Discussion:
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?
(zu alt für eine Antwort)
dolf
2018-08-27 22:15:00 UTC
Permalink
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR
SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 28 August, 2018

It is 0435 hours within the morning and the mind is contending against one
of Kant’s conjectural aspirations as a postulate upon perfection.

Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora of
opportunity.

To say that Emmanuel Macron is a delicious philanderer or that he has a
propensity for passionate fidelity as possessing proficient virility are
all propositions of permissibility which each according to my
sensibilities, are aspersions of acceptability as tolerable perfections:

petite liesse sans réprochabilité.

And in that regard we are each sapient entities within the extent of savage
or savant, but we do not capably know every subject and all there is {ie.
telos = arch + c^2: #41 x 9 = 13 September 2001} to know and for want of a
better analogical premise what then is cerebrum as cortexual context and
from where does consciousness cascade?

Romans 8:28 (KJV)
And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God,
to them who are the called according to [his] purpose.

1 Corinthians 2:9 (KJV)
But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have
entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them
that love him.

Ephesians 4:15 (KJV)
But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which
is the head, [even] Christ:

Revelation 10:6 (KJV)
And sware {ie. the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} by him that liveth
for ever and ever, who created heaven {0, 27, 54}, and the things that
therein are, and the earth {0, 9, 18}, and the things that therein are, and
the sea {0, 3, 6}, and the things which are therein, that there should be
time no longer: {1, 2, 3}

And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely make
at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that is
broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of
sensibilities, both in terms of initial focal apprehension, and it’s
subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches a
prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only then
a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that conveys a
disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make something distinctive
or attractive.

YOUTUBE: “A Conversation Between Two Linguistically Gifted Groups”



But which must then be assayed before either ignominy as disgrace or
ingenuity and virtuosity as its relative perfection is attributed to it as
quintessentially capable of an instantiation (voilà) within its own
entitlement and a permeability to forestall the ravages of time as being a
declarative truth and manifest of agreement.

- dolf

Initial Post: 28 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-28 01:41:01 UTC
Permalink
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR
SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 28 August, 2018

It is 0435 hours within the morning and the mind is contending against one
of Kant’s conjectural aspirations as a postulate upon perfection.

We return again to the prefaced consideration that the Groundwork for the
Metaphysics of Morals is representative of Kant’s characteristic position
development where he emphasizes that an adequate form of moral philosophy
has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical elements of interest,
self-love, and natural feelings as well as free from rational concepts of
perfection.

And given our elucidation at the beginning of the chapter would posit that
there might well be several dialectic proficiencies which are structurally
complimentary in facilitating the ontological syncretic experience as
entelechy.

However before concising these rudimentary constituencies, one ought to
consider their partisan propensity for societal and political cataclysm on
the pretence of an emancipation since they convey the vernacular notion of
Categorical Imperative that when provisioned with some vMemetic imperative
such as normative description as a maxim having substantility or mantric
opportunitu are regarded as a concrete existence.

Our intention is neither to invigorate nor eviscerate any such causes but
to informally engage within a process of self education as enlightenment
and participate within discourse upon the dialectics of *ONTIC* necessity,
its delimination by the Gnomic Imperative Instruction Set which is implicit
to the Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus (ie. Voluntary Will) as the
systemic basis for ideas initiation and facilitation, the dialectic of
language (ie. English) itself and lastly its circumscribeing of the
ontological experience through the means of a dialectic of dissertation
whether as formalised thetic prosody presented dogmatically, as arbitrary
prescription or simply as opined proposition.

Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora of
opportunity.

To say that Emmanuel Macron is a delicious philanderer or that he has a
propensity for passionate fidelity as possessing proficient virility are
all propositions of permissibility which each according to my
sensibilities, are aspersions of acceptability as tolerable perfections:

Petite liesse sans réprochabilité (Little jubilation without reproach).

And in that regard we are each sapient entities within the extent of savage
or savant, but we do not capably know every subject and all there is {ie.
telos = arch + c²: #41 x 9 as 13 September 2001} to know and for want of a
better analogical premise what then is cerebrum as cortexual context and
from whence does consciousness cascade?

“And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God,
to them who are the called according to [his] purpose.” [Romans 8:28 (KJV)]

“But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have
entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them
that love him.” [1 Corinthians 2:9 (KJV)]

“But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which
is the head, [even] Christ:” [Ephesians 4:15 (KJV)]

“And sware {ie. the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} by him that liveth
for ever and ever, who created heaven {0, 27, 54}, and the things that
therein are, and the earth {0, 9, 18}, and the things that therein are, and
the sea {0, 3, 6}, and the things which are therein, that there should be
time no longer: {1, 2, 3}” [Revelation 10:6 (KJV)]

And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely make
at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that is
broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of
sensibilities, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches a
prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only then
a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that conveys a
disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make something distinctive
or attractive.

YOUTUBE: “A Conversation Between Two Linguistically Gifted Groups”

http://youtu.be/ZN19oHTv_Vg

But which must then be assayed before either ignominy as disgrace or
ingenuity and virtuosity as its relative perfection is attributed to it as
quintessentially capable of an instantiation (voilà) within its own
entitlement and a permeability to forestall the ravages of time as being a
declarative truth and manifest of agreement.

- dolf

Initial Post: 28 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-28 03:21:20 UTC
Permalink
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR
SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 28 August, 2018

2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL PRINCIPLE
Ethical principles have the task of guiding our moral judgments. A more
exact analysis of their logical features takes into account that with
them help we judge not only factually existing objects but also objects
which we merely imagine or whose existence is possible but not actual.

Let us assume in a particular situation that we have two alternatives of
action at our disposal. We must decide between action A and action B. If
we choose A, B will never exist; if we choose B, A will likewise never
exist. If we wish to judge both options of action from a moral point of
view, we can do so with recourse to our ethical principles. In that
case, we test Whether the criteria formulated in the principles will be
satisfied or not satisfied. The criteria must be applicable both to
factually existing objects as well as to merely possibly existing ones
in order to guide our valuation. Both the actual action A and the merely
possible action B fall within the range of objects covered by the
principles. This condition has consequences for their modal status.

In order to express modal relations, one can make use of the
possible-worlds terminology common in semantics. In case we decide for A
and successfully translate this decision into action, then A is an
object of the actual world, and B is solely an object of a possible
world. We judge both objects With recourse to the same principles. That
means, however, that these principles express something not only about
the actual world but also about other, possible worlds. Since these
principles indicate a strength beyond that of contingency, it appears
that they exhibit the modal status of necessity. [Horn & Schönecker
(eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1021 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018:
"***@CK YOU!

This is horse-shit exponented. I will explain.

(horse-shit) x 3 = Three times the horse-shit that was here before

Time for a break, you assclown."

DOLF @ 1114 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "RHETORICAL ARTIFICE AS REDUCTIO AD
HITLERUM NOTED: ***@CK YOU

In addition to electronically serving upon you a copy of this document
"#123 - DIVINE JUDGMENT BY #509 - YAHAD (JEWISH / CHRISTIAN PROSELYTES)
AGAINST JEWISH HATRED DUE [TO] STEREOTYPICAL *SHEM* (#72) *HAMPHORASCH*
DEMENTIA BY BLASPHEMY BEING NOW A #481 - *CURSE* UPON THEM"

I've lodged an email copy of such complaint to the local *PROJECTS*
office for the *JEWISH* *ANTI*-*DEFAMATION* *LEAGUE* antidef.org.au and
to my friends at the MIKDASH EDUCATIONAL CENTER SITUATED WITHIN
JERUSALEM (as the JEWISH TEMPLE COIN depicted therein I have purchased
from them) ...

American Support for Israel, Inc.
P.O. Box 3263
Washington, DC 20010

They won't have any need to reply because they recognize the plurality
of Jewish belief which includes #509 - YAHAD (mentioned in both the Old
/ New Testaments of the Bible) as proselytes is clearly conveyed as
God's elect and chosen community.

If you have a problem with that then provide a detailed and reasoned
reply beyond engaging within a *RHETORICAL* *ARTIFICE* *OF* *REDUCTIO*
*AD* *HITLERUM* as noted: ***@CK YOU and feigned habitual ignorance by a
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL.

If not, I forewarn you that we are building capacity to pursue you
within a court of law for irrational hatred driven by a prejudice
conveying acts of dehumanisation being crimes against humanity and
constituting a war crime which is subject to a universal jurisdiction ...

Oh Father don't forgive them because they know what they do... "

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1130 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018:
"Jeezus is the Yid ***@t thick here! Little wonder the mindless and
leaderless Goys follow the likes of you (yours)."

DOLF @ 1441 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "NOTED DEPLOYMENT OF IGNORANCE OF
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DID FASCISM:

Ah so you have moved on from deploying a RHETORICAL ARTIFICE OF REDUCTIO
AD HITLERUM which was NOTED: ***@CK YOU

And now utilising an ego defensive mechanism of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL of IGNORANCE

Piaget writes that within logic, juxtaposition is a logical fallacy on
the part of the observer, where two items placed next to each other
imply a correlation, when none is actually claimed. For example, an
illustration of a politician and Adolf Hitler on the same page would
imply that the politician had a common ideology with Hitler. Similarly,
saying "Hitler was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are
you" would have the same effect.

This particular rhetorical device is common enough to have its own name,
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM*.

Thus we can factually convey without prejudice that:

#1) Your having a recourse to a particular “rhetorical device”,
#2) Reliance upon ignorance as #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL,
#3) Murderous disdain {ie. #419 - SLAUGHTER upon your altar} for Bible
Students as equivalent to HITLERS’s IDEA @215 and
#4) propensity for hymenealism (marriage) by psychosexual pejoratives
re-enforcing misnomered piety which is concerned with all-quantified,
descriptive bi-conditionals.

That by such a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE you indistinguishable from
neo-Nazi identity and you cannot argue against it—WHAT AN ABOMINATION
YOU ARE."

PESACH [NEFESH BAR YOCHAI] ACEMAN (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1335 HOURS ON
27 AUGUST 2018: "Please remove me from the list to which I never
subscribed."

DOLF @ 1449 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "#123 - DIVINE JUDGMENT BY #509 -
YAHAD (JEWISH / CHRISTIAN PROSELYTES) AGAINST JEWISH HATRED DUE [TO]
STEREOTYPICAL *SHEM* (#72) *HAMPHORASCH* DEMENTIA BY BLASPHEMY BEING NOW
A #481 - *CURSE* UPON THEM:

You are not subscribed to any list you lunatic son of #351 - BELIAL.

I notice that you use #41 within your email address and I ought to say
that I know the mind {#41 x 9} of him who said: “FOR THE CHILDREN OF
THIS WORLD {#351 - BELIAL} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE
CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}." [Luke 16:8 (KJV)]

"I AM FROM ABOVE {#41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your
parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against
autonomy ... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear false witness ... #287
- Covert Not ... #328 ... #369}: YE ARE OF THIS WORLD {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: #260) ...
#34 (@7: #175) ...
#65 (@2: #34) ...
#111 (@3: #65) ...
#175 (@4: #369) ...
#260 (@8: #111) ...
#369 (@9: #15)

}; I AM NOT OF THIS WORLD.” [John 8:23 (KJV)]

"AND JESUS ANSWERING SAID UNTO THEM, THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD MARRY,
AND ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE: BUT THEY WHICH SHALL BE ACCOUNTED WORTHY TO
OBTAIN THAT WORLD, AND THE RESURRECTION FROM THE DEAD, NEITHER MARRY,
NOR ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE: NEITHER CAN THEY DIE ANY MORE: FOR THEY ARE
EQUAL UNTO THE ANGELS; AND ARE THE CHILDREN OF GOD, BEING THE CHILDREN
OF THE RESURRECTION." [Luke 20:34-36 (KJV)]

It’s my Intellectual Property which is not going to be wasted on you.

Save us both the bother by not replying any further as I am too holy for
you to do so:

49215961@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 2 (#2),
Male: #38; Feme: #2
}

#38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching: H62 - Minor
Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of the small,
Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
#2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 - Peace, Pervading,
Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;"

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1423 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "IT
IS UP TO US!

Chancellor Hitler was the only known figure in human history to find a
way to break the Jew monopoly on the precious metals by moneti[s]ing
Caucasian labo[u]r ... along with international barter ... and for
twelve years Germany's Jew-free Reich flourished. Of course as I am sure
you know, that didn't work out too well. Now it is up to us."

DOLF @ 1614 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "IT IS UP TO US TO WIPE YOUR ARSE!

You are still purveying such Hitler bullshit when incontrovertible facts
as denial have been provided to you...

— MUMMY DEAREST —
[Written 12 January 2018]

“HERE PUSSY PUSSY,
I WANT SOME FANNY?
CROSS DRESSER SISSY.
OR EVEN A TRINNY.

MUMMY IS THE BEST.
SEXY AS MY FARCE.
AND AT MY BEQUEST.
SHE’LL WIPE MY ARSE.”

YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"



TOO BAD THAT YOU ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE AND CANNOT ENJOY THE BATTLE HYMN
OF THE REPUBLIC.

— POUTING SNOUT —

“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”

YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”



WHAT SAY YE THAT WE HAVE IT FOR OURS SINCE ITS NO VALUE OR USE TO YOU AS
JUST LIPSTICK 👄 ON A PIG 🐷 TO YOU?"

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1423 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "The
only thing that needs to be provided for you is an oven."

LOOSE CANNON (***@GMX-X.COMM) @ 0423 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "[flush]

Look what the executioner does to this NAZOID sub-louse!

A true keeper... esp[ecially] the part when the hangman sticks his
fingers into the NAZOID'S eyes..."

THE PEELER (***@THEREVD.INVALID) 0601 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018:
"<FLUSH the disgusting senile nazi homo swine's usual disgusting sick
nazi homo bullshit unread>

Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's [newsgroups], you
disgusting senile nazi homo swine!"

NEFESH BAR YOCHAI (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1003 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST
2018: "Now you are on the bad side of Dolf and I think it is funny since
he is on the prowl to butt ***@ck you. You'd like that too wouldn't you
Sockman?"

The fact that ethical principles carry in themselves the modal status of
necessity provides an important methodical starting point for the
construction of ethical theories. Thus, the execution of the commonly
performed counterfactual thought experiments in ethics is only possible
under the condition that the principles of valuation support such an
operation. Contingent principles are not in a position to do that, Kant
makes methodical use of this log1cal quality of moral principles
particularly in those places where he speaks of other “*RATIONAL*
*BEINGS*” (eg. GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). The central passage in the
Preface of the Groundwork in which he argues for the necessity of a pure
moral philosophy also belongs to this methodical usage. It does not
matter in these passages whether there actually are other such beings
as, for example, the inhabitants of other planets or also God. For the
Kantian argumentation it is sufficient that such beings could exist,
that their existence is thinkable. The corresponding passages must be
understood as methodically executed thought experiments, which make use
of the particular modal status of ethical principles. Now it becomes
clear why the “*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*” have a comparable modal status to
the “*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.” Laws of nature support counterfactual
arguments, too. In order to achieve this, they also must have a modal
status which is higher than simple contingency. The connections
formulated in them are also valid in all natural law governed, possible
worlds, and in this respect, they exhibit the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity. The difference between laws of nature and laws of freedom
appears to consist primarily in the fact that the *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* {

#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] =
qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition,
contrariness, encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;

As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days

#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days

} are concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while
the laws of [*ONTOLOGICAL*] freedom are concerned with all-quantified,
normative bi-conditionals, each receiving the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity." [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]

It is 0435 hours within the morning and the mind is contending against
one of Kant’s conjectural aspirations as a postulate upon perfection.

We return again to the prefaced consideration that the Groundwork for
the Metaphysics of Morals is representative of Kant’s characteristic
positional development where he emphasizes that an adequate form of
moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical
elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings as well as free
from rational concepts of perfection.

And given our elucidation at the beginning of the chapter would posit
that there might well be several dialectic proficiencies which are
structurally complimentary in facilitating the ontological syncretic
experience as entelechy.

However before concising these rudimentary constituencies, one ought to
consider their partisan propensity for societal and political cataclysm
on the pretence of an emancipation, since they convey the vernacular
notion of Categorical Imperative. That when provisioned with some
vMemetic characteristic such as by normative description of maxim having
substantiality or mantric opportunism are regarded as a concrete existence.

Our intention is neither to invigorate nor eviscerate any such causes
but to informally engage within a process of self education as
enlightenment and participate within discourse upon the dialectics of
*ONTIC* necessity, its delimitation by the Gnomic Imperative Instruction
Set which is implicit to the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (ie.
Voluntary Will) as the systemic basis for ideas initiation and
facilitation, the dialectic of language (ie. English) itself and lastly
its circumscribing of the ontological experience through the means of a
dialectic of dissertation whether as formalised theatric prosody
presented dogmatically, as arbitrary prescription or simply as opined
proposition.

Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora
of opportunity.

To say that Emmanuel Macron is a delicious philanderer or that he has a
propensity for passionate fidelity as possessing proficient virility are
all propositions of permissibility which each according to my
sensibilities, are aspersions of acceptability as tolerable perfections:

Petite liesse sans réprochabilité (Little jubilation without reproach).

And in that regard we are each sapient entities within the extent of
savage or savant, but we do not capably know every subject and all there
is {ie. telos = arch + c²: #41 x 9 as 13 September 2001} to know and for
want of a better analogical premise what then is cerebrum as cortexual
context and from whence does consciousness cascade?

“And we know that all things work together for good to them that love
God, to them who are the called according to [his] purpose.” [Romans
8:28 (KJV)]

“But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have
entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for
them that love him.” [1 Corinthians 2:9 (KJV)]

"But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things,
which is the head, [even] Christ:” [Ephesians 4:15 (KJV)]

“And sware {ie. the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} by him that
liveth for ever and ever, who created heaven {#0, #27, #54}, and the
things that therein are, and the earth {#0, #9, #18}, and the things
that therein are, and the sea {#0, #3, #6}, and the things which are
therein, that there should be time no longer: {#1, #2, #3}.” [Revelation
10:6 (KJV)]

And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely
make at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that
is broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of
sensibilities, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches
a prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only
then a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that
conveys a disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make
something distinctive or attractive.

YOUTUBE: “A Conversation Between Two Linguistically Gifted Groups”

http://youtu.be/ZN19oHTv_Vg

But which must then be assayed before either ignominy as disgrace or
ingenuity and virtuosity as its relative perfection is attributed to it
as quintessentially capable of an instantiation (voilà) within its own
entitlement and a permeability to forestall the ravages of time as being
a declarative truth and manifest of agreement.

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 28 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-28 05:39:46 UTC
Permalink
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR
SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 28 August, 2018

2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL PRINCIPLE
Ethical principles have the task of guiding our moral judgments. A more
exact analysis of their logical features takes into account that with
them help we judge not only factually existing objects but also objects
which we merely imagine or whose existence is possible but not actual.

Let us assume in a particular situation that we have two alternatives of
action at our disposal. We must decide between action A and action B. If
we choose A, B will never exist; if we choose B, A will likewise never
exist. If we wish to judge both options of action from a moral point of
view, we can do so with recourse to our ethical principles. In that
case, we test Whether the criteria formulated in the principles will be
satisfied or not satisfied. The criteria must be applicable both to
factually existing objects as well as to merely possibly existing ones
in order to guide our valuation. Both the actual action A and the merely
possible action B fall within the range of objects covered by the
principles. This condition has consequences for their modal status.

In order to express modal relations, one can make use of the
possible-worlds terminology common in semantics. In case we decide for A
and successfully translate this decision into action, then A is an
object of the actual world, and B is solely an object of a possible
world. We judge both objects With recourse to the same principles. That
means, however, that these principles express something not only about
the actual world but also about other, possible worlds. Since these
principles indicate a strength beyond that of contingency, it appears
that they exhibit the modal status of necessity. [Horn & Schönecker
(eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]

An alternative canonical approach to expressing these normative {ie.
YANG CH'I as MALE / YIN as FEME} bi-conditionals {

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the
same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
same light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 - TORAH} - Keep a
common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
each other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.

