Discussion:
— COME TO PAPA: EUROPEAN UNION BLIND TO DEVIL IN THE DETAIL AS THE REALITY OF BRITAIN’S PLAN ‘B’ WHEEL STOP STARTS TO BIGHT
(zu alt für eine Antwort)
dolf
2019-01-18 20:39:31 UTC
Permalink
— COME TO PAPA: EUROPEAN UNION BLIND TO DEVIL IN THE DETAIL AS THE REALITY
OF BRITAIN’S PLAN ‘B’ WHEEL STOP STARTS TO BIGHT

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 19 January, 2019

SO MR MACRON DO YOU BELIEVE IN LIBERTY OR NOT?

BRUSSELS / PARIS (REUTERS) 1024 HOURS (EST) ON 18 JANUARY 2019: “POPCORN TO
HAND, EU WATCHES BREXIT SHOW BUT FRETS FOR OWN FUTURE: If there has been a
positive from Brexit, leaders say, it has been the exceptional unity the 27
have shown in negotiation -- though a scary end-game could yet test that
togetherness.”

<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-popcorn/popcorn-to-hand-eu-watches-brexit-show-but-frets-for-own-future-idUSKCN1PC1US>

— SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMOUS DYNAMIC —

“SUCH A PLIGHT.
T’IS TIC-TAC-TOE.
AIN’T THAT SO.
AN END TO FIGHT.
IS CENTRE’S FOE.
WHERE TO GO.
OUR RULE MIGHT.”

Enclosed is an updated #26 page document to that provided to your HONOUR
upon 16 JANUARY 2019 being made in consideration of these matters, that it
has been a privilege to proffer a further clarifying advantageous opinion
upon BREXIT negotiations through the news media avenue as a subject which
was designated for British Parliamentary voting on 15 January 2019 and
probable occurrence on 29 March 2019:

HUMAN BEING (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 - ACTION PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE'
{ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE); Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391} / HETEROS {#283 / #377} / TORAH {#237 -
*DETERMINED* *WILL* / #435}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,84}&idea:{f,123}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,391}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 3, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 41 [Date: 2019.9.15, Time: 11:30
hrs, Super: #311 / #42 - Generating Things, Reason's Modifications;
I-Ching: H60 - Control, Restraint, Articulating, Limitation, Moderation;
Tetra: 52 - Measure, Ego: #391 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in
Difference; I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation]

G3809@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 10 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 10
(#91),
@4: Sup: 14 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
4 (#95),
@5: Sup: 19 (#204); Ego: 5 (#100),
@6: Sup: 29 (#233); Ego: 10 (#110),
@7: Sup: 30 (#263 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: TO MAKE PLANS IS MOST OFTEN
PRESUMPTUOUS); Ego: 1 (#111),
@8: Sup: 68 (#331 - ACTION PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE'
{ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #331; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #111 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit; I
am not given to cursing.

#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): {UMBRA:
#22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children
(*WHICH* *RELATES* *TO* *THE* *CULTIVATION* *OF* *MIND* *AND* *MORALS*,
*AND* *EMPLOYS* *FOR* *THIS* *PURPOSE* *NOW* *COMMANDS* *AND*
*ADMONITIONS*, *NOW* *REPROOF* *AND* *PUNISHMENT*) It also includes the
*TRAINING* *AND* *CARE* *OF* *THE* *BODY*; 2) *WHATEVER* *IN* *ADULTS*
*ALSO* *CULTIVATES* *THE* *SOUL*, *ESPECIALLY* *BY* *CORRECTING* *MISTAKES*
*AND* *CURBING* *PASSIONS*; 2a) *INSTRUCTION* *WHICH* *AIMS* *AT*
*INCREASING* *VIRTUE*; 2b) *CHASTISEMENT*, *CHASTENING*, (*OF* *THE*
*EVILS* *WITH* *WHICH* *GOD* *VISITS* *MEN* *FOR* *THEIR* *AMENDMENT*);

SMS DIARY NOTE @ 1059 HOURS ON 11 DECEMBER 2018: “Dear [LEGAL COUNSEL],
thank you for your forbearance within these matters over which I have
attended a file listing hearing scheduled by JUDGE MULLALY upon 27 NOVEMBER
2018 and the REGISTRAR to the COUNTY COURT has accepted the filing of some
#800+ pages.

As JUDGE MULLALY {

#451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18 as
#451 % #41 = #41} 1) *JUDGMENT*, *JUSTICE*, *ORDINANCE*; 1a) judgment; 1a1)
act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of judgment; 1a3)
*PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*); 1a4) case, cause
(presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of judgment); 1a6)
execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b) justice, right,
rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) *ORDINANCE*; 1d) *DECISION* (*IN*
*LAW*); 1e) *RIGHT*, *PRIVILEGE*, *DUE* (*LEGAL*); 1f) proper, fitting,
measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;

} only advised me today of your letter to the court dated 5 DECEMBER 2018
conveying that you are not capable of representing me in these matters, I
will now cease further dialog following letters of 18 / 30 NOVEMBER 2018
and 4 DECEMBER 2018.

Although if there was to be further dialog, I would have appreciated given
your sapient legal expertise as a CRIMINAL LAW ACCREDITED SPECIALIST, what
your prudent considerations were on this procedural question:

'With respects to #288 - UMBRA data manipulation {eg: in the instance shown
above: #311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809):
{UMBRA: #22 as #111 % #41 = #29}} as META SCHEMA OF ACQUIESCE made AGAINST
an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY of COGNITION and COHERING REALITY as MENS REA
being considered in the circumstance of the existing correspondence between
a #CENTRE having as ONTIC necessity and attributed by EVER PRESENT relative
to the circumscribing happenstance as whether intentional / unintentional
being an universe of discourse and occasioning sphere of action ⭕️ which
have both a finite temporality and continuity.

Whether the #288 - UMBRA impetus can be better considered a fixed mindset
and the data manipulation itself an ACTUS REUS that is construed as
PERPETUAL ACTION and therefore a FINDS COMMITTING status can be applied to
any *AHISTORICAL* (word of the day for 11 DECEMBER 2018) criminal acts
although having an EVENT within the past yet cleave to #123 - SENSIBILITY
of the PRESENT and against which a POWER OF ARREST under SECTION 458 of the
CRIMES ACT (1958) VICTORIA can be applied at any time.”

And thank you for your faithful considerations within my matters and good
day to you."

SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 61
(#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 - *SOVEREIGNTY* /
*CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,132}&idea:{f,246}&idea:{m,266}&idea:{f,390}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 6, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 41 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #266 / #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition, Ego:
#390 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference; I-Ching: H26 -
Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating, The taming
power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation]

TO BBC NEWSWATCH / THE AGE NEWSDESK @ 0811 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "ON A
#364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW MADE IN RELATION TO #2184 v's #1827 AS
COSMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATION OF THE STATE / COMMONWEALTH MADE IN FAVOUR OF
THE BRITISH IMPERIAL GOVERNANCE (vis a vis QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT)
THE BREXIT DIVORCE BILL CAN BE SUBJECT TO A #237 - DETERMINED WILL
REDUCTION OF ANY REMITTANCE (DESPITE PROTESTS FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION)
SOLELY IN LIGHT OF IMPENDING DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE' {ie.
#FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE."

That I have voluntarily done so with respects to my some 24 years informal
research into technologizing the existential substance {#2184 - LAWS OF
NATURE v's #1827 - ECCLESIASTICAL LITURGICAL CYCLES

CONCEPT OF SUBSISTENCE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL LUMEN GENTIUM

v's

#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE
PRIVY COUNCIL} AS #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*

} of QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 as
instrumentation to the FEDERATION of the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Being%20Human.pdf>

- dolf

Initial Post: 19 January 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2019-01-18 20:58:54 UTC
Permalink
— COME TO PAPA: EUROPEAN UNION BLIND TO DEVIL IN THE DETAIL AS THE REALITY
OF BRITAIN’S PLAN ‘B’ WHEEL STOP STARTS TO BIGHT

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 19 January, 2019

SO MR MACRON DO YOU BELIEVE IN LIBERTY OR NOT?

BRUSSELS / PARIS (REUTERS) 1024 HOURS (EST) ON 18 JANUARY 2019: “POPCORN TO
HAND, EU WATCHES BREXIT SHOW BUT FRETS FOR OWN FUTURE: If there has been a
positive from Brexit, leaders say, it has been the exceptional unity the 27
have shown in negotiation -- though a scary end-game could yet test that
togetherness.”

<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-popcorn/popcorn-to-hand-eu-watches-brexit-show-but-frets-for-own-future-idUSKCN1PC1US>

— SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMOUS DYNAMIC —

“SUCH A PLIGHT.
T’IS TIC-TAC-TOE.
AIN’T THAT SO.
AN END TO FIGHT.
IS CENTRE’S FOE.
WHERE TO GO.
OUR RULE MIGHT.”

Enclosed is an updated #26 page document to that provided to your HONOUR
upon 16 JANUARY 2019 being made in consideration of these matters, that it
has been a privilege to proffer a further clarifying advantageous opinion
upon BREXIT negotiations through the news media avenue as a subject which
was designated for British Parliamentary voting on 15 January 2019 and
probable occurrence on 29 March 2019:

HUMAN BEING (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 - ACTION PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE'
{ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE); Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391} / HETEROS {#283 / #377} / TORAH {#237 -
*DETERMINED* *WILL* / #435}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,84}&idea:{f,123}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,391}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 3, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 41 [Date: 2019.9.15, Time: 11:30
hrs, Super: #311 / #42 - Generating Things, Reason's Modifications;
I-Ching: H60 - Control, Restraint, Articulating, Limitation, Moderation;
Tetra: 52 - Measure, Ego: #391 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in
Difference; I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation]

G3809@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 10 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 10
(#91),
@4: Sup: 14 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
4 (#95),
@5: Sup: 19 (#204); Ego: 5 (#100),
@6: Sup: 29 (#233); Ego: 10 (#110),
@7: Sup: 30 (#263 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: TO MAKE PLANS IS MOST OFTEN
PRESUMPTUOUS); Ego: 1 (#111),
@8: Sup: 68 (#331 - ACTION PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE'
{ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #331; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #111 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit; I
am not given to cursing.

#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): {UMBRA:
#22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children
(*WHICH* *RELATES* *TO* *THE* *CULTIVATION* *OF* *MIND* *AND* *MORALS*,
*AND* *EMPLOYS* *FOR* *THIS* *PURPOSE* *NOW* *COMMANDS* *AND*
*ADMONITIONS*, *NOW* *REPROOF* *AND* *PUNISHMENT*) It also includes the
*TRAINING* *AND* *CARE* *OF* *THE* *BODY*; 2) *WHATEVER* *IN* *ADULTS*
*ALSO* *CULTIVATES* *THE* *SOUL*, *ESPECIALLY* *BY* *CORRECTING* *MISTAKES*
*AND* *CURBING* *PASSIONS*; 2a) *INSTRUCTION* *WHICH* *AIMS* *AT*
*INCREASING* *VIRTUE*; 2b) *CHASTISEMENT*, *CHASTENING*, (*OF* *THE*
*EVILS* *WITH* *WHICH* *GOD* *VISITS* *MEN* *FOR* *THEIR* *AMENDMENT*);

SMS DIARY NOTE @ 1059 HOURS ON 11 DECEMBER 2018: “Dear [LEGAL COUNSEL],
thank you for your forbearance within these matters over which I have
attended a file listing hearing scheduled by JUDGE MULLALY upon 27 NOVEMBER
2018 and the REGISTRAR to the COUNTY COURT has accepted the filing of some
#800+ pages.

