Discussion:
— (DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018): THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY
(zu alt für eine Antwort)
dolf
2018-08-25 04:16:52 UTC
Permalink
(DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018): THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY

The Kantian appeal for a pure moral philosophy begins With a reference to
the usefulness of the division of labor. Kant raises the question whether
philosophy would not benefit from such a division. Ultimately, he is not
concerned with whether the burden of elaborating philosophical theories
should be distributed among the shoulders of a multitude of persons.[Page
6]

We would contend against this notion as being an impotent chimeric {ie. a
thing which is hoped for but is illusory or impossible to achieve} of
idealism {ie. the unrealistic belief in or pursuit of perfection} such that
one may declare "the economic sovereignty you claim to defend is a chimera"

And thusly it is in of itself an oblique a contradiction of Kant own
characteristic position where he emphasizes that an adequate form of moral
philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical elements of
interest, self-love, and natural feelings as well as free from rational
concepts of perfection:

“And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good.
And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested
on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God blessed the
seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all
his work which God created and made.” [Genesis 1:31-2:3 (KJV)]

Thusly if the Sabbath as a sacred principle of nature which is the ultimate
perfection: “And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not
man for the sabbath.” [Mark 2:27 (KJV)]

It’s meritorious purpose as a benefit to humankind is found firstly within
the ACT TO WILL by it’s remembrance and then the voluntary avoidance of
labour as the absence of any WILL TO ACT.

Rather Kant with this rhetorical consideration, introduces an explicitly
methodological train of thought. He asks “whether the nature of the science
does not require the empirical part always to be carefully separated from
the rational."

And he confines this question to the sub-question "Whether one is not
of the opinion that it: is of the utmost necessity to work out once a pure
moral philosophy which is fully cleansed of everything that might be
in any way empirical and belong to anthropology“

The passage that is introduced by this question contains, at the same time,
a positive response — the thesis that there must be a “pure moral
philosophy” is “self evident." And indeed for Kant this evidence arises
“out of the common idea of duty and the moral law” (ibid.). Kant’s cursory
argumentation for this thesis is dif-
ficult to grasp. Undoubtedly, it constitutes one of the key argumentative
passages of the Groundwork. [Page 6]

It is perhaps presumptuous at page #6 of #323 to already take issue with
the robustness of his thesis that there must be a “pure moral philosophy”
is “self evident" given that there are seven days designates within our
understanding of the cosmology which is understood universally as an
implicit law of nature.

Yet for Kant this anthropological evidence arises “out of the common idea
of duty and the moral law” which is certainly self evident in the display
of filial affection relating to “honour bestowed upon parents” which is due
from a son or daughter:

5. (MOTHER) FORMULA OF HUMANITY AS HEAD OF STATE / *HONOUR* *PARENTS*

PYTHAGOREAN TETRAD: #1 + #2 = #3 as #MIND

MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE: {ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT) /
SERAPHIM {Heb. Saraph Gk. Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively)
poisonous (serpent); specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical creature
(from their copper color))} {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10}

TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat to
the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed with
Israel)}

PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat,
throne)}

+ 0, H9, H18 {ie. System’s Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}

Thusly, at this juncture of our ingestion of Kant’s thesis we reserved our
conjectures upon any artifices which he may deploy.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-25 06:58:13 UTC
Permalink
(DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018): THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY

The Kantian appeal for a pure moral philosophy begins with a reference
to the usefulness of the division of labor. [And here] Kant raises the
question whether philosophy would not benefit from such a division.
Ultimately, he is not concerned with whether the burden of elaborating
philosophical theories should be distributed among the shoulders of a
multitude of persons.[Page 6]

We would contend against this notion as being an impotent chimeric {ie.
a thing which is hoped for but is illusory or impossible to achieve} of
idealism {ie. the unrealistic belief in or pursuit of perfection} such
that one may declare "the economic sovereignty you claim to defend is a
chimera"

And thusly, it is in of itself an oblique contradiction of Kant's own
characteristic position development where he emphasizes that an adequate
form of moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all
empirical elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings as well
as free from rational concepts of perfection:

“And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #342)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 20 (#26); Ego: 14 (#20),
@3: Sup: 42 (#68); Ego: 22 (#42),
@4: Sup: 72 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY (%14); I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER (%16)); Ego: 30 (#72),
@5: Sup: 29 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
(%18)); Ego: 38 (#110),
@6: Sup: 75 (#244); Ego: 46 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS (%21)),
@7: Sup: 48 (#292); Ego: 54 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND (%30)),
@8: Sup: 29 (#321); Ego: 62 (#272),
@9: Sup: 18 (#339); Ego: 70 (#342),
Male: #339; Feme: #342
} // #342

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #369)@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 33 (#49); Ego: 17 (#33),
@3: Sup: 51 (#100); Ego: 18 (#51),
@4: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 40 (#91),
@5: Sup: 51 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES (%9)); Ego: 41 (#132),
@6: Sup: 12 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST (%27)); Ego:
42 (#174),
@7: Sup: 76 (#249); Ego: 64 (#238),
@8: Sup: 60 (#309); Ego: 65 (#303),
@9: Sup: 45 (#354); Ego: 66 (#369),
Male: #354; Feme: #369
} // #369

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he
rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God
blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had
rested from all his work which God created and made.” [Genesis 1:31-2:3
(KJV)]

Thusly if the Sabbath as a sacred principle of nature which is the
ultimate good as perfection: “And he said unto them, The sabbath was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath.” [Mark 2:27 (KJV)]

It’s meritorious purpose as a benefit to humankind is found firstly
within the ACT TO WILL by VOLUNTĀTIS {ie. MENTALISM {#41}: #1 - WILL,
FREE WILL, CHOICE as to engaged within actions that endeavour to #1 - BE
SOCIALLY BENEFICIAL (the Artificial Intelligence equivalent of 'DO NO
EVIL'?); {*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}} by it’s remembrance and
then the voluntary avoidance of labour as the absence of any WILL TO ACT.

H2257@{
   @1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
   @2: Sup: 10 (#18); Ego: 2 (#10),
   @3: Sup: 40 (#58); Ego: 30 (#40),
   @4: Sup: 41 (#99); Ego: 1 (#41),
   Male: #99; Feme: #41
} // #41

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #40 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;

THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.

    #VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
    #TOOLS: Labouring (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
strenuous efforts.
    #POSITION: With Duties (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
    #TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
    #CANON: #228

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
   @3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
   @4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
   Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228

#41 as [#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): {UMBRA: #6 as #40 %
#41 = #40} 1) *HURT*, *DAMAGE*, *INJURY*;

"Take heed now that ye fail not to do this: why should damage {#41 as
[#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): hurt} grow to the hurt of
the kings?" [Ezra 4:22]

Rather Kant, with this rhetorical consideration, introduces an
explicitly methodological train of thought. He asks “whether the nature
of the science {ie. ‘OTH CYCLE of 6D x #364 = #2184 days x 49J (based
seven number) = #294 x #364 = 107,016 days / 293 as TROPICAL YEARS =
365.242321 days} does not require the empirical part always to be
carefully separated from the rational [as the INTELLECTUS AS GENETIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS (ie. voluntary will)]:

"And God said, Let us make {ie.

*APPOINT* AS HAVING INCEPTION OF 22 / 7 WITH A GENESIS {DAO OF NATURE
(CHINESE: ZIRAN) / COURSE (GREEK: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (GREEK: GENESIS)}
REPRISE UPON EQUINOX OF WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 / #0 - NEW MOON OF
THURSDAY 21 MARCH 1996

} man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over
the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle,
and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon
the earth.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;
male and female created he them." [Genesis 1:26-27 (KJV)]

And he confines this question to the sub-question "Whether one is not of
the opinion that it: is of the utmost necessity to work out once a pure
moral philosophy which is fully cleansed of everything that might be in
any way empirical and belong to anthropology“

The passage that is introduced by this question contains, at the same
time, a positive response — the thesis that there must be a “pure moral
philosophy” is “self evident." And indeed for Kant this evidence arises
“out of the common idea of duty and the moral law” (ibid.). Kant’s
cursory argumentation for this thesis is difficult to grasp.
Undoubtedly, it constitutes one of the key argumentative passages of the
Groundwork. [Page 6]

It is perhaps presumptuous of us at only page #6 of #323 to already
taking issue with the robustness of Kant's other cogent thesis that
there must be a “pure moral philosophy” which is “self evident" given
that there are seven days designates within our understanding of the
cosmology which is understood universally as an implicit law of nature.

Yet for Kant this anthropological evidence arises “out of the common
idea of duty and the moral law” which is certainly self evident
contradiction of his postulate that any adequate form of moral
philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical elements
of interest, self-love, and natural feelings in the dutiful display of
filial affection by VOLUNTĀTIS {CORRESPONDENCE {#82}: #2 - desire,
inclination / Honour Parents} relating to the “honour bestowed upon
parents” which is due from a son or daughter:

H3513@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#138); Ego: 20 (#76),
   @4: Sup: 78 (#216); Ego: 2 (#78),
   @5: Sup: 1 (#217); Ego: 4 (#82),
   Male: #217; Feme: #82
} // #82

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #82 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
*OWN* *PROPERTY*.

    #VIRTUE:
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
   @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513): {UMBRA: #37 as #82 % #41
= #41} 1) to be heavy, be weighty, be grievous, be hard, be rich, be
honourable, be glorious, be burdensome, be honoured; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
be heavy; 1a2) to be heavy, be insensible, be dull; 1a3) *TO* *BE*
*HONOURED*; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made heavy, be honoured, enjoy
honour, be made abundant; 1b2) to get oneself glory or honour, gain
glory; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to make heavy, make dull, make insensible; 1c2)
to make honourable, honour, glorify; 1d) (Pual) to be made honourable,
be honoured; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to make heavy; 1e2) to make heavy, make
dull, make unresponsive; 1e3) to cause to be honoured; 1f) (Hithpael);
1f1) to make oneself heavy, make oneself dense, make oneself numerous;
1f2) to honour oneself;

"And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom {their secret; their
cement} and Gomorrah {rebellious people} is great, and because their sin
is very grievous {#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513):
honour};" [Genesis 18:20]

5. (MOTHER) FORMULA OF HUMANITY AS HEAD OF STATE / *HONOUR* *PARENTS*

PYTHAGOREAN TETRAD: #1 + #2 = #3 as #MIND

MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE: {ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT)
/ SERAPHIM {Heb. Saraph Gk. Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively)
poisonous (serpent); specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical
creature (from their copper color))} {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {1 + 2 + 3 + 4
= 10}

TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}

PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat,
throne)}

+ 0, H9, H18 {ie. System’s Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}

Thusly, at this juncture in our ingestion of Kant’s thesis, we shall
reserve our future conjectures upon any rhetorical artifices which he
may deploy until we have considered further what nominative descriptions
that he conveys by such postulates.


- dolf

SEE ALSO: "(SYNCRETIC DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018) WHAT IS A METAPHYSICS OF
MORALS: #56 - TARGETED RELIGIOUS #312 - HATRED, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
THEFT AND SLANDER BY MISNOMERED PIETY WITHIN SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE
AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Augustus.pdf>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-25 07:13:36 UTC
Permalink
(DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018): THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY

The Kantian appeal for a pure moral philosophy begins with a reference
to the usefulness of the division of labor. [And here] Kant raises the
question whether philosophy would not benefit from such a division.
Ultimately, he is not concerned with whether the burden of elaborating
philosophical theories should be distributed among the shoulders of a
multitude of persons.[Page 6]

We would contend against this notion as being an impotent chimeric {ie.
a thing which is hoped for but is illusory or impossible to achieve} of
idealism {ie. the unrealistic belief in or pursuit of perfection} such
that one may declare "the economic sovereignty you claim to defend is a
chimera".

And thusly, it is in and of itself an oblique contradiction of Kant's
own characteristic position development where he emphasizes that an
adequate form of moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from
all empirical elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings as
well as free from rational concepts of perfection:

“And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #342)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 20 (#26); Ego: 14 (#20),
@3: Sup: 42 (#68); Ego: 22 (#42),
@4: Sup: 72 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY (%14); I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER (%16)); Ego: 30 (#72),
@5: Sup: 29 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
(%18)); Ego: 38 (#110),
@6: Sup: 75 (#244); Ego: 46 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS (%21)),
@7: Sup: 48 (#292); Ego: 54 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND (%30)),
@8: Sup: 29 (#321); Ego: 62 (#272),
@9: Sup: 18 (#339); Ego: 70 (#342),
Male: #339; Feme: #342
} // #342

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #369)@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 33 (#49); Ego: 17 (#33),
@3: Sup: 51 (#100); Ego: 18 (#51),
@4: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 40 (#91),
@5: Sup: 51 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES (%9)); Ego: 41 (#132),
@6: Sup: 12 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST (%27)); Ego:
42 (#174),
@7: Sup: 76 (#249); Ego: 64 (#238),
@8: Sup: 60 (#309); Ego: 65 (#303),
@9: Sup: 45 (#354); Ego: 66 (#369),
Male: #354; Feme: #369
} // #369

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he
rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God
blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had
rested from all his work which God created and made.” [Genesis 1:31-2:3
(KJV)]

Thusly if the Sabbath as a sacred principle of nature which is the
ultimate good as perfection: “And he said unto them, The sabbath was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath.” [Mark 2:27 (KJV)]

It’s meritorious purpose as a benefit to humankind is found firstly
within the ACT TO WILL by VOLUNTĀTIS {ie. MENTALISM {#41}: #1 - WILL,
FREE WILL, CHOICE as to engaged within actions that endeavour to #1 - BE
SOCIALLY BENEFICIAL (the Artificial Intelligence equivalent of 'DO NO
EVIL'?); {*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}} by it’s remembrance and
then the voluntary avoidance of labour as the absence of any WILL TO ACT.

H2257@{
   @1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
   @2: Sup: 10 (#18); Ego: 2 (#10),
   @3: Sup: 40 (#58); Ego: 30 (#40),
   @4: Sup: 41 (#99); Ego: 1 (#41),
   Male: #99; Feme: #41
} // #41

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #40 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;

THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.

    #VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
    #TOOLS: Labouring (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
strenuous efforts.
    #POSITION: With Duties (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
    #TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
    #CANON: #228

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
   @3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
   @4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
   Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228

#41 as [#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): {UMBRA: #6 as #40 %
#41 = #40} 1) *HURT*, *DAMAGE*, *INJURY*;

"Take heed now that ye fail not to do this: why should damage {#41 as
[#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): hurt} grow to the hurt of
the kings?" [Ezra 4:22]

Rather Kant, with this rhetorical consideration, introduces an
explicitly methodological train of thought. He asks “whether the nature
of the science {ie. ‘OTH CYCLE of 6D x #364 = #2184 days x 49J (based
seven number) = #294 x #364 = 107,016 days / 293 as TROPICAL YEARS =
365.242321 days} does not require the empirical part always to be
carefully separated from the rational [as the INTELLECTUS AS GENETIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS (ie. voluntary will)]:

"And God said, Let us make {ie.

*APPOINT* AS HAVING INCEPTION OF 22 / 7 WITH A GENESIS {DAO OF NATURE
(CHINESE: ZIRAN) / COURSE (GREEK: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (GREEK: GENESIS)}
REPRISE UPON EQUINOX OF WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 / #0 - NEW MOON OF
THURSDAY 21 MARCH 1996

} man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over
the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle,
and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon
the earth.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;
male and female created he them." [Genesis 1:26-27 (KJV)]

And he confines this question to the sub-question "Whether one is not of
the opinion that it: is of the utmost necessity to work out once a pure
moral philosophy which is fully cleansed of everything that might be in
any way empirical and belong to anthropology“

The passage that is introduced by this question contains, at the same
time, a positive response — the thesis that there must be a “pure moral
philosophy” is “self evident." And indeed for Kant this evidence arises
“out of the common idea of duty and the moral law” (ibid.). Kant’s
cursory argumentation for this thesis is difficult to grasp.
Undoubtedly, it constitutes one of the key argumentative passages of the
Groundwork. [Page 6]

It is perhaps presumptuous of us at only page #6 of #323 to already be
taking issue with the robustness of Kant's otherwise cogent thesis that
there must be a “pure moral philosophy” which is “self evident" given
that there are seven days designates within our understanding of the
cosmology which is understood universally as an implicit law of nature.

Yet for Kant this anthropological evidence arises “out of the common
idea of duty and the moral law” which is also certainly self evidently a
contradiction of his initial postulate that any adequate form of moral
philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical elements
of interest, self-love, and natural feelings in the dutiful display of
filial affection by VOLUNTĀTIS {CORRESPONDENCE {#82}: #2 - desire,
inclination / Honour Parents} relating to the “honour bestowed upon
one's matrimonial or common law parents” which is due from a son or
daughter:

H3513@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#138); Ego: 20 (#76),
   @4: Sup: 78 (#216); Ego: 2 (#78),
   @5: Sup: 1 (#217); Ego: 4 (#82),
   Male: #217; Feme: #82
} // #82

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #82 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
*OWN* *PROPERTY*.

    #VIRTUE:
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
   @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513): {UMBRA: #37 as #82 % #41
= #41} 1) to be heavy, be weighty, be grievous, be hard, be rich, be
honourable, be glorious, be burdensome, be honoured; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
be heavy; 1a2) to be heavy, be insensible, be dull; 1a3) *TO* *BE*
*HONOURED*; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made heavy, be honoured, enjoy
honour, be made abundant; 1b2) to get oneself glory or honour, gain
glory; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to make heavy, make dull, make insensible; 1c2)
to make honourable, honour, glorify; 1d) (Pual) to be made honourable,
be honoured; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to make heavy; 1e2) to make heavy, make
dull, make unresponsive; 1e3) to cause to be honoured; 1f) (Hithpael);
1f1) to make oneself heavy, make oneself dense, make oneself numerous;
1f2) to honour oneself;

"And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom {their secret; their
cement} and Gomorrah {rebellious people} is great, and because their sin
is very grievous {#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513):
honour};" [Genesis 18:20]

5. (MOTHER) FORMULA OF HUMANITY AS HEAD OF STATE / *HONOUR* *PARENTS*

PYTHAGOREAN TETRAD: #1 + #2 = #3 as #MIND

MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE: {ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT)
/ SERAPHIM {Heb. Saraph Gk. Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively)
poisonous (serpent); specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical
creature (from their copper color))} {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {1 + 2 + 3 + 4
= 10}

TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}

PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat,
throne)}

+ 0, H9, H18 {ie. System’s Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}

Thusly, at this juncture in our ingestion of Kant’s thesis, we shall
reserve our future conjectures upon any rhetorical artifices which he
may deploy until we have considered further what nominative descriptions
that he conveys by such postulates.


- dolf

SEE ALSO: "(SYNCRETIC DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018) WHAT IS A METAPHYSICS OF
MORALS: #56 - TARGETED RELIGIOUS #312 - HATRED, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
THEFT AND SLANDER BY MISNOMERED PIETY WITHIN SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE
AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Augustus.pdf>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-25 07:47:06 UTC
Permalink
(DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018): THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY

The Kantian appeal for a pure moral philosophy begins with a reference
to the usefulness of the division of labor. [And here] Kant raises the
question whether philosophy would not benefit from such a division.
Ultimately, he is not concerned with whether the burden of elaborating
philosophical theories should be distributed among the shoulders of a
multitude of persons.[Page 6]

We would contend against this notion as being an impotent chimeric {ie.
a thing which is hoped for but is illusory or impossible to achieve} of
idealism {ie. the unrealistic belief in or pursuit of perfection} such
that one may declare "the economic sovereignty you claim to defend is a
chimera".

And thusly, it is in and of itself an oblique contradiction of Kant's
own characteristic position development where he emphasizes that an
adequate form of moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from
all empirical elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings as
well as free from rational concepts of perfection:

“And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #342)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 20 (#26); Ego: 14 (#20),
@3: Sup: 42 (#68); Ego: 22 (#42),
@4: Sup: 72 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY (%14); I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER (%16)); Ego: 30 (#72),
@5: Sup: 29 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
(%18)); Ego: 38 (#110),
@6: Sup: 75 (#244); Ego: 46 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS (%21)),
@7: Sup: 48 (#292); Ego: 54 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND (%30)),
@8: Sup: 29 (#321); Ego: 62 (#272),
@9: Sup: 18 (#339); Ego: 70 (#342),
Male: #339; Feme: #342
} // #342

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #369)@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 33 (#49); Ego: 17 (#33),
@3: Sup: 51 (#100); Ego: 18 (#51),
@4: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 40 (#91),
@5: Sup: 51 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES (%9)); Ego: 41 (#132),
@6: Sup: 12 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST (%27)); Ego:
42 (#174),
@7: Sup: 76 (#249); Ego: 64 (#238),
@8: Sup: 60 (#309); Ego: 65 (#303),
@9: Sup: 45 (#354); Ego: 66 (#369),
Male: #354; Feme: #369
} // #369

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he
rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God
blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had
rested from all his work which God created and made.” [Genesis 1:31-2:3
(KJV)]

Thusly if the Sabbath as a sacred principle of nature which is the
ultimate good as perfection: “And he said unto them, The sabbath was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath.” [Mark 2:27 (KJV)]

It’s meritorious purpose as a benefit to humankind is found firstly
within the ACT TO WILL by VOLUNTĀTIS {ie. MENTALISM {#41}: #1 - WILL,
FREE WILL, CHOICE as to engaged within actions that endeavour to #1 - BE
SOCIALLY BENEFICIAL (the Artificial Intelligence equivalent of 'DO NO
EVIL'?); {*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}} by it’s remembrance and
then the voluntary avoidance of labour as the absence of any WILL TO ACT.

H2257@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 10 (#18); Ego: 2 (#10),
@3: Sup: 40 (#58); Ego: 30 (#40),
@4: Sup: 41 (#99); Ego: 1 (#41),
Male: #99; Feme: #41
} // #41

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #40 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;

THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.

#VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
#TOOLS: Labouring (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
strenuous efforts.
#POSITION: With Duties (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
#TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
#CANON: #228

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
@3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
@4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228

#41 as [#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): {UMBRA: #6 as #40 %
#41 = #40} 1) *HURT*, *DAMAGE*, *INJURY*;

"Take heed now that ye fail not to do this: why should damage {#41 as
[#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): hurt} grow to the hurt of
the kings?" [Ezra 4:22]

Rather Kant, with this rhetorical consideration, introduces an
explicitly methodological train of thought. He asks “whether the nature
of the science {ie. ‘OTH CYCLE of 6D x #364 = #2184 days x 49J (based
seven number) = #294 x #364 = 107,016 days / 293 as TROPICAL YEARS =
365.242321 days} does not require the empirical part always to be
carefully separated from the rational [as the INTELLECTUS AS GENETIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS (ie. voluntary will)]:

"And God said, Let us make {ie.

*APPOINT* AS HAVING INCEPTION OF 22 / 7 WITH A GENESIS {DAO OF NATURE
(CHINESE: ZIRAN) / COURSE (GREEK: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (GREEK: GENESIS)}
REPRISE UPON EQUINOX OF WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 / #0 - NEW MOON OF
THURSDAY 21 MARCH 1996

} man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over
the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle,
and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon
the earth.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;
male and female created he them." [Genesis 1:26-27 (KJV)]

And he confines this question to the sub-question "Whether one is not of
the opinion that it: is of the utmost necessity to work out once a pure
moral philosophy which is fully cleansed of everything that might be in
any way empirical and belong to anthropology“

The passage that is introduced by this question contains, at the same
time, a positive response — the thesis that there must be a “pure moral
philosophy” is “self evident." And indeed for Kant this evidence arises
“out of the common idea of duty and the moral law” (ibid.). Kant’s
cursory argumentation for this thesis is difficult to grasp.
Undoubtedly, it constitutes one of the key argumentative passages of the
Groundwork. [Page 6]

It is perhaps presumptuous of us at only page #6 of #323 to already be
taking issue with the robustness of Kant's otherwise cogent thesis that
there must be a “pure moral philosophy” which is “self evident" given
that there are seven days designates within our understanding of the
cosmology which is understood universally as an implicit law of nature.

Yet for Kant this anthropological evidence arises “out of the common
idea of duty and the moral law” which is also certainly self evidently a
contradiction of his initial postulate that any adequate form of moral
philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical elements
of interest, self-love, and natural feelings in the dutiful display of
filial affection by VOLUNTĀTIS {CORRESPONDENCE {#82}: #2 - desire,
inclination as to engaged within actions that #2 - Don't introduce
biases; {*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}} relating to the “honour bestowed
upon one's matrimonial or common law parents” which is due from a son or
daughter:

H3513@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
@3: Sup: 76 (#138); Ego: 20 (#76),
@4: Sup: 78 (#216); Ego: 2 (#78),
@5: Sup: 1 (#217); Ego: 4 (#82),
Male: #217; Feme: #82
} // #82

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #82 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
*OWN* *PROPERTY*.

#VIRTUE:
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513): {UMBRA: #37 as #82 % #41
= #41} 1) to be heavy, be weighty, be grievous, be hard, be rich, be
honourable, be glorious, be burdensome, be honoured; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
be heavy; 1a2) to be heavy, be insensible, be dull; 1a3) *TO* *BE*
*HONOURED*; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made heavy, be honoured, enjoy
honour, be made abundant; 1b2) to get oneself glory or honour, gain
glory; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to make heavy, make dull, make insensible; 1c2)
to make honourable, honour, glorify; 1d) (Pual) to be made honourable,
be honoured; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to make heavy; 1e2) to make heavy, make
dull, make unresponsive; 1e3) to cause to be honoured; 1f) (Hithpael);
1f1) to make oneself heavy, make oneself dense, make oneself numerous;
1f2) to honour oneself;

"And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom {their secret; their
cement} and Gomorrah {rebellious people} is great, and because their sin
is very grievous {#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513):
honour};" [Genesis 18:20]

5. (MOTHER) FORMULA OF HUMANITY AS HEAD OF STATE / *HONOUR* *PARENTS*

PYTHAGOREAN TETRAD: #1 + #2 = #3 as #MIND

MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE: {ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT)
/ SERAPHIM {Heb. Saraph Gk. Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively)
poisonous (serpent); specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical
creature (from their copper color))} {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {1 + 2 + 3 + 4
= 10}

TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}

PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat,
throne)}

+ 0, H9, H18 {ie. System’s Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}

Thusly, at this juncture in our ingestion of Kant’s thesis, we shall
reserve our future conjectures upon any rhetorical artifices which he
may deploy until we have considered further what nominative descriptions
that he conveys by such postulates.

- dolf

SEE ALSO: "(SYNCRETIC DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018) WHAT IS A METAPHYSICS OF
MORALS: #56 - TARGETED RELIGIOUS #312 - HATRED, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
THEFT AND SLANDER BY MISNOMERED PIETY WITHIN SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE
AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Augustus.pdf>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-26 14:37:03 UTC
Permalink
— (DRAFT #1: 27 AUGUST 2018) 2.1 THE LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF ETHICAL
PRINCIPLES

At the center of every ethics are normative statements. Ethics of
principle, like Kant’s, presuppose that there are ethical Principles that
can be formulated with the aid of normatlve or evaluative statements, which
have a high degree of generality and. therefore allow the moral judgment {

38 45 40
43 41 39
42 37 44 = #123 / #369

} of a plurality of cases. Such principles have the goal of guiding our
moral judgments {#123} and therewith our actions. They formulate criteria
by which we can morally judge objects, for example actlons or institutions.
[Page 7]

“Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O #33
- generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the #312 - wrath
to come?

Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say
within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That
God is able of these stones to raise up children {#123 - H1121} unto
Abraham.” [Luke 3:7-8; Matthew 3:7-9 (KJV)]

Within philosophy, normative statements make claims about how things should
or ought to be, how to value them, which things are good or bad, and which
actions are right or wrong.

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.

    #VIRTUE:
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
   @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

H1121@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
   @3: Sup: 58 (#72); Ego: 50 (#58),
   @4: Sup: 68 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   @5: Sup: 73 (#213); Ego: 5 (#73),
   @6: Sup: 44 (#257); Ego: 52 (#125),
   Male: #257; Feme: #125
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g)
people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars,
arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a guild, order, class;

Ethical principles can have different logical strengths. They offer either
a necessary or a sufficient or a both necessary and suflicient criterion
for determining when an object receives a corresponding moral predicate.
The CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

- Impugning as cursing the SOVEREIGN;

+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

- Impugning our entitlement to fair Justice;

+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - *FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS*
/ *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

- As a battle cry then impugning our BOER / ANZAC tradition whom have
engaged within theatres of war;

} as defined by Kant, or, more precisely, the founding law of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE, appears to be a quite demanding principle, one
which prescribes both a necessary and a sufficient condition for morality.
Kant compares this principle with a “compass in the hand” by which one
“knows [his] way around very well in all the cases that come before [him],
how to distinguish what is good, what is evil, what conforms to duty or is
contrary to duty” (GMS, 404,1—3).

Normative propositions in which principles with such a logical rigour come
to expression exhibit, by means of a first approach, the following logical
form:

(P1) For all objects x:

if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion C, does x have the moral quality
M.

Such propositions of x {ie. being the collective of GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET} contain criteria for determining when an object receives a
certain moral predicate or when it is denied it. In (P1) it is a matter of
the conditions for the assignation of the moral predicate M {ie. VIBRATION
{#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or someone) / Do Not Kill}.

According to the all-quantified biconditional, every object that satisfies
the condition C {#123 - } receives the moral predicate, and vice versa.
General propositions that exhibit such a form consequently assist us sister
in morally evaluating individual cases. If such principles are known to us,
then we would have an extremely strong means of coming to correct
valuations of our orientations in action. [Pages 7-8]

“And [Jesus] said unto them, Ye are from beneath {@1 ... @5 ... #15 (@6:
260) ... #34 (@7: 175) ... #65 (@2: 34) ... #111 (@3: 65) ... #175 (@4:
369) ... #260 (@8: 111) ... #369 (@9: 15)}; I am from above {#41 ... #82
... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287 ... #328 ... #369}: ye are of
this world; I am not of this world...

Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my
word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and
the truth shall make you free.

They answered him, We be Abraham's seed {#123 - H1121}, and were never in
bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?

Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth
sin is the servant of sin...

They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto
them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

But now ye seek to kill me {#123 - H2491}, a man that hath told you the
truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

H2491@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 13 (#18); Ego: 8 (#13),
   @3: Sup: 43 (#61); Ego: 30 (#43),
   @4: Sup: 73 (#134); Ego: 30 (#73),
   @5: Sup: 2 (#136); Ego: 10 (#83),
   @6: Sup: 35 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 33
(#116),
   Male: #171; Feme: #116
} // #123

#123 as [#5, #8, #30, #30, #10, #600] = chalal (H2491): {UMBRA: #9 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SLAIN*, fatally wounded, pierced; 2) (CLBL) profaned; 1a)
pierced, fatally wounded; 1b) slain adj; 2a) defiled, profaned (by
divorce);

Ye do the deeds of your father {#123 - H2490

+ *1, *2, *3 {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* of individual phenomena}

- Impugning our right to religious belief in the exercise of voluntary will
without coercion;

27 *1 50
49 26 *3
*2 51 25 = #78 / #234

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #297)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 10 (#11); Ego: 9 (#10),
@3: Sup: 27 (#38); Ego: 17 (#27),
@4: Sup: 52 (#90); Ego: 25 (#52),
@5: Sup: 4 (#94); Ego: 33 (#85),
@6: Sup: 45 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS); Ego: 41
(#126),
@7: Sup: 13 (#152); Ego: 49 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR),
@8: Sup: 70 (#222); Ego: 57 (#232),
@9: Sup: 54 (#276); Ego: 65 (#297),
Male: #276; Feme: #297
} // #297

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #234)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 3 (#4); Ego: 2 (#3),
@3: Sup: 6 (#10); Ego: 3 (#6),
@4: Sup: 31 (#41); Ego: 25 (#31),
@5: Sup: 57 (#98); Ego: 26 (#57),
@6: Sup: 3 (#101); Ego: 27 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE),
@7: Sup: 52 (#153); Ego: 49 (#133),
@8: Sup: 21 (#174); Ego: 50 (#183),
@9: Sup: 72 (CAUSE AND EFFECT {#246 - ANGEL GABRIEL}: #6 - goal,
object, purpose, intention / Do Not Bear False Witness / #6 - Be
scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS* *BINDING* *NORM*} / #111); Ego: 51
(#234),
Male: #246; Feme: #234
} // #234

H7378@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 54 (#76); Ego: 38 (#54),
   @4: Sup: 64 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#64),
   @5: Sup: 66 (#206); Ego: 2 (#66),
   @6: Sup: 72 (#278); Ego: 6 (#72),
   Male: #278; Feme: #72
} // #234

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #234 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *CURSING*.

    #VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
    #TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
    #POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
    #TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
    #CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
   @1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
   @2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
   @3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
   @4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
   Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

H1870@{
   @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
   @2: Sup: 42 (#46); Ego: 38 (#42),
   @3: Sup: 62 (#108); Ego: 20 (#62),
   @4: Sup: 72 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 10 (#72),
   Male: #180; Feme: #72
} // #234

#234 as [#4, #200, #20, #10] = derek (H1870): {UMBRA: #2 as #234 % #41 =
#29} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(fig.); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

}. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication {#123 - H2183}; we
have one Father, even God.

H2183@{
   @1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
   @2: Sup: 57 (#64); Ego: 50 (#57),
   @3: Sup: 63 (#127); Ego: 6 (#63),
   @4: Sup: 32 (#159); Ego: 50 (#113),
   @5: Sup: 42 (#201); Ego: 10 (#123),
   Male: #201; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#7, #50, #6, #50, #10] = zanuwn (H2183): {UMBRA: #35 as #123 % #41
= #41} 1) adultery, *FORNICATION*, prostitution;

48  8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE}

#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels)  = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
IDEA @120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM):
One day the English will realise that they've nothing to gain in Europe...
*IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND* *AUSTRALIA*, they
can't let India go.

The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold on
to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's a
matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point of
view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE ON
RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>

). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
changed.

PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The #65 - *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A*
*BOUNDLESS* *AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS* *SHED*
*HIS* *BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD* *HAVE* *A*
*MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT* *THE* *SCENES*
*OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*. [HITLER'S TABLE TALK
IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]

#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION* 
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative)
 


<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: By week ending Saturday 8 April 2018 I had received one of these
special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE" half shekel coins.

It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the
Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]

#224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as #224}
1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted, pleasing,
acceptable

#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as [#10,
#8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288 *INTERFERENCE*
*AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach, taunt, *BLASPHEME*,
defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to *WINTER*, spend harvest time,
remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal)
*TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO* *REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <— *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 / #288}
*TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <— *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345 /
#405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

*LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364)
+ #182 days <— *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday
DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of ‘oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5 as
#19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

*BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed; a
hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
*REPOSE*; *OATH*}

#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360

H2490@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 48 (#88); Ego: 8 (#48),
   @3: Sup: 78 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 30 (#78),
   @4: Sup: 27 (#193); Ego: 30 (#108),
   @5: Sup: 37 (#230); Ego: 10 (#118),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#272); Ego: 5 (#123),
   Male: #272; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#40, #8, #30, #30, #10, #5] = chalal (H2490): {UMBRA: #14 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) to profane, defile, pollute, desecrate, begin; 2) to wound
(fatally), bore through, pierce, bore; 3) (Piel) to play the flute or pipe;
1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to profane oneself, defile oneself, pollute oneself;
1a1a) ritually; 1a1b) sexually; 1a2) to be polluted, be defiled; 1b)
(Piel); 1b1) to profane, make common, defile, pollute; 1b2) to violate the
honour of, dishonour; 1b3) to violate (a covenant); 1b4) to treat as
common; 1c) (Pual) *TO* *PROFANE* (*NAME* *OF* *GOD*); 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1)
to let be profaned; 1d2) to begin; 1e) (Hophal) to be begun; 2a) (Qal) to
pierce; 2b) (Pual) to be slain; 2c) (Poel) to wound, pierce; 2d) (Poal) to
be wounded;

Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I
proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent
me.

Why do ye not understand my speech? Even because ye cannot hear my word
{#123 - H6680}.

H6680@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 25 (#47); Ego: 9 (#25),
   @4: Sup: 31 (#78); Ego: 6 (#31),
   @5: Sup: 36 (#114); Ego: 5 (#36),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 6 (#42),
   Male: #156; Feme: #42
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #90, #6, #5, #6] = tsavah (H6680): {UMBRA: #6 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) to command, charge, give orders, lay charge, give charge to,
order; 1a) (Piel); 1a1) to lay charge upon; 1a2) to give charge to, give
command to; 1a3) to give charge unto; 1a4) to give charge over, appoint;
1a5) to give charge, command; 1a6) to charge, command; 1a7) to charge,
commission; 1a8) to command, appoint, ordain (of divine act); 1b) (Pual) to
be commanded;

And because I tell you the truth, ye believe {#123 - H539} me not.

Ye are of your father the devil {#351

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#7 as #351)@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 22 (#29); Ego: 15 (#22),
@3: Sup: 45 (#74); Ego: 23 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG),
@4: Sup: 76 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER); Ego: 31 (#76),
@5: Sup: 34 (#184 - ); Ego: 39 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN),
@6: Sup: 81 (#265); Ego: 47 (#162),
@7: Sup: 55 (#320); Ego: 55 (#217),
@8: Sup: 37 (#357); Ego: 63 (#280),
@9: Sup: 27 (#384); Ego: 71 (#351),
Male: #384; Feme: #351
} // #351

}, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar {}, and
the father of it.

H539@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 17 (#39); Ego: 1 (#17),
   @4: Sup: 57 (#96); Ego: 40 (#57),
   @5: Sup: 67 (#163); Ego: 10 (#67),
   @6: Sup: 36 (#199); Ego: 50 (#117),
   @7: Sup: 42 (#241); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #241; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #1, #40, #10, #50, #6] = 'aman (H539): {UMBRA: #13 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) to support, confirm, be faithful; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
support, confirm, be faithful, uphold, nourish; 1a1a) foster-father
(subst.); 1a1b) foster-mother, nurse; 1a1c) pillars, supporters of the
door; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be established, be faithful, be carried, make
firm; 1b1a) to be carried by a nurse; 1b1b) made firm, sure, lasting; 1b1c)
confirmed, established, sure; 1b1d) verified, confirmed; 1b1e) reliable,
faithful, trusty; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to stand firm, to trust, to be
certain, to *BELIEVE* in; 1c1a) stand firm; 1c1b) trust, *BELIEVE*;

Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? and the prophets
are dead: whom makest thou thyself? Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my
honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that
he is your God.” [John 8:23; 31-34; 39-45; 53-54 (KJV)]

H3678@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
   @3: Sup: 56 (#98); Ego: 20 (#56),
   @4: Sup: 35 (#133); Ego: 60 (#116),
   @5: Sup: 36 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 1 (#117),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#211); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #211; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #30, #20, #60, #1, #6] = kicce' (H3678): {UMBRA: #29 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) seat (of *HONOUR*), throne, seat, stool; 1a) seat (of
*HONOUR*), throne; 1b) royal dignity, authority, power (fig.);

At the heart of Kantian ethics is the moral valuation of the objects of an
entire particular class {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g)
people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars,
arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a guild, order, class;

}. The criterion of valuation, formulated by Kant is the CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE {ie. VIBRATION {#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or
someone) as designated children of Abraham and sons of God / Light 💡/ Do
Not Kill}, enables first and foremost judgement {#123} of maximums. At the
same time, the valuation of maxims leads to the valuation of actions. The
normative predicate which is of ultimate concern in the valuations of
actions is morality. [Page 8]

[TO BE CONTINUED]

- dolf

Initial Post: 27 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-26 14:51:56 UTC
Permalink
— (DRAFT #1: 27 AUGUST 2018) 2.1 THE LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF ETHICAL
PRINCIPLES

At the #41 - CENTRE of every ethics are normative statements. Ethics of
principle, like Kant’s, presuppose that there are ethical Principles that
can be formulated with the aid of normatlve or evaluative statements, which
have a high degree of generality and therefore allow the moral judgment {

38 45 40
43 41 39
42 37 44 = #123 / #369

} of a plurality of cases. Such principles have the goal of guiding our
moral judgments {#123} and therewith our actions. They formulate criteria
by which we can morally judge objects, for example actlons or institutions.
[Page 7]

“Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O #33
- generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the #312 - wrath
to come?

Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say
within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That
God is able of these stones to raise up children {#123 - H1121} unto
Abraham.” [Luke 3:7-8; Matthew 3:7-9 (KJV)]

Within philosophy, normative statements make claims about how things should
or ought to be, how to value them, which things are good or bad, and which
actions are right or wrong.

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.

    #VIRTUE:
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
   @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

H1121@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
   @3: Sup: 58 (#72); Ego: 50 (#58),
   @4: Sup: 68 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   @5: Sup: 73 (#213); Ego: 5 (#73),
   @6: Sup: 44 (#257); Ego: 52 (#125),
   Male: #257; Feme: #125
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g)
people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars,
arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a guild, order, class;

Ethical principles can have different logical strengths. They offer either
a necessary or a sufficient or a both necessary and suflicient criterion
for determining when an object receives a corresponding moral predicate.
The CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

- Impugning as cursing the SOVEREIGN;

+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

- Impugning our entitlement to fair Justice;

+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - *FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS*
/ *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

- As a battle cry then impugning our BOER / ANZAC tradition whom have
engaged within theatres of war;

} as defined by Kant, or, more precisely, the founding law of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE, appears to be a quite demanding principle, one
which prescribes both a necessary and a sufficient condition for morality.
Kant compares this principle with a “compass in the hand” by which one
“knows [his] way around very well in all the cases that come before [him],
how to distinguish what is good, what is evil, what conforms to duty or is
contrary to duty” (GMS, 404,1—3).

Normative propositions in which principles with such a logical rigour come
to expression exhibit, by means of a first approach, the following logical
form:

(P1) For all objects x:

if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion C, does x have the moral quality
M.

Such propositions of x {ie. being the collective of GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET} contain criteria for determining when an object receives a
certain moral predicate or when it is denied it. In (P1) it is a matter of
the conditions for the assignation of the moral predicate M {ie. VIBRATION
{#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or someone) / Do Not Kill}.

According to the all-quantified biconditional, every object that satisfies
the condition C {#123 - SONS AS #509 - YAHAD being Jewish} receives the
moral predicate, and vice versa. General propositions that exhibit such a
form consequently assist us sister in morally evaluating individual cases.
If such principles are known to us, then we would have an extremely strong
means of coming to correct valuations of our orientations in action. [Pages
7-8]

“And [Jesus] said unto them, Ye are from beneath {@1 ... @5 ... #15 (@6:
260) ... #34 (@7: 175) ... #65 (@2: 34) ... #111 (@3: 65) ... #175 (@4:
369) ... #260 (@8: 111) ... #369 (@9: 15)}; I am from above {#41 ... #82
... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287 ... #328 ... #369}: ye are of
this world; I am not of this world...

Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my
word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and
the truth shall make you free.

They answered him, We be Abraham's seed {#123 - H1121}, and were never in
bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?

Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth
sin is the servant of sin...

They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto
them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

But now ye seek to kill me {#123 - H2491}, a man that hath told you the
truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

H2491@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 13 (#18); Ego: 8 (#13),
   @3: Sup: 43 (#61); Ego: 30 (#43),
   @4: Sup: 73 (#134); Ego: 30 (#73),
   @5: Sup: 2 (#136); Ego: 10 (#83),
   @6: Sup: 35 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 33
(#116),
   Male: #171; Feme: #116
} // #123

#123 as [#5, #8, #30, #30, #10, #600] = chalal (H2491): {UMBRA: #9 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SLAIN*, fatally wounded, pierced; 2) (CLBL) profaned; 1a)
pierced, fatally wounded; 1b) slain adj; 2a) defiled, profaned (by
divorce);

Ye do the deeds of your father {#123 - H2490

+ *1, *2, *3 {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* of individual phenomena}

- Impugning our right to religious belief in the exercise of voluntary will
without coercion;

27 *1 50
49 26 *3
*2 51 25 = #78 / #234

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #297)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 10 (#11); Ego: 9 (#10),
@3: Sup: 27 (#38); Ego: 17 (#27),
@4: Sup: 52 (#90); Ego: 25 (#52),
@5: Sup: 4 (#94); Ego: 33 (#85),
@6: Sup: 45 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS); Ego: 41
(#126),
@7: Sup: 13 (#152); Ego: 49 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR),
@8: Sup: 70 (#222); Ego: 57 (#232),
@9: Sup: 54 (#276); Ego: 65 (#297),
Male: #276; Feme: #297
} // #297

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #234)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 3 (#4); Ego: 2 (#3),
@3: Sup: 6 (#10); Ego: 3 (#6),
@4: Sup: 31 (#41); Ego: 25 (#31),
@5: Sup: 57 (#98); Ego: 26 (#57),
@6: Sup: 3 (#101); Ego: 27 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE),
@7: Sup: 52 (#153); Ego: 49 (#133),
@8: Sup: 21 (#174); Ego: 50 (#183),
@9: Sup: 72 (CAUSE AND EFFECT {#246 - ANGEL GABRIEL}: #6 - goal,
object, purpose, intention / Do Not Bear False Witness / #6 - Be
scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS* *BINDING* *NORM*} / #111); Ego: 51
(#234),
Male: #246; Feme: #234
} // #234

H7378@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 54 (#76); Ego: 38 (#54),
   @4: Sup: 64 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#64),
   @5: Sup: 66 (#206); Ego: 2 (#66),
   @6: Sup: 72 (#278); Ego: 6 (#72),
   Male: #278; Feme: #72
} // #234

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #234 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *CURSING*.

    #VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
    #TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
    #POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
    #TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
    #CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
   @1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
   @2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
   @3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
   @4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
   Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

H1870@{
   @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
   @2: Sup: 42 (#46); Ego: 38 (#42),
   @3: Sup: 62 (#108); Ego: 20 (#62),
   @4: Sup: 72 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 10 (#72),
   Male: #180; Feme: #72
} // #234

#234 as [#4, #200, #20, #10] = derek (H1870): {UMBRA: #2 as #234 % #41 =
#29} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(fig.); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

}. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication {#123 - H2183}; we
have one Father, even God.

H2183@{
   @1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
   @2: Sup: 57 (#64); Ego: 50 (#57),
   @3: Sup: 63 (#127); Ego: 6 (#63),
   @4: Sup: 32 (#159); Ego: 50 (#113),
   @5: Sup: 42 (#201); Ego: 10 (#123),
   Male: #201; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#7, #50, #6, #50, #10] = zanuwn (H2183): {UMBRA: #35 as #123 % #41
= #41} 1) adultery, *FORNICATION*, prostitution;

48  8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE}

#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels)  = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
IDEA @120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM):
One day the English will realise that they've nothing to gain in Europe...
*IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND* *AUSTRALIA*, they
can't let India go.

The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold on
to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's a
matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point of
view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE ON
RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>

). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
changed.

PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The #65 - *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A*
*BOUNDLESS* *AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS* *SHED*
*HIS* *BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD* *HAVE* *A*
*MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT* *THE* *SCENES*
*OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*. [HITLER'S TABLE TALK
IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]

#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION* 
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative)
 


<http://www.grapple369.com/images/TempleCoin.jpg>

[IMAGE: By week ending Saturday 8 April 2018 I had received one of these
special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE" half shekel coins.

It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the
Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]

#224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as #224}
1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted, pleasing,
acceptable

#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as [#10,
#8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288 *INTERFERENCE*
*AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach, taunt, *BLASPHEME*,
defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to *WINTER*, spend harvest time,
remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal)
*TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO* *REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <— *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 / #288}
*TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <— *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345 /
#405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

*LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364)
+ #182 days <— *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday
DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of ‘oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5 as
#19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

*BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed; a
hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
*REPOSE*; *OATH*}

#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360

H2490@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 48 (#88); Ego: 8 (#48),
   @3: Sup: 78 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 30 (#78),
   @4: Sup: 27 (#193); Ego: 30 (#108),
   @5: Sup: 37 (#230); Ego: 10 (#118),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#272); Ego: 5 (#123),
   Male: #272; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#40, #8, #30, #30, #10, #5] = chalal (H2490): {UMBRA: #14 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) to profane, defile, pollute, desecrate, begin; 2) to wound
(fatally), bore through, pierce, bore; 3) (Piel) to play the flute or pipe;
1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to profane oneself, defile oneself, pollute oneself;
1a1a) ritually; 1a1b) sexually; 1a2) to be polluted, be defiled; 1b)
(Piel); 1b1) to profane, make common, defile, pollute; 1b2) to violate the
honour of, dishonour; 1b3) to violate (a covenant); 1b4) to treat as
common; 1c) (Pual) *TO* *PROFANE* (*NAME* *OF* *GOD*); 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1)
to let be profaned; 1d2) to begin; 1e) (Hophal) to be begun; 2a) (Qal) to
pierce; 2b) (Pual) to be slain; 2c) (Poel) to wound, pierce; 2d) (Poal) to
be wounded;

Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I
proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent
me.

Why do ye not understand my speech? Even because ye cannot hear my word
{#123 - H6680}.

H6680@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 25 (#47); Ego: 9 (#25),
   @4: Sup: 31 (#78); Ego: 6 (#31),
   @5: Sup: 36 (#114); Ego: 5 (#36),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 6 (#42),
   Male: #156; Feme: #42
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #90, #6, #5, #6] = tsavah (H6680): {UMBRA: #6 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) to command, charge, give orders, lay charge, give charge to,
order; 1a) (Piel); 1a1) to lay charge upon; 1a2) to give charge to, give
command to; 1a3) to give charge unto; 1a4) to give charge over, appoint;
1a5) to give charge, command; 1a6) to charge, command; 1a7) to charge,
commission; 1a8) to command, appoint, ordain (of divine act); 1b) (Pual) to
be commanded;

And because I tell you the truth, ye believe {#123 - H539} me not.

Ye are of your father the devil {#351

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#7 as #351)@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 22 (#29); Ego: 15 (#22),
@3: Sup: 45 (#74); Ego: 23 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG),
@4: Sup: 76 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER); Ego: 31 (#76),
@5: Sup: 34 (#184 - ); Ego: 39 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN),
@6: Sup: 81 (#265); Ego: 47 (#162),
@7: Sup: 55 (#320); Ego: 55 (#217),
@8: Sup: 37 (#357); Ego: 63 (#280),
@9: Sup: 27 (#384); Ego: 71 (#351),
Male: #384; Feme: #351
} // #351

}, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar {}, and
the father of it.

H539@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 17 (#39); Ego: 1 (#17),
   @4: Sup: 57 (#96); Ego: 40 (#57),
   @5: Sup: 67 (#163); Ego: 10 (#67),
   @6: Sup: 36 (#199); Ego: 50 (#117),
   @7: Sup: 42 (#241); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #241; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #1, #40, #10, #50, #6] = 'aman (H539): {UMBRA: #13 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) to support, confirm, be faithful; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
support, confirm, be faithful, uphold, nourish; 1a1a) foster-father
(subst.); 1a1b) foster-mother, nurse; 1a1c) pillars, supporters of the
door; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be established, be faithful, be carried, make
firm; 1b1a) to be carried by a nurse; 1b1b) made firm, sure, lasting; 1b1c)
confirmed, established, sure; 1b1d) verified, confirmed; 1b1e) reliable,
faithful, trusty; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to stand firm, to trust, to be
certain, to *BELIEVE* in; 1c1a) stand firm; 1c1b) trust, *BELIEVE*;

Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? and the prophets
are dead: whom makest thou thyself? Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my
honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that
he is your God.” [John 8:23; 31-34; 39-45; 53-54 (KJV)]

H3678@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
   @3: Sup: 56 (#98); Ego: 20 (#56),
   @4: Sup: 35 (#133); Ego: 60 (#116),
   @5: Sup: 36 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 1 (#117),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#211); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #211; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #30, #20, #60, #1, #6] = kicce' (H3678): {UMBRA: #29 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) seat (of *HONOUR*), throne, seat, stool; 1a) seat (of
*HONOUR*), throne; 1b) royal dignity, authority, power (fig.);

At the heart of Kantian ethics is the moral valuation of the objects of an
entire particular class {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g)
people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars,
arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a guild, order, class;

}. The criterion of valuation, formulated by Kant is the CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE {ie. VIBRATION {#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or
someone) as designated children of Abraham and sons of God / Light 💡/ Do
Not Kill}, enables first and foremost judgement {#123} of maximums. At the
same time, the valuation of maxims leads to the valuation of actions. The
normative predicate which is of ultimate concern in the valuations of
actions is morality. [Page 8]

[TO BE CONTINUED]

- dolf

Initial Post: 27 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-26 15:56:55 UTC
Permalink
— (DRAFT #1: 27 AUGUST 2018) 2.1 THE LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF ETHICAL
PRINCIPLES

At the #41 - CENTRE of every ethics are normative statements. Ethics of
principle, like Kant’s, presuppose that there are ethical Principles that
can be formulated with the aid of normatlve or evaluative statements, which
have a high degree of generality and therefore allow the moral judgment {

38 45 40
43 41 39
42 37 44 = #123 / #369

} of a plurality of cases. Such principles have the goal of guiding our
moral judgments {#123} and therewith our actions. They formulate criteria
by which we can morally judge objects, for example actlons or institutions.
[Page 7]

“Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O #33
- generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the #312 - wrath
to come?

Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say
within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That
God is able of these stones to raise up children {#123 - H1121} unto
Abraham.” [Luke 3:7-8; Matthew 3:7-9 (KJV)]

Within philosophy, normative statements make claims about how things should
or ought to be, how to value them, which things are good or bad, and which
actions are right or wrong.

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.

    #VIRTUE:
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
   @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

H1121@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
   @3: Sup: 58 (#72); Ego: 50 (#58),
   @4: Sup: 68 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   @5: Sup: 73 (#213); Ego: 5 (#73),
   @6: Sup: 44 (#257); Ego: 52 (#125),
   Male: #257; Feme: #125
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g)
people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars,
arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a guild, order, class;

Ethical principles can have different logical strengths. They offer either
a necessary or a sufficient or a both necessary and suflicient criterion
for determining when an object receives a corresponding moral predicate.
The CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

- Impugning as cursing the SOVEREIGN;

+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

- Impugning our entitlement to fair Justice;

+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - *FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS*
/ *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

- As a battle cry then impugning our BOER / ANZAC tradition whom have
engaged within theatres of war;

} as defined by Kant, or, more precisely, the founding law of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE, appears to be a quite demanding principle, one
which prescribes both a necessary and a sufficient condition for morality.
Kant compares this principle with a “compass in the hand” by which one
“knows [his] way around very well in all the cases that come before [him],
how to distinguish what is good, what is evil, what conforms to duty or is
contrary to duty” (GMS, 404,1—3).

Normative propositions in which principles with such a logical rigour come
to expression exhibit, by means of a first approach, the following logical
form:

(P1) For all objects x:

if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion C, does x have the moral quality
M.

Such propositions of x {ie. being the collective of GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET} contain criteria for determining when an object receives a
certain moral predicate or when it is denied it. In (P1) it is a matter of
the conditions for the assignation of the moral predicate M {ie. VIBRATION
{#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or someone) / Do Not Kill}.

According to the all-quantified biconditional, every object that satisfies
the condition C {#123 - SONS AS #509 - YAHAD being Jewish} receives the
moral predicate, and vice versa. General propositions that exhibit such a
form consequently assist us sister in morally evaluating individual cases.
If such principles are known to us, then we would have an extremely strong
means of coming to correct valuations of our orientations in action. [Pages
7-8]

“And [Jesus] said unto them, Ye are from beneath {@1 ... @5 ... #15 (@6:
260) ... #34 (@7: 175) ... #65 (@2: 34) ... #111 (@3: 65) ... #175 (@4:
369) ... #260 (@8: 111) ... #369 (@9: 15)}; I am from above {#41 ... #82
... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287 ... #328 ... #369}: ye are of
this world; I am not of this world...

Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my
word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and
the truth shall make you free.

They answered him, We be Abraham's seed {#123 - H1121}, and were never in
bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?

Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth
sin is the servant of sin...

They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto
them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

But now ye seek to kill me {#123 - H2491}, a man that hath told you the
truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

H2491@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 13 (#18); Ego: 8 (#13),
   @3: Sup: 43 (#61); Ego: 30 (#43),
   @4: Sup: 73 (#134); Ego: 30 (#73),
   @5: Sup: 2 (#136); Ego: 10 (#83),
   @6: Sup: 35 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 33
(#116),
   Male: #171; Feme: #116
} // #123

#123 as [#5, #8, #30, #30, #10, #600] = chalal (H2491): {UMBRA: #9 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SLAIN*, fatally wounded, pierced; 2) (CLBL) profaned; 1a)
pierced, fatally wounded; 1b) slain adj; 2a) defiled, profaned (by
divorce);

Ye do the deeds of your father {#123 - H2490

+ *1, *2, *3 {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* of individual phenomena}

- Impugning our right to religious belief in the exercise of voluntary will
without coercion;

27 *1 50
49 26 *3
*2 51 25 = #78 / #234

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #297)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 10 (#11); Ego: 9 (#10),
@3: Sup: 27 (#38); Ego: 17 (#27),
@4: Sup: 52 (#90); Ego: 25 (#52),
@5: Sup: 4 (#94); Ego: 33 (#85),
@6: Sup: 45 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS); Ego: 41
(#126),
@7: Sup: 13 (#152); Ego: 49 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR),
@8: Sup: 70 (#222); Ego: 57 (#232),
@9: Sup: 54 (#276); Ego: 65 (#297),
Male: #276; Feme: #297
} // #297

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #234)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 3 (#4); Ego: 2 (#3),
@3: Sup: 6 (#10); Ego: 3 (#6),
@4: Sup: 31 (#41); Ego: 25 (#31),
@5: Sup: 57 (#98); Ego: 26 (#57),
@6: Sup: 3 (#101); Ego: 27 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE),
@7: Sup: 52 (#153); Ego: 49 (#133),
@8: Sup: 21 (#174); Ego: 50 (#183),
@9: Sup: 72 (CAUSE AND EFFECT {#246 - ANGEL GABRIEL}: #6 - goal,
object, purpose, intention / Do Not Bear False Witness / #6 - Be
scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS* *BINDING* *NORM*} / #111); Ego: 51
(#234),
Male: #246; Feme: #234
} // #234

H7378@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 54 (#76); Ego: 38 (#54),
   @4: Sup: 64 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#64),
   @5: Sup: 66 (#206); Ego: 2 (#66),
   @6: Sup: 72 (#278); Ego: 6 (#72),
   Male: #278; Feme: #72
} // #234

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #234 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *CURSING*.

    #VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
    #TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
    #POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
    #TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
    #CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
   @1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
   @2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
   @3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
   @4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
   Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

H1870@{
   @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
   @2: Sup: 42 (#46); Ego: 38 (#42),
   @3: Sup: 62 (#108); Ego: 20 (#62),
   @4: Sup: 72 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 10 (#72),
   Male: #180; Feme: #72
} // #234

#234 as [#4, #200, #20, #10] = derek (H1870): {UMBRA: #2 as #234 % #41 =
#29} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(fig.); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

}. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication {#123 - H2183}; we
have one Father, even God.

H2183@{
   @1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
   @2: Sup: 57 (#64); Ego: 50 (#57),
   @3: Sup: 63 (#127); Ego: 6 (#63),
   @4: Sup: 32 (#159); Ego: 50 (#113),
   @5: Sup: 42 (#201); Ego: 10 (#123),
   Male: #201; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#7, #50, #6, #50, #10] = zanuwn (H2183): {UMBRA: #35 as #123 % #41
= #41} 1) adultery, *FORNICATION*, prostitution;

48  8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE}

#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels)  = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
IDEA @120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM):
One day the English will realise that they've nothing to gain in Europe...
*IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND* *AUSTRALIA*, they
can't let India go.

The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold on
to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's a
matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point of
view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE ON
RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>

). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
changed.

PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The #65 - *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A*
*BOUNDLESS* *AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS* *SHED*
*HIS* *BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD* *HAVE* *A*
*MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT* *THE* *SCENES*
*OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*. [HITLER'S TABLE TALK
IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]

#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION* 
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative)
 


<http://www.grapple369.com/images/TempleCoin.jpg>

[IMAGE: By week ending Saturday 8 April 2018 I had received one of these
special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE" half shekel coins.

It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the
Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]

#224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as #224}
1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted, pleasing,
acceptable

#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as [#10,
#8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288 *INTERFERENCE*
*AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach, taunt, *BLASPHEME*,
defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to *WINTER*, spend harvest time,
remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal)
*TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO* *REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <— *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 / #288}
*TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <— *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345 /
#405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

*LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364)
+ #182 days <— *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday
DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of ‘oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5 as
#19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

*BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed; a
hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
*REPOSE*; *OATH*}

#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360

H2490@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 48 (#88); Ego: 8 (#48),
   @3: Sup: 78 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 30 (#78),
   @4: Sup: 27 (#193); Ego: 30 (#108),
   @5: Sup: 37 (#230); Ego: 10 (#118),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#272); Ego: 5 (#123),
   Male: #272; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#40, #8, #30, #30, #10, #5] = chalal (H2490): {UMBRA: #14 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) to profane, defile, pollute, desecrate, begin; 2) to wound
(fatally), bore through, pierce, bore; 3) (Piel) to play the flute or pipe;
1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to profane oneself, defile oneself, pollute oneself;
1a1a) ritually; 1a1b) sexually; 1a2) to be polluted, be defiled; 1b)
(Piel); 1b1) to profane, make common, defile, pollute; 1b2) to violate the
honour of, dishonour; 1b3) to violate (a covenant); 1b4) to treat as
common; 1c) (Pual) *TO* *PROFANE* (*NAME* *OF* *GOD*); 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1)
to let be profaned; 1d2) to begin; 1e) (Hophal) to be begun; 2a) (Qal) to
pierce; 2b) (Pual) to be slain; 2c) (Poel) to wound, pierce; 2d) (Poal) to
be wounded;

Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I
proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent
me.

Why do ye not understand my speech? Even because ye cannot hear my word
{#123 - H6680}.

H6680@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 25 (#47); Ego: 9 (#25),
   @4: Sup: 31 (#78); Ego: 6 (#31),
   @5: Sup: 36 (#114); Ego: 5 (#36),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 6 (#42),
   Male: #156; Feme: #42
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #90, #6, #5, #6] = tsavah (H6680): {UMBRA: #6 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) to command, charge, give orders, lay charge, give charge to,
order; 1a) (Piel); 1a1) to lay charge upon; 1a2) to give charge to, give
command to; 1a3) to give charge unto; 1a4) to give charge over, appoint;
1a5) to give charge, command; 1a6) to charge, command; 1a7) to charge,
commission; 1a8) to command, appoint, ordain (of divine act); 1b) (Pual) to
be commanded;

And because I tell you the truth, ye believe {#123 - H539} me not.

Ye are of your father the devil {#351

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#7 as #351)@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 22 (#29); Ego: 15 (#22),
@3: Sup: 45 (#74); Ego: 23 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG),
@4: Sup: 76 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER); Ego: 31 (#76),
@5: Sup: 34 (#184 - ); Ego: 39 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN),
@6: Sup: 81 (#265); Ego: 47 (#162),
@7: Sup: 55 (#320); Ego: 55 (#217),
@8: Sup: 37 (#357); Ego: 63 (#280),
@9: Sup: 27 (#384); Ego: 71 (#351),
Male: #384; Feme: #351
} // #351

}, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar {CAUSE AND
EFFECT {#246 - ANGEL GABRIEL}: #6 - goal, object, purpose, intention / Do
Not Bear False Witness / #6 - Be scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS*
*BINDING* *NORM*} / #111}, and the father of it.

H539@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 17 (#39); Ego: 1 (#17),
   @4: Sup: 57 (#96); Ego: 40 (#57),
   @5: Sup: 67 (#163); Ego: 10 (#67),
   @6: Sup: 36 (#199); Ego: 50 (#117),
   @7: Sup: 42 (#241); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #241; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #1, #40, #10, #50, #6] = 'aman (H539): {UMBRA: #13 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) to support, confirm, be faithful; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
support, confirm, be faithful, uphold, nourish; 1a1a) foster-father
(subst.); 1a1b) foster-mother, nurse; 1a1c) pillars, supporters of the
door; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be established, be faithful, be carried, make
firm; 1b1a) to be carried by a nurse; 1b1b) made firm, sure, lasting; 1b1c)
confirmed, established, sure; 1b1d) verified, confirmed; 1b1e) reliable,
faithful, trusty; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to stand firm, to trust, to be
certain, to *BELIEVE* in; 1c1a) stand firm; 1c1b) trust, *BELIEVE*;

Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is dead? And the prophets
are dead: whom makest thou thyself? Jesus answered, If I honour {#123 -
H3678} myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth {#123 -
H3678} me; of whom ye say, that he is your God.” [John 8:23; 31-34; 39-45;
53-54 (KJV)]

H3678@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
   @3: Sup: 56 (#98); Ego: 20 (#56),
   @4: Sup: 35 (#133); Ego: 60 (#116),
   @5: Sup: 36 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 1 (#117),
   @6: Sup: 42 (#211); Ego: 6 (#123),
   Male: #211; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #30, #20, #60, #1, #6] = kicce' (H3678): {UMBRA: #29 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) seat (of *HONOUR*), throne, seat, stool; 1a) seat (of
*HONOUR*), throne; 1b) royal dignity, authority, power (fig.);

At the heart of Kantian ethics is the moral valuation of the objects of an
entire particular class {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g)
people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars,
arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a guild, order, class;

}. The criterion of valuation, formulated by Kant is the CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE {ie. VIBRATION {#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or
someone) as designated children of Abraham and sons of God / Light 💡/ Do
Not Kill}, enables first and foremost judgement {#123} of maximums. At the
same time, the valuation of maxims leads to the valuation of actions. The
normative predicate which is of ultimate concern in the valuations of
actions is morality. [Page 8]

[TO BE CONTINUED]

- dolf

Initial Post: 27 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-27 00:16:17 UTC
Permalink
— (DRAFT #1: 27 AUGUST 2018) 2.1 THE LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF ETHICAL
PRINCIPLES

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 27 August, 2018

— PELLIAN KNELL —

"DREAD IN SISYPHUS DENIAL.
OVER HEAVEN'S LAST TRIAL {#123}.
THOU DOEST
FREELY TELL.
NO CONFESSION TO COMPEL.
THE SOUNDING OF THE KNELL.
SO BEGINS DOWNW'D SPIRAL.
BY AN EVERLASTING QUELL.
TO WELCOME GATES OF
HELL."

YOUTUBE: "I Won't Back Down (Tom Petty And The Heartbreakers)"



QUELL_REBELLION@{
@1: Sup: 44 (#44); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 54 (#98); Ego: 29 (#35),
@3: Sup: 27 (#125); Ego: 3 (#38),
@4: Sup: 26 (#151); Ego: 13 (#51),
@5: Sup: 36 (#187); Ego: 49 (#100),
@6: Sup: 34 (#221); Ego: 73 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
@7: Sup: 34 (#255); Ego: 50 (#223),
@8: Sup: 5 (#260); Ego: 70 (#293),
@9: Sup: 15 (#275); Ego: 59 (#352),
Male: #275; Feme: #352
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{275}&idea:{352}>

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #32 -
Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 - Encounter, Coming On,
Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 - Encounters / INNER: #29 -
Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 - Suppression of the Light,
Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance injured, Intelligence hidden;
Tetra: 67 - Darkening} #275 has 10 Categories:

H7287@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 54 (#76); Ego: 38 (#54),
@4: Sup: 58 (#134); Ego: 4 (#58),
@5: Sup: 27 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 50 (#108),
@6: Sup: 32 (#193); Ego: 5 (#113),
Male: #193; Feme: #113
} // #275

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #209 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 -
Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;

THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine appearance
at Elephantine; *I* *AM* *NOT* *RAPACIOUS*.

#VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
#TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
#POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
#TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
#CANON: #102

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
@3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #76; Feme: #102
} // #102

#275 as [#6, #10, #200, #4, #50, #5] = radah (H7287): {UMBRA: #8 as #209
% #41 = #4} 1) to rule, have dominion, dominate, tread down; 2) to
scrape out; 1a) (Qal) to have dominion, rule, subjugate; 1b) (Hiphil) to
cause to dominate; 2a) (Qal) to scrape, scrape out;

"And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let
them have dominion {#275 as [#6, #10, #200, #4, #50, #5] = radah
(H7287): rule} over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air,
and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping
thing that creepeth upon the earth." [Genesis 1:26 (KJV)]

EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #28 -
Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 -
Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full Circle / INNER: #24 -
Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting}
#352 has 17 Categories: 

G3137@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 41 (#81); Ego: 1 (#41),
@3: Sup: 60 (#141); Ego: 19 (#60),
@4: Sup: 70 (#211); Ego: 10 (#70),
@5: Sup: 71 (#282); Ego: 1 (#71),
@6: Sup: 28 (#310); Ego: 38 (#109),
Male: #310; Feme: #109
} // #352

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #152 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *CURSING*.

#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

#352 as [#40, #1, #100, #10, #1, #200] = Maria (G3137): {UMBRA: #15 as
#152 % #41 = #29} 1) Mary the mother of Jesus; 2) Mary Magdalene, a
women from Magdala; 3) Mary, the sister of Lazarus and Martha; 4) Mary
of Cleophas the mother of James the less; 5) Mary the mother of John
Mark, a sister of Barnabas; 6) Mary, a Roman Christian who is greeted by
Paul in Rom. 16:6;

"Among which was Mary {#352 as [#40, #1, #100, #10, #1, #200] = Maria
(G3137): Mary} Magdalene, and Mary {#352 as [#40, #1, #100, #10, #1,
#200] = Maria (G3137): Mary} the mother of James and Joses, and the
mother of Zebedee's children." [Matthew 27:56 (KJV)]

G1382@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 74 (#78); Ego: 70 (#74),
@3: Sup: 13 (#91); Ego: 20 (#94),
@4: Sup: 23 (#114); Ego: 10 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 63 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 40 (#144),
@6: Sup: 71 (#248); Ego: 8 (#152),
@7: Sup: 28 (#276); Ego: 38 (#190),
Male: #276; Feme: #190
} // #352


#352 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #8, #200] = dokime (G1382): {UMBRA: #13
as #152 % #41 = #29} 1) proving, trial; 2) approved, tried character; 3)
a proof, a specimen of tried worth;

"Whiles by the experiment {#352 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #8, #200] =
dokime (G1382): proof} of this ministration they glorify God for your
professed subjection unto the gospel of Christ, and for your liberal
distribution unto them, and unto all men;" [2Corinthians 9:13]

"Since ye seek a proof {#352 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #8, #200] =
dokime (G1382): proof} of Christ speaking in me, which to you-ward- is
not weak, but is mighty in you." [2Corinthians 13:3]

"But ye know the proof {#352 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #8, #200] =
dokime (G1382): proof} of him, that, as a son with the father, he hath
served with me in the gospel." [Philippians 2:22]

At the #41 - CENTRE of every ethics are normative statements. Ethics of
principle, like Kant’s, presuppose that there are ethical Principles
that can be formulated with the aid of normatlve or evaluative
statements, which have a high degree of generality and therefore allow
the moral judgment {

38 45 40
43 41 39
42 37 44 = #123 / #369 AS #CENTRE {3x3) of GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE
(et al)

} of a plurality of cases. Such principles have the goal of guiding our
moral judgments {#123} and therewith our actions. They formulate
criteria by which we can morally judge objects, for example actlons or
institutions. [Page 7]

“Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O
#33 - GENERATION OF VIPERS, who hath warned you to flee from the #312 -
WRATH to come?

Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say
within yourselves, We have Abraham {father of a great multitude} to our
father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up
children {#123 - H1121} unto Abraham {father of a great multitude}.”
[Luke 3:7-8; Matthew 3:7-9 (KJV)]

Within philosophy, normative statements make claims about how things
should or ought to be, how to value them, which things are good or bad,
and which actions are right or wrong.

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
*OWN* *PROPERTY*.

#VIRTUE:
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

H1121@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
@3: Sup: 58 (#72); Ego: 50 (#58),
@4: Sup: 68 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@5: Sup: 73 (#213); Ego: 5 (#73),
@6: Sup: 44 (#257); Ego: 52 (#125),
Male: #257; Feme: #125
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth,
young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation,
ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for
angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie
sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*,
*ORDER*, *CLASS*;

Ethical principles can have different logical strengths. They offer
either a necessary or a sufficient or a both necessary and suflicient
criterion for determining when an object receives a corresponding moral
predicate. The CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

- Impugning as cursing the SOVEREIGN;

+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

- Impugning our entitlement to fair Justice;

+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - *FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI*
*JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

- As a battle cry then impugning our BOER / ANZAC tradition whom have
engaged within theatres of war;

} as defined by Kant, or, more precisely, the founding law of the
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE, appears to be a quite demanding principle, one
which prescribes both a necessary and a sufficient condition for
morality. Kant compares this principle with a “compass in the hand” by
which one “knows [his] way around very well in all the cases that come
before [him], how to distinguish what is good, what is evil, what
conforms to duty or is contrary to duty” (GMS, 404,1—3).

Normative propositions in which principles with such a logical rigour
come to expression exhibit, by means of a first approach, the following
logical form:

(P1) For all objects x:

if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion C, does x have the moral
quality M.

Such propositions of x {ie. being the collective of GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET} contain criteria for determining when an object
receives a certain moral predicate or when it is denied it. In (P1) it
is a matter of the conditions for the assignation of the moral predicate
M {ie. VIBRATION {#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or someone)
/ Do Not Kill}.

According to the all-quantified biconditional, every object that
satisfies the condition C {#123 - SONS AS #509 - YAHAD being Jewish}
receives the moral predicate, and vice versa. General propositions that
exhibit such a form consequently assist us in morally evaluating
individual cases. If such principles are known to us, then we would have
an extremely strong means of coming to correct valuations of our
orientations in action. [Pages 7-8]

“And [JESUS {he is saved / a saviour; a deliverer} OF NAZARETH
{SOVEREIGN; one chosen or set apart; separated; crowned; sanctified}]
said unto them, Ye are from beneath {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: 260) ...
#34 (@7: 175) ...
#65 (@2: 34) ...
#111 (@3: 65) ...
#175 (@4: 369) ...
#260 (@8: 111) ...

#369 (@9: 15)

}; I am from above {#41 ... #82 ... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ...
#287 ... #328 ... #369}: ye are of this world; I am not of this world...

Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in
my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth,
and the truth shall make you free.

They answered him, We be Abraham's {father of a great multitude} seed
{#123 - H1121}, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou,
Ye shall be made free?

Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever
committeth sin is the servant of sin...

They answered and said unto him, Abraham {father of a great multitude}
is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's {father of a
great multitude} children, ye would do the works of Abraham {father of a
great multitude}.

But now ye seek to kill me {#123 - H2491}, a man that hath told you the
truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham {father of a
great multitude}.

H2491@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 13 (#18); Ego: 8 (#13),
@3: Sup: 43 (#61); Ego: 30 (#43),
@4: Sup: 73 (#134); Ego: 30 (#73),
@5: Sup: 2 (#136); Ego: 10 (#83),
@6: Sup: 35 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 33
(#116),
Male: #171; Feme: #116
} // #123

#123 as [#5, #8, #30, #30, #10, #600] = chalal (H2491): {UMBRA: #9 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) *SLAIN*, fatally wounded, pierced; 2) (CLBL)
profaned; 1a) pierced, fatally wounded; 1b) slain adj; 2a) defiled,
profaned (by divorce);

Ye do the deeds of your father {#123 - H2490

+ *1, *2, *3 {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* of individual phenomena}

- Impugning our right to religious belief in the exercise of voluntary
will without coercion;

27 *1 50
49 26 *3
*2 51 25 = #78 / #234

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #297)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 10 (#11); Ego: 9 (#10),
@3: Sup: 27 (#38); Ego: 17 (#27),
@4: Sup: 52 (#90); Ego: 25 (#52),
@5: Sup: 4 (#94); Ego: 33 (#85),
@6: Sup: 45 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS);
Ego: 41 (#126),
@7: Sup: 13 (#152); Ego: 49 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR),
@8: Sup: 70 (#222); Ego: 57 (#232),
@9: Sup: 54 (#276); Ego: 65 (#297),
Male: #276; Feme: #297
} // #297

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#1 as #234)@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 3 (#4); Ego: 2 (#3),
@3: Sup: 6 (#10); Ego: 3 (#6),
@4: Sup: 31 (#41); Ego: 25 (#31),
@5: Sup: 57 (#98); Ego: 26 (#57),
@6: Sup: 3 (#101); Ego: 27 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE),
@7: Sup: 52 (#153); Ego: 49 (#133),
@8: Sup: 21 (#174); Ego: 50 (#183),
@9: Sup: 72 (CAUSE AND EFFECT {#246 - ANGEL GABRIEL}: #6 - goal,
object, purpose, intention / Do Not Bear False Witness / #6 - Be
scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS* *BINDING* *NORM*} / #111); Ego: 51
(#234),
Male: #246; Feme: #234
} // #234

H7378@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 54 (#76); Ego: 38 (#54),
@4: Sup: 64 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#64),
@5: Sup: 66 (#206); Ego: 2 (#66),
@6: Sup: 72 (#278); Ego: 6 (#72),
Male: #278; Feme: #72
} // #234

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #234 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
*I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *CURSING*.

#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

H1870@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 42 (#46); Ego: 38 (#42),
@3: Sup: 62 (#108); Ego: 20 (#62),
@4: Sup: 72 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE
{%19}); Ego: 10 (#72),
Male: #180; Feme: #72
} // #234

#234 as [#4, #200, #20, #10] = derek (H1870): {UMBRA: #2 as #234 % #41 =
#29} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(fig.); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative);

}. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication {#123 - H2183};
we have one Father, even God.

H2183@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 57 (#64); Ego: 50 (#57),
@3: Sup: 63 (#127); Ego: 6 (#63),
@4: Sup: 32 (#159); Ego: 50 (#113),
@5: Sup: 42 (#201); Ego: 10 (#123),
Male: #201; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#7, #50, #6, #50, #10] = zanuwn (H2183): {UMBRA: #35 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) adultery, *FORNICATION*, prostitution;

48 8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE}

#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels) = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
IDEA @120 ON 24TH JANUARY 1942 (A FUTURE REFORMER OF NATIONAL
SOCIALISM): One day the English will realise that they've nothing to
gain in Europe... *IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND*
*AUSTRALIA*, they can't let India go.

The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold
on to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's
a matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point
of view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE
ON RELATIONSHIP TO A LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM AN EXPLANATION GIVEN WITHIN:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>

). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
changed.

YOUTUBE: "Donald Trump Meets Sergeant Schultz"



PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The #65 - *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A*
*BOUNDLESS* *AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS*
*SHED* *HIS* *BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD*
*HAVE* *A* *MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT*
*THE* *SCENES* *OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*.
[HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @120 / PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS)]

#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION*
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative)



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/TempleCoin.jpg>

[IMAGE: By week ending Saturday 8 April 2018 I had received one of these
special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE" half shekel coins.

It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the
Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]

#224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as
#224} 1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted,
pleasing, acceptable

#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as
[#10, #8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288
*INTERFERENCE* *AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach,
taunt, *BLASPHEME*, defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to
*WINTER*, spend harvest time, remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to
acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO*
*REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;

H3054@(TRANSCENDENT CLAIM TO HUMANIST / PHILOSOPHICAL / RELIGIOUS BELIEF){
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <— *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 /
#288} *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360

@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <— *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345
/ #405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509

*LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 *
#364) + #182 days <— *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of
Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of ‘oth cycle;

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5
as #19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;

*BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed;
a hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
*REPOSE*; *OATH*}

#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360

H2490@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 48 (#88); Ego: 8 (#48),
@3: Sup: 78 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 30 (#78),
@4: Sup: 27 (#193); Ego: 30 (#108),
@5: Sup: 37 (#230); Ego: 10 (#118),
@6: Sup: 42 (#272); Ego: 5 (#123),
Male: #272; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#40, #8, #30, #30, #10, #5] = chalal (H2490): {UMBRA: #14 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) to profane, defile, pollute, desecrate, begin; 2)
to wound (fatally), bore through, pierce, bore; 3) (Piel) to play the
flute or pipe; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to profane oneself, defile oneself,
pollute oneself; 1a1a) ritually; 1a1b) sexually; 1a2) to be polluted, be
defiled; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to profane, make common, defile, pollute; 1b2)
to violate the honour of, dishonour; 1b3) to violate (a covenant); 1b4)
to treat as common; 1c) (Pual) *TO* *PROFANE* (*NAME* *OF* *GOD*); 1d)
(Hiphil); 1d1) to let be profaned; 1d2) to begin; 1e) (Hophal) to be
begun; 2a) (Qal) to pierce; 2b) (Pual) to be slain; 2c) (Poel) to wound,
pierce; 2d) (Poal) to be wounded;

Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would *LOVE* me: for I
proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.

YOUTUBE: "Haddaway - What Is Love [Official]"



Why do ye not understand my speech? Even because ye cannot hear my word
{#123 - H6680}.

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 0754 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018:
"Since you want to babble, go find yourself a rubber room, you fucking
ass-clown."

<https://www.nbn.org.il/aliyahpedia/community-housing-aliyahpedia/community-profiles/bar-yochai/>

"AND ART CONFIDENT THAT THOU THYSELF ART A GUIDE OF THE BLIND, A LIGHT
OF THEM WHICH ARE IN DARKNESS, AN INSTRUCTOR OF THE FOOLISH, A TEACHER
OF BABES, WHICH HAST THE *FORM* *OF* *KNOWLEDGE* *AND* *OF* *THE*
*TRUTH* *IN* *THE* *LAW*.

THOU THEREFORE WHICH TEACHEST ANOTHER, TEACHEST {#1 - *CENTRE*, #2 -
*FULL* *CIRCLE*, #3 - *MIRED* AS *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA} THOU NOT THYSELF? THOU THAT PREACHEST A MAN
SHOULD NOT STEAL, DOST THOU STEAL? {#73 - *COMPLETION*, #74 - *CLOSURE*,
#75 - *FAILURE*}." [Romans 2:19-21 (KJV)]

51 25 74 (#150)
73 50 27 (#150)
26 75 48 (#149 AS A LOGICAL FALLACY IN IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 /
#73 SUBSTITUTION}) / #450 {#PSEUDO NINE: #YOD (#10) + #MEM (#40) + #TAU
(#400) [+ #ALEPH (#1) = #451]}

49 9 65
57 41 25
17 73 33 = #123 / #369 {#PSEUDO NINE *OF* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* *OF* *ROMAN*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*} AS IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}





<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: The MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED
is not homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”]

#YOD {10 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#MEM {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU - CIRCUMSCRIBING
#ALEPH {23 CHROMOSOMES}

ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.

ORIGIN:
The Greek noun ánthrōpos means 'human being.' Like 60 percent of ancient
Greek vocabulary, ánthrōpos has no sure etymology. The combining form
-centric derives ultimately from Greek kentrikós 'of a point,' a
derivative of kéntron 'needle, spur, pivoting point in drawing a
circle,' borrowed into Latin as centrum, whence Old French and Middle
English centre.

I hope that such metempirical / metaphysical as jurisprudent summary of
the unlawful and unconstitutional conduct and its association to the
LETTERS PATENT TO THE COMMONWEALTH by which the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL
COMMISSION has been empowered is sufficient for them to take
consideration of my assistance accorded to them."

DOLF TO FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION @ 1009 HOURS ON 18 JULY
2018: "MATERIAL DETAILS SUMMARY OVER A COMPLAINT TO THE FINANCIAL
SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION AGAINST AMP'S 'UNCONSCIONABLE' MISCONDUCT
WHICH IS 'UNLAWFUL AND ETHICALLY AND MORALLY WRONG' AS PERJURY AT VCAT
ON 7 DECEMBER 2001 ASSOCIATED TO A SALARY CONTINUATION POLICY:

You would have noted on this morning’s news that since my MANDALAY SWAY
poem conveyed to yourselves that the MANDALAY BAY Hotel within Las Vegas
has now taken the extraordinary legal step of filing a legal claim
against the 1000 victims of the massacre in relation to which in the
absence of any motive I have provided a provisional hypothesis: #541 / #447.


That the Financial Services Royal Commission are going to become aware
that the Insurer in relation to my salary continuance claim and the
extraordinary VCAT Hearing of 7 December 2001 of their representations
being PERJURY and lies in relation my involvement (ie. I had 4 x 5
minutes = 20 minutes as strata of temporality: #1440 / #72 - ANTHROPIC
PROTOTYPE = 20 minutes) within Anti-terrorism activism and #288 - 11
SEPTEMBER 2001 TERRORIST EVENT which is clearly conveyed within my 2
Courtesy telephone calls as that which they maliciously misrepresented
and as contempt not accountable for:

#419 - KILL THE SOUL
#390 - GRAVE ROBBERS {WREATHS / CROWN: 4 JULY / ZION: monument; raised
up; sepulcher = GRAVE
#288 - UMBRA / TERRORIST EVENT: 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 / BEERSHEBA {OATH}

Q. What is a “cesspool of political bias”?

A. Essentially it is a mafia {ie. any small powerful or influential #123
- GROUP in an #369 - ORGANISATION or field; clique} which places a
prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious construct
{#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - ADVANCEMENT of unconscionable
collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} by conduct of detrude.

-- TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] --

"TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.
SHAMEFUL PARAGON AS IDOLATRY.
KING OF JEWS NAILED TO A TREE.
WOE SOME TALE OF SANCTIMONY.

MEASURED THINGS DOTH CONVEY.
GUARDIANS TO HEAVEN'S THRONE.
JUXTAPOSED BIAS UNTIL THIS DAY.
AGAINST HEAVEN'S SON FIRSTBORN.

NONE DENY HOLOCAUST'S CAUSE.
JUSTICE AND COMPASSION LOATH.
ENDURING MILLENNIA SANS PAUSE.
ALTAR #419 - *SLAUGHTER* MADE BY OATH {ie. *MARRIAGE* *VOW*}."



<Loading Image...>

<Loading Image...>

[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:

Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).

*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
sovereign dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus}
Empire Governance]



<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: The HEBREW letters as A-U-M belief systems which includes
CROWLEY, THEOSOPHY generally and FREEMASONRY are likewise capable of
being understood as ORBITAL to the PYTHAGOREAN schema]

@1 - #INR AS CHRIST #419 - SLAUGHTERS {KETHER (SUPREME CROWN - GOOD):
#99 / #297}
@5 - #CENTRE {CHOKMAH (WISDOM - BEGINNING): #111 / #333}

H7116@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 28 (#47); Ego: 9 (#28),
@3: Sup: 66 (#113); Ego: 38 (#66),
@4: Sup: 76 (#189); Ego: 10 (#76),
Male: #189; Feme: #76
} // #400

#400 as [#100, #90, #200, #10] = qatser (H7116): {#15 as #390 % #41 =
#21} 1) short, impatient; 1a) in size, number, life, strength, etc;

#5 as #PHALLUS = #360 / #72 or #365 / #73 = #5 + 5x5 = #25 / #65 /
Usurper: @1 / Mystery: #26 {*YHWH*} / Leader: #325 / Regulator: #390 /
General Governor: #780 / 2 = #390 as [#1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200]
as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) *RAPACIOUS*, ravenous; 2) *A*
*EXTORTIONER*, *A* *ROBBER* or #365 / #5 = #73}

H6115@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 29 (#69); Ego: 70 (#110),
@3: Sup: 38 (#107); Ego: 9 (#119),
@4: Sup: 76 (#183); Ego: 38 (#157),
Male: #183; Feme: #157
} // #400

#400 as [#40, #70, #90, #200] = `otser (H6115): {#11 as #360 % #41 =
#32} 1) restraint, coercion; 1a) restraint, coercion; 1b) barrenness (of
womb);

@6 - #15 {45} BINAH (INTELLIGENCE - END): #114 / #342
@7 - #34 {136} CHESED (LOVE AND MERCY - SOUTH): #117 / #351 - BELIAL AS
EQUIVALENT WITH FASCISM
@2 - #65 {325} GEVURAH (SEVERITY - NORTH): #102 / #306
@3 - #111 {666} TIFERET (GENEROSITY - EAST): #105 / #315
@4 - #175 {1225} NETZACH (ENDURANCE - UP): #108 / #324
@8 - #260 {2080} HOD (MAGNIFICENCE - DOWN): #120 / #360
@9 - #369 {3321} YESOD (PROCREATIVE FOUNDATION - WEST): #PSEUDO NINE:
#123 / #369
@10 - #505 {5050} MALKUTH (KINGDOM AS DWELLING OF GOD WITHIN CREATION -
EVIL): #231 / #693 - EGYPTIAN ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE

YOUTUBE: “Handel's Messiah ‘Comfort Ye’ {#33 - #INR, #331 - NOT, #419 -
SLAUGHTER on YOM KIPPUR sunset of 26 September 2001; #509 - YAHAD Dead
Sea Scroll Community} and ‘Every Valley Shall Be Exalted’”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=yrOVjoAp8oc>

At verses [1:14-16], the identity of the Kittim is made unmistakable
when it states that they "*SACRIFICE* *TO* *THEIR* *STANDARDS* *AND*
*WORSHIP* *THEIR* *WEAPONS* *OF* *WAR*" {ie.



<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: The Chi-Rho Symbol is characterised as a *CHRISMON*]

*CHRISMON* (plural chrismons or chrisma):
- A Christogram.
- (palaeography) A stylised siglum or character interpreted as an
invocation of Christ in Merovingian and Carolingian documents. quotations
- A Christmas decoration with explicitly Christian religious symbolism.
quotations

In pre-Christian times, the Chi-Rho symbol was also to mark a
particularly valuable or relevant passage in the margin of a page,
abbreviating chrēston (good). Some coins of Ptolemy III Euergetes (r.
246–222 BC) were marked with a Chi-Rho.

Although formed of Greek characters, the device (or its separate parts)
are frequently found serving as an abbreviation in Latin text, with
endings added appropriate to a Latin noun, thus XPo, signifying Christo,
"to Christ", the dative form of Christus.

According to Lactantius, a Latin historian of North African origins
saved from poverty by the Emperor Constantine I (r. 306–337), who made
him tutor to his son Crispus, Constantine had dreamt of being ordered to
put a "heavenly divine symbol" (Latin: coeleste signum dei) on the
shields of his soldiers. The description of the actual symbol chosen by
Emperor Constantine the next morning, as reported by Lactantius, is not
very clear: it closely resembles a Chi-Rho or a staurogram, a similar
Christian symbol. That very day Constantine's army fought the forces of
Maxentius and won the Battle of the Milvian Bridge (312), outside Rome.
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi_Rho>]

Within English scholarly usage, the meaning of chrismon (uncountable) is
mostly limited to the Chi Rho monogram. In 18th-century German usage, by
contrast, the term was expanded to include the derived cross-like sigla
not only in Merovingian {ie. Frankish dynasty founded by Clovis and
reigning in Gaul and Germany c. 500–750) and Carolingian {ie. Frankish
dynasty, founded by Charlemagne's father (Pepin III), that ruled in
western Europe from 750 to 987} times but throughout the medieval
period. English scholarly usage rarely adopts this extended usage
specifically in the context of Merovingian and Carolingian paleography.

The modern term used in American Christianity is often capitalised, as
Chrismon, and uses the plural Chrismons.
[<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/chrismon>]

“While the Pharisees {set apart} were gathered together, Jesus asked
them, 'Saying, What think ye of Christ? Whose son is he?'

They say unto him, 'The Son of David {well-beloved, dear}.'

He saith unto them, 'How then doth David {well-beloved, dear} in spirit
{ie."The LORD gave him a brilliant and discerning spirit [and] all these
he composed through prophecy given him by the Most High." [Apocryphal
Psalms of David, 11Q5 Col. 27:2-8; 11Q5 Col. 27:11]} call him Lord,
saying, 'The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I
make thine enemies thy footstool?'

If David {well-beloved, dear} then call him Lord, how is he his son {ie.
HEAVEN-EARTH-SON as *ANTHROPOCENTRIC* DYNAMIC}?'

And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from
that day forth ask him any more questions." [Matthew 22:36-46 (KJV)]

YOUTUBE: "Gaither Vocal Band - He Is Here [Live]"



"All these he composed through prophecy given him by the Most High."
[11Q5 Col. 27:11]

"AND IN EVERY PROVINCE, AND IN EVERY CITY, WHITHERSOEVER THE KING'S
COMMANDMENT AND HIS DECREE CAME, THE JEWS HAD JOY AND GLADNESS, A FEAST
AND A GOOD DAY. AND MANY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE LAND BECAME {

#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {#5 as #19
*AS* *INTERFERENCE* *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN*
*IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315} 1)
(Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud), become Judaised

— ELI ELI LAMA SABACHTHANI? —

“HEIL THE DWARFISH JEW {#INR}.
WITH CAMEO PART TO PLAY.
AS SOMEWHAT PIOUS HEW.
BUT WILL IT SAVE THE DAY?

CROWNING GLORY DECEIVE.
THORNY PLANS OF KETHER.
HABIT ROUGE GAUCHE EVE.
FLAGRANT ENVY OF VETIVER.

SUCH COSMETICUS ALL SEE.
BY BEETLEJUICE {ie. BETELGEUSE} OF DUNG.
WHITEWASHED SEPULCHRE BE.
WAITING FOR HELL HAMSTRUNG.”

YOUTUBE: “LIFE OF BRIAN”



#486 as [#20, #1, #300, #70, #10, #20, #5, #10, #50] = katoikeo (G2730):
{#23 as #1226 % #41 = #37} 1) to dwell, settle; 2) to dwell in, inhabit;
1a) metaphor: divine powers, influences, etc., are said to dwell in his
soul, to pervade, prompt, govern it; 2a) God is said to dwell in the
temple, ie. to be always present for worshippers;

YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"



} JEWS {yahad-became [H3054]: #509}; FOR THE FEAR OF THE JEWS FELL UPON
THEM." [Esther 8:17 (KJV)]

DOLF TO FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION @ 0820 HOURS ON 19 JULY
2018: "VCAT TRANSCRIPT ON MATERIAL DETAILS SUMMARY OVER A COMPLAINT TO
THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION AGAINST AMP'S 'UNCONSCIONABLE'
MISCONDUCT WHICH IS 'UNLAWFUL AND ETHICALLY AND MORALLY WRONG' AS
PERJURY AT VCAT ON 7 DECEMBER 2001 ASSOCIATED TO A SALARY CONTINUATION
POLICY:

TO: AMP CLAIMS ASSESSORS

FURTHER TO CORRESPONDENCE SENT @ 1438 HOURS ON 15 AUGUST 2017 / 1334
HOURS ON 16 AUGUST 2017 / 0911 HOURS ON 22 AUGUST / MULTIPLE OF 31
AUGUST 2017 ARE THESE ADDITIONAL DIARY NOTES WITH RESPECTS TO MY CLAIM
NO: ######## FOR PLAN NO: XXXXX,XXX:

Given this clear evidence to the contrary of Mr Peter Riddell’s
submission made to the VCAT Extra-ordinary hearing of 7 December, 2001
in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my two telephone
calls as the basis of a false report to police and perjured evidence.
The following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and
conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 February 2004
obtained from tapes provided by the Victoria Civil & Administrative
Tribunal (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 7
December 2001 before Deputy President Ms. Cate McKenzie presiding over
A500 of 2000 in matter of Australian Casualty & Life (AXA Global Group
Insurance) and Mark Capecchi. The proceedings were conducted by
telephone hook-up.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?

Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by

MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
Shannon Lindner with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called
on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the
Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter
raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I
understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason
why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless
there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by
bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if
necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then
determine how best to deal with it.

In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,
if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the
Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact
what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain
what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of
course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has
finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.

MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 November in the morning I received a
telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that
he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages
on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those
messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my
family. I, that morning, contacted the *VICTORIA* *POLICE* {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth,
young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation,
ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for
angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie
sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*,
*ORDER*, *CLASS*;

} and reported the matter and they viewed the matter most seriously.
They suggested that I not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek,
which is why I am presenting myself by way of telephone today.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?

MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript
of those

THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?

MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate
to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the
matter it ought to be on evidence.

MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]

THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape

MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
volume.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.

TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "Mr Riddell, this is Dolf Boek [calling]. I'm
just wondering whether you['ve been self congratulatory about my
previous submissions to the court and have failed to recognise their
transcendent logic built on time]. They are religious model that
co-ordinates or synchronises over 6000 years to the 9 September of this
year. That means [when this year expires,] my court case will be a
matter of an accusation of fascism against yourself at the company from
which I will not cease until I have your #419 - SOUL.

You may return this message if you like, [number omitted]. You have
until the end of this year and then I would never again turn my hand
against the action that I am going to take. Meaning? I will conclude
when one of us going to the #390 - GRAVE."

TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "Mr Riddell, Dolf Boek. You do realise that if
you are not prepared to come clean with your justifications of your past
treatment of me that as of the new year we will not be having another
contract because I will not be co-operating with you further and we will
are more likely to go to court at some stage. At some stage you are
going to have to recognise the fact that you are a blasphemer. Your
religious context has no continuing validity and since I am able to
rationally prove that with a mathematical model..... you are going to
understand how forceful and hard metaphysics is."

MR RIDDELL: That concludes the two voice mail messages.

...

MR RIDDELL: - - - submission that Mr Boek has conducted himself in such
a way that he shows he has no intention of according to the rules of the
court. He has indicated quite clearly that his court case will now be a
matter of fascism against myself and AXA and in those circumstances a
false claim is frivolous and vexatious and should be struck out forthwith.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Boek. Mr Boek? Very well, all right. Now, I will hear
from Mr

MR BOEK: Yes, ma'am, I have - you would have noticed that there were no
actual words of threat. They were words that were based on fact in that
particular phone call. Here I have a particular mathematical model which
is mentioned in that particular phone call. It is based upon a work by
Johann Kepler, a German astronomer born in 1571 to 1630. He came up with
three rules of which I have come up with a fourth [associated to the
ephemeral and mundane as a transcendent fecundite connection to the
Vernal and the Autumn Equinox in the 6th year of the 22nd Course of
Gamul: 7 x 24 x 13 x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2423 x 293 years -
Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21 March].

His three rules in terms of astronomical cycles were: (1) that the
planet... And then I will get to my bit of relevance to the 6000 years.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, yes, yes.

MR BOEK: (1) That the planets move in elliptical orbits around the sun
which is situated at one of the focus of the ellipses; (2) that the
radius vectors joining each planet to the sun describes equal areas in
equal times; (3) that the ratio of the square of the planet's year to
the cube of the planet's mean distance from the sun is the same for each
planet.

Now, what I am suggesting is that the 6000 year cycle fits a
mathematical model on logic and reason called Telos equals Arch plus
C-squared:

Telos [122J3W1D] = Arch [3W1D] + c² [9(9²+1)/2]

That has been my particular field of study as my retirement activity. A
religious pursuit which is, how can I say, an area of contemplative
life. The best model that can currently be exhibited with regards to
this particular thesis is nothing more than Harry Potter and the
Philosopher Stone. I raise that as a particular point because the poetry
that is used in...

HYPOTEÍNOUSA (verb):
- to hypothesise by ratiocination within measured bounds of division
without an incommensurate bias.

(noun):
- [GEOMETRY]: the side of a right triangle opposite the right angle.
- Also: hypothenuse.

ETYMOLOGY:
The word hypotenuse comes from Late Latin hypotēnūsa, a transliteration
of Ancient Greek ὑποτείνουσα [πλευρά] (hypoteínousa [pleurá]), meaning
"[side] subtending [the right angle]". The word was used for the
hypotenuse of a triangle c. 360 BCE by Plato in the Timaeus (dialogue)
54d and by many other ancient authors.

#1586 as [#400, #80, #70, #300, #5, #10, #50, #70, #400, #200, #1] as
'You Need Me Day And Night Gematria'

HYPOTENUSE@{
@1: Sup: 76 (#76); Ego: 76 (#76),
@2: Sup: 75 (#151); Ego: 80 (#156),
@3: Sup: 64 (#215); Ego: 70 (#226),
@4: Sup: 40 (#255); Ego: 57 (#283),
@5: Sup: 45 (#300); Ego: 5 (#288 - *UMBRA*), <-- *MAPPED* *TO*
*EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE*
#EIGHT: #120 / #360 AND TORAH PROTOTYPE #THREE: #96 / #288
@6: Sup: 55 (#355); Ego: 10 (#298),
@7: Sup: 24 (#379); Ego: 50 (#348),
@8: Sup: 13 (#392); Ego: 70 (#418),
@9: Sup: 8 (#400 - *TAU*); Ego: 76 (#494),
@10: Sup: 46 (#446); Ego: 38 (#532),
@11: Sup: 47 (#493); Ego: 1 (#533),
Male: #493; Feme: #533
} // #1586 <-- *UNITED* *NATIONS* *HUMAN* *RIGHTS* *COUNCIL*

A folk etymology incorrectly claims that tenuse means "side" and
hypotenuse means a support like a prop or buttress

ORIGIN: 1565–75; earlier hypotenusa < Latin hypotēnūsa < Greek
hypoteínousa (grámmē) subtending (line) (feminine present participle of
hypoteínein to subtend), equivalent to hypo- hypo- + tein- stretch (see
thin) + -ousa feminine present participle suffix

Within geometry, a hypotenuse (rarely: hypothenuse) is the longest side
of a right-angled triangle, the side opposite of the right angle. The
length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle can be found using the
Pythagorean theorem, which states that the square of the length of the
hypotenuse equals the sum of the squares of the lengths of the other two
sides. For example, if one of the other sides has a length of 3 (when
squared, 9) and the other has a length of 4 (when squared, 16), then
their squares add up to 25. The length of the hypotenuse is the square
root of 25, that is, 5.

PHILOSOPHICAL USE:
Whereas *OUSIA* (Greek: οὐσία) is analogous to the English concepts of
being and *ONTIC* used in contemporary philosophy. *OUSIA* is translated
as Latin substantia and essentia, and hence to English as substance and
essence.

Aristotle defined protai ousiai (πρῶται οὐσίαι), "primary substances",
in the Categories as that which is neither said of nor in any subject,
eg., "this human" in particular, or "this ox". The genera in biology and
other natural kinds are substances in a secondary sense, as universals,
formally defined by the essential qualities of the primary substances;
i.e., the individual members of those kinds.

Much later, Martin Heidegger said that the original meaning of the word
*OUSIA* was lost in its translation to the Latin, and, subsequently, in
its translation to modern languages. For him, *OUSIA* means Being, not
substance, that is, not some thing or some being that "stood" (-stance)
"under" (sub-). Moreover, he also uses the binomial parousia–apousia,
denoting presence–absence, and [relativity within the] *HYPOSTASIS*
denoting existence.

THEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE:
The word *OUSIA* is not used in the New Testament except in relation to
the substance in the sense of goods twice in the parable of the Prodigal
Son where the son asked his father to divide to him his inheritance, and
then wasted it on riotous living.

An apparently related word, epiousios (affixing the prefix epi- to the
word), is used in the Lord's Prayer, but nowhere else in the scriptures.
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ousia>



<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: Earth’s elliptical orbit around the sun accounts for points of
least and greatest center-to-center distances between the two celestial
bodies; mean values for the orbit’s two extremes are 152,000,000+
kilometers for aphelion and 147,000,000+ kilometers for perihelion:
Gothika (vector image from Horst Frank/German Wikipedia drawing), CC BY
SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons @
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Seasons1.svg>]

YOUTUBE: "Wake Me Up (Avicii [Tim Bergling RIP: 20 April 2018])"



“BE YE NOT UNEQUALLY YOKED TOGETHER WITH UNBELIEVERS: FOR WHAT
FELLOWSHIP HATH RIGHTEOUSNESS WITH UNRIGHTEOUSNESS? AND WHAT COMMUNION
HATH LIGHT {


Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#392 / #419} / HETEROS {#395 / #461} / TORAH
{#395 / #461}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:3,col:5,nous:73&idea:{m,73}&idea:{f,73}&idea:{m,392}&idea:{f,419}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

#73 as being 0600 hours / 22 June and #MEASURE {#42 - GOING TO MEET} as
conforming to the T’AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF
OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]

{
'xlit' : "havvâh",
'lingo' : 0,
'strongs' : "H1942",
'pronounce' : "hav-vaw'",
'lemma' : ["הַוָּה"],
'link' : null,
'info' : "From הָוָא (in the sense of eagerly coveting and
*RUSHING* *UPON*; by implication, of falling); desire; also ruin;
calamity, iniquity, mischief, mischievous (thing), naughtiness, naughty,
*NOISOME*, *PERVERSE* *THING*, substance, very wickedness.",
'gematria' : {'16' : [5, 6, 5]},
'umbra' : {
'419' : [6, 2, 5, 6, 400],
'451' : [30, 5, 6, 400, 10]
}
}

#419 as [#6, #2, #5, #6, #400] = havvah (H1942): {#1 as #16 *AS*
*INTERFERENCE* *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #EIGHT: #120 / #360} 1) desire; 2)
chasm (fig. of destruction); 1a) desire (in bad sense); 2a) engulfing
ruin, destruction, calamity;

***@zen: 1, row: 3, col: 5, nous: 73 [Date: 2018.6.22, Time: 0600
hrs, Super: #392 / #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46
- Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent, Ego:
#419 / #73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 - Climbing,
Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent]

} WITH DARKNESS {



Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#291 / #471} / HETEROS {#276 / #423} / TORAH {#360
/ #465}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:7,col:9,nous:67&idea:{m,67}&idea:{f,67}&idea:{m,291}&idea:{f,471}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

#67 as being 1800 hours / 22 December and #CENTRE {#1} commencement of
DAOist 103 BCE / 4 BCE designation {#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 days} of the
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis / ZIRAN [James 3:6] sequence:

***@zen: 1, row: 7, col: 9, nous: 67 [Date: 2018.12.22, Time: 1800
hrs, Super: #291 / #67 - Three Treasures; I-Ching: H10 - Treading
(conduct), Tread Carefully, Continuing; Tetra: 48 - Ritual, Ego: #471 /
#67 - Three Treasures; I-Ching: H10 - Treading (conduct), Tread
Carefully, Continuing; Tetra: 48 - Ritual]

}?” [2 Corinthians 6:11-18 (KJV)]

SEE ALSO: "WHAT IS A METAPHYSICS OF MORALS: #56 - TARGETED RELIGIOUS
#312 - HATRED, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT AND SLANDER BY MISNOMERED
PIETY WITHIN SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/1%20-%20WHAT%20IS%20A%20METAPHYSICS%20OF%20MORALS.pdf>

NEFESH BAR YOCHAI [ROYALTY3850 #312 - TERRORISM] @ 0828 HOURS ON 27
AUGUST 2018: "On this matter I agree with you.

Bar Yochai is a religious, Zionist community named after Rabbi Shimon
Bar Yochai, author of the Zohar, whose grave is located on Moshav Meron
just a few minutes from the Yishuv."

H6680@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 25 (#47); Ego: 9 (#25),
@4: Sup: 31 (#78); Ego: 6 (#31),
@5: Sup: 36 (#114); Ego: 5 (#36),
@6: Sup: 42 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 6 (#42),
Male: #156; Feme: #42
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #90, #6, #5, #6] = tsavah (H6680): {UMBRA: #6 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) to command, charge, give orders, lay charge, give charge
to, order; 1a) (Piel); 1a1) to lay charge upon; 1a2) to give charge to,
give command to; 1a3) to give charge unto; 1a4) to give charge over,
appoint; 1a5) to give charge, command; 1a6) to charge, command; 1a7) to
charge, commission; 1a8) to command, appoint, ordain (of divine act);
1b) (Pual) to be commanded;

And because I tell you the truth, ye believe {#123 - H539} me not.

Ye are of your father the devil {#351

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#7 as #351)@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 22 (#29); Ego: 15 (#22),
@3: Sup: 45 (#74); Ego: 23 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG),
@4: Sup: 76 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER); Ego: 31 (#76),
@5: Sup: 34 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW);
Ego: 39 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN),
@6: Sup: 81 (#265); Ego: 47 (#162),
@7: Sup: 55 (#320); Ego: 55 (#217),
@8: Sup: 37 (#357); Ego: 63 (#280),
@9: Sup: 27 (#384); Ego: 71 (#351),
Male: #384; Feme: #351
} // #351

}, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him.
When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar {CAUSE
AND EFFECT {#246 - ANGEL GABRIEL}: #6 - goal, object, purpose, intention
/ Do Not Bear False Witness / #6 - Be scientific; {*IMPLEMENTATION* *AS*
*BINDING* *NORM*} / #111}, and the father of it.

H539@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 17 (#39); Ego: 1 (#17),
@4: Sup: 57 (#96); Ego: 40 (#57),
@5: Sup: 67 (#163); Ego: 10 (#67),
@6: Sup: 36 (#199); Ego: 50 (#117),
@7: Sup: 42 (#241); Ego: 6 (#123),
Male: #241; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #10, #1, #40, #10, #50, #6] = 'aman (H539): {UMBRA: #13 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) to support, confirm, be faithful; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to support, confirm, be faithful, uphold, nourish; 1a1a) foster-father
(subst.); 1a1b) foster-mother, nurse; 1a1c) pillars, supporters of the
door; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be established, be faithful, be carried,
make firm; 1b1a) to be carried by a nurse; 1b1b) made firm, sure,
lasting; 1b1c) confirmed, established, sure; 1b1d) verified, confirmed;
1b1e) reliable, faithful, trusty; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to stand firm, to
trust, to be certain, to *BELIEVE* in; 1c1a) stand firm; 1c1b) trust,
*BELIEVE*;

Art thou greater than our father Abraham {father of a great multitude},
which is dead? And the prophets are dead: whom makest thou thyself?
Jesus answered, If I honour {#123 - H3678} myself, my honour is nothing:
it is my Father that honoureth {#123 - H3678} me; of whom ye say, that
he is your God.” [John 8:23; 31-34; 39-45; 53-54 (KJV)]

H3678@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
@3: Sup: 56 (#98); Ego: 20 (#56),
@4: Sup: 35 (#133); Ego: 60 (#116),
@5: Sup: 36 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 1 (#117),
@6: Sup: 42 (#211); Ego: 6 (#123),
Male: #211; Feme: #123
} // #123

#123 as [#6, #30, #20, #60, #1, #6] = kicce' (H3678): {UMBRA: #29 as
#123 % #41 = #41} 1) seat (of *HONOUR*), throne, seat, stool; 1a) seat
(of *HONOUR*), throne; 1b) royal dignity, authority, power (fig.);

At the heart of Kantian ethics is the moral valuation of the objects of
an entire particular class {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth,
young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation,
ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons of God [for
angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie
sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*,
*ORDER*, *CLASS*;

}. The criterion of valuation, formulated by Kant is the CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE {ie. VIBRATION {#123}: #3 - disposition towards (something or
someone) as designated children of Abraham {father of a great multitude}
and sons of God / Light 💡/ Do Not Kill}, enables first and foremost
judgement {#123} of maximums. At the same time, the valuation of maxims
leads to the valuation of actions. The normative predicate which is of
ultimate concern in the valuations of actions is morality. [Page 8]

DOLF @ 0854 HOURS ON 24 AUGUST 2018: "COCK-A-DOODLE DOO IN FEDERAL
PARLIAMENT {FOXING BY GAUCHE BRUTALISM}

We still have more machinations and intrigues of politics to go until
they settle down in the roost.

Clearly the people need to be governed...

...rather than civil disintegration by toxicity of Social Media Networks
mobilisation becoming the democratic impetus and norm.

And one scenario is by what means can the status quo be retained without
any parties 🎉 losing credibility and vitality because of one thing you
can be assured of, there will be rigorous analysis, many words spoken,
some considerations of insinuations including perhaps invective directed
towards accountability before the roost is secure, the foxing by gauche
brutalism is gone and the squawking quelled.

YOUTUBE: “Chicken Run”



So don’t write any brutus epitaph too soon.

Know what great sin lies at your door Rupert Murdoch, what certain
judgment {#123 - *JUDGMENT*} weights against your soul and will collect
when you die off for all I care.

— CATHOLIC ANGER AT MURDOCH'S PAPAL KNIGHTHOOD —
[Written 14 December 2017 with emendation of line #5 @ 0007 hours on
15 December 2017]

“OH RUPERT CAN YOU NOW SEE.
TWAS IMPOSSIBILITY TO SAY.
YOUR SOUL LONG LOST NOR FREE.
SOLD TO SATAN {#351} COME WHAT MAY.

DOES *MISHPOCHA* ANY COMFORT BRING?
WHILST YOU OUR NATION BETRAY.
CAN ANY WIPE SUCH TROUBLING
UNREDEEMABLE BY PHILANTHROPY.

YOUR NOT A SON OF THIS FAIR LAND.
AS A KNIGHT OF ANOTHER REALM.
TRAFFICKING LUSTS OF CONTRABAND,
PLYING DECEIT EVER SO CALM.”

<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/catholic-anger-at-murdochs-papal-knighthood-1145252.html>

*MISHPOCHA* (noun):
- Yiddish. an entire family network comprising relatives by blood and
marriage and sometimes including close friends; clan.
- Word of the Day for 15 December 2017; Courtesy: <www.dictionary.com>

30834614@{
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 14 (#47); Ego: 65 (#73),
@3: Sup: 77 (#124); Ego: 41 (#114),
@4: Sup: 15 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%13}); Ego: 53 (#167),
@5: Sup: 33 (#172); Ego: 15 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@6: Sup: 5 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 54 (#236),
@7: Sup: 44 (#221); Ego: 80 (#316),
@8: Sup: 51 (#272); Ego: 37 (#353),
@9: Sup: 62 (#334); Ego: 24 (#377),
@10: Sup: 8 (#342); Ego: 58 (#435),
@11: Sup: 40 (#382); Ego: 70 (#505),
@12: Sup: 60 (#442); Ego: 38 (#543),
@13: Sup: 48 (#490); Ego: 44 (#587),
Male: #490; Feme: #587
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{490}&idea:{587}>

RHONI A PETRA GAGAN @ 0940 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "Damn right, bro."

DOLF @ 1006 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "OUR KINETIC INTENTION IS TO
GENERATE #312 - ICONOCLASM BY SUBTLE NEURAL LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING AS
MEANS OF OSMOSIS WHICH BY THE PROCESS OF METASTASIS WILL EVENTUALLY JAR
THE TECTONIC PLATES TO THIER IMMUTABLE *NEO*-*NAZI* AS ROMAN CATHOLIC
IGNORANCE AND THEN SUBJECT THEM TO A CATATONIC STATE OF EXISTENCE AND
IMPOTENT BEING SO THAT THEY HAVE A DISRUPTIVE PROCREATIONAL IMPETUS ...

H6565@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 34 (#99); Ego: 80 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@4: Sup: 72 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 38
(#153),
@5: Sup: 11 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
Ego: 20 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
@6: Sup: 51 (#233); Ego: 40 (#213),
Male: #233; Feme: #213
} // #375

#375 as [#30, #5, #80, #200, #20, #40] = parar (H6565): {UMBRA: #6 as
#480 % #41 = #29} 1) to break, frustrate; 2) to split, divide; 1a)
(Hiphil); 1a1) to break, violate; 1a2) to frustrate, make ineffectual;
1b) (Hophal); 1b1) to be frustrated; 1b2) to be broken; 1b3) to break;
1c) (Pilpel) to break to bits, shatter; 2a) (Qal) to split, crack
through; 2b) (Poel) to break apart; 2c) (Hithpoel) to be split, be
cracked through;

Winston Churchill said it best [and I paraphrase]: “We will never
surrender to that Vatican City-State.”

YOUTUBE: “Michael Jackson - They Don’t Care About Us (Brazil Version)”



WHAT DO ENGLISH-KNOWING PEOPLE MAKE OF THE TERM "SPACETIME"?

YOUTUBE: “The Army of Ghosts (DOCTOR WHO)”



H3742@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 50 (#80); Ego: 20 (#50),
@3: Sup: 7 (#87); Ego: 38 (#88),
@4: Sup: 13 (#100); Ego: 6 (#94),
@5: Sup: 15 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 2 (#96),
@6: Sup: 25 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 (#106),
@7: Sup: 65 (#205); Ego: 40 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
Male: #205; Feme: #146
} // #308

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #228 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
Tetra: 26 - Endeavour;

THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
appearance in Urit; I am not hot of speech.

#VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
#TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
#POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
#TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
#CANON: #158

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
@1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
@2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
@4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I
AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
Male: #156; Feme: #158
} // #158

#308 as [#30, #20, #200, #6, #2, #10, #40] = keruwb (H3742): {UMBRA: #9
as #228 % #41 = #23} 1) cherub, cherubim (pl); 1a) an angelic being;
1a1) as guardians of Eden; 1a2) as flanking God's throne; 1a3) as an
image form hovering over the Ark of the Covenant; 1a4) *AS* *THE*
*CHARIOT* *OF* *JEHOVAH* (*FIGURATIVE*);

Since according to our relatively of HYPERSPACE there are seven days as
a sacred principal can we not then view the continuum of spacetime as a
septet dimensional space?

#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] =
qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition,
contrariness, encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;

As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days

#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days.

*CAN* *THIS* *’OTH* *CYCLE* *OF* #312 - *TERROR* BE ALSO REGARDED AS A
COSMOGONIC PULSE TO THEN BE TARGETED FOR SYSTEMATIC ELIMINATION AND
NEUTRALISED?

EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #4 - Using
Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 - Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws,
Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering / INNER: #39 - Achieving
Oneness, Root of Order; I-Ching: H28 - Major Superiority, Excess, Great
Exceeding, Preponderance of the great, Great surpassing, Critical mass;
Tetra: 76 - Aggravation} #490 has 19 Categories: 

G4649@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 58 (#96); Ego: 20 (#58),
@3: Sup: 47 (#143); Ego: 70 (#128),
@4: Sup: 46 (#189); Ego: 80 (#208),
@5: Sup: 35 (#224); Ego: 70 (#278),
@6: Sup: 4 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}); Ego: 50 (#328),
Male: #228; Feme: #328
} // #490

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #640 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
Distortion;

THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *BOISTEROUS* *IN* *BEHAVIOUR*.

#VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
#TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
#TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
#CANON: #185

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_185@{
@1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
@2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
@3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
@4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
Male: #108; Feme: #185
} // #185

#490 as [#200, #20, #70, #80, #70, #50] = skopos (G4649): {UMBRA: #18 as
#640 % #41 = #25} 1) an observer, a watchman; 2) the distant mark looked
at, the goal or end one has in view;

I press toward the mark {#490 as [#200, #20, #70, #80, #70, #50] =
skopos (G4649): mark} for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ
Jesus." [Philippians 3:14 (KJV)]

G2554@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21),
@3: Sup: 41 (#82); Ego: 20 (#41),
@4: Sup: 30 (#112); Ego: 70 (#111),
@5: Sup: 29 (#141); Ego: 80 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
@6: Sup: 18 (#159); Ego: 70 (#261),
@7: Sup: 28 (#187); Ego: 10 (#271),
@8: Sup: 36 (#223); Ego: 8 (#279),
@9: Sup: 74 (#297); Ego: 38 (#317),
@10: Sup: 75 (#372); Ego: 1 (#318),
@11: Sup: 4 (#376); Ego: 10 (#328),
Male: #376; Feme: #328
} // #490

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1076 % #41 = #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?;
I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net;
Tetra: 41 - Response;

THOTH MEASURE: #10 - Oh thou who orderest the flame, who makest thine
appearance in Memphis; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *FOOD*.

#VIRTUE: With Defectiveness (no. #10), selfishness and crookedness.
#TOOLS: With Vastness (no. #50), fairmindedness and desirelessness.
#POSITION: As to Branching Out (no. #9), it is the advance.
#TIME: As to Holding Back (no. #17), it is the retreat.
#CANON: #86

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_86@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 69 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%13}); Ego: 9 (#69),
@4: Sup: 5 (#144); Ego: 17 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
Male: #144; Feme: #86
} // #86

#490 as [#20, #1, #20, #70, #80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1, #10] =
kakopoieo (G2554): {UMBRA: #12 as #1076 % #41 = #10} 1) to do harm; 2)
to do evil, do wrong;

"Beloved, follow not that which is evil, but that which is good. He that
doeth good is of God: but he that doeth {#490 as [#20, #1, #20, #70,
#80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1, #10] = kakopoieo (G2554): do} evil {#490 as
[#20, #1, #20, #70, #80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1, #10] = kakopoieo
(G2554): do} hath not seen God." [3John 1:11 (KJV)]

EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #20 - Left
without Language, Different From the Vulgar; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal,
Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 50 - Vastness/Wasting / INNER: #13 -
Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending,
Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back} #587 has 31 Categories: 

H7218@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 68 (#98); Ego: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 69 (#167); Ego: 1 (#69),
@4: Sup: 45 (#212); Ego: 57 (#126),
@5: Sup: 14 (#226); Ego: 50 (#176),
@6: Sup: 20 (#246); Ego: 6 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
Male: #246; Feme: #182
} // #587

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #587 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; *I* *HAVE* *NOT* *SLAUGHTERED* *THE* *SACRED* *ANIMALS*.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#587 as [#30, #200, #1, #300, #50, #6] = ro'sh (H7218): {UMBRA: #11 as
#587 % #41 = #13} 1) head, top, summit, upper part, chief, total, sum,
height, front, beginning; 1a) head (of man, animals); 1b) top, tip (of
mountain); 1c) height (of stars); 1d) chief, head (of man, city,
*NATION*, *PLACE*, *FAMILY*, priest); 1e) head, front, beginning; 1f)
chief, choicest, best; 1g) head, division, company, band; 1h) sum;

G4374@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 18 (#98); Ego: 19 (#99),
@3: Sup: 7 (#105); Ego: 70 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN
AFFAIRS {%18}),
@4: Sup: 45 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 38 (#207),
@5: Sup: 53 (#203); Ego: 8 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF
MISCHIEF {%34}),
@6: Sup: 22 (#225); Ego: 50 (#265),
@7: Sup: 27 (#252); Ego: 5 (#270),
@8: Sup: 30 (#282); Ego: 3 (#273),
@9: Sup: 50 (#332); Ego: 20 (#293),
@10: Sup: 51 (#383); Ego: 1 (#294),
@11: Sup: 20 (#403); Ego: 50 (#344),
Male: #403; Feme: #344
} // #587

#587 as [#80, #100, #70, #200, #8, #50, #5, #3, #20, #1, #50] =
prosphero (G4374): {UMBRA: #23 as #587 % #41 = #13} 1) *TO* *BRING*
*TO*, *LEAD* *TO*; 2) to be borne towards one, to attack, assail; 1a)
one to a person who can heal him or is ready to show him some kindness,
one to a person who is to judge him; 1b) to bring a present or a thing,
to reach or hand a thing to one; 1c) to put to; 2a) to behave one's self
towards one, deal with one;

NICK O'MALLEY (SYDNEY MORNING HERALD) @ 0001 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018:
"RUDD SAVAGES ABBOTT AND MURDOCH FOR WRECKING AUSTRALIAN DEMOCRACY:

Former prime minister Kevin Rudd has launched an incendiary attack on
Tony Abbott and News Corporation executive chairman Rupert Murdoch, who
he claims have undermined Australian democracy and contributed to the
"*ORGY* *OF* *POLITICAL* *VIOLENCE*" that led to Malcolm Turnbull's ousting.

In an opinion piece written for Fairfax Media on Monday, Mr Rudd writes
that Australian politics has become toxic and unstable due to an
obsession with opinion {ie. *SPUD*: *CONSTIPATED* *TURD* 💩 *OPINION*
*BY* *SELF*-*ENTITLEMENT* *OF* *A* *GRUNT*; #PutYourPotatosOut #auspol}
polls and the juvenile culture of a "*YOUNG*-*LABOR*/*YOUNG*-*LIBERAL*
*GENERATION* *OF* *CHILD* *POLITICIANS*".

*SPUD* (noun):
A particularly ineffective person, thing or action. Usually in the
sporting arena but can be used for a variety of professions. [Urban
Dictionary: 22 July 2009]

A person of lesser intelligence who often deems feats of numskull,
clandestine and neanderthal behaviours are more valuable to the propagation
of humanity than common sense. Usually found with shaven heads and brags
of "this one time" stories. [Urban Dictionary: 27 April 2015]

<https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Spuds&amp=true&page=2>

But Mr Rudd, who was prime minister from December 2007 to June 2010 and
again from June to September 2013, argues that the most destructive
forces upon politics have been the "unique negativity, toxicity and
hatred" of Tony Abbott as well as Mr Murdoch, who he describes as the
"*GREATEST* *CANCER* *ON* *THE* *AUSTRALIAN* *DEMOCRACY*".

Mr Rudd's prime ministership coincided with the beginning of a period of
unprecedented political bloodletting on both sides of politics.
Australia has changed PM seven times since the Howard government. The
Liberal Party's decision to dump Mr Turnbull last week has sparked a
debate over the role of conservative media in politics.

"[Mr] Abbott has never cared about policy," Mr Rudd writes. "He has only
cared about politics and winning at any cost. I cannot remember a single
positive policy initiative that Abbott has championed and then implemented.

"As a result, unconstrained by policy, the entire energies of this giant
wrecking ball of Australian politics has been focussed on destroying his
opponents."

Mr Rudd courted News Corp editors during his time in politics and was
the godfather to the son of Chris Mitchell, former editor-in-chief of
The Australian. However, he is particularly critical about News Corp's
journalism in the op ed piece.

According to Mr Rudd, Mr Murdoch does not run a news organisation, but
instead, "operates as a political party, acting in pursuit of clearly
defined commercial interests, in addition to his far-right ideological
world view".

In the UK, Murdoch made Brexit possible because of the position taken by
his papers. In the US, Murdoch's Fox News is the political echo chamber
of the far-right which enabled the Tea Party and then the Trump party to
stage a hostile take-over of the Republican Party. In Australia, as in
America, Murdoch has campaigned for decades in support of tax cuts for
the wealthy, killing action on climate change and destroying anything
approximating multiculturalism.

A spokeswoman for News Corp declined to comment.

Many of Mr Turnbull's supporters in parliament believe last week's coup
was actively supported by News Corp's newspapers and some presenters on
its pay-TV station, Sky News, as well as by Ray Hadley and Alan Jones,
employed by 2GB, which is owned by Fairfax Media, publisher of this website.

Senior Liberal sources sympathetic to Mr Turnbull have told Fairfax
Media that they believe some commentators overstepped democratic
conventions during the coup and became active players, going so far as
to lobby MPs on behalf of the insurgents and maintain momentum for Peter
Dutton's forces after the first spill failed.

Channel Nine's chief political correspondent Chris Uhlmann last week
said Jones, Hadley, and "Sky after dark" presenters such as Peta
Credlin, a former chief-of-staff to Mr Abbott, were "players in the
game" to depose Mr Turnbull.

Senior Liberals close to Mr Turnbull believe Ms Credlin, Mr Jones, and
Ross Cameron, a former Liberal MP and current Sky News host, contacted
some MPs directly to criticise Mr Turnbull.

The sources in politics and media who spoke to Fairfax Media for this
story would not be named because they wanted to protect professional
relationships. [(c) 2018 FAIRFAX MEDIA, And Reproduced Due To Its
Historical Relevance and Substantial Value Added Commentary]

<https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/rudd-savages-abbott-and-murdoch-for-wrecking-australian-democracy-20180826-p4zzw8.html>

But for those whom don't know, @5 - Fifth Columnists are any group of
people who @1 - undermine a larger group from within, usually in favour
of an enemy group or nation. The activities of a fifth column can be
overt or clandestine. Forces gathered in secret can mobilize openly to
assist an external attack. In whatever circumstance, it is capable of
being hosted upon the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS as it's
mechanism for delivery and staging which then becomes an acute and risky
precipice consideration that is accorded entirely by my Intellectual
Property and thusly my reasonable objection has always been ROMAN
CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 / #33 - #INR / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5
- substituted HETEROS ethic upon our {#390 / #288 / #419} war dead and
usurping the @1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 - HOMOIOS basis to our
Commonwealth's Governance which is defined as a PRINCIPLE that is
circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37} by Queen Victoria's Letters Patent of 17
September 1900 as the instrumentation of Federation into a nation.

@1 - #17 - 2017
@2 - #33 - #INR
@3 - #65 - SOLDIER
@4 - #390 - WREATHS / CROWN / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776

#390 as [#5, #90, #80, #10, #200, #5] = tsephiyrah (H6843): {#8 as #385
% #41 = #16} 1) plait, chaplet, *WREATH*, *CROWN*; 1a) plait, coronet,
*DIADEM*;

"But ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the
passover: will ye therefore that I release unto you the King of the Jews
{#INR}?

Then cried they all again, saying, Not this man, but Barabbas {son of
shame, confusion as Babylon / Babel, incongruity; confusion; mixture as
A-U-M: #15 CE ... #34 CE ... #65 CE ... #111 CE ... #175 CE ... #260 CE
(64 meta descriptor prototypes) ... #369 CE (encapsulated use of those
prototypes to define #81 elements) as opposite to congruity and
ratiocination}. Now Barabbas was a robber {cf: #390 - ROBBERS / SAINT
ANDREWS DAY of 30 NOVEMBER: <http://www.grapple369.com?date:2017.11.30>
}." [John 18:31-40 (KJV)]

G724@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 20 (#21); Ego: 19 (#20),
@3: Sup: 19 (#40); Ego: 80 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#60); Ego: 1 (#101),
@5: Sup: 23 (#83); Ego: 3 (#104),
@6: Sup: 31 (#114); Ego: 8 (#112),
@7: Sup: 69 (#183); Ego: 38 (#150),
Male: #183; Feme: #150
} // #393

<-- LATER INCLUSION OF 21 APRIL 2018 WHICH CONFIRMS MY INTUITION OF 31
JULY 2017 AS CAUSE TO LODGE AN APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL
SAFETY ORDER WHICH IS SUBJECT TO COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER
AP-18-0775 LISTED FOR HEARING ON 21 JANUARY 2019

#393 as [#1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #8, #200] = harpage (G724): {#7 as #193
% #41 = #29} 1) the act of plundering, robbery; 2) plunder spoil; 3)
pillage (properly abstract):--extortion; 4) ravening: (of a ferocious
wild animal) extremely hungry and hunting for prey; 5) spoiling

#334 as [#20, #300, #4, #10] = Chaldeans; Chaldea; astrologers; magician
{ie. *AS* *DEMONS*, *OR* *AS* *ROBBERS*;

#5 as #PHALLUS = #360 / #72 or #365 / #73 = #5 + 5x5 = #25 / #65 /
Usurper: @1 / Mystery: #26 {*YHWH*} / Leader: #325 / Regulator: #390 /
General Governor: #780 / 2 = #390 as [#1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200]
as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242 % #41 = #78} 1) *RAPACIOUS*, ravenous; 2)
*A* *EXTORTIONER*, *A* *ROBBER* or #365 / #5 = #73}

@5 - #288 - UMBRA / BEERSHEBA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
@6 - #419 - SLAUGHTER
@7 - #391 - HOMOIOS
@8 - #13 - Letters Patent
@9 - #21 - Bequeathed to Sovereign Heirs in perpetuity

@10 - #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration; I-Ching: H40
- Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21 - Release;

However this MALFEASANCE is unlawful conduct by a public authority such
as the Victoria Police or the Returned Services League (RSL) under
Section 38(1) to (3) of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities
No. 43 of Act 2006, which states: “(1) Subject to this section, *IT*
*IS* *UNLAWFUL* *FOR* *A* *PUBLIC* *AUTHORITY* *TO* *ACT* *IN* *A* *WAY*
*THAT* *IS* *INCOMPATIBLE* *WITH* *A* *HUMAN* *RIGHT* *OR*, *IN*
*MAKING* *A* *DECISION*, *TO* *FAIL* *TO* *GIVE* *PROPER*
*CONSIDERATION* *TO* *A* *RELEVANT* *HUMAN* *RIGHT*.

MALEFICENT (adjective): literary causing harm or destruction, especially
by supernatural means. - Astrology relating to the planets Saturn (#15)
and Mars (#65), traditionally considered to have an unfavourable influence.

MALFEASANCE (noun): (LAW) the performance by a public official of an act
that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law; wrongdoing
used especially of an act in violation of a public trust; Word of the
Day for 1 March 2017; www.dictionary.com

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS
INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING
AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]
as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

Perhaps these businesses will only be satisfied when ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE fills the gap... and what sort of economy will that be?

Drop some litter {

#235 as [#6, #20, #1, #200, #8] = orach (H734): {#0 as #209} 1) way,
path; 1a) path, road; 1b) the path, way, passing of life (fig.); 1c) way
of living (fig.); 1d) traveller, wayfarer (meton);

#235 as [#20, #7, #200, #8] = zarach (H2224): {#1 as #215} 1) to rise,
come forth, break out, arise, rise up, shine; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to rise;
1a2) to come out, appear;

#349 as [#40, #10, #200, #9, #10, #70, #10] = misthios (G3407): {#10 as
#539} 1) employed for hire, hired;

} like your trashy comment and a robot comes to clean it up...

— MUMMY DEAREST —
[Written 12 January 2018]

“HERE PUSSY PUSSY,
I WANT SOME FANNY?
CROSS DRESSER SISSY.
OR EVEN A TRINNY.

MUMMY IS THE BEST.
SEXY AS MY FARCE.
AND AT MY BEQUEST.
SHE’LL WIPE MY ARSE.”

ARSEWIPE@{
@1: Sup: 64 (#64); Ego: 67 (#67),
@2: Sup: 15 (#79); Ego: 56 (#123),
@3: Sup: 1 (#80); Ego: 71 (#194),
@4: Sup: 50 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 55 (#249),
@5: Sup: 39 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 9 (#258),
@6: Sup: 3 (#172); Ego: 48 (#306),
@7: Sup: 26 (#198); Ego: 2 (#308),
@8: Sup: 48 (#246); Ego: 68 (#376),
@9: Sup: 9 (#255); Ego: 73 (#449),
Male: #255; Feme: #449
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{255}&idea:{449}>

SUPER (MALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #12 -
Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining from Desire; I-Ching: H6
- Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra: 25 - Contention /
INNER: #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity; I-Ching:
H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion} #255 has 17 Categories:

H4798@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 78 (#118); Ego: 38 (#78),
@3: Sup: 4 (#122); Ego: 7 (#85),
@4: Sup: 12 (#134); Ego: 8 (#93),
Male: #134; Feme: #93
} // #255

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #255 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#255 as [#40, #200, #7, #8] = marzeach (H4798): {UMBRA: #7 as #255 % #41
= #9} 1) cry, cry of joy, revelry; 1a) mourning cry; 1a1) perhaps, feast
cry; 1b) cry of revelry;

"For thus saith the LORD, Enter not into the house of mourning {#255 as
[#40, #200, #7, #8] = marzeach (H4798): mourning}, neither go to lament
nor bemoan them: for I have taken away my peace from this people, saith
the LORD, even lovingkindness and mercies." [Jeremiah 16:5]

H3707@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 45 (#50); Ego: 40 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@3: Sup: 65 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 20 (#65),
@4: Sup: 54 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 70 (#135),
@5: Sup: 64 (#233); Ego: 10 (#145),
@6: Sup: 43 (#276); Ego: 60 (#205),
@7: Sup: 53 (#329); Ego: 10 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
@8: Sup: 12 (#341); Ego: 40 (#255),
Male: #341; Feme: #255
} // #255

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #150 % #41 = #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure;

THOTH MEASURE: #27 - Oh thou whose face is behind thee, and who makest
thine appearance at thy cavern; *I* *AM* *NOT* *GIVEN* *TO* *UNNATURAL*
*LUST*.

#VIRTUE: With Duties (no. #27), esteem for activity.
#TOOLS: With Darkening (no. #67), esteem for rest.
#POSITION: With Mired (no. #3), plucked out from calamity.
#TIME: With Aggravation (no. #76), lacking any pardons.
#CANON: #173

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_173@{
@1: Sup: 27 (#27); Ego: 27 (#27),
@2: Sup: 13 (#40); Ego: 67 (#94),
@3: Sup: 16 (#56); Ego: 3 (#97),
@4: Sup: 11 (#67); Ego: 76 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST
{%27}),
Male: #67; Feme: #173
} // #173

#255 as [#5, #40, #20, #70, #10, #60, #10, #40] = ka`ac (H3707): {UMBRA:
#4 as #150 % #41 = #27} 1) to be angry, be vexed, be indignant, be
wroth, be grieved, provoke to anger and wrath; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be
vexed, be indignant; 1a2) to be angry; 1b) (Piel) to provoke to anger;
1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to vex; 1c2) to vex, provoke to anger;

"When thou shalt beget children, and children's children, and ye shall
have remained long in the land, and shall corrupt yourselves, and make a
graven image, or the likeness of any thing, and shall do evil in the
sight of the LORD thy God, to provoke him to anger {#255 as [#5, #40,
#20, #70, #10, #60, #10, #40] = ka`ac (H3707): anger}:" [Deuteronomy
4:25 (KJV)]

EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #44 -
Moderate Values, Setting Up Precepts; I-Ching: H1 - Pure Yang, Creative
Principle/Heaven, Force, Strong action, The key, God; Tetra: 36 -
Strength / INNER: #39 - Achieving Oneness, Root of Order; I-Ching: H28 -
Major Superiority, Excess, Great Exceeding, Preponderance of the great,
Great surpassing, Critical mass; Tetra: 76 - Aggravation} #449 has 18
Categories:

H2853@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 11 (#17); Ego: 5 (#11),
@3: Sup: 19 (#36); Ego: 8 (#19),
@4: Sup: 14 (#50); Ego: 76 (#95),
@5: Sup: 44 (#94); Ego: 30 (#125),
Male: #94; Feme: #125
} // #449

#449 as [#6, #5, #8, #400, #30] = chathal (H2853): {UMBRA: #5 as #438 %
#41 = #28} 1) to entwine, enwrap, be swaddled; 1a) (Pual) to be swathed,
be enwraped; 1b) (Hophal) to be swathed, be swaddled;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #438 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

"And as for thy nativity, in the day thou wast born thy navel was not
cut, neither wast thou washed in water to supple thee; thou wast not
salted at all, nor swaddled {#449 as [#6, #5, #8, #400, #30] = chathal
(H2853): swaddle} at all." [Ezekiel 16:4]

G3717@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 8 (#78); Ego: 19 (#89),
@3: Sup: 17 (#95); Ego: 9 (#98),
@4: Sup: 6 (#101); Ego: 70 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
@5: Sup: 44 (#145); Ego: 38 (#206),
Male: #145; Feme: #206
} // #449

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #449 % #41 = #39 - Achieving Oneness, Root of Order; I-Ching: H28
- Major Superiority, Excess, Great Exceeding, Preponderance of the
great, Great surpassing, Critical mass; Tetra: 76 - Aggravation;

THOTH MEASURE: #39 - Oh thou of beautiful shoulder, who makest thine
appearance at ....; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SWOLLEN* *WITH* *PRIDE*.

#VIRTUE: With Residence (no. #39), attaining to rank, but
#TOOLS: With Difficulties (no. #79), meeting with demotion.
#POSITION: With Encounters (no. #43), coming upon difficulties.
#TIME: With Packing (no. #31), awaiting the proper time.
#CANON: #192

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_192@{
@1: Sup: 39 (#39); Ego: 39 (#39),
@2: Sup: 37 (#76); Ego: 79 (#118),
@3: Sup: 80 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 43 (#161 - I
AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
@4: Sup: 30 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}); Ego: 31
(#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}),
Male: #186; Feme: #192
} // #192

#449 as [#70, #100, #9, #70, #200] = orthos (G3717): {UMBRA: #14 as #449
% #41 = #39} 1) straight, erect; 1a) upright; 1b) straight, not crooked;

"And make straight {#449 as [#70, #100, #9, #70, #200] = orthos (G3717):
upright} paths for your feet, lest- that which is lame be turned out of
the way; but let it rather be healed." [Hebrews 12:13 (KJV)]

[TO BE CONTINUED]

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 27 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-25 23:05:54 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT: 26 AUGUST 2018): THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 26 August, 2018

The Kantian appeal for a pure moral philosophy begins with a reference
to the usefulness of the division of labor. [And here] Kant raises the
question whether philosophy would not benefit from such a division.
Ultimately, he is not concerned with whether the burden of elaborating
philosophical theories should be distributed among the shoulders of a
multitude of persons.[Page 6]

We would contend against this notion as being an impotent chimeric {ie.
a thing which is hoped for but is illusory or impossible to achieve} of
idealism {ie. the unrealistic belief in or pursuit of perfection} such
that one may declare "the economic sovereignty you claim to defend is a
chimera".

And thusly, it is in and of itself an oblique contradiction of Kant's
own characteristic position development where he emphasizes that an
adequate form of moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from
all empirical elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings as
well as free from rational concepts of perfection:

“And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #342)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 20 (#26); Ego: 14 (#20),
@3: Sup: 42 (#68); Ego: 22 (#42),
@4: Sup: 72 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY (%14); I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER (%16)); Ego: 30 (#72),
@5: Sup: 29 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
(%18)); Ego: 38 (#110),
@6: Sup: 75 (#244); Ego: 46 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS (%21)),
@7: Sup: 48 (#292); Ego: 54 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND (%30)),
@8: Sup: 29 (#321); Ego: 62 (#272),
@9: Sup: 18 (#339); Ego: 70 (#342),
Male: #339; Feme: #342
} // #342

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #369)@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 33 (#49); Ego: 17 (#33),
@3: Sup: 51 (#100); Ego: 18 (#51),
@4: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 40 (#91),
@5: Sup: 51 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES (%9)); Ego: 41 (#132),
@6: Sup: 12 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST (%27)); Ego:
42 (#174),
@7: Sup: 76 (#249); Ego: 64 (#238),
@8: Sup: 60 (#309); Ego: 65 (#303),
@9: Sup: 45 (#354); Ego: 66 (#369),
Male: #354; Feme: #369
} // #369

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he
rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God
blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had
rested from all his work which God created and made.” [Genesis 1:31-2:3
(KJV)]

Thusly if the Sabbath as a sacred principle of nature which is the
ultimate good as perfection: “And he said unto them, The sabbath was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath.” [Mark 2:27 (KJV)]

It’s meritorious purpose as a benefit to humankind is found firstly
within the ACT TO WILL by VOLUNTĀTIS {ie. MENTALISM {#41}: #1 - WILL,
FREE WILL, CHOICE as to engage within actions that endeavour to #1 - BE
SOCIALLY BENEFICIAL (the Artificial Intelligence equivalent of 'DO NO
EVIL'?); {*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}} by it’s remembrance and
then the voluntary avoidance of labour as the absence of any WILL TO ACT.

H2257@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 10 (#18); Ego: 2 (#10),
@3: Sup: 40 (#58); Ego: 30 (#40),
@4: Sup: 41 (#99); Ego: 1 (#41),
Male: #99; Feme: #41
} // #41

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #40 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;

THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.

#VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
#TOOLS: Labouring (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
strenuous efforts.
#POSITION: With Duties (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
#TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
#CANON: #228

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
@3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
@4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228

#41 as [#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): {UMBRA: #6 as #40 %
#41 = #40} 1) *HURT*, *DAMAGE*, *INJURY*;

"Take heed now that ye fail not to do this: why should damage {#41 as
[#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): hurt} grow to the hurt of
the kings?" [Ezra 4:22]

Rather Kant, with this rhetorical consideration, introduces an
explicitly methodological train of thought. He asks “whether the nature
of the science {ie. ‘OTH CYCLE of 6D x #364 = #2184 days x 49J (based
seven number) = #294 x #364 = 107,016 days / 293 as TROPICAL YEARS =
365.242321 days} does not require the empirical part always to be
carefully separated from the rational [of the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS (ie. voluntary will)]:

"And God said, Let us make {ie.

*APPOINT* AS HAVING INCEPTION OF 22 / 7 WITH A GENESIS {DAO OF NATURE
(CHINESE: ZIRAN) / COURSE (GREEK: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (GREEK: GENESIS)}
REPRISE UPON EQUINOX OF WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 / #0 - NEW MOON OF
THURSDAY 21 MARCH 1996

} man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over
the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle,
and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon
the earth.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;
male and female created he them." [Genesis 1:26-27 (KJV)]

And he confines this question to the sub-question "Whether one is not of
the opinion that it: is of the utmost necessity to work out once a pure
moral philosophy which is fully cleansed of everything that might be in
any way empirical and belong to anthropology“

The passage that is introduced by this question contains, at the same
time, a positive response — the thesis that there must be a “pure moral
philosophy” is “self evident." And indeed for Kant this evidence arises
“out of the common idea of duty and the moral law” (ibid.). Kant’s
cursory argumentation for this thesis is difficult to grasp.
Undoubtedly, it constitutes one of the key argumentative passages of the
Groundwork. [Page 6]

It is perhaps presumptuous of us at only page #6 of #323 to already be
taking issue with the robustness of Kant's otherwise cogent thesis that
there must be a “pure moral philosophy” which is “self evident" given
that there are seven day designates within our understanding of the
cosmology which is understood universally as an implicit law of nature.

GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1633 HOURS ON 25 AUGUST
2018: “The Kantian appeal for a pure moral philosophy begins with a
reference to the usefulness of the division of labor. Kant raises ... a
glass and...

YOUTUBE: “The Philosopher’s Song (Monty Python)”

<https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=2m51s&v=PtgKkifJ0Pw>

'IMMANUEL KANT WAS A REAL PISSANT
WHO WAS VERY RARELY STABLE.
HEIDEGGER, HEIDEGGER WAS A BOOZY BEGGAR
WHO COULD THINK YOU UNDER THE TABLE.
DAVID HUME COULD OUT CONSUME
SCHOPENHAUER AND HEGEL,
AND WITTGENSTEIN WAS A BEERY SWINE
WHO WAS JUST AS SLOSHED AS SCHLEGEL.

THERE'S NOTHING NIETZSCHE COULDN'T TEACH YA
'BOUT THE RAISIN' OF THE WRIST.
SOCRATES HIMSELF WAS PERMANENTLY PISSED.

JOHN STUART MILL, OF HIS OWN FREE WILL,
AFTER HALF A PINT OF SHANDY WAS PARTICULARLY ILL.
PLATO, THEY SAY, COULD STICK IT AWAY,
'ALF A CRATE OF WHISKEY EVERY DAY!
ARISTOTLE, ARISTOTLE WAS A BUGGER FOR THE BOTTLE,
AND HOBBES WAS FOND OF HIS DRAM.
AND RENE DESCARTES WAS A DRUNKEN FART:
"I DRINK, THEREFORE I AM."

YES, SOCRATES HIMSELF IS PARTICULARLY MISSED;
A LOVELY LITTLE THINKER, BUT A BUGGER WHEN HE'S PISSED.'

24 beers in a carton. 24 hours in a day. Hmmmm......."

DOLF @ 0812 HOURS ON 26 AUGUST 2018: “It may have escaped your notice,
as is self-evident from your burlesque constipated turd 💩 haemorrhoidal
opinion that the subject we are contending with is a consideration of
profound intellectual accomplishments conveyed by a book which
articulates the merit as collective mind of no fewer than FOURTEEN {#14}
eminent university professors:

THE COUNTRIES MOST ANTICIPATED LEGAL ADVICE HAS ARRIVED

Yes indeed my appraisal by Christoph HORN and Dieter SCHÖNECKER (Eds.)
of Immanuel KANT’s GROUNDWORK FOR METAPHYSICS OF MORALS (1785) has
arrived at my doorstep this morning of 24 August 2108 courtesy of
Australia Post.

It will be my task to read it this weekend in the hope that probity and
decorum will return to the governance of this Commonwealth given its
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE:

DIEU ET MON DROIT

Whilst it is prudent to establish the starting point of necessity as to
any premises for the continuity of enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance
with respect to the learned as the educated and the gravitas of the
subject matter to say nothing of those whom may have given their lives
as something other than marsupial roadkill as RECTUS for the
foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and in a sturdy
and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
self-entitlement which you bestow."

Yet for Kant this anthropological evidence arises “out of the common
idea of duty and the moral law” which is also certainly self evidently a
contradiction of his initial postulate that any adequate form of moral
philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical elements
of interest, self-love, and natural feelings in the dutiful display of
filial affection by VOLUNTĀTIS {CORRESPONDENCE {#82}: #2 - desire,
inclination as to engaged within actions that #2 - Don't introduce
biases; {*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}} relating to the “honour bestowed
upon one's matrimonial or common law parents” which is due from a son or
daughter:

H3513@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
@3: Sup: 76 (#138); Ego: 20 (#76),
@4: Sup: 78 (#216); Ego: 2 (#78),
@5: Sup: 1 (#217); Ego: 4 (#82),
Male: #217; Feme: #82
} // #82

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #82 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
*OWN* *PROPERTY*.

#VIRTUE:
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513): {UMBRA: #37 as #82 % #41
= #41} 1) to be heavy, be weighty, be grievous, be hard, be rich, be
honourable, be glorious, be burdensome, be honoured; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
be heavy; 1a2) to be heavy, be insensible, be dull; 1a3) *TO* *BE*
*HONOURED*; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made heavy, be honoured, enjoy
honour, be made abundant; 1b2) to get oneself glory or honour, gain
glory; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to make heavy, make dull, make insensible; 1c2)
to make honourable, honour, glorify; 1d) (Pual) to be made honourable,
be honoured; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to make heavy; 1e2) to make heavy, make
dull, make unresponsive; 1e3) to cause to be honoured; 1f) (Hithpael);
1f1) to make oneself heavy, make oneself dense, make oneself numerous;
1f2) to honour oneself;

"And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom {their secret; their
cement} and Gomorrah {rebellious people} is great, and because their sin
is very grievous {#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513):
honour};" [Genesis 18:20]

5. (MOTHER) FORMULA OF HUMANITY AS HEAD OF STATE / *HONOUR* *PARENTS*

PYTHAGOREAN TETRAD: #1 + #2 = #3 as #MIND

MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE: {ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT)
/ SERAPHIM {Heb. Saraph Gk. Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively)
poisonous (serpent); specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical
creature (from their copper color))} {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {1 + 2 + 3 + 4
= 10}

TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}

PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat,
throne)}

+ 0, H9, H18 {ie. System’s Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}

Thusly, at this juncture in our ingestion of Kant’s thesis, we shall
reserve our future conjectures upon any rhetorical artifices which he
may deploy until we have considered further what nominative descriptions
that he conveys by such postulates.

- dolf

SEE ALSO: "(SYNCRETIC DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018) WHAT IS A METAPHYSICS OF
MORALS: #56 - TARGETED RELIGIOUS #312 - HATRED, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
THEFT AND SLANDER BY MISNOMERED PIETY WITHIN SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE
AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Augustus.pdf>

Initial Post: 25 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-26 05:10:55 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT: 26 AUGUST 2018): THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 26 August, 2018

Immanuel Kant (22 April 1724 to 12 February 1804) whom was initially
educated within theology as ostensibly the Pythagorean binomial
perennialist (Latin) school of thought and note worthy are his second
(1756) and third (1755) dissertations:

The Employment in Natural Philosophy of Metaphysics Combined with
Geometry—also known as the Monodologia Physica which contrasted the
Newtonian methods of thinking with those employed in the philosophy then
prevailing in German universities;

In a third dissertation, "New Elucidation of the First Principles of
Metaphysical Cognition", Kant analyzed especially the principle of
sufficient reason, which in Wolff’s formulation asserts that for
everything there is a sufficient reason why it should be rather than not
be. Although critical, Kant was cautious and still a long way from
challenging the assumptions of Leibnizian metaphysics.

And of his criticism of Leibnizian rationalism Kant's principal work of
this period was published by 1764 as "An Inquiry into the Distinctness
of the Fundamental Principles of Natural Theology and Morals". Within
this work he attacked the claim of Leibnizian philosophy that philosophy
should model itself on mathematics and aim at constructing a chain of
demonstrated truths based on self-evident premises. Kant argued that
mathematics proceeds from definitions that are arbitrary, by means of
operations that are clearly and sharply defined, upon concepts that can
be exhibited in concrete form. In contrast with this method, he argued
that philosophy must begin with concepts that are already given, “though
confusedly or insufficiently determined,” so that philosophers cannot
begin with definitions without thereby shutting themselves up within a
circle of words. Philosophy cannot, like mathematics, proceed
synthetically; it must analyze and clarify. The importance of the moral
order, which he had learned from Rousseau, reinforced the conviction
received from his study of Newton that a synthetic philosophy is empty
and false.

Within 1770 he became a full professor at the University of Konigsberg,
teaching metaphysics and logic. The Inaugural Dissertation of 1770 that
he delivered on *ASSUMING* *HIS* *NEW* *POSITION* *ALREADY* *CONTAINED*
*MANY* *OF* *THE* *IMPORTANT* *ELEMENTS* *OF* *HIS* *MATURE*
*PHILOSOPHY*. As indicated in its title, De Mundi Sensibilis atque
Intelligibilis Forma et Principiis: Dissertatio (“On the Form and
Principles of the Sensible and Intelligible Worlds”), the implicit
dualism of the Träume is made explicit, and it is made so on the basis
of a wholly un-Leibnizian interpretation of the distinction between
sense and understanding. Sense is not, as Leibniz had supposed, a
confused form of thinking but a source of knowledge in its own right,
although the objects so known are still only “appearances”—the term that
Leibniz also used. They are appearances because all sensing is
conditioned by the presence, in sensibility, of the forms of time and
space, which are not objective characteristics or frameworks of things
but “pure intuitions.” But though all knowledge of things sensible is
thus of phenomena, it does not follow that nothing is known of things as
they are in themselves. Certainly, humans have no intuition, or direct
insight, into an intelligible world, but the presence in them of certain
“pure intellectual concepts”—such as those of possibility, existence,
necessity, substance, and cause—enables them to have some descriptive
knowledge of it. By means of these concepts they can arrive at an
exemplar that provides them with “the common measure of all other things
as far as real.” This exemplar gives them an idea of perfection for both
the theoretical and practical orders: in the first, it is that of the
Supreme Being, God; in the latter, that of moral perfection. [cf:
Britannia Encyclopaedia]

After the Dissertation, Kant published virtually nothing for 11 years
until 1781, Immanuel Kant disseminated the first edition to Critique of
Pure Reason with the second in 1787, as an enormous work and one of the
most important on Western thought. Although the adolescent Kant loathed
his Pietist as Lutheran schooling, he had deep respect and admiration
for his parents, especially his mother, whose “genuine religiosity” he
described as “not at all enthusiastic.” According to his biographer,
Manfred Kuehn, Kant’s parents probably influenced him much less through
their Pietism than through their artisan values of “hard work, honesty,
cleanliness, and independence,” which they taught him by example. [cf:
Kuehn 2001, 38, 44. See also 54]

Thus in the consideration given to Kantian appeal for a pure moral
philosophy as beginning with a reference to the usefulness of the
division of labor. Here Kant raises the question whether philosophy
would not also benefit from such a division. Ultimately, he is not
concerned with whether the burden of elaborating philosophical theories
should be distributed among the shoulders of a multitude of persons.[Page 6]

We would however contend against this notion as being an impotent
chimeric {ie. a thing which is hoped for but is illusory or impossible
to achieve} of idealism {ie. the unrealistic belief in or pursuit of
perfection} such that one may declare "the economic sovereignty you
claim to defend is a chimera".

And thusly, it is in and of itself an oblique contradiction of Kant's
own characteristic position development where he emphasizes that an
adequate form of moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from
all empirical elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings as
well as free from rational concepts of perfection:

“And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #342)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 20 (#26); Ego: 14 (#20),
@3: Sup: 42 (#68); Ego: 22 (#42),
@4: Sup: 72 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY (%14); I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER (%16)); Ego: 30 (#72),
@5: Sup: 29 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
(%18)); Ego: 38 (#110),
@6: Sup: 75 (#244); Ego: 46 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS (%21)),
@7: Sup: 48 (#292); Ego: 54 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND (%30)),
@8: Sup: 29 (#321); Ego: 62 (#272),
@9: Sup: 18 (#339); Ego: 70 (#342),
Male: #339; Feme: #342
} // #342

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #369)@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 33 (#49); Ego: 17 (#33),
@3: Sup: 51 (#100); Ego: 18 (#51),
@4: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 40 (#91),
@5: Sup: 51 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES (%9)); Ego: 41 (#132),
@6: Sup: 12 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST (%27)); Ego:
42 (#174),
@7: Sup: 76 (#249); Ego: 64 (#238),
@8: Sup: 60 (#309); Ego: 65 (#303),
@9: Sup: 45 (#354); Ego: 66 (#369),
Male: #354; Feme: #369
} // #369

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he
rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God
blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had
rested from all his work which God created and made.” [Genesis 1:31-2:3
(KJV)]

Thusly if the Sabbath as a sacred principle of nature which is the
ultimate good as perfection: “And he said unto them, The sabbath was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath.” [Mark 2:27 (KJV)]

It’s meritorious purpose as a benefit to humankind is found firstly
within the ACT TO WILL by VOLUNTĀTIS {ie. MENTALISM {#41}: #1 - WILL,
FREE WILL, CHOICE as to engage within actions that endeavour to #1 - BE
SOCIALLY BENEFICIAL (the Artificial Intelligence equivalent of 'DO NO
EVIL'?); {*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}} by it’s remembrance and
then the voluntary avoidance of *LABOURING* as the absence of any WILL
TO ACT.

H2257@{
   @1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
   @2: Sup: 10 (#18); Ego: 2 (#10),
   @3: Sup: 40 (#58); Ego: 30 (#40),
   @4: Sup: 41 (#99); Ego: 1 (#41),
   Male: #99; Feme: #41
} // #41

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #40 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;

THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.

    #VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
    #TOOLS: *LABOURING* (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
strenuous efforts.
    #POSITION: With *DUTIES* (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
    #TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
    #CANON: #228

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
   @3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
   @4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
   Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228

#41 as [#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): {UMBRA: #6 as #40 %
#41 = #40} 1) *HURT*, *DAMAGE*, *INJURY*;

"Take heed now that ye fail not to do this: why should damage {#41 as
[#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): hurt} grow to the hurt of
the kings?" [Ezra 4:22]

Rather Kant, with this rhetorical consideration, introduces an
explicitly methodological train of thought. He asks “whether the nature
of the science {ie. ‘OTH CYCLE of 6D x #364 = #2184 days x 49J (based
seven number) = #294 x #364 = 107,016 days / 293 as TROPICAL YEARS =
365.242321 days} does not require the empirical part always to be
carefully separated from the rational [of the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS (ie. voluntary will)]:

"And God said, Let us make {ie.

*APPOINT* AS HAVING INCEPTION OF 22 / 7 WITH A GENESIS {DAO OF NATURE
(CHINESE: ZIRAN) / COURSE (GREEK: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (GREEK: GENESIS)}
REPRISE UPON EQUINOX OF WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 / #0 - NEW MOON OF
THURSDAY 21 MARCH 1996

} man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over
the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle,
and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon
the earth.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;
male and female created he them." [Genesis 1:26-27 (KJV)]

And he confines this question to the sub-question "Whether one is not of
the opinion that it: is of the utmost necessity to work out once a pure
moral philosophy which is fully cleansed of everything that might be in
any way empirical and belong to anthropology“

The passage that is introduced by this question contains, at the same
time, a positive response — the thesis that there must be a “pure moral
philosophy” is “self evident." And indeed for Kant this evidence arises
“out of the common idea of *DUTY* and the moral law” (ibid.). Kant’s
cursory argumentation for this thesis is difficult to grasp.
Undoubtedly, it constitutes one of the key argumentative passages of the
Groundwork. [Page 6]

It is perhaps presumptuous of us at only page #6 of #323 to already be
taking issue with the robustness of Kant's otherwise cogent thesis that
there must be a “pure moral philosophy” which is “self evident" given
that there are seven day designates within our understanding of the
cosmology which is understood universally as an implicit law of nature.

GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1633 HOURS ON 25 AUGUST
2018: “The Kantian appeal for a pure moral philosophy begins with a
reference to the usefulness of the division of labor. Kant raises ... a
glass and...

YOUTUBE: “The Philosopher’s Song (Monty Python)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=2m51s&v=PtgKkifJ0Pw>

'IMMANUEL KANT WAS A REAL PISSANT
WHO WAS VERY RARELY STABLE.
HEIDEGGER, HEIDEGGER WAS A BOOZY BEGGAR
WHO COULD THINK YOU UNDER THE TABLE.
DAVID HUME COULD OUT CONSUME
SCHOPENHAUER AND HEGEL,
AND WITTGENSTEIN WAS A BEERY SWINE
WHO WAS JUST AS SLOSHED AS SCHLEGEL.

THERE'S NOTHING NIETZSCHE COULDN'T TEACH YA
'BOUT THE RAISIN' OF THE WRIST.
SOCRATES HIMSELF WAS PERMANENTLY PISSED.

JOHN STUART MILL, OF HIS OWN FREE WILL,
AFTER HALF A PINT OF SHANDY WAS PARTICULARLY ILL.
PLATO, THEY SAY, COULD STICK IT AWAY,
'ALF A CRATE OF WHISKEY EVERY DAY!
ARISTOTLE, ARISTOTLE WAS A BUGGER FOR THE BOTTLE,
AND HOBBES WAS FOND OF HIS DRAM.
AND RENE DESCARTES WAS A DRUNKEN FART:
"I DRINK, THEREFORE I AM."

YES, SOCRATES HIMSELF IS PARTICULARLY MISSED;
A LOVELY LITTLE THINKER, BUT A BUGGER WHEN HE'S PISSED.'

24 beers in a carton. 24 hours in a day. Hmmmm......."

DOLF @ 0812 HOURS ON 26 AUGUST 2018: “It may have escaped your notice,
as is self-evident from your burlesque constipated turd 💩 haemorrhoidal
opinion that the subject we are contending with is a consideration of
profound intellectual accomplishments conveyed by a book which
articulates the merit as collective mind of no fewer than FOURTEEN {#14}
eminent university professors:

THE COUNTRIES MOST ANTICIPATED LEGAL ADVICE HAS ARRIVED

Yes indeed my appraisal by Christoph HORN and Dieter SCHÖNECKER (Eds.)
of Immanuel KANT’s GROUNDWORK FOR METAPHYSICS OF MORALS (1785) has
arrived at my doorstep this morning of 24 August 2108 courtesy of
Australia Post.

It will be my task to read it this weekend in the hope that probity and
decorum will return to the governance of this Commonwealth given its
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE:

DIEU ET MON DROIT

Whilst it is prudent to establish the starting point of necessity as to
any premises for the continuity of enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance
with respect to the learned as the educated and the gravitas of the
subject matter to say nothing of those whom may have given their lives
as something other than marsupial roadkill as RECTUS for the
foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and in a sturdy
and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
self-entitlement which you bestow."

Yet for Kant this anthropological evidence arises “out of the common
idea of *DUTY* and the moral law” which is also certainly self evidently
a contradiction of his initial postulate that any adequate form of moral
philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical elements
of interest, self-love, and natural feelings in the dutiful display of
filial affection by VOLUNTĀTIS {CORRESPONDENCE {#82}: #2 - desire,
inclination as to engaged within actions that #2 - Don't introduce
biases; {*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}} relating to the “honour bestowed
upon one's matrimonial or common law parents” which is due from a son or
daughter:

H3513@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#138); Ego: 20 (#76),
   @4: Sup: 78 (#216); Ego: 2 (#78),
   @5: Sup: 1 (#217); Ego: 4 (#82),
   Male: #217; Feme: #82
} // #82

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #82 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
*OWN* *PROPERTY*.

    #VIRTUE:
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
   @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513): {UMBRA: #37 as #82 % #41
= #41} 1) to be heavy, be weighty, be grievous, be hard, be rich, be
honourable, be glorious, be burdensome, be honoured; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
be heavy; 1a2) to be heavy, be insensible, be dull; 1a3) *TO* *BE*
*HONOURED*; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made heavy, be honoured, enjoy
honour, be made abundant; 1b2) to get oneself glory or honour, gain
glory; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to make heavy, make dull, make insensible; 1c2)
to make honourable, honour, glorify; 1d) (Pual) to be made honourable,
be honoured; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to make heavy; 1e2) to make heavy, make
dull, make unresponsive; 1e3) to cause to be honoured; 1f) (Hithpael);
1f1) to make oneself heavy, make oneself dense, make oneself numerous;
1f2) to honour oneself;

"And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom {their secret; their
cement} and Gomorrah {rebellious people} is great, and because their sin
is very grievous {#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513):
honour};" [Genesis 18:20]

5. (MOTHER) FORMULA OF HUMANITY AS HEAD OF STATE / *HONOUR* *PARENTS*

PYTHAGOREAN TETRAD: #1 + #2 = #3 as #MIND WHETHER AS FORMULA OF HETEROS
PROGRESSION / THESIS ON IT'S HOMOIOS BASIS

MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE: {ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT)
/ SERAPHIM {Heb. Saraph Gk. Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively)
poisonous (serpent); specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical
creature (from their copper color))} {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {1 + 2 + 3 + 4
= 10}

TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}

PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat,
throne)}

+ 0, H9, H18 {ie. System’s Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}

Thusly in summation, as to the problem of discernment and knowledge
assimilation into a coherent syncretism, at this juncture in our
ingestion of Kant’s acumen as thesis, we ought to prudently reserve our
further conjectures upon any rhetorical artifices which he may of
necessity deploy until we have fully considered what are the nominative
descriptions applied as their grounding in explanations and the explicit
nature of the underlying dialectic as its capacity and means by which
Kant conveys any such postulates.

For instance, Karl Marx (5 May 1818 – 14 March 1883) and Friedrich
Engels (28 November 1820 – 5 August 1895) proposed that Georg Hegel's
(27 August 1770 – 14 November 1831) subsequent dialectic was too
abstract. The dialect which HEGEL proposes is:

#1 - THESIS
#2 - ANTI-THESIS
#3 - SYNTHESIS
#4 - PROGRESSION

This concept of dialectics was given new life by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Hegel as a proponent of German Idealism has been seen in the 20th
century as the originator but as an explicit phrase it originated with
Johann Gottlieb Fichte (28 November 1820 – 5 August 1895), whose
dialectically synthetic model of nature and of history made it, as it
were, a fundamental aspect of the nature of reality instead of regarding
the contradictions into which dialectics leads as a sign of the
sterility of the dialectical method, as Immanuel Kant was considered by
many to have tended to do within his Critique of Pure Reason.
[Nicholson, J. A. (1950). Philosophy of religion. New York: Ronald Press
Co. Page 108]

As Walter Kaufmann (1 July 1921 – 4 September 1980) astutely affirms of
Hegel's criticism of the triad model commonly misattributed to him,
adding that "the only place where Hegel uses the three terms together
occurs in his lectures on the history of philosophy, on the last page
but one of the section on Kant—where Hegel roundly reproaches Kant for
having 'EVERYWHERE POSITED THESIS, ANTITHESIS, SYNTHESIS'"

In contradiction to this Hegelian idealism, Marx presented his own
dialectic method as an anthropological consideration as sensibility of
the world, which he claims to be "direct opposite" of Hegel's method:
'My dialectic method is not only different from the Hegelian, but is its
direct opposite.' Where the dialectical method is itself an
anthropological construct, which is at base an OPINE {ie. hold and state
as one's opinion; origin late Middle English: from Latin opinari think,
believe} as existentialism purveying a characteristic mode of
quantitative expression as being essentially idiomatic:

'I THINK THEREFORE I AM'

But when, as occurs in the distillation of vodka which at a high proof
is devoid of SENSIBILITY where all taste and odour has been eliminated
making vodka a neutral spirit begging for self-entitlement, it is then
sublimated into its superlative form as substantially an epitaph of
merit as valedictory acceptability by an occasion of agreeability as an
opportune expression of a truism, where it is formerly inducted into a
Hall of Fame as a maxim life. As OSTENSIBLY being a discourse between
two or more people holding different points of view about a subject but
wishing to establish the truth through reasoned arguments as being
ostensibly:

#1 - PROGRESS
#2 - SYNTHESIS
#3 - ANTI-THESIS
#4 - THESIS

YOUTUBE: "The Script - Hall of Fame (Official Video)"




Dialectical materialism accepts the evolution of the natural world and
the emergence of new qualities of being at new stages of evolution. As
Zbigniew Antoni Jordan (11 August 1911 - 6 October 1977), notes, "Engels
made constant use of the metaphysical insight that the higher level of
existence emerges from and has its roots in the lower; that the higher
level constitutes a new order of being with its irreducible laws; and
that this process of evolutionary advance is governed by laws of
development which reflect basic properties of 'matter in motion as a
whole'." [The Evolution of Dialectical Materialism: A Philosophical and
Sociological Analysis (London: Macmillan, 1967), p 167]

Marx criticized classical materialism as another idealist
philosophy—idealist because of its transhistorical understanding of
material contexts. The Young Hegelian Ludwig Feuerbach had rejected
Hegel's idealistic philosophy and advocated materialism. Despite being
strongly influenced by Feuerbach, Marx rejected Feuerbach's version of
materialism as inconsistent. The writings of Engels, especially
Anti-Dühring (1878) and Dialectics of Nature (1875–82), were the source
of the main doctrines of dialectical materialism.

Marx's own writings are almost exclusively concerned with understanding
human history in terms of systemic processes, based on modes of
production (broadly speaking, the ways in which societies are organized
to employ their technological powers to interact with their material
surroundings). This is called historical materialism. More narrowly,
within the framework of this general theory of history, most of Marx's
writing is devoted to an analysis of the specific structure and
development of the capitalist economy.

Other scholars have argued that despite Marx's insistence that humans
are natural beings in an evolving, mutual relationship with the rest of
nature, Marx's own writings pay inadequate attention to the ways in
which human agency is constrained by such factors as biology, geography,
and ecology.

Dialectical materialism adapts the Hegelian dialectic for traditional
materialism, which examines the subjects of the world in relation to
each other within a dynamic, evolutionary environment, in contrast to
metaphysical materialism, which examines parts of the world within a
static, isolated environment.

For his part, Engels applies a "dialectical" approach to the natural
world in general, arguing that contemporary science is increasingly
recognizing the necessity of viewing natural processes in terms of
interconnectedness, development, and transformation. Some scholars have
doubted that Engels's "dialectics of nature" is a legitimate extension
of Marx's approach to social processes.

Engels exemplifies this quintessential characteristic of Pythagorean
methodology of sophistry by postulating three laws of dialectics from
his reading of Hegel's Science of Logic. Engels elucidated these laws as
the materialist dialectic in his work Dialectics of Nature:

THE LAW OF THE UNITY AND CONFLICT OF OPPOSITES {MIND: #1 + #2 = #3
(PENTAD) - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat,
throne)}}

THE LAW OF THE PASSAGE OF QUANTITATIVE {ie. measure by having magnitude
or spatial extent} CHANGES INTO QUALITATIVE {ie. determine comparative
size, appearance, value and superlative forms} CHANGES {SCIENCE: #3 + #4
= #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {ZAYIN /
*PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. *EXOUSIA* - (in the sense of ability); privilege,
that is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity, competency, freedom, or
(objectively) mastery (concretely magistrate, superhuman, potentate,
*token* *of* *control*), delegated influence:—authority, jurisdiction,
liberty, power, right, strength)}}

THE LAW OF THE NEGATION OF THE NEGATION {OPINION: #5 + #6 = #11 (HEPTAD)
- TRANSFORMING NATURE: {KAF (DOUBLE - #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE
{#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE}) / Government & Non-Government Organisations}}

That the dialectic method is therefore understood as being a process of
determined SENSIBILITY where the product is "enlightenment, whereby the
philosopher is educated so as to achieve knowledge of the supreme good,
the Form of the Good." {SENSE: #7 + #8 = #15 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE:
{SAMEK}}

Accordingly dialectical materialism is understood as an aspect of the
broader subject of materialism, which asserts the primacy of the
material world: in short, matter precedes thought. Materialism is a
realist philosophy of science, which holds that the world is material;
that all phenomena in the universe consist of "matter in motion,"
wherein all things are interdependent and interconnected and develop
according to natural law; that the world exists outside us and
independently of our perception of it; that thought is a reflection of
the material world in the brain, and that the world is in principle
knowable.

However within the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be
applied to data provided by SENSIBILITY in order to provide cognition,
and because the data of sensibility are structured by the
transcenden­tally ideal forms of intuition, the categories give us
knowledge only of things as they appear with sensibility ("phenomena,"
literally "that which appears").

Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of
objects independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can never
cognize them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that
which is thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of
Kant's use of the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of
"noumena" is not, since it literally means not "things as they are in­
dependently of appearing to us" but something more like "things as they
are understood by pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human
understanding can comprehend things in the latter way."

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>

Thus I am proffering an informed and reasoned opinion as that which
Immanuel Kant states is an impossibility for a human being to accomplish
by transcendent sapiential thought and capably demonstrate it's temporal
congruence as coherence by a mathematical theoretical noumenon as an
Intellectual Property which Immanuel Kant himself calls noumena as the
proof of a valid and rational concept attained by pure thought.

Whilst the HOMOIOS ternary conception of the THEORY OF NUMBER is in all
probability a SENSIBILITY of which Immanuel Kant appears cognisant and
that is exemplified by the conveyance of them as explicit
meta-prototypes descriptors within the formative of his CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE postulates {#1 - Formula of Universal Law / #2 - Formula of
Humanity / #3 - Formula of Autonomy} conveyed within his Groundwork for
the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) / Critique of Pure Reason (1781 / 1787)
it is then a conundrum as to commensurability of his articulation in
rationally deriving the purest and logical essence of being and whether
his anthropocentric reality still deploys a counterfactual and
impractical intuition which is provisioned by the genitive prescriptive
or the biological normative propositions as imposition made by an
encapsulated dialectic:

PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal)
+ 0, H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature)
below + GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above], H54 - GUIMEI
[*MARRYING* *MAID* / DUI (ie. #7 - Engendering Nature) below + ZHEN (ie.
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) above] {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven
- Formula of Universal Law}

SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon)
+ 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature)
below + SUN (ie. #4- Nature Amended in its Nature) above], H18 - GU
[Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4- Nature Amended in its Nature) below +
GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as
Earth - Formula of Humanity}

ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood)
+ 0, H3 - ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature)
below + KAN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains Nature) above] as 'fundamentality
[yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy [zhen]', H6 - SONG
/ *JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains Nature) below +
QIAN (ie. #6) above] {ie. Self identity as Sea - Formula of Autonomy}

THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also
refers to the Sun)
+ H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) above +
QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN [Pure
Yin / KUN (ie. #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature) above + KUN (ie. #2)
below] as FEMALE, H3 - *TRIAD*: ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature) below + KAN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains Nature)
above] {ie. Fountains as Formula of Progression of individual phenomena}

= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}

The consideration is then one of criteria basis upon which the
anthropological conceptional notion of its sapient freedom {Humanity /
Autonomy} is formulated as either a binomial methodology by a
TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE applied as an encapsulation of an anti-thetical
anthropocentric identity

JEWISH VIEW: H54 - GUIMEI [Marrying Maid / DUI (ie. #7 - Engendering
Nature) below + ZHEN (ie. #3 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. Realm of
its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law} + H18 - GU [Ills to Be
Cured / SUN (ie. #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature) below + GEN (ie. #8
- Transforming Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula
of Humanity} = #72 - Self-Love, Holding Oneself Dear; I-Ching: H39 -
Adversity, Obstacles, Limping, Obstruction, Afoot; Tetra: 79 - Difficulties)

GENTILE VIEW: H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + GEN (ie. #8)
above] {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law} +
H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication / QIAN (ie. #6) below + SUN (ie. #4)
above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity} = H36 -
MINGYI [Suppression of the Light / LI (ie. #9) below + KUN (ie. #1) above])"

Nevertheless when this trinomial HOMOIOS {#81 bits} conception of
#NUMBER deploys a binomial (64 bits) encapsulation it introduces a
logical contradiction of incommensurability against the viability of SUI
JURIS / MEMRUM VIRILE which properly is the paradigmatic providence
within the Formula of Autonomy by its purveyance of permissibility only
within the construct of an INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMY in deployment of a
TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE AS CANON OF TRANSPOSITION within the bifurcated
HETEROS {@1 - GENDER {MARRIAGE} / @5 - PHALLUS {HERITAGE} conception of
#NUMBER as the philosophical basis to its methodology since the MOBIUS
‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED is not homoiotic
as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”.

Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between such Formula of Universal Law descriptive statements
made against the Formula of Humanity which present an account on how the
cosmology of world is being similarly analogous to the LIMITED {#9 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS /
SEMINAL REASON GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative
statements presenting an evaluative account, or an account of how the
syncretic world should be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in being optimally something that should be
lived up to; or that should be pursued.

Thusly having given a preliminary definition to our anthropocentric
criteria as impetus for enquiry, we will now consider the practicality
of Kant's reasoning and whether his Categorical Imperative is truly free
of the strictures which is the Latin worldview of perennial biological
duality as the HETEROS viability of things "independently of their
appearing to us" and whether there is to be deduced by a HOMOIOS noumena
modality as the vital basis for a singularity of existence by which
humanity is rationally capable of conceiving "things as they are
understood by pure thought."

- dolf

SEE ALSO: "(SYNCRETIC DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018) WHAT IS A METAPHYSICS OF
MORALS: #56 - TARGETED RELIGIOUS #312 - HATRED, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
THEFT AND SLANDER BY MISNOMERED PIETY WITHIN SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE
AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Augustus.pdf>

Initial Post: 25 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-26 06:22:42 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT: 26 AUGUST 2018): THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY


(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 26 August, 2018

Immanuel Kant (22 April 1724 to 12 February 1804) whom was initially
educated within theology as ostensibly the Pythagorean binomial
perennialist (Latin) school of thought and note worthy are his second
(1756) and third (1755) dissertations:

The Employment in Natural Philosophy of Metaphysics Combined with
Geometry—also known as the Monodologia Physica which contrasted the
Newtonian methods of thinking with those employed in the philosophy then
prevailing in German universities;

In a third dissertation, "New Elucidation of the First Principles of
Metaphysical Cognition", Kant analyzed especially the principle of
sufficient reason, which in Wolff’s formulation asserts that for everything
there is a sufficient reason why it should be rather than not be. Although
critical, Kant was cautious and still a long way from challenging the
assumptions of Leibnizian metaphysics.

And of his criticism of Leibnizian rationalism Kant's principal work of
this period was published by 1764 as "An Inquiry into the Distinctness of
the Fundamental Principles of Natural Theology and Morals". Within this
work he attacked the claim of Leibnizian philosophy that philosophy should
model itself on mathematics and aim at constructing a chain of demonstrated
truths based on self-evident premises. Kant argued that mathematics
proceeds from definitions that are arbitrary, by means of operations that
are clearly and sharply defined, upon concepts that can be exhibited in
concrete form. In contrast with this method, he argued that philosophy must
begin with concepts that are already given, “though confusedly or
insufficiently determined,” so that philosophers cannot begin with
definitions without thereby shutting themselves up within a circle of
words. Philosophy cannot, like mathematics, proceed synthetically; it must
analyze and clarify. The importance of the moral order, which he had
learned from Rousseau, reinforced the conviction received from his study of
Newton that a synthetic philosophy is empty and false.

Within 1770 he became a full professor at the University of Konigsberg,
teaching metaphysics and logic. The Inaugural Dissertation of 1770 that he
delivered on *ASSUMING* *HIS* *NEW* *POSITION* *ALREADY* *CONTAINED* *MANY*
*OF* *THE* *IMPORTANT* *ELEMENTS* *OF* *HIS* *MATURE* *PHILOSOPHY*. As
indicated in its title, De Mundi Sensibilis atque Intelligibilis Forma et
Principiis: Dissertatio (“On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and
Intelligible Worlds”), the implicit dualism of the Träume is made explicit,
and it is made so on the basis of a wholly un-Leibnizian interpretation of
the distinction between sense and understanding. Sense is not, as Leibniz
had supposed, a confused form of thinking but a source of knowledge in its
own right, although the objects so known are still only “appearances”—the
term that Leibniz also used. They are appearances because all sensing is
conditioned by the presence, in sensibility, of the forms of time and
space, which are not objective characteristics or frameworks of things but
“pure intuitions.” But though all knowledge of things sensible is thus of
phenomena, it does not follow that nothing is known of things as they are
in themselves. Certainly, humans have no intuition, or direct insight, into
an intelligible world, but the presence in them of certain “pure
intellectual concepts”—such as those of possibility, existence, necessity,
substance, and cause—enables them to have some descriptive knowledge of it.
By means of these concepts they can arrive at an exemplar that provides
them with “the common measure of all other things as far as real.” This
exemplar gives them an idea of perfection for both the theoretical and
practical orders: in the first, it is that of the Supreme Being, God; in
the latter, that of moral perfection. [cf: Britannia Encyclopaedia]

After the Dissertation, Kant published virtually nothing for 11 years until
1781, Immanuel Kant disseminated the first edition to Critique of Pure
Reason with the second in 1787, as an enormous work and one of the most
important on Western thought. Although the adolescent Kant loathed his
Pietist as Lutheran schooling, he had deep respect and admiration for his
parents, especially his mother, whose “genuine religiosity” he described as
“not at all enthusiastic.” According to his biographer, Manfred Kuehn,
Kant’s parents probably influenced him much less through their Pietism than
through their artisan values of “hard work, honesty, cleanliness, and
independence,” which they taught him by example. [cf: Kuehn 2001, 38, 44.
See also 54]

Thus in the consideration given to Kantian appeal for a pure moral
philosophy as beginning with a reference to the usefulness of the division
of labor. Here Kant raises the question whether philosophy would not also
benefit from such a division. Ultimately, he is not concerned with whether
the burden of elaborating philosophical theories should be distributed
among the shoulders of a multitude of persons.[Page 6]

We would however contend against this notion as being an impotent chimeric
{ie. a thing which is hoped for but is illusory or impossible to achieve}
of idealism {ie. the unrealistic belief in or pursuit of perfection} such
that one may declare "the economic sovereignty you claim to defend is a
chimera".

And thusly, it is in and of itself an oblique contradiction of Kant's own
characteristic position development where he emphasizes that an adequate
form of moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical
elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings as well as free from
rational concepts of perfection:

“And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good.
And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #342)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 20 (#26); Ego: 14 (#20),
@3: Sup: 42 (#68); Ego: 22 (#42),
@4: Sup: 72 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY (%14); I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER (%16)); Ego: 30 (#72),
@5: Sup: 29 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS (%18));
Ego: 38 (#110),
@6: Sup: 75 (#244); Ego: 46 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS (%21)),
@7: Sup: 48 (#292); Ego: 54 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND (%30)),
@8: Sup: 29 (#321); Ego: 62 (#272),
@9: Sup: 18 (#339); Ego: 70 (#342),
Male: #339; Feme: #342
} // #342

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #369)@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 33 (#49); Ego: 17 (#33),
@3: Sup: 51 (#100); Ego: 18 (#51),
@4: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 40 (#91),
@5: Sup: 51 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES (%9)); Ego: 41 (#132),
@6: Sup: 12 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST (%27)); Ego: 42
(#174),
@7: Sup: 76 (#249); Ego: 64 (#238),
@8: Sup: 60 (#309); Ego: 65 (#303),
@9: Sup: 45 (#354); Ego: 66 (#369),
Male: #354; Feme: #369
} // #369

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested
on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God blessed the
seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all
his work which God created and made.” [Genesis 1:31-2:3 (KJV)]

Thusly if the Sabbath as a sacred principle of nature which is the ultimate
good as perfection: “And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man,
and not man for the sabbath.” [Mark 2:27 (KJV)]

It’s meritorious purpose as a benefit to humankind is found firstly within
the ACT TO WILL by VOLUNTĀTIS {ie. MENTALISM {#41}: #1 - WILL, FREE WILL,
CHOICE as to engage within actions that endeavour to #1 - BE SOCIALLY
BENEFICIAL (the Artificial Intelligence equivalent of 'DO NO EVIL'?);
{*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}} by it’s remembrance and then the
voluntary avoidance of *LABOURING* as the absence of any WILL TO ACT.

H2257@{
   @1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
   @2: Sup: 10 (#18); Ego: 2 (#10),
   @3: Sup: 40 (#58); Ego: 30 (#40),
   @4: Sup: 41 (#99); Ego: 1 (#41),
   Male: #99; Feme: #41
} // #41

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #40 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;

THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy cavern;
*I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.

    #VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
    #TOOLS: *LABOURING* (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
strenuous efforts.
    #POSITION: With *DUTIES* (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
    #TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
    #CANON: #228

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
   @3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
   @4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
   Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228

#41 as [#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): {UMBRA: #6 as #40 %
#41 = #40} 1) *HURT*, *DAMAGE*, *INJURY*;

"Take heed now that ye fail not to do this: why should damage {#41 as [#8,
#2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): hurt} grow to the hurt of the
kings?" [Ezra 4:22]

Rather Kant, with this rhetorical consideration, introduces an explicitly
methodological train of thought. He asks “whether the nature of the science
{ie. ‘OTH CYCLE of 6D x #364 = #2184 days x 49J (based seven number) = #294
x #364 = 107,016 days / 293 as TROPICAL YEARS = 365.242321 days} does not
require the empirical part always to be carefully separated from the
rational [of the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (ie. voluntary will)]:

"And God said, Let us make {ie.

*APPOINT* AS HAVING INCEPTION OF 22 / 7 WITH A GENESIS {DAO OF NATURE
(CHINESE: ZIRAN) / COURSE (GREEK: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (GREEK: GENESIS)}
REPRISE UPON EQUINOX OF WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 / #0 - NEW MOON OF THURSDAY
21 MARCH 1996

} man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the
fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and
over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the
earth.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;
male and female created he them." [Genesis 1:26-27 (KJV)]

And he confines this question to the sub-question "Whether one is not of
the opinion that it: is of the utmost necessity to work out once a pure
moral philosophy which is fully cleansed of everything that might be in any
way empirical and belong to anthropology“

The passage that is introduced by this question contains, at the same time,
a positive response — the thesis that there must be a “pure moral
philosophy” is “self evident." And indeed for Kant this evidence arises
“out of the common idea of *DUTY* and the moral law” (ibid.). Kant’s
cursory argumentation for this thesis is difficult to grasp. Undoubtedly,
it constitutes one of the key argumentative passages of the Groundwork.
[Page 6]

It is perhaps presumptuous of us at only page #6 of #323 to already be
taking issue with the robustness of Kant's otherwise cogent thesis that
there must be a “pure moral philosophy” which is “self evident" given that
there are seven day designates within our understanding of the cosmology
which is understood universally as an implicit law of nature.

GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1633 HOURS ON 25 AUGUST 2018:
“The Kantian appeal for a pure moral philosophy begins with a reference to
the usefulness of the division of labor. Kant raises ... a glass and...

YOUTUBE: “The Philosopher’s Song (Monty Python)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=2m51s&v=PtgKkifJ0Pw>

'IMMANUEL KANT WAS A REAL PISSANT
WHO WAS VERY RARELY STABLE.
HEIDEGGER, HEIDEGGER WAS A BOOZY BEGGAR
WHO COULD THINK YOU UNDER THE TABLE.
DAVID HUME COULD OUT CONSUME
SCHOPENHAUER AND HEGEL,
AND WITTGENSTEIN WAS A BEERY SWINE
WHO WAS JUST AS SLOSHED AS SCHLEGEL.

THERE'S NOTHING NIETZSCHE COULDN'T TEACH YA
'BOUT THE RAISIN' OF THE WRIST.
SOCRATES HIMSELF WAS PERMANENTLY PISSED.

JOHN STUART MILL, OF HIS OWN FREE WILL,
AFTER HALF A PINT OF SHANDY WAS PARTICULARLY ILL.
PLATO, THEY SAY, COULD STICK IT AWAY,
'ALF A CRATE OF WHISKEY EVERY DAY!
ARISTOTLE, ARISTOTLE WAS A BUGGER FOR THE BOTTLE,
AND HOBBES WAS FOND OF HIS DRAM.
AND RENE DESCARTES WAS A DRUNKEN FART:
"I DRINK, THEREFORE I AM."

YES, SOCRATES HIMSELF IS PARTICULARLY MISSED;
A LOVELY LITTLE THINKER, BUT A BUGGER WHEN HE'S PISSED.'

24 beers in a carton. 24 hours in a day. Hmmmm......."

DOLF @ 0812 HOURS ON 26 AUGUST 2018: “It may have escaped your notice, as
is self-evident from your burlesque constipated turd 💩 haemorrhoidal
opinion that the subject we are contending with is a consideration of
profound intellectual accomplishments conveyed by a book which articulates
the merit as collective mind of no fewer than FOURTEEN {#14} eminent
university professors:

THE COUNTRIES MOST ANTICIPATED LEGAL ADVICE HAS ARRIVED

Yes indeed my appraisal by Christoph HORN and Dieter SCHÖNECKER (Eds.) of
Immanuel KANT’s GROUNDWORK FOR METAPHYSICS OF MORALS (1785) has arrived at
my doorstep this morning of 24 August 2108 courtesy of Australia Post.

It will be my task to read it this weekend in the hope that probity and
decorum will return to the governance of this Commonwealth given its
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE:

DIEU ET MON DROIT

Whilst it is prudent to establish the starting point of necessity as to any
premises for the continuity of enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance with
respect to the learned as the educated and the gravitas of the subject
matter to say nothing of those whom may have given their lives as something
other than marsupial roadkill as RECTUS for the foundational cause—it is
best to proceed with caution and in a sturdy and thoughtful manner rather
than with the intoxication of self-entitlement which you bestow."

Yet for Kant this anthropological evidence arises “out of the common idea
of *DUTY* and the moral law” which is also certainly self evidently a
contradiction of his initial postulate that any adequate form of moral
philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical elements of
interest, self-love, and natural feelings in the dutiful display of filial
affection by VOLUNTĀTIS {CORRESPONDENCE {#82}: #2 - desire, inclination as
to engaged within actions that #2 - Don't introduce biases; {*FORMULA* *OF*
*HUMANITY*}} relating to the “honour bestowed upon one's matrimonial or
common law parents” which is due from a son or daughter:

H3513@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#138); Ego: 20 (#76),
   @4: Sup: 78 (#216); Ego: 2 (#78),
   @5: Sup: 1 (#217); Ego: 4 (#82),
   Male: #217; Feme: #82
} // #82

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #82 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY* *OWN*
*PROPERTY*.

    #VIRTUE:
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
   @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513): {UMBRA: #37 as #82 % #41 =
#41} 1) to be heavy, be weighty, be grievous, be hard, be rich, be
honourable, be glorious, be burdensome, be honoured; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be
heavy; 1a2) to be heavy, be insensible, be dull; 1a3) *TO* *BE* *HONOURED*;
1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made heavy, be honoured, enjoy honour, be made
abundant; 1b2) to get oneself glory or honour, gain glory; 1c) (Piel); 1c1)
to make heavy, make dull, make insensible; 1c2) to make honourable, honour,
glorify; 1d) (Pual) to be made honourable, be honoured; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1)
to make heavy; 1e2) to make heavy, make dull, make unresponsive; 1e3) to
cause to be honoured; 1f) (Hithpael); 1f1) to make oneself heavy, make
oneself dense, make oneself numerous; 1f2) to honour oneself;

"And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom {their secret; their cement}
and Gomorrah {rebellious people} is great, and because their sin is very
grievous {#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513): honour};" [Genesis
18:20]

5. (MOTHER) FORMULA OF HUMANITY AS HEAD OF STATE / *HONOUR* *PARENTS*

PYTHAGOREAN TETRAD: #1 + #2 = #3 as #MIND WHETHER AS FORMULA OF HETEROS
PROGRESSION / THESIS ON IT'S HOMOIOS BASIS

MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE: {ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT) /
SERAPHIM {Heb. Saraph Gk. Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively)
poisonous (serpent); specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical creature
(from their copper color))} {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10}

TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat to
the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed with
Israel)}

PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat,
throne)}

+ 0, H9, H18 {ie. System’s Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}

Thusly in summation, as to the problem of discernment and knowledge
assimilation into a coherent syncretism, at this juncture in our ingestion
of Kant’s acumen as thesis, we ought to prudently reserve our further
conjectures upon any rhetorical artifices which he may of necessity deploy
until we have fully considered what are the nominative descriptions applied
as their grounding in explanations and the explicit nature of the
underlying dialectic as its capacity and means by which Kant conveys any
such postulates.

For instance, Karl Marx (5 May 1818 – 14 March 1883) and Friedrich Engels
(28 November 1820 – 5 August 1895) proposed that Georg Hegel's (27 August
1770 – 14 November 1831) subsequent dialectic was too abstract. The
dialect which HEGEL proposes is:

#1 - THESIS
#2 - ANTI-THESIS
#3 - SYNTHESIS
#4 - PROGRESSION

This concept of dialectics was given new life by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Hegel as a proponent of German Idealism has been seen in the 20th century
as the originator but as an explicit phrase it originated with Johann
Gottlieb Fichte (28 November 1820 – 5 August 1895), whose dialectically
synthetic model of nature and of history made it, as it were, a fundamental
aspect of the nature of reality instead of regarding the contradictions
into which dialectics leads as a sign of the sterility of the dialectical
method, as Immanuel Kant was considered by many to have tended to do within
his Critique of Pure Reason. [Nicholson, J. A. (1950). Philosophy of
religion. New York: Ronald Press Co. Page 108]

As Walter Kaufmann (1 July 1921 – 4 September 1980) astutely affirms of
Hegel's criticism of the triad model commonly misattributed to him, adding
that "the only place where Hegel uses the three terms together occurs in
his lectures on the history of philosophy, on the last page but one of the
section on Kant—where Hegel roundly reproaches Kant for having 'EVERYWHERE
POSITED THESIS, ANTITHESIS, SYNTHESIS'"

In contradiction to this Hegelian idealism, Marx presented his own
dialectic method as an anthropological consideration as sensibility of the
world, which he claims to be "direct opposite" of Hegel's method: 'My
dialectic method is not only different from the Hegelian, but is its direct
opposite.' Where the dialectical method is itself an anthropological
construct, which is at base an OPINE {ie. hold and state as one's opinion;
origin late Middle English: from Latin opinari think, believe} as
existentialism purveying a characteristic mode of quantitative expression
as being essentially idiomatic:

'I THINK THEREFORE I AM'

But when, as occurs in the distillation of vodka which at a high proof is
devoid of SENSIBILITY where all taste and odour has been eliminated making
vodka a neutral spirit begging for self-entitlement, it is then sublimated
into its superlative form as substantially an epitaph of merit as
valedictory acceptability by an occasion of agreeability as an opportune
expression of a truism, where it is formerly inducted into a Hall of Fame
as a maxim life. As OSTENSIBLY being a discourse between two or more
people holding different points of view about a subject but wishing to
establish the truth through reasoned arguments as being ostensibly:

#1 - PROGRESS
#2 - SYNTHESIS
#3 - ANTI-THESIS
#4 - THESIS

YOUTUBE: "The Script - Hall of Fame (Official Video)"

http://youtu.be/mk48xRzuNvA

Dialectical materialism accepts the evolution of the natural world and the
emergence of new qualities of being at new stages of evolution. As Zbigniew
Antoni Jordan (11 August 1911 - 6 October 1977), notes, "Engels made
constant use of the metaphysical insight that the higher level of existence
emerges from and has its roots in the lower; that the higher level
constitutes a new order of being with its irreducible laws; and that this
process of evolutionary advance is governed by laws of development which
reflect basic properties of 'matter in motion as a whole'." [The Evolution
of Dialectical Materialism: A Philosophical and Sociological Analysis
(London: Macmillan, 1967), p 167]

Marx criticized classical materialism as another idealist
philosophy—idealist because of its transhistorical understanding of
material contexts. The Young Hegelian Ludwig Feuerbach had rejected Hegel's
idealistic philosophy and advocated materialism. Despite being strongly
influenced by Feuerbach, Marx rejected Feuerbach's version of materialism
as inconsistent. The writings of Engels, especially Anti-Dühring (1878) and
Dialectics of Nature (1875–82), were the source of the main doctrines of
dialectical materialism.

Marx's own writings are almost exclusively concerned with understanding
human history in terms of systemic processes, based on modes of production
(broadly speaking, the ways in which societies are organized to employ
their technological powers to interact with their material surroundings).
This is called historical materialism. More narrowly, within the framework
of this general theory of history, most of Marx's writing is devoted to an
analysis of the specific structure and development of the capitalist
economy.

Other scholars have argued that despite Marx's insistence that humans are
natural beings in an evolving, mutual relationship with the rest of nature,
Marx's own writings pay inadequate attention to the ways in which human
agency is constrained by such factors as biology, geography, and ecology.

Dialectical materialism adapts the Hegelian dialectic for traditional
materialism, which examines the subjects of the world in relation to each
other within a dynamic, evolutionary environment, in contrast to
metaphysical materialism, which examines parts of the world within a
static, isolated environment.

For his part, Engels applies a "dialectical" approach to the natural world
in general, arguing that contemporary science is increasingly recognizing
the necessity of viewing natural processes in terms of interconnectedness,
development, and transformation. Some scholars have doubted that Engels's
"dialectics of nature" is a legitimate extension of Marx's approach to
social processes.

Engels exemplifies this quintessential characteristic of Pythagorean
methodology of sophistry by postulating three laws of dialectics from his
reading of Hegel's Science of Logic. Engels elucidated these laws as the
materialist dialectic in his work Dialectics of Nature:

THE LAW OF THE UNITY AND CONFLICT OF OPPOSITES {MIND: #1 + #2 = #3 (PENTAD)
- NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS
NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a stately seat; by
implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat, throne)}}

THE LAW OF THE PASSAGE OF QUANTITATIVE {ie. measure by having magnitude or
spatial extent} CHANGES INTO QUALITATIVE {ie. determine comparative size,
appearance, value and superlative forms} CHANGES {SCIENCE: #3 + #4 = #7 -
ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {ZAYIN /
*PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. *EXOUSIA* - (in the sense of ability); privilege,
that is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity, competency, freedom, or
(objectively) mastery (concretely magistrate, superhuman, potentate,
*token* *of* *control*), delegated influence:—authority, jurisdiction,
liberty, power, right, strength)}}

THE LAW OF THE NEGATION OF THE NEGATION {OPINION: #5 + #6 = #11 (HEPTAD) -
TRANSFORMING NATURE: {KAF (DOUBLE - #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE {#7 -
ENGENDERING NATURE}) / Government & Non-Government Organisations}}

That the dialectic method is therefore understood as being a process of
determined SENSIBILITY where the product is "enlightenment, whereby the
philosopher is educated so as to achieve knowledge of the supreme good, the
Form of the Good." {SENSE: #7 + #8 = #15 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE:
{SAMEK}}

Accordingly dialectical materialism is understood as an aspect of the
broader subject of materialism, which asserts the primacy of the material
world: in short, matter precedes thought. Materialism is a realist
philosophy of science, which holds that the world is material; that all
phenomena in the universe consist of "matter in motion," wherein all things
are interdependent and interconnected and develop according to natural law;
that the world exists outside us and independently of our perception of it;
that thought is a reflection of the material world in the brain, and that
the world is in principle knowable.

However within the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be applied
to data provided by SENSIBILITY in order to provide cognition, and because
the data of SENSIBILITY are structured by the transcenden­tally ideal forms
of intuition, the categories give us knowledge only of things as they
appear with sensibility ("phenomena," literally "that which appears").

Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of objects
independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can never cognize
them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that which is
thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of Kant's use of
the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of "noumena" is not,
since it literally means not "things as they are in­ dependently of
appearing to us" but something more like "things as they are understood by
pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human understanding can
comprehend things in the latter way."

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>

Thus I am proffering an informed and reasoned opinion as that which
Immanuel Kant states is an impossibility for a human being to accomplish by
transcendent sapiential thought and capably demonstrate it's temporal
congruence as coherence by a mathematical theoretical noumenon as an
Intellectual Property which Immanuel Kant himself calls noumena as the
proof of a valid and rational concept attained by pure thought.

Whilst the HOMOIOS ternary conception of the THEORY OF NUMBER is in all
probability a SENSIBILITY of which Immanuel Kant appears cognisant and that
is exemplified by the conveyance of them as explicit meta-prototypes
descriptors within the formative of his CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE postulates
{#1 - Formula of Universal Law / #2 - Formula of Humanity / #3 - Formula of
Autonomy} conveyed within his Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
(1785) / Critique of Pure Reason (1781 / 1787) it is then a conundrum as to
commensurability of his articulation in rationally deriving the purest and
logical essence of being and whether his anthropocentric reality still
deploys a counterfactual and impractical intuition which is provisioned by
the genitive prescriptive or the biological normative propositions as
imposition made by an encapsulated dialectic:

PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal)
+ 0, H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) below
+ GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above], H54 - GUIMEI [*MARRYING*
*MAID* / DUI (ie. #7 - Engendering Nature) below + ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature
Surmounts Nature) above] {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of
Universal Law}

SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon)
+ 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) below
+ SUN (ie. #4- Nature Amended in its Nature) above], H18 - GU [Ills to Be
Cured / SUN (ie. #4- Nature Amended in its Nature) below + GEN (ie. #8 -
Transforming Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of
Humanity}

ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood)
+ 0, H3 - ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature)
below + KAN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains Nature) above] as 'fundamentality
[yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy [zhen]', H6 - SONG /
*JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains Nature) below + QIAN
(ie. #6 - Form of Nature) above] {ie. Self identity as Sea - Formula of
Autonomy}

THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also refers
to the Sun)
+ H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) above +
QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN [Pure Yin /
KUN (ie. #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature) above + KUN (ie. #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature) below] as FEMALE, H3 - *TRIAD*: ZHUN [Birth Throws
/ ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) below + KAN (ie. #1 - Nature
Contains Nature) above] {ie. Fountains as Formula of Progression of
individual phenomena}

= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}

The consideration is then one of criteria basis upon which the
anthropological conceptional notion of its sapient freedom {Humanity /
Autonomy} is formulated as either a binomial methodology by a
TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE applied as an encapsulation of an anti-thetical
anthropocentric identity

JEWISH VIEW: H54 - GUIMEI [Marrying Maid / DUI (ie. #7 - Engendering
Nature) below + ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) above] {ie. Realm
of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law} + H18 - GU [Ills to Be
Cured / SUN (ie. #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature) below + GEN (ie. #8 -
Transforming Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of
Humanity} = #72 - Self-Love, Holding Oneself Dear; I-Ching: H39 -
Adversity, Obstacles, Limping, Obstruction, Afoot; Tetra: 79 -
Difficulties)

GENTILE VIEW: H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts
Nature) below + GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. Realm of its
Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law} + H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser
Domestication / QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) below + SUN (ie. #4 - Nature
is Amended in its Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula
of Humanity} = H36 - MINGYI [Suppression of the Light / LI (ie. #9 -
Autonomous Nature) below + KUN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains Nature) above])"

Nevertheless when this trinomial HOMOIOS {#81 bits} ontological conception
of #NUMBER deploys a binomial {64 bits} encapsulation as artifice it then
introduces a logical contradiction {H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81} within it’s
DISCRIMINATING NORM and the SOCIETAL ORDER of things by an
incommensurability made against the proprietary, propriety and probity as
the viability of SUI JURIS / MEMRUM VIRILE which properly is the
paradigmatic providence as *ONTIC* necessity {H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41} as
a SOVEREIGN and central characteristic within the Formula of Autonomy by
its purveyance of permissibility only within the construct of an
INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMY in deployment of a TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE AS CANON
OF TRANSPOSITION within the bifurcated HETEROS {@1 - GENDER {MARRIAGE} / @5
- PHALLUS {HERITAGE} conception of #NUMBER as the philosophical basis to
its methodology since the MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS
WISDOM SO CALLED is not homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather
“homeomorphic to a circle”.

Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between such Formula of Universal Law descriptive statements
made against the Formula of Humanity which present an account on how the
cosmology of world is being similarly analogous to the LIMITED {#9 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS /
SEMINAL REASON GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative
statements presenting an evaluative account, or an account of how the
syncretic world should be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in being optimally something that should be
lived up to; or that should be pursued.

Thusly having given a preliminary definition to our anthropocentric
criteria as impetus for enquiry, we will now consider the practicality of
Kant's reasoning and whether his Categorical Imperative is truly free of
the strictures which is the Latin worldview of perennial biological duality
as the HETEROS viability of things "independently of their appearing to us"
and whether there is to be deduced by a HOMOIOS noumena modality as the
vital basis for a singularity of existence by which humanity is rationally
capable of conceiving "things as they are understood by pure thought."

- dolf

SEE ALSO: "(SYNCRETIC DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018) WHAT IS A METAPHYSICS OF
MORALS: #56 - TARGETED RELIGIOUS #312 - HATRED, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT
AND SLANDER BY MISNOMERED PIETY WITHIN SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE AS BOER
/ ANZAC DEFAMATION?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Augustus.pdf>

Initial Post: 25 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-26 07:43:11 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT: 26 AUGUST 2018): THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 26 August, 2018

Immanuel Kant (22 April 1724 to 12 February 1804) whom was initially
educated within theology as ostensibly the Pythagorean binomial
perennialist (Latin) school of thought and note worthy are his second
(1756) and third (1755) dissertations:

The Employment in Natural Philosophy of Metaphysics Combined with
Geometry—also known as the Monodologia Physica which contrasted the
Newtonian methods of thinking with those employed in the philosophy then
prevailing in German universities;

In a third dissertation, "New Elucidation of the First Principles of
Metaphysical Cognition", Kant analyzed especially the principle of
sufficient reason, which in Wolff’s formulation asserts that for
everything there is a sufficient reason why it should be rather than not
be. Although critical, Kant was cautious and still a long way from
challenging the assumptions of Leibnizian metaphysics.

And of his criticism of Leibnizian rationalism Kant's principal work of
this period was published by 1764 as "An Inquiry into the Distinctness
of the Fundamental Principles of Natural Theology and Morals". Within
this work he attacked the claim of Leibnizian philosophy that philosophy
should model itself on mathematics and aim at constructing a chain of
demonstrated truths based on self-evident premises. Kant argued that
mathematics proceeds from definitions that are arbitrary, by means of
operations that are clearly and sharply defined, upon concepts that can
be exhibited in concrete form. In contrast with this method, he argued
that philosophy must begin with concepts that are already given, “though
confusedly or insufficiently determined,” so that philosophers cannot
begin with definitions without thereby shutting themselves up within a
circle of words. Philosophy cannot, like mathematics, proceed
synthetically; it must analyze and clarify. The importance of the moral
order, which he had learned from Rousseau, reinforced the conviction
received from his study of Newton that a synthetic philosophy is empty
and false.

Within 1770 he became a full professor at the University of Konigsberg,
teaching metaphysics and logic. The Inaugural Dissertation of 1770 that
he delivered on *ASSUMING* *HIS* *NEW* *POSITION* *ALREADY* *CONTAINED*
*MANY* *OF* *THE* *IMPORTANT* *ELEMENTS* *OF* *HIS* *MATURE*
*PHILOSOPHY*. As indicated in its title, De Mundi Sensibilis atque
Intelligibilis Forma et Principiis: Dissertatio (“On the Form and
Principles of the Sensible and Intelligible Worlds”), the implicit
dualism of the Träume is made explicit, and it is made so on the basis
of a wholly un-Leibnizian interpretation of the distinction between
sense and understanding. Sense is not, as Leibniz had supposed, a
confused form of thinking but a source of knowledge in its own right,
although the objects so known are still only “appearances”—the term that
Leibniz also used. They are appearances because all sensing is
conditioned by the presence, in sensibility, of the forms of time and
space, which are not objective characteristics or frameworks of things
but “pure intuitions.” But though all knowledge of things sensible is
thus of phenomena, it does not follow that nothing is known of things as
they are in themselves. Certainly, humans have no intuition, or direct
insight, into an intelligible world, but the presence in them of certain
“pure intellectual concepts”—such as those of possibility, existence,
necessity, substance, and cause—enables them to have some descriptive
knowledge of it. By means of these concepts they can arrive at an
exemplar that provides them with “the common measure of all other things
as far as real.” This exemplar gives them an idea of perfection for both
the theoretical and practical orders: in the first, it is that of the
Supreme Being, God; in the latter, that of moral perfection. [cf:
Britannia Encyclopaedia]

After the Dissertation, Kant published virtually nothing for 11 years
until 1781, Immanuel Kant disseminated the first edition to Critique of
Pure Reason with the second in 1787, as an enormous work and one of the
most important on Western thought. Although the adolescent Kant loathed
his Pietist as Lutheran schooling, he had deep respect and admiration
for his parents, especially his mother, whose “genuine religiosity” he
described as “not at all enthusiastic.” According to his biographer,
Manfred Kuehn, Kant’s parents probably influenced him much less through
their Pietism than through their artisan values of “hard work, honesty,
cleanliness, and independence,” which they taught him by example. [cf:
Kuehn 2001, 38, 44. See also 54]

Thus in the consideration given to Kantian appeal for a pure moral
philosophy as beginning with a reference to the usefulness of the
division of labor. Here Kant raises the question whether philosophy
would not also benefit from such a division. Ultimately, he is not
concerned with whether the burden of elaborating philosophical theories
should be distributed among the shoulders of a multitude of persons.[Page 6]

We would however contend against this notion as being an impotent
chimeric {ie. a thing which is hoped for but is illusory or impossible
to achieve} of idealism {ie. the unrealistic belief in or pursuit of
perfection} such that one may declare "the economic sovereignty you
claim to defend is a chimera".

And thusly, it is in and of itself an oblique contradiction of Kant's
own characteristic position development where he emphasizes that an
adequate form of moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from
all empirical elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings as
well as free from rational concepts of perfection:

“And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #342)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 20 (#26); Ego: 14 (#20),
@3: Sup: 42 (#68); Ego: 22 (#42),
@4: Sup: 72 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY (%14); I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER (%16)); Ego: 30 (#72),
@5: Sup: 29 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
(%18)); Ego: 38 (#110),
@6: Sup: 75 (#244); Ego: 46 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS (%21)),
@7: Sup: 48 (#292); Ego: 54 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND (%30)),
@8: Sup: 29 (#321); Ego: 62 (#272),
@9: Sup: 18 (#339); Ego: 70 (#342),
Male: #339; Feme: #342
} // #342

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #369)@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 33 (#49); Ego: 17 (#33),
@3: Sup: 51 (#100); Ego: 18 (#51),
@4: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 40 (#91),
@5: Sup: 51 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES (%9)); Ego: 41 (#132),
@6: Sup: 12 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST (%27)); Ego:
42 (#174),
@7: Sup: 76 (#249); Ego: 64 (#238),
@8: Sup: 60 (#309); Ego: 65 (#303),
@9: Sup: 45 (#354); Ego: 66 (#369),
Male: #354; Feme: #369
} // #369

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he
rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God
blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had
rested from all his work which God created and made.” [Genesis 1:31-2:3
(KJV)]

Thusly if the Sabbath as a sacred principle of nature which is the
ultimate good as perfection: “And he said unto them, The sabbath was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath.” [Mark 2:27 (KJV)]

It’s meritorious purpose as a benefit to humankind is found firstly
within the ACT TO WILL by VOLUNTĀTIS {ie. MENTALISM {#41}: #1 - WILL,
FREE WILL, CHOICE as to engage within actions that endeavour to #1 - BE
SOCIALLY BENEFICIAL (the Artificial Intelligence equivalent of 'DO NO
EVIL'?); {*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}} by it’s remembrance and
then the voluntary avoidance of *LABOURING* as the absence of any WILL
TO ACT.

H2257@{
   @1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
   @2: Sup: 10 (#18); Ego: 2 (#10),
   @3: Sup: 40 (#58); Ego: 30 (#40),
   @4: Sup: 41 (#99); Ego: 1 (#41),
   Male: #99; Feme: #41
} // #41

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #40 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;

THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.

    #VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
    #TOOLS: *LABOURING* (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
strenuous efforts.
    #POSITION: With *DUTIES* (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
    #TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
    #CANON: #228

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
   @3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
   @4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
   Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228

#41 as [#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): {UMBRA: #6 as #40 %
#41 = #40} 1) *HURT*, *DAMAGE*, *INJURY*;

"Take heed now that ye fail not to do this: why should damage {#41 as
[#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): hurt} grow to the hurt of
the kings?" [Ezra 4:22]

Rather Kant, with this rhetorical consideration, introduces an
explicitly methodological train of thought. He asks “whether the nature
of the science {ie. ‘OTH CYCLE of 6D x #364 = #2184 days x 49J (based
seven number) = #294 x #364 = 107,016 days / 293 as TROPICAL YEARS =
365.242321 days} does not require the empirical part always to be
carefully separated from the rational [of the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS (ie. voluntary will)]:

"And God said, Let us make {ie.

*APPOINT* AS HAVING INCEPTION OF 22 / 7 WITH A GENESIS {DAO OF NATURE
(CHINESE: ZIRAN) / COURSE (GREEK: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (GREEK: GENESIS)}
REPRISE UPON EQUINOX OF WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 / #0 - NEW MOON OF
THURSDAY 21 MARCH 1996

} man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over
the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle,
and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon
the earth.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;
male and female created he them." [Genesis 1:26-27 (KJV)]

And he confines this question to the sub-question "Whether one is not of
the opinion that it: is of the utmost necessity to work out once a pure
moral philosophy which is fully cleansed of everything that might be in
any way empirical and belong to anthropology.“

The passage that is introduced by this question contains, at the same
time, a positive response — the thesis that there must be a “pure moral
philosophy” is “self evident." And indeed for Kant this evidence arises
“out of the common idea of *DUTY* and the moral law” (ibid.). Kant’s
cursory argumentation for this thesis is difficult to grasp.
Undoubtedly, it constitutes one of the key argumentative passages of the
Groundwork. [Page 6]

It is perhaps presumptuous of us at only page #6 of #323 to already be
taking issue with the robustness of Kant's otherwise cogent thesis that
there must be a “pure moral philosophy” which is “self evident" given
that there are seven day designates within our understanding of the
cosmology which is understood universally as an implicit law of nature.

GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1633 HOURS ON 25 AUGUST
2018: “The Kantian appeal for a pure moral philosophy begins with a
reference to the usefulness of the division of labor. Kant raises ... a
glass and...

YOUTUBE: “The Philosopher’s Song (Monty Python)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=2m51s&v=PtgKkifJ0Pw>

'IMMANUEL KANT WAS A REAL PISSANT
WHO WAS VERY RARELY STABLE.
HEIDEGGER, HEIDEGGER WAS A BOOZY BEGGAR
WHO COULD THINK YOU UNDER THE TABLE.
DAVID HUME COULD OUT CONSUME
SCHOPENHAUER AND HEGEL,
AND WITTGENSTEIN WAS A BEERY SWINE
WHO WAS JUST AS SLOSHED AS SCHLEGEL.

THERE'S NOTHING NIETZSCHE COULDN'T TEACH YA
'BOUT THE RAISIN' OF THE WRIST.
SOCRATES HIMSELF WAS PERMANENTLY PISSED.

JOHN STUART MILL, OF HIS OWN FREE WILL,
AFTER HALF A PINT OF SHANDY WAS PARTICULARLY ILL.
PLATO, THEY SAY, COULD STICK IT AWAY,
'ALF A CRATE OF WHISKEY EVERY DAY!
ARISTOTLE, ARISTOTLE WAS A BUGGER FOR THE BOTTLE,
AND HOBBES WAS FOND OF HIS DRAM.
AND RENE DESCARTES WAS A DRUNKEN FART:
"I DRINK, THEREFORE I AM."

YES, SOCRATES HIMSELF IS PARTICULARLY MISSED;
A LOVELY LITTLE THINKER, BUT A BUGGER WHEN HE'S PISSED.'

24 beers in a carton. 24 hours in a day. Hmmmm......."

DOLF @ 0812 HOURS ON 26 AUGUST 2018: “It may have escaped your notice,
as is self-evident from your burlesque constipated turd 💩 haemorrhoidal
opinion that the subject we are contending with is a consideration of
profound intellectual accomplishments conveyed by a book which
articulates the merit as collective mind of no fewer than FOURTEEN {#14}
eminent university professors:

THE COUNTRIES MOST ANTICIPATED LEGAL ADVICE HAS ARRIVED

Yes indeed my appraisal by Christoph HORN and Dieter SCHÖNECKER (Eds.)
of Immanuel KANT’s GROUNDWORK FOR METAPHYSICS OF MORALS (1785) has
arrived at my doorstep this morning of 24 August 2108 courtesy of
Australia Post.

It will be my task to read it this weekend in the hope that probity and
decorum will return to the governance of this Commonwealth given its
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE:

DIEU ET MON DROIT

Whilst it is prudent to establish the starting point of necessity as to
any premises for the continuity of enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance
with respect to the learned as the educated and the gravitas of the
subject matter to say nothing of those whom may have given their lives
as something other than marsupial roadkill as RECTUS for the
foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and in a sturdy
and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
self-entitlement which you bestow."

Yet for Kant this anthropological evidence arises “out of the common
idea of *DUTY* and the moral law” which is also certainly self evidently
a contradiction of his initial postulate that any adequate form of moral
philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical elements
of interest, self-love, and natural feelings in the dutiful display of
filial affection by VOLUNTĀTIS {CORRESPONDENCE {#82}: #2 - desire,
inclination as to engaged within actions that #2 - Don't introduce
biases; {*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}} relating to the “honour bestowed
upon one's matrimonial or common law parents” which is due from a son or
daughter:

H3513@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#138); Ego: 20 (#76),
   @4: Sup: 78 (#216); Ego: 2 (#78),
   @5: Sup: 1 (#217); Ego: 4 (#82),
   Male: #217; Feme: #82
} // #82

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #82 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
*OWN* *PROPERTY*.

    #VIRTUE:
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
   @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513): {UMBRA: #37 as #82 % #41
= #41} 1) to be heavy, be weighty, be grievous, be hard, be rich, be
honourable, be glorious, be burdensome, be honoured; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
be heavy; 1a2) to be heavy, be insensible, be dull; 1a3) *TO* *BE*
*HONOURED*; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made heavy, be honoured, enjoy
honour, be made abundant; 1b2) to get oneself glory or honour, gain
glory; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to make heavy, make dull, make insensible; 1c2)
to make honourable, honour, glorify; 1d) (Pual) to be made honourable,
be honoured; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to make heavy; 1e2) to make heavy, make
dull, make unresponsive; 1e3) to cause to be honoured; 1f) (Hithpael);
1f1) to make oneself heavy, make oneself dense, make oneself numerous;
1f2) to honour oneself;

"And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom {their secret; their
cement} and Gomorrah {rebellious people} is great, and because their sin
is very grievous {#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513):
honour};" [Genesis 18:20]

5. (MOTHER) FORMULA OF HUMANITY AS HEAD OF STATE / *HONOUR* *PARENTS*

PYTHAGOREAN TETRAD: #1 + #2 = #3 as #MIND WHETHER AS FORMULA OF HETEROS
PROGRESSION / THESIS ON IT'S HOMOIOS BASIS

MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE: {ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT)
/ SERAPHIM {Heb. Saraph Gk. Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively)
poisonous (serpent); specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical
creature (from their copper color))} {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {1 + 2 + 3 + 4
= 10}

TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}

PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat,
throne)}

+ 0, H9, H18 {ie. System’s Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}

Thusly in summation, as to the problem of discernment and knowledge
assimilation into a coherent syncretism, at this juncture in our
ingestion of Kant’s acumen as thesis, we ought to prudently reserve our
further conjectures upon any rhetorical artifices which he may of
necessity deploy until we have fully considered what are the nominative
descriptions applied as their grounding in explanations and the explicit
nature of the underlying dialectic as its capacity and means by which
Kant conveys any such postulates.

For instance, Karl Marx (5 May 1818 – 14 March 1883) and Friedrich
Engels (28 November 1820 – 5 August 1895) proposed that Georg Hegel's
(27 August 1770 – 14 November 1831) subsequent dialectic was too
abstract. The dialect which HEGEL proposes is:

#1 - THESIS
#2 - ANTI-THESIS
#3 - SYNTHESIS
#4 - PROGRESSION

This concept of dialectics was given new life by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Hegel as a proponent of German Idealism has been seen in the 20th
century as the originator but as an explicit phrase it originated with
Johann Gottlieb Fichte (28 November 1820 – 5 August 1895), whose
dialectically synthetic model of nature and of history made it, as it
were, a fundamental aspect of the nature of reality instead of regarding
the contradictions into which dialectics leads as a sign of the
sterility of the dialectical method, as Immanuel Kant was considered by
many to have tended to do within his Critique of Pure Reason.
[Nicholson, J. A. (1950). Philosophy of religion. New York: Ronald Press
Co. Page 108]

As Walter Kaufmann (1 July 1921 – 4 September 1980) astutely affirms of
Hegel's criticism of the triad model commonly misattributed to him,
adding that "the only place where Hegel uses the three terms together
occurs in his lectures on the history of philosophy, on the last page
but one of the section on Kant—where Hegel roundly reproaches Kant for
having 'EVERYWHERE POSITED THESIS, ANTITHESIS, SYNTHESIS'"

In contradiction to this Hegelian idealism, Marx presented his own
dialectic method as an anthropological consideration and sensibility of
the world, which he claims to be "direct opposite" of Hegel's method:
'My dialectic method is not only different from the Hegelian, but is its
direct opposite.' Where the dialectical method is itself an
anthropological construct, which is at base an OPINE {ie. hold and state
as one's opinion; origin late Middle English: from Latin opinari think,
believe} as existentialism purveying a characteristic mode of
quantitative expression in being essentially idiomatic:

'I THINK THEREFORE I AM'

But when, as occurs in the distillation of vodka which at a high proof
is devoid of SENSIBILITY where all taste and odour has been eliminated
making vodka a neutral spirit begging for self-entitlement, it is then
sublimated into its superlative form as substantially an epitaph of
merit in valedictory acceptability by an occasion of agreeability as an
opportune expression of a truism, where it is formerly inducted into a
Hall of Fame as a maxim life. As OSTENSIBLY being a discourse between
two or more people holding different points of view about a subject but
wishing to establish the truth through reasoned arguments as its imperative:

#1 - PROGRESS
#2 - SYNTHESIS
#3 - ANTI-THESIS
#4 - THESIS

YOUTUBE: "The Script - Hall of Fame (Official Video)"

http://youtu.be/mk48xRzuNvA

Dialectical materialism accepts the evolution of the natural world and
the emergence of new qualities of being at new stages of evolution. As
Zbigniew Antoni Jordan (11 August 1911 - 6 October 1977), notes, "Engels
made constant use of the metaphysical insight that the higher level of
existence emerges from and has its roots in the lower; that the higher
level constitutes a new order of being with its irreducible laws; and
that this process of evolutionary advance is governed by laws of
development which reflect basic properties of 'matter in motion as a
whole'." [The Evolution of Dialectical Materialism: A Philosophical and
Sociological Analysis (London: Macmillan, 1967), p 167]

Marx criticized classical materialism as another idealist
philosophy—idealist because of its transhistorical understanding of
material contexts. The Young Hegelian Ludwig Feuerbach had rejected
Hegel's idealistic philosophy and advocated materialism. Despite being
strongly influenced by Feuerbach, Marx rejected Feuerbach's version of
materialism as inconsistent. The writings of Engels, especially
Anti-Dühring (1878) and Dialectics of Nature (1875–82), were the source
of the main doctrines of dialectical materialism.

Marx's own writings are almost exclusively concerned with understanding
human history in terms of systemic processes, based on modes of
production (broadly speaking, the ways in which societies are organized
to employ their technological powers to interact with their material
surroundings). This is called historical materialism. More narrowly,
within the framework of this general theory of history, most of Marx's
writing is devoted to an analysis of the specific structure and
development of the capitalist economy.

Other scholars have argued that despite Marx's insistence that humans
are natural beings in an evolving, mutual relationship with the rest of
nature, Marx's own writings pay inadequate attention to the ways in
which human agency is constrained by such factors as biology, geography,
and ecology.

Dialectical materialism adapts the Hegelian dialectic for traditional
materialism, which examines the subjects of the world in relation to
each other within a dynamic, evolutionary environment, in contrast to
metaphysical materialism, which examines parts of the world within a
static, isolated environment.

For his part, Engels applies a "dialectical" approach to the natural
world in general, arguing that contemporary science is increasingly
recognizing the necessity of viewing natural processes in terms of
interconnectedness, development, and transformation. Some scholars have
doubted that Engels's "dialectics of nature" is a legitimate extension
of Marx's approach to social processes.

Engels exemplifies this quintessential characteristic of Pythagorean
methodology of sophistry by postulating three laws of dialectics from
his reading of Hegel's Science of Logic. Engels elucidated these laws as
the materialist dialectic in his work Dialectics of Nature:

THE LAW OF THE UNITY AND CONFLICT OF OPPOSITES {MIND: #1 + #2 = #3
(PENTAD) - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat,
throne)}}

THE LAW OF THE PASSAGE OF QUANTITATIVE {ie. measure by having magnitude
or spatial extent} CHANGES INTO QUALITATIVE {ie. determine comparative
size, appearance, value and superlative forms} CHANGES {SCIENCE: #3 + #4
= #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {ZAYIN /
*PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. *EXOUSIA* - (in the sense of ability); privilege,
that is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity, competency, freedom, or
(objectively) mastery (concretely magistrate, superhuman, potentate,
*token* *of* *control*), delegated influence:—authority, jurisdiction,
liberty, power, right, strength)}}

THE LAW OF THE NEGATION OF THE NEGATION {OPINION: #5 + #6 = #11 (HEPTAD)
- TRANSFORMING NATURE: {KAF (DOUBLE - #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE
{#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE}) / Government & Non-Government Organisations}}

That the dialectic method is therefore understood as being a process of
determined SENSIBILITY where the product is "enlightenment, whereby the
philosopher is educated so as to achieve knowledge of the supreme good,
the Form of the Good." {SENSE: #7 + #8 = #15 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE:
{SAMEK}}

Accordingly dialectical materialism is understood as an aspect of the
broader subject of materialism, which asserts the primacy of the
material world: in short, matter precedes thought. Materialism is a
realist philosophy of science, which holds that the world is material;
that all phenomena in the universe consist of "matter in motion,"
wherein all things are interdependent and interconnected and develop
according to natural law; that the world exists outside us and
independently of our perception of it; that thought is a reflection of
the material world in the brain, and that the world is in principle
knowable.

However within the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be
applied to data provided by SENSIBILITY in order to provide cognition,
and because the data of SENSIBILITY are structured by the
transcenden­tally ideal forms of intuition, the categories give us
knowledge only of things as they appear with sensibility ("phenomena,"
literally "that which appears").

Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of
objects independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can never
cognize them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that
which is thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of
Kant's use of the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of
"noumena" is not, since it literally means not "things as they are in­
dependently of appearing to us" but something more like "things as they
are understood by pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human
understanding can comprehend things in the latter way."

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>

Thus I am proffering an informed and reasoned opinion as that which
Immanuel Kant states is an impossibility for a human being to accomplish
by transcendent sapiential thought and capably demonstrate it's temporal
congruence as coherence by a mathematical theoretical noumenon as an
Intellectual Property which Immanuel Kant himself calls noumena as the
proof of a valid and rational concept attained by pure thought.

Whilst the HOMOIOS ternary conception of the THEORY OF NUMBER is in all
probability a SENSIBILITY of which Immanuel Kant appears cognisant and
that is exemplified by the conveyance of them as explicit
meta-prototypes descriptors within the formative of his CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE postulates {#1 - Formula of Universal Law / #2 - Formula of
Humanity / #3 - Formula of Autonomy} conveyed within his Groundwork for
the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) / Critique of Pure Reason (1781 / 1787)
it is then a conundrum as to commensurability of his articulation in
rationally deriving the purest and logical essence of being and whether
his anthropocentric reality still deploys a counterfactual and
impractical intuition which is provisioned by the genitive prescriptive
or the biological normative propositions as imposition made by an
encapsulated dialectic:

PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal)
+ 0, H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature)
below + GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above], H54 - GUIMEI
[*MARRYING* *MAID* / DUI (ie. #7 - Engendering Nature) below + ZHEN (ie.
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) above] {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven
- Formula of Universal Law}

SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon)
+ 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature)
below + SUN (ie. #4- Nature Amended in its Nature) above], H18 - GU
[Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4- Nature Amended in its Nature) below +
GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as
Earth - Formula of Humanity}

ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood)
+ 0, H3 - ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature)
below + KAN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains Nature) above] as 'fundamentality
[yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy [zhen]', H6 - SONG
/ *JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains Nature) below +
QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) above] {ie. Self identity as Sea -
Formula of Autonomy}

THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also
refers to the Sun)
+ H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) above +
QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN [Pure
Yin / KUN (ie. #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature) above + KUN (ie. #2
- Nature Rejoices in its Nature) below] as FEMALE, H3 - *TRIAD*: ZHUN
[Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) below + KAN (ie.
#1 - Nature Contains Nature) above] {ie. Fountains as Formula of
Progression of individual phenomena}

= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}

The consideration is then one of criteria basis upon which the
anthropological conceptional notion of its sapient freedom {Humanity /
Autonomy} is formulated as either a binomial methodology by a
TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE applied as an encapsulation of an anti-thetical
anthropocentric identity

JEWISH VIEW: H54 - GUIMEI [Marrying Maid / DUI (ie. #7 - Engendering
Nature) below + ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) above] {ie.
Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law} + H18 - GU
[Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature) below +
GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as
Earth - Formula of Humanity} = #72 - Self-Love, Holding Oneself Dear;
I-Ching: H39 - Adversity, Obstacles, Limping, Obstruction, Afoot; Tetra:
79 - Difficulties)

GENTILE VIEW: H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts
Nature) below + GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. Realm of
its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law} + H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser
Domestication / QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) below + SUN (ie. #4 -
Nature is Amended in its Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth
- Formula of Humanity} = H36 - MINGYI [Suppression of the Light / LI
(ie. #9 - Autonomous Nature) below + KUN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains
Nature) above])"

Nevertheless when this trinomial HOMOIOS {#81 bits} ontological
conception of #NUMBER deploys a binomial {64 bits} encapsulation as
artifice it then introduces a logical contradiction {H54 + H18 + H6 + H3
= #81} within it’s DISCRIMINATING NORM and the SOCIETAL ORDER of things
by an incommensurability made against the proprietary, propriety and
probity as the viability of SUI JURIS / MEMRUM VIRILE which properly is
the paradigmatic providence as *ONTIC* necessity {H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 =
#41} as a SOVEREIGN and central characteristic within the Formula of
Autonomy by its purveyance of permissibility only within the construct
of an INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMY in deployment of a TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE
AS CANON OF TRANSPOSITION within the bifurcated HETEROS {@1 - GENDER
{MARRIAGE} / @5 - PHALLUS {HERITAGE} conception of #NUMBER as the
philosophical basis to its methodology since the MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF
PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED is not homoiotic as
anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”.

Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between such Formula of Universal Law descriptive statements
made against the Formula of Humanity which present an account on how the
cosmology of world is being similarly analogous to the LIMITED {#9 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS /
SEMINAL REASON GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative
statements presenting an evaluative account, or an account of how the
syncretic world should be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in being optimally something that should be
lived up to; or that should be pursued.

Thusly having given a preliminary definition to our anthropocentric
criteria as impetus for enquiry, we will now consider the practicality
of Kant's reasoning and whether his Categorical Imperative is truly free
of the strictures which is the Latin worldview of perennial biological
duality as the HETEROS viability of things "independently of their
appearing to us" and whether there is to be deduced by a HOMOIOS noumena
modality as the vital basis for a singularity of existence by which
humanity is rationally capable of conceiving "things as they are
understood by pure thought."

- dolf

SEE ALSO: "(SYNCRETIC DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018) WHAT IS A METAPHYSICS OF
MORALS: #56 - TARGETED RELIGIOUS #312 - HATRED, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
THEFT AND SLANDER BY MISNOMERED PIETY WITHIN SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE
AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Augustus.pdf>

Initial Post: 25 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-26 08:13:06 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT: 26 AUGUST 2018): THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 26 August, 2018

Immanuel Kant (22 April 1724 to 12 February 1804) whom was initially
educated within theology as ostensibly the Pythagorean binomial
perennialist (Latin) school of thought and note worthy are his second
(1756) and third (1755) dissertations:

The Employment in Natural Philosophy of Metaphysics Combined with
Geometry—also known as the Monodologia Physica which contrasted the
Newtonian methods of thinking with those employed in the philosophy then
prevailing in German universities;

In a third dissertation, "New Elucidation of the First Principles of
Metaphysical Cognition", Kant analyzed especially the principle of
sufficient reason, which in Wolff’s formulation asserts that for
everything there is a sufficient reason why it should be rather than not
be. Although critical, Kant was cautious and still a long way from
challenging the assumptions of Leibnizian metaphysics.

And of his criticism of Leibnizian rationalism Kant's principal work of
this period was published by 1764 as "An Inquiry into the Distinctness
of the Fundamental Principles of Natural Theology and Morals". Within
this work he attacked the claim of Leibnizian philosophy that philosophy
should model itself on mathematics and aim at constructing a chain of
demonstrated truths based on self-evident premises. Kant argued that
mathematics proceeds from definitions that are arbitrary, by means of
operations that are clearly and sharply defined, upon concepts that can
be exhibited in concrete form. In contrast with this method, he argued
that philosophy must begin with concepts that are already given, “though
confusedly or insufficiently determined,” so that philosophers cannot
begin with definitions without thereby shutting themselves up within a
circle of words. Philosophy cannot, like mathematics, proceed
synthetically; it must analyze and clarify. The importance of the moral
order, which he had learned from Rousseau, reinforced the conviction
received from his study of Newton that a synthetic philosophy is empty
and false.

Within 1770 he became a full professor at the University of Konigsberg,
teaching metaphysics and logic. The Inaugural Dissertation of 1770 that
he delivered on *ASSUMING* *HIS* *NEW* *POSITION* *ALREADY* *CONTAINED*
*MANY* *OF* *THE* *IMPORTANT* *ELEMENTS* *OF* *HIS* *MATURE*
*PHILOSOPHY*. As indicated in its title, De Mundi Sensibilis atque
Intelligibilis Forma et Principiis: Dissertatio (“On the Form and
Principles of the Sensible and Intelligible Worlds”), the implicit
dualism of the Träume is made explicit, and it is made so on the basis
of a wholly un-Leibnizian interpretation of the distinction between
sense and understanding. Sense is not, as Leibniz had supposed, a
confused form of thinking but a source of knowledge in its own right,
although the objects so known are still only “appearances”—the term that
Leibniz also used. They are appearances because all sensing is
conditioned by the presence, in sensibility, of the forms of time and
space, which are not objective characteristics or frameworks of things
but “pure intuitions.” But though all knowledge of things sensible is
thus of phenomena, it does not follow that nothing is known of things as
they are in themselves. Certainly, humans have no intuition, or direct
insight, into an intelligible world, but the presence in them of certain
“pure intellectual concepts”—such as those of possibility, existence,
necessity, substance, and cause—enables them to have some descriptive
knowledge of it. By means of these concepts they can arrive at an
exemplar that provides them with “the common measure of all other things
as far as real.” This exemplar gives them an idea of perfection for both
the theoretical and practical orders: in the first, it is that of the
Supreme Being, God; in the latter, that of moral perfection. [cf:
Britannia Encyclopaedia]

After the Dissertation, Kant published virtually nothing for 11 years
until 1781, Immanuel Kant disseminated the first edition to Critique of
Pure Reason with the second in 1787, as an enormous work and one of the
most important on Western thought. Although the adolescent Kant loathed
his Pietist as Lutheran schooling, he had deep respect and admiration
for his parents, especially his mother, whose “genuine religiosity” he
described as “not at all enthusiastic.” According to his biographer,
Manfred Kuehn, Kant’s parents probably influenced him much less through
their Pietism than through their artisan values of “hard work, honesty,
cleanliness, and independence,” which they taught him by example. [cf:
Kuehn 2001, 38, 44. See also 54]

Thus in the consideration given to Kantian appeal for a pure moral
philosophy as beginning with a reference to the usefulness of the
division of labor. Here Kant raises the question whether philosophy
would not also benefit from such a division. Ultimately, he is not
concerned with whether the burden of elaborating philosophical theories
should be distributed among the shoulders of a multitude of persons.[Page 6]

We would however contend against this notion as being an impotent
chimeric {ie. a thing which is hoped for but is illusory or impossible
to achieve} of idealism {ie. the unrealistic belief in or pursuit of
perfection} such that one may declare "the economic sovereignty you
claim to defend is a chimera".

And thusly, it is in and of itself an oblique contradiction of Kant's
own characteristic position development where he emphasizes that an
adequate form of moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from
all empirical elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings as
well as free from rational concepts of perfection:

“And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #342)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 20 (#26); Ego: 14 (#20),
@3: Sup: 42 (#68); Ego: 22 (#42),
@4: Sup: 72 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY (%14); I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER (%16)); Ego: 30 (#72),
@5: Sup: 29 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
(%18)); Ego: 38 (#110),
@6: Sup: 75 (#244); Ego: 46 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS (%21)),
@7: Sup: 48 (#292); Ego: 54 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND (%30)),
@8: Sup: 29 (#321); Ego: 62 (#272),
@9: Sup: 18 (#339); Ego: 70 (#342),
Male: #339; Feme: #342
} // #342

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (DAY #6 as #369)@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 33 (#49); Ego: 17 (#33),
@3: Sup: 51 (#100); Ego: 18 (#51),
@4: Sup: 10 (#110); Ego: 40 (#91),
@5: Sup: 51 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES (%9)); Ego: 41 (#132),
@6: Sup: 12 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST (%27)); Ego:
42 (#174),
@7: Sup: 76 (#249); Ego: 64 (#238),
@8: Sup: 60 (#309); Ego: 65 (#303),
@9: Sup: 45 (#354); Ego: 66 (#369),
Male: #354; Feme: #369
} // #369

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.

And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he
rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God
blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had
rested from all his work which God created and made.” [Genesis 1:31-2:3
(KJV)]

Thusly if the Sabbath as a sacred principle of nature which is the
ultimate good as perfection: “And he said unto them, The sabbath was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath.” [Mark 2:27 (KJV)]

It’s meritorious purpose as a benefit to humankind is found firstly
within the ACT TO WILL by VOLUNTĀTIS {ie. MENTALISM {#41}: #1 - WILL,
FREE WILL, CHOICE as to engage within actions that endeavour to #1 - BE
SOCIALLY BENEFICIAL (the Artificial Intelligence equivalent of 'DO NO
EVIL'?); {*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}} by it’s remembrance and
then the voluntary avoidance of *LABOURING* as the absence of any WILL
TO ACT.

H2257@{
   @1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
   @2: Sup: 10 (#18); Ego: 2 (#10),
   @3: Sup: 40 (#58); Ego: 30 (#40),
   @4: Sup: 41 (#99); Ego: 1 (#41),
   Male: #99; Feme: #41
} // #41

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #40 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;

THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.

    #VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
    #TOOLS: *LABOURING* (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
strenuous efforts.
    #POSITION: With *DUTIES* (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
    #TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
    #CANON: #228

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
   @3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
   @4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
   Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228

#41 as [#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): {UMBRA: #6 as #40 %
#41 = #40} 1) *HURT*, *DAMAGE*, *INJURY*;

"Take heed now that ye fail not to do this: why should damage {#41 as
[#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): hurt} grow to the hurt of
the kings?" [Ezra 4:22]

Rather Kant, with this rhetorical consideration, introduces an
explicitly methodological train of thought. He asks “whether the nature
of the science {ie. ‘OTH CYCLE of 6D x #364 = #2184 days x 49J (based
seven number) = #294 x #364 = 107,016 days / 293 as TROPICAL YEARS =
365.242321 days} does not require the empirical part always to be
carefully separated from the rational [of the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS (ie. voluntary will)]:

"And God said, Let us make {ie.

*APPOINT* AS HAVING INCEPTION OF 22 / 7 WITH A GENESIS {DAO OF NATURE
(CHINESE: ZIRAN) / COURSE (GREEK: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (GREEK: GENESIS)}
REPRISE UPON EQUINOX OF WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 / #0 - NEW MOON OF
THURSDAY 21 MARCH 1996

} man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over
the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle,
and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon
the earth.

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;
male and female created he them." [Genesis 1:26-27 (KJV)]

And he confines this question to the sub-question "Whether one is not of
the opinion that it: is of the utmost necessity to work out once a pure
moral philosophy which is fully cleansed of everything that might be in
any way empirical and belong to anthropology“

The passage that is introduced by this question contains, at the same
time, a positive response — the thesis that there must be a “pure moral
philosophy” is “self evident." And indeed for Kant this evidence arises
“out of the common idea of *DUTY* and the moral law” (ibid.). Kant’s
cursory argumentation for this thesis is difficult to grasp.
Undoubtedly, it constitutes one of the key argumentative passages of the
Groundwork. [Page 6]

It is perhaps presumptuous of us at only page #6 of #323 to already be
taking issue with the robustness of Kant's otherwise cogent thesis that
there must be a “pure moral philosophy” which is “self evident" given
that there are seven day designates within our understanding of the
cosmology which is understood universally as an implicit law of nature.

GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1633 HOURS ON 25 AUGUST
2018: “The Kantian appeal for a pure moral philosophy begins with a
reference to the usefulness of the division of labor. Kant raises ... a
glass and...

YOUTUBE: “The Philosopher’s Song (Monty Python)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=2m51s&v=PtgKkifJ0Pw>

'IMMANUEL KANT WAS A REAL PISSANT
WHO WAS VERY RARELY STABLE.
HEIDEGGER, HEIDEGGER WAS A BOOZY BEGGAR
WHO COULD THINK YOU UNDER THE TABLE.
DAVID HUME COULD OUT CONSUME
SCHOPENHAUER AND HEGEL,
AND WITTGENSTEIN WAS A BEERY SWINE
WHO WAS JUST AS SLOSHED AS SCHLEGEL.

THERE'S NOTHING NIETZSCHE COULDN'T TEACH YA
'BOUT THE RAISIN' OF THE WRIST.
SOCRATES HIMSELF WAS PERMANENTLY PISSED.

JOHN STUART MILL, OF HIS OWN FREE WILL,
AFTER HALF A PINT OF SHANDY WAS PARTICULARLY ILL.
PLATO, THEY SAY, COULD STICK IT AWAY,
'ALF A CRATE OF WHISKEY EVERY DAY!
ARISTOTLE, ARISTOTLE WAS A BUGGER FOR THE BOTTLE,
AND HOBBES WAS FOND OF HIS DRAM.
AND RENE DESCARTES WAS A DRUNKEN FART:
"I DRINK, THEREFORE I AM."

YES, SOCRATES HIMSELF IS PARTICULARLY MISSED;
A LOVELY LITTLE THINKER, BUT A BUGGER WHEN HE'S PISSED.'

24 beers in a carton. 24 hours in a day. Hmmmm......."

DOLF @ 0812 HOURS ON 26 AUGUST 2018: “It may have escaped your notice,
as is self-evident from your burlesque constipated turd 💩 haemorrhoidal
opinion that the subject we are contending with is a consideration of
profound intellectual accomplishments conveyed by a book which
articulates the merit as collective mind of no fewer than FOURTEEN {#14}
eminent university professors:

THE COUNTRIES MOST ANTICIPATED LEGAL ADVICE HAS ARRIVED

Yes indeed my appraisal by Christoph HORN and Dieter SCHÖNECKER (Eds.)
of Immanuel KANT’s GROUNDWORK FOR METAPHYSICS OF MORALS (1785) has
arrived at my doorstep this morning of 24 August 2108 courtesy of
Australia Post.

It will be my task to read it this weekend in the hope that probity and
decorum will return to the governance of this Commonwealth given its
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE:

DIEU ET MON DROIT

Whilst it is prudent to establish the starting point of necessity as to
any premises for the continuity of enquiry, I recognise as my ignorance
with respect to the learned as the educated and the gravitas of the
subject matter to say nothing of those whom may have given their lives
as something other than marsupial roadkill as RECTUS for the
foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and in a sturdy
and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
self-entitlement which you bestow."

Yet for Kant this anthropological evidence arises “out of the common
idea of *DUTY* and the moral law” which is also certainly self evidently
a contradiction of his initial postulate that any adequate form of moral
philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical elements
of interest, self-love, and natural feelings in the dutiful display of
filial affection by VOLUNTĀTIS {CORRESPONDENCE {#82}: #2 - desire,
inclination as to engaged within actions that #2 - Don't introduce
biases; {*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}} relating to the “honour bestowed
upon one's matrimonial or common law parents” which is due from a son or
daughter:

H3513@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 56 (#62); Ego: 50 (#56),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#138); Ego: 20 (#76),
   @4: Sup: 78 (#216); Ego: 2 (#78),
   @5: Sup: 1 (#217); Ego: 4 (#82),
   Male: #217; Feme: #82
} // #82

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #82 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT* *FOR* *MY*
*OWN* *PROPERTY*.

    #VIRTUE:
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
   @2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
   @3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513): {UMBRA: #37 as #82 % #41
= #41} 1) to be heavy, be weighty, be grievous, be hard, be rich, be
honourable, be glorious, be burdensome, be honoured; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
be heavy; 1a2) to be heavy, be insensible, be dull; 1a3) *TO* *BE*
*HONOURED*; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made heavy, be honoured, enjoy
honour, be made abundant; 1b2) to get oneself glory or honour, gain
glory; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to make heavy, make dull, make insensible; 1c2)
to make honourable, honour, glorify; 1d) (Pual) to be made honourable,
be honoured; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to make heavy; 1e2) to make heavy, make
dull, make unresponsive; 1e3) to cause to be honoured; 1f) (Hithpael);
1f1) to make oneself heavy, make oneself dense, make oneself numerous;
1f2) to honour oneself;

"And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom {their secret; their
cement} and Gomorrah {rebellious people} is great, and because their sin
is very grievous {#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513):
honour};" [Genesis 18:20]

5. (MOTHER) FORMULA OF HUMANITY AS HEAD OF STATE / *HONOUR* *PARENTS*

PYTHAGOREAN TETRAD: #1 + #2 = #3 as #MIND WHETHER AS FORMULA OF HETEROS
PROGRESSION / THESIS ON IT'S HOMOIOS BASIS

MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE: {ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT)
/ SERAPHIM {Heb. Saraph Gk. Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively)
poisonous (serpent); specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical
creature (from their copper color))} {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {1 + 2 + 3 + 4
= 10}

TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}

PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat,
throne)}

+ 0, H9, H18 {ie. System’s Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}

Thusly in summation, as to the problem of discernment and knowledge
assimilation into a coherent syncretism, at this juncture in our
ingestion of Kant’s acumen as thesis, we ought to prudently reserve our
further conjectures upon any rhetorical artifices which he may of
necessity deploy until we have fully considered what are the nominative
descriptions applied as their grounding in explanations and the explicit
nature of the underlying dialectic as its capacity and means by which
Kant conveys any such postulates.

For instance, Karl Marx (5 May 1818 – 14 March 1883) and Friedrich
Engels (28 November 1820 – 5 August 1895) proposed that Georg Hegel's
(27 August 1770 – 14 November 1831) subsequent dialectic was too
abstract. The dialect which HEGEL proposes is:

#1 - THESIS
#2 - ANTI-THESIS
#3 - SYNTHESIS
#4 - PROGRESSION

This concept of dialectics was given new life by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Hegel as a proponent of German Idealism has been seen in the 20th
century as the originator but as an explicit phrase it originated with
Johann Gottlieb Fichte (28 November 1820 – 5 August 1895), whose
dialectically synthetic model of nature and of history made it, as it
were, a fundamental aspect of the nature of reality instead of regarding
the contradictions into which dialectics leads as a sign of the
sterility of the dialectical method, as Immanuel Kant was considered by
many to have tended to do within his Critique of Pure Reason.
[Nicholson, J. A. (1950). Philosophy of religion. New York: Ronald Press
Co. Page 108]

As Walter Kaufmann (1 July 1921 – 4 September 1980) astutely affirms of
Hegel's criticism of the triad model commonly misattributed to him,
adding that "the only place where Hegel uses the three terms together
occurs in his lectures on the history of philosophy, on the last page
but one of the section on Kant—where Hegel roundly reproaches Kant for
having 'EVERYWHERE POSITED THESIS, ANTITHESIS, SYNTHESIS'"

In contradiction to this Hegelian idealism, Marx presented his own
dialectic method as an anthropological consideration and SENSIBILITY of
the world, which he claims to be "direct opposite" of Hegel's method:
'My dialectic method is not only different from the Hegelian, but is its
direct opposite.' To Hegel, the life-process of the human brain, ie.
the process of thinking, which, under the name of 'the Idea', he even
transforms into an independent subject, is the demiurgos {ie.

Substance of thing (materia, substantia: #15CE ... #34CE ... #65CE ...
#111CE ... #175CE ... #260CE ... 369CE), is the means to purvey the
binary distillation so as to derive the notion of gender and spermatic
attributions as bifurcated elements, so then convey the proof of its
SCIENTIFIC essence of a thing (essentia, ousia: #260 ... #175 ... #65
... #34 ... #369 ... #111 ... #15)

} of the real world, and the real world is only the external, phenomenal
form of 'the Idea'. With me, on the contrary, the idea is nothing else
than the material world reflected by the human mind {#260}, and
translated into forms of thought {#15}. [Marx, Karl. "Afterword (Second
German Ed.)". Capital. 1: 14. Retrieved 28 December 2014]

That it not only shares an organisational / institutional orbital
association to other regimes which are constituted by Pythagorean
Perennialist / A-U-M belief systems, furthermore it has a connection to
a vassal perspective {ie. *AS* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *#AIDING*, *#WILLINGLY*
*OR* *#UNWILLINGLY* *THE* *DISSOLUTION* *OF* *THE* *STATE*} as
subjugation to the mechanised autonomic transformative gnostic process
of extrusion as the "different substance or hypostasis" impetus for
Roman Imperial / Religious Empire Governance which pervaded throughout
Europe as the world created and ruled by a lesser divinity, the demiurge
as oligarch. That the oligarchy ("the rule of the few") or the
ecclesiastical hierarchy adopted by Islam, the Vatican City / State and
German Fascism, have often become instruments of transformation, by
insisting upon monarchs ("the rule of the one") or dictators share power
or giving credibility and impetus to that process of change, such as
occurred by the 20 July 1933 signing of the Concordat with the German
Reich, thereby opening the door to governance by other 'party' elements
of society.

Where the dialectical method is itself an anthropological construct,
which is at base an OPINE {ie. hold and state as one's opinion; origin
late Middle English: from Latin opinari think, believe} as
existentialism purveying a characteristic mode of quantitative
expression in being essentially idiomatic:

'I THINK THEREFORE I AM'

But when, as occurs in the distillation of vodka which at a high proof
is devoid of SENSIBILITY where all taste and odour has been eliminated
making vodka a neutral spirit begging for self-entitlement, it is then
sublimated into its superlative form as substantially an epitaph of
merit in valedictory acceptability by an occasion of agreeability as an
opportune expression of a truism, where it is formerly inducted into a
Hall of Fame as a maxim life. As OSTENSIBLY being a discourse between
two or more people holding different points of view about a subject but
wishing to establish the truth through reasoned arguments as its imperative:

#1 - PROGRESS
#2 - SYNTHESIS
#3 - ANTI-THESIS
#4 - THESIS

YOUTUBE: "The Script - Hall of Fame (Official Video)"

http://youtu.be/mk48xRzuNvA

Dialectical materialism accepts the evolution of the natural world and
the emergence of new qualities of being at new stages of evolution. As
Zbigniew Antoni Jordan (11 August 1911 - 6 October 1977), notes, "Engels
made constant use of the metaphysical insight that the higher level of
existence emerges from and has its roots in the lower; that the higher
level constitutes a new order of being with its irreducible laws; and
that this process of evolutionary advance is governed by laws of
development which reflect basic properties of 'matter in motion as a
whole'." [The Evolution of Dialectical Materialism: A Philosophical and
Sociological Analysis (London: Macmillan, 1967), p 167]

Marx criticized classical materialism as another idealist
philosophy—idealist because of its transhistorical understanding of
material contexts. The Young Hegelian Ludwig Feuerbach had rejected
Hegel's idealistic philosophy and advocated materialism. Despite being
strongly influenced by Feuerbach, Marx rejected Feuerbach's version of
materialism as inconsistent. The writings of Engels, especially
Anti-Dühring (1878) and Dialectics of Nature (1875–82), were the source
of the main doctrines of dialectical materialism.

Marx's own writings are almost exclusively concerned with understanding
human history in terms of systemic processes, based on modes of
production (broadly speaking, the ways in which societies are organized
to employ their technological powers to interact with their material
surroundings). This is called historical materialism. More narrowly,
within the framework of this general theory of history, most of Marx's
writing is devoted to an analysis of the specific structure and
development of the capitalist economy.

Other scholars have argued that despite Marx's insistence that humans
are natural beings in an evolving, mutual relationship with the rest of
nature, Marx's own writings pay inadequate attention to the ways in
which human agency is constrained by such factors as biology, geography,
and ecology.

Dialectical materialism adapts the Hegelian dialectic for traditional
materialism, which examines the subjects of the world in relation to
each other within a dynamic, evolutionary environment, in contrast to
metaphysical materialism, which examines parts of the world within a
static, isolated environment.

For his part, Engels applies a "dialectical" approach to the natural
world in general, arguing that contemporary science is increasingly
recognizing the necessity of viewing natural processes in terms of
interconnectedness, development, and transformation. Some scholars have
doubted that Engels's "dialectics of nature" is a legitimate extension
of Marx's approach to social processes.

Engels exemplifies this quintessential characteristic of Pythagorean
methodology of sophistry by postulating three laws of dialectics from
his reading of Hegel's Science of Logic. Engels elucidated these laws as
the materialist dialectic in his work Dialectics of Nature:

THE LAW OF THE UNITY AND CONFLICT OF OPPOSITES {MIND: #1 + #2 = #3
(PENTAD) - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:—seat,
throne)}}

THE LAW OF THE PASSAGE OF QUANTITATIVE {ie. measure by having magnitude
or spatial extent} CHANGES INTO QUALITATIVE {ie. determine comparative
size, appearance, value and superlative forms} CHANGES {SCIENCE: #3 + #4
= #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {ZAYIN /
*PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. *EXOUSIA* - (in the sense of ability); privilege,
that is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity, competency, freedom, or
(objectively) mastery (concretely magistrate, superhuman, potentate,
*token* *of* *control*), delegated influence:—authority, jurisdiction,
liberty, power, right, strength)}}

THE LAW OF THE NEGATION OF THE NEGATION {OPINION: #5 + #6 = #11 (HEPTAD)
- TRANSFORMING NATURE: {KAF (DOUBLE - #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE
{#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE}) / Government & Non-Government Organisations}}

That the dialectic method is therefore understood as being a process of
determined SENSIBILITY where the product is "enlightenment, whereby the
philosopher is educated so as to achieve knowledge of the supreme good,
the Form of the Good." {SENSE: #7 + #8 = #15 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE:
{SAMEK}}

Accordingly dialectical materialism is understood as an aspect of the
broader subject of materialism, which asserts the primacy of the
material world: in short, matter precedes thought. Materialism is a
realist philosophy of science, which holds that the world is material;
that all phenomena in the universe consist of "matter in motion,"
wherein all things are interdependent and interconnected and develop
according to natural law; that the world exists outside us and
independently of our perception of it; that thought is a reflection of
the material world in the brain, and that the world is in principle
knowable.

However within the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and second
edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must always be
applied to data provided by SENSIBILITY in order to provide cognition,
and because the data of SENSIBILITY are structured by the
transcenden­tally ideal forms of intuition, the categories give us
knowledge only of things as they appear with sensibility ("phenomena,"
literally "that which appears").

Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of
objects independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can never
cognize them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally "that
which is thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The meaning of
Kant's use of the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the meaning of
"noumena" is not, since it literally means not "things as they are in­
dependently of appearing to us" but something more like "things as they
are understood by pure thought." Yet Kant appears to deny that the human
understanding can comprehend things in the latter way."

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>

Thus I am proffering an informed and reasoned opinion as that which
Immanuel Kant states is an impossibility for a human being to accomplish
by transcendent sapiential thought and capably demonstrate it's temporal
congruence as coherence by a mathematical theoretical noumenon as an
Intellectual Property which Immanuel Kant himself calls noumena as the
proof of a valid and rational concept attained by pure thought.

Whilst the HOMOIOS ternary conception of the THEORY OF NUMBER is in all
probability a SENSIBILITY of which Immanuel Kant appears cognisant and
that is exemplified by the conveyance of them as explicit
meta-prototypes descriptors within the formative of his CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE postulates {#1 - Formula of Universal Law / #2 - Formula of
Humanity / #3 - Formula of Autonomy} conveyed within his Groundwork for
the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) / Critique of Pure Reason (1781 / 1787)
it is then a conundrum as to commensurability of his articulation in
rationally deriving the purest and logical essence of being and whether
his anthropocentric reality still deploys a counterfactual and
impractical intuition which is provisioned by the genitive prescriptive
or the biological normative propositions as imposition made by an
encapsulated dialectic:

PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal)
+ 0, H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature)
below + GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above], H54 - GUIMEI
[*MARRYING* *MAID* / DUI (ie. #7 - Engendering Nature) below + ZHEN (ie.
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) above] {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven
- Formula of Universal Law}

SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon)
+ 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature)
below + SUN (ie. #4- Nature Amended in its Nature) above], H18 - GU
[Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4- Nature Amended in its Nature) below +
GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as
Earth - Formula of Humanity}

ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood)
+ 0, H3 - ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature)
below + KAN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains Nature) above] as 'fundamentality
[yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy [zhen]', H6 - SONG
/ *JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains Nature) below +
QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) above] {ie. Self identity as Sea -
Formula of Autonomy}

THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also
refers to the Sun)
+ H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) above +
QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN [Pure
Yin / KUN (ie. #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature) above + KUN (ie. #2
- Nature Rejoices in its Nature) below] as FEMALE, H3 - *TRIAD*: ZHUN
[Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) below + KAN (ie.
#1 - Nature Contains Nature) above] {ie. Fountains as Formula of
Progression of individual phenomena}

= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}

The consideration is then one of criteria basis upon which the
anthropological conceptional notion of its sapient freedom {Humanity /
Autonomy} is formulated as either a binomial methodology by a
TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE applied as an encapsulation of an anti-thetical
anthropocentric identity

JEWISH VIEW: H54 - GUIMEI [Marrying Maid / DUI (ie. #7 - Engendering
Nature) below + ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) above] {ie.
Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law} + H18 - GU
[Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature) below +
GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as
Earth - Formula of Humanity} = #72 - Self-Love, Holding Oneself Dear;
I-Ching: H39 - Adversity, Obstacles, Limping, Obstruction, Afoot; Tetra:
79 - Difficulties)

GENTILE VIEW: H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts
Nature) below + GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. Realm of
its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law} + H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser
Domestication / QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) below + SUN (ie. #4 -
Nature is Amended in its Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth
- Formula of Humanity} = H36 - MINGYI [Suppression of the Light / LI
(ie. #9 - Autonomous Nature) below + KUN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains
Nature) above])"

Nevertheless when this trinomial HOMOIOS {#81 bits} ontological
conception of #NUMBER deploys a binomial {64 bits} encapsulation as
artifice it then introduces a logical contradiction {H54 + H18 + H6 + H3
= #81} within it’s DISCRIMINATING NORM and the SOCIETAL ORDER of things
by an incommensurability made against the proprietary, propriety and
probity as the viability of SUI JURIS / MEMRUM VIRILE which properly is
the paradigmatic providence as *ONTIC* necessity {H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 =
#41} as a SOVEREIGN and central characteristic within the Formula of
Autonomy by its purveyance of permissibility only within the construct
of an INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMY in deployment of a TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE
AS CANON OF TRANSPOSITION within the bifurcated HETEROS {@1 - GENDER
{MARRIAGE} / @5 - PHALLUS {HERITAGE} conception of #NUMBER as the
philosophical basis to its methodology since the MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF
PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED is not homoiotic as
anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”.

Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between such Formula of Universal Law descriptive statements
made against the Formula of Humanity which present an account on how the
cosmology of world is being similarly analogous to the LIMITED {#9 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS /
SEMINAL REASON GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative
statements presenting an evaluative account, or an account of how the
syncretic world should be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in being optimally something that should be
lived up to; or that should be pursued.

Thusly having given a preliminary definition to our anthropocentric
criteria as impetus for enquiry, we will now consider the practicality
of Kant's reasoning and whether his Categorical Imperative is truly free
of the strictures which is the Latin worldview of perennial biological
duality as the HETEROS viability of things "independently of their
appearing to us" and whether there is to be deduced by a HOMOIOS noumena
modality as the vital basis for a singularity of existence by which
humanity is rationally capable of conceiving "things as they are
understood by pure thought."

- dolf

SEE ALSO: "(SYNCRETIC DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018) WHAT IS A METAPHYSICS OF
MORALS: #56 - TARGETED RELIGIOUS #312 - HATRED, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
THEFT AND SLANDER BY MISNOMERED PIETY WITHIN SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE
AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Augustus.pdf>

Initial Post: 25 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-26 09:03:57 UTC
Permalink
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory: <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

- dolf
Post by dolf
-- (DRAFT: 26 AUGUST 2018): THE INDISPENSABILITY OF A PURE MORAL
PHILOSOPHY
(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 26 August, 2018
Immanuel Kant (22 April 1724 to 12 February 1804) whom was initially
educated within theology as ostensibly the Pythagorean binomial
perennialist (Latin) school of thought and note worthy are his second
The Employment in Natural Philosophy of Metaphysics Combined with
Geometry—also known as the Monodologia Physica which contrasted the
Newtonian methods of thinking with those employed in the philosophy
then prevailing in German universities;
In a third dissertation, "New Elucidation of the First Principles of
Metaphysical Cognition", Kant analyzed especially the principle of
sufficient reason, which in Wolff’s formulation asserts that for
everything there is a sufficient reason why it should be rather than
not be. Although critical, Kant was cautious and still a long way from
challenging the assumptions of Leibnizian metaphysics.
And of his criticism of Leibnizian rationalism Kant's principal work
of this period was published by 1764 as "An Inquiry into the
Distinctness of the Fundamental Principles of Natural Theology and
Morals". Within this work he attacked the claim of Leibnizian
philosophy that philosophy should model itself on mathematics and aim
at constructing a chain of demonstrated truths based on self-evident
premises. Kant argued that mathematics proceeds from definitions that
are arbitrary, by means of operations that are clearly and sharply
defined, upon concepts that can be exhibited in concrete form. In
contrast with this method, he argued that philosophy must begin with
concepts that are already given, “though confusedly or insufficiently
determined,” so that philosophers cannot begin with definitions
without thereby shutting themselves up within a circle of words.
Philosophy cannot, like mathematics, proceed synthetically; it must
analyze and clarify. The importance of the moral order, which he had
learned from Rousseau, reinforced the conviction received from his
study of Newton that a synthetic philosophy is empty and false.
Within 1770 he became a full professor at the University of
Konigsberg, teaching metaphysics and logic. The Inaugural Dissertation
of 1770 that he delivered on *ASSUMING* *HIS* *NEW* *POSITION*
*ALREADY* *CONTAINED* *MANY* *OF* *THE* *IMPORTANT* *ELEMENTS* *OF*
*HIS* *MATURE* *PHILOSOPHY*. As indicated in its title, De Mundi
Sensibilis atque Intelligibilis Forma et Principiis: Dissertatio (“On
the Form and Principles of the Sensible and Intelligible Worlds”), the
implicit dualism of the Träume is made explicit, and it is made so on
the basis of a wholly un-Leibnizian interpretation of the distinction
between sense and understanding. Sense is not, as Leibniz had
supposed, a confused form of thinking but a source of knowledge in its
own right, although the objects so known are still only
“appearances”—the term that Leibniz also used. They are appearances
because all sensing is conditioned by the presence, in sensibility, of
the forms of time and space, which are not objective characteristics
or frameworks of things but “pure intuitions.” But though all
knowledge of things sensible is thus of phenomena, it does not follow
that nothing is known of things as they are in themselves. Certainly,
humans have no intuition, or direct insight, into an intelligible
world, but the presence in them of certain “pure intellectual
concepts”—such as those of possibility, existence, necessity,
substance, and cause—enables them to have some descriptive knowledge
of it. By means of these concepts they can arrive at an exemplar that
provides them with “the common measure of all other things as far as
real.” This exemplar gives them an idea of perfection for both the
theoretical and practical orders: in the first, it is that of the
Britannia Encyclopaedia]
After the Dissertation, Kant published virtually nothing for 11 years
until 1781, Immanuel Kant disseminated the first edition to Critique
of Pure Reason with the second in 1787, as an enormous work and one of
the most important on Western thought. Although the adolescent Kant
loathed his Pietist as Lutheran schooling, he had deep respect and
admiration for his parents, especially his mother, whose “genuine
religiosity” he described as “not at all enthusiastic.” According to
his biographer, Manfred Kuehn, Kant’s parents probably influenced him
much less through their Pietism than through their artisan values of
“hard work, honesty, cleanliness, and independence,” which they taught
him by example. [cf: Kuehn 2001, 38, 44. See also 54]
Thus in the consideration given to Kantian appeal for a pure moral
philosophy as beginning with a reference to the usefulness of the
division of labor. Here Kant raises the question whether philosophy
would not also benefit from such a division. Ultimately, he is not
concerned with whether the burden of elaborating philosophical
theories should be distributed among the shoulders of a multitude of
persons.[Page 6]
We would however contend against this notion as being an impotent
chimeric {ie. a thing which is hoped for but is illusory or impossible
to achieve} of idealism {ie. the unrealistic belief in or pursuit of
perfection} such that one may declare "the economic sovereignty you
claim to defend is a chimera".
And thusly, it is in and of itself an oblique contradiction of Kant's
own characteristic position development where he emphasizes that an
adequate form of moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from
all empirical elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings as
“And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
EAVES-DROPPER (%16)); Ego: 30 (#72),
(%18)); Ego: 38 (#110),
(%30)),
    Male: #339; Feme: #342
} // #342
42 (#174),
    Male: #354; Feme: #369
} // #369
Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.
And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he
rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God
blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had
rested from all his work which God created and made.” [Genesis
1:31-2:3 (KJV)]
Thusly if the Sabbath as a sacred principle of nature which is the
ultimate good as perfection: “And he said unto them, The sabbath was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath.” [Mark 2:27 (KJV)]
It’s meritorious purpose as a benefit to humankind is found firstly
within the ACT TO WILL by VOLUNTĀTIS {ie. MENTALISM {#41}: #1 - WILL,
FREE WILL, CHOICE as to engage within actions that endeavour to #1 -
BE SOCIALLY BENEFICIAL (the Artificial Intelligence equivalent of 'DO
NO EVIL'?); {*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}} by it’s remembrance
and then the voluntary avoidance of *LABOURING* as the absence of any
WILL TO ACT.
   Male: #99; Feme: #41
} // #41
UMBRA: #40 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;
THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *UNJUST* *PREFERENCES*.
    #VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with
All-under-Heaven.
    #TOOLS: *LABOURING* (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite
strenuous efforts.
    #POSITION: With *DUTIES* (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
    #TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
    #CANON: #228
{%40}),
   Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228
#41 as [#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): {UMBRA: #6 as #40
% #41 = #40} 1) *HURT*, *DAMAGE*, *INJURY*;
"Take heed now that ye fail not to do this: why should damage {#41 as
[#8, #2, #30, #1] = chabal (Aramaic) (H2257): hurt} grow to the hurt
of the kings?" [Ezra 4:22]
Rather Kant, with this rhetorical consideration, introduces an
explicitly methodological train of thought. He asks “whether the
nature of the science {ie. ‘OTH CYCLE of 6D x #364 = #2184 days x 49J
(based seven number) = #294 x #364 = 107,016 days / 293 as TROPICAL
YEARS = 365.242321 days} does not require the empirical part always to
be carefully separated from the rational [of the INTELLECTUS AS
"And God said, Let us make {ie.
*APPOINT* AS HAVING INCEPTION OF 22 / 7 WITH A GENESIS {DAO OF NATURE
(CHINESE: ZIRAN) / COURSE (GREEK: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (GREEK: GENESIS)}
REPRISE UPON EQUINOX OF WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 / #0 - NEW MOON OF
THURSDAY 21 MARCH 1996
} man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion
over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the
cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that
creepeth upon the earth.
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he
him; male and female created he them." [Genesis 1:26-27 (KJV)]
And he confines this question to the sub-question "Whether one is not
of the opinion that it: is of the utmost necessity to work out once a
pure moral philosophy which is fully cleansed of everything that might
be in any way empirical and belong to anthropology“
The passage that is introduced by this question contains, at the same
time, a positive response — the thesis that there must be a “pure
moral philosophy” is “self evident." And indeed for Kant this evidence
arises “out of the common idea of *DUTY* and the moral law” (ibid.).
Kant’s cursory argumentation for this thesis is difficult to grasp.
Undoubtedly, it constitutes one of the key argumentative passages of
the Groundwork. [Page 6]
It is perhaps presumptuous of us at only page #6 of #323 to already be
taking issue with the robustness of Kant's otherwise cogent thesis
that there must be a “pure moral philosophy” which is “self evident"
given that there are seven day designates within our understanding of
the cosmology which is understood universally as an implicit law of
nature.
2018: “The Kantian appeal for a pure moral philosophy begins with a
reference to the usefulness of the division of labor. Kant raises ...
a glass and...
YOUTUBE: “The Philosopher’s Song (Monty Python)”
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=2m51s&v=PtgKkifJ0Pw>
'IMMANUEL KANT WAS A REAL PISSANT
WHO WAS VERY RARELY STABLE.
HEIDEGGER, HEIDEGGER WAS A BOOZY BEGGAR
WHO COULD THINK YOU UNDER THE TABLE.
DAVID HUME COULD OUT CONSUME
SCHOPENHAUER AND HEGEL,
AND WITTGENSTEIN WAS A BEERY SWINE
WHO WAS JUST AS SLOSHED AS SCHLEGEL.
THERE'S NOTHING NIETZSCHE COULDN'T TEACH YA
'BOUT THE RAISIN' OF THE WRIST.
SOCRATES HIMSELF WAS PERMANENTLY PISSED.
JOHN STUART MILL, OF HIS OWN FREE WILL,
AFTER HALF A PINT OF SHANDY WAS PARTICULARLY ILL.
PLATO, THEY SAY, COULD STICK IT AWAY,
'ALF A CRATE OF WHISKEY EVERY DAY!
ARISTOTLE, ARISTOTLE WAS A BUGGER FOR THE BOTTLE,
AND HOBBES WAS FOND OF HIS DRAM.
"I DRINK, THEREFORE I AM."
YES, SOCRATES HIMSELF IS PARTICULARLY MISSED;
A LOVELY LITTLE THINKER, BUT A BUGGER WHEN HE'S PISSED.'
24 beers in a carton. 24 hours in a day. Hmmmm......."
as is self-evident from your burlesque constipated turd 💩
haemorrhoidal opinion that the subject we are contending with is a
consideration of profound intellectual accomplishments conveyed by a
book which articulates the merit as collective mind of no fewer than
THE COUNTRIES MOST ANTICIPATED LEGAL ADVICE HAS ARRIVED
Yes indeed my appraisal by Christoph HORN and Dieter SCHÖNECKER (Eds.)
of Immanuel KANT’s GROUNDWORK FOR METAPHYSICS OF MORALS (1785) has
arrived at my doorstep this morning of 24 August 2108 courtesy of
Australia Post.
It will be my task to read it this weekend in the hope that probity
and decorum will return to the governance of this Commonwealth given
DIEU ET MON DROIT
Whilst it is prudent to establish the starting point of necessity as
to any premises for the continuity of enquiry, I recognise as my
ignorance with respect to the learned as the educated and the gravitas
of the subject matter to say nothing of those whom may have given
their lives as something other than marsupial roadkill as RECTUS for
the foundational cause—it is best to proceed with caution and in a
sturdy and thoughtful manner rather than with the intoxication of
self-entitlement which you bestow."
Yet for Kant this anthropological evidence arises “out of the common
idea of *DUTY* and the moral law” which is also certainly self
evidently a contradiction of his initial postulate that any adequate
form of moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all
empirical elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings in the
dutiful display of filial affection by VOLUNTĀTIS {CORRESPONDENCE
{#82}: #2 - desire, inclination as to engaged within actions that #2 -
Don't introduce biases; {*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}} relating to the
“honour bestowed upon one's matrimonial or common law parents” which
   Male: #217; Feme: #82
} // #82
UMBRA: #82 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in
Difference; I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force,
Great Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage,
Potential energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine
appearance at thy cavern; *I* *HAVE* *NO* *STRONG* *DESIRE* *EXCEPT*
*FOR* *MY* *OWN* *PROPERTY*.
    #TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
    #POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
    #TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
    #CANON: #157
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#82 as [#6, #50, #20, #2, #4] = kabad (H3513): {UMBRA: #37 as #82 %
#41 = #41} 1) to be heavy, be weighty, be grievous, be hard, be rich,
be honourable, be glorious, be burdensome, be honoured; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to be heavy; 1a2) to be heavy, be insensible, be dull; 1a3) *TO*
*BE* *HONOURED*; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made heavy, be honoured,
enjoy honour, be made abundant; 1b2) to get oneself glory or honour,
gain glory; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to make heavy, make dull, make
insensible; 1c2) to make honourable, honour, glorify; 1d) (Pual) to be
made honourable, be honoured; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to make heavy; 1e2)
to make heavy, make dull, make unresponsive; 1e3) to cause to be
honoured; 1f) (Hithpael); 1f1) to make oneself heavy, make oneself
dense, make oneself numerous; 1f2) to honour oneself;
"And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom {their secret; their
cement} and Gomorrah {rebellious people} is great, and because their
honour};" [Genesis 18:20]
5. (MOTHER) FORMULA OF HUMANITY AS HEAD OF STATE / *HONOUR* *PARENTS*
PYTHAGOREAN TETRAD: #1 + #2 = #3 as #MIND WHETHER AS FORMULA OF
HETEROS PROGRESSION / THESIS ON IT'S HOMOIOS BASIS
MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE: {ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF
MERIT) / SERAPHIM {Heb. Saraph Gk. Ophis - burning, that is,
(figuratively) poisonous (serpent); specifically a fiery (serpent) or
symbolical creature (from their copper color))} {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA
{1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10}
TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 -
NATURE CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM
(Gk. Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy
seat to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God
communed with Israel)}
PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos -
a stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a
potentate:—seat, throne)}
+ 0, H9, H18 {ie. System’s Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
Thusly in summation, as to the problem of discernment and knowledge
assimilation into a coherent syncretism, at this juncture in our
ingestion of Kant’s acumen as thesis, we ought to prudently reserve
our further conjectures upon any rhetorical artifices which he may of
necessity deploy until we have fully considered what are the
nominative descriptions applied as their grounding in explanations and
the explicit nature of the underlying dialectic as its capacity and
means by which Kant conveys any such postulates.
For instance, Karl Marx (5 May 1818 – 14 March 1883) and Friedrich
Engels (28 November 1820 – 5 August 1895) proposed that Georg Hegel's
(27 August 1770 – 14 November 1831) subsequent dialectic was too
#1 - THESIS
#2 - ANTI-THESIS
#3 - SYNTHESIS
#4 - PROGRESSION
This concept of dialectics was given new life by Georg Wilhelm
Friedrich Hegel as a proponent of German Idealism has been seen in the
20th century as the originator but as an explicit phrase it originated
with Johann Gottlieb Fichte (28 November 1820 – 5 August 1895), whose
dialectically synthetic model of nature and of history made it, as it
were, a fundamental aspect of the nature of reality instead of
regarding the contradictions into which dialectics leads as a sign of
the sterility of the dialectical method, as Immanuel Kant was
considered by many to have tended to do within his Critique of Pure
Ronald Press Co. Page 108]
As Walter Kaufmann (1 July 1921 – 4 September 1980) astutely affirms
of Hegel's criticism of the triad model commonly misattributed to him,
adding that "the only place where Hegel uses the three terms together
occurs in his lectures on the history of philosophy, on the last page
but one of the section on Kant—where Hegel roundly reproaches Kant for
having 'EVERYWHERE POSITED THESIS, ANTITHESIS, SYNTHESIS'"
In contradiction to this Hegelian idealism, Marx presented his own
dialectic method as an anthropological consideration and SENSIBILITY
of the world, which he claims to be "direct opposite" of Hegel's
method: 'My dialectic method is not only different from the Hegelian,
but is its direct opposite.'  To Hegel, the life-process of the human
brain, ie. the process of thinking, which, under the name of 'the
Idea', he even transforms into an independent subject, is the
demiurgos {ie.
Substance of thing (materia, substantia: #15CE ... #34CE ... #65CE ...
#111CE ... #175CE ... #260CE ... 369CE), is the means to purvey the
binary distillation so as to derive the notion of gender and spermatic
attributions as bifurcated elements, so then convey the proof of its
SCIENTIFIC essence of a thing (essentia, ousia: #260 ... #175 ... #65
... #34 ... #369 ... #111 ... #15)
} of the real world, and the real world is only the external,
phenomenal form of 'the Idea'. With me, on the contrary, the idea is
nothing else than the material world reflected by the human mind
{#260}, and translated into forms of thought {#15}. [Marx, Karl.
"Afterword (Second German Ed.)". Capital. 1: 14. Retrieved 28 December
2014]
That it not only shares an organisational / institutional orbital
association to other regimes which are constituted by Pythagorean
Perennialist / A-U-M belief systems, furthermore it has a connection
to a vassal perspective {ie. *AS* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *#AIDING*,
*#WILLINGLY* *OR* *#UNWILLINGLY* *THE* *DISSOLUTION* *OF* *THE*
*STATE*} as subjugation to the mechanised autonomic transformative
gnostic process of extrusion as the "different substance or
hypostasis" impetus for Roman Imperial / Religious Empire Governance
which pervaded throughout Europe as the world created and ruled by a
lesser divinity, the demiurge as oligarch. That the oligarchy ("the
rule of the few") or the ecclesiastical hierarchy adopted by Islam,
the Vatican City / State and German Fascism, have often become
instruments of transformation, by insisting upon monarchs ("the rule
of the one") or dictators share power or giving credibility and
impetus to that process of change, such as occurred by the 20 July
1933 signing of the Concordat with the German Reich, thereby opening
the door to governance by other 'party' elements of society.
Where the dialectical method is itself an anthropological construct,
which is at base an OPINE {ie. hold and state as one's opinion; origin
late Middle English: from Latin opinari think, believe} as
existentialism purveying a characteristic mode of quantitative
'I THINK THEREFORE I AM'
But when, as occurs in the distillation of vodka which at a high proof
is devoid of SENSIBILITY where all taste and odour has been eliminated
making vodka a neutral spirit begging for self-entitlement, it is then
sublimated into its superlative form as substantially an epitaph of
merit in valedictory acceptability by an occasion of agreeability as
an opportune expression of a truism, where it is formerly inducted
into a Hall of Fame as a maxim life.  As OSTENSIBLY being a discourse
between two or more people holding different points of view about a
subject but wishing to establish the truth through reasoned arguments
#1 - PROGRESS
#2 - SYNTHESIS
#3 - ANTI-THESIS
#4 - THESIS
YOUTUBE: "The Script - Hall of Fame (Official Video)"
http://youtu.be/mk48xRzuNvA
Dialectical materialism accepts the evolution of the natural world and
the emergence of new qualities of being at new stages of evolution. As
Zbigniew Antoni Jordan (11 August 1911 - 6 October 1977), notes,
"Engels made constant use of the metaphysical insight that the higher
level of existence emerges from and has its roots in the lower; that
the higher level constitutes a new order of being with its irreducible
laws; and that this process of evolutionary advance is governed by
laws of development which reflect basic properties of 'matter in
motion as a whole'." [The Evolution of Dialectical Materialism: A
Philosophical and Sociological Analysis (London: Macmillan, 1967), p 167]
Marx criticized classical materialism as another idealist
philosophy—idealist because of its transhistorical understanding of
material contexts. The Young Hegelian Ludwig Feuerbach had rejected
Hegel's idealistic philosophy and advocated materialism. Despite being
strongly influenced by Feuerbach, Marx rejected Feuerbach's version of
materialism as inconsistent. The writings of Engels, especially
Anti-Dühring (1878) and Dialectics of Nature (1875–82), were the
source of the main doctrines of dialectical materialism.
Marx's own writings are almost exclusively concerned with
understanding human history in terms of systemic processes, based on
modes of production (broadly speaking, the ways in which societies are
organized to employ their technological powers to interact with their
material surroundings). This is called historical materialism. More
narrowly, within the framework of this general theory of history, most
of Marx's writing is devoted to an analysis of the specific structure
and development of the capitalist economy.
Other scholars have argued that despite Marx's insistence that humans
are natural beings in an evolving, mutual relationship with the rest
of nature, Marx's own writings pay inadequate attention to the ways in
which human agency is constrained by such factors as biology,
geography, and ecology.
Dialectical materialism adapts the Hegelian dialectic for traditional
materialism, which examines the subjects of the world in relation to
each other within a dynamic, evolutionary environment, in contrast to
metaphysical materialism, which examines parts of the world within a
static, isolated environment.
For his part, Engels applies a "dialectical" approach to the natural
world in general, arguing that contemporary science is increasingly
recognizing the necessity of viewing natural processes in terms of
interconnectedness, development, and transformation. Some scholars
have doubted that Engels's "dialectics of nature" is a legitimate
extension of Marx's approach to social processes.
Engels exemplifies this quintessential characteristic of Pythagorean
methodology of sophistry by postulating three laws of dialectics from
his reading of Hegel's Science of Logic. Engels elucidated these laws
THE LAW OF THE UNITY AND CONFLICT OF OPPOSITES {MIND: #1 + #2 = #3
(PENTAD) - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos -
a stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a
potentate:—seat, throne)}}
THE LAW OF THE PASSAGE OF QUANTITATIVE {ie. measure by having
magnitude or spatial extent} CHANGES INTO QUALITATIVE {ie. determine
comparative size, appearance, value and superlative forms} CHANGES
{SCIENCE: #3 + #4 = #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN
ITS NATURE: {ZAYIN / *PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. *EXOUSIA* - (in the sense
of ability); privilege, that is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity,
competency, freedom, or (objectively) mastery (concretely magistrate,
superhuman, potentate, *token* *of* *control*), delegated
influence:—authority, jurisdiction, liberty, power, right, strength)}}
THE LAW OF THE NEGATION OF THE NEGATION {OPINION: #5 + #6 = #11
(HEPTAD) - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {KAF (DOUBLE - #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN
ITS NATURE {#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE}) / Government & Non-Government
Organisations}}
That the dialectic method is therefore understood as being a process
of determined SENSIBILITY where the product is "enlightenment, whereby
the philosopher is educated so as to achieve knowledge of the supreme
good, the Form of the Good." {SENSE: #7 + #8 = #15 - NATURE SURMOUNTS
NATURE: {SAMEK}}
Accordingly dialectical materialism is understood as an aspect of the
broader subject of materialism, which asserts the primacy of the
material world: in short, matter precedes thought. Materialism is a
realist philosophy of science, which holds that the world is material;
that all phenomena in the universe consist of "matter in motion,"
wherein all things are interdependent and interconnected and develop
according to natural law; that the world exists outside us and
independently of our perception of it; that thought is a reflection of
the material world in the brain, and that the world is in principle
knowable.
However within the third chapter of the "Analytic of Principles," on
phenomena and noumena, Kant in Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and
second edition 1787) emphasizes that because the categories must
always be applied to data provided by SENSIBILITY in order to provide
cognition, and because the data of SENSIBILITY are structured by the
transcenden­tally ideal forms of intuition, the categories give us
knowledge only of things as they appear with sensibility ("phenomena,"
literally "that which appears").
Although through pure understanding (nous in Greek) we may think of
objects independently of their being given in sensibil­ity, we can
never cognize them as such non-sensible entities ("noumena," literally
"that which is thought" as a subject of some 112 mentions). The
meaning of Kant's use of the term "phenomena" is self-evident, but the
meaning of "noumena" is not, since it literally means not "things as
they are in­ dependently of appearing to us" but something more like
"things as they are understood by pure thought." Yet Kant appears to
deny that the human understanding can comprehend things in the latter
way."
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>
Thus I am proffering an informed and reasoned opinion as that which
Immanuel Kant states is an impossibility for a human being to
accomplish by transcendent sapiential thought and capably demonstrate
it's temporal congruence as coherence by a mathematical theoretical
noumenon as an Intellectual Property which Immanuel Kant himself calls
noumena as the proof of a valid and rational concept attained by pure
thought.
Whilst the HOMOIOS ternary conception of the THEORY OF NUMBER is in
all probability a SENSIBILITY of which Immanuel Kant appears cognisant
and that is exemplified by the conveyance of them as explicit
meta-prototypes descriptors within the formative of his CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE postulates {#1 - Formula of Universal Law / #2 - Formula of
Humanity / #3 - Formula of Autonomy} conveyed within his Groundwork
for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) / Critique of Pure Reason (1781 /
1787) it is then a conundrum as to commensurability of his
articulation in rationally deriving the purest and logical essence of
being and whether his anthropocentric reality still deploys a
counterfactual and impractical intuition which is provisioned by the
genitive prescriptive or the biological normative propositions as
PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal)
+ 0, H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature)
below + GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above], H54 - GUIMEI
[*MARRYING* *MAID* / DUI (ie. #7 - Engendering Nature) below + ZHEN
(ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) above] {ie. Realm of its Nature as
Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon)
+ 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature)
below + SUN (ie. #4- Nature Amended in its Nature) above], H18 - GU
[Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4- Nature Amended in its Nature) below +
GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as
Earth - Formula of Humanity}
ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood)
+ 0, H3 - ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature)
below + KAN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains Nature) above] as
'fundamentality [yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy
[zhen]', H6 - SONG / *JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1 - Nature
Contains Nature) below + QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) above] {ie.
Self identity as Sea - Formula of Autonomy}
THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also
refers to the Sun)
+ H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) above
+ QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN
[Pure Yin / KUN (ie. #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature) above + KUN 
(ie. #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature) below] as FEMALE, H3 -
*TRIAD*: ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature)
below + KAN (ie. #1 - Nature Contains Nature) above] {ie. Fountains as
Formula of Progression of individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER*
OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
The consideration is then one of criteria basis upon which the
anthropological conceptional notion of its sapient freedom {Humanity /
Autonomy} is formulated as either a binomial methodology by a
TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE applied as an encapsulation of an
anti-thetical anthropocentric identity
JEWISH VIEW: H54 - GUIMEI [Marrying Maid / DUI (ie. #7 - Engendering
Nature) below + ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature) above] {ie.
Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law} + H18 - GU
[Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature) below
+ GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as
Earth - Formula of Humanity} = #72 - Self-Love, Holding Oneself Dear;
I-Ching: H39 - Adversity, Obstacles, Limping, Obstruction, Afoot;
Tetra: 79 - Difficulties)
GENTILE VIEW: H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3 - Nature Surmounts
Nature) below + GEN (ie. #8 - Transforming Nature) above] {ie. Realm
of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law} + H9 - XIAOXU
[Lesser Domestication / QIAN (ie. #6 - Form of Nature) below + SUN
(ie. #4 - Nature is Amended in its Nature) above] {ie. System's
Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity} = H36 - MINGYI [Suppression
of the Light / LI (ie. #9 - Autonomous Nature) below + KUN (ie. #1 -
Nature Contains Nature) above])"
Nevertheless when this trinomial HOMOIOS {#81 bits} ontological
conception of #NUMBER deploys a binomial {64 bits} encapsulation as
artifice it then introduces a logical contradiction {H54 + H18 + H6 +
H3 = #81} within it’s DISCRIMINATING NORM and the SOCIETAL ORDER of
things by an incommensurability made against the proprietary,
propriety and probity as the viability of SUI JURIS / MEMRUM VIRILE
which properly is the paradigmatic providence as *ONTIC* necessity
{H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41} as a SOVEREIGN and central characteristic
within the Formula of Autonomy by its purveyance of permissibility
only within the construct of an INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMY in deployment of
a TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE AS CANON OF TRANSPOSITION within the
conception of #NUMBER as the philosophical basis to its methodology
since the MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED
is not homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a
circle”.
Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between such Formula of Universal Law descriptive
statements made against the Formula of Humanity which present an
account on how the cosmology of world is being similarly analogous to
the LIMITED {#9 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS / SEMINAL REASON GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH}
and the normative statements presenting an evaluative account, or an
account of how the syncretic world should be as existentially the
UNLIMITED {#72 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in being optimally
something that should be lived up to; or that should be pursued.
Thusly having given a preliminary definition to our anthropocentric
criteria as impetus for enquiry, we will now consider the practicality
of Kant's reasoning and whether his Categorical Imperative is truly
free of the strictures which is the Latin worldview of perennial
biological duality as the HETEROS viability of things "independently
of their appearing to us" and whether there is to be deduced by a
HOMOIOS noumena modality as the vital basis for a singularity of
existence by which humanity is rationally capable of conceiving
"things as they are understood by pure thought."
- dolf
SEE ALSO: "(SYNCRETIC DRAFT: 25 AUGUST 2018) WHAT IS A METAPHYSICS OF
MORALS: #56 - TARGETED RELIGIOUS #312 - HATRED, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
THEFT AND SLANDER BY MISNOMERED PIETY WITHIN SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE
CÉLÈBRE AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION?"
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Augustus.pdf>
Initial Post: 25 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS {#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE (translation published within English as first European language in 1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist, expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Loading...