} as being compliant with the prescriptive as progressive triadic
character {ie. HEAVEN-EARTH-MAN} of ontological perspective and the
formulation of Kant's articulation of the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {#1 -
Formula of Universal Law; #2 - Formula of Humanity; #3 - Formula of
Autonomy} that is then expressing "a situation requiring a choice
between equally undesirable alternatives" and its modal relations, but
in terms of *DILEMMA* which contextually frame meta-dialectic syllogism
as being otherwise consistent with a jurisprudent logical syllogism:

*DILEMMA* (noun):
- A situation requiring a choice between equally undesirable alternatives.
- Any difficult or perplexing situation or problem.
- [Logic]: A form of meta-dialectic syllogism *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *TEN*
*COMMANDMENTS* (*NOMOS* *COMPRISING* *AN* *INTELLECTUAL* *TETRAD*
*ENCOMPASSING* *OUR* *NOMENCLATURE* *AND* *BASIS* *TO* *INTELLECTUS*
*AS* *GENITIVE* *VOLUNTĀTIS*:

#A {Major Premise},
#B {Minor Premise},
#C {Assumptive Proposition},
#D {Restatement of a Sacred / Sovereign Principle}

In which the major premise is formed of two or more hypothetical
propositions and the minor premise is a disjunctive proposition, as

'IF #A {#1 - Nature Contains Nature} THEN #B {#2 - Nature Rejoices in
its Nature};

IF #C {#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature} THEN #D {#4 - Nature Amended in its
Nature}.

EITHER #A OR #C.

THEREFORE, EITHER #B OR #D.'

[Origin 1515–25 CE: Late Latin from Greek dílēmma, equivalent to di +
lêmma an assumption, premise, derivative of lambánein to take {#384 =
#5, #300, #10, #3, #6, #50, #10 as nasag (H5381): 1) to reach, overtake,
take hold upon; 1a) (Hiphil); 1a1) to overtake; 1a2) to reach, attain
to, cause to reach; 1a3) to be able to secure, reach, have enough}.

22/7 as 3W1D ...

THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of*
*priests* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days:

"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]

THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of
20 March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;

"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]

THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.

"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]

THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: It is
also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the Gregorian
calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made divisible by 22
to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew letters in a pattern
which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle of the Chinese 4 BCE
published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the year into 364.5 days
and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a magic square of #369
having a distinct mathematical property at centre of #41 for the
equivalent date of 13 September.

#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses}

As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of Torah
being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = EQUINOX of Wednesday
DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday
DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the
Sabbath year of 'oth cycle

#YOD = 10 SEPTEMBER 2001 as HEAVEN {Divine GODHEAD which is the Mind of
Christ as *HYPOSTATIS*} +

#MEM = 13 SEPTEMBER 2001 as EARTH {DAO-ziran (Chinese) / COURSE-trochos
(Greek) OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]} +

#TAU = 22 SEPTEMBER 2001 as MAN {HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]} +

#ALEPH = 23 SEPTEMBER 2001 {23 CHROMOSOME ELEMENTS AS THEORY OF GENDER}

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1021 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018:
"***@CK YOU!

This is horse-shit exponented. I will explain.

(horse-shit) x 3 = Three times the horse-shit that was here before

Time for a break, you assclown."

DOLF @ 1114 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "RHETORICAL ARTIFICE AS REDUCTIO AD
HITLERUM NOTED: ***@CK YOU

In addition to electronically serving upon you a copy of this document
"#123 - DIVINE JUDGMENT BY #509 - YAHAD (JEWISH / CHRISTIAN PROSELYTES)
AGAINST JEWISH HATRED DUE [TO] STEREOTYPICAL *SHEM* (#72) *HAMPHORASCH*
DEMENTIA BY BLASPHEMY BEING NOW A #481 - *CURSE* UPON THEM"

I've lodged an email copy of such complaint to the local *PROJECTS*
office for the *JEWISH* *ANTI*-*DEFAMATION* *LEAGUE* antidef.org.au and
to my friends at the MIKDASH EDUCATIONAL CENTER SITUATED WITHIN
JERUSALEM (as the JEWISH TEMPLE COIN depicted therein I have purchased
from them) ...

American Support for Israel, Inc.
P.O. Box 3263
Washington, DC 20010

They won't have any need to reply because they recognize the plurality
of Jewish belief which includes #509 - YAHAD (mentioned in both the Old
/ New Testaments of the Bible) as proselytes is clearly conveyed as
God's elect and chosen community.

If you have a problem with that, then you ought to provide a detailed
and reasoned reply beyond engaging within a *RHETORICAL* *ARTIFICE* *OF*
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM* as noted: ***@CK YOU and feigned habitual
ignorance by a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL.

If not, I forewarn you that we are building capacity to pursue you
within a court of law for irrational hatred driven by a prejudice
conveying acts of dehumanisation being crimes against humanity and
constituting a war crime which is subject to a universal jurisdiction ...

Oh Father don't forgive them because they know what they do... "

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1130 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018:
"Jeezus is the Yid ***@t thick here! Little wonder the mindless and
leaderless Goys follow the likes of you (yours)."

DOLF @ 1441 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "NOTED DEPLOYMENT OF IGNORANCE OF
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DID FASCISM:

Ah so you have moved on from deploying a RHETORICAL ARTIFICE OF REDUCTIO
AD HITLERUM which was NOTED: ***@CK YOU

And now utilising an ego defensive mechanism of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL of IGNORANCE

Piaget writes that within logic, juxtaposition is a logical fallacy on
the part of the observer, where two items placed next to each other
imply a correlation, when none is actually claimed. For example, an
illustration of a politician and Adolf Hitler on the same page would
imply that the politician had a common ideology with Hitler. Similarly,
saying "Hitler was in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are
you" would have the same effect.

This particular rhetorical device is common enough to have its own name,
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM*.

Thus we can factually convey without prejudice that:

#1) Your having a recourse to a particular “rhetorical device”,
#2) Reliance upon ignorance as #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL,
#3) Murderous disdain {ie. #419 - SLAUGHTER upon your altar} for Bible
Students as equivalent to HITLERS’s IDEA @215 and
#4) Propensity for hymenealism (marriage) by psychosexual pejoratives
re-enforcing misnomered piety which is concerned with all-quantified,
descriptive bi-conditionals.

That by such a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE you indistinguishable from
neo-Nazi identity and you cannot argue against it—WHAT AN ABOMINATION
YOU ARE."

PESACH [NEFESH BAR YOCHAI] ACEMAN (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1335 HOURS ON
27 AUGUST 2018: "Please remove me from the list to which I never
subscribed."

DOLF @ 1449 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "#123 - DIVINE JUDGMENT BY #509 -
YAHAD (JEWISH / CHRISTIAN PROSELYTES) AGAINST JEWISH HATRED DUE [TO]
STEREOTYPICAL *SHEM* (#72) *HAMPHORASCH* DEMENTIA BY BLASPHEMY BEING NOW
A #481 - *CURSE* UPON THEM:

You are not subscribed to any list you lunatic son of #351 - BELIAL.

I notice that you use #41 within your email address and I ought to say
that I know the mind {#41 x 9} of him who said: “FOR THE CHILDREN OF
THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH / ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR
GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}." [Luke 16:8 (KJV)]

"I AM FROM ABOVE {#41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your
parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against
autonomy ... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear false witness ... #287
- Covet Not ... #328 ... #369}: YE ARE OF THIS WORLD {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: #260) ...
#34 (@7: #175) ...
#65 (@2: #34) ...
#111 (@3: #65) ...
#175 (@4: #369) ...
#260 (@8: #111) ...
#369 (@9: #15)

}; I AM NOT OF THIS WORLD.” [John 8:23 (KJV)]

"AND JESUS ANSWERING SAID UNTO THEM, THE CHILDREN {#SEVEN: #117 / #351
as BELIAL - ANKH / ROMAN} OF THIS WORLD MARRY {#ONE: #99 / #297}, AND
ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE {#175 AS ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE}: BUT THEY WHICH
SHALL BE ACCOUNTED WORTHY TO OBTAIN THAT WORLD, AND THE RESURRECTION
FROM THE DEAD, NEITHER MARRY, NOR ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE: NEITHER CAN
THEY DIE ANY MORE: FOR THEY ARE EQUAL UNTO THE ANGELS; AND ARE THE
CHILDREN OF GOD {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth,
young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation,
ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] *OR* *SONS* *OF* *GOD*
[*FOR* *ANGELS*]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless
things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A*
*GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

}, BEING THE CHILDREN OF THE RESURRECTION." [Luke 20:34-36 (KJV)]

It’s my Intellectual Property which is not going to be wasted on you.

Save us both the bother by not replying any further as I am too holy for
you to do so:

RESPONSE@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 2 (#2),
Male: #38; Feme: #2
}

#38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching: H62 - Minor
Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of the small,
Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;

#2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 - Peace, Pervading,
Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;"

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1423 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "IT
IS UP TO US!

Chancellor Hitler was the only known figure in human history to find a
way to break the Jew monopoly on the precious metals by moneti[s]ing
Caucasian labo[u]r ... along with international barter ... and for
twelve years Germany's Jew-free Reich flourished. Of course as I am sure
you know, that didn't work out too well. Now it is up to us."

DOLF @ 1614 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "IT IS UP TO US TO WIPE YOUR ARSE!

You are still purveying such Hitler bullshit when incontrovertible facts
as denial have been provided to you...

— MUMMY DEAREST —
[Written 12 January 2018]

“HERE PUSSY PUSSY,
I WANT SOME FANNY?
CROSS DRESSER SISSY.
OR EVEN A TRINNY.

MUMMY IS THE BEST.
SEXY AS MY FARCE.
AND AT MY BEQUEST.
SHE’LL WIPE MY ARSE.”

YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"

http://youtu.be/Jy6AOGRsR80

TOO BAD THAT YOU ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE AND CANNOT ENJOY THE BATTLE HYMN
OF THE REPUBLIC.

— POUTING SNOUT —

“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”

YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”

http://youtu.be/rjQtzV9IZ0Q

WHAT SAY YE THAT WE HAVE IT FOR OURS SINCE ITS NO VALUE OR USE TO YOU AS
JUST LIPSTICK 👄 ON A PIG 🐷 TO YOU?"

CAROLINA REB (***@ATT.NET) @ 1423 HOURS ON 27 AUGUST 2018: "The
only thing that needs to be provided for you is an oven."

LOOSE CANNON (***@GMX-X.COMM) @ 0423 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018: "[flush]

Look what the executioner does to this NAZOID sub-louse!

A true keeper... esp[ecially] the part when the hangman sticks his
fingers into the NAZOID'S eyes..."

THE PEELER (***@THEREVD.INVALID) 0601 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST 2018:
"<FLUSH the disgusting senile nazi homo swine's usual disgusting sick
nazi homo bullshit unread>

Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's [newsgroups], you
disgusting senile nazi homo swine!"

NEFESH BAR YOCHAI (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1003 HOURS ON 28 AUGUST
2018: "Now you are on the bad side of Dolf and I think it is funny since
he is on the prowl to butt ***@ck you. You'd like that too wouldn't you
Sockman?"

The fact that ethical principles carry in themselves the modal status of
necessity provides an important methodical starting point for the
construction of ethical theories. Thus, the execution of the commonly
performed counterfactual thought experiments in ethics is only possible
under the condition that the principles of valuation support such an
operation. Contingent principles are not in a position to do that, Kant
makes methodical use of this log1cal quality of moral principles
particularly in those places where he speaks of other “*RATIONAL*
*BEINGS*” (eg. GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). The central passage in the
Preface of the Groundwork in which he argues for the necessity of a pure
moral philosophy also belongs to this methodical usage. It does not
matter in these passages whether there actually are other such beings
as, for example, the inhabitants of other planets or also God. For the
Kantian argumentation it is sufficient that such beings could exist,
that their existence is thinkable. The corresponding passages must be
understood as methodically executed thought experiments, which make use
of the particular modal status of ethical principles. Now it becomes
clear why the “*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*” have a comparable modal status to
the “*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.” Laws of nature support counterfactual
arguments, too. In order to achieve this, they also must have a modal
status which is higher than simple contingency. The connections
formulated in them are also valid in all natural law governed, possible
worlds, and in this respect, they exhibit the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity. The difference between laws of nature and laws of freedom
appears to consist primarily in the fact that the *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* {

#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] =
qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition,
contrariness, encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;

As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days

#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days

} are concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while
the laws of [*ONTOLOGICAL*] freedom are concerned with all-quantified,
normative bi-conditionals, each receiving the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity." [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]

Nicolai Hartmann distinguishes among ontology, *ONTICS*, and
metaphysics: (i) ontology concerns the categorical analysis of entities
by means of the knowledge categories able to classify them, (ii)
*ONTICS* refers to a pre-categorical and pre-objectual connection which
is best expressed in the relation to transcendent acts, and (iii)
metaphysics is that part of *ONTICS* or that part of ontology which
concerns the residue of being that cannot be *RATIONALIZED* further
according to categories. [<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontic>]

Within philosophy, *ONTIC* (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: “of that
which is”) is physical, real, or factual existence. The British
philosopher Roy Bhaskar (15 May 1944 – 19 November 2014), who was
closely associated with the philosophical movement of Critical Realism
writes:

“I differentiate the ‘*ONTIC*’ (‘*ONTICAL*’ etc.) from the
‘ontological’. I employ the former to refer to:

#1) whatever pertains to being generally [SUCH AS THE THOTH MEASURES AS
T’AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES}], rather
than some distinctively philosophical (or scientific) theory of it
(ontology), so that in this sense, that of the *ONTIC*, we can speak of
the *ONTIC* presuppositions of a work of art, a joke or a strike as much
as a theory of knowledge [IN THEIR BEING ESSENTIAL RATIOCINATION
QUANTITATIVE AND CANONICAL CONSIDERATIONS AS META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES
CIRCUMSCRIBING LANGUAGE EPISTEMOLOGY]; and, within this rubric, to

#2) the intransitive objects of some specific, historically determinate,
scientific investigation (or set of such investigations [OF TEMPORAL
DISTINCTIONS]), the *ONTIC*.

Our informal research task into determining the epistemological
principles and properties of metaphysical necessity has been completed
and we substantially convey as factual the hypothetical postulate that
the *ONTIC* premises as meta-descriptor prototypes conveying NATURAL LAW
of NORMA OBLIGANS by a circumscribing ethical construct of being / ousia
are carried by the ONTOLOGICAL experience of language as HEBREW / GREEK
lexicon being CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING defined by a trinomial
mathematical theoretical noumenon:

45: [1]
68: [42]
84: [2]
86: [10]
102: [4]
104: [7]
115: [5]
130: [3]
139: [13]
140: [14, 16] // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER
146: [15]
148: [12]
150: [28]
156: [21]
157: [17, 41] // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE
NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY
158: [23]
161: [9]
166: [11]
168: [26]
169: [18]
171: [20]
173: [27]
175: [22]
177: [29]
180: [19]
181: [24, 35] // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
182: [6]
184: [36]
185: [25]
186: [31]
191: [32]
192: [39]
196: [37]
197: [33]
200: [8]
210: [30]
215: [34]
220: [38]
228: [40]



<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D /
#0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY
FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]

Whilst we publish our findings so that a peer review may be undertaken
and the core definitions can be utilised for political agreements
without the need to provide any substantial narrative of concise
consensus agreement.

Professor Ruth Groff (Political Science department at Saint Louis
University, St. Louis, Missouri) offers this expansion of Bhaskar’s note
above:

“The *ONTIC* is always specified, and only identified, by its relation,
as the intransitive object(s) of some or other (denumerable set of)
particular transitive process(es) of enquiry. It is cognitive process-,
and level-specific; whereas the ontological (like the *ONTIC*) is not.”

Thusly Ontoticism or onticism is the philosophical branch of ontology
which studies the factual existence.

The consideration then is a matter of an appropriate jurisprudential
definition of *SAPIENT* that can equally apply as the discriminating norm:

9(9²+1)/2 = #369

to humans and machine alike as requisite for Artificial Intelligence can
define factual existence:

n: {n: {zen: n, row: n, col: n}, nous: [n]}

Syncretism of cognitions can only occur when there is *ONTIC*
referential integrity relating to the nature of references or any
allusions. And for this realisation one must have recourse to at least
a rudimentary understanding of the meta-descriptor prototypes as being
implicit within the notion of any metacognition which is “cognition
about cognition”, “thinking about thinking”, “knowing about knowing”,
becoming “aware of one’s awareness” and higher-order thinking skills.
The term comes from the root word meta, meaning “beyond”.

The term metacognition literally means cognition about cognition, or
more informally, thinking about thinking. Flavell defined metacognition
as knowledge about cognition and control of cognition. For example, a
person is engaging in metacognition if he notices that they are having a
*DILEMMA* as more trouble learning #A than #B, or if it strikes them
that they should double-check #C before accepting it as factually #D.
[J. H. Flavell (1976, p. 232)]

It is 0435 hours within the morning and the mind is contending against
one of Kant’s conjectural aspirations as a postulate upon perfection.

We return again to the prefaced consideration that the Groundwork for
the Metaphysics of Morals is representative of Kant’s characteristic
positional development where he emphasizes that an adequate form of
moral philosophy has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical
elements of interest, self-love, and natural feelings as well as free
from rational concepts of perfection.

And given our earlier elucidation we would provisionally posit that
there might well be several dialectic proficiencies which are
structurally complimentary in facilitating the ontological syncretic
experience as entelechy.

However before concising these rudimentary constituencies, one ought to
consider their partisan propensity for societal and political cataclysm
on the pretence of an emancipation, since they convey the vernacular
notion of Categorical Imperative. That when provisioned with some
vMemetic characteristic such as by normative description of maxim having
substantiality or mantric opportunism are regarded as a concrete existence.

Our intention is neither to invigorate nor eviscerate any such causes
but to informally engage within a process of self education as
enlightenment and participate within discourse upon the dialectics of
*ONTIC* necessity, its delimitation by the Gnomic Imperative Instruction
Set which is implicit to the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (ie.
Voluntary Will) as the systemic basis for ideas initiation and
facilitation, the dialectic of language (ie. English) itself and lastly
its circumscribing of the ontological experience through the means of a
dialectic of dissertation whether as formalised theatric prosody
presented dogmatically, as arbitrary prescription or simply as opined
proposition.

Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora
of opportunity.

To say that Emmanuel Macron is a delicious philanderer or that he has a
propensity for passionate fidelity as possessing proficient virility are
all propositions of permissibility which each according to my
sensibilities, are aspersions of acceptability as tolerable perfections:

Petite liesse sans réprochabilité (Little jubilation without reproach).

And in that regard we are each sapient entities within the extent of
savage or savant, but we do not capably know every subject and all there
is {ie. telos = arch + c²: #41 x 9 as 13 September 2001} to know and for
want of a better analogical premise what then is cerebrum as cortexual
context and from whence does consciousness cascade?

“And we know that all things work together for good to them that love
God, to them who are the called according to [his] purpose.” [Romans
8:28 (KJV)]

“But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have
entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for
them that love him.” [1 Corinthians 2:9 (KJV)]

"But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things,
which is the head, [even] Christ:” [Ephesians 4:15 (KJV)]

“And sware {ie. the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} by him that
liveth for ever and ever, who created heaven {#0, #27, #54}, and the
things that therein are, and the earth {#0, #9, #18}, and the things
that therein are, and the sea {#0, #3, #6}, and the things which are
therein, that there should be time no longer: {#1, #2, #3}.” [Revelation
10:6 (KJV)]

And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely
make at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that
is broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of
sensibilities, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches
a prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only
then a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that
conveys a disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make
something distinctive or attractive.

YOUTUBE: “A Conversation Between Two Linguistically Gifted Groups”

http://youtu.be/ZN19oHTv_Vg

But which must then be assayed before either ignominy as disgrace or
ingenuity and virtuosity as its relative perfection is attributed to it
as quintessentially capable of an instantiation (voilà) within its own
entitlement and a permeability to forestall the ravages of time as being
a declarative truth and manifest of agreement.

[TO BE CONTINUED]

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 28 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-28 07:26:49 UTC
Permalink
Once again you are lacking integrity in responding to an obsoleted as an
earlier draft and especially since #168 - CONDEMNATION {
48  8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE}
#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION* 
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #nn % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity; I-Ching:
H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty at the
beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;

THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait;
I am not the cause of weeping to any.

#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 26 (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 (#37); Ego: 66 (#92),
@3: Sup: 30 (#67); Ego: 19 (#111),
@4: Sup: 6 (#73); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168

H5771@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 72 (#74); Ego: 70 (#72),
@3: Sup: 78 (#152); Ego: 6 (#78),
@4: Sup: 47 (#199); Ego: 50 (#128),
@5: Sup: 80 (#279); Ego: 33 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #279; Feme: #161
} // #168

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #168 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 -
Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;

THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine appearance at
Elephantine; I am not rapacious.

#VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
#TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
#POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
#TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
#CANON: #102

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
@3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #76; Feme: #102
} // #102 ***

An alternative canonical approach to expressing these normative {ie. YANG
CH'I as MALE / YIN as FEME} bi-conditionals:

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the same
ancestor;
#2 {#102 *** / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
same light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 - TORAH} - Keep a common
way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.

#168 as [#2, #70, #6, #50, #600] = `avon (H5771): {UMBRA: #11 as #168 % #41
= #4} 1) perversity, depravity, iniquity, guilt or punishment of iniquity;
1a) iniquity; 1b) guilt of iniquity, guilt (as great), guilt (of
condition); 1c) consequence of or punishment for iniquity;
} and #451 - CONTEMN {
They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old;
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them."
The Ode comes from For the Fallen, a poem by the English poet and writer
Laurence Binyon and was published in London in the Winnowing Fan; Poems of
the Great War in 1914.
Each year after Anzac Day and Remembrance Day debate rises on the word
'condemn' or 'contemn'.
} is a bestowal upon your ARROGANT / HAUGHTY self this REMEMBRANCE /
ARMISTICE DAY 11 NOVEMBER
2018 CENTENNIAL is as simple as it needs to be.
DOLF SMS DIALOG @ 1019 HOURS ON 15 JULY 2018: "TODAY'S POEM ATTEMPTS TO
BRIDGE A NEURAL LINGUISTIC CONNECTION BETWEEN THE MANDALAY LAS VEGAS
MASSACRE and local events:

— MANDALAY SWAY —
[Bastille Day on Saturday 14 July 2018]

“STEVE DOTH MOW.
HIS PADDOCK TODAY.
BUT NO EVIL TO SOW.
OR DEATH ITS SWAY.

A GREETING WAVE.
OF FATES COURSE.
AND WICKED NIEVE {#541 as [#80, #400, #3, #40, #8, #10] = pugme (G4435):
{#53 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) the fist, clenched hand; 2) up to the elbow}
ETERNITY DIVORCE {#541 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #300, #5, #50, #5, #10] =
apokteino (G615): {#60 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to kill in any way whatever;
2) metaphor: to extinguish, abolish; 1a) to destroy, to allow to perish;
2a) to inflict mortal death; 2b) *TO* *DEPRIVE* *OF* *SPIRITUAL* *LIFE*
*AND* *PROCURE* *ETERNAL* *MISERY* *IN* *HELL*}.

MUSIC PLAYS CLEAR.
RHAPSODY SO PURE.
OF HEAVEN’S CHEER.
AND GRACE DEMURE.”

YOUTUBE: "[OFFICIAL VIDEO] Bohemian Rhapsody – Pentatonix"



CONTEMN@{
@1: Sup: 71 (#71); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 13 (#84); Ego: 43 (#65),
@3: Sup: 14 (#98); Ego: 29 (#94),
@4: Sup: 69 (#167); Ego: 32 (#126),
@5: Sup: 51 (#218); Ego: 34 (#160),
@6: Sup: 3 (#221); Ego: 65 (#225),
@7: Sup: 52 (#273); Ego: 45 (#270),
@8: Sup: 61 (#334); Ego: 12 (#282), <-- *MENS* *REA*: #334 as [#40, #4,
#200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 = #19} 1) way,
road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b) journey; 1c)
direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life (figurative); 1f)
of moral character (figurative);

@9: Sup: 13 (#347); Ego: 48 (#330 - SECRET NAME: HRUMACHIS - 'The Holy
Spirit of Truth and Justice'),
@10: Sup: 35 (#382); Ego: 24 (#354),
@11: Sup: 75 (#457); Ego: 38 (#392),
@12: Sup: 21 (#478); Ego: 17 (#409),
@13: Sup: 63 (#541); Ego: 38 (#447),
Male: #541; Feme: #447
}

ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK AS IDEA @215: "TO MY WAY OF THINKING, THE REAL
IDEAL IS THAT TWO BEINGS SHOULD UNITE FOR LIFE {

#541 as [#20, #300, #1, #200, #9, #1, #10] = ktaomai (G2932): {#63 as #541
% #41 = #8} 1) to acquire, get, or procure a thing for one's self, to
possess; 1a) to marry a wife;

} AND THAT THEIR LOVE SHOULD BE SANCTIFIED BY THE PRESENCE OF CHILDREN. IF
OUR FARMS HAVE REMAINED OFTEN FOR CENTURIES, IN SOME CASES FOR AS LONG AS
SEVEN HUNDRED YEARS, IN THE POSSESSION OF THE SAME FAMILY, IT IS FOR THE
MOST PART BECAUSE MARRIAGES WERE ARRANGED ONLY WHEN AN INFANT WAS ON THE
WAY. AND FOR CENTURIES THE CATHOLIC CHURCH BOWED TO THIS CUSTOM AND
TOLERATED WHAT WAS CALLED 'THE TRIAL'. WHEN THE BIRTH OF THE INFANT WAS
IMMINENT, THE PRIEST WOULD REMIND THE FUTURE FATHER OF HIS DUTY TO MARRY.
UNFORTUNATELY THE PROTESTANT CHURCH HAS BROKEN WITH THESE HEALTHY CUSTOMS
AND HAS PREPARED THE WAY, WITH THE AID OF LAWS WRITTEN OR UNWRITTEN, FOR A
HYPOCRISY WHOSE OBJECT IT IS TO STIGMATISE AS SOMETHING SHAMEFUL A MARRIAGE
WHICH HAS BEEN PROVOKED BY THE ARRIVAL OF A CHILD. AND DON'T LET US FORGET,
IF WE ARE GOING TO BE COMPLETELY TRUTHFUL, THAT A LARGE PART OF THE
PRUSSIAN NOBILITY OWES ITS EXISTENCE TO A FAUX-PAS ON THE PART OF ONE OF
THE GIRLS OF THE BOURGEOISIE.

MOREOVER, THESE PREJUDICES ONLY OPERATE IN REVERSE, AND LOGIC HAS NO
BEARING ON THE TREND OF OUR DESIRES--FOR THE *ADMISSIBILITY* *OF* *THE*
*DISSOLUTION* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *ON* *ACCOUNT* *OF* *INCOMPATIBILITY* *IS*
*LEGALLY* *RECOGNISED*. IF IT IS CONTRARY TO THE LAW OF NATURE TO INSIST ON
THE MAINTENANCE OF A UNION IN WHICH THE PARTNERS ARE UNABLE TO AGREE, IT IS
NO LESS WRONG TO PUT OBSTACLES IN THE WAY OF A MARRIAGE JUSTIFIABLE ON THE
GROUNDS OF PERFECT RECIPROCAL UNITY. MY AGE SAVES ME FROM THE SUSPICION
THAT I AM PERHAPS PLEADING #321 - *PRO* *DOMO* {ie.

*FOR* (*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the interests
of a given perspective or for the benefit of any small powerful or
influential #123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION / FIELD / CLIQUE
which places a prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious
construct {#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of
unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} by conduct
of detrude.

G3622@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 80 (#150); Ego: 10 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#169); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 8 (#177); Ego: 70 (#170),
@5: Sup: 58 (#235); Ego: 50 (#220),
@6: Sup: 47 (#282); Ego: 70 (#290),
@7: Sup: 6 (#288 - UMBRA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS) / BEERSHEBA /
ANTI-SEMITISM); Ego: 40 (#330), <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* /
*ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360
@8: Sup: 16 (#304); Ego: 10 (#340),
@9: Sup: 17 (#321 as *PRO* *DOMO*); Ego: 1 (#341),
@10: Sup: 67 (#388); Ego: 50 (#391),
Male: #388; Feme: #391
} // #391

#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the office
of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration, dispensation;

#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460 %
#41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b) like:
ie. corresponding to a thing;

#541 as [#5, #80, #10, #200, #20, #10, #1, #200, #5, #10] = episkiazo
(G1982): {#55 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *TO* *THROW* *A* *SHADOW* *UPON*, *TO*
*ENVELOP* *IN* *A* *SHADOW*, *TO* *OVERSHADOW* from a vaporous cloud that
casts a shadow the word is transferred to a shining cloud surrounding and
enveloping persons with brightness. Used of the Holy Spirit exerting
creative energy upon the womb of the virgin Mary and impregnating it (a use
of the word which seems to have been drawn from the familiar Old Testament
idea of a cloud as symbolising the immediate presence and power of God);

#541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the office
of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration, dispensation;

}, AND SO I AM ABLE TO INVITE ATTENTION TO THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM.

I SHALL HAVE NO PEACE OF MIND UNTIL I HAVE SUCCEEDED IN PLANTING A SEED OF
NORDIC BLOOD WHEREVER THE POPULATION STAND IN NEED OF REGENERATION." [ADOLF
HITLER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK AS IDEA: @215 ON 12th MAY 1942 / PAGE:
#475]
It doesn’t require your permissibility and especially so when I am
intentionally deploying a superlative linguistic rhetorical form which is
characterised by an infusion of florid semantical constructions.
-- STRAWBERRIES --
"CALIGULA'S ARMY MARCHES,
ALL ACROSS THE LAND.
THE TRIUMPHANT ARCHES.
WITH BASKETS IN HAND.
LIKE A LITTLE SMURF,
THEY'RE HARD TO FIND.
FROM MOUNT TO SURF.
IT'S SUCH A GRIND.
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER.
TIME IS MONEY.
IT'S OFF TO TRUMP TOWER.
TRY NOT TO BE FUNNY.
SPIT THE DUMMY.
SO MUCH TO COUNT.
PEE A PENNY.
MORE TO MOUNT."
"And he said, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but this
once: Peradventure ten shall be found there. And he said, I will not
destroy [it] for ten's sake." [Genesis 18:32 (KJV)]
DOLF: "I would not find 10 among you...
And shake the dust off my feet.
Here pussy pussy {ie. the 'boy-pussy' was a smaller version of the
cat-o-nine-tails as known to being a colonial authoritative punishment
'TAKE IT LIKE A MAN'!}"
YOUTUBE: "Ten Little Indians (Popular Nursery)"

Clearly if the subject exceeds your simple and savage intellectual
capability then it’s time recuse yourself pussy boy.
48  8 64
56 40 24
16 72 32 = #120 / #360 {#EIGHT *AS* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE}
#8 (9) - KHATEL (Seraphim-Angels)  = #8
#16 (8) - HAQMYAH (Cherubim-Angels) = #24
#24 (7) - HAHOUYAH (Throne-Angels) = #48
#32 (6) - OUSHRYAH (Dominion-Angels) = #80
#40 (5) - YEIZEL (Powers-Angels) = #120 <--- [*HITLER'S* *TABLE* *TALK*
One day the English will realise that they've nothing to gain in Europe...
*IF* *THEY* *WANT* *TO* *SAVE* *NEW* *ZEALAND* *AND* *AUSTRALIA*, they
can't let India go.
The English have two possibilities : either to give up Europe and hold on
to the East, or vice versa. They can't bet on both tables. When it's a
matter of the richest country in the world (from the capitalist point of
view), one understands the importance of such a *DILEMMA* (NOTE: SEE ON
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Pinocchio.pdf>
). It would be enough for them to be aware of it for everything to be
changed.
YOUTUBE: "Donald Trump Meets Sergeant Schultz"

PAGE #609 (REVISITING BATTLEFIELDS): The #65 - *SOLDIER* *HAS* *A*
*BOUNDLESS* *AFFECTION* *FOR* *THE* *GROUND* *ON* *WHICH* *HE* *HAS* *SHED*
*HIS* *BLOOD*. IF WE COULD ARRANGE THE TRANSPORT, WE *SHOULD* *HAVE* *A*
*MILLION* *PEOPLE* *POURING* *INTO* *FRANCE* *TO* *REVISIT* *THE* *SCENES*
*OF* *THEIR* *FORMER* [*BOER* / *ANZAC*] *STRUGGLE*. [HITLER'S TABLE TALK
#48 (4) - MIHEL (Virtues-Angels) = #168 <-- *CONDEMNATION* 
#56 (3) - PHOHEL (Principalities-Angels) = #224 {*MENS* *REA*: #334 as
[#40, #4, #200, #20, #10, #20, #40] = derek (H1870): {#1 as #224 % #41 =
#19} 1) way, road, distance, journey, manner; 1a) road, way, path; 1b)
journey; 1c) direction; 1d) manner, habit, way; 1e) of course of life
(figurative); 1f) of moral character (figurative)
 
<Loading Image...>
[IMAGE: By week ending Saturday 8 April 2018 I had received one of these
special 1000 minted "TRUMP JEWISH TEMPLE" half shekel coins.
It is my intellectual property associated with the letters patent to the
Australian commonwealth which makes that entirely possible]
#224 as [#4, #70, #20, #10, #40, #70, #10] = dokimos (G1384): {#61 as #224}
1) accepted, particularly of coins and money; 2) accepted, pleasing,
acceptable
#64 (2) - MEHIEL (Archangels-Angels) = #288 as ANTI-SEMITISM: #364 as [#10,
#8, #200, #80, #6, #50, #10] = charaph (H2778): {#1 as #288 *INTERFERENCE*
*AS* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *ANTI*-*SEMITISM*} 1) to reproach, taunt, *BLASPHEME*,
defy, jeopardise, rail, upbraid; 2) (Qal) to *WINTER*, spend harvest time,
remain in harvest time; 3) (Niphal) to acquire, *BE* *BETROTHED*; 1a) (Qal)
*TO* *REPROACH*; 1b) (Piel) *TO* *REPROACH*, *DEFY*, *TAUNT*;
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 35 (#75); Ego: 76 (#116),
@3: Sup: 45 (#120 ***); Ego: 10 (#126), <— *MAPPED* {#120 / #224 / #288}
*TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360
@4: Sup: 50 (#170); Ego: 5 (#131),
@5: Sup: 54 (#224 ***); Ego: 4 (#135), <— *ISLAMIC* PROTOTYPES {#345 /
#405 / #465} AS STOICHEION CONCEPTIONS OF EARTH, FIRE, AIR, WATER
@6: Sup: 64 (#288 ***); Ego: 10 (#145),
@7: Sup: 23 (#311); Ego: 40 (#185),
Male: #311; Feme: #185
} // #509
*LIMIT* *IS* *ASSOCIATED* *TO* #509 - *YAHAD* *PROSELYTE* *JEWISH*
*CHRISTIANS* *AND* *DEAD* *SEA* *SCROLL* *COMMUNITY* *COSMOLOGY* *AS*
*GENESIS* *REPRISE* *OF* EQUINOX of Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364)
+ #182 days <— *LIMIT* = Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday
DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the Sabbath year of ‘oth cycle;
#509 as [#40, #400, #10, #5, #4, #10, #40] = yahad (H3054): {UMBRA: #5 as
#19 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to become a Jew (in fact or in fraud),
become Judaised;
*BEERSHEBA* {*BEER* {a *WELL*: AUM #288 as [#8, #80, #200] = To cut in,
dig; to search out, *TO* *SPY*; to turn red (with shame); to be ashamed; a
hole; n. Blushing, Pit or *WELL*} *SHEBA* {*CAPTIVITY*; *OLD* *MAN*;
*REPOSE*; *OATH*}
#72 (1) - MOUMYAH (Angels-Angels) = #360
- dolf
Post by dolf
Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora of
opportunity.
If you can't express your idea in clear, simple terms that all can
understand, it means your idea is crap.
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR
SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?
(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 28 August, 2018
2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL PRINCIPLE
Ethical principles have the task of guiding our moral judgments. A more
exact analysis of their logical features takes into account that with them
help we judge not only factually existing objects but also objects which we
merely imagine or whose existence is possible but not actual.
Let us assume in a particular situation that we have two alternatives of
action at our disposal. We must decide between action A and action B. If we
choose A, B will never exist; if we choose B, A will likewise never exist.
If we wish to judge both options of action from a moral point of view, we
can do so with recourse to our ethical principles. In that case, we test
Whether the criteria formulated in the principles will be satisfied or not
satisfied. The criteria must be applicable both to factually existing
objects as well as to merely possibly existing ones in order to guide our
valuation. Both the actual action A and the merely possible action B fall
within the range of objects covered by the principles. This condition has
consequences for their modal status.
In order to express modal relations, one can make use of the
possible-worlds terminology common in semantics. In case we decide for A
and successfully translate this decision into action, then A is an object
of the actual world, and B is solely an object of a possible world. We
judge both objects With recourse to the same principles. That means,
however, that these principles express something not only about the actual
world but also about other, possible worlds. Since these principles
indicate a strength beyond that of contingency, it appears that they
exhibit the modal status of necessity. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 10]
An alternative canonical approach to expressing these normative {ie. YANG
#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the same
ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the same
light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 - TORAH} - Keep a common
way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.
 