As JUDGE MULLALY {

#451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18 as
#451 % #41 = #41} 1) *JUDGMENT*, *JUSTICE*, *ORDINANCE*; 1a) judgment; 1a1)
act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of judgment; 1a3)
*PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*); 1a4) case, cause
(presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of judgment); 1a6)
execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b) justice, right,
rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) *ORDINANCE*; 1d) *DECISION* (*IN*
*LAW*); 1e) *RIGHT*, *PRIVILEGE*, *DUE* (*LEGAL*); 1f) proper, fitting,
measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;

} only advised me today of your letter to the court dated 5 DECEMBER 2018
conveying that you are not capable of representing me in these matters, I
will now cease further dialog following letters of 18 / 30 NOVEMBER 2018
and 4 DECEMBER 2018.

Although if there was to be further dialog, I would have appreciated given
your sapient legal expertise as a CRIMINAL LAW ACCREDITED SPECIALIST, what
your prudent considerations were on this procedural question:

'With respects to #288 - UMBRA data manipulation {eg: in the instance shown
above: #311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809):
{UMBRA: #22 as #111 % #41 = #29}} as META SCHEMA OF ACQUIESCE made AGAINST
an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY of COGNITION and COHERING REALITY as MENS REA
being considered in the circumstance of the existing correspondence between
a #CENTRE having as ONTIC necessity and attributed by EVER PRESENT relative
to the circumscribing happenstance as whether intentional / unintentional
being an universe of discourse and occasioning sphere of action ⭕️ which
have both a finite temporality and continuity.

Whether the #288 - UMBRA impetus can be better considered a fixed mindset
and the data manipulation itself an ACTUS REUS that is construed as
PERPETUAL ACTION and therefore a FINDS COMMITTING status can be applied to
any *AHISTORICAL* (word of the day for 11 DECEMBER 2018) criminal acts
although having an EVENT within the past yet cleave to #123 - SENSIBILITY
of the PRESENT and against which a POWER OF ARREST under SECTION 458 of the
CRIMES ACT (1958) VICTORIA can be applied at any time.”

And thank you for your faithful considerations within my matters and good
day to you."

SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 61
(#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 - *SOVEREIGNTY* /
*CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,132}&idea:{f,246}&idea:{m,266}&idea:{f,390}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 6, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 41 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #266 / #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition, Ego:
#390 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference; I-Ching: H26 -
Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating, The taming
power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation]

TO BBC NEWSWATCH / THE AGE NEWSDESK @ 0811 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "ON A
#364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW MADE IN RELATION TO #2184 v's #1827 AS
COSMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATION OF THE STATE / COMMONWEALTH MADE IN FAVOUR OF
THE BRITISH IMPERIAL GOVERNANCE (vis a vis QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT)
THE BREXIT DIVORCE BILL CAN BE SUBJECT TO A #237 - DETERMINED WILL
REDUCTION OF ANY REMITTANCE (DESPITE PROTESTS FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION)
SOLELY IN LIGHT OF IMPENDING DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE' {ie.
#FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE."

That I have voluntarily done so with respects to my some 24 years informal
research into technologizing the existential substance {#2184 - LAWS OF
NATURE v's #1827 - ECCLESIASTICAL LITURGICAL CYCLES

CONCEPT OF SUBSISTENCE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL LUMEN GENTIUM

v's

#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE
PRIVY COUNCIL} AS #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*

} of QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 as
instrumentation to the FEDERATION of the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Being%20Human.pdf>

- dolf

Initial Post: 19 January 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2019-01-18 22:06:53 UTC
Permalink
— COME TO PAPA: EUROPEAN UNION BLIND TO DEVIL IN THE DETAIL AS THE
REALITY OF BRITAIN’S PLAN ‘B’ WHEEL STOP STARTS TO BIGHT

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 19 January, 2019

SO MR MACRON DO YOU BELIEVE IN LIBERTY OR NOT?

BRUSSELS / PARIS (REUTERS) 1024 HOURS (EST) ON 18 JANUARY 2019: “POPCORN
TO HAND, EU WATCHES BREXIT SHOW BUT FRETS FOR OWN FUTURE: If there has
been a positive from Brexit, leaders say, it has been the exceptional
unity the 27 have shown in negotiation -- though a scary end-game could
yet test that togetherness.”
[<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-popcorn/popcorn-to-hand-eu-watches-brexit-show-but-frets-for-own-future-idUSKCN1PC1US>]

— SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMOUS DYNAMIC —

“SUCH A PLIGHT.
T’IS TIC-TAC-TOE.
AIN’T THAT SO.
AN END TO FIGHT. {@5: Sup: 33 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 33 (#108)},
IS CENTRE'S FOE. {@6: Sup: 18 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 66 (#174)},
WHERE TO GO.
OUR RULE MIGHT.” {@8: Sup: 61 (#280 - SEE KANT'S IDEA); Ego: 5 (#223)}



<Loading Image...>

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION OF
1789) IDEA: #280: "It can be said that the whole of transcendental
philosophy, which necessarily precedes all of metaphysics, is itself
nothing other than simply the complete solution of the question
presented here, but in systematic order and detail, and that until now
there has therefore been no transcendental philosophy; for what goes
under this name is really a part of metaphysics, but this science is to
settle the possibility of metaphysics in the first place, and therefore
must precede all metaphysics. Hence there need be no surprise because a
science is required that is utterly deprived of assistance from other
sciences, hence is itself completely new, in order just to answer a
single question adequately, when the solution to it is conjoined with
trouble and difficulty and even with some obscurity.

In now setting to work on this solution – and indeed following the
analytic method, in which we presuppose that such cognitions from pure
reason are actual – we can appeal to only two sciences of theoretical
knowledge (which alone is being discussed here), namely, pure
mathematics and pure natural science; for only these can present objects
to us in intuition, and consequently, if they happen to contain an a
priori cognition, can show its truth {ie. SOVEREIGN: #266 / #390
AUTONOMOUS: #311 / #391 DYNAMIC} or correspondence with the object *IN*
*CONCRETO*, i.e., its actuality, from which one could then proceed along
the analytic path to the ground of its possibility. This greatly
facilitates the work, in which general considerations are not only
applied to facts, but even start from them, instead of, as in the
synthetic procedure, having to be derived wholly in abstracto {ie. #111
from #311 as #288 - UMBRA DATA MANIPUTATION} from concepts.

But in order to ascend from these pure a priori cognitions (which are
not only actual but also well-founded) to a possible cognition that we
seek – namely, a metaphysics as science – we need to comprehend un- der
our main question that which gives rise to metaphysics and which
underlies its purely naturally given (though not above suspicion as
regards truth) cognition a priori (which cognition, when pursued without
any critical investigation of its possibility, is normally called
metaphysics already) – in a word, the natural disposition to such a
science; and so the main transcendental question, divided into four
other questions, will be [IDEA: @280] answered step by step:

1. How is pure mathematics possible?
2. How is pure natural science possible?
3. How is metaphysics in general possible?
4. How is metaphysics as science possible?

It can be seen that even if the solution to these problems is intended
principally to present the essential content of the Critique, still it
also possesses something distinctive that is worthy of attention in its
own right, namely, the search for the sources of given sciences in
reason itself, in order to investigate and to survey for reason, by way
of the deed itself, its power to cognize something a priori; whereby
these sciences themselves then benefit, if not with respect to their
content, nonetheless as regards their proper practice, and, while
bringing light to a higher question regarding their common origin, they
simultaneously provide occasion for a better explanation of their own
nature." [Pages 30-31]

Enclosed is an updated #26 page document to that provided to your HONOUR
upon 16 JANUARY 2019 being made in consideration of these matters, that
it has been a privilege to proffer a further clarifying advantageous
opinion upon BREXIT negotiations through the news media avenue as a
subject which was designated for British Parliamentary voting on 15
January 2019 and probable occurrence on 29 March 2019:

HUMAN BEING (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 - ACTION PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN
'CONCRETE' {ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE); Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391} / HETEROS {#283 / #377} / TORAH {#237
- *DETERMINED* *WILL* / #435}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,84}&idea:{f,123}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,391}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 3, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 41 [Date: 2019.9.15, Time: 11:30
hrs, Super: #311 / #42 - Generating Things, Reason's Modifications;
I-Ching: H60 - Control, Restraint, Articulating, Limitation, Moderation;
Tetra: 52 - Measure, Ego: #391 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness
in Difference; I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force,
Great Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage,
Potential energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation]

G3809@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 10 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 10
(#91),
@4: Sup: 14 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego: 4
(#95),
@5: Sup: 19 (#204); Ego: 5 (#100),
@6: Sup: 29 (#233); Ego: 10 (#110),
@7: Sup: 30 (#263 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: TO MAKE PLANS IS MOST OFTEN
PRESUMPTUOUS); Ego: 1 (#111),
@8: Sup: 68 (#331 - ACTION PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN
'CONCRETE' {ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #331; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #111 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
I am not given to cursing.

#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): {UMBRA:
#22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children
(*WHICH* *RELATES* *TO* *THE* *CULTIVATION* *OF* *MIND* *AND* *MORALS*,
*AND* *EMPLOYS* *FOR* *THIS* *PURPOSE* *NOW* *COMMANDS* *AND*
*ADMONITIONS*, *NOW* *REPROOF* *AND* *PUNISHMENT*) It also includes the
*TRAINING* *AND* *CARE* *OF* *THE* *BODY*; 2) *WHATEVER* *IN* *ADULTS*
*ALSO* *CULTIVATES* *THE* *SOUL*, *ESPECIALLY* *BY* *CORRECTING*
*MISTAKES* *AND* *CURBING* *PASSIONS*; 2a) *INSTRUCTION* *WHICH* *AIMS*
*AT* *INCREASING* *VIRTUE*; 2b) *CHASTISEMENT*, *CHASTENING*, (*OF*
*THE* *EVILS* *WITH* *WHICH* *GOD* *VISITS* *MEN* *FOR* *THEIR*
*AMENDMENT*);

SMS DIARY NOTE @ 1059 HOURS ON 11 DECEMBER 2018: “Dear [LEGAL COUNSEL],
thank you for your forbearance within these matters over which I have
attended a file listing hearing scheduled by JUDGE MULLALY upon 27
NOVEMBER 2018 and the REGISTRAR to the COUNTY COURT has accepted the
filing of some #800+ pages.

As JUDGE MULLALY {

#451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18
as #451 % #41 = #41} 1) *JUDGMENT*, *JUSTICE*, *ORDINANCE*; 1a)
judgment; 1a1) act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of
judgment; 1a3) *PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*);
1a4) case, cause (presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of
judgment); 1a6) execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b)
justice, right, rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) *ORDINANCE*;
1d) *DECISION* (*IN* *LAW*); 1e) *RIGHT*, *PRIVILEGE*, *DUE* (*LEGAL*);
1f) proper, fitting, measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;

} only advised me today of your letter to the court dated 5 DECEMBER
2018 conveying that you are not capable of representing me in these
matters, I will now cease further dialog following letters of 18 / 30
NOVEMBER 2018 and 4 DECEMBER 2018.

Although if there was to be further dialog, I would have appreciated
given your sapient legal expertise as a CRIMINAL LAW ACCREDITED
SPECIALIST, what your prudent considerations were on this procedural
question:

'With respects to #288 - UMBRA data manipulation {eg: in the instance
shown above: #311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia
(G3809): {UMBRA: #22 as #111 % #41 = #29}} as META SCHEMA OF ACQUIESCE
made AGAINST an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY of COGNITION and COHERING REALITY
as MENS REA being considered in the circumstance of the existing
correspondence between a #CENTRE having as ONTIC necessity and
attributed by EVER PRESENT relative to the circumscribing happenstance
as whether intentional / unintentional being an universe of discourse
and occasioning sphere of action ⭕️ which have both a finite temporality
and continuity.

