Discussion:
-- YOUR ARMY NEEDS YOU AND YOUR RESILIENCE (DON’T F@CK YOUR COUNTY WITH #325 {5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE)
(zu alt für eine Antwort)
dolf
2019-01-04 11:07:35 UTC
Permalink
-- YOUR ARMY NEEDS YOU AND YOUR RESILIENCE (DON’T ***@CK YOUR COUNTY WITH
#325 {5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE)

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 4 January, 2019

For our next update to the GRAPPLE prototype we have to give some
consideration on how to resolve the perennial problem of SOCIAL MEDIA
conquest defined as the:

PRO DOMO {ie. FOR THEIR OWN CAUSE OF IDENTITY}
SUI JURIS AS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {eg: IGNORANCE}
MEMBRUM VIRILE AS #120 / #360 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE

YOUTUBE: "Your Army Needs You, and Your Resilience"



Dynamic within the context of the #72 - ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE quest {#312 -
ATTRIBUTE DIFFERENTIALS / #288 - IDEALISATIONS} for sexual opportunism:

#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPES OF
THE PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159 - SEE KANT'S IDEA B159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
*IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234 - SEE KANT'S IDEA B234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH* #902
- RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC* NECESSITY
COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC ORIGINS), #492
- VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}

#360 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE (ANKH BINOMIAL HETEROS PROTOTYPES OF THE
PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 24 (#32); Ego: 16 (#24),
@3: Sup: 48 (#80); Ego: 24 (#48),
@4: Sup: 80 (#160); Ego: 32 (#80),
@5: Sup: 39 (#199); Ego: 40 (#120),
@6: Sup: 6 (#205); Ego: 48 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
@7: Sup: 62 (#267); Ego: 56 (#224),
@8: Sup: 45 (#312 - CONTRADICTION BY *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS*);
Ego: 64 (#288 - *MEMORIAL*, *REMINDER*, *REMEMBRANCE* COMMON WITH ADOLF
HITLER'S USAGE),
@9: Sup: 36 (#348); Ego: 72 (#360),
Male: #348; Feme: #360
}

Yet egotistically, SOCIAL MEDIA often claims as its integral view, the
resorting to a process as disenfranchising of the essence and soul of the
human dignity itself as the value of the person being the other by its
habituated pervasive carelessness as a culture of disrespect which is
always a quantification as:

#1 - a degree of avaricious want;
#2 - the potential of limitations upon reality;
#3 - a capability to beguile and stupefy with words, the quarry sought as
the object of virile necessity;
#4 - variance of acceptability as the cause for improbability;
#5 - the permissiblity of idealisations;
#6 - the organisational readiness to eliminate any inhibitors to the
physical dynamics of opportunity;
#7 - to facilitate a sporting prowess of a proud accomplishment in a
mutually satisfying purposed delivery; and
#8 - a job well done, always wants more.

I have in the past, even given such cursory universal observations which
are independent of gender and sexual identity as summarily proclaimed but
not exhaustively made of the sexual act. Been accused of over
intellectualising how people engage their wants within this physical act.

Although some have more succinctly surmised as nothing more than a ***@ck you
and then onto the next, until you run out of opportunities.

Now that SAME SEX MARRIAGE has been adopted within LEGISLATION, how
effectively and strategically the GLBTQI COMMUNITY engages within this
process can do more to effectively control and eliminate neo-nazism and
religious extremism than 17 years of the Afghanistan or Iraqi Wars could
ever do.

With the continuing rise of neo-nazism, terrorism and religious bigotry
this nation especially needs you to be mindful of the effect that the
sexual opportunities you make can win that war.

In chaos theory, the butterfly effect is the sensitive dependence on
initial conditions in which a small change in one state of a deterministic
nonlinear system can result in large differences in a later state.

YOUTUBE: "The Butterfly Effect | This Video Will Change Your Life |
Documentary"



Sadly such ignorance of individual #391 - HOMOGENEOUS accountability in
safe guarding any PRO DOMO entitlement without diminishing another party's
SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE human rights / constitutional protections within
sexual opportunism amongst GRINDR users is especially deprecated to the
extent that its culpability and deprivation within the community is worse
than any socially communicable disease of living memory.

So within the coming weeks we're going to give some consideration to
expanding the GRAPPLE prototype with PRO DOMO / SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE
notions as methodology functions.

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION) IDEA:
@B159 THIRD SECTION: OF THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE UNDERSTANDING

SYSTEMATIC PRESENTATION OF ALL SYNTHETIC PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE
UNDERSTANDING
That principles occur anywhere at all is due solely to the pure
understanding, which is not only the faculty of rules with respect to that
which [IDEA: @B198] happens, but is itself the source of the principles in
accordance with which [IDEA: @A159] everything (that can come forward to
us only as object) necessarily falls under rules, since without such rules
the appearances could never amount to cognition of an object corresponding
to them. Even the #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:

SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO BE
#364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 - SEPULCHRE}, AND
#273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184 -
*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182
AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = 11 SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE EVENT
OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR PERSONS AS
MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT,
ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 -
*YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA: @319: "There are many *LAWS* *OF*
*NATURE* {ie. #2184 ipso facto 6 x #364 - OBEDIENT(H7522) {#273 as [#6, #7,
#20, #200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1) *REMEMBRANCE*}, 7 x #312 -
AIDING(H5826) {#273 as [#40, #50, #8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion
(G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*}, 7 x #273 - ASSISTING / DEVOTE ONESELF(H5144)
{#273 as [#1, #200, #9, #5, #50, #8] = asthenes (G0772 ): 1) *WEAK*;
*INCAPACITY*} UNTO THE GOVERNOR GENERAL IS A REQUIREMENT OF ALL CITIZENS
UNDER SECTION VIII OF QUEEN VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT} that we can know
only through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
i.e., nature in general, we cannot come to know through any experience,
because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a priori at the
basis of its possibility.

OBEDIENT(H7522)@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
   @3: Sup: 46 (#60); Ego: 38 (#46),
   @4: Sup: 55 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 9 (#55),
   @5: Sup: 61 (#176); Ego: 6 (#61),
   @6: Sup: 30 (#206); Ego: 50 (#111),
   @7: Sup: 40 (#246); Ego: 10 (#121),
   Male: #246; Feme: #121
}

H7522@{
   @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
   @2: Sup: 68 (#98); Ego: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   @3: Sup: 77 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 9 (#77),
   @4: Sup: 46 (#221); Ego: 50 (#127),
   @5: Sup: 66 (#287); Ego: 20 (#147),
   @6: Sup: 25 (#312); Ego: 40 (#187),
   Male: #312; Feme: #187
} // #430

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #346 % #41 = #18 - Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of
Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra:
49 - Flight;

THOTH MEASURE: #18 - Oh Tutuf, who makest thine appearance in Ati; *I*
*TROUBLE* *MYSELF* *ONLY* *WITH* *MY* *OWN* *AFFAIRS*.

    #VIRTUE: As to Waiting (no. #18), it exits.
    #TOOLS: As to Closing in (no. #58), it enters.
    #POSITION: As to Release (no. #21), it is softness, but
    #TIME: As to Hardness (no. #72), it is leathery toughness.
    #CANON: #169

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_169@{
   @1: Sup: 18 (#18); Ego: 18 (#18),
   @2: Sup: 76 (#94); Ego: 58 (#76),
   @3: Sup: 16 (#110); Ego: 21 (#97),
   @4: Sup: 7 (#117); Ego: 72 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN
AFFAIRS {%18}),
   Male: #117; Feme: #169
} // #169 {#273 as [#6, #7, #20, #200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1)
*REMEMBRANCE*}

#364 as [#6, #2, #200, #90, #6, #50, #10] / #430 as [#30, #200, #90, #50,
#20, #40] = ratsown (H7522): {UMBRA: #14 as #346 % #41 = #18} 1) pleasure,
delight, favour, goodwill, acceptance, will; 1a) goodwill, favour; 1b)
acceptance; 1c) will, desire, pleasure, self-will;

AIDING(H5826)@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 24 (#89); Ego: 70 (#105),
@4: Sup: 31 (#120); Ego: 7 (#112),
@5: Sup: 69 (#189); Ego: 38 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #189; Feme: #150
}

H5826@{
   @1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
   @2: Sup: 29 (#69); Ego: 70 (#110),
   @3: Sup: 36 (#105); Ego: 7 (#117),
   @4: Sup: 74 (#179); Ego: 38 (#155),
   @5: Sup: 3 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego:
10 (#165),
   @6: Sup: 43 (#225); Ego: 40 (#205),
   Male: #225; Feme: #205
} // #367

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #277 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;

THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *INCONSTANT* *MIND*.

    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
   @1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
   @2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186 {#273 as [#40, #50, #8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion
(G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*}

#312 as [#30, #5, #70, #7, #200] / #367 as [#40, #70, #7, #200, #10, #40] =
âzar (H5826): {UMBRA: #4 as #277 % #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *HELP*, *SUCCOUR*,
*SUPPORT*; 1a) (Qal) to help; 1b) (Niphal) to be helped; 1c) (Hiphil) to
help;

DEVOTE ONESELF(H5144)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 66 (#88); Ego: 50 (#66),
@4: Sup: 73 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 7 (#73),
@5: Sup: 30 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 38 (#111),
Male: #191; Feme: #111
}

H5144@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 66 (#88); Ego: 50 (#66),
   @4: Sup: 73 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 7 (#73),
   @5: Sup: 30 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 38 (#111),
   @6: Sup: 36 (#227); Ego: 6 (#117),
   Male: #227; Feme: #117
} // #279

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #257 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching: H8
- Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra: 33
- Closeness;

THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
appearance in Amenta; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SLUGGISH*.

    #VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
    #TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
    #POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
    #TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
    #CANON: #166

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_166@{
   @1: Sup: 11 (#11); Ego: 11 (#11),
   @2: Sup: 62 (#73); Ego: 51 (#62),
   @3: Sup: 5 (#78); Ego: 24 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
   @4: Sup: 4 (#82); Ego: 80 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
   Male: #82; Feme: #166
} // #166 {#273 as [#1, #200, #9, #5, #50, #8] = asthenes (G0772 ): 1)
*WEAK*; *INCAPACITY*}

#273 as [#6, #10, #50, #7, #200] / #279 as [#6, #10, #50, #7, #200, #6] =
nazar (H5144): {UMBRA: #4 as #257 % #41 = #11} 1) to dedicate, consecrate,
separate; 2) (Hiphil) to be a Nazarite, live as a Nazarite; 1a) (Niphal) to
dedicate oneself, devote oneself; 1b) (Hiphil) to keep sacredly separate;
2) *SOVEREIGN*; *ONE* *CHOSEN* *OR* *SET* *APART*; *SEPARATED*; *CROWNED*;
SANCTIFIED;

THEREFORE THE INTERDICTION: “GOD SAVE THE QUEEN FROM YOU FASCISTS” given
the impunity against the DIGNITY ROYAL as an OAK TREE PLANTING upon 27
OCTOBER 1934 BY HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCE HENRY DUKE OF GLOUCESTER
expressed as *CARPE* *DIEM* upon the SATURDAY of 28 OCTOBER 2017 at a
distance of some 40 to 60 metres within the street to passing persons whom
paused and laughed with absolute conviction as derision by means of #325
{#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE MORE PROPERLY DEFINED AS A CONTEMPT BY
MALFEASANCE AS UNLAWFUL CONDUCT BY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY.

G3622@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 80 (#150); Ego: 10 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#169); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 8 (#177); Ego: 70 (#170),
@5: Sup: 58 (#235 - ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @235 ON 7 JUNE 1942
AS SHOOTING ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY OF THESE SELF-STYLED BIBLE STUDENTS
(BIBELFORSCHER}); Ego: 50 (#220),
@6: Sup: 47 (#282); Ego: 70 (#290),
@7: Sup: 6 (#288 - UMBRA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS) / BEERSHEBA /
ANTI-SEMITISM); Ego: 40 (#330), <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* /
*ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360
@8: Sup: 16 (#304); Ego: 10 (#340),
@9: Sup: 17 (#321 as *PRO* *DOMO* (G156): BEING (LOGICAL) REASON
(MOTIVE, MATTER), (LEGAL) CRIME (ALLEGED OR PROVED)); Ego: 1 (#341 - *TO*
*PUT* *A* *NAME* *UPON*, *NAME* AS #444 - *SPORT* / *31ST* *DECEMBER* *AS*
*END**OF* *TROPICAL* *YEAR*),
@10: Sup: 67 (#388); Ego: 50 (#391),
Male: #388; Feme: #391
} // #391

REGARDING PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 -
ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}

V'S

PRINCIPLE OF #391 - HOMOGENEOUS STEWARDSHIP {#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) =
#1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 = #273 - *MOMENT*}

#371 as [#30, #40, #100, #200, #1] = miqra' (H4744): {UMBRA: #4 as #341 %
#41 = #13 *AS* *DATA* *MANIPULATION* *BEING* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *AN*
*INTENTION* *TO* *HIJACK* *WORLD* *WAR* *ONE* *CENTENNIAL* #288 -
*MEMORIAL* COMMEMORATIONS AS SAINT ANDREWS 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BY
INCESSANT LIEUTENANTS OF ROMAN CATHOLIC / FREEMASONRY KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL BEING A NEO-FASCIST FOREIGN POWER BY IMPOST OF AN ABHORRENT
RELIGIOUS PRACTICE THAT IS PROHIBITED UNDER SECTION 116 OF THE AUSTRALIAN
CONSTITUTION} 1) convocation, convoking, reading, a calling together; 1a)
convocation, *SACRED* *ASSEMBLY*; 1b) convoking; 1c) reading;

#371 as [#6, #70, #90, #200, #5] = `atsarah (H6116): {UMBRA: #5 as #365 %
#41 = #37 *AS* *DATA* MANIPULATION TO THE SOLAR YEAR CYCLE ENDING 31
DECEMBER: #341 / #444} 1) assembly, solemn assembly; 1a) *ASSEMBLY*
(*SACRED* *OR* *FESTIVE* *MEETING*); 1b) *ASSEMBLAGE*, #123 - *COMPANY*,
#369 - *GROUP*.

#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {UMBRA: #11 as #341 % #41 = #13 AS DATA MANIPULATION TO *31ST*
*DECEMBER* *AS* *END**OF* *TROPICAL* *YEAR*} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF*
*A* *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the office
of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration, dispensation;

#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {UMBRA: #12 as
#460 % #41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling;
1b) like: ie. corresponding to a thing;

#541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
(G3622): {UMBRA: #56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the office
of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration, dispensation;

#541 as [#5, #70, #2, #4, #400, #50, #10] = `abad (H5647): {UMBRA: #42 as
#541 % #41 = #8} 1) to work, serve; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to labour, work, do
work; 1a2) to work for another, serve another by labour; 1a3) to serve as
subjects; 1a4) to serve (God); 1a5) to serve (with Levitical service); 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be worked, be tilled (of land); 1b2) to make oneself a
servant; 1c) (Pual) to be worked; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to compel to labour or
work, cause to labour, cause to serve; 1d2) to cause to serve as subjects;
1e) (Hophal) to be led or enticed to serve;

#541 as [#50, #1, #90, #400] = na'ats (H5006): {UMBRA: #31 as #541 % #41 =
#8} 1) to spurn, contemn, despise, abhor; 1a) (Qal) to spurn, contemn; 1b)
(Piel); 1b1) to spurn; 1b2) to cause to contemn; 1c) (Hiphil) to spurn; 1d)
(Hithpolel) to be contemned;

#541 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #300, #5, #50, #5, #10] = apokteino (G615):
{UMBRA: #60 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to kill in any way whatever; 2) metaph.
to extinguish, abolish; 1a) to destroy, to allow to perish; 2a) to inflict
mortal death; 2b) to deprive of spiritual life and procure eternal misery
in hell;

It also provides understanding of the underlying methodology as the
precedent PRO DOMO IDEA (12 MAY 1942) @215 / @235 (7 JUNE 1942) assigned to
ADOLF HITLER’S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK depiction as the shooting of one
hundred and thirty bible students whom were indicted by the highest
military court of the Wehrmacht charged with demoralization of the armed
forces.

THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE IDEA @215 - I AM
NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34}

#325 (PYTHAGOREAN ESOTERIC VALUE FOR #65 - *SOLDIER* AND KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL AS UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER) as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis
(G1520): {UMBRA: #12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*

#235 as [#20, #7, #200, #8] = zarach (H2224): {UMBRA: #1 as #215 % #41 =
#10} 1) *TO* *RISE*, *COME* *FORTH*, *BREAK* *OUT*, *ARISE*, *RISE* *UP*,
*SHINE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to rise; 1a2) to come out, appear;

#175 {MARRIAGE} (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous
Nature [#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...

210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]

TOTAL: @210 + @215 + @220 + @228 = #873 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE OF
SUBSTANCE as [#80, #5, #100, #10, #70, #600, #8] = perioche (G4042):
{UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12} 1) an encompassing, compass, circuit; 2) that
which is contained; 2a) the contents of any writing SUCH AS QUEEN VICTORIAS
LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS DICTUM OF #2184 - FREEDOM from #1827 -
OPPRESSION is:

#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC* necessity
comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic origins),

#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and

#391 - HOMOGENIOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY

That inhumanity as a lack of sapience is then an endless conflict against
nature itself."

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as the
sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so we
cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
*PRINCIPLES* {ie. #390 + #312 + #390 = #1092 or #364 + #312 + #728 + #390 +
#390 = @2184} *OF* *THEIR* *CONNECTION* *IN* *US*, i.e., *FROM* *THE*
*CONDITIONS* *OF* *NECESSARY* *UNIFICATION* *IN* *ONE* *CONSCIOUSNESS*,
*WHICH* *UNIFICATION* *CONSTITUTES* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*."
[page 70]

SECTION VI: "And whereas by 'The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
1900,' {#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}} it is amongst other
things enacted, that we may authorise the GOVERNOR GENERAL to APPOINT any
person or persons, jointly or severally, to be his DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES:
{#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 14 =
#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}} within any part of Our Commonwealth,
and in that capacity to exercise, during the pleasure of the GOVERNOR
GENERAL such POWERS, and FUNCTIONS of the said GOVERNOR GENERAL as he
thinks fit to assign to such DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES, subject to any #168 -
*LIMITATIONS* and directions as aforesaid, to APPOINT any person or
persons, jointly or severally. To be his DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES within any part
of Our said Commonwealth of Australia, and in that capacity to exercise,
during his pleasure, such of his POWERS and FUNCTIONS, as he may deem it
necessary or expedient to assign to him or them: Provided always, that the
APPOINTMENT of such a DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES shall not affect the exercise by
the GOVERNOR GENERAL himself of any POWER or FUNCTION."

SECTION VII: "And We do hereby declare Our pleasure to be that, in the
event of death, #273 - INCAPACITY, removal, or absence of Our said GOVERNOR
GENERAL out of Our said Commonwealth, and all and EVERY THE POWERS AND
AUTHORITIES herein granted to him shall until Our further pleasure is
signified therein, be vested in such person as may be APPOINTED by Us under
Our Sign Manual and Signet to be Our LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR of Our said
Commonwealth: or if there shall be no such LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR in Our said
Commonwealth, then in such person or persons as may be APPOINTED by Us
under Our Sign Manual and Signet to administer the Government of the same.
No SUCH POWERS OR AUTHORITIES SHALL VEST in such LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, or
such other person or persons, UNTIL HE OR THEY SHALL HAVE TAKEN THE #108 -
*OATHS* *APPOINTED* {

"They clave to their brethren, their nobles, and entered into a curse, and
into an oath, to walk in God's law, which was given by Moses the servant of
God, and to observe and do all the commandments of the LORD our Lord, and
his judgments and his statutes {#108 as [#8, #100] = choq (H2706):
statute};" [Nehemiah 10:29 (KJV)]

} to be taken by the GOVERNOR GENERAL of Our said Commonwealth, and in the
manner provided by the Instructions accompanying these Our Letters Patent."

ASSOCIATED TO THE DIGNITY ROYAL AS SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE #390 -
SOVEREIGN ENTITLEMENT {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 21 = #104 - COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}}:

H5157@{
   @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
   @2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
   @3: Sup: 68 (#138); Ego: 8 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   @4: Sup: 17 (#155); Ego: 30 (#98),
   @5: Sup: 23 (#178); Ego: 6 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   Male: #178; Feme: #104
} // #104

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra:
34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.

    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
   @1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
   @2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   @3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   @4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#104 as [#10, #50, #8, #30, #6] = nachal (H5157): {UMBRA: #16 as #104 % #41
= #22} 1) to get as a possession, acquire, inherit, possess; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to take possession, inherit; 1a2) to have or get as a possession or
property (fig.); 1a3) to divide the land for a possession; 1a4) to acquire
(testimonies) (fig.); 1b) (Piel) to divide for a possession; 1c) (Hithpael)
to possess oneself of; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to give as a possession; 1d2) to
cause to inherit, give as an inheritance; 1e) (Hophal) to be allotted, be
made to possess;

SECTION IX: “And We do hereby reserve to Ourselves Our #104 - HEIRS AND
SUCCESSORS, FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY FROM TIME TO TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR
AMEND these Our Letters Patent, as to Us or THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”

If they are considered as fundamental laws of the empirical use of the
understanding, at the same time carry with them an expression of necessity,
hence at least the presumption of being determined from grounds that are
valid a priori and before all experience. But all #2184 - *LAWS* *OF*
*NATURE*, without distinction, fall under higher principles of the
understanding, since they merely apply such principles to particular cases
of appearance.

... The table of categories provides us with completely natural
instructions [IDEA: @A161 / @B200] for the table of principles, since these
principles are indeed nothing other than rules for the objective use of the
categories." [pages 180 - 181]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION) IDEA:
@B252 SECOND ANALOGY: PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF
CAUSALITY

ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF
CAUSE AND EFFECT.
PROOF: I perceive that appearances succeed one another, that is, that
[IDEA: @B233] one state of a thing exists at one time, the opposite of
which existed in the previous state. I am therefore actually connecting two
perceptions in time. Now connection is no act of mere sense and intuition,
but is here the product of a synthetic faculty of the imagination that
determines the inner sense with respect to relation in time. The
imagination can however conjoin the aforementioned two states in two
different ways, so that either one or the other would precede in time; for
time cannot be perceived in itself and what precedes and what follows in
objects determined, as it were empirically, in relation to it. I am
therefore conscious only that my imagination places one state before, the
other after, not that in the object [IDEA: @B234] one precedes the other;
or, in other words, the objective relation of the appearances that succeed
one another remains undetermined through mere perception. In order then for
this relation to be cognized as determined, the relation between the two
states must be so thought that it is thereby determined with necessity
which of them must be placed before, which after, and not the reverse.
However, the concept that carries with it a necessity of synthetic unity
can only be a pure concept of the understanding, which does not lie in
perception – and here it is the concept of the relation of cause and
effect, in which the former determines the latter in time as consequence,
and not merely as something that could precede it in the imagination (or
not be perceived at all). It is, then, only because we subject the
succession of appearances, hence all alterations, to the law of causality
that experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the appearances – is
possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects of experience are
possible only in accordance with this very law.

The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
[IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one another. Whether
they also succeed one another in the object is a further point for
reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in fact
call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is conscious
of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation what this
word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not insofar as they
(as representations) [A: @190] are objects, but only in so far as they
designate an object. In as much as they, merely as representations, are at
the same time objects of consciousness, they are not at all to be
distinguished from apprehension, i.e., reception into the synthesis of the
imagination, and one must then say: that the manifold of appearances is
always generated successively in the mind. Were appearances things in
themselves, then no human being would be able to conclude from the
succession of representations how the manifold of those appearances might
be conjoined in the object. For in the end we have to do only with our own
representations; how things in themselves may be (without regard to
representations through which they affect us) is completely beyond our
sphere of cognition. Now although the appearances are not things in
themselves, and nevertheless are the only thing that can be given to us for
cognition, I still have to show what in the appearances themselves may suit
the manifold for a conjoining in time, notwithstanding that its
representation in apprehension is always successive. Thus, for example, the
apprehension of the manifold in the appearances of a house that stands
before me is successive. Now the question is: whether the manifold of this
house itself also is successive in itself, which of course no one will
grant. However, as soon as I raise my concept of an object up to
transcendental significance, the house is now indeed no thing in itself,
but [IDEA: @B236] only an appearance, i.e., a representation, whose
transcendental object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown; what, then, shall I
understand by the question: how might the manifold be conjoined in the
appearance itself (which is still nothing in itself )? That which lies in
the successive apprehension is here viewed as representation, while the
appearance that is given to me, notwithstanding that it is nothing more
than a sum of such representations, is viewed as their object – with which
my concept, which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has
to agree. Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can
easily be seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of
empirical truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the
representations of apprehension, can only be represented as their object
that is distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it
from every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
necessary rule of apprehension is the object.

Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
@B237] cannot be perceived empirically unless preceded by an appearance
that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state in itself; for a reality
following upon an empty time, hence, a coming to be that no state of things
precedes, can be apprehended just as little as empty time itself. Every
apprehension of an event is therefore a perception that follows upon
another perception. Since this is, though, the case with every synthesis of
apprehension, as I have shown above in the appearance of a house, it does
not in this way yet distinguish itself from the others. But I also note:
that if, in an appearance containing a happening, I call the preceding
state of perception A and the succeeding one B, then B can only follow A in
the apprehension, while the perception a cannot follow but only precede B.
I see for example a ship drifting downstream. My perception of its location
further down succeeds the perception of its location further up the course
of the river, and it is impossible that in the apprehension of this
appearance the ship should first be perceived further downstream but
afterwards further upstream. Here, then, the order in the succession of
perceptions in the apprehension is determined, and the apprehension is
bound by that order. In the previous example of a house, in the
apprehension my perceptions could start at [IDEA: @B238] the top of the
house and end with the ground, or else start from below and end above, just
as they could apprehend the manifold of empirical intuition from the right
or the left. In the series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was,
then, no determined order making it necessary when in the apprehension I
had to begin in order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is,
however, always to be met with in the perception of something that happens,
and it makes the order of the perceptions succeeding one another (in the
apprehension of this appearance) necessary.

In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing about
the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is completely
arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the order of the
manifold of the appearance according to which the apprehension of the one
(what happens) follows upon that of the other (which precedes) according to
a rule. Only in this way can I gain the right to say of the appearance
itself, and not merely of my apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be
found – which is as much as to say that I cannot institute the apprehension
otherwise than exactly in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF
PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, SECOND ANALOGY of
ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES, pp 184-187]

YOUR COUNTRY NEEDS YOU TO PLAY YOUR PART AND DON'T LET neo-nazism,
terrorism and religious bigotry BECOME AN UNSTOPPABLE PLAQUE

<Loading Image...>

WHAT HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN?

- dolf

Initial Post: 4 January 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2019-01-04 20:42:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
#325 {5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE)
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 4 January, 2019
YOUTUBE: “In the Navy (Village People)”


Post by dolf
For our next update to the GRAPPLE prototype we have to give some
consideration on how to resolve the perennial problem of SOCIAL MEDIA
PRO DOMO {ie. FOR THEIR OWN CAUSE OF IDENTITY}
SUI JURIS AS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {eg: IGNORANCE}
MEMBRUM VIRILE AS #120 / #360 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE
YOUTUBE: "Your Army Needs You, and Your Resilience"
http://youtu.be/YFGHEZMSek4
Dynamic within the context of the #72 - ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE quest {#312 -
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPES OF
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159 - SEE KANT'S IDEA B159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND*
*IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234 - SEE KANT'S IDEA B234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH* #902
- RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC* NECESSITY
COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC ORIGINS), #492
- VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}
#360 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE (ANKH BINOMIAL HETEROS PROTOTYPES OF THE
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 24 (#32); Ego: 16 (#24),
@3: Sup: 48 (#80); Ego: 24 (#48),
@4: Sup: 80 (#160); Ego: 32 (#80),
@5: Sup: 39 (#199); Ego: 40 (#120),
@6: Sup: 6 (#205); Ego: 48 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
@7: Sup: 62 (#267); Ego: 56 (#224),
@8: Sup: 45 (#312 - CONTRADICTION BY *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS*);
Ego: 64 (#288 - *MEMORIAL*, *REMINDER*, *REMEMBRANCE* COMMON WITH ADOLF
HITLER'S USAGE),
@9: Sup: 36 (#348); Ego: 72 (#360),
Male: #348; Feme: #360
}
Yet egotistically, SOCIAL MEDIA often claims as its integral view, the
resorting to a process as disenfranchising of the essence and soul of the
human dignity itself as the value of the person being the other by its
habituated pervasive carelessness as a culture of disrespect which is
#1 - a degree of avaricious want;
#2 - the potential of limitations upon reality;
#3 - a capability to beguile and stupefy with words, the quarry sought as
the object of virile necessity;
#4 - variance of acceptability as the cause for improbability;
#5 - the permissiblity of idealisations;
#6 - the organisational readiness to eliminate any inhibitors to the
physical dynamics of opportunity;
#7 - to facilitate a sporting prowess of a proud accomplishment in a
mutually satisfying purposed delivery; and
#8 - a job well done, always wants more.
I have in the past, even given such cursory universal observations which
are independent of gender and sexual identity as summarily proclaimed but
not exhaustively made of the sexual act. Been accused of over
intellectualising how people engage their wants within this physical act.
and then onto the next, until you run out of opportunities.
Now that SAME SEX MARRIAGE has been adopted within LEGISLATION, how
effectively and strategically the GLBTQI COMMUNITY engages within this
process can do more to effectively control and eliminate neo-nazism and
religious extremism than 17 years of the Afghanistan or Iraqi Wars could
ever do.
With the continuing rise of neo-nazism, terrorism and religious bigotry
this nation especially needs you to be mindful of the effect that the
sexual opportunities you make can win that war.
In chaos theory, the butterfly effect is the sensitive dependence on
initial conditions in which a small change in one state of a deterministic
nonlinear system can result in large differences in a later state.
YOUTUBE: "The Butterfly Effect | This Video Will Change Your Life |
Documentary"
http://youtu.be/G2xFJUSLEv8
Sadly such ignorance of individual #391 - HOMOGENEOUS accountability in
safe guarding any PRO DOMO entitlement without diminishing another party's
SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE human rights / constitutional protections within
sexual opportunism amongst GRINDR users is especially deprecated to the
extent that its culpability and deprivation within the community is worse
than any socially communicable disease of living memory.
So within the coming weeks we're going to give some consideration to
expanding the GRAPPLE prototype with PRO DOMO / SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE
notions as methodology functions.
@B159 THIRD SECTION: OF THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE UNDERSTANDING
SYSTEMATIC PRESENTATION OF ALL SYNTHETIC PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE
UNDERSTANDING
That principles occur anywhere at all is due solely to the pure
understanding, which is not only the faculty of rules with respect to that
us only as object) necessarily falls under rules, since without such rules
the appearances could never amount to cognition of an object corresponding
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO BE
#364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 - SEPULCHRE}, AND
#273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184 -
*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182
AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = 11 SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE EVENT
OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR PERSONS AS
MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT,
ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 -
*YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
*NATURE* {ie. #2184 ipso facto 6 x #364 - OBEDIENT(H7522) {#273 as [#6, #7,
#20, #200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1) *REMEMBRANCE*}, 7 x #312 -
AIDING(H5826) {#273 as [#40, #50, #8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion
(G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*}, 7 x #273 - ASSISTING / DEVOTE ONESELF(H5144)
{#273 as [#1, #200, #9, #5, #50, #8] = asthenes (G0772 ): 1) *WEAK*;
*INCAPACITY*} UNTO THE GOVERNOR GENERAL IS A REQUIREMENT OF ALL CITIZENS
UNDER SECTION VIII OF QUEEN VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT} that we can know
only through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances,
i.e., nature in general, we cannot come to know through any experience,
because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a priori at the
basis of its possibility.
   Male: #246; Feme: #121
}
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   Male: #312; Feme: #187
} // #430
UMBRA: #346 % #41 = #18 - Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of
49 - Flight;
THOTH MEASURE: #18 - Oh Tutuf, who makest thine appearance in Ati; *I*
*TROUBLE* *MYSELF* *ONLY* *WITH* *MY* *OWN* *AFFAIRS*.
    #VIRTUE: As to Waiting (no. #18), it exits.
    #TOOLS: As to Closing in (no. #58), it enters.
    #POSITION: As to Release (no. #21), it is softness, but
    #TIME: As to Hardness (no. #72), it is leathery toughness.
    #CANON: #169
AFFAIRS {%18}),
   Male: #117; Feme: #169
} // #169 {#273 as [#6, #7, #20, #200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1)
*REMEMBRANCE*}
#364 as [#6, #2, #200, #90, #6, #50, #10] / #430 as [#30, #200, #90, #50,
#20, #40] = ratsown (H7522): {UMBRA: #14 as #346 % #41 = #18} 1) pleasure,
delight, favour, goodwill, acceptance, will; 1a) goodwill, favour; 1b)
acceptance; 1c) will, desire, pleasure, self-will;
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 24 (#89); Ego: 70 (#105),
@4: Sup: 31 (#120); Ego: 7 (#112),
@5: Sup: 69 (#189); Ego: 38 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #189; Feme: #150
}
10 (#165),
   Male: #225; Feme: #205
} // #367
UMBRA: #277 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;
THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *INCONSTANT* *MIND*.
    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186
{%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186 {#273 as [#40, #50, #8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion
(G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*}
#312 as [#30, #5, #70, #7, #200] / #367 as [#40, #70, #7, #200, #10, #40] =
âzar (H5826): {UMBRA: #4 as #277 % #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *HELP*, *SUCCOUR*,
*SUPPORT*; 1a) (Qal) to help; 1b) (Niphal) to be helped; 1c) (Hiphil) to
help;
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 66 (#88); Ego: 50 (#66),
@4: Sup: 73 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 7 (#73),
@5: Sup: 30 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 38 (#111),
Male: #191; Feme: #111
}
{%32}); Ego: 38 (#111),
   Male: #227; Feme: #117
} // #279
UMBRA: #257 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching: H8
- Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra: 33
- Closeness;
THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
appearance in Amenta; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SLUGGISH*.
    #VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
    #TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
    #POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
    #TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
    #CANON: #166
   Male: #82; Feme: #166
} // #166 {#273 as [#1, #200, #9, #5, #50, #8] = asthenes (G0772 ): 1)
*WEAK*; *INCAPACITY*}
#273 as [#6, #10, #50, #7, #200] / #279 as [#6, #10, #50, #7, #200, #6] =
nazar (H5144): {UMBRA: #4 as #257 % #41 = #11} 1) to dedicate, consecrate,
separate; 2) (Hiphil) to be a Nazarite, live as a Nazarite; 1a) (Niphal) to
dedicate oneself, devote oneself; 1b) (Hiphil) to keep sacredly separate;
2) *SOVEREIGN*; *ONE* *CHOSEN* *OR* *SET* *APART*; *SEPARATED*; *CROWNED*;
SANCTIFIED;
THEREFORE THE INTERDICTION: “GOD SAVE THE QUEEN FROM YOU FASCISTS” given
the impunity against the DIGNITY ROYAL as an OAK TREE PLANTING upon 27
OCTOBER 1934 BY HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCE HENRY DUKE OF GLOUCESTER
expressed as *CARPE* *DIEM* upon the SATURDAY of 28 OCTOBER 2017 at a
distance of some 40 to 60 metres within the street to passing persons whom
paused and laughed with absolute conviction as derision by means of #325
{#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE MORE PROPERLY DEFINED AS A CONTEMPT BY
MALFEASANCE AS UNLAWFUL CONDUCT BY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY.
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 80 (#150); Ego: 10 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#169); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 8 (#177); Ego: 70 (#170),
@5: Sup: 58 (#235 - ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @235 ON 7 JUNE 1942
AS SHOOTING ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY OF THESE SELF-STYLED BIBLE STUDENTS
(BIBELFORSCHER}); Ego: 50 (#220),
@6: Sup: 47 (#282); Ego: 70 (#290),
@7: Sup: 6 (#288 - UMBRA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS) / BEERSHEBA /
ANTI-SEMITISM); Ego: 40 (#330), <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* /
*ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360
@8: Sup: 16 (#304); Ego: 10 (#340),
@9: Sup: 17 (#321 as *PRO* *DOMO* (G156): BEING (LOGICAL) REASON
(MOTIVE, MATTER), (LEGAL) CRIME (ALLEGED OR PROVED)); Ego: 1 (#341 - *TO*
*PUT* *A* *NAME* *UPON*, *NAME* AS #444 - *SPORT* / *31ST* *DECEMBER* *AS*
*END**OF* *TROPICAL* *YEAR*),
@10: Sup: 67 (#388); Ego: 50 (#391),
Male: #388; Feme: #391
} // #391
REGARDING PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 -
ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}
V'S
PRINCIPLE OF #391 - HOMOGENEOUS STEWARDSHIP {#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) =
#1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 = #273 - *MOMENT*}
#371 as [#30, #40, #100, #200, #1] = miqra' (H4744): {UMBRA: #4 as #341 %
#41 = #13 *AS* *DATA* *MANIPULATION* *BEING* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *AN*
*INTENTION* *TO* *HIJACK* *WORLD* *WAR* *ONE* *CENTENNIAL* #288 -
*MEMORIAL* COMMEMORATIONS AS SAINT ANDREWS 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BY
INCESSANT LIEUTENANTS OF ROMAN CATHOLIC / FREEMASONRY KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL BEING A NEO-FASCIST FOREIGN POWER BY IMPOST OF AN ABHORRENT
RELIGIOUS PRACTICE THAT IS PROHIBITED UNDER SECTION 116 OF THE AUSTRALIAN
CONSTITUTION} 1) convocation, convoking, reading, a calling together; 1a)
convocation, *SACRED* *ASSEMBLY*; 1b) convoking; 1c) reading;
#371 as [#6, #70, #90, #200, #5] = `atsarah (H6116): {UMBRA: #5 as #365 %
#41 = #37 *AS* *DATA* MANIPULATION TO THE SOLAR YEAR CYCLE ENDING 31
DECEMBER: #341 / #444} 1) assembly, solemn assembly; 1a) *ASSEMBLY*
(*SACRED* *OR* *FESTIVE* *MEETING*); 1b) *ASSEMBLAGE*, #123 - *COMPANY*,
#369 - *GROUP*.
#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {UMBRA: #11 as #341 % #41 = #13 AS DATA MANIPULATION TO *31ST*
*DECEMBER* *AS* *END**OF* *TROPICAL* *YEAR*} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF*
*A* *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the office
of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration, dispensation;
#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {UMBRA: #12 as
#460 % #41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling;
1b) like: ie. corresponding to a thing;
#541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
(G3622): {UMBRA: #56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the office
of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration, dispensation;
#541 as [#5, #70, #2, #4, #400, #50, #10] = `abad (H5647): {UMBRA: #42 as
#541 % #41 = #8} 1) to work, serve; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to labour, work, do
work; 1a2) to work for another, serve another by labour; 1a3) to serve as
subjects; 1a4) to serve (God); 1a5) to serve (with Levitical service); 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to be worked, be tilled (of land); 1b2) to make oneself a
servant; 1c) (Pual) to be worked; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to compel to labour or
work, cause to labour, cause to serve; 1d2) to cause to serve as subjects;
1e) (Hophal) to be led or enticed to serve;
#541 as [#50, #1, #90, #400] = na'ats (H5006): {UMBRA: #31 as #541 % #41 =
#8} 1) to spurn, contemn, despise, abhor; 1a) (Qal) to spurn, contemn; 1b)
(Piel); 1b1) to spurn; 1b2) to cause to contemn; 1c) (Hiphil) to spurn; 1d)
(Hithpolel) to be contemned;
{UMBRA: #60 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to kill in any way whatever; 2) metaph.
to extinguish, abolish; 1a) to destroy, to allow to perish; 2a) to inflict
mortal death; 2b) to deprive of spiritual life and procure eternal misery
in hell;
It also provides understanding of the underlying methodology as the
ADOLF HITLER’S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK depiction as the shooting of one
hundred and thirty bible students whom were indicted by the highest
military court of the Wehrmacht charged with demoralization of the armed
forces.
NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34}
#325 (PYTHAGOREAN ESOTERIC VALUE FOR #65 - *SOLDIER* AND KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL AS UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER) as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis
(G1520): {UMBRA: #12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*
#235 as [#20, #7, #200, #8] = zarach (H2224): {UMBRA: #1 as #215 % #41 =
#10} 1) *TO* *RISE*, *COME* *FORTH*, *BREAK* *OUT*, *ARISE*, *RISE* *UP*,
*SHINE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to rise; 1a2) to come out, appear;
Nature [#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
{UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12} 1) an encompassing, compass, circuit; 2) that
which is contained; 2a) the contents of any writing SUCH AS QUEEN VICTORIAS
LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS DICTUM OF #2184 - FREEDOM from #1827 -
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC* necessity
comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENIOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
That inhumanity as a lack of sapience is then an endless conflict against
nature itself."
The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as the
sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so we
cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
*PRINCIPLES* {ie. #390 + #312 + #390 = #1092 or #364 + #312 + #728 + #390 +
*CONDITIONS* *OF* *NECESSARY* *UNIFICATION* *IN* *ONE* *CONSCIOUSNESS*,
*WHICH* *UNIFICATION* *CONSTITUTES* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*."
[page 70]
SECTION VI: "And whereas by 'The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
1900,' {#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}} it is amongst other
things enacted, that we may authorise the GOVERNOR GENERAL to APPOINT any
{#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 14 =
#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}} within any part of Our Commonwealth,
and in that capacity to exercise, during the pleasure of the GOVERNOR
GENERAL such POWERS, and FUNCTIONS of the said GOVERNOR GENERAL as he
thinks fit to assign to such DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES, subject to any #168 -
*LIMITATIONS* and directions as aforesaid, to APPOINT any person or
persons, jointly or severally. To be his DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES within any part
of Our said Commonwealth of Australia, and in that capacity to exercise,
during his pleasure, such of his POWERS and FUNCTIONS, as he may deem it
necessary or expedient to assign to him or them: Provided always, that the
APPOINTMENT of such a DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES shall not affect the exercise by
the GOVERNOR GENERAL himself of any POWER or FUNCTION."
SECTION VII: "And We do hereby declare Our pleasure to be that, in the
event of death, #273 - INCAPACITY, removal, or absence of Our said GOVERNOR
GENERAL out of Our said Commonwealth, and all and EVERY THE POWERS AND
AUTHORITIES herein granted to him shall until Our further pleasure is
signified therein, be vested in such person as may be APPOINTED by Us under
Our Sign Manual and Signet to be Our LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR of Our said
Commonwealth: or if there shall be no such LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR in Our said
Commonwealth, then in such person or persons as may be APPOINTED by Us
under Our Sign Manual and Signet to administer the Government of the same.
No SUCH POWERS OR AUTHORITIES SHALL VEST in such LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, or
such other person or persons, UNTIL HE OR THEY SHALL HAVE TAKEN THE #108 -
*OATHS* *APPOINTED* {
"They clave to their brethren, their nobles, and entered into a curse, and
into an oath, to walk in God's law, which was given by Moses the servant of
God, and to observe and do all the commandments of the LORD our Lord, and
statute};" [Nehemiah 10:29 (KJV)]
} to be taken by the GOVERNOR GENERAL of Our said Commonwealth, and in the
manner provided by the Instructions accompanying these Our Letters Patent."
ASSOCIATED TO THE DIGNITY ROYAL AS SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE #390 -
SOVEREIGN ENTITLEMENT {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   Male: #178; Feme: #104
} // #104
34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.
    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175
   Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#104 as [#10, #50, #8, #30, #6] = nachal (H5157): {UMBRA: #16 as #104 % #41
= #22} 1) to get as a possession, acquire, inherit, possess; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to take possession, inherit; 1a2) to have or get as a possession or
property (fig.); 1a3) to divide the land for a possession; 1a4) to acquire
(testimonies) (fig.); 1b) (Piel) to divide for a possession; 1c) (Hithpael)
to possess oneself of; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to give as a possession; 1d2) to
cause to inherit, give as an inheritance; 1e) (Hophal) to be allotted, be
made to possess;
SECTION IX: “And We do hereby reserve to Ourselves Our #104 - HEIRS AND
SUCCESSORS, FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY FROM TIME TO TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR
AMEND these Our Letters Patent, as to Us or THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”
If they are considered as fundamental laws of the empirical use of the
understanding, at the same time carry with them an expression of necessity,
hence at least the presumption of being determined from grounds that are
valid a priori and before all experience. But all #2184 - *LAWS* *OF*
*NATURE*, without distinction, fall under higher principles of the
understanding, since they merely apply such principles to particular cases
of appearance.
... The table of categories provides us with completely natural
principles are indeed nothing other than rules for the objective use of the
categories." [pages 180 - 181]
@B252 SECOND ANALOGY: PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF
CAUSALITY
ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF
CAUSE AND EFFECT.
PROOF: I perceive that appearances succeed one another, that is, that
which existed in the previous state. I am therefore actually connecting two
perceptions in time. Now connection is no act of mere sense and intuition,
but is here the product of a synthetic faculty of the imagination that
determines the inner sense with respect to relation in time. The
imagination can however conjoin the aforementioned two states in two
different ways, so that either one or the other would precede in time; for
time cannot be perceived in itself and what precedes and what follows in
objects determined, as it were empirically, in relation to it. I am
therefore conscious only that my imagination places one state before, the
or, in other words, the objective relation of the appearances that succeed
one another remains undetermined through mere perception. In order then for
this relation to be cognized as determined, the relation between the two
states must be so thought that it is thereby determined with necessity
which of them must be placed before, which after, and not the reverse.
However, the concept that carries with it a necessity of synthetic unity
can only be a pure concept of the understanding, which does not lie in
perception – and here it is the concept of the relation of cause and
effect, in which the former determines the latter in time as consequence,
and not merely as something that could precede it in the imagination (or
not be perceived at all). It is, then, only because we subject the
succession of appearances, hence all alterations, to the law of causality
that experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the appearances – is
possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects of experience are
possible only in accordance with this very law.
The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
they also succeed one another in the object is a further point for
reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in fact
call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is conscious
of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation what this
designate an object. In as much as they, merely as representations, are at
the same time objects of consciousness, they are not at all to be
distinguished from apprehension, i.e., reception into the synthesis of the
imagination, and one must then say: that the manifold of appearances is
always generated successively in the mind. Were appearances things in
themselves, then no human being would be able to conclude from the
succession of representations how the manifold of those appearances might
be conjoined in the object. For in the end we have to do only with our own
representations; how things in themselves may be (without regard to
representations through which they affect us) is completely beyond our
sphere of cognition. Now although the appearances are not things in
themselves, and nevertheless are the only thing that can be given to us for
cognition, I still have to show what in the appearances themselves may suit
the manifold for a conjoining in time, notwithstanding that its
representation in apprehension is always successive. Thus, for example, the
apprehension of the manifold in the appearances of a house that stands
before me is successive. Now the question is: whether the manifold of this
house itself also is successive in itself, which of course no one will
grant. However, as soon as I raise my concept of an object up to
transcendental significance, the house is now indeed no thing in itself,
understand by the question: how might the manifold be conjoined in the
appearance itself (which is still nothing in itself )? That which lies in
the successive apprehension is here viewed as representation, while the
appearance that is given to me, notwithstanding that it is nothing more
than a sum of such representations, is viewed as their object – with which
my concept, which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has
to agree. Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can
easily be seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of
empirical truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the
representations of apprehension, can only be represented as their object
that is distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it
from every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
@B237] cannot be perceived empirically unless preceded by an appearance
following upon an empty time, hence, a coming to be that no state of things
precedes, can be apprehended just as little as empty time itself. Every
apprehension of an event is therefore a perception that follows upon
another perception. Since this is, though, the case with every synthesis of
apprehension, as I have shown above in the appearance of a house, it does
that if, in an appearance containing a happening, I call the preceding
state of perception A and the succeeding one B, then B can only follow A in
the apprehension, while the perception a cannot follow but only precede B.
I see for example a ship drifting downstream. My perception of its location
further down succeeds the perception of its location further up the course
of the river, and it is impossible that in the apprehension of this
appearance the ship should first be perceived further downstream but
afterwards further upstream. Here, then, the order in the succession of
perceptions in the apprehension is determined, and the apprehension is
bound by that order. In the previous example of a house, in the
house and end with the ground, or else start from below and end above, just
as they could apprehend the manifold of empirical intuition from the right
then, no determined order making it necessary when in the apprehension I
had to begin in order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is,
however, always to be met with in the perception of something that happens,
and it makes the order of the perceptions succeeding one another (in the
apprehension of this appearance) necessary.
In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing about
the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is completely
arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the order of the
manifold of the appearance according to which the apprehension of the one
(what happens) follows upon that of the other (which precedes) according to
a rule. Only in this way can I gain the right to say of the appearance
itself, and not merely of my apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be
found – which is as much as to say that I cannot institute the apprehension
otherwise than exactly in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF
PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, SECOND ANALOGY of
ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES, pp 184-187]
YOUR COUNTRY NEEDS YOU TO PLAY YOUR PART AND DON'T LET neo-nazism,
terrorism and religious bigotry BECOME AN UNSTOPPABLE PLAQUE
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/uncle-sam-wants-you.png>
WHAT HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN?
- dolf
Initial Post: 4 January 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Loading...