<Loading Image...>
<Loading Image...>
Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).
*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage / sovereign
dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus} Empire
Governance] 
As being compliant with the prescriptive as progressive triadic character
{ie. HEAVEN-EARTH-MAN} of ontological perspective and the formulation of
Kant's articulation of the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {#1 - Formula of
Universal Law; #2 - Formula of Humanity; #3 - Formula of Autonomy} that is
then expressing "a situation requiring a choice between equally undesirable
alternatives" and its modal relations, but in terms of *DILEMMA* which
contextually frame meta-dialectic syllogism as being otherwise consistent
- A situation requiring a choice between equally undesirable alternatives.
- Any difficult or perplexing situation or problem.
- [Logic]: A form of meta-dialectic syllogism *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *TEN*
*COMMANDMENTS* (*NOMOS* *COMPRISING* *AN* *INTELLECTUAL* *TETRAD*
*ENCOMPASSING* *OUR* *NOMENCLATURE* *AND* *BASIS* *TO* *INTELLECTUS* *AS*
#A {Major Premise},
#B {Minor Premise},
#C {Assumptive Proposition},
#D {Restatement of a Sacred / Sovereign Principle}
In which the major premise is formed of two or more hypothetical
propositions and the minor premise is a disjunctive proposition, as
'IF #A {#1 - Nature Contains Nature} THEN #B {#2 - Nature Rejoices in its
Nature};
IF #C {#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature} THEN #D {#4 - Nature Amended in its
Nature}.
EITHER #A OR #C.
THEREFORE, EITHER #B OR #D.'
[Origin 1515–25 CE: Late Latin from Greek dílēmma, equivalent to di + lêmma
an assumption, premise, derivative of lambánein to take {#384 = #5, #300,
#10, #3, #6, #50, #10 as nasag (H5381): 1) to reach, overtake, take hold
upon; 1a) (Hiphil); 1a1) to overtake; 1a2) to reach, attain to, cause to
reach; 1a3) to be able to secure, reach, have enough}.
22/7 as 3W1D ...
THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of* *priests*
x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the
'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation =
"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which have
brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods before
me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of Humanity},
which contains the command to behave in accordance with the law, that is,
the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or
365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of 20 March 1996 / New
Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And
showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD
will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus 20:7
(KJV)]
THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: It is also
possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the Gregorian
calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made divisible by 22 to
obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew letters in a pattern which
has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle of the Chinese 4 BCE
published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the year into 364.5 days and
the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a magic square of #369 having
a distinct mathematical property at centre of #41 for the equivalent date
of 13 September.
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses}
As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of Torah
being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = EQUINOX of Wednesday
DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday
DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the
Sabbath year of 'oth cycle
#YOD = 10 SEPTEMBER 2001 as HEAVEN {Divine GODHEAD which is the Mind of
Christ as *HYPOSTATIS*} +
#MEM = 13 SEPTEMBER 2001 as EARTH {DAO-ziran (Chinese) / COURSE-trochos
(Greek) OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]} +
#TAU = 22 SEPTEMBER 2001 as MAN {HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]} +
#ALEPH = 23 SEPTEMBER 2001 {23 CHROMOSOME ELEMENTS AS THEORY OF GENDER}
YOU!
This is horse-shit exponented. I will explain.
(horse-shit) x 3 = Three times the horse-shit that was here before
Time for a break, you assclown."
In addition to electronically serving upon you a copy of this document
"#123 - DIVINE JUDGMENT BY #509 - YAHAD (JEWISH / CHRISTIAN PROSELYTES)
AGAINST JEWISH HATRED DUE [TO] STEREOTYPICAL *SHEM* (#72) *HAMPHORASCH*
DEMENTIA BY BLASPHEMY BEING NOW A #481 - *CURSE* UPON THEM"
I've lodged an email copy of such complaint to the local *PROJECTS* office
for the *JEWISH* *ANTI*-*DEFAMATION* *LEAGUE* antidef.org.au and to my
friends at the MIKDASH EDUCATIONAL CENTER SITUATED WITHIN JERUSALEM (as the
JEWISH TEMPLE COIN depicted therein I have purchased from them) ...
American Support for Israel, Inc.
P.O. Box 3263
Washington, DC 20010
They won't have any need to reply because they recognize the plurality of
Jewish belief which includes #509 - YAHAD (mentioned in both the Old / New
Testaments of the Bible) as proselytes is clearly conveyed as God's elect
and chosen community.
If you have a problem with that, then you ought to provide a detailed and
reasoned reply beyond engaging within a *RHETORICAL* *ARTIFICE* *OF*
ignorance by a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL.
If not, I forewarn you that we are building capacity to pursue you within a
court of law for irrational hatred driven by a prejudice conveying acts of
dehumanisation being crimes against humanity and constituting a war crime
which is subject to a universal jurisdiction ...
Oh Father don't forgive them because they know what they do... "
follow the likes of you (yours)."
Ah so you have moved on from deploying a RHETORICAL ARTIFICE OF REDUCTIO AD
And now utilising an ego defensive mechanism of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL of IGNORANCE
Piaget writes that within logic, juxtaposition is a logical fallacy on the
part of the observer, where two items placed next to each other imply a
correlation, when none is actually claimed. For example, an illustration of
a politician and Adolf Hitler on the same page would imply that the
politician had a common ideology with Hitler. Similarly, saying "Hitler was
in favour of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, and so are you" would have the
same effect.
This particular rhetorical device is common enough to have its own name,
*REDUCTIO* *AD* *HITLERUM*.
#1) Your having a recourse to a particular “rhetorical device”,
#2) Reliance upon ignorance as #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL,
#3) Murderous disdain {ie. #419 - SLAUGHTER upon your altar} for Bible
#4) Propensity for hymenealism (marriage) by psychosexual pejoratives
re-enforcing misnomered piety which is concerned with all-quantified,
descriptive bi-conditionals.
That by such a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE you indistinguishable from neo-Nazi
identity and you cannot argue against it—WHAT AN ABOMINATION YOU ARE."
AUGUST 2018: "Please remove me from the list to which I never subscribed."
YAHAD (JEWISH / CHRISTIAN PROSELYTES) AGAINST JEWISH HATRED DUE [TO]
STEREOTYPICAL *SHEM* (#72) *HAMPHORASCH* DEMENTIA BY BLASPHEMY BEING NOW A
You are not subscribed to any list you lunatic son of #351 - BELIAL.
I notice that you use #41 within your email address and I ought to say that
I know the mind {#41 x 9} of him who said: “FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD
{#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH / ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION
WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}." [Luke 16:8 (KJV)]
"I AM FROM ABOVE {#41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your parents
... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy ...
#205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear false witness ... #287 - Covet Not ...
#328 ... #369}: YE ARE OF THIS WORLD {
@1 ...
@5 ...
}; I AM NOT OF THIS WORLD.” [John 8:23 (KJV)]
"AND JESUS ANSWERING SAID UNTO THEM, THE CHILDREN {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as
BELIAL - ANKH / ROMAN} OF THIS WORLD MARRY {#ONE: #99 / #297}, AND ARE
GIVEN IN MARRIAGE {#175 AS ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE}: BUT THEY WHICH SHALL BE
ACCOUNTED WORTHY TO OBTAIN THAT WORLD, AND THE RESURRECTION FROM THE DEAD,
FOR THEY ARE EQUAL UNTO THE ANGELS; AND ARE THE CHILDREN OF GOD {
#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] *OR* *SONS* *OF* *GOD* [*FOR*
*ANGELS*]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie
sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*,
*CLASS*;
}, BEING THE CHILDREN OF THE RESURRECTION." [Luke 20:34-36 (KJV)]
It’s my Intellectual Property which is not going to be wasted on you.
Save us both the bother by not replying any further as I am too holy for
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 2 (#2),
Male: #38; Feme: #2
}
#38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching: H62 - Minor
Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of the small,
Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
#2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 - Peace, Pervading,
Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;"
UP TO US!
Chancellor Hitler was the only known figure in human history to find a way
to break the Jew monopoly on the precious metals by moneti[s]ing Caucasian
labo[u]r ... along with international barter ... and for twelve years
Germany's Jew-free Reich flourished. Of course as I am sure you know, that
didn't work out too well. Now it is up to us."
You are still purveying such Hitler bullshit when incontrovertible facts as
denial have been provided to you...
— MUMMY DEAREST —
[Written 12 January 2018]
“HERE PUSSY PUSSY,
I WANT SOME FANNY?
CROSS DRESSER SISSY.
OR EVEN A TRINNY.
MUMMY IS THE BEST.
SEXY AS MY FARCE.
AND AT MY BEQUEST.
SHE’LL WIPE MY ARSE.”
YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"
http://youtu.be/Jy6AOGRsR80
TOO BAD THAT YOU ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE AND CANNOT ENJOY THE BATTLE HYMN OF
THE REPUBLIC.
— POUTING SNOUT —
“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”
YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”
http://youtu.be/rjQtzV9IZ0Q
WHAT SAY YE THAT WE HAVE IT FOR OURS SINCE ITS NO VALUE OR USE TO YOU AS
JUST LIPSTICK 👄 ON A PIG 🐷 TO YOU?"
only thing that needs to be provided for you is an oven."
Look what the executioner does to this NAZOID sub-louse!
A true keeper... esp[ecially] the part when the hangman sticks his fingers
into the NAZOID'S eyes..."
"<FLUSH the disgusting senile nazi homo swine's usual disgusting sick nazi
homo bullshit unread>
Keep your FAGGOT STENCH out of straight people's [newsgroups], you
disgusting senile nazi homo swine!"
"Now you are on the bad side of Dolf and I think it is funny since he is on
The fact that ethical principles carry in themselves the modal status of
necessity provides an important methodical starting point for the
construction of ethical theories. Thus, the execution of the commonly
performed counterfactual thought experiments in ethics is only possible
under the condition that the principles of valuation support such an
operation. Contingent principles are not in a position to do that, Kant
makes methodical use of this log1cal quality of moral principles
particularly in those places where he speaks of other “*RATIONAL* *BEINGS*”
(eg. GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). The central passage in the Preface of
the Groundwork in which he argues for the necessity of a pure moral
philosophy also belongs to this methodical usage. It does not matter in
these passages whether there actually are other such beings as, for
example, the inhabitants of other planets or also God. For the Kantian
argumentation it is sufficient that such beings could exist, that their
existence is thinkable. The corresponding passages must be understood as
methodically executed thought experiments, which make use of the particular
modal status of ethical principles. Now it becomes clear why the “*LAWS*
*OF* *FREEDOM*” have a comparable modal status to the “*LAWS* *OF*
*NATURE*.” Laws of nature support counterfactual arguments, too. In order
to achieve this, they also must have a modal status which is higher than
simple contingency. The connections formulated in them are also valid in
all natural law governed, possible worlds, and in this respect, they
exhibit the modal status of [*ONTIC*] necessity. The difference between
laws of nature and laws of freedom appears to consist primarily in the fact
that the *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* {
#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy
(H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition, contrariness,
encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;
As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days
#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days
} are concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while the
laws of [*ONTOLOGICAL*] freedom are concerned with all-quantified,
normative bi-conditionals, each receiving the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity." [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]
(i) ontology concerns the categorical analysis of entities by means of the
knowledge categories able to classify them, (ii) *ONTICS* refers to a
pre-categorical and pre-objectual connection which is best expressed in the
relation to transcendent acts, and (iii) metaphysics is that part of
*ONTICS* or that part of ontology which concerns the residue of being that
cannot be *RATIONALIZED* further according to categories.
[<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontic>]
Within philosophy, *ONTIC* (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: “of that
which is”) is physical, real, or factual existence. The British
philosopher Roy Bhaskar (15 May 1944 – 19 November 2014), who was closely
“I differentiate the ‘*ONTIC*’ (‘*ONTICAL*’ etc.) from the ‘ontological’. I
#1) whatever pertains to being generally [SUCH AS THE THOTH MEASURES AS
T’AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES}], rather than
some distinctively philosophical (or scientific) theory of it (ontology),
so that in this sense, that of the *ONTIC*, we can speak of the *ONTIC*
presuppositions of a work of art, a joke or a strike as much as a theory of
knowledge [IN THEIR BEING ESSENTIAL RATIOCINATION QUANTITATIVE AND
CANONICAL CONSIDERATIONS AS META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES CIRCUMSCRIBING
LANGUAGE EPISTEMOLOGY]; and, within this rubric, to
#2) the intransitive objects of some specific, historically determinate,
scientific investigation (or set of such investigations [OF TEMPORAL
DISTINCTIONS]), the *ONTIC*.
Our informal research task into determining the epistemological principles
and properties of metaphysical necessity has been completed and we
substantially convey as factual the hypothetical postulate that the *ONTIC*
premises as meta-descriptor prototypes conveying NATURAL LAW of NORMA
OBLIGANS by a circumscribing ethical construct of being / ousia are carried
by the ONTOLOGICAL experience of language as HEBREW / GREEK lexicon being
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING defined by a trinomial mathematical theoretical
45: [1]
68: [42]
84: [2]
86: [10]
102: [4]
104: [7]
115: [5]
130: [3]
139: [13]
140: [14, 16] // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER
146: [15]
148: [12]
150: [28]
156: [21]
157: [17, 41] // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY
158: [23]
161: [9]
166: [11]
168: [26]
169: [18]
171: [20]
173: [27]
175: [22]
177: [29]
180: [19]
181: [24, 35] // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
182: [6]
184: [36]
185: [25]
186: [31]
191: [32]
192: [39]
196: [37]
197: [33]
200: [8]
210: [30]
215: [34]
220: [38]
228: [40]
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/thoth9.gif>
[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D / #0 -
21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY FOR
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]
Whilst we publish our findings so that a peer review may be undertaken and
the core definitions can be utilised for political agreements without the
need to provide any substantial narrative of concise consensus agreement.
Professor Ruth Groff (Political Science department at Saint Louis
University, St. Louis, Missouri) offers this expansion of Bhaskar’s note
“The *ONTIC* is always specified, and only identified, by its relation, as
the intransitive object(s) of some or other (denumerable set of) particular
transitive process(es) of enquiry. It is cognitive process-, and
level-specific; whereas the ontological (like the *ONTIC*) is not.”
Thusly Ontoticism or onticism is the philosophical branch of ontology which
studies the factual existence.
The consideration then is a matter of an appropriate jurisprudential
9(9²+1)/2 = #369
to humans and machine alike as requisite for Artificial Intelligence can
n: {n: {zen: n, row: n, col: n}, nous: [n]}
Syncretism of cognitions can only occur when there is *ONTIC* referential
integrity relating to the nature of references or any allusions. And for
this realisation one must have recourse to at least a rudimentary
understanding of the meta-descriptor prototypes as being implicit within
the notion of any metacognition which is “cognition about cognition”,
“thinking about thinking”, “knowing about knowing”, becoming “aware of
one’s awareness” and higher-order thinking skills. The term comes from the
root word meta, meaning “beyond”.
The term metacognition literally means cognition about cognition, or more
informally, thinking about thinking. Flavell defined metacognition as
knowledge about cognition and control of cognition. For example, a person
is engaging in metacognition if he notices that they are having a *DILEMMA*
as more trouble learning #A than #B, or if it strikes them that they should
double-check #C before accepting it as factually #D. [J. H. Flavell (1976,
p. 232)]
It is 0435 hours within the morning and the mind is contending against one
of Kant’s conjectural aspirations as a postulate upon perfection.
We return again to the prefaced consideration that the Groundwork for the
Metaphysics of Morals is representative of Kant’s characteristic positional
development where he emphasizes that an adequate form of moral philosophy
has to be ‘pure’, ie. both free from all empirical elements of interest,
self-love, and natural feelings as well as free from rational concepts of
perfection.
And given our earlier elucidation we would provisionally posit that there
might well be several dialectic proficiencies which are structurally
complimentary in facilitating the ontological syncretic experience as
entelechy.
However before concising these rudimentary constituencies, one ought to
consider their partisan propensity for societal and political cataclysm on
the pretence of an emancipation, since they convey the vernacular notion of
Categorical Imperative. That when provisioned with some vMemetic
characteristic such as by normative description of maxim having
substantiality or mantric opportunism are regarded as a concrete existence.
Our intention is neither to invigorate nor eviscerate any such causes but
to informally engage within a process of self education as enlightenment
and participate within discourse upon the dialectics of *ONTIC* necessity,
its delimitation by the Gnomic Imperative Instruction Set which is implicit
to the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS (ie. Voluntary Will) as the
systemic basis for ideas initiation and facilitation, the dialectic of
language (ie. English) itself and lastly its circumscribing of the
ontological experience through the means of a dialectic of dissertation
whether as formalised theatric prosody presented dogmatically, as arbitrary
prescription or simply as opined proposition.
Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora of
opportunity.
To say that Emmanuel Macron is a delicious philanderer or that he has a
propensity for passionate fidelity as possessing proficient virility are
all propositions of permissibility which each according to my
Petite liesse sans réprochabilité (Little jubilation without reproach).
And in that regard we are each sapient entities within the extent of savage
or savant, but we do not capably know every subject and all there is {ie.
telos = arch + c²: #41 x 9 as 13 September 2001} to know and for want of a
better analogical premise what then is cerebrum as cortexual context and
from whence does consciousness cascade?
“And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God,
to them who are the called according to [his] purpose.” [Romans 8:28 (KJV)]
“But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have
entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them
that love him.” [1 Corinthians 2:9 (KJV)]
"But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which
is the head, [even] Christ:” [Ephesians 4:15 (KJV)]
“And sware {ie. the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} by him that liveth
for ever and ever, who created heaven {#0, #27, #54}, and the things that
therein are, and the earth {#0, #9, #18}, and the things that therein are,
and the sea {#0, #3, #6}, and the things which are therein, that there
should be time no longer: {#1, #2, #3}.” [Revelation 10:6 (KJV)]
And that the hypothetical semantical aspiration which we opportunely make
at this juncture is upon the cognitive proposition itself and that is
broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of
sensibilities, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches a
prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only then
a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that conveys a
disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make something distinctive
or attractive.
YOUTUBE: “A Conversation Between Two Linguistically Gifted Groups”
http://youtu.be/ZN19oHTv_Vg
But which must then be assayed before either ignominy as disgrace or
ingenuity and virtuosity as its relative perfection is attributed to it as
quintessentially capable of an instantiation (voilà) within its own
entitlement and a permeability to forestall the ravages of time as being a
declarative truth and manifest of agreement.
[TO BE CONTINUED]
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 28 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-28 10:21:08 UTC
Permalink
"I would that ye all spake with tongues, but rather that ye prophesied:
for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues,
except- he interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5,
#400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}, that the church may
receive edifying." [1Corinthians 14:5]

"Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may
interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10]
= diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:13]

"If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most
by three, and that by course; and let one interpret {#640 as [#4, #10,
#5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo (G1329):
interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:27]

If you don't mind I'm deploying a meta-physical dialectic which is more
suitable for Neural Linguistic Programming:

"Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull {#598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out
the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?"
[Matthew 7:4]

"Thou hypocrite, first cast {#598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8,
#200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out the beam out of
thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast {#598 as [#5,
#20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544):
cast} out the mote out of thy brother's eye." [Matthew 7:5]

[IS, THERE, TO, BE, FOUND, A, LANGUAGE, OF, PERFECTION, RATHER, THAN,
ONLY, CENSOR, SCORN, AND, PREJUDICED, DISDAIN]

And the answer is YES there is both #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #1, #10] = *PANEGYRICAL* {ie. a public speech or published text in
praise of someone or something} *LANGUAGE* and #598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = SPEECH OF COMPULSION {ie.
*to* *compel* *one* *to* *depart*} embedded within the subject title.

Additionally it was designed to *COMPEL* *YOU* *TO* *SEEK* *AN*
*EXPLANATION*: #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8,
#10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold* *the* *meaning* *of* *what*
*is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;

*THUS* *THERE* *ARE* *THREE* *ETHEREAL* *REFERENCES* *TO* *LANGUAGE*
*AND* *OF* *PERFECTION* *WITHIN* *THE* *TITLE* *SO* *THEN* *IT* *IS
*PERFECTLY* *SUITED*

#598 as [#80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #1, #200] =
paliggenesia (G3824): {UMBRA: #21 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1d) the signal
and glorious change of all things (in heaven and earth) for the better,
that restoration of the primal and *perfect* condition of things which
existed before the fall of our first parents, which the Jews looked for
in connection with the advent of the Messiah, and which Christians
expected in connection with the visible return of Jesus from heaven;

"And I am sure that, when I come unto you, I shall come in the fulness
of the blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing} of the gospel of Christ." [Romans 15:29]

"For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own
belly; and by good words and fair {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10,
#1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} speeches {#529 as [#5, #400, #30,
#70, #3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} deceive the hearts
of the simple." [Romans 16:18]

"And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the
earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I
saying, Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto
him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever."
[Revelation 5:13]

"Saying, Amen: Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10]
= eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving,
and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever.
Amen." [Revelation 7:12]

PANEGYRICAL_LANGUAGE@{
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 23 (#60); Ego: 65 (#93),
@3: Sup: 78 (#138); Ego: 17 (#110),
@4: Sup: 6 (#144); Ego: 7 (#117),
@5: Sup: 23 (#167); Ego: 15 (#132),
@6: Sup: 24 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 1 (#133),
@7: Sup: 44 (#235); Ego: 77 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
@8: Sup: 8 (#243); Ego: 66 (#276),
@9: Sup: 16 (#259); Ego: 12 (#288),
@10: Sup: 27 (#286); Ego: 70 (#358),
@11: Sup: 10 (#296); Ego: 16 (#374),
@12: Sup: 73 (#369); Ego: 30 (#404),
@13: Sup: 44 (#413); Ego: 65 (#469),
@14: Sup: 32 (#445); Ego: 60 (#529 ***), // #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70,
#3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia MEANING: 1) praise, laudation, panegyric: of
Christ or God; 2) *fine* *discourse*, *polished* *language*;

@15: Sup: 59 (#504); Ego: 55 (#584),
@16: Sup: 78 (#582); Ego: 14 (#598 ***), // #598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30,
#8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo MEANING: *to* *compel*
*one* *to* *depart*; *to* *bid* *one* *depart*, *in* *stern* *though*
*not* *violent* *language*;

@17: Sup: 58 (#640 ***); Ego: 15 (#613), // #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100,
#40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold*
*the* *meaning* *of* *what* *is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
Male: #640; Feme: #613
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,640}&idea:{f,613}>

SUBJECT WAS: I would like to find meaningful sentences instead of
insufferable gibberish

On 28/8/18 6:35 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
<SNIP idiotic top-posting>
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of
perfection as
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora of
opportunity.
If you can't express your idea in clear, simple terms that all can
understand, it means your idea is crap.
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR
SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?
"Is there to be found" - what do you mean? Are you finding something,
am I, or is somebody else?
But worse are the consequences of this inauspicious start to your
"rather than" is a coordinating adverb of comparison. Because you've
started off with the passive voice, and because you've allowed ambiguity
to creep in (what is being coordinated here? The verb "found", or the
noun "language"?) you've ended up hopelessly confused about what form of
words you should be using on the other side, AND you've made it even
worse by using your usual catalogue technique, BUT your catalogue
consists of a verb (in the wrong form), an ambiguous noun/verb, and a
noun, thus exacerbating the chaos of ambiguity and ultimately causing
your sentence to descend into gibberish.
Quite simply, this is not how to construct a sentence.
"I would that ye all spake with tongues, but rather that ye prophesied:
for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues,
except- he interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5,
#400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}, that the church may
receive edifying." [1Corinthians 14:5]

"Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may
interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10]
= diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:13]

"If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most
by three, and that by course; and let one interpret {#640 as [#4, #10,
#5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo (G1329):
interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:27]

If you don't mind I'm deploying a meta-physical dialectic which is more
suitable for Neural Linguistic Programming:

"Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull {#598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out
the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?"
[Matthew 7:4]

"Thou hypocrite, first cast {#598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8,
#200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out the beam out of
thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast {#598 as [#5,
#20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544):
cast} out the mote out of thy brother's eye." [Matthew 7:5]

[IS, THERE, TO, BE, FOUND, A, LANGUAGE, OF, PERFECTION, RATHER, THAN,
ONLY, CENSOR, SCORN, AND, PREJUDICED, DISDAIN]

And the answer is YES there is both #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #1, #10] = *PANEGYRICAL* {ie. a public speech or published text in
praise of someone or something} *LANGUAGE* and #598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = SPEECH OF COMPULSION {ie.
*to* *compel* *one* *to* *depart*} embedded within the subject title.