Whether the #288 - UMBRA impetus can be better considered a fixed
mindset and the data manipulation itself an ACTUS REUS that is construed
as PERPETUAL ACTION and therefore a FINDS COMMITTING status can be
applied to any *AHISTORICAL* (word of the day for 11 DECEMBER 2018)
criminal acts although having an EVENT within the past yet cleave to
#123 - SENSIBILITY of the PRESENT and against which a POWER OF ARREST
under SECTION 458 of the CRIMES ACT (1958) VICTORIA can be applied at
any time.”

And thank you for your faithful considerations within my matters and
good day to you."

SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 61 (#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,132}&idea:{f,246}&idea:{m,266}&idea:{f,390}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 6, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 41 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #266 / #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition, Ego:
#390 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference; I-Ching: H26
- Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating, The taming
power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation]

TO BBC NEWSWATCH / THE AGE NEWSDESK @ 0811 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "ON
A #364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW MADE IN RELATION TO #2184 v's #1827 AS
COSMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATION OF THE STATE / COMMONWEALTH MADE IN FAVOUR OF
THE BRITISH IMPERIAL GOVERNANCE (vis a vis QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT) THE BREXIT DIVORCE BILL CAN BE SUBJECT TO A #237 - DETERMINED
WILL REDUCTION OF ANY REMITTANCE (DESPITE PROTESTS FROM THE EUROPEAN
UNION) SOLELY IN LIGHT OF IMPENDING DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE'
{ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE."

That I have voluntarily done so with respects to my some 24 years
informal research into technologizing the existential substance {#2184 -
LAWS OF NATURE v's #1827 - ECCLESIASTICAL LITURGICAL CYCLES

CONCEPT OF SUBSISTENCE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL LUMEN GENTIUM

v's

#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE
PRIVY COUNCIL} AS #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*

} of QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 as
instrumentation to the FEDERATION of the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Being%20Human.pdf>

- dolf

Initial Post: 19 January 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-01-18 23:58:40 UTC
Permalink
— COME TO PAPA: EUROPEAN UNION BLIND TO DEVIL IN THE DETAIL AS THE
REALITY OF BRITAIN’S PLAN ‘B’ WHEEL STOP STARTS TO BITE

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 19 January, 2019

SO MR MACRON DO YOU BELIEVE IN LIBERTY OR NOT?

BRUSSELS / PARIS (REUTERS) 1024 HOURS (EST) ON 18 JANUARY 2019: “POPCORN
TO HAND, EU WATCHES BREXIT SHOW BUT FRETS FOR OWN FUTURE: If there has
been a positive from Brexit, leaders say, it has been the exceptional
unity the 27 have shown in negotiation -- though a scary end-game could
yet test that togetherness.”
[<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-popcorn/popcorn-to-hand-eu-watches-brexit-show-but-frets-for-own-future-idUSKCN1PC1US>]

— SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMOUS DYNAMIC —

“SUCH A PLIGHT.
T’IS TIC-TAC-TOE.
AIN’T THAT SO.
AN END TO FIGHT. {@5: Sup: 33 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 33 (#108)},
IS CENTRE'S FOE. {@6: Sup: 18 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 66 (#174)},
WHERE TO GO.
OUR RULE MIGHT.” {@8: Sup: 61 (#280 - SEE KANT'S IDEA); Ego: 5 (#223)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION OF
1789) IDEA: #280: "It can be said that the whole of transcendental
philosophy, which necessarily precedes all of metaphysics, is itself
nothing other than simply the complete solution of the question
presented here, but in systematic order and detail, and that until now
there has therefore been no transcendental philosophy; for what goes
under this name is really a part of metaphysics, but this science is to
settle the possibility of metaphysics in the first place, and therefore
must precede all metaphysics. Hence there need be no surprise because a
science is required that is utterly deprived of assistance from other
sciences, hence is itself completely new, in order just to answer a
single question adequately, when the solution to it is conjoined with
trouble and difficulty and even with some obscurity.

In now setting to work on this solution – and indeed following the
analytic method, in which we presuppose that such cognitions from pure
reason are actual – we can appeal to only two sciences of theoretical
knowledge (which alone is being discussed here), namely, pure
mathematics and pure natural science; for only these can present objects
to us in intuition, and consequently, if they happen to contain an a
priori cognition, can show its truth {ie. SOVEREIGN: #266 / #390
AUTONOMOUS: #311 / #391 DYNAMIC} or correspondence with the object *IN*
*CONCRETO*, i.e., its actuality, from which one could then proceed along
the analytic path to the ground of its possibility. This greatly
facilitates the work, in which general considerations are not only
applied to facts, but even start from them, instead of, as in the
synthetic procedure, having to be derived wholly *IN* *ABSTRACTO* {ie.
#111 from #311 as #288 - UMBRA DATA MANIPUTATION} from concepts.

But in order to ascend from these pure a priori cognitions (which are
not only actual but also well-founded) to a possible cognition that we
seek – namely, a metaphysics as science – we need to comprehend under
our main question that which gives rise to metaphysics and which
underlies its purely naturally given (though not above suspicion as
regards truth) cognition a priori (which cognition, when pursued without
any critical investigation of its possibility, is normally called
metaphysics already) – in a word, the natural disposition to such a
science; and so the main transcendental question, divided into four
other questions, will be [IDEA: @280] answered step by step:

1. How is pure mathematics possible?
2. How is pure natural science possible?
3. How is metaphysics in general possible?
4. How is metaphysics as science possible?

It can be seen that even if the solution to these problems is intended
principally to present the essential content of the Critique, still it
also possesses something distinctive that is worthy of attention in its
own right, namely, the search for the sources of given sciences in
reason itself, in order to investigate and to survey for reason, by way
of the deed itself, its power to cognize something a priori; whereby
these sciences themselves then benefit, if not with respect to their
content, nonetheless as regards their proper practice, and, while
bringing light to a higher question regarding their common origin, they
simultaneously provide occasion for a better explanation of their own
nature." [Pages 30-31]

Enclosed is an updated #26 page document to that provided to your HONOUR
upon 16 JANUARY 2019 being made in consideration of these matters, that
it has been a privilege to proffer a further clarifying advantageous
opinion upon BREXIT negotiations through the news media avenue as a
subject which was designated for British Parliamentary voting on 15
January 2019 and probable occurrence on 29 March 2019:

HUMAN BEING (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL*
*DOCTRINE* *OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF*
*PRINCIPLES*); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 - ACTION PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN
'CONCRETE' {ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE); Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391} / HETEROS {#283 / #377} / TORAH {#237
- *DETERMINED* *WILL* / #435}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,84}&idea:{f,123}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,391}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 3, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 41 [Date: 2019.9.15, Time: 11:30
hrs, Super: #311 / #42 - Generating Things, Reason's Modifications;
I-Ching: H60 - Control, Restraint, Articulating, Limitation, Moderation;
Tetra: 52 - Measure, Ego: #391 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness
in Difference; I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force,
Great Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage,
Potential energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation]

G3809@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 10 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 10
(#91),
@4: Sup: 14 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego: 4
(#95),
@5: Sup: 19 (#204); Ego: 5 (#100),
@6: Sup: 29 (#233); Ego: 10 (#110),
@7: Sup: 30 (#263 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: TO MAKE PLANS IS MOST OFTEN
PRESUMPTUOUS); Ego: 1 (#111),
@8: Sup: 68 (#331 - ACTION PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN
'CONCRETE' {ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #331; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #111 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
I am not given to cursing.

#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): {UMBRA:
#22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children
(*WHICH* *RELATES* *TO* *THE* *CULTIVATION* *OF* *MIND* *AND* *MORALS*,
*AND* *EMPLOYS* *FOR* *THIS* *PURPOSE* *NOW* *COMMANDS* *AND*
*ADMONITIONS*, *NOW* *REPROOF* *AND* *PUNISHMENT*) It also includes the
*TRAINING* *AND* *CARE* *OF* *THE* *BODY*; 2) *WHATEVER* *IN* *ADULTS*
*ALSO* *CULTIVATES* *THE* *SOUL*, *ESPECIALLY* *BY* *CORRECTING*
*MISTAKES* *AND* *CURBING* *PASSIONS*; 2a) *INSTRUCTION* *WHICH* *AIMS*
*AT* *INCREASING* *VIRTUE*; 2b) *CHASTISEMENT*, *CHASTENING*, (*OF*
*THE* *EVILS* *WITH* *WHICH* *GOD* *VISITS* *MEN* *FOR* *THEIR*
*AMENDMENT*);

SMS DIARY NOTE @ 1059 HOURS ON 11 DECEMBER 2018: “Dear [LEGAL COUNSEL],
thank you for your forbearance within these matters over which I have
attended a file listing hearing scheduled by JUDGE MULLALY upon 27
NOVEMBER 2018 and the REGISTRAR to the COUNTY COURT has accepted the
filing of some #800+ pages.

As JUDGE MULLALY {

#451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18
as #451 % #41 = #41} 1) *JUDGMENT*, *JUSTICE*, *ORDINANCE*; 1a)
judgment; 1a1) act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of
judgment; 1a3) *PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*);
1a4) case, cause (presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of
judgment); 1a6) execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b)
justice, right, rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) *ORDINANCE*;
1d) *DECISION* (*IN* *LAW*); 1e) *RIGHT*, *PRIVILEGE*, *DUE* (*LEGAL*);
1f) proper, fitting, measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;

} only advised me today of your letter to the court dated 5 DECEMBER
2018 conveying that you are not capable of representing me in these
matters, I will now cease further dialog following letters of 18 / 30
NOVEMBER 2018 and 4 DECEMBER 2018.

Although if there was to be further dialog, I would have appreciated
given your sapient legal expertise as a CRIMINAL LAW ACCREDITED
SPECIALIST, what your prudent considerations were on this procedural
question:

'With respects to #288 - UMBRA data manipulation {eg: in the instance
shown above: #311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia
(G3809): {UMBRA: #22 as #111 % #41 = #29}} as META SCHEMA OF ACQUIESCE
made AGAINST an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY of COGNITION and COHERING REALITY
as MENS REA being considered in the circumstance of the existing
correspondence between a #CENTRE having as ONTIC necessity and
attributed by EVER PRESENT relative to the circumscribing happenstance
as whether intentional / unintentional being an universe of discourse
and occasioning sphere of action ⭕️ which have both a finite temporality
and continuity.

Whether the #288 - UMBRA impetus can be better considered a fixed
mindset and the data manipulation itself an ACTUS REUS that is construed
as PERPETUAL ACTION and therefore a FINDS COMMITTING status can be
applied to any *AHISTORICAL* (word of the day for 11 DECEMBER 2018)
criminal acts although having an EVENT within the past yet cleave to
#123 - SENSIBILITY of the PRESENT and against which a POWER OF ARREST
under SECTION 458 of the CRIMES ACT (1958) VICTORIA can be applied at
any time.”

And thank you for your faithful considerations within my matters and
good day to you."

SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL*
*DOCTRINE* *OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF*
*PRINCIPLES*); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 61 (#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,132}&idea:{f,246}&idea:{m,266}&idea:{f,390}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 6, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 41 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #266 / #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition, Ego:
#390 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference; I-Ching: H26
- Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating, The taming
power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation]

TO BBC NEWSWATCH / THE AGE NEWSDESK @ 0811 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "ON
A #364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW MADE IN RELATION TO #2184 v's #1827 AS
COSMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATION OF THE STATE / COMMONWEALTH MADE IN FAVOUR OF
THE BRITISH IMPERIAL GOVERNANCE (vis a vis QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT) THE BREXIT DIVORCE BILL CAN BE SUBJECT TO A #237 - DETERMINED
WILL REDUCTION OF ANY REMITTANCE (DESPITE PROTESTS FROM THE EUROPEAN
UNION) SOLELY IN LIGHT OF IMPENDING DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE'
{ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE."

