Discussion:
— SUBSUMING HINDU’S PRINCIPLE DEITIES INTO A MATHEMATICAL FUNCTION OF AN #2184 - ANTHROPOLOGIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AND FUNCTION
(zu alt für eine Antwort)
dolf
2019-01-27 09:40:28 UTC
Permalink
You are mistaken in that my metempirical / metaphysical philosophy and
theology as shown to you being a syncretism of Jewish Torah / DAOist
Humanist / Christian is transcendent being a trinomial paradigm to
#364 - Vishnu,
#312 - Shiva and
#273 - Brahma
Which I have clearly shown by subsuming HINDU’s Principle Deities into a
mathematical function of an #2184 - ANTHROPOLOGIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AND
FUNCTION.
*DO* *NOT* *MAKE* *THAT* *BLASPHEMOUS* *FALSE* *CLAIM* *AGAIN* AND SHOW A
GREATER #873 - PROBITY TOWARDS #115 - PREEMINENCE OTHERWISE WE MIGHT DIRECT
YOUR RETURN TO INDIA ON GROUNDS THAT YOU HAVE VIOLATED THE CRITERIA OF
CITIZENSHIP WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA.
Your snipped content has been restored...
#364 - Vishnu,
#312 - Shiva and
#273 - Brahma
YOUTUBE: “DOCTOR WHO (PARTING OF WAYS)”

India provides Indians with correct religious approaches involving superb
mythology and metaphysics with associated customs and traditions,
In the 1960s the ISKCON started. Hordes of whites started doing strange
things in India. My uncle was a police officer. I heard him tell my
father that it was a CIA trick. Like all the Bhagwan stuff a bit later.
Was your uncle lamenting the diminished opportunity for graft and
corruption since the ISKCON took all the money?
YOU ANSWERED YOUR OWN QUESTION: “I have led a sheltered life, in the
research field where only the #1 type (ie. my uncle police officer) were
around, but I could not help noticing how they were affected by [by graft
The very scum of the Earth who pretend to be the former. Being scum, they
know how to rise to top places.”
I do note that QUEEN VICTORIA was the EMPRESS OF INDIA at the time of
granting such PRESENTS to our nation as LETTERS PATENT to the FEDERATION OF
THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.
Before that time she was the biggest drug dealer on the planet.
Such exemplary sovereign dignity was obviously wasted on INDIA whom can
Atomic bombs are evil and Bollywood has no merit, but Indian cinema is
great though often only in flashes of singing and dancing.
#364 - Vishnu,
#312 - Shiva and
#273 - Brahma
YOUTUBE: “DOCTOR WHO (PARTING OF WAYS)”
http://youtu.be/6ThpkjDgdvY
India provides Indians with correct religious approaches involving superb
mythology and metaphysics with associated customs and traditions, many
beautiful languages, the best literature Sanskrit downwards, music and
dancing, art and architecture, agriculture and pottery, medicine and the
correct theories of state administration, weaving and animal rearing, the
best family values, the greatest views, the tasties dishes, the
healthiest approaches, etc.
True, one has to get out of India to appreciate the value of India, past
and also present. India can do a lot better when Indians acquire more
self-confidence in their past. This process has started with the election
of Modi, and I believe, will continue.
Case in point is that INDIANS migrate to AUSTRALIA and not AUSTRALIANS
migrate to INDIA.
No doubt. Indians have much to learn and Australia is a wonderful country
from where to learn and also live well in the process. Indians have a
right to migrate to Australia, for the British used the wealths from
India to develop Australia. And other colonies as well.
I have no doubt that Australians will migrate to India when conditions in
India suit them. That may happen, within 20-50 years, depending upon
progress in India. Some Australians I have met seem hopeful, given the
quality of infrastructure that has been built up in the last few years. I
think with good telecom and power tools, a lot of progress is possible
very fast. Let us see.
Thanks for your kind interest,
Arindam Banerjee
next comment he will have cursed the entire INDIAN pantheon of gods.
*CHECKMATE*
YOUTUBE: “ONE NIGHT IN BANGKOK (MURRAY HEAD)”

What do you think of my KRISHNA consciousness as dark humour?
YOUTUBE: “My Sweet Lord (George Harrison”

I do note that QUEEN VICTORIA was the EMPRESS OF INDIA at the time of
granting such PRESENTS to our nation as LETTERS PATENT to the FEDERATION OF
THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.
Such exemplary sovereign dignity was obviously wasted on INDIA whom can
“I was recently informed that Nile-mud Brahman priesthood off-scouring the
most common sort in INDIA - are composed of two types.
1. Decent, laid back, hard-working, kindly, etc. who are the salt of the
earth and so have made the country what it is - from something rejected by
paternal England, to what it is now, with high value real estate prices,
most livable cities, fine roads and services, etc.
2. The very scum of the Earth who pretend to be the former. Being scum,
they know how to rise to top places.
I have led a sheltered life, in the research field where only the #1 type
were around, but I could not help noticing how they were affected by the #2
types.
In which category [as contortions of truth state of sapience and bearing
their buttholes to the sun] are INDIAN [yoga practitioner] politicians to
quote so as to assay universal truth about India’s sacred cows]
Case in point is that INDIANS migrate to AUSTRALIA and not AUSTRALIANS
migrate to INDIA.
YOUTUBE: “Toto - Africa (Official Music Video)”

That the constitution to our democracy comes with its own sapient trinomial
mathematical theoretical noumenon by which we can assay your INDIAN speak

(#72); Ego: 31 (#31)},
(#149); Ego: 63 (#94)},
Ego: 14 (#108)},
IDEA ‘CONSCIOUS ONLY THAT MY IMAGINATION PLACES ONE STATE BEFORE, THE
OTHER AFTER’); Ego: 33 (#141)},
(#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *BY* *UNSCRUPULOUS* *INDIAN*); Ego: 5 (#146 - I AM
NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15})}
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783 as APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION 1789)
IDEA B233: “All alterations take place in accordance with the law of the
connection of cause and effect.
PROOF: I perceive that appearances succeed one another, that is, that one
state of a thing exists at one time, the opposite of which existed in the
previous state. I am therefore actually connecting two perceptions in time.
Now connection is no act of mere sense and intuition, but is here the
product of a synthetic faculty of the imagination that determines the inner
sense with respect to relation in time. The imagination can however conjoin
the aforementioned two states in two different ways, so that either one or
the other would precede in time; for time cannot be perceived in itself and
what precedes and what follows in objects determined, as it were
empirically, in relation to it. I am therefore conscious only that my
imagination places one state before, the other after, not that in the
object one precedes the other; or, in other words, the objective relation
of the appearances that succeed one another remains undetermined through
mere perception. In order then for this relation to be cognized as
determined, the relation between the two states must be so thought that it
is thereby determined with necessity which of them must be placed before,
which after, and not the reverse.
However, the concept that carries with it a necessity of synthetic unity
{ie. faculty #41 x n of moral prescriptions} can only be a pure concept of
the understanding, and effect, in which the former determines the latter in
time as consequence, and not merely as something that could precede it in
the imagination (or not be perceived at all). It is, then, only because we
subject the succession of appearances, hence all alterations, to the law of
causality that experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the
appearances – is possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects of
experience are possible only in accordance with this very law: #2184 / 7 =
#312” [pages 184-185]
AS UNCONSCIONABLE AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDUCT AS BREACHES TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 {
#371 - *SAINT* *ANDREWS* *AS* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *30* *NOVEMBER* *FIVE*
*YEAR*: 4 x #364 + #371 = #1827 *LITURGICAL* *CALENDAR*,
#288 - *REMEMBRANCE* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI* *PROTOTYPE*,
#390 - *WREATHS* / *SOVEREIGNTY*,
#312 - *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI*
*PROTOTYPE*,
#419 - *SLAUGHTER*
} OF DETERMINED AND PREMEDITATED BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING RACIAL
HATRED, ANTI-SEMITISM BY ESPECIALLY *INDIANS* / ROMAN CATHOLICS /
FREEMASONRY AS KNIGHTS TEMPLARS BEING AN UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER AND
PSYCHOSEXUAL SLANDER AGAINST WHICH THEY HAVE NOT BEEN RESPONSIVE.
- dolf
There are those who are funny when they try to be serious. There are
those who are funny when they write nonsense. Then there are those who
write nonsense seriously. That too can be funny, but when they are merely
peculiar then they are bad comics.
-- GREAT #273 - MOMENTS AT THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM (22 TO 25 JANUARY 2019)
ON THE #364 - QUESTION OF CLIMATE CHANGE AS BEING LOGICAL #312 -
CONTRADICTIONS ADVANCED DURING DEBATE
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 25 January 2019
Jacinda Ardern has given a powerful rebuke to her fellow heads-of-state who
refuse to act on climate change."
<https://www.facebook.com/sbsnews/videos/2204421053147316/>
NEW ZEALAND PRIME MINISTER: "There's nothing to fear about your individual
political status.
Actually, this is about being on the *RIGHT* *SIDE* *OF* *HISTORY*, and do
you want to be a *LEADER* that you look back in time and say that you were
on the wrong side of the argument when the world was *CRYING* *OUT* for a
solution, and it's as simple as that, I think."
AL GORE (ENVIRONMENTALIST): "Well said, well said."
DOLF: “Miss Ardern is only the cause for illegitimate outcomes as
bastardised reality and is incapable of an ‘I DO’ on any #2184 -
*ANTHROPOCENTRIC* topic {#2184 / 6 = #364; #2184 / 7 = #312; #2184 / 8 =
#273} be it environment or self interest...
— WE #273 - REMEMBER YOUR FORGET —
“LEST WE FORGET.
TO FIRST #288 - REMEMBER.
THIS NATION’S TUNE.
AS SOVEREIGN BEGET.
ISN’T NAZI DISTEMPER.
BUT BY PRIVY TRIBUNE.
NO #364 - OBEY, #312 - AID, #273 - ASSIST REGRET.”
HISTORICAL CHRISTIAN WEDDING VOW: "I, *NAME* *OF* *BRIDE*, #312 - *TAKE*
*THEE* {ie. A WILLING, WILL}, *NAME* *OF* *GROOM* to be my #2184 -
*LAWFULLY* {ie. LAWS OF NATURE} wedding husband. To have and to hold #273 -
*FROM* *THIS* *DAY* *FORWARD* {ie. SUCCESSIVELY IN ORDER}, for richer or
poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and #364 - *OBEY* until death do
we part, today I pledge my faithfulness."
There is nothing between us because of #273 v’s #288 due to you having no
value within your life...
YOUTUBE: "Paradise By The Dashboard Light (Meat Loaf)"

DID YOU SWEAR AN OATH OF OFFICE JACINDA?”
sure are words, but also numbers.”
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION OF
@318] This question, which is the highest point that transcendental
philosophy can ever reach, and up to which, as its boundary and completion,
it must be taken, actually contains two questions.
FIRST: How is nature possible in general in the material sense, namely,
according to intuition, as the sum total of appearances; how are space,
time, and that which fills them both, the object of sensation, possible in
general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of our sensibility, in
accordance with which our sensibility is affected in its characteristic way
by objects that are in themselves unknown to it and that are wholly
distinct from said appearances. This answer is, in the book itself, given
in the TRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC, {ie. The first part of the Transcendental
Doctrine of Elements (see pape 137) of Critique of Pure Reason} but here in
the Prolegomena through the solution of the first main question.
SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of the
rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be thought as
connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out otherwise than: it
is possible only by means of the constitution of our understanding, in
accordance with which all these *REPRESENTATIONS* *OF* *SENSIBILITY* *ARE*
*NECESSARILY* *REFERRED* *TO* *ONE* *CONSCIOUSNESS*, *AND* *THROUGH*
*WHICH*, *FIRST*, *THE* *CHARACTERISTIC* *MANNER* *OF* *OUR* *THINKING*,
*NAMELY* *BY* *MEANS* *OF* *RULES*, *IS* *POSSIBLE*, *AND* *THEN*, *BY*
HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35 - I
AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]
OF MATERIALITY {3 x #1091: THAT #1092 = 3 x #364 IS THE 'OTH CYCLE OF THE
JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE}: "WHO HATH TAKEN THIS *COUNSEL* {
@1 (#1) + @2 (#41) + @3 (#81) + @4 (#369) = #10 (#492) / #12 = #41 - ONTIC
NECESSITY ESPOUSED BY 'ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL' (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER
1900}) WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL BASIS TO EMPIRE GOVERNANCE
} AGAINST TYRE {strength; rock; sharp}, THE CROWNING CITY, WHOSE MERCHANTS
ARE PRINCES, WHOSE TRAFFICKERS ARE THE HONOURABLE OF THE EARTH?" [Isaiah
23:8]
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO BE
#364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 - SEPULCHRE}, AND
#273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS
OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS
DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = SUNSET 11 SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE
EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR
PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR
LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
*OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) = #491 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTINUITY
TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL
SEEM MEET.”
Which is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects in
themselves. This answer is, in the book itself, given in the TRANSCENDENTAL
LOGIC, {ie. The second part of the Transcendental Doctrine of Elements,
coordinate with the Aesthetic, though much longer (see page 137) of
Critique of Pure Reason} but here in the Prolegomena, in the course of
solving the second main question.
But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and answered,
because we always have need of them in turn for all answering and for all
thinking of objects.
There are many #2184 - LAWS OF NATURE that we can know only through
experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances, i.e., nature
because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a priori at the
basis of its possibility.
The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the #2184
- UNIVERSAL LAW OF NATURE, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature {ie. #1827 =
4 x #364 + #371} except as the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the
representations in us, and so we cannot get the laws of their connection
from anywhere else except the principles of their connection in us, i.e.,
from the conditions of necessary *UNIFICATION* *IN* *ONE* *CONSCIOUSNESS*,
which unification constitutes the possibility of experience.
According to IMMANUEL KANT, DAVID HUME (died 25 August 1776, Edinburgh) was
a Scottish Enlightenment philosopher, historian, economist, and essayist,
who is best known today for his highly influential system of philosophical
empiricism, skepticism, and naturalism, who had raised objections to the
notions of equality and congruence (among others) within geometry, which
objections appealed to experience (Treatise, i.ii.4.4, pp. 42–53), thereby
subjecting mathematics to experience, and whereby he also *INCORRECTLY*
rejected THE CONCEPTION THAT MATHEMATICS CONSIDERS ITS OBJECTS
#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 = #273 -
*MOMENT*
As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
*CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the principle of #312 -
#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {
*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN DIALECTS OF CONTRADICTIONS ON
NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING
v's
#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CYCLE BLASPHEMY CENTRED
UPON 30 NOVEMBER AS SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE} +
#728 - REACTANCE {8 x #91 = 2 x #273 + #182 - *LIMIT*} +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27 MAY
1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 - PRIESTLY
SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}
AS UNCONSCIONABLE AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDUCT AS BREACHES TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 {
#371 - *SAINT* *ANDREWS* *AS* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *30* *NOVEMBER* *FIVE*
*YEAR*: 4 x #364 + #371 = #1827 *LITURGICAL* *CALENDAR*,
#288 - *REMEMBRANCE* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI* *PROTOTYPE*,
#390 - *WREATHS* / *SOVEREIGNTY*,
#312 - *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI*
*PROTOTYPE*,
#419 - *SLAUGHTER*
} OF DETERMINED AND PREMEDITATED BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING RACIAL
HATRED, ANTI-SEMITISM BY ESPECIALLY ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY AS
KNIGHTS TEMPLARS BEING AN UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER AND PSYCHOSEXUAL SLANDER
AGAINST WHICH THEY HAVE NOT BEEN RESPONSIVE.
*NATURE* {ie.
#24 x #7 x #13 as #2184 ipso facto
6 x #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY AS OBEDIENT(H7522) {#273 as [#6, #7, #20,
#200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1) *REMEMBRANCE*},
7 x #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION AS AIDING(H5826) {#273 as [#40, #50,
#8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion (G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*},
8 x #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC SUCCESSION AS ASSISTING / DEVOTE
1) *WEAK*; *INCAPACITY*}
UNTO THE GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 =
SUNSET 11 SEPTEMBER 2001} IS A REQUIREMENT OF ALL CITIZENS UNDER SECTION
VIII OF QUEEN VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT
} that we can know only through experience, but lawfulness in the
connection of appearances, i.e., nature in general, we cannot come to know
through any experience, because experience itself has need of such laws,
which lie a priori at the basis of its possibility.
That there was a determined campaign of partiality shown to the BOER WAR
MEMORIAL established on 29 OCTOBER 1909 being the cornerstone of Australian
identity as ethos of "#OBEDIENT, #AIDING AND #ASSISTING" and we reject
CATEGORICALLY their unreasoned disloyalty by INTELLECTUAL assent given to
FOREIGN POWERS {ie. ESPECIALLY IRISH, SCOTTISH, RSL / FREEMASONRY / ROMAN
CATHOLIC [BY] SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE} as all unconscionable attempts
#FIVE [#114/#342 ***]} against the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS
whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL {#235 - ADOLF HITLER'S (1941 - 1944)
TABLE TALK ON 7 JUNE 1942 AS IDEA: *ANYONE* *WHO* *FOR* *FALSE* *REASONS*
*OF* *MERCY* *DEVIATES* *FROM* *THIS* *CLEAR* *PRINCIPLE* *IS* *AIDING*,
*WILLINGLY* *OR* *UNWILLINGLY*, *THE* *DISSOLUTION* *OF* *THE* *STATE*}
#ONE [#78/#234 ***]} the SOVEREIGNTY embodied within the Governor General
as ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE {#2184}.
The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as the
sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so we
cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
*PRINCIPLES* {ie. #390 + #312 + #390 = #1092 or #364 + #312 + #728 + #390 +
*CONDITIONS* *OF* *NECESSARY* *UNIFICATION* *IN* *ONE* *CONSCIOUSNESS*,
*WHICH* *UNIFICATION* *CONSTITUTES* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*."
[page 70]
have we stumbled upon here? Surely this is a bot...”
ENTRAILS.
1) the PRE-PLATONIC advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) a principle proponent
of the PYTHAGOREAN doctrine considered the Natural Year to be 364.5 days
which is identical to the Chinese trinomial conception of number that by
its circularity conveys an #41 - ONTIC: #205 + #164 = #369 organisation as
premise of #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY for #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
<Loading Image...>
2) PYTHAGORAS invented the binomial number methodology #36 - ELEMENTS so
that by new sciences diminished the need for “*CONJURED* *PIETY* *BY*
*READING* *THE* *ENTRAILS* *OF* *SLAUGHTERED* *CHICKENS*”

“Upon the near affinity which Pythagoras (following Orpheus) conceived to
be between the gods and numbers, he collected a kind of Arithmancy. This he
not only practiced himself, but communicated to his disciples—as is
manifest from Iamblichus, who cites this fragment of the Sacred Discourse,
a book ascribed to him.
“Concerning the gods of Pythagoras, son of Mnesarchus, I learned this when
I was initiated at Libeth in Thrace, Aglaophemus administering the rites to
me. Orpheus, son of Calliope, instructed by his mother in the Pangaean
mountain, said that number is an eternal substance, the most provident
principle of the universe: heaven, and earth, and middle nature; likewise
the root of divine beings, and of gods and daemons.”
Hence (says Iamblichus) it is manifest that Pythagoras received from the
traditions of Orpheus the doctrine that numbers hold the determinate
essence of the gods. *BY* *THESE* *NUMBERS* *HE* *FRAMED* *A* *WONDERFUL*
*SYSTEM* *OF* *DIVINATION* *AND* *SERVICE* *OF* *THE* *GODS*. This had the
closest affinity to numbers {ie.
MIND: #1 + #2 = #3
SCIENCE: #3 + #4 = #7
OPINION: #5 + #6 = #11
SENSE: #7 + #8 = #15
#3 + #7 + #11 + #15 = #36 AS ITS SCHEMA OF DIVINATION
AND A #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS EQUIVALENTLY 64 ELEMENTS OF A
BINOMIAL METHODOLOGY}, as may be evinced from hence (for it is requisite to
give an instance for confirmation of what we say).
The student of Pythagoras, Abaris, performed those kinds of sacrifices to
which he was accustomed, and *DILIGENTLY* *PRACTICED* *DIVINATION* *AFTER*
*THE* *WAYS* *OF* *THE* *BARBARIANS* *BY* *VICTIMS* (*PRINCIPALLY* *OF*
*COCKS*, *WHOSE* *ENTRAILS* *THEY* *CONCEIVED* *TO* *BE* *MOST* *EXACT*
*FOR* *INSPECTION*). Pythagoras, not willing to take him away from his
study of truth; yet, in order to direct him by a safer way, without blood
and slaughter (moreover esteeming the cock sacred to the Sun), taught
Abaris to find out all truth by the science of arithmetic. Thus says
Iamblichus, who writes elsewhere that Pythagoras, instead of the art of
divining by sacrifices, taught that kind of prediction which is by numbers,
conceiving that to be more sacred and divine, and more agreeable to the
celestial nature of the gods.
This hint some have taken to impose upon the world, under the name of
Pythagoras, an Onomantic kind of arithmetic—assigning particular numbers to
the letters of the alphabet, to the *PLANETS*, to the days of the week, and
to the signs of the Zodiac. They thereby resolve questions concerning
nativities, victory, life or death, journeys, prosperity or adversity.
*SUCH* *A* *SYSTEM* *IS* *SET* *DOWN* *BY* *FLUDD*, {
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL* *DOCTRINE*
41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 61
(#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3
APRIL 33 AD),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC
GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL 33 AD);
Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin voluntās f (genitive voluntātis).
- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such as
mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of the natural world.
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin nōluntās f (genitive nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used in
reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian philosophies
associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the natural world.
- Robert Fludd was born at Milgate House, Bearsted and was the son of Sir
Thomas Fludd, a high-ranking governmental official (Queen Elizabeth I's
treasurer for war in Europe), and Member of Parliament.
KANT’s implementation of SYMBOLICAL associator to the NOUMENON as having a
#41 - *ONTIC* necessity with CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING which
incontrovertibly conform to a COGNITION of a trinomial as HOMOIOS THEORY OF
NUMBER that has a definitive impetus from 1783 and thusly we can by such
APRIORITY CASCADE against subsequent HISTORY and is capable of BEREAVING
SOVEREIGN STATES of IDENTITY which as MARRIAGE / SOVEREIGN DYNAMIC has been
built on castles of SAND which deploys a microcosm binomial redefinition
(HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER) of those APRIORITY trinomial CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING.
} who adds that Apollonius has delivered another *WAY* *OF* *DIVINATION*
*ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *PYTHAGOREAN* *DOCTRINE*: {
@1 - @728 - PASSOVER {#ONE: FRIDAY OF 3 APRIL 33 AD},
@5 - PENTECOST {#FIVE: + 7x7+1 AS 50 DAYS ON 23 MAY WHICH *CONFLICTS*
*WITH* *ARCHBISHOP* *GEORGE* *PELL'S* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* AT SAINT
PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CATHEDRAL, MELBOURNE UPON PENTECOST SUNDAY / BEERSHEBA
MEMORIAL DAY OF 31 MAY 1998 AND PENTECOST {#382 - *THE* *SCIENCE* *INTO*
*A* *PERMANENT* *STATE*; #383; #384; #385; #386} OF SUNDAY 21 JUNE 2000
(SOLAR ECLIPSE YEAR FOLLOWING: Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#382 / #385} / HETEROS
#337 as [#30, #50, #7, #200, #10, #40] = naziyr (H5139): {UMBRA: #7 as #267
% #41 = #21} 1) consecrated or devoted one, Nazarite; 1a) *CONSECRATED*
*ONE*; 1b) *DEVOTEE*, Nazarite; 1c) untrimmed (vine);
{UMBRA: #6 as #414 % #41 = #4} 1) *HOLY*, *SEPARATE*; 2) (TWOT) *ANGELS*,
*SAINTS*;
AS BEING COGENT #364 - *QUESTIONS* *OF* #430 - *LAW* AGAINST #364 x 4 +
#371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY OF THE SECOND VATICAN
COUNCIL BY EXPLANTATION AND SUBSTANTIATION MADE OF A LEGITIMATE IDENTITY TO
JEWISH / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES AS A SECTARIAN ASSOCIATION OF NAZARENES / #509
- YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY [Acts 24:1-6; Acts 28:17-22] WHICH WAS
INITIALLY CONVEYED WITHIN OUR INSTRUCTIONS TO LEGAL COUNSEL DATED 18
NOVEMBER 2018
#65 - *SOLDIER* {MARS},
#175 - MARRIAGE {VENUS} THEURGIC COSMOGONIC SYNCRETISM) OF NEOPLATONISM
COMMONLY USED BY PYTHAGOREAN NUMBER DERIVED GOVERNANCE (ROMAN CATHOLICISM /
ISLAM etc)
} affirming that future things may be prognosticated by virtue of a wheel
invented by Pythagoras. Hereby is treated of life and death, of fugitives,
of litigious business, of victories, of the sex of children unborn, and
infinite others of the like kind. But concerning the exposition of the
wheel, and the true position of numbers, therein the ancient authors have
written very inconstantly. So that the truth of its composition cannot be
comprehended otherwise than by conjecture. What ancient authors he means I
know not. The citation of Apollonius I doubt to be no less an assumption
than the wheel itself, which Trithemius and others acknowledge to be an
invention of later times.” [NINTH SECTION OF the 1687 EDITION OF THE
HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY: Pythagoras: His Life and Teaching, a Compendium of
Classical Sources, Part IX, Chapter 15, Page 529]
This would appear to be the basis of the premise of the Apostle Paul's
theology: "Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for
God hath showed it unto them.
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly
seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power
Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither
were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish
heart was darkened.
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory
of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to
birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their
own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed
the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more
than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen." [Romans 1:19-25 (KJV)]
"For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That
And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my
body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.
After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying,
This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink
it, in remembrance of me.
For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do show the
Lord’s death till he come.
Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord,
unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let a
man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that
cup.
For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation
to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body.
For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. For if
we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. But when we are judged,
we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the
world." [1 Corinthians 11:23-32 (KJV)]
3) SOME WOULD SUGGEST this is identical to the NUMBER COMMENTARY METHOD OF
DIVINATION WITHIN THE MYSTERY where similarly there were #36 YARROW STALKS
{ie. the process of bifurcation resulted in 1, 2 or 3} within the T’AI
HSUAN set.
Thus the questions are whether any such PhD established upon the binomial
methodology is little better than chicken shit void of any capacity to make
any sound judgment upon ALL.
That such mystical proclivities need to be differentiated from neo-fascism
as also a *PROMOTION* *OF* *NEOPLATONIC* *HELLENISM*
Show me salvation.”
AS PER MY 31 DECEMBER 2018 CORRESPONDENCE TO THE REGISTRAR OF THE LATROBE
COUNTY COURT WITHIN APPEAL CASE NUMBERS: AP-18-0609 / AP-18-0775 /
AP-18-0794 / AP-18-2201 / AP-18-2202, it is reasonably alleged that the
RESPONDENTS within each of these APPEALS have by determined means conveyed
SECTION VIII - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS SOVEREIGNTY
SECTION IX - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY AS SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE
TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS CONVEYING THE
PERSISTENCE OF SUBSTANCE MADE AGAINST ELIZABETH {THE OATH, FULLNESS OF GOD}
REGINA II and thereby is an impunity of the DIGNITY ROYAL as actions being
facilitated by the abnormal BOER WAR MEMORIAL #390 - WREATH PLACEMENT which
subsequently occurred upon 27 OCTOBER 2018 and #312 - WITHERED STATE
REMOVAL upon MONDAY 5 NOVEMBER 2018 as undertaken by DETERMINED IGNOMINIOUS
ACTIONS of MALEFICENCE PERPETUATED against the DIGNITY ROYAL which is
unambiguously defined by a proximity VICTORIA PARK OAK TREE PLANTING EVENT
OF 27 OCTOBER 1934 as coinciding with the dedication of the WORLD WAR ONE
WAR #288 - MEMORIAL situated within HYDE PARK, SYDNEY.
As a consideration which needs to be firstly addressed by the COURT being a
PROBITY AND DECORUM question of the PERMISSIBILITY AS TO THE LAWFULNESS OF
ORGANISATIONS'
HAVING A PARASITIC IMPOST UPON #288 - REMEMBRANCE WORLD WAR ONE 2018
CENTENNIAL COMMEMORATIONS as a #364 - *QUESTION* *OF* #430 - *LAW* which we
have in the past conveyed to the STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERALS, ought
to given such gravitas, as conveyed by SECTION VIII to QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 [then referred with requisite suitable
apriority impetus, to the HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA for consideration, and
over which legal precedents have frequently been made concerning the
legitimacy of FEDERAL MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT holding dual nationality].
WITH RESPECTS TO SUBSTANTIATING THE CLAIM OF IMPETUS OF *PRO* *DOMO* BY A
LOGICAL FALLACY OF DUPLICITOUS REDEFINITION BY #288 - UMBRA MANIPULATION
MADE TO CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING #311 AGAINST MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND
THAT OF IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA PUBLISHED WITHIN 1783 WHICH DUE TO HIS
FORMER RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IS AS PREVIOUSLY SHOWN ALREADY COGNISANT OF THE
SPECTRUM AS HEBREW (22 / 7 as RATIONAL PI) and GREEK (24) IPSO FACTO: #2184
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING THAT ARE EXHIBITED WITHIN ASSOCIATIONS MADE TO
TETRAGRAMMATON {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} HIERARCHY
VALUE AS THE METAPHYSICAL CATEGORICAL APRIORITY IMPERATIVE TO THE HOMOIOS
GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL 33 AD}, 54
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
#311 as [#70, #10, #20, #10, #1, #200] = oikia (G3614): {UMBRA: #21 as #111
% #41 = #29} 1) a house; 1a) an inhabited edifice, a dwelling; 1b) the
inmates of a house, the family; 1c) property, wealth, goods;
#22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children
(which relates to the cultivation of mind and morals, and employs for this
purpose now commands and admonitions, now reproof and punishment) It also
includes the training and care of the body; 2) whatever in adults also
cultivates the soul, esp. by correcting mistakes and curbing passions.; 2a)
instruction which aims at increasing virtue; 2b) chastisement, chastening,
(of the evils with which God visits men for their amendment);
THAT BOTH MY SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE HUMAN RIGHTS EXPRESSED BY ANY
ENTITLEMENT OF AUTONOMY AS A SAPIENT PERSON AND MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
KNOWN AS GRAPPLE369 BEING A TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL THEORETICAL NOUMENON IS
BEING SPECIFICALLY AND SYSTEMATICALLY TARGETED BY A SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE
CÉLÈBRE INSTITUTIONAL IMPERATIVE SUCH AS THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL
AS AN UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER ESTABLISHED WITHIN 2015 DUE TO #288 - UMBRA
DATA MANIPULATION AS CONSTITUTING SETTING A TRAP OR DEVICE PROHIBITED UNDER
SECTION 26 (10 years maximum) CRIMES ACT OF VICTORIA (1958) AND
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT OF SUCH INNOVATION AS MINE INVALIDATING THE
ORTHODOX AND ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH'S CLAIM TO JUBILEE2000 AS BEING ENTIRELY
DELUSIONAL AND FRAUDULENT BY A 16TH MAY 2000 REPORT TITLED 'GOOD DESIGN AND
THE CONCEPTION/NOTION OF PARKING AGREEMENT IN A PRIVATE STREET WITHIN AN
AREA TO WHICH APPLIES A HISTORIC OVERLAY' PREPARED IN RESPONSE TO A NOTICE
OF AN APPLICATION FOR PLANNING PERMIT REFERENCE TP00/55 WHICH WAS
SUBSEQUENTLY SUBJECT TO A VCAT HEARING.
HOWEVER WHEN SUCH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ARE ALSO ALIGNED WITH THE PRESENTS
{ie. HEAVENLY (EPOURANIOS) GIFT (DŌREA: a gratuity:—gift) [Hebrews 6:4-12]
as *GLOBUS* *CRUCIGER*} OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTES PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER
1900, THEN THE CONTEMPT BY PERSONS WHICH IS HABITUALLY MADE AGAINST #492 -
AUTONOMOUS FREEWILL {
@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = @10 {#492 / #12 = #41}
} AS A SAPIENT PERSON HUMAN RIGHT {
*AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*
} BEING SHOWN AS CONTRAVENTIONS OF KANT’S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE
METAPHYSICS (1785) SYMBOLIC SCHEMA WHICH IS COMPLIANT WITH JURISPRUDENCE'S
CAPACITY TO FRAME LEGISLATION DEFINING PROTECTIONS AGAINST AUTONOMY IT
BECOMES IN THE CIRCUMSTANCE OF #343 - RIGHTS OF SUCCESSION, A TRANSGRESSION
AGAINST THE DIGNITY ROYAL AS SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE #390 - SOVEREIGN
"AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE TO OURSELVES OUR HEIRS AND SUCCESSORS, FULL POWER
AND AUTHORITY FROM TIME TO TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR
LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL SEEM MEET"
AS TREASON AGAINST THE ENABLING THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH TO BECOME A
REPUBLIC (ie. THE FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH) AS A SOVEREIGN
ENTITY WITHIN ITS OWN RIGHT AND ENTITLEMENT.
GIVEN ITS USAGE WITHIN IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SCHEMA IS A INTERSECTION
OF #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY AND #81 - SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION INFRACTION AS
CONSTITUTING TREASON THERE OUGHT TO BE SEVERE LEGAL PENALTIES SOUGHT."
don’t try to explain it only makes it worse.
your comment yesterday: “Covington Catholic School, educating those fine
young men who hurled racist abuse at a First Nation...”
You hold Catholic views that are racist, anti Semitic and as sedition
against this nation.
Nothing to be proud of in my humble opinion.”
@220 / @228} TO PRINCIPLES OF PARTICULAR SECTIONS VIII / IX QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS CONVEYING THE PERSISTENCE OF
SUBSTANCE MADE AGAINST ELIZABETH {THE OATH, FULLNESS OF GOD} REGINA II and
of TREASON the ONUS of accountability is placed upon OTHERS having no
entitlement for any use of that INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY in such a manner
whatsoever.
Nature [#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
{UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12} 1) an encompassing, compass, circuit; 2) that
which is contained; 2a) the contents of any writing SUCH AS QUEEN VICTORIAS
LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS DICTUM OF #2184 - FREEDOM from #1827 -
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC* necessity
comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
THUS IF THE SUBJECT IS SACRED, AND THE SUBJECT IS SOVEREIGN ACCORDINGLY IT
REQUIRES A THRESHOLD OF #873 - *PROBITY* AND #644 - *DECORUM* AS #123 -
*JUDGMENT* *SENSIBILITY* THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY GREATER THAN THEIR EXHIBITED
#101 - *INDOLENT* TERRESTRIAL MANNER.”
next level 🤔.
Using your big-boy words, tell us what exactly is the problem...”
enjoyable, informative and robust chat with Phoebe from “My Health Records”
and conveyed some 8 pages as this entire narrative given the circumstance
of the “Registry of #451 - births, #873 - deaths and #175 - marriages” is a
government function.
I’m not responsible your ignorance as peter unprincipled.”
- dolf
Initial Post: 23 January 2019
#WeRemember
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2019-02-17 19:12:06 UTC
Permalink
-- CONSTIPATED IDEAS --

"OH SUCH NUGGET OF WISDOM.
BESTOWAL OF TURGID REALITY.
BIRTHED BY IGNORANT SCUM.
INFINITE AGE GIVING BANALITY.
HEY MISSUS NOW WIPE MY BUM.
ENDLESS REACH MY STUPIDITY." {@7: Sup: 33 (#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65
- *SOLDIER*); Ego: 60 (#318: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) EXCERPT OF IDEA: @318 FROM SECTION #36 - HOW
IS NATURE ITSELF POSSIBLE?
This question, which is the highest point that transcendental philosophy
*CAN* *EVER* *REACH*, *AND* *UP* *TO* *WHICH*, *AS* *ITS* *BOUNDARY*
*AND* *COMPLETION*, it must be taken, actually contains two questions.

FIRST: How is nature possible in general in the material sense, namely,
according to intuition, as the sum total of appearances; how are space,
time {#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 =
#65 - SOLDIER {*DODECAHEDRON*} as Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *DO* *NOT* *KILL*

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CELEBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

}, and that which fills them both, the object of sensation {

#175 - MARRIAGE {*ICOSAHEDRON*} as Principle of Persistent Substance
{#205} - Discriminating Norm {#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO*
*NOT* *STEAL*

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist {ie.
ADOLF HITLER & ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE: @1, @5, #65 - SOLDIER, #175 -
MARRIAGE: *DODECAHEDRON* + *ICOSAHEDRON* = TETRAD / *TETRACTYS*},
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD /
TETRACTYS

}, possible in general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of
our sensibility, in accordance with which our #123 - *SENSIBILITY* is
affected in its characteristic way by objects that are in themselves
unknown to it and that are wholly distinct from said appearances. This
answer is, in the book itself, given in the Transcendental Aesthetic,
but here in the Prolegomena through the solution of the first main question.

SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of
the rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be
thought as connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out
otherwise than: it is possible only by means of the constitution of our
understand- ing, in accordance with which all these representations of
sensibility are necessarily referred to one consciousness, and through
which, first, the characteristic manner of our thinking, namely by means
of rules, is possible, and then, by means of these rules, experience is
possible – which is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects
in themselves. This answer is, in the book itself, given in the
Transcendental Logic,16 but here in the Prolegomena, in the course of
solving the second main question.

But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and
answered, because we always have need of them in turn for all answering
and for all thinking of objects:

Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial
consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial
rationality in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ONTIC
necessity as conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):

6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry
7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction
8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression

What then is A-U-M?

“For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed [the
righteousness] of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter
into the kingdom of heaven.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]

Whom is holier than thou?

There are many #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* that we can know only
through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
i.e., nature in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any
experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
priori at the basis of its possibility.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification
constitutes the possibility of experience.

Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this
entire part, that universal #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* can be cognized
a priori, already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest
legislation for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding,
and that we must not seek the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
from nature by means of experience, but, conversely, must seek nature,
as regards its universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of
the possibility of experience that lie in our sensibility and
understanding; for how would it otherwise be possible to become
acquainted with these laws a priori, since they are surely not rules of
analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic amplifications of
cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary agreement, between the
principles of possible experience and the laws of the possibility of
nature, can come about from only two causes: either these laws are taken
from nature by means of experience, or, conversely, nature is derived
from the laws of the possibility of experience in general and is fully
identical with the mere universal lawfulness of experience. The first
one contradicts itself, for the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the
understanding; so only the second remains.

We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*,
which always [IDEA: @320] presuppose particular perceptions, from the
pure or *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF
#451 = Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

Which, without having particular *PERCEPTIONS* *UNDERLYING* *THEM*,
*CONTAIN* *MERELY* *THE* *CONDITIONS* *FOR* *THE* *NECESSARY*
*UNIFICATION* *OF* *SUCH* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *ONE* *EXPERIENCE*; with
respect to the latter laws, nature and possible experience are one and
the same, and since in *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *THE* *LAWFULNESS*
*RESTS* on the necessary connection of appearances in one experience
(without which we would not be able to cognize any object of the
sensible world at all), and so on the original laws of the
understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at first, it is
nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 -
*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*: the understanding does not draw its (a priori)
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, but prescribes them to it." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEA: @320, pages 69-71]

- dolf

On 17/2/19 11:49 pm, Daniel60 wrote:> Arindam Banerjee wrote on
*Your* *ideas* *are* *constipated* ...
<Snip>
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic
Eucharist, expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which
appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the
Pythagorean TETRAD/TETRACTYS
ADOLF HITLER & ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE: @1, @5, #65 - SOLDIER, #175 -
MARRIAGE

#65 - SOLDIER {*DODECAHEDRON*} as Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *DO* *NOT* *KILL*

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CELEBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

#175 - MARRIAGE {*ICOSAHEDRON*} as Principle of Persistent Substance
{#205} - Discriminating Norm {#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO*
*NOT* *STEAL*

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

*DODECAHEDRON* + *ICOSAHEDRON* = TETRAD / *TETRACTYS*
Gad, a strange creature here, makes no sense at all. Is this supposed
to be comic relief?
What?? Did you actually bother to read the tripe??
THIS INFORMED AND RESEARCHED OPINION WAS UNREASONABLY CENSORED BY THE
TOTALITARIAN NEWS AGENCY FRANCE24.

WHEN WE TALK OF VOLUNTARY FREEWILL IN RELATION TO RULE OF LAW IT
COMPLIES WITH LIBERTÉ, ÉGALITÉ, FRATERNITÉ AS FRENCH VALUES.

WHILST IT IS A GENERAL COMMENT IT MAY BE EXTRAPOLATED TO THE SOYLENT
GREEN ANARCHY HOWEVER IT IS NECESSARY TO MAKE POLITICAL COMMENT WITHOUT
POLITICAL INTERFERENCE.

Well may you say with regards to antisemitism and holocaust never again,
let us be lambs to the slaughter however bleating “unacceptable” is not
an adequate reasoned response.

Unacceptable is when you provide a comprehensive solution to the “WORLD
JEWISH CONGRESS” and they refuse to engage within any dialog (not even
acknowledgement let alone appreciation) and continue to send you
solicitations for money saying the matter is URGENT.

A case in point is President TRUMP's foresight in establishing a BORDER
WALL due to the risk of a RIPPLE or CONTAGION EFFECT from basket case
ECONOMIES and failed STATES within LATIN AMERICA.

When you consider that implicit within the notion of LATIN AMERICA is a
conception of SOVEREIGN STATES which are a reliance upon ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE: @1, @5, #65 - SOLDIER, #175 - MARRIAGE that apart from a
demiurge existential impost {eg: alleged Russian interference within the
American political system} always has inherent dichotomies,
irrationality and irreconcilability.

This is distinct from a SAPIENT / KNOWLEDGE economy which as conveyed by
the GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE as DATA SET comprised of #729 = #9 x #9 x #9 / 2 =
#364.5 BIFURCATED APPRAISALS as being a SUB-SET of the available 14,298
RECORDS.

We are now meeting the requirement for the development of some program
functions against that originating DATA SET. Before we commence the
actual process of generating our individual LEXICON JSON resource files
and GEMATRIA aggregation of them we will make the 14,298 REFERENCE
SOURCE OBJECTS available for the exigency of GOVERNMENT and NEWS MEDIA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/scripts/Strongs.zip>

OBJECT FORMATS:

STRONGS:

{
"strongs" : "G3614",
"gematria" : {
"110" : [70, 10, 20, 9, 1],
"111" : [70, 10, 20, 10, 1]
}
}

STRONGS_MIN:

{
"strongs" : "G3614"
}

STRONGS_UMBRA:

{
"strongs" : "G3614",
"umbra" : {
"111" : [70, 10, 20, 10, 1]
},
"gematria" : {
"110" : [70, 10, 20, 9, 1],
"111" : [70, 10, 20, 10, 1]
}
}

STRONGS_MAX:

{
"strongs" : "G3614",
"umbra" : {
"111" : [70, 10, 20, 10, 1]
},
"gematria" : {
"110" : [70, 10, 20, 9, 1],
"111" : [70, 10, 20, 10, 1],
"121" : [70, 10, 20, 10, 1, 10],
"161" : [70, 10, 20, 10, 1, 50],
"311" : [70, 10, 20, 10, 1, 200],
"960" : [70, 10, 20, 10, 800, 50]
}
}

Noting that the PRE-PLATONIC advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) a
principle proponent of the PYTHAGOREAN doctrine considered the Natural
Year to be 364.5 days which is identical to the Chinese trinomial
conception of number that by its circularity conveys an #41 - ONTIC
necessity proscriptions: #205 - Principle of Persistent Substance + #164
- Principle of Materiality = #369 - Discriminating Norm (Human Nature)
being organisation as premise of #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY for #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL.



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>

A reasonable question in regard to this is made of EMANATION theology in
relation to the perspective that ASYLUM INFLUX may be viewed as an
irrationality of the LATIN / PYTHAGOREAN binomial construct of imperial
governance as perspective of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.

Emanation of the state is a term used in European law to describe any
body which provides a public service under the control of government.
The term was defined by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Foster, A
and others v. British Gas plc. The ECJ's ruling defines the term as:

A body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible,
pursuant to a measure adopted by the state, for providing a public
service under the control of the state and has for that purpose special
powers beyond that which result from the normal rules applicable in
relations between individuals.

The term is most obviously used to describe public sector employers,
such as the police, fire service, local government bodies or schools.

<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanation_of_the_state>

Thusly can we not therefore consider antisemitism as emanation within
the state as similar to such issues of Institutional corruption or of an
emerging contagious shooting dynamic whether in police services,
educational institutions or the norm within society as a sociological
accountability phenomenon first observed in military and police
personnel, in which one person firing on a target can induce others to
begin shooting.

In my view EMANATION theology presents to us a circularity which as
intuited from the TORAH has as #4 - Principle of Materiality as it’s
grounding that as temporality is anchored within 49J1W2D as Jewish
Exodus from Egypt and 40 years sojourn = 50J

CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF
#451 = Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273} - *DO* *NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial
consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial
rationality in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ontic
necessity as conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):

6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry
7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction
8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression

What then is A-U-M?

“For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed [the
righteousness] of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter
into the kingdom of heaven.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]

Whom is holier than thou?

- dolf

Initial Post: 17 February 2019
Your ideas are constipated ...
Show some evidence of wit. Borrow some.
— HEY GIBLET —
A CAPED CRUSADER.
MEATHEAD PARASOL.
MY SPACE INVADER.
HYENAS EACH ONE.
ON A PICNIC TREAT.
CONGREGATING FUN.
GROWLING CONCEIT.
YOU’RE NO TROJAN.
JUST TURKEY ARSE.
A FORAGING BOGAN.
FEVERISH FOR FARCE.”
YOUTUBE: "African Safari Oleg"

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Excuse me, Bob?
Do you remember where I hid the K-Y Jelly?”
DOLF: “You dry old twat {ie. a person regarded as stupid or obnoxious} who
is still living in the 80’s...
Silicon based lubricants gives a better glide.
And afterwards you can polish the linoleum floors.”
RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “okay, i'll try the WD-40.
thanks for all your continued great advice.”
— LOVE IS AN OPEN DOOR —
“NO DEAR, HERE’S SOME ADVICE.
WD-40 IS FOR YOUR DRY HINGE.
AND KEEN FOR TRYST AS TO VICE.
IT’S NO VALUE FOR A LONG BINGE.
WHEN YOU CAN’T EVEN PLAY NICE.
BECAUSE YOU’RE ONLY UNHINGED.”
- dolf
Initial Post: 18 April 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-02-17 20:04:23 UTC
Permalink
-- VOX POPULI VOX DEI

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 14 February 2019

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1326 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Show some evidence of wit. Borrow some."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1833 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "YAWN."

DOLF @ 1855 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Your ideas are *CONSTIPATED* ...

— HEY GIBLET —

“DANG YOU ***@THOLE
A CAPED CRUSADER.
MEATHEAD PARASOL.
MY SPACE INVADER.

HYENAS EACH ONE.
ON A PICNIC TREAT.
CONGREGATING FUN.
GROWLING CONCEIT.

YOU’RE NO TROJAN.
JUST TURKEY ARSE.
A FORAGING BOGAN.
FEVERISH FOR FARCE.”

YOUTUBE: "African Safari Oleg"

http://youtu.be/ezYfujKJsxQ

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1835 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Truly witless people, programmed to babble whatever rubbish they
hear from approved sources, can have no comprehension of wit."

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Excuse me, Bob?

Do you remember where I hid the K-Y Jelly?”

DOLF: “You dry old twat {ie. a person regarded as stupid or obnoxious} who
is still living in the 80’s...

Silicon based lubricants gives a better glide.

And afterwards you can polish the linoleum floors.”

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “okay, i'll try the WD-40.

thanks for all your continued great advice.”

— LOVE IS AN OPEN DOOR —

“NO DEAR, HERE’S SOME ADVICE.
WD-40 IS FOR YOUR DRY HINGE.
AND KEEN FOR TRYST AS TO VICE.
IT’S NO VALUE FOR A LONG BINGE.
WHEN YOU CAN’T EVEN PLAY NICE.
BECAUSE YOU’RE ONLY UNHINGED.”

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1937 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Gad, a strange creature here, makes no sense at all. Is this
supposed to be comic relief?"

DOLF @ 2009 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Your Indian mate and don’t
believe in sapient human rights due to your mentally deficient binomial
paradigm: @1, @5, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 - *MARRIAGE* since our superior
democracy is established upon a trinomial paradigm:

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL

YOUR SHIT HOLE NATION CANNOT PROVIDE FLUSHING TOILETS OR HUMAN RIGHTS
FOR THE UNTOUCHABLES..."

YOUTUBE: "Coldplay - Hymn For The Weekend (Official Video)"



ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2154 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Bad comic."

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Noting that the PRE-PLATONIC
advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) a principle proponent of the
PYTHAGOREAN doctrine considered the Natural Year to be 364.5 days which
is identical to the Chinese trinomial conception of number that by its
circularity conveys an #41 - ONTIC necessity proscriptions: #205 -
Principle of Persistent Substance + #164 - Principle of Materiality =
#369 - Discriminating Norm (Human Nature) being organisation as premise
of #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY for #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL.



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>

A reasonable question in regard to this is made of EMANATION theology in
relation to the perspective that ASYLUM INFLUX may be viewed as an
irrationality of the LATIN / PYTHAGOREAN binomial construct of imperial
governance as perspective of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.

Emanation of the state is a term used in European law to describe any
body which provides a public service under the control of government.
The term was defined by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Foster, A
and others v. British Gas plc. The ECJ's ruling defines the term as:

A body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible,
pursuant to a measure adopted by the state, for providing a public
service under the control of the state and has for that purpose special
powers beyond that which result from the normal rules applicable in
relations between individuals.

The term is most obviously used to describe public sector employers,
such as the police, fire service, local government bodies or schools.

<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanation_of_the_state>

Thusly can we not therefore consider antisemitism as emanation within
the state as similar to such issues of Institutional corruption or of an
emerging contagious shooting dynamic whether in police services,
educational institutions or the norm within society as a sociological
accountability phenomenon first observed in military and police
personnel, in which one person firing on a target can induce others to
begin shooting.

In my view EMANATION theology presents to us a circularity which as
intuited from the TORAH has as #4 - Principle of Materiality as it’s
grounding that as temporality is anchored within 49J1W2D as Jewish
Exodus from Egypt and 40 years sojourn = 50J"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1857 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Says
the person who said good things about Trump thus revealing his own
babbling sources.... "

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Well may you say with regards to
antisemitism and holocaust never again, let us be lambs to the slaughter
however bleating “unacceptable” is not an adequate reasoned response.

Unacceptable is when you provide a comprehensive solution to the “WORLD
JEWISH CONGRESS” and they refuse to engage within any dialog (not even
acknowledgement let alone appreciation) and continue to send you
solicitations for money saying the matter is URGENT.

A case in point is President TRUMP's foresight in establishing a BORDER
WALL due to the risk of a RIPPLE or CONTAGION EFFECT from basket case
ECONOMIES and failed STATES within LATIN AMERICA.

When you consider that implicit within the notion of LATIN AMERICA is a
conception of SOVEREIGN STATES which are a reliance upon ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE: @1, @5, #65 - SOLDIER, #175 - MARRIAGE that apart from a
demiurge existential impost {eg: alleged Russian interference within the
American political system} always has inherent dichotomies,
irrationality and irreconcilability.

This is distinct from a SAPIENT / KNOWLEDGE economy which as conveyed by
the GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE as DATA SET comprised of #729 = #9 x #9 x #9 / 2 =
#364.5 BIFURCATED APPRAISALS as being a SUB-SET of the available 14,298
RECORDS.

We are now meeting the requirement for the development of some program
functions against that originating DATA SET. Before we commence the
actual process of generating our individual LEXICON JSON resource files
and GEMATRIA aggregation of them we will make the 14,298 REFERENCE
SOURCE OBJECTS available for the exigency of GOVERNMENT and NEWS MEDIA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/scripts/Strongs.zip>

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2026 HOURS
ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Have you suddenly and without warning switched to
describing the people in India?"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2347 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "Indians, especially Bengalis, are very witty. They have the best
jokes. Facebook provides them for me, galore.

I was talking in general, about the brainwashed masses, and their
robotic minds that being so robotic can have no comprehension of wit."

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 0733 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"This should be interesting to watch: a lowlife racist alt-right wanker
against this strange newbie!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0922 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "So what are you? You have been described as a marxist. At their
best, marxists are ripe-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy, envious,
pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0927 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "For
God's sake try to use some brains if you have any! It should be obvious
even to an idiot that he was described as being a 'marxist' by a known
troll. Or didn't you understand the responses that were given about
that troll?

At their best, marxists are ripe-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy,
envious, pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way.

Now you're turning you attention to him (thus making a lie of your
comments about how unworthy he was of your attnetion [snort]) your
insults are still lame and pathetic."

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1005 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "It
looks like some people's idea what a discussion of a topic should look
like is quite different from what this newbie thinks.

There are those like "*DOLF*" for instance who loves ranting on and on
and on but rational readers can never work out what he is on about. I am
afraid the same goes for this poster.

I am still unable to work out why he insists on posting to this
newsgroup. Why he insists posting at all!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1143 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "Is there someone high up in this n[ews]g[roup] who has signed a
document showing who is a troll and who is not? Even if he did, that
would not be binding upon anyone in any free society.

As far as I am concerned, all are equal here, *EXCEPT* *THOSE* *LIKE*
*DOLF* *WHO* *WRITE* [TO] *HARASS* *ME* *WITH* *HATE* *SPEECH*. Those I
regard as the real scum, and will report to the police about them if
they continue with such harassment. Cybercrime involving hate speech,
that is hateful to minorities, is an offence that is taken seriously
these days.

Anyway why are you speaking for this dog character? Can't he decide for
himself what he is? I suppose you all are suffering severe identity crises."

DE CHUCKA (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1148 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"Really, I might take [*DOLF*] out of the bozo bin as he sound like a
sensible fellow now.

Anyhow why is a US west coast Indian posting in this n[ews]g[roup],
shouldn't you be on a reservation sitting in a tee-pee?"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1348 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "I was
waiting for someone else to pick up on that. Now he says he's in
Melbourne and has been since 1989................"

DANIEL60 (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2349 HOURS ON 17 FEBRUARY
2019: "What?? Did you actually bother to read the tripe??"

-- CONSTIPATED IDEAS --

"OH SUCH NUGGET OF WISDOM.
BESTOWAL OF TURGID REALITY.
BIRTHED BY IGNORANT SCUM.
INFINITE AGE GIVING BANALITY.
HEY MISSUS NOW WIPE MY BUM.
ENDLESS REACH MY STUPIDITY." {@7: Sup: 33 (#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65
- *SOLDIER*); Ego: 60 (#318: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) EXCERPT OF IDEA: @318 FROM SECTION #36 - HOW
IS NATURE ITSELF POSSIBLE?
This question, which is the highest point that transcendental philosophy
*CAN* *EVER* *REACH*, *AND* *UP* *TO* *WHICH*, *AS* *ITS* *BOUNDARY*
*AND* *COMPLETION*, it must be taken, actually contains two questions.

FIRST: How is nature possible in general in the material sense, namely,
according to intuition, as the sum total of appearances; how are space,
time {#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - SOLDIER {*DODECAHEDRON*} as
Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273} - *DO* *NOT* *KILL*

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CELEBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

}, and that which fills them both, the object of sensation {

#175 - MARRIAGE {*ICOSAHEDRON*} as Principle of Persistent Substance
{#205} - Discriminating Norm {#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO*
*NOT* *STEAL*

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist {ie.
ADOLF HITLER & ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE: @1, @5, #65 - SOLDIER, #175 -
MARRIAGE: *DODECAHEDRON* + *ICOSAHEDRON* = TETRAD / *TETRACTYS*},
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD /
TETRACTYS

}, possible in general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of
our sensibility, in accordance with which our #123 - *SENSIBILITY* is
affected in its characteristic way by objects that are in themselves
unknown to it and that are wholly distinct from said appearances. This
answer is, in the book itself, given in the Transcendental Aesthetic,
but here in the Prolegomena through the solution of the first main
question.

SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of
the rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be
thought as connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out
otherwise than: it is possible only by means of the constitution of our
understand- ing, in accordance with which all these representations of
sensibility are necessarily referred to one consciousness, and through
which, first, the characteristic manner of our thinking, namely by means
of rules, is possible, and then, by means of these rules, experience is
possible – which is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects
in themselves. This answer is, in the book itself, given in the
Transcendental Logic,16 but here in the Prolegomena, in the course of
solving the second main question.

But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and
answered, because we always have need of them in turn for all answering
and for all thinking of objects:

Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial
consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial
rationality in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ONTIC
necessity as conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):

6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry
7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction
8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression

What then is A-U-M?

“For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed [the
righteousness] of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter
into the kingdom of heaven.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]

Whom is holier than thou?

There are many #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* that we can know only
through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
i.e., nature in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any
experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
priori at the basis of its possibility.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification
constitutes the possibility of experience.

Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this
entire part, that universal #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* can be cognized
a priori, already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest
legislation for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding,
and that we must not seek the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
from nature by means of experience, but, conversely, must seek nature,
as regards its universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of
the possibility of experience that lie in our sensibility and
understanding; for how would it otherwise be possible to become
acquainted with these laws a priori, since they are surely not rules of
analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic amplifications of
cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary agreement, between the
principles of possible experience and the laws of the possibility of
nature, can come about from only two causes: either these laws are taken
from nature by means of experience, or, conversely, nature is derived
from the laws of the possibility of experience in general and is fully
identical with the mere universal lawfulness of experience. The first
one contradicts itself, for the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the
understanding; so only the second remains.

We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*,
which always [IDEA: @320] presuppose particular perceptions, from the
pure or *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF
#451 = Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

Which, without having particular *PERCEPTIONS* *UNDERLYING* *THEM*,
*CONTAIN* *MERELY* *THE* *CONDITIONS* *FOR* *THE* *NECESSARY*
*UNIFICATION* *OF* *SUCH* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *ONE* *EXPERIENCE*; with
respect to the latter laws, nature and possible experience are one and
the same, and since in *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *THE* *LAWFULNESS*
*RESTS* on the necessary connection of appearances in one experience
(without which we would not be able to cognize any object of the
sensible world at all), and so on the original laws of the
understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at first, it is
nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 -
*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*: the understanding does not draw its (a priori)
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, but prescribes them to it." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEA: @320, pages 69-71]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0655 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "[Being educated as a Roman Catholic] I live and thrive
on and for this kind of shite, didn't you know?"

- dolf

Initial Post: 18 February 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-02-17 22:22:30 UTC
Permalink
-- VOX POPULI VOX DEI

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 14 February 2019

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1326 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Show some evidence of wit. Borrow some."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1833 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "YAWN."

DOLF @ 1855 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Your ideas are *CONSTIPATED* ...

— HEY GIBLET —

“DANG YOU ***@THOLE
A CAPED CRUSADER.
MEATHEAD PARASOL.
MY SPACE INVADER.

HYENAS EACH ONE.
ON A PICNIC TREAT.
CONGREGATING FUN.
GROWLING CONCEIT.

YOU’RE NO TROJAN.
JUST TURKEY ARSE.
A FORAGING BOGAN.
FEVERISH FOR FARCE.”

YOUTUBE: "African Safari Oleg"

http://youtu.be/ezYfujKJsxQ

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1835 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Truly witless people, programmed to babble whatever rubbish they
hear from approved sources, can have no comprehension of wit."

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Excuse me, Bob?

Do you remember where I hid the K-Y Jelly?”

DOLF: “You dry old twat {ie. a person regarded as stupid or obnoxious} who
is still living in the 80’s...

Silicon based lubricants gives a better glide.

And afterwards you can polish the linoleum floors.”

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Okay, i'll try the WD-40.

thanks for all your continued great advice.”

— LOVE IS AN OPEN DOOR —

“NO DEAR, HERE’S SOME ADVICE.
WD-40 IS FOR YOUR DRY HINGE.
AND KEEN FOR TRYST AS TO VICE.
IT’S NO VALUE FOR A LONG BINGE.
WHEN YOU CAN’T EVEN PLAY NICE.
BECAUSE YOU’RE ONLY UNHINGED.”

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1937 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Gad, a strange creature here, makes no sense at all. Is this
supposed to be comic relief?"

DOLF @ 2009 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "You’re Indian mate and don’t
believe in sapient human rights due to your mentally deficient binomial
paradigm: @1, @5, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 - *MARRIAGE* since our superior
democracy is established upon a trinomial paradigm:

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL

YOUR SHIT HOLE NATION CANNOT PROVIDE FLUSHING TOILETS OR HUMAN RIGHTS FOR
THE UNTOUCHABLES..."

YOUTUBE: "Coldplay - Hymn For The Weekend (Official Video)"

http://youtu.be/YykjpeuMNEk

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2154 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Bad comic."

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Noting that the PRE-PLATONIC
advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) a principle proponent of the PYTHAGOREAN
doctrine considered the Natural Year to be 364.5 days which is identical to
the Chinese trinomial conception of number that by its circularity conveys
an #41 - ONTIC necessity proscriptions: #205 - Principle of Persistent
Substance + #164 - Principle of Materiality = #369 - Discriminating Norm
(Human Nature) being organisation as premise of #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY
for #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL.



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>

A reasonable question in regard to this is made of EMANATION theology in
relation to the perspective that ASYLUM INFLUX may be viewed as an
irrationality of the LATIN / PYTHAGOREAN binomial construct of imperial
governance as perspective of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.

Emanation of the state is a term used in European law to describe any body
which provides a public service under the control of government. The term
was defined by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Foster, A and others
v. British Gas plc. The ECJ's ruling defines the term as:

A body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible, pursuant
to a measure adopted by the state, for providing a public service under the
control of the state and has for that purpose special powers beyond that
which result from the normal rules applicable in relations between
individuals.

The term is most obviously used to describe public sector employers, such
as the police, fire service, local government bodies or schools.

<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanation_of_the_state>

Thusly can we not therefore consider antisemitism as emanation within the
state as similar to such issues of Institutional corruption or of an
emerging contagious shooting dynamic whether in police services,
educational institutions or the norm within society as a sociological
accountability phenomenon first observed in military and police personnel,
in which one person firing on a target can induce others to begin shooting.

In my view EMANATION theology presents to us a circularity which as
intuited from the TORAH has as #4 - Principle of Materiality as it’s
grounding that as temporality is anchored within 49J1W2D as Jewish Exodus
from Egypt and 40 years sojourn = 50J"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1857 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Says the
person who said good things about Trump thus revealing his own babbling
sources.... "

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Well may you say with regards to
antisemitism and holocaust never again, let us be lambs to the slaughter
however bleating “unacceptable” is not an adequate reasoned response.

Unacceptable is when you provide a comprehensive solution to the “WORLD
JEWISH CONGRESS” and they refuse to engage within any dialog (not even
acknowledgement let alone appreciation) and continue to send you
solicitations for money saying the matter is URGENT.

A case in point is President TRUMP's foresight in establishing a BORDER
WALL due to the risk of a RIPPLE or CONTAGION EFFECT from basket case
ECONOMIES and failed STATES within LATIN AMERICA.

When you consider that implicit within the notion of LATIN AMERICA is a
conception of SOVEREIGN STATES which are a reliance upon ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE: @1, @5, #65 - SOLDIER, #175 - MARRIAGE that apart from a
demiurge existential impost {eg: alleged Russian interference within the
American political system} always has inherent dichotomies, irrationality
and irreconcilability.

This is distinct from a SAPIENT / KNOWLEDGE economy which as conveyed by
the GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE as DATA SET comprised of #729 = #9 x #9 x #9 / 2 =
#364.5 BIFURCATED APPRAISALS as being a SUB-SET of the available 14,298
RECORDS.

We are now meeting the requirement for the development of some program
functions against that originating DATA SET. Before we commence the actual
process of generating our individual LEXICON JSON resource files and
GEMATRIA aggregation of them we will make the 14,298 REFERENCE SOURCE
OBJECTS available for the exigency of GOVERNMENT and NEWS MEDIA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/scripts/Strongs.zip>

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2026 HOURS ON
27 JANUARY 2019: "Have you suddenly and without warning switched to
describing the people in India?"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2347 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "Indians, especially Bengalis, are very witty. They have the best
jokes. Facebook provides them for me, galore.

I was talking in general, about the brainwashed masses, and their robotic
minds that being so robotic can have no comprehension of wit."

— OUR SHINDIG —

“OH FOR THE LOVE
OF PUSSY DEAR.
TRUTH SO PLAIN.
TO GOD {#86} ABOVE. {@5: Sup: 41 (#98); Ego: 70 (#305 - SEE KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @305)}
AND ALL HERE.
WE’RE JUST VAIN.” {@7: Sup: 15 (#118 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @B118);
Ego: 50 (#417)}

YOUTUBE: "PUSSY GALORE"



ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 0733 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "This
should be interesting to watch: a lowlife racist alt-right wanker against
this strange newbie!"

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #22 AS IDEA @305: "To sum this up: the
*BUSINESS* *OF* *THE* *SENSES* is to intuit; that of the understanding, to
think. To think, however, is to unite representations in a consciousness.
This unification either arises merely relative to the subject and is
contingent and subjective, or it occurs without condition and is necessary
or objective. The unification of representations in a consciousness is
judgment. Therefore, thinking is the same as judging or as relating
representations to judgments in general. Judgments are therefore either
merely subjective, if representations are related to one consciousness in
one subject alone and are united in it, or they are objective, if they are
united in a consciousness in general, i.e., are united necessarily therein.
[IDEA: @305] The logical moments of all judgments are so many possible ways
of uniting representations in a consciousness.

If, however, the very same moments serve as concepts, they are concepts of
the necessary unification of these representations in a consciousness, and
so are principles of objectively valid judgments. This unification in a
consciousness is either analytic, through identity, or synthetic, through
combination and addition of various representations with one another.
Experience consists in the synthetic connection of appearances
(perceptions) in a consciousness, insofar as this connection is necessary.

Therefore pure concepts of the understanding are those under which all
perceptions must first be subsumed before they can serve in judgments of
experience, in which the synthetic unity of perceptions is represented as
necessary and universally valid." [pages 56-57]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0922 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "So what are you? You have been described as a marxist. At their
best, marxists are ripe-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy, envious,
pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0927 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "For
God's sake try to use some brains if you have any! It should be obvious
even to an idiot that he was described as being a 'marxist' by a known
troll. Or didn't you understand the responses that were given about that
troll?

At their best, marxists are ripe-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy, envious,
pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way.

Now you're turning you attention to him (thus making a lie of your comments
about how unworthy he was of your attnetion [snort]) your insults are still
lame and pathetic."

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA @B118: "Hence I call the explanation of
the way in which concepts can relate a priori to objects the transcendental
deduction of those concepts, and I distinguish it from an empirical
deduction, which shows how a concept is acquired through experience and
reflection on experience, and which concerns therefore not the legitimacy
of the possession, but the fact of how possession came about.

Now we have indeed two sorts of concepts, completely different in [IDEA:
@B118] kind, that nonetheless agree with one another in that both of them
relate to objects entirely a priori: namely, the concepts of space and
time, as forms of #123 - SENSIBILITY, and the categories {

#118 / #417 as [#5, #300, #1, #60, #1, #50] = tasso (G5021): {UMBRA: #19 as
#1501 % #41 = #25} 1) to put in order, to station; 1a) to place in a
certain order, to arrange, to assign a place, to appoint; 1a1) to assign
(appoint) a thing to one; 1b) to appoint, ordain, order; 1b1) to appoint on
one's own responsibility or authority; 1b2) to appoint mutually, ie. agree
upon;

}, as concepts of the understanding.

To attempt an empirical deduction of these concepts would be completely
idle labor, because the differentia of their nature consists in the [IDEA:
@A86] very fact that they relate to their objects without having to borrow
anything from experience for the representation of those objects. If
therefore a deduction of these concepts is needed, it will always have to
be transcendental." [page 212]

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1005 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "It
looks like some people's idea what a discussion of a topic should look like
is quite different from what this newbie thinks.

There are those like "*DOLF*" for instance who loves ranting on and on and
on but rational readers can never work out what he is on about. I am afraid
the same goes for this poster.

I am still unable to work out why he insists on posting to this newsgroup.
Why he insists posting at all!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1143 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "Is there someone high up in this n[ews]g[roup] who has signed a
document showing who is a troll and who is not? Even if he did, that would
not be binding upon anyone in any free society.

As far as I am concerned, all are equal here, *EXCEPT* *THOSE* *LIKE*
*DOLF* *WHO* *WRITE* [TO] *HARASS* *ME* *WITH* *HATE* *SPEECH*. Those I
regard as the real scum, and will report to the police about them if they
continue with such harassment. Cybercrime involving hate speech, that is
hateful to minorities, is an offence that is taken seriously these days.

Anyway why are you speaking for this dog character? Can't he decide for
himself what he is? I suppose you all are suffering severe identity
crises."

DE CHUCKA (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1148 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "Really,
I might take [*DOLF*] out of the bozo bin as he sound like a sensible
fellow now.

Anyhow why is a US west coast Indian posting in this n[ews]g[roup],
shouldn't you be on a reservation sitting in a tee-pee?"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1348 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "I was
waiting for someone else to pick up on that. Now he says he's in Melbourne
and has been since 1989................"

DANIEL60 (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2349 HOURS ON 17 FEBRUARY 2019:
"What?? Did you actually bother to read the tripe??"

-- CONSTIPATED IDEAS --

"OH SUCH NUGGET OF WISDOM.
BESTOWAL OF TURGID REALITY.
BIRTHED BY IGNORANT SCUM.
INFINITE AGE GIVING BANALITY.
HEY MISSUS NOW WIPE MY BUM.
ENDLESS REACH MY STUPIDITY." {@7: Sup: 33 (#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 -
*SOLDIER*); Ego: 60 (#318: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) EXCERPT OF IDEA: @318 FROM SECTION #36 - HOW IS
NATURE ITSELF POSSIBLE?
This question, which is the highest point that transcendental philosophy
*CAN* *EVER* *REACH*, *AND* *UP* *TO* *WHICH*, *AS* *ITS* *BOUNDARY* *AND*
*COMPLETION*, it must be taken, actually contains two questions.

FIRST: How is nature possible in general in the material sense, namely,
according to intuition, as the sum total of appearances; how are space,
time {#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - SOLDIER {*DODECAHEDRON*} as Principle
of Syncretic Progression {#273} - *DO* *NOT* *KILL*

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CELEBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

}, and that which fills them both, the object of sensation {

#175 - MARRIAGE {*ICOSAHEDRON*} as Principle of Persistent Substance {#205}
- Discriminating Norm {#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT*
*STEAL*

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY
1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist {ie.
ADOLF HITLER & ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE: @1, @5, #65 - SOLDIER, #175 -
MARRIAGE: *DODECAHEDRON* + *ICOSAHEDRON* = TETRAD / *TETRACTYS*}, expresses
an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric
conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD / TETRACTYS

}, possible in general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of our
sensibility, in accordance with which our #123 - *SENSIBILITY* is affected
in its characteristic way by objects that are in themselves unknown to it
and that are wholly distinct from said appearances. This answer is, in the
book itself, given in the Transcendental Aesthetic, but here in the
Prolegomena through the solution of the first main question.

SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of the
rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be thought as
connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out otherwise than: it
is possible only by means of the constitution of our understand- ing, in
accordance with which all these representations of sensibility are
necessarily referred to one consciousness, and through which, first, the
characteristic manner of our thinking, namely by means of rules, is
possible, and then, by means of these rules, experience is possible – which
is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects in themselves. This
answer is, in the book itself, given in the Transcendental Logic,16 but
here in the Prolegomena, in the course of solving the second main question.


But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and answered,
because we always have need of them in turn for all answering and for all
thinking of objects:

Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial
consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial rationality
in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ONTIC necessity as
conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):

6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry
7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction
8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression

What then is A-U-M?

“For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed [the
righteousness] of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into
the kingdom of heaven.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]

Whom is holier than thou?

There are many #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* that we can know only through
experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances, i.e., nature
in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any experience,
because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a priori at the
basis of its possibility.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as the
sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so we
cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification constitutes
the possibility of experience.

Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this entire
part, that universal #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* can be cognized a priori,
already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest legislation
for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding, and that we
must not seek the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* from nature by
means of experience, but, conversely, must seek nature, as regards its
universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of the possibility of
experience that lie in our sensibility and understanding; for how would it
otherwise be possible to become acquainted with these laws a priori, since
they are surely not rules of analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic
amplifications of cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary
agreement, between the principles of possible experience and the laws of
the possibility of nature, can come about from only two causes: either
these laws are taken from nature by means of experience, or, conversely,
nature is derived from the laws of the possibility of experience in general
and is fully identical with the mere universal lawfulness of experience.
The first one contradicts itself, for the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF*
*NATURE* can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the
understanding; so only the second remains.

We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, which
always [IDEA: @320] presuppose particular perceptions, from the pure or
*UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF #451
= Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE*
*SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR*
*PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO* *NOT*
*KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of Contradiction
{#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273}
- *COVET* *NOT*

Which, without having particular *PERCEPTIONS* *UNDERLYING* *THEM*,
*CONTAIN* *MERELY* *THE* *CONDITIONS* *FOR* *THE* *NECESSARY* *UNIFICATION*
*OF* *SUCH* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *ONE* *EXPERIENCE*; with respect to the
latter laws, nature and possible experience are one and the same, and since
in *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *THE* *LAWFULNESS* *RESTS* on the necessary
connection of appearances in one experience (without which we would not be
able to cognize any object of the sensible world at all), and so on the
original laws of the understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at
first, it is nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the *UNIVERSAL*
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*: the understanding does not draw its (a
priori) #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, but prescribes them to it."
[CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any
Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @320, pages 69-71]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0655 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY
2019: "[Being educated as a Roman Catholic] I live and thrive on and for
this kind of shite, didn't you know?"

- dolf

Initial Post: 18 February 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2019-02-18 01:09:31 UTC
Permalink
-- VOX POPULI VOX DEI

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 17 February 2019

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1326 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Show some evidence of wit. Borrow some."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1833 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "YAWN."

DOLF @ 1855 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Your ideas are *CONSTIPATED* ...

— HEY GIBLET —

“DANG YOU ***@THOLE
A CAPED CRUSADER.
MEATHEAD PARASOL.
MY SPACE INVADER.

HYENAS EACH ONE.
ON A PICNIC TREAT.
CONGREGATING FUN.
GROWLING CONCEIT.

YOU’RE NO TROJAN.
JUST TURKEY ARSE.
A FORAGING BOGAN.
FEVERISH FOR FARCE.”

YOUTUBE: "African Safari Oleg"

http://youtu.be/ezYfujKJsxQ

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1835 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Truly witless people, programmed to babble whatever rubbish they
hear from approved sources, can have no comprehension of wit."

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Excuse me, Bob?

Do you remember where I hid the K-Y Jelly?”

DOLF: “You dry old twat {ie. a person regarded as stupid or obnoxious}
who is still living in the 80’s...

Silicon based lubricants gives a better glide.

And afterwards you can polish the linoleum floors.”

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Okay, i'll try the WD-40.

thanks for all your continued great advice.”

— LOVE IS AN OPEN DOOR —

“NO DEAR, HERE’S SOME ADVICE.
WD-40 IS FOR YOUR DRY HINGE.
AND KEEN FOR TRYST AS TO VICE.
IT’S NO VALUE FOR A LONG BINGE.
WHEN YOU CAN’T EVEN PLAY NICE.
BECAUSE YOU’RE ONLY UNHINGED.”

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1937 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Gad, a strange creature here, makes no sense at all. Is this
supposed to be comic relief?"

DOLF @ 2009 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "You’re Indian mate and don’t
believe in sapient human rights due to your mentally deficient binomial
paradigm:

*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE*

Since our superior democracy is established upon a trinomial paradigm:

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL

YOUR SHIT HOLE NATION CANNOT PROVIDE FLUSHING TOILETS OR HUMAN RIGHTS
FOR THE UNTOUCHABLES..."

YOUTUBE: "Coldplay - Hymn For The Weekend (Official Video)"

http://youtu.be/YykjpeuMNEk

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2154 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Bad comic."

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Noting that the PRE-PLATONIC
advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) a principle proponent of the
PYTHAGOREAN doctrine considered the Natural Year to be 364.5 days which
is identical to the Chinese trinomial conception of number that by its
circularity conveys an #41 - ONTIC necessity proscriptions: #205 -
Principle of Persistent Substance ✡️ / ☯️ #164 - Principle of
Materiality = #369 - Discriminating Norm (Human Nature) being
organisation as premise of #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY for #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>

A reasonable question in regard to this is made of EMANATION theology in
relation to the perspective that ASYLUM INFLUX may be viewed as an
irrationality of the LATIN / PYTHAGOREAN binomial construct of imperial
governance as perspective of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.

Emanation of the state is a term used in European law to describe any
body which provides a public service under the control of government.
The term was defined by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Foster, A
and others v. British Gas plc. The ECJ's ruling defines the term as:

A body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible,
pursuant to a measure adopted by the state, for providing a public
service under the control of the state and has for that purpose special
powers beyond that which result from the normal rules applicable in
relations between individuals.

The term is most obviously used to describe public sector employers,
such as the police, fire service, local government bodies or schools.
[<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanation_of_the_state>]

Thusly can we not therefore consider antisemitism as emanation within
the state as similar to such issues of Institutional corruption or of an
emerging contagious shooting dynamic whether in police services,
educational institutions or the norm within society as a sociological
accountability phenomenon first observed in military and police
personnel, in which one person firing on a target can induce others to
begin shooting.

In my view EMANATION theology presents to us a circularity which as
intuited from the TORAH has as #4 - Principle of Materiality as it’s
grounding that as temporality is anchored within 49J1W2D as Jewish
Exodus from Egypt and 40 years sojourn = 50J"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1857 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Says
the person who said good things about Trump thus revealing his own
babbling sources.... "

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Well may you say with regards to
antisemitism and holocaust never again, let us be lambs to the slaughter
however bleating “unacceptable” is not an adequate reasoned response.

Unacceptable is when you provide a comprehensive solution to the “WORLD
JEWISH CONGRESS” and they refuse to engage within any dialog (not even
acknowledgement let alone appreciation) and continue to send you
solicitations for money saying the matter is URGENT.

A case in point is President TRUMP's foresight in establishing a BORDER
WALL due to the risk of a RIPPLE or CONTAGION EFFECT from basket case
ECONOMIES and failed STATES within LATIN AMERICA.

When you consider that implicit within the notion of LATIN AMERICA is a
conception of SOVEREIGN STATES which are a reliance upon ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE: *ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 -
FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT
ROME, @5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 -
*SOLDIER*, #175 - *MARRIAGE* that apart from a demiurge existential
impost {eg: alleged Russian interference within the American political
system} always has inherent dichotomies, irrationality and
irreconcilability.

This is distinct from a SAPIENT / KNOWLEDGE economy which as conveyed by
the GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE as DATA SET comprised of #729 = #9 x #9 x #9 / 2 =
#364.5 BIFURCATED APPRAISALS as being a SUB-SET of the available 14,298
RECORDS.

We are now meeting the requirement for the development of some program
functions against that originating DATA SET. Before we commence the
actual process of generating our individual LEXICON JSON resource files
and GEMATRIA aggregation of them we will make the 14,298 REFERENCE
SOURCE OBJECTS available for the exigency of GOVERNMENT and NEWS MEDIA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/scripts/Strongs.zip>

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2026 HOURS
ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Have you suddenly and without warning switched to
describing the people in India?"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2347 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "Indians, especially Bengalis, are very witty. They have the best
jokes. Facebook provides them for me, galore.

I was talking in general, about the brainwashed masses, and their
robotic minds that being so robotic can have no comprehension of wit."

— OUR SHINDIG —

“OH FOR THE LOVE
OF PUSSY DEAR.
TRUTH SO PLAIN.
TO GOD {#86} ABOVE. {@5: Sup: 41 (#98); Ego: 70 (#305 - SEE KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @305)}
AND ALL HERE.
WE’RE JUST VAIN.” {@7: Sup: 15 (#118 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA:
@B118); Ego: 50 (#417)}

YOUTUBE: "PUSSY GALORE"

http://youtu.be/XCLqyXf2s70

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 0733 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"This should be interesting to watch: a lowlife racist alt-right wanker
against this strange newbie!"

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #22 AS IDEA @305: "To sum this up: the
*BUSINESS* *OF* *THE* *SENSES* is to intuit; that of the understanding,
to think. To think, however, is to unite representations in a
consciousness. This unification either arises merely relative to the
subject and is contingent and subjective, or it occurs without condition
and is necessary or objective. The unification of representations in a
consciousness is judgment. Therefore, thinking is the same as judging or
as relating representations to judgments in general. Judgments are
therefore either merely subjective, if representations are related to
one consciousness in one subject alone and are united in it, or they are
objective, if they are united in a consciousness in general, i.e., are
united necessarily therein. [IDEA: @305] The logical moments of all
judgments are so many possible ways of uniting representations in a
consciousness.

If, however, the very same moments serve as concepts, they are concepts
of the necessary unification of these representations in a
consciousness, and so are principles of objectively valid judgments.
This unification in a consciousness is either analytic, through
identity, or synthetic, through combination and addition of various
representations with one another. Experience consists in the synthetic
connection of appearances (perceptions) in a consciousness, insofar as
this connection is necessary.

Therefore pure concepts of the understanding are those under which all
perceptions must first be subsumed before they can serve in judgments of
experience, in which the synthetic unity of perceptions is represented
as necessary and universally valid." [pages 56-57]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0922 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "So what are you? You have been described as a marxist. At their
best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy, envious,
pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0927 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "For
God's sake try to use some brains if you have any! It should be obvious
even to an idiot that he was described as being a 'marxist' by a known
troll. Or didn't you understand the responses that were given about
that troll?

At their best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy,
envious, pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way.

Now you're turning you attention to him (thus making a lie of your
comments about how unworthy he was of your attnetion [snort]) your
insults are still lame and pathetic."

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA @B118: "Hence I call the explanation
of the way in which concepts can relate a priori to objects the
transcendental deduction of those concepts, and I distinguish it from an
empirical deduction, which shows how a concept is acquired through
experience and reflection on experience, and which concerns therefore
not the legitimacy of the possession, but the fact of how possession
came about.

Now we have indeed two sorts of concepts, completely different in [IDEA:
@B118] kind, that nonetheless agree with one another in that both of
them relate to objects entirely a priori: namely, the concepts of space
and time, as forms of #123 - SENSIBILITY, and the categories {

#118 / #417 as [#5, #300, #1, #60, #1, #50] = tasso (G5021): {UMBRA: #19
as #1501 % #41 = #25} 1) to put in order, to station; 1a) to place in a
certain order, to arrange, to assign a place, to appoint; 1a1) to assign
(appoint) a thing to one; 1b) to appoint, ordain, order; 1b1) to appoint
on one's own responsibility or authority; 1b2) *TO* *APPOINT*
*MUTUALLY*, ie. *AGREE* *UPON*;

}, as concepts of the understanding.

To attempt an empirical deduction of these concepts would be completely
idle labor, because the differentia of their nature consists in the
[IDEA: @A86] very fact that they relate to their objects without having
to borrow anything from experience for the representation of those
objects. If therefore a deduction of these concepts is needed, it will
always have to be transcendental." [page 212]

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1005 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "It
looks like some people's idea what a discussion of a topic should look
like is quite different from what this newbie thinks.

There are those like "*DOLF*" for instance who loves ranting on and on
and on but rational readers can never work out what he is on about. I am
afraid the same goes for this poster.

I am still unable to work out why he insists on posting to this
newsgroup. Why he insists posting at all!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1143 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "Is there someone high up in this n[ews]g[roup] who has signed a
document showing who is a troll and who is not? Even if he did, that
would not be binding upon anyone in any free society.

As far as I am concerned, all are equal here, *EXCEPT* *THOSE* *LIKE*
*DOLF* *WHO* *WRITE* [TO] *HARASS* *ME* *WITH* *HATE* *SPEECH*. Those I
regard as the real scum, and will report to the police about them if
they continue with such harassment. Cybercrime involving hate speech,
that is hateful to minorities, is an offence that is taken seriously
these days.

Anyway why are you speaking for this dog character? Can't he decide for
himself what he is? I suppose you all are suffering severe identity crises."

DE NUN CHUCKA (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1148 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"Really, I might take [*DOLF*] out of the bozo bin as he sound like a
sensible fellow now.

Anyhow why is a US west coast Indian posting in this n[ews]g[roup],
shouldn't you be on a reservation sitting in a tee-pee?"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1348 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "I was
waiting for someone else to pick up on that. Now he says he's in
Melbourne and has been since 1989................"

DANIEL60 (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2349 HOURS ON 17 FEBRUARY
2019: "What?? Did you actually bother to read the tripe??"

-- CONSTIPATED IDEAS --

"OH SUCH NUGGET OF WISDOM.
BESTOWAL OF TURGID REALITY.
BIRTHED BY IGNORANT SCUM.
INFINITE AGE GIVING BANALITY.
HEY MISSUS NOW WIPE MY BUM.
ENDLESS REACH MY STUPIDITY." {@7: Sup: 33 (#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65
- *SOLDIER*); Ego: 60 (#318: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) EXCERPT OF IDEA: @318 FROM SECTION #36 - HOW
IS NATURE ITSELF POSSIBLE?
This question, which is the highest point that transcendental philosophy
*CAN* *EVER* *REACH*, *AND* *UP* *TO* *WHICH*, *AS* *ITS* *BOUNDARY*
*AND* *COMPLETION*, it must be taken, actually contains two questions.

FIRST: How is nature possible in general in the material sense, namely,
according to intuition, as the sum total of appearances; how are space,
time {#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - SOLDIER {*DODECAHEDRON*} as
Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273} - *DO* *NOT* *KILL*

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CELEBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

}, and that which fills them both, the object of sensation {

#175 - MARRIAGE {*ICOSAHEDRON*} as Principle of Persistent Substance
{#205} - Discriminating Norm {#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO*
*NOT* *STEAL*

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist {ie.
*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE*: *DODECAHEDRON* + *ICOSAHEDRON* = TETRAD / *TETRACTYS*},
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD /
TETRACTYS

<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: TRUTH IS A COSMOGONIC CONSIDERATION AFTER ALL:

1) Telos (6,000 as 122J3W1D) = Arch (#0 as 22/7 = 3W1D) + c² is a
genuine Sabbath based PARADIGM [Exodus 20:8; Deuteronomy 5:15]

As the relativity and grounding of the Infinite to the temporal reality
(ie. the phenomenology as the deterministic unfolding of history) which
is implied by the notion of rational PI and the cosmogonical Genesis
reprise {#0} of the lunar / solar cycle occurring on the equinox of
Wednesday 20th March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday 21st March 1996.

2) Pythagorean Theorem: c² = a² + b² is fascist (see discussion below)
and now redundant as only a METHODOLOGY]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0945 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "Small minded, when not idiotic."

"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {

#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}

INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114 {#5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} #6 {114 / #342 - ANKH /
ROMAN}}; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
} // #270

THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1018
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Idiotic is an alternate officially approved
signature of Arindam Banerjee

[Believe me since I am Arindam Banerjee (or we are, or, what the ***@ck,
who really knows)]"

HITLER HIMSELF SAID OF FASCISM: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST
POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*}
MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE
TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON
SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]

'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was
one of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir
of the great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians
have so many qualities that make us like them.

Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the
*STATE*. THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF
ALL.' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]

}, possible in general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of
our sensibility, in accordance with which our #123 - *SENSIBILITY* is
affected in its characteristic way by objects that are in themselves
unknown to it and that are wholly distinct from said appearances. This
answer is, in the book itself, given in the Transcendental Aesthetic,
but here in the Prolegomena through the solution of the first main
question.

— EUROPEAN UNION'S RAPE —

"OH BOUDICA, REGINA HERO
THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE.
ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF NERO.
FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE. {@6: Sup: 35 (#242); Ego: 1 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT
ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})

TESTIMONY {#873} BY MORTAL WILL.
VICTORIA REMEMBERS THEE.
WITHIN ROME'S GRASP STILL. {@9: Sup: 11 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *THE*
*SENSES* *DO* *NOT* *SUPPLY* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE*
*UNDERSTANDING* *IN* *CONCRETO*); Ego: 7 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *BUT*
*ONLY* *THE* *SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*)}
ITS TIME TO SET YOU FREE."

YOUTUBE: "Horrible Histories (Boudicca)

<https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nhi4w>

SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of
the rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be
thought as connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out
otherwise than: it is possible only by means of the constitution of our
understanding, in accordance with which all these representations of
sensibility are necessarily referred to one consciousness, and through
which, first, the characteristic manner of our thinking, namely by means
of rules, is possible, and then, by means of these rules, experience is
possible – which is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects
in themselves. This answer is, in the book itself, given in the
Transcendental Logic, but here in the Prolegomena, in the course of
solving the second main question.

"THEN PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART} THEREFORE TOOK JESUS {HE IS SAVED/A
SAVIOUR; A DELIVERER} OF NAZARETH {SOVEREIGN; ONE CHOSEN OR SET APART;
SEPARATED; CROWNED; SANCTIFIED}, AND SCOURGED HIM.

AND THE #65 - *SOLDIERS* PLATTED A CROWN OF THORNS, AND PUT IT ON HIS
HEAD, AND THEY PUT ON HIM A PURPLE ROBE, AND SAID, HAIL, KING OF THE
JEWS! AND THEY SMOTE HIM WITH THEIR HANDS.

PILATE THEREFORE WENT FORTH AGAIN, AND SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD, I BRING
HIM FORTH TO YOU, THAT YE MAY KNOW THAT I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM. THEN
CAME JESUS FORTH, WEARING THE CROWN OF THORNS, AND THE PURPLE ROBE. AND
PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD THE MAN!

WHEN THE CHIEF PRIESTS THEREFORE AND OFFICERS SAW HIM, THEY CRIED OUT,
SAYING, CRUCIFY HIM, CRUCIFY HIM. PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, TAKE YE HIM,
AND CRUCIFY HIM: FOR I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM.

THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE,
BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE SON OF GOD. WHEN PILATE THEREFORE HEARD
THAT SAYING, HE WAS THE MORE AFRAID; AND WENT AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT
HALL, AND SAITH UNTO JESUS, WHENCE ART THOU? BUT JESUS GAVE HIM NO ANSWER.

THEN SAITH PILATE UNTO HIM, SPEAKEST THOU NOT UNTO ME? KNOWEST THOU NOT
THAT I HAVE POWER TO CRUCIFY THEE, AND HAVE POWER TO RELEASE THEE?

JESUS ANSWERED, THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER AT ALL AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
WERE GIVEN THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE {ie.

"ALWAYS BEARING ABOUT IN THE BODY THE DYING OF THE LORD JESUS, THAT THE
LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE MANIFEST IN OUR BODY. FOR WE WHICH LIVE
ARE ALWAY DELIVERED {

G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
1 (#101),
@5: Sup: 24 (#224); Ego: 4 (#105),
@6: Sup: 34 (#258); Ego: 10 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@7: Sup: 38 (#296); Ego: 4 (#119),
@8: Sup: 28 (#324); Ego: 71 (#190),
@9: Sup: 68 (#392); Ego: 40 (#230),
@10: Sup: 78 (#470); Ego: 10 (#240),
Male: #470; Feme: #240
}

#325 {MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4,
#10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10,
#4, #800, #40, #10] = paradidomi (3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8}
1) to give into the hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's)
power or use; 3) to commit, to commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to
permit allow; 2a) to deliver to one something to keep, use, take care
of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one to custody, to be judged, condemned,
punished, scourged, tormented, put to death; 2c) to deliver up
treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one to be taken; 2c2) to
deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands, rites; 4b) to deliver
by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will allow that is when its
*RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents itself;

} UNTO DEATH FOR JESUS’ SAKE, THAT THE LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE
MANIFEST IN OUR MORTAL FLESH." [2 Corinthians 4:10 -11 (KJV)]

} THAT DELIVERED {

G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 24 (#204); Ego: 5 (#105),
@5: Sup: 28 (#232); Ego: 4 (#109),
@6: Sup: 17 (#249); Ego: 70 (#179),
@7: Sup: 26 (#275); Ego: 9 (#188),
@8: Sup: 34 (#309); Ego: 8 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
@9: Sup: 10 (#319); Ego: 57 (#253),
@10: Sup: 15 (#334); Ego: 5 (#258),
Male: #334; Feme: #258
} // #582

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #582 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 -
The Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;

THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *SACRED* *PROPERTY*.

#VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
#TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence
between word and deed.
#POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
#TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
#CANON: #200

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_200@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 56 (#64); Ego: 48 (#56),
@3: Sup: 41 (#105); Ego: 66 (#122),
@4: Sup: 38 (#143); Ego: 78 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200

#582 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #4, #70, #9, #8, #300, #5] = paradidomi
(G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8} 1) to give into the hands (of
another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 3) to commit, to
commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to permit allow; 2a) to deliver to
one something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one
to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented, put
to death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one
to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands,
rites; 4b) to deliver by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will
allow that is when its *RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents
itself;

} ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.

AND FROM THENCEFORTH PILATE SOUGHT TO RELEASE HIM: BUT THE JEWS CRIED
OUT, SAYING, IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU ART NOT CAESAR’S FRIEND:
WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:1-12
(KJV)]

But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and
answered, because we always have need of them in turn for all answering
and for all thinking of objects:

Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial
consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial
rationality in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ONTIC
necessity as conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):

6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry
7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction
8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression

What then is A-U-M?

“FOR I SAY UNTO YOU, THAT EXCEPT YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL EXCEED [THE
RIGHTEOUSNESS] OF THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES, YE SHALL IN NO CASE ENTER
INTO THE KINGDOM {ie. #2184} OF HEAVEN.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]

Whom is holier than thou?

There are many #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* that we can know only
through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
i.e., nature in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any
experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
priori at the basis of its possibility.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification
constitutes the possibility of experience.

Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this
entire part, that universal #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* can be cognized
a priori, already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest
legislation for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding,
and that we must not seek the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
from nature by means of experience, but, conversely, must seek nature,
as regards its universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of
the possibility of experience that lie in our sensibility and
understanding; for how would it otherwise be possible to become
acquainted with these laws a priori, since they are surely not rules of
analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic amplifications of
cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary agreement, between the
principles of possible experience and the laws of the possibility of
nature, can come about from only two causes: either these laws are taken
from nature by means of experience, or, conversely, nature is derived
from the laws of the possibility of experience in general and is fully
identical with the mere universal lawfulness of experience. The first
one contradicts itself, for the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the
understanding; so only the second remains.

We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*,
which always [IDEA: @320] presuppose particular perceptions, from the
pure or *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF
#451 = Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

Which, without having particular *PERCEPTIONS* *UNDERLYING* *THEM*,
*CONTAIN* *MERELY* *THE* *CONDITIONS* *FOR* *THE* *NECESSARY*
*UNIFICATION* *OF* *SUCH* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *ONE* *EXPERIENCE*; with
respect to the latter laws, nature and possible experience are one and
the same, and since in *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *THE* *LAWFULNESS*
*RESTS* on the necessary connection of appearances in one experience
(without which we would not be able to cognize any object of the
sensible world at all), and so on the original laws of the
understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at first, it is
nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 -
*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*: the understanding does not draw its (a priori)
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, but prescribes them to it." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEA: @320, pages 69-71]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0655 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "[Being educated as a Roman Catholic] I live and thrive
on and for this kind of shite, didn't you know?"

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0931 HOURS
ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Over a billion of them live among and thrive on
shite, didn't you know?."

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 18 February 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-02-18 01:15:11 UTC
Permalink
-- VOX POPULI VOX DEI

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 17 February 2019

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1326 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Show some evidence of wit. Borrow some."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1833 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "YAWN."

DOLF @ 1855 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Your ideas are *CONSTIPATED* ...

— HEY GIBLET —

“DANG YOU ***@THOLE
A CAPED CRUSADER.
MEATHEAD PARASOL.
MY SPACE INVADER.

HYENAS EACH ONE.
ON A PICNIC TREAT.
CONGREGATING FUN.
GROWLING CONCEIT.

YOU’RE NO TROJAN.
JUST TURKEY ARSE.
A FORAGING BOGAN.
FEVERISH FOR FARCE.”

YOUTUBE: "African Safari Oleg"

http://youtu.be/ezYfujKJsxQ

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1835 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Truly witless people, programmed to babble whatever rubbish they
hear from approved sources, can have no comprehension of wit."

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Excuse me, Bob?

Do you remember where I hid the K-Y Jelly?”

DOLF: “You dry old twat {ie. a person regarded as stupid or obnoxious}
who is still living in the 80’s...

Silicon based lubricants gives a better glide.

And afterwards you can polish the linoleum floors.”

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Okay, i'll try the WD-40.

thanks for all your continued great advice.”

— LOVE IS AN OPEN DOOR —

“NO DEAR, HERE’S SOME ADVICE.
WD-40 IS FOR YOUR DRY HINGE.
AND KEEN FOR TRYST AS TO VICE.
IT’S NO VALUE FOR A LONG BINGE.
WHEN YOU CAN’T EVEN PLAY NICE.
BECAUSE YOU’RE ONLY UNHINGED.”

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1937 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Gad, a strange creature here, makes no sense at all. Is this
supposed to be comic relief?"

DOLF @ 2009 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "You’re Indian mate and don’t
believe in sapient human rights due to your mentally deficient binomial
paradigm:

*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE*

Since our superior democracy is established upon a trinomial paradigm:

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL

YOUR SHIT HOLE NATION CANNOT PROVIDE FLUSHING TOILETS OR HUMAN RIGHTS
FOR THE UNTOUCHABLES..."

YOUTUBE: "Coldplay - Hymn For The Weekend (Official Video)"

http://youtu.be/YykjpeuMNEk

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2154 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Bad comic."

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Noting that the PRE-PLATONIC
advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) a principle proponent of the
PYTHAGOREAN doctrine considered the Natural Year to be 364.5 days which
is identical to the Chinese trinomial conception of number that by its
circularity conveys an #41 - ONTIC necessity proscriptions: #205 -
Principle of Persistent Substance ✡️ / ☯️ #164 - Principle of
Materiality = #369 - Discriminating Norm (Human Nature) being
organisation as premise of #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY for #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>

A reasonable question in regard to this is made of EMANATION theology in
relation to the perspective that ASYLUM INFLUX may be viewed as an
irrationality of the LATIN / PYTHAGOREAN binomial construct of imperial
governance as perspective of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.

Emanation of the state is a term used in European law to describe any
body which provides a public service under the control of government.
The term was defined by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Foster, A
and others v. British Gas plc. The ECJ's ruling defines the term as:

A body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible,
pursuant to a measure adopted by the state, for providing a public
service under the control of the state and has for that purpose special
powers beyond that which result from the normal rules applicable in
relations between individuals.

The term is most obviously used to describe public sector employers,
such as the police, fire service, local government bodies or schools.
[<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanation_of_the_state>]

Thusly can we not therefore consider antisemitism as emanation within
the state as similar to such issues of Institutional corruption or of an
emerging contagious shooting dynamic whether in police services,
educational institutions or the norm within society as a sociological
accountability phenomenon first observed in military and police
personnel, in which one person firing on a target can induce others to
begin shooting.

In my view EMANATION theology presents to us a circularity which as
intuited from the TORAH has as #4 - Principle of Materiality as it’s
grounding that as temporality is anchored within 49J1W2D as Jewish
Exodus from Egypt and 40 years sojourn = 50J"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1857 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Says
the person who said good things about Trump thus revealing his own
babbling sources.... "

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Well may you say with regards to
antisemitism and holocaust never again, let us be lambs to the slaughter
however bleating “unacceptable” is not an adequate reasoned response.

Unacceptable is when you provide a comprehensive solution to the “WORLD
JEWISH CONGRESS” and they refuse to engage within any dialog (not even
acknowledgement let alone appreciation) and continue to send you
solicitations for money saying the matter is URGENT.

A case in point is President TRUMP's foresight in establishing a BORDER
WALL due to the risk of a RIPPLE or CONTAGION EFFECT from basket case
ECONOMIES and failed STATES within LATIN AMERICA.

When you consider that implicit within the notion of LATIN AMERICA is a
conception of SOVEREIGN STATES which are a reliance upon ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE: *ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 -
FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT
ROME, @5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 -
*SOLDIER*, #175 - *MARRIAGE* that apart from a demiurge existential
impost {eg: alleged Russian interference within the American political
system} always has inherent dichotomies, irrationality and
irreconcilability.

This is distinct from a SAPIENT / KNOWLEDGE economy which as conveyed by
the GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE as DATA SET comprised of #729 = #9 x #9 x #9 / 2 =
#364.5 BIFURCATED APPRAISALS as being a SUB-SET of the available 14,298
RECORDS.

We are now meeting the requirement for the development of some program
functions against that originating DATA SET. Before we commence the
actual process of generating our individual LEXICON JSON resource files
and GEMATRIA aggregation of them we will make the 14,298 REFERENCE
SOURCE OBJECTS available for the exigency of GOVERNMENT and NEWS MEDIA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/scripts/Strongs.zip>

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2026 HOURS
ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Have you suddenly and without warning switched to
describing the people in India?"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2347 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "Indians, especially Bengalis, are very witty. They have the best
jokes. Facebook provides them for me, galore.

I was talking in general, about the brainwashed masses, and their
robotic minds that being so robotic can have no comprehension of wit."

— OUR SHINDIG —

“OH FOR THE LOVE
OF PUSSY DEAR.
TRUTH SO PLAIN.
TO GOD {#86} ABOVE. {@5: Sup: 41 (#98); Ego: 70 (#305 - SEE KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @305)}
AND ALL HERE.
WE’RE JUST VAIN.” {@7: Sup: 15 (#118 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA:
@B118); Ego: 50 (#417)}

YOUTUBE: "PUSSY GALORE"

http://youtu.be/XCLqyXf2s70

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 0733 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"This should be interesting to watch: a lowlife racist alt-right wanker
against this strange newbie!"

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #22 AS IDEA @305: "To sum this up: the
*BUSINESS* *OF* *THE* *SENSES* is to intuit; that of the understanding,
to think. To think, however, is to unite representations in a
consciousness. This unification either arises merely relative to the
subject and is contingent and subjective, or it occurs without condition
and is necessary or objective. The unification of representations in a
consciousness is judgment. Therefore, thinking is the same as judging or
as relating representations to judgments in general. Judgments are
therefore either merely subjective, if representations are related to
one consciousness in one subject alone and are united in it, or they are
objective, if they are united in a consciousness in general, i.e., are
united necessarily therein. [IDEA: @305] The logical moments of all
judgments are so many possible ways of uniting representations in a
consciousness.

If, however, the very same moments serve as concepts, they are concepts
of the necessary unification of these representations in a
consciousness, and so are principles of objectively valid judgments.
This unification in a consciousness is either analytic, through
identity, or synthetic, through combination and addition of various
representations with one another. Experience consists in the synthetic
connection of appearances (perceptions) in a consciousness, insofar as
this connection is necessary.

Therefore pure concepts of the understanding are those under which all
perceptions must first be subsumed before they can serve in judgments of
experience, in which the synthetic unity of perceptions is represented
as necessary and universally valid." [pages 56-57]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0922 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "So what are you? You have been described as a marxist. At their
best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy, envious,
pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0927 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "For
God's sake try to use some brains if you have any! It should be obvious
even to an idiot that he was described as being a 'marxist' by a known
troll. Or didn't you understand the responses that were given about
that troll?

At their best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy,
envious, pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way.

Now you're turning you attention to him (thus making a lie of your
comments about how unworthy he was of your attnetion [snort]) your
insults are still lame and pathetic."

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA @B118: "Hence I call the explanation
of the way in which concepts can relate a priori to objects the
transcendental deduction of those concepts, and I distinguish it from an
empirical deduction, which shows how a concept is acquired through
experience and reflection on experience, and which concerns therefore
not the legitimacy of the possession, but the fact of how possession
came about.

Now we have indeed two sorts of concepts, completely different in [IDEA:
@B118] kind, that nonetheless agree with one another in that both of
them relate to objects entirely a priori: namely, the concepts of space
and time, as forms of #123 - SENSIBILITY, and the categories {

#118 / #417 as [#5, #300, #1, #60, #1, #50] = tasso (G5021): {UMBRA: #19
as #1501 % #41 = #25} 1) to put in order, to station; 1a) to place in a
certain order, to arrange, to assign a place, to appoint; 1a1) to assign
(appoint) a thing to one; 1b) to appoint, ordain, order; 1b1) to appoint
on one's own responsibility or authority; 1b2) *TO* *APPOINT*
*MUTUALLY*, ie. *AGREE* *UPON*;

}, as concepts of the understanding.

To attempt an empirical deduction of these concepts would be completely
idle labor, because the differentia of their nature consists in the
[IDEA: @A86] very fact that they relate to their objects without having
to borrow anything from experience for the representation of those
objects. If therefore a deduction of these concepts is needed, it will
always have to be transcendental." [page 212]

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1005 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "It
looks like some people's idea what a discussion of a topic should look
like is quite different from what this newbie thinks.

There are those like "*DOLF*" for instance who loves ranting on and on
and on but rational readers can never work out what he is on about. I am
afraid the same goes for this poster.

I am still unable to work out why he insists on posting to this
newsgroup. Why he insists posting at all!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1143 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "Is there someone high up in this n[ews]g[roup] who has signed a
document showing who is a troll and who is not? Even if he did, that
would not be binding upon anyone in any free society.

As far as I am concerned, all are equal here, *EXCEPT* *THOSE* *LIKE*
*DOLF* *WHO* *WRITE* [TO] *HARASS* *ME* *WITH* *HATE* *SPEECH*. Those I
regard as the real scum, and will report to the police about them if
they continue with such harassment. Cybercrime involving hate speech,
that is hateful to minorities, is an offence that is taken seriously
these days.

Anyway why are you speaking for this dog character? Can't he decide for
himself what he is? I suppose you all are suffering severe identity crises."

DE NUN CHUCKA (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1148 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"Really, I might take [*DOLF*] out of the bozo bin as he sound like a
sensible fellow now.

Anyhow why is a US west coast Indian posting in this n[ews]g[roup],
shouldn't you be on a reservation sitting in a tee-pee?"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1348 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "I was
waiting for someone else to pick up on that. Now he says he's in
Melbourne and has been since 1989................"

DANIEL60 (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2349 HOURS ON 17 FEBRUARY
2019: "What?? Did you actually bother to read the tripe??"

-- CONSTIPATED IDEAS --

"OH SUCH NUGGET OF WISDOM.
BESTOWAL OF TURGID REALITY.
BIRTHED BY IGNORANT SCUM.
INFINITE AGE GIVING BANALITY.
HEY MISSUS NOW WIPE MY BUM.
ENDLESS REACH MY STUPIDITY." {@7: Sup: 33 (#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65
- *SOLDIER*); Ego: 60 (#318: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) EXCERPT OF IDEA: @318 FROM SECTION #36 - HOW
IS NATURE ITSELF POSSIBLE?
This question, which is the highest point that transcendental philosophy
*CAN* *EVER* *REACH*, *AND* *UP* *TO* *WHICH*, *AS* *ITS* *BOUNDARY*
*AND* *COMPLETION*, it must be taken, actually contains two questions.

FIRST: How is nature possible in general in the material sense, namely,
according to intuition, as the sum total of appearances; how are space,
time {#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - SOLDIER {*DODECAHEDRON*} as
Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273} - *DO* *NOT* *KILL*

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CELEBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

}, and that which fills them both, the object of sensation {

#175 - MARRIAGE {*ICOSAHEDRON*} as Principle of Persistent Substance
{#205} - Discriminating Norm {#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO*
*NOT* *STEAL*

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist {ie.
*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE*: *DODECAHEDRON* + *ICOSAHEDRON* = TETRAD / *TETRACTYS*},
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD /
TETRACTYS

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/fascist.gif>

[IMAGE: TRUTH IS A COSMOGONIC CONSIDERATION AFTER ALL:

1) Telos (6,000 as 122J3W1D) = Arch (#0 as 22/7 = 3W1D) + c² is a
genuine Sabbath based PARADIGM [Exodus 20:8; Deuteronomy 5:15]

As the relativity and grounding of the Infinite to the temporal reality
(ie. the phenomenology as the deterministic unfolding of history) which
is implied by the notion of rational PI and the cosmogonical Genesis
reprise {#0} of the lunar / solar cycle occurring on the equinox of
Wednesday 20th March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday 21st March 1996.

2) Pythagorean Theorem: c² = a² + b² is fascist (see discussion below)
and now redundant as only a METHODOLOGY]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0945 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "Small minded, when not idiotic."

"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {

#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}

INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114 {#5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} #6 {114 / #342 - ANKH /
ROMAN}}; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
} // #270

THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1018
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Idiotic is an alternate officially approved
signature of Arindam Banerjee

[Believe me since I am Arindam Banerjee (or we are, or, what the ***@ck,
who really knows)]"

HITLER HIMSELF SAID OF FASCISM: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST
POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*}
MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE
TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON
SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]

'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was
one of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir
of the great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians
have so many qualities that make us like them.

Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the
*STATE*. THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF
ALL.' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]

}, possible in general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of
our sensibility, in accordance with which our #123 - *SENSIBILITY* is
affected in its characteristic way by objects that are in themselves
unknown to it and that are wholly distinct from said appearances. This
answer is, in the book itself, given in the Transcendental Aesthetic,
but here in the Prolegomena through the solution of the first main
question.

— EUROPEAN UNION'S RAPE —

"OH BOUDICA, REGINA HERO
THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE.
ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF NERO.
FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE. {@6: Sup: 35 (#242); Ego: 1 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT
ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})

TESTIMONY {#873} BY MORTAL WILL.
VICTORIA REMEMBERS THEE.
WITHIN ROME'S GRASP STILL. {@9: Sup: 11 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *THE*
*SENSES* *DO* *NOT* *SUPPLY* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE*
*UNDERSTANDING* *IN* *CONCRETO*); Ego: 7 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *BUT*
*ONLY* *THE* *SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*)}
ITS TIME TO SET YOU FREE."

YOUTUBE: "Horrible Histories (Boudicca)

<https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nhi4w>

SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of
the rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be
thought as connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out
otherwise than: it is possible only by means of the constitution of our
understanding, in accordance with which all these representations of
sensibility are necessarily referred to one consciousness, and through
which, first, the characteristic manner of our thinking, namely by means
of rules, is possible, and then, by means of these rules, experience is
possible – which is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects
in themselves. This answer is, in the book itself, given in the
Transcendental Logic, but here in the Prolegomena, in the course of
solving the second main question.

"THEN PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART} THEREFORE TOOK JESUS {HE IS SAVED/A
SAVIOUR; A DELIVERER} OF NAZARETH {SOVEREIGN; ONE CHOSEN OR SET APART;
SEPARATED; CROWNED; SANCTIFIED}, AND SCOURGED HIM.

AND THE #65 - *SOLDIERS* PLATTED A CROWN OF THORNS, AND PUT IT ON HIS
HEAD, AND THEY PUT ON HIM A PURPLE ROBE, AND SAID, HAIL, KING OF THE
JEWS! AND THEY SMOTE HIM WITH THEIR HANDS.

PILATE THEREFORE WENT FORTH AGAIN, AND SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD, I BRING
HIM FORTH TO YOU, THAT YE MAY KNOW THAT I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM. THEN
CAME JESUS FORTH, WEARING THE CROWN OF THORNS, AND THE PURPLE ROBE. AND
PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD THE MAN!

WHEN THE CHIEF PRIESTS THEREFORE AND OFFICERS SAW HIM, THEY CRIED OUT,
SAYING, CRUCIFY HIM, CRUCIFY HIM. PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, TAKE YE HIM,
AND CRUCIFY HIM: FOR I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM.

THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE,
BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE SON OF GOD. WHEN PILATE THEREFORE HEARD
THAT SAYING, HE WAS THE MORE AFRAID; AND WENT AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT
HALL, AND SAITH UNTO JESUS, WHENCE ART THOU? BUT JESUS GAVE HIM NO ANSWER.

THEN SAITH PILATE UNTO HIM, SPEAKEST THOU NOT UNTO ME? KNOWEST THOU NOT
THAT I HAVE POWER TO CRUCIFY THEE, AND HAVE POWER TO RELEASE THEE?

JESUS ANSWERED, THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER AT ALL AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
WERE GIVEN THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE {ie.

"ALWAYS BEARING ABOUT IN THE BODY THE DYING OF THE LORD JESUS, THAT THE
LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE MANIFEST IN OUR BODY. FOR WE WHICH LIVE
ARE ALWAY DELIVERED {

G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
1 (#101),
@5: Sup: 24 (#224); Ego: 4 (#105),
@6: Sup: 34 (#258); Ego: 10 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@7: Sup: 38 (#296); Ego: 4 (#119),
@8: Sup: 28 (#324); Ego: 71 (#190),
@9: Sup: 68 (#392); Ego: 40 (#230),
@10: Sup: 78 (#470); Ego: 10 (#240),
Male: #470; Feme: #240
}

#325 {MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4,
#10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10,
#4, #800, #40, #10] = paradidomi (3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8}
1) to give into the hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's)
power or use; 3) to commit, to commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to
permit allow; 2a) to deliver to one something to keep, use, take care
of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one to custody, to be judged, condemned,
punished, scourged, tormented, put to death; 2c) to deliver up
treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one to be taken; 2c2) to
deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands, rites; 4b) to deliver
by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will allow that is when its
*RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents itself;

} UNTO DEATH FOR JESUS’ SAKE, THAT THE LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE
MANIFEST IN OUR MORTAL FLESH." [2 Corinthians 4:10 -11 (KJV)]

} THAT DELIVERED {

G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 24 (#204); Ego: 5 (#105),
@5: Sup: 28 (#232); Ego: 4 (#109),
@6: Sup: 17 (#249); Ego: 70 (#179),
@7: Sup: 26 (#275); Ego: 9 (#188),
@8: Sup: 34 (#309); Ego: 8 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
@9: Sup: 10 (#319); Ego: 57 (#253),
@10: Sup: 15 (#334); Ego: 5 (#258),
Male: #334; Feme: #258
} // #582

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #582 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 -
The Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;

THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *SACRED* *PROPERTY*.

#VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
#TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence
between word and deed.
#POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
#TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
#CANON: #200

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_200@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 56 (#64); Ego: 48 (#56),
@3: Sup: 41 (#105); Ego: 66 (#122),
@4: Sup: 38 (#143); Ego: 78 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200

#582 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #4, #70, #9, #8, #300, #5] = paradidomi
(G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8} 1) to give into the hands (of
another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 3) to commit, to
commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to permit allow; 2a) to deliver to
one something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one
to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented, put
to death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one
to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands,
rites; 4b) to deliver by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will
allow that is when its *RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents
itself;

} ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.

AND FROM THENCEFORTH PILATE SOUGHT TO RELEASE HIM: BUT THE JEWS CRIED
OUT, SAYING, IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU ART NOT CAESAR’S FRIEND:
WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:1-12
(KJV)]

But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and
answered, because we always have need of them in turn for all answering
and for all thinking of objects:

Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial
consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial
rationality in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ONTIC
necessity as conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):

6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry
7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction
8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression

What then is A-U-M?

“FOR I SAY UNTO YOU, THAT EXCEPT YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL EXCEED [THE
RIGHTEOUSNESS] OF THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES, YE SHALL IN NO CASE ENTER
INTO THE KINGDOM {ie. #2184} OF HEAVEN.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]

Whom is holier than thou?

There are many #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* that we can know only
through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
i.e., nature in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any
experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
priori at the basis of its possibility.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification
constitutes the possibility of experience.

Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this
entire part, that universal #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* can be cognized
a priori, already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest
legislation for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding,
and that we must not seek the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
from nature by means of experience, but, conversely, must seek nature,
as regards its universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of
the possibility of experience that lie in our sensibility and
understanding; for how would it otherwise be possible to become
acquainted with these laws a priori, since they are surely not rules of
analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic amplifications of
cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary agreement, between the
principles of possible experience and the laws of the possibility of
nature, can come about from only two causes: either these laws are taken
from nature by means of experience, or, conversely, nature is derived
from the laws of the possibility of experience in general and is fully
identical with the mere universal lawfulness of experience. The first
one contradicts itself, for the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the
understanding; so only the second remains.

We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*,
which always [IDEA: @320] presuppose particular perceptions, from the
pure or *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF
#451 = Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

Which, without having particular *PERCEPTIONS* *UNDERLYING* *THEM*,
*CONTAIN* *MERELY* *THE* *CONDITIONS* *FOR* *THE* *NECESSARY*
*UNIFICATION* *OF* *SUCH* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *ONE* *EXPERIENCE*; with
respect to the latter laws, nature and possible experience are one and
the same, and since in *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *THE* *LAWFULNESS*
*RESTS* on the necessary connection of appearances in one experience
(without which we would not be able to cognize any object of the
sensible world at all), and so on the original laws of the
understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at first, it is
nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 -
*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*: the understanding does not draw its (a priori)
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, but prescribes them to it." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEA: @320, pages 69-71]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0655 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "[Being educated as a Roman Catholic] I live and thrive
on and for this kind of shite, didn't you know?"

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1037
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Sure I know. I suspected as much about you
right from the beginning!

Anglo-Celtic racist pigs must be a special breed!

How otherwise could one account for your 'special quality/quantity'
Usenet output?

Cheer up! It won't be long before your utter mental decline has almost
run its course."

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0931 HOURS
ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Over a billion of them live among and thrive on
shite, didn't you know?."

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 18 February 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-02-18 21:35:06 UTC
Permalink
-- VOX POPULI VOX DEI

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 17 February 2019

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1118 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY
2019: "WHAT ARE AUSTRALIANS LIKE?

I was recently informed that white Anglo Australians - the most common
sort in Australia - are composed of two types.

1. Decent, laid back, hard-working, kindly, etc. who are the salt of the
earth and so have made the country what it is - from something rejected
by the Dutch, to what it is now, with high value real estate prices,
most liveable cities, fine roads and services, etc.

2. The very scum of the Earth who pretend to be the former. Being scum,
they know how to rise to top places.

I have led a sheltered life, in the research field where only the #1
type were around, but I could not help noticing how they were affected
by the #2 types.

In which category are Australian politicians to be placed?"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1813 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY 2019: "You
asked the wrong people but I appreciate your attempt at trolling....."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1027 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY
2019: "Rather dull aren't you."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0926 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019:
"Thankfully not as dull as a troll."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1326 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Show some evidence of wit. Borrow some."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1833 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "YAWN."

DOLF @ 1855 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Your ideas are *CONSTIPATED* ...

— HEY GIBLET —

“DANG YOU ***@THOLE
A CAPED CRUSADER.
MEATHEAD PARASOL.
MY SPACE INVADER.

HYENAS EACH ONE.
ON A PICNIC TREAT.
CONGREGATING FUN.
GROWLING CONCEIT.

YOU’RE NO TROJAN.
JUST TURKEY ARSE.
A FORAGING BOGAN.
FEVERISH FOR FARCE.”

YOUTUBE: "African Safari Oleg"

http://youtu.be/ezYfujKJsxQ

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1835 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Truly witless people, programmed to babble whatever rubbish they
hear from approved sources, can have no comprehension of wit."

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Excuse me, Bob?

Do you remember where I hid the K-Y Jelly?”

DOLF: “You dry old twat {ie. a person regarded as stupid or obnoxious}
who is still living in the 80’s...

Silicon based lubricants gives a better glide.

And afterwards you can polish the linoleum floors.”

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Okay, i'll try the WD-40.

thanks for all your continued great advice.”

— LOVE IS AN OPEN DOOR —

“NO DEAR, HERE’S SOME ADVICE.
WD-40 IS FOR YOUR DRY HINGE.
AND KEEN FOR TRYST AS TO VICE.
IT’S NO VALUE FOR A LONG BINGE.
WHEN YOU CAN’T EVEN PLAY NICE.
BECAUSE YOU’RE ONLY UNHINGED.”

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1937 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Gad, a strange creature here, makes no sense at all. Is this
supposed to be comic relief?"

DOLF @ 2009 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "You’re Indian mate and don’t
believe in sapient human rights due to your mentally deficient binomial
paradigm:

*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE*

Since our superior democracy is established upon a trinomial paradigm:

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL

YOUR SHIT HOLE NATION CANNOT PROVIDE FLUSHING TOILETS OR HUMAN RIGHTS
FOR THE UNTOUCHABLES..."

YOUTUBE: "Coldplay - Hymn For The Weekend (Official Video)"

http://youtu.be/YykjpeuMNEk

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2154 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Bad comic."

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Noting that the PRE-PLATONIC
advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) a principle proponent of the
PYTHAGOREAN doctrine considered the Natural Year to be 364.5 days which
is identical to the Chinese trinomial conception of number that by its
circularity conveys an #41 - ONTIC necessity proscriptions: #205 -
Principle of Persistent Substance ✡️ / ☯️ #164 - Principle of
Materiality = #369 - Discriminating Norm (Human Nature) being
organisation as premise of #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY for #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>

A reasonable question in regard to this is made of EMANATION theology in
relation to the perspective that ASYLUM INFLUX may be viewed as an
irrationality of the LATIN / PYTHAGOREAN binomial construct of imperial
governance as perspective of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.

Emanation of the state is a term used in European law to describe any
body which provides a public service under the control of government.
The term was defined by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Foster, A
and others v. British Gas plc. The ECJ's ruling defines the term as:

A body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible,
pursuant to a measure adopted by the state, for providing a public
service under the control of the state and has for that purpose special
powers beyond that which result from the normal rules applicable in
relations between individuals.

The term is most obviously used to describe public sector employers,
such as the police, fire service, local government bodies or schools.
[<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanation_of_the_state>]

Thusly can we not therefore consider antisemitism as emanation within
the state as similar to such issues of Institutional corruption or of an
emerging contagious shooting dynamic whether in police services,
educational institutions or the norm within society as a sociological
accountability phenomenon first observed in military and police
personnel, in which one person firing on a target can induce others to
begin shooting.

In my view EMANATION theology presents to us a circularity which as
intuited from the TORAH has as #4 - Principle of Materiality as it’s
grounding that as temporality is anchored within 49J1W2D as Jewish
Exodus from Egypt and 40 years sojourn = 50J"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1857 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Says
the person who said good things about Trump thus revealing his own
babbling sources.... "

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Well may you say with regards to
antisemitism and holocaust never again, let us be lambs to the slaughter
however bleating “unacceptable” is not an adequate reasoned response.

Unacceptable is when you provide a comprehensive solution to the “WORLD
JEWISH CONGRESS” and they refuse to engage within any dialog (not even
acknowledgement let alone appreciation) and continue to send you
solicitations for money saying the matter is URGENT.

A case in point is President TRUMP's foresight in establishing a BORDER
WALL due to the risk of a RIPPLE or CONTAGION EFFECT from basket case
ECONOMIES and failed STATES within LATIN AMERICA.

When you consider that implicit within the notion of LATIN AMERICA is a
conception of SOVEREIGN STATES which are a reliance upon ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE: *ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 -
FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT
ROME, @5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 -
*SOLDIER*, #175 - *MARRIAGE* that apart from a demiurge existential
impost {eg: alleged Russian interference within the American political
system} always has inherent dichotomies, irrationality and
irreconcilability.

This is distinct from a SAPIENT / KNOWLEDGE economy which as conveyed by
the GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE as DATA SET comprised of #729 = #9 x #9 x #9 / 2 =
#364.5 BIFURCATED APPRAISALS as being a SUB-SET of the available 14,298
RECORDS.

We are now meeting the requirement for the development of some program
functions against that originating DATA SET. Before we commence the
actual process of generating our individual LEXICON JSON resource files
and GEMATRIA aggregation of them we will make the 14,298 REFERENCE
SOURCE OBJECTS available for the exigency of GOVERNMENT and NEWS MEDIA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/scripts/Strongs.zip>

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2026 HOURS
ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Have you suddenly and without warning switched to
describing the people in India?"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2347 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "Indians, especially Bengalis, are very witty. They have the best
jokes. Facebook provides them for me, galore.

I was talking in general, about the brainwashed masses, and their
robotic minds that being so robotic can have no comprehension of wit."

— OUR SHINDIG —

“OH FOR THE LOVE
OF PUSSY DEAR.
TRUTH SO PLAIN.
TO GOD {#86} ABOVE. {@5: Sup: 41 (#98); Ego: 70 (#305 - SEE KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @305)}
AND ALL HERE.
WE’RE JUST VAIN.” {@7: Sup: 15 (#118 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA:
@B118); Ego: 50 (#417)}

YOUTUBE: "PUSSY GALORE"

http://youtu.be/XCLqyXf2s70

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 0733 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"This should be interesting to watch: a lowlife racist alt-right wanker
against this strange newbie!"

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #22 AS IDEA @305: "To sum this up: the
*BUSINESS* *OF* *THE* *SENSES* is to intuit; that of the understanding,
to think. To think, however, is to unite representations in a
consciousness. This unification either arises merely relative to the
subject and is contingent and subjective, or it occurs without condition
and is necessary or objective. The unification of representations in a
consciousness is judgment. Therefore, thinking is the same as judging or
as relating representations to judgments in general. Judgments are
therefore either merely subjective, if representations are related to
one consciousness in one subject alone and are united in it, or they are
objective, if they are united in a consciousness in general, i.e., are
united necessarily therein. [IDEA: @305] The logical moments of all
judgments are so many possible ways of uniting representations in a
consciousness.

If, however, the very same moments serve as concepts, they are concepts
of the necessary unification of these representations in a
consciousness, and so are principles of objectively valid judgments.
This unification in a consciousness is either analytic, through
identity, or synthetic, through combination and addition of various
representations with one another. Experience consists in the synthetic
connection of appearances (perceptions) in a consciousness, insofar as
this connection is necessary.

Therefore pure concepts of the understanding are those under which all
perceptions must first be subsumed before they can serve in judgments of
experience, in which the synthetic unity of perceptions is represented
as necessary and universally valid." [pages 56-57]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0922 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "So what are you? You have been described as a marxist. At their
best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy, envious,
pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0927 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "For
God's sake try to use some brains if you have any! It should be obvious
even to an idiot that he was described as being a 'marxist' by a known
troll. Or didn't you understand the responses that were given about
that troll?

At their best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy,
envious, pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way.

Now you're turning you attention to him (thus making a lie of your
comments about how unworthy he was of your attnetion [snort]) your
insults are still lame and pathetic."

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA @B118: "Hence I call the explanation
of the way in which concepts can relate a priori to objects the
transcendental deduction of those concepts, and I distinguish it from an
empirical deduction, which shows how a concept is acquired through
experience and reflection on experience, and which concerns therefore
not the legitimacy of the possession, but the fact of how possession
came about.

Now we have indeed two sorts of concepts, completely different in [IDEA:
@B118] kind, that nonetheless agree with one another in that both of
them relate to objects entirely a priori: namely, the concepts of space
and time, as forms of #123 - SENSIBILITY, and the categories {

#118 / #417 as [#5, #300, #1, #60, #1, #50] = tasso (G5021): {UMBRA: #19
as #1501 % #41 = #25} 1) to put in order, to station; 1a) to place in a
certain order, to arrange, to assign a place, to appoint; 1a1) to assign
(appoint) a thing to one; 1b) to appoint, ordain, order; 1b1) to appoint
on one's own responsibility or authority; 1b2) *TO* *APPOINT*
*MUTUALLY*, ie. *AGREE* *UPON*;

}, as concepts of the understanding.

To attempt an empirical deduction of these concepts would be completely
idle labor, because the differentia of their nature consists in the
[IDEA: @A86] very fact that they relate to their objects without having
to borrow anything from experience for the representation of those
objects. If therefore a deduction of these concepts is needed, it will
always have to be transcendental." [page 212]

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1005 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "It
looks like some people's idea what a discussion of a topic should look
like is quite different from what this newbie thinks.

There are those like "*DOLF*" for instance who loves ranting on and on
and on but rational readers can never work out what he is on about. I am
afraid the same goes for this poster.

I am still unable to work out why he insists on posting to this
newsgroup. Why he insists posting at all!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1143 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "Is there someone high up in this n[ews]g[roup] who has signed a
document showing who is a troll and who is not? Even if he did, that
would not be binding upon anyone in any free society.

As far as I am concerned, all are equal here, *EXCEPT* *THOSE* *LIKE*
*DOLF* *WHO* *WRITE* [TO] *HARASS* *ME* *WITH* *HATE* *SPEECH*. Those I
regard as the real scum, and will report to the police about them if
they continue with such harassment. Cybercrime involving hate speech,
that is hateful to minorities, is an offence that is taken seriously
these days.

Anyway why are you speaking for this dog character? Can't he decide for
himself what he is? I suppose you all are suffering severe identity crises."

DE NUN CHUCKA (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1148 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"Really, I might take [*DOLF*] out of the bozo bin as he sound[s] like a
sensible fellow now.

Anyhow why is a US west coast Indian posting in this n[ews]g[roup],
shouldn't you be on a reservation sitting in a tee-pee?"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1348 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "I was
waiting for someone else to pick up on that. Now he says he's in
Melbourne and has been since 1989................"

DANIEL60 (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2349 HOURS ON 17 FEBRUARY
2019: "What?? Did you actually bother to read the tripe??"

-- CONSTIPATED IDEAS --

"OH SUCH NUGGET OF WISDOM.
BESTOWAL OF TURGID REALITY.
BIRTHED BY IGNORANT SCUM.
INFINITE AGE GIVING BANALITY.
HEY MISSUS NOW WIPE MY BUM.
ENDLESS REACH MY STUPIDITY." {@7: Sup: 33 (#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65
- *SOLDIER*); Ego: 60 (#318: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) EXCERPT OF IDEA: @318 FROM SECTION #36 - HOW
IS NATURE ITSELF POSSIBLE?
This question, which is the highest point that transcendental philosophy
*CAN* *EVER* *REACH*, *AND* *UP* *TO* *WHICH*, *AS* *ITS* *BOUNDARY*
*AND* *COMPLETION*, it must be taken, actually contains two questions.

FIRST: How is nature possible in general in the material sense, namely,
according to intuition, as the sum total of appearances; how are space,
time {#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - SOLDIER {*DODECAHEDRON*} as
Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273} - *DO* *NOT* *KILL*

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CELEBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

}, and that which fills them both, the object of sensation {

#175 - MARRIAGE {*ICOSAHEDRON*} as Principle of Persistent Substance
{#205} - Discriminating Norm {#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO*
*NOT* *STEAL*

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist {ie.
*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE*: *DODECAHEDRON* + *ICOSAHEDRON* = TETRAD / *TETRACTYS*},
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD /
TETRACTYS

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "My point is that the racist bigots will do their best to ignore
and pull down the highest, supreme talent, as giving publicity to the
highest talent which does not conform to their biases, will make them
feel small.

Which is a pain, for the arts and sciences. My other inventions and
works are also ignored, by the ruling racist bigots, and that is not
good for the progress of humanity.

Of course, this is just their style, to intimidate. Being highly
theistic, I smile at such efforts on their part, for following my
Catholic schooling I dedicate all my deeds to God.

Well, God in my case means the Hindu Gods and Goddesses mainly, but I am
also very grateful to *JEHOVAH* and *BUNJIL* {



<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: Within Australian Aboriginal mythology, Bunjil is a creator
deity, culture hero and ancestral being, often depicted as a
wedge-tailed eagle [as similar modal depiction within the Egyptian Book
of the Dead]. In the Kulin nation in central Victoria he was regarded as
one of two moiety ancestors, the other being Waa the crow. Bunjil has
two wives and a son, Binbeal the rainbow. His brother is Palian the bat]

} for looking after my family and I so well.

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"Are you pissed at OZ for whatever (real or imaginary) personal
grievances you have had?"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "No, I understand their limitations, so what is the point of
getting pissed. I am well off after all, despite all machinations.

When one dedicates all one's works to God, then one can only admire the
way God works: so fine, so admirable! Now that is not something the
racist bigots will understand, for they are limited by their narrow
sectarian visions. But, they too are a part of God, not that they will
understand this, so they have to play their parts in the great game around."

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"Believe me (or don't) there are many ways to discuss topics in
newsgroups. Some are OK some ain't. Madly trolling, ignorant comments,
drifting off topic, whinging/whining, posting disgruntled rants and
alienating regular posters in your targeted newsgroup is definitely not
the right way to do it."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "In this case I was simply saying that India does produce things
the world steals without giving due credit. Such as my works, and there
have been plenty more over the ages and even now. The racist bigots will
ignore, then steal the new ideas from the poor thirdworlders struggling
for sheer existence."

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"But feel free to try Facebook or some similar crazy social media
instead of Usenet!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "I do use facebook. That is useful, for I can put in photos and
videos.

<https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359>

Usenet is useful as it is a very open medium where assertions are
forcefully challenged. So new ideas placed on usenet, such as my
inventions of the Hydrogen Transmission Network, or the Internal Force
Engine, are open to criticism. It is a test by fire, very useful. A good
way to improve, by absorbing the criticism from the public. Also it
ensures that my new inventions remain my property, at least in the moral
sense if not legal sense by patenting. That is some satisfaction.
Publicity thus has its uses. Indians at least will remember my works,
this I believe. Certainly some Australians as well, meaning my family
and my friends here."

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/fascist.gif>

[IMAGE: TRUTH IS A COSMOGONIC CONSIDERATION AFTER ALL:

1) Telos (6,000 as 122J3W1D) = Arch (#0 as 22/7 = 3W1D) + c² is a
genuine Sabbath based PARADIGM [Exodus 20:8; Deuteronomy 5:15]

As the relativity and grounding of the Infinite to the temporal reality
(ie. the phenomenology as the deterministic unfolding of history) which
is implied by the notion of rational PI and the cosmogonical Genesis
reprise {#0} of the lunar / solar cycle occurring on the equinox of
Wednesday 20th March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday 21st March 1996.

2) Pythagorean Theorem: c² = a² + b² is fascist (see discussion below)
and now redundant as only a METHODOLOGY]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0945 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "Small minded, when not idiotic."

"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {

#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}

INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114 {#5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} #6 {114 / #342 - ANKH /
ROMAN}}; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
} // #270

THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1018
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Idiotic is an alternate officially approved
signature of Arindam Banerjee

[Believe me since I am Arindam Banerjee (or we are, or, what the ***@ck,
who really knows)]"

HITLER HIMSELF SAID OF FASCISM: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST
POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*}
MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE
TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON
SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]

'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was
one of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir
of the great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians
have so many qualities that make us like them.

Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the
*STATE*. THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF
ALL.' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]

}, possible in general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of
our sensibility, in accordance with which our #123 - *SENSIBILITY* is
affected in its characteristic way by objects that are in themselves
unknown to it and that are wholly distinct from said appearances. This
answer is, in the book itself, given in the Transcendental Aesthetic,
but here in the Prolegomena through the solution of the first main
question.

— EUROPEAN UNION'S RAPE —

"OH BOUDICA, REGINA HERO
THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE.
ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF NERO.
FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE. {@6: Sup: 35 (#242); Ego: 1 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT
ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})

TESTIMONY {#873} BY MORTAL WILL.
VICTORIA REMEMBERS THEE.
WITHIN ROME'S GRASP STILL. {@9: Sup: 11 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *THE*
*SENSES* *DO* *NOT* *SUPPLY* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE*
*UNDERSTANDING* *IN* *CONCRETO*); Ego: 7 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *BUT*
*ONLY* *THE* *SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*)}
ITS TIME TO SET YOU FREE."

YOUTUBE: "Horrible Histories (Boudicca)

<https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nhi4w>

SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of
the rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be
thought as connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out
otherwise than: it is possible only by means of the constitution of our
understanding, in accordance with which all these representations of
sensibility are necessarily referred to one consciousness, and through
which, first, the characteristic manner of our thinking, namely by means
of rules, is possible, and then, by means of these rules, experience is
possible – which is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects
in themselves. This answer is, in the book itself, given in the
Transcendental Logic, but here in the Prolegomena, in the course of
solving the second main question.

"THEN PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART} THEREFORE TOOK JESUS {HE IS SAVED/A
SAVIOUR; A DELIVERER} OF NAZARETH {SOVEREIGN; ONE CHOSEN OR SET APART;
SEPARATED; CROWNED; SANCTIFIED}, AND SCOURGED HIM.

AND THE #65 - *SOLDIERS* PLATTED A CROWN OF THORNS, AND PUT IT ON HIS
HEAD, AND THEY PUT ON HIM A PURPLE ROBE, AND SAID, HAIL, KING OF THE
JEWS! AND THEY SMOTE HIM WITH THEIR HANDS.

PILATE THEREFORE WENT FORTH AGAIN, AND SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD, I BRING
HIM FORTH TO YOU, THAT YE MAY KNOW THAT I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM. THEN
CAME JESUS FORTH, WEARING THE CROWN OF THORNS, AND THE PURPLE ROBE. AND
PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD THE MAN!

WHEN THE CHIEF PRIESTS THEREFORE AND OFFICERS SAW HIM, THEY CRIED OUT,
SAYING, CRUCIFY HIM, CRUCIFY HIM. PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, TAKE YE HIM,
AND CRUCIFY HIM: FOR I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM.

THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE,
BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE SON OF GOD. WHEN PILATE THEREFORE HEARD
THAT SAYING, HE WAS THE MORE AFRAID; AND WENT AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT
HALL, AND SAITH UNTO JESUS, WHENCE ART THOU? BUT JESUS GAVE HIM NO ANSWER.

THEN SAITH PILATE UNTO HIM, SPEAKEST THOU NOT UNTO ME? KNOWEST THOU NOT
THAT I HAVE POWER TO CRUCIFY THEE, AND HAVE POWER TO RELEASE THEE?

JESUS ANSWERED, THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER AT ALL AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
WERE GIVEN THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE {ie.

"ALWAYS BEARING ABOUT IN THE BODY THE DYING OF THE LORD JESUS, THAT THE
LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE MANIFEST IN OUR BODY. FOR WE WHICH LIVE
ARE ALWAY DELIVERED {

G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
1 (#101),
@5: Sup: 24 (#224); Ego: 4 (#105),
@6: Sup: 34 (#258); Ego: 10 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@7: Sup: 38 (#296); Ego: 4 (#119),
@8: Sup: 28 (#324); Ego: 71 (#190),
@9: Sup: 68 (#392); Ego: 40 (#230),
@10: Sup: 78 (#470); Ego: 10 (#240),
Male: #470; Feme: #240
}

#325 {MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4,
#10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10,
#4, #800, #40, #10] = paradidomi (3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8}
1) to give into the hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's)
power or use; 3) to commit, to commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to
permit allow; 2a) to deliver to one something to keep, use, take care
of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one to custody, to be judged, condemned,
punished, scourged, tormented, put to death; 2c) to deliver up
treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one to be taken; 2c2) to
deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands, rites; 4b) to deliver
by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will allow that is when its
*RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents itself;

} UNTO DEATH FOR JESUS’ SAKE, THAT THE LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE
MANIFEST IN OUR MORTAL FLESH." [2 Corinthians 4:10 -11 (KJV)]

} THAT DELIVERED {

G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 24 (#204); Ego: 5 (#105),
@5: Sup: 28 (#232); Ego: 4 (#109),
@6: Sup: 17 (#249); Ego: 70 (#179),
@7: Sup: 26 (#275); Ego: 9 (#188),
@8: Sup: 34 (#309); Ego: 8 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
@9: Sup: 10 (#319); Ego: 57 (#253),
@10: Sup: 15 (#334); Ego: 5 (#258),
Male: #334; Feme: #258
} // #582

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #582 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 -
The Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;

THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *SACRED* *PROPERTY*.

#VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
#TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence
between word and deed.
#POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
#TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
#CANON: #200

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_200@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 56 (#64); Ego: 48 (#56),
@3: Sup: 41 (#105); Ego: 66 (#122),
@4: Sup: 38 (#143); Ego: 78 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200

#582 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #4, #70, #9, #8, #300, #5] = paradidomi
(G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8} 1) to give into the hands (of
another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 3) to commit, to
commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to permit allow; 2a) to deliver to
one something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one
to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented, put
to death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one
to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands,
rites; 4b) to deliver by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will
allow that is when its *RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents
itself;

} ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.

AND FROM THENCEFORTH PILATE SOUGHT TO RELEASE HIM: BUT THE JEWS CRIED
OUT, SAYING, IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU ART NOT CAESAR’S FRIEND:
WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:1-12
(KJV)]

But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and
answered, because we always have need of them in turn for all answering
and for all thinking of objects:

Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial
consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial
rationality in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ONTIC
necessity as conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):

6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry
7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction
8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression

What then is A-U-M?

“FOR I SAY UNTO YOU, THAT EXCEPT YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL EXCEED [THE
RIGHTEOUSNESS] OF THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES, YE SHALL IN NO CASE ENTER
INTO THE KINGDOM {ie. #2184} OF HEAVEN.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]

Whom is holier than thou?

There are many #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* that we can know only
through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
i.e., nature in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any
experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
priori at the basis of its possibility.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification
constitutes the possibility of experience.

Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this
entire part, that universal #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* can be cognized
a priori, already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest
legislation for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding,
and that we must not seek the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
from nature by means of experience, but, conversely, must seek nature,
as regards its universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of
the possibility of experience that lie in our sensibility and
understanding; for how would it otherwise be possible to become
acquainted with these laws a priori, since they are surely not rules of
analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic amplifications of
cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary agreement, between the
principles of possible experience and the laws of the possibility of
nature, can come about from only two causes: either these laws are taken
from nature by means of experience, or, conversely, nature is derived
from the laws of the possibility of experience in general and is fully
identical with the mere universal lawfulness of experience. The first
one contradicts itself, for the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the
understanding; so only the second remains.

We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*,
which always [IDEA: @320] presuppose particular perceptions, from the
pure or *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF
#451 = Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

Which, without having particular *PERCEPTIONS* *UNDERLYING* *THEM*,
*CONTAIN* *MERELY* *THE* *CONDITIONS* *FOR* *THE* *NECESSARY*
*UNIFICATION* *OF* *SUCH* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *ONE* *EXPERIENCE*; with
respect to the latter laws, nature and possible experience are one and
the same, and since in *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *THE* *LAWFULNESS*
*RESTS* on the necessary connection of appearances in one experience
(without which we would not be able to cognize any object of the
sensible world at all), and so on the original laws of the
understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at first, it is
nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 -
*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*: the understanding does not draw its (a priori)
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, but prescribes them to it." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEA: @320, pages 69-71]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0655 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "[Being educated as a Roman Catholic] I live and thrive
on and for this kind of shite, didn't you know?"

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1037
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Sure I know. I suspected as much about you
right from the beginning!

Anglo-Celtic racist pigs must be a special breed!

How otherwise could one account for your 'special quality/quantity'
Usenet output?

Cheer up! It won't be long before your utter mental decline has almost
run its course."

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0931 HOURS
ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Over a billion of them live among and thrive on
shite, didn't you know?."

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 18 February 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-02-18 22:59:53 UTC
Permalink
-- VOX POPULI VOX DEI

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 18 February 2019

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1118 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY
2019: "WHAT ARE AUSTRALIANS LIKE?

I was recently informed that white Anglo Australians - the most common
sort in Australia - are composed of two types.

1. Decent, laid back, hard-working, kindly, etc. who are the salt of the
earth and so have made the country what it is - from something rejected
by the Dutch, to what it is now, with high value real estate prices,
most liveable cities, fine roads and services, etc.

2. The very scum of the Earth who pretend to be the former. Being scum,
they know how to rise to top places.

I have led a sheltered life, in the research field where only the #1
type were around, but I could not help noticing how they were affected
by the #2 types.

In which category are Australian politicians to be placed?"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1813 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY 2019: "You
asked the wrong people but I appreciate your attempt at trolling....."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1027 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY
2019: "Rather dull aren't you."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0926 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019:
"Thankfully not as dull as a troll."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1326 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Show some evidence of wit. Borrow some."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1833 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "YAWN."

DOLF @ 1855 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Your ideas are *CONSTIPATED* ...

— HEY GIBLET —

“DANG YOU ***@THOLE
A CAPED CRUSADER.
MEATHEAD PARASOL.
MY SPACE INVADER.

HYENAS EACH ONE.
ON A PICNIC TREAT.
CONGREGATING FUN.
GROWLING CONCEIT.

YOU’RE NO TROJAN.
JUST TURKEY ARSE.
A FORAGING BOGAN.
FEVERISH FOR FARCE.”

YOUTUBE: "African Safari Oleg"

http://youtu.be/ezYfujKJsxQ

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1835 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Truly witless people, programmed to babble whatever rubbish they
hear from approved sources, can have no comprehension of wit."

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Excuse me, Bob?

Do you remember where I hid the K-Y Jelly?”

DOLF: “You dry old twat {ie. a person regarded as stupid or obnoxious}
who is still living in the 80’s...

Silicon based lubricants gives a better glide.

And afterwards you can polish the linoleum floors.”

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Okay, i'll try the WD-40.

thanks for all your continued great advice.”

— LOVE IS AN OPEN DOOR —

“NO DEAR, HERE’S SOME ADVICE.
WD-40 IS FOR YOUR DRY HINGE.
AND KEEN FOR TRYST AS TO VICE.
IT’S NO VALUE FOR A LONG BINGE.
WHEN YOU CAN’T EVEN PLAY NICE.
BECAUSE YOU’RE ONLY UNHINGED.”

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1937 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Gad, a strange creature here, makes no sense at all. Is this
supposed to be comic relief?"

DOLF @ 2009 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "You’re Indian mate and don’t
believe in sapient human rights due to your mentally deficient binomial
paradigm:

*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE*

Since our superior democracy is established upon a trinomial paradigm:

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL

YOUR SHIT HOLE NATION CANNOT PROVIDE FLUSHING TOILETS OR HUMAN RIGHTS
FOR THE UNTOUCHABLES..."

YOUTUBE: "Coldplay - Hymn For The Weekend (Official Video)"

http://youtu.be/YykjpeuMNEk

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2154 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Bad comic."

DOLF @ 2207 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "What do you mean by that
offensive racist remark?

And don’t get me started on equal rights for women whom no less as
sapient have the innate human right to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0843 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "There are those who are funny when they try to be serious. There
are those who are funny when they write nonsense. Then there are those
who write nonsense seriously. That too can be funny, but when they are
merely peculiar then they are bad comics."

DOLF @ 0858 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Our the constitution to our
democracy comes with its own sapient trinomial mathematical theoretical
noumenon by which we can assay your INDIAN speak with forked tongue 👅:

"There are those who are funny when they try to be serious. {@1: Sup: 72
(#72); Ego: 31 (#31)},
There are those who are funny when they write nonsense. {@2: Sup: 77
(#149); Ego: 63 (#94)},
Then there are those who write nonsense seriously. {@3: Sup: 40 (#189);
Ego: 14 (#108)},
That too can be funny, {@4: Sup: 44 (#233); Ego: 33 (#141)},
but when they are merely peculiar then they are bad comics." {@5: Sup:
79 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *BY* *UNSCRUPULOUS* *INDIAN*); Ego: 5 (#146 -
I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15})},

AS UNCONSCIONABLE AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDUCT AS BREACHES TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 {

#371 - *SAINT* *ANDREWS* *AS* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *30* *NOVEMBER* *FIVE*
*YEAR*: 4 x #364 + #371 = #1827 *LITURGICAL* *CALENDAR*,
#288 - *REMEMBRANCE* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI* *PROTOTYPE*,
#390 - *WREATHS* / *SOVEREIGNTY*,
#312 - *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI*
*PROTOTYPE*,
#419 - *SLAUGHTER*

} OF DETERMINED AND PREMEDITATED BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING
RACIAL HATRED, ANTI-SEMITISM BY ESPECIALLY *INDIANS* / ROMAN CATHOLICS /
FREEMASONRY AS KNIGHTS TEMPLARS BEING AN UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER AND
PSYCHOSEXUAL SLANDER AGAINST WHICH THEY HAVE NOT BEEN RESPONSIVE."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1133 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "I invented googling while I lived in India and that is not
nothing. The pains of life in India also gives scope for incredible
creativity well beyond thr scope of the pampered racist bigots."

DOLF @ 0920 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "I do note that QUEEN VICTORIA was
the EMPRESS OF INDIA at the time of granting such PRESENTS to our nation
as LETTERS PATENT to the FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.

Such exemplary sovereign dignity was obviously wasted on INDIA whom can
only produce an atomic bomb, Bollywood and little else of memorable merit:

Case in point is that INDIANS migrate to AUSTRALIA and not AUSTRALIANS
migrate to INDIA."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1907 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "Before that time she was the biggest drug dealer on the planet.

Atomic bombs are evil and Bollywood has no merit, but Indian cinema is
great though often only in flashes of singing and dancing.

India provides Indians with correct religious approaches involving
superb mythology and metaphysics with associated customs and traditions,
many beautiful languages, the best literature Sanskrit downwards, music
and dancing, art and architecture, agriculture and pottery, medicine and
the correct theories of state administration, weaving and animal
rearing, the best family values, the greatest views, the tasties dishes,
the healthiest approaches, etc.

True, one has to get out of India to appreciate the value of India, past
and also present. India can do a lot better when Indians acquire more
self-confidence in their past. This process has started with the
election of Modi, and I believe, will continue.

No doubt. Indians have much to learn and Australia is a wonderful
country from where to learn and also live well in the process. Indians
have a right to migrate to Australia, for the British used the wealths
from India to develop Australia. And other colonies as well.

I have no doubt that Australians will migrate to India when conditions
in India suit them. That may happen, within 20-50 years, depending upon
progress in India. Some Australians I have met seem hopeful, given the
quality of infrastructure that has been built up in the last few years.
I think with good telecom and power tools, a lot of progress is possible
very fast. Let us see."

DOLF @ 1937 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "SUBSUMING HINDU’S PRINCIPLE
DEITIES INTO A MATHEMATICAL FUNCTION OF AN #2184 - ANTHROPOLOGIC
COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AND FUNCTION:

You are mistaken in that my metempirical / metaphysical philosophy and
theology as shown to you being a syncretism of Jewish Torah / DAOist
Humanist / Christian is transcendent being a trinomial paradigm to
Hinduism’s reliance upon a binomial methodology:

#364 - Vishnu,
#312 - Shiva and
#273 - Brahma

Which I have clearly shown by subsuming HINDU’s Principle Deities into a
mathematical function of an #2184 - ANTHROPOLOGIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE
AND FUNCTION.

*DO* *NOT* *MAKE* *THAT* *BLASPHEMOUS* *FALSE* *CLAIM* *AGAIN* AND SHOW
A GREATER #873 - PROBITY TOWARDS #115 - PREEMINENCE OTHERWISE WE MIGHT
DIRECT YOUR RETURN TO INDIA ON GROUNDS THAT YOU HAVE VIOLATED THE
CRITERIA OF CITIZENSHIP WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2244 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "May I assure you that I have not the faintest interest in any
philosophy of yours."

DOLF @ 0001 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "I OBJECT TO YOUR NEO-NAZI ROMAN
CATHOLIC BLASPHEMY ASSOCIATED WITH AN ABOMINATION OF INDIAN IDOLATRY
WHICH MAKES FALSE AND DELUSIONAL CLAIMS OF ENTITLEMENT AGAINST MY
PREROGATIVE RIGHT TO CITIZENSHIP AND THE EXERCISE OF AN UNENCUMBERED
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL WHICH YOU HAVE SLANDERED:

“INDIANS HAVE A RIGHT TO MIGRATE TO AUSTRALIA, FOR THE BRITISH USED THE
WEALTHS FROM INDIA TO DEVELOP AUSTRALIA.” [Arindam Banerjee
<***@gmail.com>, 27 JANUARY 2019]

If you don’t conform and have no intention to conform to the
FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES OF THIS AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH BY QUEEN
VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 THEN YOU OUGHT TO BE
IMMEDIATELY DECLARE A PERSONA NON GRATA AND EXPELLED FROM THIS COUNTRY
AS BEING AN UNDESIRABLE ALIEN WITH
AN INCURABLE DISEASE AS A PERSON OF UNSOUND MIND.

Get out of our country you fascist excrement."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0913 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "This hate speech was posted in facebook, using one of the posts
in my timeline. I have reported this hate speech to facebook
authorities. And of course, blocked the creep from doing such nasty
things again in facebook at least."

DOLF @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "What do you think of my KRISHNA
consciousness as dark humour?

YOUTUBE: “My Sweet Lord (George Harrison”

http://youtu.be/SP9wms6oEMo

DOLF @ 1340 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "If Arindam Banerjee
<***@gmail.com> is not very careful in his
next comment he will have cursed entire pantheon of gods.

*CHECKMATE*

YOUTUBE: “ONE NIGHT IN BANGKOK (MURRAY HEAD)”

http://youtu.be/rgc_LRjlbTU

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1435 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "In the 1960s the ISKCON started. Hordes of whites started doing
strange things in India. My uncle was a police officer. I heard him tell
my father that it was a CIA trick. Like all the Bhagwan stuff a bit later."

DOLF @ 1446 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Yes yes of course one cannot
trust the bhagwan—***@ck you.

Was your uncle lamenting the diminished opportunity for graft and
corruption since the ISKCON took all the money?

YOU ANSWERED YOUR OWN QUESTION: “I was recently informed that Nile-mud
Brahman priesthood off-scouring the most common sort in INDIA - are
composed of two types:

I have led a sheltered life, in the research field where only the #1
type (ie. my uncle police officer) were around, but I could not help
noticing how they were affected by [by graft and corruption from] the #2
types: The very scum of the Earth who pretend to be the former. Being
scum, they know how to rise to top places.

In which category [as contortions of truth state of sapience and bearing
their buttholes to the sun] are INDIAN [yoga practitioner] politicians
to be placed?” [paraphrase of Arindam Banerjee
<***@gmail.com> quote so as to assay universal truth about
India’s sacred cows]

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1520 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"OK, mate. Calm down! So WTF has all that to do with contemporary
aus.politics????

You are badly off topic here w/o a shred of relevance. If you insist on
posting to Usenet try an India related newsgroup!"

DOLF @ 1953 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "It cannot BE CONSIDERED A RACIAL
HATRED REMARK AS IRRATIONALITY DIRECTED TOWARDS PERSONS OF INDIAN
NATIONALITY because the opinion is made on the basis of “criteria and
expectations of citizenship” associated with a delusional and haughty
self-bestowal a prerogative life at the expense of ABORIGINAL #451 -
ENTITLEMENT (DREAMTIME) which is indigenous to the #41 - establishment
of the #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL as principle central to the nation’s
identity as the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH."

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Noting that the PRE-PLATONIC
advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) a principle proponent of the
PYTHAGOREAN doctrine considered the Natural Year to be 364.5 days which
is identical to the Chinese trinomial conception of number that by its
circularity conveys an #41 - ONTIC necessity proscriptions: #205 -
Principle of Persistent Substance ✡️ / ☯️ #164 - Principle of
Materiality = #369 - Discriminating Norm (Human Nature) being
organisation as premise of #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY for #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>

A reasonable question in regard to this is made of EMANATION theology in
relation to the perspective that ASYLUM INFLUX may be viewed as an
irrationality of the LATIN / PYTHAGOREAN binomial construct of imperial
governance as perspective of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.

Emanation of the state is a term used in European law to describe any
body which provides a public service under the control of government.
The term was defined by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Foster, A
and others v. British Gas plc. The ECJ's ruling defines the term as:

A body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible,
pursuant to a measure adopted by the state, for providing a public
service under the control of the state and has for that purpose special
powers beyond that which result from the normal rules applicable in
relations between individuals.

The term is most obviously used to describe public sector employers,
such as the police, fire service, local government bodies or schools.
[<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanation_of_the_state>]

Thusly can we not therefore consider antisemitism as emanation within
the state as similar to such issues of Institutional corruption or of an
emerging contagious shooting dynamic whether in police services,
educational institutions or the norm within society as a sociological
accountability phenomenon first observed in military and police
personnel, in which one person firing on a target can induce others to
begin shooting.

In my view EMANATION theology presents to us a circularity which as
intuited from the TORAH has as #4 - Principle of Materiality as it’s
grounding that as temporality is anchored within 49J1W2D as Jewish
Exodus from Egypt and 40 years sojourn = 50J"

DOLF @ 0123 HOURS ON 29 JANUARY 2019: "Such that we have women’s
suffrage as their entitlement to exercise #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
within political life, but when you come into this country and fail to
succeed to that principle which women have in this country (but not in
Saudi Arabia for instance) then it is YOU whom are failing that
unambiguous “criteria and expectations of citizenship” and your capacity
to remain within this country ought to be annulled.

That principle is not up to negotiation or disparities since it is
causal to the necessity as why we exist as a nation over 119 years ago
then we consented to the notion that women have rights, women have
entitlement and women are equal to men."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1857 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Says
the person who said good things about Trump thus revealing his own
babbling sources.... "

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Well may you say with regards to
antisemitism and holocaust never again, let us be lambs to the slaughter
however bleating “unacceptable” is not an adequate reasoned response.

Unacceptable is when you provide a comprehensive solution to the “WORLD
JEWISH CONGRESS” and they refuse to engage within any dialog (not even
acknowledgement let alone appreciation) and continue to send you
solicitations for money saying the matter is URGENT.

A case in point is President TRUMP's foresight in establishing a BORDER
WALL due to the risk of a RIPPLE or CONTAGION EFFECT from basket case
ECONOMIES and failed STATES within LATIN AMERICA.

When you consider that implicit within the notion of LATIN AMERICA is a
conception of SOVEREIGN STATES which are a reliance upon ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE: *ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 -
FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT
ROME, @5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 -
*SOLDIER*, #175 - *MARRIAGE* that apart from a demiurge existential
impost {eg: alleged Russian interference within the American political
system} always has inherent dichotomies, irrationality and
irreconcilability.

This is distinct from a SAPIENT / KNOWLEDGE economy which as conveyed by
the GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE as DATA SET comprised of #729 = #9 x #9 x #9 / 2 =
#364.5 BIFURCATED APPRAISALS as being a SUB-SET of the available 14,298
RECORDS.

We are now meeting the requirement for the development of some program
functions against that originating DATA SET. Before we commence the
actual process of generating our individual LEXICON JSON resource files
and GEMATRIA aggregation of them we will make the 14,298 REFERENCE
SOURCE OBJECTS available for the exigency of GOVERNMENT and NEWS MEDIA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/scripts/Strongs.zip>

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2026 HOURS
ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Have you suddenly and without warning switched to
describing the people in India?"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2347 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "Indians, especially Bengalis, are very witty. They have the best
jokes. Facebook provides them for me, galore.

I was talking in general, about the brainwashed masses, and their
robotic minds that being so robotic can have no comprehension of wit."

— OUR SHINDIG —

“OH FOR THE LOVE
OF PUSSY DEAR.
TRUTH SO PLAIN.
TO GOD {#86} ABOVE. {@5: Sup: 41 (#98); Ego: 70 (#305 - SEE KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @305)}
AND ALL HERE.
WE’RE JUST VAIN.” {@7: Sup: 15 (#118 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA:
@B118); Ego: 50 (#417)}

YOUTUBE: "PUSSY GALORE"

http://youtu.be/XCLqyXf2s70

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 0733 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"This should be interesting to watch: a lowlife racist alt-right wanker
against this strange newbie!"

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #22 AS IDEA @305: "To sum this up: the
*BUSINESS* *OF* *THE* *SENSES* is to intuit; that of the understanding,
to think. To think, however, is to unite representations in a
consciousness. This unification either arises merely relative to the
subject and is contingent and subjective, or it occurs without condition
and is necessary or objective. The unification of representations in a
consciousness is judgment. Therefore, thinking is the same as judging or
as relating representations to judgments in general. Judgments are
therefore either merely subjective, if representations are related to
one consciousness in one subject alone and are united in it, or they are
objective, if they are united in a consciousness in general, i.e., are
united necessarily therein. [IDEA: @305] The logical moments of all
judgments are so many possible ways of uniting representations in a
consciousness.

If, however, the very same moments serve as concepts, they are concepts
of the necessary unification of these representations in a
consciousness, and so are principles of objectively valid judgments.
This unification in a consciousness is either analytic, through
identity, or synthetic, through combination and addition of various
representations with one another. Experience consists in the synthetic
connection of appearances (perceptions) in a consciousness, insofar as
this connection is necessary.

Therefore pure concepts of the understanding are those under which all
perceptions must first be subsumed before they can serve in judgments of
experience, in which the synthetic unity of perceptions is represented
as necessary and universally valid." [pages 56-57]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0922 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "So what are you? You have been described as a marxist. At their
best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy, envious,
pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0927 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "For
God's sake try to use some brains if you have any! It should be obvious
even to an idiot that he was described as being a 'marxist' by a known
troll. Or didn't you understand the responses that were given about
that troll?

At their best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy,
envious, pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way.

Now you're turning you attention to him (thus making a lie of your
comments about how unworthy he was of your attnetion [snort]) your
insults are still lame and pathetic."

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA @B118: "Hence I call the explanation
of the way in which concepts can relate a priori to objects the
transcendental deduction of those concepts, and I distinguish it from an
empirical deduction, which shows how a concept is acquired through
experience and reflection on experience, and which concerns therefore
not the legitimacy of the possession, but the fact of how possession
came about.

Now we have indeed two sorts of concepts, completely different in [IDEA:
@B118] kind, that nonetheless agree with one another in that both of
them relate to objects entirely a priori: namely, the concepts of space
and time, as forms of #123 - SENSIBILITY, and the categories {

#118 / #417 as [#5, #300, #1, #60, #1, #50] = tasso (G5021): {UMBRA: #19
as #1501 % #41 = #25} 1) to put in order, to station; 1a) to place in a
certain order, to arrange, to assign a place, to appoint; 1a1) to assign
(appoint) a thing to one; 1b) to appoint, ordain, order; 1b1) to appoint
on one's own responsibility or authority; 1b2) *TO* *APPOINT*
*MUTUALLY*, ie. *AGREE* *UPON*;

}, as concepts of the understanding.

To attempt an empirical deduction of these concepts would be completely
idle labor, because the differentia of their nature consists in the
[IDEA: @A86] very fact that they relate to their objects without having
to borrow anything from experience for the representation of those
objects. If therefore a deduction of these concepts is needed, it will
always have to be transcendental." [page 212]

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1005 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "It
looks like some people's idea what a discussion of a topic should look
like is quite different from what this newbie thinks.

There are those like "*DOLF*" for instance who loves ranting on and on
and on but rational readers can never work out what he is on about. I am
afraid the same goes for this poster.

I am still unable to work out why he insists on posting to this
newsgroup. Why he insists posting at all!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1143 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "Is there someone high up in this n[ews]g[roup] who has signed a
document showing who is a troll and who is not? Even if he did, that
would not be binding upon anyone in any free society.

As far as I am concerned, all are equal here, *EXCEPT* *THOSE* *LIKE*
*DOLF* *WHO* *WRITE* [TO] *HARASS* *ME* *WITH* *HATE* *SPEECH*. Those I
regard as the real scum, and will report to the police about them if
they continue with such harassment. Cybercrime involving hate speech,
that is hateful to minorities, is an offence that is taken seriously
these days.

Anyway why are you speaking for this dog character? Can't he decide for
himself what he is? I suppose you all are suffering severe identity crises."

DE NUN CHUCKA (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1148 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"Really, I might take [*DOLF*] out of the bozo bin as he sound[s] like a
sensible fellow now.

Anyhow why is a US west coast Indian posting in this n[ews]g[roup],
shouldn't you be on a reservation sitting in a tee-pee?"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1348 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "I was
waiting for someone else to pick up on that. Now he says he's in
Melbourne and has been since 1989................"

DANIEL60 (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2349 HOURS ON 17 FEBRUARY
2019: "What?? Did you actually bother to read the tripe??"

-- CONSTIPATED IDEAS --

"OH SUCH NUGGET OF WISDOM.
BESTOWAL OF TURGID REALITY.
BIRTHED BY IGNORANT SCUM.
INFINITE AGE GIVING BANALITY.
HEY MISSUS NOW WIPE MY BUM.
ENDLESS REACH MY STUPIDITY." {@7: Sup: 33 (#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65
- *SOLDIER*); Ego: 60 (#318: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) EXCERPT OF IDEA: @318 FROM SECTION #36 - HOW
IS NATURE ITSELF POSSIBLE?
This question, which is the highest point that transcendental philosophy
*CAN* *EVER* *REACH*, *AND* *UP* *TO* *WHICH*, *AS* *ITS* *BOUNDARY*
*AND* *COMPLETION*, it must be taken, actually contains two questions.

FIRST: How is nature possible in general in the material sense, namely,
according to intuition, as the sum total of appearances; how are space,
time {#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - SOLDIER {*DODECAHEDRON*} as
Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273} - *DO* *NOT* *KILL*

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CELEBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

}, and that which fills them both, the object of sensation {

#175 - MARRIAGE {*ICOSAHEDRON*} as Principle of Persistent Substance
{#205} - Discriminating Norm {#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO*
*NOT* *STEAL*

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist {ie.
*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE*: *DODECAHEDRON* + *ICOSAHEDRON* = TETRAD / *TETRACTYS*},
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD /
TETRACTYS

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "My point is that the racist bigots will do their best to ignore
and pull down the highest, supreme talent, as giving publicity to the
highest talent which does not conform to their biases, will make them
feel small.

Which is a pain, for the arts and sciences. My other inventions and
works are also ignored, by the ruling racist bigots, and that is not
good for the progress of humanity.

Of course, this is just their style, to intimidate. Being highly
theistic, I smile at such efforts on their part, for following my
Catholic schooling I dedicate all my deeds to God.

Well, God in my case means the Hindu Gods and Goddesses mainly, but I am
also very grateful to *JEHOVAH* and *BUNJIL* {

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/weddingblues.jpg>

[IMAGE: Within Australian Aboriginal mythology, Bunjil is a creator
deity, culture hero and ancestral being, often depicted as a
wedge-tailed eagle [as similar modal depiction within the Egyptian Book
of the Dead]. In the Kulin nation in central Victoria he was regarded as
one of two moiety ancestors, the other being Waa the crow. Bunjil has
two wives and a son, Binbeal the rainbow. His brother is Palian the bat]

} for looking after my family and I so well.

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"Are you pissed at OZ for whatever (real or imaginary) personal
grievances you have had?"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "No, I understand their limitations, so what is the point of
getting pissed. I am well off after all, despite all machinations.

When one dedicates all one's works to God, then one can only admire the
way God works: so fine, so admirable! Now that is not something the
racist bigots will understand, for they are limited by their narrow
sectarian visions. But, they too are a part of God, not that they will
understand this, so they have to play their parts in the great game around."

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"Believe me (or don't) there are many ways to discuss topics in
newsgroups. Some are OK some ain't. Madly trolling, ignorant comments,
drifting off topic, whinging/whining, posting disgruntled rants and
alienating regular posters in your targeted newsgroup is definitely not
the right way to do it."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "In this case I was simply saying that India does produce things
the world steals without giving due credit. Such as my works, and there
have been plenty more over the ages and even now. The racist bigots will
ignore, then steal the new ideas from the poor thirdworlders struggling
for sheer existence."

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"But feel free to try Facebook or some similar crazy social media
instead of Usenet!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "I do use facebook. That is useful, for I can put in photos and
videos.

<https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359>

Usenet is useful as it is a very open medium where assertions are
forcefully challenged. So new ideas placed on usenet, such as my
inventions of the Hydrogen Transmission Network, or the Internal Force
Engine, are open to criticism. It is a test by fire, very useful. A good
way to improve, by absorbing the criticism from the public. Also it
ensures that my new inventions remain my property, at least in the moral
sense if not legal sense by patenting. That is some satisfaction.
Publicity thus has its uses. Indians at least will remember my works,
this I believe. Certainly some Australians as well, meaning my family
and my friends here."

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/fascist.gif>

[IMAGE: TRUTH IS A COSMOGONIC CONSIDERATION AFTER ALL:

1) Telos (6,000 as 122J3W1D) = Arch (#0 as 22/7 = 3W1D) + c² is a
genuine Sabbath based PARADIGM [Exodus 20:8; Deuteronomy 5:15]

As the relativity and grounding of the Infinite to the temporal reality
(ie. the phenomenology as the deterministic unfolding of history) which
is implied by the notion of rational PI and the cosmogonical Genesis
reprise {#0} of the lunar / solar cycle occurring on the equinox of
Wednesday 20th March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday 21st March 1996.

2) Pythagorean Theorem: c² = a² + b² is fascist (see discussion below)
and now redundant as only a METHODOLOGY]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0945 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "Small minded, when not idiotic."

"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {

#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}

INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114 {#5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} #6 {114 / #342 - ANKH /
ROMAN}}; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
} // #270

THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1018
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Idiotic is an alternate officially approved
signature of Arindam Banerjee

[Believe me since I am Arindam Banerjee (or we are, or, what the ***@ck,
who really knows)]"

HITLER HIMSELF SAID OF FASCISM: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST
POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*}
MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE
TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON
SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]

'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was
one of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir
of the great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians
have so many qualities that make us like them.

Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the
*STATE*. THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF
ALL.' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]

}, possible in general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of
our sensibility, in accordance with which our #123 - *SENSIBILITY* is
affected in its characteristic way by objects that are in themselves
unknown to it and that are wholly distinct from said appearances. This
answer is, in the book itself, given in the Transcendental Aesthetic,
but here in the Prolegomena through the solution of the first main
question.

— EUROPEAN UNION'S RAPE —

"OH BOUDICA, REGINA HERO
THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE.
ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF NERO.
FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE. {@6: Sup: 35 (#242); Ego: 1 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT
ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})

TESTIMONY {#873} BY MORTAL WILL.
VICTORIA REMEMBERS THEE.
WITHIN ROME'S GRASP STILL. {@9: Sup: 11 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *THE*
*SENSES* *DO* *NOT* *SUPPLY* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE*
*UNDERSTANDING* *IN* *CONCRETO*); Ego: 7 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *BUT*
*ONLY* *THE* *SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*)}
ITS TIME TO SET YOU FREE."

YOUTUBE: "Horrible Histories (Boudicca)

<https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nhi4w>

SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of
the rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be
thought as connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out
otherwise than: it is possible only by means of the constitution of our
understanding, in accordance with which all these representations of
sensibility are necessarily referred to one consciousness, and through
which, first, the characteristic manner of our thinking, namely by means
of rules, is possible, and then, by means of these rules, experience is
possible – which is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects
in themselves. This answer is, in the book itself, given in the
Transcendental Logic, but here in the Prolegomena, in the course of
solving the second main question.

"THEN PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART} THEREFORE TOOK JESUS {HE IS SAVED/A
SAVIOUR; A DELIVERER} OF NAZARETH {SOVEREIGN; ONE CHOSEN OR SET APART;
SEPARATED; CROWNED; SANCTIFIED}, AND SCOURGED HIM.

AND THE #65 - *SOLDIERS* PLATTED A CROWN OF THORNS, AND PUT IT ON HIS
HEAD, AND THEY PUT ON HIM A PURPLE ROBE, AND SAID, HAIL, KING OF THE
JEWS! AND THEY SMOTE HIM WITH THEIR HANDS.

PILATE THEREFORE WENT FORTH AGAIN, AND SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD, I BRING
HIM FORTH TO YOU, THAT YE MAY KNOW THAT I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM. THEN
CAME JESUS FORTH, WEARING THE CROWN OF THORNS, AND THE PURPLE ROBE. AND
PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD THE MAN!

WHEN THE CHIEF PRIESTS THEREFORE AND OFFICERS SAW HIM, THEY CRIED OUT,
SAYING, CRUCIFY HIM, CRUCIFY HIM. PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, TAKE YE HIM,
AND CRUCIFY HIM: FOR I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM.

THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE,
BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE SON OF GOD. WHEN PILATE THEREFORE HEARD
THAT SAYING, HE WAS THE MORE AFRAID; AND WENT AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT
HALL, AND SAITH UNTO JESUS, WHENCE ART THOU? BUT JESUS GAVE HIM NO ANSWER.

THEN SAITH PILATE UNTO HIM, SPEAKEST THOU NOT UNTO ME? KNOWEST THOU NOT
THAT I HAVE POWER TO CRUCIFY THEE, AND HAVE POWER TO RELEASE THEE?

JESUS ANSWERED, THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER AT ALL AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
WERE GIVEN THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE {ie.

"ALWAYS BEARING ABOUT IN THE BODY THE DYING OF THE LORD JESUS, THAT THE
LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE MANIFEST IN OUR BODY. FOR WE WHICH LIVE
ARE ALWAY DELIVERED {

G3860@{
   @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
   @2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
   @3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
   @4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
1 (#101),
   @5: Sup: 24 (#224); Ego: 4 (#105),
   @6: Sup: 34 (#258); Ego: 10 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
   @7: Sup: 38 (#296); Ego: 4 (#119),
   @8: Sup: 28 (#324); Ego: 71 (#190),
   @9: Sup: 68 (#392); Ego: 40 (#230),
   @10: Sup: 78 (#470); Ego: 10 (#240),
   Male: #470; Feme: #240
}

#325 {MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4,
#10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10,
#4, #800, #40, #10] = paradidomi (3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8}
1) to give into the hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's)
power or use; 3) to commit, to commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to
permit allow; 2a) to deliver to one something to keep, use, take care
of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one to custody, to be judged, condemned,
punished, scourged, tormented, put to death; 2c) to deliver up
treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one to be taken; 2c2) to
deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands, rites; 4b) to deliver
by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will allow that is when its
*RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents itself;

} UNTO DEATH FOR JESUS’ SAKE, THAT THE LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE
MANIFEST IN OUR MORTAL FLESH." [2 Corinthians 4:10 -11 (KJV)]

} THAT DELIVERED {

G3860@{
   @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
   @2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
   @3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#204); Ego: 5 (#105),
   @5: Sup: 28 (#232); Ego: 4 (#109),
   @6: Sup: 17 (#249); Ego: 70 (#179),
   @7: Sup: 26 (#275); Ego: 9 (#188),
   @8: Sup: 34 (#309); Ego: 8 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
   @9: Sup: 10 (#319); Ego: 57 (#253),
   @10: Sup: 15 (#334); Ego: 5 (#258),
   Male: #334; Feme: #258
} // #582

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #582 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 -
The Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;

THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *SACRED* *PROPERTY*.

    #VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
    #TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence
between word and deed.
    #POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
    #TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
    #CANON: #200

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_200@{
   @1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
   @2: Sup: 56 (#64); Ego: 48 (#56),
   @3: Sup: 41 (#105); Ego: 66 (#122),
   @4: Sup: 38 (#143); Ego: 78 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
   Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200

#582 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #4, #70, #9, #8, #300, #5] = paradidomi
(G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8} 1) to give into the hands (of
another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 3) to commit, to
commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to permit allow; 2a) to deliver to
one something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one
to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented, put
to death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one
to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands,
rites; 4b) to deliver by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will
allow that is when its *RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents
itself;

} ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.

AND FROM THENCEFORTH PILATE SOUGHT TO RELEASE HIM: BUT THE JEWS CRIED
OUT, SAYING, IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU ART NOT CAESAR’S FRIEND:
WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:1-12
(KJV)]

But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and
answered, because we always have need of them in turn for all answering
and for all thinking of objects:

Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial
consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial
rationality in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ONTIC
necessity as conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):

6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry {*VISHNU*}
7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction {*SHIVA*}
8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression {*BRAHMA*}

YOUTUBE: “DOCTOR WHO (PARTING OF WAYS)”

http://youtu.be/6ThpkjDgdvY

WHAT THEN IS A-U-M?

“FOR I SAY UNTO YOU, THAT EXCEPT YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL EXCEED [THE
RIGHTEOUSNESS] OF THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES, YE SHALL IN NO CASE ENTER
INTO THE KINGDOM {ie. #2184} OF HEAVEN.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]

Whom is holier than thou?

There are many #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* that we can know only
through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
i.e., nature in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any
experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
priori at the basis of its possibility.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification
constitutes the possibility of experience.

Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this
entire part, that universal #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* can be cognized
a priori, already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest
legislation for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding,
and that we must not seek the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
from nature by means of experience, but, conversely, must seek nature,
as regards its universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of
the possibility of experience that lie in our sensibility and
understanding; for how would it otherwise be possible to become
acquainted with these laws a priori, since they are surely not rules of
analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic amplifications of
cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary agreement, between the
principles of possible experience and the laws of the possibility of
nature, can come about from only two causes: either these laws are taken
from nature by means of experience, or, conversely, nature is derived
from the laws of the possibility of experience in general and is fully
identical with the mere universal lawfulness of experience. The first
one contradicts itself, for the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the
understanding; so only the second remains.

We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*,
which always [IDEA: @320] presuppose particular perceptions, from the
pure or *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF
#451 = Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

Which, without having particular *PERCEPTIONS* *UNDERLYING* *THEM*,
*CONTAIN* *MERELY* *THE* *CONDITIONS* *FOR* *THE* *NECESSARY*
*UNIFICATION* *OF* *SUCH* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *ONE* *EXPERIENCE*; with
respect to the latter laws, nature and possible experience are one and
the same, and since in *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *THE* *LAWFULNESS*
*RESTS* on the necessary connection of appearances in one experience
(without which we would not be able to cognize any object of the
sensible world at all), and so on the original laws of the
understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at first, it is
nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 -
*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*: the understanding does not draw its (a priori)
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, but prescribes them to it." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEA: @320, pages 69-71]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0655 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "[Being educated as a Roman Catholic] I live and thrive
on and for this kind of shite, didn't you know?"

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1037
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Sure I know. I suspected as much about you
right from the beginning!

Anglo-Celtic racist pigs must be a special breed!

How otherwise could one account for your 'special quality/quantity'
Usenet output?

Cheer up! It won't be long before your utter mental decline has almost
run its course."

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0931 HOURS
ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Over a billion of them live among and thrive on
shite, didn't you know?."

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 18 February 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-02-19 00:09:19 UTC
Permalink
-- VOX POPULI VOX DEI

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 18 February 2019

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1118 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY
2019: "WHAT ARE AUSTRALIANS LIKE?

I was recently informed that white Anglo Australians - the most common
sort in Australia - are composed of two types.

1. Decent, laid back, hard-working, kindly, etc. who are the salt of the
earth and so have made the country what it is - from something rejected
by the Dutch, to what it is now, with high value real estate prices,
most liveable cities, fine roads and services, etc.

2. The very scum of the Earth who pretend to be the former. Being scum,
they know how to rise to top places.

I have led a sheltered life, in the research field where only the #1
type were around, but I could not help noticing how they were affected
by the #2 types.

In which category are Australian politicians to be placed?"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1813 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY 2019: "You
asked the wrong people but I appreciate your attempt at trolling....."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1027 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY
2019: "Rather dull aren't you."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0926 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019:
"Thankfully not as dull as a troll."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1326 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Show some evidence of wit. Borrow some."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1833 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "YAWN."

DOLF @ 1855 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Your ideas are *CONSTIPATED* ...

— HEY GIBLET —

“DANG YOU ***@THOLE
A CAPED CRUSADER.
MEATHEAD PARASOL.
MY SPACE INVADER.

HYENAS EACH ONE.
ON A PICNIC TREAT.
CONGREGATING FUN.
GROWLING CONCEIT.

YOU’RE NO TROJAN.
JUST TURKEY ARSE.
A FORAGING BOGAN.
FEVERISH FOR FARCE.”

YOUTUBE: "African Safari Oleg"

http://youtu.be/ezYfujKJsxQ

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1835 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Truly witless people, programmed to babble whatever rubbish they
hear from approved sources, can have no comprehension of wit."

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Excuse me, Bob?

Do you remember where I hid the K-Y Jelly?”

DOLF: “You dry old twat {ie. a person regarded as stupid or obnoxious}
who is still living in the 80’s...

Silicon based lubricants gives a better glide.

And afterwards you can polish the linoleum floors.”

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Okay, i'll try the WD-40.

thanks for all your continued great advice.”

— LOVE IS AN OPEN DOOR —

“NO DEAR, HERE’S SOME ADVICE.
WD-40 IS FOR YOUR DRY HINGE.
AND KEEN FOR TRYST AS TO VICE.
IT’S NO VALUE FOR A LONG BINGE.
WHEN YOU CAN’T EVEN PLAY NICE.
BECAUSE YOU’RE ONLY UNHINGED.”

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1937 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Gad, a strange creature here, makes no sense at all. Is this
supposed to be comic relief?"

DOLF @ 2009 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "You’re Indian mate and don’t
believe in sapient human rights due to your mentally deficient binomial
paradigm:

*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE*

Since our superior democracy is established upon a trinomial paradigm:

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL

YOUR SHIT HOLE NATION CANNOT PROVIDE FLUSHING TOILETS OR HUMAN RIGHTS
FOR THE UNTOUCHABLES..."

YOUTUBE: "Coldplay - Hymn For The Weekend (Official Video)"

http://youtu.be/YykjpeuMNEk

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2154 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Bad comic."

DOLF @ 2207 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "What do you mean by that
offensive racist remark?

And don’t get me started on equal rights for women whom no less as
sapient have the innate human right to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0843 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "There are those who are funny when they try to be serious. There
are those who are funny when they write nonsense. Then there are those
who write nonsense seriously. That too can be funny, but when they are
merely peculiar then they are bad comics."

DOLF @ 0858 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Our the constitution to our
democracy comes with its own sapient trinomial mathematical theoretical
noumenon by which we can assay your INDIAN speak with forked tongue 👅:

"There are those who are funny when they try to be serious. {@1: Sup: 72
(#72); Ego: 31 (#31)},
There are those who are funny when they write nonsense. {@2: Sup: 77
(#149); Ego: 63 (#94)},
Then there are those who write nonsense seriously. {@3: Sup: 40 (#189);
Ego: 14 (#108 - *PROGENITOR*)},
That too can be funny, {@4: Sup: 44 (#233); Ego: 33 (#141)},
but when they are merely peculiar then they are bad comics." {@5: Sup:
79 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *BY* *UNSCRUPULOUS* *INDIAN*); Ego: 5 (#146 -
I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15})},

AS UNCONSCIONABLE AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDUCT AS BREACHES TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 {

#371 - *SAINT* *ANDREWS* *AS* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *30* *NOVEMBER* *FIVE*
*YEAR*: 4 x #364 + #371 = #1827 *LITURGICAL* *CALENDAR*,
#288 - *REMEMBRANCE* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI* *PROTOTYPE*,
#390 - *WREATHS* / *SOVEREIGNTY*,
#312 - *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI*
*PROTOTYPE*,
#419 - *SLAUGHTER*

} OF DETERMINED AND PREMEDITATED BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING
RACIAL HATRED, ANTI-SEMITISM BY ESPECIALLY *INDIANS* / ROMAN CATHOLICS /
FREEMASONRY AS KNIGHTS TEMPLARS BEING AN UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER AND
PSYCHOSEXUAL SLANDER AGAINST WHICH THEY HAVE NOT BEEN RESPONSIVE."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1133 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "I invented googling while I lived in India and that is not
nothing. The pains of life in India also gives scope for incredible
creativity well beyond thr scope of the pampered racist bigots."

DOLF @ 0920 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "I do note that QUEEN VICTORIA was
the EMPRESS OF INDIA at the time of granting such PRESENTS to our nation
as LETTERS PATENT to the FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.

Such exemplary sovereign dignity was obviously wasted on INDIA whom can
only produce an atomic bomb, Bollywood and little else of memorable merit:

Case in point is that INDIANS migrate to AUSTRALIA and not AUSTRALIANS
migrate to INDIA."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1907 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "Before that time she was the biggest drug dealer on the planet.

Atomic bombs are evil and Bollywood has no merit, but Indian cinema is
great though often only in flashes of singing and dancing.

India provides Indians with correct religious approaches involving
superb mythology and metaphysics with associated customs and traditions,
many beautiful languages, the best literature Sanskrit downwards, music
and dancing, art and architecture, agriculture and pottery, medicine and
the correct theories of state administration, weaving and animal
rearing, the best family values, the greatest views, the tasties dishes,
the healthiest approaches, etc.

True, one has to get out of India to appreciate the value of India, past
and also present. India can do a lot better when Indians acquire more
self-confidence in their past. This process has started with the
election of Modi, and I believe, will continue.

No doubt. Indians have much to learn and Australia is a wonderful
country from where to learn and also live well in the process. Indians
have a right to migrate to Australia, for the British used the wealths
from India to develop Australia. And other colonies as well.

I have no doubt that Australians will migrate to India when conditions
in India suit them. That may happen, within 20-50 years, depending upon
progress in India. Some Australians I have met seem hopeful, given the
quality of infrastructure that has been built up in the last few years.
I think with good telecom and power tools, a lot of progress is possible
very fast. Let us see."

DOLF @ 1937 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "SUBSUMING HINDU’S PRINCIPLE
DEITIES INTO A MATHEMATICAL FUNCTION OF AN #2184 - ANTHROPOLOGIC
COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AND FUNCTION:

You are mistaken in that my metempirical / metaphysical philosophy and
theology as shown to you being a syncretism of Jewish Torah / DAOist
Humanist / Christian is transcendent being a trinomial paradigm to
Hinduism’s reliance upon a binomial methodology:

#364 - Vishnu,
#312 - Shiva and
#273 - Brahma

Which I have clearly shown by subsuming HINDU’s Principle Deities into a
mathematical function of an #2184 - ANTHROPOLOGIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE
AND FUNCTION.

*DO* *NOT* *MAKE* *THAT* *BLASPHEMOUS* *FALSE* *CLAIM* *AGAIN* AND SHOW
A GREATER #873 - PROBITY TOWARDS #115 - PREEMINENCE OTHERWISE WE MIGHT
DIRECT YOUR RETURN TO INDIA ON GROUNDS THAT YOU HAVE VIOLATED THE
CRITERIA OF CITIZENSHIP WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2244 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "May I assure you that I have not the faintest interest in any
philosophy of yours."

DOLF @ 0001 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "I OBJECT TO YOUR NEO-NAZI ROMAN
CATHOLIC BLASPHEMY ASSOCIATED WITH AN ABOMINATION OF INDIAN IDOLATRY
WHICH MAKES FALSE AND DELUSIONAL CLAIMS OF ENTITLEMENT AGAINST MY
PREROGATIVE RIGHT TO CITIZENSHIP AND THE EXERCISE OF AN UNENCUMBERED
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL WHICH YOU HAVE SLANDERED:

“INDIANS HAVE A RIGHT TO MIGRATE TO AUSTRALIA, FOR THE BRITISH USED THE
WEALTHS FROM INDIA TO DEVELOP AUSTRALIA.” [Arindam Banerjee
<***@gmail.com>, 27 JANUARY 2019]

If you don’t conform and have no intention to conform to the
FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES OF THIS AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH BY QUEEN
VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 THEN YOU OUGHT TO BE
IMMEDIATELY DECLARED A PERSONA NON GRATA AND EXPELLED FROM THIS COUNTRY
AS BEING AN UNDESIRABLE ALIEN WITH
AN INCURABLE DISEASE AS A PERSON OF UNSOUND MIND.

Get out of our country you fascist excrement."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0913 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "This hate speech was posted in facebook, using one of the posts
in my timeline. I have reported this hate speech to facebook
authorities. And of course, blocked the creep from doing such nasty
things again in facebook at least."

DOLF @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "What do you think of my KRISHNA
consciousness as dark humour?

YOUTUBE: “My Sweet Lord (George Harrison”

http://youtu.be/SP9wms6oEMo

DOLF @ 1340 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "If Arindam Banerjee
<***@gmail.com> is not very careful in his
next comment he will have cursed entire pantheon of gods.

*CHECKMATE*

YOUTUBE: “ONE NIGHT IN BANGKOK (MURRAY HEAD)”

http://youtu.be/rgc_LRjlbTU

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1435 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "In the 1960s the ISKCON started. Hordes of whites started doing
strange things in India. My uncle was a police officer. I heard him tell
my father that it was a CIA trick. Like all the Bhagwan stuff a bit later."

DOLF @ 1446 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Yes yes of course one cannot
trust the bhagwan—***@ck you.

Was your uncle lamenting the diminished opportunity for graft and
corruption since the ISKCON took all the money?

YOU ANSWERED YOUR OWN QUESTION: “I was recently informed that Nile-mud
Brahman priesthood off-scouring the most common sort in INDIA - are
composed of two types:

I have led a sheltered life, in the research field where only the #1
type (ie. my uncle police officer) were around, but I could not help
noticing how they were affected by [by graft and corruption from] the #2
types: The very scum of the Earth who pretend to be the former. Being
scum, they know how to rise to top places.

In which category [as contortions of truth state of sapience and bearing
their buttholes to the sun] are INDIAN [yoga practitioner] politicians
to be placed?” [paraphrase of Arindam Banerjee
<***@gmail.com> quote so as to assay universal truth about
India’s sacred cows]

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1520 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"OK, mate. Calm down! So WTF has all that to do with contemporary
aus.politics????

You are badly off topic here w/o a shred of relevance. If you insist on
posting to Usenet try an India related newsgroup!"

DOLF @ 1953 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "It cannot BE CONSIDERED A RACIAL
HATRED REMARK AS IRRATIONALITY DIRECTED TOWARDS PERSONS OF INDIAN
NATIONALITY because the opinion is made on the basis of “criteria and
expectations of citizenship” associated with a delusional and haughty
self-bestowal a prerogative life at the expense of ABORIGINAL #451 -
ENTITLEMENT (DREAMTIME) which is indigenous to the #41 - establishment
of the #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL as principle central to the nation’s
identity as the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH."

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Noting that the PRE-PLATONIC
advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) a principle proponent of the
PYTHAGOREAN doctrine considered the Natural Year to be 364.5 days which
is identical to the Chinese trinomial conception of number that by its
circularity conveys an #41 - ONTIC necessity proscriptions: #205 -
Principle of Persistent Substance ✡️ / ☯️ #164 - Principle of
Materiality = #369 - Discriminating Norm (Human Nature) being
organisation as premise of #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY for #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>

A reasonable question in regard to this is made of EMANATION theology in
relation to the perspective that ASYLUM INFLUX may be viewed as an
irrationality of the LATIN / PYTHAGOREAN binomial construct of imperial
governance as perspective of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.

Emanation of the state is a term used in European law to describe any
body which provides a public service under the control of government.
The term was defined by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Foster, A
and others v. British Gas plc. The ECJ's ruling defines the term as:

A body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible,
pursuant to a measure adopted by the state, for providing a public
service under the control of the state and has for that purpose special
powers beyond that which result from the normal rules applicable in
relations between individuals.

The term is most obviously used to describe public sector employers,
such as the police, fire service, local government bodies or schools.
[<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanation_of_the_state>]

Thusly can we not therefore consider antisemitism as emanation within
the state as similar to such issues of Institutional corruption or of an
emerging contagious shooting dynamic whether in police services,
educational institutions or the norm within society as a sociological
accountability phenomenon first observed in military and police
personnel, in which one person firing on a target can induce others to
begin shooting.

In my view EMANATION theology presents to us a circularity which as
intuited from the TORAH has as #4 - Principle of Materiality as it’s
grounding that as temporality is anchored within 49J1W2D as Jewish
Exodus from Egypt and 40 years sojourn = 50J"

DOLF @ 0123 HOURS ON 29 JANUARY 2019: "Such that we have women’s
suffrage as their entitlement to exercise #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
within political life, but when you come into this country and fail to
succeed to that principle which women have in this country (but not in
Saudi Arabia for instance) then it is YOU whom are failing that
unambiguous “criteria and expectations of citizenship” and your capacity
to remain within this country ought to be annulled.

That principle is not up to negotiation or disparities since it is
causal to the necessity as why we exist as a nation over 119 years ago
then we consented to the notion that women have rights, women have
entitlement and women are equal to men."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1857 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Says
the person who said good things about Trump thus revealing his own
babbling sources.... "

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Well may you say with regards to
antisemitism and holocaust never again, let us be lambs to the slaughter
however bleating “unacceptable” is not an adequate reasoned response.

Unacceptable is when you provide a comprehensive solution to the “WORLD
JEWISH CONGRESS” and they refuse to engage within any dialog (not even
acknowledgement let alone appreciation) and continue to send you
solicitations for money saying the matter is URGENT.

A case in point is President TRUMP's foresight in establishing a BORDER
WALL due to the risk of a RIPPLE or CONTAGION EFFECT from basket case
ECONOMIES and failed STATES within LATIN AMERICA.

When you consider that implicit within the notion of LATIN AMERICA is a
conception of SOVEREIGN STATES which are a reliance upon ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE: *ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 -
FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT
ROME, @5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 -
*SOLDIER*, #175 - *MARRIAGE* that apart from a demiurge existential
impost {eg: alleged Russian interference within the American political
system} always has inherent dichotomies, irrationality and
irreconcilability.

This is distinct from a SAPIENT / KNOWLEDGE economy which as conveyed by
the GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE as DATA SET comprised of #729 = #9 x #9 x #9 / 2 =
#364.5 BIFURCATED APPRAISALS as being a SUB-SET of the available 14,298
RECORDS.

We are now meeting the requirement for the development of some program
functions against that originating DATA SET. Before we commence the
actual process of generating our individual LEXICON JSON resource files
and GEMATRIA / UMBRA {ie.

That the *ISOPSEPHIC* extent of #800 as threshold has equivalence to the
*ORDINAL* value of 26th letter to the ENGLISH / ROMANISATION languages
suggests that there is a probable CIRCUMSCRIBING #311 / #111 - impetus
made against the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS by the SAINT ANDREWS
#371 - 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE from otherwise LATIN / ARABIC or OTHER
BINOMIAL LINGUISTIC GROUPS by its pantomime and regular patterning which
undertaken by INTERNET MILITIA is intentioned upon #325 {MAGIC SUM OF
5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #70, #40, #5,
#9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #800, #40, #10] =
paradidomi (3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8} 1) to give into the
hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; ... 4b)
*TO* *DELIVER* *BY* *NARRATING*, to report;

} aggregation of them we will make the 14,298 REFERENCE SOURCE OBJECTS
available for the exigency of GOVERNMENT and NEWS MEDIA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/scripts/Strongs.zip>

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2026 HOURS
ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Have you suddenly and without warning switched to
describing the people in India?"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2347 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "Indians, especially Bengalis, are very witty. They have the best
jokes. Facebook provides them for me, galore.

I was talking in general, about the brainwashed masses, and their
robotic minds that being so robotic can have no comprehension of wit."

— OUR SHINDIG —

“OH FOR THE LOVE
OF PUSSY DEAR.
TRUTH SO PLAIN.
TO GOD {#86} ABOVE. {@5: Sup: 41 (#98); Ego: 70 (#305 - SEE KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @305)}
AND ALL HERE.
WE’RE JUST VAIN.” {@7: Sup: 15 (#118 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA:
@B118); Ego: 50 (#417)}

YOUTUBE: "PUSSY GALORE"

http://youtu.be/XCLqyXf2s70

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 0733 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"This should be interesting to watch: a lowlife racist alt-right wanker
against this strange newbie!"

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #22 AS IDEA @305: "To sum this up: the
*BUSINESS* *OF* *THE* *SENSES* is to intuit; that of the understanding,
to think. To think, however, is to unite representations in a
consciousness. This unification either arises merely relative to the
subject and is contingent and subjective, or it occurs without condition
and is necessary or objective. The unification of representations in a
consciousness is judgment. Therefore, thinking is the same as judging or
as relating representations to judgments in general. Judgments are
therefore either merely subjective, if representations are related to
one consciousness in one subject alone and are united in it, or they are
objective, if they are united in a consciousness in general, i.e., are
united necessarily therein. [IDEA: @305] The logical moments of all
judgments are so many possible ways of uniting representations in a
consciousness.

If, however, the very same moments serve as concepts, they are concepts
of the necessary unification of these representations in a
consciousness, and so are principles of objectively valid judgments.
This unification in a consciousness is either analytic, through
identity, or synthetic, through combination and addition of various
representations with one another. Experience consists in the synthetic
connection of appearances (perceptions) in a consciousness, insofar as
this connection is necessary.

Therefore pure concepts of the understanding are those under which all
perceptions must first be subsumed before they can serve in judgments of
experience, in which the synthetic unity of perceptions is represented
as necessary and universally valid." [pages 56-57]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0922 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "So what are you? You have been described as a marxist. At their
best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy, envious,
pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0927 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "For
God's sake try to use some brains if you have any! It should be obvious
even to an idiot that he was described as being a 'marxist' by a known
troll. Or didn't you understand the responses that were given about
that troll?

At their best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy,
envious, pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way.

Now you're turning you attention to him (thus making a lie of your
comments about how unworthy he was of your attnetion [snort]) your
insults are still lame and pathetic."

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA @B118: "Hence I call the explanation
of the way in which concepts can relate a priori to objects the
transcendental deduction of those concepts, and I distinguish it from an
empirical deduction, which shows how a concept is acquired through
experience and reflection on experience, and which concerns therefore
not the legitimacy of the possession, but the fact of how possession
came about.

Now we have indeed two sorts of concepts, completely different in [IDEA:
@B118] kind, that nonetheless agree with one another in that both of
them relate to objects entirely a priori: namely, the concepts of space
and time, as forms of #123 - SENSIBILITY, and the categories {

#118 / #417 as [#5, #300, #1, #60, #1, #50] = tasso (G5021): {UMBRA: #19
as #1501 % #41 = #25} 1) to put in order, to station; 1a) to place in a
certain order, to arrange, to assign a place, to appoint; 1a1) to assign
(appoint) a thing to one; 1b) to appoint, ordain, order; 1b1) to appoint
on one's own responsibility or authority; 1b2) *TO* *APPOINT*
*MUTUALLY*, ie. *AGREE* *UPON*;

}, as concepts of the understanding.

To attempt an empirical deduction of these concepts would be completely
idle labor, because the differentia of their nature consists in the
[IDEA: @A86] very fact that they relate to their objects without having
to borrow anything from experience for the representation of those
objects. If therefore a deduction of these concepts is needed, it will
always have to be transcendental." [page 212]

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1005 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "It
looks like some people's idea what a discussion of a topic should look
like is quite different from what this newbie thinks.

There are those like "*DOLF*" for instance who loves ranting on and on
and on but rational readers can never work out what he is on about. I am
afraid the same goes for this poster.

I am still unable to work out why he insists on posting to this
newsgroup. Why he insists posting at all!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1143 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "Is there someone high up in this n[ews]g[roup] who has signed a
document showing who is a troll and who is not? Even if he did, that
would not be binding upon anyone in any free society.

As far as I am concerned, all are equal here, *EXCEPT* *THOSE* *LIKE*
*DOLF* *WHO* *WRITE* [TO] *HARASS* *ME* *WITH* *HATE* *SPEECH*. Those I
regard as the real scum, and will report to the police about them if
they continue with such harassment. Cybercrime involving hate speech,
that is hateful to minorities, is an offence that is taken seriously
these days.

Anyway why are you speaking for this dog character? Can't he decide for
himself what he is? I suppose you all are suffering severe identity crises."

DE NUN CHUCKA (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1148 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"Really, I might take [*DOLF*] out of the bozo bin as he sound[s] like a
sensible fellow now.

Anyhow why is a US west coast Indian posting in this n[ews]g[roup],
shouldn't you be on a reservation sitting in a tee-pee?"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1348 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "I was
waiting for someone else to pick up on that. Now he says he's in
Melbourne and has been since 1989................"

DANIEL60 (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2349 HOURS ON 17 FEBRUARY
2019: "What?? Did you actually bother to read the tripe??"

-- CONSTIPATED IDEAS --

"OH SUCH NUGGET OF WISDOM.
BESTOWAL OF TURGID REALITY.
BIRTHED BY IGNORANT SCUM.
INFINITE AGE GIVING BANALITY.
HEY MISSUS NOW WIPE MY BUM.
ENDLESS REACH MY STUPIDITY." {@7: Sup: 33 (#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65
- *SOLDIER*); Ego: 60 (#318: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) EXCERPT OF IDEA: @318 FROM SECTION #36 - HOW
IS NATURE ITSELF POSSIBLE?
This question, which is the highest point that transcendental philosophy
*CAN* *EVER* *REACH*, *AND* *UP* *TO* *WHICH*, *AS* *ITS* *BOUNDARY*
*AND* *COMPLETION*, it must be taken, actually contains two questions.

FIRST: How is nature possible in general in the material sense, namely,
according to intuition, as the sum total of appearances; how are space,
time {#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - SOLDIER {*DODECAHEDRON*} as
Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273} - *DO* *NOT* *KILL*

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CELEBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

}, and that which fills them both, the object of sensation {

#175 - MARRIAGE {*ICOSAHEDRON*} as Principle of Persistent Substance
{#205} - Discriminating Norm {#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO*
*NOT* *STEAL*

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist {ie.
*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE*: *DODECAHEDRON* + *ICOSAHEDRON* = TETRAD / *TETRACTYS*},
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD /
TETRACTYS

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "My point is that the racist bigots will do their best to ignore
and pull down the highest, supreme talent, as giving publicity to the
highest talent which does not conform to their biases, will make them
feel small.

Which is a pain, for the arts and sciences. My other inventions and
works are also ignored, by the ruling racist bigots, and that is not
good for the progress of humanity.

Of course, this is just their style, to intimidate. Being highly
theistic, I smile at such efforts on their part, for following my
Catholic schooling I dedicate all my deeds to God.

Well, God in my case means the Hindu Gods and Goddesses mainly, but I am
also very grateful to *JEHOVAH* and *BUNJIL* {

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/weddingblues.jpg>

[IMAGE: Within Australian Aboriginal mythology, Bunjil is a creator
deity, culture hero and ancestral being, often depicted as a
wedge-tailed eagle [as similar modal depiction within the Egyptian Book
of the Dead]. In the Kulin nation in central Victoria he was regarded as
one of two moiety ancestors, the other being Waa the crow. Bunjil has
two wives and a son, Binbeal the rainbow. His brother is Palian the bat]

} for looking after my family and I so well.

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"Are you pissed at OZ for whatever (real or imaginary) personal
grievances you have had?"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "No, I understand their limitations, so what is the point of
getting pissed. I am well off after all, despite all machinations.

When one dedicates all one's works to God, then one can only admire the
way God works: so fine, so admirable! Now that is not something the
racist bigots will understand, for they are limited by their narrow
sectarian visions. But, they too are a part of God, not that they will
understand this, so they have to play their parts in the great game around."

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"Believe me (or don't) there are many ways to discuss topics in
newsgroups. Some are OK some ain't. Madly trolling, ignorant comments,
drifting off topic, whinging/whining, posting disgruntled rants and
alienating regular posters in your targeted newsgroup is definitely not
the right way to do it."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "In this case I was simply saying that India does produce things
the world steals without giving due credit. Such as my works, and there
have been plenty more over the ages and even now. The racist bigots will
ignore, then steal the new ideas from the poor thirdworlders struggling
for sheer existence."

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"But feel free to try Facebook or some similar crazy social media
instead of Usenet!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "I do use facebook. That is useful, for I can put in photos and
videos.

<https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359>

Usenet is useful as it is a very open medium where assertions are
forcefully challenged. So new ideas placed on usenet, such as my
inventions of the Hydrogen Transmission Network, or the Internal Force
Engine, are open to criticism. It is a test by fire, very useful. A good
way to improve, by absorbing the criticism from the public. Also it
ensures that my new inventions remain my property, at least in the moral
sense if not legal sense by patenting. That is some satisfaction.
Publicity thus has its uses. Indians at least will remember my works,
this I believe. Certainly some Australians as well, meaning my family
and my friends here."

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/fascist.gif>

[IMAGE: TRUTH IS A COSMOGONIC CONSIDERATION AFTER ALL:

1) Telos (6,000 as 122J3W1D) = Arch (#0 as 22/7 = 3W1D) + c² is a
genuine Sabbath based PARADIGM [Exodus 20:8; Deuteronomy 5:15]

As the relativity and grounding of the Infinite to the temporal reality
(ie. the phenomenology as the deterministic unfolding of history) which
is implied by the notion of rational PI and the cosmogonical Genesis
reprise {#0} of the lunar / solar cycle occurring on the equinox of
Wednesday 20th March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday 21st March 1996.

2) Pythagorean Theorem: c² = a² + b² is fascist (see discussion below)
and now redundant as only a METHODOLOGY]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0945 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "Small minded, when not idiotic."

"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {

#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}

INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114 {#5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} #6 {114 / #342 - ANKH /
ROMAN}}; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
} // #270

THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1018
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Idiotic is an alternate officially approved
signature of Arindam Banerjee

[Believe me since I am Arindam Banerjee (or we are, or, what the ***@ck,
who really knows)]"

HITLER HIMSELF SAID OF FASCISM: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST
POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*}
MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE
TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON
SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]

'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was
one of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir
of the great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians
have so many qualities that make us like them.

Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the
*STATE*. THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF
ALL.' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]

}, possible in general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of
our sensibility, in accordance with which our #123 - *SENSIBILITY* is
affected in its characteristic way by objects that are in themselves
unknown to it and that are wholly distinct from said appearances. This
answer is, in the book itself, given in the Transcendental Aesthetic,
but here in the Prolegomena through the solution of the first main
question.

— EUROPEAN UNION'S RAPE —

"OH BOUDICA, REGINA HERO
THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE.
ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF NERO.
FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE. {@6: Sup: 35 (#242); Ego: 1 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT
ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})

TESTIMONY {#873} BY MORTAL WILL.
VICTORIA REMEMBERS THEE.
WITHIN ROME'S GRASP STILL. {@9: Sup: 11 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *THE*
*SENSES* *DO* *NOT* *SUPPLY* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE*
*UNDERSTANDING* *IN* *CONCRETO*); Ego: 7 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *BUT*
*ONLY* *THE* *SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*)}
ITS TIME TO SET YOU FREE."

YOUTUBE: "Horrible Histories (Boudicca)

<https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nhi4w>

SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of
the rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be
thought as connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out
otherwise than: it is possible only by means of the constitution of our
understanding, in accordance with which all these representations of
sensibility are necessarily referred to one consciousness, and through
which, first, the characteristic manner of our thinking, namely by means
of rules, is possible, and then, by means of these rules, experience is
possible – which is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects
in themselves. This answer is, in the book itself, given in the
Transcendental Logic, but here in the Prolegomena, in the course of
solving the second main question.

"THEN PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART} THEREFORE TOOK JESUS {HE IS SAVED/A
SAVIOUR; A DELIVERER} OF NAZARETH {SOVEREIGN; ONE CHOSEN OR SET APART;
SEPARATED; CROWNED; SANCTIFIED}, AND SCOURGED HIM.

AND THE #65 - *SOLDIERS* PLATTED A CROWN OF THORNS, AND PUT IT ON HIS
HEAD, AND THEY PUT ON HIM A PURPLE ROBE, AND SAID, HAIL, KING OF THE
JEWS! AND THEY SMOTE HIM WITH THEIR HANDS.

PILATE THEREFORE WENT FORTH AGAIN, AND SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD, I BRING
HIM FORTH TO YOU, THAT YE MAY KNOW THAT I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM. THEN
CAME JESUS FORTH, WEARING THE CROWN OF THORNS, AND THE PURPLE ROBE. AND
PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD THE MAN!

WHEN THE CHIEF PRIESTS THEREFORE AND OFFICERS SAW HIM, THEY CRIED OUT,
SAYING, CRUCIFY HIM, CRUCIFY HIM. PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, TAKE YE HIM,
AND CRUCIFY HIM: FOR I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM.

THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE,
BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE SON OF GOD. WHEN PILATE THEREFORE HEARD
THAT SAYING, HE WAS THE MORE AFRAID; AND WENT AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT
HALL, AND SAITH UNTO JESUS, WHENCE ART THOU? BUT JESUS GAVE HIM NO ANSWER.

THEN SAITH PILATE UNTO HIM, SPEAKEST THOU NOT UNTO ME? KNOWEST THOU NOT
THAT I HAVE POWER TO CRUCIFY THEE, AND HAVE POWER TO RELEASE THEE?

JESUS ANSWERED, THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER AT ALL AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
WERE GIVEN THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE {ie.

"ALWAYS BEARING ABOUT IN THE BODY THE DYING OF THE LORD JESUS, THAT THE
LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE MANIFEST IN OUR BODY. FOR WE WHICH LIVE
ARE ALWAY DELIVERED {

G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
1 (#101),
@5: Sup: 24 (#224); Ego: 4 (#105),
@6: Sup: 34 (#258); Ego: 10 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@7: Sup: 38 (#296); Ego: 4 (#119),
@8: Sup: 28 (#324); Ego: 71 (#190),
@9: Sup: 68 (#392); Ego: 40 (#230),
@10: Sup: 78 (#470); Ego: 10 (#240),
Male: #470; Feme: #240
}

#325 {MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4,
#10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10,
#4, #800, #40, #10] = paradidomi (3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8}
1) to give into the hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's)
power or use; 3) to commit, to commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to
permit allow; 2a) to deliver to one something to keep, use, take care
of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one to custody, to be judged, condemned,
punished, scourged, tormented, put to death; 2c) to deliver up
treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one to be taken; 2c2) to
deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands, rites; 4b) to deliver
by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will allow that is when its
*RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents itself;

} UNTO DEATH FOR JESUS’ SAKE, THAT THE LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE
MANIFEST IN OUR MORTAL FLESH." [2 Corinthians 4:10 -11 (KJV)]

} THAT DELIVERED {

G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 24 (#204); Ego: 5 (#105),
@5: Sup: 28 (#232); Ego: 4 (#109),
@6: Sup: 17 (#249); Ego: 70 (#179),
@7: Sup: 26 (#275); Ego: 9 (#188),
@8: Sup: 34 (#309); Ego: 8 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
@9: Sup: 10 (#319); Ego: 57 (#253),
@10: Sup: 15 (#334); Ego: 5 (#258),
Male: #334; Feme: #258
} // #582

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #582 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 -
The Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;

THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *SACRED* *PROPERTY*.

#VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
#TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence
between word and deed.
#POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
#TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
#CANON: #200

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_200@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 56 (#64); Ego: 48 (#56),
@3: Sup: 41 (#105); Ego: 66 (#122),
@4: Sup: 38 (#143); Ego: 78 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200

#582 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #4, #70, #9, #8, #300, #5] = paradidomi
(G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8} 1) to give into the hands (of
another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 3) to commit, to
commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to permit allow; 2a) to deliver to
one something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one
to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented, put
to death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one
to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands,
rites; 4b) to deliver by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will
allow that is when its *RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents
itself;

} ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.

AND FROM THENCEFORTH PILATE SOUGHT TO RELEASE HIM: BUT THE JEWS CRIED
OUT, SAYING, IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU ART NOT CAESAR’S FRIEND:
WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:1-12
(KJV)]

But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and
answered, because we always have need of them in turn for all answering
and for all thinking of objects:

Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial
consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial
rationality in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ONTIC
necessity as conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):

6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry {*VISHNU*}
7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction {*SHIVA*}
8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression {*BRAHMA*}

YOUTUBE: “DOCTOR WHO (PARTING OF WAYS)”

http://youtu.be/6ThpkjDgdvY

WHAT THEN IS A-U-M?

“FOR I SAY UNTO YOU, THAT EXCEPT YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL EXCEED [THE
RIGHTEOUSNESS] OF THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES, YE SHALL IN NO CASE ENTER
INTO THE KINGDOM {ie. #2184} OF HEAVEN.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]

Whom is holier than thou?

There are many #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* that we can know only
through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
i.e., nature in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any
experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
priori at the basis of its possibility.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification
constitutes the possibility of experience.

Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this
entire part, that universal #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* can be cognized
a priori, already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest
legislation for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding,
and that we must not seek the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
from nature by means of experience, but, conversely, must seek nature,
as regards its universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of
the possibility of experience that lie in our sensibility and
understanding; for how would it otherwise be possible to become
acquainted with these laws a priori, since they are surely not rules of
analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic amplifications of
cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary agreement, between the
principles of possible experience and the laws of the possibility of
nature, can come about from only two causes: either these laws are taken
from nature by means of experience, or, conversely, nature is derived
from the laws of the possibility of experience in general and is fully
identical with the mere universal lawfulness of experience. The first
one contradicts itself, for the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the
understanding; so only the second remains.

We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*,
which always [IDEA: @320] presuppose particular perceptions, from the
pure or *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF
#451 = Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

Which, without having particular *PERCEPTIONS* *UNDERLYING* *THEM*,
*CONTAIN* *MERELY* *THE* *CONDITIONS* *FOR* *THE* *NECESSARY*
*UNIFICATION* *OF* *SUCH* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *ONE* *EXPERIENCE*; with
respect to the latter laws, nature and possible experience are one and
the same, and since in *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *THE* *LAWFULNESS*
*RESTS* on the necessary connection of appearances in one experience
(without which we would not be able to cognize any object of the
sensible world at all), and so on the original laws of the
understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at first, it is
nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 -
*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*: the understanding does not draw its (a priori)
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, but prescribes them to it." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEA: @320, pages 69-71]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0655 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "[Being educated as a Roman Catholic] I live and thrive
on and for this kind of shite, didn't you know?"

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1037
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Sure I know. I suspected as much about you
right from the beginning!

Anglo-Celtic racist pigs must be a special breed!

How otherwise could one account for your 'special quality/quantity'
Usenet output?

Cheer up! It won't be long before your utter mental decline has almost
run its course."

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0931 HOURS
ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Over a billion of them live among and thrive on
shite, didn't you know?."

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 18 February 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-02-19 00:19:04 UTC
Permalink
-- VOX POPULI VOX DEI

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 18 February 2019

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1118 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY
2019: "WHAT ARE AUSTRALIANS LIKE?

I was recently informed that white Anglo Australians - the most common
sort in Australia - are composed of two types.

1. Decent, laid back, hard-working, kindly, etc. who are the salt of the
earth and so have made the country what it is - from something rejected
by the Dutch, to what it is now, with high value real estate prices,
most liveable cities, fine roads and services, etc.

2. The very scum of the Earth who pretend to be the former. Being scum,
they know how to rise to top places.

I have led a sheltered life, in the research field where only the #1
type were around, but I could not help noticing how they were affected
by the #2 types.

In which category are Australian politicians to be placed?"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1813 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY 2019: "You
asked the wrong people but I appreciate your attempt at trolling....."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1027 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY
2019: "Rather dull aren't you."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0926 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019:
"Thankfully not as dull as a troll."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1326 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Show some evidence of wit. Borrow some."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1833 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "YAWN."

DOLF @ 1855 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Your ideas are *CONSTIPATED* ...

— HEY GIBLET —

“DANG YOU ***@THOLE
A CAPED CRUSADER.
MEATHEAD PARASOL.
MY SPACE INVADER.

HYENAS EACH ONE.
ON A PICNIC TREAT.
CONGREGATING FUN.
GROWLING CONCEIT.

YOU’RE NO TROJAN.
JUST TURKEY ARSE.
A FORAGING BOGAN.
FEVERISH FOR FARCE.”

YOUTUBE: "African Safari Oleg"

http://youtu.be/ezYfujKJsxQ

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1835 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Truly witless people, programmed to babble whatever rubbish they
hear from approved sources, can have no comprehension of wit."

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Excuse me, Bob?

Do you remember where I hid the K-Y Jelly?”

DOLF: “You dry old twat {ie. a person regarded as stupid or obnoxious}
who is still living in the 80’s...

Silicon based lubricants gives a better glide.

And afterwards you can polish the linoleum floors.”

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Okay, i'll try the WD-40.

thanks for all your continued great advice.”

— LOVE IS AN OPEN DOOR —

“NO DEAR, HERE’S SOME ADVICE.
WD-40 IS FOR YOUR DRY HINGE.
AND KEEN FOR TRYST AS TO VICE.
IT’S NO VALUE FOR A LONG BINGE.
WHEN YOU CAN’T EVEN PLAY NICE.
BECAUSE YOU’RE ONLY UNHINGED.”

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1937 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Gad, a strange creature here, makes no sense at all. Is this
supposed to be comic relief?"

DOLF @ 2009 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "You’re Indian mate and don’t
believe in sapient human rights due to your mentally deficient binomial
paradigm:

*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE*

Since our superior democracy is established upon a trinomial paradigm:

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL

YOUR SHIT HOLE NATION CANNOT PROVIDE FLUSHING TOILETS OR HUMAN RIGHTS
FOR THE UNTOUCHABLES..."

YOUTUBE: "Coldplay - Hymn For The Weekend (Official Video)"

http://youtu.be/YykjpeuMNEk

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2154 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Bad comic."

DOLF @ 2207 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "What do you mean by that
offensive racist remark?

And don’t get me started on equal rights for women whom no less as
sapient have the innate human right to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0843 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "There are those who are funny when they try to be serious. There
are those who are funny when they write nonsense. Then there are those
who write nonsense seriously. That too can be funny, but when they are
merely peculiar then they are bad comics."

DOLF @ 0858 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Our the constitution to our
democracy comes with its own sapient trinomial mathematical theoretical
noumenon by which we can assay your INDIAN speak with forked tongue 👅:

"There are those who are funny when they try to be serious. {@1: Sup: 72
(#72); Ego: 31 (#31)},
There are those who are funny when they write nonsense. {@2: Sup: 77
(#149); Ego: 63 (#94)},
Then there are those who write nonsense seriously. {@3: Sup: 40 (#189);
Ego: 14 (#108 - *PROGENITOR*)},
That too can be funny, {@4: Sup: 44 (#233); Ego: 33 (#141)},
but when they are merely peculiar then they are bad comics." {@5: Sup:
79 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *BY* *UNSCRUPULOUS* *INDIAN*); Ego: 5 (#146 -
I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15})},

AS UNCONSCIONABLE AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDUCT AS BREACHES TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 {

#371 - *SAINT* *ANDREWS* *AS* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *30* *NOVEMBER* *FIVE*
*YEAR*: 4 x #364 + #371 = #1827 *LITURGICAL* *CALENDAR*,
#288 - *REMEMBRANCE* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI* *PROTOTYPE*,
#390 - *WREATHS* / *SOVEREIGNTY*,
#312 - *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI*
*PROTOTYPE*,
#419 - *SLAUGHTER*

} OF DETERMINED AND PREMEDITATED BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING
RACIAL HATRED, ANTI-SEMITISM BY ESPECIALLY *INDIANS* / ROMAN CATHOLICS /
FREEMASONRY AS KNIGHTS TEMPLARS BEING AN UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER AND
PSYCHOSEXUAL SLANDER AGAINST WHICH THEY HAVE NOT BEEN RESPONSIVE."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1133 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "I invented googling while I lived in India and that is not
nothing. The pains of life in India also gives scope for incredible
creativity well beyond thr scope of the pampered racist bigots."

DOLF @ 0920 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "I do note that QUEEN VICTORIA was
the EMPRESS OF INDIA at the time of granting such PRESENTS to our nation
as LETTERS PATENT to the FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.

Such exemplary sovereign dignity was obviously wasted on INDIA whom can
only produce an atomic bomb, Bollywood and little else of memorable merit:

Case in point is that INDIANS migrate to AUSTRALIA and not AUSTRALIANS
migrate to INDIA."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1907 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "Before that time she was the biggest drug dealer on the planet.

Atomic bombs are evil and Bollywood has no merit, but Indian cinema is
great though often only in flashes of singing and dancing.

India provides Indians with correct religious approaches involving
superb mythology and metaphysics with associated customs and traditions,
many beautiful languages, the best literature Sanskrit downwards, music
and dancing, art and architecture, agriculture and pottery, medicine and
the correct theories of state administration, weaving and animal
rearing, the best family values, the greatest views, the tasties dishes,
the healthiest approaches, etc.

True, one has to get out of India to appreciate the value of India, past
and also present. India can do a lot better when Indians acquire more
self-confidence in their past. This process has started with the
election of Modi, and I believe, will continue.

No doubt. Indians have much to learn and Australia is a wonderful
country from where to learn and also live well in the process. Indians
have a right to migrate to Australia, for the British used the wealths
from India to develop Australia. And other colonies as well.

I have no doubt that Australians will migrate to India when conditions
in India suit them. That may happen, within 20-50 years, depending upon
progress in India. Some Australians I have met seem hopeful, given the
quality of infrastructure that has been built up in the last few years.
I think with good telecom and power tools, a lot of progress is possible
very fast. Let us see."

DOLF @ 1937 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "SUBSUMING HINDU’S PRINCIPLE
DEITIES INTO A MATHEMATICAL FUNCTION OF AN #2184 - ANTHROPOLOGIC
COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AND FUNCTION:

You are mistaken in that my metempirical / metaphysical philosophy and
theology as shown to you being a syncretism of Jewish Torah / DAOist
Humanist / Christian is transcendent being a trinomial paradigm to
Hinduism’s reliance upon a binomial methodology:

#364 - Vishnu,
#312 - Shiva and
#273 - Brahma

Which I have clearly shown by subsuming HINDU’s Principle Deities into a
mathematical function of an #2184 - ANTHROPOLOGIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE
AND FUNCTION.

*DO* *NOT* *MAKE* *THAT* *BLASPHEMOUS* *FALSE* *CLAIM* *AGAIN* AND SHOW
A GREATER #873 - PROBITY TOWARDS #115 - PREEMINENCE OTHERWISE WE MIGHT
DIRECT YOUR RETURN TO INDIA ON GROUNDS THAT YOU HAVE VIOLATED THE
CRITERIA OF CITIZENSHIP WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2244 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "May I assure you that I have not the faintest interest in any
philosophy of yours."

DOLF @ 0001 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "I OBJECT TO YOUR NEO-NAZI ROMAN
CATHOLIC BLASPHEMY ASSOCIATED WITH AN ABOMINATION OF INDIAN IDOLATRY
WHICH MAKES FALSE AND DELUSIONAL CLAIMS OF ENTITLEMENT AGAINST MY
PREROGATIVE RIGHT TO CITIZENSHIP AND THE EXERCISE OF AN UNENCUMBERED
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL WHICH YOU HAVE SLANDERED:

“INDIANS HAVE A RIGHT TO MIGRATE TO AUSTRALIA, FOR THE BRITISH USED THE
WEALTHS FROM INDIA TO DEVELOP AUSTRALIA.” [Arindam Banerjee
<***@gmail.com>, 27 JANUARY 2019]

If you don’t conform and have no intention to conform to the
FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES OF THIS AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH BY QUEEN
VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 THEN YOU OUGHT TO BE
IMMEDIATELY DECLARED A PERSONA NON GRATA AND EXPELLED FROM THIS COUNTRY
AS BEING AN UNDESIRABLE ALIEN WITH
AN INCURABLE DISEASE AS A PERSON OF UNSOUND MIND.

Get out of our country you fascist excrement."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0913 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "This hate speech was posted in facebook, using one of the posts
in my timeline. I have reported this hate speech to facebook
authorities. And of course, blocked the creep from doing such nasty
things again in facebook at least."

DOLF @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "What do you think of my KRISHNA
consciousness as dark humour?

YOUTUBE: “My Sweet Lord (George Harrison”

http://youtu.be/SP9wms6oEMo

DOLF @ 1340 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "If Arindam Banerjee
<***@gmail.com> is not very careful in his
next comment he will have cursed entire pantheon of gods.

*CHECKMATE*

YOUTUBE: “ONE NIGHT IN BANGKOK (MURRAY HEAD)”

http://youtu.be/rgc_LRjlbTU

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1435 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "In the 1960s the ISKCON started. Hordes of whites started doing
strange things in India. My uncle was a police officer. I heard him tell
my father that it was a CIA trick. Like all the Bhagwan stuff a bit later."

DOLF @ 1446 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Yes yes of course one cannot
trust the bhagwan—***@ck you.

Was your uncle lamenting the diminished opportunity for graft and
corruption since the ISKCON took all the money?

YOU ANSWERED YOUR OWN QUESTION: “I was recently informed that Nile-mud
Brahman priesthood off-scouring the most common sort in INDIA - are
composed of two types:

I have led a sheltered life, in the research field where only the #1
type (ie. my uncle police officer) were around, but I could not help
noticing how they were affected by [by graft and corruption from] the #2
types: The very scum of the Earth who pretend to be the former. Being
scum, they know how to rise to top places.

In which category [as contortions of truth state of sapience and bearing
their buttholes to the sun] are INDIAN [yoga practitioner] politicians
to be placed?” [paraphrase of Arindam Banerjee
<***@gmail.com> quote so as to assay universal truth about
India’s sacred cows]

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1520 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"OK, mate. Calm down! So WTF has all that to do with contemporary
aus.politics????

You are badly off topic here w/o a shred of relevance. If you insist on
posting to Usenet try an India related newsgroup!"

DOLF @ 1953 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "It cannot BE CONSIDERED A RACIAL
HATRED REMARK AS IRRATIONALITY DIRECTED TOWARDS PERSONS OF INDIAN
NATIONALITY because the opinion is made on the basis of “criteria and
expectations of citizenship” associated with a delusional and haughty
self-bestowal a prerogative life at the expense of ABORIGINAL #451 -
ENTITLEMENT (DREAMTIME) which is indigenous to the #41 - establishment
of the #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL as principle central to the nation’s
identity as the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH."

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Noting that the PRE-PLATONIC
advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) a principle proponent of the
PYTHAGOREAN doctrine considered the Natural Year to be 364.5 days which
is identical to the Chinese trinomial conception of number that by its
circularity conveys an #41 - ONTIC necessity proscriptions: #205 -
Principle of Persistent Substance ✡️ / ☯️ #164 - Principle of
Materiality = #369 - Discriminating Norm (Human Nature) being
organisation as premise of #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY for #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>

A reasonable question in regard to this is made of EMANATION theology in
relation to the perspective that ASYLUM INFLUX may be viewed as an
irrationality of the LATIN / PYTHAGOREAN binomial construct of imperial
governance as perspective of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.

Emanation of the state is a term used in European law to describe any
body which provides a public service under the control of government.
The term was defined by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Foster, A
and others v. British Gas plc. The ECJ's ruling defines the term as:

A body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible,
pursuant to a measure adopted by the state, for providing a public
service under the control of the state and has for that purpose special
powers beyond that which result from the normal rules applicable in
relations between individuals.

The term is most obviously used to describe public sector employers,
such as the police, fire service, local government bodies or schools.
[<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanation_of_the_state>]

Thusly can we not therefore consider antisemitism as emanation within
the state as similar to such issues of Institutional corruption or of an
emerging contagious shooting dynamic whether in police services,
educational institutions or the norm within society as a sociological
accountability phenomenon first observed in military and police
personnel, in which one person firing on a target can induce others to
begin shooting.

In my view EMANATION theology presents to us a circularity which as
intuited from the TORAH has as #4 - Principle of Materiality as it’s
grounding that as temporality is anchored within 49J1W2D as Jewish
Exodus from Egypt and 40 years sojourn = 50J"

DOLF @ 0123 HOURS ON 29 JANUARY 2019: "Such that we have women’s
suffrage as their entitlement to exercise #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
within political life, but when you come into this country and fail to
succeed to that principle which women have in this country (but not in
Saudi Arabia for instance) then it is YOU whom are failing that
unambiguous “criteria and expectations of citizenship” and your capacity
to remain within this country ought to be annulled.

That principle is not up to negotiation or disparities since it is
causal to the necessity as why we exist as a nation over 119 years ago
then we consented to the notion that women have rights, women have
entitlement and women are equal to men."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1857 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Says
the person who said good things about Trump thus revealing his own
babbling sources.... "

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Well may you say with regards to
antisemitism and holocaust never again, let us be lambs to the slaughter
however bleating “unacceptable” is not an adequate reasoned response.

Unacceptable is when you provide a comprehensive solution to the “WORLD
JEWISH CONGRESS” and they refuse to engage within any dialog (not even
acknowledgement let alone appreciation) and continue to send you
solicitations for money saying the matter is URGENT.

A case in point is President TRUMP's foresight in establishing a BORDER
WALL due to the risk of a RIPPLE or CONTAGION EFFECT from basket case
ECONOMIES and failed STATES within LATIN AMERICA.

When you consider that implicit within the notion of LATIN AMERICA is a
conception of SOVEREIGN STATES which are a reliance upon ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE: *ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 -
FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT
ROME, @5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 -
*SOLDIER*, #175 - *MARRIAGE* that apart from a demiurge existential
impost {eg: alleged Russian interference within the American political
system} always has inherent dichotomies, irrationality and
irreconcilability.

This is distinct from a SAPIENT / KNOWLEDGE economy which as conveyed by
the GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE as DATA SET comprised of #729 = #9 x #9 x #9 / 2 =
#364.5 BIFURCATED APPRAISALS as being a SUB-SET of the available 14,298
RECORDS.

We are now meeting the requirement for the development of some program
functions against that originating DATA SET. Before we commence the
actual process of generating our individual LEXICON JSON resource files
and GEMATRIA / UMBRA {ie.

That the *ISOPSEPHIC* extent of #800 as threshold has equivalence to the
*ORDINAL* value of 26th letter to the ENGLISH / ROMANISATION languages
suggests that there is a probable CIRCUMSCRIBING #311 / #111 - impetus
made against the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS by the SAINT ANDREWS
#371 - 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE from otherwise LATIN / ARABIC or OTHER
BINOMIAL LINGUISTIC GROUPS by its pantomime and regular patterning which
undertaken by INTERNET MILITIA is intentioned upon #325 {MAGIC SUM OF
5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #70, #40, #5,
#9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #800, #40, #10] =
paradidomi (3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8} 1) to give into the
hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; ... 4b)
*TO* *DELIVER* *BY* *NARRATING*, to report;

} aggregation of them we will make the 14,298 REFERENCE SOURCE OBJECTS
available for the exigency of GOVERNMENT and NEWS MEDIA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/scripts/Strongs.zip>

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2026 HOURS
ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Have you suddenly and without warning switched to
describing the people in India?"

CASEOFEMERGENCY (***@ROSEWATER.EU) @ 0104 HOURS ON 12
DECEMBER 2018: "CATHOLIC NARCISSISTIC IMBECILE FORTUNE COOKIE QUOTES:
NATURE IS NOT A WHORE / DE NATUUR IS GEEN HOER:

WOW! Een hele karavaan gekken uit de toendra. Putin pakt het groot aan.
Nicht kleckern sondern klotzen, mein Tsarevitz.

TRANSLATION: WOW! A whole caravan madmen from the tundra. Putin takes a
big deal. Do not spill but cuddle, my Tsarevitz."

DOLF @ 0408 HOURS ON 12 DECEMBER 2018: "YOU ARE NOT AN #343 -
*UBERMENSCH* ...

But understand this our FINAL SOLUTION that as a narcissistic imbecile
with an infatuation of self-bestowed dignity which is ignorance as #231
- JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL.

It is little wonder that the Dutch capitulated to the Nazi’s within 5
days but at least the French #22 - *RESISTANCE* will be sufficient to
withstand the hysteria of the SOYLENT GREEN ANARCHIST RIOTING.

We are here to render assistance but that you should to get use to the
idea your ego ought NOT to impose itself by any means whatsoever upon my
SELF-IDENTITY AS FORMULA AS AUTONOMY.

— APPLE RELISH —

"GUILTY AS SIN,
NOT REALLY NICE.
OVERTAKE TIME.
TRUTH'S DEVICE.
HEAR IT RHYME
OUR NANO IS IN."

Otherwise I will give you a lesson which will leave you pickled and it
won't be relish.

Het lijkt erop dat u onderworpen bent aan een gemeenschappelijke stroom
semantiek als het lexicon van opportunisme:

Verzet is zinloos - you will be assimilated!

YOUTUBE: "The Borg Assimilation"



THE ÜBERMENSCH (GERMAN FOR "BEYOND-MAN", "SUPERMAN", "OVERMAN",
"SUPERHUMAN", "HYPERMAN", "HYPERHUMAN"); IS A CONCEPT IN THE PHILOSOPHY
OF FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE. IN HIS 1883 BOOK THUS SPOKE ZARATHUSTRA (GERMAN:
ALSO SPRACH ZARATHUSTRA), NIETZSCHE HAS HIS CHARACTER ZARATHUSTRA POSIT
THE ÜBERMENSCH AS A GOAL {

#343 - TELOS / *AUTONOMOUS* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *COHESION*: @65 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN: #3
+ #6 = #9 as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE *AGAINST* *BOTH* *THE*
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *JUXTAPOSITION*: @1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81 AND
PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY @5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27 IN REGARD TO
THE SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY

} FOR HUMANITY TO SET FOR ITSELF. IT IS A WORK OF PHILOSOPHICAL ALLEGORY {

#288 - META SCHEMA ACQUIESCENCE: @1 - @728 - PASSOVER, @5 - PENTECOST,
@65, #175 THEURGIC SYNCRETISM OF NEOPLATONISM COMMONLY USED BY
PYTHAGOREAN NUMBER DERIVED GOVERNANCE (ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM etc)
THAT IS UNLAWFULLY DEPLOYING MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS PARADIGM BY #288 - UMBRA RAW MAPPING TO THEIR ANKH HETEROS /
TORAH PROTOTYPES

}, WITH A STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY TO THE GATHAS OF ZOROASTER/ZARATHUSTRA."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2347 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "Indians, especially Bengalis, are very witty. They have the best
jokes. Facebook provides them for me, galore.

I was talking in general, about the brainwashed masses, and their
robotic minds that being so robotic can have no comprehension of wit."

— OUR SHINDIG —

“OH FOR THE LOVE
OF PUSSY DEAR.
TRUTH SO PLAIN.
TO GOD {#86} ABOVE. {@5: Sup: 41 (#98); Ego: 70 (#305 - SEE KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @305)}
AND ALL HERE.
WE’RE JUST VAIN.” {@7: Sup: 15 (#118 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA:
@B118); Ego: 50 (#417)}

YOUTUBE: "PUSSY GALORE"

http://youtu.be/XCLqyXf2s70

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 0733 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"This should be interesting to watch: a lowlife racist alt-right wanker
against this strange newbie!"

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #22 AS IDEA @305: "To sum this up: the
*BUSINESS* *OF* *THE* *SENSES* is to intuit; that of the understanding,
to think. To think, however, is to unite representations in a
consciousness. This unification either arises merely relative to the
subject and is contingent and subjective, or it occurs without condition
and is necessary or objective. The unification of representations in a
consciousness is judgment. Therefore, thinking is the same as judging or
as relating representations to judgments in general. Judgments are
therefore either merely subjective, if representations are related to
one consciousness in one subject alone and are united in it, or they are
objective, if they are united in a consciousness in general, i.e., are
united necessarily therein. [IDEA: @305] The logical moments of all
judgments are so many possible ways of uniting representations in a
consciousness.

If, however, the very same moments serve as concepts, they are concepts
of the necessary unification of these representations in a
consciousness, and so are principles of objectively valid judgments.
This unification in a consciousness is either analytic, through
identity, or synthetic, through combination and addition of various
representations with one another. Experience consists in the synthetic
connection of appearances (perceptions) in a consciousness, insofar as
this connection is necessary.

Therefore pure concepts of the understanding are those under which all
perceptions must first be subsumed before they can serve in judgments of
experience, in which the synthetic unity of perceptions is represented
as necessary and universally valid." [pages 56-57]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0922 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "So what are you? You have been described as a marxist. At their
best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy, envious,
pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0927 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "For
God's sake try to use some brains if you have any! It should be obvious
even to an idiot that he was described as being a 'marxist' by a known
troll. Or didn't you understand the responses that were given about
that troll?

At their best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy,
envious, pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way.

Now you're turning you attention to him (thus making a lie of your
comments about how unworthy he was of your attnetion [snort]) your
insults are still lame and pathetic."

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA @B118: "Hence I call the explanation
of the way in which concepts can relate a priori to objects the
transcendental deduction of those concepts, and I distinguish it from an
empirical deduction, which shows how a concept is acquired through
experience and reflection on experience, and which concerns therefore
not the legitimacy of the possession, but the fact of how possession
came about.

Now we have indeed two sorts of concepts, completely different in [IDEA:
@B118] kind, that nonetheless agree with one another in that both of
them relate to objects entirely a priori: namely, the concepts of space
and time, as forms of #123 - SENSIBILITY, and the categories {

#118 / #417 as [#5, #300, #1, #60, #1, #50] = tasso (G5021): {UMBRA: #19
as #1501 % #41 = #25} 1) to put in order, to station; 1a) to place in a
certain order, to arrange, to assign a place, to appoint; 1a1) to assign
(appoint) a thing to one; 1b) to appoint, ordain, order; 1b1) to appoint
on one's own responsibility or authority; 1b2) *TO* *APPOINT*
*MUTUALLY*, ie. *AGREE* *UPON*;

}, as concepts of the understanding.

To attempt an empirical deduction of these concepts would be completely
idle labor, because the differentia of their nature consists in the
[IDEA: @A86] very fact that they relate to their objects without having
to borrow anything from experience for the representation of those
objects. If therefore a deduction of these concepts is needed, it will
always have to be transcendental." [page 212]

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1005 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "It
looks like some people's idea what a discussion of a topic should look
like is quite different from what this newbie thinks.

There are those like "*DOLF*" for instance who loves ranting on and on
and on but rational readers can never work out what he is on about. I am
afraid the same goes for this poster.

I am still unable to work out why he insists on posting to this
newsgroup. Why he insists posting at all!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1143 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "Is there someone high up in this n[ews]g[roup] who has signed a
document showing who is a troll and who is not? Even if he did, that
would not be binding upon anyone in any free society.

As far as I am concerned, all are equal here, *EXCEPT* *THOSE* *LIKE*
*DOLF* *WHO* *WRITE* [TO] *HARASS* *ME* *WITH* *HATE* *SPEECH*. Those I
regard as the real scum, and will report to the police about them if
they continue with such harassment. Cybercrime involving hate speech,
that is hateful to minorities, is an offence that is taken seriously
these days.

Anyway why are you speaking for this dog character? Can't he decide for
himself what he is? I suppose you all are suffering severe identity crises."

DE NUN CHUCKA (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1148 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"Really, I might take [*DOLF*] out of the bozo bin as he sound[s] like a
sensible fellow now.

Anyhow why is a US west coast Indian posting in this n[ews]g[roup],
shouldn't you be on a reservation sitting in a tee-pee?"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1348 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "I was
waiting for someone else to pick up on that. Now he says he's in
Melbourne and has been since 1989................"

DANIEL60 (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2349 HOURS ON 17 FEBRUARY
2019: "What?? Did you actually bother to read the tripe??"

-- CONSTIPATED IDEAS --

"OH SUCH NUGGET OF WISDOM.
BESTOWAL OF TURGID REALITY.
BIRTHED BY IGNORANT SCUM.
INFINITE AGE GIVING BANALITY.
HEY MISSUS NOW WIPE MY BUM.
ENDLESS REACH MY STUPIDITY." {@7: Sup: 33 (#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65
- *SOLDIER*); Ego: 60 (#318: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) EXCERPT OF IDEA: @318 FROM SECTION #36 - HOW
IS NATURE ITSELF POSSIBLE?
This question, which is the highest point that transcendental philosophy
*CAN* *EVER* *REACH*, *AND* *UP* *TO* *WHICH*, *AS* *ITS* *BOUNDARY*
*AND* *COMPLETION*, it must be taken, actually contains two questions.

FIRST: How is nature possible in general in the material sense, namely,
according to intuition, as the sum total of appearances; how are space,
time {#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - SOLDIER {*DODECAHEDRON*} as
Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273} - *DO* *NOT* *KILL*

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CELEBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

}, and that which fills them both, the object of sensation {

#175 - MARRIAGE {*ICOSAHEDRON*} as Principle of Persistent Substance
{#205} - Discriminating Norm {#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO*
*NOT* *STEAL*

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist {ie.
*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE*: *DODECAHEDRON* + *ICOSAHEDRON* = TETRAD / *TETRACTYS*},
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD /
TETRACTYS

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "My point is that the racist bigots will do their best to ignore
and pull down the highest, supreme talent, as giving publicity to the
highest talent which does not conform to their biases, will make them
feel small.

Which is a pain, for the arts and sciences. My other inventions and
works are also ignored, by the ruling racist bigots, and that is not
good for the progress of humanity.

Of course, this is just their style, to intimidate. Being highly
theistic, I smile at such efforts on their part, for following my
Catholic schooling I dedicate all my deeds to God.

Well, God in my case means the Hindu Gods and Goddesses mainly, but I am
also very grateful to *JEHOVAH* and *BUNJIL* {

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/weddingblues.jpg>

[IMAGE: Within Australian Aboriginal mythology, Bunjil is a creator
deity, culture hero and ancestral being, often depicted as a
wedge-tailed eagle [as similar modal depiction within the Egyptian Book
of the Dead]. In the Kulin nation in central Victoria he was regarded as
one of two moiety ancestors, the other being Waa the crow. Bunjil has
two wives and a son, Binbeal the rainbow. His brother is Palian the bat]

} for looking after my family and I so well.

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"Are you pissed at OZ for whatever (real or imaginary) personal
grievances you have had?"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "No, I understand their limitations, so what is the point of
getting pissed. I am well off after all, despite all machinations.

When one dedicates all one's works to God, then one can only admire the
way God works: so fine, so admirable! Now that is not something the
racist bigots will understand, for they are limited by their narrow
sectarian visions. But, they too are a part of God, not that they will
understand this, so they have to play their parts in the great game around."

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"Believe me (or don't) there are many ways to discuss topics in
newsgroups. Some are OK some ain't. Madly trolling, ignorant comments,
drifting off topic, whinging/whining, posting disgruntled rants and
alienating regular posters in your targeted newsgroup is definitely not
the right way to do it."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "In this case I was simply saying that India does produce things
the world steals without giving due credit. Such as my works, and there
have been plenty more over the ages and even now. The racist bigots will
ignore, then steal the new ideas from the poor thirdworlders struggling
for sheer existence."

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"But feel free to try Facebook or some similar crazy social media
instead of Usenet!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "I do use facebook. That is useful, for I can put in photos and
videos.

<https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359>

Usenet is useful as it is a very open medium where assertions are
forcefully challenged. So new ideas placed on usenet, such as my
inventions of the Hydrogen Transmission Network, or the Internal Force
Engine, are open to criticism. It is a test by fire, very useful. A good
way to improve, by absorbing the criticism from the public. Also it
ensures that my new inventions remain my property, at least in the moral
sense if not legal sense by patenting. That is some satisfaction.
Publicity thus has its uses. Indians at least will remember my works,
this I believe. Certainly some Australians as well, meaning my family
and my friends here."

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/fascist.gif>

[IMAGE: TRUTH IS A COSMOGONIC CONSIDERATION AFTER ALL:

1) Telos (6,000 as 122J3W1D) = Arch (#0 as 22/7 = 3W1D) + c² is a
genuine Sabbath based PARADIGM [Exodus 20:8; Deuteronomy 5:15]

As the relativity and grounding of the Infinite to the temporal reality
(ie. the phenomenology as the deterministic unfolding of history) which
is implied by the notion of rational PI and the cosmogonical Genesis
reprise {#0} of the lunar / solar cycle occurring on the equinox of
Wednesday 20th March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday 21st March 1996.

2) Pythagorean Theorem: c² = a² + b² is fascist (see discussion below)
and now redundant as only a METHODOLOGY]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0945 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "Small minded, when not idiotic."

"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {

#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}

INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114 {#5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} #6 {114 / #342 - ANKH /
ROMAN}}; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
} // #270

THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1018
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Idiotic is an alternate officially approved
signature of Arindam Banerjee

[Believe me since I am Arindam Banerjee (or we are, or, what the ***@ck,
who really knows)]"

HITLER HIMSELF SAID OF FASCISM: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST
POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*}
MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE
TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON
SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]

'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was
one of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir
of the great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians
have so many qualities that make us like them.

Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the
*STATE*. THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF
ALL.' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]

}, possible in general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of
our sensibility, in accordance with which our #123 - *SENSIBILITY* is
affected in its characteristic way by objects that are in themselves
unknown to it and that are wholly distinct from said appearances. This
answer is, in the book itself, given in the Transcendental Aesthetic,
but here in the Prolegomena through the solution of the first main
question.

— EUROPEAN UNION'S RAPE —

"OH BOUDICA, REGINA HERO
THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE.
ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF NERO.
FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE. {@6: Sup: 35 (#242); Ego: 1 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT
ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})

TESTIMONY {#873} BY MORTAL WILL.
VICTORIA REMEMBERS THEE.
WITHIN ROME'S GRASP STILL. {@9: Sup: 11 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *THE*
*SENSES* *DO* *NOT* *SUPPLY* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE*
*UNDERSTANDING* *IN* *CONCRETO*); Ego: 7 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *BUT*
*ONLY* *THE* *SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*)}
ITS TIME TO SET YOU FREE."

YOUTUBE: "Horrible Histories (Boudicca)

<https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nhi4w>

SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of
the rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be
thought as connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out
otherwise than: it is possible only by means of the constitution of our
understanding, in accordance with which all these representations of
sensibility are necessarily referred to one consciousness, and through
which, first, the characteristic manner of our thinking, namely by means
of rules, is possible, and then, by means of these rules, experience is
possible – which is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects
in themselves. This answer is, in the book itself, given in the
Transcendental Logic, but here in the Prolegomena, in the course of
solving the second main question.

"THEN PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART} THEREFORE TOOK JESUS {HE IS SAVED/A
SAVIOUR; A DELIVERER} OF NAZARETH {SOVEREIGN; ONE CHOSEN OR SET APART;
SEPARATED; CROWNED; SANCTIFIED}, AND SCOURGED HIM.

AND THE #65 - *SOLDIERS* PLATTED A CROWN OF THORNS, AND PUT IT ON HIS
HEAD, AND THEY PUT ON HIM A PURPLE ROBE, AND SAID, HAIL, KING OF THE
JEWS! AND THEY SMOTE HIM WITH THEIR HANDS.

PILATE THEREFORE WENT FORTH AGAIN, AND SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD, I BRING
HIM FORTH TO YOU, THAT YE MAY KNOW THAT I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM. THEN
CAME JESUS FORTH, WEARING THE CROWN OF THORNS, AND THE PURPLE ROBE. AND
PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD THE MAN!

WHEN THE CHIEF PRIESTS THEREFORE AND OFFICERS SAW HIM, THEY CRIED OUT,
SAYING, CRUCIFY HIM, CRUCIFY HIM. PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, TAKE YE HIM,
AND CRUCIFY HIM: FOR I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM.

THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE,
BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE SON OF GOD. WHEN PILATE THEREFORE HEARD
THAT SAYING, HE WAS THE MORE AFRAID; AND WENT AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT
HALL, AND SAITH UNTO JESUS, WHENCE ART THOU? BUT JESUS GAVE HIM NO ANSWER.

THEN SAITH PILATE UNTO HIM, SPEAKEST THOU NOT UNTO ME? KNOWEST THOU NOT
THAT I HAVE POWER TO CRUCIFY THEE, AND HAVE POWER TO RELEASE THEE?

JESUS ANSWERED, THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER AT ALL AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
WERE GIVEN THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE {ie.

"ALWAYS BEARING ABOUT IN THE BODY THE DYING OF THE LORD JESUS, THAT THE
LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE MANIFEST IN OUR BODY. FOR WE WHICH LIVE
ARE ALWAY DELIVERED {

G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
1 (#101),
@5: Sup: 24 (#224); Ego: 4 (#105),
@6: Sup: 34 (#258); Ego: 10 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@7: Sup: 38 (#296); Ego: 4 (#119),
@8: Sup: 28 (#324); Ego: 71 (#190),
@9: Sup: 68 (#392); Ego: 40 (#230),
@10: Sup: 78 (#470); Ego: 10 (#240),
Male: #470; Feme: #240
}

#325 {MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4,
#10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10,
#4, #800, #40, #10] = paradidomi (3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8}
1) to give into the hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's)
power or use; 3) to commit, to commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to
permit allow; 2a) to deliver to one something to keep, use, take care
of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one to custody, to be judged, condemned,
punished, scourged, tormented, put to death; 2c) to deliver up
treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one to be taken; 2c2) to
deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands, rites; 4b) to deliver
by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will allow that is when its
*RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents itself;

} UNTO DEATH FOR JESUS’ SAKE, THAT THE LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE
MANIFEST IN OUR MORTAL FLESH." [2 Corinthians 4:10 -11 (KJV)]

} THAT DELIVERED {

G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 24 (#204); Ego: 5 (#105),
@5: Sup: 28 (#232); Ego: 4 (#109),
@6: Sup: 17 (#249); Ego: 70 (#179),
@7: Sup: 26 (#275); Ego: 9 (#188),
@8: Sup: 34 (#309); Ego: 8 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
@9: Sup: 10 (#319); Ego: 57 (#253),
@10: Sup: 15 (#334); Ego: 5 (#258),
Male: #334; Feme: #258
} // #582

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #582 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 -
The Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;

THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *SACRED* *PROPERTY*.

#VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
#TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence
between word and deed.
#POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
#TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
#CANON: #200

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_200@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 56 (#64); Ego: 48 (#56),
@3: Sup: 41 (#105); Ego: 66 (#122),
@4: Sup: 38 (#143); Ego: 78 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200

#582 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #4, #70, #9, #8, #300, #5] = paradidomi
(G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8} 1) to give into the hands (of
another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 3) to commit, to
commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to permit allow; 2a) to deliver to
one something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one
to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented, put
to death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one
to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands,
rites; 4b) to deliver by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will
allow that is when its *RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents
itself;

} ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.

AND FROM THENCEFORTH PILATE SOUGHT TO RELEASE HIM: BUT THE JEWS CRIED
OUT, SAYING, IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU ART NOT CAESAR’S FRIEND:
WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:1-12
(KJV)]

But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and
answered, because we always have need of them in turn for all answering
and for all thinking of objects:

Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial
consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial
rationality in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ONTIC
necessity as conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):

6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry {*VISHNU*}
7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction {*SHIVA*}
8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression {*BRAHMA*}

YOUTUBE: “DOCTOR WHO (PARTING OF WAYS)”

http://youtu.be/6ThpkjDgdvY

WHAT THEN IS A-U-M?

“FOR I SAY UNTO YOU, THAT EXCEPT YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL EXCEED [THE
RIGHTEOUSNESS] OF THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES, YE SHALL IN NO CASE ENTER
INTO THE KINGDOM {ie. #2184} OF HEAVEN.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]

Whom is holier than thou?

There are many #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* that we can know only
through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
i.e., nature in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any
experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
priori at the basis of its possibility.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification
constitutes the possibility of experience.

Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this
entire part, that universal #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* can be cognized
a priori, already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest
legislation for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding,
and that we must not seek the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
from nature by means of experience, but, conversely, must seek nature,
as regards its universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of
the possibility of experience that lie in our sensibility and
understanding; for how would it otherwise be possible to become
acquainted with these laws a priori, since they are surely not rules of
analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic amplifications of
cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary agreement, between the
principles of possible experience and the laws of the possibility of
nature, can come about from only two causes: either these laws are taken
from nature by means of experience, or, conversely, nature is derived
from the laws of the possibility of experience in general and is fully
identical with the mere universal lawfulness of experience. The first
one contradicts itself, for the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the
understanding; so only the second remains.

We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*,
which always [IDEA: @320] presuppose particular perceptions, from the
pure or *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF
#451 = Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

Which, without having particular *PERCEPTIONS* *UNDERLYING* *THEM*,
*CONTAIN* *MERELY* *THE* *CONDITIONS* *FOR* *THE* *NECESSARY*
*UNIFICATION* *OF* *SUCH* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *ONE* *EXPERIENCE*; with
respect to the latter laws, nature and possible experience are one and
the same, and since in *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *THE* *LAWFULNESS*
*RESTS* on the necessary connection of appearances in one experience
(without which we would not be able to cognize any object of the
sensible world at all), and so on the original laws of the
understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at first, it is
nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 -
*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*: the understanding does not draw its (a priori)
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, but prescribes them to it." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEA: @320, pages 69-71]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0655 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "[Being educated as a Roman Catholic] I live and thrive
on and for this kind of shite, didn't you know?"

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1037
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Sure I know. I suspected as much about you
right from the beginning!

Anglo-Celtic racist pigs must be a special breed!

How otherwise could one account for your 'special quality/quantity'
Usenet output?

Cheer up! It won't be long before your utter mental decline has almost
run its course."

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0931 HOURS
ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Over a billion of them live among and thrive on
shite, didn't you know?."

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 18 February 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-02-19 06:01:08 UTC
Permalink
-- VOX POPULI VOX DEI

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 19 February 2019

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1118 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY
2019: "WHAT ARE AUSTRALIANS LIKE?

I was recently informed that white Anglo Australians - the most common
sort in Australia - are composed of two types.

1. Decent, laid back, hard-working, kindly, etc. who are the salt of the
earth and so have made the country what it is - from something rejected
by the Dutch, to what it is now, with high value real estate prices,
most liveable cities, fine roads and services, etc.

2. The very scum of the Earth who pretend to be the former. Being scum,
they know how to rise to top places.

I have led a sheltered life, in the research field where only the #1
type were around, but I could not help noticing how they were affected
by the #2 types.

In which category are Australian politicians to be placed?"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1813 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY 2019: "You
asked the wrong people but I appreciate your attempt at trolling....."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1027 HOURS ON 25 JANUARY
2019: "Rather dull aren't you."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0926 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019:
"Thankfully not as dull as a troll."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1326 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Show some evidence of wit. Borrow some."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1833 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "YAWN."

DOLF @ 1855 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Your ideas are *CONSTIPATED* ...

— HEY GIBLET —

“DANG YOU ***@THOLE
A CAPED CRUSADER.
MEATHEAD PARASOL.
MY SPACE INVADER.

HYENAS EACH ONE.
ON A PICNIC TREAT.
CONGREGATING FUN.
GROWLING CONCEIT.

YOU’RE NO TROJAN.
JUST TURKEY ARSE.
A FORAGING BOGAN.
FEVERISH FOR FARCE.”

YOUTUBE: "African Safari Oleg"

http://youtu.be/ezYfujKJsxQ

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1835 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Truly witless people, programmed to babble whatever rubbish they
hear from approved sources, can have no comprehension of wit."

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Excuse me, Bob?

Do you remember where I hid the K-Y Jelly?”

DOLF: “You dry old twat {ie. a person regarded as stupid or obnoxious}
who is still living in the 80’s...

Silicon based lubricants gives a better glide.

And afterwards you can polish the linoleum floors.”

RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Okay, i'll try the WD-40.

thanks for all your continued great advice.”

— LOVE IS AN OPEN DOOR —

“NO DEAR, HERE’S SOME ADVICE.
WD-40 IS FOR YOUR DRY HINGE.
AND KEEN FOR TRYST AS TO VICE.
IT’S NO VALUE FOR A LONG BINGE.
WHEN YOU CAN’T EVEN PLAY NICE.
BECAUSE YOU’RE ONLY UNHINGED.”

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1937 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Gad, a strange creature here, makes no sense at all. Is this
supposed to be comic relief?"

DOLF @ 2009 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "You’re Indian mate and don’t
believe in sapient human rights due to your mentally deficient binomial
paradigm:

*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE*

Since our superior democracy is established upon a trinomial paradigm:

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL

YOUR SHIT HOLE NATION CANNOT PROVIDE FLUSHING TOILETS OR HUMAN RIGHTS
FOR THE UNTOUCHABLES..."

YOUTUBE: "Coldplay - Hymn For The Weekend (Official Video)"

http://youtu.be/YykjpeuMNEk

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2154 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Bad comic."

DOLF @ 2207 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "What do you mean by that
offensive racist remark?

And don’t get me started on equal rights for women whom no less as
sapient have the innate human right to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0843 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "There are those who are funny when they try to be serious. There
are those who are funny when they write nonsense. Then there are those
who write nonsense seriously. That too can be funny, but when they are
merely peculiar then they are bad comics."

DOLF @ 0858 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Our the constitution to our
democracy comes with its own sapient trinomial mathematical theoretical
noumenon by which we can assay your INDIAN speak with forked tongue 👅:

"There are those who are funny when they try to be serious. {@1: Sup: 72
(#72); Ego: 31 (#31)},
There are those who are funny when they write nonsense. {@2: Sup: 77
(#149); Ego: 63 (#94)},
Then there are those who write nonsense seriously. {@3: Sup: 40 (#189);
Ego: 14 (#108 - *PROGENITOR*)},
That too can be funny, {@4: Sup: 44 (#233); Ego: 33 (#141)},
but when they are merely peculiar then they are bad comics." {@5: Sup:
79 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *BY* *UNSCRUPULOUS* *INDIAN*); Ego: 5 (#146 -
I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15})},

AS UNCONSCIONABLE AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDUCT AS BREACHES TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 {

#371 - *SAINT* *ANDREWS* *AS* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *30* *NOVEMBER* *FIVE*
*YEAR*: 4 x #364 + #371 = #1827 *LITURGICAL* *CALENDAR*,
#288 - *REMEMBRANCE* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI* *PROTOTYPE*,
#390 - *WREATHS* / *SOVEREIGNTY*,
#312 - *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI*
*PROTOTYPE*,
#419 - *SLAUGHTER*

} OF DETERMINED AND PREMEDITATED BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING
RACIAL HATRED, ANTI-SEMITISM BY ESPECIALLY *INDIANS* / ROMAN CATHOLICS /
FREEMASONRY AS KNIGHTS TEMPLARS BEING AN UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER AND
PSYCHOSEXUAL SLANDER AGAINST WHICH THEY HAVE NOT BEEN RESPONSIVE."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1133 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "I invented googling while I lived in India and that is not
nothing. The pains of life in India also gives scope for incredible
creativity well beyond thr scope of the pampered racist bigots."

DOLF @ 0920 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "I do note that QUEEN VICTORIA was
the EMPRESS OF INDIA at the time of granting such PRESENTS to our nation
as LETTERS PATENT to the FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.

Such exemplary sovereign dignity was obviously wasted on INDIA whom can
only produce an atomic bomb, Bollywood and little else of memorable merit:

Case in point is that INDIANS migrate to AUSTRALIA and not AUSTRALIANS
migrate to INDIA."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1907 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "Before that time she was the biggest drug dealer on the planet.

Atomic bombs are evil and Bollywood has no merit, but Indian cinema is
great though often only in flashes of singing and dancing.

India provides Indians with correct religious approaches involving
superb mythology and metaphysics with associated customs and traditions,
many beautiful languages, the best literature Sanskrit downwards, music
and dancing, art and architecture, agriculture and pottery, medicine and
the correct theories of state administration, weaving and animal
rearing, the best family values, the greatest views, the tasties dishes,
the healthiest approaches, etc.

True, one has to get out of India to appreciate the value of India, past
and also present. India can do a lot better when Indians acquire more
self-confidence in their past. This process has started with the
election of Modi, and I believe, will continue.

No doubt. Indians have much to learn and Australia is a wonderful
country from where to learn and also live well in the process. Indians
have a right to migrate to Australia, for the British used the wealths
from India to develop Australia. And other colonies as well.

I have no doubt that Australians will migrate to India when conditions
in India suit them. That may happen, within 20-50 years, depending upon
progress in India. Some Australians I have met seem hopeful, given the
quality of infrastructure that has been built up in the last few years.
I think with good telecom and power tools, a lot of progress is possible
very fast. Let us see."

DOLF @ 1937 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "SUBSUMING HINDU’S PRINCIPLE
DEITIES INTO A MATHEMATICAL FUNCTION OF AN #2184 - ANTHROPOLOGIC
COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AND FUNCTION:

You are mistaken in that my metempirical / metaphysical philosophy and
theology as shown to you being a syncretism of Jewish Torah / DAOist
Humanist / Christian is transcendent being a trinomial paradigm to
Hinduism’s reliance upon a binomial methodology:

#364 - Vishnu,
#312 - Shiva and
#273 - Brahma

Which I have clearly shown by subsuming HINDU’s Principle Deities into a
mathematical function of an #2184 - ANTHROPOLOGIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE
AND FUNCTION.

*DO* *NOT* *MAKE* *THAT* *BLASPHEMOUS* *FALSE* *CLAIM* *AGAIN* AND SHOW
A GREATER #873 - PROBITY TOWARDS #115 - PREEMINENCE OTHERWISE WE MIGHT
DIRECT YOUR RETURN TO INDIA ON GROUNDS THAT YOU HAVE VIOLATED THE
CRITERIA OF CITIZENSHIP WITHIN THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2244 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "May I assure you that I have not the faintest interest in any
philosophy of yours."

DOLF @ 0001 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "I OBJECT TO YOUR NEO-NAZI ROMAN
CATHOLIC BLASPHEMY ASSOCIATED WITH AN ABOMINATION OF INDIAN IDOLATRY
WHICH MAKES FALSE AND DELUSIONAL CLAIMS OF ENTITLEMENT AGAINST MY
PREROGATIVE RIGHT TO CITIZENSHIP AND THE EXERCISE OF AN UNENCUMBERED
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL WHICH YOU HAVE SLANDERED:

“INDIANS HAVE A RIGHT TO MIGRATE TO AUSTRALIA, FOR THE BRITISH USED THE
WEALTHS FROM INDIA TO DEVELOP AUSTRALIA.” [Arindam Banerjee
<***@gmail.com>, 27 JANUARY 2019]

If you don’t conform and have no intention to conform to the
FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES OF THIS AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH BY QUEEN
VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 THEN YOU OUGHT TO BE
IMMEDIATELY DECLARED A PERSONA NON GRATA AND EXPELLED FROM THIS COUNTRY
AS BEING AN UNDESIRABLE ALIEN WITH
AN INCURABLE DISEASE AS A PERSON OF UNSOUND MIND.

Get out of our country you fascist excrement."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0913 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "This hate speech was posted in facebook, using one of the posts
in my timeline. I have reported this hate speech to facebook
authorities. And of course, blocked the creep from doing such nasty
things again in facebook at least."

DOLF @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "What do you think of my KRISHNA
consciousness as dark humour?

YOUTUBE: “My Sweet Lord (George Harrison”

http://youtu.be/SP9wms6oEMo

DOLF @ 1340 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "If Arindam Banerjee
<***@gmail.com> is not very careful in his
next comment he will have cursed entire pantheon of gods.

*CHECKMATE*

YOUTUBE: “ONE NIGHT IN BANGKOK (MURRAY HEAD)”

http://youtu.be/rgc_LRjlbTU

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1435 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "In the 1960s the ISKCON started. Hordes of whites started doing
strange things in India. My uncle was a police officer. I heard him tell
my father that it was a CIA trick. Like all the Bhagwan stuff a bit later."

DOLF @ 1446 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Yes yes of course one cannot
trust the bhagwan—***@ck you.

Was your uncle lamenting the diminished opportunity for graft and
corruption since the ISKCON took all the money?

YOU ANSWERED YOUR OWN QUESTION: “I was recently informed that Nile-mud
Brahman priesthood off-scouring the most common sort in INDIA - are
composed of two types:

I have led a sheltered life, in the research field where only the #1
type (ie. my uncle police officer) were around, but I could not help
noticing how they were affected by [by graft and corruption from] the #2
types: The very scum of the Earth who pretend to be the former. Being
scum, they know how to rise to top places.

In which category [as contortions of truth state of sapience and bearing
their buttholes to the sun] are INDIAN [yoga practitioner] politicians
to be placed?” [paraphrase of Arindam Banerjee
<***@gmail.com> quote so as to assay universal truth about
India’s sacred cows]

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1520 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"OK, mate. Calm down! So WTF has all that to do with contemporary
aus.politics????

You are badly off topic here w/o a shred of relevance. If you insist on
posting to Usenet try an India related newsgroup!"

DOLF @ 1953 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "It cannot BE CONSIDERED A RACIAL
HATRED REMARK AS IRRATIONALITY DIRECTED TOWARDS PERSONS OF INDIAN
NATIONALITY because the opinion is made on the basis of “criteria and
expectations of citizenship” associated with a delusional and haughty
self-bestowal a prerogative life at the expense of ABORIGINAL #451 -
ENTITLEMENT (DREAMTIME) which is indigenous to the #41 - establishment
of the #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL as principle central to the nation’s
identity as the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH."

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Noting that the PRE-PLATONIC
advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) a principle proponent of the
PYTHAGOREAN doctrine considered the Natural Year to be 364.5 days which
is identical to the Chinese trinomial conception of number that by its
circularity conveys an #41 - ONTIC necessity proscriptions: #205 -
Principle of Persistent Substance ✡️ / ☯️ #164 - Principle of
Materiality = #369 - Discriminating Norm (Human Nature) being
organisation as premise of #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY for #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>

A reasonable question in regard to this is made of EMANATION theology in
relation to the perspective that ASYLUM INFLUX may be viewed as an
irrationality of the LATIN / PYTHAGOREAN binomial construct of imperial
governance as perspective of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.

Emanation of the state is a term used in European law to describe any
body which provides a public service under the control of government.
The term was defined by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Foster, A
and others v. British Gas plc. The ECJ's ruling defines the term as:

A body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible,
pursuant to a measure adopted by the state, for providing a public
service under the control of the state and has for that purpose special
powers beyond that which result from the normal rules applicable in
relations between individuals.

The term is most obviously used to describe public sector employers,
such as the police, fire service, local government bodies or schools.
[<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanation_of_the_state>]

Thusly can we not therefore consider antisemitism as emanation within
the state as similar to such issues of Institutional corruption or of an
emerging contagious shooting dynamic whether in police services,
educational institutions or the norm within society as a sociological
accountability phenomenon first observed in military and police
personnel, in which one person firing on a target can induce others to
begin shooting.

In my view EMANATION theology presents to us a circularity which as
intuited from the TORAH has as #4 - Principle of Materiality as it’s
grounding that as temporality is anchored within 49J1W2D as Jewish
Exodus from Egypt and 40 years sojourn = 50J"

DOLF @ 0123 HOURS ON 29 JANUARY 2019: "Such that we have women’s
suffrage as their entitlement to exercise #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
within political life, but when you come into this country and fail to
succeed to that principle which women have in this country (but not in
Saudi Arabia for instance) then it is YOU whom are failing that
unambiguous “criteria and expectations of citizenship” and your capacity
to remain within this country ought to be annulled.

That principle is not up to negotiation or disparities since it is
causal to the necessity as why we exist as a nation over 119 years ago
then we consented to the notion that women have rights, women have
entitlement and women are equal to men."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1857 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Says
the person who said good things about Trump thus revealing his own
babbling sources.... "

DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Well may you say with regards to
antisemitism and holocaust never again, let us be lambs to the slaughter
however bleating “unacceptable” is not an adequate reasoned response.

Unacceptable is when you provide a comprehensive solution to the “WORLD
JEWISH CONGRESS” and they refuse to engage within any dialog (not even
acknowledgement let alone appreciation) and continue to send you
solicitations for money saying the matter is URGENT.

A case in point is President TRUMP's foresight in establishing a BORDER
WALL due to the risk of a RIPPLE or CONTAGION EFFECT from basket case
ECONOMIES and failed STATES within LATIN AMERICA.

When you consider that implicit within the notion of LATIN AMERICA is a
conception of SOVEREIGN STATES which are a reliance upon ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE: *ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 -
FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT
ROME, @5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 -
*SOLDIER*, #175 - *MARRIAGE* that apart from a demiurge existential
impost {eg: alleged Russian interference within the American political
system} always has inherent dichotomies, irrationality and
irreconcilability.

This is distinct from a SAPIENT / KNOWLEDGE economy which as conveyed by
the GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE as DATA SET comprised of #729 = #9 x #9 x #9 / 2 =
#364.5 BIFURCATED APPRAISALS as being a SUB-SET of the available 14,298
RECORDS.

We are now meeting the requirement for the development of some program
functions against that originating DATA SET. Before we commence the
actual process of generating our individual LEXICON JSON resource files
and GEMATRIA / UMBRA {ie.

That the *ISOPSEPHIC* extent of #800 as threshold has equivalence to the
*ORDINAL* value of 26th letter to the ENGLISH / ROMANISATION languages
suggests that there is a probable CIRCUMSCRIBING #311 / #111 - impetus
made against the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS by the SAINT ANDREWS
#371 - 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE from otherwise LATIN / ARABIC or OTHER
BINOMIAL LINGUISTIC GROUPS by its pantomime and regular patterning which
undertaken by INTERNET MILITIA is intentioned upon #325 {MAGIC SUM OF
5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #70, #40, #5,
#9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #800, #40, #10] =
paradidomi (3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8} 1) to give into the
hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; ... 4b)
*TO* *DELIVER* *BY* *NARRATING*, to report;

} aggregation of them we will make the 14,298 REFERENCE SOURCE OBJECTS
available for the exigency of GOVERNMENT and NEWS MEDIA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/scripts/Strongs.zip>

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2026 HOURS
ON 27 JANUARY 2019: "Have you suddenly and without warning switched to
describing the people in India?"

CASEOFEMERGENCY (***@ROSEWATER.EU) @ 0104 HOURS ON 12
DECEMBER 2018: "CATHOLIC NARCISSISTIC IMBECILE FORTUNE COOKIE QUOTES:
NATURE IS NOT A WHORE / DE NATUUR IS GEEN HOER:

WOW! Een hele karavaan gekken uit de toendra. Putin pakt het groot aan.
Nicht kleckern sondern klotzen, mein Tsarevitz.

TRANSLATION: WOW! A whole caravan madmen from the tundra. Putin takes a
big deal. Do not spill but cuddle, my Tsarevitz."

DOLF @ 0408 HOURS ON 12 DECEMBER 2018: "YOU ARE NOT AN #343 -
*UBERMENSCH* ...

But understand this our FINAL SOLUTION that as a narcissistic imbecile
with an infatuation of self-bestowed dignity which is ignorance as #231
- JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL.

It is little wonder that the Dutch capitulated to the Nazi’s within 5
days but at least the French #22 - *RESISTANCE* will be sufficient to
withstand the hysteria of the SOYLENT GREEN ANARCHIST RIOTING.

We are here to render assistance but that you should to get use to the
idea your ego ought NOT to impose itself by any means whatsoever upon my
SELF-IDENTITY AS FORMULA AS AUTONOMY.

— APPLE RELISH —

"GUILTY AS SIN,
NOT REALLY NICE.
OVERTAKE TIME.
TRUTH'S DEVICE.
HEAR IT RHYME
OUR NANO IS IN."

Otherwise I will give you a lesson which will leave you pickled and it
won't be relish.

Het lijkt erop dat u onderworpen bent aan een gemeenschappelijke stroom
semantiek als het lexicon van opportunisme:

Verzet is zinloos - you will be assimilated!

YOUTUBE: "The Borg Assimilation"

http://youtu.be/AkasJZZxRU0

THE ÜBERMENSCH (GERMAN FOR "BEYOND-MAN", "SUPERMAN", "OVERMAN",
"SUPERHUMAN", "HYPERMAN", "HYPERHUMAN"); IS A CONCEPT IN THE PHILOSOPHY
OF FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE. IN HIS 1883 BOOK THUS SPOKE ZARATHUSTRA (GERMAN:
ALSO SPRACH ZARATHUSTRA), NIETZSCHE HAS HIS CHARACTER ZARATHUSTRA POSIT
THE ÜBERMENSCH AS A GOAL {

#343 - TELOS / *AUTONOMOUS* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *COHESION*: @65 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN: #3
+ #6 = #9 as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE *AGAINST* *BOTH* *THE*
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *JUXTAPOSITION*: @1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81 AND
PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY @5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27 IN REGARD TO
THE SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY

} FOR HUMANITY TO SET FOR ITSELF. IT IS A WORK OF PHILOSOPHICAL ALLEGORY {

#288 - META SCHEMA ACQUIESCENCE: @1 - @728 - PASSOVER, @5 - PENTECOST,
@65, #175 THEURGIC SYNCRETISM OF NEOPLATONISM COMMONLY USED BY
PYTHAGOREAN NUMBER DERIVED GOVERNANCE (ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM etc)
THAT IS UNLAWFULLY DEPLOYING MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS PARADIGM BY #288 - UMBRA RAW MAPPING TO THEIR ANKH HETEROS /
TORAH PROTOTYPES

}, WITH A STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY TO THE GATHAS OF ZOROASTER/ZARATHUSTRA."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2347 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "Indians, especially Bengalis, are very witty. They have the best
jokes. Facebook provides them for me, galore.

I was talking in general, about the brainwashed masses, and their
robotic minds that being so robotic can have no comprehension of wit."

— OUR SHINDIG —

“OH FOR THE LOVE
OF PUSSY DEAR.
TRUTH SO PLAIN.
TO GOD {#86} ABOVE. {@5: Sup: 41 (#98); Ego: 70 (#305 - SEE KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @305)}
AND ALL HERE.
WE’RE JUST VAIN.” {@7: Sup: 15 (#118 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA:
@B118); Ego: 50 (#417)}

YOUTUBE: "PUSSY GALORE"

http://youtu.be/XCLqyXf2s70

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 0733 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"This should be interesting to watch: a lowlife racist alt-right wanker
against this strange newbie!"

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #22 AS IDEA @305: "To sum this up: the
*BUSINESS* *OF* *THE* *SENSES* is to intuit; that of the understanding,
to think. To think, however, is to unite representations in a
consciousness. This unification either arises merely relative to the
subject and is contingent and subjective, or it occurs without condition
and is necessary or objective. The unification of representations in a
consciousness is judgment. Therefore, thinking is the same as judging or
as relating representations to judgments in general. Judgments are
therefore either merely subjective, if representations are related to
one consciousness in one subject alone and are united in it, or they are
objective, if they are united in a consciousness in general, i.e., are
united necessarily therein. [IDEA: @305] The logical moments of all
judgments are so many possible ways of uniting representations in a
consciousness.

If, however, the very same moments serve as concepts, they are concepts
of the necessary unification of these representations in a
consciousness, and so are principles of objectively valid judgments.
This unification in a consciousness is either analytic, through
identity, or synthetic, through combination and addition of various
representations with one another. Experience consists in the synthetic
connection of appearances (perceptions) in a consciousness, insofar as
this connection is necessary.

Therefore pure concepts of the understanding are those under which all
perceptions must first be subsumed before they can serve in judgments of
experience, in which the synthetic unity of perceptions is represented
as necessary and universally valid." [pages 56-57]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0922 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "So what are you? You have been described as a marxist. At their
best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy, envious,
pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way."

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0927 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "For
God's sake try to use some brains if you have any! It should be obvious
even to an idiot that he was described as being a 'marxist' by a known
troll. Or didn't you understand the responses that were given about
that troll?

At their best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy,
envious, pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way.

Now you're turning you attention to him (thus making a lie of your
comments about how unworthy he was of your attnetion [snort]) your
insults are still lame and pathetic."

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA @B118: "Hence I call the explanation
of the way in which concepts can relate a priori to objects the
transcendental deduction of those concepts, and I distinguish it from an
empirical deduction, which shows how a concept is acquired through
experience and reflection on experience, and which concerns therefore
not the legitimacy of the possession, but the fact of how possession
came about.

Now we have indeed two sorts of concepts, completely different in [IDEA:
@B118] kind, that nonetheless agree with one another in that both of
them relate to objects entirely a priori: namely, the concepts of space
and time, as forms of #123 - SENSIBILITY, and the categories {

#118 / #417 as [#5, #300, #1, #60, #1, #50] = tasso (G5021): {UMBRA: #19
as #1501 % #41 = #25} 1) to put in order, to station; 1a) to place in a
certain order, to arrange, to assign a place, to appoint; 1a1) to assign
(appoint) a thing to one; 1b) to appoint, ordain, order; 1b1) to appoint
on one's own responsibility or authority; 1b2) *TO* *APPOINT*
*MUTUALLY*, ie. *AGREE* *UPON*;

}, as concepts of the understanding.

To attempt an empirical deduction of these concepts would be completely
idle labor, because the differentia of their nature consists in the
[IDEA: @A86] very fact that they relate to their objects without having
to borrow anything from experience for the representation of those
objects. If therefore a deduction of these concepts is needed, it will
always have to be transcendental." [page 212]

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1005 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "It
looks like some people's idea what a discussion of a topic should look
like is quite different from what this newbie thinks.

There are those like "*DOLF*" for instance who loves ranting on and on
and on but rational readers can never work out what he is on about. I am
afraid the same goes for this poster.

I am still unable to work out why he insists on posting to this
newsgroup. Why he insists posting at all!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1143 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "Is there someone high up in this n[ews]g[roup] who has signed a
document showing who is a troll and who is not? Even if he did, that
would not be binding upon anyone in any free society.

As far as I am concerned, all are equal here, *EXCEPT* *THOSE* *LIKE*
*DOLF* *WHO* *WRITE* [TO] *HARASS* *ME* *WITH* *HATE* *SPEECH*. Those I
regard as the real scum, and will report to the police about them if
they continue with such harassment. Cybercrime involving hate speech,
that is hateful to minorities, is an offence that is taken seriously
these days.

Anyway why are you speaking for this dog character? Can't he decide for
himself what he is? I suppose you all are suffering severe identity crises."

DE NUN CHUCKA (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1148 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"Really, I might take [*DOLF*] out of the bozo bin as he sound[s] like a
sensible fellow now.

Anyhow why is a US west coast Indian posting in this n[ews]g[roup],
shouldn't you be on a reservation sitting in a tee-pee?"

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1348 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "I was
waiting for someone else to pick up on that. Now he says he's in
Melbourne and has been since 1989................"

DANIEL60 (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2349 HOURS ON 17 FEBRUARY
2019: "What?? Did you actually bother to read the tripe??"

H7750@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 63 (#69); Ego: 57 (#63),
@3: Sup: 72 (#141); Ego: 9 (#72),
@4: Sup: 1 (#142); Ego: 10 (#82),
Male: #142; Feme: #82
} // #325

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #315 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#6, #300, #9, #10] = suwt (H7750):
{UMBRA: #9 as #315 % #41 = #28} 1) to swerve, fall away; 2) *TO*
*THRUST* *OR* *FORCE* *DOWN*, *OUT*, *OR* *AWAY*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
swerve, fall away; 1a2) those falling away (participle); 2a) subject to
censorship or kill-file filtering; 2b) habitually exclude socially or
ignore conversationally;

FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1454 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Just
shove him in your *KILLFILE* {#325 - DETRUDE}. Most of us did soon
after he arrived."

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1459 HOURS
ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Fran felt especially challenged by opinions that
conflict with her irrational beliefs, due to her cognitive dissonance.

This is the woman who believes the 'boats never stopped' although she is
well aware that the few remaining detention centres still open are now
virtually empty of illegal entrants."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1727 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "Woman is so stupid, she confuses me with my impostor. A
half-wit could see the difference in quality.

She is very stupid.

She is very very stupid."

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0759 HOURS
ON 19 FEBRUARY 2019: "For once, I am on Fran's side. I can't tell any of
you apart either."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1606 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "A genocidal psychopath is expected to be a bit more
clever than very, very, stupid."

DOLF @ 1632 HOURS ON 19 FEBRUARY 2019: "Thusly it would behoove us to
appraise any UMBRA / GEMATRIA Categories of Understanding which
specifically have a value of #325 and what is fascinating here is the
#41 - ONTIC notion of FORTY YEARS which introduces a logical fallacy of
HETERONOMY against AUTONOMY {ie. #ONE} conceptions of EMANATION theology
that presents to us a circularity which as intuited from the TORAH has
as #4 - Principle of Materiality as it’s grounding that as temporality
is anchored within 49J1W2D as Jewish Exodus from Egypt and 40 years
sojourn = 50J."

{
"derivation" : "multiple of H702 (אַרְבַּע);",
"pron" : "ar-baw-eem'",
"outline" : {

"@1" : "forty"
},
"kjv_def" : "-forty.",
"lemma" : "אַרְבָּעִים",
"frequency" : 135,
"strongs_def" : "forty",
"xlit" : "ʼarbâʻîym",
"strongs" : "H705",
"umbra" : {
"323" : [1, 200, 2, 70, 10, 600]
},
"gematria" : {
"323" : {
"0" : [1, 200, 2, 70, 10, 40], "1" : [1, 200, 2, 70, 10, 600]
}, "325" : [2, 1, 200, 2, 70, 10, 600], "328" : [5, 1, 200, 2, 70,
10, 600], "329" : [6, 1, 200, 2, 70, 10, 600], "343" : [20, 1, 200, 2,
70, 10, 600], "883" : [1, 200, 2, 70, 10, 600]
}
}

{
"derivation" : "from H142 (אָדַר) and H4428 (מֶלֶךְ); splendor of
(the) king;",
"pron" : "ad-ram-meh'-lek",
"outline" : {

"@0" : "Adrammelech = 'honour of the king'",
"@1" : "or 'Adar is prince'",
"@2" : "or 'Adar is Counsellor, Decider'",
"@3" : "an idol or god of the Sepharvites, introduced to Israel
by Shalmaneser the fifth",
"@4" : "the son and murderer of Sennacherib"
},
"kjv_def" : "Adrammelech.",
"lemma" : "אֲדְרַמֶּלֶךְ",
"frequency" : 3,
"strongs_def" : "Adrammelek, the name of an Assyrian idol, also of
a son of Sennacherib",
"xlit" : "ʼĂdrammelek",
"strongs" : "H152",
"umbra" : {
"295" : [1, 4, 200, 40, 30, 500]
},
"gematria" : {
"295" : [1, 4, 200, 40, 30, 20],
"301" : [6, 1, 4, 200, 40, 30, 500],
"325" : [30, 1, 4, 200, 40, 30, 500],
"775" : [1, 4, 200, 40, 30, 500]
}
}

{
"derivation" : "patrial from H795 (אַשְׁדּוֹד);",
"pron" : "ash-do-dee'",
"outline" : {

"@0" : "Ashdodites = 'I will spoil'",
"@1" : "an inhabitant of Ashdod"
},
"kjv_def" : "Ashdodites, of Ashdod.",
"lemma" : "אַשְׁדּוֹדִי",
"frequency" : 5,
"strongs_def" : "an Ashdodite (often collectively) or inhabitant of
Asdod",
"xlit" : "ʼAshdôwdîy",
"strongs" : "H796",
"umbra" : {
"325" : [1, 300, 4, 6, 4, 10]
},
"gematria" : {
"325" : [1, 300, 4, 6, 4, 10],
"336" : [6, 5, 1, 300, 4, 6, 4, 10],
"365" : [1, 300, 4, 6, 4, 10, 600],
"370" : [5, 1, 300, 4, 6, 4, 10, 600],
"376" : [6, 5, 1, 300, 4, 6, 4, 10, 600],
"731" : [1, 300, 4, 6, 4, 10, 6, 400]
}
}

I must confess that I didn't just accidentally stumble upon the word
#325 {MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4,
#10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] = paradidomi (3860), in that I was asleep
and the thought "*THIS* *IS* *THE* *WORD* *WHICH* *YOU* *OUGHT* *TO*
*LOOK* *AT*" entering into my mind was sufficient to CAUSE ME TO THEN
AWAKEN and when I latter checked the word it was SO."

-- CONSTIPATED IDEAS --

"OH SUCH NUGGET OF WISDOM.
BESTOWAL OF TURGID REALITY.
BIRTHED BY IGNORANT SCUM.
INFINITE AGE GIVING BANALITY.
HEY MISSUS NOW WIPE MY BUM.
ENDLESS REACH MY STUPIDITY." {@7: Sup: 33 (#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65
- *SOLDIER*); Ego: 60 (#318: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}

KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) EXCERPT OF IDEA: @318 FROM SECTION #36 - HOW
IS NATURE ITSELF POSSIBLE?
This question, which is the highest point that transcendental philosophy
*CAN* *EVER* *REACH*, *AND* *UP* *TO* *WHICH*, *AS* *ITS* *BOUNDARY*
*AND* *COMPLETION*, it must be taken, actually contains two questions.

FIRST: How is nature possible in general in the material sense, namely,
according to intuition, as the sum total of appearances; how are space,
time {#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - SOLDIER {*DODECAHEDRON*} as
Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273} - *DO* *NOT* *KILL*

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CELEBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

}, and that which fills them both, the object of sensation {

#175 - MARRIAGE {*ICOSAHEDRON*} as Principle of Persistent Substance
{#205} - Discriminating Norm {#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO*
*NOT* *STEAL*

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist {ie.
*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT
IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN
EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE*: *DODECAHEDRON* + *ICOSAHEDRON* = TETRAD / *TETRACTYS*},
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD /
TETRACTYS

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "My point is that the racist bigots will do their best to ignore
and pull down the highest, supreme talent, as giving publicity to the
highest talent which does not conform to their biases, will make them
feel small.

Which is a pain, for the arts and sciences. My other inventions and
works are also ignored, by the ruling racist bigots, and that is not
good for the progress of humanity.

Of course, this is just their style, to intimidate. Being highly
theistic, I smile at such efforts on their part, for following my
Catholic schooling I dedicate all my deeds to God.

Well, God in my case means the Hindu Gods and Goddesses mainly, but I am
also very grateful to *JEHOVAH* and *BUNJIL* {

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/weddingblues.jpg>

[IMAGE: Within Australian Aboriginal mythology, Bunjil is a creator
deity, culture hero and ancestral being, often depicted as a
wedge-tailed eagle [as similar modal depiction within the Egyptian Book
of the Dead]. In the Kulin nation in central Victoria he was regarded as
one of two moiety ancestors, the other being Waa the crow. Bunjil has
two wives and a son, Binbeal the rainbow. His brother is Palian the bat]

} for looking after my family and I so well.

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"Are you pissed at OZ for whatever (real or imaginary) personal
grievances you have had?"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "No, I understand their limitations, so what is the point of
getting pissed. I am well off after all, despite all machinations.

When one dedicates all one's works to God, then one can only admire the
way God works: so fine, so admirable! Now that is not something the
racist bigots will understand, for they are limited by their narrow
sectarian visions. But, they too are a part of God, not that they will
understand this, so they have to play their parts in the great game around."

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"Believe me (or don't) there are many ways to discuss topics in
newsgroups. Some are OK some ain't. Madly trolling, ignorant comments,
drifting off topic, whinging/whining, posting disgruntled rants and
alienating regular posters in your targeted newsgroup is definitely not
the right way to do it."

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "In this case I was simply saying that India does produce things
the world steals without giving due credit. Such as my works, and there
have been plenty more over the ages and even now. The racist bigots will
ignore, then steal the new ideas from the poor thirdworlders struggling
for sheer existence."

ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1152 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY 2019:
"But feel free to try Facebook or some similar crazy social media
instead of Usenet!"

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1925 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "I do use facebook. That is useful, for I can put in photos and
videos.

<https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359>

Usenet is useful as it is a very open medium where assertions are
forcefully challenged. So new ideas placed on usenet, such as my
inventions of the Hydrogen Transmission Network, or the Internal Force
Engine, are open to criticism. It is a test by fire, very useful. A good
way to improve, by absorbing the criticism from the public. Also it
ensures that my new inventions remain my property, at least in the moral
sense if not legal sense by patenting. That is some satisfaction.
Publicity thus has its uses. Indians at least will remember my works,
this I believe. Certainly some Australians as well, meaning my family
and my friends here."

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/fascist.gif>

[IMAGE: TRUTH IS A COSMOGONIC CONSIDERATION AFTER ALL:

1) Telos (6,000 as 122J3W1D) = Arch (#0 as 22/7 = 3W1D) + c² is a
genuine Sabbath based PARADIGM [Exodus 20:8; Deuteronomy 5:15]

As the relativity and grounding of the Infinite to the temporal reality
(ie. the phenomenology as the deterministic unfolding of history) which
is implied by the notion of rational PI and the cosmogonical Genesis
reprise {#0} of the lunar / solar cycle occurring on the equinox of
Wednesday 20th March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday 21st March 1996.

2) Pythagorean Theorem: c² = a² + b² is fascist (see discussion below)
and now redundant as only a METHODOLOGY]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0945 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "Small minded, when not idiotic."

"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {

#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 -
Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS
THY NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1
SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO
which is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}

INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114 {#5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} #6 {114 / #342 - ANKH /
ROMAN}}; Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
} // #270

THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1018
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Idiotic is an alternate officially approved
signature of Arindam Banerjee

[Believe me since I am Arindam Banerjee (or we are, or, what the ***@ck,
who really knows)]"

HITLER HIMSELF SAID OF FASCISM: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST
POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*}
MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE
TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON
SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]

'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was
one of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir
of the great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians
have so many qualities that make us like them.

Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the
*STATE*. THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF
ALL.' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]

}, possible in general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of
our sensibility, in accordance with which our #123 - *SENSIBILITY* is
affected in its characteristic way by objects that are in themselves
unknown to it and that are wholly distinct from said appearances. This
answer is, in the book itself, given in the Transcendental Aesthetic,
but here in the Prolegomena through the solution of the first main
question.

— EUROPEAN UNION'S RAPE —

"OH BOUDICA, REGINA HERO
THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE.
ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF NERO.
FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE. {@6: Sup: 35 (#242); Ego: 1 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT
ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})

TESTIMONY {#873} BY MORTAL WILL.
VICTORIA REMEMBERS THEE.
WITHIN ROME'S GRASP STILL. {@9: Sup: 11 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *THE*
*SENSES* *DO* *NOT* *SUPPLY* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE*
*UNDERSTANDING* *IN* *CONCRETO*); Ego: 7 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *BUT*
*ONLY* *THE* *SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*)}
ITS TIME TO SET YOU FREE."

YOUTUBE: "Horrible Histories (Boudicca)

<https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nhi4w>

SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of
the rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be
thought as connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out
otherwise than: it is possible only by means of the constitution of our
understanding, in accordance with which all these representations of
sensibility are necessarily referred to one consciousness, and through
which, first, the characteristic manner of our thinking, namely by means
of rules, is possible, and then, by means of these rules, experience is
possible – which is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects
in themselves. This answer is, in the book itself, given in the
Transcendental Logic, but here in the Prolegomena, in the course of
solving the second main question.

"THEN PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART} THEREFORE TOOK JESUS {HE IS SAVED/A
SAVIOUR; A DELIVERER} OF NAZARETH {SOVEREIGN; ONE CHOSEN OR SET APART;
SEPARATED; CROWNED; SANCTIFIED}, AND SCOURGED HIM.

AND THE #65 - *SOLDIERS* PLATTED A CROWN OF THORNS, AND PUT IT ON HIS
HEAD, AND THEY PUT ON HIM A PURPLE ROBE, AND SAID, HAIL, KING OF THE
JEWS! AND THEY SMOTE HIM WITH THEIR HANDS.

PILATE THEREFORE WENT FORTH AGAIN, AND SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD, I BRING
HIM FORTH TO YOU, THAT YE MAY KNOW THAT I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM. THEN
CAME JESUS FORTH, WEARING THE CROWN OF THORNS, AND THE PURPLE ROBE. AND
PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD THE MAN!

WHEN THE CHIEF PRIESTS THEREFORE AND OFFICERS SAW HIM, THEY CRIED OUT,
SAYING, CRUCIFY HIM, CRUCIFY HIM. PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, TAKE YE HIM,
AND CRUCIFY HIM: FOR I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM.

THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE,
BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE SON OF GOD. WHEN PILATE THEREFORE HEARD
THAT SAYING, HE WAS THE MORE AFRAID; AND WENT AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT
HALL, AND SAITH UNTO JESUS, WHENCE ART THOU? BUT JESUS GAVE HIM NO ANSWER.

THEN SAITH PILATE UNTO HIM, SPEAKEST THOU NOT UNTO ME? KNOWEST THOU NOT
THAT I HAVE POWER TO CRUCIFY THEE, AND HAVE POWER TO RELEASE THEE?

JESUS ANSWERED, THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER AT ALL AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
WERE GIVEN THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE {ie.

"ALWAYS BEARING ABOUT IN THE BODY THE DYING OF THE LORD JESUS, THAT THE
LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE MANIFEST IN OUR BODY. FOR WE WHICH LIVE
ARE ALWAY DELIVERED {

G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
1 (#101),
@5: Sup: 24 (#224); Ego: 4 (#105),
@6: Sup: 34 (#258); Ego: 10 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@7: Sup: 38 (#296); Ego: 4 (#119),
@8: Sup: 28 (#324); Ego: 71 (#190),
@9: Sup: 68 (#392); Ego: 40 (#230),
@10: Sup: 78 (#470); Ego: 10 (#240),
Male: #470; Feme: #240
}

#325 {MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4,
#10, #4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10,
#4, #800, #40, #10] = paradidomi (3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8}
1) to give into the hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's)
power or use; 3) to commit, to commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to
permit allow; 2a) to deliver to one something to keep, use, take care
of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one to custody, to be judged, condemned,
punished, scourged, tormented, put to death; 2c) to deliver up
treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one to be taken; 2c2) to
deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands, rites; 4b) to deliver
by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will allow that is when its
*RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents itself;

} UNTO DEATH FOR JESUS’ SAKE, THAT THE LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE
MANIFEST IN OUR MORTAL FLESH." [2 Corinthians 4:10 -11 (KJV)]

} THAT DELIVERED {

G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 24 (#204); Ego: 5 (#105),
@5: Sup: 28 (#232); Ego: 4 (#109),
@6: Sup: 17 (#249); Ego: 70 (#179),
@7: Sup: 26 (#275); Ego: 9 (#188),
@8: Sup: 34 (#309); Ego: 8 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
@9: Sup: 10 (#319); Ego: 57 (#253),
@10: Sup: 15 (#334); Ego: 5 (#258),
Male: #334; Feme: #258
} // #582

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #582 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 -
The Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;

THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *SACRED* *PROPERTY*.

#VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
#TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence
between word and deed.
#POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
#TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
#CANON: #200

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_200@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 56 (#64); Ego: 48 (#56),
@3: Sup: 41 (#105); Ego: 66 (#122),
@4: Sup: 38 (#143); Ego: 78 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200

#582 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #4, #70, #9, #8, #300, #5] = paradidomi
(G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8} 1) to give into the hands (of
another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 3) to commit, to
commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to permit allow; 2a) to deliver to
one something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one
to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented, put
to death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one
to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands,
rites; 4b) to deliver by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will
allow that is when its *RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents
itself;

} ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.

AND FROM THENCEFORTH PILATE SOUGHT TO RELEASE HIM: BUT THE JEWS CRIED
OUT, SAYING, IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU ART NOT CAESAR’S FRIEND:
WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:1-12
(KJV)]

But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and
answered, because we always have need of them in turn for all answering
and for all thinking of objects:

Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial
consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial
rationality in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ONTIC
necessity as conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):

6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry {*VISHNU*}
7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction {*SHIVA*}
8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression {*BRAHMA*}

YOUTUBE: “DOCTOR WHO (PARTING OF WAYS)”

http://youtu.be/6ThpkjDgdvY

WHAT THEN IS A-U-M?

“FOR I SAY UNTO YOU, THAT EXCEPT YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL EXCEED [THE
RIGHTEOUSNESS] OF THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES, YE SHALL IN NO CASE ENTER
INTO THE KINGDOM {ie. #2184} OF HEAVEN.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]

Whom is holier than thou?

There are many #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* that we can know only
through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
i.e., nature in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any
experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
priori at the basis of its possibility.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification
constitutes the possibility of experience.

Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this
entire part, that universal #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* can be cognized
a priori, already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest
legislation for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding,
and that we must not seek the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
from nature by means of experience, but, conversely, must seek nature,
as regards its universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of
the possibility of experience that lie in our sensibility and
understanding; for how would it otherwise be possible to become
acquainted with these laws a priori, since they are surely not rules of
analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic amplifications of
cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary agreement, between the
principles of possible experience and the laws of the possibility of
nature, can come about from only two causes: either these laws are taken
from nature by means of experience, or, conversely, nature is derived
from the laws of the possibility of experience in general and is fully
identical with the mere universal lawfulness of experience. The first
one contradicts itself, for the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*
can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the
understanding; so only the second remains.

We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*,
which always [IDEA: @320] presuppose particular perceptions, from the
pure or *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF
#451 = Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:

DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE* *SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO*
*NOT* *KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of
Contradiction {#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression
{#273} - *COVET* *NOT*

Which, without having particular *PERCEPTIONS* *UNDERLYING* *THEM*,
*CONTAIN* *MERELY* *THE* *CONDITIONS* *FOR* *THE* *NECESSARY*
*UNIFICATION* *OF* *SUCH* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *ONE* *EXPERIENCE*; with
respect to the latter laws, nature and possible experience are one and
the same, and since in *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *THE* *LAWFULNESS*
*RESTS* on the necessary connection of appearances in one experience
(without which we would not be able to cognize any object of the
sensible world at all), and so on the original laws of the
understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at first, it is
nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 -
*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*: the understanding does not draw its (a priori)
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, but prescribes them to it." [CAMBRIDGE
TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future
Metaphysics, IDEA: @320, pages 69-71]

ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0655 HOURS ON 18
FEBRUARY 2019: "[Being educated as a Roman Catholic] I live and thrive
on and for this kind of shite, didn't you know?"

MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1037
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Sure I know. I suspected as much about you
right from the beginning!

Anglo-Celtic racist pigs must be a special breed!

How otherwise could one account for your 'special quality/quantity'
Usenet output?

Cheer up! It won't be long before your utter mental decline has almost
run its course."

LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0931 HOURS
ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Over a billion of them live among and thrive on
shite, didn't you know?."

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 18 February 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Loading...