Additionally it was designed to *COMPEL* *YOU* *TO* *SEEK* *AN*
*EXPLANATION*: #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8,
#10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold* *the* *meaning* *of* *what*
*is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;

*THUS* *THERE* *ARE* *THREE* *ETHEREAL* *REFERENCES* *TO* *LANGUAGE*
*AND* *OF* *PERFECTION* *WITHIN* *THE* *TITLE* *SO* *THEN* *IT* *IS
*PERFECTLY* *SUITED*

#598 as [#80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #1, #200] =
paliggenesia (G3824): {UMBRA: #21 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1d) the signal
and glorious change of all things (in heaven and earth) for the better,
that restoration of the primal and *perfect* condition of things which
existed before the fall of our first parents, which the Jews looked for
in connection with the advent of the Messiah, and which Christians
expected in connection with the visible return of Jesus from heaven;

"And I am sure that, when I come unto you, I shall come in the fulness
of the blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing} of the gospel of Christ." [Romans 15:29]

"For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own
belly; and by good words and fair {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10,
#1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} speeches {#529 as [#5, #400, #30,
#70, #3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} deceive the hearts
of the simple." [Romans 16:18]

"And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the
earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I
saying, Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto
him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever."
[Revelation 5:13]

"Saying, Amen: Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10]
= eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving,
and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever.
Amen." [Revelation 7:12]

PANEGYRICAL_LANGUAGE@{
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 23 (#60); Ego: 65 (#93),
@3: Sup: 78 (#138); Ego: 17 (#110),
@4: Sup: 6 (#144); Ego: 7 (#117),
@5: Sup: 23 (#167); Ego: 15 (#132),
@6: Sup: 24 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 1 (#133),
@7: Sup: 44 (#235); Ego: 77 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
@8: Sup: 8 (#243); Ego: 66 (#276),
@9: Sup: 16 (#259); Ego: 12 (#288),
@10: Sup: 27 (#286); Ego: 70 (#358),
@11: Sup: 10 (#296); Ego: 16 (#374),
@12: Sup: 73 (#369); Ego: 30 (#404),
@13: Sup: 44 (#413); Ego: 65 (#469),
@14: Sup: 32 (#445); Ego: 60 (#529 ***), // #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70,
#3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia MEANING: 1) praise, laudation, panegyric: of
Christ or God; 2) *fine* *discourse*, *polished* *language*;

@15: Sup: 59 (#504); Ego: 55 (#584),
@16: Sup: 78 (#582); Ego: 14 (#598 ***), // #598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30,
#8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo MEANING: *to* *compel*
*one* *to* *depart*; *to* *bid* *one* *depart*, *in* *stern* *though*
*not* *violent* *language*;

@17: Sup: 58 (#640 ***); Ego: 15 (#613), // #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100,
#40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold*
*the* *meaning* *of* *what* *is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
Male: #640; Feme: #613
}

<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,640}&idea:{f,613}>

EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #43 -
Absolute Negation, It's Universal Application; I-Ching: H50 - The
Cauldron, Holding; Tetra: 44 - Stove / INNER: #37 - Non-Deeming Action,
Government Administration; I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance,
Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21 - Release} #529 has 41 Categories:

G2129@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
@3: Sup: 30 (#116); Ego: 30 (#111),
@4: Sup: 19 (#135); Ego: 70 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
@5: Sup: 22 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 3 (#184 - I PUT NO
CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36}),
@6: Sup: 32 (#189); Ego: 10 (#194),
@7: Sup: 33 (#222); Ego: 1 (#195),
@8: Sup: 43 (#265); Ego: 10 (#205),
Male: #265; Feme: #205
} // #529

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #529 % #41 = #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release;

THOTH MEASURE: #37 - Oh Striker, who makest thine appearance in Heaven;
I am not one of loud voice.

#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject’s preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
#CANON: #196

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_196@{
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 37 (#37),
@2: Sup: 33 (#70); Ego: 77 (#114),
@3: Sup: 47 (#117); Ego: 14 (#128),
@4: Sup: 34 (#151); Ego: 68 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
Male: #151; Feme: #196
} // #196

#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia (G2129):
{UMBRA: #37 as #529 % #41 = #37} 1) praise, laudation, panegyric: of
Christ or God; 2) *fine* *discourse*, *polished* *language*; 3) an
invocation of blessing, benediction; 4) consecration; 5) a (concrete)
blessing, benefit; 2a) in a bad sense, *language* *artfully* *adapted*
*to* *captivate* *the* *hearer*: *fair* *speaking*, *fine* *speeches*;

G1544@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 25 (#30); Ego: 20 (#25),
@3: Sup: 27 (#57); Ego: 2 (#27),
@4: Sup: 57 (#114); Ego: 30 (#57),
@5: Sup: 65 (#179); Ego: 8 (#65),
@6: Sup: 74 (#253); Ego: 9 (#74),
@7: Sup: 1 (#254); Ego: 8 (#82),
@8: Sup: 39 (#293); Ego: 38 (#120),
@9: Sup: 44 (#337); Ego: 5 (#125),
@10: Sup: 20 (#357); Ego: 57 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@11: Sup: 21 (#378); Ego: 1 (#183),
@12: Sup: 31 (#409); Ego: 10 (#193),
Male: #409; Feme: #193
} // #598

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #598 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;

THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
I lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.

#VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
#TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
#POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
#TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
#CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
@3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
@4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181


#598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] =
ekballo (G1544): {UMBRA: #16 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1) to cast out, drive
out, to send out; 1a) with notion of violence; 1a1) to drive out (cast
out); 1a2) to cast out; 1a2a) of the world, i.e. be deprived of the
power and influence he exercises in the world; 1a2b) a thing: excrement
from the belly into the sink; 1a3) to expel a person from a society: to
banish from a family; 1a4) *to* *compel* *one* *to* *depart*; *to* *bid*
*one* *depart*, *in* *stern* *though* *not* *violent* *language*; 1a5)
so employed that the rapid motion of the one going is transferred to the
one sending forth; 1a51) to command or cause one to depart in haste;
1a6) to draw out with force, tear out; 1a7) with implication of force
overcoming opposite force; 1a7a) to cause a thing to move straight on
its intended goal; 1a8) to reject with contempt, to cast off or away;
1b) without the notion of violence; 1b1) to draw out, extract, one thing
inserted in another; 1b2) to bring out of, to draw or bring forth; 1b3)
to except, to leave out, i.e. not receive; 1b4) to lead one forth or
away somewhere with a force which he cannot resist;

G3824@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 30 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 30 (#111),
@4: Sup: 40 (#231); Ego: 10 (#121),
@5: Sup: 43 (#274); Ego: 3 (#124),
@6: Sup: 46 (#320); Ego: 3 (#127),
@7: Sup: 51 (#371); Ego: 5 (#132),
@8: Sup: 20 (#391); Ego: 50 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@9: Sup: 25 (#416); Ego: 5 (#187),
@10: Sup: 63 (#479); Ego: 38 (#225),
@11: Sup: 73 (#552); Ego: 10 (#235),
@12: Sup: 74 (#626); Ego: 1 (#236),
@13: Sup: 31 (#657); Ego: 38 (#274),
Male: #657; Feme: #274
} // #598

#598 as [#80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #1, #200] =
paliggenesia (G3824): {UMBRA: #21 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1) new birth,
reproduction, renewal, recreation, regeneration; 1a) hence renovation,
regeneration, the production of a new life consecrated to God, a radical
change of mind for the better. The word often used to denote the
restoration of a thing to its pristine state, its renovation, as a
renewal or restoration of life after death; 1b) the renovation of the
earth after the deluge; 1c) the renewal of the world to take place after
its destruction by fire, as the Stoics taught; 1d) the signal and
glorious change of all things (in heaven and earth) for the better, that
restoration of the primal and *perfect* condition of things which
existed before the fall of our first parents, which the Jews looked for
in connection with the advent of the Messiah, and which Christians
expected in connection with the visible return of Jesus from heaven.;
1e) other uses; 1e1) of Cicero's restoration to rank and fortune on his
recall from exile; 1e2) of the restoration of the Jewish nation after
exile; 1e3) of the recovery of knowledge by recollection;

G1329@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 19 (#37); Ego: 5 (#19),
@4: Sup: 38 (#75); Ego: 19 (#38),
@5: Sup: 78 (#153); Ego: 40 (#78),
@6: Sup: 5 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 8 (#86 - I AM
NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@7: Sup: 55 (#213); Ego: 50 (#136),
@8: Sup: 60 (#273); Ego: 5 (#141),
@9: Sup: 55 (#328); Ego: 76 (#217),
@10: Sup: 63 (#391); Ego: 8 (#225),
@11: Sup: 73 (#464); Ego: 10 (#235),
Male: #464; Feme: #235
} // #640

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #640 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
Distortion;

THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; I am not boisterous in behaviour.

#VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
#TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
#TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
#CANON: #185

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_185@{
@1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
@2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
@3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
@4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
Male: #108; Feme: #185
} // #185

#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] =
diermeneuo (G1329): {UMBRA: #51 as #640 % #41 = #25} 1) *to* *unfold*
*the* *meaning* *of* *what* *is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*; 2) to
translate into one's native language;

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-29 00:32:31 UTC
Permalink
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...

Translation: but we do our best

As a metempirical dialectic construct:

[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]

Metempirics is the study of concepts and relationships conceived as beyond
and yet related to knowledge gained empirically

As GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET:

35611457@{
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 69 (#69),
@2: Sup: 81 (#118); Ego: 24 (#93),
@3: Sup: 18 (#136); Ego: 2 (#95),
4: Sup: 31 (#167); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 28 (#195); Ego: 81 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
@6: Sup: 16 (#211); Ego: 63 (#248),
Male: #211; Feme: #248
}

Derivative normative *ONTIC* necessity:

#211 % #41 = #6: {
thoth: "Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in Heaven; I am
not fraudulent in measures of grain.",
dictum: "I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN",
virtue: [6 ,"With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction."],
tools: [46 ,"Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition."],
position: [63 ,"As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent."],
time: [67 ,"As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct."],
canon: 182,
ankh: 0
}

#248 % #41 = #2: {
thoth: "Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine appearance in
Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.",
dictum: "I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE",
virtue: [2 ,"With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue."],
position: [42 ,"With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment."],
tools: [10 ,"With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked."],
time: [30 ,"With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?"],
canon: 84,
ankh: 0
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,211}&idea:{f,248}>

Any SYNCRETIC {‘OTH - #2184} CONTINUUM EQUIVALENTS as CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING conveying ONTIC normative premise as then causal for
heuristic which is conducive to cognition, adaptive apperception

H1696@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 9 (#14); Ego: 4 (#9),
@3: Sup: 11 (#25); Ego: 2 (#11),
@4: Sup: 49 (#74); Ego: 38 (#49),
Male: #74; Feme: #49
} // #211

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #211 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching:
H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 -
Departure;

THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; I am not fraudulent in measures of grain.

#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_182@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 52 (#58); Ego: 46 (#52),
@3: Sup: 34 (#92); Ego: 63 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@4: Sup: 20 (#112); Ego: 67 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}),
Male: #112; Feme: #182
} // #182

#211 as [#5, #4, #2, #200] = dabar (H1696): {UMBRA: #3 as #211 % #41 = #6}
1) to *speak*, *declare*, *converse*, command, promise, warn, threaten,
sing; 1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one another, talk; 1c)
(Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to be spoken; 1e)
(Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to flight;

G1961@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95),
@4: Sup: 54 (#77); Ego: 40 (#135),
@5: Sup: 59 (#136); Ego: 5 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM
NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
@6: Sup: 69 (#205); Ego: 10 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@7: Sup: 38 (#243); Ego: 50 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY
{%8}),
@8: Sup: 39 (#282); Ego: 1 (#201),
@9: Sup: 49 (#331); Ego: 10 (#211),
Male: #331; Feme: #211
} // #211

#211 as [#5, #80, #10, #40, #5, #10, #50, #1, #10] = epimeno (G1961):
{UMBRA: #59 as #211 % #41 = #6} 1) to stay at or with, to tarry still,
still to abide, to continue, remain; 1a) of tarrying in a place; 1b) to
persevere, continue; 1b1) of the thing continued in; 1b2) *in* *the* *work*
*of* *teaching*; 1b3) of the blessing for which one keeps himself fit; 1b4)
denoting the action persisted in;

G3004@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 38 (#103); Ego: 3 (#38),
@4: Sup: 27 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 70 (#108),
@5: Sup: 67 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 40 (#148 -
I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 72 (#269); Ego: 5 (#153),
@7: Sup: 41 (#310); Ego: 50 (#203),
@8: Sup: 49 (#359); Ego: 8 (#211),
Male: #359; Feme: #211
} // #211

#211 as [#30, #5, #3, #70, #40, #5, #50, #8] = lego (G3004): {UMBRA: #58 as
#211 % #41 = #6} 1) to say, to speak; 1a) affirm over, maintain; 1b) to
teach; 1c) to exhort, advise, to command, direct; 1d) *to* *point* *out*
*with* *words*, intend, mean, mean to say; 1e) to call by name, to call,
name; 1f) to speak out, speak of, mention;

G3004@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 38 (#103); Ego: 3 (#38),
@4: Sup: 27 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 70 (#108),
@5: Sup: 67 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 40 (#148 -
I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 72 (#269); Ego: 5 (#153),
@7: Sup: 41 (#310); Ego: 50 (#203),
@8: Sup: 49 (#359); Ego: 8 (#211),
Male: #359; Feme: #211
} // #211

ORIGINAL CONTEXT: “As being a hypothetical and conjectural postulate of the
cognitive reality I desire to grasp (ie. there may be semantical
misapprehensions: mais nous faisons de notre mieux) is a notion of
contingency as a quantum sensibility within the context of a metaphysical
philosophical derivation where there is a normative absence or a
substitution of *ONTIC* necessity as the factuality of being so without
being so and which whilst absent of quantitative certainty yet has a
provisional possibility for occurrence or eventuality.”

#248 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #600] = bara' (H1254): {UMBRA: #0 as #248 % #41
= #2} 1) to create, shape, form; 2) to be fat; 1a) (Qal) *to* *shape*,
*fashion*, *create* (*always* *with* *God* *as* *subject*); 1a1) of heaven
and earth; 1a2) of individual man; 1a3) of new conditions and
circumstances; 1a4) of transformations; 1b) (Niphal) to be created; 1b1) of
heaven and earth; 1b2) of birth; 1b3) of something new; 1b4) of miracles;
1c) (Piel); 1c1) to cut down; 1c2) to cut out; 2a) (Hiphil) to make
yourselves fat;

H1254@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 7 (#12); Ego: 2 (#7),
@3: Sup: 45 (#57); Ego: 38 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@4: Sup: 46 (#103); Ego: 1 (#46),
@5: Sup: 79 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego:
33 (#79),
Male: #182; Feme: #79
} // #248

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #248 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;

THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.

#VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
#TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
#TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
#CANON: #84

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
@4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84

#248 as [#2, #4, #2, #200, #600] = dabar (H1696): {UMBRA: #9 as #248 % #41
= #2} 1) to *speak*, *declare*, *converse*, *command*, promise, warn,
threaten, sing; 1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one another,
talk; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to be spoken;
1e) (Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to flight;

H1696@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 6 (#8); Ego: 4 (#6),
@3: Sup: 8 (#16); Ego: 2 (#8),
@4: Sup: 46 (#62); Ego: 38 (#46),
@5: Sup: 79 (#141); Ego: 33 (#79),
Male: #141; Feme: #79
} // #248

It seems #CENTRED on a coherent reality and which is epistemologically
compliant with four languages...

How readest thou?

- dolf
<SNIP IDIOTIC TOP-POSTING>
Post by dolf
On 28/8/18 6:35 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
<SNIP idiotic top-posting>
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora of
opportunity.
If you can't express your idea in clear, simple terms that all can
understand, it means your idea is crap.
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR
SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?
"Is there to be found" - what do you mean? Are you finding something,
am I, or is somebody else?
"rather than" is a coordinating adverb of comparison. Because you've
started off with the passive voice, and because you've allowed
ambiguity to creep in (what is being coordinated here? The verb
"found", or the noun "language"?) you've ended up hopelessly confused
about what form of words you should be using on the other side, AND
you've made it even worse by using your usual catalogue technique, BUT
your catalogue consists of a verb (in the wrong form), an ambiguous
noun/verb, and a noun, thus exacerbating the chaos of ambiguity and
ultimately causing your sentence to descend into gibberish.
Your response exhibits psychosis, vehemence and hysteria:

H5006@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 9 (#49); Ego: 50 (#90),
@3: Sup: 10 (#59); Ego: 1 (#91),
@4: Sup: 19 (#78); Ego: 9 (#100),
@5: Sup: 29 (#107); Ego: 10 (#110),
@6: Sup: 43 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 14 (#124),
Male: #150; Feme: #124
} // #211

#211 as [#40, #50, #1, #90, #10, #500] = na'ats (H5006): {UMBRA: #42 as
#211 % #41 = #6} 1) to spurn, contemn, despise, abhor; 1a) (Qal) to spurn,
*contemn*; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to spurn; 1b2) to cause to contemn; 1c)
(Hiphil) to spurn; 1d) (Hithpolel) to be contemned;