That I have voluntarily done so with respects to my some 24 years
informal research into technologizing the existential substance {#2184 -
LAWS OF NATURE v's #1827 - ECCLESIASTICAL LITURGICAL CYCLES

CONCEPT OF SUBSISTENCE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL LUMEN GENTIUM

v's

#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE
PRIVY COUNCIL} AS #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*

} of QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 as
instrumentation to the FEDERATION of the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Being%20Human.pdf>

- dolf

Initial Post: 19 January 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-01-19 01:38:02 UTC
Permalink
— WE #273 - REMEMBER YOUR FORGET —

“LEST WE FORGET.
TO FIRST #288 - REMEMBER.
THIS NATION’S TUNE.
AS SOVEREIGN BEGET.
ISN’T NAZI DISTEMPER.
BUT BY PRIVY TRIBUNE.
#364 - OBEY, #312 - AID, #273 - ASSIST REGRET.”

TO BBC NEWSWATCH / THE AGE NEWSDESK @ 0811 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "ON A
#364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW MADE IN RELATION TO #2184 v's #1827 AS
COSMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATION OF THE STATE / COMMONWEALTH MADE IN FAVOUR OF
THE BRITISH IMPERIAL GOVERNANCE (vis a vis QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT)
THE BREXIT DIVORCE BILL CAN BE SUBJECT TO A #237 - DETERMINED WILL
REDUCTION OF ANY REMITTANCE (DESPITE PROTESTS FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION)
SOLELY IN LIGHT OF IMPENDING DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE' {ie.
#FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE."

That I have voluntarily done so with respects to my some 24 years informal
research into technologizing the existential substance {#2184 - LAWS OF
NATURE v's #1827 - ECCLESIASTICAL LITURGICAL CYCLES

CONCEPT OF SUBSISTENCE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL LUMEN GENTIUM

v's

#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE
PRIVY COUNCIL} AS #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*

} of QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 as
instrumentation to the FEDERATION of the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Being%20Human.pdf>

SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO BE
#364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 - SEPULCHRE}, AND
#273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS
OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS
DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = SUNSET 11 SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE
EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR
PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR
LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."

#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 {*MARRIAGE*} - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS
NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...

84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]

TOTAL: @84 + @86 + @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF* *TIME*), *KINGDOM* /
*DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR* + @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A* *POSSESSION*, *ACQUIRE*,
*INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF* + @115 = *MOSES* *SEAT*
*OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) = #491 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTINUITY

SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE TO OURSELVES OUR @104 - HEIRS AND
SUCCESSORS, FULL @115 - POWER AND AUTHORITY FROM @102 - TIME TO @104 - TIME
TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL
SEEM MEET.”

According to IMMANUEL KANT, DAVID HUME (died 25 August 1776, Edinburgh) was
a Scottish Enlightenment philosopher, historian, economist, and essayist,
who is best known today for his highly influential system of philosophical
empiricism, skepticism, and naturalism, who had raised objections to the
notions of equality and congruence (among others) within geometry, which
objections appealed to experience (Treatise, i.ii.4.4, pp. 42–53), thereby
subjecting mathematics to experience, and whereby he also *INCORRECTLY*
rejected THE CONCEPTION THAT MATHEMATICS CONSIDERS ITS OBJECTS
INDEPENDENTLY OF THEIR EXISTENCE IN NATURE:

#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 = #273 -
*MOMENT*

As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
*CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the principle of #312 -
CONTRADICTION:

#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {

*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN DIALECTS OF CONTRADICTIONS ON
NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING

v's

#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CYCLE BLASPHEMY CENTRED
UPON 30 NOVEMBER AS SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE} +

#728 - REACTANCE +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27 MAY
1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 - PRIESTLY
SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}

AS UNCONSCIONABLE AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDUCT AS BREACHES TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 {

#371 - *SAINT* *ANDREWS* *AS* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *30* *NOVEMBER* *FIVE*
*YEAR*: 4 x #364 + #371 = #1827 *LITURGICAL* *CALENDAR*,

#288 - *REMEMBRANCE* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI* *PROTOTYPE*,

#390 - *WREATHS* / *SOVEREIGNTY*,

#312 - *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI*
*PROTOTYPE*,

#419 - *SLAUGHTER*

} OF DETERMINED AND PREMEDITATED BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING RACIAL
HATRED, ANTI-SEMITISM BY ESPECIALLY ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY AS
KNIGHTS TEMPLARS BEING AN UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER AND PSYCHOSEXUAL SLANDER
AGAINST WHICH THEY HAVE NOT BEEN RESPONSIVE.

GNOSIS EX MACHINA {#2184}: @6 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364}; @7 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTRADICTION {#312}; @8 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC SUCCESSION {#273}

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA: @319: "There are many *LAWS* *OF*
*NATURE* {ie.

#24 x #7 x #13 as #2184 ipso facto

6 x #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY AS OBEDIENT(H7522) {#273 as [#6, #7, #20,
#200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1) *REMEMBRANCE*},

7 x #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION AS AIDING(H5826) {#273 as [#40, #50,
#8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion (G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*},

8 x #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC SUCCESSION AS ASSISTING / DEVOTE
ONESELF(H5144) {#273 as [#1, #200, #9, #5, #50, #8] = asthenes (G0772 ):
1) *WEAK*; *INCAPACITY*}

UNTO THE GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 =
SUNSET 11 SEPTEMBER 2001} IS A REQUIREMENT OF ALL CITIZENS UNDER SECTION
VIII OF QUEEN VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT

} that we can know only through experience, but lawfulness in the
connection of appearances, i.e., nature in general, we cannot come to know
through any experience, because experience itself has need of such laws,
which lie a priori at the basis of its possibility.

That there was a determined campaign of partiality shown to the BOER WAR
MEMORIAL established on 29 OCTOBER 1909 being the cornerstone of Australian
identity as ethos of "#OBEDIENT, #AIDING AND #ASSISTING" and we reject
CATEGORICALLY their unreasoned disloyalty by INTELLECTUAL assent given to
FOREIGN POWERS {ie. ESPECIALLY IRISH, SCOTTISH, RSL / FREEMASONRY / ROMAN
CATHOLIC [BY] SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE} as all unconscionable attempts
to impose a substituted ethic @5 {HETEROS: #FIVE [#111/#333 ***] / TORAH:
#FIVE [#114/#342 ***]} against the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS
whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL {#235 - ADOLF HITLER'S (1941 - 1944)
TABLE TALK ON 7 JUNE 1942 AS IDEA: *ANYONE* *WHO* *FOR* *FALSE* *REASONS*
*OF* *MERCY* *DEVIATES* *FROM* *THIS* *CLEAR* *PRINCIPLE* *IS* *AIDING*,
*WILLINGLY* *OR* *UNWILLINGLY*, *THE* *DISSOLUTION* *OF* *THE* *STATE*}
upon our War Dead and to usurp @1 {HETEROS: #ONE [#99/#297 ***] / TORAH:
#ONE [#78/#234 ***]} the SOVEREIGNTY embodied within the Governor General
as ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE {#2184}.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as the
sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so we
cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
*PRINCIPLES* {ie. #390 + #312 + #390 = #1092 or #364 + #312 + #728 + #390 +
#390 = @2184} *OF* *THEIR* *CONNECTION* *IN* *US*, i.e., *FROM* *THE*
*CONDITIONS* *OF* *NECESSARY* *UNIFICATION* *IN* *ONE* *CONSCIOUSNESS*,
*WHICH* *UNIFICATION* *CONSTITUTES* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*."
[page 70]

- dolf
Post by dolf
Enclosed is an updated #26 page document to that provided to your HONOUR
upon 16 JANUARY 2019 being made in consideration of these matters, that it
has been a privilege to proffer a further clarifying advantageous opinion
upon BREXIT negotiations through the news media avenue as a subject which
was designated for British Parliamentary voting on 15 January 2019 and
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
<SNIP ETC GIBBERISH>
Sending this kind of gibberish to a magistrate in charge of your
restraining order will only convince him of the need to have you undergo
yet another psych evaluation.
— COME TO PAPA: EUROPEAN UNION BLIND TO DEVIL IN THE DETAIL AS THE REALITY
OF BRITAIN’S PLAN ‘B’ WHEEL STOP STARTS TO BITE

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 19 January, 2019

SO MR MACRON DO YOU BELIEVE IN LIBERTY OR NOT?

BRUSSELS / PARIS (REUTERS) 1024 HOURS (EST) ON 18 JANUARY 2019: “POPCORN TO
HAND, EU WATCHES BREXIT SHOW BUT FRETS FOR OWN FUTURE: If there has been a
positive from Brexit, leaders say, it has been the exceptional unity the 27
have shown in negotiation -- though a scary end-game could yet test that
togetherness.”
[<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-popcorn/popcorn-to-hand-eu-watches-brexit-show-but-frets-for-own-future-idUSKCN1PC1US>]

— SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMOUS DYNAMIC —

“SUCH A PLIGHT.
T’IS TIC-TAC-TOE.
AIN’T THAT SO.
AN END TO FIGHT. {@5: Sup: 33 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 33 (#108)},
IS CENTRE'S FOE. {@6: Sup: 18 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY
{%8}); Ego: 66 (#174)},
WHERE TO GO.
OUR RULE MIGHT.” {@8: Sup: 61 (#280 - SEE KANT'S IDEA); Ego: 5 (#223)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION OF
1789) IDEA: #280: "It can be said that the whole of transcendental
philosophy, which necessarily precedes all of metaphysics, is itself
nothing other than simply the complete solution of the question presented
here, but in systematic order and detail, and that until now there has
therefore been no transcendental philosophy; for what goes under this name
is really a part of metaphysics, but this science is to settle the
possibility of metaphysics in the first place, and therefore must precede
all metaphysics. Hence there need be no surprise because a science is
required that is utterly deprived of assistance from other sciences, hence
is itself completely new, in order just to answer a single question
adequately, when the solution to it is conjoined with trouble and
difficulty and even with some obscurity.

In now setting to work on this solution – and indeed following the analytic
method, in which we presuppose that such cognitions from pure reason are
actual – we can appeal to only two sciences of theoretical knowledge (which
alone is being discussed here), namely, pure mathematics and pure natural
science; for only these can present objects to us in intuition, and
consequently, if they happen to contain an a priori cognition, can show its
truth {ie. SOVEREIGN: #266 / #390 AUTONOMOUS: #311 / #391 DYNAMIC} or
correspondence with the object *IN* *CONCRETO*, i.e., its actuality, from
which one could then proceed along the analytic path to the ground of its
possibility. This greatly facilitates the work, in which general
considerations are not only applied to facts, but even start from them,
instead of, as in the synthetic procedure, having to be derived wholly *IN*
*ABSTRACTO* {ie. #111 from #311 as #288 - UMBRA DATA MANIPUTATION} from
concepts.

But in order to ascend from these pure a priori cognitions (which are not
only actual but also well-founded) to a possible cognition that we seek –
namely, a metaphysics as science – we need to comprehend under our main
question that which gives rise to metaphysics and which underlies its
purely naturally given (though not above suspicion as regards truth)
cognition a priori (which cognition, when pursued without any critical
investigation of its possibility, is normally called metaphysics already) –
in a word, the natural disposition to such a science; and so the main
transcendental question, divided into four other questions, will be [IDEA:
@280] answered step by step:

1. How is pure mathematics possible?
2. How is pure natural science possible?
3. How is metaphysics in general possible?
4. How is metaphysics as science possible?

It can be seen that even if the solution to these problems is intended
principally to present the essential content of the Critique, still it also
possesses something distinctive that is worthy of attention in its own
right, namely, the search for the sources of given sciences in reason
itself, in order to investigate and to survey for reason, by way of the
deed itself, its power to cognize something a priori; whereby these
sciences themselves then benefit, if not with respect to their content,
nonetheless as regards their proper practice, and, while bringing light to
a higher question regarding their common origin, they simultaneously
provide occasion for a better explanation of their own nature." [Pages
30-31]

Enclosed is an updated #26 page document to that provided to your HONOUR
upon 16 JANUARY 2019 being made in consideration of these matters, that it
has been a privilege to proffer a further clarifying advantageous opinion
upon BREXIT negotiations through the news media avenue as a subject which
was designated for British Parliamentary voting on 15 January 2019 and
probable occurrence on 29 March 2019:

HUMAN BEING (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL* *DOCTRINE*
*OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF* *PRINCIPLES*); Ego:
41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 - ACTION PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE'
{ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE); Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391} / HETEROS {#283 / #377} / TORAH {#237 -
*DETERMINED* *WILL* / #435}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,84}&idea:{f,123}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,391}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 3, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 41 [Date: 2019.9.15, Time: 11:30
hrs, Super: #311 / #42 - Generating Things, Reason's Modifications;
I-Ching: H60 - Control, Restraint, Articulating, Limitation, Moderation;
Tetra: 52 - Measure, Ego: #391 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in
Difference; I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation]

G3809@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 10 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 10
(#91),
@4: Sup: 14 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego:
4 (#95),
@5: Sup: 19 (#204); Ego: 5 (#100),
@6: Sup: 29 (#233); Ego: 10 (#110),
@7: Sup: 30 (#263 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: TO MAKE PLANS IS MOST OFTEN
PRESUMPTUOUS); Ego: 1 (#111),
@8: Sup: 68 (#331 - ACTION PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE'
{ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #331; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #111 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit; I
am not given to cursing.

#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): {UMBRA:
#22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children
(*WHICH* *RELATES* *TO* *THE* *CULTIVATION* *OF* *MIND* *AND* *MORALS*,
*AND* *EMPLOYS* *FOR* *THIS* *PURPOSE* *NOW* *COMMANDS* *AND*
*ADMONITIONS*, *NOW* *REPROOF* *AND* *PUNISHMENT*) It also includes the
*TRAINING* *AND* *CARE* *OF* *THE* *BODY*; 2) *WHATEVER* *IN* *ADULTS*
*ALSO* *CULTIVATES* *THE* *SOUL*, *ESPECIALLY* *BY* *CORRECTING* *MISTAKES*
*AND* *CURBING* *PASSIONS*; 2a) *INSTRUCTION* *WHICH* *AIMS* *AT*
*INCREASING* *VIRTUE*; 2b) *CHASTISEMENT*, *CHASTENING*, (*OF* *THE*
*EVILS* *WITH* *WHICH* *GOD* *VISITS* *MEN* *FOR* *THEIR* *AMENDMENT*);

SMS DIARY NOTE @ 1059 HOURS ON 11 DECEMBER 2018: “Dear [LEGAL COUNSEL],
thank you for your forbearance within these matters over which I have
attended a file listing hearing scheduled by JUDGE MULLALY upon 27 NOVEMBER
2018 and the REGISTRAR to the COUNTY COURT has accepted the filing of some
#800+ pages.

As JUDGE MULLALY {

#451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18 as
#451 % #41 = #41} 1) *JUDGMENT*, *JUSTICE*, *ORDINANCE*; 1a) judgment; 1a1)
act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of judgment; 1a3)
*PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*); 1a4) case, cause
(presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of judgment); 1a6)
execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b) justice, right,
rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) *ORDINANCE*; 1d) *DECISION* (*IN*
*LAW*); 1e) *RIGHT*, *PRIVILEGE*, *DUE* (*LEGAL*); 1f) proper, fitting,
measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;

} only advised me today of your letter to the court dated 5 DECEMBER 2018
conveying that you are not capable of representing me in these matters, I
will now cease further dialog following letters of 18 / 30 NOVEMBER 2018
and 4 DECEMBER 2018.

Although if there was to be further dialog, I would have appreciated given
your sapient legal expertise as a CRIMINAL LAW ACCREDITED SPECIALIST, what
your prudent considerations were on this procedural question:

'With respects to #288 - UMBRA data manipulation {eg: in the instance shown
above: #311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809):
{UMBRA: #22 as #111 % #41 = #29}} as META SCHEMA OF ACQUIESCE made AGAINST
an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY of COGNITION and COHERING REALITY as MENS REA
being considered in the circumstance of the existing correspondence between
a #CENTRE having as ONTIC necessity and attributed by EVER PRESENT relative
to the circumscribing happenstance as whether intentional / unintentional
being an universe of discourse and occasioning sphere of action ⭕️ which
have both a finite temporality and continuity.

Whether the #288 - UMBRA impetus can be better considered a fixed mindset
and the data manipulation itself an ACTUS REUS that is construed as
PERPETUAL ACTION and therefore a FINDS COMMITTING status can be applied to
any *AHISTORICAL* (word of the day for 11 DECEMBER 2018) criminal acts
although having an EVENT within the past yet cleave to #123 - SENSIBILITY
of the PRESENT and against which a POWER OF ARREST under SECTION 458 of the
CRIMES ACT (1958) VICTORIA can be applied at any time.”

And thank you for your faithful considerations within my matters and good
day to you."

SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL* *DOCTRINE*
*OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF* *PRINCIPLES*); Ego:
41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 61
(#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 - *SOVEREIGNTY* /
*CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,132}&idea:{f,246}&idea:{m,266}&idea:{f,390}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 6, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 41 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #266 / #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition, Ego:
#390 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference; I-Ching: H26 -
Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating, The taming
power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation]

TO BBC NEWSWATCH / THE AGE NEWSDESK @ 0811 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "ON A
#364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW MADE IN RELATION TO #2184 v's #1827 AS
COSMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATION OF THE STATE / COMMONWEALTH MADE IN FAVOUR OF
THE BRITISH IMPERIAL GOVERNANCE (vis a vis QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT)
THE BREXIT DIVORCE BILL CAN BE SUBJECT TO A #237 - DETERMINED WILL
REDUCTION OF ANY REMITTANCE (DESPITE PROTESTS FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION)
SOLELY IN LIGHT OF IMPENDING DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE' {ie.
#FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE."

That I have voluntarily done so with respects to my some 24 years informal
research into technologizing the existential substance {#2184 - LAWS OF
NATURE v's #1827 - ECCLESIASTICAL LITURGICAL CYCLES

CONCEPT OF SUBSISTENCE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL LUMEN GENTIUM

v's

#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE
PRIVY COUNCIL} AS #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*

} of QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 as
instrumentation to the FEDERATION of the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Being%20Human.pdf>

- dolf

Initial Post: 19 January 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2019-01-19 02:02:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
— WE #273 - REMEMBER YOUR FORGET —
“LEST WE FORGET.
TO FIRST #288 - REMEMBER.
THIS NATION’S TUNE.
AS SOVEREIGN BEGET.
ISN’T NAZI DISTEMPER.
BUT BY PRIVY TRIBUNE.
NO #364 - OBEY, #312 - AID, #273 - ASSIST REGRET.”
#364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW MADE IN RELATION TO #2184 v's #1827 AS
COSMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATION OF THE STATE / COMMONWEALTH MADE IN FAVOUR OF
THE BRITISH IMPERIAL GOVERNANCE (vis a vis QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT)
THE BREXIT DIVORCE BILL CAN BE SUBJECT TO A #237 - DETERMINED WILL
REDUCTION OF ANY REMITTANCE (DESPITE PROTESTS FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION)
SOLELY IN LIGHT OF IMPENDING DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE' {ie.
#FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE."
That I have voluntarily done so with respects to my some 24 years informal
research into technologizing the existential substance {#2184 - LAWS OF
NATURE v's #1827 - ECCLESIASTICAL LITURGICAL CYCLES
CONCEPT OF SUBSISTENCE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL LUMEN GENTIUM
v's
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE
PRIVY COUNCIL} AS #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*
} of QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 as
instrumentation to the FEDERATION of the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Being%20Human.pdf>
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO BE
#364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 - SEPULCHRE}, AND
#273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS
OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS
DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = SUNSET 11 SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE
EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR
PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR
LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
*OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) = #491 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTINUITY
TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL
SEEM MEET.”
According to IMMANUEL KANT, DAVID HUME (died 25 August 1776, Edinburgh) was
a Scottish Enlightenment philosopher, historian, economist, and essayist,
who is best known today for his highly influential system of philosophical
empiricism, skepticism, and naturalism, who had raised objections to the
notions of equality and congruence (among others) within geometry, which
objections appealed to experience (Treatise, i.ii.4.4, pp. 42–53), thereby
subjecting mathematics to experience, and whereby he also *INCORRECTLY*
rejected THE CONCEPTION THAT MATHEMATICS CONSIDERS ITS OBJECTS
#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 = #273 -
*MOMENT*
As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
*CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the principle of #312 -
#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {
*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN DIALECTS OF CONTRADICTIONS ON
NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING
v's
#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CYCLE BLASPHEMY CENTRED
UPON 30 NOVEMBER AS SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE} +
#728 - REACTANCE +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27 MAY
1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 - PRIESTLY
SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}
AS UNCONSCIONABLE AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDUCT AS BREACHES TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 {
#371 - *SAINT* *ANDREWS* *AS* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *30* *NOVEMBER* *FIVE*
*YEAR*: 4 x #364 + #371 = #1827 *LITURGICAL* *CALENDAR*,
#288 - *REMEMBRANCE* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI* *PROTOTYPE*,
#390 - *WREATHS* / *SOVEREIGNTY*,
#312 - *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI*
*PROTOTYPE*,
#419 - *SLAUGHTER*
} OF DETERMINED AND PREMEDITATED BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING RACIAL
HATRED, ANTI-SEMITISM BY ESPECIALLY ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY AS
KNIGHTS TEMPLARS BEING AN UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER AND PSYCHOSEXUAL SLANDER
AGAINST WHICH THEY HAVE NOT BEEN RESPONSIVE.
*NATURE* {ie.
#24 x #7 x #13 as #2184 ipso facto
6 x #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY AS OBEDIENT(H7522) {#273 as [#6, #7, #20,
#200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1) *REMEMBRANCE*},
7 x #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION AS AIDING(H5826) {#273 as [#40, #50,
#8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion (G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*},
8 x #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC SUCCESSION AS ASSISTING / DEVOTE
1) *WEAK*; *INCAPACITY*}
UNTO THE GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 =
SUNSET 11 SEPTEMBER 2001} IS A REQUIREMENT OF ALL CITIZENS UNDER SECTION
VIII OF QUEEN VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT
} that we can know only through experience, but lawfulness in the
connection of appearances, i.e., nature in general, we cannot come to know
through any experience, because experience itself has need of such laws,
which lie a priori at the basis of its possibility.
That there was a determined campaign of partiality shown to the BOER WAR
MEMORIAL established on 29 OCTOBER 1909 being the cornerstone of Australian
identity as ethos of "#OBEDIENT, #AIDING AND #ASSISTING" and we reject
CATEGORICALLY their unreasoned disloyalty by INTELLECTUAL assent given to
FOREIGN POWERS {ie. ESPECIALLY IRISH, SCOTTISH, RSL / FREEMASONRY / ROMAN
CATHOLIC [BY] SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE} as all unconscionable attempts
#FIVE [#114/#342 ***]} against the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS
whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL {#235 - ADOLF HITLER'S (1941 - 1944)
TABLE TALK ON 7 JUNE 1942 AS IDEA: *ANYONE* *WHO* *FOR* *FALSE* *REASONS*
*OF* *MERCY* *DEVIATES* *FROM* *THIS* *CLEAR* *PRINCIPLE* *IS* *AIDING*,
*WILLINGLY* *OR* *UNWILLINGLY*, *THE* *DISSOLUTION* *OF* *THE* *STATE*}
#ONE [#78/#234 ***]} the SOVEREIGNTY embodied within the Governor General
as ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE {#2184}.
The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as the
sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so we
cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
*PRINCIPLES* {ie. #390 + #312 + #390 = #1092 or #364 + #312 + #728 + #390 +
*CONDITIONS* *OF* *NECESSARY* *UNIFICATION* *IN* *ONE* *CONSCIOUSNESS*,
*WHICH* *UNIFICATION* *CONSTITUTES* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*."
[page 70]
- dolf
Post by dolf
Enclosed is an updated #26 page document to that provided to your HONOUR
upon 16 JANUARY 2019 being made in consideration of these matters, that it
has been a privilege to proffer a further clarifying advantageous opinion
upon BREXIT negotiations through the news media avenue as a subject which
was designated for British Parliamentary voting on 15 January 2019 and
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
<SNIP ETC GIBBERISH>
Sending this kind of gibberish to a magistrate in charge of your
restraining order will only convince him of the need to have you undergo
yet another psych evaluation.
— COME TO PAPA: EUROPEAN UNION BLIND TO DEVIL IN THE DETAIL AS THE REALITY
OF BRITAIN’S PLAN ‘B’ WHEEL STOP STARTS TO BITE
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 19 January, 2019
SO MR MACRON DO YOU BELIEVE IN LIBERTY OR NOT?
BRUSSELS / PARIS (REUTERS) 1024 HOURS (EST) ON 18 JANUARY 2019: “POPCORN TO
HAND, EU WATCHES BREXIT SHOW BUT FRETS FOR OWN FUTURE: If there has been a
positive from Brexit, leaders say, it has been the exceptional unity the 27
have shown in negotiation -- though a scary end-game could yet test that
togetherness.”
[<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-popcorn/popcorn-to-hand-eu-watches-brexit-show-but-frets-for-own-future-idUSKCN1PC1US>]
— SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMOUS DYNAMIC —
“SUCH A PLIGHT.
T’IS TIC-TAC-TOE.
AIN’T THAT SO.
GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 33 (#108)},
{%8}); Ego: 66 (#174)},
WHERE TO GO.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION OF
1789) IDEA: #280: "It can be said that the whole of transcendental
philosophy, which necessarily precedes all of metaphysics, is itself
nothing other than simply the complete solution of the question presented
here, but in systematic order and detail, and that until now there has
therefore been no transcendental philosophy; for what goes under this name
is really a part of metaphysics, but this science is to settle the
possibility of metaphysics in the first place, and therefore must precede
all metaphysics. Hence there need be no surprise because a science is
required that is utterly deprived of assistance from other sciences, hence
is itself completely new, in order just to answer a single question
adequately, when the solution to it is conjoined with trouble and
difficulty and even with some obscurity.
In now setting to work on this solution – and indeed following the analytic
method, in which we presuppose that such cognitions from pure reason are
actual – we can appeal to only two sciences of theoretical knowledge (which
alone is being discussed here), namely, pure mathematics and pure natural
science; for only these can present objects to us in intuition, and
consequently, if they happen to contain an a priori cognition, can show its
truth {ie. SOVEREIGN: #266 / #390 AUTONOMOUS: #311 / #391 DYNAMIC} or
correspondence with the object *IN* *CONCRETO*, i.e., its actuality, from
which one could then proceed along the analytic path to the ground of its
possibility. This greatly facilitates the work, in which general
considerations are not only applied to facts, but even start from them,
instead of, as in the synthetic procedure, having to be derived wholly *IN*
*ABSTRACTO* {ie. #111 from #311 as #288 - UMBRA DATA MANIPUTATION} from
concepts.
But in order to ascend from these pure a priori cognitions (which are not
only actual but also well-founded) to a possible cognition that we seek –
namely, a metaphysics as science – we need to comprehend under our main
question that which gives rise to metaphysics and which underlies its
purely naturally given (though not above suspicion as regards truth)
cognition a priori (which cognition, when pursued without any critical
investigation of its possibility, is normally called metaphysics already) –
in a word, the natural disposition to such a science; and so the main
1. How is pure mathematics possible?
2. How is pure natural science possible?
3. How is metaphysics in general possible?
4. How is metaphysics as science possible?
It can be seen that even if the solution to these problems is intended
principally to present the essential content of the Critique, still it also
possesses something distinctive that is worthy of attention in its own
right, namely, the search for the sources of given sciences in reason
itself, in order to investigate and to survey for reason, by way of the
deed itself, its power to cognize something a priori; whereby these
sciences themselves then benefit, if not with respect to their content,
nonetheless as regards their proper practice, and, while bringing light to
a higher question regarding their common origin, they simultaneously
provide occasion for a better explanation of their own nature." [Pages
30-31]
Enclosed is an updated #26 page document to that provided to your HONOUR
upon 16 JANUARY 2019 being made in consideration of these matters, that it
has been a privilege to proffer a further clarifying advantageous opinion
upon BREXIT negotiations through the news media avenue as a subject which
was designated for British Parliamentary voting on 15 January 2019 and
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL* *DOCTRINE*
41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 - ACTION PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE'
{ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE); Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391} / HETEROS {#283 / #377} / TORAH {#237 -
*DETERMINED* *WILL* / #435}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,84}&idea:{f,123}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,391}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
hrs, Super: #311 / #42 - Generating Things, Reason's Modifications;
I-Ching: H60 - Control, Restraint, Articulating, Limitation, Moderation;
Tetra: 52 - Measure, Ego: #391 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in
Difference; I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation]
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 10 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 10
(#91),
4 (#95),
@5: Sup: 19 (#204); Ego: 5 (#100),
@6: Sup: 29 (#233); Ego: 10 (#110),
@7: Sup: 30 (#263 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: TO MAKE PLANS IS MOST OFTEN
PRESUMPTUOUS); Ego: 1 (#111),
@8: Sup: 68 (#331 - ACTION PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE'
{ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #331; Feme: #149
} // #311
UMBRA: #111 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;
THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit; I
am not given to cursing.
#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177
#22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children
(*WHICH* *RELATES* *TO* *THE* *CULTIVATION* *OF* *MIND* *AND* *MORALS*,
*AND* *EMPLOYS* *FOR* *THIS* *PURPOSE* *NOW* *COMMANDS* *AND*
*ADMONITIONS*, *NOW* *REPROOF* *AND* *PUNISHMENT*) It also includes the
*TRAINING* *AND* *CARE* *OF* *THE* *BODY*; 2) *WHATEVER* *IN* *ADULTS*
*ALSO* *CULTIVATES* *THE* *SOUL*, *ESPECIALLY* *BY* *CORRECTING* *MISTAKES*
*AND* *CURBING* *PASSIONS*; 2a) *INSTRUCTION* *WHICH* *AIMS* *AT*
*INCREASING* *VIRTUE*; 2b) *CHASTISEMENT*, *CHASTENING*, (*OF* *THE*
*EVILS* *WITH* *WHICH* *GOD* *VISITS* *MEN* *FOR* *THEIR* *AMENDMENT*);
thank you for your forbearance within these matters over which I have
attended a file listing hearing scheduled by JUDGE MULLALY upon 27 NOVEMBER
2018 and the REGISTRAR to the COUNTY COURT has accepted the filing of some
#800+ pages.
As JUDGE MULLALY {
#451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18 as
#451 % #41 = #41} 1) *JUDGMENT*, *JUSTICE*, *ORDINANCE*; 1a) judgment; 1a1)
act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of judgment; 1a3)
*PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*); 1a4) case, cause
(presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of judgment); 1a6)
execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b) justice, right,
rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) *ORDINANCE*; 1d) *DECISION* (*IN*
*LAW*); 1e) *RIGHT*, *PRIVILEGE*, *DUE* (*LEGAL*); 1f) proper, fitting,
measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;
} only advised me today of your letter to the court dated 5 DECEMBER 2018
conveying that you are not capable of representing me in these matters, I
will now cease further dialog following letters of 18 / 30 NOVEMBER 2018
and 4 DECEMBER 2018.
Although if there was to be further dialog, I would have appreciated given
your sapient legal expertise as a CRIMINAL LAW ACCREDITED SPECIALIST, what
'With respects to #288 - UMBRA data manipulation {eg: in the instance shown
{UMBRA: #22 as #111 % #41 = #29}} as META SCHEMA OF ACQUIESCE made AGAINST
an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY of COGNITION and COHERING REALITY as MENS REA
being considered in the circumstance of the existing correspondence between
a #CENTRE having as ONTIC necessity and attributed by EVER PRESENT relative
to the circumscribing happenstance as whether intentional / unintentional
being an universe of discourse and occasioning sphere of action ⭕️ which
have both a finite temporality and continuity.
Whether the #288 - UMBRA impetus can be better considered a fixed mindset
and the data manipulation itself an ACTUS REUS that is construed as
PERPETUAL ACTION and therefore a FINDS COMMITTING status can be applied to
any *AHISTORICAL* (word of the day for 11 DECEMBER 2018) criminal acts
although having an EVENT within the past yet cleave to #123 - SENSIBILITY
of the PRESENT and against which a POWER OF ARREST under SECTION 458 of the
CRIMES ACT (1958) VICTORIA can be applied at any time.”
And thank you for your faithful considerations within my matters and good
day to you."
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL* *DOCTRINE*
41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 61
(#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 - *SOVEREIGNTY* /
*CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,132}&idea:{f,246}&idea:{m,266}&idea:{f,390}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
Super: #266 / #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46 -
#390 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference; I-Ching: H26 -
Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating, The taming
power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation]
#364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW MADE IN RELATION TO #2184 v's #1827 AS
COSMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATION OF THE STATE / COMMONWEALTH MADE IN FAVOUR OF
THE BRITISH IMPERIAL GOVERNANCE (vis a vis QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT)
THE BREXIT DIVORCE BILL CAN BE SUBJECT TO A #237 - DETERMINED WILL
REDUCTION OF ANY REMITTANCE (DESPITE PROTESTS FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION)
SOLELY IN LIGHT OF IMPENDING DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE' {ie.
#FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE."
That I have voluntarily done so with respects to my some 24 years informal
research into technologizing the existential substance {#2184 - LAWS OF
NATURE v's #1827 - ECCLESIASTICAL LITURGICAL CYCLES
CONCEPT OF SUBSISTENCE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL LUMEN GENTIUM
v's
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE
PRIVY COUNCIL} AS #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*
} of QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 as
instrumentation to the FEDERATION of the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Being%20Human.pdf>
- dolf
Initial Post: 19 January 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2019-01-19 04:58:53 UTC
Permalink
— COME TO PAPA: EUROPEAN UNION BLIND TO DEVIL IN THE DETAIL AS THE
REALITY OF BRITAIN’S PLAN ‘B’ WHEEL STOP STARTS TO BITE

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 19 January, 2019

SO MR MACRON DO YOU BELIEVE IN LIBERTY OR NOT?

BRUSSELS / PARIS (REUTERS) 1024 HOURS (EST) ON 18 JANUARY 2019: “POPCORN
TO HAND, EU WATCHES BREXIT SHOW BUT FRETS FOR OWN FUTURE: If there has
been a positive from Brexit, leaders say, it has been the exceptional
unity the 27 have shown in negotiation -- though a scary end-game could
yet test that togetherness.”
[<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-popcorn/popcorn-to-hand-eu-watches-brexit-show-but-frets-for-own-future-idUSKCN1PC1US>]

— SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMOUS DYNAMIC —

“SUCH A PLIGHT.
T’IS TIC-TAC-TOE.
AIN’T THAT SO.
AN END TO FIGHT. {@5: Sup: 33 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 33 (#108)},
IS CENTRE'S FOE. {@6: Sup: 18 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 66 (#174)},
WHERE TO GO.
OUR RULE MIGHT.” {@8: Sup: 61 (#280 - SEE KANT'S IDEA); Ego: 5 (#223)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION OF
1789) IDEA: #280: "It can be said that the whole of transcendental
philosophy, which necessarily precedes all of metaphysics, is itself
nothing other than simply the complete solution of the question
presented here, but in systematic order and detail, and that until now
there has therefore been no transcendental philosophy; for what goes
under this name is really a part of metaphysics, but this science is to
settle the possibility of metaphysics in the first place, and therefore
must precede all metaphysics. Hence there need be no surprise because a
science is required that is utterly deprived of assistance from other
sciences, hence is itself completely new, in order just to answer a
single question adequately, when the solution to it is conjoined with
trouble and difficulty and even with some obscurity.

In now setting to work on this solution – and indeed following the
analytic method, in which we presuppose that such cognitions from pure
reason are actual – we can appeal to only two sciences of theoretical
knowledge (which alone is being discussed here), namely, pure
mathematics and pure natural science; for only these can present objects
to us in intuition, and consequently, if they happen to contain an a
priori cognition, can show its truth {ie. SOVEREIGN: #266 / #390
AUTONOMOUS: #311 / #391 DYNAMIC} or correspondence with the object *IN*
*CONCRETO*, i.e., its actuality, from which one could then proceed along
the analytic path to the ground of its possibility. This greatly
facilitates the work, in which general considerations are not only
applied to facts, but even start from them, instead of, as in the
synthetic procedure, having to be derived wholly *IN* *ABSTRACTO* {ie.
#111 from #311 as #288 - UMBRA DATA MANIPUTATION} from concepts.

But in order to ascend from these pure a priori cognitions (which are
not only actual but also well-founded) to a possible cognition that we
seek – namely, a metaphysics as science – we need to comprehend under
our main question that which gives rise to metaphysics and which
underlies its purely naturally given (though not above suspicion as
regards truth) cognition a priori (which cognition, when pursued without
any critical investigation of its possibility, is normally called
metaphysics already) – in a word, the natural disposition to such a
science; and so the main transcendental question, divided into four
other questions, will be [IDEA: @280] answered step by step:

1. How is pure mathematics possible?
2. How is pure natural science possible?
3. How is metaphysics in general possible?
4. How is metaphysics as science possible?

It can be seen that even if the solution to these problems is intended
principally to present the essential content of the Critique, still it
also possesses something distinctive that is worthy of attention in its
own right, namely, the search for the sources of given sciences in
reason itself, in order to investigate and to survey for reason, by way
of the deed itself, its power to cognize something a priori; whereby
these sciences themselves then benefit, if not with respect to their
content, nonetheless as regards their proper practice, and, while
bringing light to a higher question regarding their common origin, they
simultaneously provide occasion for a better explanation of their own
nature." [Pages 30-31]

Enclosed is an updated #26 page document to that provided to your HONOUR
upon 16 JANUARY 2019 being made in consideration of these matters, that
it has been a privilege to proffer a further clarifying advantageous
opinion upon BREXIT negotiations through the news media avenue as a
subject which was designated for British Parliamentary voting on 15
January 2019 and probable occurrence on 29 March 2019:

HUMAN BEING (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL*
*DOCTRINE* *OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF*
*PRINCIPLES*); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 - ACTION PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN
'CONCRETE' {ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE); Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391} / HETEROS {#283 / #377} / TORAH {#237
- *DETERMINED* *WILL* / #435}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,84}&idea:{f,123}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,391}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 3, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 41 [Date: 2019.9.15, Time: 11:30
hrs, Super: #311 / #42 - Generating Things, Reason's Modifications;
I-Ching: H60 - Control, Restraint, Articulating, Limitation, Moderation;
Tetra: 52 - Measure, Ego: #391 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness
in Difference; I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force,
Great Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage,
Potential energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation]

G3809@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 10 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 10
(#91),
@4: Sup: 14 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego: 4
(#95),
@5: Sup: 19 (#204); Ego: 5 (#100),
@6: Sup: 29 (#233); Ego: 10 (#110),
@7: Sup: 30 (#263 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: TO MAKE PLANS IS MOST OFTEN
PRESUMPTUOUS); Ego: 1 (#111),
@8: Sup: 68 (#331 - ACTION PLAN FOR DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN
'CONCRETE' {ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE); Ego: 38 (#149),
Male: #331; Feme: #149
} // #311

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #111 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit;
I am not given to cursing.

#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): {UMBRA:
#22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children
(*WHICH* *RELATES* *TO* *THE* *CULTIVATION* *OF* *MIND* *AND* *MORALS*,
*AND* *EMPLOYS* *FOR* *THIS* *PURPOSE* *NOW* *COMMANDS* *AND*
*ADMONITIONS*, *NOW* *REPROOF* *AND* *PUNISHMENT*) It also includes the
*TRAINING* *AND* *CARE* *OF* *THE* *BODY*; 2) *WHATEVER* *IN* *ADULTS*
*ALSO* *CULTIVATES* *THE* *SOUL*, *ESPECIALLY* *BY* *CORRECTING*
*MISTAKES* *AND* *CURBING* *PASSIONS*; 2a) *INSTRUCTION* *WHICH* *AIMS*
*AT* *INCREASING* *VIRTUE*; 2b) *CHASTISEMENT*, *CHASTENING*, (*OF*
*THE* *EVILS* *WITH* *WHICH* *GOD* *VISITS* *MEN* *FOR* *THEIR*
*AMENDMENT*);

SMS DIARY NOTE @ 1059 HOURS ON 11 DECEMBER 2018: “Dear [LEGAL COUNSEL],
thank you for your forbearance within these matters over which I have
attended a file listing hearing scheduled by JUDGE MULLALY upon 27
NOVEMBER 2018 and the REGISTRAR to the COUNTY COURT has accepted the
filing of some #800+ pages.

As JUDGE MULLALY {

#451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18
as #451 % #41 = #41} 1) *JUDGMENT*, *JUSTICE*, *ORDINANCE*; 1a)
judgment; 1a1) act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of
judgment; 1a3) *PROCESS*, *PROCEDURE*, *LITIGATION* (*BEFORE* *JUDGES*);
1a4) case, cause (presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of
judgment); 1a6) execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b)
justice, right, rectitude (attributes of God or man); 1c) *ORDINANCE*;
1d) *DECISION* (*IN* *LAW*); 1e) *RIGHT*, *PRIVILEGE*, *DUE* (*LEGAL*);
1f) proper, fitting, measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;

} only advised me today of your letter to the court dated 5 DECEMBER
2018 conveying that you are not capable of representing me in these
matters, I will now cease further dialog following letters of 18 / 30
NOVEMBER 2018 and 4 DECEMBER 2018.

Although if there was to be further dialog, I would have appreciated
given your sapient legal expertise as a CRIMINAL LAW ACCREDITED
SPECIALIST, what your prudent considerations were on this procedural
question:

'With respects to #288 - UMBRA data manipulation {eg: in the instance
shown above: #311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia
(G3809): {UMBRA: #22 as #111 % #41 = #29}} as META SCHEMA OF ACQUIESCE
made AGAINST an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY of COGNITION and COHERING REALITY
as MENS REA being considered in the circumstance of the existing
correspondence between a #CENTRE having as ONTIC necessity and
attributed by EVER PRESENT relative to the circumscribing happenstance
as whether intentional / unintentional being an universe of discourse
and occasioning sphere of action ⭕️ which have both a finite temporality
and continuity.

Whether the #288 - UMBRA impetus can be better considered a fixed
mindset and the data manipulation itself an ACTUS REUS that is construed
as PERPETUAL ACTION and therefore a FINDS COMMITTING status can be
applied to any *AHISTORICAL* (word of the day for 11 DECEMBER 2018)
criminal acts although having an EVENT within the past yet cleave to
#123 - SENSIBILITY of the PRESENT and against which a POWER OF ARREST
under SECTION 458 of the CRIMES ACT (1958) VICTORIA can be applied at
any time.”

And thank you for your faithful considerations within my matters and
good day to you."

SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL*
*DOCTRINE* *OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF*
*PRINCIPLES*); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 61 (#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,132}&idea:{f,246}&idea:{m,266}&idea:{f,390}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 6, row: 5, col: 5, nous: 41 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #266 / #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition, Ego:
#390 / #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference; I-Ching: H26
- Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating, The taming
power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation]

TO BBC NEWSWATCH / THE AGE NEWSDESK @ 0811 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "ON
A #364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW MADE IN RELATION TO #2184 v's #1827 AS
COSMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATION OF THE STATE / COMMONWEALTH MADE IN FAVOUR OF
THE BRITISH IMPERIAL GOVERNANCE (vis a vis QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT) THE BREXIT DIVORCE BILL CAN BE SUBJECT TO A #237 - DETERMINED
WILL REDUCTION OF ANY REMITTANCE (DESPITE PROTESTS FROM THE EUROPEAN
UNION) SOLELY IN LIGHT OF IMPENDING DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE'
{ie. #FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE."

That I have voluntarily done so with respects to my some 24 years
informal research into technologizing the existential substance {#2184 -
LAWS OF NATURE v's #1827 - ECCLESIASTICAL LITURGICAL CYCLES

CONCEPT OF SUBSISTENCE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL LUMEN GENTIUM

v's

#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE
PRIVY COUNCIL} AS #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*

} of QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 as
instrumentation to the FEDERATION of the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Being%20Human.pdf>

— WE #273 - REMEMBER YOUR FORGET —

“LEST WE FORGET.
TO FIRST #288 - REMEMBER. {@3}
THIS NATION’S TUNE.
AS SOVEREIGN BEGET.
ISN’T NAZI DISTEMPER. {@6: Sup: 50 (#310); Ego: 41 (#318 - KANT'S
SECTION #36 - HOW IS NATURE ITSELF POSSIBLE?)},
BUT BY PRIVY TRIBUNE. {@7: Sup: 37 (#347); Ego: 51 (#369 -
DISCRIMINATING NORM AS #205 + #164)}
NO #364 - OBEY, #312 - AID, #273 - ASSIST REGRET.”

{@3: Sup: 41 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 51 (#157 - I
AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR
MY OWN PROPERTY {%41})}

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION OF
1789) SECTION #36 - HOW IS NATURE ITSELF POSSIBLE? AS IDEA: @318:
"[IDEA: @318] This question, which is the highest point that
transcendental philosophy can ever reach, and up to which, as its
boundary and completion, it must be taken, actually contains two questions.

FIRST: How is nature possible in general in the material sense, namely,
according to intuition, as the sum total of appearances; how are space,
time, and that which fills them both, the object of sensation, possible
in general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of our
sensibility, in accordance with which our sensibility is affected in its
characteristic way by objects that are in themselves unknown to it and
that are wholly distinct from said appearances. This answer is, in the
book itself, given in the TRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC, b{ie. The first part
of the Transcendental Doctrine of Elements (see pape 137) of Critique of
Pure Reason} but here in the Prolegomena through the solution of the
first main question.
SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of
the rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be
thought as connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out
otherwise than: it is possible only by means of the constitution of our
understanding, in accordance with which all these *REPRESENTATIONS* *OF*
*SENSIBILITY* *ARE* *NECESSARILY* *REFERRED* *TO* *ONE* *CONSCIOUSNESS*,
*AND* *THROUGH* *WHICH*, *FIRST*, *THE* *CHARACTERISTIC* *MANNER* *OF*
*OUR* *THINKING*, *NAMELY* *BY* *MEANS* *OF* *RULES*, *IS* *POSSIBLE*,
*AND* *THEN*, *BY* *MEANS* *OF* *THESE* *RULES*, *EXPERIENCE* *IS*
*POSSIBLE*:
#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#164 -
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...

166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35
- I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]

TOTAL: @166 + @168 + @169 + @171 + @173 + @175 + @177 + @180 + @181 +
@182 + @184 + @185 + @186 + @191 + @192 + @196 + @197 + @200 = #3273 -
PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {3 x #1091: THAT #1092 = 3 x #364 IS THE 'OTH
CYCLE OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE}: "WHO HATH TAKEN THIS
*COUNSEL* {

@1 (#1) + @2 (#41) + @3 (#81) + @4 (#369) = #10 (#492) / #12 = #41 -
ONTIC NECESSITY ESPOUSED BY 'ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL' (LIBERTÉ {17
SEPTEMBER 1900}) WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL BASIS TO EMPIRE GOVERNANCE

} AGAINST TYRE {strength; rock; sharp}, THE CROWNING CITY, WHOSE
MERCHANTS ARE PRINCES, WHOSE TRAFFICKERS ARE THE HONOURABLE OF THE
EARTH?" [Isaiah 23:8]

SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO
BE #364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 -
SEPULCHRE}, AND #273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR
GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = SUNSET 11
SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR
ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF
NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT
THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID
COMMONWEALTH."

#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 {*MARRIAGE*} - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS
NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...

84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]

TOTAL: @84 + @86 + @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF* *TIME*), *KINGDOM* /
*DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR* + @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A* *POSSESSION*,
*ACQUIRE*, *INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF* + @115 =
*MOSES* *SEAT* *OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) =
#491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY

SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE TO OURSELVES OUR @104 - HEIRS AND
SUCCESSORS, FULL @115 - POWER AND AUTHORITY FROM @102 - TIME TO @104 -
TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR
THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”

Which is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects in
themselves. This answer is, in the book itself, given in the
TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC, {ie. The second part of the Transcendental
Doctrine of Elements, coordinate with the Aesthetic, though much longer
(see page 137) of Critique of Pure Reason} but here in the Prolegomena,
in the course of solving the second main question.

But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and
answered, because we always have need of them in turn for all answering
and for all thinking of objects.

There are many #2184 - LAWS OF NATURE that we can know only through
experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances, i.e.,
nature in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any
experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
priori at the basis of its possibility.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
#2184 - UNIVERSAL LAW OF NATURE, and the principles of the former are
themselves the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature
{ie. #1827 = 4 x #364 + #371} except as the sum total of appearances,
i.e., of the representations in us, and so we cannot get the laws of
their connection from anywhere else except the principles of their
connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of necessary *UNIFICATION*
*IN* *ONE* *CONSCIOUSNESS*, which unification constitutes the
possibility of experience.

According to IMMANUEL KANT, DAVID HUME (died 25 August 1776, Edinburgh)
was a Scottish Enlightenment philosopher, historian, economist, and
essayist, who is best known today for his highly influential system of
philosophical empiricism, skepticism, and naturalism, who had raised
objections to the notions of equality and congruence (among others)
within geometry, which objections appealed to experience (Treatise,
i.ii.4.4, pp. 42–53), thereby subjecting mathematics to experience, and
whereby he also *INCORRECTLY* rejected THE CONCEPTION THAT MATHEMATICS
CONSIDERS ITS OBJECTS INDEPENDENTLY OF THEIR EXISTENCE IN NATURE:

#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
#273 - *MOMENT*

As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
*CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the principle of #312 -
CONTRADICTION:

#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {

*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN DIALECTS OF CONTRADICTIONS ON
NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING

v's

#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CYCLE BLASPHEMY
CENTRED UPON 30 NOVEMBER AS SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE} +

#728 - REACTANCE +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}

AS UNCONSCIONABLE AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDUCT AS BREACHES TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 {

#371 - *SAINT* *ANDREWS* *AS* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *30* *NOVEMBER* *FIVE*
*YEAR*: 4 x #364 + #371 = #1827 *LITURGICAL* *CALENDAR*,

#288 - *REMEMBRANCE* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI* *PROTOTYPE*,

#390 - *WREATHS* / *SOVEREIGNTY*,

#312 - *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI*
*PROTOTYPE*,

#419 - *SLAUGHTER*

} OF DETERMINED AND PREMEDITATED BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING
RACIAL HATRED, ANTI-SEMITISM BY ESPECIALLY ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY
AS KNIGHTS TEMPLARS BEING AN UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER AND PSYCHOSEXUAL
SLANDER AGAINST WHICH THEY HAVE NOT BEEN RESPONSIVE.

GNOSIS EX MACHINA {#2184}: @6 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364}; @7 -
PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {#312}; @8 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC
SUCCESSION {#273}

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA: @319: "There are many *LAWS*
*OF* *NATURE* {ie.

#24 x #7 x #13 as #2184 ipso facto

6 x #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY AS OBEDIENT(H7522) {#273 as [#6, #7,
#20, #200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1) *REMEMBRANCE*},

7 x #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION AS AIDING(H5826) {#273 as [#40,
#50, #8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion (G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*},

8 x #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC SUCCESSION AS ASSISTING / DEVOTE
ONESELF(H5144) {#273 as [#1, #200, #9, #5, #50, #8] = asthenes (G0772
): 1) *WEAK*; *INCAPACITY*}

UNTO THE GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182
= SUNSET 11 SEPTEMBER 2001} IS A REQUIREMENT OF ALL CITIZENS UNDER
SECTION VIII OF QUEEN VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT

} that we can know only through experience, but lawfulness in the
connection of appearances, i.e., nature in general, we cannot come to
know through any experience, because experience itself has need of such
laws, which lie a priori at the basis of its possibility.

That there was a determined campaign of partiality shown to the BOER WAR
MEMORIAL established on 29 OCTOBER 1909 being the cornerstone of
Australian identity as ethos of "#OBEDIENT, #AIDING AND #ASSISTING" and
we reject CATEGORICALLY their unreasoned disloyalty by INTELLECTUAL
assent given to FOREIGN POWERS {ie. ESPECIALLY IRISH, SCOTTISH, RSL /
FREEMASONRY / ROMAN CATHOLIC [BY] SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE} as all
unconscionable attempts to impose a substituted ethic @5 {HETEROS: #FIVE
[#111/#333 ***] / TORAH: #FIVE [#114/#342 ***]} against the INTELLECTUS
AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL {#235 - ADOLF
HITLER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK ON 7 JUNE 1942 AS IDEA: *ANYONE* *WHO*
*FOR* *FALSE* *REASONS* *OF* *MERCY* *DEVIATES* *FROM* *THIS* *CLEAR*
*PRINCIPLE* *IS* *AIDING*, *WILLINGLY* *OR* *UNWILLINGLY*, *THE*
*DISSOLUTION* *OF* *THE* *STATE*} upon our War Dead and to usurp @1
{HETEROS: #ONE [#99/#297 ***] / TORAH: #ONE [#78/#234 ***]} the
SOVEREIGNTY embodied within the Governor General as ANTHROPIC
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE {#2184}.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
*PRINCIPLES* {ie. #390 + #312 + #390 = #1092 or #364 + #312 + #728 +
#390 + #390 = @2184} *OF* *THEIR* *CONNECTION* *IN* *US*, i.e., *FROM*
*THE* *CONDITIONS* *OF* *NECESSARY* *UNIFICATION* *IN* *ONE*
*CONSCIOUSNESS*, *WHICH* *UNIFICATION* *CONSTITUTES* *THE* *POSSIBILITY*
*OF* *EXPERIENCE*." [page 70]

Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this
entire part, that #2184 - UNIVERSAL LAWS OF NATURE can be cognized a
priori, already leads by itself to the proposition: *THAT* *THE*
*HIGHEST* *LEGISLATION* *FOR* *NATURE* *MUST* *LIE* *IN* *OUR* *SELF*,
i.e., in our understanding, and that we must not seek the #2184 -
UNIVERSAL LAWS OF NATURE from nature by means of experience, but,
conversely, must seek nature, as regards its universal conformity to
law, solely in the conditions of the possibility of experience that lie
in our sensibility and understanding; for how would it otherwise be
possible to become acquainted with these laws a priori, since they are
surely not rules of analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic
amplifications of cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary
agreement, between the principles of possible experience and the laws of
the possibility of nature, can come about from only two causes: either
these laws are taken from nature by means of experience, or, conversely,
nature is derived from the laws of the possibility of experience in
general and is fully identical with the mere universal lawfulness of
experience. The first one contradicts itself, for the universal laws of
nature can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the
understanding; so only the second remains.∗
We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - LAWS OF NATURE, which
always presuppose particular perceptions, from the pure or universal
laws of nature, which, without having particular perceptions underlying
them, contain merely the conditions for the necessary unification of
such perceptions in one experience; with respect to the latter laws,
nature and possible experience are one and the same, and since in
possible experience the lawfulness rests on the necessary connection of
appearances in one experience (without which we would not be able to
cognize any object of the sensible world at all), and so on the original
laws of the understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at first,
it is nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the #2184 -
UNIVERSAL LAWS OF NATURE: the understanding does not draw its (a priori)
laws from nature, but prescribes them to it." [Pages 69-72]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION OF
1789) IDEA: #347: "Therefore freedom{ie. #2184 - FREEDOM from #1827 -
OPPRESSION} does not impede the #2184 - NATURAL LAW OF APPEARANCES, any
more than this law interferes with the freedom of the practical use of
reason, a use that stands in connection with things in themselves as
determining grounds.

In this way practical freedom – namely, that freedom in which reason has
causality in accordance with objective determining grounds – is rescued,
without natural necessity suffering the least harm with respect to the
very same effects, as appearances. This can also help elucidate what we
have had to say about *TRANSCENDENTAL* *FREEDOM* *AND* *ITS*
*UNIFICATION* *WITH* *NATURAL* *NECESSITY* (in the same subject, but not
taken in one and the same respect). For, as regards transcendental
freedom, any beginning of an action of a being out of objective causes
is always, with respect to these determining grounds, a first beginning,
although the same action is, in the series of appearances, only a
SUBALTERNATE BEGINNING, prior to which a state of the cause must precede
which determines that cause and which is itself determined in the same
way by an immediately preceding cause: so that in rational beings (or in
general in any beings, provided that their causality is determined in
them as things in themselves) one can conceive of a faculty for
beginning a series of states spontaneously without falling into
contradiction with the laws of nature. For the relation of an action to
the objective grounds of reason is not a temporal relation; here, that
which determines the causality does not precede the action as regards
time, because such determining grounds do not represent the relation of
objects to the senses (and so to causes within appearance), but rather
they represent determining causes as things in themselves, which are not
subject to temporal conditions. Hence the action can be regarded as a
first beginning with respect to the causality of reason, but can
nonetheless at the [IDEA: 4:347] same time be seen as a mere
subordinated beginning with respect to the series of appearances {ie.

#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins):

WHEREAS, by an Act of Parliament passed on the ninth day of July One
thousand nine hundred, in the Sixty fourth year of Our reign, intiluled
“An Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia,” it is enacted that
“it shall be lawful for the Queen,” with the advice of the Privy
Council, to declare by Proclamation that, on and after a day therein
appointed, not being later than one year after this passing of this Act,
the people of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland,
and Tasmania, and also, if Her Majesty is satisfied that the people of
Western Australia have agreed thereto, of Western Australia, shall be
united in a Federal Commonwealth under the name of the Commonwealth of
Australia. But the Queen may, at any time after Proclamation, appoint a
Governor General for the Commonwealth:

#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE
PRIVY COUNCIL}: #41 X#12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} IN THE EXERCISE OF THE
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*MATERIALITY*}), and

#391 - HOMOGENIOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900 AS BY
PROCLAMATION SHALL BE UNITED IN A FEDERAL COMMONWEALTH}) OF CIVIL SOCIETY

}, and can without #312 - *CONTRADICTION* be considered in the former
respect as free, in the latter (since the action is mere appearance) as
subject to natural necessity." [Pages 97-98]

- dolf

Initial Post: 19 January 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Loading...