, abundantly streaming. This *ONE* was by the Ancients termed [“Zeus”]
>> as Jupiter; *TWO* as [“Hera”]
>>
>> G1520@{
>> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>> @2: Sup: 55 (#60); Ego: 50 (#55),
>> @3: Sup: 44 (#104); Ego: 70 (#125),
>> @4: Sup: 1 (#105); Ego: 38 (#163),
>> Male: #105; Feme: #163
>> } // #325
>>
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #215 % #41 = #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?; I-Ching:
>> H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net; Tetra:
>> 41 - Response;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #10 - Oh thou who orderest the flame, who makest thine
>> appearance in Memphis; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *FOOD*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Defectiveness (no. #10), selfishness and crookedness.
>> #TOOLS: With Vastness (no. #50), fairmindedness and desirelessness.
>> #POSITION: As to Branching Out (no. #9), it is the advance.
>> #TIME: As to Holding Back (no. #17), it is the retreat.
>> #CANON: #86 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *JUDGES* / *ELOHYM*
>>
>> #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis (G1520):
>> {#12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*;
>>
>> At this stage of appraisal, Kant appears to be procrastinatory {ie. as
>> the habitual/intentional delay of starting or finishing a task despite
>> its negative consequences} and conveys the ambiguous thought on ANALYTIC
>> A POSTERIORI that it was self-contradictory by nature. But, some other
>> philosophers treated it as valid. But what are examples of ANALYTIC A
>> POSTERIORI knowledge?
>>
>> Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology
>> of 364 days an example of “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI” knowledge?
>>
>> 364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126
>>
>> Is defining the TELOS as #6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with a #41 as
>> ONTIC necessity of the *APEIRON* also an example of “ANALYTIC A
>> POSTERIORI” knowledge?
>>
>> #0 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he supplants,
>> That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 4000 BCE
>>
>> ... [THE APEIRON] ...
>>
>> #8800 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he
>> supplants, That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 8800 CE
>>
>> APEIRON@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 81 (#82); Ego: 80 (#81),
>> @3: Sup: 5 (#87); Ego: 5 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @4: Sup: 15 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 10 (#96),
>> @5: Sup: 34 (#136); Ego: 19 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
>> @6: Sup: 23 (#159); Ego: 70 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN
>> BEHAVIOUR {%25}),
>> @7: Sup: 73 (#232); Ego: 50 (#235),
>> Male: #232; Feme: #235
>> } // #316
>>
>> APEIRON (ἄπειρον) is a Greek word meaning "(that which is) unlimited,"
>> "boundless", "infinite", or "indefinite"[1] from ἀ- a-, "without" and
>> πεῖραρ peirar, "end, limit", "boundary",[2] the Ionic Greek form of
>> πέρας peras, "end, limit, boundary". It is akin to Persian piramon,
>> meaning "*BOUNDARY*, *CIRCUMFERENCE*, *SURROUNDING*".
>>
>> My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
>> that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
>> doesn’t fully conceive any “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI” possibility and it’s
>> notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate but as a
>> recursive enumeration giving forth a trinomial #NUMBER definition as
>> process of “SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI” by it's as formulation of
>> progression. This dialectic is then in turn consistent with Kant's
>> CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE as rationalism being an intellectual conception:
>>
>> + 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law {@1}
>> + 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity {@2}
>> + 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy {@3}
>> + 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression {@4}
>>
>> Thus the ANALYTIC {YANG CH’I} A PRIORI given by the alternative HOMOIOS
>> mathematical notion of #NUMBER with the recursive necessity of an #41 -
>> ONTIC {NORMA OBLIGANS} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism:
>> REMEMBER THE SABBATH and it’s SYNCRETIC {YIN CH’I} A PRIORI such as
>> beIng SAPIENT with the recursive necessity of an #82 - ONTIC
>> {MANIFESTING NORM} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism:
>> HONOUR PARENTS is a conception of fecundity by its capacity in producing
>> or capable of producing offspring, fruit, vegetation, etc., in
>> abundance; prolific; fruitful: fecund parents; fecund farmland and hence
>> its equinox
>> association.
>>
>> It also conveys a sapient propensity in being very productive or
>> creative intellectually: the fecund years of the Italian Renaissance.
>>
>> One must therefore ask on the basis of an analytic a posteriori why Kant
>> withheld such knowledge given the words had their origin: 1375–1425;
>> late Middle English < Latin fēcundus, equivalent to fē- (see fetus) +
>> -cundus adj. suffix; replacing late Middle English fecounde < Anglo-French
>>
>> And the most probable answer is that such idea which Kant conveys by
>> APRIORITY PROTOTYPES is that they are tectonic shifts with a cataclysmic
>> consequence which is made against the prevailing Latin binomial world
>> order constituted by its NATURE bifurcations by means of another
>> ethereal construct: @1 / @5.
>>
>> Furthermore is Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
>> consideration of *VOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin voluntās f (genitive
>> voluntātis):
>> - (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
>> creation, etc.
>> - *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
>> reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
>> as mountains and dwellings.
>> - (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
>> philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
>> the natural world.
>>
>> And consideration of *NOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin nōluntās f (genitive
>> nōluntātis).
>> - (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
>> destruction, etc.
>> - *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
>> in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
>> *MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
>> - (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
>> philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
>> natural world.
>>
>> Are these then considered a priori as to the enumeration of an autonomy
>> of will by which apperception is circumscribed as an ANALYTIC A
>> POSTERIORI of PUPIL with the recursive necessity of an #123 - ONTIC
>> {DISCRIMINATING
>> NORM} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism: DO NOT KILL as its
>> ontological utility as reciprocality {#369: 9(9²+1)/2 A POSTERIORI as
>> enumeration function of equation n(n²+1)/2 — *NEED* *TO* *THINK* *ABOUT*
>> *THIS*
>>
>> #1 + #41 + #81 = #123 + #369 = #492 (#451 + #41) as *FREEWILL* being #12
>> x #41 as ONTIC necessity
>>
>> #YOD (#10) as CENTRE
>> #MEM (#40) as DELIMITATION
>> #TAU (#400) as CIRCUMSCRIBING
>> #ALEPH (#1) as STREAMING {23 CHROMOSOMES} = #451
>>
>> AS BIFURCATION: #TAU x #41 = #902 / #2 = #451
>>
>> } the syncretic process eventually occurs as SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI
>> progression being then genitive of a self declaration as an heteronomous
>> {ie subject to law external to itself} and autonomous reality.
>>
>> In such a circumstance, what is then the *PROBITY* of utilising an EGO
>> defensive mechanism constituted by a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL of
>> IGNORANCE against any further progression of this #41 - *ONTIC*
>> NECESSITY = #492 (#451 + #41) AS *FREEWILL* being #12 x #41 of
>> ANTHROPOCENTRIC (CIRCULAR) REALITY?
>>
>> Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
>> distinction between descriptive statements which present an account of
>> how the world is being analogous to the LIMITED {#9 - JUXTAPOSITION
>> CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS / SEMINAL REASON
>> GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative statements presenting
>> an evaluative account, or an account of how the syncretic world should
>> be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in
>> being optimally something that should be lived up to; or that should be
>> pursued.
>>
>> “JESUS ANSWERED, *ARE* *THERE* *NOT* *TWELVE* *HOURS* *IN* *THE* *DAY*
>> {ie. 24 x 60 minutes = #1440 / #72 = 20 minutes allocations}? *IF* *ANY*
>> *MAN* *WALK* *IN* *THE* *DAY*, *HE* *STUMBLETH* *NOT*, *BECAUSE* *HE*
>> *SEETH* *THE* *LIGHT* *OF* *THIS* *WORLD*-*KOSMOS*.
>>
>> BUT IF A MAN WALK IN THE NIGHT, HE STUMBLETH, BECAUSE THERE IS NO LIGHT
>> IN HIM.” [John 11:9-10 (KJV)]
>>
>> At the center of a philosophical doctrine of nature, there would then
>> stand general descriptive judgments; that means, more precisely,
>> statements of law that describe how objects of nature act. And at the
>> center of a doctrine of morals there would stand normative judgments
>> that exhibit a comparable degree of generality and modal status. I will
>> later address more thoroughly what it could mean that some normative
>> judgments exhibit a comparable modal status to statements of law in the
>> natural sciences. Such a parallel is far from trivial. On the contrary,
>> it is one of the critical challenges for the interpretation of Kant’s
>> ethical writings. The first step toward a unified interpretation of the
>> two kinds of laws consists in seeing both kinds equally as
>> propositionally structured entities that demonstrate a clearly
>> identifiable logical form. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 5]
>>
>> And to illustrate the ontological significances of this, I'm considering
>> on the proviso that there is sufficient time for its inclusion within
>> this initial draft document, a summary of Kant’s broad description of
>> the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE before then using the noumena to examine the
>> historical event occurring upon 25 December 1770 when Captain Cook
>> sought repairs in Batavia and a sailor absconded as worthy example.
>>
>> But I will have to do some preliminary research and prudently consider
>> the semantical terms which are not common usage to our present
>> sensibility, before that occurs."
>>
>> DANIEL60 [SHORT A DIGIT: +1 = #61 / % #41 = #20]
>> (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2154 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "My
>> question for the day would have to be "What the hell does '*REFUTATION*'
>> {ie. the action of proving a statement or theory to be wrong or false}
>> mean??" Sounds like a made-up word! Or a 'WORD' used by someone trying
>> to sound edu-ma-cated, in the vein of 'BULLSHIT BAFFLES THE BRAINLESS'!!"
>>
>> NOMEN NESCIO [LATIN: I DON'T KNOW THE NAME] (***@DIZUM.COM) @ 2022
>> HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "DOLF CAN PEEL AND EAT BANANAS USING HIS TOES:
>>
>> N.B. Harry Houdini never did this, but other primates can."
>>
>> FRAN SNORTELUS (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1157 HOURS ON 2
>> SEPTEMBER 2018: "It's a perfectly valid word and can be found in the
>> OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY. It means the action of refuting or
>> disproving a statement/fact and probably also a theory.
>>
>> But it IS a valid word and it IS used by people who ARE educated!"
>>
>> DOLF @ 0658 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018: "NOMEN NESCIO’S [LATIN: I DON'T
>> KNOW THE NAME] NEO-NAZISM AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION IS TO BE DRIVEN
>> FROM OUR LAND WITH ALL THE ZEAL IN FREEDOM OF VOLUNTARY WILL WHICH WAS
>> AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE AND THE FRENCH ENLIGHTENMENT AS REVOLUTION:
>>
>> Whom are you as #41 - ONTIC necessity that we ought consider any
>> ontological regard?
>>
>> The Australian Catholic Church by rejecting calls for priests to report
>> child abuses confession and instead making an economy of such by an
>> appeal to so called Papal Authority against counsel of the Royal
>> Commission established by Letters Patent (DIEU ET MON DROIT) as powers
>> and Authority given Royal Assent on 8 August 1902.
>>
>> Validates our authority of intended purpose in having #8 Papal Bulls
>> within our prudent determination as legal recourse and we are going to
>> first assist others in their recompense and then we will take the rest...
>>
>> And I swear by Almighty God that what has been ordained to be so shall be.
>>
>> THE END OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM BABOONERY MASQUERADING PIETY AS THE
>> CLAMOURING FOR ‘N ORT AND WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A CAT-O-NINE TAILS TO
>> YOUR IMPERTINENT HIDE AND TEACH YOU FIRSTLY A PROTOCOL OF CONFESSION AND
>> THEN THE DIGNITY OF SILENCE.
>>
>> The *TRINOMIAL* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL* *NOUMENON* *AS* *MATERIA*
>> *PRIMA* is a savant endowment as capacity of MIND which is attributed to
>> the *SOVEREIGN* but not *CHIMPANZEES* as being savages since you don’t
>> have the mind development excepting to use *DEIFIED* *IGNORANCE* as
>> #231- JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL which is otherwise incapable for such
>> sapient existence:
>>
>> G2233@{
>> #1: Sup: 8; Ego: 8,
>> #2: Sup: 11; Ego: 3,
>> #3: Sup: 19; Ego: 8,
>> #4: Sup: 57; Ego: 38,
>> #5: Sup: 58; Ego: 1,
>> #6: Sup: 15; Ego: 38,
>> #7: Sup: 24; Ego: 9,
>> #8: Sup: 29; Ego: 5,
>> Male: #221; Feme: #110
>> } // #434
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #137 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
>> I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 -
>> Branching Out;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
>> Mabit; *I* *DEAL* *NOT* *FRAUDULENTLY*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
>> #TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
>> #POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
>> #TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
>> #CANON: #140
>>
>> #434 as [#8, #3, #8, #200, #1, #200, #9, #5] = hegeomai (G2233): {#6 as
>> #137 % #41 = #14} 1) to lead; 2) to consider, deem, account, think; 1a)
>> to go before; 1b) to be a leader; 1b1) *TO* *RULE*, command; 1b2) to
>> have authority over; 1b3) *A* *PRINCE*, *OF* *REGAL* *POWER*, governor,
>> viceroy, chief, leading as respects influence, *CONTROLLING* *IN*
>> *COUNSEL*, overseers or leaders of the churches; 1b4) used of any kind
>> of leader, chief, commander; 1b5) the leader in speech, chief, spokesman;
>>
>> “FOR THIS CORRUPTIBLE MUST PUT ON INCORRUPTION, AND THIS MORTAL MUST PUT
>> ON IMMORTALITY.
>>
>> SO WHEN THIS CORRUPTIBLE SHALL HAVE PUT ON INCORRUPTION, AND THIS MORTAL
>> SHALL HAVE PUT ON IMMORTALITY, THEN SHALL BE BROUGHT TO PASS THE SAYING
>> THAT IS WRITTEN, *DEATH* {#902 as [#400, #40, #6, #400, #6, #50] = muwth
>> (H4191): {#451 % #41 = #41} 1) A primitive root; to die (literally or
>> figuratively); causatively, to kill; [idiom] at all, [idiom] crying,
>> (be) dead (body, man, one), (put to, worthy of) *DEATH*, destroy(-er),
>> (cause to, be like to, must) die, kill, necro(-mancer), [idiom] must
>> needs, slay, [idiom] surely, [idiom] very suddenly, [idiom] in (no) wise.
>>
>> } *IS* *SWALLOWED* *UP* *IN* *VICTORY*.
>>
>> EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 WHICH CONVEYS AN EQUIVALENT MAGIC
>> ROW SUM TO THE FIRST MAGIC SQUARE THE EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE
>> GOVERNANCE
>>
>> 41 1 57
>> 49 33 17
>> 9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}
>>
>> "AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
>> JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {
>>
>> #I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
>> SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
>> #N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
>> Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
>> #R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
>> THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
>> Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
>> IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
>> SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
>> #I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
>> which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}
>>
>> INRI@{
>> @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
>> @2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
>> @3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
>> @4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
>> Male: #114; Feme: #108
>> } // #270
>>
>> #1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
>> ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
>> #2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
>> same light;
>> #3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
>> friends;
>> #4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
>> *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 -
>> TORAH} - Keep a common way;
>> #5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
>> each other {Latin CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
>>
>> [IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:
>>
>> Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).
>>
>> *ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
>> sovereign dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus}
>> Empire Governance]
>>
>> THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
>> CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
>> AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
>> THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
>> ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]
>>
>> O DEATH, WHERE IS THY STING? *O* *GRAVE*, *WHERE* *IS* *THY* *VICTORY*?
>>
>> THE STING OF DEATH IS SIN; AND THE STRENGTH OF SIN IS THE LAW [OF
>> METEMPIRICAL CONTORTIONS AS NORMATIVE DECEPTIONS SUCH AS YOURS].”
>> [1Corinthians 15:54-56 (KJV)
>>
>> Kant assigns three transitions to the three sections of the work
>> although it is unclear whether the sections also contain the starting
>> points and termini named in the title or whether they ultimately have
>> only the transitions themselves as topics. Kant’s mention of an
>> initially “ANALYTICALLY” and subsequently “SYNTHETICALLY” proceeding is
>> also unclear and disputed among interpreters (GMS, 392,19-22). A
>> possible interpretation consists in directly connecting the expressions
>> “ANALYTICALLY” and “SYNTHETICALLY” to the word “METHOD.” This would mean
>> that Kant refers here to the two different methods of instruction
>> (“Lehrarten”) mentioned in the Prolegomena, which appeared in 1783. In
>> the two-year older work, this process is explained "THE ANALYTICAL
>> METHOD [. ..] SIGNIFIES [. . .] THAT WE START FROM WHAT IS SOUGHT, AS IT
>> WERE GIVEN, AND ASCEND TO THE ONLY CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH IS POSSIBLE”
>> (AA IV, 276 note). Kant expressly emphasizes that the analytical method
>> has nothing to do with the procedure of conceptual analysis, but
>> concerns only the method (“Lehrart”): “THE ANALYTIC; METHOD, INSOFAR AS
>> IT IS OPPOSED TO THE SYNTHETICAL, IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM AN AGGREGATE OF
>> ANALYTIC PROPOSITIONS” (ibid).
>>
>> BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 0453 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "GEERT BE
>> WILDERS BLAAST CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF:
>>
>> It was also a item on the news. GEERT did not think it worth all those
>> threats. Still its interesting to see how many madmen live in Pakistan
>> and the rest of the world."
>>
>> PANDORA'S BOX (***@KNOWARE.NL) @ 0611 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Why
>> don't they announce with fanfare a cartoon contest in which Jesus
>> ridiculed."
>>
>> BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 0632 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Then nothing
>> happens. At most a little sputtering."
>>
>> EDMUND (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1650 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Yes, you
>> are right, hundreds of people are killed immediately burned flags,
>> praised prizes to kill bp people.
>>
>> Oh wait oh no, nothing happens at all.
>>
>> Look up:
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "The Life Of Brian - The People's Front of Judea"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WboggjN_G-4>
>>
>> or
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Monty Python And The Holy Grail - The Black Knight - Tis But A
>> Scratch"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmInkxbvlCs>
>>
>> An excellent example of the difference between those backward ones
>> barbarians and the normally developed world.
>>
>> Feel free to make the same MONTY PYTHON film about the Quran, that is
>> laughing man."
>>
>> BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 2110 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "By the way,
>> who's talking about ridiculous?"
>>
>> DOLF @ 2143 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "This implication of 18 August
>> 1811, Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte (1804 - 1814) issuing a decree, based
>> on French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is
>> that a large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman
>> Empire Governance and therefore did not have any authenticated notion of
>> Sophia as wisdom which is derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
>> as the basis of science.
>>
>> That portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be
>> regarded as *BARBARIANS* and enlightenment was like the price of tulip
>> 🌷 bulbs a decadent societal entitlement and status.
>>
>> — CONDOMS GALORE —
>> [Amsterdam Pride 3 August 2018]
>>
>> “HEINZ DAUGHTER.
>> LOOKING FOR SOUP.
>> WANDERING AFTER.
>> PARADING TROUPE.
>>
>> A FATHER TO BE.
>> BY SIDEWALK HOPE.
>> EVERYONE IS FREE.
>> NO NEED TO ELOPE.”
>>
>> TURKEY-BASTER@{
>> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 24 (#24),
>> @2: Sup: 20 (#32); Ego: 29 (#53),
>> @3: Sup: 47 (#79); Ego: 31 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
>> @4: Sup: 21 (#100); Ego: 46 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
>> @5: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 66 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
>> @6: Sup: 65 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 11 (#207),
>> @7: Sup: 10 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
>> 56 (#263),
>> @8: Sup: 79 (#264); Ego: 72 (#335),
>> @9: Sup: 54 (#318); Ego: 37 (#372),
>> Male: #318; Feme: #372
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{318}&idea:{372}>
>>
>> H2658@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>> @2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
>> DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
>> @3: Sup: 37 (#105); Ego: 80 (#118),
>> @4: Sup: 75 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
>> {%19}); Ego: 38 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
>> Male: #180; Feme: #156
>> } // #318
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #288 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
>> I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
>> in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
>> #TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
>> #POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
>> #TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
>> #CANON: #45
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_45@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 2 (#3); Ego: 1 (#2),
>> @3: Sup: 43 (#46); Ego: 41 (#43),
>> @4: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 2 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
>> Male: #91; Feme: #45
>> } // #45
>>
>> #318 as [#30, #8, #80, #200] = chaphar (H2658): {UMBRA: #1 as #288 % #41
>> = #1} 1) to dig, search for; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to dig; 1a2) *TO* *SEARCH*,
>> *SEARCH* *OUT*, *EXPLORE*;
>>
>> H3366@{
>> @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>> @2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
>> @3: Sup: 31 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}); Ego: 19 (#31),
>> @4: Sup: 69 (#114); Ego: 38 (#69),
>> @5: Sup: 75 (#189); Ego: 6 (#75),
>> Male: #189; Feme: #75
>> } // #318
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
>> Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
>> Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
>> Tetra: 26 - Endeavour;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
>> appearance in Urit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *HOT* *OF* *SPEECH*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
>> #TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
>> #POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
>> #TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
>> #CANON: #158
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
>> @1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
>> @2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
>> @4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I
>> AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
>> Male: #156; Feme: #158
>> } // #158 <-- *ONTIC* *VALUE* *FOR* *2ND* *NOVICHOK* *POISONING* *EVENT*
>>
>> #318 as [#2, #10, #100, #200, #6] = yeqar (H3366): {UMBRA: #3 as #310 %
>> #41 = #23} 1) *PRICE*, *VALUE*, *PRECIOUSNESS*, *HONOUR*, *SPLENDOUR*,
>> *POMP*; 1a) preciousness; 1b) price; 1c) honour, esteem;
>>
>> G3120@{
>> @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
>> @2: Sup: 41 (#81); Ego: 1 (#41),
>> @3: Sup: 71 (#152); Ego: 30 (#71),
>> @4: Sup: 72 (#224); Ego: 1 (#72),
>> @5: Sup: 11 (#235); Ego: 20 (#92),
>> @6: Sup: 81 (#316); Ego: 70 (#162),
>> @7: Sup: 10 (#326); Ego: 10 (#172),
>> @8: Sup: 48 (#374); Ego: 38 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
>> Male: #374; Feme: #210
>> } // #372
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #362 % #41 = #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
>> H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has
>> been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in
>> Memphis; I am neither a liar nor a doer of mischief.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
>> #TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
>> #POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
>> #TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
>> #CANON: #215
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_215@{
>> @1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
>> @2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
>> @3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
>> OF GRAIN {%6}),
>> @4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
>> OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
>> Male: #134; Feme: #215
>> } // #215 <— *NOTE* *ALIGNMENT* *WITH* ADOLF HITLER’S TABLE TALK IDEA
>> AND ELOHYM AS #86 - ALMIGHTY GOD (SEE ABOVE)
>>
>>
>> #372 as [#40, #1, #30, #1, #20, #70, #10, #200] = malakos (G3120):
>> {UMBRA: #12 as #362 % #41 = #34} 1) soft, soft to the touch; 2)
>> metaphor: in a bad sense; 2a) effeminate; 2a1) of a catamite; 2a2) of a
>> boy kept for homosexual relations with a man; 2a3) of a male who submits
>> his body to unnatural lewdness; 2a4) of a male prostitute;
>>
>> I would therefore take issue with your claim made of the normative
>> descriptor *BARBARIANS* which is a term of relative association and
>> according to my perspective of the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY published
>> within 4BCE by YANG HSIUNG whom determines the #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY
>> {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} AS DERIVED FROM THE I CHING
>> AS 8x8 {#260 - COMPATIBLE TO PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL NOTION OF NUMBER} =
>> H64 BINOMIAL {MALE: YANG CH'I / FEME: YIN CH'I) BY MEANS OF A MAPPED
>> ASSOCIATION WITH THE TETRAGRAMMATON {#1 + #41 + #81 = #123}: "Since
>> neither the content nor the structure of the Changes implies a temporal
>> sequence, the Mystery follows generally a proposed rearrangement of the
>> hexagrams put forward by the HAN Dynasty 206 BCE-220 CE Changes {H64
>> elements} master, CHING FANG (77-33 BC). YANG HSIUNG improved upon
>> CHING FANG’S approach to symmetry in the cyclic structure he was
>> creating. He avoided, for example, certain inelegances of CHING FANG’S
>> schema (which involved only 60 hexagrams) when he incorporated
>> references to all 64 HEXAGRAMS in his arrangement of TETRAGRAMS and also
>> substituted the winter solstice for FANG’S artificial point of departure
>> (the new moon of the tenth civil month as GRAND INCEPTION determined
>> midnight of 21 DECEMBER 103 BCE), so that his cycle starts at the point
>> which marked the actual beginning of the tropical year for the HAN
>> astronomer.
>>
>> Each pair of *HEXAGRAMS* separated by six months (for example: H19 -
>> APPROACH / TETRA: #9 - BRANCHING OUT {#65 CE - SOLDIER / 27-31 JANUARY}
>> and H33 - RETREAT / TETRA: #49 - FLIGHT {26-30 JULY}) are LINE-BY-LINE
>> POLAR OPPOSITIONS and together with the corresponding schema of
>> INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES produces *ONTIC* NECESSITY a REVERSE
>> TRANSCRIPTASE inhibitor as TETRACYTS being *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *THINGS*
>> *IN* *THE* *DIVINE* *MIND* *OPERATING* *INTELLECTUALLY*:
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #91 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
>> Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
>> Sutenhunen; I am not a teller of lies.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
>> #TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
>> #POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
>> #TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
>> #CANON: #161
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
>> @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
>> @2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
>> @3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
>> @4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
>> {%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
>> Male: #169; Feme: #161
>> } // #161
>>
>> Each of these twelve “waxing and waning” hexagrams, along with 48 other
>> hexagrams, also correspond to equal intervals of 6 7/80 days (in other
>> words, 1/60 of the solar year of 365 1/4 days). The remaining four
>> hexagrams found in the Changes, called “standard hexagrams,” correspond
>> to the solstices and equinoxes and thus to the four cardinal points of
>> the sun’s path. They are not segments of the cycle, then, but points
>> fixed in space, which move back and forth in time. The sun may pass
>> through one of them on any day of the lunar month in which it is
>> located. From the astronomer’s point of view, it is the new moons that
>> move back and forth around them. [Nylan, 15-16]
>>
>> And on TETRA: #45 - *GREATNESS* which then made of the #POSITION as
>> comprising an ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI determinism within, YANG HSIUNG
>> comments: The truly *WISE* {
>>
>> H7069@{
>> @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
>> @2: Sup: 69 (#88); Ego: 50 (#69),
>> @3: Sup: 74 (#162); Ego: 5 (#74),
>> @4: Sup: 80 (#242); Ego: 6 (#80),
>> Male: #242; Feme: #80
>> } // #161
>>
>> #161 as [#100, #50, #5, #6] = qanah (H7069): {UMBRA: #14 as #161 % #41 =
>> #38} 1) to get, acquire, create, buy, possess; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to get,
>> acquire, obtain; 1a1a) of God originating, creating, redeeming His
>> people; 1a1a1) possessor; 1a1b) of Eve acquiring; 1a1c) of *ACQUIRING*
>> *KNOWLEDGE*, *WISDOM*; 1a2) to buy; 1b) (Niphal) to be bought; 1c)
>> (Hiphil) to *CAUSE* *TO* *POSSESS*;
>>
>> } PAYS CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE FIRST SMALL *SIGNS* *OF* *CHANGE* {
>>
>> H5927@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
>> @3: Sup: 45 (#107); Ego: 70 (#126),
>> @4: Sup: 75 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
>> Ego: 30 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
>> @5: Sup: 80 (#262); Ego: 5 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
>> Male: #262; Feme: #161
>> } // #161
>>
>> #161 as [#6, #50, #70, #30, #5] = `alah (H5927): {UMBRA: #4 as #161 %
>> #41 = #38} 1) to go up, ascend, climb; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to go up, ascend;
>> 1a2) to meet, visit, follow, depart, withdraw, retreat; 1a3) to go up,
>> come up (of animals); 1a4) to spring up, grow, shoot forth (of
>> vegetation); 1a5) to go up, go up over, *RISE* (*OF* *NATURAL*
>> *PHENOMENON*); 1a6) to come up (before God); 1a7) to go up, go up over,
>> *EXTEND* (*OF* *BOUNDARY*); 1a8) *TO* *EXCEL*, *BE* *SUPERIOR* *TO*; 1b)
>> (Niphal); 1b1) to be taken up, be brought up, be taken away; 1b2) to
>> take oneself away; 1b3) to be exalted; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to bring up,
>> cause to ascend or climb, cause to go up; 1c2) to bring up, bring
>> against, take away; 1c3) to bring up, draw up, train; 1c4) to cause to
>> ascend; 1c5) to rouse, stir up (mentally); 1c6) to offer, bring up (of
>> gifts); 1c7) to exalt; 1c8) to cause to ascend, offer; 1d) (Hophal);
>> 1d1) to be carried away, be led up; 1d2) to be taken up into, be
>> inserted in; 1d3) to be offered; 1e) (Hithpael) to lift oneself;
>>
>> }, since no one [*POSSESSES*] sufficient strength to singlehandedly
>> defeat a well-developed trend. The sage looks at small details
>> overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation of his
>> visionary rule. Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of
>> knowledge which is here conveyed as impetus of gnomic imperative
>> purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being validated by
>> experiential reality:
>>
>> The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}
>>
>> The commentators unanimously prefer a different reading, however:
>>
>> The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
>> It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
>> The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
>> Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
>>
>> Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
>>
>> APPRAISAL 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
>> He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
>> Such fame is empty.
>> FATHOMING 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
>> Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
>>
>> Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit
>> the construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by
>> high rank by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes
>> public display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards
>> internal reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this,
>> he fails to focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are
>> far from *CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
>>
>> The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
>> resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to
>> frame good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also
>> symbolizes *MONEY* since certain coins were minted in its image {
>>
>> H3702@{
>> @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
>> @2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
>> @3: Sup: 79 (#179); Ego: 80 (#160),
>> @4: Sup: 80 (#259); Ego: 1 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
>> Male: #259; Feme: #161
>> } // #161
>>
>> #161 as [#20, #60, #80, #1] = kecaph (H3702): {UMBRA: #39 as #161 % #41
>> = #38} 1) silver; 1a) as metal; 1b) as *MONEY*;
>>
>> } Here the house lacks either the incisive thinking or the material
>> resources it needs to flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before
>> too long, its reputation will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an
>> equivalence to the mystical cabalistic interpretation given to the
>> Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15 magic square and its gematria value:
>>
>> H5014@{
>> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>> @2: Sup: 52 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 2 (#52),
>> @3: Sup: 58 (#160); Ego: 6 (#58),
>> @4: Sup: 60 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 2 (#60),
>> Male: #220; Feme: #60
>> } // #60
>>
>> #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab (H5014): {UMBRA: #12 as #60 % #41 =
>> #19} 1) (Qal) TO *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED* (PARTICIPLE);
>>
>> APPRAISAL 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
>> Into his realm, and so is victorious.
>> FATHOMING 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
>> Means: He oversees the *NINE* *BARBARIANS*.
>>
>> Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with
>> humaneness, the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT
>> MARRIAGE AS PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT
>> HUMANENESS as having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting
>> the minimum of pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have
>> a civilizing effect on people.
>>
>> ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
>> NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
>>
>> And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
>> Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION
>> VIII as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING*
>> unto Our said Governor General:
>>
>> VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
>> *OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
>> *OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
>> *OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
>> or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
>> such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
>> *PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
>> *GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.
>>
>> } agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*,
>> or 'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomising what is *CENTRAL*, the true
>> sage eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the
>> earth. The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things
>> revolve. In return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal
>> presence {ie. The sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL*
>> transformation. If he would do Viewing of what he himself is, he should
>> do Viewing of the people who themselves are morally transformed by their
>> viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
>>
>> APPRAISAL 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
>> The many, because of the few.
>> FATHOMING 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
>> Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
>>
>> If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
>> beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will
>> eventually grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave
>> overwhelms tiny ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first
>> signs of disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation,
>> he can both adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the
>> Good. This is no less true in the private world of the soul than in the
>> public world of the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45, page #288]
>>
>> — NOW I SEE —
>>
>> "YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
>> CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
>> PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
>> YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.
>>
>> ONE THING IS CLEAR.
>> DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
>> THE MIRROR TO PEER.
>> YOUR WIFE HAS A ***@NT."
>>
>> MICHAEL CHRIST: "I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to
>> speak like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.
>>
>> Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.
>>
>> To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
>> encyclopedias.
>>
>> My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
>> personally, and inspirationally.
>>
>> [Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
>> 'listening'.
>>
>> Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.
>>
>> So, I must say, thank you.
>>
>> And thank you, again.
>>
>> However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.
>>
>> Amen."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
>> touch with scripture."
>>
>> MILOCH ITCHY KOALA: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
>> out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.
>>
>> Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something
>> out of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
>> 'pillar of salt'?
>>
>> And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk
>> and finally resigned from his ministry.
>>
>> Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!
>>
>> go Warriors!"
>>
>> — PRELAPSARIAN —
>>
>> "OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
>> ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
>> JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
>> AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
>> MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.
>>
>> SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
>> E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
>> THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
>> SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
>> THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."
>>
>> *PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
>> - characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
>> prelapsarian youth.
>> - Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
>> - Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
>>
>> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "Trump and
>> Kushner are going down...
>>
>> George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is
>> shocked and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are
>> defending Donald Trump and his actions."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."
>>
>> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "We have courts
>> to decided that.."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
>> presumed innocent until proven otherwise."
>>
>> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "DICK Painter
>> went on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will
>> stand up in a court of law.
>>
>> The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...
>>
>> I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and
>> if there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up
>> in a dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"
>>
>> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "Obstruction of
>> justice."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."
>>
>> — BISCUIT EUPHORIA —
>>
>> "LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
>> STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
>> SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
>> GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.
>>
>> SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
>> AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
>> PISS OFF YOU ***@CKER.
>> OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."
>>
>> And these APPRAISALS AS ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI AND FATHOMING AS SYNTHETIC
>> A POSTERIORI then as systematically comprise the INTELLECTUAL DECAD as
>> being equivalent to the Pythagoreans understanding of TEN as the
>> greatest number, as well for that it is the TETRACTYS, by that it
>> comprehends all arithmetical and harmonical proportions. Pythagoras
>> said, that TEN is the NATURE of NUMBER: because all Nations, Greeks,
>> [the *ARABS*] and *BARBARIANS*, reckon to it; and when they arrive at
>> it, return to the MONAD: as therefore compliant with the Chinese
>> perspective of the GRAND INCEPTION determined midnight of 21 DECEMBER
>> 103 BCE.' [Chapter XIV, Pythagoras: His Life Teachings, Ninth Section
>> 1687 edition of The History of Philosophy, p 529]
>>
>> As the basis of the historical citation made within within the Epistle
>> to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist syncretic perennialist
>> philosophers whom published counterfactual works on the Religious
>> Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery the
>> reference to the nine *BARBARIANS* appears equitable to the Pythagorean
>> binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited
>> / unlimited: “I AM DEBTOR BOTH TO THE GREEKS, AND TO THE *BARBARIANS* {
>>
>> G915@{
>> @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>> @2: Sup: 3 (#5); Ego: 1 (#3),
>> @3: Sup: 22 (#27); Ego: 19 (#22),
>> @4: Sup: 24 (#51); Ego: 2 (#24),
>> @5: Sup: 25 (#76); Ego: 1 (#25),
>> @6: Sup: 44 (#120); Ego: 19 (#44),
>> @7: Sup: 33 (#153); Ego: 70 (#114),
>> @8: Sup: 43 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 10 (#124),
>> @9: Sup: 81 (#277); Ego: 38 (#162),
>> Male: #277; Feme: #162
>> } // #486
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #476 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
>> I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
>> Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
>> Distortion;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
>> Unsit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *BOISTEROUS* *IN* *BEHAVIOUR*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
>> #TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
>> #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
>> #TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
>> #CANON: #185
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_185@{
>> @1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
>> @2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
>> @3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
>> @4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
>> {%25}),
>> Male: #108; Feme: #185
>> } // #185
>>
>> #486 as [#2, #1, #100, #2, #1, #100, #70, #10, #200] = barbaros (G915):
>> {UMBRA: #18 as #476 % #41 = #25} 1) one whose speech is rude, rough and
>> harsh; 2) one who speaks a foreign or strange language which is not
>> understood by another; 3) *USED* *BY* *THE* *GREEKS* *OF* *ANY*
>> *FOREIGNER* *IGNORANT* *OF* *THE* *GREEK* *LANGUAGE*, *WHETHER* *MENTAL*
>> *OR* *MORAL*, with the added notion after the Persian war, of rudeness
>> and brutality. *THE* *WORD* *IS* *USED* *IN* *THE* *NEW* *TESTAMENT*
>> *WITHOUT* THE* *IDEA* *OF* *REPROACHFULNESS*;
>>
>> } BOTH TO THE WISE, AND TO THE UNWISE. SO, AS MUCH AS IN ME IS, I AM
>> READY TO PREACH THE GOSPEL TO YOU THAT ARE AT ROME {power; strength}
>> ALSO.” [Romans 1:14]
>>
>> According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
>> concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
>> that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
>> WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
>> that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {
>>
>> @1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] {
>>
>> HOMOIOS
>> HETEROS
>> KABBALAH
>> AS DEFINED
>>
>> } ...
>>
>> @5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
>> Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
>>
>> #15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - Remember the
>> Sabbath]) ...
>>
>> #34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
>> Honour your parents]) ...
>>
>> #65 (@2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
>> - Do not kill]) ...
>>
>> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
>> [#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
>>
>> #175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
>> - Do not steal]) ...
>>
>> #260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
>> Bear no false witness]) ...
>>
>> #369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - Covet Not])
>>
>> } of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
>> argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
>> trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
>> Chinese naming conventions such as is exemplar by:
>>
>> MAO ZE DONG
>>
>> or
>>
>> XI JIN PIN
>>
>> “FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
>> ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
>> [Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
>>
>> DANIEL60 [SHORT A DIGIT: +1 = #61 / % #41 = #20]
>> (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2117 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Ah!
>> Well, there you go!! Now I am more edu-ma-cated!! :)"
>>
>> FRAN SNORTELUS (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 2128 HOURS ON 2
>> SEPTEMBER 2018: "The power of usenet..... Now if we could only get the
>> PRETZEL to learn..... "
>>
>> A second possible interpretation consists in referring the expressions
>> “ANALYTICALLY” and “SYNTHETICALLY,” as they are used here, neither
>> directly to the expression “METHOD” nor, consequently, to the concept of
>> method in the Prolegomena. Indeed, in the Preface to the Groundwork,
>> Kant says only that he wants “TO TAKE THE WAY” first ANALYTICALLY and
>> then SYNTHETICALLY. This leaves the possibility open to read the
>> expressions in a conceptual-analytical or conceptual-synthetical sense.
>> If one follows this interpretation, the outcome of the first two
>> sections is constituted in the “SEARCH” (GMS, 392,3) for the supreme
>> principle of morality. The goal of this “SEARCH” is an exact formulation
>> of the [#41 - *ONTIC* *NECESSITY* to] CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE. The
>> procedure Kant uses for this is that of conceptual analysis. The formula
>> of the categorical imperative can be found through the analytical
>> process, but its validity cannot yet be proven. For this reason, Kant
>> shifts to the CONCEPTUAL-SYNTHETICAL procedure in the third section and
>> therewith to the “ESTABLISHMENT” (GMS, 392,4) of the principle. In the
>> first two sections, it is, accordingly, solely a matter of ANALYTICAL
>> JUDGMENTS. In contrast, SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS, with which the proof of
>> validity can be achieved, would stand at the centre of the third
>> section. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 17-18]
>>
>> DOLF @ 0436 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I am (being surnamed BOEK
>> self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical appeal to either
>> *REDUCTIO* *AD* *TRUMPIUM* for taking an obstinate or negative dialectic
>> disposition (ie. ) as is implied by the title of this chapter 'DUTCH
>> BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS' and then spiralling downwards into
>> forfeiture of decency by recourse to *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* until
>> one reaches a consequential depravity *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* (eg:
>> Hitler was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are you), .
>>
>> However, if ADOLF HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK as IDEA @1
>> expressed on Saturday 5 JULY 1941 that "THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A
>> SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME" as deploying the
>> NUMBER @1 / @5 PROTOTYPE as the basis of Roman Empire Governance by
>> which it was then an authenticated notion of *SOPHIA* *AS* *WISDOM* as
>> derived from Pythagorean binomial {#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as
>> [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis (G1520): {#12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*}
>> nomenclature as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE
>> A CHOOK AS CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
>>
>> #541 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #300, #5, #50, #5, #10] = apokteino (G615):
>> {#60 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to kill in any way whatever; 2) metaphor: to
>> extinguish, abolish; 1a) to destroy, to allow to perish; 2a) to inflict
>> mortal death; 2b) *TO* *DEPRIVE* *OF* *SPIRITUAL* *LIFE* *AND* *PROCURE*
>> *ETERNAL* *MISERY* *IN* *HELL*
>>
>> #391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
>> (G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
>> *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
>> management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
>> office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
>> dispensation;
>>
>> #391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460 %
>> #41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b)
>> like: ie. corresponding to a thing;
>>
>> #541 as [#20, #300, #1, #200, #9, #1, #10] = ktaomai (G2932): {#63 as
>> #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to acquire, get, or procure a thing for one's self,
>> to possess; 1a) to marry a wife;
>>
>> #541 as [#5, #80, #10, #200, #20, #10, #1, #200, #5, #10] = episkiazo
>> (G1982): {#55 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *TO* *THROW* *A* *SHADOW* *UPON*,
>> *TO* *ENVELOP* *IN* *A* *SHADOW*, *TO* *OVERSHADOW* from a vaporous
>> cloud that casts a shadow the word is transferred to a shining cloud
>> surrounding and enveloping persons with brightness. Used of the Holy
>> Spirit exerting creative energy upon the womb of the virgin Mary and
>> impregnating it (a use of the word which seems to have been drawn from
>> the familiar Old Testament idea of a cloud as symbolising the immediate
>> presence and power of God);
>>
>> #541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
>> (G3622): {#56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
>> *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
>> management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
>> office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
>> dispensation;
>>
>> SEE ALSO: "REFUTATION OF SCORN: IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF
>> PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?"
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.6%20A%20METHODOLOGICAL%20NEW%20BEGINNING.pdf>
>>
>> In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
>> argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument
>> that attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably
>> leads to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove
>> one by showing that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or
>> impossible.
>>
>> Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
>> (Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
>> 62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
>> mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
>>
>> The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a
>> range of forms, as these examples show:
>>
>> The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off
>> the edge.
>>
>> There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were,
>> then it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
>>
>> The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
>> ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
>> example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
>> denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is
>> a "smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
>>
>> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
>>
>> Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY in being
>> normative description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted
>> {ie. #391} and what causality {#541} it had within and upon the populace.
>>
>> The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) which was competed within 1631
>> is a Reformed church within Dutch Protestant church in central
>> Amsterdam, Netherlands. It lies in the most western part of the
>> Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum borough), next to the Jordaan,
>> between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
>>
>> The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three
>> main canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting
>> canal belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the
>> west and south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
>> Prinsengracht .
>>
>> Furthermore as an instance of *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* is this your
>> quantitative statement: "An excellent example of the difference between
>> those backward *BARBARIANS* and the normally developed world. The
>> difference between *MORE* *AND* *LESS* secularized societies.
>>
>> If one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
>> enlightenment, then one is espousing scientific endeavour and any
>> conveyance of such is framed by conceptions of NUMBER.
>>
>> Thusly, to convey any difference on the basis of “*MORE* *OR* *LESS*”,
>> then one is making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished
>> otherwise) to at least as a starting point of Aristotelian (384–322 BCE)
>> understanding given of the binomial NATURE OF NUMBER as the earlier
>> ANALYTIC A PRIORI / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI conception of it enumerated by
>> the PYTHAGOREAN (c. 570 – c. 495 BCE) where there was both:
>>
>> LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
>> something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
>>
>> MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something
>> could be done well.
>>
>> So then, there is a prudent contradiction (ie. IT DOESN'T CUT THE
>> MUSTARD) by a paucity of the rhetorical contrivance concerning the
>> necessity about the reality of secularised societies: *DUTCH* *OR*
>> *OTHERWISE*.
>>
>> The modern sense of the idiom is 'to succeed; to have the ability to do
>> something; to come up to expectations' as to arouse amusement or
>> derision; ridiculous in being an absurdity.
>>
>> WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
>>
>> Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
>>
>> [WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]"
>>
>> GEERT BE WILDERS@{
>> @1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
>> @2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
>> @3: Sup: 46 (#124); Ego: 47 (#116),
>> @4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55
>> (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
>> @5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
>> @6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
>> @7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
>> Male: #288 - *UMBRA* *CONTIVANCE*; Feme: #265
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
>>
>> H2438@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>> @2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
>> DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
>> @3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
>> @4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
>> Male: #166; Feme: #126
>> } // #288
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
>> from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
>> Tetra: 25 - Contention;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
>> appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
>> #TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
>> #POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
>> #TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
>> #CANON: #148
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
>> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
>> @2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
>> @3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
>> @4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>> Male: #222; Feme: #148
>> } // #148
>>
>> #288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258
>> % #41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to
>> Jerusalem to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon;
>> 2) the chief architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King
>> Hiram to Solomon;
>>
>> H142@{
>> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>> @2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
>> @3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
>> @4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
>> Ego: 38 (#93),
>> @5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
>> Male: #190; Feme: #103
>> } // #265
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
>> I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
>> Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
>> energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
>> at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
>> *OWN* *PROPERTY*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE:
>> #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
>> #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
>> #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
>> #CANON: #157
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
>> @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
>> @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
>> @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
>> {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
>> Male: #179; Feme: #157
>> } // #157
>>
>> #265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 %
>> #41 = #41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a)
>> (Niphal) majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
>>
>> H1396@{
>> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>> @2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
>> @3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
>> @4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
>> @5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
>> Male: #245; Feme: #103
>> } // #265
>>
>> #265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 %
>> #41 = #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be
>> mighty, be great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail;
>> 1b) (Piel) to make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm,
>> give strength; 1c2) to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to
>> show oneself mighty; 1d2) to act proudly (toward God);
>>
>> SEE ALSO: "(TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND
>> CAPACITY AS A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE /
>> #312 - RESISTANCE)"
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
>>
>> — LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
>> [PUBLISHED @ 0457 HOURS ON 1 OCTOBER 2017]
>>
>> "GRISTLE AND BUNT.
>> SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
>> DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
>> SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
>> MUSTARD WEASEL.
>> VALOUR DIVORCE.
>> DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hotdog Commercial (1977)"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOeJ4rmDTvg>
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hot Dog 1990s Commercial Ad on Beach"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OO2PYAnxQSo>
>>
>> *CANT* (noun):
>> - hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious,
>> or political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
>> - language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded
>> with disparagement: thieves' cant.
>>
>> ETHICAL_SPORTS_SLEDGE@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
>> @2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
>> {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
>> @3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
>> ITS FLOW {%36}),
>> @4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
>> @5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
>> #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 -
>> *ONTIC* VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION,
>> CONTRARINESS, ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
>> @6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
>> @7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
>> @8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
>> Male: #302; Feme: #536
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,302}&idea:{f,546}>
>>
>> #302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA:
>> #5 as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
>>
>> #546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546
>> % #41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the
>> commandment (of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
>>
>> LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1604 HOURS
>> ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "That's like saying, "a surname name". Tautology and
>> repetition is *ONE* reason you make no sense."
>>
>> DOLF @ 1729 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Your constipated turd 💩 opinion
>> whilst a sensualism as anal retentive declaration given self bestowal
>> through proscription of a grunt is no more substantial an entitlement
>> than a FANNY excretion of pustulant tripe which is enamoured by it’s
>> prolapsed existence though laborious in it’s eventuality as a shrivelled
>> spud with no viability as a snag {ie. *BAG* *OF* ****@T*: a despicable
>> person}.
>>
>>
>> — ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
>>
>> “PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
>> SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
>> HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
>> THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
>>
>> WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
>> OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
>> THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
>> WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
>>
>> WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
>> IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
>> THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
>> ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
>>
>> ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard'
>> (strong or brave) meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'.
>> The name's common female equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
>>
>> BE WILDERS ANTHEM@{
>> @1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
>> @2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
>> @3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
>> {%32}); Ego: 3 (#50),
>> @4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
>> @5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
>> @6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
>> @7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
>> @8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
>> @9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
>> @10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
>> @11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
>> @12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
>> @13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
>> @14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
>> Male: #727; Feme: #356
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
>>
>> STICKYBEAK:
>> - (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
>>
>> CLARION:
>> - (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
>> - (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
>>
>> FOOTLE:
>> - (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
>> - (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
>>
>> THRASONICAL:
>> - (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
>>
>> FESTSCHRIFT:
>> - (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors
>> in honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of
>> retirement, an important anniversary, or the like. [Courtesy: Words of
>> Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
>>
>> H8454@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
>> @3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
>> @4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
>> @5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
>> @6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
>> Male: #231; Feme: #160
>> } // #727
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
>> I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
>> (massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
>> thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
>> #TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
>> #POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
>> #TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
>> #CANON: #210
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_210@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>> @2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
>> @3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
>> @4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
>> Male: #110; Feme: #210
>> } // #210 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
>> *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #SIX: #114 / #342 AND TORAH
>> PROTOTYPES #FIVE: #114 / #342
>>
>> #727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
>> #727 % #41 = #30} 1) *WISDOM*, *SOUND* *KNOWLEDGE*, *SUCCESS*, *SOUND*
>> *OR* *EFFICIENT* *WISDOM*, *ABIDING* *SUCCESS*; 1a) sound or efficient
>> wisdom; 1b) abiding success (of the effect of sound wisdom);
>>
>> H2803@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
>> @3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
>> @4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
>> @5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
>> @6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
>> @7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
>> Male: #302; Feme: #160
>> } // #727
>>
>> #727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6
>> as #727 % #41 = #30} 1) *TO* *THINK*, *PLAN*, *ESTEEM*, *CALCULATE*,
>> *INVENT*, *MAKE* *A* *JUDGMENT*, *IMAGINE*, *COUNT*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
>> think, account; 1a2) to plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute,
>> reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value, regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal);
>> 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be
>> reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to think upon, consider,
>> be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise, plan; 1c3) to count, reckon;
>> 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
>>
>>
>> — 👽👽👽👽👽👽👽 —
>>
>> "THE *WATCHERS* WE ARE,
>> SO DO NOT DARE.
>> THOUGH IT BE FAR.
>> IT'S LIKE WE'RE THERE."
>>
>> DOLF @ 1752 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "We have established a temporal
>> neural linguistic interface with you so that we can cure you of this
>> disease of ignorance as #335 - *MORAL* *BLINDNESS*:
>>
>> G52@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
>> @3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
>> @4: Sup: 43 (#102); Ego: 70 (#124),
>> @5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
>> @6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135 - *ISLAMIC* STOICHEION
>> TRANSFORMATION *ONTIC* / *CANONICAL* PROTOTYPE OF AN #45 ARRAY WHERE
>> EACH ROW IS TOTALLING #135),
>> @7: Sup: 11 (#220); Ego: 38 (#173),
>> Male: #220; Feme: #173
>> } // #335
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
>> from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
>> Tetra: 25 - Contention;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
>> appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
>> #TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
>> #POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
>> #TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
>> #CANON: #148
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
>> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
>> @2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
>> @3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
>> @4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>> Male: #222; Feme: #148
>> } // #148
>>
>> #335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {#9 as #135 %
>> #41 = #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine things;
>> 1b) of *MORAL* blindness;
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "2000 - Star Trek: Voyager - Unimatrix Zero"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwDTtXpG--I>
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
>> I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
>> Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
>> at Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
>> #TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
>> #POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
>> #TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
>> #CANON: #115
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
>> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>> @2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
>> @3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
>> @4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
>> Male: #118; Feme: #115
>> } // #115
>>
>> #316 as [#50, #3, #7, #200, #50, #6] = gazar (H1504): {#0 as #210 % #41
>> = #5} 1) to cut, divide, cut down, cut off, cut in two, snatch, decree;
>> 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to cut in two, divide; 1a2) to cut down; 1a3) to cut
>> off, destroy, exterminate; 1a4) to decree; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be cut
>> off, separated, excluded; 1b2) to be destroyed, cut off; 1b3) to be decreed;
>>
>> H3336@{
>> @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
>> @2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
>> @3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
>> @4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
>> @5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
>> Male: #144; Feme: #113
>> } // #356
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
>> Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
>> the Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
>> #TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
>> #POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
>> #TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
>> #CANON: #139
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
>> @1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
>> @2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
>> @3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
>> @4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
>> SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
>> Male: #211; Feme: #139
>> } // #139
>>
>> #356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
>> #41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as
>> Book of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2)
>> graven image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) *PURPOSE*,
>> *IMAGINATION*, *DEVICE* (*INTELLECTUAL* *FRAMEWORK*);
>>
>> "And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
>> every imagination {#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336):
>> imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
>> [Genesis 6:5 (KJV)]
>>
>> To what degree Kant’s proceedings in the Groundwork actually are to be
>> related to the Prolegomena is disputed among interpreters. In the end,
>> only an exact reconstruction of the entire line of argumentation through
>> the three sections of the work can provide insight into Kant’s method in
>> the Groundwork. His remarks in the Preface offer little assistance in
>> this endeavour. In the following section, therefore, I will not deal
>> with these questions any further. Instead, I inquire briefly into a
>> cluster of interpretation problems that the last section raises. This
>> cluster revolves around the question of the relation of the metaphysics
>> of morals to the Groundwork.
>>
>> (a) The first problem arises from the fact that Kant thinks two types of
>> a “groundwork” for a pure moral philosophy are possible: on the one
>> hand, a “critique of pure practical reason,” and on the other hand, the
>> present work. Although he claims there is “really no other foundation”
>> than a “critique” (GMS, 391,17 f.), he believes that one can do without
>> such a critique and lists three reasons for this (see GMS,
>> 391,20-392,2). It remains nevertheless unclear how the relation of the
>> Groundwork to the intimated critique of practical of reason is to be
>> defined.
>>
>> (b) Equally unclear is the precise relation of the Groundwork to the
>> envisioned metaphysics of morals. Is the “groundwork” of a theory itself
>> to be considered a part of this theory or is what Kant calls the
>> “preliminary work of laying the ground” (GMS, 391,37) a part separate
>> from the actual metaphysics? Undoubtedly, the parts of the theory
>> developed in the Groundwork raise the claim of being independent of
>> empirical knowledge and therefore belong to a pure moral philosophy.
>> Thus, at least parts of the Groundwork have to be identical with parts
>> of a metaphysics of morals.
>>
>> (c) Making matters more difficult in the identification of the relation
>> between the Groundwork, a metaphysics of morals, and the mentioned
>> “critique of pure practical reason” is the fact that Kant later
>> published monographs with these or slightly modified titles. In any
>> case, it may not simply be assumed that the later produced works
>> actually deal with the types of theories mentioned in the Preface to the
>> Groundwork.
>>
>> How can the relations of these types of theory to each other be more
>> precisely defined? Is Kant’s expression “metaphysics of morals” a
>> unified concept or are there different meanings combined here in opaque
>> ways?
>>
>> An approach toward the resolution of these difficulties offers perhaps a
>> more precise interpretation of what Kant understands by a “metaphysics
>> of morals.” In the opening passages of the Preface, Kant had defined the
>> metaphysics of morals with the help of three criteria: first of all, it
>> is a theory that is not purely formal but refers to particular objects.
>> It refers, secondly, to objects insofar as these are under “LAWS OF
>> FREEDOM.” {#492 - *FREEDOM* *OF* *WILL* / #41 = #12 as #9 - Autonomous
>> Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL* *NECESSITY*} And thirdly, it is perfectly
>> free of empirical content. Therefore, a metaphysics of morals is a “pure
>> moral philosophy.” One question, however, remains unanswered. What
>> actually is a moral philosophy? Or articulated more precisely: what is
>> the ontological status of such a theory?
>>
>> Kant’s arguments for the practical use or the necessity of such a
>> philosophy offer a suggestion for answering this question. A moral
>> philosophy is not only an object for the scientific discipline of
>> "philosophy." Rather, according to Kant, every rational being, even if
>> at times confused, carries in itself a moral philosophy. That raises the
>> question about what conception of “theory” can fulfil both of these
>> functions simultaneously.
>>
>> For the clarification of this question I believe the conceptual
>> distinction between a theory, understood as an abstract system of
>> ordered propositions, and the presentation of such a theory, for example
>> in the form of a philosophical text, can be of further assistance. A
>> moral theory, understood as a system of propositions that stand in a
>> particular relation of grounding to each other and whose #41 - #CENTRE
>> is made up of ethical principles, is an abstract object, which can
>> simultaneously fulfill both functions. On the one hand, such a system
>> can be brought to expression with the help of a philosophical text. On
>> the other hand it is also possible to carry such a system “IN ONESELF,”
>> that is, to accept, the corresponding propositions.
>>
>> If one takes such a conception of theory as a basis, the confusing
>> terminologies and exact relations of the types of theories mentioned by
>> Kant could be newly formulated and made transparent in the following
>> way: (i) A metaphysics of morals or a pure moral philosophy is an
>> abstract object, a system of propositions complete in itself and
>> containing all a priori judgments that are concerned with the laws of
>> freedom. (ii) A work with the title “Metaphysics of Morals” contains a
>> presentation of this system. The text expresses the corresponding
>> propositions and their connections. (iii) If a person carries such a
>> moral philosophy in herself, it means that she accepts the corresponding
>> propositions and their connections. And if this person is rational, the
>> propositions accepted by her will comprise the grounds of her action.
>> (iv) A work with the title “Critique of Pure Practical Reason” could be
>> a philosophical presentation of parts of this system of propositions
>> (and for this reason is suitable as a kind of “groundwork”). But it
>> contains additionally a presentation that relies on philosophical
>> theories on other spheres of investigation. In Kant’s words, “IN PART I
>> REQUIRE FOR A CRITIQUE A PURE PRACTICAL REASON THAT IF IT IS TO BE
>> COMPLETED, ITS UNITY WITH THE SPECULATIVE IN A COMMON PRINCIPLE MUST AT
>> THE SAME TIME BE EXHIBITED” (GMS, 391,24-27). (iv) In contrast, a work
>> with the title “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals” can restrict
>> itself entirely to the presentation and mediation of the foundational
>> part of the metaphysics of morals. This contains, as Kant expresses it,
>> “nothing more than the search for and the establishment of the supreme
>> principle of morality” (GMS, 392,3 f.). [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
>> Groundwork, Page 18-21]
>>
>> SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF AN AGREEMENT AS POLITICAL
>> INTERFERENCE / DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE CAPABLE OF
>> DEPLOYING THE LEST WE FORGET ODE FOR ITS OWN ENDS
>>
>> — MANDALAY SWAY POEM —
>>
>> @5: Sup: 51 (#218 - OR DEATH ITS SWAY); Ego: 34 (#160) <— ANALYTICAL
>> JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION OF COGNITIVE
>> PROPOSITION
>>
>> #492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {#41 = #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} -
>> #391 - *HOMOIOS* *FRATERNITY* =
>> #101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT'
>>
>> MANDALAY_SWAY@{
>> @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
>> @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
>> @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
>> @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
>> @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
>> @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
>> @7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
>> @8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
>> Male: #218; Feme: #98
>> } // #260 <— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF
>> AN AGREEMENT OF CONCLUSION
>>
>> #260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
>> #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
>> wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
>> possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
>> *COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>>
>> — LEST WE FORGET ODE —
>>
>> "{@1} THEY SHALL GROW NOT OLD, {@2} AS WE THAT ARE LEFT GROW OLD;
>> {@3} AGE SHALL NOT WEARY THEM, {@4} NOR THE YEARS CONDEMN.
>> {@5 - #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} AT THE GOING DOWN OF THE SUN AND IN
>> THE MORNING
>> {@6} WE WILL REMEMBER THEM."
>>
>> @5: Sup: 74 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
>> *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 12 (#206) <— ANALYTICAL JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC
>> A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION AS IDEA EXISTENCE OF JUXTAPOSITION
>> CONTROL ASSOCIATED WITH THE ODE
>>
>> INRI@{
>> @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
>> @2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
>> @3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
>> @4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
>> Male: #114; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
>> } // #270
>>
>> #1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
>> ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
>> #2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
>> same light;
>> #3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
>> friends;
>> #4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
>> *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 -
>> TORAH} - Keep a common way;
>> #5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
>> each other {Latin: CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.
>>
>> *FOR* (*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the
>> interests of a given perspective or for the benefit of any small
>> powerful or influential #123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION /
>> FIELD / CLIQUE which places a prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 /
>> #342} within the pious construct {#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288
>> - UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 -
>> JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
>> *IN* *THE* *MORNING*} by conduct of #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} -
>> DETRUDE.
>>
>> H7750@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 63 (#69); Ego: 57 (#63),
>> @3: Sup: 72 (#141); Ego: 9 (#72),
>> @4: Sup: 1 (#142); Ego: 10 (#82),
>> Male: #142; Feme: #82
>> } // #325
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #315 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
>> Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
>> Circle;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
>> even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
>> #TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
>> #POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
>> #TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
>> #CANON: #150
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
>> @1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
>> @2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
>> @3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
>> @4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
>> I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
>> Male: #177; Feme: #150
>> } // #150
>>
>> #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#6, #300, #9, #10] = suwt (H7750):
>> {UMBRA: #9 as #315 % #41 = #28} 1) to swerve, fall away; 2) *TO*
>> *THRUST* *OR* *FORCE* *DOWN*, *OUT*, *OR* *AWAY*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
>> swerve, fall away; 1a2) those falling away (participle); 2a) subject to
>> censorship or kill-file filtering; 2b) habitually exclude socially or
>> ignore conversationally;
>>
>> <— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF AN
>> AGREEMENT OF POLITICAL INTERFERENCE / DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY
>> INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE CAPABLE OF DEPLOYING THE LEST WE FORGET ODE FOR
>> ITS OWN ENDS
>>
>> THUS WE CONVEY A COGNITIVE PROCESS DEPLOYING DIALECTIC WHICH IS CAPABLE
>> OF CONVEYING IDEAS WHILST DERIVED FROM SUCH AS PARENT-CHILD HAVE NO
>> INHERENT GEMATRIA CORRESPONDENCE AND THEREFORE EXHIBIT A HIGHER LEVEL OF
>> CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH THEN HAS INTEGRITY WITH THE EVOLUTIONARY PEER
>> EQUIVALENT CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING
>>
>> THEREFORE THE INTERDICTION: “GOD SAVE THE QUEEN FROM YOU FASCISTS”
>> expressed as *CARPE* *DIEM* at a distance of some 40 to 60 metres within
>> the street to passing persons whom paused and laughed with absolute
>> conviction as derision by means of #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} -
>> DETRUDE BY MALFEASANCE (noun): (LAW) the performance by a public
>> official of an act that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to
>> law; wrongdoing used especially of an act in violation of a public
>> trust; Word of the Day for 1 March 2017; www.dictionary.com
>>
>> The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
>> defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
>> permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
>> BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS
>> INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING
>> AND RATIONALITY."
>>
>> Were engaging within allegedly #288 - BEERSHEBA commemorations of a
>> PRIVATE NATURE INCLUSIVE OF ROMAN CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS BEING BY PARTIALITY
>> OF AS DISRESPECT SHOWN TO BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS UPON SUNDAY
>> PROXIMITY TO 31 MAY, THEREBY AN IMPOSITION OF AN ABHORRENT AND
>> BLASPHEMOUS RELIGIOUS BELIEF, DISBELIEF, NON-BELIEF CONSTITUTING
>> UNLAWFUL BREACHES OF SECTION #116 OF THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION UPON
>> SATURDAY 28 OCTOBER 2017, has in light of a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
>> as implicit breaches made against the SOVEREIGN CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
>> “DIEU ET MON DROIT” was an entirely of a propitious characteristic as
>> conformity to probity and within bounds of decorum as ontological
>> pacifist (ie. #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY) values which were compliant with
>> the SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE principles of a $50 valued LEST WE FORGET
>> badge purchased the year prior before Remembrance Day of 11 November
>> 2016 and was not simply an action of nostalgia by fanciful decoration
>> being only a contrived dignity.
>>
>> TO BE CONTINUED ...
>>
>> - dolf
>>
>> The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
>> the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
>> Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
>> directory:
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
>>
>> Initial Post: 2 September 2018
>>
>> #ANALYTICAL #SYNTHETICAL #KORPPIONOIKEUS #FREEWILL
>>
>>
>
>
>