Try to explain yourself with concise, reasoned and conclusive examples of
deductive, redactive or inductive CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE which are relevant
to the subject.
Post by dolf
Quite simply, this is not how to construct a sentence.
<SNIP IDIOTIC BIBLE QUOTES>
Post by dolf
If you don't mind I'm deploying a meta-physical dialectic which is more
Actually, I *do* mind, because what you are "deploying" is
incomprehensible because it does not follow the rules of grammar but
instead seems to be following some incomprehensible rules of numerology
of your own devising.
Post by dolf
[IS, THERE, TO, BE, FOUND, A, LANGUAGE, OF, PERFECTION, RATHER, THAN,
ONLY, CENSOR, SCORN, AND, PREJUDICED, DISDAIN]
That is the meaningless, poorly-constructed sentence I have already addressed.
Post by dolf
And the answer is YES there is both <SNIP> *PANEGYRICAL*
<SNIP> *LANGUAGE* and <SNIP> SPEECH OF COMPULSION <SNIP>
embedded within the subject title.
Additionally it was designed to *COMPEL* *YOU* *TO* *SEEK* *AN*
*EXPLANATION* <SNIP> *to* *unfold* *the* *meaning* *of* *what*
*is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
*THUS* *THERE* *ARE* *THREE* *ETHEREAL* *REFERENCES* *TO* *LANGUAGE*
*AND* *OF* *PERFECTION* *WITHIN* *THE* *TITLE* *SO* *THEN* *IT* *IS
*PERFECTLY* *SUITED*
Your explanation fails to address the ambiguity and errors in your
sentence which rendered it meaningless. Your explanation is slightly
clearer than the original (once I SNIPped out the numerology) but it
still fails to convey any comprehensible meaning.
<SNIP BIBLE QUOTES>
<SNIP REPEATED NONSENSE>
for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues,
except- he interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5,
#400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}, that the church may
receive edifying." [1Corinthians 14:5]
"Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may
interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10]
= diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:13]
"If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most
by three, and that by course; and let one interpret {#640 as [#4, #10,
interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:27]
If you don't mind I'm deploying a meta-physical dialectic which is more
"Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull {#598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out
the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?"
[Matthew 7:4]
"Thou hypocrite, first cast {#598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8,
#200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out the beam out of
thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast {#598 as [#5,
cast} out the mote out of thy brother's eye." [Matthew 7:5]
[IS, THERE, TO, BE, FOUND, A, LANGUAGE, OF, PERFECTION, RATHER, THAN,
ONLY, CENSOR, SCORN, AND, PREJUDICED, DISDAIN]
And the answer is YES there is both #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #1, #10] = *PANEGYRICAL* {ie. a public speech or published text in
praise of someone or something} *LANGUAGE* and #598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = SPEECH OF COMPULSION {ie.
*to* *compel* *one* *to* *depart*} embedded within the subject title.
Additionally it was designed to *COMPEL* *YOU* *TO* *SEEK* *AN*
*EXPLANATION*: #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8,
#10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold* *the* *meaning* *of* *what*
*is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
*THUS* *THERE* *ARE* *THREE* *ETHEREAL* *REFERENCES* *TO* *LANGUAGE*
*AND* *OF* *PERFECTION* *WITHIN* *THE* *TITLE* *SO* *THEN* *IT* *IS
*PERFECTLY* *SUITED*
#598 as [#80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #1, #200] =
paliggenesia (G3824): {UMBRA: #21 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1d) the signal
and glorious change of all things (in heaven and earth) for the better,
that restoration of the primal and *perfect* condition of things which
existed before the fall of our first parents, which the Jews looked for
in connection with the advent of the Messiah, and which Christians
expected in connection with the visible return of Jesus from heaven;
"And I am sure that, when I come unto you, I shall come in the fulness
of the blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing} of the gospel of Christ." [Romans 15:29]
"For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own
belly; and by good words and fair {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10,
#1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} speeches {#529 as [#5, #400, #30,
#70, #3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} deceive the hearts
of the simple." [Romans 16:18]
"And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the
earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I
saying, Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto
him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever."
[Revelation 5:13]
"Saying, Amen: Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10]
= eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving,
and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever.
Amen." [Revelation 7:12]
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 23 (#60); Ego: 65 (#93),
@3: Sup: 78 (#138); Ego: 17 (#110),
@4: Sup: 6 (#144); Ego: 7 (#117),
@5: Sup: 23 (#167); Ego: 15 (#132),
@6: Sup: 24 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 1 (#133),
@7: Sup: 44 (#235); Ego: 77 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
@8: Sup: 8 (#243); Ego: 66 (#276),
@9: Sup: 16 (#259); Ego: 12 (#288),
@10: Sup: 27 (#286); Ego: 70 (#358),
@11: Sup: 10 (#296); Ego: 16 (#374),
@12: Sup: 73 (#369); Ego: 30 (#404),
@13: Sup: 44 (#413); Ego: 65 (#469),
@14: Sup: 32 (#445); Ego: 60 (#529 ***), // #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70,
#3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia MEANING: 1) praise, laudation, panegyric: of
Christ or God; 2) *fine* *discourse*, *polished* *language*;
@15: Sup: 59 (#504); Ego: 55 (#584),
@16: Sup: 78 (#582); Ego: 14 (#598 ***), // #598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30,
#8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo MEANING: *to* *compel*
*one* *to* *depart*; *to* *bid* *one* *depart*, *in* *stern* *though*
*not* *violent* *language*;
@17: Sup: 58 (#640 ***); Ego: 15 (#613), // #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100,
#40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold*
*the* *meaning* *of* *what* *is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
Male: #640; Feme: #613
}
<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,640}&idea:{f,613}>
SUBJECT WAS: I would like to find meaningful sentences instead of
insufferable gibberish
On 28/8/18 6:35 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by dolf
<SNIP idiotic top-posting>
Post by dolf
Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora of
opportunity.
If you can't express your idea in clear, simple terms that all can
understand, it means your idea is crap.
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR
SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?
"Is there to be found" - what do you mean? Are you finding something, am
I, or is somebody else?
"rather than" is a coordinating adverb of comparison. Because you've
started off with the passive voice, and because you've allowed ambiguity
to creep in (what is being coordinated here? The verb "found", or the
noun "language"?) you've ended up hopelessly confused about what form of
words you should be using on the other side, AND you've made it even
worse by using your usual catalogue technique, BUT your catalogue
consists of a verb (in the wrong form), an ambiguous noun/verb, and a
noun, thus exacerbating the chaos of ambiguity and ultimately causing
your sentence to descend into gibberish.
Quite simply, this is not how to construct a sentence.
for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues,
except- he interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5,
#400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}, that the church may
receive edifying." [1Corinthians 14:5]
"Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may
interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10]
= diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:13]
"If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most
by three, and that by course; and let one interpret {#640 as [#4, #10,
interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:27]
If you don't mind I'm deploying a meta-physical dialectic which is more
"Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull {#598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out
the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?"
[Matthew 7:4]
"Thou hypocrite, first cast {#598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8,
#200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out the beam out of
thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast {#598 as [#5,
cast} out the mote out of thy brother's eye." [Matthew 7:5]
[IS, THERE, TO, BE, FOUND, A, LANGUAGE, OF, PERFECTION, RATHER, THAN,
ONLY, CENSOR, SCORN, AND, PREJUDICED, DISDAIN]
And the answer is YES there is both #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #1, #10] = *PANEGYRICAL* {ie. a public speech or published text in
praise of someone or something} *LANGUAGE* and #598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = SPEECH OF COMPULSION {ie.
*to* *compel* *one* *to* *depart*} embedded within the subject title.
Additionally it was designed to *COMPEL* *YOU* *TO* *SEEK* *AN*
*EXPLANATION*: #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8,
#10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold* *the* *meaning* *of* *what*
*is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
*THUS* *THERE* *ARE* *THREE* *ETHEREAL* *REFERENCES* *TO* *LANGUAGE*
*AND* *OF* *PERFECTION* *WITHIN* *THE* *TITLE* *SO* *THEN* *IT* *IS
*PERFECTLY* *SUITED*
#598 as [#80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #1, #200] =
paliggenesia (G3824): {UMBRA: #21 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1d) the signal
and glorious change of all things (in heaven and earth) for the better,
that restoration of the primal and *perfect* condition of things which
existed before the fall of our first parents, which the Jews looked for
in connection with the advent of the Messiah, and which Christians
expected in connection with the visible return of Jesus from heaven;
"And I am sure that, when I come unto you, I shall come in the fulness
of the blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing} of the gospel of Christ." [Romans 15:29]
"For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own
belly; and by good words and fair {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10,
#1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} speeches {#529 as [#5, #400, #30,
#70, #3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} deceive the hearts
of the simple." [Romans 16:18]
"And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the
earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I
saying, Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto
him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever."
[Revelation 5:13]
"Saying, Amen: Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10]
= eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving,
and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever.
Amen." [Revelation 7:12]
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 23 (#60); Ego: 65 (#93),
@3: Sup: 78 (#138); Ego: 17 (#110),
@4: Sup: 6 (#144); Ego: 7 (#117),
@5: Sup: 23 (#167); Ego: 15 (#132),
@6: Sup: 24 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 1 (#133),
@7: Sup: 44 (#235); Ego: 77 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
@8: Sup: 8 (#243); Ego: 66 (#276),
@9: Sup: 16 (#259); Ego: 12 (#288),
@10: Sup: 27 (#286); Ego: 70 (#358),
@11: Sup: 10 (#296); Ego: 16 (#374),
@12: Sup: 73 (#369); Ego: 30 (#404),
@13: Sup: 44 (#413); Ego: 65 (#469),
@14: Sup: 32 (#445); Ego: 60 (#529 ***), // #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70,
#3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia MEANING: 1) praise, laudation, panegyric: of
Christ or God; 2) *fine* *discourse*, *polished* *language*;
@15: Sup: 59 (#504); Ego: 55 (#584),
@16: Sup: 78 (#582); Ego: 14 (#598 ***), // #598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30,
#8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo MEANING: *to* *compel*
*one* *to* *depart*; *to* *bid* *one* *depart*, *in* *stern* *though*
*not* *violent* *language*;
@17: Sup: 58 (#640 ***); Ego: 15 (#613), // #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100,
#40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold*
*the* *meaning* *of* *what* *is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
Male: #640; Feme: #613
}
<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,640}&idea:{f,613}>
EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #43 -
Absolute Negation, It's Universal Application; I-Ching: H50 - The
Cauldron, Holding; Tetra: 44 - Stove / INNER: #37 - Non-Deeming Action,
Government Administration; I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance,
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
@3: Sup: 30 (#116); Ego: 30 (#111),
@4: Sup: 19 (#135); Ego: 70 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
@5: Sup: 22 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 3 (#184 - I PUT NO
CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36}),
@6: Sup: 32 (#189); Ego: 10 (#194),
@7: Sup: 33 (#222); Ego: 1 (#195),
@8: Sup: 43 (#265); Ego: 10 (#205),
Male: #265; Feme: #205
} // #529
UMBRA: #529 % #41 = #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release;
THOTH MEASURE: #37 - Oh Striker, who makest thine appearance in Heaven;
I am not one of loud voice.
#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject’s preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
#CANON: #196
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 37 (#37),
@2: Sup: 33 (#70); Ego: 77 (#114),
@3: Sup: 47 (#117); Ego: 14 (#128),
@4: Sup: 34 (#151); Ego: 68 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
Male: #151; Feme: #196
} // #196
{UMBRA: #37 as #529 % #41 = #37} 1) praise, laudation, panegyric: of
Christ or God; 2) *fine* *discourse*, *polished* *language*; 3) an
invocation of blessing, benediction; 4) consecration; 5) a (concrete)
blessing, benefit; 2a) in a bad sense, *language* *artfully* *adapted*
*to* *captivate* *the* *hearer*: *fair* *speaking*, *fine* *speeches*;
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 25 (#30); Ego: 20 (#25),
@3: Sup: 27 (#57); Ego: 2 (#27),
@4: Sup: 57 (#114); Ego: 30 (#57),
@5: Sup: 65 (#179); Ego: 8 (#65),
@6: Sup: 74 (#253); Ego: 9 (#74),
@7: Sup: 1 (#254); Ego: 8 (#82),
@8: Sup: 39 (#293); Ego: 38 (#120),
@9: Sup: 44 (#337); Ego: 5 (#125),
@10: Sup: 20 (#357); Ego: 57 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@11: Sup: 21 (#378); Ego: 1 (#183),
@12: Sup: 31 (#409); Ego: 10 (#193),
Male: #409; Feme: #193
} // #598
UMBRA: #598 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
I lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.
#VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
#TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
#POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
#TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
#CANON: #181
@1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
@3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
@4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181
#598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] =
ekballo (G1544): {UMBRA: #16 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1) to cast out, drive
out, to send out; 1a) with notion of violence; 1a1) to drive out (cast
out); 1a2) to cast out; 1a2a) of the world, i.e. be deprived of the
power and influence he exercises in the world; 1a2b) a thing: excrement
from the belly into the sink; 1a3) to expel a person from a society: to
banish from a family; 1a4) *to* *compel* *one* *to* *depart*; *to* *bid*
*one* *depart*, *in* *stern* *though* *not* *violent* *language*; 1a5)
so employed that the rapid motion of the one going is transferred to the
one sending forth; 1a51) to command or cause one to depart in haste;
1a6) to draw out with force, tear out; 1a7) with implication of force
overcoming opposite force; 1a7a) to cause a thing to move straight on
its intended goal; 1a8) to reject with contempt, to cast off or away;
1b) without the notion of violence; 1b1) to draw out, extract, one thing
inserted in another; 1b2) to bring out of, to draw or bring forth; 1b3)
to except, to leave out, i.e. not receive; 1b4) to lead one forth or
away somewhere with a force which he cannot resist;
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 30 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 30 (#111),
@4: Sup: 40 (#231); Ego: 10 (#121),
@5: Sup: 43 (#274); Ego: 3 (#124),
@6: Sup: 46 (#320); Ego: 3 (#127),
@7: Sup: 51 (#371); Ego: 5 (#132),
@8: Sup: 20 (#391); Ego: 50 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@9: Sup: 25 (#416); Ego: 5 (#187),
@10: Sup: 63 (#479); Ego: 38 (#225),
@11: Sup: 73 (#552); Ego: 10 (#235),
@12: Sup: 74 (#626); Ego: 1 (#236),
@13: Sup: 31 (#657); Ego: 38 (#274),
Male: #657; Feme: #274
} // #598
#598 as [#80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #1, #200] =
paliggenesia (G3824): {UMBRA: #21 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1) new birth,
reproduction, renewal, recreation, regeneration; 1a) hence renovation,
regeneration, the production of a new life consecrated to God, a radical
change of mind for the better. The word often used to denote the
restoration of a thing to its pristine state, its renovation, as a
renewal or restoration of life after death; 1b) the renovation of the
earth after the deluge; 1c) the renewal of the world to take place after
its destruction by fire, as the Stoics taught; 1d) the signal and
glorious change of all things (in heaven and earth) for the better, that
restoration of the primal and *perfect* condition of things which
existed before the fall of our first parents, which the Jews looked for
in connection with the advent of the Messiah, and which Christians
expected in connection with the visible return of Jesus from heaven.;
1e) other uses; 1e1) of Cicero's restoration to rank and fortune on his
recall from exile; 1e2) of the restoration of the Jewish nation after
exile; 1e3) of the recovery of knowledge by recollection;
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 19 (#37); Ego: 5 (#19),
@4: Sup: 38 (#75); Ego: 19 (#38),
@5: Sup: 78 (#153); Ego: 40 (#78),
@6: Sup: 5 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 8 (#86 - I AM
NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@7: Sup: 55 (#213); Ego: 50 (#136),
@8: Sup: 60 (#273); Ego: 5 (#141),
@9: Sup: 55 (#328); Ego: 76 (#217),
@10: Sup: 63 (#391); Ego: 8 (#225),
@11: Sup: 73 (#464); Ego: 10 (#235),
Male: #464; Feme: #235
} // #640
UMBRA: #640 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
Distortion;
THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; I am not boisterous in behaviour.
#VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
#TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
#TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
#CANON: #185
@1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
@2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
@3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
@4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
Male: #108; Feme: #185
} // #185
#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] =
diermeneuo (G1329): {UMBRA: #51 as #640 % #41 = #25} 1) *to* *unfold*
*the* *meaning* *of* *what* *is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*; 2) to
translate into one's native language;
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-29 21:27:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...
Translation: but we do our best
Why say it twice? Repetition is a major problem with your writing,
together with your extensive parenthetic rambling.
Post by dolf
[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]
It's a phrase, not a "metempirical whatsit", whatever that means.
Such dictum which you advance concerning the permissibility of variation as
to the form of noun, pronoun or adjective by which its grammatical form is
conveyed as acceptable binomial nomenclature usage is as “knit one purl
one” just ribbing and the of sowing discordant objectives with impetus of
declension and has no intrinsic ontological dignity worth emulating as
pretence to any principled life: “Be not deceived: evil communications
corrupt good manners.

Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of
God: I speak this to your shame.”

The garment which you are hodgepodging is a corruption of decency and is
barely capable to cover your paunch and bollocks: “For this corruptible
must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal
shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying
that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.

O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?

The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law [of
metempirical contortions as normative deceptions such as yours]”

Matthew 23:27 (KJV)
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within
full of dead [men's] bones, and of all uncleanness.

Luke 11:52 (KJV)
Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye
entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.
Post by dolf
Metempirics is the study of concepts and relationships conceived as beyond
and yet related to knowledge gained empirically
And yet the phrase you refer to is a simple declarative assertion,
nothing to do with metempiric whatsits.
Post by dolf
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 69 (#69),
@2: Sup: 81 (#118); Ego: 24 (#93),
@3: Sup: 18 (#136); Ego: 2 (#95),
4: Sup: 31 (#167); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 28 (#195); Ego: 81 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
@6: Sup: 16 (#211); Ego: 63 (#248),
Male: #211; Feme: #248
And that's just gobbledigook.
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...
Translation: but we do our best
[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]
Metempirics is the study of concepts and relationships conceived as beyond
and yet related to knowledge gained empirically
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 69 (#69),
@2: Sup: 81 (#118); Ego: 24 (#93),
@3: Sup: 18 (#136); Ego: 2 (#95),
4: Sup: 31 (#167); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 28 (#195); Ego: 81 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
@6: Sup: 16 (#211); Ego: 63 (#248),
Male: #211; Feme: #248
}
#211 % #41 = #6: {
thoth: "Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in Heaven; I am
not fraudulent in measures of grain.",
dictum: "I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN",
virtue: [6 ,"With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction."],
tools: [46 ,"Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition."],
position: [63 ,"As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent."],
time: [67 ,"As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct."],
canon: 182,
ankh: 0
}
#248 % #41 = #2: {
thoth: "Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine appearance in
Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.",
dictum: "I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE",
virtue: [2 ,"With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue."],
position: [42 ,"With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment."],
tools: [10 ,"With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked."],
time: [30 ,"With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?"],
canon: 84,
ankh: 0
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,211}&idea:{f,248}>
Any SYNCRETIC {‘OTH - #2184} CONTINUUM EQUIVALENTS as CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING conveying ONTIC normative premise as then causal for
heuristic which is conducive to cognition, adaptive apperception
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 9 (#14); Ego: 4 (#9),
@3: Sup: 11 (#25); Ego: 2 (#11),
@4: Sup: 49 (#74); Ego: 38 (#49),
Male: #74; Feme: #49
} // #211
H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 -
Departure;
THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; I am not fraudulent in measures of grain.
#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 52 (#58); Ego: 46 (#52),
@3: Sup: 34 (#92); Ego: 63 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@4: Sup: 20 (#112); Ego: 67 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}),
Male: #112; Feme: #182
} // #182
#211 as [#5, #4, #2, #200] = dabar (H1696): {UMBRA: #3 as #211 % #41 = #6}
1) to *speak*, *declare*, *converse*, command, promise, warn, threaten,
sing; 1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one another, talk; 1c)
(Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to be spoken; 1e)
(Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to flight;
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95),
@4: Sup: 54 (#77); Ego: 40 (#135),
@5: Sup: 59 (#136); Ego: 5 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM
NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
@6: Sup: 69 (#205); Ego: 10 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@7: Sup: 38 (#243); Ego: 50 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY
{%8}),
@8: Sup: 39 (#282); Ego: 1 (#201),
@9: Sup: 49 (#331); Ego: 10 (#211),
Male: #331; Feme: #211
} // #211
{UMBRA: #59 as #211 % #41 = #6} 1) to stay at or with, to tarry still,
still to abide, to continue, remain; 1a) of tarrying in a place; 1b) to
persevere, continue; 1b1) of the thing continued in; 1b2) *in* *the* *work*
*of* *teaching*; 1b3) of the blessing for which one keeps himself fit; 1b4)
denoting the action persisted in;
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 38 (#103); Ego: 3 (#38),
@4: Sup: 27 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 70 (#108),
@5: Sup: 67 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 40 (#148 -
I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 72 (#269); Ego: 5 (#153),
@7: Sup: 41 (#310); Ego: 50 (#203),
@8: Sup: 49 (#359); Ego: 8 (#211),
Male: #359; Feme: #211
} // #211
#211 as [#30, #5, #3, #70, #40, #5, #50, #8] = lego (G3004): {UMBRA: #58 as
#211 % #41 = #6} 1) to say, to speak; 1a) affirm over, maintain; 1b) to
teach; 1c) to exhort, advise, to command, direct; 1d) *to* *point* *out*
*with* *words*, intend, mean, mean to say; 1e) to call by name, to call,
name; 1f) to speak out, speak of, mention;
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 38 (#103); Ego: 3 (#38),
@4: Sup: 27 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 70 (#108),
@5: Sup: 67 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 40 (#148 -
I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 72 (#269); Ego: 5 (#153),
@7: Sup: 41 (#310); Ego: 50 (#203),
@8: Sup: 49 (#359); Ego: 8 (#211),
Male: #359; Feme: #211
} // #211
ORIGINAL CONTEXT: “As being a hypothetical and conjectural postulate of the
cognitive reality I desire to grasp (ie. there may be semantical
misapprehensions: mais nous faisons de notre mieux) is a notion of
contingency as a quantum sensibility within the context of a metaphysical
philosophical derivation where there is a normative absence or a
substitution of *ONTIC* necessity as the factuality of being so without
being so and which whilst absent of quantitative certainty yet has a
provisional possibility for occurrence or eventuality.”
#248 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #600] = bara' (H1254): {UMBRA: #0 as #248 % #41
= #2} 1) to create, shape, form; 2) to be fat; 1a) (Qal) *to* *shape*,
*fashion*, *create* (*always* *with* *God* *as* *subject*); 1a1) of heaven
and earth; 1a2) of individual man; 1a3) of new conditions and
circumstances; 1a4) of transformations; 1b) (Niphal) to be created; 1b1) of
heaven and earth; 1b2) of birth; 1b3) of something new; 1b4) of miracles;
1c) (Piel); 1c1) to cut down; 1c2) to cut out; 2a) (Hiphil) to make
yourselves fat;
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 7 (#12); Ego: 2 (#7),
@3: Sup: 45 (#57); Ego: 38 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@4: Sup: 46 (#103); Ego: 1 (#46),
33 (#79),
Male: #182; Feme: #79
} // #248
UMBRA: #248 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;
THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.
#VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
#TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
#TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
#CANON: #84
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
@4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84
#248 as [#2, #4, #2, #200, #600] = dabar (H1696): {UMBRA: #9 as #248 % #41
= #2} 1) to *speak*, *declare*, *converse*, *command*, promise, warn,
threaten, sing; 1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one another,
talk; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to be spoken;
1e) (Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to flight;
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 6 (#8); Ego: 4 (#6),
@3: Sup: 8 (#16); Ego: 2 (#8),
@4: Sup: 46 (#62); Ego: 38 (#46),
@5: Sup: 79 (#141); Ego: 33 (#79),
Male: #141; Feme: #79
} // #248
It seems #CENTRED on a coherent reality and which is epistemologically
compliant with four languages...
How readest thou?
- dolf
Post by dolf
<SNIP IDIOTIC TOP-POSTING>
Post by dolf
On 28/8/18 6:35 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
<SNIP idiotic top-posting>
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora of
opportunity.
If you can't express your idea in clear, simple terms that all can
understand, it means your idea is crap.
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR
SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?
"Is there to be found" - what do you mean? Are you finding something,
am I, or is somebody else?
"rather than" is a coordinating adverb of comparison. Because you've
started off with the passive voice, and because you've allowed
ambiguity to creep in (what is being coordinated here? The verb
"found", or the noun "language"?) you've ended up hopelessly confused
about what form of words you should be using on the other side, AND
you've made it even worse by using your usual catalogue technique, BUT
your catalogue consists of a verb (in the wrong form), an ambiguous
noun/verb, and a noun, thus exacerbating the chaos of ambiguity and
ultimately causing your sentence to descend into gibberish.
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 9 (#49); Ego: 50 (#90),
@3: Sup: 10 (#59); Ego: 1 (#91),
@4: Sup: 19 (#78); Ego: 9 (#100),
@5: Sup: 29 (#107); Ego: 10 (#110),
@6: Sup: 43 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 14 (#124),
Male: #150; Feme: #124
} // #211
#211 as [#40, #50, #1, #90, #10, #500] = na'ats (H5006): {UMBRA: #42 as
#211 % #41 = #6} 1) to spurn, contemn, despise, abhor; 1a) (Qal) to spurn,
*contemn*; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to spurn; 1b2) to cause to contemn; 1c)
(Hiphil) to spurn; 1d) (Hithpolel) to be contemned;
Try to explain yourself with concise, reasoned and conclusive examples of
deductive, redactive or inductive CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE which are relevant
to the subject.
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Quite simply, this is not how to construct a sentence.
<SNIP IDIOTIC BIBLE QUOTES>
Post by dolf
If you don't mind I'm deploying a meta-physical dialectic which is more
Actually, I *do* mind, because what you are "deploying" is
incomprehensible because it does not follow the rules of grammar but
instead seems to be following some incomprehensible rules of numerology
of your own devising.
Post by dolf
[IS, THERE, TO, BE, FOUND, A, LANGUAGE, OF, PERFECTION, RATHER, THAN,
ONLY, CENSOR, SCORN, AND, PREJUDICED, DISDAIN]
That is the meaningless, poorly-constructed sentence I have already addressed.
Post by dolf
And the answer is YES there is both <SNIP> *PANEGYRICAL*
<SNIP> *LANGUAGE* and <SNIP> SPEECH OF COMPULSION <SNIP>
embedded within the subject title.
Additionally it was designed to *COMPEL* *YOU* *TO* *SEEK* *AN*
*EXPLANATION* <SNIP> *to* *unfold* *the* *meaning* *of* *what*
*is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
*THUS* *THERE* *ARE* *THREE* *ETHEREAL* *REFERENCES* *TO* *LANGUAGE*
*AND* *OF* *PERFECTION* *WITHIN* *THE* *TITLE* *SO* *THEN* *IT* *IS
*PERFECTLY* *SUITED*
Your explanation fails to address the ambiguity and errors in your
sentence which rendered it meaningless. Your explanation is slightly
clearer than the original (once I SNIPped out the numerology) but it
still fails to convey any comprehensible meaning.
<SNIP BIBLE QUOTES>
<SNIP REPEATED NONSENSE>
for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues,
except- he interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5,
#400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}, that the church may
receive edifying." [1Corinthians 14:5]
"Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may
interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10]
= diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:13]
"If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most
by three, and that by course; and let one interpret {#640 as [#4, #10,
interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:27]
If you don't mind I'm deploying a meta-physical dialectic which is more
"Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull {#598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out
the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?"
[Matthew 7:4]
"Thou hypocrite, first cast {#598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8,
#200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out the beam out of
thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast {#598 as [#5,
cast} out the mote out of thy brother's eye." [Matthew 7:5]
[IS, THERE, TO, BE, FOUND, A, LANGUAGE, OF, PERFECTION, RATHER, THAN,
ONLY, CENSOR, SCORN, AND, PREJUDICED, DISDAIN]
And the answer is YES there is both #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #1, #10] = *PANEGYRICAL* {ie. a public speech or published text in
praise of someone or something} *LANGUAGE* and #598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = SPEECH OF COMPULSION {ie.
*to* *compel* *one* *to* *depart*} embedded within the subject title.
Additionally it was designed to *COMPEL* *YOU* *TO* *SEEK* *AN*
*EXPLANATION*: #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8,
#10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold* *the* *meaning* *of* *what*
*is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
*THUS* *THERE* *ARE* *THREE* *ETHEREAL* *REFERENCES* *TO* *LANGUAGE*
*AND* *OF* *PERFECTION* *WITHIN* *THE* *TITLE* *SO* *THEN* *IT* *IS
*PERFECTLY* *SUITED*
#598 as [#80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #1, #200] =
paliggenesia (G3824): {UMBRA: #21 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1d) the signal
and glorious change of all things (in heaven and earth) for the better,
that restoration of the primal and *perfect* condition of things which
existed before the fall of our first parents, which the Jews looked for
in connection with the advent of the Messiah, and which Christians
expected in connection with the visible return of Jesus from heaven;
"And I am sure that, when I come unto you, I shall come in the fulness
of the blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing} of the gospel of Christ." [Romans 15:29]
"For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own
belly; and by good words and fair {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10,
#1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} speeches {#529 as [#5, #400, #30,
#70, #3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} deceive the hearts
of the simple." [Romans 16:18]
"And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the
earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I
saying, Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto
him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever."
[Revelation 5:13]
"Saying, Amen: Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10]
= eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving,
and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever.
Amen." [Revelation 7:12]
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 23 (#60); Ego: 65 (#93),
@3: Sup: 78 (#138); Ego: 17 (#110),
@4: Sup: 6 (#144); Ego: 7 (#117),
@5: Sup: 23 (#167); Ego: 15 (#132),
@6: Sup: 24 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 1 (#133),
@7: Sup: 44 (#235); Ego: 77 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
@8: Sup: 8 (#243); Ego: 66 (#276),
@9: Sup: 16 (#259); Ego: 12 (#288),
@10: Sup: 27 (#286); Ego: 70 (#358),
@11: Sup: 10 (#296); Ego: 16 (#374),
@12: Sup: 73 (#369); Ego: 30 (#404),
@13: Sup: 44 (#413); Ego: 65 (#469),
@14: Sup: 32 (#445); Ego: 60 (#529 ***), // #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70,
#3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia MEANING: 1) praise, laudation, panegyric: of
Christ or God; 2) *fine* *discourse*, *polished* *language*;
@15: Sup: 59 (#504); Ego: 55 (#584),
@16: Sup: 78 (#582); Ego: 14 (#598 ***), // #598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30,
#8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo MEANING: *to* *compel*
*one* *to* *depart*; *to* *bid* *one* *depart*, *in* *stern* *though*
*not* *violent* *language*;
@17: Sup: 58 (#640 ***); Ego: 15 (#613), // #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100,
#40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold*
*the* *meaning* *of* *what* *is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
Male: #640; Feme: #613
}
<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,640}&idea:{f,613}>
SUBJECT WAS: I would like to find meaningful sentences instead of
insufferable gibberish
On 28/8/18 6:35 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by dolf
<SNIP idiotic top-posting>
Post by dolf
Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora of
opportunity.
If you can't express your idea in clear, simple terms that all can
understand, it means your idea is crap.
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR
SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?
"Is there to be found" - what do you mean? Are you finding something, am
I, or is somebody else?
"rather than" is a coordinating adverb of comparison. Because you've
started off with the passive voice, and because you've allowed ambiguity
to creep in (what is being coordinated here? The verb "found", or the
noun "language"?) you've ended up hopelessly confused about what form of
words you should be using on the other side, AND you've made it even
worse by using your usual catalogue technique, BUT your catalogue
consists of a verb (in the wrong form), an ambiguous noun/verb, and a
noun, thus exacerbating the chaos of ambiguity and ultimately causing
your sentence to descend into gibberish.
Quite simply, this is not how to construct a sentence.
for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues,
except- he interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5,
#400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}, that the church may
receive edifying." [1Corinthians 14:5]
"Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may
interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10]
= diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:13]
"If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most
by three, and that by course; and let one interpret {#640 as [#4, #10,
interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:27]
If you don't mind I'm deploying a meta-physical dialectic which is more
"Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull {#598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out
the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?"
[Matthew 7:4]
"Thou hypocrite, first cast {#598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8,
#200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out the beam out of
thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast {#598 as [#5,
cast} out the mote out of thy brother's eye." [Matthew 7:5]
[IS, THERE, TO, BE, FOUND, A, LANGUAGE, OF, PERFECTION, RATHER, THAN,
ONLY, CENSOR, SCORN, AND, PREJUDICED, DISDAIN]
And the answer is YES there is both #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #1, #10] = *PANEGYRICAL* {ie. a public speech or published text in
praise of someone or something} *LANGUAGE* and #598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = SPEECH OF COMPULSION {ie.
*to* *compel* *one* *to* *depart*} embedded within the subject title.
Additionally it was designed to *COMPEL* *YOU* *TO* *SEEK* *AN*
*EXPLANATION*: #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8,
#10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold* *the* *meaning* *of* *what*
*is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
*THUS* *THERE* *ARE* *THREE* *ETHEREAL* *REFERENCES* *TO* *LANGUAGE*
*AND* *OF* *PERFECTION* *WITHIN* *THE* *TITLE* *SO* *THEN* *IT* *IS
*PERFECTLY* *SUITED*
#598 as [#80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #1, #200] =
paliggenesia (G3824): {UMBRA: #21 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1d) the signal
and glorious change of all things (in heaven and earth) for the better,
that restoration of the primal and *perfect* condition of things which
existed before the fall of our first parents, which the Jews looked for
in connection with the advent of the Messiah, and which Christians
expected in connection with the visible return of Jesus from heaven;
"And I am sure that, when I come unto you, I shall come in the fulness
of the blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing} of the gospel of Christ." [Romans 15:29]
"For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own
belly; and by good words and fair {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10,
#1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} speeches {#529 as [#5, #400, #30,
#70, #3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} deceive the hearts
of the simple." [Romans 16:18]
"And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the
earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I
saying, Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto
him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever."
[Revelation 5:13]
"Saying, Amen: Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10]
= eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving,
and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever.
Amen." [Revelation 7:12]
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 23 (#60); Ego: 65 (#93),
@3: Sup: 78 (#138); Ego: 17 (#110),
@4: Sup: 6 (#144); Ego: 7 (#117),
@5: Sup: 23 (#167); Ego: 15 (#132),
@6: Sup: 24 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 1 (#133),
@7: Sup: 44 (#235); Ego: 77 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
@8: Sup: 8 (#243); Ego: 66 (#276),
@9: Sup: 16 (#259); Ego: 12 (#288),
@10: Sup: 27 (#286); Ego: 70 (#358),
@11: Sup: 10 (#296); Ego: 16 (#374),
@12: Sup: 73 (#369); Ego: 30 (#404),
@13: Sup: 44 (#413); Ego: 65 (#469),
@14: Sup: 32 (#445); Ego: 60 (#529 ***), // #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70,
#3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia MEANING: 1) praise, laudation, panegyric: of
Christ or God; 2) *fine* *discourse*, *polished* *language*;
@15: Sup: 59 (#504); Ego: 55 (#584),
@16: Sup: 78 (#582); Ego: 14 (#598 ***), // #598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30,
#8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo MEANING: *to* *compel*
*one* *to* *depart*; *to* *bid* *one* *depart*, *in* *stern* *though*
*not* *violent* *language*;
@17: Sup: 58 (#640 ***); Ego: 15 (#613), // #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100,
#40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold*
*the* *meaning* *of* *what* *is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
Male: #640; Feme: #613
}
<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,640}&idea:{f,613}>
EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #43 -
Absolute Negation, It's Universal Application; I-Ching: H50 - The
Cauldron, Holding; Tetra: 44 - Stove / INNER: #37 - Non-Deeming Action,
Government Administration; I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance,
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
@3: Sup: 30 (#116); Ego: 30 (#111),
@4: Sup: 19 (#135); Ego: 70 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
@5: Sup: 22 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 3 (#184 - I PUT NO
CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36}),
@6: Sup: 32 (#189); Ego: 10 (#194),
@7: Sup: 33 (#222); Ego: 1 (#195),
@8: Sup: 43 (#265); Ego: 10 (#205),
Male: #265; Feme: #205
} // #529
UMBRA: #529 % #41 = #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release;
THOTH MEASURE: #37 - Oh Striker, who makest thine appearance in Heaven;
I am not one of loud voice.
#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject’s preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
#CANON: #196
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 37 (#37),
@2: Sup: 33 (#70); Ego: 77 (#114),
@3: Sup: 47 (#117); Ego: 14 (#128),
@4: Sup: 34 (#151); Ego: 68 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
Male: #151; Feme: #196
} // #196
{UMBRA: #37 as #529 % #41 = #37} 1) praise, laudation, panegyric: of
Christ or God; 2) *fine* *discourse*, *polished* *language*; 3) an
invocation of blessing, benediction; 4) consecration; 5) a (concrete)
blessing, benefit; 2a) in a bad sense, *language* *artfully* *adapted*
*to* *captivate* *the* *hearer*: *fair* *speaking*, *fine* *speeches*;
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 25 (#30); Ego: 20 (#25),
@3: Sup: 27 (#57); Ego: 2 (#27),
@4: Sup: 57 (#114); Ego: 30 (#57),
@5: Sup: 65 (#179); Ego: 8 (#65),
@6: Sup: 74 (#253); Ego: 9 (#74),
@7: Sup: 1 (#254); Ego: 8 (#82),
@8: Sup: 39 (#293); Ego: 38 (#120),
@9: Sup: 44 (#337); Ego: 5 (#125),
@10: Sup: 20 (#357); Ego: 57 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@11: Sup: 21 (#378); Ego: 1 (#183),
@12: Sup: 31 (#409); Ego: 10 (#193),
Male: #409; Feme: #193
} // #598
UMBRA: #598 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
I lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.
#VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
#TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
#POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
#TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
#CANON: #181
@1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
@3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
@4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181
#598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] =
ekballo (G1544): {UMBRA: #16 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1) to cast out, drive
out, to send out; 1a) with notion of violence; 1a1) to drive out (cast
out); 1a2) to cast out; 1a2a) of the world, i.e. be deprived of the
power and influence he exercises in the world; 1a2b) a thing: excrement
from the belly into the sink; 1a3) to expel a person from a society: to
banish from a family; 1a4) *to* *compel* *one* *to* *depart*; *to* *bid*
*one* *depart*, *in* *stern* *though* *not* *violent* *language*; 1a5)
so employed that the rapid motion of the one going is transferred to the
one sending forth; 1a51) to command or cause one to depart in haste;
1a6) to draw out with force, tear out; 1a7) with implication of force
overcoming opposite force; 1a7a) to cause a thing to move straight on
its intended goal; 1a8) to reject with contempt, to cast off or away;
1b) without the notion of violence; 1b1) to draw out, extract, one thing
inserted in another; 1b2) to bring out of, to draw or bring forth; 1b3)
to except, to leave out, i.e. not receive; 1b4) to lead one forth or
away somewhere with a force which he cannot resist;
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 30 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 30 (#111),
@4: Sup: 40 (#231); Ego: 10 (#121),
@5: Sup: 43 (#274); Ego: 3 (#124),
@6: Sup: 46 (#320); Ego: 3 (#127),
@7: Sup: 51 (#371); Ego: 5 (#132),
@8: Sup: 20 (#391); Ego: 50 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@9: Sup: 25 (#416); Ego: 5 (#187),
@10: Sup: 63 (#479); Ego: 38 (#225),
@11: Sup: 73 (#552); Ego: 10 (#235),
@12: Sup: 74 (#626); Ego: 1 (#236),
@13: Sup: 31 (#657); Ego: 38 (#274),
Male: #657; Feme: #274
} // #598
#598 as [#80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #1, #200] =
paliggenesia (G3824): {UMBRA: #21 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1) new birth,
reproduction, renewal, recreation, regeneration; 1a) hence renovation,
regeneration, the production of a new life consecrated to God, a radical
change of mind for the better. The word often used to denote the
restoration of a thing to its pristine state, its renovation, as a
renewal or restoration of life after death; 1b) the renovation of the
earth after the deluge; 1c) the renewal of the world to take place after
its destruction by fire, as the Stoics taught; 1d) the signal and
glorious change of all things (in heaven and earth) for the better, that
restoration of the primal and *perfect* condition of things which
existed before the fall of our first parents, which the Jews looked for
in connection with the advent of the Messiah, and which Christians
expected in connection with the visible return of Jesus from heaven.;
1e) other uses; 1e1) of Cicero's restoration to rank and fortune on his
recall from exile; 1e2) of the restoration of the Jewish nation after
exile; 1e3) of the recovery of knowledge by recollection;
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 19 (#37); Ego: 5 (#19),
@4: Sup: 38 (#75); Ego: 19 (#38),
@5: Sup: 78 (#153); Ego: 40 (#78),
@6: Sup: 5 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 8 (#86 - I AM
NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@7: Sup: 55 (#213); Ego: 50 (#136),
@8: Sup: 60 (#273); Ego: 5 (#141),
@9: Sup: 55 (#328); Ego: 76 (#217),
@10: Sup: 63 (#391); Ego: 8 (#225),
@11: Sup: 73 (#464); Ego: 10 (#235),
Male: #464; Feme: #235
} // #640
UMBRA: #640 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
Distortion;
THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; I am not boisterous in behaviour.
#VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
#TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
#TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
#CANON: #185
@1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
@2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
@3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
@4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
Male: #108; Feme: #185
} // #185
#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] =
diermeneuo (G1329): {UMBRA: #51 as #640 % #41 = #25} 1) *to* *unfold*
*the* *meaning* *of* *what* *is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*; 2) to
translate into one's native language;
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-29 21:29:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by dolf
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...
Translation: but we do our best
Why say it twice? Repetition is a major problem with your writing,
together with your extensive parenthetic rambling.
Post by dolf
[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]
It's a phrase, not a "metempirical whatsit", whatever that means.
Such dictum which you advance concerning the permissibility of variation as
to the NATURE of noun, pronoun or adjective by which its grammatical form
is conveyed as acceptable binomial nomenclature usage is as “knit one purl
one” just ribbing and the of sowing discordant objectives with impetus of
declension and has no intrinsic ontological dignity worth emulating as
pretence to any principled life: “Be not deceived: evil communications
corrupt good manners.

Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of
God: I speak this to your shame.”

The garment which you are hodgepodging is a corruption of decency and is
barely capable to cover your paunch and bollocks: “For this corruptible
must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal
shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying
that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.

O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?

The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law [of
metempirical contortions as normative deceptions such as yours]”

Matthew 23:27 (KJV)
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within
full of dead [men's] bones, and of all uncleanness.

Luke 11:52 (KJV)
Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye
entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.
Post by dolf
Metempirics is the study of concepts and relationships conceived as beyond
and yet related to knowledge gained empirically
And yet the phrase you refer to is a simple declarative assertion,
nothing to do with metempiric whatsits.
Post by dolf
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 69 (#69),
@2: Sup: 81 (#118); Ego: 24 (#93),
@3: Sup: 18 (#136); Ego: 2 (#95),
4: Sup: 31 (#167); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 28 (#195); Ego: 81 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
@6: Sup: 16 (#211); Ego: 63 (#248),
Male: #211; Feme: #248
And that's just gobbledigook.
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...
Translation: but we do our best
[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]
Metempirics is the study of concepts and relationships conceived as beyond
and yet related to knowledge gained empirically
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 69 (#69),
@2: Sup: 81 (#118); Ego: 24 (#93),
@3: Sup: 18 (#136); Ego: 2 (#95),
4: Sup: 31 (#167); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 28 (#195); Ego: 81 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
@6: Sup: 16 (#211); Ego: 63 (#248),
Male: #211; Feme: #248
}
#211 % #41 = #6: {
thoth: "Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in Heaven; I am
not fraudulent in measures of grain.",
dictum: "I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN",
virtue: [6 ,"With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction."],
tools: [46 ,"Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition."],
position: [63 ,"As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent."],
time: [67 ,"As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct."],
canon: 182,
ankh: 0
}
#248 % #41 = #2: {
thoth: "Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine appearance in
Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.",
dictum: "I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE",
virtue: [2 ,"With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue."],
position: [42 ,"With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment."],
tools: [10 ,"With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked."],
time: [30 ,"With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?"],
canon: 84,
ankh: 0
}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,211}&idea:{f,248}>
Any SYNCRETIC {‘OTH - #2184} CONTINUUM EQUIVALENTS as CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING conveying ONTIC normative premise as then causal for
heuristic which is conducive to cognition, adaptive apperception
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 9 (#14); Ego: 4 (#9),
@3: Sup: 11 (#25); Ego: 2 (#11),
@4: Sup: 49 (#74); Ego: 38 (#49),
Male: #74; Feme: #49
} // #211
H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 -
Departure;
THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; I am not fraudulent in measures of grain.
#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 52 (#58); Ego: 46 (#52),
@3: Sup: 34 (#92); Ego: 63 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@4: Sup: 20 (#112); Ego: 67 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}),
Male: #112; Feme: #182
} // #182
#211 as [#5, #4, #2, #200] = dabar (H1696): {UMBRA: #3 as #211 % #41 = #6}
1) to *speak*, *declare*, *converse*, command, promise, warn, threaten,
sing; 1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one another, talk; 1c)
(Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to be spoken; 1e)
(Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to flight;
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95),
@4: Sup: 54 (#77); Ego: 40 (#135),
@5: Sup: 59 (#136); Ego: 5 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM
NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
@6: Sup: 69 (#205); Ego: 10 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@7: Sup: 38 (#243); Ego: 50 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY
{%8}),
@8: Sup: 39 (#282); Ego: 1 (#201),
@9: Sup: 49 (#331); Ego: 10 (#211),
Male: #331; Feme: #211
} // #211
{UMBRA: #59 as #211 % #41 = #6} 1) to stay at or with, to tarry still,
still to abide, to continue, remain; 1a) of tarrying in a place; 1b) to
persevere, continue; 1b1) of the thing continued in; 1b2) *in* *the* *work*
*of* *teaching*; 1b3) of the blessing for which one keeps himself fit; 1b4)
denoting the action persisted in;
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 38 (#103); Ego: 3 (#38),
@4: Sup: 27 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 70 (#108),
@5: Sup: 67 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 40 (#148 -
I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 72 (#269); Ego: 5 (#153),
@7: Sup: 41 (#310); Ego: 50 (#203),
@8: Sup: 49 (#359); Ego: 8 (#211),
Male: #359; Feme: #211
} // #211
#211 as [#30, #5, #3, #70, #40, #5, #50, #8] = lego (G3004): {UMBRA: #58 as
#211 % #41 = #6} 1) to say, to speak; 1a) affirm over, maintain; 1b) to
teach; 1c) to exhort, advise, to command, direct; 1d) *to* *point* *out*
*with* *words*, intend, mean, mean to say; 1e) to call by name, to call,
name; 1f) to speak out, speak of, mention;
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 38 (#103); Ego: 3 (#38),
@4: Sup: 27 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 70 (#108),
@5: Sup: 67 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 40 (#148 -
I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 72 (#269); Ego: 5 (#153),
@7: Sup: 41 (#310); Ego: 50 (#203),
@8: Sup: 49 (#359); Ego: 8 (#211),
Male: #359; Feme: #211
} // #211
ORIGINAL CONTEXT: “As being a hypothetical and conjectural postulate of the
cognitive reality I desire to grasp (ie. there may be semantical
misapprehensions: mais nous faisons de notre mieux) is a notion of
contingency as a quantum sensibility within the context of a metaphysical
philosophical derivation where there is a normative absence or a
substitution of *ONTIC* necessity as the factuality of being so without
being so and which whilst absent of quantitative certainty yet has a
provisional possibility for occurrence or eventuality.”
#248 as [#5, #2, #200, #1, #600] = bara' (H1254): {UMBRA: #0 as #248 % #41
= #2} 1) to create, shape, form; 2) to be fat; 1a) (Qal) *to* *shape*,
*fashion*, *create* (*always* *with* *God* *as* *subject*); 1a1) of heaven
and earth; 1a2) of individual man; 1a3) of new conditions and
circumstances; 1a4) of transformations; 1b) (Niphal) to be created; 1b1) of
heaven and earth; 1b2) of birth; 1b3) of something new; 1b4) of miracles;
1c) (Piel); 1c1) to cut down; 1c2) to cut out; 2a) (Hiphil) to make
yourselves fat;
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 7 (#12); Ego: 2 (#7),
@3: Sup: 45 (#57); Ego: 38 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@4: Sup: 46 (#103); Ego: 1 (#46),
33 (#79),
Male: #182; Feme: #79
} // #248
UMBRA: #248 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;
THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.
#VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
#TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
#TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
#CANON: #84
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
@4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84
#248 as [#2, #4, #2, #200, #600] = dabar (H1696): {UMBRA: #9 as #248 % #41
= #2} 1) to *speak*, *declare*, *converse*, *command*, promise, warn,
threaten, sing; 1a) (Qal) to speak; 1b) (Niphal) to speak with one another,
talk; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to speak; 1c2) to promise; 1d) (Pual) to be spoken;
1e) (Hithpael) to speak; 1f) (Hiphil) to lead away, put to flight;
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 6 (#8); Ego: 4 (#6),
@3: Sup: 8 (#16); Ego: 2 (#8),
@4: Sup: 46 (#62); Ego: 38 (#46),
@5: Sup: 79 (#141); Ego: 33 (#79),
Male: #141; Feme: #79
} // #248
It seems #CENTRED on a coherent reality and which is epistemologically
compliant with four languages...
How readest thou?
- dolf
Post by dolf
<SNIP IDIOTIC TOP-POSTING>
Post by dolf
On 28/8/18 6:35 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
<SNIP idiotic top-posting>
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora of
opportunity.
If you can't express your idea in clear, simple terms that all can
understand, it means your idea is crap.
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR
SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?
"Is there to be found" - what do you mean? Are you finding something,
am I, or is somebody else?
"rather than" is a coordinating adverb of comparison. Because you've
started off with the passive voice, and because you've allowed
ambiguity to creep in (what is being coordinated here? The verb
"found", or the noun "language"?) you've ended up hopelessly confused
about what form of words you should be using on the other side, AND
you've made it even worse by using your usual catalogue technique, BUT
your catalogue consists of a verb (in the wrong form), an ambiguous
noun/verb, and a noun, thus exacerbating the chaos of ambiguity and
ultimately causing your sentence to descend into gibberish.
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 9 (#49); Ego: 50 (#90),
@3: Sup: 10 (#59); Ego: 1 (#91),
@4: Sup: 19 (#78); Ego: 9 (#100),
@5: Sup: 29 (#107); Ego: 10 (#110),
@6: Sup: 43 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 14 (#124),
Male: #150; Feme: #124
} // #211
#211 as [#40, #50, #1, #90, #10, #500] = na'ats (H5006): {UMBRA: #42 as
#211 % #41 = #6} 1) to spurn, contemn, despise, abhor; 1a) (Qal) to spurn,
*contemn*; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to spurn; 1b2) to cause to contemn; 1c)
(Hiphil) to spurn; 1d) (Hithpolel) to be contemned;
Try to explain yourself with concise, reasoned and conclusive examples of
deductive, redactive or inductive CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE which are relevant
to the subject.
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Quite simply, this is not how to construct a sentence.
<SNIP IDIOTIC BIBLE QUOTES>
Post by dolf
If you don't mind I'm deploying a meta-physical dialectic which is more
Actually, I *do* mind, because what you are "deploying" is
incomprehensible because it does not follow the rules of grammar but
instead seems to be following some incomprehensible rules of numerology
of your own devising.
Post by dolf
[IS, THERE, TO, BE, FOUND, A, LANGUAGE, OF, PERFECTION, RATHER, THAN,
ONLY, CENSOR, SCORN, AND, PREJUDICED, DISDAIN]
That is the meaningless, poorly-constructed sentence I have already addressed.
Post by dolf
And the answer is YES there is both <SNIP> *PANEGYRICAL*
<SNIP> *LANGUAGE* and <SNIP> SPEECH OF COMPULSION <SNIP>
embedded within the subject title.
Additionally it was designed to *COMPEL* *YOU* *TO* *SEEK* *AN*
*EXPLANATION* <SNIP> *to* *unfold* *the* *meaning* *of* *what*
*is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
*THUS* *THERE* *ARE* *THREE* *ETHEREAL* *REFERENCES* *TO* *LANGUAGE*
*AND* *OF* *PERFECTION* *WITHIN* *THE* *TITLE* *SO* *THEN* *IT* *IS
*PERFECTLY* *SUITED*
Your explanation fails to address the ambiguity and errors in your
sentence which rendered it meaningless. Your explanation is slightly
clearer than the original (once I SNIPped out the numerology) but it
still fails to convey any comprehensible meaning.
<SNIP BIBLE QUOTES>
<SNIP REPEATED NONSENSE>
for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues,
except- he interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5,
#400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}, that the church may
receive edifying." [1Corinthians 14:5]
"Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may
interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10]
= diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:13]
"If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most
by three, and that by course; and let one interpret {#640 as [#4, #10,
interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:27]
If you don't mind I'm deploying a meta-physical dialectic which is more
"Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull {#598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out
the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?"
[Matthew 7:4]
"Thou hypocrite, first cast {#598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8,
#200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out the beam out of
thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast {#598 as [#5,
cast} out the mote out of thy brother's eye." [Matthew 7:5]
[IS, THERE, TO, BE, FOUND, A, LANGUAGE, OF, PERFECTION, RATHER, THAN,
ONLY, CENSOR, SCORN, AND, PREJUDICED, DISDAIN]
And the answer is YES there is both #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #1, #10] = *PANEGYRICAL* {ie. a public speech or published text in
praise of someone or something} *LANGUAGE* and #598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = SPEECH OF COMPULSION {ie.
*to* *compel* *one* *to* *depart*} embedded within the subject title.
Additionally it was designed to *COMPEL* *YOU* *TO* *SEEK* *AN*
*EXPLANATION*: #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8,
#10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold* *the* *meaning* *of* *what*
*is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
*THUS* *THERE* *ARE* *THREE* *ETHEREAL* *REFERENCES* *TO* *LANGUAGE*
*AND* *OF* *PERFECTION* *WITHIN* *THE* *TITLE* *SO* *THEN* *IT* *IS
*PERFECTLY* *SUITED*
#598 as [#80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #1, #200] =
paliggenesia (G3824): {UMBRA: #21 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1d) the signal
and glorious change of all things (in heaven and earth) for the better,
that restoration of the primal and *perfect* condition of things which
existed before the fall of our first parents, which the Jews looked for
in connection with the advent of the Messiah, and which Christians
expected in connection with the visible return of Jesus from heaven;
"And I am sure that, when I come unto you, I shall come in the fulness
of the blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing} of the gospel of Christ." [Romans 15:29]
"For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own
belly; and by good words and fair {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10,
#1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} speeches {#529 as [#5, #400, #30,
#70, #3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} deceive the hearts
of the simple." [Romans 16:18]
"And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the
earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I
saying, Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto
him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever."
[Revelation 5:13]
"Saying, Amen: Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10]
= eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving,
and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever.
Amen." [Revelation 7:12]
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 23 (#60); Ego: 65 (#93),
@3: Sup: 78 (#138); Ego: 17 (#110),
@4: Sup: 6 (#144); Ego: 7 (#117),
@5: Sup: 23 (#167); Ego: 15 (#132),
@6: Sup: 24 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 1 (#133),
@7: Sup: 44 (#235); Ego: 77 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
@8: Sup: 8 (#243); Ego: 66 (#276),
@9: Sup: 16 (#259); Ego: 12 (#288),
@10: Sup: 27 (#286); Ego: 70 (#358),
@11: Sup: 10 (#296); Ego: 16 (#374),
@12: Sup: 73 (#369); Ego: 30 (#404),
@13: Sup: 44 (#413); Ego: 65 (#469),
@14: Sup: 32 (#445); Ego: 60 (#529 ***), // #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70,
#3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia MEANING: 1) praise, laudation, panegyric: of
Christ or God; 2) *fine* *discourse*, *polished* *language*;
@15: Sup: 59 (#504); Ego: 55 (#584),
@16: Sup: 78 (#582); Ego: 14 (#598 ***), // #598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30,
#8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo MEANING: *to* *compel*
*one* *to* *depart*; *to* *bid* *one* *depart*, *in* *stern* *though*
*not* *violent* *language*;
@17: Sup: 58 (#640 ***); Ego: 15 (#613), // #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100,
#40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold*
*the* *meaning* *of* *what* *is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
Male: #640; Feme: #613
}
<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,640}&idea:{f,613}>
SUBJECT WAS: I would like to find meaningful sentences instead of
insufferable gibberish
On 28/8/18 6:35 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul
Post by dolf
<SNIP idiotic top-posting>
Post by dolf
Ought we not rather consider prerequisite the mechanics of perfection as
determinant of exemplar rather than of it as a declarative finalidade
conceding a minuscule contextualisation of proficiency within a plethora of
opportunity.
If you can't express your idea in clear, simple terms that all can
understand, it means your idea is crap.
— IS THERE TO BE FOUND A LANGUAGE OF PERFECTION RATHER THAN ONLY CENSOR
SCORN AND PREJUDICED DISDAIN?
"Is there to be found" - what do you mean? Are you finding something, am
I, or is somebody else?
"rather than" is a coordinating adverb of comparison. Because you've
started off with the passive voice, and because you've allowed ambiguity
to creep in (what is being coordinated here? The verb "found", or the
noun "language"?) you've ended up hopelessly confused about what form of
words you should be using on the other side, AND you've made it even
worse by using your usual catalogue technique, BUT your catalogue
consists of a verb (in the wrong form), an ambiguous noun/verb, and a
noun, thus exacerbating the chaos of ambiguity and ultimately causing
your sentence to descend into gibberish.
Quite simply, this is not how to construct a sentence.
for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues,
except- he interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5,
#400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}, that the church may
receive edifying." [1Corinthians 14:5]
"Wherefore let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that he may
interpret {#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10]
= diermeneuo (G1329): interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:13]
"If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most
by three, and that by course; and let one interpret {#640 as [#4, #10,
interpret}." [1Corinthians 14:27]
If you don't mind I'm deploying a meta-physical dialectic which is more
"Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull {#598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out
the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?"
[Matthew 7:4]
"Thou hypocrite, first cast {#598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8,
#200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo (G1544): cast} out the beam out of
thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast {#598 as [#5,
cast} out the mote out of thy brother's eye." [Matthew 7:5]
[IS, THERE, TO, BE, FOUND, A, LANGUAGE, OF, PERFECTION, RATHER, THAN,
ONLY, CENSOR, SCORN, AND, PREJUDICED, DISDAIN]
And the answer is YES there is both #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #1, #10] = *PANEGYRICAL* {ie. a public speech or published text in
praise of someone or something} *LANGUAGE* and #598 as [#5, #20, #2,
#30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = SPEECH OF COMPULSION {ie.
*to* *compel* *one* *to* *depart*} embedded within the subject title.
Additionally it was designed to *COMPEL* *YOU* *TO* *SEEK* *AN*
*EXPLANATION*: #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8,
#10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold* *the* *meaning* *of* *what*
*is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
*THUS* *THERE* *ARE* *THREE* *ETHEREAL* *REFERENCES* *TO* *LANGUAGE*
*AND* *OF* *PERFECTION* *WITHIN* *THE* *TITLE* *SO* *THEN* *IT* *IS
*PERFECTLY* *SUITED*
#598 as [#80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #1, #200] =
paliggenesia (G3824): {UMBRA: #21 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1d) the signal
and glorious change of all things (in heaven and earth) for the better,
that restoration of the primal and *perfect* condition of things which
existed before the fall of our first parents, which the Jews looked for
in connection with the advent of the Messiah, and which Christians
expected in connection with the visible return of Jesus from heaven;
"And I am sure that, when I come unto you, I shall come in the fulness
of the blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing} of the gospel of Christ." [Romans 15:29]
"For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own
belly; and by good words and fair {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10,
#1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} speeches {#529 as [#5, #400, #30,
#70, #3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia (G2129): blessing} deceive the hearts
of the simple." [Romans 16:18]
"And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the
earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I
saying, Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10] =
eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto
him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever."
[Revelation 5:13]
"Saying, Amen: Blessing {#529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70, #3, #10, #1, #10]
= eulogia (G2129): blessing}, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving,
and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever.
Amen." [Revelation 7:12]
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 23 (#60); Ego: 65 (#93),
@3: Sup: 78 (#138); Ego: 17 (#110),
@4: Sup: 6 (#144); Ego: 7 (#117),
@5: Sup: 23 (#167); Ego: 15 (#132),
@6: Sup: 24 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 1 (#133),
@7: Sup: 44 (#235); Ego: 77 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
@8: Sup: 8 (#243); Ego: 66 (#276),
@9: Sup: 16 (#259); Ego: 12 (#288),
@10: Sup: 27 (#286); Ego: 70 (#358),
@11: Sup: 10 (#296); Ego: 16 (#374),
@12: Sup: 73 (#369); Ego: 30 (#404),
@13: Sup: 44 (#413); Ego: 65 (#469),
@14: Sup: 32 (#445); Ego: 60 (#529 ***), // #529 as [#5, #400, #30, #70,
#3, #10, #1, #10] = eulogia MEANING: 1) praise, laudation, panegyric: of
Christ or God; 2) *fine* *discourse*, *polished* *language*;
@15: Sup: 59 (#504); Ego: 55 (#584),
@16: Sup: 78 (#582); Ego: 14 (#598 ***), // #598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30,
#8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] = ekballo MEANING: *to* *compel*
*one* *to* *depart*; *to* *bid* *one* *depart*, *in* *stern* *though*
*not* *violent* *language*;
@17: Sup: 58 (#640 ***); Ego: 15 (#613), // #640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100,
#40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] = diermeneuo MEANING: 1) *to* *unfold*
*the* *meaning* *of* *what* *is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*;
Male: #640; Feme: #613
}
<http://www.grapple369.com?idea:{m,640}&idea:{f,613}>
EGO (FEMALE) Y-M-T-A HOMOIOS THEORY ON NUMBER IDEA: {OUTER: #43 -
Absolute Negation, It's Universal Application; I-Ching: H50 - The
Cauldron, Holding; Tetra: 44 - Stove / INNER: #37 - Non-Deeming Action,
Government Administration; I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance,
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 81 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 76 (#81),
@3: Sup: 30 (#116); Ego: 30 (#111),
@4: Sup: 19 (#135); Ego: 70 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
@5: Sup: 22 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 3 (#184 - I PUT NO
CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36}),
@6: Sup: 32 (#189); Ego: 10 (#194),
@7: Sup: 33 (#222); Ego: 1 (#195),
@8: Sup: 43 (#265); Ego: 10 (#205),
Male: #265; Feme: #205
} // #529
UMBRA: #529 % #41 = #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release;
THOTH MEASURE: #37 - Oh Striker, who makest thine appearance in Heaven;
I am not one of loud voice.
#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject’s preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
#CANON: #196
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 37 (#37),
@2: Sup: 33 (#70); Ego: 77 (#114),
@3: Sup: 47 (#117); Ego: 14 (#128),
@4: Sup: 34 (#151); Ego: 68 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
Male: #151; Feme: #196
} // #196
{UMBRA: #37 as #529 % #41 = #37} 1) praise, laudation, panegyric: of
Christ or God; 2) *fine* *discourse*, *polished* *language*; 3) an
invocation of blessing, benediction; 4) consecration; 5) a (concrete)
blessing, benefit; 2a) in a bad sense, *language* *artfully* *adapted*
*to* *captivate* *the* *hearer*: *fair* *speaking*, *fine* *speeches*;
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 25 (#30); Ego: 20 (#25),
@3: Sup: 27 (#57); Ego: 2 (#27),
@4: Sup: 57 (#114); Ego: 30 (#57),
@5: Sup: 65 (#179); Ego: 8 (#65),
@6: Sup: 74 (#253); Ego: 9 (#74),
@7: Sup: 1 (#254); Ego: 8 (#82),
@8: Sup: 39 (#293); