Discussion:
— YOUR CONDUCT OF CONFLATION IS OFFENSIVE: Therefore, the Planck constant Angular, in Momentum and Frequency.
(zu alt für eine Antwort)
dolf
2019-03-13 16:25:22 UTC
Permalink
We have told you before that YHWH is a trinomial metastasised reality and
that ALLAH is a binomial stasis construct as contrivance and usurping the
unity of #1...

It’s offensive as blasphemy to conflate the ideas together...

#2184 / 7 = #312 - #81 - PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION = #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL

<https://www.etsy.com/sg-en/listing/550755155/salvador-dali-print-crucifixion>
Therefore, the Planck constant Angular, in Momentum and Frequency.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.physics/XU2ze2Q6xLo
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.math/8smkKJluJkI
O Jesus Christ! the Quantum of Action.
YHWH Allah
(LORD God)
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2019-03-13 16:29:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
We have told you before that YHWH is a trinomial metastasised reality and
that ALLAH is a binomial stasis construct as contrivance and usurping the
unity of #1...
It’s offensive as blasphemy to conflate the ideas together...
#2184 / 7 = #312 - #81 - PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION = #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
<https://www.etsy.com/sg-en/listing/550755155/salvador-dali-print-crucifixion>
Therefore, the Planck constant Angular, in Momentum and Frequency.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.physics/XU2ze2Q6xLo
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.math/8smkKJluJkI
O Jesus Christ! the Quantum of Action.
YHWH Allah
(LORD God)
-- WHAT IS BREXT?

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 9 March, 2019

Nous: #24
Time: 23:15 hrs
Date: 2019.3.9
Torah: [#40, #50, #100]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 9 (#49); Ego: 50 (#90),
@3: Sup: 28 (#77); Ego: 19 (#109),
Male: #77; Feme: #109
} // #190

Dao: Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence
Tetra: #18 - Waiting
I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving

Latin: Operator {Word which produces all things} Alt: Eriel {Watchfulness
of God} {

1. GENERATION OF BEINGS & PHILOSOPHICAL KNOWLEDGE
2. PROTECTS & REGENERATES, LEADS TO INNER HARMONY
3. PHENOMENA OF NATURE
4. Thopibui
}

#1379 CE

Solar Eclipse: 9 March 1997 (AEST) / Solar Eclipse: 3 November 2013 (AEST)

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#250 / #354} / HETEROS {#280 / #369} / TORAH {#280 /
#369}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:9,col:8,nous:24&idea:{m,150}&idea:{f,198}&idea:{m,250}&idea:{f,354}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 4, row: 9, col: 8, nous: 24 [Date: 2019.3.9, Time: 23:15
hrs, Super: #250 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching:
H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #354 / #24 - Important
Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay,
Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting]

We have a busy time today doing something that I rarely do upon the #364 -
Sabbath day and that is working on document preparation which plans the
demise of others as it seems to be a #312 - contradiction and so we need
some #273 - syncretistic mechanism to facilitate a favourable outcome.

And to do that I thought to consider (this is a spontaneous comment and
subject to revision) the question on WHAT IS BREXIT?

IS IT REALITY?
OR AN *OBJECT* OF REALITY?
ONLY A CHIMERA OR MIRROR OF REALITY?
OUR IMPETUS AS *OBJECTIVE* FOR REALITY?

Europeans would readily agree that such four corners of dialectics whether
GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 -
Progression or KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 -
Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis that there is no end of idealism or argument and
which may lead to disastrous consequences with the world being turned
upside down.

[B, {@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2)},
R, {@2: Sup: 11 (#13); Ego: 9 (#11)},
E, {@3: Sup: 16 (#29); Ego: 5 (#16)},
X, {@4: Sup: 49 (#78); Ego: 33 (#49)},
I, {@5: Sup: 58 (#136); Ego: 9 (#58)},
T] {@6: Sup: 15 (#151: SEE TRANSITION POINT AS IDEA: @A149 WITHIN IMMANUEL
KANT’S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 38 (#96)}

YOUTUBE: "The Master and Insanity (Doctor Who)



IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) THE TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF THE POWER
OF JUDGMENT (OR ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES) SECOND CHAPTER ON SYSTEM OF ALL
PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE UNDERSTANDING: “[IDEAS: @A148 / @B187] In the
previous chapter we have considered the transcendental power of judgment
according only to the general conditions under which alone is entitled to
use the pure concepts of the understanding for synthetic judgments. Our
task now is to exhibit, in systematic connection, the judgments that the
understanding actually achieves a priori under this critical provision, in
which our table of categories must, without doubt, give us natural and sure
guidance. For the relation of these categories to possible experience is
exactly that which must constitute all pure a priori cognition of the
understanding, and for that reason their relation to sensibility in general
will exhibit, completely and [IDEA: @B188] in a system, all the
transcendental principles for the use of the understanding.

A priori principles bear this name not only because they contain in
themselves the grounds for other judgments, but also because they are not
themselves grounded in higher and more general cognitions. This [IDEA:
@A149] property does not, however, exempt them from all proof.

For although such a *PRINCIPLE* *CANNOT* *BE* *TAKEN* *FURTHER*
*OBJECTIVELY*, but underlies all cognition of its *OBJECT*, this does not
at all prevent its being possible or even necessary to create a proof from
the *SUBJECTIVE* *SOURCES* *OF* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *A* *COGNITION*
*OF* *AN* *OBJECT* *IN* *GENERAL*, for otherwise the proposition would, for
all that, carry the highest suspicion of being a purely fraudulent
assertion.

Second, we will limit ourselves merely to those principles that relate to
the categories. The principles of the Transcendental Aesthetic, according
to which space and time are the conditions of the possibility of all things
as appearances, together with the restriction of these principles – namely,
that they cannot be related to things in themselves – thus do not belong to
the field of investigation we’ve picked out.

Equally, mathematical principles do not make up any part of this system,
since they are drawn only from intuition and not from the pure concepts of
the understanding; nonetheless, the possibility of such principles, [IDEA:
@B189] since they are still synthetic a priori judgments, will necessarily
find a place here, not indeed in order to prove their correctness and
apodeictic {ie. *CLEARLY* *ESTABLISHED* *BEYOND* *DISPUTE*} certainty, of
which they have no need at all, but only to make comprehensible, and to
deduce, the possibility of such evident cognitions a priori.” [pages 177 to
178]

STATES OF EUROPEAN UNION (VOLUNTĀTIS)
#1 - Principle of Enquiry;
#2 - Principle of Contradiction;
#3 - Principle of Syncretic Progression;
#4 - Principle of Materiality
#5 - Discriminating Norm {Principle of Enquiry}
#6 - Obligating Norm {Principle of Contradiction}: Binomial stasis
nomenclature
#7 - Manifesting Norm {Principle of Syncretic Progression}

FUNCTION OF EUROPEAN UNION
#8 - Transformational Principle {Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature}
#9 - Ontological Principle {Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature}

*OBJECTIVE* OF EUROPEAN UNION
#10 - Sovereign Principle {Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}

So firstly we need to consider what is reality?

And the answer which I would consider is that it is constituted by a
metastasised characteristic of identity or persona.

Whereas a ring on one’s finger is an *OBJECT* of reality.

How is such stasis of reality achieved as CONCORDIA?

BINOMIAL APPARATUS:
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*

G4074@{
   @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
   @2: Sup: 4 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 5 (#85),
   @3: Sup: 61 (#145); Ego: 57 (#142),
   @4: Sup: 80 (#225); Ego: 19 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
   @5: Sup: 4 (#229); Ego: 5 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
   Male: #229; Feme: #166
} // #490 + @1 AS *CARDINAL* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *RETENTION* = #491

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #755 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;

THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am not
one of prating tongue.

    #VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
    #TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
    #POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
    #TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 17 (#17); Ego: 17 (#17),
   @2: Sup: 74 (#91); Ego: 57 (#74),
   @3: Sup: 70 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 77 (#151),
   @4: Sup: 76 (#237); Ego: 6 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #237; Feme: #157
} // #157

#490 as [#80, #5, #300, #100, #5] = Petros (G4074): {UMBRA: #16 as #755 %
#41 = #17} 1) one of the twelve disciples of Jesus;

"AND I SAY ALSO UNTO THEE, THAT THOU ART PETER {#490 as [#80, #5, #300,
#100, #5] = Petros (G4074): Peter}, AND UPON THIS ROCK I WILL BUILD MY
CHURCH; AND THE *GATES* {

@1 - #33 [#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 /
#342 - ANKH / ROMAN} - *SHARE* *THE* *SAME* *ANCESTOR*]
@5 - #77 [#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} -
*PROTECT* *EACH* *OTHER* {Latin: CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}]

= #100 - *WHAT* *IS* *TRUTH*? AS THE ESTABLISHING OF A #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL

#473 as [#40, #400, #1, #2, #30] = 'abal (H56): {UMBRA: #0 as #33 % #41 =
#33} 1) to mourn, lament; 1a) (Qal) to mourn, lament; 1a1) of humans; 1a2)
of inanimate objects (fig.); 1a2a) of *GATES*; 1a2b) of land; 1b) (Hiphil);
1b1) to mourn, cause to mourn (fig.); 1c) (Hithpael); 1c1) to mourn; 1c2)
play the mourner;

#473 as [#20, #3, #50, #400] = gannah (H1593): {UMBRA: #1 as #58 -
Political Reversal, Adaptation to Change; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 29 - Decisiveness % #41 = #17}
1) garden, orchard;

#473 as [#6, #400, #7, #2, #8, #10, #40] = zabach (H2076): {UMBRA: #2 as
#17 % #41 = #17} 1) to slaughter, kill, sacrifice, slaughter for sacrifice;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter for sacrifice; 1a2) to slaughter for eating;
1a3) to slaughter in divine judgment; 1b) (Piel) to sacrifice, offer
sacrifice;

} OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT." [Matthew 16:18 (KJV)]

TRINOMIAL APPARATUS:
@1 <— #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {#369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM / #123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (3x3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@5 <— #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE
DIGNITY ROYAL}
@491 <— #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
@164 <— #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY

@123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY AS #2188 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION
(#273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION)

THUSLY: 3 x 1091 + @1 (1) - HOMOGENEOUS + @2 (1) - HETEROGENEOUS + @3 (1) -
TORAH = 3 x #1092 IS STILL IN HARMONY / EQUILIBRIUM WITH THE #2184 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AS CONSTITUTION OF STATE / PROVINCE

1) DEMIURGE OF NATURE {4 x #364 + #371 = #1827}

@1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT
ROME [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]

@5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE
TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]

H3632@{
   @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
   @2: Sup: 50 (#70); Ego: 30 (#50),
   @3: Sup: 60 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 10 (#60),
   @4: Sup: 9 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS {%13});
Ego: 30 (#90),
   @5: Sup: 4 (#143); Ego: 76 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
   Male: #143; Feme: #166
} // #490 + @1 AS *CARDINAL* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *RETENTION* = #491

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #90 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 - The
Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;

THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards; I am
not a robber of sacred property.

    #VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
    #TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence between
word and deed.
    #POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
    #TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
    #CANON: #200

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_200@{
   @1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
   @2: Sup: 56 (#64); Ego: 48 (#56),
   @3: Sup: 41 (#105); Ego: 66 (#122),
   @4: Sup: 38 (#143); Ego: 78 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY
{%8}),
   Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200

#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl (H3632): {UMBRA: #3 as #90 %
#41 = #8} 1) entire, all, perfect adv; 2) entirety subst; 3) whole, whole
burnt offering, *HOLOCAUST*, entirety;

"THEY SHALL TEACH JACOB THY JUDGMENTS, AND ISRAEL THY LAW: THEY SHALL PUT
INCENSE BEFORE THEE, AND WHOLE {#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl
(H3632): perfect} BURNT {#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl
(H3632): perfect} SACRIFICE UPON THINE ALTAR." [Deuteronomy 33:10 (KJV)]

#65 - *SOLDIER* (MARS: PRIAPUS / PHALLUS)

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS #371 - 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

#175 - *MARRIAGE* (VENUS: HYMENIALISM)

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY
1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

H6944@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
   @3: Sup: 55 (#97); Ego: 19 (#55),
   @4: Sup: 59 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 4 (#59),
   @5: Sup: 35 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 57 (#116),
   @6: Sup: 45 (#236); Ego: 10 (#126),
   @7: Sup: 4 (#240); Ego: 40 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
   Male: #240; Feme: #166
} // #490 + @1 AS *CARDINAL* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *RETENTION* = #491

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #404 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;

THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; I
am not one who curseth the king.

    #VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
    #TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
    #POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
    #TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
    #CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
   @1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
   @2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
   @3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
   @4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181

#490 as [#6, #30, #100, #4, #300, #10, #40] = qodesh (H6944): {UMBRA: #10
as #404 % #41 = #35} 1) apartness, holiness, sacredness, separateness; 1a)
apartness, sacredness, holiness; 1a1) *OF* *GOD*; 1a2) of places; 1a3) of
things; 1b) set-apartness, separateness;

ZAKAR (H2142) #667 {MALE: #408 / FEME: #262} as [#50, #80, #300, #2, #200,
#10, #6, #8, #1, #10] (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 0101 HOURS ON 8 MARCH
2019: "LISTEN UP HUNS AND MUSLIMS:

You talk of Allah, Odin, Frig and Thor, but I talk of the One and Only God,
Yahweh the God of Israel and He will smite you."

2) COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis {6 x #364 = #2184 as ANTHROPOCENTRIC
COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE}

@1 {#451 - INCEPTION} +
@2 {#41 - AN ETHICAL / MORAL PRESCRIPTION “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 -
*ONTIC* X n] NECESSITY WITH IT” WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL WORLDVIEW} EQUALS

@3 {#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* = #369} +

@4 {#123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY} EQUALS

@10 {#615 - TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT AND TO SUBJECT TO PROCEDURES / #41 = #15
{#113 as [#6, #5, #2, #50, #10, #600] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #6 as #113 %
#41 = #31} 1) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*}}

BEING THE IMPETUS OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900
AND ACCORDING BREXIT WITH THE QUINTESSENTIAL MECHANICS OF PROCESS BY AN
ENTIRELY METEMPIRICAL AS ONTIC PREMISE {

@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@205 / #873
@82 / #491
@164 / #3273
@123 / #2188

@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION

} IS ENTIRELY MATHEMATICAL AND PERSISTENT AS WRITTEN AGREEMENT WHICH IN MY
HUMBLE OPINION IT IS THEREBY A ROBUST AND VITAL IMPETUS FOR THE EUROPEAN
UNION ACHIEVING THE REALITY AS SAPIENT ECONOMY.

IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND SECTION OF THE HIGHEST PRINCIPLE
OF ALL SYNTHETIC JUDGMENTS AS IDEA @A157: “OF THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF
THE PURE UNDERSTANDING [IDEAS: @A154 / @B193] It is therefore given: that
if one must go outside a given concept to compare [IDEAS: @A155 / @B194] it
synthetically with another, then a third thing is needed, in which alone
the synthesis of two concepts can originate. But what is then this third
thing, the medium of all synthetic judgments? . . .

If a cognition is to have *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*, i.e., if it is to relate
to an *OBJECT* and to have significance and sense in that *OBJECT*, then
the *OBJECT* must be able to be given in some way.

Without this, concepts are empty, and though one has indeed thought with
them, one has in fact cognized [IDEA: @196] nothing through this thinking,
but has merely played with representations.

To give an *OBJECT* – if this is not to mean giving it again only
mediately, [IDEA: @A156] but exhibiting it immediately in intuition – is
nothing other than to relate a representation of it to experience (whether
actual or indeed possible). Even space and time, as pure as these concepts
are of everything empirical, and as certain as it is also that they are
represented fully a priori in the mind, would nonetheless be without
*OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* and without sense and significance, if their
necessary use were not directed upon the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* –
indeed, their representation is a mere schema that is always related to the
reproductive imagination, which calls forth the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*
without which they would have no significance; and thus it is with all
concepts, without distinction.

The possibility of experience is then what gives *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY* to
all our a priori cognitions. Now experience rests on the synthetic unity of
the appearances, i.e., on a synthesis according to *CONCEPTS* *OF* *AN*
*OBJECT* *OF* *APPEARANCES* *IN* *GENERAL*, without which it would not even
be cognition, but a rhapsody of perceptions, which in no context would
agree together according to the rules of a thoroughly connected (possible)
consciousness, hence also not for the transcendental and necessary unity of
apperception.

Experience therefore has principles of its form underlying it a priori,
[IDEA: @B196] namely universal rules of unity in the synthesis of the
appearances, whose [IDEA: @A157] *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY* as necessary {#287 -
STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION} conditions can always be pointed to in
experience, indeed, even in its possibility. Outside this relation,
however, synthetic a priori propositions are completely impossible, since
they have no third thing, namely, no pure *OBJECT*, upon which the
synthetic unity of their concepts could establish *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*.

Although we cognize a priori in synthetic judgments so much about space in
general, or the figures that the reproductive imagination inscribes in it,
that we actually require no experience thereto at all; nonetheless, this
cognition would amount to nothing but preoccupation with a mere brain
phantom, were it not that space is to be regarded as a condition of the
appearances that constitute the stuff of outer experience; in consequence,
these pure synthetic judgments relate (albeit only mediately) to possible
experience, or rather to the *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *ITSELF*,
*AND* *GROUND* *THE* *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* *OF* *THEIR* *SYNTHESIS* upon
that alone.

Since then experience, as empirical synthesis, is in its possibility the
single type of cognition that gives reality to every other synthesis, as a
[IDEA: @B197] priori cognition the other synthesis also has truth
(*AGREEMENT* *WITH* *AN* [IDEA: @A158] *OBJECT*) only in that it contains
nothing more than what is necessary for the synthetic unity of experience
in general.

The highest principle of all synthetic judgments is then: *EVERY* *OBJECT*
*FALLS* *UNDER* *THE* *NECESSARY* *CONDITIONS* *OF* *THE* *SYNTHETIC*
*UNITY* *OF* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *OF* *INTUITION* *IN* *A* *POSSIBLE*
*EXPERIENCE*. Synthetic a priori judgments are possible in this way: if we
relate the formal conditions of a priori intuition, the synthesis of the
imagination, and its necessary unity in a transcendental apperception to a
possible cognition of experience in general and say: the conditions of the
possibility of experience in general are at the same time the conditions of
the possibility of the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, AND FOR THAT REASON
HAVE *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* in a synthetic judgment a priori. [pages 179 to
180]

CAVEAT: Ignore any grammatical errors, as it was 0500 hours when I began
writing this in bed and just after 0720 hours when I initially sent it.
Once again I am only proffering an informal opinion from my causal
infatuation as metaphysical faculty of endeavour and as such I am entirely
reliant upon the sapient expertise of others to provision its potential
utility and material merits.

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 9 March 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2019-03-13 19:45:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
We have told you before that YHWH is a trinomial metastasised reality and
that ALLAH is a binomial stasis construct as contrivance and usurping the
unity of #1...
It’s offensive as blasphemy to conflate the ideas together...
“And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let
it divide the waters from the waters.

<Loading Image...>

And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the
firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were
the second day.” [Genesis 1:6-8 (KJV)]
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
#2184 / 7 = #312 - #81 - PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION = #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
<https://www.etsy.com/sg-en/listing/550755155/salvador-dali-print-crucifixion>
Therefore, the Planck constant Angular, in Momentum and Frequency.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.physics/XU2ze2Q6xLo
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.math/8smkKJluJkI
O Jesus Christ! the Quantum of Action.
YHWH Allah
(LORD God)
-- WHAT IS BREXT?
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 9 March, 2019
Nous: #24
Time: 23:15 hrs
Date: 2019.3.9
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 9 (#49); Ego: 50 (#90),
@3: Sup: 28 (#77); Ego: 19 (#109),
Male: #77; Feme: #109
} // #190
Dao: Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence
Tetra: #18 - Waiting
I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving
Latin: Operator {Word which produces all things} Alt: Eriel {Watchfulness
of God} {
1. GENERATION OF BEINGS & PHILOSOPHICAL KNOWLEDGE
2. PROTECTS & REGENERATES, LEADS TO INNER HARMONY
3. PHENOMENA OF NATURE
4. Thopibui
}
#1379 CE
Solar Eclipse: 9 March 1997 (AEST) / Solar Eclipse: 3 November 2013 (AEST)
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#250 / #354} / HETEROS {#280 / #369} / TORAH {#280 /
#369}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:9,col:8,nous:24&idea:{m,150}&idea:{f,198}&idea:{m,250}&idea:{f,354}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #354 / #24 - Important
Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay,
Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting]
We have a busy time today doing something that I rarely do upon the #364 -
Sabbath day and that is working on document preparation which plans the
demise of others as it seems to be a #312 - contradiction and so we need
some #273 - syncretistic mechanism to facilitate a favourable outcome.
And to do that I thought to consider (this is a spontaneous comment and
subject to revision) the question on WHAT IS BREXIT?
IS IT REALITY?
OR AN *OBJECT* OF REALITY?
ONLY A CHIMERA OR MIRROR OF REALITY?
OUR IMPETUS AS *OBJECTIVE* FOR REALITY?
Europeans would readily agree that such four corners of dialectics whether
which may lead to disastrous consequences with the world being turned
upside down.
KANT’S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 38 (#96)}
YOUTUBE: "The Master and Insanity (Doctor Who)
http://youtu.be/m0RvDZFN71A
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) THE TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF THE POWER
OF JUDGMENT (OR ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES) SECOND CHAPTER ON SYSTEM OF ALL
previous chapter we have considered the transcendental power of judgment
according only to the general conditions under which alone is entitled to
use the pure concepts of the understanding for synthetic judgments. Our
task now is to exhibit, in systematic connection, the judgments that the
understanding actually achieves a priori under this critical provision, in
which our table of categories must, without doubt, give us natural and sure
guidance. For the relation of these categories to possible experience is
exactly that which must constitute all pure a priori cognition of the
understanding, and for that reason their relation to sensibility in general
transcendental principles for the use of the understanding.
A priori principles bear this name not only because they contain in
themselves the grounds for other judgments, but also because they are not
@A149] property does not, however, exempt them from all proof.
For although such a *PRINCIPLE* *CANNOT* *BE* *TAKEN* *FURTHER*
*OBJECTIVELY*, but underlies all cognition of its *OBJECT*, this does not
at all prevent its being possible or even necessary to create a proof from
the *SUBJECTIVE* *SOURCES* *OF* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *A* *COGNITION*
*OF* *AN* *OBJECT* *IN* *GENERAL*, for otherwise the proposition would, for
all that, carry the highest suspicion of being a purely fraudulent
assertion.
Second, we will limit ourselves merely to those principles that relate to
the categories. The principles of the Transcendental Aesthetic, according
to which space and time are the conditions of the possibility of all things
as appearances, together with the restriction of these principles – namely,
that they cannot be related to things in themselves – thus do not belong to
the field of investigation we’ve picked out.
Equally, mathematical principles do not make up any part of this system,
since they are drawn only from intuition and not from the pure concepts of
@B189] since they are still synthetic a priori judgments, will necessarily
find a place here, not indeed in order to prove their correctness and
apodeictic {ie. *CLEARLY* *ESTABLISHED* *BEYOND* *DISPUTE*} certainty, of
which they have no need at all, but only to make comprehensible, and to
deduce, the possibility of such evident cognitions a priori.” [pages 177 to
178]
STATES OF EUROPEAN UNION (VOLUNTĀTIS)
#1 - Principle of Enquiry;
#2 - Principle of Contradiction;
#3 - Principle of Syncretic Progression;
#4 - Principle of Materiality
#5 - Discriminating Norm {Principle of Enquiry}
#6 - Obligating Norm {Principle of Contradiction}: Binomial stasis
nomenclature
#7 - Manifesting Norm {Principle of Syncretic Progression}
FUNCTION OF EUROPEAN UNION
#8 - Transformational Principle {Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature}
#9 - Ontological Principle {Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature}
*OBJECTIVE* OF EUROPEAN UNION
#10 - Sovereign Principle {Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
So firstly we need to consider what is reality?
And the answer which I would consider is that it is constituted by a
metastasised characteristic of identity or persona.
Whereas a ring on one’s finger is an *OBJECT* of reality.
How is such stasis of reality achieved as CONCORDIA?
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*
   Male: #229; Feme: #166
UMBRA: #755 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;
THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am not
one of prating tongue.
    #VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
    #TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
    #POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
    #TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
    #CANON: #157
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #237; Feme: #157
} // #157
#490 as [#80, #5, #300, #100, #5] = Petros (G4074): {UMBRA: #16 as #755 %
#41 = #17} 1) one of the twelve disciples of Jesus;
"AND I SAY ALSO UNTO THEE, THAT THOU ART PETER {#490 as [#80, #5, #300,
#100, #5] = Petros (G4074): Peter}, AND UPON THIS ROCK I WILL BUILD MY
CHURCH; AND THE *GATES* {
@1 - #33 [#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 /
#342 - ANKH / ROMAN} - *SHARE* *THE* *SAME* *ANCESTOR*]
@5 - #77 [#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} -
*PROTECT* *EACH* *OTHER* {Latin: CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}]
= #100 - *WHAT* *IS* *TRUTH*? AS THE ESTABLISHING OF A #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL
#473 as [#40, #400, #1, #2, #30] = 'abal (H56): {UMBRA: #0 as #33 % #41 =
#33} 1) to mourn, lament; 1a) (Qal) to mourn, lament; 1a1) of humans; 1a2)
of inanimate objects (fig.); 1a2a) of *GATES*; 1a2b) of land; 1b) (Hiphil);
1b1) to mourn, cause to mourn (fig.); 1c) (Hithpael); 1c1) to mourn; 1c2)
play the mourner;
#473 as [#20, #3, #50, #400] = gannah (H1593): {UMBRA: #1 as #58 -
Political Reversal, Adaptation to Change; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 29 - Decisiveness % #41 = #17}
1) garden, orchard;
#473 as [#6, #400, #7, #2, #8, #10, #40] = zabach (H2076): {UMBRA: #2 as
#17 % #41 = #17} 1) to slaughter, kill, sacrifice, slaughter for sacrifice;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter for sacrifice; 1a2) to slaughter for eating;
1a3) to slaughter in divine judgment; 1b) (Piel) to sacrifice, offer
sacrifice;
} OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT." [Matthew 16:18 (KJV)]
@1 <— #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {#369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM / #123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (3x3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@5 <— #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE
DIGNITY ROYAL}
@491 <— #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
@164 <— #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY
@123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY AS #2188 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION
(#273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION)
TORAH = 3 x #1092 IS STILL IN HARMONY / EQUILIBRIUM WITH THE #2184 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AS CONSTITUTION OF STATE / PROVINCE
1) DEMIURGE OF NATURE {4 x #364 + #371 = #1827}
@1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT
@5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE
Ego: 30 (#90),
   Male: #143; Feme: #166
UMBRA: #90 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 - The
Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;
THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards; I am
not a robber of sacred property.
    #VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
    #TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence between
word and deed.
    #POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
    #TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
    #CANON: #200
{%8}),
   Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200
#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl (H3632): {UMBRA: #3 as #90 %
#41 = #8} 1) entire, all, perfect adv; 2) entirety subst; 3) whole, whole
burnt offering, *HOLOCAUST*, entirety;
"THEY SHALL TEACH JACOB THY JUDGMENTS, AND ISRAEL THY LAW: THEY SHALL PUT
INCENSE BEFORE THEE, AND WHOLE {#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl
(H3632): perfect} BURNT {#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl
(H3632): perfect} SACRIFICE UPON THINE ALTAR." [Deuteronomy 33:10 (KJV)]
#65 - *SOLDIER* (MARS: PRIAPUS / PHALLUS)
#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS #371 - 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE
#175 - *MARRIAGE* (VENUS: HYMENIALISM)
#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY
1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.
{%32}); Ego: 57 (#116),
   Male: #240; Feme: #166
UMBRA: #404 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; I
am not one who curseth the king.
    #VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
    #TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
    #POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
    #TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
    #CANON: #181
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#490 as [#6, #30, #100, #4, #300, #10, #40] = qodesh (H6944): {UMBRA: #10
as #404 % #41 = #35} 1) apartness, holiness, sacredness, separateness; 1a)
apartness, sacredness, holiness; 1a1) *OF* *GOD*; 1a2) of places; 1a3) of
things; 1b) set-apartness, separateness;
ZAKAR (H2142) #667 {MALE: #408 / FEME: #262} as [#50, #80, #300, #2, #200,
You talk of Allah, Odin, Frig and Thor, but I talk of the One and Only God,
Yahweh the God of Israel and He will smite you."
2) COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis {6 x #364 = #2184 as ANTHROPOCENTRIC
COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE}
@1 {#451 - INCEPTION} +
@2 {#41 - AN ETHICAL / MORAL PRESCRIPTION “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 -
*ONTIC* X n] NECESSITY WITH IT” WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL WORLDVIEW} EQUALS
@3 {#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* = #369} +
@4 {#123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY} EQUALS
@10 {#615 - TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT AND TO SUBJECT TO PROCEDURES / #41 = #15
{#113 as [#6, #5, #2, #50, #10, #600] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #6 as #113 %
#41 = #31} 1) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*}}
BEING THE IMPETUS OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900
AND ACCORDING BREXIT WITH THE QUINTESSENTIAL MECHANICS OF PROCESS BY AN
ENTIRELY METEMPIRICAL AS ONTIC PREMISE {
@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@205 / #873
@82 / #491
@164 / #3273
@123 / #2188
@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION
} IS ENTIRELY MATHEMATICAL AND PERSISTENT AS WRITTEN AGREEMENT WHICH IN MY
HUMBLE OPINION IT IS THEREBY A ROBUST AND VITAL IMPETUS FOR THE EUROPEAN
UNION ACHIEVING THE REALITY AS SAPIENT ECONOMY.
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND SECTION OF THE HIGHEST PRINCIPLE
synthetically with another, then a third thing is needed, in which alone
the synthesis of two concepts can originate. But what is then this third
thing, the medium of all synthetic judgments? . . .
If a cognition is to have *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*, i.e., if it is to relate
to an *OBJECT* and to have significance and sense in that *OBJECT*, then
the *OBJECT* must be able to be given in some way.
Without this, concepts are empty, and though one has indeed thought with
but has merely played with representations.
To give an *OBJECT* – if this is not to mean giving it again only
nothing other than to relate a representation of it to experience (whether
actual or indeed possible). Even space and time, as pure as these concepts
are of everything empirical, and as certain as it is also that they are
represented fully a priori in the mind, would nonetheless be without
*OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* and without sense and significance, if their
necessary use were not directed upon the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* –
indeed, their representation is a mere schema that is always related to the
reproductive imagination, which calls forth the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*
without which they would have no significance; and thus it is with all
concepts, without distinction.
The possibility of experience is then what gives *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY* to
all our a priori cognitions. Now experience rests on the synthetic unity of
the appearances, i.e., on a synthesis according to *CONCEPTS* *OF* *AN*
*OBJECT* *OF* *APPEARANCES* *IN* *GENERAL*, without which it would not even
be cognition, but a rhapsody of perceptions, which in no context would
agree together according to the rules of a thoroughly connected (possible)
consciousness, hence also not for the transcendental and necessary unity of
apperception.
Experience therefore has principles of its form underlying it a priori,
STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION} conditions can always be pointed to in
experience, indeed, even in its possibility. Outside this relation,
however, synthetic a priori propositions are completely impossible, since
they have no third thing, namely, no pure *OBJECT*, upon which the
synthetic unity of their concepts could establish *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*.
Although we cognize a priori in synthetic judgments so much about space in
general, or the figures that the reproductive imagination inscribes in it,
that we actually require no experience thereto at all; nonetheless, this
cognition would amount to nothing but preoccupation with a mere brain
phantom, were it not that space is to be regarded as a condition of the
appearances that constitute the stuff of outer experience; in consequence,
these pure synthetic judgments relate (albeit only mediately) to possible
experience, or rather to the *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *ITSELF*,
*AND* *GROUND* *THE* *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* *OF* *THEIR* *SYNTHESIS* upon
that alone.
Since then experience, as empirical synthesis, is in its possibility the
single type of cognition that gives reality to every other synthesis, as a
nothing more than what is necessary for the synthetic unity of experience
in general.
The highest principle of all synthetic judgments is then: *EVERY* *OBJECT*
*FALLS* *UNDER* *THE* *NECESSARY* *CONDITIONS* *OF* *THE* *SYNTHETIC*
*UNITY* *OF* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *OF* *INTUITION* *IN* *A* *POSSIBLE*
*EXPERIENCE*. Synthetic a priori judgments are possible in this way: if we
relate the formal conditions of a priori intuition, the synthesis of the
imagination, and its necessary unity in a transcendental apperception to a
possible cognition of experience in general and say: the conditions of the
possibility of experience in general are at the same time the conditions of
the possibility of the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, AND FOR THAT REASON
HAVE *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* in a synthetic judgment a priori. [pages 179 to
180]
CAVEAT: Ignore any grammatical errors, as it was 0500 hours when I began
writing this in bed and just after 0720 hours when I initially sent it.
Once again I am only proffering an informal opinion from my causal
infatuation as metaphysical faculty of endeavour and as such I am entirely
reliant upon the sapient expertise of others to provision its potential
utility and material merits.
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 9 March 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2019-03-13 19:57:25 UTC
Permalink
MENE MENE TEKEL UPHARSIN

#2184 / 7 = #312 (ie. DID I JUST HEAR THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT VOTE YES ON
‘NO DEAL BREXIT’?) - #81 - PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION = #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL

MENE, God has numbered the days of your kingdom and brought it to an end;
TEKEL, you have been weighed ... and found wanting;" and "PERES, your
kingdom is divided and given to another...
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
We have told you before that YHWH is a trinomial metastasised reality and
that ALLAH is a binomial stasis construct as contrivance and usurping the
unity of #1...
It’s offensive as blasphemy to conflate the ideas together...
“And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let
it divide the waters from the waters.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/EarthSeasons.png>

And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the
firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were
the second day.” [Genesis 1:6-8 (KJV)]
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
#2184 / 7 = #312 - #81 - PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION = #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
<https://www.etsy.com/sg-en/listing/550755155/salvador-dali-print-crucifixion>
Therefore, the Planck constant Angular, in Momentum and Frequency.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.physics/XU2ze2Q6xLo
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.math/8smkKJluJkI
O Jesus Christ! the Quantum of Action.
YHWH Allah
(LORD God)
-- WHAT IS BREXT?
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 9 March, 2019
Nous: #24
Time: 23:15 hrs
Date: 2019.3.9
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 9 (#49); Ego: 50 (#90),
@3: Sup: 28 (#77); Ego: 19 (#109),
Male: #77; Feme: #109
} // #190
Dao: Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence
Tetra: #18 - Waiting
I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving
Latin: Operator {Word which produces all things} Alt: Eriel {Watchfulness
of God} {
1. GENERATION OF BEINGS & PHILOSOPHICAL KNOWLEDGE
2. PROTECTS & REGENERATES, LEADS TO INNER HARMONY
3. PHENOMENA OF NATURE
4. Thopibui
}
#1379 CE
Solar Eclipse: 9 March 1997 (AEST) / Solar Eclipse: 3 November 2013 (AEST)
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#250 / #354} / HETEROS {#280 / #369} / TORAH {#280 /
#369}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:9,col:8,nous:24&idea:{m,150}&idea:{f,198}&idea:{m,250}&idea:{f,354}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #354 / #24 - Important
Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay,
Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting]
We have a busy time today doing something that I rarely do upon the #364 -
Sabbath day and that is working on document preparation which plans the
demise of others as it seems to be a #312 - contradiction and so we need
some #273 - syncretistic mechanism to facilitate a favourable outcome.
And to do that I thought to consider (this is a spontaneous comment and
subject to revision) the question on WHAT IS BREXIT?
IS IT REALITY?
OR AN *OBJECT* OF REALITY?
ONLY A CHIMERA OR MIRROR OF REALITY?
OUR IMPETUS AS *OBJECTIVE* FOR REALITY?
Europeans would readily agree that such four corners of dialectics whether
which may lead to disastrous consequences with the world being turned
upside down.
KANT’S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 38 (#96)}
YOUTUBE: "The Master and Insanity (Doctor Who)
http://youtu.be/m0RvDZFN71A
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) THE TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF THE POWER
OF JUDGMENT (OR ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES) SECOND CHAPTER ON SYSTEM OF ALL
previous chapter we have considered the transcendental power of judgment
according only to the general conditions under which alone is entitled to
use the pure concepts of the understanding for synthetic judgments. Our
task now is to exhibit, in systematic connection, the judgments that the
understanding actually achieves a priori under this critical provision, in
which our table of categories must, without doubt, give us natural and sure
guidance. For the relation of these categories to possible experience is
exactly that which must constitute all pure a priori cognition of the
understanding, and for that reason their relation to sensibility in general
transcendental principles for the use of the understanding.
A priori principles bear this name not only because they contain in
themselves the grounds for other judgments, but also because they are not
@A149] property does not, however, exempt them from all proof.
For although such a *PRINCIPLE* *CANNOT* *BE* *TAKEN* *FURTHER*
*OBJECTIVELY*, but underlies all cognition of its *OBJECT*, this does not
at all prevent its being possible or even necessary to create a proof from
the *SUBJECTIVE* *SOURCES* *OF* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *A* *COGNITION*
*OF* *AN* *OBJECT* *IN* *GENERAL*, for otherwise the proposition would, for
all that, carry the highest suspicion of being a purely fraudulent
assertion.
Second, we will limit ourselves merely to those principles that relate to
the categories. The principles of the Transcendental Aesthetic, according
to which space and time are the conditions of the possibility of all things
as appearances, together with the restriction of these principles – namely,
that they cannot be related to things in themselves – thus do not belong to
the field of investigation we’ve picked out.
Equally, mathematical principles do not make up any part of this system,
since they are drawn only from intuition and not from the pure concepts of
@B189] since they are still synthetic a priori judgments, will necessarily
find a place here, not indeed in order to prove their correctness and
apodeictic {ie. *CLEARLY* *ESTABLISHED* *BEYOND* *DISPUTE*} certainty, of
which they have no need at all, but only to make comprehensible, and to
deduce, the possibility of such evident cognitions a priori.” [pages 177 to
178]
STATES OF EUROPEAN UNION (VOLUNTĀTIS)
#1 - Principle of Enquiry;
#2 - Principle of Contradiction;
#3 - Principle of Syncretic Progression;
#4 - Principle of Materiality
#5 - Discriminating Norm {Principle of Enquiry}
#6 - Obligating Norm {Principle of Contradiction}: Binomial stasis
nomenclature
#7 - Manifesting Norm {Principle of Syncretic Progression}
FUNCTION OF EUROPEAN UNION
#8 - Transformational Principle {Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature}
#9 - Ontological Principle {Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature}
*OBJECTIVE* OF EUROPEAN UNION
#10 - Sovereign Principle {Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
So firstly we need to consider what is reality?
And the answer which I would consider is that it is constituted by a
metastasised characteristic of identity or persona.
Whereas a ring on one’s finger is an *OBJECT* of reality.
How is such stasis of reality achieved as CONCORDIA?
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*
   Male: #229; Feme: #166
UMBRA: #755 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;
THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am not
one of prating tongue.
    #VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
    #TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
    #POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
    #TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
    #CANON: #157
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #237; Feme: #157
} // #157
#490 as [#80, #5, #300, #100, #5] = Petros (G4074): {UMBRA: #16 as #755 %
#41 = #17} 1) one of the twelve disciples of Jesus;
"AND I SAY ALSO UNTO THEE, THAT THOU ART PETER {#490 as [#80, #5, #300,
#100, #5] = Petros (G4074): Peter}, AND UPON THIS ROCK I WILL BUILD MY
CHURCH; AND THE *GATES* {
@1 - #33 [#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 /
#342 - ANKH / ROMAN} - *SHARE* *THE* *SAME* *ANCESTOR*]
@5 - #77 [#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} -
*PROTECT* *EACH* *OTHER* {Latin: CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}]
= #100 - *WHAT* *IS* *TRUTH*? AS THE ESTABLISHING OF A #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL
#473 as [#40, #400, #1, #2, #30] = 'abal (H56): {UMBRA: #0 as #33 % #41 =
#33} 1) to mourn, lament; 1a) (Qal) to mourn, lament; 1a1) of humans; 1a2)
of inanimate objects (fig.); 1a2a) of *GATES*; 1a2b) of land; 1b) (Hiphil);
1b1) to mourn, cause to mourn (fig.); 1c) (Hithpael); 1c1) to mourn; 1c2)
play the mourner;
#473 as [#20, #3, #50, #400] = gannah (H1593): {UMBRA: #1 as #58 -
Political Reversal, Adaptation to Change; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 29 - Decisiveness % #41 = #17}
1) garden, orchard;
#473 as [#6, #400, #7, #2, #8, #10, #40] = zabach (H2076): {UMBRA: #2 as
#17 % #41 = #17} 1) to slaughter, kill, sacrifice, slaughter for sacrifice;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter for sacrifice; 1a2) to slaughter for eating;
1a3) to slaughter in divine judgment; 1b) (Piel) to sacrifice, offer
sacrifice;
} OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT." [Matthew 16:18 (KJV)]
@1 <— #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {#369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM / #123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (3x3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@5 <— #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE
DIGNITY ROYAL}
@491 <— #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
@164 <— #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY
@123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY AS #2188 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION
(#273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION)
TORAH = 3 x #1092 IS STILL IN HARMONY / EQUILIBRIUM WITH THE #2184 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AS CONSTITUTION OF STATE / PROVINCE
1) DEMIURGE OF NATURE {4 x #364 + #371 = #1827}
@1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT
@5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE
Ego: 30 (#90),
   Male: #143; Feme: #166
UMBRA: #90 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 - The
Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;
THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards; I am
not a robber of sacred property.
    #VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
    #TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence between
word and deed.
    #POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
    #TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
    #CANON: #200
{%8}),
   Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200
#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl (H3632): {UMBRA: #3 as #90 %
#41 = #8} 1) entire, all, perfect adv; 2) entirety subst; 3) whole, whole
burnt offering, *HOLOCAUST*, entirety;
"THEY SHALL TEACH JACOB THY JUDGMENTS, AND ISRAEL THY LAW: THEY SHALL PUT
INCENSE BEFORE THEE, AND WHOLE {#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl
(H3632): perfect} BURNT {#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl
(H3632): perfect} SACRIFICE UPON THINE ALTAR." [Deuteronomy 33:10 (KJV)]
#65 - *SOLDIER* (MARS: PRIAPUS / PHALLUS)
#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS #371 - 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE
#175 - *MARRIAGE* (VENUS: HYMENIALISM)
#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY
1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.
{%32}); Ego: 57 (#116),
   Male: #240; Feme: #166
UMBRA: #404 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; I
am not one who curseth the king.
    #VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
    #TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
    #POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
    #TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
    #CANON: #181
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#490 as [#6, #30, #100, #4, #300, #10, #40] = qodesh (H6944): {UMBRA: #10
as #404 % #41 = #35} 1) apartness, holiness, sacredness, separateness; 1a)
apartness, sacredness, holiness; 1a1) *OF* *GOD*; 1a2) of places; 1a3) of
things; 1b) set-apartness, separateness;
ZAKAR (H2142) #667 {MALE: #408 / FEME: #262} as [#50, #80, #300, #2, #200,
You talk of Allah, Odin, Frig and Thor, but I talk of the One and Only God,
Yahweh the God of Israel and He will smite you."
2) COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis {6 x #364 = #2184 as ANTHROPOCENTRIC
COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE}
@1 {#451 - INCEPTION} +
@2 {#41 - AN ETHICAL / MORAL PRESCRIPTION “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 -
*ONTIC* X n] NECESSITY WITH IT” WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL WORLDVIEW} EQUALS
@3 {#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* = #369} +
@4 {#123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY} EQUALS
@10 {#615 - TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT AND TO SUBJECT TO PROCEDURES / #41 = #15
{#113 as [#6, #5, #2, #50, #10, #600] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #6 as #113 %
#41 = #31} 1) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*}}
BEING THE IMPETUS OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900
AND ACCORDING BREXIT WITH THE QUINTESSENTIAL MECHANICS OF PROCESS BY AN
ENTIRELY METEMPIRICAL AS ONTIC PREMISE {
@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@205 / #873
@82 / #491
@164 / #3273
@123 / #2188
@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION
} IS ENTIRELY MATHEMATICAL AND PERSISTENT AS WRITTEN AGREEMENT WHICH IN MY
HUMBLE OPINION IT IS THEREBY A ROBUST AND VITAL IMPETUS FOR THE EUROPEAN
UNION ACHIEVING THE REALITY AS SAPIENT ECONOMY.
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND SECTION OF THE HIGHEST PRINCIPLE
synthetically with another, then a third thing is needed, in which alone
the synthesis of two concepts can originate. But what is then this third
thing, the medium of all synthetic judgments? . . .
If a cognition is to have *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*, i.e., if it is to relate
to an *OBJECT* and to have significance and sense in that *OBJECT*, then
the *OBJECT* must be able to be given in some way.
Without this, concepts are empty, and though one has indeed thought with
but has merely played with representations.
To give an *OBJECT* – if this is not to mean giving it again only
nothing other than to relate a representation of it to experience (whether
actual or indeed possible). Even space and time, as pure as these concepts
are of everything empirical, and as certain as it is also that they are
represented fully a priori in the mind, would nonetheless be without
*OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* and without sense and significance, if their
necessary use were not directed upon the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* –
indeed, their representation is a mere schema that is always related to the
reproductive imagination, which calls forth the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*
without which they would have no significance; and thus it is with all
concepts, without distinction.
The possibility of experience is then what gives *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY* to
all our a priori cognitions. Now experience rests on the synthetic unity of
the appearances, i.e., on a synthesis according to *CONCEPTS* *OF* *AN*
*OBJECT* *OF* *APPEARANCES* *IN* *GENERAL*, without which it would not even
be cognition, but a rhapsody of perceptions, which in no context would
agree together according to the rules of a thoroughly connected (possible)
consciousness, hence also not for the transcendental and necessary unity of
apperception.
Experience therefore has principles of its form underlying it a priori,
STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION} conditions can always be pointed to in
experience, indeed, even in its possibility. Outside this relation,
however, synthetic a priori propositions are completely impossible, since
they have no third thing, namely, no pure *OBJECT*, upon which the
synthetic unity of their concepts could establish *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*.
Although we cognize a priori in synthetic judgments so much about space in
general, or the figures that the reproductive imagination inscribes in it,
that we actually require no experience thereto at all; nonetheless, this
cognition would amount to nothing but preoccupation with a mere brain
phantom, were it not that space is to be regarded as a condition of the
appearances that constitute the stuff of outer experience; in consequence,
these pure synthetic judgments relate (albeit only mediately) to possible
experience, or rather to the *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *ITSELF*,
*AND* *GROUND* *THE* *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* *OF* *THEIR* *SYNTHESIS* upon
that alone.
Since then experience, as empirical synthesis, is in its possibility the
single type of cognition that gives reality to every other synthesis, as a
nothing more than what is necessary for the synthetic unity of experience
in general.
The highest principle of all synthetic judgments is then: *EVERY* *OBJECT*
*FALLS* *UNDER* *THE* *NECESSARY* *CONDITIONS* *OF* *THE* *SYNTHETIC*
*UNITY* *OF* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *OF* *INTUITION* *IN* *A* *POSSIBLE*
*EXPERIENCE*. Synthetic a priori judgments are possible in this way: if we
relate the formal conditions of a priori intuition, the synthesis of the
imagination, and its necessary unity in a transcendental apperception to a
possible cognition of experience in general and say: the conditions of the
possibility of experience in general are at the same time the conditions of
the possibility of the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, AND FOR THAT REASON
HAVE *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* in a synthetic judgment a priori. [pages 179 to
180]
CAVEAT: Ignore any grammatical errors, as it was 0500 hours when I began
writing this in bed and just after 0720 hours when I initially sent it.
Once again I am only proffering an informal opinion from my causal
infatuation as metaphysical faculty of endeavour and as such I am entirely
reliant upon the sapient expertise of others to provision its potential
utility and material merits.
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 9 March 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2019-03-13 20:08:09 UTC
Permalink
You have no habitation with the Almighty...

“For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your
own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.” [Acts 17:28 (KJV)]

MENE MENE TEKEL UPHARSIN

#2184 / 7 = #312 (ie. DID I JUST HEAR THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT VOTE YES ON
REJECTING ‘NO DEAL BREXIT’?) - #81 - PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION =
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL

MENE, God has numbered the days of your kingdom and brought it to an end;
TEKEL, you have been weighed ... and found wanting;" and "PERES, your
kingdom is divided and given to another...
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
We have told you before that YHWH is a trinomial metastasised reality and
that ALLAH is a binomial stasis construct as contrivance and usurping the
unity of #1...
It’s offensive as blasphemy to conflate the ideas together...
“And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let
it divide the waters from the waters.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/EarthSeasons.png>

And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the
firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were
the second day.” [Genesis 1:6-8 (KJV)]
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
#2184 / 7 = #312 - #81 - PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION = #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
<https://www.etsy.com/sg-en/listing/550755155/salvador-dali-print-crucifixion>
Therefore, the Planck constant Angular, in Momentum and Frequency.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.physics/XU2ze2Q6xLo
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.math/8smkKJluJkI
O Jesus Christ! the Quantum of Action.
YHWH Allah
(LORD God)
-- WHAT IS BREXT?
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 9 March, 2019
Nous: #24
Time: 23:15 hrs
Date: 2019.3.9
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 9 (#49); Ego: 50 (#90),
@3: Sup: 28 (#77); Ego: 19 (#109),
Male: #77; Feme: #109
} // #190
Dao: Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence
Tetra: #18 - Waiting
I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving
Latin: Operator {Word which produces all things} Alt: Eriel {Watchfulness
of God} {
1. GENERATION OF BEINGS & PHILOSOPHICAL KNOWLEDGE
2. PROTECTS & REGENERATES, LEADS TO INNER HARMONY
3. PHENOMENA OF NATURE
4. Thopibui
}
#1379 CE
Solar Eclipse: 9 March 1997 (AEST) / Solar Eclipse: 3 November 2013 (AEST)
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#250 / #354} / HETEROS {#280 / #369} / TORAH {#280 /
#369}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:9,col:8,nous:24&idea:{m,150}&idea:{f,198}&idea:{m,250}&idea:{f,354}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #354 / #24 - Important
Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay,
Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting]
We have a busy time today doing something that I rarely do upon the #364 -
Sabbath day and that is working on document preparation which plans the
demise of others as it seems to be a #312 - contradiction and so we need
some #273 - syncretistic mechanism to facilitate a favourable outcome.
And to do that I thought to consider (this is a spontaneous comment and
subject to revision) the question on WHAT IS BREXIT?
IS IT REALITY?
OR AN *OBJECT* OF REALITY?
ONLY A CHIMERA OR MIRROR OF REALITY?
OUR IMPETUS AS *OBJECTIVE* FOR REALITY?
Europeans would readily agree that such four corners of dialectics whether
which may lead to disastrous consequences with the world being turned
upside down.
KANT’S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 38 (#96)}
YOUTUBE: "The Master and Insanity (Doctor Who)
http://youtu.be/m0RvDZFN71A
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) THE TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF THE POWER
OF JUDGMENT (OR ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES) SECOND CHAPTER ON SYSTEM OF ALL
previous chapter we have considered the transcendental power of judgment
according only to the general conditions under which alone is entitled to
use the pure concepts of the understanding for synthetic judgments. Our
task now is to exhibit, in systematic connection, the judgments that the
understanding actually achieves a priori under this critical provision, in
which our table of categories must, without doubt, give us natural and sure
guidance. For the relation of these categories to possible experience is
exactly that which must constitute all pure a priori cognition of the
understanding, and for that reason their relation to sensibility in general
transcendental principles for the use of the understanding.
A priori principles bear this name not only because they contain in
themselves the grounds for other judgments, but also because they are not
@A149] property does not, however, exempt them from all proof.
For although such a *PRINCIPLE* *CANNOT* *BE* *TAKEN* *FURTHER*
*OBJECTIVELY*, but underlies all cognition of its *OBJECT*, this does not
at all prevent its being possible or even necessary to create a proof from
the *SUBJECTIVE* *SOURCES* *OF* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *A* *COGNITION*
*OF* *AN* *OBJECT* *IN* *GENERAL*, for otherwise the proposition would, for
all that, carry the highest suspicion of being a purely fraudulent
assertion.
Second, we will limit ourselves merely to those principles that relate to
the categories. The principles of the Transcendental Aesthetic, according
to which space and time are the conditions of the possibility of all things
as appearances, together with the restriction of these principles – namely,
that they cannot be related to things in themselves – thus do not belong to
the field of investigation we’ve picked out.
Equally, mathematical principles do not make up any part of this system,
since they are drawn only from intuition and not from the pure concepts of
@B189] since they are still synthetic a priori judgments, will necessarily
find a place here, not indeed in order to prove their correctness and
apodeictic {ie. *CLEARLY* *ESTABLISHED* *BEYOND* *DISPUTE*} certainty, of
which they have no need at all, but only to make comprehensible, and to
deduce, the possibility of such evident cognitions a priori.” [pages 177 to
178]
STATES OF EUROPEAN UNION (VOLUNTĀTIS)
#1 - Principle of Enquiry;
#2 - Principle of Contradiction;
#3 - Principle of Syncretic Progression;
#4 - Principle of Materiality
#5 - Discriminating Norm {Principle of Enquiry}
#6 - Obligating Norm {Principle of Contradiction}: Binomial stasis
nomenclature
#7 - Manifesting Norm {Principle of Syncretic Progression}
FUNCTION OF EUROPEAN UNION
#8 - Transformational Principle {Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature}
#9 - Ontological Principle {Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature}
*OBJECTIVE* OF EUROPEAN UNION
#10 - Sovereign Principle {Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
So firstly we need to consider what is reality?
And the answer which I would consider is that it is constituted by a
metastasised characteristic of identity or persona.
Whereas a ring on one’s finger is an *OBJECT* of reality.
How is such stasis of reality achieved as CONCORDIA?
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*
   Male: #229; Feme: #166
UMBRA: #755 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;
THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am not
one of prating tongue.
    #VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
    #TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
    #POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
    #TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
    #CANON: #157
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #237; Feme: #157
} // #157
#490 as [#80, #5, #300, #100, #5] = Petros (G4074): {UMBRA: #16 as #755 %
#41 = #17} 1) one of the twelve disciples of Jesus;
"AND I SAY ALSO UNTO THEE, THAT THOU ART PETER {#490 as [#80, #5, #300,
#100, #5] = Petros (G4074): Peter}, AND UPON THIS ROCK I WILL BUILD MY
CHURCH; AND THE *GATES* {
@1 - #33 [#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 /
#342 - ANKH / ROMAN} - *SHARE* *THE* *SAME* *ANCESTOR*]
@5 - #77 [#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} -
*PROTECT* *EACH* *OTHER* {Latin: CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}]
= #100 - *WHAT* *IS* *TRUTH*? AS THE ESTABLISHING OF A #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL
#473 as [#40, #400, #1, #2, #30] = 'abal (H56): {UMBRA: #0 as #33 % #41 =
#33} 1) to mourn, lament; 1a) (Qal) to mourn, lament; 1a1) of humans; 1a2)
of inanimate objects (fig.); 1a2a) of *GATES*; 1a2b) of land; 1b) (Hiphil);
1b1) to mourn, cause to mourn (fig.); 1c) (Hithpael); 1c1) to mourn; 1c2)
play the mourner;
#473 as [#20, #3, #50, #400] = gannah (H1593): {UMBRA: #1 as #58 -
Political Reversal, Adaptation to Change; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 29 - Decisiveness % #41 = #17}
1) garden, orchard;
#473 as [#6, #400, #7, #2, #8, #10, #40] = zabach (H2076): {UMBRA: #2 as
#17 % #41 = #17} 1) to slaughter, kill, sacrifice, slaughter for sacrifice;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter for sacrifice; 1a2) to slaughter for eating;
1a3) to slaughter in divine judgment; 1b) (Piel) to sacrifice, offer
sacrifice;
} OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT." [Matthew 16:18 (KJV)]
@1 <— #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {#369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM / #123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (3x3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@5 <— #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE
DIGNITY ROYAL}
@491 <— #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
@164 <— #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY
@123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY AS #2188 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION
(#273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION)
TORAH = 3 x #1092 IS STILL IN HARMONY / EQUILIBRIUM WITH THE #2184 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AS CONSTITUTION OF STATE / PROVINCE
1) DEMIURGE OF NATURE {4 x #364 + #371 = #1827}
@1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT
@5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE
Ego: 30 (#90),
   Male: #143; Feme: #166
UMBRA: #90 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 - The
Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;
THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards; I am
not a robber of sacred property.
    #VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
    #TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence between
word and deed.
    #POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
    #TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
    #CANON: #200
{%8}),
   Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200
#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl (H3632): {UMBRA: #3 as #90 %
#41 = #8} 1) entire, all, perfect adv; 2) entirety subst; 3) whole, whole
burnt offering, *HOLOCAUST*, entirety;
"THEY SHALL TEACH JACOB THY JUDGMENTS, AND ISRAEL THY LAW: THEY SHALL PUT
INCENSE BEFORE THEE, AND WHOLE {#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl
(H3632): perfect} BURNT {#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl
(H3632): perfect} SACRIFICE UPON THINE ALTAR." [Deuteronomy 33:10 (KJV)]
#65 - *SOLDIER* (MARS: PRIAPUS / PHALLUS)
#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS #371 - 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE
#175 - *MARRIAGE* (VENUS: HYMENIALISM)
#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY
1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.
{%32}); Ego: 57 (#116),
   Male: #240; Feme: #166
UMBRA: #404 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; I
am not one who curseth the king.
    #VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
    #TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
    #POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
    #TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
    #CANON: #181
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#490 as [#6, #30, #100, #4, #300, #10, #40] = qodesh (H6944): {UMBRA: #10
as #404 % #41 = #35} 1) apartness, holiness, sacredness, separateness; 1a)
apartness, sacredness, holiness; 1a1) *OF* *GOD*; 1a2) of places; 1a3) of
things; 1b) set-apartness, separateness;
ZAKAR (H2142) #667 {MALE: #408 / FEME: #262} as [#50, #80, #300, #2, #200,
You talk of Allah, Odin, Frig and Thor, but I talk of the One and Only God,
Yahweh the God of Israel and He will smite you."
2) COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis {6 x #364 = #2184 as ANTHROPOCENTRIC
COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE}
@1 {#451 - INCEPTION} +
@2 {#41 - AN ETHICAL / MORAL PRESCRIPTION “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 -
*ONTIC* X n] NECESSITY WITH IT” WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL WORLDVIEW} EQUALS
@3 {#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* = #369} +
@4 {#123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY} EQUALS
@10 {#615 - TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT AND TO SUBJECT TO PROCEDURES / #41 = #15
{#113 as [#6, #5, #2, #50, #10, #600] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #6 as #113 %
#41 = #31} 1) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*}}
BEING THE IMPETUS OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900
AND ACCORDING BREXIT WITH THE QUINTESSENTIAL MECHANICS OF PROCESS BY AN
ENTIRELY METEMPIRICAL AS ONTIC PREMISE {
@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@205 / #873
@82 / #491
@164 / #3273
@123 / #2188
@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION
} IS ENTIRELY MATHEMATICAL AND PERSISTENT AS WRITTEN AGREEMENT WHICH IN MY
HUMBLE OPINION IT IS THEREBY A ROBUST AND VITAL IMPETUS FOR THE EUROPEAN
UNION ACHIEVING THE REALITY AS SAPIENT ECONOMY.
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND SECTION OF THE HIGHEST PRINCIPLE
synthetically with another, then a third thing is needed, in which alone
the synthesis of two concepts can originate. But what is then this third
thing, the medium of all synthetic judgments? . . .
If a cognition is to have *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*, i.e., if it is to relate
to an *OBJECT* and to have significance and sense in that *OBJECT*, then
the *OBJECT* must be able to be given in some way.
Without this, concepts are empty, and though one has indeed thought with
but has merely played with representations.
To give an *OBJECT* – if this is not to mean giving it again only
nothing other than to relate a representation of it to experience (whether
actual or indeed possible). Even space and time, as pure as these concepts
are of everything empirical, and as certain as it is also that they are
represented fully a priori in the mind, would nonetheless be without
*OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* and without sense and significance, if their
necessary use were not directed upon the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* –
indeed, their representation is a mere schema that is always related to the
reproductive imagination, which calls forth the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*
without which they would have no significance; and thus it is with all
concepts, without distinction.
The possibility of experience is then what gives *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY* to
all our a priori cognitions. Now experience rests on the synthetic unity of
the appearances, i.e., on a synthesis according to *CONCEPTS* *OF* *AN*
*OBJECT* *OF* *APPEARANCES* *IN* *GENERAL*, without which it would not even
be cognition, but a rhapsody of perceptions, which in no context would
agree together according to the rules of a thoroughly connected (possible)
consciousness, hence also not for the transcendental and necessary unity of
apperception.
Experience therefore has principles of its form underlying it a priori,
STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION} conditions can always be pointed to in
experience, indeed, even in its possibility. Outside this relation,
however, synthetic a priori propositions are completely impossible, since
they have no third thing, namely, no pure *OBJECT*, upon which the
synthetic unity of their concepts could establish *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*.
Although we cognize a priori in synthetic judgments so much about space in
general, or the figures that the reproductive imagination inscribes in it,
that we actually require no experience thereto at all; nonetheless, this
cognition would amount to nothing but preoccupation with a mere brain
phantom, were it not that space is to be regarded as a condition of the
appearances that constitute the stuff of outer experience; in consequence,
these pure synthetic judgments relate (albeit only mediately) to possible
experience, or rather to the *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *ITSELF*,
*AND* *GROUND* *THE* *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* *OF* *THEIR* *SYNTHESIS* upon
that alone.
Since then experience, as empirical synthesis, is in its possibility the
single type of cognition that gives reality to every other synthesis, as a
nothing more than what is necessary for the synthetic unity of experience
in general.
The highest principle of all synthetic judgments is then: *EVERY* *OBJECT*
*FALLS* *UNDER* *THE* *NECESSARY* *CONDITIONS* *OF* *THE* *SYNTHETIC*
*UNITY* *OF* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *OF* *INTUITION* *IN* *A* *POSSIBLE*
*EXPERIENCE*. Synthetic a priori judgments are possible in this way: if we
relate the formal conditions of a priori intuition, the synthesis of the
imagination, and its necessary unity in a transcendental apperception to a
possible cognition of experience in general and say: the conditions of the
possibility of experience in general are at the same time the conditions of
the possibility of the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, AND FOR THAT REASON
HAVE *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* in a synthetic judgment a priori. [pages 179 to
180]
CAVEAT: Ignore any grammatical errors, as it was 0500 hours when I began
writing this in bed and just after 0720 hours when I initially sent it.
Once again I am only proffering an informal opinion from my causal
infatuation as metaphysical faculty of endeavour and as such I am entirely
reliant upon the sapient expertise of others to provision its potential
utility and material merits.
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 9 March 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2019-03-13 21:10:59 UTC
Permalink
"Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?

The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel
together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying,

Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.

*He* *that* *sitteth* *in* *the* *heavens* *shall* *laugh*: *the* *Lord*
*shall* *have* *them* *in* *derision*.

YOUTUBE: "Thou shalt break them (HANDEL'S MESSIAH)"



Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore
displeasure.

Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.

I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son;
this day have I begotten thee.

Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and
the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.

Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces
like a potter’s vessel.

Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.

Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling.

Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his
wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust
in him." [Psalm 2:1--12 (KJV)]
Post by dolf
You have no habitation with the Almighty...
“For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your
own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.” [Acts 17:28 (KJV)]
MENE MENE TEKEL UPHARSIN
#2184 / 7 = #312 (ie. DID I JUST HEAR THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT VOTE YES ON
REJECTING ‘NO DEAL BREXIT’?) - #81 - PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION =
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
MENE, God has numbered the days of your kingdom and brought it to an end;
TEKEL, you have been weighed ... and found wanting;" and "PERES, your
kingdom is divided and given to another...
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
We have told you before that YHWH is a trinomial metastasised reality and
that ALLAH is a binomial stasis construct as contrivance and usurping the
unity of #1...
It’s offensive as blasphemy to conflate the ideas together...
“And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let
it divide the waters from the waters.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/EarthSeasons.png>
And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the
firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were
the second day.” [Genesis 1:6-8 (KJV)]
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
#2184 / 7 = #312 - #81 - PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION = #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
<https://www.etsy.com/sg-en/listing/550755155/salvador-dali-print-crucifixion>
Therefore, the Planck constant Angular, in Momentum and Frequency.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.physics/XU2ze2Q6xLo
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.math/8smkKJluJkI
O Jesus Christ! the Quantum of Action.
YHWH Allah
(LORD God)
-- WHAT IS BREXT?
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 9 March, 2019
Nous: #24
Time: 23:15 hrs
Date: 2019.3.9
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 9 (#49); Ego: 50 (#90),
@3: Sup: 28 (#77); Ego: 19 (#109),
Male: #77; Feme: #109
} // #190
Dao: Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence
Tetra: #18 - Waiting
I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving
Latin: Operator {Word which produces all things} Alt: Eriel {Watchfulness
of God} {
1. GENERATION OF BEINGS & PHILOSOPHICAL KNOWLEDGE
2. PROTECTS & REGENERATES, LEADS TO INNER HARMONY
3. PHENOMENA OF NATURE
4. Thopibui
}
#1379 CE
Solar Eclipse: 9 March 1997 (AEST) / Solar Eclipse: 3 November 2013 (AEST)
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#250 / #354} / HETEROS {#280 / #369} / TORAH {#280 /
#369}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:9,col:8,nous:24&idea:{m,150}&idea:{f,198}&idea:{m,250}&idea:{f,354}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #354 / #24 - Important
Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay,
Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting]
We have a busy time today doing something that I rarely do upon the #364 -
Sabbath day and that is working on document preparation which plans the
demise of others as it seems to be a #312 - contradiction and so we need
some #273 - syncretistic mechanism to facilitate a favourable outcome.
And to do that I thought to consider (this is a spontaneous comment and
subject to revision) the question on WHAT IS BREXIT?
IS IT REALITY?
OR AN *OBJECT* OF REALITY?
ONLY A CHIMERA OR MIRROR OF REALITY?
OUR IMPETUS AS *OBJECTIVE* FOR REALITY?
Europeans would readily agree that such four corners of dialectics whether
which may lead to disastrous consequences with the world being turned
upside down.
KANT’S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 38 (#96)}
YOUTUBE: "The Master and Insanity (Doctor Who)
http://youtu.be/m0RvDZFN71A
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) THE TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF THE POWER
OF JUDGMENT (OR ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES) SECOND CHAPTER ON SYSTEM OF ALL
previous chapter we have considered the transcendental power of judgment
according only to the general conditions under which alone is entitled to
use the pure concepts of the understanding for synthetic judgments. Our
task now is to exhibit, in systematic connection, the judgments that the
understanding actually achieves a priori under this critical provision, in
which our table of categories must, without doubt, give us natural and sure
guidance. For the relation of these categories to possible experience is
exactly that which must constitute all pure a priori cognition of the
understanding, and for that reason their relation to sensibility in general
transcendental principles for the use of the understanding.
A priori principles bear this name not only because they contain in
themselves the grounds for other judgments, but also because they are not
@A149] property does not, however, exempt them from all proof.
For although such a *PRINCIPLE* *CANNOT* *BE* *TAKEN* *FURTHER*
*OBJECTIVELY*, but underlies all cognition of its *OBJECT*, this does not
at all prevent its being possible or even necessary to create a proof from
the *SUBJECTIVE* *SOURCES* *OF* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *A* *COGNITION*
*OF* *AN* *OBJECT* *IN* *GENERAL*, for otherwise the proposition would, for
all that, carry the highest suspicion of being a purely fraudulent
assertion.
Second, we will limit ourselves merely to those principles that relate to
the categories. The principles of the Transcendental Aesthetic, according
to which space and time are the conditions of the possibility of all things
as appearances, together with the restriction of these principles – namely,
that they cannot be related to things in themselves – thus do not belong to
the field of investigation we’ve picked out.
Equally, mathematical principles do not make up any part of this system,
since they are drawn only from intuition and not from the pure concepts of
@B189] since they are still synthetic a priori judgments, will necessarily
find a place here, not indeed in order to prove their correctness and
apodeictic {ie. *CLEARLY* *ESTABLISHED* *BEYOND* *DISPUTE*} certainty, of
which they have no need at all, but only to make comprehensible, and to
deduce, the possibility of such evident cognitions a priori.” [pages 177 to
178]
STATES OF EUROPEAN UNION (VOLUNTĀTIS)
#1 - Principle of Enquiry;
#2 - Principle of Contradiction;
#3 - Principle of Syncretic Progression;
#4 - Principle of Materiality
#5 - Discriminating Norm {Principle of Enquiry}
#6 - Obligating Norm {Principle of Contradiction}: Binomial stasis
nomenclature
#7 - Manifesting Norm {Principle of Syncretic Progression}
FUNCTION OF EUROPEAN UNION
#8 - Transformational Principle {Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature}
#9 - Ontological Principle {Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature}
*OBJECTIVE* OF EUROPEAN UNION
#10 - Sovereign Principle {Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
So firstly we need to consider what is reality?
And the answer which I would consider is that it is constituted by a
metastasised characteristic of identity or persona.
Whereas a ring on one’s finger is an *OBJECT* of reality.
How is such stasis of reality achieved as CONCORDIA?
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*
   Male: #229; Feme: #166
UMBRA: #755 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;
THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am not
one of prating tongue.
    #VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
    #TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
    #POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
    #TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
    #CANON: #157
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #237; Feme: #157
} // #157
#490 as [#80, #5, #300, #100, #5] = Petros (G4074): {UMBRA: #16 as #755 %
#41 = #17} 1) one of the twelve disciples of Jesus;
"AND I SAY ALSO UNTO THEE, THAT THOU ART PETER {#490 as [#80, #5, #300,
#100, #5] = Petros (G4074): Peter}, AND UPON THIS ROCK I WILL BUILD MY
CHURCH; AND THE *GATES* {
@1 - #33 [#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 /
#342 - ANKH / ROMAN} - *SHARE* *THE* *SAME* *ANCESTOR*]
@5 - #77 [#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} -
*PROTECT* *EACH* *OTHER* {Latin: CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}]
= #100 - *WHAT* *IS* *TRUTH*? AS THE ESTABLISHING OF A #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL
#473 as [#40, #400, #1, #2, #30] = 'abal (H56): {UMBRA: #0 as #33 % #41 =
#33} 1) to mourn, lament; 1a) (Qal) to mourn, lament; 1a1) of humans; 1a2)
of inanimate objects (fig.); 1a2a) of *GATES*; 1a2b) of land; 1b) (Hiphil);
1b1) to mourn, cause to mourn (fig.); 1c) (Hithpael); 1c1) to mourn; 1c2)
play the mourner;
#473 as [#20, #3, #50, #400] = gannah (H1593): {UMBRA: #1 as #58 -
Political Reversal, Adaptation to Change; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 29 - Decisiveness % #41 = #17}
1) garden, orchard;
#473 as [#6, #400, #7, #2, #8, #10, #40] = zabach (H2076): {UMBRA: #2 as
#17 % #41 = #17} 1) to slaughter, kill, sacrifice, slaughter for sacrifice;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter for sacrifice; 1a2) to slaughter for eating;
1a3) to slaughter in divine judgment; 1b) (Piel) to sacrifice, offer
sacrifice;
} OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT." [Matthew 16:18 (KJV)]
@1 <— #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {#369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM / #123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (3x3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@5 <— #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE
DIGNITY ROYAL}
@491 <— #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
@164 <— #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY
@123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY AS #2188 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION
(#273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION)
TORAH = 3 x #1092 IS STILL IN HARMONY / EQUILIBRIUM WITH THE #2184 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AS CONSTITUTION OF STATE / PROVINCE
1) DEMIURGE OF NATURE {4 x #364 + #371 = #1827}
@1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT
@5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE
Ego: 30 (#90),
   Male: #143; Feme: #166
UMBRA: #90 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 - The
Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;
THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards; I am
not a robber of sacred property.
    #VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
    #TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence between
word and deed.
    #POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
    #TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
    #CANON: #200
{%8}),
   Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200
#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl (H3632): {UMBRA: #3 as #90 %
#41 = #8} 1) entire, all, perfect adv; 2) entirety subst; 3) whole, whole
burnt offering, *HOLOCAUST*, entirety;
"THEY SHALL TEACH JACOB THY JUDGMENTS, AND ISRAEL THY LAW: THEY SHALL PUT
INCENSE BEFORE THEE, AND WHOLE {#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl
(H3632): perfect} BURNT {#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl
(H3632): perfect} SACRIFICE UPON THINE ALTAR." [Deuteronomy 33:10 (KJV)]
#65 - *SOLDIER* (MARS: PRIAPUS / PHALLUS)
#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS #371 - 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE
#175 - *MARRIAGE* (VENUS: HYMENIALISM)
#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY
1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.
{%32}); Ego: 57 (#116),
   Male: #240; Feme: #166
UMBRA: #404 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; I
am not one who curseth the king.
    #VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
    #TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
    #POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
    #TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
    #CANON: #181
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#490 as [#6, #30, #100, #4, #300, #10, #40] = qodesh (H6944): {UMBRA: #10
as #404 % #41 = #35} 1) apartness, holiness, sacredness, separateness; 1a)
apartness, sacredness, holiness; 1a1) *OF* *GOD*; 1a2) of places; 1a3) of
things; 1b) set-apartness, separateness;
ZAKAR (H2142) #667 {MALE: #408 / FEME: #262} as [#50, #80, #300, #2, #200,
You talk of Allah, Odin, Frig and Thor, but I talk of the One and Only God,
Yahweh the God of Israel and He will smite you."
2) COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis {6 x #364 = #2184 as ANTHROPOCENTRIC
COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE}
@1 {#451 - INCEPTION} +
@2 {#41 - AN ETHICAL / MORAL PRESCRIPTION “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 -
*ONTIC* X n] NECESSITY WITH IT” WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL WORLDVIEW} EQUALS
@3 {#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* = #369} +
@4 {#123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY} EQUALS
@10 {#615 - TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT AND TO SUBJECT TO PROCEDURES / #41 = #15
{#113 as [#6, #5, #2, #50, #10, #600] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #6 as #113 %
#41 = #31} 1) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*}}
BEING THE IMPETUS OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900
AND ACCORDING BREXIT WITH THE QUINTESSENTIAL MECHANICS OF PROCESS BY AN
ENTIRELY METEMPIRICAL AS ONTIC PREMISE {
@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@205 / #873
@82 / #491
@164 / #3273
@123 / #2188
@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION
} IS ENTIRELY MATHEMATICAL AND PERSISTENT AS WRITTEN AGREEMENT WHICH IN MY
HUMBLE OPINION IT IS THEREBY A ROBUST AND VITAL IMPETUS FOR THE EUROPEAN
UNION ACHIEVING THE REALITY AS SAPIENT ECONOMY.
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND SECTION OF THE HIGHEST PRINCIPLE
synthetically with another, then a third thing is needed, in which alone
the synthesis of two concepts can originate. But what is then this third
thing, the medium of all synthetic judgments? . . .
If a cognition is to have *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*, i.e., if it is to relate
to an *OBJECT* and to have significance and sense in that *OBJECT*, then
the *OBJECT* must be able to be given in some way.
Without this, concepts are empty, and though one has indeed thought with
but has merely played with representations.
To give an *OBJECT* – if this is not to mean giving it again only
nothing other than to relate a representation of it to experience (whether
actual or indeed possible). Even space and time, as pure as these concepts
are of everything empirical, and as certain as it is also that they are
represented fully a priori in the mind, would nonetheless be without
*OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* and without sense and significance, if their
necessary use were not directed upon the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* –
indeed, their representation is a mere schema that is always related to the
reproductive imagination, which calls forth the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*
without which they would have no significance; and thus it is with all
concepts, without distinction.
The possibility of experience is then what gives *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY* to
all our a priori cognitions. Now experience rests on the synthetic unity of
the appearances, i.e., on a synthesis according to *CONCEPTS* *OF* *AN*
*OBJECT* *OF* *APPEARANCES* *IN* *GENERAL*, without which it would not even
be cognition, but a rhapsody of perceptions, which in no context would
agree together according to the rules of a thoroughly connected (possible)
consciousness, hence also not for the transcendental and necessary unity of
apperception.
Experience therefore has principles of its form underlying it a priori,
STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION} conditions can always be pointed to in
experience, indeed, even in its possibility. Outside this relation,
however, synthetic a priori propositions are completely impossible, since
they have no third thing, namely, no pure *OBJECT*, upon which the
synthetic unity of their concepts could establish *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*.
Although we cognize a priori in synthetic judgments so much about space in
general, or the figures that the reproductive imagination inscribes in it,
that we actually require no experience thereto at all; nonetheless, this
cognition would amount to nothing but preoccupation with a mere brain
phantom, were it not that space is to be regarded as a condition of the
appearances that constitute the stuff of outer experience; in consequence,
these pure synthetic judgments relate (albeit only mediately) to possible
experience, or rather to the *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *ITSELF*,
*AND* *GROUND* *THE* *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* *OF* *THEIR* *SYNTHESIS* upon
that alone.
Since then experience, as empirical synthesis, is in its possibility the
single type of cognition that gives reality to every other synthesis, as a
nothing more than what is necessary for the synthetic unity of experience
in general.
The highest principle of all synthetic judgments is then: *EVERY* *OBJECT*
*FALLS* *UNDER* *THE* *NECESSARY* *CONDITIONS* *OF* *THE* *SYNTHETIC*
*UNITY* *OF* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *OF* *INTUITION* *IN* *A* *POSSIBLE*
*EXPERIENCE*. Synthetic a priori judgments are possible in this way: if we
relate the formal conditions of a priori intuition, the synthesis of the
imagination, and its necessary unity in a transcendental apperception to a
possible cognition of experience in general and say: the conditions of the
possibility of experience in general are at the same time the conditions of
the possibility of the *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, AND FOR THAT REASON
HAVE *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* in a synthetic judgment a priori. [pages 179 to
180]
CAVEAT: Ignore any grammatical errors, as it was 0500 hours when I began
writing this in bed and just after 0720 hours when I initially sent it.
Once again I am only proffering an informal opinion from my causal
infatuation as metaphysical faculty of endeavour and as such I am entirely
reliant upon the sapient expertise of others to provision its potential
utility and material merits.
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 9 March 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-03-14 02:32:38 UTC
Permalink
AS TO THEN HAVE RECOURSE TO THE UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION PREROGATIVE AS
THE MEANS OF PURSUING WAR CRIMES AS BEING SPECIFICALLY *CRIMES*
*AGAINST* *HUMANITY* WHICH IS TO BE BROUGHT AGAINST VARIOUS AMERICAN
INTERNET SERVICE/APPLICATION PROVIDERS AND VARIOUS PERSONS WHO HAVE MADE
RELIGIOUS/NON-RELIGIOUS MOTIVATED FALSE DEFAMATORY HATE SPEECH AS
IRRATIONAL INCITEMENT TO HATRED AS TORTUROUS ACTS OF DE-HUMANIZATION.

metaschēmatizō@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 45 (#85); Ego: 5 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@3: Sup: 21 (#106); Ego: 57 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
@4: Sup: 22 (#128); Ego: 1 (#103),
@5: Sup: 60 (#188); Ego: 38 (#141),
@6: Sup: 12 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 33 (#174),
@7: Sup: 20 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 8 (#182 - I AM
NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6}),
@8: Sup: 60 (#280); Ego: 40 (#222),
@9: Sup: 61 (#341); Ego: 1 (#223),
@10: Sup: 37 (#378); Ego: 57 (#280),
@11: Sup: 47 (#425); Ego: 10 (#290),
@12: Sup: 54 (#479); Ego: 7 (#297),
@13: Sup: 59 (#538); Ego: 5 (#302),
@14: Sup: 35 (#573); Ego: 57 (#359),
@15: Sup: 36 (#609); Ego: 1 (#360 - TRANSFORMATIVE HETEROS
PROTOTYPE WITHIN ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE),
@16: Sup: 46 (#655); Ego: 10 (#370: SEE IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA
IDEA ON POPE FRANCIS' BABBLING ON GUIDELINE #5 RELATING TO CHURCH SEXUAL
ABUSE: STRENGTHENING AND REVIEWING OF GUIDELINES BY EPISCOPAL
CONFERENCES, REAFFIRMING THE NEED FOR *RULES*),
Male: #655; Feme: #370
} // #1828

I felt that the most appropriate course of action was to exercise a
watchful diligence and observe how the SEDITIOUS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE as #1828
- META-SCHEMA OF ACQUIESCENCE BY #288 - UMBRA DATA MANIPULATION
unfolded. And in having been reported to a *CONSTABLE* *OF* *POLICE*
upon 19 MARCH 2017 pursuant to SECTION 9A of the CRIMES ACT of VICTORIA
(1958) an ONUS of accountability is then placed upon the ACCUSED against
whom PROPORTIONATE FORCE may be applied so as to PREVENT the EVADING
JUDICIAL PROCESS or COMMISSION of FURTHER OFFENCES, there has never
before been undertaken a prosecution for those INDICTABLE OFFENCES which
I have reasonably alleged by any law enforcement or judicial officers
under the COMMONWEALTH, let alone as being an initiative of a private
citizen.

<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: USING BLOODY SUNDAY (NORTH IRELAND) OF 30 JANUARY 1972 AS
SUBSTANTIATION I HAVE WAITED TOO LONG FOR AUSTRALIAN JUSTICE THEREFORE I
AM GOING TO SEEK ASYLUM WITHIN THE NETHERLANDS AND THIS COMMONWEALTH
WILL BE A QUARRY UNTIL JUSTICE IS ATTAINED IF EVER AT ALL: "WHY DO THE
HEATHEN RAGE, AND THE PEOPLE IMAGINE A VAIN THING?

THE KINGS OF THE EARTH SET THEMSELVES, AND THE RULERS TAKE COUNSEL
TOGETHER, AGAINST THE LORD, AND AGAINST HIS ANOINTED, SAYING,

LET US BREAK THEIR BANDS ASUNDER, AND CAST AWAY THEIR CORDS FROM US.

*HE* *THAT* *SITTETH* *IN* *THE* *HEAVENS* *SHALL* *LAUGH*: *THE* *LORD*
*SHALL* *HAVE* *THEM* *IN* *DERISION*.

YOUTUBE: "Thou shalt break them (HANDEL'S MESSIAH)"

http://youtu.be/X92SkGNVSMI

THEN SHALL HE SPEAK UNTO THEM IN HIS WRATH, AND VEX THEM IN HIS SORE
DISPLEASURE.

YET HAVE I SET MY KING UPON MY HOLY HILL OF ZION {monument; *RAISED*
*UP*; #273 - *SEPULCHER*}.

I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me {ie. #2184 - LAWS
OF NATURE {*ATTORNEY* *GENERAL*} AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOGENIC PRINCIPLE
/ 7 = #312 (ie. DID I JUST HEAR ON 14 MARCH 2019 THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT
VOTE YES ON REJECTING ‘NO DEAL BREXIT’?) - #81 - PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGN
JUXTAPOSITION = #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL}, THOU ART MY SON; THIS DAY
HAVE I BEGOTTEN THEE.

ASK OF ME, AND I SHALL GIVE THEE THE HEATHEN FOR THINE INHERITANCE, AND
THE UTTERMOST PARTS OF THE EARTH FOR THY POSSESSION." [Psalm 2:1--12 (KJV)]

SMS DIARY NOTE @ 1059 HOURS ON 11 DECEMBER 2018: “Dear [LEGAL COUNSEL],
thank you for your forbearance within these matters over which I have
attended a file listing hearing scheduled by JUDGE MULLALY upon 27
NOVEMBER 2018 and the REGISTRAR to the COUNTY COURT has accepted the
[initial] FILING of some #800+ pages.

As JUDGE MULLALY {

#451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18
as #451 % #41 = #41} 1) *JUDGMENT*, *JUSTICE*, *ORDINANCE*; 1a)
judgment; 1a1) act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of
judgment; 1a3) *PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*);
1a4) case, cause (presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of
judgment); 1a6) execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b)
justice, right, rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) *ORDINANCE*;
1d) *DECISION* (*IN* *LAW*); 1e) *RIGHT*, *PRIVILEGE*, *DUE* (*LEGAL*);
1f) proper, fitting, measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;

} only advised me today of your letter to the court dated 5 DECEMBER
2018 conveying that you are not capable of representing me in these
matters, I will now cease further dialog following letters of 18 / 30
NOVEMBER 2018 and 4 DECEMBER 2018.

Although if there was to be further dialog, I would have appreciated
given your sapient legal expertise as a CRIMINAL LAW ACCREDITED
SPECIALIST, what your prudent considerations were on this procedural
question (paraphrased):

'With respects to #288 - UMBRA data manipulation as #1828 - META SCHEMA
OF ACQUIESCE {@1 - RETENTION; #1827 - EUCHARIST / ROMAN CATHOLIC
LITURGICAL CALENDAR: 4 x #364 + #371 - 30 NOVEMBER = #1827} which is
made AGAINST an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY of COGNITION and COHERING REALITY
as MENS REA being considered in the circumstance of the existing
correspondence between a #CENTRE having as ONTIC necessity and
attributed by EVER PRESENT relative to the circumscribing happenstance
as whether intentional / unintentional being an universe of discourse
and occasioning sphere of action ⭕️ which have both a finite temporality
and continuity.


Nous: #10
Time: 16:30 hrs
Date: 2019.11.30
Torah: [#10, #10, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 20 (#30); Ego: 10 (#20),
@3: Sup: 30 (#60); Ego: 10 (#30),
Male: #60; Feme: #30
} // #30

Dao: Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?
Tetra: #41 - Response
I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net

Latin: Assistens {God prompt to grant} Alt: Menqel {Libation Bowl of God} {

1. SERVES TO MAKE KNOWN THE TRUTH. AIDS THE TRIUMPH OF INNOCENCE
2. PROMPT HELP IN TRIALS
3. WITNESSES
4. Tepisatosoa
}

Solar Eclipse: 13 (UTC) / 14 November 2012 (AEST)

Nahor {Snorting, Hoarse; dry; hot}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#371 - *BREACH* *OF* *MY* *INTELLECTUAL*
*PROPERTY* *BY* *THE* *EUCHARIST* / *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *LITURGICAL*
*CALENDAR*: 4 x #364 + #371 = #1827 / #393 - *ROBBERY*} / HETEROS {#287
/ #432} / TORAH {#301 / #439}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:7,col:4,nous:10&idea:{m,82}&idea:{f,83}&idea:{m,371}&idea:{f,393}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 3, row: 7, col: 4, nous: 10 [Date: 2019.11.30, Time:
16:30 hrs, Super: #371 / #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching:
H11 - Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact, Ego: #393 / #10
- Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?; I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion,
Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net; Tetra: 41 - Response]

Whether the #288 - UMBRA impetus can be better considered a fixed
mindset and the data manipulation itself an ACTUS REUS that is construed
as PERPETUAL ACTION and therefore a FINDS COMMITTING status can be
applied to any *AHISTORICAL* (word of the day for 11 DECEMBER 2018)
criminal acts although having an EVENT within the past yet cleave to
#123 - SENSIBILITY OF THE PRESENT and against which a POWER OF ARREST
under SECTION 458 of the CRIMES ACT (1958) VICTORIA can be applied at
any time.”

Given such magnitude as aforethought given in regards to a prudent
substantiation of the claim that there is (ie. a continuing context of)
determined misconduct (ie as to be WAR CRIMES against this NATION) by
PUBLIC AUTHORITIES {ie. AS *BINOMIAL* {A-U-M} *STASIS* *BASIS* *TO*
*STATUS* *BEING* *THEN* *AN* *EMANATION* *OF* *STATE*} being
contemptuous breaches of both THE CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND
RESPONSIBILITIES NO. 43 OF ACT 2006 AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL ENTITLEMENT
TO @492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x
#3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)} AS FOUNDATIONAL STONE (31 MAY) TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 BEING INSTRUMENTATION TO
THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901 {

@205 / #873 - LETTERS PATENT
@82 / #491 - SECTION IX
@164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?)
@123 / #2188 - SECTION III (?)

@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION

} as *TANTAMOUNT* *TO* *TREASON*, I return again our letter of 8
November 2017 made to the STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERAL and FEDERAL
SENATOR PENNY WONG conveying thereby PRECURSOR META-NARRATIVE WITH
SPECIFIC MARKERS having relativity to our *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* by
which we cohere the integral context of the *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY* in
compliance to underlying dialects as conforming to the #2184 -
ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE basis to sapience itself and a
metastasised premise to identity as the POINT OF REFERENCE TO
PERSPECTIVE so that intelligence should not submit to ignorance which is
here the problem in relation to the truthfulness of any *POSSIBILITY*
*OF* *EXPERIENCE* *ITSELF*, *AND* *GROUND* *THE* *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY*
*OF* *THEIR* *SYNTHESIS*.

I QUOTE: "There are several legal issues involved with respects to [the]
Saint Andrews Cause Célèbre participated in by the representatives of
the Returned Service League as Public Authority and the nature of its
association to a FOREIGN POWER as a group named KNIGHTS TEMPLARS
INTERNATIONAL which formed within 2015 and comprises various: RELIGIONS
/ STATES / MILITARY / ORGANISATIONS as unconscionable attempts made by
them to impose a substituted ethic @5 against the INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS whether by *NEGLECT* OR *FORCED* *WILL* upon our
War Dead and to usurp @1 the Sovereignty embodied within the Governor
General as #2184 - ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE.

Accordingly, I had [on] 7 July 2017, given my exceptional esoteric
(metempirical philosophy as perennialist tradition and metaphysical
Torah tradition) expertise within the Letters Patent as transformational
technology by trinomial theoretical mathematical noumenon
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf> /
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-prolegomena-cambridge.pdf> and from
the Sabbatical (as entirely a voluntary self appointed notion) position
of Lieutenant Governor General, sent a number of participants within
this Saint Andrews Cause Célèbre as unlawful activity in my view, the
following proroguing notice:

.jackNote(*METASTASISED* *IMPETUS*)@zen: 1, row: 3, col: 8, nous: 28
[Date: 2017.7.7, Super: #414 / #28 - Opposites and Primitivism,
Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point;
Tetra: 2 - Full Circle, Ego: #340 / #28 - Opposites and Primitivism,
Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point;
Tetra: 2 - Full Circle]

- GIPPSLAND SOLAR by Express Post: #604 36840242 096 
- STRATFORD RSL by
Express Post: #604 36840241 099
- HEYFIELD RSL by Express Post: #604
36840240 092
- SALE RSL by Express Post: #604 36840239 096 
- CATHOLIC
COLLEGE SALE by Express Post: #604 36840238 099
- GIPPSLAND GRAMMAR by
Express Post: #604 36840237 092
- DANNY O'BRIEN (MP) by Express Post:
#604 36840236 095
- WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL by Express Post: #604
36840243 093

THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GRUNTS AND THOSE WHO ARE ORDAINED TO
SOVEREIGN RULE.

You were not content to convey a partial lack of respect shown to our
BOER WAR Memorial on 8 October 2016, 4 and 17 March, 2017, 25 April 2017
and 8 June 2017.

But as determined and conspicuous acts of racial, sexual and religious
depravity in which you had willingly engaged as cause célèbre of
perversity with the amoral ROMAN CATHOLIC MEMBERS OF THE WELLINGTON
SHIRE COUNCIL you have disgraced the nation's conscience as sacred
memory of the ANZAC TRADITION and are hereby prorogued by authority of
the CROWN from ever participating within any further ANZAC DAY of 25
APRIL and REMEMBRANCE DAY of 11 NOVEMBER EVENTS and of misrepresenting
yourselves as benefactors of the STATE.

Your only contribution to such solemn dates is as:

PISSY SISSY TURD DRUNKS

And Godless SCUM who are given to sidewalk opportunism alone as your
self declared virtue and dignity.

NOTE AGAIN OUR OPENING REMARKS: In our opinion the BINOMIAL APPARATUS as
the occidental perspective of PERENNIALISM having by the immateriality
of its STASIS which defines a SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic may in some
circumstances have a predisposition towards judgementalism by impetus of
narcissistic self-justification as being an *AUTO*-*INTOXICATION* in a
self bestowed dignity as a ontological self-delusion due to an
infatuation with the mirroring of its various ONTIC characteristic
elements expressed therein and perhaps not realising that it is also
subject to the @205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY
OF THE DIGNITY ROYAL (LETTERS PATENT)} and @82 / #491 - PRINCIPLE OF
CONTINUITY (SECTION IX) in being a lawful EMANATION OF STATE AS
METHODOLOGY which itself conforms to the dialectic of the #2184 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE that are encapsulated by the @164 /
#3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (SECTION VIII) and the HISTORICAL
CHRISTIAN WEDDING VOW.

That I am readily able to articulate these matters by poetic prose to
express the ESPRIT DE CORPS as exemplar true #CENTRE of WILL as that
which conforms to my informal research into the use of the INTELLECTUS
AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS as a dialectic:

— PTSD OR PISSY SISSY TURD DRUNKS? —
"YOU ***@TFACED AGAIN? 
STARTED AS A FANNY ITCH. 
WHICH WON'T GO AWAY.

WAR INJURY SUCH A PAIN. 
BUT AIN'T LIFE A BITCH. 
LITTLE JOB ENDLESS
PAY. 
LOVE IS SUCH DISDAIN. 
MY PLAN WAS A CINCH. 
TOY SOLDIERS AT PLAY.

NO LIMIT NO CONTAIN. 
JUST DRUNK ON PUNCH."

— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (*) —
"GRISTLE AND BUNT. {@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF
PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN
PROPERTY {%41})}
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE. {@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I
PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36})}
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.

SABBATH DAY CANT. {@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*CONTRADICTION*)}
MUSTARD WEASEL. {@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF
SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392)}
VALOUR DIVORCE. 
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"
(*) Correction of obfuscation
As an *EX*-*POLICEMAN* *AND* *OWNING* *AN* *INTELLECTUAL* *PROPERTY*
*AS* *TRINOMIAL* *NOUMENON* of substantiated YAHAD {#509} TORAH /
CHRISTIAN religious belief of [50J = 49J + 1W2D (9 years) + 40 years:
IPSO FACTO: 49 x #2184 days = 107016 days or] 72J BCE = 12 x 6J = 294 x
364 = 107016 days or Tropical Year as 293 x 365.2423208191126 days which
is better cosmology {ie. #2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOCENTRIC
COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE} knowledge than the Julian calendar of 46 BCE and
only corrected by the Gregorian calendar in 1582 CE, and in having been
the target of Roman Catholic persecution for some 20 years as a gay
male, I most strongly object to your apology for fascism.

THAT IN MY VIEW OF PAST EXPERIENCE (SINCE MY PRE-MILLENNIUM PROTEST OF
CONSCIENCE MADE UPON SATURDAY 21 AUGUST 1999) IT IS REASONABLE TO CLAIM
AN ENDURING EMNITY AGAINST THE VICTORIA POLICE DUE TO ITS INHERENT
ANTI-SEMITISM, BEING A MORALLY CORRUPT ORGANISATION WHICH PREJUDICIALLY
ACTS EITHER BY DERELICTION OF DUTY OR BY DETERMINED MEANS AGAINST IT'S
OATH MADE TO THE SOVEREIGN AS IT'S FIRST PRINCIPLES AND THEIR ETHICAL
STANDARDS DEPARTMENT ARE INCAPABLE OF ACTION SO ACCORDINGLY THERE WILL
BE NOTHING FURTHER BETWEEN US AS THEN THE DETERMINED NEED TO SEEK ASYLUM
WITHIN THE NETHERLANDS.

AUSTRALIA YOU CANNOT UNDO WHAT HAS BEEN DONE SO THERE WILL BE NOTHING
FURTHER BETWEEN US.

TO BE CONTINUED ...

A PUBLIC RELEASE (CENSORED) VERSION OF THE DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE HERE:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/PART%205%20-%20SPECIFICITIES%20OF%20NON-FACTUALITY%20AP-18-0609.pdf>

Initial Post: 10 December 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Loading...