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-03 18:53:54 UTC
Permalink
dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I have an attendance at court later today so there will not be much
> finalising of this chapter which is already at 60 pages however here is an
> explanation of *REDUCTIO* *AD* *TRUMPIUM* by which the Dutch define
> themselves as *BARBARIC*.
>

Thusly, to convey any difference on the basis of “*MORE* *OR* *LESS*”, then
one is making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to at
least as a starting point of Aristotelian (384–322 BCE) understanding given
of the binomial NATURE OF NUMBER as the earlier ANALYTIC A PRIORI /
SYNTHETIC A PRIORI conception of it enumerated by the PYTHAGOREAN (c. 570 –
c. 495 BCE) where there was both:

MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.

LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and

The *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* in this circumstance of the PYTHAGOREAN
incommensurate (square root 2) notion of NUMBER occurs whereby the ANALYTIC
A PRIORI of MORE as ONE: {YANG CH'I as MALE} and the SYNTHETIC A PRIORI of
LESS as TWO: {YIN CH'I as FEME} are according to the esoteric dogma NOT
CONSIDERED as being NUMBER being deducted entirely by DEDUCTION is by
*REDUCTIVE* *REDACTION* {ie. @1 @5 bifurcation}and are therefore an
incomprehensibility or an *INSENSIBILITY* which is incapable of being
COGNISED as offensive constituting hate-speech other than being an
irrationality which BEWILDERS and confounds the minds of impotent Dutch
justice.

For want of a model let’s consider the hypothetical postulation that #123 -
SENSIBILITY by #41 - *ONTIC* necessity might be similarly considered within
terms of #9 - LIMIT / #72 - UNLIMITED whereby there is then virtual process
of #65 - DELIMITATION (ie. it’s 0409 hours) within the temporality by which
noumena grounding then occurs as determinant of the relativity as DYNAMIC
NATURAL ASSOCIATOR which is a virtual #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
providing the intrinsic and prerequisite GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET
that is then mechanism for an IDEA to be circumscribed {#12 x #41 = #492}
as ratiocination before the DIALECTIC process of #73 - EXTRUSION {#492 +
#41 = #533} by vocalisation according to its nuance of metrication which is
RHYTHMIC and within good / evil bounds of SENSIBILITIES: #15 —> #34 —> #65
—> #111 —> #175 —> #260 —> #369 as the opine of TRUTH {% #41} or NOT BEING
TRUTH {% #81}: DOUBLE DUTCH {ie. *GIBBERISH*}.

Can the epithet: gibberish be also viewed as a racialist pejorative: double
dutch by being quantitatively: SCREAMING NUTBAG then considered hate speech
as jingoistic BOER / ANZAC defamation and endless amusement for
Australians.

Nous: #65
Time: 04:05 hrs
Date: 2018.5.22
Torah: [#8, #70, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 78 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 70 (#78),
@3: Sup: 37 (#123); Ego: 40 (#118),
Male: #123; Feme: #118
} // #118

Dao: Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity
Tetra: #63 - Watch
I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up

Latin: Sublevator {God, the hope of all the children of the earth} Alt:
Mabhel {Emptiness of Things Before God} {

1. PROTECTS AGAINST LIGHTNING & INFERNAL SPIRITS OF RELIGIOUS CULTS
2. CREED
3. INFLUENCES & PROTECTS THOSE WHO SEEK THE TRUTH
4. Serucuth
}

Jehoshaphat {The Lord is judge}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#287 / #465} / HETEROS {#299 / #390} / TORAH {#300 /
#431}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:2,col:7,nous:65&idea:{m,88}&idea:{f,117}&idea:{m,287}&idea:{f,465}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 2, col: 7, nous: 65 [Date: 2018.5.22, Time: 04:05
hrs, Super: #287 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching:
H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #465 / #65 - Unlearned
Virtuosity as Simplicity; I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view),
Looking up; Tetra: 63 - Watch]



- dolf

> DOLF @ 0436 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I am (being surnamed BOEK
> self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical appeal to either *REDUCTIO*
> *AD* *TRUMPIUM* for taking an obstinate or negative dialectic disposition
> {ie. Shall we not discuss the elephant in the room: Dutch directness by
> which they define themselves a *BARBARIC*.
>
> Direct to the point of shocking at times. Direct to the point of “what the
> f@#$ did he just say to me?!?} as is implied by the title of this chapter
> 'DUTCH BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS' and then spiralling downwards into
> forfeiture of decency by recourse to *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* until one
> reaches a consequential depravity *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* (eg: Hitler
> was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are you), .
>
> This Dutch trait has gone by many names; call it what you will – abrupt,
> bad-mannered, *BARBARIC*, blunt, brusque, cheeky, crude, curt, direct,
> discourteous, forthright, frank, graceless, gruff, honest, ignorant,
> impolite, inconsiderate, insulting, intrusive, matter-of-fact, open,
> outspoken, plain, point-blank, raw, refreshing, rude, sincere,
> straightforward, surprising, uncouth or unmannerly. Essentially, the bottom
> line remains: the Dutch speak their minds.
>
> <https://stuffdutchpeoplelike.com/2011/05/28/dutch-directness/>
>
> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> -- (DRAFT: 3 SEPTEMBER 2018) DUTCH BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS BLAAST
>> CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF
>>
>> (c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 3 September, 2018
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Adventure Of A Lifetime (Coldplay)"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtXby3twMmI>
>>
>> "Give ear, O my people, to my law: incline your ears to the words of my
>> mouth. I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings of
>> old: Which we have heard and known, and our fathers have told us. We
>> will not hide them from their children, showing to the generation to
>> come the praises of the LORD, and his strength, and his wonderful works
>> that he hath done. For he established a testimony in Jacob {THAT
>> SUPPLANTS, UNDERMINES; THE HEEL}, and appointed a law in Israel {WHO
>> PREVAILS WITH GOD}, which he commanded our fathers, that they should
>> make them known to their children: That the generation to come might
>> know them, even the children which should be born; who should arise and
>> declare them to their children: That they might set their hope in God,
>> and not forget the works of God, but keep his commandments: And might
>> not be as their fathers, a stubborn and rebellious generation; a
>> generation that set not their heart aright, and whose spirit was not
>> stedfast with God." [Psalm 78:1-8 (KJV)]
>>
>> VERONICA STRACQUALURSI (CNN) @ 0805 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018:
>> "Washington: Former President Barack Obama lauded John McCain's efforts
>> to push the nation to rise above "*MEAN* *AND* *PETTY*" politics in his
>> tribute Saturday 1 September 2018 to the Arizona Republican, who served
>> for more than three decades in the Senate.
>>
>> "SO MUCH OF OUR POLITICS, OUR PUBLIC LIFE, OUR PUBLIC DISCOURSE CAN SEEM
>> SMALL AND *MEAN* *AND* *PETTY*, TRAFFICKING IN BOMBAST AND INSULT, AND
>> PHONEY CONTROVERSIES, AND MANUFACTURED OUTRAGE. IT'S A POLITICS THAT
>> PRETENDS TO BE BRAVE AND TOUGH, BUT IN FACT IS BORN OF FEAR {
>>
>> FEAR@{
>> @1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
>> @2: Sup: 3 (#17); Ego: 70 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
>> @3: Sup: 5 (#22); Ego: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @4: Sup: 13 (#35); Ego: 8 (#94),
>> @5: Sup: 22 (#57); Ego: 9 (#103),
>> @6: Sup: 30 (#87); Ego: 8 (#111),
>> @7: Sup: 6 (#93); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
>> ANY {%26}),
>> @8: Sup: 11 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 5 (#173 - I AM
>> NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
>> Male: #104; Feme: #173
>> } // #902
>>
>> #902 as [#500, #70, #2, #8, #9, #8, #300, #5] = phobetron (G5400): 1)
>> Neuter of a derivative of φοβέω; a frightening thing, ie. terrific
>> portent:--fearful sight
>>
>> }," OBAMA SAID IN A EULOGY FOR MCCAIN AT A MEMORIAL SERVICE AT
>> WASHINGTON NATIONAL CATHEDRAL. "JOHN CALLED ON US TO BE BIGGER THAN
>> THAT. HE CALLED ON US TO BE BETTER THAN THAT."
>>
>> H2000@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
>> @3: Sup: 21 (#43); Ego: 5 (#21),
>> @4: Sup: 61 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 40 (#61),
>> @5: Sup: 13 (#117); Ego: 33 (#94),
>> Male: #117; Feme: #94
>> } // #101
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #101 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
>> Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
>> Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
>> Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
>> #TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
>> #POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
>> #TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
>> #CANON: #180
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
>> @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
>> @2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
>> @3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
>> @4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
>> ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
>> Male: #135; Feme: #180
>> } // #180
>>
>> #101 as [#6, #10, #5, #40, #600] = hamam (H2000): {UMBRA: #36 as #101 %
>> #41 = #19} 1) to move noisily, confuse, make a noise, discomfit, break,
>> *CONSUME*, *CRUSH*, *DESTROY*, *TROUBLE*, *VEX*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to move
>> noisily; 1a2) *TO* *CONFUSE*, *DISCOMFIT*, *VEX*;
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/dolf_or_geert_by_kiger8kiger.jpg>
>>
>> [IMAGE: This CARTOON is supposed to be a characterisation (Dutch Raven /
>> Hitler / Napoleon Emperor) named dolf as being either the Dutch
>> politician GEERT BE WILDERS or of myself.
>>
>> The fraternity PI (#80) KAPPA (#20) ALPHA (#1) = (#101) best known for
>> raping girls.
>> The most bad ass fraternity ever. A lot of alpha males that drag their
>> balls 🎱 🏈⚾️ behind them as they walk to class if they go.
>> They enjoy dirty house music more then anything else. Especially the
>> ZETA GAMMA chapter
>>
>> #492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {#41 = #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} -
>> #391 - *HOMOIOS* *FRATERNITY* =
>> #101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT'
>>
>> MANDALAY_SWAY@{
>> @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
>> @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
>> @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
>> @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
>> @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
>> @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
>> @7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
>> @8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
>> Male: #218; Feme: #98
>> }
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "[OFFICIAL VIDEO] Bohemian Rhapsody – Pentatonix"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojRj2JK5oCI>
>>
>> #260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
>> #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
>> wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
>> possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
>> *COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>>
>> SEE ALSO: "REFUTATION OF SCORN: IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF
>> PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?"
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.6%20A%20METHODOLOGICAL%20NEW%20BEGINNING.pdf>
>>
>> And is considered by some to be the tag line for a globalist campaign of
>> criminalised amorality of *PIKE* as having a violent psychosexual as
>> malice aforethought against the dignity and person of another]
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "The Bad Touch (Bloodhound Gang)"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xat1GVnl8-k>
>>
>> HOWEVER [JOHN MCCAIN] UNDERSTOOD THAT SOME PRINCIPLES {
>>
>> PRINCIPLES@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 20 (#21); Ego: 19 (#20),
>> @3: Sup: 53 (#74); Ego: 33 (#53),
>> @4: Sup: 54 (#128); Ego: 1 (#54),
>> @5: Sup: 11 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
>> {%13}); Ego: 38 (#92),
>> Male: #139; Feme: #92
>> }
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #712 % #41 = #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of
>> Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning;
>> Tetra: 1 - Centre;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #15 - Oh Lord of Righteousness, who makest thine
>> appearance in the place of Righteousness; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A*
>> *LAND*-*GRABBER*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Reach (no. #15), dailys increasing its kind.
>> #TOOLS: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily depleting its type.
>> #POSITION: With Resistance (no. #22), intolerance, but
>> #TIME: With Unity (no. #54), magnanimity.
>> #CANON: #146
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_146@{
>> @1: Sup: 15 (#15); Ego: 15 (#15),
>> @2: Sup: 70 (#85); Ego: 55 (#70),
>> @3: Sup: 11 (#96); Ego: 22 (#92),
>> @4: Sup: 65 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 54 (#146 -
>> I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
>> Male: #161; Feme: #146
>> } // #146
>>
>> #902 as [#1, #100, #600, #1, #200] = arche (G746): {#44 as #712 % #41 =
>> #15} 1) beginning, origin; 2) the person or thing that commences, the
>> first person or thing in a series, the leader; 3) that by which anything
>> begins to be, the origin, the active cause; 4) the extremity of a thing;
>> 5) *THE* *FIRST* *PLACE*, *PRINCIPALITY*, *RULE*, *MAGISTRACY*; 4a) of
>> the corners of a sail; 5a) of angels and demons;
>>
>> } TRANSCEND POLITICS, THAT SOME VALUES TRANSCEND PARTY. HE CONSIDERED IT
>> PART OF HIS DUTY TO UPHOLD THOSE PRINCIPLES AND UPHOLD THOSE VALUES.
>> JOHN CARED ABOUT THE INSTITUTIONS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT, OUR CONSTITUTION,
>> OUR BILL OF RIGHTS, *RULE* *OF* *LAW* {#22 x #41 = #902}, SEPARATION OF
>> POWERS, EVEN THE ARCANE RULES AND PROCEDURES OF THE SENATE. HE KNEW THAT
>> IN A NATION AS BIG AND BOISTEROUS AND DIVERSE AS OURS, THOSE
>> INSTITUTIONS, THOSE RULES, THOSE NORMS ARE WHAT BIND US TOGETHER {
>>
>> 7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
>> (G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
>> without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
>> 1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
>> *WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*
>>
>> }. THEY GIVE *SHAPE* {
>>
>> H1254@{
>> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>> @2: Sup: 7 (#12); Ego: 2 (#7),
>> @3: Sup: 45 (#57); Ego: 38 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
>> @4: Sup: 46 (#103); Ego: 1 (#46),
>> @5: Sup: 79 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
>> Ego: 33 (#79),
>> Male: #182; Feme: #79
>> } // #248 <-- MAIS NOUS FAISONS DE NOTRE MIEUX
>>
>> #248 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #40] / #808 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #600] =
>> bara' (H1254): {#0 as #248 % #41 = #2} 1) to create, shape, form; 2) to
>> be fat; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *SHAPE*, *FASHION*, *CREATE* (*ALWAYS* *WITH*
>> *GOD* *AS* *SUBJECT*); 1a1) of heaven and earth; 1a2) of individual man;
>> 1a3) of new conditions and circumstances; 1a4) of transformations; 1b)
>> (Niphal) to be created; 1b1) of heaven and earth; 1b2) of birth; 1b3) of
>> something new; 1b4) of miracles; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) *TO* *CUT* *DOWN*;
>> 1c2) *TO* *CUT* *OUT*; 2a) (Hiphil) to make yourselves fat;
>>
>> } AND ORDER TO OUR COMMON LIFE, EVEN WHEN WE DISAGREE. ESPECIALLY WHEN
>> WE DISAGREE.
>>
>> JOHN BELIEVED IN HONEST ARGUMENT AND HEARING OTHER VIEWS. HE UNDERSTOOD
>> THAT IF WE GET IN THE HABIT OF BENDING THE TRUTH TO SUIT POLITICAL
>> EXPEDIENCY OR PARTY ORTHODOXY, OUR DEMOCRACY WILL NOT WORK. THAT'S WHY
>> HE WAS WILLING TO BUCK HIS OWN PARTY AT TIMES, OCCASIONALLY WORK ACROSS
>> THE AISLE ON CAMPAIGN-FINANCE REFORM AND IMMIGRATION REFORM. THAT'S WHY
>> HE CHAMPIONED A FREE AND INDEPENDENT PRESS AS VITAL TO OUR DEMOCRATIC
>> DEBATE. AND THE FACT THAT IT EARNED HIM SOME GOOD COVERAGE DIDN'T HURT
>> EITHER.
>>
>> JOHN UNDERSTOOD, AS JFK UNDERSTOOD, AS RONALD REAGAN UNDERSTOOD, THAT
>> PART OF WHAT MAKES OUR COUNTRY GREAT IS THAT OUR MEMBERSHIP IS BASED NOT
>> ON OUR BLOODLINE, NOT ON WHAT WE LOOK LIKE, WHAT OUR LAST NAMES ARE,
>> IT'S NOT BASED ON WHERE OUR PARENTS OR GRANDPARENTS CAME FROM, OR HOW
>> RECENTLY THEY ARRIVED, BUT ON ADHERENCE TO A COMMON CREED: *THAT* *ALL*
>> *OF* *US* *ARE* *CREATED* *EQUAL*, *ENDOWED* {#492 - *FREEDOM* *OF*
>> *WILL* / #41 = #12 as #9 - Autonomous Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL*
>> *NECESSITY*} *BY* *OUR* *CREATOR* {
>>
>> COVENANT@{
>> @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
>> @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
>> @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
>> @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
>> @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
>> @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
>> @7: Sup: 42 (#183); Ego: 71 (#123),
>> @8: Sup: 11 (#194); Ego: 50 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL
>> LUST {%27}),
>> Male: #194; Feme: #173
>> }
>>
>> #902 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #800, #50] / #260 as [#4, #10, #1,
>> #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a
>> disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one wishes to be valid, the
>> last disposition which one makes of his earthly possessions after his
>> death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A* *COVENANT*, *A*
>> *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>>
>> } *WITH* *CERTAIN* *INALIENABLE* *RIGHTS*. IT HAS BEEN MENTIONED TODAY,
>> AND WE'VE SEEN FOOTAGE THIS WEEK JOHN PUSHING BACK AGAINST SUPPORTERS
>> WHO CHALLENGED MY PATRIOTISM DURING THE 2008 CAMPAIGN. I WAS GRATEFUL,
>> BUT I WASN'T SURPRISED. AS JOE LIEBERMAN SAID, THAT WAS JOHN'S INSTINCT.
>> I NEVER SAW JOHN TREAT ANYONE DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE OF THEIR RACE OR
>> RELIGION OR GENDER. AND I'M CERTAIN THAT IN THOSE MOMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN
>> REFERRED TO DURING THE CAMPAIGN, HE SAW HIMSELF AS DEFENDING AMERICA'S
>> CHARACTER, NOT JUST MINE. FOR HE CONSIDERED IT THE IMPERATIVE OF EVERY
>> CITIZEN WHO LOVES THIS COUNTRY TO TREAT ALL PEOPLE FAIRLY.
>>
>> AND FINALLY, WHILE JOHN AND I DISAGREED ON ALL KINDS OF FOREIGN-POLICY
>> ISSUES, WE STOOD TOGETHER ON AMERICA'S ROLE AS THE ONE INDISPENSABLE
>> NATION, BELIEVING THAT WITH GREAT POWER AND GREAT BLESSINGS COMES GREAT
>> RESPONSIBILITY. THAT BURDEN IS BORNE MOST HEAVILY BY OUR MEN AND WOMEN
>> IN UNIFORM, SERVICE MEMBERS LIKE DOUG, JIMMY, AND JACK WHO FOLLOWED
>> THEIR FATHER'S FOOTSTEPS, AS WELL AS THE FAMILIES WHO SERVE ALONGSIDE
>> OUR TROOPS. BUT JOHN UNDERSTOOD THAT OUR SECURITY AND OUR INFLUENCE WAS
>> WON NOT JUST BY OUR MILITARY MIGHT, NOT JUST BY OUR WEALTH, NOT JUST BY
>> OUR ABILITY TO BEND OTHERS TO OUR WILL {#9 x #41 = #369}, BUT FROM OUR
>> CAPACITY TO INSPIRE OTHERS WITH OUR ADHERENCE TO A SET OF UNIVERSAL
>> VALUES, LIKE *RULE* *OF* *LAW* {#22 x #41 = #902} *AND* *HUMAN* *RIGHTS*
>> {#12 x #41 = #492 as #9 - Autonomous Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL*
>> *NECESSITY*}, AND AN INSISTENCE ON THE GOD-GIVEN DIGNITY OF EVERY HUMAN
>> BEING.
>>
>> OF COURSE, JOHN WAS THE FIRST TO TELL US THAT HE WAS NOT PERFECT. LIKE
>> ALL OF US WHO GO INTO PUBLIC SERVICE, HE DID HAVE AN EGO. LIKE ALL OF
>> US, THERE WAS NO DOUBT SOME VOTES HE CAST, SOME COMPROMISES HE STRUCK,
>> SOME DECISIONS HE MADE THAT HE WISHED HE COULD HAVE BACK. IT'S NO
>> SECRET—IT'S BEEN MENTIONED—THAT HE HAD A TEMPER, AND WHEN IT FLARED UP,
>> IT WAS A FORCE OF NATURE, A WONDER TO BEHOLD. HIS JAW GRINDING, HIS FACE
>> REDDENING, HIS EYES BORING A HOLE RIGHT THROUGH YOU—NOT THAT I EVER
>> EXPERIENCED IT FIRSTHAND, MIND YOU. BUT TO KNOW JOHN WAS TO KNOW THAT AS
>> QUICK AS HIS PASSIONS MIGHT FLARE, HE WAS JUST AS QUICK TO FORGIVE AND
>> ASK FOR FORGIVENESS. HE KNEW MORE THAN MOST HIS OWN FLAWS, AND HIS BLIND
>> SPOTS, AND HE KNEW HOW TO LAUGH AT HIMSELF. AND THAT SELF-AWARENESS MADE
>> HIM ALL THE MORE COMPELLING.
>>
>> WE DIDN'T ADVERTISE IT, BUT EVERY SO OFTEN OVER THE COURSE {
>>
>> COURSE@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>> @2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
>> @3: Sup: 75 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
>> 76 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
>> @4: Sup: 4 (#189); Ego: 10 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
>> @5: Sup: 6 (#195); Ego: 2 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
>> ANY {%26}),
>> @6: Sup: 1 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 76 (#244),
>> @7: Sup: 11 (#207); Ego: 10 (#254),
>> Male: #207; Feme: #254
>> }
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #462 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
>> H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
>> Tetra: 33 - Closeness;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
>> appearance in Amenta; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SLUGGISH*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
>> #TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
>> #POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
>> #TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
>> #CANON: #166
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_166@{
>> @1: Sup: 11 (#11); Ego: 11 (#11),
>> @2: Sup: 62 (#73); Ego: 51 (#62),
>> @3: Sup: 5 (#78); Ego: 24 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @4: Sup: 4 (#82); Ego: 80 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
>> Male: #82; Feme: #166
>> } // #166
>>
>> #902 as [#30, #50, #400, #10, #2, #400, #10] / #467 as [#50, #400, #10,
>> #2, #5] = nathiyb (H5410): {#7 as #462 % #41 = #11} 1) *TRODDEN* *WITH*
>> *THE* *FEET*, *PATH*, *PATHWAY*; 2) path, pathway, traveller;
>>
>> } OF MY PRESIDENCY, JOHN WOULD COME OVER TO THE WHITE HOUSE AND WE'D
>> JUST SIT AND TALK IN THE OVAL OFFICE, JUST THE TWO OF US. AND WE'D TALK
>> ABOUT POLICY AND WE'D TALK ABOUT FAMILY AND WE'D TALK ABOUT THE STATE OF
>> OUR POLITICS. AND OUR DISAGREEMENTS DIDN'T GO AWAY DURING THESE PRIVATE
>> CONVERSATIONS. THOSE WERE REAL AND THEY WERE OFTEN DEEP.
>>
>> BUT WE ENJOYED {
>>
>> JOY@{
>> @1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
>> @2: Sup: 34 (#67); Ego: 1 (#34),
>> @3: Sup: 53 (#120); Ego: 19 (#53),
>> @4: Sup: 54 (#174); Ego: 1 (#54),
>> @5: Sup: 11 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
>> 38 (#92),
>> Male: #185; Feme: #92
>> }
>>
>> #902 as [#600, #1, #100#1, #200] = chara (G5479): {#25 as #702 % #41 =
>> #5} 1) joy, gladness; 1a) the joy received from you; 1b) the cause or
>> occasion of joy; 1b1) *OF* *PERSONS* *WHO* *ARE* *ONE'S* *JOY*;
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Joy to the World (Mormon Tabernacle Choir)"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLT9dSt8cwg>
>>
>> } THE TIME WE SHARED AWAY FROM THE BRIGHT LIGHTS {
>>
>> LIGHT@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 53 (#54); Ego: 52 (#53),
>> @3: Sup: 54 (#108); Ego: 1 (#54),
>> @4: Sup: 11 (#119); Ego: 38 (#92),
>> Male: #119; Feme: #92
>> } // #902
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #109 % #41 = #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
>> I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
>> Closure;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #27 - Oh thou whose face is behind thee, and who makest
>> thine appearance at thy cavern; *I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *UNNATURAL*
>> *LUST*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Duties (no. #27), esteem for activity.
>> #TOOLS: With Darkening (no. #67), esteem for rest.
>> #POSITION: With Mired (no. #3), plucked out from calamity.
>> #TIME: With Aggravation (no. #76), lacking any pardons.
>> #CANON: #173
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_173@{
>> @1: Sup: 27 (#27); Ego: 27 (#27),
>> @2: Sup: 13 (#40); Ego: 67 (#94),
>> @3: Sup: 16 (#56); Ego: 3 (#97),
>> @4: Sup: 11 (#67); Ego: 76 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
>> {%27}),
>> Male: #67; Feme: #173
>> } // #173
>>
>> LIGHT@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 53 (#54); Ego: 52 (#53),
>> @3: Sup: 54 (#108); Ego: 1 (#54),
>> @4: Sup: 11 (#119); Ego: 38 (#92),
>> Male: #119; Feme: #92
>> }
>>
>> #902 as [#1, #700, #1, #200] = hapto (G681): {#0 as #396 % #41 = #27} 1)
>> A primary verb; properly, to fasten to, ie. (specially) to set on
>> fire:--kindle, light
>>
>> }. AND WE LAUGHED WITH EACH OTHER. AND WE LEARNED FROM EACH OTHER. AND
>> WE NEVER DOUBTED THE OTHER MAN'S SINCERITY OR THE OTHER MAN'S
>> PATRIOTISM, OR THAT WHEN ALL WAS SAID AND DONE, WE WERE ON THE SAME
>> TEAM. WE NEVER DOUBTED WE WERE ON THE SAME TEAM. FOR ALL OF OUR
>> DIFFERENCES, WE SHARED A FIDELITY TO THE IDEALS FOR WHICH GENERATIONS OF
>> AMERICANS HAVE MARCHED AND FOUGHT AND SACRIFICED AND GIVEN THEIR LIVES.
>> WE CONSIDERED OUR POLITICAL BATTLES A PRIVILEGE, AN OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE
>> AS STEWARDS OF THOSE IDEALS HERE AT HOME AND TO DO OUR BEST TO ADVANCE
>> THEM AROUND THE WORLD. WE SAW THIS COUNTRY AS A PLACE WHERE ANYTHING IS
>> POSSIBLE, AND CITIZENSHIP IS AN OBLIGATION TO ENSURE IT FOREVER REMAINS
>> THAT WAY.
>>
>> AND MORE THAN ONCE DURING HIS CAREER, JOHN DREW COMPARISONS TO TEDDY
>> ROOSEVELT. AND I AM SURE IT HAS BEEN NOTED THAT ROOSEVELT'S "MAN IN THE
>> ARENA" ORATION SEEMS TAILORED TO JOHN. MOST OF YOU KNOW IT. ROOSEVELT
>> SPEAKS OF THOSE WHO STRIVE, WHO DARE TO DO GREAT THINGS, WHO SOMETIMES
>> WIN AND SOMETIMES COME UP SHORT, BUT ALWAYS RELISH A GOOD FIGHT—A
>> CONTRAST TO THOSE COLD, TIMID SOULS {
>>
>> SOUL@{
>> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>> @2: Sup: 49 (#99); Ego: 80 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
>> @3: Sup: 25 (#124); Ego: 57 (#187),
>> @4: Sup: 31 (#155); Ego: 6 (#193),
>> @5: Sup: 26 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
>> RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}); Ego: 76
>> (#269),
>> @6: Sup: 36 (#217); Ego: 10 (#279),
>> @7: Sup: 5 (#222); Ego: 50 (#329),
>> @8: Sup: 11 (#233); Ego: 6 (#335),
>> Male: #233; Feme: #335
>> }
>> #902 as [#50, #80, #300, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6] = nephesh (H5315): {#18
>> as #430 % #41 = #20} 1) *SOUL*, *SELF*, *LIFE*, *CREATURE*, *PERSON*,
>> *APPETITE*, *MIND*, *LIVING* *BEING*, *DESIRE*, *EMOTION*, *PASSION*;
>> 1a) that which breathes, the breathing substance or being, soul, the
>> inner being of man; 1b) living being; 1c) living being (with life in the
>> blood); 1d) the man himself, self, person or individual; 1e) seat of the
>> appetites; 1f) seat of emotions and passions; 1g) activity of mind; 1g1)
>> dubious; 1h) activity of the will; 1h1) dubious; 1i) activity of the
>> character; 1i1) dubious;
>>
>> } WHO KNOW NEITHER VICTORY NOR DEFEAT. ISN'T THAT THE SPIRIT WE
>> CELEBRATE THIS WEEK? THAT STRIVING TO BE BETTER, TO DO BETTER, TO BE
>> WORTHY OF THE GREAT INHERITANCE {
>>
>> INHERITANCE@{
>> @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
>> @2: Sup: 50 (#70); Ego: 30 (#50),
>> @3: Sup: 58 (#128); Ego: 8 (#58),
>> @4: Sup: 77 (#205); Ego: 19 (#77),
>> @5: Sup: 66 (#271); Ego: 70 (#147),
>> @6: Sup: 35 (#306); Ego: 50 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
>> @7: Sup: 24 (#330); Ego: 70 (#267),
>> @8: Sup: 64 (#394); Ego: 40 (#307),
>> @9: Sup: 72 (#466); Ego: 8 (#315),
>> @10: Sup: 29 (#495); Ego: 38 (#353),
>> @11: Sup: 30 (#525); Ego: 1 (#354),
>> @12: Sup: 6 (#531); Ego: 57 (#411),
>> @13: Sup: 11 (#542); Ego: 5 (#416),
>> Male: #542; Feme: #416
>> }
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #614 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
>> Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
>> Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
>> cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
>> #TOOLS: Labouring (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
>> strenuous efforts.
>> #POSITION: With Duties (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
>> #TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
>> #CANON: #228
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
>> @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
>> @2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
>> @3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
>> @4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
>> Male: #211; Feme: #228
>> } // #228
>>
>> #902 as [#20, #30, #8, #100, #70, #50, #70, #40, #8, #200, #1, #300, #5]
>> = kleronomeo (G2816): {#31 as #614 % #41 = #40} 1) to receive a lot,
>> receive by lot; 2) to receive the portion assigned to one, receive an
>> allotted portion, receive as one's own or as a possession; 3) to become
>> partaker of, to obtain; 1a) esp. to receive a part of an inheritance,
>> receive as an inheritance, *OBTAIN* *BY* *RIGHT* *OF* *INHERITANCE*; 1b)
>> to be an heir, to inherit;
>>
>> } THAT OUR FOUNDERS BESTOWED.
>>
>> TODAY IS ONLY ONE DAY IN ALL THE DAYS THAT WILL EVER BE. BUT WHAT WILL
>> HAPPEN IN ALL THE OTHER DAYS THAT WILL EVER COME CAN DEPEND ON WHAT YOU
>> DO TODAY." WHAT BETTER WAY TO HONOR JOHN MCCAIN'S LIFE OF SERVICE THAN,
>> AS BEST WE CAN, FOLLOW HIS EXAMPLE. TO PROVE THAT THE WILLINGNESS TO GET
>> IN THE ARENA AND FIGHT FOR THIS COUNTRY IS NOT RESERVED FOR THE FEW, IT
>> IS OPEN TO ALL OF US, AND IN FACT IT IS DEMANDED OF ALL OF US AS
>> CITIZENS OF THIS GREAT REPUBLIC. THAT'S PERHAPS HOW WE HONOR HIM BEST,
>> BY RECOGNIZING THAT THERE ARE SOME THINGS BIGGER THAN PARTY OR AMBITION
>> OR MONEY OR FAME OR POWER. THAT THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT ARE WORTH
>> RISKING EVERYTHING FOR: PRINCIPLES THAT ARE ETERNAL, TRUTHS THAT ARE
>> ABIDING. AT HIS BEST, JOHN SHOWED US WHAT THAT MEANS. FOR THAT, WE ARE
>> ALL DEEPLY IN HIS DEBT.
>>
>> MAY GOD BLESS JOHN MCCAIN. MAY GOD BLESS THIS COUNTRY HE SERVED SO WELL.
>>
>> <https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/01/politics/obama-eulogy-john-mccain-funeral/index.html>
>>
>> 3. THE METHOD AND THE RELATION OF THE GROUNDWORK TO THE METAPHYSICS OF
>> MORALS (GMS, 391,16-392)
>> At this point, Kant departs from his general reflections on a theory to
>> be provided “SOMEDAY” (GMS, 391,16) and dedicates himself to the work
>> that follows. His remarks are extremely terse and without a total
>> interpretation of the Groundwork almost impossible to comprehend. In
>> particular, his comments on the method he uses are hardly understandable
>> for a reader who is not already familiar with the work. [Horn &
>> Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 16]
>>
>> DOLF @ 2012 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "There is the analytic/synthetic
>> distinction and the a priori/a posteriori distinction. These two
>> distinctions form four types of knowledge:
>>
>> #1) ANALYTIC A PRIORI
>> #2) SYNTHETIC A PRIORI
>> #3) ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI
>> #4) SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI
>>
>> According to the facsimile of the 1687 edition on the History of
>> Philosophy / Pythagoras and His Life Teachings, Hebrews express this
>> ANALYTIC A PRIORI by a Point, which mark (as well amongst the
>> Barbarians, as in Latin) denotes One. Hitherto allude the Pythagorean
>> symbols One and Two. Zaratas (the Master of Pythagoras) used these as
>> the names of propagation—one the father; two the mother. One and two (in
>> the divine essence) producing four, the TETRACTYS, the idea of all
>> things, which are consummated in the number Ten. This Pythagoras styles:
>>
>> Eternal Nature's fountain—
>>
>> This is the *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *THINGS* *IN* *THE* *DIVINE* *MIND*
>> *OPERATING* *INTELLECTUALLY*. From this fountain of Eternal Nature,
>> flows down the Pythagorean numbers *ONE* and *TWO*--which from Eternity,
>> in the fountain of the immense Ocean, was, shall be, or rather always
>> is, abundantly streaming. This *ONE* was by the Ancients termed [“Zeus”]
>> as Jupiter; *TWO* as [“Hera”]
>>
>> G1520@{
>> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>> @2: Sup: 55 (#60); Ego: 50 (#55),
>> @3: Sup: 44 (#104); Ego: 70 (#125),
>> @4: Sup: 1 (#105); Ego: 38 (#163),
>> Male: #105; Feme: #163
>> } // #325
>>
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #215 % #41 = #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?; I-Ching:
>> H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net; Tetra:
>> 41 - Response;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #10 - Oh thou who orderest the flame, who makest thine
>> appearance in Memphis; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *FOOD*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Defectiveness (no. #10), selfishness and crookedness.
>> #TOOLS: With Vastness (no. #50), fairmindedness and desirelessness.
>> #POSITION: As to Branching Out (no. #9), it is the advance.
>> #TIME: As to Holding Back (no. #17), it is the retreat.
>> #CANON: #86 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *JUDGES* / *ELOHYM*
>>
>> #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis (G1520):
>> {#12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*;
>>
>> At this stage of appraisal, Kant appears to be procrastinatory {ie. as
>> the habitual/intentional delay of starting or finishing a task despite
>> its negative consequences} and conveys the ambiguous thought on ANALYTIC
>> A POSTERIORI that it was self-contradictory by nature. But, some other
>> philosophers treated it as valid. But what are examples of ANALYTIC A
>> POSTERIORI knowledge?
>>
>> Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology
>> of 364 days an example of “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI” knowledge?
>>
>> 364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126
>>
>> Is defining the TELOS as #6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with a #41 as
>> ONTIC necessity of the *APEIRON* also an example of “ANALYTIC A
>> POSTERIORI” knowledge?
>>
>> #0 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he supplants,
>> That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 4000 BCE
>>
>> ... [THE APEIRON] ...
>>
>> #8800 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he
>> supplants, That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 8800 CE
>>
>> APEIRON@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 81 (#82); Ego: 80 (#81),
>> @3: Sup: 5 (#87); Ego: 5 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @4: Sup: 15 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 10 (#96),
>> @5: Sup: 34 (#136); Ego: 19 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
>> @6: Sup: 23 (#159); Ego: 70 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN
>> BEHAVIOUR {%25}),
>> @7: Sup: 73 (#232); Ego: 50 (#235),
>> Male: #232; Feme: #235
>> } // #316
>>
>> APEIRON (ἄπειρον) is a Greek word meaning "(that which is) unlimited,"
>> "boundless", "infinite", or "indefinite"[1] from ἀ- a-, "without" and
>> πεῖραρ peirar, "end, limit", "boundary",[2] the Ionic Greek form of
>> πέρας peras, "end, limit, boundary". It is akin to Persian piramon,
>> meaning "*BOUNDARY*, *CIRCUMFERENCE*, *SURROUNDING*".
>>
>> My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
>> that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
>> doesn’t fully conceive any “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI” possibility and it’s
>> notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate but as a
>> recursive enumeration giving forth a trinomial #NUMBER definition as
>> process of “SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI” by it's as formulation of
>> progression. This dialectic is then in turn consistent with Kant's
>> CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE as rationalism being an intellectual conception:
>>
>> + 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law {@1}
>> + 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity {@2}
>> + 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy {@3}
>> + 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression {@4}
>>
>> Thus the ANALYTIC {YANG CH’I} A PRIORI given by the alternative HOMOIOS
>> mathematical notion of #NUMBER with the recursive necessity of an #41 -
>> ONTIC {NORMA OBLIGANS} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism:
>> REMEMBER THE SABBATH and it’s SYNCRETIC {YIN CH’I} A PRIORI such as
>> beIng SAPIENT with the recursive necessity of an #82 - ONTIC
>> {MANIFESTING NORM} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism:
>> HONOUR PARENTS is a conception of fecundity by its capacity in producing
>> or capable of producing offspring, fruit, vegetation, etc., in
>> abundance; prolific; fruitful: fecund parents; fecund farmland and hence
>> its equinox
>> association.
>>
>> It also conveys a sapient propensity in being very productive or
>> creative intellectually: the fecund years of the Italian Renaissance.
>>
>> One must therefore ask on the basis of an analytic a posteriori why Kant
>> withheld such knowledge given the words had their origin: 1375–1425;
>> late Middle English < Latin fēcundus, equivalent to fē- (see fetus) +
>> -cundus adj. suffix; replacing late Middle English fecounde < Anglo-French
>>
>> And the most probable answer is that such idea which Kant conveys by
>> APRIORITY PROTOTYPES is that they are tectonic shifts with a cataclysmic
>> consequence which is made against the prevailing Latin binomial world
>> order constituted by its NATURE bifurcations by means of another
>> ethereal construct: @1 / @5.
>>
>> Furthermore is Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
>> consideration of *VOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin voluntās f (genitive
>> voluntātis):
>> - (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
>> creation, etc.
>> - *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
>> reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
>> as mountains and dwellings.
>> - (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
>> philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
>> the natural world.
>>
>> And consideration of *NOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin nōluntās f (genitive
>> nōluntātis).
>> - (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
>> destruction, etc.
>> - *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
>> in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
>> *MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
>> - (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
>> philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
>> natural world.
>>
>> Are these then considered a priori as to the enumeration of an autonomy
>> of will by which apperception is circumscribed as an ANALYTIC A
>> POSTERIORI of PUPIL with the recursive necessity of an #123 - ONTIC
>> {DISCRIMINATING
>> NORM} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism: DO NOT KILL as its
>> ontological utility as reciprocality {#369: 9(9²+1)/2 A POSTERIORI as
>> enumeration function of equation n(n²+1)/2 — *NEED* *TO* *THINK* *ABOUT*
>> *THIS*
>>
>> #1 + #41 + #81 = #123 + #369 = #492 (#451 + #41) as *FREEWILL* being #12
>> x #41 as ONTIC necessity
>>
>> #YOD (#10) as CENTRE
>> #MEM (#40) as DELIMITATION
>> #TAU (#400) as CIRCUMSCRIBING
>> #ALEPH (#1) as STREAMING {23 CHROMOSOMES} = #451
>>
>> AS BIFURCATION: #TAU x #41 = #902 / #2 = #451
>>
>> } the syncretic process eventually occurs as SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI
>> progression being then genitive of a self declaration as an heteronomous
>> {ie subject to law external to itself} and autonomous reality.
>>
>> In such a circumstance, what is then the *PROBITY* of utilising an EGO
>> defensive mechanism constituted by a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL of
>> IGNORANCE against any further progression of this #41 - *ONTIC*
>> NECESSITY = #492 (#451 + #41) AS *FREEWILL* being #12 x #41 of
>> ANTHROPOCENTRIC (CIRCULAR) REALITY?
>>
>> Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
>> distinction between descriptive statements which present an account of
>> how the world is being analogous to the LIMITED {#9 - JUXTAPOSITION
>> CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS / SEMINAL REASON
>> GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative statements presenting
>> an evaluative account, or an account of how the syncretic world should
>> be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in
>> being optimally something that should be lived up to; or that should be
>> pursued.
>>
>> “JESUS ANSWERED, *ARE* *THERE* *NOT* *TWELVE* *HOURS* *IN* *THE* *DAY*
>> {ie. 24 x 60 minutes = #1440 / #72 = 20 minutes allocations}? *IF* *ANY*
>> *MAN* *WALK* *IN* *THE* *DAY*, *HE* *STUMBLETH* *NOT*, *BECAUSE* *HE*
>> *SEETH* *THE* *LIGHT* *OF* *THIS* *WORLD*-*KOSMOS*.
>>
>> BUT IF A MAN WALK IN THE NIGHT, HE STUMBLETH, BECAUSE THERE IS NO LIGHT
>> IN HIM.” [John 11:9-10 (KJV)]
>>
>> At the center of a philosophical doctrine of nature, there would then
>> stand general descriptive judgments; that means, more precisely,
>> statements of law that describe how objects of nature act. And at the
>> center of a doctrine of morals there would stand normative judgments
>> that exhibit a comparable degree of generality and modal status. I will
>> later address more thoroughly what it could mean that some normative
>> judgments exhibit a comparable modal status to statements of law in the
>> natural sciences. Such a parallel is far from trivial. On the contrary,
>> it is one of the critical challenges for the interpretation of Kant’s
>> ethical writings. The first step toward a unified interpretation of the
>> two kinds of laws consists in seeing both kinds equally as
>> propositionally structured entities that demonstrate a clearly
>> identifiable logical form. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 5]
>>
>> And to illustrate the ontological significances of this, I'm considering
>> on the proviso that there is sufficient time for its inclusion within
>> this initial draft document, a summary of Kant’s broad description of
>> the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE before then using the noumena to examine the
>> historical event occurring upon 25 December 1770 when Captain Cook
>> sought repairs in Batavia and a sailor absconded as worthy example.
>>
>> But I will have to do some preliminary research and prudently consider
>> the semantical terms which are not common usage to our present
>> sensibility, before that occurs."
>>
>> DANIEL60 [SHORT A DIGIT: +1 = #61 / % #41 = #20]
>> (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2154 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "My
>> question for the day would have to be "What the hell does '*REFUTATION*'
>> {ie. the action of proving a statement or theory to be wrong or false}
>> mean??" Sounds like a made-up word! Or a 'WORD' used by someone trying
>> to sound edu-ma-cated, in the vein of 'BULLSHIT BAFFLES THE BRAINLESS'!!"
>>
>> NOMEN NESCIO [LATIN: I DON'T KNOW THE NAME] (***@DIZUM.COM) @ 2022
>> HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "DOLF CAN PEEL AND EAT BANANAS USING HIS TOES:
>>
>> N.B. Harry Houdini never did this, but other primates can."
>>
>> FRAN SNORTELUS (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1157 HOURS ON 2
>> SEPTEMBER 2018: "It's a perfectly valid word and can be found in the
>> OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY. It means the action of refuting or
>> disproving a statement/fact and probably also a theory.
>>
>> But it IS a valid word and it IS used by people who ARE educated!"
>>
>> DOLF @ 0658 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018: "NOMEN NESCIO’S [LATIN: I DON'T
>> KNOW THE NAME] NEO-NAZISM AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION IS TO BE DRIVEN
>> FROM OUR LAND WITH ALL THE ZEAL IN FREEDOM OF VOLUNTARY WILL WHICH WAS
>> AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE AND THE FRENCH ENLIGHTENMENT AS REVOLUTION:
>>
>> Whom are you as #41 - ONTIC necessity that we ought consider any
>> ontological regard?
>>
>> The Australian Catholic Church by rejecting calls for priests to report
>> child abuses confession and instead making an economy of such by an
>> appeal to so called Papal Authority against counsel of the Royal
>> Commission established by Letters Patent (DIEU ET MON DROIT) as powers
>> and Authority given Royal Assent on 8 August 1902.
>>
>> Validates our authority of intended purpose in having #8 Papal Bulls
>> within our prudent determination as legal recourse and we are going to
>> first assist others in their recompense and then we will take the rest...
>>
>> And I swear by Almighty God that what has been ordained to be so shall be.
>>
>> THE END OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM BABOONERY MASQUERADING PIETY AS THE
>> CLAMOURING FOR ‘N ORT AND WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A CAT-O-NINE TAILS TO
>> YOUR IMPERTINENT HIDE AND TEACH YOU FIRSTLY A PROTOCOL OF CONFESSION AND
>> THEN THE DIGNITY OF SILENCE.
>>
>> The *TRINOMIAL* *MATHEMATICAL* *THEORETICAL* *NOUMENON* *AS* *MATERIA*
>> *PRIMA* is a savant endowment as capacity of MIND which is attributed to
>> the *SOVEREIGN* but not *CHIMPANZEES* as being savages since you don’t
>> have the mind development excepting to use *DEIFIED* *IGNORANCE* as
>> #231- JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL which is otherwise incapable for such
>> sapient existence:
>>
>> G2233@{
>> #1: Sup: 8; Ego: 8,
>> #2: Sup: 11; Ego: 3,
>> #3: Sup: 19; Ego: 8,
>> #4: Sup: 57; Ego: 38,
>> #5: Sup: 58; Ego: 1,
>> #6: Sup: 15; Ego: 38,
>> #7: Sup: 24; Ego: 9,
>> #8: Sup: 29; Ego: 5,
>> Male: #221; Feme: #110
>> } // #434
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #137 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
>> I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 -
>> Branching Out;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
>> Mabit; *I* *DEAL* *NOT* *FRAUDULENTLY*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
>> #TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
>> #POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
>> #TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
>> #CANON: #140
>>
>> #434 as [#8, #3, #8, #200, #1, #200, #9, #5] = hegeomai (G2233): {#6 as
>> #137 % #41 = #14} 1) to lead; 2) to consider, deem, account, think; 1a)
>> to go before; 1b) to be a leader; 1b1) *TO* *RULE*, command; 1b2) to
>> have authority over; 1b3) *A* *PRINCE*, *OF* *REGAL* *POWER*, governor,
>> viceroy, chief, leading as respects influence, *CONTROLLING* *IN*
>> *COUNSEL*, overseers or leaders of the churches; 1b4) used of any kind
>> of leader, chief, commander; 1b5) the leader in speech, chief, spokesman;
>>
>> “FOR THIS CORRUPTIBLE MUST PUT ON INCORRUPTION, AND THIS MORTAL MUST PUT
>> ON IMMORTALITY.
>>
>> SO WHEN THIS CORRUPTIBLE SHALL HAVE PUT ON INCORRUPTION, AND THIS MORTAL
>> SHALL HAVE PUT ON IMMORTALITY, THEN SHALL BE BROUGHT TO PASS THE SAYING
>> THAT IS WRITTEN, *DEATH* {#902 as [#400, #40, #6, #400, #6, #50] = muwth
>> (H4191): {#451 % #41 = #41} 1) A primitive root; to die (literally or
>> figuratively); causatively, to kill; [idiom] at all, [idiom] crying,
>> (be) dead (body, man, one), (put to, worthy of) *DEATH*, destroy(-er),
>> (cause to, be like to, must) die, kill, necro(-mancer), [idiom] must
>> needs, slay, [idiom] surely, [idiom] very suddenly, [idiom] in (no) wise.
>>
>> } *IS* *SWALLOWED* *UP* *IN* *VICTORY*.
>>
>> EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 WHICH CONVEYS AN EQUIVALENT MAGIC
>> ROW SUM TO THE FIRST MAGIC SQUARE THE EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE
>> GOVERNANCE
>>
>> 41 1 57
>> 49 33 17
>> 9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}
>>
>> "AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
>> JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {
>>
>> #I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
>> SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
>> #N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
>> Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
>> #R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
>> THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
>> Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
>> IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
>> SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
>> #I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
>> which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}
>>
>> INRI@{
>> @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
>> @2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
>> @3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
>> @4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
>> Male: #114; Feme: #108
>> } // #270
>>
>> #1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
>> ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
>> #2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
>> same light;
>> #3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
>> friends;
>> #4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
>> *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 -
>> TORAH} - Keep a common way;
>> #5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
>> each other {Latin CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
>>
>> [IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:
>>
>> Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).
>>
>> *ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
>> sovereign dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus}
>> Empire Governance]
>>
>> THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
>> CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
>> AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
>> THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
>> ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]
>>
>> O DEATH, WHERE IS THY STING? *O* *GRAVE*, *WHERE* *IS* *THY* *VICTORY*?
>>
>> THE STING OF DEATH IS SIN; AND THE STRENGTH OF SIN IS THE LAW [OF
>> METEMPIRICAL CONTORTIONS AS NORMATIVE DECEPTIONS SUCH AS YOURS].”
>> [1Corinthians 15:54-56 (KJV)
>>
>> Kant assigns three transitions to the three sections of the work
>> although it is unclear whether the sections also contain the starting
>> points and termini named in the title or whether they ultimately have
>> only the transitions themselves as topics. Kant’s mention of an
>> initially “ANALYTICALLY” and subsequently “SYNTHETICALLY” proceeding is
>> also unclear and disputed among interpreters (GMS, 392,19-22). A
>> possible interpretation consists in directly connecting the expressions
>> “ANALYTICALLY” and “SYNTHETICALLY” to the word “METHOD.” This would mean
>> that Kant refers here to the two different methods of instruction
>> (“Lehrarten”) mentioned in the Prolegomena, which appeared in 1783. In
>> the two-year older work, this process is explained "THE ANALYTICAL
>> METHOD [. ..] SIGNIFIES [. . .] THAT WE START FROM WHAT IS SOUGHT, AS IT
>> WERE GIVEN, AND ASCEND TO THE ONLY CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH IS POSSIBLE”
>> (AA IV, 276 note). Kant expressly emphasizes that the analytical method
>> has nothing to do with the procedure of conceptual analysis, but
>> concerns only the method (“Lehrart”): “THE ANALYTIC; METHOD, INSOFAR AS
>> IT IS OPPOSED TO THE SYNTHETICAL, IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM AN AGGREGATE OF
>> ANALYTIC PROPOSITIONS” (ibid).
>>
>> BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 0453 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "GEERT BE
>> WILDERS BLAAST CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF:
>>
>> It was also a item on the news. GEERT did not think it worth all those
>> threats. Still its interesting to see how many madmen live in Pakistan
>> and the rest of the world."
>>
>> PANDORA'S BOX (***@KNOWARE.NL) @ 0611 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Why
>> don't they announce with fanfare a cartoon contest in which Jesus
>> ridiculed."
>>
>> BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 0632 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Then nothing
>> happens. At most a little sputtering."
>>
>> EDMUND (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1650 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Yes, you
>> are right, hundreds of people are killed immediately burned flags,
>> praised prizes to kill bp people.
>>
>> Oh wait oh no, nothing happens at all.
>>
>> Look up:
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "The Life Of Brian - The People's Front of Judea"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WboggjN_G-4>
>>
>> or
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Monty Python And The Holy Grail - The Black Knight - Tis But A
>> Scratch"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmInkxbvlCs>
>>
>> An excellent example of the difference between those backward ones
>> barbarians and the normally developed world.
>>
>> Feel free to make the same MONTY PYTHON film about the Quran, that is
>> laughing man."
>>
>> BUGHUNTER (***@COM) @ 2110 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "By the way,
>> who's talking about ridiculous?"
>>
>> DOLF @ 2143 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "This implication of 18 August
>> 1811, Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte (1804 - 1814) issuing a decree, based
>> on French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is
>> that a large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman
>> Empire Governance and therefore did not have any authenticated notion of
>> Sophia as wisdom which is derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
>> as the basis of science.
>>
>> That portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be
>> regarded as *BARBARIANS* and enlightenment was like the price of tulip
>> 🌷 bulbs a decadent societal entitlement and status.
>>
>> — CONDOMS GALORE —
>> [Amsterdam Pride 3 August 2018]
>>
>> “HEINZ DAUGHTER.
>> LOOKING FOR SOUP.
>> WANDERING AFTER.
>> PARADING TROUPE.
>>
>> A FATHER TO BE.
>> BY SIDEWALK HOPE.
>> EVERYONE IS FREE.
>> NO NEED TO ELOPE.”
>>
>> TURKEY-BASTER@{
>> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 24 (#24),
>> @2: Sup: 20 (#32); Ego: 29 (#53),
>> @3: Sup: 47 (#79); Ego: 31 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
>> @4: Sup: 21 (#100); Ego: 46 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
>> @5: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 66 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
>> @6: Sup: 65 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 11 (#207),
>> @7: Sup: 10 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
>> 56 (#263),
>> @8: Sup: 79 (#264); Ego: 72 (#335),
>> @9: Sup: 54 (#318); Ego: 37 (#372),
>> Male: #318; Feme: #372
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{318}&idea:{372}>
>>
>> H2658@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>> @2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
>> DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
>> @3: Sup: 37 (#105); Ego: 80 (#118),
>> @4: Sup: 75 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
>> {%19}); Ego: 38 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
>> Male: #180; Feme: #156
>> } // #318
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #288 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
>> I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
>> in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
>> #TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
>> #POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
>> #TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
>> #CANON: #45
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_45@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 2 (#3); Ego: 1 (#2),
>> @3: Sup: 43 (#46); Ego: 41 (#43),
>> @4: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 2 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
>> Male: #91; Feme: #45
>> } // #45
>>
>> #318 as [#30, #8, #80, #200] = chaphar (H2658): {UMBRA: #1 as #288 % #41
>> = #1} 1) to dig, search for; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to dig; 1a2) *TO* *SEARCH*,
>> *SEARCH* *OUT*, *EXPLORE*;
>>
>> H3366@{
>> @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>> @2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
>> @3: Sup: 31 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}); Ego: 19 (#31),
>> @4: Sup: 69 (#114); Ego: 38 (#69),
>> @5: Sup: 75 (#189); Ego: 6 (#75),
>> Male: #189; Feme: #75
>> } // #318
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
>> Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
>> Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
>> Tetra: 26 - Endeavour;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
>> appearance in Urit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *HOT* *OF* *SPEECH*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
>> #TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
>> #POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
>> #TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
>> #CANON: #158
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
>> @1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
>> @2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
>> @4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I
>> AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
>> Male: #156; Feme: #158
>> } // #158 <-- *ONTIC* *VALUE* *FOR* *2ND* *NOVICHOK* *POISONING* *EVENT*
>>
>> #318 as [#2, #10, #100, #200, #6] = yeqar (H3366): {UMBRA: #3 as #310 %
>> #41 = #23} 1) *PRICE*, *VALUE*, *PRECIOUSNESS*, *HONOUR*, *SPLENDOUR*,
>> *POMP*; 1a) preciousness; 1b) price; 1c) honour, esteem;
>>
>> G3120@{
>> @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
>> @2: Sup: 41 (#81); Ego: 1 (#41),
>> @3: Sup: 71 (#152); Ego: 30 (#71),
>> @4: Sup: 72 (#224); Ego: 1 (#72),
>> @5: Sup: 11 (#235); Ego: 20 (#92),
>> @6: Sup: 81 (#316); Ego: 70 (#162),
>> @7: Sup: 10 (#326); Ego: 10 (#172),
>> @8: Sup: 48 (#374); Ego: 38 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
>> Male: #374; Feme: #210
>> } // #372
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #362 % #41 = #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
>> H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has
>> been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in
>> Memphis; I am neither a liar nor a doer of mischief.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
>> #TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
>> #POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
>> #TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
>> #CANON: #215
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_215@{
>> @1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
>> @2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
>> @3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
>> OF GRAIN {%6}),
>> @4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
>> OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
>> Male: #134; Feme: #215
>> } // #215 <— *NOTE* *ALIGNMENT* *WITH* ADOLF HITLER’S TABLE TALK IDEA
>> AND ELOHYM AS #86 - ALMIGHTY GOD (SEE ABOVE)
>>
>>
>> #372 as [#40, #1, #30, #1, #20, #70, #10, #200] = malakos (G3120):
>> {UMBRA: #12 as #362 % #41 = #34} 1) soft, soft to the touch; 2)
>> metaphor: in a bad sense; 2a) effeminate; 2a1) of a catamite; 2a2) of a
>> boy kept for homosexual relations with a man; 2a3) of a male who submits
>> his body to unnatural lewdness; 2a4) of a male prostitute;
>>
>> I would therefore take issue with your claim made of the normative
>> descriptor *BARBARIANS* which is a term of relative association and
>> according to my perspective of the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY published
>> within 4BCE by YANG HSIUNG whom determines the #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY
>> {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} AS DERIVED FROM THE I CHING
>> AS 8x8 {#260 - COMPATIBLE TO PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL NOTION OF NUMBER} =
>> H64 BINOMIAL {MALE: YANG CH'I / FEME: YIN CH'I) BY MEANS OF A MAPPED
>> ASSOCIATION WITH THE TETRAGRAMMATON {#1 + #41 + #81 = #123}: "Since
>> neither the content nor the structure of the Changes implies a temporal
>> sequence, the Mystery follows generally a proposed rearrangement of the
>> hexagrams put forward by the HAN Dynasty 206 BCE-220 CE Changes {H64
>> elements} master, CHING FANG (77-33 BC). YANG HSIUNG improved upon
>> CHING FANG’S approach to symmetry in the cyclic structure he was
>> creating. He avoided, for example, certain inelegances of CHING FANG’S
>> schema (which involved only 60 hexagrams) when he incorporated
>> references to all 64 HEXAGRAMS in his arrangement of TETRAGRAMS and also
>> substituted the winter solstice for FANG’S artificial point of departure
>> (the new moon of the tenth civil month as GRAND INCEPTION determined
>> midnight of 21 DECEMBER 103 BCE), so that his cycle starts at the point
>> which marked the actual beginning of the tropical year for the HAN
>> astronomer.
>>
>> Each pair of *HEXAGRAMS* separated by six months (for example: H19 -
>> APPROACH / TETRA: #9 - BRANCHING OUT {#65 CE - SOLDIER / 27-31 JANUARY}
>> and H33 - RETREAT / TETRA: #49 - FLIGHT {26-30 JULY}) are LINE-BY-LINE
>> POLAR OPPOSITIONS and together with the corresponding schema of
>> INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES produces *ONTIC* NECESSITY a REVERSE
>> TRANSCRIPTASE inhibitor as TETRACYTS being *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *THINGS*
>> *IN* *THE* *DIVINE* *MIND* *OPERATING* *INTELLECTUALLY*:
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #91 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
>> Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
>> Sutenhunen; I am not a teller of lies.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
>> #TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
>> #POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
>> #TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
>> #CANON: #161
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
>> @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
>> @2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
>> @3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
>> @4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
>> {%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
>> Male: #169; Feme: #161
>> } // #161
>>
>> Each of these twelve “waxing and waning” hexagrams, along with 48 other
>> hexagrams, also correspond to equal intervals of 6 7/80 days (in other
>> words, 1/60 of the solar year of 365 1/4 days). The remaining four
>> hexagrams found in the Changes, called “standard hexagrams,” correspond
>> to the solstices and equinoxes and thus to the four cardinal points of
>> the sun’s path. They are not segments of the cycle, then, but points
>> fixed in space, which move back and forth in time. The sun may pass
>> through one of them on any day of the lunar month in which it is
>> located. From the astronomer’s point of view, it is the new moons that
>> move back and forth around them. [Nylan, 15-16]
>>
>> And on TETRA: #45 - *GREATNESS* which then made of the #POSITION as
>> comprising an ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI determinism within, YANG HSIUNG
>> comments: The truly *WISE* {
>>
>> H7069@{
>> @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
>> @2: Sup: 69 (#88); Ego: 50 (#69),
>> @3: Sup: 74 (#162); Ego: 5 (#74),
>> @4: Sup: 80 (#242); Ego: 6 (#80),
>> Male: #242; Feme: #80
>> } // #161
>>
>> #161 as [#100, #50, #5, #6] = qanah (H7069): {UMBRA: #14 as #161 % #41 =
>> #38} 1) to get, acquire, create, buy, possess; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to get,
>> acquire, obtain; 1a1a) of God originating, creating, redeeming His
>> people; 1a1a1) possessor; 1a1b) of Eve acquiring; 1a1c) of *ACQUIRING*
>> *KNOWLEDGE*, *WISDOM*; 1a2) to buy; 1b) (Niphal) to be bought; 1c)
>> (Hiphil) to *CAUSE* *TO* *POSSESS*;
>>
>> } PAYS CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE FIRST SMALL *SIGNS* *OF* *CHANGE* {
>>
>> H5927@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
>> @3: Sup: 45 (#107); Ego: 70 (#126),
>> @4: Sup: 75 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
>> Ego: 30 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
>> @5: Sup: 80 (#262); Ego: 5 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
>> Male: #262; Feme: #161
>> } // #161
>>
>> #161 as [#6, #50, #70, #30, #5] = `alah (H5927): {UMBRA: #4 as #161 %
>> #41 = #38} 1) to go up, ascend, climb; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to go up, ascend;
>> 1a2) to meet, visit, follow, depart, withdraw, retreat; 1a3) to go up,
>> come up (of animals); 1a4) to spring up, grow, shoot forth (of
>> vegetation); 1a5) to go up, go up over, *RISE* (*OF* *NATURAL*
>> *PHENOMENON*); 1a6) to come up (before God); 1a7) to go up, go up over,
>> *EXTEND* (*OF* *BOUNDARY*); 1a8) *TO* *EXCEL*, *BE* *SUPERIOR* *TO*; 1b)
>> (Niphal); 1b1) to be taken up, be brought up, be taken away; 1b2) to
>> take oneself away; 1b3) to be exalted; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to bring up,
>> cause to ascend or climb, cause to go up; 1c2) to bring up, bring
>> against, take away; 1c3) to bring up, draw up, train; 1c4) to cause to
>> ascend; 1c5) to rouse, stir up (mentally); 1c6) to offer, bring up (of
>> gifts); 1c7) to exalt; 1c8) to cause to ascend, offer; 1d) (Hophal);
>> 1d1) to be carried away, be led up; 1d2) to be taken up into, be
>> inserted in; 1d3) to be offered; 1e) (Hithpael) to lift oneself;
>>
>> }, since no one [*POSSESSES*] sufficient strength to singlehandedly
>> defeat a well-developed trend. The sage looks at small details
>> overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation of his
>> visionary rule. Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of
>> knowledge which is here conveyed as impetus of gnomic imperative
>> purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being validated by
>> experiential reality:
>>
>> The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}
>>
>> The commentators unanimously prefer a different reading, however:
>>
>> The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
>> It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
>> The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
>> Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
>>
>> Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
>>
>> APPRAISAL 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
>> He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
>> Such fame is empty.
>> FATHOMING 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
>> Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
>>
>> Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit
>> the construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by
>> high rank by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes
>> public display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards
>> internal reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this,
>> he fails to focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are
>> far from *CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
>>
>> The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
>> resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to
>> frame good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also
>> symbolizes *MONEY* since certain coins were minted in its image {
>>
>> H3702@{
>> @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
>> @2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
>> @3: Sup: 79 (#179); Ego: 80 (#160),
>> @4: Sup: 80 (#259); Ego: 1 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
>> Male: #259; Feme: #161
>> } // #161
>>
>> #161 as [#20, #60, #80, #1] = kecaph (H3702): {UMBRA: #39 as #161 % #41
>> = #38} 1) silver; 1a) as metal; 1b) as *MONEY*;
>>
>> } Here the house lacks either the incisive thinking or the material
>> resources it needs to flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before
>> too long, its reputation will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an
>> equivalence to the mystical cabalistic interpretation given to the
>> Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15 magic square and its gematria value:
>>
>> H5014@{
>> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>> @2: Sup: 52 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 2 (#52),
>> @3: Sup: 58 (#160); Ego: 6 (#58),
>> @4: Sup: 60 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 2 (#60),
>> Male: #220; Feme: #60
>> } // #60
>>
>> #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab (H5014): {UMBRA: #12 as #60 % #41 =
>> #19} 1) (Qal) TO *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED* (PARTICIPLE);
>>
>> APPRAISAL 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
>> Into his realm, and so is victorious.
>> FATHOMING 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
>> Means: He oversees the *NINE* *BARBARIANS*.
>>
>> Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with
>> humaneness, the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT
>> MARRIAGE AS PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT
>> HUMANENESS as having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting
>> the minimum of pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have
>> a civilizing effect on people.
>>
>> ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
>> NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
>>
>> And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
>> Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION
>> VIII as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING*
>> unto Our said Governor General:
>>
>> VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
>> *OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
>> *OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
>> *OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
>> or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
>> such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
>> *PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
>> *GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.
>>
>> } agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*,
>> or 'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomising what is *CENTRAL*, the true
>> sage eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the
>> earth. The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things
>> revolve. In return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal
>> presence {ie. The sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL*
>> transformation. If he would do Viewing of what he himself is, he should
>> do Viewing of the people who themselves are morally transformed by their
>> viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
>>
>> APPRAISAL 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
>> The many, because of the few.
>> FATHOMING 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
>> Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
>>
>> If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
>> beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will
>> eventually grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave
>> overwhelms tiny ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first
>> signs of disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation,
>> he can both adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the
>> Good. This is no less true in the private world of the soul than in the
>> public world of the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45, page #288]
>>
>> — NOW I SEE —
>>
>> "YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
>> CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
>> PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
>> YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.
>>
>> ONE THING IS CLEAR.
>> DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
>> THE MIRROR TO PEER.
>> YOUR WIFE HAS A ***@NT."
>>
>> MICHAEL CHRIST: "I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to
>> speak like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.
>>
>> Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.
>>
>> To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
>> encyclopedias.
>>
>> My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
>> personally, and inspirationally.
>>
>> [Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
>> 'listening'.
>>
>> Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.
>>
>> So, I must say, thank you.
>>
>> And thank you, again.
>>
>> However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.
>>
>> Amen."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
>> touch with scripture."
>>
>> MILOCH ITCHY KOALA: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
>> out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.
>>
>> Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something
>> out of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
>> 'pillar of salt'?
>>
>> And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk
>> and finally resigned from his ministry.
>>
>> Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!
>>
>> go Warriors!"
>>
>> — PRELAPSARIAN —
>>
>> "OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
>> ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
>> JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
>> AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
>> MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.
>>
>> SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
>> E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
>> THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
>> SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
>> THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."
>>
>> *PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
>> - characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
>> prelapsarian youth.
>> - Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
>> - Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
>>
>> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "Trump and
>> Kushner are going down...
>>
>> George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is
>> shocked and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are
>> defending Donald Trump and his actions."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."
>>
>> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "We have courts
>> to decided that.."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
>> presumed innocent until proven otherwise."
>>
>> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "DICK Painter
>> went on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will
>> stand up in a court of law.
>>
>> The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...
>>
>> I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and
>> if there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up
>> in a dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"
>>
>> ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "Obstruction of
>> justice."
>>
>> DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."
>>
>> — BISCUIT EUPHORIA —
>>
>> "LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
>> STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
>> SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
>> GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.
>>
>> SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
>> AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
>> PISS OFF YOU ***@CKER.
>> OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."
>>
>> And these APPRAISALS AS ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI AND FATHOMING AS SYNTHETIC
>> A POSTERIORI then as systematically comprise the INTELLECTUAL DECAD as
>> being equivalent to the Pythagoreans understanding of TEN as the
>> greatest number, as well for that it is the TETRACTYS, by that it
>> comprehends all arithmetical and harmonical proportions. Pythagoras
>> said, that TEN is the NATURE of NUMBER: because all Nations, Greeks,
>> [the *ARABS*] and *BARBARIANS*, reckon to it; and when they arrive at
>> it, return to the MONAD: as therefore compliant with the Chinese
>> perspective of the GRAND INCEPTION determined midnight of 21 DECEMBER
>> 103 BCE.' [Chapter XIV, Pythagoras: His Life Teachings, Ninth Section
>> 1687 edition of The History of Philosophy, p 529]
>>
>> As the basis of the historical citation made within within the Epistle
>> to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist syncretic perennialist
>> philosophers whom published counterfactual works on the Religious
>> Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery the
>> reference to the nine *BARBARIANS* appears equitable to the Pythagorean
>> binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited
>> / unlimited: “I AM DEBTOR BOTH TO THE GREEKS, AND TO THE *BARBARIANS* {
>>
>> G915@{
>> @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>> @2: Sup: 3 (#5); Ego: 1 (#3),
>> @3: Sup: 22 (#27); Ego: 19 (#22),
>> @4: Sup: 24 (#51); Ego: 2 (#24),
>> @5: Sup: 25 (#76); Ego: 1 (#25),
>> @6: Sup: 44 (#120); Ego: 19 (#44),
>> @7: Sup: 33 (#153); Ego: 70 (#114),
>> @8: Sup: 43 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 10 (#124),
>> @9: Sup: 81 (#277); Ego: 38 (#162),
>> Male: #277; Feme: #162
>> } // #486
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #476 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
>> I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
>> Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
>> Distortion;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
>> Unsit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *BOISTEROUS* *IN* *BEHAVIOUR*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
>> #TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
>> #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
>> #TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
>> #CANON: #185
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_185@{
>> @1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
>> @2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
>> @3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
>> @4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
>> {%25}),
>> Male: #108; Feme: #185
>> } // #185
>>
>> #486 as [#2, #1, #100, #2, #1, #100, #70, #10, #200] = barbaros (G915):
>> {UMBRA: #18 as #476 % #41 = #25} 1) one whose speech is rude, rough and
>> harsh; 2) one who speaks a foreign or strange language which is not
>> understood by another; 3) *USED* *BY* *THE* *GREEKS* *OF* *ANY*
>> *FOREIGNER* *IGNORANT* *OF* *THE* *GREEK* *LANGUAGE*, *WHETHER* *MENTAL*
>> *OR* *MORAL*, with the added notion after the Persian war, of rudeness
>> and brutality. *THE* *WORD* *IS* *USED* *IN* *THE* *NEW* *TESTAMENT*
>> *WITHOUT* THE* *IDEA* *OF* *REPROACHFULNESS*;
>>
>> } BOTH TO THE WISE, AND TO THE UNWISE. SO, AS MUCH AS IN ME IS, I AM
>> READY TO PREACH THE GOSPEL TO YOU THAT ARE AT ROME {power; strength}
>> ALSO.” [Romans 1:14]
>>
>> According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
>> concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
>> that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
>> WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
>> that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {
>>
>> @1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] {
>>
>> HOMOIOS
>> HETEROS
>> KABBALAH
>> AS DEFINED
>>
>> } ...
>>
>> @5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
>> Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
>>
>> #15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - Remember the
>> Sabbath]) ...
>>
>> #34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
>> Honour your parents]) ...
>>
>> #65 (@2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
>> - Do not kill]) ...
>>
>> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
>> [#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
>>
>> #175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
>> - Do not steal]) ...
>>
>> #260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
>> Bear no false witness]) ...
>>
>> #369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - Covet Not])
>>
>> } of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
>> argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
>> trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
>> Chinese naming conventions such as is exemplar by:
>>
>> MAO ZE DONG
>>
>> or
>>
>> XI JIN PIN
>>
>> “FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
>> ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
>> [Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
>>
>> DANIEL60 [SHORT A DIGIT: +1 = #61 / % #41 = #20]
>> (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2117 HOURS ON 2 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Ah!
>> Well, there you go!! Now I am more edu-ma-cated!! :)"
>>
>> FRAN SNORTELUS (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 2128 HOURS ON 2
>> SEPTEMBER 2018: "The power of usenet..... Now if we could only get the
>> PRETZEL to learn..... "
>>
>> A second possible interpretation consists in referring the expressions
>> “ANALYTICALLY” and “SYNTHETICALLY,” as they are used here, neither
>> directly to the expression “METHOD” nor, consequently, to the concept of
>> method in the Prolegomena. Indeed, in the Preface to the Groundwork,
>> Kant says only that he wants “TO TAKE THE WAY” first ANALYTICALLY and
>> then SYNTHETICALLY. This leaves the possibility open to read the
>> expressions in a conceptual-analytical or conceptual-synthetical sense.
>> If one follows this interpretation, the outcome of the first two
>> sections is constituted in the “SEARCH” (GMS, 392,3) for the supreme
>> principle of morality. The goal of this “SEARCH” is an exact formulation
>> of the [#41 - *ONTIC* *NECESSITY* to] CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE. The
>> procedure Kant uses for this is that of conceptual analysis. The formula
>> of the categorical imperative can be found through the analytical
>> process, but its validity cannot yet be proven. For this reason, Kant
>> shifts to the CONCEPTUAL-SYNTHETICAL procedure in the third section and
>> therewith to the “ESTABLISHMENT” (GMS, 392,4) of the principle. In the
>> first two sections, it is, accordingly, solely a matter of ANALYTICAL
>> JUDGMENTS. In contrast, SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS, with which the proof of
>> validity can be achieved, would stand at the centre of the third
>> section. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 17-18]
>>
>> DOLF @ 0436 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I am (being surnamed BOEK
>> self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical appeal to either
>> *REDUCTIO* *AD* *TRUMPIUM* for taking an obstinate or negative dialectic
>> disposition (ie. ) as is implied by the title of this chapter 'DUTCH
>> BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS' and then spiralling downwards into
>> forfeiture of decency by recourse to *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* until
>> one reaches a consequential depravity *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* (eg:
>> Hitler was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are you), .
>>
>> However, if ADOLF HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK as IDEA @1
>> expressed on Saturday 5 JULY 1941 that "THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A
>> SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME" as deploying the
>> NUMBER @1 / @5 PROTOTYPE as the basis of Roman Empire Governance by
>> which it was then an authenticated notion of *SOPHIA* *AS* *WISDOM* as
>> derived from Pythagorean binomial {#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as
>> [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis (G1520): {#12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*}
>> nomenclature as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE
>> A CHOOK AS CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
>>
>> #541 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #300, #5, #50, #5, #10] = apokteino (G615):
>> {#60 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to kill in any way whatever; 2) metaphor: to
>> extinguish, abolish; 1a) to destroy, to allow to perish; 2a) to inflict
>> mortal death; 2b) *TO* *DEPRIVE* *OF* *SPIRITUAL* *LIFE* *AND* *PROCURE*
>> *ETERNAL* *MISERY* *IN* *HELL*
>>
>> #391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
>> (G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
>> *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
>> management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
>> office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
>> dispensation;
>>
>> #391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460 %
>> #41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b)
>> like: ie. corresponding to a thing;
>>
>> #541 as [#20, #300, #1, #200, #9, #1, #10] = ktaomai (G2932): {#63 as
>> #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to acquire, get, or procure a thing for one's self,
>> to possess; 1a) to marry a wife;
>>
>> #541 as [#5, #80, #10, #200, #20, #10, #1, #200, #5, #10] = episkiazo
>> (G1982): {#55 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *TO* *THROW* *A* *SHADOW* *UPON*,
>> *TO* *ENVELOP* *IN* *A* *SHADOW*, *TO* *OVERSHADOW* from a vaporous
>> cloud that casts a shadow the word is transferred to a shining cloud
>> surrounding and enveloping persons with brightness. Used of the Holy
>> Spirit exerting creative energy upon the womb of the virgin Mary and
>> impregnating it (a use of the word which seems to have been drawn from
>> the familiar Old Testament idea of a cloud as symbolising the immediate
>> presence and power of God);
>>
>> #541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
>> (G3622): {#56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
>> *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
>> management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
>> office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
>> dispensation;
>>
>> SEE ALSO: "REFUTATION OF SCORN: IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF
>> PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?"
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.6%20A%20METHODOLOGICAL%20NEW%20BEGINNING.pdf>
>>
>> In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
>> argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument
>> that attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably
>> leads to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove
>> one by showing that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or
>> impossible.
>>
>> Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
>> (Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
>> 62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
>> mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
>>
>> The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a
>> range of forms, as these examples show:
>>
>> The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off
>> the edge.
>>
>> There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were,
>> then it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
>>
>> The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
>> ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
>> example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
>> denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is
>> a "smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
>>
>> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
>>
>> Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY in being
>> normative description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted
>> {ie. #391} and what causality {#541} it had within and upon the populace.
>>
>> The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) which was competed within 1631
>> is a Reformed church within Dutch Protestant church in central
>> Amsterdam, Netherlands. It lies in the most western part of the
>> Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum borough), next to the Jordaan,
>> between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
>>
>> The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three
>> main canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting
>> canal belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the
>> west and south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
>> Prinsengracht .
>>
>> Furthermore as an instance of *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* is this your
>> quantitative statement: "An excellent example of the difference between
>> those backward *BARBARIANS* and the normally developed world. The
>> difference between *MORE* *AND* *LESS* secularized societies.
>>
>> If one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
>> enlightenment, then one is espousing scientific endeavour and any
>> conveyance of such is framed by conceptions of NUMBER.
>>
>> Thusly, to convey any difference on the basis of “*MORE* *OR* *LESS*”,
>> then one is making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished
>> otherwise) to at least as a starting point of Aristotelian (384–322 BCE)
>> understanding given of the binomial NATURE OF NUMBER as the earlier
>> ANALYTIC A PRIORI / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI conception of it enumerated by
>> the PYTHAGOREAN (c. 570 – c. 495 BCE) where there was both:
>>
>> LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
>> something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
>>
>> MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something
>> could be done well.
>>
>> So then, there is a prudent contradiction (ie. IT DOESN'T CUT THE
>> MUSTARD) by a paucity of the rhetorical contrivance concerning the
>> necessity about the reality of secularised societies: *DUTCH* *OR*
>> *OTHERWISE*.
>>
>> The modern sense of the idiom is 'to succeed; to have the ability to do
>> something; to come up to expectations' as to arouse amusement or
>> derision; ridiculous in being an absurdity.
>>
>> WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
>>
>> Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
>>
>> [WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]"
>>
>> GEERT BE WILDERS@{
>> @1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
>> @2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
>> @3: Sup: 46 (#124); Ego: 47 (#116),
>> @4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55
>> (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
>> @5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
>> @6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
>> @7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
>> Male: #288 - *UMBRA* *CONTIVANCE*; Feme: #265
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
>>
>> H2438@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>> @2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
>> DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
>> @3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
>> @4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
>> @5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
>> Male: #166; Feme: #126
>> } // #288
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
>> from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
>> Tetra: 25 - Contention;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
>> appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
>> #TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
>> #POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
>> #TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
>> #CANON: #148
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
>> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
>> @2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
>> @3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
>> @4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>> Male: #222; Feme: #148
>> } // #148
>>
>> #288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258
>> % #41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to
>> Jerusalem to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon;
>> 2) the chief architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King
>> Hiram to Solomon;
>>
>> H142@{
>> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>> @2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
>> @3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
>> @4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
>> Ego: 38 (#93),
>> @5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
>> Male: #190; Feme: #103
>> } // #265
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
>> I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
>> Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
>> energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
>> at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
>> *OWN* *PROPERTY*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE:
>> #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
>> #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
>> #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
>> #CANON: #157
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
>> @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
>> @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
>> @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
>> {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
>> Male: #179; Feme: #157
>> } // #157
>>
>> #265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 %
>> #41 = #41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a)
>> (Niphal) majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
>>
>> H1396@{
>> @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
>> @2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
>> @3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
>> @4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
>> @5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
>> Male: #245; Feme: #103
>> } // #265
>>
>> #265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 %
>> #41 = #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be
>> mighty, be great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail;
>> 1b) (Piel) to make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm,
>> give strength; 1c2) to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to
>> show oneself mighty; 1d2) to act proudly (toward God);
>>
>> SEE ALSO: "(TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND
>> CAPACITY AS A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE /
>> #312 - RESISTANCE)"
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
>>
>> — LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
>> [PUBLISHED @ 0457 HOURS ON 1 OCTOBER 2017]
>>
>> "GRISTLE AND BUNT.
>> SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
>> DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
>> SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
>> MUSTARD WEASEL.
>> VALOUR DIVORCE.
>> DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hotdog Commercial (1977)"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOeJ4rmDTvg>
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hot Dog 1990s Commercial Ad on Beach"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OO2PYAnxQSo>
>>
>> *CANT* (noun):
>> - hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious,
>> or political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
>> - language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded
>> with disparagement: thieves' cant.
>>
>> ETHICAL_SPORTS_SLEDGE@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
>> @2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
>> {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
>> @3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
>> ITS FLOW {%36}),
>> @4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
>> @5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
>> #100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 -
>> *ONTIC* VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION,
>> CONTRARINESS, ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
>> @6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
>> @7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
>> @8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
>> Male: #302; Feme: #536
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,302}&idea:{f,546}>
>>
>> #302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA:
>> #5 as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
>>
>> #546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546
>> % #41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the
>> commandment (of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
>>
>> LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1604 HOURS
>> ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "That's like saying, "a surname name". Tautology and
>> repetition is *ONE* reason you make no sense."
>>
>> DOLF @ 1729 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "Your constipated turd 💩 opinion
>> whilst a sensualism as anal retentive declaration given self bestowal
>> through proscription of a grunt is no more substantial an entitlement
>> than a FANNY excretion of pustulant tripe which is enamoured by it’s
>> prolapsed existence though laborious in it’s eventuality as a shrivelled
>> spud with no viability as a snag {ie. *BAG* *OF* ****@T*: a despicable
>> person}.
>>
>>
>> — ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
>>
>> “PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
>> SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
>> HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
>> THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
>>
>> WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
>> OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
>> THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
>> WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
>>
>> WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
>> IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
>> THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
>> ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
>>
>> ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard'
>> (strong or brave) meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'.
>> The name's common female equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
>>
>> BE WILDERS ANTHEM@{
>> @1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
>> @2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
>> @3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
>> {%32}); Ego: 3 (#50),
>> @4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
>> @5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
>> @6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
>> @7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
>> @8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
>> @9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
>> @10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
>> @11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
>> @12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
>> @13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
>> @14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
>> Male: #727; Feme: #356
>> }
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
>>
>> STICKYBEAK:
>> - (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
>>
>> CLARION:
>> - (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
>> - (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
>>
>> FOOTLE:
>> - (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
>> - (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
>>
>> THRASONICAL:
>> - (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
>>
>> FESTSCHRIFT:
>> - (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors
>> in honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of
>> retirement, an important anniversary, or the like. [Courtesy: Words of
>> Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
>>
>> H8454@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
>> @3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
>> @4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
>> @5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
>> @6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
>> Male: #231; Feme: #160
>> } // #727
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
>> I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
>> (massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
>> thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
>> #TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
>> #POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
>> #TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
>> #CANON: #210
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_210@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>> @2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
>> @3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
>> @4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
>> Male: #110; Feme: #210
>> } // #210 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
>> *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #SIX: #114 / #342 AND TORAH
>> PROTOTYPES #FIVE: #114 / #342
>>
>> #727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
>> #727 % #41 = #30} 1) *WISDOM*, *SOUND* *KNOWLEDGE*, *SUCCESS*, *SOUND*
>> *OR* *EFFICIENT* *WISDOM*, *ABIDING* *SUCCESS*; 1a) sound or efficient
>> wisdom; 1b) abiding success (of the effect of sound wisdom);
>>
>> H2803@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
>> @3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
>> @4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
>> @5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
>> @6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
>> @7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
>> Male: #302; Feme: #160
>> } // #727
>>
>> #727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6
>> as #727 % #41 = #30} 1) *TO* *THINK*, *PLAN*, *ESTEEM*, *CALCULATE*,
>> *INVENT*, *MAKE* *A* *JUDGMENT*, *IMAGINE*, *COUNT*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
>> think, account; 1a2) to plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute,
>> reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value, regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal);
>> 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be
>> reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to think upon, consider,
>> be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise, plan; 1c3) to count, reckon;
>> 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
>>
>>
>> — 👽👽👽👽👽👽👽 —
>>
>> "THE *WATCHERS* WE ARE,
>> SO DO NOT DARE.
>> THOUGH IT BE FAR.
>> IT'S LIKE WE'RE THERE."
>>
>> DOLF @ 1752 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "We have established a temporal
>> neural linguistic interface with you so that we can cure you of this
>> disease of ignorance as #335 - *MORAL* *BLINDNESS*:
>>
>> G52@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
>> @3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
>> @4: Sup: 43 (#102); Ego: 70 (#124),
>> @5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
>> @6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135 - *ISLAMIC* STOICHEION
>> TRANSFORMATION *ONTIC* / *CANONICAL* PROTOTYPE OF AN #45 ARRAY WHERE
>> EACH ROW IS TOTALLING #135),
>> @7: Sup: 11 (#220); Ego: 38 (#173),
>> Male: #220; Feme: #173
>> } // #335
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
>> from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
>> Tetra: 25 - Contention;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
>> appearance in the Unseen Land; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TRANSGRESSOR*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
>> #TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
>> #POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
>> #TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
>> #CANON: #148
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
>> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
>> @2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
>> @3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
>> @4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>> Male: #222; Feme: #148
>> } // #148
>>
>> #335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {#9 as #135 %
>> #41 = #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine things;
>> 1b) of *MORAL* blindness;
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "2000 - Star Trek: Voyager - Unimatrix Zero"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwDTtXpG--I>
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
>> I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
>> Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
>> at Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
>> #TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
>> #POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
>> #TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
>> #CANON: #115
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
>> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>> @2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
>> @3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
>> @4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
>> Male: #118; Feme: #115
>> } // #115
>>
>> #316 as [#50, #3, #7, #200, #50, #6] = gazar (H1504): {#0 as #210 % #41
>> = #5} 1) to cut, divide, cut down, cut off, cut in two, snatch, decree;
>> 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to cut in two, divide; 1a2) to cut down; 1a3) to cut
>> off, destroy, exterminate; 1a4) to decree; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be cut
>> off, separated, excluded; 1b2) to be destroyed, cut off; 1b3) to be decreed;
>>
>> H3336@{
>> @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
>> @2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
>> @3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
>> @4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
>> @5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
>> Male: #144; Feme: #113
>> } // #356
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
>> Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
>> the Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
>> #TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
>> #POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
>> #TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
>> #CANON: #139
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
>> @1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
>> @2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
>> @3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
>> @4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
>> SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
>> Male: #211; Feme: #139
>> } // #139
>>
>> #356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
>> #41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as
>> Book of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2)
>> graven image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) *PURPOSE*,
>> *IMAGINATION*, *DEVICE* (*INTELLECTUAL* *FRAMEWORK*);
>>
>> "And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
>> every imagination {#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336):
>> imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
>> [Genesis 6:5 (KJV)]
>>
>> To what degree Kant’s proceedings in the Groundwork actually are to be
>> related to the Prolegomena is disputed among interpreters. In the end,
>> only an exact reconstruction of the entire line of argumentation through
>> the three sections of the work can provide insight into Kant’s method in
>> the Groundwork. His remarks in the Preface offer little assistance in
>> this endeavour. In the following section, therefore, I will not deal
>> with these questions any further. Instead, I inquire briefly into a
>> cluster of interpretation problems that the last section raises. This
>> cluster revolves around the question of the relation of the metaphysics
>> of morals to the Groundwork.
>>
>> (a) The first problem arises from the fact that Kant thinks two types of
>> a “groundwork” for a pure moral philosophy are possible: on the one
>> hand, a “critique of pure practical reason,” and on the other hand, the
>> present work. Although he claims there is “really no other foundation”
>> than a “critique” (GMS, 391,17 f.), he believes that one can do without
>> such a critique and lists three reasons for this (see GMS,
>> 391,20-392,2). It remains nevertheless unclear how the relation of the
>> Groundwork to the intimated critique of practical of reason is to be
>> defined.
>>
>> (b) Equally unclear is the precise relation of the Groundwork to the
>> envisioned metaphysics of morals. Is the “groundwork” of a theory itself
>> to be considered a part of this theory or is what Kant calls the
>> “preliminary work of laying the ground” (GMS, 391,37) a part separate
>> from the actual metaphysics? Undoubtedly, the parts of the theory
>> developed in the Groundwork raise the claim of being independent of
>> empirical knowledge and therefore belong to a pure moral philosophy.
>> Thus, at least parts of the Groundwork have to be identical with parts
>> of a metaphysics of morals.
>>
>> (c) Making matters more difficult in the identification of the relation
>> between the Groundwork, a metaphysics of morals, and the mentioned
>> “critique of pure practical reason” is the fact that Kant later
>> published monographs with these or slightly modified titles. In any
>> case, it may not simply be assumed that the later produced works
>> actually deal with the types of theories mentioned in the Preface to the
>> Groundwork.
>>
>> How can the relations of these types of theory to each other be more
>> precisely defined? Is Kant’s expression “metaphysics of morals” a
>> unified concept or are there different meanings combined here in opaque
>> ways?
>>
>> An approach toward the resolution of these difficulties offers perhaps a
>> more precise interpretation of what Kant understands by a “metaphysics
>> of morals.” In the opening passages of the Preface, Kant had defined the
>> metaphysics of morals with the help of three criteria: first of all, it
>> is a theory that is not purely formal but refers to particular objects.
>> It refers, secondly, to objects insofar as these are under “LAWS OF
>> FREEDOM.” {#492 - *FREEDOM* *OF* *WILL* / #41 = #12 as #9 - Autonomous
>> Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL* *NECESSITY*} And thirdly, it is perfectly
>> free of empirical content. Therefore, a metaphysics of morals is a “pure
>> moral philosophy.” One question, however, remains unanswered. What
>> actually is a moral philosophy? Or articulated more precisely: what is
>> the ontological status of such a theory?
>>
>> Kant’s arguments for the practical use or the necessity of such a
>> philosophy offer a suggestion for answering this question. A moral
>> philosophy is not only an object for the scientific discipline of
>> "philosophy." Rather, according to Kant, every rational being, even if
>> at times confused, carries in itself a moral philosophy. That raises the
>> question about what conception of “theory” can fulfil both of these
>> functions simultaneously.
>>
>> For the clarification of this question I believe the conceptual
>> distinction between a theory, understood as an abstract system of
>> ordered propositions, and the presentation of such a theory, for example
>> in the form of a philosophical text, can be of further assistance. A
>> moral theory, understood as a system of propositions that stand in a
>> particular relation of grounding to each other and whose #41 - #CENTRE
>> is made up of ethical principles, is an abstract object, which can
>> simultaneously fulfill both functions. On the one hand, such a system
>> can be brought to expression with the help of a philosophical text. On
>> the other hand it is also possible to carry such a system “IN ONESELF,”
>> that is, to accept, the corresponding propositions.
>>
>> If one takes such a conception of theory as a basis, the confusing
>> terminologies and exact relations of the types of theories mentioned by
>> Kant could be newly formulated and made transparent in the following
>> way: (i) A metaphysics of morals or a pure moral philosophy is an
>> abstract object, a system of propositions complete in itself and
>> containing all a priori judgments that are concerned with the laws of
>> freedom. (ii) A work with the title “Metaphysics of Morals” contains a
>> presentation of this system. The text expresses the corresponding
>> propositions and their connections. (iii) If a person carries such a
>> moral philosophy in herself, it means that she accepts the corresponding
>> propositions and their connections. And if this person is rational, the
>> propositions accepted by her will comprise the grounds of her action.
>> (iv) A work with the title “Critique of Pure Practical Reason” could be
>> a philosophical presentation of parts of this system of propositions
>> (and for this reason is suitable as a kind of “groundwork”). But it
>> contains additionally a presentation that relies on philosophical
>> theories on other spheres of investigation. In Kant’s words, “IN PART I
>> REQUIRE FOR A CRITIQUE A PURE PRACTICAL REASON THAT IF IT IS TO BE
>> COMPLETED, ITS UNITY WITH THE SPECULATIVE IN A COMMON PRINCIPLE MUST AT
>> THE SAME TIME BE EXHIBITED” (GMS, 391,24-27). (iv) In contrast, a work
>> with the title “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals” can restrict
>> itself entirely to the presentation and mediation of the foundational
>> part of the metaphysics of morals. This contains, as Kant expresses it,
>> “nothing more than the search for and the establishment of the supreme
>> principle of morality” (GMS, 392,3 f.). [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
>> Groundwork, Page 18-21]
>>
>> SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF AN AGREEMENT AS POLITICAL
>> INTERFERENCE / DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE CAPABLE OF
>> DEPLOYING THE LEST WE FORGET ODE FOR ITS OWN ENDS
>>
>> — MANDALAY SWAY POEM —
>>
>> @5: Sup: 51 (#218 - OR DEATH ITS SWAY); Ego: 34 (#160) <— ANALYTICAL
>> JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION OF COGNITIVE
>> PROPOSITION
>>
>> #492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {#41 = #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} -
>> #391 - *HOMOIOS* *FRATERNITY* =
>> #101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS RIGHT'
>>
>> MANDALAY_SWAY@{
>> @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
>> @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
>> @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
>> @4: Sup: 24 (#57); Ego: 9 (#24),
>> @5: Sup: 32 (#89); Ego: 8 (#32),
>> @6: Sup: 52 (#141); Ego: 20 (#52),
>> @7: Sup: 60 (#201); Ego: 8 (#60),
>> @8: Sup: 17 (#218 - *OR* *DEATH* *ITS* *SWAY*); Ego: 38 (#98),
>> Male: #218; Feme: #98
>> } // #260 <— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF
>> AN AGREEMENT OF CONCLUSION
>>
>> #260 as [#4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8, #200] = diatheke (G1242): {#31 as
>> #60 % #41 = #19} 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort, which one
>> wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of his earthly
>> possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) *A* *COMPACT*, *A*
>> *COVENANT*, *A* *TESTAMENT*; 2a) *GOD'S* *COVENANT* *WITH* *NOAH*, etc.;
>>
>> — LEST WE FORGET ODE —
>>
>> "{@1} THEY SHALL GROW NOT OLD, {@2} AS WE THAT ARE LEFT GROW OLD;
>> {@3} AGE SHALL NOT WEARY THEM, {@4} NOR THE YEARS CONDEMN.
>> {@5 - #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} AT THE GOING DOWN OF THE SUN AND IN
>> THE MORNING
>> {@6} WE WILL REMEMBER THEM."
>>
>> @5: Sup: 74 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
>> *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 12 (#206) <— ANALYTICAL JUDGMENTS: ANALYTIC
>> A POSTERIORI BY DIALECTIC EXTRUSION AS IDEA EXISTENCE OF JUXTAPOSITION
>> CONTROL ASSOCIATED WITH THE ODE
>>
>> INRI@{
>> @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
>> @2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
>> @3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
>> @4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
>> Male: #114; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
>> } // #270
>>
>> #1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
>> ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
>> #2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
>> same light;
>> #3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
>> friends;
>> #4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
>> *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 -
>> TORAH} - Keep a common way;
>> #5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
>> each other {Latin: CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.
>>
>> *FOR* (*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the
>> interests of a given perspective or for the benefit of any small
>> powerful or influential #123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION /
>> FIELD / CLIQUE which places a prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 /
>> #342} within the pious construct {#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288
>> - UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 -
>> JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
>> *IN* *THE* *MORNING*} by conduct of #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} -
>> DETRUDE.
>>
>> H7750@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 63 (#69); Ego: 57 (#63),
>> @3: Sup: 72 (#141); Ego: 9 (#72),
>> @4: Sup: 1 (#142); Ego: 10 (#82),
>> Male: #142; Feme: #82
>> } // #325
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #315 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
>> Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
>> Circle;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
>> even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
>> #TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
>> #POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
>> #TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
>> #CANON: #150
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
>> @1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
>> @2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
>> @3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
>> @4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
>> I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
>> Male: #177; Feme: #150
>> } // #150
>>
>> #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#6, #300, #9, #10] = suwt (H7750):
>> {UMBRA: #9 as #315 % #41 = #28} 1) to swerve, fall away; 2) *TO*
>> *THRUST* *OR* *FORCE* *DOWN*, *OUT*, *OR* *AWAY*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
>> swerve, fall away; 1a2) those falling away (participle); 2a) subject to
>> censorship or kill-file filtering; 2b) habitually exclude socially or
>> ignore conversationally;
>>
>> <— SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS: SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI HYPOTHESIS OF AN
>> AGREEMENT OF POLITICAL INTERFERENCE / DOMESTIC TERRORISM BY
>> INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE CAPABLE OF DEPLOYING THE LEST WE FORGET ODE FOR
>> ITS OWN ENDS
>>
>> THUS WE CONVEY A COGNITIVE PROCESS DEPLOYING DIALECTIC WHICH IS CAPABLE
>> OF CONVEYING IDEAS WHILST DERIVED FROM SUCH AS PARENT-CHILD HAVE NO
>> INHERENT GEMATRIA CORRESPONDENCE AND THEREFORE EXHIBIT A HIGHER LEVEL OF
>> CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH THEN HAS INTEGRITY WITH THE EVOLUTIONARY PEER
>> EQUIVALENT CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING
>>
>> THEREFORE THE INTERDICTION: “GOD SAVE THE QUEEN FROM YOU FASCISTS”
>> expressed as *CARPE* *DIEM* at a distance of some 40 to 60 metres within
>> the street to passing persons whom paused and laughed with absolute
>> conviction as derision by means of #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} -
>> DETRUDE BY MALFEASANCE (noun): (LAW) the performance by a public
>> official of an act that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to
>> law; wrongdoing used especially of an act in violation of a public
>> trust; Word of the Day for 1 March 2017; www.dictionary.com
>>
>> The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
>> defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
>> permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
>> BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS
>> INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING
>> AND RATIONALITY."
>>
>> Were engaging within allegedly #288 - BEERSHEBA commemorations of a
>> PRIVATE NATURE INCLUSIVE OF ROMAN CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS BEING BY PARTIALITY
>> OF AS DISRESPECT SHOWN TO BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS UPON SUNDAY
>> PROXIMITY TO 31 MAY, THEREBY AN IMPOSITION OF AN ABHORRENT AND
>> BLASPHEMOUS RELIGIOUS BELIEF, DISBELIEF, NON-BELIEF CONSTITUTING
>> UNLAWFUL BREACHES OF SECTION #116 OF THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION UPON
>> SATURDAY 28 OCTOBER 2017, has in light of a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
>> as implicit breaches made against the SOVEREIGN CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
>> “DIEU ET MON DROIT” was an entirely of a propitious characteristic as
>> conformity to probity and within bounds of decorum as ontological
>> pacifist (ie. #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY) values which were compliant with
>> the SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE principles of a $50 valued LEST WE FORGET
>> badge purchased the year prior before Remembrance Day of 11 November
>> 2016 and was not simply an action of nostalgia by fanciful decoration
>> being only a contrived dignity.
>>
>> TO BE CONTINUED ...
>>
>> - dolf
>>
>> The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
>> the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
>> Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
>> directory:
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
>>
>> Initial Post: 2 September 2018
>>
>> #ANALYTICAL #SYNTHETICAL #KORPPIONOIKEUS #FREEWILL
>>
>>
>
>
>



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-06 11:08:42 UTC
Permalink
Now I’m going to partake in another curious cognitive function and that is
to load a conundrum or concertion within the sub-consciousness mind so that
a coalescence may be facilitated and the process of substantialization
occurs with a reasonable concretion as the outcome.

And that is the consideration which we initially conveyed within section “2
- THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” which for purposes of
conceptualisation, we’ll repeat again: “Whilst it is prudent to establish
the starting point of necessity as to any premises for the continuity of
enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance with respect to the learned as the
educated and the gravitas of the subject matter to say nothing of those
whom may have given their lives as something other than marsupial roadkill
as RECTUS for the foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and
in a sturdy and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
self-entitlement [as] bestowal.”

Thusly I want to consider whether the COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE) may be thought of in terms by the similitude as traversal of
consciousness being a continuum in much the same way as to be resolutely
{#2184} driving down a roadway and to do so I need a vocabulary to describe
it.

So therefore the starting point of such necessity is consideration that the
temporal extent of % #364 - ADMITTANCE may be viewed as markers by which we
overtake, whereas the temporal extent of % #728 - REACTANCE are the #CENTRE
markers as stability guidance for our consciousness traversal and that the
temporal extent of % #312 - RESISTANCE are then markers by which intercept
points are cognised.

So then I want to think about the process of thinking for which we have
definitive meta-descriptor prototypes and to then facilitate that with some
semantical constructs as clarifying outcomes which might resonate with the
experience.

Where can I find such ready answers?

I will have to sleep on that.


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-06 20:48:12 UTC
Permalink
This is a broad sketch of the nocturnal considerations which over the
coming days we’ll cohere into our existing chapter:

We are dealing here with only hypothetical postulates which need to be
assayed for verity as factuality and the reason for that is simply that
one’s ego must always continually exist within the temporality as the
notion broadly conveyed within section: “2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL
PRINCIPLE”

Ethical principles have the task of guiding our moral judgments. A more
exact analysis of their logical features takes into account that with them
help we judge not only factually existing objects but also objects which we
merely imagine or whose existence is possible but not actual.

...

And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely make
at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that is
broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of #123 -
SENSIBILITIES, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches a
prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only then
a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that conveys a
disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make something distinctive
or attractive. “

To illustrate this incommensurate reality and the necessity to make prudent
considerations over any course of action I will convey some and limited
aspects of my discussion yesterday with a security company over personal
safety alarm activation and that is the existentialistic consideration that
any @5 - EVENT has a @7 - FABRIC OF TIME essentially by association with
the NOUMENON then conveys the #41 - ONTIC necessity within the ontological
as Kabbalistic World of Assiah within the material realm of action as the
@10 sephirot known as Malkuth {TETRACTYS: @1 + @2 + @3 + @4 = @10}.

In short, each alarm activation or camera event may convey something of the
MIND which is then causal for the will to action.

For instance if I observe CONSTANTINE being thrown into the police van @
1145 hours what may I deduce from the noumenon about the probability of
guilty mind?

YOUTUBE: “Kermit vs. Constantine (Dark Kermit)”

<https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Biv_TKkvzC4>

And the answer is much more than you can possibly imagine as a veritable
smorgasbord of opportunism relating to the LAW OF WILL as LAW OF NATURE
that provides a NEURAL LINGUISTIC PREMISE {#2184: 24 x 7 x 13} OF
RATIOCINATION which may then provide quintessential {HEBREW / GREEK}
parameters from whence is derived the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and
TELOS HIERARCHY INTERSECTIONS which VALIDATE ACTUS REUS as prerequisite for
any quantitation of gravitas and consequential immanent action provisioned
within artificial intellectual cognitive services:

<http://www.grapple369.com?time:11.45>

H817@{
   @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
   @2: Sup: 58 (#59); Ego: 57 (#58),
   @3: Sup: 17 (#76); Ego: 40 (#98),
   @4: Sup: 57 (#133); Ego: 40 (#138),
   Male: #133; Feme: #138
} // #381

#381 as [#1, #300, #40, #40] = 'asham (H817): {UMBRA: #0 as #341 % #41 =
#13} 1) guilt, offense, guiltiness; 1a) offense, trespass, fault; 1b)
guilt, guiltiness; 1c) compensation (for offense); 1d) trespass offering,
guilt offering;

H7285@{
   @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
   @2: Sup: 40 (#42); Ego: 38 (#40),
   @3: Sup: 43 (#85); Ego: 3 (#43),
   @4: Sup: 19 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 57 (#100),
   Male: #104; Feme: #100
} // #505

#505 {@***@10 magic square} as [#2, #200, #3, #300] = regesh (H7285):
{UMBRA: #9 as #503 % #41 = #11} 1) throng, in *company* n f; 2) throng; 3)
(TWOT) *scheming*;

#505 as [#5, #400, #90, #6, #4] = tsuwd (H6679): {UMBRA: #7 as #100 % #41 =
#18} 1) to hunt; 1a) (Qal) to hunt; 1b) (Poel) *to* *hunt*, *hunt*
*eagerly* *or* *keenly*; 1c) (Hithpael) take provision;
H6679@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
   @3: Sup: 9 (#95); Ego: 9 (#90),
   @4: Sup: 15 (#110); Ego: 6 (#96),
   @5: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 4 (#100),
   Male: #129; Feme: #100
} // #505

H2179@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 13 (#19); Ego: 7 (#13),
   @3: Sup: 63 (#82); Ego: 50 (#63),
   @4: Sup: 65 (#147); Ego: 2 (#65),
   @5: Sup: 60 (#207); Ego: 76 (#141),
   @6: Sup: 19 (#226); Ego: 40 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #226; Feme: #181
} // #505

#505 as [#6, #7, #50, #2, #400, #40] = zanab (H2179): {UMBRA: #1 as #59 %
#41 = #18} 1) to cut off; 1a) (Piel) to attack the rear, *smite* the tail;

#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]

IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}

DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE

G1515@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 15 (#20); Ego: 10 (#15),
   @3: Sup: 34 (#54); Ego: 19 (#34),
   @4: Sup: 42 (#96); Ego: 8 (#42),
   @5: Sup: 11 (#107); Ego: 50 (#92),
   @6: Sup: 19 (#126); Ego: 8 (#100),
   @7: Sup: 57 (#183); Ego: 38 (#138),
   Male: #183; Feme: #138
} // #381

#381 as [#5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #200] = eirene (G1515): {UMBRA: #8 as
#181 % #41 = #17} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) of Christianity, the tranquil
state of a soul assured of its salvation through Christ, and so fearing
nothing from God and content with its earthly lot, of whatsoever sort that
is; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
*exemption* *from* *the* *rage* *and* *havoc* *of* *war*; 4a) the way that
leads to peace (salvation);

Sephirot (In Hebrew סְפִירוֹת), meaning "enumerations", are the 10
attributes/emanations within Kabbalah, through which God (who is referred
to as Ein Sof - The Limitless) reveals him/herself and continuously creates
both the physical realm and the chain of higher metaphysical realms (Seder
hishtalshelus). The term is alternatively transliterated into English as
Sephiroth/Sefiroth, singular Sephirah etc.

Alternative configurations of the sephirot are given by different schools
in the historical development of Kabbalah, with each articulating different
spiritual aspects. The tradition of enumerating 10 is stated in the Sefer
Yetzirah, "Ten sephirot of nothingness, ten and not nine, ten and not
eleven". As altogether 11 sephirot are listed across the different schemes,
two (Keter and Daat) are seen as unconscious and conscious manifestations
of the same principle, conserving the ten categories.

In Kabbalah the functional structure of the sephirot in channelling Divine
creative lifeforce, and revealing the unknowable Divine essence to Creation
is described. As God's attributes to allow Creation to know him, the first
sephirah describes the DIVINE WILL {@1 - YANG CH’I as MALE / ANALYTIC A
PRIORI} ABOVE INTELLECT {@2 - YIN CH’I as FEME / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI} and
from with #123 - SENSIBILITY as UNDERSTANDING {@3 - ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI}
is then ascertained

<http://www.thefullwiki.org/Sephirot>

[conundrum, or, concertion, within, the, sub-consciousness, mind, so, that,
a, coalescence, may, be, facilitated, and, the, process, of,
substantialization, occurs, with, a, reasonable, concretion, as, the,
outcome]

ONTIC_FOCAL_DIALECTIC@{

@4: Sup: 69 (#233); Ego: 47 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),

Male: #1422; Feme: #979
}

#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy])

#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 -
Engendering Nature}}

OBLIGANS {
166: [11],
168: [26],
169: [18],
171: [20],
173: [27],
175: [22],
177: [29],
180: [19],
181: [24, 35], // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING 182: [6],
184: [36],
185: [25],
186: [31],
191: [32],
192: [39],
196: [37],
197: [33],
200: [8]
} ...

G2018@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
   @3: Sup: 9 (#18); Ego: 5 (#90),
   @4: Sup: 59 (#77); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM
NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
   @5: Sup: 64 (#141); Ego: 5 (#145),
   @6: Sup: 67 (#208); Ego: 3 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
   @7: Sup: 6 (#214); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
   @8: Sup: 11 (#225); Ego: 5 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
   @9: Sup: 21 (#246); Ego: 10 (#183),
   @10: Sup: 71 (#317); Ego: 50 (#233),
   Male: #317; Feme: #233
} // #233

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1500 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence;
I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving;
Tetra: 18 - Waiting;

THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu; I
lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.

    #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
    #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
    #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
    #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
    #CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
   @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
   @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
   @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
   @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181

#233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018):
{UMBRA: #9 as #1500 % #41 = #24} 1) to bring upon, bring forward; 2) to lay
upon, to inflict; 3) to bring upon, ie. in addition, to add, increase; 4)
to put upon, cast upon, impose; 1a) used of accusers;

"Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed
about the body of Moses, durst not bring {#233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5,
#3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} against {#233 as [#5,
#80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} him a
railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee." [Jude 1:9]

dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Now I’m going to partake in another curious cognitive function and that is
> to load a conundrum or concertion within the sub-consciousness mind so that
> a coalescence may be facilitated and the process of substantialization
> occurs with a reasonable concretion as the outcome.
>
> And that is the consideration which we initially conveyed within section “2
> - THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” which for purposes of
> conceptualisation, we’ll repeat again: “Whilst it is prudent to establish
> the starting point of necessity as to any premises for the continuity of
> enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance with respect to the learned as the
> educated and the gravitas of the subject matter to say nothing of those
> whom may have given their lives as something other than marsupial roadkill
> as RECTUS for the foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and
> in a sturdy and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
> self-entitlement [as] bestowal.”
>
> Thusly I want to consider whether the COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
> A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
> RESISTANCE) may be thought of in terms by the similitude as traversal of
> consciousness being a continuum in much the same way as to be resolutely
> {#2184} driving down a roadway and to do so I need a vocabulary to describe
> it.
>
> So therefore the starting point of such necessity is consideration that the
> temporal extent of % #364 - ADMITTANCE may be viewed as markers by which we
> overtake, whereas the temporal extent of % #728 - REACTANCE are the #CENTRE
> markers as stability guidance for our consciousness traversal and that the
> temporal extent of % #312 - RESISTANCE are then markers by which intercept
> points are cognised.
>
> So then I want to think about the process of thinking for which we have
> definitive meta-descriptor prototypes and to then facilitate that with some
> semantical constructs as clarifying outcomes which might resonate with the
> experience.
>
> Where can I find such ready answers?
>
> I will have to sleep on that.
>
>



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-06 21:18:57 UTC
Permalink
Thus in regard to any continuation of actions as a subsequent EVENT which
might have occurred at 0705 HOURS then what assessment of MORALITY can we
make of such an juvenile TOAD as each event enables us to build a composite
picture as to the extent and nature of circumstantiality of the
misdemeanour:

Nous: #23
Time: 07:05 hrs
Date: 2018.7.8
Torah: [#40, #5, #300]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 45 (#85); Ego: 5 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@3: Sup: 21 (#106); Ego: 57 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #106; Feme: #102
} // #345

Dao: Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence
Tetra: #26 - Endeavour
I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what
has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch

Latin: Verus {God saviour} Alt: Nanael {Pray to God} {

1. HELPS TO LIVE IN PEACE WITH ALL
2. OCCULT MAGIC & THEOLOGY
3. LEARNING
4. Teut or Theuth
}

Mahalalel {Praise (fame) of God}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #335} / HETEROS {#307 / #333} / TORAH {#296 /
#287}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:3,col:8,nous:23&idea:{m,73}&idea:{f,48}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,335}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 3, col: 8, nous: 23 [Date: 2018.7.8, Time: 07:05
hrs, Super: #311 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance,
Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance, Ego: #335 / #23 -
Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 -
Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been
spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 26 - Endeavour]

H7944@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 62 (#67); Ego: 57 (#62),
@3: Sup: 11 (#78); Ego: 30 (#92),
Male: #78; Feme: #92
} // #335

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #330 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;

THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.

#VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
#TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
#TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
#CANON: #84

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
@4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84

#335 as [#5, #300, #30] = shal (H7944): {UMBRA: #8 as #330 % #41 = #2} 1)
error, fault; 1a) meaning uncertain;

G52@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
@3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
@4: Sup: 43 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 70 (#124),
@5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
@6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135),
@7: Sup: 11 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 38 (#173 - I AM NOT
GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
Male: #220; Feme: #173
} // #335

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra:
25 - Contention;

THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148

#335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {UMBRA: #9 as
#135 % #41 = #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine
things; 1b) of moral blindness;

G399@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 56 (#108); Ego: 5 (#56),
@4: Sup: 25 (#133); Ego: 50 (#106),
@5: Sup: 30 (#163); Ego: 5 (#111),
@6: Sup: 33 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 3 (#114),
@7: Sup: 53 (#249); Ego: 20 (#134),
@8: Sup: 54 (#303); Ego: 1 (#135),
@9: Sup: 11 (#314); Ego: 38 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
Male: #314; Feme: #173
} // #335

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1457 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#335 as [#1, #50, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #1, #200] = anaphero (G399):
{UMBRA: #10 as #1457 % #41 = #22} 1) to carry or bring up, to lead up; 2)
to put upon the altar, to bring to the altar, to offer; 3) to lift up one's
self, to take upon one's self; 1a) men to a higher place; 3a) to place on
one's self anything as a load to be carried; 3b) to sustain, ie. their
punishment;

H6973@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
@3: Sup: 75 (#137); Ego: 19 (#75),
@4: Sup: 4 (#141); Ego: 10 (#85),
@5: Sup: 13 (#154); Ego: 9 (#94),
@6: Sup: 63 (#217); Ego: 50 (#144),
@7: Sup: 68 (#285); Ego: 5 (#149),
Male: #285; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #196 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 -
Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 -
Encounters;

THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit; I
do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
#TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
#POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
#TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
#CANON: #191

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
@1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
@2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
@4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191

#311 as [#6, #50, #100, #10, #90, #50, #5] = quwts (H6973): {UMBRA: #13 as
#196 % #41 = #32} 1) to be grieved, loathe, abhor, feel a loathing or
abhorrence or sickening dread; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to feel a loathing at,
abhor; 1a2) to feel a sickening dread; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause
sickening dread; 1b2) to cause loathing;

H665@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 31 (#61); Ego: 1 (#31),
@3: Sup: 30 (#91); Ego: 80 (#111),
@4: Sup: 68 (#159); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #159; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #281 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;

THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; I
am not one who curseth the king.

#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181

#311 as [#30, #1, #80, #200] = 'epher (H665): {UMBRA: #3 as #281 % #41 =
#35} 1) ashes; 2) (CLBL) worthlessness (fig.);

H560@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
@3: Sup: 71 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 1 (#71),
@4: Sup: 30 (#201); Ego: 40 (#111),
@5: Sup: 68 (#269); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #269; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching:
H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness;

THOTH MEASURE: #36 - Oh thou who doest according to thine own will, and
makest thine appearance in Tebuu; I put no check upon the water in its
flow.

#VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring good.
#TOOLS: With Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil.
#POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends.
#TIME: With Closed Mouth (no. #56), few allies.
#CANON: #184

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184@{
@1: Sup: 36 (#36); Ego: 36 (#36),
@2: Sup: 31 (#67); Ego: 76 (#112),
@3: Sup: 47 (#114); Ego: 16 (#128),
@4: Sup: 22 (#136); Ego: 56 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
Male: #136; Feme: #184
} // #184

#311 as [#30, #40, #1, #40, #200] = 'amar (Aramaic) (H560): {UMBRA: #2 as
#241 % #41 = #36} 1) (P'al) to say, to speak, to command, to tell, to
relate;



dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> This is a broad sketch of the nocturnal considerations which over the
> coming days we’ll cohere into our existing chapter:
>
> We are dealing here with only hypothetical postulates which need to be
> assayed for verity as factuality and the reason for that is simply that
> one’s ego must always continually exist within the temporality as the
> notion broadly conveyed within section: “2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL
> PRINCIPLE”
>
> Ethical principles have the task of guiding our moral judgments. A more
> exact analysis of their logical features takes into account that with them
> help we judge not only factually existing objects but also objects which we
> merely imagine or whose existence is possible but not actual.
>
> ...
>
> And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely make
> at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that is
> broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of #123 -
> SENSIBILITIES, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
> subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
> determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
> incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
> justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches a
> prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only then
> a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that conveys a
> disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make something distinctive
> or attractive. “
>
> To illustrate this incommensurate reality and the necessity to make prudent
> considerations over any course of action I will convey some and limited
> aspects of my discussion yesterday with a security company over personal
> safety alarm activation and that is the existentialistic consideration that
> any @5 - EVENT has a @7 - FABRIC OF TIME essentially by association with
> the NOUMENON then conveys the #41 - ONTIC necessity within the ontological
> as Kabbalistic World of Assiah within the material realm of action as the
> @10 sephirot known as Malkuth {TETRACTYS: @1 + @2 + @3 + @4 = @10}.
>
> In short, each alarm activation or camera event may convey something of the
> MIND which is then causal for the will to action.
>
> For instance if I observe CONSTANTINE being thrown into the police van @
> 1145 hours what may I deduce from the noumenon about the probability of
> guilty mind?
>
> YOUTUBE: “Kermit vs. Constantine (Dark Kermit)”
>
> <https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Biv_TKkvzC4>
>
> And the answer is much more than you can possibly imagine as a veritable
> smorgasbord of opportunism relating to the LAW OF WILL as LAW OF NATURE
> that provides a NEURAL LINGUISTIC PREMISE {#2184: 24 x 7 x 13} OF
> RATIOCINATION which may then provide quintessential {HEBREW / GREEK}
> parameters from whence is derived the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and
> TELOS HIERARCHY INTERSECTIONS which VALIDATE ACTUS REUS as prerequisite for
> any quantitation of gravitas and consequential immanent action provisioned
> within artificial intellectual cognitive services:
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com?time:11.45>
>
> H817@{
>    @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>    @2: Sup: 58 (#59); Ego: 57 (#58),
>    @3: Sup: 17 (#76); Ego: 40 (#98),
>    @4: Sup: 57 (#133); Ego: 40 (#138),
>    Male: #133; Feme: #138
> } // #381
>
> #381 as [#1, #300, #40, #40] = 'asham (H817): {UMBRA: #0 as #341 % #41 =
> #13} 1) guilt, offense, guiltiness; 1a) offense, trespass, fault; 1b)
> guilt, guiltiness; 1c) compensation (for offense); 1d) trespass offering,
> guilt offering;
>
> H7285@{
>    @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>    @2: Sup: 40 (#42); Ego: 38 (#40),
>    @3: Sup: 43 (#85); Ego: 3 (#43),
>    @4: Sup: 19 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 57 (#100),
>    Male: #104; Feme: #100
> } // #505
>
> #505 {@***@10 magic square} as [#2, #200, #3, #300] = regesh (H7285):
> {UMBRA: #9 as #503 % #41 = #11} 1) throng, in *company* n f; 2) throng; 3)
> (TWOT) *scheming*;
>
> #505 as [#5, #400, #90, #6, #4] = tsuwd (H6679): {UMBRA: #7 as #100 % #41 =
> #18} 1) to hunt; 1a) (Qal) to hunt; 1b) (Poel) *to* *hunt*, *hunt*
> *eagerly* *or* *keenly*; 1c) (Hithpael) take provision;
> H6679@{
>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>    @2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
>    @3: Sup: 9 (#95); Ego: 9 (#90),
>    @4: Sup: 15 (#110); Ego: 6 (#96),
>    @5: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 4 (#100),
>    Male: #129; Feme: #100
> } // #505
>
> H2179@{
>    @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>    @2: Sup: 13 (#19); Ego: 7 (#13),
>    @3: Sup: 63 (#82); Ego: 50 (#63),
>    @4: Sup: 65 (#147); Ego: 2 (#65),
>    @5: Sup: 60 (#207); Ego: 76 (#141),
>    @6: Sup: 19 (#226); Ego: 40 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
> OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>    Male: #226; Feme: #181
> } // #505
>
> #505 as [#6, #7, #50, #2, #400, #40] = zanab (H2179): {UMBRA: #1 as #59 %
> #41 = #18} 1) to cut off; 1a) (Piel) to attack the rear, *smite* the tail;
>
> #8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
> Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
>
> IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
>
> DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE
>
> G1515@{
>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>    @2: Sup: 15 (#20); Ego: 10 (#15),
>    @3: Sup: 34 (#54); Ego: 19 (#34),
>    @4: Sup: 42 (#96); Ego: 8 (#42),
>    @5: Sup: 11 (#107); Ego: 50 (#92),
>    @6: Sup: 19 (#126); Ego: 8 (#100),
>    @7: Sup: 57 (#183); Ego: 38 (#138),
>    Male: #183; Feme: #138
> } // #381
>
> #381 as [#5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #200] = eirene (G1515): {UMBRA: #8 as
> #181 % #41 = #17} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
> individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
> felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
> prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) of Christianity, the tranquil
> state of a soul assured of its salvation through Christ, and so fearing
> nothing from God and content with its earthly lot, of whatsoever sort that
> is; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
> *exemption* *from* *the* *rage* *and* *havoc* *of* *war*; 4a) the way that
> leads to peace (salvation);
>
> Sephirot (In Hebrew סְפִירוֹת), meaning "enumerations", are the 10
> attributes/emanations within Kabbalah, through which God (who is referred
> to as Ein Sof - The Limitless) reveals him/herself and continuously creates
> both the physical realm and the chain of higher metaphysical realms (Seder
> hishtalshelus). The term is alternatively transliterated into English as
> Sephiroth/Sefiroth, singular Sephirah etc.
>
> Alternative configurations of the sephirot are given by different schools
> in the historical development of Kabbalah, with each articulating different
> spiritual aspects. The tradition of enumerating 10 is stated in the Sefer
> Yetzirah, "Ten sephirot of nothingness, ten and not nine, ten and not
> eleven". As altogether 11 sephirot are listed across the different schemes,
> two (Keter and Daat) are seen as unconscious and conscious manifestations
> of the same principle, conserving the ten categories.
>
> In Kabbalah the functional structure of the sephirot in channelling Divine
> creative lifeforce, and revealing the unknowable Divine essence to Creation
> is described. As God's attributes to allow Creation to know him, the first
> sephirah describes the DIVINE WILL {@1 - YANG CH’I as MALE / ANALYTIC A
> PRIORI} ABOVE INTELLECT {@2 - YIN CH’I as FEME / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI} and
> from with #123 - SENSIBILITY as UNDERSTANDING {@3 - ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI}
> is then ascertained
>
> <http://www.thefullwiki.org/Sephirot>
>
> [conundrum, or, concertion, within, the, sub-consciousness, mind, so, that,
> a, coalescence, may, be, facilitated, and, the, process, of,
> substantialization, occurs, with, a, reasonable, concretion, as, the,
> outcome]
>
> ONTIC_FOCAL_DIALECTIC@{
>
> @4: Sup: 69 (#233); Ego: 47 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
>
> Male: #1422; Feme: #979
> }
>
> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
> [#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy])
>
> #8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 -
> Engendering Nature}}
>
> OBLIGANS {
> 166: [11],
> 168: [26],
> 169: [18],
> 171: [20],
> 173: [27],
> 175: [22],
> 177: [29],
> 180: [19],
> 181: [24, 35], // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
> RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING 182: [6],
> 184: [36],
> 185: [25],
> 186: [31],
> 191: [32],
> 192: [39],
> 196: [37],
> 197: [33],
> 200: [8]
> } ...
>
> G2018@{
>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>    @2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
>    @3: Sup: 9 (#18); Ego: 5 (#90),
>    @4: Sup: 59 (#77); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM
> NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
>    @5: Sup: 64 (#141); Ego: 5 (#145),
>    @6: Sup: 67 (#208); Ego: 3 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>    @7: Sup: 6 (#214); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
> {%26}),
>    @8: Sup: 11 (#225); Ego: 5 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
> {%27}),
>    @9: Sup: 21 (#246); Ego: 10 (#183),
>    @10: Sup: 71 (#317); Ego: 50 (#233),
>    Male: #317; Feme: #233
> } // #233
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #1500 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence;
> I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving;
> Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu; I
> lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.
>
>     #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
>     #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
>     #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
>     #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
>     #CANON: #181
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
>    @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
>    @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
>    @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
>    @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
> RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>    Male: #98; Feme: #181
> } // #181
>
> #233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018):
> {UMBRA: #9 as #1500 % #41 = #24} 1) to bring upon, bring forward; 2) to lay
> upon, to inflict; 3) to bring upon, ie. in addition, to add, increase; 4)
> to put upon, cast upon, impose; 1a) used of accusers;
>
> "Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed
> about the body of Moses, durst not bring {#233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5,
> #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} against {#233 as [#5,
> #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} him a
> railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee." [Jude 1:9]
>
> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Now I’m going to partake in another curious cognitive function and that is
>> to load a conundrum or concertion within the sub-consciousness mind so that
>> a coalescence may be facilitated and the process of substantialization
>> occurs with a reasonable concretion as the outcome.
>>
>> And that is the consideration which we initially conveyed within section “2
>> - THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” which for purposes of
>> conceptualisation, we’ll repeat again: “Whilst it is prudent to establish
>> the starting point of necessity as to any premises for the continuity of
>> enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance with respect to the learned as the
>> educated and the gravitas of the subject matter to say nothing of those
>> whom may have given their lives as something other than marsupial roadkill
>> as RECTUS for the foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and
>> in a sturdy and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
>> self-entitlement [as] bestowal.”
>>
>> Thusly I want to consider whether the COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
>> A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
>> RESISTANCE) may be thought of in terms by the similitude as traversal of
>> consciousness being a continuum in much the same way as to be resolutely
>> {#2184} driving down a roadway and to do so I need a vocabulary to describe
>> it.
>>
>> So therefore the starting point of such necessity is consideration that the
>> temporal extent of % #364 - ADMITTANCE may be viewed as markers by which we
>> overtake, whereas the temporal extent of % #728 - REACTANCE are the #CENTRE
>> markers as stability guidance for our consciousness traversal and that the
>> temporal extent of % #312 - RESISTANCE are then markers by which intercept
>> points are cognised.
>>
>> So then I want to think about the process of thinking for which we have
>> definitive meta-descriptor prototypes and to then facilitate that with some
>> semantical constructs as clarifying outcomes which might resonate with the
>> experience.
>>
>> Where can I find such ready answers?
>>
>> I will have to sleep on that.
>>
>>
>
>
>



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-06 22:43:11 UTC
Permalink
With all due respect as to the fatality of consequence for the divulging of
State Secrets the comparator I would prudently make is that of Julian
ASSANGE whom has been within BRITAIN but domiciled within the Ecuadoran
Consulate for asylum since 2012 out of abject fear as retribution from the
Americans.

YOUTUBE: “Compare The Meerkat - Commercial 26 (Alexsandr & Sergei Sing)
(HD)”

<https:/www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfTsTvP93LU>

— VOODOO HOODOO —

“ALEXANDER IS DONE...
SERGEI HAD HIS DAY.
WILL MAIYA BE NEXT?
FLY STRIKE MAGGOTRY.

EACH AND EVERYONE.
ALL GONE THIS WAY.
ENDED BY A PRETEXT.
VOODOO OF IDOLATRY.”

YOUTUBE: "Compare the Meerkat - Advert 55 (It's Either Me Or He)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dCUyLDtyQk>

'Preventing flystrike is more economical than treating it. Short term
management tools such as *strategic* *chemical* *application*, *crutching*
and shearing, and controlling worms and *dags* will be beneficial in the
short term, whilst producers looking for a longer term solution should
investigate genetic options such as *breeding* for reduced *dags* and
*wrinkle*.'"

— RACHEL {WETHERED SHEEP} MAKES A PLEA —

"NOW WAIT A TICK. {#1}
YOU'RE DRIBBLING. {#2}
WHY THE SHTICK. {#3}
ENDLESS QUIBBLING. {#4}

O'ER THE PUERILE. {#5}
IMPISH LIMP STICK. {#6}
PRISSY LOATH'G BILE. {#7}
CEASELESS BRICK. {#8}

INSANE PUSSY CALLS. {#9}
BY A SENILE PRICK. {#10}
WITHOUT ANY BALLS. {#11}
MY FANNY LICK." {#12}

HE WHOM LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD AND THANK GOD THAT I AM AN
ONTOLOGICAL PACIFIST...

As you are without any *foundation* and have the moral scruples of a dag
festering ANAL-SADISTIC (ie. displaying abnormal aggressive and destructive
tendencies supposedly caused by fixation at the anal stage of development)
MAGGOT.

YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat - Fall In Love With MAIYA!"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSH4-DBxYdA>

Thus in regard to any continuation of actions as a subsequent EVENT which
might have occurred at 0705 HOURS then what assessment of MORALITY can we
make of such a juvenile TOAD as each event enables us to build a composite
picture as to the extent and nature of circumstantiality of the
misdemeanour:

In regard to any continuation of actions as to subsequent PERSONAL SAFETY
EVENTS which again occurred at 0705 HOURS when returning to attendance as
retrieval of my Garbage bin from street collection, the RESPONDENT in an
irrational manner then did in the meantime open his door and wait to ambush
with a megaphone whereupon he then repeated shouted: “YOU ARE A PHONEY.”

That self justification assessment of MORALITY can we make of such an
juvenile TOAD as each event enables us to build a composite picture as to
the gravitas extent and nature of circumstantiality of the misdemeanour
being unaware that material details of TREASON have already been lodged to
the COUNTY COURT on the basis of legal argument established upon REDUCTIO
AD HITLERUM associated with PRO [#541 - CONTEMN / CONDEMN v's #391] DOMO
[cf: ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK (1941-1944) IDEA @215 ON 12 MAY 1942]: *FOR*
(*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the interests of a
given perspective or for the benefit of any small powerful or influential
#123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION / FIELD / CLIQUE which places a
prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct
{#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of
unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / *AT* *THE*
*GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*} by conduct of
#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE as BOER / ANZAC defamation.

0750 HOURS ON 7 SEPTEMBER 2018: “Someone was utilising an electronic saw in
an area which had no timbered fixtures and I opened the rear door to
identity the cause of the unusual event.

Whereupon the RESPONDENT said mind your own business and stop stalking me.”

For which #391 - STRATA MANAGEMENT has a vicarious liability.

JUST KEEPING YOU INFORMED OF THE LEGAL ACTION WHICH I AM INTELLECTUALLY AND
BY PAST EMPLOYMENT AND SCHOOL EDUCATION BY THE VICTORIA POLICE THEN CAPABLE
OF UNDERTAKING

Nous: #23
Time: 07:05 hrs
Date: 2018.7.8
Torah: [#40, #5, #300]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 45 (#85); Ego: 5 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@3: Sup: 21 (#106); Ego: 57 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #106; Feme: #102
} // #345

Dao: Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence
Tetra: #26 - Endeavour
I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what
has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch

Latin: Verus {God saviour} Alt: Nanael {Pray to God} {

1. HELPS TO LIVE IN PEACE WITH ALL
2. OCCULT MAGIC & THEOLOGY
3. LEARNING
4. Teut or Theuth
}

Mahalalel {Praise (fame) of God}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #335} / HETEROS {#307 / #333} / TORAH {#296 /
#287}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:3,col:8,nous:23&idea:{m,73}&idea:{f,48}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,335}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 3, col: 8, nous: 23 [Date: 2018.7.8, Time: 07:05
hrs, Super: #311 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance,
Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance, Ego: #335 / #23 -
Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 -
Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been
spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 26 - Endeavour]

H7944@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 62 (#67); Ego: 57 (#62),
@3: Sup: 11 (#78); Ego: 30 (#92),
Male: #78; Feme: #92
} // #335

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #330 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;

THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.

#VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
#TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
#TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
#CANON: #84

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
@4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84

#335 as [#5, #300, #30] = shal (H7944): {UMBRA: #8 as #330 % #41 = #2} 1)
error, fault; 1a) meaning uncertain;

G52@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
@3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
@4: Sup: 43 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 70 (#124),
@5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
@6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135),
@7: Sup: 11 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 38 (#173 - I AM NOT
GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
Male: #220; Feme: #173
} // #335

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra:
25 - Contention;

THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148

#335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {UMBRA: #9 as
#135 % #41 = #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine
things; 1b) of moral blindness;

G399@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 56 (#108); Ego: 5 (#56),
@4: Sup: 25 (#133); Ego: 50 (#106),
@5: Sup: 30 (#163); Ego: 5 (#111),
@6: Sup: 33 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 3 (#114),
@7: Sup: 53 (#249); Ego: 20 (#134),
@8: Sup: 54 (#303); Ego: 1 (#135),
@9: Sup: 11 (#314); Ego: 38 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
Male: #314; Feme: #173
} // #335

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1457 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#335 as [#1, #50, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #1, #200] = anaphero (G399):
{UMBRA: #10 as #1457 % #41 = #22} 1) to carry or bring up, to lead up; 2)
to put upon the altar, to bring to the altar, to offer; 3) to lift up one's
self, to take upon one's self; 1a) men to a higher place; 3a) to place on
one's self anything as a load to be carried; 3b) to sustain, ie. their
punishment;

H6973@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
@3: Sup: 75 (#137); Ego: 19 (#75),
@4: Sup: 4 (#141); Ego: 10 (#85),
@5: Sup: 13 (#154); Ego: 9 (#94),
@6: Sup: 63 (#217); Ego: 50 (#144),
@7: Sup: 68 (#285); Ego: 5 (#149),
Male: #285; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #196 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 -
Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 -
Encounters;

THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit; I
do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
#TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
#POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
#TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
#CANON: #191

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
@1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
@2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
@4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191

#311 as [#6, #50, #100, #10, #90, #50, #5] = quwts (H6973): {UMBRA: #13 as
#196 % #41 = #32} 1) to be grieved, loathe, abhor, feel a loathing or
abhorrence or sickening dread; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to feel a loathing at,
abhor; 1a2) to feel a sickening dread; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause
sickening dread; 1b2) to cause loathing;

H665@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 31 (#61); Ego: 1 (#31),
@3: Sup: 30 (#91); Ego: 80 (#111),
@4: Sup: 68 (#159); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #159; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #281 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;

THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; I
am not one who curseth the king.

#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181

#311 as [#30, #1, #80, #200] = 'epher (H665): {UMBRA: #3 as #281 % #41 =
#35} 1) ashes; 2) (CLBL) worthlessness (fig.);

H560@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
@3: Sup: 71 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 1 (#71),
@4: Sup: 30 (#201); Ego: 40 (#111),
@5: Sup: 68 (#269); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #269; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching:
H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness;

THOTH MEASURE: #36 - Oh thou who doest according to thine own will, and
makest thine appearance in Tebuu; I put no check upon the water in its
flow.

#VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring good.
#TOOLS: With Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil.
#POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends.
#TIME: With Closed Mouth (no. #56), few allies.
#CANON: #184

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184@{
@1: Sup: 36 (#36); Ego: 36 (#36),
@2: Sup: 31 (#67); Ego: 76 (#112),
@3: Sup: 47 (#114); Ego: 16 (#128),
@4: Sup: 22 (#136); Ego: 56 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
Male: #136; Feme: #184
} // #184

#311 as [#30, #40, #1, #40, #200] = 'amar (Aramaic) (H560): {UMBRA: #2 as
#241 % #41 = #36} 1) (P'al) to say, to speak, to command, to tell, to
relate;



dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> This is a broad sketch of the nocturnal considerations which over the
> coming days we’ll cohere into our existing chapter:
>
> We are dealing here with only hypothetical postulates which need to be
> assayed for verity as factuality and the reason for that is simply that
> one’s ego must always continually exist within the temporality as the
> notion broadly conveyed within section: “2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL
> PRINCIPLE”
>
> Ethical principles have the task of guiding our moral judgments. A more
> exact analysis of their logical features takes into account that with them
> help we judge not only factually existing objects but also objects which we
> merely imagine or whose existence is possible but not actual.
>
> ...
>
> And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely make
> at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that is
> broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of #123 -
> SENSIBILITIES, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
> subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
> determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
> incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
> justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches a
> prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only then
> a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that conveys a
> disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make something distinctive
> or attractive. “
>
> To illustrate this incommensurate reality and the necessity to make prudent
> considerations over any course of action I will convey some and limited
> aspects of my discussion yesterday with a security company over personal
> safety alarm activation and that is the existentialistic consideration that
> any @5 - EVENT has a @7 - FABRIC OF TIME essentially by association with
> the NOUMENON then conveys the #41 - ONTIC necessity within the ontological
> as Kabbalistic World of Assiah within the material realm of action as the
> @10 sephirot known as Malkuth {TETRACTYS: @1 + @2 + @3 + @4 = @10}.
>
> In short, each alarm activation or camera event may convey something of the
> MIND which is then causal for the will to action.
>
> For instance if I observe CONSTANTINE being thrown into the police van @
> 1145 hours what may I deduce from the noumenon about the probability of
> guilty mind?
>
> YOUTUBE: “Kermit vs. Constantine (Dark Kermit)”
>
> <https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Biv_TKkvzC4>
>
> And the answer is much more than you can possibly imagine as a veritable
> smorgasbord of opportunism relating to the LAW OF WILL as LAW OF NATURE
> that provides a NEURAL LINGUISTIC PREMISE {#2184: 24 x 7 x 13} OF
> RATIOCINATION which may then provide quintessential {HEBREW / GREEK}
> parameters from whence is derived the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and
> TELOS HIERARCHY INTERSECTIONS which VALIDATE ACTUS REUS as prerequisite for
> any quantitation of gravitas and consequential immanent action provisioned
> within artificial intellectual cognitive services:
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com?time:11.45>
>
> H817@{
>    @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>    @2: Sup: 58 (#59); Ego: 57 (#58),
>    @3: Sup: 17 (#76); Ego: 40 (#98),
>    @4: Sup: 57 (#133); Ego: 40 (#138),
>    Male: #133; Feme: #138
> } // #381
>
> #381 as [#1, #300, #40, #40] = 'asham (H817): {UMBRA: #0 as #341 % #41 =
> #13} 1) guilt, offense, guiltiness; 1a) offense, trespass, fault; 1b)
> guilt, guiltiness; 1c) compensation (for offense); 1d) trespass offering,
> guilt offering;
>
> H7285@{
>    @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>    @2: Sup: 40 (#42); Ego: 38 (#40),
>    @3: Sup: 43 (#85); Ego: 3 (#43),
>    @4: Sup: 19 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 57 (#100),
>    Male: #104; Feme: #100
> } // #505
>
> #505 {@***@10 magic square} as [#2, #200, #3, #300] = regesh (H7285):
> {UMBRA: #9 as #503 % #41 = #11} 1) throng, in *company* n f; 2) throng; 3)
> (TWOT) *scheming*;
>
> #505 as [#5, #400, #90, #6, #4] = tsuwd (H6679): {UMBRA: #7 as #100 % #41 =
> #18} 1) to hunt; 1a) (Qal) to hunt; 1b) (Poel) *to* *hunt*, *hunt*
> *eagerly* *or* *keenly*; 1c) (Hithpael) take provision;
> H6679@{
>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>    @2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
>    @3: Sup: 9 (#95); Ego: 9 (#90),
>    @4: Sup: 15 (#110); Ego: 6 (#96),
>    @5: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 4 (#100),
>    Male: #129; Feme: #100
> } // #505
>
> H2179@{
>    @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>    @2: Sup: 13 (#19); Ego: 7 (#13),
>    @3: Sup: 63 (#82); Ego: 50 (#63),
>    @4: Sup: 65 (#147); Ego: 2 (#65),
>    @5: Sup: 60 (#207); Ego: 76 (#141),
>    @6: Sup: 19 (#226); Ego: 40 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
> OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>    Male: #226; Feme: #181
> } // #505
>
> #505 as [#6, #7, #50, #2, #400, #40] = zanab (H2179): {UMBRA: #1 as #59 %
> #41 = #18} 1) to cut off; 1a) (Piel) to attack the rear, *smite* the tail;
>
> #8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
> Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
>
> IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
>
> DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE
>
> G1515@{
>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>    @2: Sup: 15 (#20); Ego: 10 (#15),
>    @3: Sup: 34 (#54); Ego: 19 (#34),
>    @4: Sup: 42 (#96); Ego: 8 (#42),
>    @5: Sup: 11 (#107); Ego: 50 (#92),
>    @6: Sup: 19 (#126); Ego: 8 (#100),
>    @7: Sup: 57 (#183); Ego: 38 (#138),
>    Male: #183; Feme: #138
> } // #381
>
> #381 as [#5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #200] = eirene (G1515): {UMBRA: #8 as
> #181 % #41 = #17} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
> individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
> felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
> prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) of Christianity, the tranquil
> state of a soul assured of its salvation through Christ, and so fearing
> nothing from God and content with its earthly lot, of whatsoever sort that
> is; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
> *exemption* *from* *the* *rage* *and* *havoc* *of* *war*; 4a) the way that
> leads to peace (salvation);
>
> Sephirot (In Hebrew סְפִירוֹת), meaning "enumerations", are the 10
> attributes/emanations within Kabbalah, through which God (who is referred
> to as Ein Sof - The Limitless) reveals him/herself and continuously creates
> both the physical realm and the chain of higher metaphysical realms (Seder
> hishtalshelus). The term is alternatively transliterated into English as
> Sephiroth/Sefiroth, singular Sephirah etc.
>
> Alternative configurations of the sephirot are given by different schools
> in the historical development of Kabbalah, with each articulating different
> spiritual aspects. The tradition of enumerating 10 is stated in the Sefer
> Yetzirah, "Ten sephirot of nothingness, ten and not nine, ten and not
> eleven". As altogether 11 sephirot are listed across the different schemes,
> two (Keter and Daat) are seen as unconscious and conscious manifestations
> of the same principle, conserving the ten categories.
>
> In Kabbalah the functional structure of the sephirot in channelling Divine
> creative lifeforce, and revealing the unknowable Divine essence to Creation
> is described. As God's attributes to allow Creation to know him, the first
> sephirah describes the DIVINE WILL {@1 - YANG CH’I as MALE / ANALYTIC A
> PRIORI} ABOVE INTELLECT {@2 - YIN CH’I as FEME / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI} and
> from with #123 - SENSIBILITY as UNDERSTANDING {@3 - ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI}
> is then ascertained
>
> <http://www.thefullwiki.org/Sephirot>
>
> [conundrum, or, concertion, within, the, sub-consciousness, mind, so, that,
> a, coalescence, may, be, facilitated, and, the, process, of,
> substantialization, occurs, with, a, reasonable, concretion, as, the,
> outcome]
>
> ONTIC_FOCAL_DIALECTIC@{
>
> @4: Sup: 69 (#233); Ego: 47 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
>
> Male: #1422; Feme: #979
> }
>
> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
> [#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy])
>
> #8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 -
> Engendering Nature}}
>
> OBLIGANS {
> 166: [11],
> 168: [26],
> 169: [18],
> 171: [20],
> 173: [27],
> 175: [22],
> 177: [29],
> 180: [19],
> 181: [24, 35], // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
> RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING 182: [6],
> 184: [36],
> 185: [25],
> 186: [31],
> 191: [32],
> 192: [39],
> 196: [37],
> 197: [33],
> 200: [8]
> } ...
>
> G2018@{
>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>    @2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
>    @3: Sup: 9 (#18); Ego: 5 (#90),
>    @4: Sup: 59 (#77); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM
> NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
>    @5: Sup: 64 (#141); Ego: 5 (#145),
>    @6: Sup: 67 (#208); Ego: 3 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>    @7: Sup: 6 (#214); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
> {%26}),
>    @8: Sup: 11 (#225); Ego: 5 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
> {%27}),
>    @9: Sup: 21 (#246); Ego: 10 (#183),
>    @10: Sup: 71 (#317); Ego: 50 (#233),
>    Male: #317; Feme: #233
> } // #233
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #1500 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence;
> I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving;
> Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu; I
> lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.
>
>     #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
>     #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
>     #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
>     #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
>     #CANON: #181
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
>    @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
>    @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
>    @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
>    @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
> RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>    Male: #98; Feme: #181
> } // #181
>
> #233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018):
> {UMBRA: #9 as #1500 % #41 = #24} 1) to bring upon, bring forward; 2) to lay
> upon, to inflict; 3) to bring upon, ie. in addition, to add, increase; 4)
> to put upon, cast upon, impose; 1a) used of accusers;
>
> "Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed
> about the body of Moses, durst not bring {#233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5,
> #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} against {#233 as [#5,
> #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} him a
> railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee." [Jude 1:9]
>
> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Now I’m going to partake in another curious cognitive function and that is
>> to load a conundrum or concertion within the sub-consciousness mind so that
>> a coalescence may be facilitated and the process of substantialization
>> occurs with a reasonable concretion as the outcome.
>>
>> And that is the consideration which we initially conveyed within section “2
>> - THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” which for purposes of
>> conceptualisation, we’ll repeat again: “Whilst it is prudent to establish
>> the starting point of necessity as to any premises for the continuity of
>> enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance with respect to the learned as the
>> educated and the gravitas of the subject matter to say nothing of those
>> whom may have given their lives as something other than marsupial roadkill
>> as RECTUS for the foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and
>> in a sturdy and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
>> self-entitlement [as] bestowal.”
>>
>> Thusly I want to consider whether the COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
>> A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
>> RESISTANCE) may be thought of in terms by the similitude as traversal of
>> consciousness being a continuum in much the same way as to be resolutely
>> {#2184} driving down a roadway and to do so I need a vocabulary to describe
>> it.
>>
>> So therefore the starting point of such necessity is consideration that the
>> temporal extent of % #364 - ADMITTANCE may be viewed as markers by which we
>> overtake, whereas the temporal extent of % #728 - REACTANCE are the #CENTRE
>> markers as stability guidance for our consciousness traversal and that the
>> temporal extent of % #312 - RESISTANCE are then markers by which intercept
>> points are cognised.
>>
>> So then I want to think about the process of thinking for which we have
>> definitive meta-descriptor prototypes and to then facilitate that with some
>> semantical constructs as clarifying outcomes which might resonate with the
>> experience.
>>
>> Where can I find such ready answers?
>>
>> I will have to sleep on that.
>>
>>
>
>
>



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-06 22:45:16 UTC
Permalink
With all due respect as to the fatality of consequence for the divulging of
State Secrets the comparator I would prudently make is that of Julian
ASSANGE whom has been within BRITAIN but domiciled within the Ecuadoran
Consulate for asylum since 2012 out of abject fear as retribution from the
Americans.

YOUTUBE: “Compare The Meerkat - Commercial 26 (Alexsandr & Sergei Sing)
(HD)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfTsTvP93LU>

— VOODOO HOODOO —

“ALEXANDER IS DONE...
SERGEI HAD HIS DAY.
WILL MAIYA BE NEXT?
FLY STRIKE MAGGOTRY.

EACH AND EVERYONE.
ALL GONE THIS WAY.
ENDED BY A PRETEXT.
VOODOO OF IDOLATRY.”

YOUTUBE: "Compare the Meerkat - Advert 55 (It's Either Me Or He)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dCUyLDtyQk>

'Preventing flystrike is more economical than treating it. Short term
management tools such as *strategic* *chemical* *application*, *crutching*
and shearing, and controlling worms and *dags* will be beneficial in the
short term, whilst producers looking for a longer term solution should
investigate genetic options such as *breeding* for reduced *dags* and
*wrinkle*.'"

— RACHEL {WETHERED SHEEP} MAKES A PLEA —

"NOW WAIT A TICK. {#1}
YOU'RE DRIBBLING. {#2}
WHY THE SHTICK. {#3}
ENDLESS QUIBBLING. {#4}

O'ER THE PUERILE. {#5}
IMPISH LIMP STICK. {#6}
PRISSY LOATH'G BILE. {#7}
CEASELESS BRICK. {#8}

INSANE PUSSY CALLS. {#9}
BY A SENILE PRICK. {#10}
WITHOUT ANY BALLS. {#11}
MY FANNY LICK." {#12}

HE WHOM LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD AND THANK GOD THAT I AM AN
ONTOLOGICAL PACIFIST...

As you are without any *foundation* and have the moral scruples of a dag
festering ANAL-SADISTIC (ie. displaying abnormal aggressive and destructive
tendencies supposedly caused by fixation at the anal stage of development)
MAGGOT.

YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat - Fall In Love With MAIYA!"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSH4-DBxYdA>

Thus in regard to any continuation of actions as a subsequent EVENT which
might have occurred at 0705 HOURS then what assessment of MORALITY can we
make of such a juvenile TOAD as each event enables us to build a composite
picture as to the extent and nature of circumstantiality of the
misdemeanour:

In regard to any continuation of actions as to subsequent PERSONAL SAFETY
EVENTS which again occurred at 0705 HOURS when returning to attendance as
retrieval of my Garbage bin from street collection, the RESPONDENT in an
irrational manner then did in the meantime open his door and wait to ambush
with a megaphone whereupon he then repeated shouted: “YOU ARE A PHONEY.”

That self justification assessment of MORALITY can we make of such an
juvenile TOAD as each event enables us to build a composite picture as to
the gravitas extent and nature of circumstantiality of the misdemeanour
being unaware that material details of TREASON have already been lodged to
the COUNTY COURT on the basis of legal argument established upon REDUCTIO
AD HITLERUM associated with PRO [#541 - CONTEMN / CONDEMN v's #391] DOMO
[cf: ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK (1941-1944) IDEA @215 ON 12 MAY 1942]: *FOR*
(*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the interests of a
given perspective or for the benefit of any small powerful or influential
#123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION / FIELD / CLIQUE which places a
prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct
{#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of
unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / *AT* *THE*
*GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*} by conduct of
#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE as BOER / ANZAC defamation.

0750 HOURS ON 7 SEPTEMBER 2018: “Someone was utilising an electronic saw in
an area which had no timbered fixtures and I opened the rear door to
identity the cause of the unusual event.

Whereupon the RESPONDENT said mind your own business and stop stalking me.”

For which #391 - STRATA MANAGEMENT has a vicarious liability.

JUST KEEPING YOU INFORMED OF THE LEGAL ACTION WHICH I AM INTELLECTUALLY AND
BY PAST EMPLOYMENT AND SCHOOL EDUCATION BY THE VICTORIA POLICE THEN CAPABLE
OF UNDERTAKING

Nous: #23
Time: 07:05 hrs
Date: 2018.7.8
Torah: [#40, #5, #300]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 45 (#85); Ego: 5 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@3: Sup: 21 (#106); Ego: 57 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #106; Feme: #102
} // #345

Dao: Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence
Tetra: #26 - Endeavour
I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what
has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch

Latin: Verus {God saviour} Alt: Nanael {Pray to God} {

1. HELPS TO LIVE IN PEACE WITH ALL
2. OCCULT MAGIC & THEOLOGY
3. LEARNING
4. Teut or Theuth
}

Mahalalel {Praise (fame) of God}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #335} / HETEROS {#307 / #333} / TORAH {#296 /
#287}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:3,col:8,nous:23&idea:{m,73}&idea:{f,48}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,335}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 3, col: 8, nous: 23 [Date: 2018.7.8, Time: 07:05
hrs, Super: #311 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance,
Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance, Ego: #335 / #23 -
Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 -
Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been
spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 26 - Endeavour]

H7944@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 62 (#67); Ego: 57 (#62),
@3: Sup: 11 (#78); Ego: 30 (#92),
Male: #78; Feme: #92
} // #335

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #330 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;

THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.

#VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
#TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
#TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
#CANON: #84

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
@4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84

#335 as [#5, #300, #30] = shal (H7944): {UMBRA: #8 as #330 % #41 = #2} 1)
error, fault; 1a) meaning uncertain;

G52@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
@3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
@4: Sup: 43 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 70 (#124),
@5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
@6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135),
@7: Sup: 11 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 38 (#173 - I AM NOT
GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
Male: #220; Feme: #173
} // #335

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra:
25 - Contention;

THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148

#335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {UMBRA: #9 as
#135 % #41 = #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine
things; 1b) of moral blindness;

G399@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 56 (#108); Ego: 5 (#56),
@4: Sup: 25 (#133); Ego: 50 (#106),
@5: Sup: 30 (#163); Ego: 5 (#111),
@6: Sup: 33 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 3 (#114),
@7: Sup: 53 (#249); Ego: 20 (#134),
@8: Sup: 54 (#303); Ego: 1 (#135),
@9: Sup: 11 (#314); Ego: 38 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
Male: #314; Feme: #173
} // #335

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1457 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#335 as [#1, #50, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #1, #200] = anaphero (G399):
{UMBRA: #10 as #1457 % #41 = #22} 1) to carry or bring up, to lead up; 2)
to put upon the altar, to bring to the altar, to offer; 3) to lift up one's
self, to take upon one's self; 1a) men to a higher place; 3a) to place on
one's self anything as a load to be carried; 3b) to sustain, ie. their
punishment;

H6973@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
@3: Sup: 75 (#137); Ego: 19 (#75),
@4: Sup: 4 (#141); Ego: 10 (#85),
@5: Sup: 13 (#154); Ego: 9 (#94),
@6: Sup: 63 (#217); Ego: 50 (#144),
@7: Sup: 68 (#285); Ego: 5 (#149),
Male: #285; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #196 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 -
Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 -
Encounters;

THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit; I
do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
#TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
#POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
#TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
#CANON: #191

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
@1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
@2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
@4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191

#311 as [#6, #50, #100, #10, #90, #50, #5] = quwts (H6973): {UMBRA: #13 as
#196 % #41 = #32} 1) to be grieved, loathe, abhor, feel a loathing or
abhorrence or sickening dread; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to feel a loathing at,
abhor; 1a2) to feel a sickening dread; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause
sickening dread; 1b2) to cause loathing;

H665@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 31 (#61); Ego: 1 (#31),
@3: Sup: 30 (#91); Ego: 80 (#111),
@4: Sup: 68 (#159); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #159; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #281 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;

THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; I
am not one who curseth the king.

#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181

#311 as [#30, #1, #80, #200] = 'epher (H665): {UMBRA: #3 as #281 % #41 =
#35} 1) ashes; 2) (CLBL) worthlessness (fig.);

H560@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
@3: Sup: 71 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 1 (#71),
@4: Sup: 30 (#201); Ego: 40 (#111),
@5: Sup: 68 (#269); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #269; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching:
H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness;

THOTH MEASURE: #36 - Oh thou who doest according to thine own will, and
makest thine appearance in Tebuu; I put no check upon the water in its
flow.

#VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring good.
#TOOLS: With Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil.
#POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends.
#TIME: With Closed Mouth (no. #56), few allies.
#CANON: #184

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184@{
@1: Sup: 36 (#36); Ego: 36 (#36),
@2: Sup: 31 (#67); Ego: 76 (#112),
@3: Sup: 47 (#114); Ego: 16 (#128),
@4: Sup: 22 (#136); Ego: 56 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
Male: #136; Feme: #184
} // #184

#311 as [#30, #40, #1, #40, #200] = 'amar (Aramaic) (H560): {UMBRA: #2 as
#241 % #41 = #36} 1) (P'al) to say, to speak, to command, to tell, to
relate;



dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> This is a broad sketch of the nocturnal considerations which over the
> coming days we’ll cohere into our existing chapter:
>
> We are dealing here with only hypothetical postulates which need to be
> assayed for verity as factuality and the reason for that is simply that
> one’s ego must always continually exist within the temporality as the
> notion broadly conveyed within section: “2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL
> PRINCIPLE”
>
> Ethical principles have the task of guiding our moral judgments. A more
> exact analysis of their logical features takes into account that with them
> help we judge not only factually existing objects but also objects which we
> merely imagine or whose existence is possible but not actual.
>
> ...
>
> And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely make
> at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that is
> broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of #123 -
> SENSIBILITIES, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
> subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
> determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
> incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
> justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches a
> prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only then
> a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that conveys a
> disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make something distinctive
> or attractive. “
>
> To illustrate this incommensurate reality and the necessity to make prudent
> considerations over any course of action I will convey some and limited
> aspects of my discussion yesterday with a security company over personal
> safety alarm activation and that is the existentialistic consideration that
> any @5 - EVENT has a @7 - FABRIC OF TIME essentially by association with
> the NOUMENON then conveys the #41 - ONTIC necessity within the ontological
> as Kabbalistic World of Assiah within the material realm of action as the
> @10 sephirot known as Malkuth {TETRACTYS: @1 + @2 + @3 + @4 = @10}.
>
> In short, each alarm activation or camera event may convey something of the
> MIND which is then causal for the will to action.
>
> For instance if I observe CONSTANTINE being thrown into the police van @
> 1145 hours what may I deduce from the noumenon about the probability of
> guilty mind?
>
> YOUTUBE: “Kermit vs. Constantine (Dark Kermit)”
>
> <https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Biv_TKkvzC4>
>
> And the answer is much more than you can possibly imagine as a veritable
> smorgasbord of opportunism relating to the LAW OF WILL as LAW OF NATURE
> that provides a NEURAL LINGUISTIC PREMISE {#2184: 24 x 7 x 13} OF
> RATIOCINATION which may then provide quintessential {HEBREW / GREEK}
> parameters from whence is derived the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and
> TELOS HIERARCHY INTERSECTIONS which VALIDATE ACTUS REUS as prerequisite for
> any quantitation of gravitas and consequential immanent action provisioned
> within artificial intellectual cognitive services:
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com?time:11.45>
>
> H817@{
>    @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>    @2: Sup: 58 (#59); Ego: 57 (#58),
>    @3: Sup: 17 (#76); Ego: 40 (#98),
>    @4: Sup: 57 (#133); Ego: 40 (#138),
>    Male: #133; Feme: #138
> } // #381
>
> #381 as [#1, #300, #40, #40] = 'asham (H817): {UMBRA: #0 as #341 % #41 =
> #13} 1) guilt, offense, guiltiness; 1a) offense, trespass, fault; 1b)
> guilt, guiltiness; 1c) compensation (for offense); 1d) trespass offering,
> guilt offering;
>
> H7285@{
>    @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>    @2: Sup: 40 (#42); Ego: 38 (#40),
>    @3: Sup: 43 (#85); Ego: 3 (#43),
>    @4: Sup: 19 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 57 (#100),
>    Male: #104; Feme: #100
> } // #505
>
> #505 {@***@10 magic square} as [#2, #200, #3, #300] = regesh (H7285):
> {UMBRA: #9 as #503 % #41 = #11} 1) throng, in *company* n f; 2) throng; 3)
> (TWOT) *scheming*;
>
> #505 as [#5, #400, #90, #6, #4] = tsuwd (H6679): {UMBRA: #7 as #100 % #41 =
> #18} 1) to hunt; 1a) (Qal) to hunt; 1b) (Poel) *to* *hunt*, *hunt*
> *eagerly* *or* *keenly*; 1c) (Hithpael) take provision;
> H6679@{
>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>    @2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
>    @3: Sup: 9 (#95); Ego: 9 (#90),
>    @4: Sup: 15 (#110); Ego: 6 (#96),
>    @5: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 4 (#100),
>    Male: #129; Feme: #100
> } // #505
>
> H2179@{
>    @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>    @2: Sup: 13 (#19); Ego: 7 (#13),
>    @3: Sup: 63 (#82); Ego: 50 (#63),
>    @4: Sup: 65 (#147); Ego: 2 (#65),
>    @5: Sup: 60 (#207); Ego: 76 (#141),
>    @6: Sup: 19 (#226); Ego: 40 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
> OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>    Male: #226; Feme: #181
> } // #505
>
> #505 as [#6, #7, #50, #2, #400, #40] = zanab (H2179): {UMBRA: #1 as #59 %
> #41 = #18} 1) to cut off; 1a) (Piel) to attack the rear, *smite* the tail;
>
> #8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
> Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
>
> IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
>
> DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE
>
> G1515@{
>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>    @2: Sup: 15 (#20); Ego: 10 (#15),
>    @3: Sup: 34 (#54); Ego: 19 (#34),
>    @4: Sup: 42 (#96); Ego: 8 (#42),
>    @5: Sup: 11 (#107); Ego: 50 (#92),
>    @6: Sup: 19 (#126); Ego: 8 (#100),
>    @7: Sup: 57 (#183); Ego: 38 (#138),
>    Male: #183; Feme: #138
> } // #381
>
> #381 as [#5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #200] = eirene (G1515): {UMBRA: #8 as
> #181 % #41 = #17} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
> individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
> felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
> prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) of Christianity, the tranquil
> state of a soul assured of its salvation through Christ, and so fearing
> nothing from God and content with its earthly lot, of whatsoever sort that
> is; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
> *exemption* *from* *the* *rage* *and* *havoc* *of* *war*; 4a) the way that
> leads to peace (salvation);
>
> Sephirot (In Hebrew סְפִירוֹת), meaning "enumerations", are the 10
> attributes/emanations within Kabbalah, through which God (who is referred
> to as Ein Sof - The Limitless) reveals him/herself and continuously creates
> both the physical realm and the chain of higher metaphysical realms (Seder
> hishtalshelus). The term is alternatively transliterated into English as
> Sephiroth/Sefiroth, singular Sephirah etc.
>
> Alternative configurations of the sephirot are given by different schools
> in the historical development of Kabbalah, with each articulating different
> spiritual aspects. The tradition of enumerating 10 is stated in the Sefer
> Yetzirah, "Ten sephirot of nothingness, ten and not nine, ten and not
> eleven". As altogether 11 sephirot are listed across the different schemes,
> two (Keter and Daat) are seen as unconscious and conscious manifestations
> of the same principle, conserving the ten categories.
>
> In Kabbalah the functional structure of the sephirot in channelling Divine
> creative lifeforce, and revealing the unknowable Divine essence to Creation
> is described. As God's attributes to allow Creation to know him, the first
> sephirah describes the DIVINE WILL {@1 - YANG CH’I as MALE / ANALYTIC A
> PRIORI} ABOVE INTELLECT {@2 - YIN CH’I as FEME / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI} and
> from with #123 - SENSIBILITY as UNDERSTANDING {@3 - ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI}
> is then ascertained
>
> <http://www.thefullwiki.org/Sephirot>
>
> [conundrum, or, concertion, within, the, sub-consciousness, mind, so, that,
> a, coalescence, may, be, facilitated, and, the, process, of,
> substantialization, occurs, with, a, reasonable, concretion, as, the,
> outcome]
>
> ONTIC_FOCAL_DIALECTIC@{
>
> @4: Sup: 69 (#233); Ego: 47 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
>
> Male: #1422; Feme: #979
> }
>
> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
> [#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy])
>
> #8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 -
> Engendering Nature}}
>
> OBLIGANS {
> 166: [11],
> 168: [26],
> 169: [18],
> 171: [20],
> 173: [27],
> 175: [22],
> 177: [29],
> 180: [19],
> 181: [24, 35], // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
> RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING 182: [6],
> 184: [36],
> 185: [25],
> 186: [31],
> 191: [32],
> 192: [39],
> 196: [37],
> 197: [33],
> 200: [8]
> } ...
>
> G2018@{
>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>    @2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
>    @3: Sup: 9 (#18); Ego: 5 (#90),
>    @4: Sup: 59 (#77); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM
> NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
>    @5: Sup: 64 (#141); Ego: 5 (#145),
>    @6: Sup: 67 (#208); Ego: 3 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>    @7: Sup: 6 (#214); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
> {%26}),
>    @8: Sup: 11 (#225); Ego: 5 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
> {%27}),
>    @9: Sup: 21 (#246); Ego: 10 (#183),
>    @10: Sup: 71 (#317); Ego: 50 (#233),
>    Male: #317; Feme: #233
> } // #233
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #1500 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence;
> I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving;
> Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu; I
> lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.
>
>     #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
>     #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
>     #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
>     #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
>     #CANON: #181
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
>    @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
>    @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
>    @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
>    @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
> RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>    Male: #98; Feme: #181
> } // #181
>
> #233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018):
> {UMBRA: #9 as #1500 % #41 = #24} 1) to bring upon, bring forward; 2) to lay
> upon, to inflict; 3) to bring upon, ie. in addition, to add, increase; 4)
> to put upon, cast upon, impose; 1a) used of accusers;
>
> "Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed
> about the body of Moses, durst not bring {#233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5,
> #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} against {#233 as [#5,
> #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} him a
> railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee." [Jude 1:9]
>
> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Now I’m going to partake in another curious cognitive function and that is
>> to load a conundrum or concertion within the sub-consciousness mind so that
>> a coalescence may be facilitated and the process of substantialization
>> occurs with a reasonable concretion as the outcome.
>>
>> And that is the consideration which we initially conveyed within section “2
>> - THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” which for purposes of
>> conceptualisation, we’ll repeat again: “Whilst it is prudent to establish
>> the starting point of necessity as to any premises for the continuity of
>> enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance with respect to the learned as the
>> educated and the gravitas of the subject matter to say nothing of those
>> whom may have given their lives as something other than marsupial roadkill
>> as RECTUS for the foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and
>> in a sturdy and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
>> self-entitlement [as] bestowal.”
>>
>> Thusly I want to consider whether the COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
>> A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
>> RESISTANCE) may be thought of in terms by the similitude as traversal of
>> consciousness being a continuum in much the same way as to be resolutely
>> {#2184} driving down a roadway and to do so I need a vocabulary to describe
>> it.
>>
>> So therefore the starting point of such necessity is consideration that the
>> temporal extent of % #364 - ADMITTANCE may be viewed as markers by which we
>> overtake, whereas the temporal extent of % #728 - REACTANCE are the #CENTRE
>> markers as stability guidance for our consciousness traversal and that the
>> temporal extent of % #312 - RESISTANCE are then markers by which intercept
>> points are cognised.
>>
>> So then I want to think about the process of thinking for which we have
>> definitive meta-descriptor prototypes and to then facilitate that with some
>> semantical constructs as clarifying outcomes which might resonate with the
>> experience.
>>
>> Where can I find such ready answers?
>>
>> I will have to sleep on that.
>>
>>
>
>
>



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-07 02:00:45 UTC
Permalink
Thus in my ignorant view the FIRST NOVICHOK poisoning was in the first
instance clearly a PRO DOMO EVENT upon the legal status of asylum and
prerogative of citizenship.

But the subsequent as SECOND event was accidental to the extent that one
cannot readily determine the will for any detrimental and intentional
action by its reckless disposal.

With all due respect as to the fatality of consequence for the divulging of
State Secrets the comparator I would prudently make is that of Julian
ASSANGE whom has been within BRITAIN but domiciled within the Ecuadoran
Consulate for asylum since 2012 out of abject fear as retribution from the
Americans.

Thus a moral dilemma as incommensurate nature of the action which is
brought against the sovereignty of another nation and which may not have
been initiated by the Sovereign authority of the hostile initiator.

That in order of precedent action to avoid heteronomy against sovereign
autonomy, in my view based only upon informal research and having no
practical experience in statecraft, is as follows:

1) Ensure that no other agency differentiated from STATE INTERESTS can
derive any material / immaterial political opportunity from the cataclysmic
event (this may involve counter-factual portrayals)

2) Ensure that the correct #41 - ONTIC necessity and proscriptive dialectic
as protocols of resolution are deployed in a structured manner and that
semantical constructs are measured.

3) Resolve the extraneous and any mirrored events which are attributed by a
PRO DOMO EVENT upon the legal status of asylum and prerogative of
citizenship.

4) Such action ought to build capacity for political resilience and
diminish the adverse consequence of contingency for any future events.

YOUTUBE: “Compare The Meerkat - Commercial 26 (Alexsandr & Sergei Sing)
(HD)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfTsTvP93LU>

— VOODOO HOODOO —

“ALEXANDER IS DONE...
SERGEI HAD HIS DAY.
WILL MAIYA BE NEXT?
FLY STRIKE MAGGOTRY.

EACH AND EVERYONE.
ALL GONE THIS WAY.
ENDED BY A PRETEXT.
VOODOO OF IDOLATRY.”

YOUTUBE: "Compare the Meerkat - Advert 55 (It's Either Me Or He)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dCUyLDtyQk>

'Preventing flystrike is more economical than treating it. Short term
management tools such as *strategic* *chemical* *application*, *crutching*
and shearing, and controlling worms and *dags* will be beneficial in the
short term, whilst producers looking for a longer term solution should
investigate genetic options such as *breeding* for reduced *dags* and
*wrinkle*.'"

— RACHEL {WETHERED SHEEP} MAKES A PLEA —

"NOW WAIT A TICK. {#1}
YOU'RE DRIBBLING. {#2}
WHY THE SHTICK. {#3}
ENDLESS QUIBBLING. {#4}

O'ER THE PUERILE. {#5}
IMPISH LIMP STICK. {#6}
PRISSY LOATH'G BILE. {#7}
CEASELESS BRICK. {#8}

INSANE PUSSY CALLS. {#9}
BY A SENILE PRICK. {#10}
WITHOUT ANY BALLS. {#11}
MY FANNY LICK." {#12}

HE WHOM LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD AND THANK GOD THAT I AM AN
ONTOLOGICAL PACIFIST...

As you are without any *foundation* and have the moral scruples of a dag
festering ANAL-SADISTIC (ie. displaying abnormal aggressive and destructive
tendencies supposedly caused by fixation at the anal stage of development)
MAGGOT.

YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat - Fall In Love With MAIYA!"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSH4-DBxYdA>

Thus in regard to any continuation of actions as a subsequent EVENT which
might have occurred at 0705 HOURS then what assessment of MORALITY can we
make of such a juvenile TOAD as each event enables us to build a composite
picture as to the extent and nature of circumstantiality of the
misdemeanour:

In regard to any continuation of actions as to subsequent PERSONAL SAFETY
EVENTS which again occurred at 0705 HOURS when returning to attendance as
retrieval of my Garbage bin from street collection, the RESPONDENT in an
irrational manner then did in the meantime open his door and wait to ambush
with a megaphone whereupon he then repeated shouted: “YOU ARE A PHONEY.”

That self justification assessment of MORALITY can we make of such an
juvenile TOAD as each event enables us to build a composite picture as to
the gravitas extent and nature of circumstantiality of the misdemeanour
being unaware that material details of TREASON have already been lodged to
the COUNTY COURT on the basis of legal argument established upon REDUCTIO
AD HITLERUM associated with PRO [#541 - CONTEMN / CONDEMN v's #391] DOMO
[cf: ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK (1941-1944) IDEA @215 ON 12 MAY 1942]: *FOR*
(*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the interests of a
given perspective or for the benefit of any small powerful or influential
#123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION / FIELD / CLIQUE which places a
prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct
{#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of
unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / *AT* *THE*
*GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*} by conduct of
#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE as BOER / ANZAC defamation.

0750 HOURS ON 7 SEPTEMBER 2018: “Someone was utilising an electronic saw in
an area which had no timbered fixtures and I opened the rear door to
identity the cause of the unusual event.

Whereupon the RESPONDENT said mind your own business and stop stalking me.”

For which #391 - STRATA MANAGEMENT has a vicarious liability.

JUST KEEPING YOU INFORMED OF THE LEGAL ACTION WHICH I AM INTELLECTUALLY AND
BY PAST EMPLOYMENT AND SCHOOL EDUCATION BY THE VICTORIA POLICE THEN CAPABLE
OF UNDERTAKING

Nous: #23
Time: 07:05 hrs
Date: 2018.7.8
Torah: [#40, #5, #300]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 45 (#85); Ego: 5 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@3: Sup: 21 (#106); Ego: 57 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #106; Feme: #102
} // #345

Dao: Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence
Tetra: #26 - Endeavour
I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what
has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch

Latin: Verus {God saviour} Alt: Nanael {Pray to God} {

1. HELPS TO LIVE IN PEACE WITH ALL
2. OCCULT MAGIC & THEOLOGY
3. LEARNING
4. Teut or Theuth
}

Mahalalel {Praise (fame) of God}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #335} / HETEROS {#307 / #333} / TORAH {#296 /
#287}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:3,col:8,nous:23&idea:{m,73}&idea:{f,48}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,335}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 3, col: 8, nous: 23 [Date: 2018.7.8, Time: 07:05
hrs, Super: #311 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance,
Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance, Ego: #335 / #23 -
Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 -
Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been
spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 26 - Endeavour]

H7944@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 62 (#67); Ego: 57 (#62),
@3: Sup: 11 (#78); Ego: 30 (#92),
Male: #78; Feme: #92
} // #335

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #330 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;

THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.

#VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
#TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
#TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
#CANON: #84

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
@4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84

#335 as [#5, #300, #30] = shal (H7944): {UMBRA: #8 as #330 % #41 = #2} 1)
error, fault; 1a) meaning uncertain;

G52@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
@3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
@4: Sup: 43 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 70 (#124),
@5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
@6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135),
@7: Sup: 11 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 38 (#173 - I AM NOT
GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
Male: #220; Feme: #173
} // #335

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra:
25 - Contention;

THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148

#335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {UMBRA: #9 as
#135 % #41 = #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine
things; 1b) of moral blindness;

G399@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 56 (#108); Ego: 5 (#56),
@4: Sup: 25 (#133); Ego: 50 (#106),
@5: Sup: 30 (#163); Ego: 5 (#111),
@6: Sup: 33 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 3 (#114),
@7: Sup: 53 (#249); Ego: 20 (#134),
@8: Sup: 54 (#303); Ego: 1 (#135),
@9: Sup: 11 (#314); Ego: 38 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
Male: #314; Feme: #173
} // #335

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1457 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#335 as [#1, #50, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #1, #200] = anaphero (G399):
{UMBRA: #10 as #1457 % #41 = #22} 1) to carry or bring up, to lead up; 2)
to put upon the altar, to bring to the altar, to offer; 3) to lift up one's
self, to take upon one's self; 1a) men to a higher place; 3a) to place on
one's self anything as a load to be carried; 3b) to sustain, ie. their
punishment;

H6973@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
@3: Sup: 75 (#137); Ego: 19 (#75),
@4: Sup: 4 (#141); Ego: 10 (#85),
@5: Sup: 13 (#154); Ego: 9 (#94),
@6: Sup: 63 (#217); Ego: 50 (#144),
@7: Sup: 68 (#285); Ego: 5 (#149),
Male: #285; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #196 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 -
Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 -
Encounters;

THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit; I
do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
#TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
#POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
#TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
#CANON: #191

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
@1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
@2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
@4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191

#311 as [#6, #50, #100, #10, #90, #50, #5] = quwts (H6973): {UMBRA: #13 as
#196 % #41 = #32} 1) to be grieved, loathe, abhor, feel a loathing or
abhorrence or sickening dread; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to feel a loathing at,
abhor; 1a2) to feel a sickening dread; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause
sickening dread; 1b2) to cause loathing;

H665@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 31 (#61); Ego: 1 (#31),
@3: Sup: 30 (#91); Ego: 80 (#111),
@4: Sup: 68 (#159); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #159; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #281 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;

THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; I
am not one who curseth the king.

#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181

#311 as [#30, #1, #80, #200] = 'epher (H665): {UMBRA: #3 as #281 % #41 =
#35} 1) ashes; 2) (CLBL) worthlessness (fig.);

H560@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
@3: Sup: 71 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 1 (#71),
@4: Sup: 30 (#201); Ego: 40 (#111),
@5: Sup: 68 (#269); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #269; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching:
H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness;

THOTH MEASURE: #36 - Oh thou who doest according to thine own will, and
makest thine appearance in Tebuu; I put no check upon the water in its
flow.

#VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring good.
#TOOLS: With Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil.
#POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends.
#TIME: With Closed Mouth (no. #56), few allies.
#CANON: #184

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184@{
@1: Sup: 36 (#36); Ego: 36 (#36),
@2: Sup: 31 (#67); Ego: 76 (#112),
@3: Sup: 47 (#114); Ego: 16 (#128),
@4: Sup: 22 (#136); Ego: 56 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
Male: #136; Feme: #184
} // #184

#311 as [#30, #40, #1, #40, #200] = 'amar (Aramaic) (H560): {UMBRA: #2 as
#241 % #41 = #36} 1) (P'al) to say, to speak, to command, to tell, to
relate;



dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> This is a broad sketch of the nocturnal considerations which over the
> coming days we’ll cohere into our existing chapter:
>
> We are dealing here with only hypothetical postulates which need to be
> assayed for verity as factuality and the reason for that is simply that
> one’s ego must always continually exist within the temporality as the
> notion broadly conveyed within section: “2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL
> PRINCIPLE”
>
> Ethical principles have the task of guiding our moral judgments. A more
> exact analysis of their logical features takes into account that with them
> help we judge not only factually existing objects but also objects which we
> merely imagine or whose existence is possible but not actual.
>
> ...
>
> And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely make
> at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that is
> broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of #123 -
> SENSIBILITIES, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
> subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
> determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
> incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
> justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches a
> prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only then
> a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that conveys a
> disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make something distinctive
> or attractive. “
>
> To illustrate this incommensurate reality and the necessity to make prudent
> considerations over any course of action I will convey some and limited
> aspects of my discussion yesterday with a security company over personal
> safety alarm activation and that is the existentialistic consideration that
> any @5 - EVENT has a @7 - FABRIC OF TIME essentially by association with
> the NOUMENON then conveys the #41 - ONTIC necessity within the ontological
> as Kabbalistic World of Assiah within the material realm of action as the
> @10 sephirot known as Malkuth {TETRACTYS: @1 + @2 + @3 + @4 = @10}.
>
> In short, each alarm activation or camera event may convey something of the
> MIND which is then causal for the will to action.
>
> For instance if I observe CONSTANTINE being thrown into the police van @
> 1145 hours what may I deduce from the noumenon about the probability of
> guilty mind?
>
> YOUTUBE: “Kermit vs. Constantine (Dark Kermit)”
>
> <https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Biv_TKkvzC4>
>
> And the answer is much more than you can possibly imagine as a veritable
> smorgasbord of opportunism relating to the LAW OF WILL as LAW OF NATURE
> that provides a NEURAL LINGUISTIC PREMISE {#2184: 24 x 7 x 13} OF
> RATIOCINATION which may then provide quintessential {HEBREW / GREEK}
> parameters from whence is derived the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and
> TELOS HIERARCHY INTERSECTIONS which VALIDATE ACTUS REUS as prerequisite for
> any quantitation of gravitas and consequential immanent action provisioned
> within artificial intellectual cognitive services:
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com?time:11.45>
>
> H817@{
>    @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>    @2: Sup: 58 (#59); Ego: 57 (#58),
>    @3: Sup: 17 (#76); Ego: 40 (#98),
>    @4: Sup: 57 (#133); Ego: 40 (#138),
>    Male: #133; Feme: #138
> } // #381
>
> #381 as [#1, #300, #40, #40] = 'asham (H817): {UMBRA: #0 as #341 % #41 =
> #13} 1) guilt, offense, guiltiness; 1a) offense, trespass, fault; 1b)
> guilt, guiltiness; 1c) compensation (for offense); 1d) trespass offering,
> guilt offering;
>
> H7285@{
>    @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>    @2: Sup: 40 (#42); Ego: 38 (#40),
>    @3: Sup: 43 (#85); Ego: 3 (#43),
>    @4: Sup: 19 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 57 (#100),
>    Male: #104; Feme: #100
> } // #505
>
> #505 {@***@10 magic square} as [#2, #200, #3, #300] = regesh (H7285):
> {UMBRA: #9 as #503 % #41 = #11} 1) throng, in *company* n f; 2) throng; 3)
> (TWOT) *scheming*;
>
> #505 as [#5, #400, #90, #6, #4] = tsuwd (H6679): {UMBRA: #7 as #100 % #41 =
> #18} 1) to hunt; 1a) (Qal) to hunt; 1b) (Poel) *to* *hunt*, *hunt*
> *eagerly* *or* *keenly*; 1c) (Hithpael) take provision;
> H6679@{
>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>    @2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
>    @3: Sup: 9 (#95); Ego: 9 (#90),
>    @4: Sup: 15 (#110); Ego: 6 (#96),
>    @5: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 4 (#100),
>    Male: #129; Feme: #100
> } // #505
>
> H2179@{
>    @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>    @2: Sup: 13 (#19); Ego: 7 (#13),
>    @3: Sup: 63 (#82); Ego: 50 (#63),
>    @4: Sup: 65 (#147); Ego: 2 (#65),
>    @5: Sup: 60 (#207); Ego: 76 (#141),
>    @6: Sup: 19 (#226); Ego: 40 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
> OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>    Male: #226; Feme: #181
> } // #505
>
> #505 as [#6, #7, #50, #2, #400, #40] = zanab (H2179): {UMBRA: #1 as #59 %
> #41 = #18} 1) to cut off; 1a) (Piel) to attack the rear, *smite* the tail;
>
> #8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
> Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
>
> IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
>
> DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE
>
> G1515@{
>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>    @2: Sup: 15 (#20); Ego: 10 (#15),
>    @3: Sup: 34 (#54); Ego: 19 (#34),
>    @4: Sup: 42 (#96); Ego: 8 (#42),
>    @5: Sup: 11 (#107); Ego: 50 (#92),
>    @6: Sup: 19 (#126); Ego: 8 (#100),
>    @7: Sup: 57 (#183); Ego: 38 (#138),
>    Male: #183; Feme: #138
> } // #381
>
> #381 as [#5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #200] = eirene (G1515): {UMBRA: #8 as
> #181 % #41 = #17} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
> individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
> felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
> prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) of Christianity, the tranquil
> state of a soul assured of its salvation through Christ, and so fearing
> nothing from God and content with its earthly lot, of whatsoever sort that
> is; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
> *exemption* *from* *the* *rage* *and* *havoc* *of* *war*; 4a) the way that
> leads to peace (salvation);
>
> Sephirot (In Hebrew סְפִירוֹת), meaning "enumerations", are the 10
> attributes/emanations within Kabbalah, through which God (who is referred
> to as Ein Sof - The Limitless) reveals him/herself and continuously creates
> both the physical realm and the chain of higher metaphysical realms (Seder
> hishtalshelus). The term is alternatively transliterated into English as
> Sephiroth/Sefiroth, singular Sephirah etc.
>
> Alternative configurations of the sephirot are given by different schools
> in the historical development of Kabbalah, with each articulating different
> spiritual aspects. The tradition of enumerating 10 is stated in the Sefer
> Yetzirah, "Ten sephirot of nothingness, ten and not nine, ten and not
> eleven". As altogether 11 sephirot are listed across the different schemes,
> two (Keter and Daat) are seen as unconscious and conscious manifestations
> of the same principle, conserving the ten categories.
>
> In Kabbalah the functional structure of the sephirot in channelling Divine
> creative lifeforce, and revealing the unknowable Divine essence to Creation
> is described. As God's attributes to allow Creation to know him, the first
> sephirah describes the DIVINE WILL {@1 - YANG CH’I as MALE / ANALYTIC A
> PRIORI} ABOVE INTELLECT {@2 - YIN CH’I as FEME / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI} and
> from with #123 - SENSIBILITY as UNDERSTANDING {@3 - ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI}
> is then ascertained
>
> <http://www.thefullwiki.org/Sephirot>
>
> [conundrum, or, concertion, within, the, sub-consciousness, mind, so, that,
> a, coalescence, may, be, facilitated, and, the, process, of,
> substantialization, occurs, with, a, reasonable, concretion, as, the,
> outcome]
>
> ONTIC_FOCAL_DIALECTIC@{
>
> @4: Sup: 69 (#233); Ego: 47 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
>
> Male: #1422; Feme: #979
> }
>
> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
> [#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy])
>
> #8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 -
> Engendering Nature}}
>
> OBLIGANS {
> 166: [11],
> 168: [26],
> 169: [18],
> 171: [20],
> 173: [27],
> 175: [22],
> 177: [29],
> 180: [19],
> 181: [24, 35], // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
> RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING 182: [6],
> 184: [36],
> 185: [25],
> 186: [31],
> 191: [32],
> 192: [39],
> 196: [37],
> 197: [33],
> 200: [8]
> } ...
>
> G2018@{
>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>    @2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
>    @3: Sup: 9 (#18); Ego: 5 (#90),
>    @4: Sup: 59 (#77); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM
> NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
>    @5: Sup: 64 (#141); Ego: 5 (#145),
>    @6: Sup: 67 (#208); Ego: 3 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>    @7: Sup: 6 (#214); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
> {%26}),
>    @8: Sup: 11 (#225); Ego: 5 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
> {%27}),
>    @9: Sup: 21 (#246); Ego: 10 (#183),
>    @10: Sup: 71 (#317); Ego: 50 (#233),
>    Male: #317; Feme: #233
> } // #233
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #1500 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence;
> I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving;
> Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu; I
> lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.
>
>     #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
>     #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
>     #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
>     #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
>     #CANON: #181
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
>    @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
>    @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
>    @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
>    @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
> RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>    Male: #98; Feme: #181
> } // #181
>
> #233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018):
> {UMBRA: #9 as #1500 % #41 = #24} 1) to bring upon, bring forward; 2) to lay
> upon, to inflict; 3) to bring upon, ie. in addition, to add, increase; 4)
> to put upon, cast upon, impose; 1a) used of accusers;
>
> "Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed
> about the body of Moses, durst not bring {#233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5,
> #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} against {#233 as [#5,
> #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} him a
> railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee." [Jude 1:9]
>
> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Now I’m going to partake in another curious cognitive function and that is
>> to load a conundrum or concertion within the sub-consciousness mind so that
>> a coalescence may be facilitated and the process of substantialization
>> occurs with a reasonable concretion as the outcome.
>>
>> And that is the consideration which we initially conveyed within section “2
>> - THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” which for purposes of
>> conceptualisation, we’ll repeat again: “Whilst it is prudent to establish
>> the starting point of necessity as to any premises for the continuity of
>> enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance with respect to the learned as the
>> educated and the gravitas of the subject matter to say nothing of those
>> whom may have given their lives as something other than marsupial roadkill
>> as RECTUS for the foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and
>> in a sturdy and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
>> self-entitlement [as] bestowal.”
>>
>> Thusly I want to consider whether the COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
>> A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
>> RESISTANCE) may be thought of in terms by the similitude as traversal of
>> consciousness being a continuum in much the same way as to be resolutely
>> {#2184} driving down a roadway and to do so I need a vocabulary to describe
>> it.
>>
>> So therefore the starting point of such necessity is consideration that the
>> temporal extent of % #364 - ADMITTANCE may be viewed as markers by which we
>> overtake, whereas the temporal extent of % #728 - REACTANCE are the #CENTRE
>> markers as stability guidance for our consciousness traversal and that the
>> temporal extent of % #312 - RESISTANCE are then markers by which intercept
>> points are cognised.
>>
>> So then I want to think about the process of thinking for which we have
>> definitive meta-descriptor prototypes and to then facilitate that with some
>> semantical constructs as clarifying outcomes which might resonate with the
>> experience.
>>
>> Where can I find such ready answers?
>>
>> I will have to sleep on that.
>>
>>
>
>
>



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-07 04:07:25 UTC
Permalink
It’s not my place to pontificate to Sovereign Nations however Julian
Assange is as citizen subject to the laws of the Commonwealth of Australia.

Clearly in such as the NOVICHOK POISONING equivalent of PRO DOMO EVENT upon
the legal status of asylum and prerogative of citizenship where Sovereign
nation were prepared given such gravitas to expel Russian diplomats and
families from their DOMO that the ASSANGE problem can be resolved in the
same manner.

Place police at the entrance of ECUADOR embassy to maintain a vigil. Issue
a notice of expulsion within an acceptable timeframe to the entire diplomat
staff of the embassy.

Once the Embassy ceases to function as such then arrest ASSANGE.

Refuse by delay AIRPORT departure for any EMBASSY staff until ASSANGE has
been taken into the providence of BRITAIN’s Sovereignty.

Then rescind the expulsion notice to the ECUADOR embassy on grounds of
regard for probity and decorum.

Problem solved and necessary in light of the novichok poisoning event.

- dolf


dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Thus in my ignorant view the FIRST NOVICHOK poisoning was in the first
> instance clearly a PRO DOMO EVENT upon the legal status of asylum and
> prerogative of citizenship.
>
> But the subsequent as SECOND event was accidental to the extent that one
> cannot readily determine the will for any detrimental and intentional
> action by its reckless disposal.
>
> With all due respect as to the fatality of consequence for the divulging of
> State Secrets the comparator I would prudently make is that of Julian
> ASSANGE whom has been within BRITAIN but domiciled within the Ecuadoran
> Consulate for asylum since 2012 out of abject fear as retribution from the
> Americans.
>
> Thus a moral dilemma as incommensurate nature of the action which is
> brought against the sovereignty of another nation and which may not have
> been initiated by the Sovereign authority of the hostile initiator.
>
> That in order of precedent action to avoid heteronomy against sovereign
> autonomy, in my view based only upon informal research and having no
> practical experience in statecraft, is as follows:
>
> 1) Ensure that no other agency differentiated from STATE INTERESTS can
> derive any material / immaterial political opportunity from the cataclysmic
> event (this may involve counter-factual portrayals)
>
> 2) Ensure that the correct #41 - ONTIC necessity and proscriptive dialectic
> as protocols of resolution are deployed in a structured manner and that
> semantical constructs are measured.
>
> 3) Resolve the extraneous and any mirrored events which are attributed by a
> PRO DOMO EVENT upon the legal status of asylum and prerogative of
> citizenship.
>
> 4) Such action ought to build capacity for political resilience and
> diminish the adverse consequence of contingency for any future events.
>
> YOUTUBE: “Compare The Meerkat - Commercial 26 (Alexsandr & Sergei Sing)
> (HD)”
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfTsTvP93LU>
>
> — VOODOO HOODOO —
>
> “ALEXANDER IS DONE...
> SERGEI HAD HIS DAY.
> WILL MAIYA BE NEXT?
> FLY STRIKE MAGGOTRY.
>
> EACH AND EVERYONE.
> ALL GONE THIS WAY.
> ENDED BY A PRETEXT.
> VOODOO OF IDOLATRY.”
>
> YOUTUBE: "Compare the Meerkat - Advert 55 (It's Either Me Or He)"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dCUyLDtyQk>
>
> 'Preventing flystrike is more economical than treating it. Short term
> management tools such as *strategic* *chemical* *application*, *crutching*
> and shearing, and controlling worms and *dags* will be beneficial in the
> short term, whilst producers looking for a longer term solution should
> investigate genetic options such as *breeding* for reduced *dags* and
> *wrinkle*.'"
>
> — RACHEL {WETHERED SHEEP} MAKES A PLEA —
>
> "NOW WAIT A TICK. {#1}
> YOU'RE DRIBBLING. {#2}
> WHY THE SHTICK. {#3}
> ENDLESS QUIBBLING. {#4}
>
> O'ER THE PUERILE. {#5}
> IMPISH LIMP STICK. {#6}
> PRISSY LOATH'G BILE. {#7}
> CEASELESS BRICK. {#8}
>
> INSANE PUSSY CALLS. {#9}
> BY A SENILE PRICK. {#10}
> WITHOUT ANY BALLS. {#11}
> MY FANNY LICK." {#12}
>
> HE WHOM LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD AND THANK GOD THAT I AM AN
> ONTOLOGICAL PACIFIST...
>
> As you are without any *foundation* and have the moral scruples of a dag
> festering ANAL-SADISTIC (ie. displaying abnormal aggressive and destructive
> tendencies supposedly caused by fixation at the anal stage of development)
> MAGGOT.
>
> YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat - Fall In Love With MAIYA!"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSH4-DBxYdA>
>
> Thus in regard to any continuation of actions as a subsequent EVENT which
> might have occurred at 0705 HOURS then what assessment of MORALITY can we
> make of such a juvenile TOAD as each event enables us to build a composite
> picture as to the extent and nature of circumstantiality of the
> misdemeanour:
>
> In regard to any continuation of actions as to subsequent PERSONAL SAFETY
> EVENTS which again occurred at 0705 HOURS when returning to attendance as
> retrieval of my Garbage bin from street collection, the RESPONDENT in an
> irrational manner then did in the meantime open his door and wait to ambush
> with a megaphone whereupon he then repeated shouted: “YOU ARE A PHONEY.”
>
> That self justification assessment of MORALITY can we make of such an
> juvenile TOAD as each event enables us to build a composite picture as to
> the gravitas extent and nature of circumstantiality of the misdemeanour
> being unaware that material details of TREASON have already been lodged to
> the COUNTY COURT on the basis of legal argument established upon REDUCTIO
> AD HITLERUM associated with PRO [#541 - CONTEMN / CONDEMN v's #391] DOMO
> [cf: ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK (1941-1944) IDEA @215 ON 12 MAY 1942]: *FOR*
> (*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the interests of a
> given perspective or for the benefit of any small powerful or influential
> #123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION / FIELD / CLIQUE which places a
> prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct
> {#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of
> unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / *AT* *THE*
> *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*} by conduct of
> #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE as BOER / ANZAC defamation.
>
> 0750 HOURS ON 7 SEPTEMBER 2018: “Someone was utilising an electronic saw in
> an area which had no timbered fixtures and I opened the rear door to
> identity the cause of the unusual event.
>
> Whereupon the RESPONDENT said mind your own business and stop stalking me.”
>
> For which #391 - STRATA MANAGEMENT has a vicarious liability.
>
> JUST KEEPING YOU INFORMED OF THE LEGAL ACTION WHICH I AM INTELLECTUALLY AND
> BY PAST EMPLOYMENT AND SCHOOL EDUCATION BY THE VICTORIA POLICE THEN CAPABLE
> OF UNDERTAKING
>
> Nous: #23
> Time: 07:05 hrs
> Date: 2018.7.8
> Torah: [#40, #5, #300]@{
> @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
> @2: Sup: 45 (#85); Ego: 5 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
> @3: Sup: 21 (#106); Ego: 57 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
> Male: #106; Feme: #102
> } // #345
>
> Dao: Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence
> Tetra: #26 - Endeavour
> I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what
> has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch
>
> Latin: Verus {God saviour} Alt: Nanael {Pray to God} {
>
> 1. HELPS TO LIVE IN PEACE WITH ALL
> 2. OCCULT MAGIC & THEOLOGY
> 3. LEARNING
> 4. Teut or Theuth
> }
>
> Mahalalel {Praise (fame) of God}
>
> Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #335} / HETEROS {#307 / #333} / TORAH {#296 /
> #287}
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:3,col:8,nous:23&idea:{m,73}&idea:{f,48}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,335}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
>
> ***@zen: 2, row: 3, col: 8, nous: 23 [Date: 2018.7.8, Time: 07:05
> hrs, Super: #311 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance,
> Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance, Ego: #335 / #23 -
> Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 -
> Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been
> spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 26 - Endeavour]
>
> H7944@{
> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
> @2: Sup: 62 (#67); Ego: 57 (#62),
> @3: Sup: 11 (#78); Ego: 30 (#92),
> Male: #78; Feme: #92
> } // #335
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #330 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
> Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
> appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
> #TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
> #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
> punishment.
> #TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
> #CANON: #84
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
> @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
> @2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
> @3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
> {%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
> @4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
> Male: #71; Feme: #84
> } // #84
>
> #335 as [#5, #300, #30] = shal (H7944): {UMBRA: #8 as #330 % #41 = #2} 1)
> error, fault; 1a) meaning uncertain;
>
> G52@{
> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
> @2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
> @3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
> @4: Sup: 43 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 70 (#124),
> @5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
> @6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135),
> @7: Sup: 11 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 38 (#173 - I AM NOT
> GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
> Male: #220; Feme: #173
> } // #335
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
> from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra:
> 25 - Contention;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
> appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
> #TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
> #POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
> #TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
> #CANON: #148
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
> @2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
> @3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
> @4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
> Male: #222; Feme: #148
> } // #148
>
> #335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {UMBRA: #9 as
> #135 % #41 = #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine
> things; 1b) of moral blindness;
>
> G399@{
> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
> @2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
> @3: Sup: 56 (#108); Ego: 5 (#56),
> @4: Sup: 25 (#133); Ego: 50 (#106),
> @5: Sup: 30 (#163); Ego: 5 (#111),
> @6: Sup: 33 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 3 (#114),
> @7: Sup: 53 (#249); Ego: 20 (#134),
> @8: Sup: 54 (#303); Ego: 1 (#135),
> @9: Sup: 11 (#314); Ego: 38 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
> {%27}),
> Male: #314; Feme: #173
> } // #335
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #1457 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
> I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
> Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
> not a transgressor.
>
> #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
> #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
> #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
> #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
> #CANON: #175
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
> @1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
> @2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
> @3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
> @4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
> Male: #61; Feme: #175
> } // #175
>
> #335 as [#1, #50, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #1, #200] = anaphero (G399):
> {UMBRA: #10 as #1457 % #41 = #22} 1) to carry or bring up, to lead up; 2)
> to put upon the altar, to bring to the altar, to offer; 3) to lift up one's
> self, to take upon one's self; 1a) men to a higher place; 3a) to place on
> one's self anything as a load to be carried; 3b) to sustain, ie. their
> punishment;
>
> H6973@{
> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
> @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
> @3: Sup: 75 (#137); Ego: 19 (#75),
> @4: Sup: 4 (#141); Ego: 10 (#85),
> @5: Sup: 13 (#154); Ego: 9 (#94),
> @6: Sup: 63 (#217); Ego: 50 (#144),
> @7: Sup: 68 (#285); Ego: 5 (#149),
> Male: #285; Feme: #149
> } // #311
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #196 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 -
> Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 -
> Encounters;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit; I
> do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
> #TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
> #POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
> #TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
> #CANON: #191
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
> @1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
> @2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
> @3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
> @4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
> SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
> Male: #155; Feme: #191
> } // #191
>
> #311 as [#6, #50, #100, #10, #90, #50, #5] = quwts (H6973): {UMBRA: #13 as
> #196 % #41 = #32} 1) to be grieved, loathe, abhor, feel a loathing or
> abhorrence or sickening dread; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to feel a loathing at,
> abhor; 1a2) to feel a sickening dread; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause
> sickening dread; 1b2) to cause loathing;
>
> H665@{
> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
> @2: Sup: 31 (#61); Ego: 1 (#31),
> @3: Sup: 30 (#91); Ego: 80 (#111),
> @4: Sup: 68 (#159); Ego: 38 (#149),
> Male: #159; Feme: #149
> } // #311
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #281 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
> I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; I
> am not one who curseth the king.
>
> #VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
> #TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
> #POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
> #TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
> #CANON: #181
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
> @1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
> @2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
> @3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
> @4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
> OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
> Male: #119; Feme: #181
> } // #181
>
> #311 as [#30, #1, #80, #200] = 'epher (H665): {UMBRA: #3 as #281 % #41 =
> #35} 1) ashes; 2) (CLBL) worthlessness (fig.);
>
> H560@{
> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
> @2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
> @3: Sup: 71 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 1 (#71),
> @4: Sup: 30 (#201); Ego: 40 (#111),
> @5: Sup: 68 (#269); Ego: 38 (#149),
> Male: #269; Feme: #149
> } // #311
>
> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>
> UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching:
> H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
> shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness;
>
> THOTH MEASURE: #36 - Oh thou who doest according to thine own will, and
> makest thine appearance in Tebuu; I put no check upon the water in its
> flow.
>
> #VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring good.
> #TOOLS: With Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil.
> #POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends.
> #TIME: With Closed Mouth (no. #56), few allies.
> #CANON: #184
>
> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184@{
> @1: Sup: 36 (#36); Ego: 36 (#36),
> @2: Sup: 31 (#67); Ego: 76 (#112),
> @3: Sup: 47 (#114); Ego: 16 (#128),
> @4: Sup: 22 (#136); Ego: 56 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
> FLOW {%36}),
> Male: #136; Feme: #184
> } // #184
>
> #311 as [#30, #40, #1, #40, #200] = 'amar (Aramaic) (H560): {UMBRA: #2 as
> #241 % #41 = #36} 1) (P'al) to say, to speak, to command, to tell, to
> relate;
>
>
>
> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> This is a broad sketch of the nocturnal considerations which over the
>> coming days we’ll cohere into our existing chapter:
>>
>> We are dealing here with only hypothetical postulates which need to be
>> assayed for verity as factuality and the reason for that is simply that
>> one’s ego must always continually exist within the temporality as the
>> notion broadly conveyed within section: “2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL
>> PRINCIPLE”
>>
>> Ethical principles have the task of guiding our moral judgments. A more
>> exact analysis of their logical features takes into account that with them
>> help we judge not only factually existing objects but also objects which we
>> merely imagine or whose existence is possible but not actual.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely make
>> at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that is
>> broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of #123 -
>> SENSIBILITIES, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
>> subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
>> determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
>> incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
>> justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches a
>> prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only then
>> a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that conveys a
>> disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make something distinctive
>> or attractive. “
>>
>> To illustrate this incommensurate reality and the necessity to make prudent
>> considerations over any course of action I will convey some and limited
>> aspects of my discussion yesterday with a security company over personal
>> safety alarm activation and that is the existentialistic consideration that
>> any @5 - EVENT has a @7 - FABRIC OF TIME essentially by association with
>> the NOUMENON then conveys the #41 - ONTIC necessity within the ontological
>> as Kabbalistic World of Assiah within the material realm of action as the
>> @10 sephirot known as Malkuth {TETRACTYS: @1 + @2 + @3 + @4 = @10}.
>>
>> In short, each alarm activation or camera event may convey something of the
>> MIND which is then causal for the will to action.
>>
>> For instance if I observe CONSTANTINE being thrown into the police van @
>> 1145 hours what may I deduce from the noumenon about the probability of
>> guilty mind?
>>
>> YOUTUBE: “Kermit vs. Constantine (Dark Kermit)”
>>
>> <https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Biv_TKkvzC4>
>>
>> And the answer is much more than you can possibly imagine as a veritable
>> smorgasbord of opportunism relating to the LAW OF WILL as LAW OF NATURE
>> that provides a NEURAL LINGUISTIC PREMISE {#2184: 24 x 7 x 13} OF
>> RATIOCINATION which may then provide quintessential {HEBREW / GREEK}
>> parameters from whence is derived the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and
>> TELOS HIERARCHY INTERSECTIONS which VALIDATE ACTUS REUS as prerequisite for
>> any quantitation of gravitas and consequential immanent action provisioned
>> within artificial intellectual cognitive services:
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com?time:11.45>
>>
>> H817@{
>>    @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>>    @2: Sup: 58 (#59); Ego: 57 (#58),
>>    @3: Sup: 17 (#76); Ego: 40 (#98),
>>    @4: Sup: 57 (#133); Ego: 40 (#138),
>>    Male: #133; Feme: #138
>> } // #381
>>
>> #381 as [#1, #300, #40, #40] = 'asham (H817): {UMBRA: #0 as #341 % #41 =
>> #13} 1) guilt, offense, guiltiness; 1a) offense, trespass, fault; 1b)
>> guilt, guiltiness; 1c) compensation (for offense); 1d) trespass offering,
>> guilt offering;
>>
>> H7285@{
>>    @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>>    @2: Sup: 40 (#42); Ego: 38 (#40),
>>    @3: Sup: 43 (#85); Ego: 3 (#43),
>>    @4: Sup: 19 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 57 (#100),
>>    Male: #104; Feme: #100
>> } // #505
>>
>> #505 {@***@10 magic square} as [#2, #200, #3, #300] = regesh (H7285):
>> {UMBRA: #9 as #503 % #41 = #11} 1) throng, in *company* n f; 2) throng; 3)
>> (TWOT) *scheming*;
>>
>> #505 as [#5, #400, #90, #6, #4] = tsuwd (H6679): {UMBRA: #7 as #100 % #41 =
>> #18} 1) to hunt; 1a) (Qal) to hunt; 1b) (Poel) *to* *hunt*, *hunt*
>> *eagerly* *or* *keenly*; 1c) (Hithpael) take provision;
>> H6679@{
>>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>>    @2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
>>    @3: Sup: 9 (#95); Ego: 9 (#90),
>>    @4: Sup: 15 (#110); Ego: 6 (#96),
>>    @5: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 4 (#100),
>>    Male: #129; Feme: #100
>> } // #505
>>
>> H2179@{
>>    @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>>    @2: Sup: 13 (#19); Ego: 7 (#13),
>>    @3: Sup: 63 (#82); Ego: 50 (#63),
>>    @4: Sup: 65 (#147); Ego: 2 (#65),
>>    @5: Sup: 60 (#207); Ego: 76 (#141),
>>    @6: Sup: 19 (#226); Ego: 40 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
>> OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>>    Male: #226; Feme: #181
>> } // #505
>>
>> #505 as [#6, #7, #50, #2, #400, #40] = zanab (H2179): {UMBRA: #1 as #59 %
>> #41 = #18} 1) to cut off; 1a) (Piel) to attack the rear, *smite* the tail;
>>
>> #8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
>> Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
>>
>> IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
>>
>> DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE
>>
>> G1515@{
>>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>>    @2: Sup: 15 (#20); Ego: 10 (#15),
>>    @3: Sup: 34 (#54); Ego: 19 (#34),
>>    @4: Sup: 42 (#96); Ego: 8 (#42),
>>    @5: Sup: 11 (#107); Ego: 50 (#92),
>>    @6: Sup: 19 (#126); Ego: 8 (#100),
>>    @7: Sup: 57 (#183); Ego: 38 (#138),
>>    Male: #183; Feme: #138
>> } // #381
>>
>> #381 as [#5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #200] = eirene (G1515): {UMBRA: #8 as
>> #181 % #41 = #17} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
>> individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
>> felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
>> prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) of Christianity, the tranquil
>> state of a soul assured of its salvation through Christ, and so fearing
>> nothing from God and content with its earthly lot, of whatsoever sort that
>> is; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
>> *exemption* *from* *the* *rage* *and* *havoc* *of* *war*; 4a) the way that
>> leads to peace (salvation);
>>
>> Sephirot (In Hebrew סְפִירוֹת), meaning "enumerations", are the 10
>> attributes/emanations within Kabbalah, through which God (who is referred
>> to as Ein Sof - The Limitless) reveals him/herself and continuously creates
>> both the physical realm and the chain of higher metaphysical realms (Seder
>> hishtalshelus). The term is alternatively transliterated into English as
>> Sephiroth/Sefiroth, singular Sephirah etc.
>>
>> Alternative configurations of the sephirot are given by different schools
>> in the historical development of Kabbalah, with each articulating different
>> spiritual aspects. The tradition of enumerating 10 is stated in the Sefer
>> Yetzirah, "Ten sephirot of nothingness, ten and not nine, ten and not
>> eleven". As altogether 11 sephirot are listed across the different schemes,
>> two (Keter and Daat) are seen as unconscious and conscious manifestations
>> of the same principle, conserving the ten categories.
>>
>> In Kabbalah the functional structure of the sephirot in channelling Divine
>> creative lifeforce, and revealing the unknowable Divine essence to Creation
>> is described. As God's attributes to allow Creation to know him, the first
>> sephirah describes the DIVINE WILL {@1 - YANG CH’I as MALE / ANALYTIC A
>> PRIORI} ABOVE INTELLECT {@2 - YIN CH’I as FEME / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI} and
>> from with #123 - SENSIBILITY as UNDERSTANDING {@3 - ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI}
>> is then ascertained
>>
>> <http://www.thefullwiki.org/Sephirot>
>>
>> [conundrum, or, concertion, within, the, sub-consciousness, mind, so, that,
>> a, coalescence, may, be, facilitated, and, the, process, of,
>> substantialization, occurs, with, a, reasonable, concretion, as, the,
>> outcome]
>>
>> ONTIC_FOCAL_DIALECTIC@{
>>
>> @4: Sup: 69 (#233); Ego: 47 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
>>
>> Male: #1422; Feme: #979
>> }
>>
>> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
>> [#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy])
>>
>> #8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 -
>> Engendering Nature}}
>>
>> OBLIGANS {
>> 166: [11],
>> 168: [26],
>> 169: [18],
>> 171: [20],
>> 173: [27],
>> 175: [22],
>> 177: [29],
>> 180: [19],
>> 181: [24, 35], // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
>> RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING 182: [6],
>> 184: [36],
>> 185: [25],
>> 186: [31],
>> 191: [32],
>> 192: [39],
>> 196: [37],
>> 197: [33],
>> 200: [8]
>> } ...
>>
>> G2018@{
>>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>>    @2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
>>    @3: Sup: 9 (#18); Ego: 5 (#90),
>>    @4: Sup: 59 (#77); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM
>> NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
>>    @5: Sup: 64 (#141); Ego: 5 (#145),
>>    @6: Sup: 67 (#208); Ego: 3 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>>    @7: Sup: 6 (#214); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
>> {%26}),
>>    @8: Sup: 11 (#225); Ego: 5 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
>> {%27}),
>>    @9: Sup: 21 (#246); Ego: 10 (#183),
>>    @10: Sup: 71 (#317); Ego: 50 (#233),
>>    Male: #317; Feme: #233
>> } // #233
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #1500 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence;
>> I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving;
>> Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu; I
>> lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.
>>
>>     #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
>>     #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
>>     #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
>>     #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
>>     #CANON: #181
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
>>    @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
>>    @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
>>    @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
>>    @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
>> RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>>    Male: #98; Feme: #181
>> } // #181
>>
>> #233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018):
>> {UMBRA: #9 as #1500 % #41 = #24} 1) to bring upon, bring forward; 2) to lay
>> upon, to inflict; 3) to bring upon, ie. in addition, to add, increase; 4)
>> to put upon, cast upon, impose; 1a) used of accusers;
>>
>> "Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed
>> about the body of Moses, durst not bring {#233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5,
>> #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} against {#233 as [#5,
>> #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} him a
>> railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee." [Jude 1:9]
>>
>> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Now I’m going to partake in another curious cognitive function and that is
>>> to load a conundrum or concertion within the sub-consciousness mind so that
>>> a coalescence may be facilitated and the process of substantialization
>>> occurs with a reasonable concretion as the outcome.
>>>
>>> And that is the consideration which we initially conveyed within section “2
>>> - THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” which for purposes of
>>> conceptualisation, we’ll repeat again: “Whilst it is prudent to establish
>>> the starting point of necessity as to any premises for the continuity of
>>> enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance with respect to the learned as the
>>> educated and the gravitas of the subject matter to say nothing of those
>>> whom may have given their lives as something other than marsupial roadkill
>>> as RECTUS for the foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and
>>> in a sturdy and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
>>> self-entitlement [as] bestowal.”
>>>
>>> Thusly I want to consider whether the COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
>>> A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
>>> RESISTANCE) may be thought of in terms by the similitude as traversal of
>>> consciousness being a continuum in much the same way as to be resolutely
>>> {#2184} driving down a roadway and to do so I need a vocabulary to describe
>>> it.
>>>
>>> So therefore the starting point of such necessity is consideration that the
>>> temporal extent of % #364 - ADMITTANCE may be viewed as markers by which we
>>> overtake, whereas the temporal extent of % #728 - REACTANCE are the #CENTRE
>>> markers as stability guidance for our consciousness traversal and that the
>>> temporal extent of % #312 - RESISTANCE are then markers by which intercept
>>> points are cognised.
>>>
>>> So then I want to think about the process of thinking for which we have
>>> definitive meta-descriptor prototypes and to then facilitate that with some
>>> semantical constructs as clarifying outcomes which might resonate with the
>>> experience.
>>>
>>> Where can I find such ready answers?
>>>
>>> I will have to sleep on that.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-07 04:49:47 UTC
Permalink
For instance I just had @ 1441 hours on 7 September 2018 an improper
delivery of toilet blocks from the Memorial Hall where there was a
categorical clarity as to my home address as consistent with toilet time
children’s book images littering within the street after a cenotaph
memorial events held there.

dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> It’s not my place to pontificate to Sovereign Nations however Julian
> Assange is as citizen subject to the laws of the Commonwealth of Australia.
>
> Clearly in such as the NOVICHOK POISONING equivalent of PRO DOMO EVENT upon
> the legal status of asylum and prerogative of citizenship where Sovereign
> nation were prepared given such gravitas to expel Russian diplomats and
> families from their DOMO that the ASSANGE problem can be resolved in the
> same manner.
>
> Place police at the entrance of ECUADOR embassy to maintain a vigil. Issue
> a notice of expulsion within an acceptable timeframe to the entire diplomat
> staff of the embassy.
>
> Once the Embassy ceases to function as such then arrest ASSANGE.
>
> Refuse by delay AIRPORT departure for any EMBASSY staff until ASSANGE has
> been taken into the providence of BRITAIN’s Sovereignty.
>
> Then rescind the expulsion notice to the ECUADOR embassy on grounds of
> regard for probity and decorum.
>
> Problem solved and necessary in light of the novichok poisoning event.
>
> - dolf
>
>
> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Thus in my ignorant view the FIRST NOVICHOK poisoning was in the first
>> instance clearly a PRO DOMO EVENT upon the legal status of asylum and
>> prerogative of citizenship.
>>
>> But the subsequent as SECOND event was accidental to the extent that one
>> cannot readily determine the will for any detrimental and intentional
>> action by its reckless disposal.
>>
>> With all due respect as to the fatality of consequence for the divulging of
>> State Secrets the comparator I would prudently make is that of Julian
>> ASSANGE whom has been within BRITAIN but domiciled within the Ecuadoran
>> Consulate for asylum since 2012 out of abject fear as retribution from the
>> Americans.
>>
>> Thus a moral dilemma as incommensurate nature of the action which is
>> brought against the sovereignty of another nation and which may not have
>> been initiated by the Sovereign authority of the hostile initiator.
>>
>> That in order of precedent action to avoid heteronomy against sovereign
>> autonomy, in my view based only upon informal research and having no
>> practical experience in statecraft, is as follows:
>>
>> 1) Ensure that no other agency differentiated from STATE INTERESTS can
>> derive any material / immaterial political opportunity from the cataclysmic
>> event (this may involve counter-factual portrayals)
>>
>> 2) Ensure that the correct #41 - ONTIC necessity and proscriptive dialectic
>> as protocols of resolution are deployed in a structured manner and that
>> semantical constructs are measured.
>>
>> 3) Resolve the extraneous and any mirrored events which are attributed by a
>> PRO DOMO EVENT upon the legal status of asylum and prerogative of
>> citizenship.
>>
>> 4) Such action ought to build capacity for political resilience and
>> diminish the adverse consequence of contingency for any future events.
>>
>> YOUTUBE: “Compare The Meerkat - Commercial 26 (Alexsandr & Sergei Sing)
>> (HD)”
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfTsTvP93LU>
>>
>> — VOODOO HOODOO —
>>
>> “ALEXANDER IS DONE...
>> SERGEI HAD HIS DAY.
>> WILL MAIYA BE NEXT?
>> FLY STRIKE MAGGOTRY.
>>
>> EACH AND EVERYONE.
>> ALL GONE THIS WAY.
>> ENDED BY A PRETEXT.
>> VOODOO OF IDOLATRY.”
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "Compare the Meerkat - Advert 55 (It's Either Me Or He)"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dCUyLDtyQk>
>>
>> 'Preventing flystrike is more economical than treating it. Short term
>> management tools such as *strategic* *chemical* *application*, *crutching*
>> and shearing, and controlling worms and *dags* will be beneficial in the
>> short term, whilst producers looking for a longer term solution should
>> investigate genetic options such as *breeding* for reduced *dags* and
>> *wrinkle*.'"
>>
>> — RACHEL {WETHERED SHEEP} MAKES A PLEA —
>>
>> "NOW WAIT A TICK. {#1}
>> YOU'RE DRIBBLING. {#2}
>> WHY THE SHTICK. {#3}
>> ENDLESS QUIBBLING. {#4}
>>
>> O'ER THE PUERILE. {#5}
>> IMPISH LIMP STICK. {#6}
>> PRISSY LOATH'G BILE. {#7}
>> CEASELESS BRICK. {#8}
>>
>> INSANE PUSSY CALLS. {#9}
>> BY A SENILE PRICK. {#10}
>> WITHOUT ANY BALLS. {#11}
>> MY FANNY LICK." {#12}
>>
>> HE WHOM LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD AND THANK GOD THAT I AM AN
>> ONTOLOGICAL PACIFIST...
>>
>> As you are without any *foundation* and have the moral scruples of a dag
>> festering ANAL-SADISTIC (ie. displaying abnormal aggressive and destructive
>> tendencies supposedly caused by fixation at the anal stage of development)
>> MAGGOT.
>>
>> YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat - Fall In Love With MAIYA!"
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSH4-DBxYdA>
>>
>> Thus in regard to any continuation of actions as a subsequent EVENT which
>> might have occurred at 0705 HOURS then what assessment of MORALITY can we
>> make of such a juvenile TOAD as each event enables us to build a composite
>> picture as to the extent and nature of circumstantiality of the
>> misdemeanour:
>>
>> In regard to any continuation of actions as to subsequent PERSONAL SAFETY
>> EVENTS which again occurred at 0705 HOURS when returning to attendance as
>> retrieval of my Garbage bin from street collection, the RESPONDENT in an
>> irrational manner then did in the meantime open his door and wait to ambush
>> with a megaphone whereupon he then repeated shouted: “YOU ARE A PHONEY.”
>>
>> That self justification assessment of MORALITY can we make of such an
>> juvenile TOAD as each event enables us to build a composite picture as to
>> the gravitas extent and nature of circumstantiality of the misdemeanour
>> being unaware that material details of TREASON have already been lodged to
>> the COUNTY COURT on the basis of legal argument established upon REDUCTIO
>> AD HITLERUM associated with PRO [#541 - CONTEMN / CONDEMN v's #391] DOMO
>> [cf: ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK (1941-1944) IDEA @215 ON 12 MAY 1942]: *FOR*
>> (*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the interests of a
>> given perspective or for the benefit of any small powerful or influential
>> #123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION / FIELD / CLIQUE which places a
>> prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct
>> {#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of
>> unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / *AT* *THE*
>> *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*} by conduct of
>> #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE as BOER / ANZAC defamation.
>>
>> 0750 HOURS ON 7 SEPTEMBER 2018: “Someone was utilising an electronic saw in
>> an area which had no timbered fixtures and I opened the rear door to
>> identity the cause of the unusual event.
>>
>> Whereupon the RESPONDENT said mind your own business and stop stalking me.”
>>
>> For which #391 - STRATA MANAGEMENT has a vicarious liability.
>>
>> JUST KEEPING YOU INFORMED OF THE LEGAL ACTION WHICH I AM INTELLECTUALLY AND
>> BY PAST EMPLOYMENT AND SCHOOL EDUCATION BY THE VICTORIA POLICE THEN CAPABLE
>> OF UNDERTAKING
>>
>> Nous: #23
>> Time: 07:05 hrs
>> Date: 2018.7.8
>> Torah: [#40, #5, #300]@{
>> @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
>> @2: Sup: 45 (#85); Ego: 5 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
>> @3: Sup: 21 (#106); Ego: 57 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
>> Male: #106; Feme: #102
>> } // #345
>>
>> Dao: Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence
>> Tetra: #26 - Endeavour
>> I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what
>> has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch
>>
>> Latin: Verus {God saviour} Alt: Nanael {Pray to God} {
>>
>> 1. HELPS TO LIVE IN PEACE WITH ALL
>> 2. OCCULT MAGIC & THEOLOGY
>> 3. LEARNING
>> 4. Teut or Theuth
>> }
>>
>> Mahalalel {Praise (fame) of God}
>>
>> Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #335} / HETEROS {#307 / #333} / TORAH {#296 /
>> #287}
>>
>> <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:3,col:8,nous:23&idea:{m,73}&idea:{f,48}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,335}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
>>
>> ***@zen: 2, row: 3, col: 8, nous: 23 [Date: 2018.7.8, Time: 07:05
>> hrs, Super: #311 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance,
>> Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance, Ego: #335 / #23 -
>> Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 -
>> Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been
>> spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 26 - Endeavour]
>>
>> H7944@{
>> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>> @2: Sup: 62 (#67); Ego: 57 (#62),
>> @3: Sup: 11 (#78); Ego: 30 (#92),
>> Male: #78; Feme: #92
>> } // #335
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #330 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
>> Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
>> appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
>> #TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
>> #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
>> punishment.
>> #TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
>> #CANON: #84
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
>> @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>> @2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
>> @3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
>> {%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
>> @4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
>> Male: #71; Feme: #84
>> } // #84
>>
>> #335 as [#5, #300, #30] = shal (H7944): {UMBRA: #8 as #330 % #41 = #2} 1)
>> error, fault; 1a) meaning uncertain;
>>
>> G52@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
>> @3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
>> @4: Sup: 43 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 70 (#124),
>> @5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
>> @6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135),
>> @7: Sup: 11 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 38 (#173 - I AM NOT
>> GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
>> Male: #220; Feme: #173
>> } // #335
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
>> from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra:
>> 25 - Contention;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
>> appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
>> #TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
>> #POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
>> #TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
>> #CANON: #148
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
>> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
>> @2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
>> @3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
>> @4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>> Male: #222; Feme: #148
>> } // #148
>>
>> #335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {UMBRA: #9 as
>> #135 % #41 = #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine
>> things; 1b) of moral blindness;
>>
>> G399@{
>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>> @2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
>> @3: Sup: 56 (#108); Ego: 5 (#56),
>> @4: Sup: 25 (#133); Ego: 50 (#106),
>> @5: Sup: 30 (#163); Ego: 5 (#111),
>> @6: Sup: 33 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 3 (#114),
>> @7: Sup: 53 (#249); Ego: 20 (#134),
>> @8: Sup: 54 (#303); Ego: 1 (#135),
>> @9: Sup: 11 (#314); Ego: 38 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
>> {%27}),
>> Male: #314; Feme: #173
>> } // #335
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #1457 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
>> I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
>> Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
>> not a transgressor.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
>> #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
>> #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
>> #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
>> #CANON: #175
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
>> @1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
>> @2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
>> @3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
>> @4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
>> Male: #61; Feme: #175
>> } // #175
>>
>> #335 as [#1, #50, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #1, #200] = anaphero (G399):
>> {UMBRA: #10 as #1457 % #41 = #22} 1) to carry or bring up, to lead up; 2)
>> to put upon the altar, to bring to the altar, to offer; 3) to lift up one's
>> self, to take upon one's self; 1a) men to a higher place; 3a) to place on
>> one's self anything as a load to be carried; 3b) to sustain, ie. their
>> punishment;
>>
>> H6973@{
>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>> @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
>> @3: Sup: 75 (#137); Ego: 19 (#75),
>> @4: Sup: 4 (#141); Ego: 10 (#85),
>> @5: Sup: 13 (#154); Ego: 9 (#94),
>> @6: Sup: 63 (#217); Ego: 50 (#144),
>> @7: Sup: 68 (#285); Ego: 5 (#149),
>> Male: #285; Feme: #149
>> } // #311
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #196 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 -
>> Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 -
>> Encounters;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit; I
>> do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
>> #TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
>> #POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
>> #TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
>> #CANON: #191
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
>> @1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
>> @2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
>> @3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
>> @4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
>> SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
>> Male: #155; Feme: #191
>> } // #191
>>
>> #311 as [#6, #50, #100, #10, #90, #50, #5] = quwts (H6973): {UMBRA: #13 as
>> #196 % #41 = #32} 1) to be grieved, loathe, abhor, feel a loathing or
>> abhorrence or sickening dread; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to feel a loathing at,
>> abhor; 1a2) to feel a sickening dread; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause
>> sickening dread; 1b2) to cause loathing;
>>
>> H665@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>> @2: Sup: 31 (#61); Ego: 1 (#31),
>> @3: Sup: 30 (#91); Ego: 80 (#111),
>> @4: Sup: 68 (#159); Ego: 38 (#149),
>> Male: #159; Feme: #149
>> } // #311
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #281 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
>> I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; I
>> am not one who curseth the king.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
>> #TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
>> #POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
>> #TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
>> #CANON: #181
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
>> @1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
>> @2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
>> @3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
>> @4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
>> OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>> Male: #119; Feme: #181
>> } // #181
>>
>> #311 as [#30, #1, #80, #200] = 'epher (H665): {UMBRA: #3 as #281 % #41 =
>> #35} 1) ashes; 2) (CLBL) worthlessness (fig.);
>>
>> H560@{
>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>> @2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
>> @3: Sup: 71 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 1 (#71),
>> @4: Sup: 30 (#201); Ego: 40 (#111),
>> @5: Sup: 68 (#269); Ego: 38 (#149),
>> Male: #269; Feme: #149
>> } // #311
>>
>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>
>> UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching:
>> H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
>> shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness;
>>
>> THOTH MEASURE: #36 - Oh thou who doest according to thine own will, and
>> makest thine appearance in Tebuu; I put no check upon the water in its
>> flow.
>>
>> #VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring good.
>> #TOOLS: With Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil.
>> #POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends.
>> #TIME: With Closed Mouth (no. #56), few allies.
>> #CANON: #184
>>
>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184@{
>> @1: Sup: 36 (#36); Ego: 36 (#36),
>> @2: Sup: 31 (#67); Ego: 76 (#112),
>> @3: Sup: 47 (#114); Ego: 16 (#128),
>> @4: Sup: 22 (#136); Ego: 56 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
>> FLOW {%36}),
>> Male: #136; Feme: #184
>> } // #184
>>
>> #311 as [#30, #40, #1, #40, #200] = 'amar (Aramaic) (H560): {UMBRA: #2 as
>> #241 % #41 = #36} 1) (P'al) to say, to speak, to command, to tell, to
>> relate;
>>
>>
>>
>> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> This is a broad sketch of the nocturnal considerations which over the
>>> coming days we’ll cohere into our existing chapter:
>>>
>>> We are dealing here with only hypothetical postulates which need to be
>>> assayed for verity as factuality and the reason for that is simply that
>>> one’s ego must always continually exist within the temporality as the
>>> notion broadly conveyed within section: “2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL
>>> PRINCIPLE”
>>>
>>> Ethical principles have the task of guiding our moral judgments. A more
>>> exact analysis of their logical features takes into account that with them
>>> help we judge not only factually existing objects but also objects which we
>>> merely imagine or whose existence is possible but not actual.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely make
>>> at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that is
>>> broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of #123 -
>>> SENSIBILITIES, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
>>> subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
>>> determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
>>> incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
>>> justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches a
>>> prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only then
>>> a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that conveys a
>>> disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make something distinctive
>>> or attractive. “
>>>
>>> To illustrate this incommensurate reality and the necessity to make prudent
>>> considerations over any course of action I will convey some and limited
>>> aspects of my discussion yesterday with a security company over personal
>>> safety alarm activation and that is the existentialistic consideration that
>>> any @5 - EVENT has a @7 - FABRIC OF TIME essentially by association with
>>> the NOUMENON then conveys the #41 - ONTIC necessity within the ontological
>>> as Kabbalistic World of Assiah within the material realm of action as the
>>> @10 sephirot known as Malkuth {TETRACTYS: @1 + @2 + @3 + @4 = @10}.
>>>
>>> In short, each alarm activation or camera event may convey something of the
>>> MIND which is then causal for the will to action.
>>>
>>> For instance if I observe CONSTANTINE being thrown into the police van @
>>> 1145 hours what may I deduce from the noumenon about the probability of
>>> guilty mind?
>>>
>>> YOUTUBE: “Kermit vs. Constantine (Dark Kermit)”
>>>
>>> <https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Biv_TKkvzC4>
>>>
>>> And the answer is much more than you can possibly imagine as a veritable
>>> smorgasbord of opportunism relating to the LAW OF WILL as LAW OF NATURE
>>> that provides a NEURAL LINGUISTIC PREMISE {#2184: 24 x 7 x 13} OF
>>> RATIOCINATION which may then provide quintessential {HEBREW / GREEK}
>>> parameters from whence is derived the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and
>>> TELOS HIERARCHY INTERSECTIONS which VALIDATE ACTUS REUS as prerequisite for
>>> any quantitation of gravitas and consequential immanent action provisioned
>>> within artificial intellectual cognitive services:
>>>
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com?time:11.45>
>>>
>>> H817@{
>>>    @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>>>    @2: Sup: 58 (#59); Ego: 57 (#58),
>>>    @3: Sup: 17 (#76); Ego: 40 (#98),
>>>    @4: Sup: 57 (#133); Ego: 40 (#138),
>>>    Male: #133; Feme: #138
>>> } // #381
>>>
>>> #381 as [#1, #300, #40, #40] = 'asham (H817): {UMBRA: #0 as #341 % #41 =
>>> #13} 1) guilt, offense, guiltiness; 1a) offense, trespass, fault; 1b)
>>> guilt, guiltiness; 1c) compensation (for offense); 1d) trespass offering,
>>> guilt offering;
>>>
>>> H7285@{
>>>    @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>>>    @2: Sup: 40 (#42); Ego: 38 (#40),
>>>    @3: Sup: 43 (#85); Ego: 3 (#43),
>>>    @4: Sup: 19 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 57 (#100),
>>>    Male: #104; Feme: #100
>>> } // #505
>>>
>>> #505 {@***@10 magic square} as [#2, #200, #3, #300] = regesh (H7285):
>>> {UMBRA: #9 as #503 % #41 = #11} 1) throng, in *company* n f; 2) throng; 3)
>>> (TWOT) *scheming*;
>>>
>>> #505 as [#5, #400, #90, #6, #4] = tsuwd (H6679): {UMBRA: #7 as #100 % #41 =
>>> #18} 1) to hunt; 1a) (Qal) to hunt; 1b) (Poel) *to* *hunt*, *hunt*
>>> *eagerly* *or* *keenly*; 1c) (Hithpael) take provision;
>>> H6679@{
>>>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>>>    @2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
>>>    @3: Sup: 9 (#95); Ego: 9 (#90),
>>>    @4: Sup: 15 (#110); Ego: 6 (#96),
>>>    @5: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 4 (#100),
>>>    Male: #129; Feme: #100
>>> } // #505
>>>
>>> H2179@{
>>>    @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>>>    @2: Sup: 13 (#19); Ego: 7 (#13),
>>>    @3: Sup: 63 (#82); Ego: 50 (#63),
>>>    @4: Sup: 65 (#147); Ego: 2 (#65),
>>>    @5: Sup: 60 (#207); Ego: 76 (#141),
>>>    @6: Sup: 19 (#226); Ego: 40 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
>>> OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>>>    Male: #226; Feme: #181
>>> } // #505
>>>
>>> #505 as [#6, #7, #50, #2, #400, #40] = zanab (H2179): {UMBRA: #1 as #59 %
>>> #41 = #18} 1) to cut off; 1a) (Piel) to attack the rear, *smite* the tail;
>>>
>>> #8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
>>> Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
>>>
>>> IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
>>>
>>> DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE
>>>
>>> G1515@{
>>>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>>>    @2: Sup: 15 (#20); Ego: 10 (#15),
>>>    @3: Sup: 34 (#54); Ego: 19 (#34),
>>>    @4: Sup: 42 (#96); Ego: 8 (#42),
>>>    @5: Sup: 11 (#107); Ego: 50 (#92),
>>>    @6: Sup: 19 (#126); Ego: 8 (#100),
>>>    @7: Sup: 57 (#183); Ego: 38 (#138),
>>>    Male: #183; Feme: #138
>>> } // #381
>>>
>>> #381 as [#5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #200] = eirene (G1515): {UMBRA: #8 as
>>> #181 % #41 = #17} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
>>> individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
>>> felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
>>> prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) of Christianity, the tranquil
>>> state of a soul assured of its salvation through Christ, and so fearing
>>> nothing from God and content with its earthly lot, of whatsoever sort that
>>> is; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
>>> *exemption* *from* *the* *rage* *and* *havoc* *of* *war*; 4a) the way that
>>> leads to peace (salvation);
>>>
>>> Sephirot (In Hebrew סְפִירוֹת), meaning "enumerations", are the 10
>>> attributes/emanations within Kabbalah, through which God (who is referred
>>> to as Ein Sof - The Limitless) reveals him/herself and continuously creates
>>> both the physical realm and the chain of higher metaphysical realms (Seder
>>> hishtalshelus). The term is alternatively transliterated into English as
>>> Sephiroth/Sefiroth, singular Sephirah etc.
>>>
>>> Alternative configurations of the sephirot are given by different schools
>>> in the historical development of Kabbalah, with each articulating different
>>> spiritual aspects. The tradition of enumerating 10 is stated in the Sefer
>>> Yetzirah, "Ten sephirot of nothingness, ten and not nine, ten and not
>>> eleven". As altogether 11 sephirot are listed across the different schemes,
>>> two (Keter and Daat) are seen as unconscious and conscious manifestations
>>> of the same principle, conserving the ten categories.
>>>
>>> In Kabbalah the functional structure of the sephirot in channelling Divine
>>> creative lifeforce, and revealing the unknowable Divine essence to Creation
>>> is described. As God's attributes to allow Creation to know him, the first
>>> sephirah describes the DIVINE WILL {@1 - YANG CH’I as MALE / ANALYTIC A
>>> PRIORI} ABOVE INTELLECT {@2 - YIN CH’I as FEME / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI} and
>>> from with #123 - SENSIBILITY as UNDERSTANDING {@3 - ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI}
>>> is then ascertained
>>>
>>> <http://www.thefullwiki.org/Sephirot>
>>>
>>> [conundrum, or, concertion, within, the, sub-consciousness, mind, so, that,
>>> a, coalescence, may, be, facilitated, and, the, process, of,
>>> substantialization, occurs, with, a, reasonable, concretion, as, the,
>>> outcome]
>>>
>>> ONTIC_FOCAL_DIALECTIC@{
>>>
>>> @4: Sup: 69 (#233); Ego: 47 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
>>>
>>> Male: #1422; Feme: #979
>>> }
>>>
>>> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
>>> [#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy])
>>>
>>> #8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 -
>>> Engendering Nature}}
>>>
>>> OBLIGANS {
>>> 166: [11],
>>> 168: [26],
>>> 169: [18],
>>> 171: [20],
>>> 173: [27],
>>> 175: [22],
>>> 177: [29],
>>> 180: [19],
>>> 181: [24, 35], // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
>>> RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING 182: [6],
>>> 184: [36],
>>> 185: [25],
>>> 186: [31],
>>> 191: [32],
>>> 192: [39],
>>> 196: [37],
>>> 197: [33],
>>> 200: [8]
>>> } ...
>>>
>>> G2018@{
>>>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>>>    @2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
>>>    @3: Sup: 9 (#18); Ego: 5 (#90),
>>>    @4: Sup: 59 (#77); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM
>>> NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
>>>    @5: Sup: 64 (#141); Ego: 5 (#145),
>>>    @6: Sup: 67 (#208); Ego: 3 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>>>    @7: Sup: 6 (#214); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
>>> {%26}),
>>>    @8: Sup: 11 (#225); Ego: 5 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
>>> {%27}),
>>>    @9: Sup: 21 (#246); Ego: 10 (#183),
>>>    @10: Sup: 71 (#317); Ego: 50 (#233),
>>>    Male: #317; Feme: #233
>>> } // #233
>>>
>>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>>
>>> UMBRA: #1500 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence;
>>> I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving;
>>> Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
>>>
>>> THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu; I
>>> lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.
>>>
>>>     #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
>>>     #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
>>>     #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
>>>     #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
>>>     #CANON: #181
>>>
>>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
>>>    @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
>>>    @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
>>>    @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
>>>    @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
>>> RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>>>    Male: #98; Feme: #181
>>> } // #181
>>>
>>> #233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018):
>>> {UMBRA: #9 as #1500 % #41 = #24} 1) to bring upon, bring forward; 2) to lay
>>> upon, to inflict; 3) to bring upon, ie. in addition, to add, increase; 4)
>>> to put upon, cast upon, impose; 1a) used of accusers;
>>>
>>> "Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed
>>> about the body of Moses, durst not bring {#233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5,
>>> #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} against {#233 as [#5,
>>> #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} him a
>>> railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee." [Jude 1:9]
>>>
>>> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Now I’m going to partake in another curious cognitive function and that is
>>>> to load a conundrum or concertion within the sub-consciousness mind so that
>>>> a coalescence may be facilitated and the process of substantialization
>>>> occurs with a reasonable concretion as the outcome.
>>>>
>>>> And that is the consideration which we initially conveyed within section “2
>>>> - THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” which for purposes of
>>>> conceptualisation, we’ll repeat again: “Whilst it is prudent to establish
>>>> the starting point of necessity as to any premises for the continuity of
>>>> enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance with respect to the learned as the
>>>> educated and the gravitas of the subject matter to say nothing of those
>>>> whom may have given their lives as something other than marsupial roadkill
>>>> as RECTUS for the foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and
>>>> in a sturdy and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
>>>> self-entitlement [as] bestowal.”
>>>>
>>>> Thusly I want to consider whether the COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
>>>> A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
>>>> RESISTANCE) may be thought of in terms by the similitude as traversal of
>>>> consciousness being a continuum in much the same way as to be resolutely
>>>> {#2184} driving down a roadway and to do so I need a vocabulary to describe
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> So therefore the starting point of such necessity is consideration that the
>>>> temporal extent of % #364 - ADMITTANCE may be viewed as markers by which we
>>>> overtake, whereas the temporal extent of % #728 - REACTANCE are the #CENTRE
>>>> markers as stability guidance for our consciousness traversal and that the
>>>> temporal extent of % #312 - RESISTANCE are then markers by which intercept
>>>> points are cognised.
>>>>
>>>> So then I want to think about the process of thinking for which we have
>>>> definitive meta-descriptor prototypes and to then facilitate that with some
>>>> semantical constructs as clarifying outcomes which might resonate with the
>>>> experience.
>>>>
>>>> Where can I find such ready answers?
>>>>
>>>> I will have to sleep on that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-07 05:02:49 UTC
Permalink
dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
> For instance I just had @ 1441 hours on 7 September 2018 an improper
> delivery of toilet blocks from the Memorial Hall where there was a
> categorical clarity as to my home address as consistent with toilet time
> children’s book images littering within the street after a cenotaph
> memorial events held there.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/RSL%20DEFECATION%2020171028%20-%201.jpg>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/RSL%20DEFECATION%2020171028%20-%202.jpg>

[IMAGES: *BIG* *BOYS* *TOILET* items left in the street within proximity to
the Memorial Shrine event of 28 October 2018]

>
> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> It’s not my place to pontificate to Sovereign Nations however Julian
>> Assange is as citizen subject to the laws of the Commonwealth of Australia.
>>
>> Clearly in such as the NOVICHOK POISONING equivalent of PRO DOMO EVENT upon
>> the legal status of asylum and prerogative of citizenship where Sovereign
>> nation were prepared given such gravitas to expel Russian diplomats and
>> families from their DOMO that the ASSANGE problem can be resolved in the
>> same manner.
>>
>> Place police at the entrance of ECUADOR embassy to maintain a vigil. Issue
>> a notice of expulsion within an acceptable timeframe to the entire diplomat
>> staff of the embassy.
>>
>> Once the Embassy ceases to function as such then arrest ASSANGE.
>>
>> Refuse by delay AIRPORT departure for any EMBASSY staff until ASSANGE has
>> been taken into the providence of BRITAIN’s Sovereignty.
>>
>> Then rescind the expulsion notice to the ECUADOR embassy on grounds of
>> regard for probity and decorum.
>>
>> Problem solved and necessary in light of the novichok poisoning event.
>>
>> - dolf
>>
>>
>> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thus in my ignorant view the FIRST NOVICHOK poisoning was in the first
>>> instance clearly a PRO DOMO EVENT upon the legal status of asylum and
>>> prerogative of citizenship.
>>>
>>> But the subsequent as SECOND event was accidental to the extent that one
>>> cannot readily determine the will for any detrimental and intentional
>>> action by its reckless disposal.
>>>
>>> With all due respect as to the fatality of consequence for the divulging of
>>> State Secrets the comparator I would prudently make is that of Julian
>>> ASSANGE whom has been within BRITAIN but domiciled within the Ecuadoran
>>> Consulate for asylum since 2012 out of abject fear as retribution from the
>>> Americans.
>>>
>>> Thus a moral dilemma as incommensurate nature of the action which is
>>> brought against the sovereignty of another nation and which may not have
>>> been initiated by the Sovereign authority of the hostile initiator.
>>>
>>> That in order of precedent action to avoid heteronomy against sovereign
>>> autonomy, in my view based only upon informal research and having no
>>> practical experience in statecraft, is as follows:
>>>
>>> 1) Ensure that no other agency differentiated from STATE INTERESTS can
>>> derive any material / immaterial political opportunity from the cataclysmic
>>> event (this may involve counter-factual portrayals)
>>>
>>> 2) Ensure that the correct #41 - ONTIC necessity and proscriptive dialectic
>>> as protocols of resolution are deployed in a structured manner and that
>>> semantical constructs are measured.
>>>
>>> 3) Resolve the extraneous and any mirrored events which are attributed by a
>>> PRO DOMO EVENT upon the legal status of asylum and prerogative of
>>> citizenship.
>>>
>>> 4) Such action ought to build capacity for political resilience and
>>> diminish the adverse consequence of contingency for any future events.
>>>
>>> YOUTUBE: “Compare The Meerkat - Commercial 26 (Alexsandr & Sergei Sing)
>>> (HD)”
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfTsTvP93LU>
>>>
>>> — VOODOO HOODOO —
>>>
>>> “ALEXANDER IS DONE...
>>> SERGEI HAD HIS DAY.
>>> WILL MAIYA BE NEXT?
>>> FLY STRIKE MAGGOTRY.
>>>
>>> EACH AND EVERYONE.
>>> ALL GONE THIS WAY.
>>> ENDED BY A PRETEXT.
>>> VOODOO OF IDOLATRY.”
>>>
>>> YOUTUBE: "Compare the Meerkat - Advert 55 (It's Either Me Or He)"
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dCUyLDtyQk>
>>>
>>> 'Preventing flystrike is more economical than treating it. Short term
>>> management tools such as *strategic* *chemical* *application*, *crutching*
>>> and shearing, and controlling worms and *dags* will be beneficial in the
>>> short term, whilst producers looking for a longer term solution should
>>> investigate genetic options such as *breeding* for reduced *dags* and
>>> *wrinkle*.'"
>>>
>>> — RACHEL {WETHERED SHEEP} MAKES A PLEA —
>>>
>>> "NOW WAIT A TICK. {#1}
>>> YOU'RE DRIBBLING. {#2}
>>> WHY THE SHTICK. {#3}
>>> ENDLESS QUIBBLING. {#4}
>>>
>>> O'ER THE PUERILE. {#5}
>>> IMPISH LIMP STICK. {#6}
>>> PRISSY LOATH'G BILE. {#7}
>>> CEASELESS BRICK. {#8}
>>>
>>> INSANE PUSSY CALLS. {#9}
>>> BY A SENILE PRICK. {#10}
>>> WITHOUT ANY BALLS. {#11}
>>> MY FANNY LICK." {#12}
>>>
>>> HE WHOM LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD AND THANK GOD THAT I AM AN
>>> ONTOLOGICAL PACIFIST...
>>>
>>> As you are without any *foundation* and have the moral scruples of a dag
>>> festering ANAL-SADISTIC (ie. displaying abnormal aggressive and destructive
>>> tendencies supposedly caused by fixation at the anal stage of development)
>>> MAGGOT.
>>>
>>> YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat - Fall In Love With MAIYA!"
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSH4-DBxYdA>
>>>
>>> Thus in regard to any continuation of actions as a subsequent EVENT which
>>> might have occurred at 0705 HOURS then what assessment of MORALITY can we
>>> make of such a juvenile TOAD as each event enables us to build a composite
>>> picture as to the extent and nature of circumstantiality of the
>>> misdemeanour:
>>>
>>> In regard to any continuation of actions as to subsequent PERSONAL SAFETY
>>> EVENTS which again occurred at 0705 HOURS when returning to attendance as
>>> retrieval of my Garbage bin from street collection, the RESPONDENT in an
>>> irrational manner then did in the meantime open his door and wait to ambush
>>> with a megaphone whereupon he then repeated shouted: “YOU ARE A PHONEY.”
>>>
>>> That self justification assessment of MORALITY can we make of such an
>>> juvenile TOAD as each event enables us to build a composite picture as to
>>> the gravitas extent and nature of circumstantiality of the misdemeanour
>>> being unaware that material details of TREASON have already been lodged to
>>> the COUNTY COURT on the basis of legal argument established upon REDUCTIO
>>> AD HITLERUM associated with PRO [#541 - CONTEMN / CONDEMN v's #391] DOMO
>>> [cf: ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK (1941-1944) IDEA @215 ON 12 MAY 1942]: *FOR*
>>> (*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the interests of a
>>> given perspective or for the benefit of any small powerful or influential
>>> #123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION / FIELD / CLIQUE which places a
>>> prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct
>>> {#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of
>>> unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / *AT* *THE*
>>> *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*} by conduct of
>>> #325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE as BOER / ANZAC defamation.
>>>
>>> 0750 HOURS ON 7 SEPTEMBER 2018: “Someone was utilising an electronic saw in
>>> an area which had no timbered fixtures and I opened the rear door to
>>> identity the cause of the unusual event.
>>>
>>> Whereupon the RESPONDENT said mind your own business and stop stalking me.”
>>>
>>> For which #391 - STRATA MANAGEMENT has a vicarious liability.
>>>
>>> JUST KEEPING YOU INFORMED OF THE LEGAL ACTION WHICH I AM INTELLECTUALLY AND
>>> BY PAST EMPLOYMENT AND SCHOOL EDUCATION BY THE VICTORIA POLICE THEN CAPABLE
>>> OF UNDERTAKING
>>>
>>> Nous: #23
>>> Time: 07:05 hrs
>>> Date: 2018.7.8
>>> Torah: [#40, #5, #300]@{
>>> @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
>>> @2: Sup: 45 (#85); Ego: 5 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
>>> @3: Sup: 21 (#106); Ego: 57 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
>>> Male: #106; Feme: #102
>>> } // #345
>>>
>>> Dao: Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence
>>> Tetra: #26 - Endeavour
>>> I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what
>>> has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch
>>>
>>> Latin: Verus {God saviour} Alt: Nanael {Pray to God} {
>>>
>>> 1. HELPS TO LIVE IN PEACE WITH ALL
>>> 2. OCCULT MAGIC & THEOLOGY
>>> 3. LEARNING
>>> 4. Teut or Theuth
>>> }
>>>
>>> Mahalalel {Praise (fame) of God}
>>>
>>> Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #335} / HETEROS {#307 / #333} / TORAH {#296 /
>>> #287}
>>>
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:3,col:8,nous:23&idea:{m,73}&idea:{f,48}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,335}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
>>>
>>> ***@zen: 2, row: 3, col: 8, nous: 23 [Date: 2018.7.8, Time: 07:05
>>> hrs, Super: #311 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance,
>>> Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance, Ego: #335 / #23 -
>>> Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 -
>>> Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been
>>> spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 26 - Endeavour]
>>>
>>> H7944@{
>>> @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>>> @2: Sup: 62 (#67); Ego: 57 (#62),
>>> @3: Sup: 11 (#78); Ego: 30 (#92),
>>> Male: #78; Feme: #92
>>> } // #335
>>>
>>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>>
>>> UMBRA: #330 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
>>> Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;
>>>
>>> THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
>>> appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.
>>>
>>> #VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
>>> #TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
>>> #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
>>> punishment.
>>> #TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
>>> #CANON: #84
>>>
>>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
>>> @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>>> @2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
>>> @3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
>>> {%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
>>> @4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
>>> Male: #71; Feme: #84
>>> } // #84
>>>
>>> #335 as [#5, #300, #30] = shal (H7944): {UMBRA: #8 as #330 % #41 = #2} 1)
>>> error, fault; 1a) meaning uncertain;
>>>
>>> G52@{
>>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>>> @2: Sup: 4 (#5); Ego: 3 (#4),
>>> @3: Sup: 54 (#59); Ego: 50 (#54),
>>> @4: Sup: 43 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 70 (#124),
>>> @5: Sup: 53 (#155); Ego: 10 (#134),
>>> @6: Sup: 54 (#209); Ego: 1 (#135),
>>> @7: Sup: 11 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 38 (#173 - I AM NOT
>>> GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
>>> Male: #220; Feme: #173
>>> } // #335
>>>
>>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>>
>>> UMBRA: #135 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
>>> from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra:
>>> 25 - Contention;
>>>
>>> THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
>>> appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
>>>
>>> #VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
>>> #TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
>>> #POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
>>> #TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
>>> #CANON: #148
>>>
>>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
>>> @1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
>>> @2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
>>> @3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
>>> @4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>>> Male: #222; Feme: #148
>>> } // #148
>>>
>>> #335 as [#1, #3, #50, #70, #10, #1, #200] = agnoia (G52): {UMBRA: #9 as
>>> #135 % #41 = #12} 1) lack of knowledge, ignorance; 1a) esp. of divine
>>> things; 1b) of moral blindness;
>>>
>>> G399@{
>>> @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>>> @2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
>>> @3: Sup: 56 (#108); Ego: 5 (#56),
>>> @4: Sup: 25 (#133); Ego: 50 (#106),
>>> @5: Sup: 30 (#163); Ego: 5 (#111),
>>> @6: Sup: 33 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 3 (#114),
>>> @7: Sup: 53 (#249); Ego: 20 (#134),
>>> @8: Sup: 54 (#303); Ego: 1 (#135),
>>> @9: Sup: 11 (#314); Ego: 38 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
>>> {%27}),
>>> Male: #314; Feme: #173
>>> } // #335
>>>
>>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>>
>>> UMBRA: #1457 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
>>> I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
>>> Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;
>>>
>>> THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
>>> not a transgressor.
>>>
>>> #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
>>> #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
>>> #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
>>> #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
>>> #CANON: #175
>>>
>>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
>>> @1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
>>> @2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
>>> @3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
>>> @4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
>>> Male: #61; Feme: #175
>>> } // #175
>>>
>>> #335 as [#1, #50, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #1, #200] = anaphero (G399):
>>> {UMBRA: #10 as #1457 % #41 = #22} 1) to carry or bring up, to lead up; 2)
>>> to put upon the altar, to bring to the altar, to offer; 3) to lift up one's
>>> self, to take upon one's self; 1a) men to a higher place; 3a) to place on
>>> one's self anything as a load to be carried; 3b) to sustain, ie. their
>>> punishment;
>>>
>>> H6973@{
>>> @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>>> @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
>>> @3: Sup: 75 (#137); Ego: 19 (#75),
>>> @4: Sup: 4 (#141); Ego: 10 (#85),
>>> @5: Sup: 13 (#154); Ego: 9 (#94),
>>> @6: Sup: 63 (#217); Ego: 50 (#144),
>>> @7: Sup: 68 (#285); Ego: 5 (#149),
>>> Male: #285; Feme: #149
>>> } // #311
>>>
>>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>>
>>> UMBRA: #196 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 -
>>> Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 -
>>> Encounters;
>>>
>>> THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit; I
>>> do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.
>>>
>>> #VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
>>> #TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
>>> #POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
>>> #TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
>>> #CANON: #191
>>>
>>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
>>> @1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
>>> @2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
>>> @3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
>>> @4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
>>> SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
>>> Male: #155; Feme: #191
>>> } // #191
>>>
>>> #311 as [#6, #50, #100, #10, #90, #50, #5] = quwts (H6973): {UMBRA: #13 as
>>> #196 % #41 = #32} 1) to be grieved, loathe, abhor, feel a loathing or
>>> abhorrence or sickening dread; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to feel a loathing at,
>>> abhor; 1a2) to feel a sickening dread; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause
>>> sickening dread; 1b2) to cause loathing;
>>>
>>> H665@{
>>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>>> @2: Sup: 31 (#61); Ego: 1 (#31),
>>> @3: Sup: 30 (#91); Ego: 80 (#111),
>>> @4: Sup: 68 (#159); Ego: 38 (#149),
>>> Male: #159; Feme: #149
>>> } // #311
>>>
>>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>>
>>> UMBRA: #281 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
>>> I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
>>>
>>> THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; I
>>> am not one who curseth the king.
>>>
>>> #VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
>>> #TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
>>> #POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
>>> #TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
>>> #CANON: #181
>>>
>>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
>>> @1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
>>> @2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
>>> @3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
>>> @4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
>>> OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>>> Male: #119; Feme: #181
>>> } // #181
>>>
>>> #311 as [#30, #1, #80, #200] = 'epher (H665): {UMBRA: #3 as #281 % #41 =
>>> #35} 1) ashes; 2) (CLBL) worthlessness (fig.);
>>>
>>> H560@{
>>> @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
>>> @2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
>>> @3: Sup: 71 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 1 (#71),
>>> @4: Sup: 30 (#201); Ego: 40 (#111),
>>> @5: Sup: 68 (#269); Ego: 38 (#149),
>>> Male: #269; Feme: #149
>>> } // #311
>>>
>>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>>
>>> UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching:
>>> H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
>>> shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness;
>>>
>>> THOTH MEASURE: #36 - Oh thou who doest according to thine own will, and
>>> makest thine appearance in Tebuu; I put no check upon the water in its
>>> flow.
>>>
>>> #VIRTUE: With Strength (no. #36), untiring good.
>>> #TOOLS: With Aggravation (no. #76), unending evil.
>>> #POSITION: With Contact (no. #16), many friends.
>>> #TIME: With Closed Mouth (no. #56), few allies.
>>> #CANON: #184
>>>
>>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184@{
>>> @1: Sup: 36 (#36); Ego: 36 (#36),
>>> @2: Sup: 31 (#67); Ego: 76 (#112),
>>> @3: Sup: 47 (#114); Ego: 16 (#128),
>>> @4: Sup: 22 (#136); Ego: 56 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
>>> FLOW {%36}),
>>> Male: #136; Feme: #184
>>> } // #184
>>>
>>> #311 as [#30, #40, #1, #40, #200] = 'amar (Aramaic) (H560): {UMBRA: #2 as
>>> #241 % #41 = #36} 1) (P'al) to say, to speak, to command, to tell, to
>>> relate;
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> This is a broad sketch of the nocturnal considerations which over the
>>>> coming days we’ll cohere into our existing chapter:
>>>>
>>>> We are dealing here with only hypothetical postulates which need to be
>>>> assayed for verity as factuality and the reason for that is simply that
>>>> one’s ego must always continually exist within the temporality as the
>>>> notion broadly conveyed within section: “2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL
>>>> PRINCIPLE”
>>>>
>>>> Ethical principles have the task of guiding our moral judgments. A more
>>>> exact analysis of their logical features takes into account that with them
>>>> help we judge not only factually existing objects but also objects which we
>>>> merely imagine or whose existence is possible but not actual.
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely make
>>>> at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that is
>>>> broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of #123 -
>>>> SENSIBILITIES, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
>>>> subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
>>>> determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
>>>> incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
>>>> justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches a
>>>> prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only then
>>>> a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that conveys a
>>>> disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make something distinctive
>>>> or attractive. “
>>>>
>>>> To illustrate this incommensurate reality and the necessity to make prudent
>>>> considerations over any course of action I will convey some and limited
>>>> aspects of my discussion yesterday with a security company over personal
>>>> safety alarm activation and that is the existentialistic consideration that
>>>> any @5 - EVENT has a @7 - FABRIC OF TIME essentially by association with
>>>> the NOUMENON then conveys the #41 - ONTIC necessity within the ontological
>>>> as Kabbalistic World of Assiah within the material realm of action as the
>>>> @10 sephirot known as Malkuth {TETRACTYS: @1 + @2 + @3 + @4 = @10}.
>>>>
>>>> In short, each alarm activation or camera event may convey something of the
>>>> MIND which is then causal for the will to action.
>>>>
>>>> For instance if I observe CONSTANTINE being thrown into the police van @
>>>> 1145 hours what may I deduce from the noumenon about the probability of
>>>> guilty mind?
>>>>
>>>> YOUTUBE: “Kermit vs. Constantine (Dark Kermit)”
>>>>
>>>> <https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Biv_TKkvzC4>
>>>>
>>>> And the answer is much more than you can possibly imagine as a veritable
>>>> smorgasbord of opportunism relating to the LAW OF WILL as LAW OF NATURE
>>>> that provides a NEURAL LINGUISTIC PREMISE {#2184: 24 x 7 x 13} OF
>>>> RATIOCINATION which may then provide quintessential {HEBREW / GREEK}
>>>> parameters from whence is derived the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET and
>>>> TELOS HIERARCHY INTERSECTIONS which VALIDATE ACTUS REUS as prerequisite for
>>>> any quantitation of gravitas and consequential immanent action provisioned
>>>> within artificial intellectual cognitive services:
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.grapple369.com?time:11.45>
>>>>
>>>> H817@{
>>>>    @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
>>>>    @2: Sup: 58 (#59); Ego: 57 (#58),
>>>>    @3: Sup: 17 (#76); Ego: 40 (#98),
>>>>    @4: Sup: 57 (#133); Ego: 40 (#138),
>>>>    Male: #133; Feme: #138
>>>> } // #381
>>>>
>>>> #381 as [#1, #300, #40, #40] = 'asham (H817): {UMBRA: #0 as #341 % #41 =
>>>> #13} 1) guilt, offense, guiltiness; 1a) offense, trespass, fault; 1b)
>>>> guilt, guiltiness; 1c) compensation (for offense); 1d) trespass offering,
>>>> guilt offering;
>>>>
>>>> H7285@{
>>>>    @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
>>>>    @2: Sup: 40 (#42); Ego: 38 (#40),
>>>>    @3: Sup: 43 (#85); Ego: 3 (#43),
>>>>    @4: Sup: 19 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 57 (#100),
>>>>    Male: #104; Feme: #100
>>>> } // #505
>>>>
>>>> #505 {@***@10 magic square} as [#2, #200, #3, #300] = regesh (H7285):
>>>> {UMBRA: #9 as #503 % #41 = #11} 1) throng, in *company* n f; 2) throng; 3)
>>>> (TWOT) *scheming*;
>>>>
>>>> #505 as [#5, #400, #90, #6, #4] = tsuwd (H6679): {UMBRA: #7 as #100 % #41 =
>>>> #18} 1) to hunt; 1a) (Qal) to hunt; 1b) (Poel) *to* *hunt*, *hunt*
>>>> *eagerly* *or* *keenly*; 1c) (Hithpael) take provision;
>>>> H6679@{
>>>>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>>>>    @2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
>>>>    @3: Sup: 9 (#95); Ego: 9 (#90),
>>>>    @4: Sup: 15 (#110); Ego: 6 (#96),
>>>>    @5: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 4 (#100),
>>>>    Male: #129; Feme: #100
>>>> } // #505
>>>>
>>>> H2179@{
>>>>    @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
>>>>    @2: Sup: 13 (#19); Ego: 7 (#13),
>>>>    @3: Sup: 63 (#82); Ego: 50 (#63),
>>>>    @4: Sup: 65 (#147); Ego: 2 (#65),
>>>>    @5: Sup: 60 (#207); Ego: 76 (#141),
>>>>    @6: Sup: 19 (#226); Ego: 40 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
>>>> OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>>>>    Male: #226; Feme: #181
>>>> } // #505
>>>>
>>>> #505 as [#6, #7, #50, #2, #400, #40] = zanab (H2179): {UMBRA: #1 as #59 %
>>>> #41 = #18} 1) to cut off; 1a) (Piel) to attack the rear, *smite* the tail;
>>>>
>>>> #8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
>>>> Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
>>>>
>>>> IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
>>>>
>>>> DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE
>>>>
>>>> G1515@{
>>>>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>>>>    @2: Sup: 15 (#20); Ego: 10 (#15),
>>>>    @3: Sup: 34 (#54); Ego: 19 (#34),
>>>>    @4: Sup: 42 (#96); Ego: 8 (#42),
>>>>    @5: Sup: 11 (#107); Ego: 50 (#92),
>>>>    @6: Sup: 19 (#126); Ego: 8 (#100),
>>>>    @7: Sup: 57 (#183); Ego: 38 (#138),
>>>>    Male: #183; Feme: #138
>>>> } // #381
>>>>
>>>> #381 as [#5, #10, #100, #8, #50, #8, #200] = eirene (G1515): {UMBRA: #8 as
>>>> #181 % #41 = #17} 1) a state of national tranquillity; 2) peace between
>>>> individuals, ie. harmony, concord; 3) security, safety, prosperity,
>>>> felicity, (because peace and harmony make and keep things safe and
>>>> prosperous); 4) of the Messiah's peace; 5) of Christianity, the tranquil
>>>> state of a soul assured of its salvation through Christ, and so fearing
>>>> nothing from God and content with its earthly lot, of whatsoever sort that
>>>> is; 6) the blessed state of devout and upright men after death; 1a)
>>>> *exemption* *from* *the* *rage* *and* *havoc* *of* *war*; 4a) the way that
>>>> leads to peace (salvation);
>>>>
>>>> Sephirot (In Hebrew סְפִירוֹת), meaning "enumerations", are the 10
>>>> attributes/emanations within Kabbalah, through which God (who is referred
>>>> to as Ein Sof - The Limitless) reveals him/herself and continuously creates
>>>> both the physical realm and the chain of higher metaphysical realms (Seder
>>>> hishtalshelus). The term is alternatively transliterated into English as
>>>> Sephiroth/Sefiroth, singular Sephirah etc.
>>>>
>>>> Alternative configurations of the sephirot are given by different schools
>>>> in the historical development of Kabbalah, with each articulating different
>>>> spiritual aspects. The tradition of enumerating 10 is stated in the Sefer
>>>> Yetzirah, "Ten sephirot of nothingness, ten and not nine, ten and not
>>>> eleven". As altogether 11 sephirot are listed across the different schemes,
>>>> two (Keter and Daat) are seen as unconscious and conscious manifestations
>>>> of the same principle, conserving the ten categories.
>>>>
>>>> In Kabbalah the functional structure of the sephirot in channelling Divine
>>>> creative lifeforce, and revealing the unknowable Divine essence to Creation
>>>> is described. As God's attributes to allow Creation to know him, the first
>>>> sephirah describes the DIVINE WILL {@1 - YANG CH’I as MALE / ANALYTIC A
>>>> PRIORI} ABOVE INTELLECT {@2 - YIN CH’I as FEME / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI} and
>>>> from with #123 - SENSIBILITY as UNDERSTANDING {@3 - ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI}
>>>> is then ascertained
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.thefullwiki.org/Sephirot>
>>>>
>>>> [conundrum, or, concertion, within, the, sub-consciousness, mind, so, that,
>>>> a, coalescence, may, be, facilitated, and, the, process, of,
>>>> substantialization, occurs, with, a, reasonable, concretion, as, the,
>>>> outcome]
>>>>
>>>> ONTIC_FOCAL_DIALECTIC@{
>>>>
>>>> @4: Sup: 69 (#233); Ego: 47 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
>>>>
>>>> Male: #1422; Feme: #979
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> #111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
>>>> [#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy])
>>>>
>>>> #8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 -
>>>> Engendering Nature}}
>>>>
>>>> OBLIGANS {
>>>> 166: [11],
>>>> 168: [26],
>>>> 169: [18],
>>>> 171: [20],
>>>> 173: [27],
>>>> 175: [22],
>>>> 177: [29],
>>>> 180: [19],
>>>> 181: [24, 35], // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
>>>> RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING 182: [6],
>>>> 184: [36],
>>>> 185: [25],
>>>> 186: [31],
>>>> 191: [32],
>>>> 192: [39],
>>>> 196: [37],
>>>> 197: [33],
>>>> 200: [8]
>>>> } ...
>>>>
>>>> G2018@{
>>>>    @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
>>>>    @2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
>>>>    @3: Sup: 9 (#18); Ego: 5 (#90),
>>>>    @4: Sup: 59 (#77); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM
>>>> NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
>>>>    @5: Sup: 64 (#141); Ego: 5 (#145),
>>>>    @6: Sup: 67 (#208); Ego: 3 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
>>>>    @7: Sup: 6 (#214); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
>>>> {%26}),
>>>>    @8: Sup: 11 (#225); Ego: 5 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
>>>> {%27}),
>>>>    @9: Sup: 21 (#246); Ego: 10 (#183),
>>>>    @10: Sup: 71 (#317); Ego: 50 (#233),
>>>>    Male: #317; Feme: #233
>>>> } // #233
>>>>
>>>> T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
>>>>
>>>> UMBRA: #1500 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence;
>>>> I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving;
>>>> Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
>>>>
>>>> THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu; I
>>>> lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.
>>>>
>>>>     #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
>>>>     #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
>>>>     #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
>>>>     #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
>>>>     #CANON: #181
>>>>
>>>> ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
>>>>    @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
>>>>    @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
>>>>    @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
>>>>    @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
>>>> RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
>>>>    Male: #98; Feme: #181
>>>> } // #181
>>>>
>>>> #233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018):
>>>> {UMBRA: #9 as #1500 % #41 = #24} 1) to bring upon, bring forward; 2) to lay
>>>> upon, to inflict; 3) to bring upon, ie. in addition, to add, increase; 4)
>>>> to put upon, cast upon, impose; 1a) used of accusers;
>>>>
>>>> "Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed
>>>> about the body of Moses, durst not bring {#233 as [#5, #80, #5, #50, #5,
>>>> #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} against {#233 as [#5,
>>>> #80, #5, #50, #5, #3, #20, #5, #10, #50] = epiphero (G2018): bring} him a
>>>> railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee." [Jude 1:9]
>>>>
>>>> dolf <***@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Now I’m going to partake in another curious cognitive function and that is
>>>>> to load a conundrum or concertion within the sub-consciousness mind so that
>>>>> a coalescence may be facilitated and the process of substantialization
>>>>> occurs with a reasonable concretion as the outcome.
>>>>>
>>>>> And that is the consideration which we initially conveyed within section “2
>>>>> - THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” which for purposes of
>>>>> conceptualisation, we’ll repeat again: “Whilst it is prudent to establish
>>>>> the starting point of necessity as to any premises for the continuity of
>>>>> enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance with respect to the learned as the
>>>>> educated and the gravitas of the subject matter to say nothing of those
>>>>> whom may have given their lives as something other than marsupial roadkill
>>>>> as RECTUS for the foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and
>>>>> in a sturdy and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
>>>>> self-entitlement [as] bestowal.”
>>>>>
>>>>> Thusly I want to consider whether the COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
>>>>> A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
>>>>> RESISTANCE) may be thought of in terms by the similitude as traversal of
>>>>> consciousness being a continuum in much the same way as to be resolutely
>>>>> {#2184} driving down a roadway and to do so I need a vocabulary to describe
>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>> So therefore the starting point of such necessity is consideration that the
>>>>> temporal extent of % #364 - ADMITTANCE may be viewed as markers by which we
>>>>> overtake, whereas the temporal extent of % #728 - REACTANCE are the #CENTRE
>>>>> markers as stability guidance for our consciousness traversal and that the
>>>>> temporal extent of % #312 - RESISTANCE are then markers by which intercept
>>>>> points are cognised.
>>>>>
>>>>> So then I want to think about the process of thinking for which we have
>>>>> definitive meta-descriptor prototypes and to then facilitate that with some
>>>>> semantical constructs as clarifying outcomes which might resonate with the
>>>>> experience.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where can I find such ready answers?
>>>>>
>>>>> I will have to sleep on that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-03 20:38:48 UTC
Permalink
I have an attendance at court later today so there will not be much
finalising of this chapter which is already at 60 pages however here is
an explanation of *REDUCTIO* *AD* *TRUMPIUM* by which the Dutch define
themselves as *BARBARIC*.

DOLF @ 0436 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I am (being surnamed BOEK
self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical appeal to either
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *TRUMPIUM* for taking an obstinate or negative dialectic
disposition {ie. Shall we not discuss the elephant in the room: Dutch
directness by which they define themselves a *BARBARIC*.

Direct to the point of shocking at times. Direct to the point of “what
the f@#$ did he just say to me?!?} as is implied by the title of this
chapter 'DUTCH BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS' and then spiralling
downwards into forfeiture of decency by recourse to *REDUCTIO* *AD*
*ABSURDUM* until one reaches a consequential depravity *REDUCTIO* *AD*
*HITLERUM* (eg: Hitler was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL,
and so are you), .

This Dutch trait has gone by many names; call it what you will – abrupt,
bad-mannered, *BARBARIC*, blunt, brusque, cheeky, crude, curt, direct,
discourteous, forthright, frank, graceless, gruff, honest, ignorant,
impolite, inconsiderate, insulting, intrusive, matter-of-fact, open,
outspoken, plain, point-blank, raw, refreshing, rude, sincere,
straightforward, surprising, uncouth or unmannerly. Essentially, the
bottom line remains: the Dutch speak their minds.

<https://stuffdutchpeoplelike.com/2011/05/28/dutch-directness/>

Thusly, to convey any difference on the basis of “*MORE* *OR* *LESS*”,
then one is making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished
otherwise) to at least as a starting point of Aristotelian (384–322 BCE)
understanding given of the binomial NATURE OF NUMBER as the earlier
ANALYTIC A PRIORI / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI conception of it enumerated by
the PYTHAGOREAN (c. 570 – c. 495 BCE) where there was both:

MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something
could be done well.

LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and

The *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* in this circumstance of the PYTHAGOREAN
incommensurate (square root 2) notion of NUMBER occurs whereby the
ANALYTIC A PRIORI of MORE as ONE: {YANG CH'I as MALE} and the SYNTHETIC
A PRIORI of LESS as TWO: {YIN CH'I as FEME} are according to the
esoteric dogma NOT CONSIDERED as being NUMBER being deducted entirely by
*REDUCTIVE* *REDACTION* {ie. @1 @5 bifurcation} and are therefore an
incomprehensibility or an *INSENSIBILITY* which is incapable of being
COGNISED as offensive constituting hate-speech other than being an
irrationality which BEWILDERS and confounds the minds of impotent Dutch
justice.

For want of a model let’s consider the hypothetical postulation that
#123 - SENSIBILITY by #41 - *ONTIC* necessity might be similarly
considered within terms of #9 - LIMIT / #72 - UNLIMITED whereby there is
then virtual process of #65 - DELIMITATION (ie. it’s 0409 hours) within
the temporality by which noumena grounding then occurs as determinant of
the relativity as DYNAMIC NATURAL ASSOCIATOR which is a virtual #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL providing the intrinsic and prerequisite GNOMIC
IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET that is then mechanism for an IDEA to be
circumscribed {#12 x #41 = #492} as ratiocination before the DIALECTIC
process of #73 - EXTRUSION {#492 + #41 = #533} by vocalisation according
to its nuance of metrication which is RHYTHMIC and within good / evil
bounds of SENSIBILITIES: #15 —> #34 —> #65 —> #111 —> #175 —> #260 —>
#369 as the opine of TRUTH {% #41} or NOT BEING TRUTH {% #81} IS ASSAYED
{ie. If #72 is THE FORMA CORPIS AS ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE CAN NOT THE
SERIES: #73 to #81 BE CONSIDERED THE JUXTAPOSITION BY WHICH CRITERIA OF
PURE REASON IS MEASURED}: DOUBLE DUTCH {ie. *GIBBERISH*}.

Can the epithet: gibberish be also viewed as a racialist pejorative of
double dutch by being quantitatively: SCREAMING NUTBAG then considered
hate speech as jingoistic BOER / ANZAC defamation and endless amusement
for Australians by which they commemorate their *HEROS* of WAR.

YOUTUBE: "Heros (David Bowie}"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsYp9q3QNaQ>

G3023@{
   @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
   @2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
   @3: Sup: 24 (#89); Ego: 70 (#105),
   @4: Sup: 74 (#163); Ego: 50 (#155),
   @5: Sup: 50 (#213); Ego: 57 (#212),
   @6: Sup: 60 (#273); Ego: 10 (#222),
   Male: #273; Feme: #222
} // #465

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #885 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;

THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
*I* *LEND* *NOT* *A* *DEAF* *EAR* *TO* *THE* *WORDS* *OF* *RIGHTEOUSNESS*.

    #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
    #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
    #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
    #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
    #CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
   @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
   @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
   @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
   @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181

#465 as [#30, #5, #70, #50, #300, #10] = leon (G3023): {UMBRA: #17 as
#885 % #41 = #24} 1) a *LION*; 2) a brave and mighty hero;

G316@{
   @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
   @2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
   @3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
   @4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
   @5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
   @6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
   @7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
   @8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
   @9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
   Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; I indulge not in anger.

    #VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
    #TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
    #POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
    #TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
    #CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
   @1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
   @2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
   Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

#287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios (G316):
{UMBRA: #9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*;

Nous: #65
Time: 04:05 hrs
Date: 2018.5.22
Torah: [#8, #70, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 78 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 70 (#78),
@3: Sup: 37 (#123); Ego: 40 (#118),
Male: #123; Feme: #118
} // #118

Dao: Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity
Tetra: #63 - Watch
I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up

Latin: Sublevator {God, the hope of all the children of the earth} Alt:
Mabhel {Emptiness of Things Before God} {

1. PROTECTS AGAINST LIGHTNING & INFERNAL SPIRITS OF RELIGIOUS CULTS
2. CREED
3. INFLUENCES & PROTECTS THOSE WHO SEEK THE TRUTH
4. Serucuth
}

Jehoshaphat {The Lord is judge}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#287 / #465} / HETEROS {#299 / #390} / TORAH {#300
/ #431}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:2,col:7,nous:65&idea:{m,88}&idea:{f,117}&idea:{m,287}&idea:{f,465}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 2, col: 7, nous: 65 [Date: 2018.5.22, Time: 04:05
hrs, Super: #287 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #465 / #65 -
Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity; I-Ching: H20 - Viewing,
Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 63 - Watch]


--


YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-09-03 20:51:46 UTC
Permalink
-- RATIOCINATION BY THE CRITERIA OF PURE REASON AND THE ASSAYING OF TRUTH

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 3 September, 2018

I have an attendance at COURT later today so there will not be much
finalising of this chapter which is already at 60 pages however here is
an explanation of *REDUCTIO* *AD* *TRUMPIUM* by which the Dutch define
themselves as *BARBARIC*.

DOLF @ 0436 HOURS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I am (being surnamed BOEK
self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical appeal to either
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *TRUMPIUM* for taking an obstinate or negative dialectic
disposition {ie. Shall we not discuss the elephant in the room: Dutch
directness by which they define themselves a *BARBARIC*.

Direct to the point of shocking at times. Direct to the point of “what
the f@#$ did he just say to me?!?} as is implied by the title of this
chapter 'DUTCH BARBARISM: GEERT BE WILDERS' and then spiralling
downwards into forfeiture of decency by recourse to *REDUCTIO* *AD*
*ABSURDUM* until one reaches a consequential depravity *REDUCTIO* *AD*
*HITLERUM* (eg: Hitler was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL,
and so are you), .

This Dutch trait has gone by many names; call it what you will – abrupt,
bad-mannered, *BARBARIC*, blunt, brusque, cheeky, crude, curt, direct,
discourteous, forthright, frank, graceless, gruff, honest, ignorant,
impolite, inconsiderate, insulting, intrusive, matter-of-fact, open,
outspoken, plain, point-blank, raw, refreshing, rude, sincere,
straightforward, surprising, uncouth or unmannerly. Essentially, the
bottom line remains: the Dutch speak their minds.

<https://stuffdutchpeoplelike.com/2011/05/28/dutch-directness/>

Thusly, to convey any difference on the basis of “*MORE* *OR* *LESS*”,
then one is making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished
otherwise) to at least as a starting point of Aristotelian (384–322 BCE)
understanding given of the binomial NATURE OF NUMBER as the earlier
ANALYTIC A PRIORI / SYNTHETIC A PRIORI conception of it enumerated by
the PYTHAGOREAN (c. 570 – c. 495 BCE) where there was both:

MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something
could be done well.

LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and

The *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM* in this circumstance of the PYTHAGOREAN
incommensurate (square root 2) notion of NUMBER occurs whereby the
ANALYTIC A PRIORI of MORE as ONE: {YANG CH'I as MALE} and the SYNTHETIC
A PRIORI of LESS as TWO: {YIN CH'I as FEME} are according to the
esoteric dogma NOT CONSIDERED as being NUMBER being deducted entirely by
*REDUCTIVE* *REDACTION* {ie. @1 @5 bifurcation} and are therefore an
incomprehensibility or an *INSENSIBILITY* which is incapable of being
COGNISED as offensive in constituting hate-speech other than being an
irrationality which BEWILDERS and confounds the minds of impotent DUTCH
JUSTICE: Dutch Justice is not justice at all, but rather the justice one
gets when indicting someone for his views on the freedom of speech.

Geert Wilders became the victim of Dutch Justice when he had to appear
in court to answer allegations of being divisive when speaking the truth
about multiculturalism. [Urban Dictionary: by TS STORMRAGE February 06,
2010]

For want of a model let’s consider the hypothetical postulation that
#123 - SENSIBILITY by #41 - *ONTIC* necessity might be similarly
considered within terms of #9 - LIMIT / #72 - UNLIMITED whereby there is
then virtual process of #65 - DELIMITATION (ie. it’s 0409 hours) within
the temporality by which noumena grounding then occurs as determinant of
the relativity as DYNAMIC NATURAL ASSOCIATOR which is a virtual #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL providing the intrinsic and prerequisite GNOMIC
IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET that is then mechanism for an IDEA to be
circumscribed {#12 x #41 = #492} as ratiocination before the DIALECTIC
process of #73 - EXTRUSION {#492 + #41 = #533} by vocalisation according
t