Discussion:
— DUTCH BARBARISM: WILDERS BLAAST CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF
(zu alt für eine Antwort)
dolf
2018-08-31 11:43:51 UTC
Permalink
This implication of on 18 August 1811, Napoleon issuing a decree, based on
French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is that a
large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman Empire
Governance and therefore had not authenticated notion of Sophia as wisdom
derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as the basis of science.

The portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be as
*BARBARIANS* and enlightenment was like the price of tulip 🌷 bulbs a
decadent societal entitlement and status.
TT zonder paginanummer.
WTF?
Kwam ook op het journaal. Hij vond het al die
bedreigingen niet waard. Toch wel interessant
te zien hoeveel gekken er in Pakistan en de rest
van de wereld wonen.
Kondig eens met veel fanfare een cartoonwedstrijd aan waarin Jezus
belachelijk wordt gemaakt.
Ja hebt gelijk hoor dan worden er meteen honderden mensen vermoord
vlaggen verbrand, prijzen uitgeloofd om bp mensen te vermoorden.
Oh wacht oh nee, er gebeurd helemaal niks.
the life of Brian.
of
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Een uitstekend voorbeeld van het verschil tussen die achterlijke
barbaren en de normaal ontwikkelde wereld.
Maak gerust eenzelfde monty pyton film over the koran, dat
wordt lachen man.
Edmund
I would take issue with your claim of the Barbarians which in my view from
the citation within the Epistle to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist
syncretic perennialist philosophers whom published counterfactual works on
the Religious Mysteries in 4 / : BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery
the reference to the nine Barbarians appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited /
unlimited: “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to
the wise, and to the unwise.” [Romans 1:14]

And on TETRA: 45 - *GREATNESS*, Yang Hsiung comments: The sage looks at
small details overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation
of his visionary rule.

The commentators unanimously prefer a different reading, however:

The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.

Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)

Appraisal 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
Fathoming 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.

Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit the
construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by high rank
by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes public
display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards internal
reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this, he fails to
focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are far from
*CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country

The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to frame
good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also symbolizes
money since certain coins were minted in its image. Here the house lacks
either the incisive thinking or the material resources it needs to
flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before too long, its reputation
will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an equivalence to the mystical
cabalistic interpretation given to the Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15
magic square and its gematria value #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab
(H5014): {#12 as #60} 1) (Qal) *TO* *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED*
(*PARTICIPLE*)}.

Appraisal 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
Fathoming 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the Nine Barbarians.

Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with humaneness,
the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT MARRIAGE AS
PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT HUMANENESS as
having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting the minimum of
pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have a civilizing
effect on people.

ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}

And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION VIII
as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our
said Governor General:

VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL* *OTHER*
*THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE* *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General, or, *in* *the*
*event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF*
*THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our
said Commonwealth.

} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*, or
'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomizing what is *CENTRAL*, the true sage
eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the earth.
The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things revolve. In
return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal presence {ie. The
sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL* transformation. If he would do
Viewing of what he himself is, he should do Viewing of the people who
themselves are morally transformed by their viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.

Appraisal 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
Fathoming 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.

If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will eventually
grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave overwhelms tiny
ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first signs of
disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation, he can both
adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the Good. This is
no less true in the private world of the soul than in the public world of
the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45]

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...

@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...

#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - Remember the
Sabbath]) ...

#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
Honour your parents]) ...

#65 (@2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123 -
Do not kill]) ...

#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...

#175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205 -
Do not steal]) ...

#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 - Bear
no false witness]) ...

#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - Covet Not])

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Chinese naming conventions such as is exemplar by:

Mao Ze Dong

or

Xi Jin Pin

“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]

Consider then the consequence of French historians traditionally place the
Enlightenment between 1715 (the year that Louis XIV died) and 1789 (the
beginning of the French Revolution). International historians begin the
period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution.

On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.

Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."

<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-31 18:36:41 UTC
Permalink
This implication of 18 August 1811, when Napoleon issuing a decree, based on
French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is that a
large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman Empire
Governance and therefore had not any authenticated notion of Sophia as wisdom
derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as the basis of science.
The portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be defined as
*BARBARIANS* where enlightenment was like the price of tulip 🌷 bulbs a
decadent societal entitlement and status.
I am (being surnamed BOEK self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical
appeal to either *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* or *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*.

That if HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK that fascism was a return
to the ancient traditions of Roman Empire Governance it was authenticated
notion of Sophia as wisdom derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE A CHOOK AS
CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?

In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument that
attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a
ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing
that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible.

Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
(Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.

The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a range
of forms, as these examples show:

The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off the
edge.

There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then
it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.

The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is a
"smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).

<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>

Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* necessity in being normative
description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted and what
causality it had within and upon the populace.

The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) competed within 1631 is a Reformed
church within Dutch Protestant church in central Amsterdam, Netherlands. It
lies in the most western part of the Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum
borough), next to the Jordaan, between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.

The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three main
canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting canal
belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the west and
south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
Prinsengracht .

FURTHERMORE AS *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*. is this your quantitative
statement:

An excellent example of the difference between those backward barbarians
and the normally developed world. The difference between more and less
secularized societies.

if one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
enlightenment then one is speaking of scientific endeavour and any such is
framed by conceptions of number.

Thusly to convey any difference on the basis of “more or less” then one is
making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to the
Aristotelian understanding of nature there was both:

LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and

MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.

So then there is a prudent contradiction by paucity of rhetorical
contrivance concerning the necessity about the reality of secularised
societies: Dutch or otherwise.

WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?

Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.

[WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]

GEERT BE WILDERS@{
@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
@3: Sup: 46 #124); Ego: 47 (#116),
@4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55 (#171 - I
AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
@5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
@6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
@7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
Male: #288; Feme: #265
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>

H2438@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
@4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
Male: #166; Feme: #126
} // #288

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra:
25 - Contention;

THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148

#288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258 %
#41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to Jerusalem
to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon; 2) the chief
architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King Hiram to Solomon;

H142@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
@3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
@4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 38
(#93),
@5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
Male: #190; Feme: #103
} // #265

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.

#VIRTUE:
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 % #41 =
#41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a) (Niphal)
majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;

#265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 % #41
= #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be mighty, be
great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail; 1b) (Piel) to
make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm, give strength; 1c2)
to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to show oneself mighty; 1d2)
to act proudly (toward God); H1396@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
@3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #245; Feme: #103
} // #265

— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>

— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
[PUBLISHED @ 0457 HOURS ON 1 OCTOBER 2017]

"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"

DOLF: “In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually
given, at least when it is first mentioned, and the date of publication may
be specified.”

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@gmail.com): “That's like
saying, "a surname name". Tautology and repetition is *one* reason you make
no sense.”

DOLF: “Your constipated turd 💩 opinion whilst a sensualism as anal
retentive declaration given self bestowal through proscription of a grunt
is no more substantial an entitlement than a FANNY excretion of pustulant
tripe which is enamoured by it’s prolapsed existence though laborious in
it’s eventuality as a shrivelled spud with no viability as a snag.”

*CANT* (noun):
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or
political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded with
disparagement: thieves' cant.

ETHICAL_SPORTS_SLEDGE@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 - *ONTIC*
VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION, CONTRARINESS,
ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}

#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA: #5
as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;

#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546 %
#41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the commandment
(of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);





- dolf
TT zonder paginanummer.
WTF?
Kwam ook op het journaal. Hij vond het al die
bedreigingen niet waard. Toch wel interessant
te zien hoeveel gekken er in Pakistan en de rest
van de wereld wonen.
Kondig eens met veel fanfare een cartoonwedstrijd aan waarin Jezus
belachelijk wordt gemaakt.
Ja hebt gelijk hoor dan worden er meteen honderden mensen vermoord
vlaggen verbrand, prijzen uitgeloofd om bp mensen te vermoorden.
Oh wacht oh nee, er gebeurd helemaal niks.
the life of Brian.
of
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Een uitstekend voorbeeld van het verschil tussen die achterlijke
barbaren en de normaal ontwikkelde wereld.
Maak gerust eenzelfde monty pyton film over the koran, dat
wordt lachen man.
Edmund
I would take issue with your claim of the Barbarians which in my view from
the citation within the Epistle to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist
syncretic perennialist philosophers whom published counterfactual works on
the Religious Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery
the reference to the nine Barbarians appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited /
unlimited: “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to
the wise, and to the unwise.” [Romans 1:14]
And on TETRA: 45 - *GREATNESS*, Yang Hsiung comments: The sage looks at
small details overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation
of his visionary rule.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
Appraisal 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
Fathoming 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit the
construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by high rank
by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes public
display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards internal
reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this, he fails to
focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are far from
*CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to frame
good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also symbolizes
money since certain coins were minted in its image. Here the house lacks
either the incisive thinking or the material resources it needs to
flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before too long, its reputation
will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an equivalence to the mystical
cabalistic interpretation given to the Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15
magic square and its gematria value #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab
(H5014): {#12 as #60} 1) (Qal) *TO* *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED*
(*PARTICIPLE*)}.
Appraisal 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
Fathoming 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the Nine Barbarians.
Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with humaneness,
the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT MARRIAGE AS
PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT HUMANENESS as
having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting the minimum of
pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have a civilizing
effect on people.
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION VIII
as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL* *OTHER*
*THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE* *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General, or, *in* *the*
*event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF*
*THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our
said Commonwealth.
} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*, or
'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomizing what is *CENTRAL*, the true sage
eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the earth.
The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things revolve. In
return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal presence {ie. The
sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL* transformation. If he would do
Viewing of what he himself is, he should do Viewing of the people who
themselves are morally transformed by their viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
Appraisal 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
Fathoming 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will eventually
grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave overwhelms tiny
ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first signs of
disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation, he can both
adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the Good. This is
no less true in the private world of the soul than in the public world of
the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45]
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
Sabbath]) ...
Honour your parents]) ...
Do not kill]) ...
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
Do not steal]) ...
no false witness]) ...
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Mao Ze Dong
or
Xi Jin Pin
“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
Consider then the consequence of French historians traditionally place the
Enlightenment between 1715 (the year that Louis XIV died) and 1789 (the
beginning of the French Revolution). International historians begin the
period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution.
On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.
Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."
<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-31 19:34:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
This implication of 18 August 1811, when Napoleon issuing a decree, based on
French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is that a
large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman Empire
Governance and therefore had not any authenticated notion of Sophia as wisdom
derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as the basis of science.
The portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be defined as
*BARBARIANS* where enlightenment was like the price of tulip 🌷 bulbs a
decadent societal entitlement and status.
I am (being surnamed BOEK self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical
appeal to either *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* or *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*.
That if HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK that fascism was a return
to the ancient traditions of Roman Empire Governance it was authenticated
notion of Sophia as wisdom derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE A CHOOK AS
CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument that
attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a
ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing
that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible.
Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
(Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a range
The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off the
edge.
There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then
it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is a
"smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* necessity in being normative
description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted and what
causality it had within and upon the populace.
The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) competed within 1631 is a Reformed
church within Dutch Protestant church in central Amsterdam, Netherlands. It
lies in the most western part of the Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum
borough), next to the Jordaan, between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three main
canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting canal
belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the west and
south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
Prinsengracht .
FURTHERMORE AS *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*. is this your quantitative
An excellent example of the difference between those backward barbarians
and the normally developed world. The difference between more and less
secularized societies.
if one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
enlightenment then one is speaking of scientific endeavour and any such is
framed by conceptions of number.
Thusly to convey any difference on the basis of “more or less” then one is
making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to the
LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.
So then there is a prudent contradiction by paucity of rhetorical
contrivance concerning the necessity about the reality of secularised
societies: Dutch or otherwise.
WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
ODE TO GEERT {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard' (strong or brave)
meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'. The name's common female
equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}

— ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —

“PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.

WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.

WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”

BE WILDERS ANTHEM@{
@1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
@3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32});
Ego: 3 (#50),
@4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
@5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
@6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
@7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
@8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
@10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
@11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
@12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
@13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
@14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
Male: #727; Feme: #356
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>

STICKYBEAK:
- (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.

CLARION:
- (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
- (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.

FOOTLE:
- (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
- (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.

THRASONICAL:
- (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.

FESTSCHRIFT:
- (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors in
honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of retirement, an
important anniversary, or the like.

[Courtesy: Words of Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]

H8454@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
@4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
@5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
Male: #231; Feme: #160
} // #727

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;

THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.

#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_210@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
@3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #110; Feme: #210
} // #210

#727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) *wisdom*, sound knowledge, success, sound or efficient
wisdom, abiding success; 1a) sound or efficient wisdom; 1b) abiding success
(of the effect of sound wisdom);

H2803@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
@4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
@5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
@6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
@7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
Male: #302; Feme: #160
} // #727

#727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) to think, plan, esteem, calculate, invent, make a
*judgment*, imagine, count; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to think, account; 1a2) to
plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute, reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value,
regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be
esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel);
1c1) to think upon, consider, be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise,
plan; 1c3) to count, reckon; 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;

H3336@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
@5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
Male: #144; Feme: #113
} // #356 T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4
BCE]:

UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as Book
of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2) graven
image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) purpose, *imagination*,
device (intellectual framework);

"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
every imagination {#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336):
imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
[Genesis 6:5]
Post by dolf
[WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]
@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
@3: Sup: 46 #124); Ego: 47 (#116),
@4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55 (#171 - I
AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
@5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
@6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
@7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
Male: #288; Feme: #265
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
@4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
Male: #166; Feme: #126
} // #288
UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
#288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258 %
#41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to Jerusalem
to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon; 2) the chief
architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King Hiram to Solomon;
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
@3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
@4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 38
(#93),
@5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
Male: #190; Feme: #103
} // #265
UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 % #41 =
#41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a) (Niphal)
majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
#265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 % #41
= #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be mighty, be
great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail; 1b) (Piel) to
make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm, give strength; 1c2)
to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to show oneself mighty; 1d2)
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
@3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #245; Feme: #103
} // #265
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
DOLF: “In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually
given, at least when it is first mentioned, and the date of publication may
be specified.”
saying, "a surname name". Tautology and repetition is *one* reason you make
no sense.”
DOLF: “Your constipated turd 💩 opinion whilst a sensualism as anal
retentive declaration given self bestowal through proscription of a grunt
is no more substantial an entitlement than a FANNY excretion of pustulant
tripe which is enamoured by it’s prolapsed existence though laborious in
it’s eventuality as a shrivelled spud with no viability as a snag.” {ie.
*BAG* *OF* *SHIT*: despicable person}
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or
political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded with
disparagement: thieves' cant.
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 - *ONTIC*
VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION, CONTRARINESS,
ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}
#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA: #5
as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546 %
#41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the commandment
(of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
- dolf
TT zonder paginanummer.
WTF?
Kwam ook op het journaal. Hij vond het al die
bedreigingen niet waard. Toch wel interessant
te zien hoeveel gekken er in Pakistan en de rest
van de wereld wonen.
Kondig eens met veel fanfare een cartoonwedstrijd aan waarin Jezus
belachelijk wordt gemaakt.
Ja hebt gelijk hoor dan worden er meteen honderden mensen vermoord
vlaggen verbrand, prijzen uitgeloofd om bp mensen te vermoorden.
Oh wacht oh nee, er gebeurd helemaal niks.
the life of Brian.
of
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Een uitstekend voorbeeld van het verschil tussen die achterlijke
barbaren en de normaal ontwikkelde wereld.
Maak gerust eenzelfde monty pyton film over the koran, dat
wordt lachen man.
Edmund
I would take issue with your claim of the Barbarians which in my view from
the citation within the Epistle to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist
syncretic perennialist philosophers whom published counterfactual works on
the Religious Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery
the reference to the nine Barbarians appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited /
unlimited: “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to
the wise, and to the unwise.” [Romans 1:14]
And on TETRA: 45 - *GREATNESS*, Yang Hsiung comments: The sage looks at
small details overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation
of his visionary rule.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
Appraisal 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
Fathoming 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit the
construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by high rank
by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes public
display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards internal
reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this, he fails to
focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are far from
*CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to frame
good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also symbolizes
money since certain coins were minted in its image. Here the house lacks
either the incisive thinking or the material resources it needs to
flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before too long, its reputation
will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an equivalence to the mystical
cabalistic interpretation given to the Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15
magic square and its gematria value #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab
(H5014): {#12 as #60} 1) (Qal) *TO* *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED*
(*PARTICIPLE*)}.
Appraisal 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
Fathoming 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the Nine Barbarians.
Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with humaneness,
the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT MARRIAGE AS
PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT HUMANENESS as
having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting the minimum of
pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have a civilizing
effect on people.
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION VIII
as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL* *OTHER*
*THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE* *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General, or, *in* *the*
*event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF*
*THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our
said Commonwealth.
} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*, or
'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomizing what is *CENTRAL*, the true sage
eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the earth.
The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things revolve. In
return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal presence {ie. The
sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL* transformation. If he would do
Viewing of what he himself is, he should do Viewing of the people who
themselves are morally transformed by their viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
Appraisal 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
Fathoming 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will eventually
grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave overwhelms tiny
ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first signs of
disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation, he can both
adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the Good. This is
no less true in the private world of the soul than in the public world of
the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45]
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
Sabbath]) ...
Honour your parents]) ...
Do not kill]) ...
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
Do not steal]) ...
no false witness]) ...
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Mao Ze Dong
or
Xi Jin Pin
“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
Consider then the consequence of French historians traditionally place the
Enlightenment between 1715 (the year that Louis XIV died) and 1789 (the
beginning of the French Revolution). International historians begin the
period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution.
On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.
Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."
<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-31 22:50:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
This implication of 18 August 1811, when Napoleon issuing a decree, based on
French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is that a
large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman Empire
Governance and therefore had not any authenticated notion of Sophia as wisdom
derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as the basis of science.
The portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be defined as
*BARBARIANS* where enlightenment was like the price of tulip 🌷 bulbs a
decadent societal entitlement and status.
I am (being surnamed BOEK self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical
appeal to either *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* or *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*.
That if HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK that fascism was a return
to the ancient traditions of Roman Empire Governance it was authenticated
notion of Sophia as wisdom derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE A CHOOK AS
CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument that
attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a
ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing
that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible.
Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
(Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a range
The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off the
edge.
There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then
it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is a
"smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* necessity in being normative
description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted and what
causality it had within and upon the populace.
The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) competed within 1631 is a Reformed
church within Dutch Protestant church in central Amsterdam, Netherlands. It
lies in the most western part of the Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum
borough), next to the Jordaan, between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three main
canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting canal
belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the west and
south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
Prinsengracht .
FURTHERMORE AS *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*. is this your quantitative
An excellent example of the difference between those backward barbarians
and the normally developed world. The difference between more and less
secularized societies.
if one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
enlightenment then one is speaking of scientific endeavour and any such is
framed by conceptions of number.
Thusly to convey any difference on the basis of “more or less” then one is
making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to the
LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.
So then there is a prudent contradiction by paucity of rhetorical
contrivance concerning the necessity about the reality of secularised
societies: Dutch or otherwise.
WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
ODE TO GEERT {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard' (strong or brave)
meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'. The name's common female
equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
— ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
“PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
@1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
@3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32});
Ego: 3 (#50),
@4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
@5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
@6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
@7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
@8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
@10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
@11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
@12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
@13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
@14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
Male: #727; Feme: #356
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
- (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
- (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
- (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
- (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
- (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
- (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
- (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors in
honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of retirement, an
important anniversary, or the like.
[Courtesy: Words of Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
@4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
@5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
Male: #231; Feme: #160
} // #727
UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
@3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #110; Feme: #210
} // #210
#727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) *wisdom*, sound knowledge, success, sound or efficient
wisdom, abiding success; 1a) sound or efficient wisdom; 1b) abiding success
(of the effect of sound wisdom);
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
@4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
@5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
@6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
@7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
Male: #302; Feme: #160
} // #727
#727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) to think, plan, esteem, calculate, invent, make a
*judgment*, imagine, count; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to think, account; 1a2) to
plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute, reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value,
regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be
esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel);
1c1) to think upon, consider, be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise,
plan; 1c3) to count, reckon; 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
@5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
Male: #144; Feme: #113
} // #356 T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as Book
of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2) graven
image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) purpose, *imagination*,
device (intellectual framework);
"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
[Genesis 6:5]
Post by dolf
[WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]
@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
@3: Sup: 46 #124); Ego: 47 (#116),
@4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55 (#171 - I
AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
@5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
@6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
@7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
Male: #288; Feme: #265
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
@4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
Male: #166; Feme: #126
} // #288
UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
#288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258 %
#41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to Jerusalem
to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon; 2) the chief
architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King Hiram to Solomon;
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
@3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
@4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 38
(#93),
@5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
Male: #190; Feme: #103
} // #265
UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 % #41 =
#41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a) (Niphal)
majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
#265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 % #41
= #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be mighty, be
great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail; 1b) (Piel) to
make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm, give strength; 1c2)
to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to show oneself mighty; 1d2)
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
@3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #245; Feme: #103
} // #265
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
DOLF: “In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually
given, at least when it is first mentioned, and the date of publication may
be specified.”
saying, "a surname name". Tautology and repetition is *one* reason you make
no sense.”
DOLF: “Your constipated turd 💩 opinion whilst a sensualism as anal
retentive declaration given self bestowal through proscription of a grunt
is no more substantial an entitlement than a FANNY excretion of pustulant
tripe which is enamoured by it’s prolapsed existence though laborious in
it’s eventuality as a shrivelled spud with no viability as a snag.” {ie.
*BAG* *OF* *SHIT*: despicable person}
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or
political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded with
disparagement: thieves' cant.
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 - *ONTIC*
VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION, CONTRARINESS,
ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}
#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA: #5
as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546 %
#41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the commandment
(of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
- dolf
TT zonder paginanummer.
WTF?
Kwam ook op het journaal. Hij vond het al die
bedreigingen niet waard. Toch wel interessant
te zien hoeveel gekken er in Pakistan en de rest
van de wereld wonen.
Kondig eens met veel fanfare een cartoonwedstrijd aan waarin Jezus
belachelijk wordt gemaakt.
Ja hebt gelijk hoor dan worden er meteen honderden mensen vermoord
vlaggen verbrand, prijzen uitgeloofd om bp mensen te vermoorden.
Oh wacht oh nee, er gebeurd helemaal niks.
the life of Brian.
of
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Een uitstekend voorbeeld van het verschil tussen die achterlijke
barbaren en de normaal ontwikkelde wereld.
Maak gerust eenzelfde monty pyton film over the koran, dat
wordt lachen man.
Edmund
I would take issue with your claim of the Barbarians which in my view from
the citation within the Epistle to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist
syncretic perennialist philosophers whom published counterfactual works on
the Religious Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery
the reference to the nine Barbarians appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited /
unlimited: “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to
the wise, and to the unwise.” [Romans 1:14]
And on TETRA: 45 - *GREATNESS*, Yang Hsiung comments: The sage looks at
small details {ie.
Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of knowledge as impetus of
gnomic imperative purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being
validated by experiential reality:

The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}

} overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
of his visionary rule.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
Appraisal 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
Fathoming 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit the
construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by high rank
by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes public
display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards internal
reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this, he fails to
focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are far from
*CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to frame
good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also symbolizes
money since certain coins were minted in its image. Here the house lacks
either the incisive thinking or the material resources it needs to
flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before too long, its reputation
will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an equivalence to the mystical
cabalistic interpretation given to the Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15
magic square and its gematria value #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab
(H5014): {#12 as #60} 1) (Qal) *TO* *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED*
(*PARTICIPLE*)}.
Appraisal 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
Fathoming 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the Nine Barbarians.
Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with humaneness,
the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT MARRIAGE AS
PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT HUMANENESS as
having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting the minimum of
pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have a civilizing
effect on people.
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION VIII
as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL* *OTHER*
*THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE* *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General, or, *in* *the*
*event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF*
*THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our
said Commonwealth.
} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*, or
'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomizing what is *CENTRAL*, the true sage
eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the earth.
The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things revolve. In
return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal presence {ie. The
sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL* transformation. If he would do
Viewing of what he himself is, he should do Viewing of the people who
themselves are morally transformed by their viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
Appraisal 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
Fathoming 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will eventually
grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave overwhelms tiny
ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first signs of
disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation, he can both
adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the Good. This is
no less true in the private world of the soul than in the public world of
the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45]
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
Sabbath]) ...
Honour your parents]) ...
Do not kill]) ...
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
Do not steal]) ...
no false witness]) ...
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Mao Ze Dong
or
Xi Jin Pin
“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
Consider then the consequence of French historians traditionally place the
Enlightenment between 1715 (the year that Louis XIV died) and 1789 (the
beginning of the French Revolution). International historians begin the
period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution.
On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.
Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."
<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-31 22:57:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
This implication of 18 August 1811, when Napoleon issuing a decree, based on
French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is that a
large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman Empire
Governance and therefore had not any authenticated notion of Sophia as wisdom
derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as the basis of science.
The portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be defined as
*BARBARIANS* where enlightenment was like the price of tulip 🌷 bulbs a
decadent societal entitlement and status.
I am (being surnamed BOEK self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical
appeal to either *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* or *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*.
That if HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK that fascism was a return
to the ancient traditions of Roman Empire Governance it was authenticated
notion of Sophia as wisdom derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE A CHOOK AS
CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument that
attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a
ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing
that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible.
Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
(Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a range
The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off the
edge.
There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then
it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is a
"smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* necessity in being normative
description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted and what
causality it had within and upon the populace.
The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) competed within 1631 is a Reformed
church within Dutch Protestant church in central Amsterdam, Netherlands. It
lies in the most western part of the Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum
borough), next to the Jordaan, between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three main
canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting canal
belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the west and
south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
Prinsengracht .
FURTHERMORE AS *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*. is this your quantitative
An excellent example of the difference between those backward barbarians
and the normally developed world. The difference between more and less
secularized societies.
if one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
enlightenment then one is speaking of scientific endeavour and any such is
framed by conceptions of number.
Thusly to convey any difference on the basis of “more or less” then one is
making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to the
LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.
So then there is a prudent contradiction by paucity of rhetorical
contrivance concerning the necessity about the reality of secularised
societies: Dutch or otherwise.
WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
ODE TO GEERT {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard' (strong or brave)
meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'. The name's common female
equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
— ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
“PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
@1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
@3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32});
Ego: 3 (#50),
@4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
@5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
@6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
@7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
@8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
@10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
@11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
@12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
@13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
@14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
Male: #727; Feme: #356
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
- (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
- (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
- (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
- (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
- (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
- (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
- (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors in
honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of retirement, an
important anniversary, or the like.
[Courtesy: Words of Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
@4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
@5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
Male: #231; Feme: #160
} // #727
UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
@3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #110; Feme: #210
} // #210
#727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) *wisdom*, sound knowledge, success, sound or efficient
wisdom, abiding success; 1a) sound or efficient wisdom; 1b) abiding success
(of the effect of sound wisdom);
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
@4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
@5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
@6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
@7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
Male: #302; Feme: #160
} // #727
#727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) to think, plan, esteem, calculate, invent, make a
*judgment*, imagine, count; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to think, account; 1a2) to
plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute, reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value,
regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be
esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel);
1c1) to think upon, consider, be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise,
plan; 1c3) to count, reckon; 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
@5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
Male: #144; Feme: #113
} // #356 T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as Book
of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2) graven
image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) purpose, *imagination*,
device (intellectual framework);
"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
[Genesis 6:5]
Post by dolf
[WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]
@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
@3: Sup: 46 #124); Ego: 47 (#116),
@4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55 (#171 - I
AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
@5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
@6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
@7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
Male: #288; Feme: #265
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
@4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
Male: #166; Feme: #126
} // #288
UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
#288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258 %
#41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to Jerusalem
to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon; 2) the chief
architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King Hiram to Solomon;
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
@3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
@4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 38
(#93),
@5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
Male: #190; Feme: #103
} // #265
UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 % #41 =
#41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a) (Niphal)
majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
#265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 % #41
= #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be mighty, be
great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail; 1b) (Piel) to
make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm, give strength; 1c2)
to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to show oneself mighty; 1d2)
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
@3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #245; Feme: #103
} // #265
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
DOLF: “In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually
given, at least when it is first mentioned, and the date of publication may
be specified.”
saying, "a surname name". Tautology and repetition is *one* reason you make
no sense.”
DOLF: “Your constipated turd 💩 opinion whilst a sensualism as anal
retentive declaration given self bestowal through proscription of a grunt
is no more substantial an entitlement than a FANNY excretion of pustulant
tripe which is enamoured by it’s prolapsed existence though laborious in
it’s eventuality as a shrivelled spud with no viability as a snag.” {ie.
*BAG* *OF* *SHIT*: despicable person}
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or
political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded with
disparagement: thieves' cant.
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 - *ONTIC*
VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION, CONTRARINESS,
ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}
#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA: #5
as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546 %
#41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the commandment
(of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
- dolf
TT zonder paginanummer.
WTF?
Kwam ook op het journaal. Hij vond het al die
bedreigingen niet waard. Toch wel interessant
te zien hoeveel gekken er in Pakistan en de rest
van de wereld wonen.
Kondig eens met veel fanfare een cartoonwedstrijd aan waarin Jezus
belachelijk wordt gemaakt.
Ja hebt gelijk hoor dan worden er meteen honderden mensen vermoord
vlaggen verbrand, prijzen uitgeloofd om bp mensen te vermoorden.
Oh wacht oh nee, er gebeurd helemaal niks.
the life of Brian.
of
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Een uitstekend voorbeeld van het verschil tussen die achterlijke
barbaren en de normaal ontwikkelde wereld.
Maak gerust eenzelfde monty pyton film over the koran, dat
wordt lachen man.
Edmund
I would take issue with your claim of the Barbarians which in my view from
the citation within the Epistle to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist
syncretic perennialist philosophers whom published counterfactual works on
the Religious Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery
the reference to the nine Barbarians appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited /
unlimited: “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to
the wise, and to the unwise.” [Romans 1:14]
And on TETRA: 45 - *GREATNESS*, Yang Hsiung comments: The sage looks at
small details {ie.
Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of knowledge as impetus of
gnomic imperative purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being
validated by experiential reality:

The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}

} overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
of his visionary rule.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
Appraisal 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
Fathoming 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit the
construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by high rank
by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes public
display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards internal
reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this, he fails to
focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are far from
*CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to frame
good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also symbolizes
money since certain coins were minted in its image. Here the house lacks
either the incisive thinking or the material resources it needs to
flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before too long, its reputation
will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an equivalence to the mystical
cabalistic interpretation given to the Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15
magic square and its gematria value #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab
(H5014): {#12 as #60} 1) (Qal) *TO* *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED*
(*PARTICIPLE*)}.
Appraisal 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
Fathoming 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the Nine Barbarians.
Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with humaneness,
the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT MARRIAGE AS
PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT HUMANENESS as
having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting the minimum of
pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have a civilizing
effect on people.
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION VIII
as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL* *OTHER*
*THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE* *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General, or, *in* *the*
*event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF*
*THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our
said Commonwealth.
} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*, or
'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomizing what is *CENTRAL*, the true sage
eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the earth.
The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things revolve.
-- NOW I SEE --

"YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.

ONE THING IS CLEAR.
DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
THE MIRROR TO PEER.
YOUR WIFE HAS A ***@NT."

MICHAEL CHRIST: ""I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to speak
like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.

Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.

To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
encyclopedias.

My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
personally, and inspirationally.

[Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
'listening'.

Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.

So, I must say, thank you.

And thank you, again.

However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.

Amen."

DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
touch with scripture."

MILOCH ITCHY KOALO: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.

Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something out
of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
'pillar of salt'?

And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk and
finally resigned from his ministry.

Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!

go Warriors!"

-- PRELAPSARIAN --

"OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.

SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."

*PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
- characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
prelapsarian youth.
- Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
- Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com

ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "Trump and Kushner
are going down...

George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is shocked
and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are defending
Donald Trump and his actions."

DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."

ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "We have courts to
decided that.."

DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
presumed innocent until proven otherwise."

ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "DICK Painter went
on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will stand up
in a court of law.

The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...

I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and if
there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up in a
dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."

DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"

ROD [FASCIST CATHOLIC] KUMAR 🐴 ***@GMAIL.COM) EASTMAN: "Obstruction of
justice."

DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."

-- BISCUIT EUPHORIA --

"LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.

SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
PISS OFF YOU ***@CKER.
OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
In
return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal presence {ie. The
sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL* transformation. If he would do
Viewing of what he himself is, he should do Viewing of the people who
themselves are morally transformed by their viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
Appraisal 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
Fathoming 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will eventually
grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave overwhelms tiny
ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first signs of
disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation, he can both
adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the Good. This is
no less true in the private world of the soul than in the public world of
the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45]
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
Sabbath]) ...
Honour your parents]) ...
Do not kill]) ...
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
Do not steal]) ...
no false witness]) ...
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Mao Ze Dong
or
Xi Jin Pin
“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
Consider then the consequence of French historians traditionally place the
Enlightenment between 1715 (the year that Louis XIV died) and 1789 (the
beginning of the French Revolution). International historians begin the
period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution.
On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.
Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."
<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-01 10:12:43 UTC
Permalink
This is going to be the material of my next chapter as Section 3.0 as the
final section.

My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
doesn’t fully conceive any “analytic a posteriori” possibility and it’s
notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate of recursive
enumeration giving a trinomial #NUMBER definition as “synthetic a
posteriori” by formulation of progression. This dialectic is then
consistent with his CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE as and Intellectual conception:

+ 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law
+ 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity
+ 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy
+ 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression

There is the analytic/synthetic distinction and the a priori/a posteriori
distinction. These two distinctions form four types of knowledge:

analytic a priori
synthetic a priori
analytic a posteriori
synthetic a posteriori

Kant thought analytic a posteriori is self-contradictory. But, some
philosophers (e.g. Stephen Palmquist) treat it as valid.

What are examples of analytic a posteriori knowledge?

Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology of
364 days an example of “a posteriori” knowledge?

364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126

6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with #41 as ONTIC necessity is that also an
example of “a posteriori” knowledge?

I’m then going to include Kant’s description of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE before using the noumena to examine the historical
event on 25 December 1770 when Captain Cook sought repairs in Batavia and a
sailor absconded as worthy example.

I will have to do some preliminary research

- dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
This implication of 18 August 1811, when Napoleon issuing a decree, based on
French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is that a
large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman Empire
Governance and therefore had not any authenticated notion of Sophia as wisdom
derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as the basis of science.
The portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be defined as
*BARBARIANS* where enlightenment was like the price of tulip 🌷 bulbs a
decadent societal entitlement and status.
I am (being surnamed BOEK self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical
appeal to either *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* or *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*.
That if HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK that fascism was a return
to the ancient traditions of Roman Empire Governance it was authenticated
notion of Sophia as wisdom derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE A CHOOK AS
CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument that
attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a
ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing
that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible.
Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
(Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a range
The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off the
edge.
There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then
it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is a
"smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* necessity in being normative
description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted and what
causality it had within and upon the populace.
The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) competed within 1631 is a Reformed
church within Dutch Protestant church in central Amsterdam, Netherlands. It
lies in the most western part of the Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum
borough), next to the Jordaan, between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three main
canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting canal
belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the west and
south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
Prinsengracht .
FURTHERMORE AS *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*. is this your quantitative
An excellent example of the difference between those backward barbarians
and the normally developed world. The difference between more and less
secularized societies.
if one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
enlightenment then one is speaking of scientific endeavour and any such is
framed by conceptions of number.
Thusly to convey any difference on the basis of “more or less” then one is
making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to the
LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.
So then there is a prudent contradiction by paucity of rhetorical
contrivance concerning the necessity about the reality of secularised
societies: Dutch or otherwise.
WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
ODE TO GEERT {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard' (strong or brave)
meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'. The name's common female
equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
— ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
“PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
@1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
@3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32});
Ego: 3 (#50),
@4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
@5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
@6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
@7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
@8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
@10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
@11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
@12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
@13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
@14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
Male: #727; Feme: #356
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
- (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
- (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
- (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
- (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
- (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
- (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
- (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors in
honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of retirement, an
important anniversary, or the like.
[Courtesy: Words of Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
@4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
@5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
Male: #231; Feme: #160
} // #727
UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
@3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #110; Feme: #210
} // #210
#727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) *wisdom*, sound knowledge, success, sound or efficient
wisdom, abiding success; 1a) sound or efficient wisdom; 1b) abiding success
(of the effect of sound wisdom);
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
@4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
@5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
@6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
@7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
Male: #302; Feme: #160
} // #727
#727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) to think, plan, esteem, calculate, invent, make a
*judgment*, imagine, count; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to think, account; 1a2) to
plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute, reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value,
regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be
esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel);
1c1) to think upon, consider, be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise,
plan; 1c3) to count, reckon; 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
@5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
Male: #144; Feme: #113
} // #356 T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as Book
of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2) graven
image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) purpose, *imagination*,
device (intellectual framework);
"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
[Genesis 6:5]
Post by dolf
[WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]
@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
@3: Sup: 46 #124); Ego: 47 (#116),
@4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55 (#171 - I
AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
@5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
@6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
@7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
Male: #288; Feme: #265
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
@4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
Male: #166; Feme: #126
} // #288
UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
#288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258 %
#41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to Jerusalem
to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon; 2) the chief
architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King Hiram to Solomon;
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
@3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
@4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 38
(#93),
@5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
Male: #190; Feme: #103
} // #265
UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 % #41 =
#41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a) (Niphal)
majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
#265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 % #41
= #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be mighty, be
great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail; 1b) (Piel) to
make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm, give strength; 1c2)
to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to show oneself mighty; 1d2)
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
@3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #245; Feme: #103
} // #265
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
DOLF: “In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually
given, at least when it is first mentioned, and the date of publication may
be specified.”
saying, "a surname name". Tautology and repetition is *one* reason you make
no sense.”
DOLF: “Your constipated turd 💩 opinion whilst a sensualism as anal
retentive declaration given self bestowal through proscription of a grunt
is no more substantial an entitlement than a FANNY excretion of pustulant
tripe which is enamoured by it’s prolapsed existence though laborious in
it’s eventuality as a shrivelled spud with no viability as a snag.” {ie.
*BAG* *OF* *SHIT*: despicable person}
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or
political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded with
disparagement: thieves' cant.
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 - *ONTIC*
VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION, CONTRARINESS,
ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}
#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA: #5
as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546 %
#41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the commandment
(of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
- dolf
TT zonder paginanummer.
WTF?
Kwam ook op het journaal. Hij vond het al die
bedreigingen niet waard. Toch wel interessant
te zien hoeveel gekken er in Pakistan en de rest
van de wereld wonen.
Kondig eens met veel fanfare een cartoonwedstrijd aan waarin Jezus
belachelijk wordt gemaakt.
Ja hebt gelijk hoor dan worden er meteen honderden mensen vermoord
vlaggen verbrand, prijzen uitgeloofd om bp mensen te vermoorden.
Oh wacht oh nee, er gebeurd helemaal niks.
the life of Brian.
of
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Een uitstekend voorbeeld van het verschil tussen die achterlijke
barbaren en de normaal ontwikkelde wereld.
Maak gerust eenzelfde monty pyton film over the koran, dat
wordt lachen man.
Edmund
I would take issue with your claim of the Barbarians which in my view from
the citation within the Epistle to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist
syncretic perennialist philosophers whom published counterfactual works on
the Religious Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery
the reference to the nine Barbarians appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited /
unlimited: “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to
the wise, and to the unwise.” [Romans 1:14]
And on TETRA: 45 - *GREATNESS*, Yang Hsiung comments: The sage looks at
small details {ie.
Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of knowledge as impetus of
gnomic imperative purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being
The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}
} overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
of his visionary rule.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
Appraisal 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
Fathoming 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit the
construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by high rank
by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes public
display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards internal
reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this, he fails to
focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are far from
*CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to frame
good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also symbolizes
money since certain coins were minted in its image. Here the house lacks
either the incisive thinking or the material resources it needs to
flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before too long, its reputation
will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an equivalence to the mystical
cabalistic interpretation given to the Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15
magic square and its gematria value #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab
(H5014): {#12 as #60} 1) (Qal) *TO* *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED*
(*PARTICIPLE*)}.
Appraisal 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
Fathoming 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the Nine Barbarians.
Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with humaneness,
the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT MARRIAGE AS
PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT HUMANENESS as
having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting the minimum of
pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have a civilizing
effect on people.
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION VIII
as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL* *OTHER*
*THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE* *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General, or, *in* *the*
*event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF*
*THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our
said Commonwealth.
} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*, or
'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomizing what is *CENTRAL*, the true sage
eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the earth.
The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things revolve.
-- NOW I SEE --
"YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.
ONE THING IS CLEAR.
DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
THE MIRROR TO PEER.
MICHAEL CHRIST: ""I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to speak
like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.
Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.
To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
encyclopedias.
My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
personally, and inspirationally.
[Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
'listening'.
Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.
So, I must say, thank you.
And thank you, again.
However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.
Amen."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
touch with scripture."
MILOCH ITCHY KOALO: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.
Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something out
of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
'pillar of salt'?
And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk and
finally resigned from his ministry.
Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!
go Warriors!"
-- PRELAPSARIAN --
"OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.
SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."
*PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
- characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
prelapsarian youth.
- Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
- Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
are going down...
George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is shocked
and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are defending
Donald Trump and his actions."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."
decided that.."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
presumed innocent until proven otherwise."
on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will stand up
in a court of law.
The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...
I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and if
there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up in a
dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"
justice."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."
-- BISCUIT EUPHORIA --
"LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.
SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
In
return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal presence {ie. The
sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL* transformation. If he would do
Viewing of what he himself is, he should do Viewing of the people who
themselves are morally transformed by their viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
Appraisal 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
Fathoming 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will eventually
grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave overwhelms tiny
ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first signs of
disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation, he can both
adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the Good. This is
no less true in the private world of the soul than in the public world of
the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45]
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
Sabbath]) ...
Honour your parents]) ...
Do not kill]) ...
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
Do not steal]) ...
no false witness]) ...
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Mao Ze Dong
or
Xi Jin Pin
“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
Consider then the consequence of French historians traditionally place the
Enlightenment between 1715 (the year that Louis XIV died) and 1789 (the
beginning of the French Revolution). International historians begin the
period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution.
On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.
Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."
<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-01 11:40:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
This is going to be the material of my next chapter as Section 3.0 as the
final section.
My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
doesn’t fully conceive any “analytic a posteriori” possibility and it’s
notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate of recursive
enumeration giving a trinomial #NUMBER definition as “synthetic a
posteriori” by formulation of progression. This dialectic is then
+ 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law
+ 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity
Thus the analytic {YANG CH’I} a priori such a HOMOIOS and it’s syncretic
{YIN CH’I} a priori is a conception of fecundity as its capacity in
producing or capable of producing offspring, fruit, vegetation, etc., in
abundance; prolific; fruitful: fecund parents; fecund farmland and hence
its equinox association.

It also conveys a sapient propensity in being very productive or creative
intellectually: the fecund years of the Italian Renaissance.

One must therefore ask on the basis of an analytic a posteriori why he
withheld such knowledge given the words origin: 1375–1425; late Middle
English < Latin fēcundus, equivalent to fē- (see fetus) + -cundus adj.
suffix; replacing late Middle English fecounde < Anglo-French

Furthermore is Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
consideration of *VOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin voluntās f (genitive
voluntātis):

- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such as
mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of the natural world.

And consideration of *NOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin nōluntās f (genitive
nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used in
reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the natural world.

Are these then considered a priori as to the enumeration of an autonomy of
will by which apperception is circumscribed before the syncretic process
even occurs as synthetic a posteriori
Post by dolf
+ 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy
+ 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression
There is the analytic/synthetic distinction and the a priori/a posteriori
analytic a priori
synthetic a priori
analytic a posteriori
synthetic a posteriori
Kant thought analytic a posteriori is self-contradictory. But, some
philosophers (e.g. Stephen Palmquist) treat it as valid.
What are examples of analytic a posteriori knowledge?
Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology of
364 days an example of “a posteriori” knowledge?
364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126
6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with #41 as ONTIC necessity is that also an
example of “a posteriori” knowledge?
I’m then going to include Kant’s description of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE before using the noumena to examine the historical
event on 25 December 1770 when Captain Cook sought repairs in Batavia and a
sailor absconded as worthy example.
I will have to do some preliminary research
- dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
This implication of 18 August 1811, when Napoleon issuing a decree, based on
French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is that a
large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman Empire
Governance and therefore had not any authenticated notion of Sophia as wisdom
derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as the basis of science.
The portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be defined as
*BARBARIANS* where enlightenment was like the price of tulip 🌷 bulbs a
decadent societal entitlement and status.
I am (being surnamed BOEK self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical
appeal to either *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* or *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*.
That if HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK that fascism was a return
to the ancient traditions of Roman Empire Governance it was authenticated
notion of Sophia as wisdom derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE A CHOOK AS
CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument that
attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a
ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing
that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible.
Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
(Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a range
The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off the
edge.
There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then
it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is a
"smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* necessity in being normative
description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted and what
causality it had within and upon the populace.
The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) competed within 1631 is a Reformed
church within Dutch Protestant church in central Amsterdam, Netherlands. It
lies in the most western part of the Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum
borough), next to the Jordaan, between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three main
canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting canal
belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the west and
south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
Prinsengracht .
FURTHERMORE AS *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*. is this your quantitative
An excellent example of the difference between those backward barbarians
and the normally developed world. The difference between more and less
secularized societies.
if one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
enlightenment then one is speaking of scientific endeavour and any such is
framed by conceptions of number.
Thusly to convey any difference on the basis of “more or less” then one is
making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to the
LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.
So then there is a prudent contradiction by paucity of rhetorical
contrivance concerning the necessity about the reality of secularised
societies: Dutch or otherwise.
WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
ODE TO GEERT {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard' (strong or brave)
meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'. The name's common female
equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
— ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
“PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
@1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
@3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32});
Ego: 3 (#50),
@4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
@5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
@6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
@7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
@8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
@10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
@11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
@12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
@13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
@14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
Male: #727; Feme: #356
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
- (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
- (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
- (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
- (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
- (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
- (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
- (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors in
honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of retirement, an
important anniversary, or the like.
[Courtesy: Words of Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
@4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
@5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
Male: #231; Feme: #160
} // #727
UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
@3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #110; Feme: #210
} // #210
#727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) *wisdom*, sound knowledge, success, sound or efficient
wisdom, abiding success; 1a) sound or efficient wisdom; 1b) abiding success
(of the effect of sound wisdom);
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
@4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
@5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
@6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
@7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
Male: #302; Feme: #160
} // #727
#727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) to think, plan, esteem, calculate, invent, make a
*judgment*, imagine, count; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to think, account; 1a2) to
plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute, reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value,
regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be
esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel);
1c1) to think upon, consider, be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise,
plan; 1c3) to count, reckon; 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
@5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
Male: #144; Feme: #113
} // #356 T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as Book
of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2) graven
image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) purpose, *imagination*,
device (intellectual framework);
"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
[Genesis 6:5]
Post by dolf
[WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]
@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
@3: Sup: 46 #124); Ego: 47 (#116),
@4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55 (#171 - I
AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
@5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
@6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
@7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
Male: #288; Feme: #265
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
@4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
Male: #166; Feme: #126
} // #288
UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
#288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258 %
#41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to Jerusalem
to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon; 2) the chief
architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King Hiram to Solomon;
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
@3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
@4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 38
(#93),
@5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
Male: #190; Feme: #103
} // #265
UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 % #41 =
#41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a) (Niphal)
majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
#265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 % #41
= #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be mighty, be
great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail; 1b) (Piel) to
make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm, give strength; 1c2)
to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to show oneself mighty; 1d2)
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
@3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #245; Feme: #103
} // #265
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
DOLF: “In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually
given, at least when it is first mentioned, and the date of publication may
be specified.”
saying, "a surname name". Tautology and repetition is *one* reason you make
no sense.”
DOLF: “Your constipated turd 💩 opinion whilst a sensualism as anal
retentive declaration given self bestowal through proscription of a grunt
is no more substantial an entitlement than a FANNY excretion of pustulant
tripe which is enamoured by it’s prolapsed existence though laborious in
it’s eventuality as a shrivelled spud with no viability as a snag.” {ie.
*BAG* *OF* *SHIT*: despicable person}
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or
political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded with
disparagement: thieves' cant.
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 - *ONTIC*
VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION, CONTRARINESS,
ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}
#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA: #5
as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546 %
#41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the commandment
(of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
- dolf
TT zonder paginanummer.
WTF?
Kwam ook op het journaal. Hij vond het al die
bedreigingen niet waard. Toch wel interessant
te zien hoeveel gekken er in Pakistan en de rest
van de wereld wonen.
Kondig eens met veel fanfare een cartoonwedstrijd aan waarin Jezus
belachelijk wordt gemaakt.
Ja hebt gelijk hoor dan worden er meteen honderden mensen vermoord
vlaggen verbrand, prijzen uitgeloofd om bp mensen te vermoorden.
Oh wacht oh nee, er gebeurd helemaal niks.
the life of Brian.
of
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Een uitstekend voorbeeld van het verschil tussen die achterlijke
barbaren en de normaal ontwikkelde wereld.
Maak gerust eenzelfde monty pyton film over the koran, dat
wordt lachen man.
Edmund
I would take issue with your claim of the Barbarians which in my view from
the citation within the Epistle to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist
syncretic perennialist philosophers whom published counterfactual works on
the Religious Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery
the reference to the nine Barbarians appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited /
unlimited: “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to
the wise, and to the unwise.” [Romans 1:14]
And on TETRA: 45 - *GREATNESS*, Yang Hsiung comments: The sage looks at
small details {ie.
Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of knowledge as impetus of
gnomic imperative purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being
The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}
} overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
of his visionary rule.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
Appraisal 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
Fathoming 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit the
construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by high rank
by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes public
display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards internal
reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this, he fails to
focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are far from
*CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to frame
good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also symbolizes
money since certain coins were minted in its image. Here the house lacks
either the incisive thinking or the material resources it needs to
flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before too long, its reputation
will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an equivalence to the mystical
cabalistic interpretation given to the Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15
magic square and its gematria value #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab
(H5014): {#12 as #60} 1) (Qal) *TO* *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED*
(*PARTICIPLE*)}.
Appraisal 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
Fathoming 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the Nine Barbarians.
Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with humaneness,
the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT MARRIAGE AS
PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT HUMANENESS as
having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting the minimum of
pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have a civilizing
effect on people.
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION VIII
as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL* *OTHER*
*THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE* *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General, or, *in* *the*
*event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF*
*THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our
said Commonwealth.
} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*, or
'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomizing what is *CENTRAL*, the true sage
eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the earth.
The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things revolve.
-- NOW I SEE --
"YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.
ONE THING IS CLEAR.
DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
THE MIRROR TO PEER.
MICHAEL CHRIST: ""I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to speak
like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.
Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.
To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
encyclopedias.
My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
personally, and inspirationally.
[Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
'listening'.
Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.
So, I must say, thank you.
And thank you, again.
However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.
Amen."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
touch with scripture."
MILOCH ITCHY KOALO: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.
Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something out
of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
'pillar of salt'?
And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk and
finally resigned from his ministry.
Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!
go Warriors!"
-- PRELAPSARIAN --
"OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.
SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."
*PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
- characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
prelapsarian youth.
- Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
- Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
are going down...
George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is shocked
and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are defending
Donald Trump and his actions."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."
decided that.."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
presumed innocent until proven otherwise."
on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will stand up
in a court of law.
The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...
I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and if
there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up in a
dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"
justice."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."
-- BISCUIT EUPHORIA --
"LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.
SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
In
return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal presence {ie. The
sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL* transformation. If he would do
Viewing of what he himself is, he should do Viewing of the people who
themselves are morally transformed by their viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
Appraisal 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
Fathoming 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will eventually
grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave overwhelms tiny
ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first signs of
disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation, he can both
adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the Good. This is
no less true in the private world of the soul than in the public world of
the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45]
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
Sabbath]) ...
Honour your parents]) ...
Do not kill]) ...
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
Do not steal]) ...
no false witness]) ...
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Mao Ze Dong
or
Xi Jin Pin
“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
Consider then the consequence of French historians traditionally place the
Enlightenment between 1715 (the year that Louis XIV died) and 1789 (the
beginning of the French Revolution). International historians begin the
period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution.
On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.
Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."
<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-01 15:21:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
This is going to be the material of my next chapter as Section 3.0 as the
final section.
My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
doesn’t fully conceive any “analytic a posteriori” possibility and it’s
notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate of recursive
enumeration giving a trinomial #NUMBER definition as “synthetic a
posteriori” by formulation of progression. This dialectic is then
+ 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law
+ 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity
Thus the analytic {YANG CH’I} a priori such a HOMOIOS with the necessity of
an #41 - ONTIC meta-prototype as Intellectualism: Remember the Sabbath and
it’s syncretic {YIN CH’I} a priori such as beIng SAPIENT with the necessity
of an #82 - ONTIC meta-prototype as Intellectualism: Honour Parents is a
conception of fecundity as its capacity in producing or capable of
producing offspring, fruit, vegetation, etc., in abundance; prolific;
fruitful: fecund parents; fecund farmland and hence its equinox
association.

It also conveys by its sapient propensity in being very productive or
creative intellectually: the fecund years of the Italian Renaissance.

One must therefore ask on the basis of an analytic a posteriori why he
withheld such knowledge given the words origin: 1375–1425; late Middle
English < Latin fēcundus, equivalent to fē- (see fetus) + -cundus adj.
suffix; replacing late Middle English fecounde < Anglo-French

And the most probable answer is that such idea which he conveys by
apriority prototypes are tectonic shifts with cataclysmic consequence made
against the prevailing Latin binomial world order which constituted NATURE
bifurcations by means of another ethereal construct: @1 / @5.

Furthermore is Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
consideration of *VOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin voluntās f (genitive
voluntātis):

- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such as
mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of the natural world.

And consideration of *NOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin nōluntās f (genitive
nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used in
reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the natural world.

Are these then considered a priori as to the enumeration of an autonomy of
will by which apperception is circumscribed as analytic a posteriori of
PUPIL with the necessity of an #123 - ONTIC meta-prototype as
Intellectualism: Do Not Kill conveying an ontological utility of
reciprocality {#369} the syncretic process even occurs as synthetic a
posteriori as then genitive of self declared reality.
Post by dolf
+ 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy
+ 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression
There is the analytic/synthetic distinction and the a priori/a posteriori
analytic a priori
synthetic a priori
analytic a posteriori
synthetic a posteriori
Kant thought analytic a posteriori is self-contradictory. But, some
philosophers (e.g. Stephen Palmquist) treat it as valid.
What are examples of analytic a posteriori knowledge?
Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology of
364 days an example of “a posteriori” knowledge?
364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126
6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with #41 as ONTIC necessity is that also an
example of “a posteriori” knowledge?
I’m then going to include Kant’s description of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE before using the noumena to examine the historical
event on 25 December 1770 when Captain Cook sought repairs in Batavia and a
sailor absconded as worthy example.
I will have to do some preliminary research
- dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
This implication of 18 August 1811, when Napoleon issuing a decree, based on
French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is that a
large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman Empire
Governance and therefore had not any authenticated notion of Sophia as wisdom
derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as the basis of science.
The portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be defined as
*BARBARIANS* where enlightenment was like the price of tulip 🌷 bulbs a
decadent societal entitlement and status.
I am (being surnamed BOEK self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical
appeal to either *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* or *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*.
That if HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK that fascism was a return
to the ancient traditions of Roman Empire Governance it was authenticated
notion of Sophia as wisdom derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE A CHOOK AS
CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument that
attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a
ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing
that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible.
Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
(Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a range
The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off the
edge.
There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then
it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is a
"smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* necessity in being normative
description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted and what
causality it had within and upon the populace.
The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) competed within 1631 is a Reformed
church within Dutch Protestant church in central Amsterdam, Netherlands. It
lies in the most western part of the Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum
borough), next to the Jordaan, between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three main
canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting canal
belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the west and
south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
Prinsengracht .
FURTHERMORE AS *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*. is this your quantitative
An excellent example of the difference between those backward barbarians
and the normally developed world. The difference between more and less
secularized societies.
if one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
enlightenment then one is speaking of scientific endeavour and any such is
framed by conceptions of number.
Thusly to convey any difference on the basis of “more or less” then one is
making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to the
LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.
So then there is a prudent contradiction by paucity of rhetorical
contrivance concerning the necessity about the reality of secularised
societies: Dutch or otherwise.
WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
ODE TO GEERT {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard' (strong or brave)
meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'. The name's common female
equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
— ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
“PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
@1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
@3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32});
Ego: 3 (#50),
@4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
@5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
@6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
@7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
@8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
@10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
@11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
@12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
@13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
@14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
Male: #727; Feme: #356
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
- (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
- (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
- (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
- (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
- (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
- (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
- (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors in
honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of retirement, an
important anniversary, or the like.
[Courtesy: Words of Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
@4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
@5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
Male: #231; Feme: #160
} // #727
UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
@3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #110; Feme: #210
} // #210
#727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) *wisdom*, sound knowledge, success, sound or efficient
wisdom, abiding success; 1a) sound or efficient wisdom; 1b) abiding success
(of the effect of sound wisdom);
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
@4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
@5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
@6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
@7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
Male: #302; Feme: #160
} // #727
#727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) to think, plan, esteem, calculate, invent, make a
*judgment*, imagine, count; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to think, account; 1a2) to
plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute, reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value,
regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be
esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel);
1c1) to think upon, consider, be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise,
plan; 1c3) to count, reckon; 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
@5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
Male: #144; Feme: #113
} // #356 T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as Book
of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2) graven
image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) purpose, *imagination*,
device (intellectual framework);
"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
[Genesis 6:5]
Post by dolf
[WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]
@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
@3: Sup: 46 #124); Ego: 47 (#116),
@4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55 (#171 - I
AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
@5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
@6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
@7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
Male: #288; Feme: #265
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
@4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
Male: #166; Feme: #126
} // #288
UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
#288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258 %
#41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to Jerusalem
to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon; 2) the chief
architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King Hiram to Solomon;
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
@3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
@4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 38
(#93),
@5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
Male: #190; Feme: #103
} // #265
UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 % #41 =
#41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a) (Niphal)
majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
#265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 % #41
= #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be mighty, be
great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail; 1b) (Piel) to
make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm, give strength; 1c2)
to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to show oneself mighty; 1d2)
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
@3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #245; Feme: #103
} // #265
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
DOLF: “In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually
given, at least when it is first mentioned, and the date of publication may
be specified.”
saying, "a surname name". Tautology and repetition is *one* reason you make
no sense.”
DOLF: “Your constipated turd 💩 opinion whilst a sensualism as anal
retentive declaration given self bestowal through proscription of a grunt
is no more substantial an entitlement than a FANNY excretion of pustulant
tripe which is enamoured by it’s prolapsed existence though laborious in
it’s eventuality as a shrivelled spud with no viability as a snag.” {ie.
*BAG* *OF* *SHIT*: despicable person}
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or
political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded with
disparagement: thieves' cant.
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 - *ONTIC*
VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION, CONTRARINESS,
ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}
#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA: #5
as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546 %
#41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the commandment
(of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
- dolf
TT zonder paginanummer.
WTF?
Kwam ook op het journaal. Hij vond het al die
bedreigingen niet waard. Toch wel interessant
te zien hoeveel gekken er in Pakistan en de rest
van de wereld wonen.
Kondig eens met veel fanfare een cartoonwedstrijd aan waarin Jezus
belachelijk wordt gemaakt.
Ja hebt gelijk hoor dan worden er meteen honderden mensen vermoord
vlaggen verbrand, prijzen uitgeloofd om bp mensen te vermoorden.
Oh wacht oh nee, er gebeurd helemaal niks.
the life of Brian.
of
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Een uitstekend voorbeeld van het verschil tussen die achterlijke
barbaren en de normaal ontwikkelde wereld.
Maak gerust eenzelfde monty pyton film over the koran, dat
wordt lachen man.
Edmund
I would take issue with your claim of the Barbarians which in my view from
the citation within the Epistle to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist
syncretic perennialist philosophers whom published counterfactual works on
the Religious Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery
the reference to the nine Barbarians appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited /
unlimited: “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to
the wise, and to the unwise.” [Romans 1:14]
And on TETRA: 45 - *GREATNESS*, Yang Hsiung comments: The sage looks at
small details {ie.
Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of knowledge as impetus of
gnomic imperative purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being
The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}
} overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
of his visionary rule.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
Appraisal 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
Fathoming 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit the
construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by high rank
by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes public
display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards internal
reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this, he fails to
focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are far from
*CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to frame
good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also symbolizes
money since certain coins were minted in its image. Here the house lacks
either the incisive thinking or the material resources it needs to
flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before too long, its reputation
will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an equivalence to the mystical
cabalistic interpretation given to the Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15
magic square and its gematria value #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab
(H5014): {#12 as #60} 1) (Qal) *TO* *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED*
(*PARTICIPLE*)}.
Appraisal 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
Fathoming 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the Nine Barbarians.
Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with humaneness,
the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT MARRIAGE AS
PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT HUMANENESS as
having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting the minimum of
pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have a civilizing
effect on people.
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION VIII
as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL* *OTHER*
*THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE* *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General, or, *in* *the*
*event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF*
*THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our
said Commonwealth.
} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*, or
'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomizing what is *CENTRAL*, the true sage
eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the earth.
The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things revolve.
-- NOW I SEE --
"YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.
ONE THING IS CLEAR.
DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
THE MIRROR TO PEER.
MICHAEL CHRIST: ""I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to speak
like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.
Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.
To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
encyclopedias.
My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
personally, and inspirationally.
[Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
'listening'.
Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.
So, I must say, thank you.
And thank you, again.
However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.
Amen."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
touch with scripture."
MILOCH ITCHY KOALO: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.
Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something out
of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
'pillar of salt'?
And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk and
finally resigned from his ministry.
Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!
go Warriors!"
-- PRELAPSARIAN --
"OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.
SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."
*PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
- characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
prelapsarian youth.
- Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
- Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
are going down...
George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is shocked
and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are defending
Donald Trump and his actions."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."
decided that.."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
presumed innocent until proven otherwise."
on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will stand up
in a court of law.
The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...
I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and if
there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up in a
dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"
justice."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."
-- BISCUIT EUPHORIA --
"LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.
SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
In
return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal presence {ie. The
sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL* transformation. If he would do
Viewing of what he himself is, he should do Viewing of the people who
themselves are morally transformed by their viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
Appraisal 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
Fathoming 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will eventually
grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave overwhelms tiny
ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first signs of
disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation, he can both
adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the Good. This is
no less true in the private world of the soul than in the public world of
the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45]
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
Sabbath]) ...
Honour your parents]) ...
Do not kill]) ...
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
Do not steal]) ...
no false witness]) ...
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Mao Ze Dong
or
Xi Jin Pin
“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
Consider then the consequence of French historians traditionally place the
Enlightenment between 1715 (the year that Louis XIV died) and 1789 (the
beginning of the French Revolution). International historians begin the
period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution.
On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.
Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."
<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-01 16:00:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
This is going to be the material of my next chapter as Section 3.0 as the
final section.
My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
doesn’t fully conceive any “analytic a posteriori” possibility and it’s
notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate of recursive
enumeration giving a trinomial #NUMBER definition as “synthetic a
posteriori” by formulation of progression. This dialectic is then
+ 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law
+ 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity
Thus the analytic {YANG CH’I} a priori such a HOMOIOS with the recursive
necessity of an #41 - ONTIC {NORMA OBLIGANS} meta-prototype as
Intellectualism: Remember the Sabbath and it’s syncretic {YIN CH’I} a
priori such as beIng SAPIENT with the recursive necessity of an #82 - ONTIC
{MANIFESTING NORM} meta-prototype as Intellectualism: Honour Parents is a
conception of fecundity as its capacity in producing or capable of
producing offspring, fruit, vegetation, etc., in abundance; prolific;
fruitful: fecund parents; fecund farmland and hence its equinox
association.

It also conveys by its sapient propensity in being very productive or
creative intellectually: the fecund years of the Italian Renaissance.

One must therefore ask on the basis of an analytic a posteriori why he
withheld such knowledge given the words origin: 1375–1425; late Middle
English < Latin fēcundus, equivalent to fē- (see fetus) + -cundus adj.
suffix; replacing late Middle English fecounde < Anglo-French

And the most probable answer is that such idea which he conveys by
apriority prototypes are tectonic shifts with cataclysmic consequence made
against the prevailing Latin binomial world order which constituted NATURE
bifurcations by means of another ethereal construct: @1 / @5.

Furthermore is Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
consideration of *VOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin voluntās f (genitive
voluntātis):

- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such as
mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of the natural world.

And consideration of *NOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin nōluntās f (genitive
nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used in
reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the natural world.

Are these then considered a priori as to the enumeration of an autonomy of
will by which apperception is circumscribed as an analytic a posteriori of
PUPIL with the recursive necessity of an #123 - ONTIC {DISCRIMINATING
NORM} meta-prototype as Intellectualism: Do Not Kill conveying an
ontological utility of reciprocality {#369: 9(9²+1)/2 a posteriori as
enumeration function of equation n(n²+1)/2 — *NEED* *TO* *THINK* *ABOUT*
*THIS*} the syncretic process even occurs as synthetic a posteriori being
then genitive of self declared as an heteronomous {ie subject to law
external to itself} and autonomous reality.
Post by dolf
+ 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy
+ 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression
There is the analytic/synthetic distinction and the a priori/a posteriori
analytic a priori
synthetic a priori
analytic a posteriori
synthetic a posteriori
Kant thought analytic a posteriori is self-contradictory. But, some
philosophers (e.g. Stephen Palmquist) treat it as valid.
What are examples of analytic a posteriori knowledge?
Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology of
364 days an example of “a posteriori” knowledge?
364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126
6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with #41 as ONTIC necessity is that also an
example of “a posteriori” knowledge?
I’m then going to include Kant’s description of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE before using the noumena to examine the historical
event on 25 December 1770 when Captain Cook sought repairs in Batavia and a
sailor absconded as worthy example.
I will have to do some preliminary research
- dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
This implication of 18 August 1811, when Napoleon issuing a decree, based on
French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is that a
large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman Empire
Governance and therefore had not any authenticated notion of Sophia as wisdom
derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as the basis of science.
The portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be defined as
*BARBARIANS* where enlightenment was like the price of tulip 🌷 bulbs a
decadent societal entitlement and status.
I am (being surnamed BOEK self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical
appeal to either *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* or *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*.
That if HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK that fascism was a return
to the ancient traditions of Roman Empire Governance it was authenticated
notion of Sophia as wisdom derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE A CHOOK AS
CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument that
attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a
ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing
that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible.
Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
(Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a range
The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off the
edge.
There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then
it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is a
"smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* necessity in being normative
description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted and what
causality it had within and upon the populace.
The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) competed within 1631 is a Reformed
church within Dutch Protestant church in central Amsterdam, Netherlands. It
lies in the most western part of the Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum
borough), next to the Jordaan, between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three main
canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting canal
belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the west and
south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
Prinsengracht .
FURTHERMORE AS *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*. is this your quantitative
An excellent example of the difference between those backward barbarians
and the normally developed world. The difference between more and less
secularized societies.
if one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
enlightenment then one is speaking of scientific endeavour and any such is
framed by conceptions of number.
Thusly to convey any difference on the basis of “more or less” then one is
making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to the
LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.
So then there is a prudent contradiction by paucity of rhetorical
contrivance concerning the necessity about the reality of secularised
societies: Dutch or otherwise.
WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
ODE TO GEERT {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard' (strong or brave)
meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'. The name's common female
equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
— ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
“PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
@1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
@3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32});
Ego: 3 (#50),
@4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
@5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
@6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
@7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
@8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
@10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
@11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
@12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
@13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
@14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
Male: #727; Feme: #356
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
- (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
- (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
- (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
- (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
- (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
- (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
- (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors in
honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of retirement, an
important anniversary, or the like.
[Courtesy: Words of Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
@4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
@5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
Male: #231; Feme: #160
} // #727
UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
@3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #110; Feme: #210
} // #210
#727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) *wisdom*, sound knowledge, success, sound or efficient
wisdom, abiding success; 1a) sound or efficient wisdom; 1b) abiding success
(of the effect of sound wisdom);
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
@4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
@5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
@6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
@7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
Male: #302; Feme: #160
} // #727
#727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) to think, plan, esteem, calculate, invent, make a
*judgment*, imagine, count; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to think, account; 1a2) to
plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute, reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value,
regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be
esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel);
1c1) to think upon, consider, be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise,
plan; 1c3) to count, reckon; 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
@5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
Male: #144; Feme: #113
} // #356 T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as Book
of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2) graven
image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) purpose, *imagination*,
device (intellectual framework);
"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
[Genesis 6:5]
Post by dolf
[WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]
@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
@3: Sup: 46 #124); Ego: 47 (#116),
@4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55 (#171 - I
AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
@5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
@6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
@7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
Male: #288; Feme: #265
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
@4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
Male: #166; Feme: #126
} // #288
UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
#288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258 %
#41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to Jerusalem
to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon; 2) the chief
architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King Hiram to Solomon;
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
@3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
@4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 38
(#93),
@5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
Male: #190; Feme: #103
} // #265
UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 % #41 =
#41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a) (Niphal)
majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
#265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 % #41
= #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be mighty, be
great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail; 1b) (Piel) to
make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm, give strength; 1c2)
to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to show oneself mighty; 1d2)
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
@3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #245; Feme: #103
} // #265
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
DOLF: “In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually
given, at least when it is first mentioned, and the date of publication may
be specified.”
saying, "a surname name". Tautology and repetition is *one* reason you make
no sense.”
DOLF: “Your constipated turd 💩 opinion whilst a sensualism as anal
retentive declaration given self bestowal through proscription of a grunt
is no more substantial an entitlement than a FANNY excretion of pustulant
tripe which is enamoured by it’s prolapsed existence though laborious in
it’s eventuality as a shrivelled spud with no viability as a snag.” {ie.
*BAG* *OF* *SHIT*: despicable person}
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or
political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded with
disparagement: thieves' cant.
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 - *ONTIC*
VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION, CONTRARINESS,
ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}
#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA: #5
as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546 %
#41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the commandment
(of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
- dolf
TT zonder paginanummer.
WTF?
Kwam ook op het journaal. Hij vond het al die
bedreigingen niet waard. Toch wel interessant
te zien hoeveel gekken er in Pakistan en de rest
van de wereld wonen.
Kondig eens met veel fanfare een cartoonwedstrijd aan waarin Jezus
belachelijk wordt gemaakt.
Ja hebt gelijk hoor dan worden er meteen honderden mensen vermoord
vlaggen verbrand, prijzen uitgeloofd om bp mensen te vermoorden.
Oh wacht oh nee, er gebeurd helemaal niks.
the life of Brian.
of
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Een uitstekend voorbeeld van het verschil tussen die achterlijke
barbaren en de normaal ontwikkelde wereld.
Maak gerust eenzelfde monty pyton film over the koran, dat
wordt lachen man.
Edmund
I would take issue with your claim of the Barbarians which in my view from
the citation within the Epistle to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist
syncretic perennialist philosophers whom published counterfactual works on
the Religious Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery
the reference to the nine Barbarians appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited /
unlimited: “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to
the wise, and to the unwise.” [Romans 1:14]
And on TETRA: 45 - *GREATNESS*, Yang Hsiung comments: The sage looks at
small details {ie.
Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of knowledge as impetus of
gnomic imperative purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being
The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}
} overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
of his visionary rule.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
Appraisal 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
Fathoming 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit the
construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by high rank
by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes public
display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards internal
reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this, he fails to
focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are far from
*CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to frame
good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also symbolizes
money since certain coins were minted in its image. Here the house lacks
either the incisive thinking or the material resources it needs to
flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before too long, its reputation
will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an equivalence to the mystical
cabalistic interpretation given to the Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15
magic square and its gematria value #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab
(H5014): {#12 as #60} 1) (Qal) *TO* *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED*
(*PARTICIPLE*)}.
Appraisal 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
Fathoming 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the Nine Barbarians.
Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with humaneness,
the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT MARRIAGE AS
PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT HUMANENESS as
having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting the minimum of
pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have a civilizing
effect on people.
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION VIII
as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL* *OTHER*
*THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE* *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General, or, *in* *the*
*event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF*
*THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our
said Commonwealth.
} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*, or
'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomizing what is *CENTRAL*, the true sage
eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the earth.
The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things revolve.
-- NOW I SEE --
"YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.
ONE THING IS CLEAR.
DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
THE MIRROR TO PEER.
MICHAEL CHRIST: ""I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to speak
like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.
Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.
To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
encyclopedias.
My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
personally, and inspirationally.
[Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
'listening'.
Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.
So, I must say, thank you.
And thank you, again.
However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.
Amen."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
touch with scripture."
MILOCH ITCHY KOALO: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.
Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something out
of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
'pillar of salt'?
And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk and
finally resigned from his ministry.
Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!
go Warriors!"
-- PRELAPSARIAN --
"OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.
SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."
*PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
- characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
prelapsarian youth.
- Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
- Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
are going down...
George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is shocked
and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are defending
Donald Trump and his actions."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."
decided that.."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
presumed innocent until proven otherwise."
on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will stand up
in a court of law.
The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...
I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and if
there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up in a
dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"
justice."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."
-- BISCUIT EUPHORIA --
"LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.
SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
In
return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal presence {ie. The
sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL* transformation. If he would do
Viewing of what he himself is, he should do Viewing of the people who
themselves are morally transformed by their viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
Appraisal 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
Fathoming 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will eventually
grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave overwhelms tiny
ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first signs of
disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation, he can both
adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the Good. This is
no less true in the private world of the soul than in the public world of
the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45]
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
Sabbath]) ...
Honour your parents]) ...
Do not kill]) ...
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
Do not steal]) ...
no false witness]) ...
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Mao Ze Dong
or
Xi Jin Pin
“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
Consider then the consequence of French historians traditionally place the
Enlightenment between 1715 (the year that Louis XIV died) and 1789 (the
beginning of the French Revolution). International historians begin the
period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution.
On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.
Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."
<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-01 16:30:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
This is going to be the material of my next chapter as Section 3.0 as the
final section.
My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
doesn’t fully conceive any “analytic a posteriori” possibility and it’s
notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate of recursive
enumeration giving a trinomial #NUMBER definition as “synthetic a
posteriori” by formulation of progression. This dialectic is then
+ 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law
+ 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity
Thus the analytic {YANG CH’I} a priori such a HOMOIOS with the recursive
necessity of an #41 - ONTIC {NORMA OBLIGANS} meta-prototype as
Intellectualism: Remember the Sabbath and it’s syncretic {YIN CH’I} a
priori such as beIng SAPIENT with the recursive necessity of an #82 - ONTIC
{MANIFESTING NORM} meta-prototype as Intellectualism: Honour Parents is a
conception of fecundity as its capacity in producing or capable of
producing offspring, fruit, vegetation, etc., in abundance; prolific;
fruitful: fecund parents; fecund farmland and hence its equinox
association.

It also conveys by its sapient propensity in being very productive or
creative intellectually: the fecund years of the Italian Renaissance.

One must therefore ask on the basis of an analytic a posteriori why he
withheld such knowledge given the words origin: 1375–1425; late Middle
English < Latin fēcundus, equivalent to fē- (see fetus) + -cundus adj.
suffix; replacing late Middle English fecounde < Anglo-French

And the most probable answer is that such idea which he conveys by
apriority prototypes are tectonic shifts with cataclysmic consequence made
against the prevailing Latin binomial world order which constituted NATURE
bifurcations by means of another ethereal construct: @1 / @5.

Furthermore is Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
consideration of *VOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin voluntās f (genitive
voluntātis):

- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such as
mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of the natural world.

And consideration of *NOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin nōluntās f (genitive
nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used in
reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the natural world.

Are these then considered a priori as to the enumeration of an autonomy of
will by which apperception is circumscribed as an analytic a posteriori of
PUPIL with the recursive necessity of an #123 - ONTIC {DISCRIMINATING
NORM} meta-prototype as Intellectualism: Do Not Kill conveying an
ontological utility of reciprocality {#369: 9(9²+1)/2 a posteriori as
enumeration function of equation n(n²+1)/2 — *NEED* *TO* *THINK* *ABOUT*
*THIS*

#1 + #41 + #81 = #123 + #369 = #492 (#451 + #41) as *FREEWILL*

#YOD (#10) as CENTRE
#MEM (#40) as DELIMITATION
#TAU (#400) as CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH (#1) as STREAMING {23 CHROMOSOMES}

} the syncretic process even occurs as synthetic a posteriori being then
genitive of self declared as an heteronomous {ie subject to law external to
itself} and autonomous reality.

#492 as [#6, #50, #4, #2, #400, #10, #20] = nedabah (H5071): {UMBRA: #6 as
#61 % #41 = #20} 1) *voluntariness*, free-will offering; 1a) voluntariness;
1b) freewill, *voluntary*, offering;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #61 % #41 = #20 - Left without Language, Different From the Vulgar;
I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 50 -
Vastness/Wasting;

THOTH MEASURE: #20 - Oh Maa-antu-f, who makest thine appearance in Pa-Amsu,
I am not unchaste with any one.

#VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
#TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
#POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
#TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
#CANON: #171

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
@3: Sup: 28 (#128); Ego: 29 (#109),
@4: Sup: 9 (#137); Ego: 62 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
{%20}),
Male: #137; Feme: #171
} // #171

H5071@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
@3: Sup: 60 (#122); Ego: 4 (#60),
@4: Sup: 62 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36});
Ego: 2 (#62),
@5: Sup: 57 (#241); Ego: 76 (#138),
@6: Sup: 67 (#308); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@7: Sup: 6 (#314); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
Male: #314; Feme: #168
} // #492
Post by dolf
+ 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy
+ 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression
There is the analytic/synthetic distinction and the a priori/a posteriori
analytic a priori
synthetic a priori
analytic a posteriori
synthetic a posteriori
Kant thought analytic a posteriori is self-contradictory. But, some
philosophers (e.g. Stephen Palmquist) treat it as valid.
What are examples of analytic a posteriori knowledge?
Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology of
364 days an example of “a posteriori” knowledge?
364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126
6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with #41 as ONTIC necessity is that also an
example of “a posteriori” knowledge?
I’m then going to include Kant’s description of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE before using the noumena to examine the historical
event on 25 December 1770 when Captain Cook sought repairs in Batavia and a
sailor absconded as worthy example.
I will have to do some preliminary research
- dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
This implication of 18 August 1811, when Napoleon issuing a decree, based on
French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is that a
large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman Empire
Governance and therefore had not any authenticated notion of Sophia as wisdom
derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as the basis of science.
The portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be defined as
*BARBARIANS* where enlightenment was like the price of tulip 🌷 bulbs a
decadent societal entitlement and status.
I am (being surnamed BOEK self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical
appeal to either *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* or *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*.
That if HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK that fascism was a return
to the ancient traditions of Roman Empire Governance it was authenticated
notion of Sophia as wisdom derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE A CHOOK AS
CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument that
attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a
ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing
that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible.
Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
(Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a range
The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off the
edge.
There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then
it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is a
"smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* necessity in being normative
description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted and what
causality it had within and upon the populace.
The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) competed within 1631 is a Reformed
church within Dutch Protestant church in central Amsterdam, Netherlands. It
lies in the most western part of the Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum
borough), next to the Jordaan, between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three main
canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting canal
belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the west and
south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
Prinsengracht .
FURTHERMORE AS *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*. is this your quantitative
An excellent example of the difference between those backward barbarians
and the normally developed world. The difference between more and less
secularized societies.
if one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
enlightenment then one is speaking of scientific endeavour and any such is
framed by conceptions of number.
Thusly to convey any difference on the basis of “more or less” then one is
making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to the
LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.
So then there is a prudent contradiction by paucity of rhetorical
contrivance concerning the necessity about the reality of secularised
societies: Dutch or otherwise.
WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
ODE TO GEERT {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard' (strong or brave)
meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'. The name's common female
equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
— ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
“PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
@1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
@3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32});
Ego: 3 (#50),
@4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
@5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
@6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
@7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
@8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
@10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
@11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
@12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
@13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
@14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
Male: #727; Feme: #356
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
- (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
- (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
- (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
- (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
- (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
- (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
- (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors in
honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of retirement, an
important anniversary, or the like.
[Courtesy: Words of Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
@4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
@5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
Male: #231; Feme: #160
} // #727
UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
@3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #110; Feme: #210
} // #210
#727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) *wisdom*, sound knowledge, success, sound or efficient
wisdom, abiding success; 1a) sound or efficient wisdom; 1b) abiding success
(of the effect of sound wisdom);
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
@4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
@5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
@6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
@7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
Male: #302; Feme: #160
} // #727
#727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) to think, plan, esteem, calculate, invent, make a
*judgment*, imagine, count; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to think, account; 1a2) to
plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute, reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value,
regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be
esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel);
1c1) to think upon, consider, be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise,
plan; 1c3) to count, reckon; 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
@5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
Male: #144; Feme: #113
} // #356 T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as Book
of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2) graven
image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) purpose, *imagination*,
device (intellectual framework);
"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
[Genesis 6:5]
Post by dolf
[WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]
@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
@3: Sup: 46 #124); Ego: 47 (#116),
@4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55 (#171 - I
AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
@5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
@6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
@7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
Male: #288; Feme: #265
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
@4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
Male: #166; Feme: #126
} // #288
UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
#288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258 %
#41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to Jerusalem
to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon; 2) the chief
architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King Hiram to Solomon;
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
@3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
@4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 38
(#93),
@5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
Male: #190; Feme: #103
} // #265
UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 % #41 =
#41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a) (Niphal)
majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
#265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 % #41
= #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be mighty, be
great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail; 1b) (Piel) to
make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm, give strength; 1c2)
to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to show oneself mighty; 1d2)
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
@3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #245; Feme: #103
} // #265
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
DOLF: “In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually
given, at least when it is first mentioned, and the date of publication may
be specified.”
saying, "a surname name". Tautology and repetition is *one* reason you make
no sense.”
DOLF: “Your constipated turd 💩 opinion whilst a sensualism as anal
retentive declaration given self bestowal through proscription of a grunt
is no more substantial an entitlement than a FANNY excretion of pustulant
tripe which is enamoured by it’s prolapsed existence though laborious in
it’s eventuality as a shrivelled spud with no viability as a snag.” {ie.
*BAG* *OF* *SHIT*: despicable person}
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or
political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded with
disparagement: thieves' cant.
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 - *ONTIC*
VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION, CONTRARINESS,
ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}
#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA: #5
as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546 %
#41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the commandment
(of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
- dolf
TT zonder paginanummer.
WTF?
Kwam ook op het journaal. Hij vond het al die
bedreigingen niet waard. Toch wel interessant
te zien hoeveel gekken er in Pakistan en de rest
van de wereld wonen.
Kondig eens met veel fanfare een cartoonwedstrijd aan waarin Jezus
belachelijk wordt gemaakt.
Ja hebt gelijk hoor dan worden er meteen honderden mensen vermoord
vlaggen verbrand, prijzen uitgeloofd om bp mensen te vermoorden.
Oh wacht oh nee, er gebeurd helemaal niks.
the life of Brian.
of
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Een uitstekend voorbeeld van het verschil tussen die achterlijke
barbaren en de normaal ontwikkelde wereld.
Maak gerust eenzelfde monty pyton film over the koran, dat
wordt lachen man.
Edmund
I would take issue with your claim of the Barbarians which in my view from
the citation within the Epistle to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist
syncretic perennialist philosophers whom published counterfactual works on
the Religious Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery
the reference to the nine Barbarians appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited /
unlimited: “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to
the wise, and to the unwise.” [Romans 1:14]
And on TETRA: 45 - *GREATNESS*, Yang Hsiung comments: The sage looks at
small details {ie.
Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of knowledge as impetus of
gnomic imperative purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being
The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}
} overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
of his visionary rule.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
Appraisal 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
Fathoming 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit the
construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by high rank
by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes public
display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards internal
reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this, he fails to
focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are far from
*CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to frame
good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also symbolizes
money since certain coins were minted in its image. Here the house lacks
either the incisive thinking or the material resources it needs to
flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before too long, its reputation
will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an equivalence to the mystical
cabalistic interpretation given to the Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15
magic square and its gematria value #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab
(H5014): {#12 as #60} 1) (Qal) *TO* *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED*
(*PARTICIPLE*)}.
Appraisal 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
Fathoming 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the Nine Barbarians.
Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with humaneness,
the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT MARRIAGE AS
PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT HUMANENESS as
having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting the minimum of
pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have a civilizing
effect on people.
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION VIII
as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL* *OTHER*
*THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE* *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General, or, *in* *the*
*event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF*
*THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our
said Commonwealth.
} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*, or
'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomizing what is *CENTRAL*, the true sage
eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the earth.
The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things revolve.
-- NOW I SEE --
"YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.
ONE THING IS CLEAR.
DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
THE MIRROR TO PEER.
MICHAEL CHRIST: ""I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to speak
like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.
Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.
To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
encyclopedias.
My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
personally, and inspirationally.
[Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
'listening'.
Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.
So, I must say, thank you.
And thank you, again.
However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.
Amen."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
touch with scripture."
MILOCH ITCHY KOALO: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.
Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something out
of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
'pillar of salt'?
And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk and
finally resigned from his ministry.
Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!
go Warriors!"
-- PRELAPSARIAN --
"OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.
SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."
*PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
- characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
prelapsarian youth.
- Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
- Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
are going down...
George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is shocked
and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are defending
Donald Trump and his actions."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."
decided that.."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
presumed innocent until proven otherwise."
on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will stand up
in a court of law.
The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...
I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and if
there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up in a
dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"
justice."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."
-- BISCUIT EUPHORIA --
"LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.
SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
In
return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal presence {ie. The
sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL* transformation. If he would do
Viewing of what he himself is, he should do Viewing of the people who
themselves are morally transformed by their viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
Appraisal 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
Fathoming 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will eventually
grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave overwhelms tiny
ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first signs of
disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation, he can both
adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the Good. This is
no less true in the private world of the soul than in the public world of
the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45]
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
Sabbath]) ...
Honour your parents]) ...
Do not kill]) ...
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
Do not steal]) ...
no false witness]) ...
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Mao Ze Dong
or
Xi Jin Pin
“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
Consider then the consequence of French historians traditionally place the
Enlightenment between 1715 (the year that Louis XIV died) and 1789 (the
beginning of the French Revolution). International historians begin the
period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution.
On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.
Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."
<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-01 16:33:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
This is going to be the material of my next chapter as Section 3.0 as the
final section.
My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
doesn’t fully conceive any “analytic a posteriori” possibility and it’s
notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate of recursive
enumeration giving a trinomial #NUMBER definition as “synthetic a
posteriori” by formulation of progression. This dialectic is then
+ 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law
+ 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity
Thus the analytic {YANG CH’I} a priori such a HOMOIOS with the recursive
necessity of an #41 - ONTIC {NORMA OBLIGANS} meta-prototype as
Intellectualism: Remember the Sabbath and it’s syncretic {YIN CH’I} a
priori such as beIng SAPIENT with the recursive necessity of an #82 - ONTIC
{MANIFESTING NORM} meta-prototype as Intellectualism: Honour Parents is a
conception of fecundity as its capacity in producing or capable of
producing offspring, fruit, vegetation, etc., in abundance; prolific;
fruitful: fecund parents; fecund farmland and hence its equinox
association.

It also conveys by its sapient propensity in being very productive or
creative intellectually: the fecund years of the Italian Renaissance.

One must therefore ask on the basis of an analytic a posteriori why he
withheld such knowledge given the words origin: 1375–1425; late Middle
English < Latin fēcundus, equivalent to fē- (see fetus) + -cundus adj.
suffix; replacing late Middle English fecounde < Anglo-French

And the most probable answer is that such idea which he conveys by
apriority prototypes are tectonic shifts with cataclysmic consequence made
against the prevailing Latin binomial world order which constituted NATURE
bifurcations by means of another ethereal construct: @1 / @5.

Furthermore is Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
consideration of *VOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin voluntās f (genitive
voluntātis):

- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such as
mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of the natural world.

And consideration of *NOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin nōluntās f (genitive
nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used in
reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the natural world.

Are these then considered a priori as to the enumeration of an autonomy of
will by which apperception is circumscribed as an analytic a posteriori of
PUPIL with the recursive necessity of an #123 - ONTIC {DISCRIMINATING
NORM} meta-prototype as Intellectualism: Do Not Kill conveying an
ontological utility of reciprocality {#369: 9(9²+1)/2 a posteriori as
enumeration function of equation n(n²+1)/2 — *NEED* *TO* *THINK* *ABOUT*
*THIS*

#1 + #41 + #81 = #123 + #369 = #492 (#451 + #41) as *FREEWILL* being #12 x
#41 as ONTIC necessity

#YOD (#10) as CENTRE
#MEM (#40) as DELIMITATION
#TAU (#400) as CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH (#1) as STREAMING {23 CHROMOSOMES}

} the syncretic process even occurs as synthetic a posteriori being then
genitive of self declared as an heteronomous {ie subject to law external to
itself} and autonomous reality.

#492 as [#6, #50, #4, #2, #400, #10, #20] = nedabah (H5071): {UMBRA: #6 as
#61 % #41 = #20} 1) *voluntariness*, free-will offering; 1a) voluntariness;
1b) freewill, *voluntary*, offering;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #61 % #41 = #20 - Left without Language, Different From the Vulgar;
I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 50 -
Vastness/Wasting;

THOTH MEASURE: #20 - Oh Maa-antu-f, who makest thine appearance in Pa-Amsu,
I am not unchaste with any one.

#VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
#TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
#POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
#TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
#CANON: #171

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
@3: Sup: 28 (#128); Ego: 29 (#109),
@4: Sup: 9 (#137); Ego: 62 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
{%20}),
Male: #137; Feme: #171
} // #171

H5071@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
@3: Sup: 60 (#122); Ego: 4 (#60),
@4: Sup: 62 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36});
Ego: 2 (#62),
@5: Sup: 57 (#241); Ego: 76 (#138),
@6: Sup: 67 (#308); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@7: Sup: 6 (#314); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
Male: #314; Feme: #168
} // #492
Post by dolf
+ 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy
+ 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression
There is the analytic/synthetic distinction and the a priori/a posteriori
analytic a priori
synthetic a priori
analytic a posteriori
synthetic a posteriori
Kant thought analytic a posteriori is self-contradictory. But, some
philosophers (e.g. Stephen Palmquist) treat it as valid.
What are examples of analytic a posteriori knowledge?
Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology of
364 days an example of “a posteriori” knowledge?
364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126
6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with #41 as ONTIC necessity is that also an
example of “a posteriori” knowledge?
I’m then going to include Kant’s description of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE before using the noumena to examine the historical
event on 25 December 1770 when Captain Cook sought repairs in Batavia and a
sailor absconded as worthy example.
I will have to do some preliminary research
- dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
This implication of 18 August 1811, when Napoleon issuing a decree, based on
French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is that a
large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman Empire
Governance and therefore had not any authenticated notion of Sophia as wisdom
derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as the basis of science.
The portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be defined as
*BARBARIANS* where enlightenment was like the price of tulip 🌷 bulbs a
decadent societal entitlement and status.
I am (being surnamed BOEK self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical
appeal to either *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* or *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*.
That if HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK that fascism was a return
to the ancient traditions of Roman Empire Governance it was authenticated
notion of Sophia as wisdom derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE A CHOOK AS
CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument that
attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a
ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing
that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible.
Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
(Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a range
The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off the
edge.
There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then
it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is a
"smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* necessity in being normative
description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted and what
causality it had within and upon the populace.
The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) competed within 1631 is a Reformed
church within Dutch Protestant church in central Amsterdam, Netherlands. It
lies in the most western part of the Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum
borough), next to the Jordaan, between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three main
canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting canal
belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the west and
south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
Prinsengracht .
FURTHERMORE AS *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*. is this your quantitative
An excellent example of the difference between those backward barbarians
and the normally developed world. The difference between more and less
secularized societies.
if one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
enlightenment then one is speaking of scientific endeavour and any such is
framed by conceptions of number.
Thusly to convey any difference on the basis of “more or less” then one is
making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to the
LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.
So then there is a prudent contradiction by paucity of rhetorical
contrivance concerning the necessity about the reality of secularised
societies: Dutch or otherwise.
WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
ODE TO GEERT {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard' (strong or brave)
meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'. The name's common female
equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
— ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
“PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
@1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
@3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32});
Ego: 3 (#50),
@4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
@5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
@6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
@7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
@8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
@10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
@11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
@12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
@13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
@14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
Male: #727; Feme: #356
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
- (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
- (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
- (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
- (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
- (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
- (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
- (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors in
honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of retirement, an
important anniversary, or the like.
[Courtesy: Words of Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
@4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
@5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
Male: #231; Feme: #160
} // #727
UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
@3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #110; Feme: #210
} // #210
#727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) *wisdom*, sound knowledge, success, sound or efficient
wisdom, abiding success; 1a) sound or efficient wisdom; 1b) abiding success
(of the effect of sound wisdom);
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
@4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
@5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
@6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
@7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
Male: #302; Feme: #160
} // #727
#727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) to think, plan, esteem, calculate, invent, make a
*judgment*, imagine, count; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to think, account; 1a2) to
plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute, reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value,
regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be
esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel);
1c1) to think upon, consider, be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise,
plan; 1c3) to count, reckon; 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
@5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
Male: #144; Feme: #113
} // #356 T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as Book
of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2) graven
image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) purpose, *imagination*,
device (intellectual framework);
"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
[Genesis 6:5]
Post by dolf
[WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]
@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
@3: Sup: 46 #124); Ego: 47 (#116),
@4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55 (#171 - I
AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
@5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
@6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
@7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
Male: #288; Feme: #265
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
@4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
Male: #166; Feme: #126
} // #288
UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
#288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258 %
#41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to Jerusalem
to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon; 2) the chief
architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King Hiram to Solomon;
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
@3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
@4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 38
(#93),
@5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
Male: #190; Feme: #103
} // #265
UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 % #41 =
#41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a) (Niphal)
majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
#265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 % #41
= #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be mighty, be
great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail; 1b) (Piel) to
make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm, give strength; 1c2)
to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to show oneself mighty; 1d2)
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
@3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #245; Feme: #103
} // #265
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
DOLF: “In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually
given, at least when it is first mentioned, and the date of publication may
be specified.”
saying, "a surname name". Tautology and repetition is *one* reason you make
no sense.”
DOLF: “Your constipated turd 💩 opinion whilst a sensualism as anal
retentive declaration given self bestowal through proscription of a grunt
is no more substantial an entitlement than a FANNY excretion of pustulant
tripe which is enamoured by it’s prolapsed existence though laborious in
it’s eventuality as a shrivelled spud with no viability as a snag.” {ie.
*BAG* *OF* *SHIT*: despicable person}
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or
political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded with
disparagement: thieves' cant.
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 - *ONTIC*
VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION, CONTRARINESS,
ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}
#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA: #5
as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546 %
#41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the commandment
(of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
- dolf
TT zonder paginanummer.
WTF?
Kwam ook op het journaal. Hij vond het al die
bedreigingen niet waard. Toch wel interessant
te zien hoeveel gekken er in Pakistan en de rest
van de wereld wonen.
Kondig eens met veel fanfare een cartoonwedstrijd aan waarin Jezus
belachelijk wordt gemaakt.
Ja hebt gelijk hoor dan worden er meteen honderden mensen vermoord
vlaggen verbrand, prijzen uitgeloofd om bp mensen te vermoorden.
Oh wacht oh nee, er gebeurd helemaal niks.
the life of Brian.
of
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Een uitstekend voorbeeld van het verschil tussen die achterlijke
barbaren en de normaal ontwikkelde wereld.
Maak gerust eenzelfde monty pyton film over the koran, dat
wordt lachen man.
Edmund
I would take issue with your claim of the Barbarians which in my view from
the citation within the Epistle to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist
syncretic perennialist philosophers whom published counterfactual works on
the Religious Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery
the reference to the nine Barbarians appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited /
unlimited: “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to
the wise, and to the unwise.” [Romans 1:14]
And on TETRA: 45 - *GREATNESS*, Yang Hsiung comments: The sage looks at
small details {ie.
Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of knowledge as impetus of
gnomic imperative purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being
The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}
} overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
of his visionary rule.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
Appraisal 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
Fathoming 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit the
construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by high rank
by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes public
display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards internal
reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this, he fails to
focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are far from
*CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to frame
good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also symbolizes
money since certain coins were minted in its image. Here the house lacks
either the incisive thinking or the material resources it needs to
flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before too long, its reputation
will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an equivalence to the mystical
cabalistic interpretation given to the Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15
magic square and its gematria value #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab
(H5014): {#12 as #60} 1) (Qal) *TO* *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED*
(*PARTICIPLE*)}.
Appraisal 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
Fathoming 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the Nine Barbarians.
Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with humaneness,
the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT MARRIAGE AS
PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT HUMANENESS as
having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting the minimum of
pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have a civilizing
effect on people.
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION VIII
as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL* *OTHER*
*THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE* *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General, or, *in* *the*
*event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF*
*THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our
said Commonwealth.
} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*, or
'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomizing what is *CENTRAL*, the true sage
eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the earth.
The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things revolve.
-- NOW I SEE --
"YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.
ONE THING IS CLEAR.
DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
THE MIRROR TO PEER.
MICHAEL CHRIST: ""I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to speak
like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.
Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.
To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
encyclopedias.
My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
personally, and inspirationally.
[Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
'listening'.
Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.
So, I must say, thank you.
And thank you, again.
However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.
Amen."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
touch with scripture."
MILOCH ITCHY KOALO: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.
Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something out
of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
'pillar of salt'?
And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk and
finally resigned from his ministry.
Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!
go Warriors!"
-- PRELAPSARIAN --
"OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.
SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."
*PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
- characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
prelapsarian youth.
- Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
- Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
are going down...
George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is shocked
and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are defending
Donald Trump and his actions."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."
decided that.."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
presumed innocent until proven otherwise."
on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will stand up
in a court of law.
The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...
I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and if
there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up in a
dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"
justice."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."
-- BISCUIT EUPHORIA --
"LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.
SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
In
return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal presence {ie. The
sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL* transformation. If he would do
Viewing of what he himself is, he should do Viewing of the people who
themselves are morally transformed by their viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
Appraisal 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
Fathoming 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will eventually
grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave overwhelms tiny
ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first signs of
disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation, he can both
adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the Good. This is
no less true in the private world of the soul than in the public world of
the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45]
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
Sabbath]) ...
Honour your parents]) ...
Do not kill]) ...
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
Do not steal]) ...
no false witness]) ...
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Mao Ze Dong
or
Xi Jin Pin
“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
Consider then the consequence of French historians traditionally place the
Enlightenment between 1715 (the year that Louis XIV died) and 1789 (the
beginning of the French Revolution). International historians begin the
period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution.
On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.
Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."
<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-01 17:06:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
This is going to be the material of my next chapter as Section 3.0 as the
final section.
My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
doesn’t fully conceive any “analytic a posteriori” possibility and it’s
notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate of recursive
enumeration giving a trinomial #NUMBER definition as “synthetic a
posteriori” by formulation of progression. This dialectic is then
+ 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law
+ 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity
Thus the analytic {YANG CH’I} a priori such a HOMOIOS with the recursive
necessity of an #41 - ONTIC {NORMA OBLIGANS} meta-prototype as
Intellectualism: Remember the Sabbath and it’s syncretic {YIN CH’I} a
priori such as beIng SAPIENT with the recursive necessity of an #82 - ONTIC
{MANIFESTING NORM} meta-prototype as Intellectualism: Honour Parents is a
conception of fecundity as its capacity in producing or capable of
producing offspring, fruit, vegetation, etc., in abundance; prolific;
fruitful: fecund parents; fecund farmland and hence its equinox
association.

It also conveys by its sapient propensity in being very productive or
creative intellectually: the fecund years of the Italian Renaissance.

One must therefore ask on the basis of an analytic a posteriori why he
withheld such knowledge given the words origin: 1375–1425; late Middle
English < Latin fēcundus, equivalent to fē- (see fetus) + -cundus adj.
suffix; replacing late Middle English fecounde < Anglo-French

And the most probable answer is that such idea which he conveys by
apriority prototypes are tectonic shifts with cataclysmic consequence made
against the prevailing Latin binomial world order which constituted NATURE
bifurcations by means of another ethereal construct: @1 / @5.

Furthermore is Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
consideration of *VOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin voluntās f (genitive
voluntātis):

- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such as
mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of the natural world.

And consideration of *NOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin nōluntās f (genitive
nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used in
reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the natural world.

Are these then considered a priori as to the enumeration of an autonomy of
will by which apperception is circumscribed as an analytic a posteriori of
PUPIL with the recursive necessity of an #123 - ONTIC {DISCRIMINATING
NORM} meta-prototype as Intellectualism: Do Not Kill conveying an
ontological utility of reciprocality {#369: 9(9²+1)/2 a posteriori as
enumeration function of equation n(n²+1)/2 — *NEED* *TO* *THINK* *ABOUT*
*THIS*

#1 + #41 + #81 = #123 + #369 = #492 (#451 + #41) as *FREEWILL* being #12 x
#41 as ONTIC necessity

#YOD (#10) as CENTRE
#MEM (#40) as DELIMITATION
#TAU (#400) as CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH (#1) as STREAMING {23 CHROMOSOMES}

} the syncretic process even occurs as synthetic a posteriori being then
genitive of self declared as an heteronomous {ie subject to law external to
itself} and autonomous reality.

*PROBITY* of utilising an ego defensive mechanism of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL of IGNORANCE against the #41 - *ONTIC* necessity of = #492 (#451 +
#41) as *FREEWILL* being #12 x #41 of ANTHROPOCENTRIC (CIRCULAR) REALITY

Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between descriptive statements which present an account of how
the world is being analogous to the LIMITED {#9 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS
DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS / SEMINAL REASON GENERALLY
DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative statements presenting an
evaluative account, or an account of how the syncretic world should be as
existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in being
optimally something that should be lived up to; or that should be pursued.

“JESUS ANSWERED, *ARE* *THERE* *NOT* *TWELVE* *HOURS* *IN* *THE* *DAY* {ie.
24 x 60 minutes = #1440 / #72 = 20 minutes allocations}? *IF* *ANY* *MAN*
*WALK* *IN* *THE* *DAY*, *HE* *STUMBLETH* *NOT*, *BECAUSE* *HE* *SEETH*
*THE* *LIGHT* *OF* *THIS* *WORLD*-*KOSMOS*.

BUT IF A MAN WALK IN THE NIGHT, HE STUMBLETH, BECAUSE THERE IS NO LIGHT IN
HIM.” [John 11:9-10 (KJV)]

At the center of a philosophical doctrine of nature, there would then stand
general descriptive judgments; that means, more precisely, statements of
law that describe how objects of nature act. And at the center of a
doctrine of morals there would stand normative judgments that exhibit a
comparable degree of generality and modal status. I will later address more
thoroughly what it could mean that some normative judgments exhibit a
comparable modal status to statements of law in the natural sciences. Such
a parallel is far from trivial. On the contrary, it is one of the critical
challenges for the interpretation of Kant’s ethical writings. The first
step toward a unified interpretation of the two kinds of laws consists in
seeing both kinds equally as propositionally structured entities that
demonstrate a clearly identifiable logical form.

H5071@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
@3: Sup: 60 (#122); Ego: 4 (#60),
@4: Sup: 62 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36});
Ego: 2 (#62),
@5: Sup: 57 (#241); Ego: 76 (#138),
@6: Sup: 67 (#308); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@7: Sup: 6 (#314); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
Male: #314; Feme: #168
} // #492

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #61 % #41 = #20 - Left without Language, Different From the Vulgar;
I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 50 -
Vastness/Wasting;

THOTH MEASURE: #20 - Oh Maa-antu-f, who makest thine appearance in Pa-Amsu,
I am not unchaste with any one.

#VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
#TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
#POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
#TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
#CANON: #171

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
@3: Sup: 28 (#128); Ego: 29 (#109),
@4: Sup: 9 (#137); Ego: 62 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
{%20}),
Male: #137; Feme: #171
} // #171

#492 as [#6, #50, #4, #2, #400, #10, #20] = nedabah (H5071): {UMBRA: #6 as
#61 % #41 = #20} 1) *voluntariness*, free-will offering; 1a) voluntariness;
1b) freewill, *voluntary*, offering;
Post by dolf
+ 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy
+ 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression
There is the analytic/synthetic distinction and the a priori/a posteriori
analytic a priori
synthetic a priori
analytic a posteriori
synthetic a posteriori
Kant thought analytic a posteriori is self-contradictory. But, some
philosophers (e.g. Stephen Palmquist) treat it as valid.
What are examples of analytic a posteriori knowledge?
Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology of
364 days an example of “a posteriori” knowledge?
364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126
6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with #41 as ONTIC necessity is that also an
example of “a posteriori” knowledge?
I’m then going to include Kant’s description of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE before using the noumena to examine the historical
event on 25 December 1770 when Captain Cook sought repairs in Batavia and a
sailor absconded as worthy example.
I will have to do some preliminary research
- dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
This implication of 18 August 1811, when Napoleon issuing a decree, based on
French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is that a
large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman Empire
Governance and therefore had not any authenticated notion of Sophia as wisdom
derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as the basis of science.
The portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be defined as
*BARBARIANS* where enlightenment was like the price of tulip 🌷 bulbs a
decadent societal entitlement and status.
I am (being surnamed BOEK self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical
appeal to either *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* or *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*.
That if HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK that fascism was a return
to the ancient traditions of Roman Empire Governance it was authenticated
notion of Sophia as wisdom derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE A CHOOK AS
CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument that
attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a
ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing
that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible.
Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
(Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a range
The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off the
edge.
There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then
it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is a
"smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* necessity in being normative
description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted and what
causality it had within and upon the populace.
The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) competed within 1631 is a Reformed
church within Dutch Protestant church in central Amsterdam, Netherlands. It
lies in the most western part of the Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum
borough), next to the Jordaan, between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three main
canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting canal
belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the west and
south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
Prinsengracht .
FURTHERMORE AS *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*. is this your quantitative
An excellent example of the difference between those backward barbarians
and the normally developed world. The difference between more and less
secularized societies.
if one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
enlightenment then one is speaking of scientific endeavour and any such is
framed by conceptions of number.
Thusly to convey any difference on the basis of “more or less” then one is
making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to the
LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.
So then there is a prudent contradiction by paucity of rhetorical
contrivance concerning the necessity about the reality of secularised
societies: Dutch or otherwise.
WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
ODE TO GEERT {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard' (strong or brave)
meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'. The name's common female
equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
— ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
“PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
@1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
@3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32});
Ego: 3 (#50),
@4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
@5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
@6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
@7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
@8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
@10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
@11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
@12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
@13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
@14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
Male: #727; Feme: #356
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
- (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
- (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
- (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
- (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
- (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
- (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
- (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors in
honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of retirement, an
important anniversary, or the like.
[Courtesy: Words of Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
@4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
@5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
Male: #231; Feme: #160
} // #727
UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
@3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #110; Feme: #210
} // #210
#727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) *wisdom*, sound knowledge, success, sound or efficient
wisdom, abiding success; 1a) sound or efficient wisdom; 1b) abiding success
(of the effect of sound wisdom);
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
@4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
@5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
@6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
@7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
Male: #302; Feme: #160
} // #727
#727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) to think, plan, esteem, calculate, invent, make a
*judgment*, imagine, count; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to think, account; 1a2) to
plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute, reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value,
regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be
esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel);
1c1) to think upon, consider, be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise,
plan; 1c3) to count, reckon; 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
@5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
Male: #144; Feme: #113
} // #356 T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as Book
of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2) graven
image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) purpose, *imagination*,
device (intellectual framework);
"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
[Genesis 6:5]
Post by dolf
[WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]
@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
@3: Sup: 46 #124); Ego: 47 (#116),
@4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55 (#171 - I
AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
@5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
@6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
@7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
Male: #288; Feme: #265
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
@4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
Male: #166; Feme: #126
} // #288
UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
#288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258 %
#41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to Jerusalem
to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon; 2) the chief
architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King Hiram to Solomon;
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
@3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
@4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 38
(#93),
@5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
Male: #190; Feme: #103
} // #265
UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 % #41 =
#41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a) (Niphal)
majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
#265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 % #41
= #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be mighty, be
great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail; 1b) (Piel) to
make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm, give strength; 1c2)
to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to show oneself mighty; 1d2)
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
@3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #245; Feme: #103
} // #265
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
DOLF: “In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually
given, at least when it is first mentioned, and the date of publication may
be specified.”
saying, "a surname name". Tautology and repetition is *one* reason you make
no sense.”
DOLF: “Your constipated turd 💩 opinion whilst a sensualism as anal
retentive declaration given self bestowal through proscription of a grunt
is no more substantial an entitlement than a FANNY excretion of pustulant
tripe which is enamoured by it’s prolapsed existence though laborious in
it’s eventuality as a shrivelled spud with no viability as a snag.” {ie.
*BAG* *OF* *SHIT*: despicable person}
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or
political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded with
disparagement: thieves' cant.
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 - *ONTIC*
VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION, CONTRARINESS,
ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}
#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA: #5
as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546 %
#41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the commandment
(of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
- dolf
TT zonder paginanummer.
WTF?
Kwam ook op het journaal. Hij vond het al die
bedreigingen niet waard. Toch wel interessant
te zien hoeveel gekken er in Pakistan en de rest
van de wereld wonen.
Kondig eens met veel fanfare een cartoonwedstrijd aan waarin Jezus
belachelijk wordt gemaakt.
Ja hebt gelijk hoor dan worden er meteen honderden mensen vermoord
vlaggen verbrand, prijzen uitgeloofd om bp mensen te vermoorden.
Oh wacht oh nee, er gebeurd helemaal niks.
the life of Brian.
of
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Een uitstekend voorbeeld van het verschil tussen die achterlijke
barbaren en de normaal ontwikkelde wereld.
Maak gerust eenzelfde monty pyton film over the koran, dat
wordt lachen man.
Edmund
I would take issue with your claim of the Barbarians which in my view from
the citation within the Epistle to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist
syncretic perennialist philosophers whom published counterfactual works on
the Religious Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery
the reference to the nine Barbarians appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited /
unlimited: “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to
the wise, and to the unwise.” [Romans 1:14]
And on TETRA: 45 - *GREATNESS*, Yang Hsiung comments: The sage looks at
small details {ie.
Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of knowledge as impetus of
gnomic imperative purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being
The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}
} overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
of his visionary rule.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
Appraisal 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
Fathoming 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit the
construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by high rank
by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes public
display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards internal
reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this, he fails to
focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are far from
*CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to frame
good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also symbolizes
money since certain coins were minted in its image. Here the house lacks
either the incisive thinking or the material resources it needs to
flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before too long, its reputation
will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an equivalence to the mystical
cabalistic interpretation given to the Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15
magic square and its gematria value #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab
(H5014): {#12 as #60} 1) (Qal) *TO* *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED*
(*PARTICIPLE*)}.
Appraisal 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
Fathoming 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the Nine Barbarians.
Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with humaneness,
the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT MARRIAGE AS
PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT HUMANENESS as
having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting the minimum of
pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have a civilizing
effect on people.
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION VIII
as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL* *OTHER*
*THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE* *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General, or, *in* *the*
*event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF*
*THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our
said Commonwealth.
} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*, or
'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomizing what is *CENTRAL*, the true sage
eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the earth.
The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things revolve.
-- NOW I SEE --
"YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.
ONE THING IS CLEAR.
DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
THE MIRROR TO PEER.
MICHAEL CHRIST: ""I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to speak
like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.
Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.
To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
encyclopedias.
My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
personally, and inspirationally.
[Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
'listening'.
Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.
So, I must say, thank you.
And thank you, again.
However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.
Amen."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
touch with scripture."
MILOCH ITCHY KOALO: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.
Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something out
of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
'pillar of salt'?
And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk and
finally resigned from his ministry.
Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!
go Warriors!"
-- PRELAPSARIAN --
"OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.
SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."
*PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
- characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
prelapsarian youth.
- Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
- Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
are going down...
George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is shocked
and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are defending
Donald Trump and his actions."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."
decided that.."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
presumed innocent until proven otherwise."
on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will stand up
in a court of law.
The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...
I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and if
there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up in a
dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"
justice."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."
-- BISCUIT EUPHORIA --
"LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.
SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
In
return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal presence {ie. The
sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL* transformation. If he would do
Viewing of what he himself is, he should do Viewing of the people who
themselves are morally transformed by their viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
Appraisal 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
Fathoming 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will eventually
grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave overwhelms tiny
ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first signs of
disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation, he can both
adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the Good. This is
no less true in the private world of the soul than in the public world of
the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45]
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
Sabbath]) ...
Honour your parents]) ...
Do not kill]) ...
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
Do not steal]) ...
no false witness]) ...
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Mao Ze Dong
or
Xi Jin Pin
“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
Consider then the consequence of French historians traditionally place the
Enlightenment between 1715 (the year that Louis XIV died) and 1789 (the
beginning of the French Revolution). International historians begin the
period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution.
On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.
Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."
<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-01 17:59:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
This is going to be the material of my next chapter as Section 3.0 as the
final section.
My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
doesn’t fully conceive any “analytic a posteriori” possibility and it’s
notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate of recursive
enumeration giving a trinomial #NUMBER definition as “synthetic a
posteriori” by formulation of progression. This dialectic is then
+ 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law
+ 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity
Thus the analytic {YANG CH’I} a priori such a HOMOIOS with the recursive
necessity of an #41 - ONTIC {NORMA OBLIGANS} meta-prototype as
Intellectualism: Remember the Sabbath and it’s syncretic {YIN CH’I} a
priori such as beIng SAPIENT with the recursive necessity of an #82 - ONTIC
{MANIFESTING NORM} meta-prototype as Intellectualism: Honour Parents is a
conception of fecundity as its capacity in producing or capable of
producing offspring, fruit, vegetation, etc., in abundance; prolific;
fruitful: fecund parents; fecund farmland and hence its equinox
association.

It also conveys by its sapient propensity in being very productive or
creative intellectually: the fecund years of the Italian Renaissance.

One must therefore ask on the basis of an analytic a posteriori why he
withheld such knowledge given the words origin: 1375–1425; late Middle
English < Latin fēcundus, equivalent to fē- (see fetus) + -cundus adj.
suffix; replacing late Middle English fecounde < Anglo-French

And the most probable answer is that such idea which he conveys by
apriority prototypes are tectonic shifts with cataclysmic consequence made
against the prevailing Latin binomial world order which constituted NATURE
bifurcations by means of another ethereal construct: @1 / @5.

Furthermore is Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
consideration of *VOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin voluntās f (genitive
voluntātis):

- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such as
mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of the natural world.

And consideration of *NOLUNTY* (noun) from Latin nōluntās f (genitive
nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used in
reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the natural world.

Are these then considered a priori as to the enumeration of an autonomy of
will by which apperception is circumscribed as an analytic a posteriori of
PUPIL with the recursive necessity of an #123 - ONTIC {DISCRIMINATING
NORM} meta-prototype as Intellectualism: Do Not Kill conveying an
ontological utility of reciprocality {#369: 9(9²+1)/2 a posteriori as
enumeration function of equation n(n²+1)/2 — *NEED* *TO* *THINK* *ABOUT*
*THIS*

#1 + #41 + #81 = #123 + #369 = #492 (#451 + #41) as *FREEWILL* being #12 x
#41 as ONTIC necessity

#YOD (#10) as CENTRE
#MEM (#40) as DELIMITATION
#TAU (#400) as CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH (#1) as STREAMING {23 CHROMOSOMES} = #451

AS BIFURCATION: #TAU x #41 = #902 / #2 = #451

} the syncretic process even occurs as synthetic a posteriori being then
genitive of self declared as an heteronomous {ie subject to law external to
itself} and autonomous reality.

*PROBITY* of utilising an ego defensive mechanism of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL of IGNORANCE against the #41 - *ONTIC* necessity of = #492 (#451 +
#41) as *FREEWILL* being #12 x #41 of ANTHROPOCENTRIC (CIRCULAR) REALITY

Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between descriptive statements which present an account of how
the world is being analogous to the LIMITED {#9 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS
DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS / SEMINAL REASON GENERALLY
DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative statements presenting an
evaluative account, or an account of how the syncretic world should be as
existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in being
optimally something that should be lived up to; or that should be pursued.

“JESUS ANSWERED, *ARE* *THERE* *NOT* *TWELVE* *HOURS* *IN* *THE* *DAY* {ie.
24 x 60 minutes = #1440 / #72 = 20 minutes allocations}? *IF* *ANY* *MAN*
*WALK* *IN* *THE* *DAY*, *HE* *STUMBLETH* *NOT*, *BECAUSE* *HE* *SEETH*
*THE* *LIGHT* *OF* *THIS* *WORLD*-*KOSMOS*.

BUT IF A MAN WALK IN THE NIGHT, HE STUMBLETH, BECAUSE THERE IS NO LIGHT IN
HIM.” [John 11:9-10 (KJV)]

At the center of a philosophical doctrine of nature, there would then stand
general descriptive judgments; that means, more precisely, statements of
law that describe how objects of nature act. And at the center of a
doctrine of morals there would stand normative judgments that exhibit a
comparable degree of generality and modal status. I will later address more
thoroughly what it could mean that some normative judgments exhibit a
comparable modal status to statements of law in the natural sciences. Such
a parallel is far from trivial. On the contrary, it is one of the critical
challenges for the interpretation of Kant’s ethical writings. The first
step toward a unified interpretation of the two kinds of laws consists in
seeing both kinds equally as propositionally structured entities that
demonstrate a clearly identifiable logical form.

H5071@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
@3: Sup: 60 (#122); Ego: 4 (#60),
@4: Sup: 62 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36});
Ego: 2 (#62),
@5: Sup: 57 (#241); Ego: 76 (#138),
@6: Sup: 67 (#308); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@7: Sup: 6 (#314); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
Male: #314; Feme: #168
} // #492

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #61 % #41 = #20 - Left without Language, Different From the Vulgar;
I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 50 -
Vastness/Wasting;

THOTH MEASURE: #20 - Oh Maa-antu-f, who makest thine appearance in Pa-Amsu,
I am not unchaste with any one.

#VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
#TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
#POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
#TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
#CANON: #171

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
@3: Sup: 28 (#128); Ego: 29 (#109),
@4: Sup: 9 (#137); Ego: 62 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
{%20}),
Male: #137; Feme: #171
} // #171

#492 as [#6, #50, #4, #2, #400, #10, #20] = nedabah (H5071): {UMBRA: #6 as
#61 % #41 = #20} 1) *voluntariness*, free-will offering; 1a) voluntariness;
1b) freewill, *voluntary*, offering;
Post by dolf
+ 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy
+ 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression
There is the analytic/synthetic distinction and the a priori/a posteriori
analytic a priori
synthetic a priori
analytic a posteriori
synthetic a posteriori
Kant thought analytic a posteriori is self-contradictory. But, some
philosophers (e.g. Stephen Palmquist) treat it as valid.
What are examples of analytic a posteriori knowledge?
Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology of
364 days an example of “a posteriori” knowledge?
364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126
6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with #41 as ONTIC necessity is that also an
example of “a posteriori” knowledge?
I’m then going to include Kant’s description of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE before using the noumena to examine the historical
event on 25 December 1770 when Captain Cook sought repairs in Batavia and a
sailor absconded as worthy example.
I will have to do some preliminary research
- dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
This implication of 18 August 1811, when Napoleon issuing a decree, based on
French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is that a
large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman Empire
Governance and therefore had not any authenticated notion of Sophia as wisdom
derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as the basis of science.
The portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be defined as
*BARBARIANS* where enlightenment was like the price of tulip 🌷 bulbs a
decadent societal entitlement and status.
I am (being surnamed BOEK self-evidently) of course making a rhetorical
appeal to either *REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* or *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*.
That if HITLER considered within his TABLE TALK that fascism was a return
to the ancient traditions of Roman Empire Governance it was authenticated
notion of Sophia as wisdom derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science—WHY THEN DID THE NATION SQUAT LIKE A CHOOK AS
CAPITULATION AFTER FIVE DAYS?
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"; also
argumentum ad absurdum, "argument to absurdity") is a form of argument that
attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a
ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing
that if it were not true, the result would be absurd or impossible.
Traced back to classical Greek philosophy in Aristotle's Prior Analytics
(Greek: ἡ εἰς τὸ ἀδύνατον ἀπόδειξις 'demonstration to the impossible',
62b), this technique has been used throughout history in both formal
mathematical and philosophical reasoning, as well as in debate.
The "absurd" conclusion of a reductio ad absurdum argument can take a range
The Earth cannot be flat; otherwise, we would find people falling off the
edge.
There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then
it could be divided by two to get a smaller one.
The first example argues that denial of the premise would result in a
ridiculous conclusion, against the evidence of our senses. The second
example is a mathematical proof by contradiction which argues that the
denial of the premise would result in a logical contradiction (there is a
"smallest" number and yet there is a number smaller than it).
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>
Firstly the consideration is of #41 - *ONTIC* necessity in being normative
description of any moral reality as to how it was constituted and what
causality it had within and upon the populace.
The Westerkerk (English: Western Church) competed within 1631 is a Reformed
church within Dutch Protestant church in central Amsterdam, Netherlands. It
lies in the most western part of the Grachtengordel neighborhood (Centrum
borough), next to the Jordaan, between the Prinsengracht and Keizersgracht.
The Keizersgracht (dt .: Kaiser trench ) is the average of the three main
canals of the 17th century in the old city of Amsterdam resulting canal
belt . It encloses the medieval city center semicircular in the west and
south. Within parallel to it runs the Herengracht , outside the
Prinsengracht .
FURTHERMORE AS *REDUCTIO* *AD* *ABSURDUM*. is this your quantitative
An excellent example of the difference between those backward barbarians
and the normally developed world. The difference between more and less
secularized societies.
if one speaks of binomial nomenclature as the basis of wisdom /
enlightenment then one is speaking of scientific endeavour and any such is
framed by conceptions of number.
Thusly to convey any difference on the basis of “more or less” then one is
making a philosophical appeal (unless distinguished otherwise) to the
LESSER: weak sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that
something "might chance to happen or not to happen", and
MORE: stronger sense {YANG CH'I as MALE}, to indicate how something could
be done well.
So then there is a prudent contradiction by paucity of rhetorical
contrivance concerning the necessity about the reality of secularised
societies: Dutch or otherwise.
WHOM IS WISE AND WHO THEN UNWISE?
Are you even capable of judging that for yourselves.
ODE TO GEERT {Germanic words 'ger' (*SPEAR*) and 'hard' (strong or brave)
meaning 'Strong or Brave with the *SPEAR*'. The name's common female
equivalent is 'Geertje' as my mother's name}
— ODE TO GEERT BE WILDERS —
“PARDON MY BEING A STICKYBEAK,
SCRUFF & GRINDR ARE NOW OBLIQUE.
HEARD YOUR CLARION FROM AFAR.
THE *WATCHERS* THAT WE ARE.
WHETHER YOUR FOOTLE IS TO BE
OR THRASONICAL FOR US MAY SEE
THE MEASURE OF YOUR SOUL.
WE KNOW, WE *KNOW* *IT* *ALL*.
WHEN JUSTICE IS SO VAIN,
IN WANT LOSS AND DISDAIN.
THIS FESTSCHRIFT IS TO YOU,
ALSTUBLIEFT AND ADIEU.”
@1: Sup: 69 (#69); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#123); Ego: 43 (#47),
@3: Sup: 68 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32});
Ego: 3 (#50),
@4: Sup: 75 (#266); Ego: 13 (#63),
@5: Sup: 23 (#289); Ego: 24 (#87),
@6: Sup: 73 (#362); Ego: 30 (#117),
@7: Sup: 46 (#408); Ego: 3 (#120),
@8: Sup: 28 (#436); Ego: 30 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@9: Sup: 78 (#514); Ego: 1 (#151),
@10: Sup: 33 (#547); Ego: 28 (#179),
@11: Sup: 64 (#611); Ego: 56 (#235),
@12: Sup: 36 (#647); Ego: 36 (#271),
@13: Sup: 43 (#690); Ego: 43 (#314),
@14: Sup: 37 (#727); Ego: 42 (#356),
Male: #727; Feme: #356
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{727}&idea:{356}>
- (noun) Australian Slang for a busybody; meddler.
- (adjective) Clear and shrill: the clarion call of a battle trump.
- (noun) An ancient trumpet with a curved shape.
- (verb) to act or talk in a foolish or silly way.
- (noun) nonsense; foolishness; silliness.
- (adjective) boastful; vainglorious.
- (noun) A volume of articles, essays, etc., contributed by many authors in
honour of a colleague, usually published on the occasion of retirement, an
important anniversary, or the like.
[Courtesy: Words of Day for 8 to 12 December, 2016; www.dictionary.com]
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 7 (#14); Ego: 6 (#88),
@4: Sup: 64 (#78); Ego: 57 (#145),
@5: Sup: 74 (#152); Ego: 10 (#155),
@6: Sup: 79 (#231); Ego: 5 (#160),
Male: #231; Feme: #160
} // #727
UMBRA: #727 % #41 = #30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War;
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing;
THOTH MEASURE: #30 - Oh thou who earnest thine own offering, and makest
thine appearance in Syut; I am not of aggressive hand.
#VIRTUE: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), daring but
#TOOLS: With Severance (no. #70), weakening.
#POSITION: With Failure (no. #75), great loss.
#TIME: With Gathering (no. #35), small gain.
#CANON: #210
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 19 (#49); Ego: 70 (#100),
@3: Sup: 13 (#62); Ego: 75 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@4: Sup: 48 (#110); Ego: 35 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #110; Feme: #210
} // #210
#727 as [#6, #400, #6, #300, #10, #5] = tuwshiyah (H8454): {UMBRA: #3 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) *wisdom*, sound knowledge, success, sound or efficient
wisdom, abiding success; 1a) sound or efficient wisdom; 1b) abiding success
(of the effect of sound wisdom);
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 1 (#7); Ego: 76 (#82),
@3: Sup: 9 (#16); Ego: 8 (#90),
@4: Sup: 66 (#82); Ego: 57 (#147),
@5: Sup: 68 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 2 (#149),
@6: Sup: 73 (#223); Ego: 5 (#154),
@7: Sup: 79 (#302); Ego: 6 (#160),
Male: #302; Feme: #160
} // #727
#727 as [#6, #400, #8, #300, #2, #5, #6] = chashab (H2803): {UMBRA: #6 as
#727 % #41 = #30} 1) to think, plan, esteem, calculate, invent, make a
*judgment*, imagine, count; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to think, account; 1a2) to
plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute, reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value,
regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be
esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel);
1c1) to think upon, consider, be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise,
plan; 1c3) to count, reckon; 1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 19 (#29); Ego: 9 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 26 (#112); Ego: 50 (#107),
@5: Sup: 32 (#144); Ego: 6 (#113),
Male: #144; Feme: #113
} // #356 T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#356 as [#10, #90, #200, #50, #6] = yetser (H3336): {UMBRA: #0 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) form, framing, purpose, framework; 2) Sefer Yetzirah as Book
of Creation in Theory and Practice; 1a) form; 1a1) pottery; 1a2) graven
image; 1a3) man (as formed from the dust); 1b) purpose, *imagination*,
device (intellectual framework);
"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
imagination} of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually-."
[Genesis 6:5]
Post by dolf
[WHOM, IS, WISE, AND, WHO, THEN, UNWISE]
@1: Sup: 61 (#61); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 17 (#78); Ego: 28 (#69),
@3: Sup: 46 #124); Ego: 47 (#116),
@4: Sup: 73 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 55 (#171 - I
AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
@5: Sup: 43 (#240); Ego: 1 (#172),
@6: Sup: 34 (#274); Ego: 20 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
@7: Sup: 14 (#288); Ego: 73 (#265),
Male: #288; Feme: #265
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{288}&idea:{265}>
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 8 (#38),
@3: Sup: 48 (#116); Ego: 10 (#48),
@4: Sup: 5 (#121); Ego: 38 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 45 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 40 (#126),
Male: #166; Feme: #126
} // #288
UMBRA: #258 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
#288 as [#30, #8, #10, #200, #40] = Chiyram (H2438): {UMBRA: #3 as #258 %
#41 = #12} 1) the king of Tyre who sent workmen and materials to Jerusalem
to build both the palace for David and the temple for Solomon; 2) the chief
architect and engineer of Solomon's temple sent by King Hiram to Solomon;
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 51 (#101); Ego: 1 (#51),
@3: Sup: 55 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#55),
@4: Sup: 12 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 38
(#93),
@5: Sup: 22 (#190); Ego: 10 (#103),
Male: #190; Feme: #103
} // #265
UMBRA: #205 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#265 as [#50, #1, #4, #200, #10] = 'adar (H142): {UMBRA: #0 as #205 % #41 =
#41} 1) to be great, be majestic, wide, noble (poetic); 1a) (Niphal)
majestic, glorious (participle); 1b) (Hiphil) make glorious;
#265 as [#50, #3, #2, #10, #200] = gabar (H1396): {UMBRA: #2 as #205 % #41
= #41} 1) to prevail, have strength, be strong, be powerful, be mighty, be
great; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong, mighty; 1a2) to prevail; 1b) (Piel) to
make strong, strengthen; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to confirm, give strength; 1c2)
to confirm (a covenant); 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to show oneself mighty; 1d2)
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 53 (#103); Ego: 3 (#53),
@3: Sup: 55 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 2 (#55),
@4: Sup: 65 (#223); Ego: 10 (#65),
@5: Sup: 22 (#245); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #245; Feme: #103
} // #265
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/2.3%20NECESSITY%20NORMATIVITY%20AND%20APRIORITY.pdf>
— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
DOLF: “In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually
given, at least when it is first mentioned, and the date of publication may
be specified.”
saying, "a surname name". Tautology and repetition is *one* reason you make
no sense.”
DOLF: “Your constipated turd 💩 opinion whilst a sensualism as anal
retentive declaration given self bestowal through proscription of a grunt
is no more substantial an entitlement than a FANNY excretion of pustulant
tripe which is enamoured by it’s prolapsed existence though laborious in
it’s eventuality as a shrivelled spud with no viability as a snag.” {ie.
*BAG* *OF* *SHIT*: despicable person}
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or
political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded with
disparagement: thieves' cant.
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS
FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 - *ONTIC*
VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION, CONTRARINESS,
ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}
#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA: #5
as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;
#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546 %
#41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the commandment
(of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);
- dolf
TT zonder paginanummer.
WTF?
Kwam ook op het journaal. Hij vond het al die
bedreigingen niet waard. Toch wel interessant
te zien hoeveel gekken er in Pakistan en de rest
van de wereld wonen.
Kondig eens met veel fanfare een cartoonwedstrijd aan waarin Jezus
belachelijk wordt gemaakt.
Ja hebt gelijk hoor dan worden er meteen honderden mensen vermoord
vlaggen verbrand, prijzen uitgeloofd om bp mensen te vermoorden.
Oh wacht oh nee, er gebeurd helemaal niks.
the life of Brian.
of
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Een uitstekend voorbeeld van het verschil tussen die achterlijke
barbaren en de normaal ontwikkelde wereld.
Maak gerust eenzelfde monty pyton film over the koran, dat
wordt lachen man.
Edmund
I would take issue with your claim of the Barbarians which in my view from
the citation within the Epistle to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist
syncretic perennialist philosophers whom published counterfactual works on
the Religious Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery
the reference to the nine Barbarians appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited /
unlimited: “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to
the wise, and to the unwise.” [Romans 1:14]
And on TETRA: 45 - *GREATNESS*, Yang Hsiung comments: The sage looks at
small details {ie.
Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of knowledge as impetus of
gnomic imperative purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being
The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}
} overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
of his visionary rule.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.
Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)
Appraisal 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
Fathoming 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.
Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit the
construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by high rank
by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes public
display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards internal
reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this, he fails to
focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are far from
*CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country
The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to frame
good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also symbolizes
money since certain coins were minted in its image. Here the house lacks
either the incisive thinking or the material resources it needs to
flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before too long, its reputation
will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an equivalence to the mystical
cabalistic interpretation given to the Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15
magic square and its gematria value #60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab
(H5014): {#12 as #60} 1) (Qal) *TO* *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED*
(*PARTICIPLE*)}.
Appraisal 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
Fathoming 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the Nine Barbarians.
Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with humaneness,
the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT MARRIAGE AS
PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT HUMANENESS as
having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting the minimum of
pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have a civilizing
effect on people.
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION VIII
as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL* *OTHER*
*THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE* *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General, or, *in* *the*
*event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF*
*THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our
said Commonwealth.
} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*, or
'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomizing what is *CENTRAL*, the true sage
eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the earth.
The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things revolve.
-- NOW I SEE --
"YOU'RE NOT AXIS MUNDI.
CENTRE OF AFFECTION.
PLAIN AS IT'S MONDAY.
YOUR BANAL REFLECTION.
ONE THING IS CLEAR.
DRESSED UP WITH BUNT {ie. smut}
THE MIRROR TO PEER.
MICHAEL CHRIST: ""I said to my wife [Brunhilda] that I would like to speak
like R.C. Sproul because he is articulate.
Lots of people who teach at that level are articulate.
To my surprise, she says, speakers like him speak like world book
encyclopedias.
My wife reckons I speak real, normal language, true and relevant, engage
personally, and inspirationally.
[Brunhilda] says if you are not personal then there is no hope of any
'listening'.
Now I know my newsgroup fans would agree with my wife.
So, I must say, thank you.
And thank you, again.
However, those of you that do not agree with my wife can get stuffed.
Amen."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "You speak fine. You just are out of
touch with scripture."
MILOCH ITCHY KOALO: "Dunno DukeMan...we need to parse his acknowledgment
out. I'm wondering if he sees his wife like Lot's wife.
Did Mrs Mikey's wife do something unBiblical... you know... something out
of Sodom & Gomorrah and now Mikey's worried about her turning into a
'pillar of salt'?
And what's the deal with RC Sproul... other than the fact he's a drunk and
finally resigned from his ministry.
Soooo many questions without any redeeming answers!
go Warriors!"
-- PRELAPSARIAN --
"OH DEAR 'TIS SO PLAIN.
ORIGINAL SIN FOR ALL SEE.
JUST FOR BEING SO VAIN.
AND DISDAINFUL OF ME.
MURDEROUS LIKE CAIN.
SUCH A CROSS TO BEAR.
E'RYONE SEEMS TO KNOW.
THE NEWS IS EVERYWHERE.
SHAME IS SUCH A BLOW.
THEY'RE STARTING TO STARE."
*PRELAPSARIAN* (adjective)
- characteristic of or pertaining to any innocent or carefree period: a
prelapsarian youth.
- Theology: occurring before the Fall: the prelapsarian innocence of Eden.
- Word of the Day for 12 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
are going down...
George Bush's ex Whitehouse lawyer said in his own words that he is shocked
and dismayed that the Republican Party and Trumps supporters are defending
Donald Trump and his actions."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Why not? He's innocent."
decided that.."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Nope. The Constitution says we are
presumed innocent until proven otherwise."
on to say that Comey has provided the kind of evidence that will stand up
in a court of law.
The Republican Party must be every bit as rotten as Trump and Kushner...
I hope that Trump and Kushner are booted out of politics and jailed and if
there is any justice at all in this world then they will lock them up in a
dungeon, throw the key away and burn the dungeon."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "For what?"
justice."
DUKE EARL (FASCIST CATHOLIC) WEBER: "Not guilty."
-- BISCUIT EUPHORIA --
"LET ME SPELL IT OUT.
STORIES OF GOSPEL TRUTH.
SO WHY OUGHT I POUT?
GOD BLIMEY AND STREWTH.
SHOULD I JUST PUCKER?
AS I LIKE STROOPWAFEL.
OVER MATTERS SO TRIFLE."
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
In
return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal presence {ie. The
sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL* transformation. If he would do
Viewing of what he himself is, he should do Viewing of the people who
themselves are morally transformed by their viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.
Appraisal 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
Fathoming 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.
If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will eventually
grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave overwhelms tiny
ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first signs of
disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation, he can both
adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the Good. This is
no less true in the private world of the soul than in the public world of
the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45]
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
Sabbath]) ...
Honour your parents]) ...
Do not kill]) ...
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
Do not steal]) ...
no false witness]) ...
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Mao Ze Dong
or
Xi Jin Pin
“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
Consider then the consequence of French historians traditionally place the
Enlightenment between 1715 (the year that Louis XIV died) and 1789 (the
beginning of the French Revolution). International historians begin the
period in the 1620s, with the start of the scientific revolution.
On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.
Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."
<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-02 07:40:40 UTC
Permalink
DOLF @ 2143 HOURS ON 31 AUGUST 2018: "This implication of 18 August
1811, Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte (1804 - 1814) issuing a decree, based
on French law, regarding adoption of surnames within the Netherlands is
that a large portion of the Dutch population were not subject to Roman
Empire Governance and therefore did not have any authenticated notion of
Sophia as wisdom which is derived from Pythagorean binomial nomenclature
as the basis of science.

That portions of the Dutch population could historically and lawfully be
regarded as *BARBARIANS* and enlightenment was like the price of tulip
🌷 bulbs a decadent societal entitlement and status.

I would therefore take issue with your claim made of the *BARBARIANS* is
a term of relative association which in my view of the CANON OF SUPREME
MYSTERY published within 4BCE by Yang HSIUNG determines the *ONTIC*
NECESSITY {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} AS DERIVED FROM
THE I CHING AS 8x8 {#260 - COMPATIBLE TO PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL NOTION OF
NUMBER} = H64 BINOMIAL {MALE: YANG CH'I / FEME: YIN CH'I) MAPPED
ASSOCIATION WITH TETRA: "Since neither the content nor the structure of
the Changes implies a temporal sequence, the Mystery follows generally a
proposed rearrangement of the hexagrams put forward by the HAN Dynasty
206 BCE-220 CE Changes {H64 elements} master, CHING FANG (77-33 BC).
YANG HSIUNG improved upon CHING FANG’S approach to symmetry in the
cyclic structure he was creating. He avoided, for example, certain
inelegances of CHING FANG’S schema (which involved only 60 hexagrams)
when he incorporated references to all 64 HEXAGRAMS in his arrangement
of TETRAGRAMS and also substituted the winter solstice for FANG’S
artificial point of departure (the new moon of the tenth civil month as
GRAND INCEPTION determined midnight of 21 DECEMBER 103 BCE), so that his
cycle starts at the point which marked the actual beginning of the
tropical year for the HAN astronomer.

Each pair of *HEXAGRAMS* separated by six months (for example: H19 -
APPROACH / TETRA: #9 - BRANCHING OUT {#65 CE - SOLDIER / 27-31 JANUARY}
and H33 - RETREAT / TETRA: #49 - FLIGHT {26-30 JULY}) are LINE-BY-LINE
POLAR OPPOSITIONS and together with the corresponding schema of
INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES produces *ONTIC* NECESSITY a REVERSE
TRANSCRIPTASE inhibitor as TETRACYTS being *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *THINGS*
*IN* *THE* *DIVINE* *MIND* *OPERATING* *INTELLECTUALLY*:

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #91 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; I am not a teller of lies.

    #VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
    #TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
    #POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
    #TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
    #CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
   @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
   @2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
   @3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
   @4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
   Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

Each of these twelve “waxing and waning” hexagrams, along with 48 other
hexagrams, also correspond to equal intervals of 6 7/80 days (in other
words, 1/60 of the solar year of 365 1/4 days). The remaining four
hexagrams found in the Changes, called “standard hexagrams,” correspond
to the solstices and equinoxes and thus to the four cardinal points of
the sun’s path. They are not segments of the cycle, then, but points
fixed in space, which move back and forth in time. The sun may pass
through one of them on any day of the lunar month in which it is
located. From the astronomer’s point of view, it is the new moons that
move back and forth around them. [Nylan, 15-16]

And on TETRA: #45 - *GREATNESS* which then made of the #POSITION as
comprising an ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI determinism within, YANG HSIUNG
comments: The truly *WISE* {

H7069@{
   @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
   @2: Sup: 69 (#88); Ego: 50 (#69),
   @3: Sup: 74 (#162); Ego: 5 (#74),
   @4: Sup: 80 (#242); Ego: 6 (#80),
   Male: #242; Feme: #80
} // #161

#161 as [#100, #50, #5, #6] = qanah (H7069): {UMBRA: #14 as #161 % #41 =
#38} 1) to get, acquire, create, buy, possess; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to get,
acquire, obtain; 1a1a) of God originating, creating, redeeming His
people; 1a1a1) possessor; 1a1b) of Eve acquiring; 1a1c) of *ACQUIRING*
*KNOWLEDGE*, *WISDOM*; 1a2) to buy; 1b) (Niphal) to be bought; 1c)
(Hiphil) to *CAUSE* *TO* *POSSESS*;

} PAYS CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE FIRST SMALL *SIGNS* *OF* *CHANGE* {

H5927@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
   @3: Sup: 45 (#107); Ego: 70 (#126),
   @4: Sup: 75 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
Ego: 30 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
   @5: Sup: 80 (#262); Ego: 5 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
   Male: #262; Feme: #161
} // #161

#161 as [#6, #50, #70, #30, #5] = `alah (H5927): {UMBRA: #4 as #161 %
#41 = #38} 1) to go up, ascend, climb; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to go up, ascend;
1a2) to meet, visit, follow, depart, withdraw, retreat; 1a3) to go up,
come up (of animals); 1a4) to spring up, grow, shoot forth (of
vegetation); 1a5) to go up, go up over, *RISE* (*OF* *NATURAL*
*PHENOMENON*); 1a6) to come up (before God); 1a7) to go up, go up over,
*EXTEND* (*OF* *BOUNDARY*); 1a8) *TO* *EXCEL*, *BE* *SUPERIOR* *TO*; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be taken up, be brought up, be taken away; 1b2) to
take oneself away; 1b3) to be exalted; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to bring up,
cause to ascend or climb, cause to go up; 1c2) to bring up, bring
against, take away; 1c3) to bring up, draw up, train; 1c4) to cause to
ascend; 1c5) to rouse, stir up (mentally); 1c6) to offer, bring up (of
gifts); 1c7) to exalt; 1c8) to cause to ascend, offer; 1d) (Hophal);
1d1) to be carried away, be led up; 1d2) to be taken up into, be
inserted in; 1d3) to be offered; 1e) (Hithpael) to lift oneself;

}, since no one [*POSSESSES*] sufficient strength to singlehandedly
defeat a well-developed trend. The sage looks at small details
overlooked by lesser men, making them the secure foundation of his
visionary rule. Again a self-evident truth on the encapsulation of
knowledge which is here conveyed as impetus of gnomic imperative
purveyed by the binomial designation of name in being validated by
experiential reality:

The Apostle is named *PAUL* {small; little}

The commentators unanimously prefer a different reading, however:

The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*.
It helps to use [this way] to become *GREAT*.
The *GREAT* do not view themselves as *GREAT*,
Meaning: They use 'keeping small' as the base.

Either reading is possible. (Compare with Appraisal 6 below.)

APPRAISAL 4: Though failing to get the knife he needs,
He enlarges his *GATES* outside the city.
Such fame is empty.
FATHOMING 4: Enlarging his *GATES* in suburbs
Means: As real worth goes, the name comes.

Position 4 corresponds to official rank. Chinese sumptuary rules limit
the construction and enlargement of high *GATES* to those honoured by
high rank by the emperor. Enlargement of the *GATES*, then, constitutes
public display of enhanced status. The petty man typically disregards
internal reform, concentrating instead on advertising himself. In this,
he fails to focus on what is fundamental. That his preoccupations are
far from *CENTRAL* is indicated by the *GATES* location out in the country

The *GREATNESS* of any house lies in its ability to concentrate is
resources. The *SHARP* knife symbolises the *SHARP* *MIND* able to
frame good decisions which benefit the community. The knife also
symbolizes *MONEY* since certain coins were minted in its image {

H3702@{
   @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
   @2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
   @3: Sup: 79 (#179); Ego: 80 (#160),
   @4: Sup: 80 (#259); Ego: 1 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
   Male: #259; Feme: #161
} // #161

#161 as [#20, #60, #80, #1] = kecaph (H3702): {UMBRA: #39 as #161 % #41
= #38} 1) silver; 1a) as metal; 1b) as *MONEY*;

} Here the house lacks either the incisive thinking or the material
resources it needs to flourish. How long can it sustain itself? Before
too long, its reputation will be shown to be *HOLLOW* {ie. this is an
equivalence to the mystical cabalistic interpretation given to the
Hebrew letter SAMEK as both the #15 magic square and its gematria value:

H5014@{
   @1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
   @2: Sup: 52 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 2 (#52),
   @3: Sup: 58 (#160); Ego: 6 (#58),
   @4: Sup: 60 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 2 (#60),
   Male: #220; Feme: #60
} // #60

#60 as [#50, #2, #6, #2] = nabab (H5014): {UMBRA: #12 as #60 % #41 =
#19} 1) (Qal) TO *HOLLOW* *OUT*; 1a) *HOLLOWED* (PARTICIPLE);

APPRAISAL 5: By using the Mean, he draws the outlines
Into his realm, and so is victorious.
FATHOMING 5: Bringing them in by *CENTRING*
Means: He oversees the *NINE* *BARBARIANS*.

Position 5 is aligned with Earth, with the *CENTRE*, and with
humaneness, the binding {ie. the BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS) IS NOT
MARRIAGE AS PROPOSED BY THE PYTHAGOREAN HETEROS THOERY OF NUMBER, BUT
HUMANENESS as having or showing compassion or benevolence; inflicting
the minimum of pain; [formal] (of a branch of learning) intended to have
a civilizing effect on people.

ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}

And under the Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth of
Australia of 1901, the binding agent as norm is defined under SECTION
VIII as the requirement to be "*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING*
unto Our said Governor General:

VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
*OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
*PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
*GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.

} agent for society. As such, it represents the virtue of *CENTRALITY*,
or 'keeping to the Mean.' By epitomising what is *CENTRAL*, the true
sage eventually gains power and authority over all four corners of the
earth. The rule functions as AXIS MUNDI around which other things
revolve. In return, all people are shielded from harm by the royal
presence {ie. The sovereign as ruler is the master of *MORAL*
transformation. If he would do Viewing of what he himself is, he should
do Viewing of the people who
themselves are morally transformed by their viewing as the *WATCHERS*}.

APPRAISAL 6: The *GREAT* fail because of the small;
The many, because of the few.
FATHOMING 6: The *GREAT* failing in the small
Means: The seemingly insignificant breeds disaster.

If the individual neglects what appear to be the only insignificant
beginnings of contrary trends, those unfortunate tendencies will
eventually grow to overwhelm present prosperity, much as a large wave
overwhelms tiny ripples. The true sage is on the lookout for the first
signs of disruption; by taking immediate steps to remedy the situation,
he can both adapt to and manipulate the situation for the benefit of the
Good. This is no less true in the private world of the soul than in the
public world of the court. [Canon of Supreme Mystery on Tetra 45, page #288]

And these APPRAISALS AS ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI AND FATHOMING AS SYNTHETIC
A POSTERIORI then as systematically comprise the INTELLECTUAL DECAD as
being equivalent to the Pythagoreans understanding of TEN as the
greatest number, as well for that it is the TETRACTYS, by that it
comprehends all arithmetical and harmonical proportions. Pythagoras
said, that TEN is the NATURE of NUMBER: because all Nations, Greeks,
[the *ARABS*] and *BARBARIANS*, reckon to it; and when they arrive at
it, return to the MONAD: as therefore compliant with the Chinese
perspective of the GRAND INCEPTION determined midnight of 21 DECEMBER
103 BCE.' [Chapter XIV, Pythagoras: His Life Teachings, Ninth Section
1687 edition of The History of Philosophy, p 529]

As the basis of the historical citation made within within the Epistle
to the Romans applies to the Chinese DAOist syncretic perennialist
philosophers whom published counterfactual works on the Religious
Mysteries in 4 / 2 BCE wherein the Canon of Supreme Mystery the
reference to the nine *BARBARIANS* appears equitable to the Pythagorean
binomial conception of Number and the cosmological dichotomy of limited
/ unlimited: “I AM DEBTOR BOTH TO THE GREEKS, AND TO THE *BARBARIANS* {

G915@{
   @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
   @2: Sup: 3 (#5); Ego: 1 (#3),
   @3: Sup: 22 (#27); Ego: 19 (#22),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#51); Ego: 2 (#24),
   @5: Sup: 25 (#76); Ego: 1 (#25),
   @6: Sup: 44 (#120); Ego: 19 (#44),
   @7: Sup: 33 (#153); Ego: 70 (#114),
   @8: Sup: 43 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 10 (#124),
   @9: Sup: 81 (#277); Ego: 38 (#162),
   Male: #277; Feme: #162
} // #486

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #476 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
Distortion;

THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *BOISTEROUS* *IN* *BEHAVIOUR*.

    #VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
    #TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
    #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
    #TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
    #CANON: #185

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_185@{
   @1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
   @2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
   @3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
   @4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
   Male: #108; Feme: #185
} // #185

#486 as [#2, #1, #100, #2, #1, #100, #70, #10, #200] = barbaros (G915):
{UMBRA: #18 as #476 % #41 = #25} 1) one whose speech is rude, rough and
harsh; 2) one who speaks a foreign or strange language which is not
understood by another; 3) *USED* *BY* *THE* *GREEKS* *OF* *ANY*
*FOREIGNER* *IGNORANT* *OF* *THE* *GREEK* *LANGUAGE*, *WHETHER* *MENTAL*
*OR* *MORAL*, with the added notion after the Persian war, of rudeness
and brutality. *THE* *WORD* *IS* *USED* *IN* *THE* *NEW* *TESTAMENT*
*WITHOUT* THE* *IDEA* *OF* *REPROACHFULNESS*;

} both to the wise, and to the unwise. So, as much as in me is, I am
ready to preach the gospel to you that are at Rome {power; strength}
also.” [Romans 1:14]

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...

@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...

#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - Remember the
Sabbath]) ...

#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
Honour your parents]) ...

#65 (@2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
- Do not kill]) ...

#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...

#175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- Do not steal]) ...

#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
Bear no false witness]) ...

#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - Covet Not])

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Chinese naming conventions such as is exemplar by:

Mao Ze Dong

or

Xi Jin Pin

“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]

A second possible interpretation consists in referring the expressions
“ANALYTICALLY” and “SYNTHETICALLY,” as they are used here, neither
directly to the expression “METHOD” nor, consequently, to the concept of
method in the Prolegomena. Indeed, in the Preface to the Groundwork,
Kant says only that he wants “TO TAKE THE WAY” first ANALYTICALLY and
then SYNTHETICALLY. This leaves the possibility open to read the
expressions in a conceptual-analytical or conceptual-synthetical sense.
If one follows this interpretation, the outcome of the first two
sections is constituted in the “SEARCH” (GMS, 392,3) for the supreme
principle of morality. The goal of this “SEARCH” is an exact formulation
of the categorical imperative. The procedure Kant uses for this is that
of conceptual analysis. The formula of the categorical imperative can be
found through the analytical process, but its validity cannot yet be
proven. For this reason, Kant shifts to the CONCEPTUAL-SYNTHETICAL
procedure in the third section and therewith to the “ESTABLISHMENT”
(GMS, 392,4) of the principle. In the first two sections, it is,
accordingly, solely a matter of ANALYTICAL JUDGMENTS. In contrast,
SYNTHETICAL JUDGMENTS, with which the proof of validity can be achieved,
would stand at the centre of the third section. [Horn & Schönecker
(eds.) Groundwork, Page 17-18]

TO BE CONTINUED ...

To what degree Kant’s proceedings in the Groundwork actually are to be
related to the Prolegomena is disputed among interpreters. In the end,
only an exact reconstruction of the entire line of argumentation through
the three sections of the work can provide insight into Kant’s method in
the Groundwork. His remarks in the Preface offer little assistance in
this endeavour. In the following section, therefore, I will not deal
with these questions any further. Instead, I inquire briefly into a
cluster of interpretation problems that the last section raises. This
cluster revolves around the question of the relation of the metaphysics
of morals to the Groundwork.

(a) The first problem arises from the fact that Kant thinks two types of
a “groundwork” for a pure moral philosophy are possible: on the one
hand, a “critique of pure practical reason,” and on the other hand, the
present work. Although he claims there is “really no other foundation”
than a “critique” (GMS, 391,17 f.), he believes that one can do without
such a critique and lists three reasons for this (see GMS,
391,20-392,2). It remains nevertheless unclear how the relation of the
Groundwork to the intimated critique of practical of reason is to be
defined.

(b) Equally unclear is the precise relation of the Groundwork to the
envisioned metaphysics of morals. Is the “groundwork” of a theory itself
to be considered a part of this theory or is what Kant calls the
“preliminary work of laying the ground” (GMS, 391,37) a part separate
from the actual metaphysics? Undoubtedly, the parts of the theory
developed in the Groundwork raise the claim of being independent of
empirical knowledge and therefore belong to a pure moral philosophy.
Thus, at least parts of the Groundwork have to be identical with parts
of a metaphysics of morals.

(c) Making matters more difficult in the identification of the relation
between the Groundwork, a metaphysics of morals, and the mentioned
“critique of pure practical reason” is the fact that Kant later
published monographs with these or slightly modified titles. In any
case, it may not simply be assumed that the later produced works
actually deal with the types of theories mentioned in the Preface to the
Groundwork.

How can the relations of these types of theory to each other be more
precisely defined? Is Kant’s expression “metaphysics of morals” a
unified concept or are there different meanings combined here in opaque
ways?

An approach toward the resolution of these difficulties offers perhaps a
more precise interpretation of what Kant understands by a “metaphysics
of morals.” In the opening passages of the Preface, Kant had defined the
metaphysics of morals with the help of three criteria: first of all, it
is a theory that is not purely formal but refers to particular objects.
It refers, secondly, to objects insofar as these are under “laws of
freedom.” {#492 - *FREEDOM* *OF* *WILL* / #41 = #12 as #9 - Autonomous
Nature being an *ONTOLOGICAL* *NECESSITY*} And thirdly, it is perfectly
free of empirical content. Therefore, a metaphysics of morals is a “pure
moral philosophy.” One question, however, remains unanswered. What
actually is a moral philosophy? Or articulated more precisely: what is
the ontological status of such a theory?

Kant’s arguments for the practical use or the necessity of such a
philosophy offer a suggestion for answering this question. A moral
philosophy is not only an object for the scientific discipline of
"philosophy." Rather, according to Kant, every rational being, even if
at times confused, carries in itself a moral philosophy. That raises the
question about what conception of “theory” can fulfil both of these
functions simultaneously.

For the clarification of this question I believe the conceptual
distinction between a theory, understood as an abstract system of
ordered propositions, and the presentation of such a theory, for example
in the form of a philosophical text, can be of further assistance. A
moral theory, understood as a system of propositions that stand in a
particular relation of grounding to each other and whose #41 - #CENTRE
is made up of ethical principles, is an abstract object, which can
simultaneously fulfill both functions. On the one hand, such a system
can be brought to expression with the help of a philosophical text. On
the other hand it is also possible to carry such a system “IN ONESELF,”
that is, to accept, the corresponding propositions.

If one takes such a conception of theory as a basis, the confusing
terminologies and exact relations of the types of theories mentioned by
Kant could be newly formulated and made transparent in the following
way: (i) A metaphysics of morals or a pure moral philosophy is an
abstract object, a system of propositions complete in itself and
containing all a priori judgments that are concerned with the laws of
freedom. (ii) A work with the title “Metaphysics of Morals” contains a
presentation of this system. The text expresses the corresponding
propositions and their connections. (iii) If a person carries such a
moral philosophy in herself, it means that she accepts the corresponding
propositions and their connections. And if this person is rational, the
propositions accepted by her will comprise the grounds of her action.
(iv) A work with the title “Critique of Pure Practical Reason” could be
a philosophical presentation of parts of this system of propositions
(and for this reason is suitable as a kind of “groundwork”). But it
contains additionally a presentation that relies on philosophical
theories on other spheres of investigation. In Kant’s words, “IN PART I
REQUIRE FOR A CRITIQUE A PURE PRACTICAL REASON THAT IF IT IS TO BE
COMPLETED, ITS UNITY WITH THE SPECULATIVE IN A COMMON PRINCIPLE MUST AT
THE SAME TIME BE EXHIBITED” (GMS, 391,24-27). (iv) In contrast, a work
with the title “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals” can restrict
itself entirely to the presentation and mediation of the foundational
part of
the metaphysics of morals. This contains, as Kant expresses it, “nothing
more than the search for and the establishment of the supreme principle
of morality” (GMS, 392,3 f.). [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork,
Page 18-21]

TO BE CONTINUED ...

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 2 September 2018

#ANALYTICAL #SYNTHETICAL #KORPPIONOIKEUS #FREEWILL
TT zonder paginanummer.
WTF?
Kwam ook op het journaal. Hij vond het al die
bedreigingen niet waard. Toch wel interessant
te zien hoeveel gekken er in Pakistan en de rest
van de wereld wonen.
Kondig eens met veel fanfare een cartoonwedstrijd aan waarin Jezus
belachelijk wordt gemaakt.
Ja hebt gelijk hoor dan worden er meteen honderden mensen vermoord
vlaggen verbrand, prijzen uitgeloofd om bp mensen te vermoorden.
Oh wacht oh nee, er gebeurd helemaal niks.
the life of Brian.
of
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Een uitstekend voorbeeld van het verschil tussen die achterlijke
barbaren en de normaal ontwikkelde wereld.
Maak gerust eenzelfde monty pyton film over the koran, dat
wordt lachen man.
Edmund
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Loading...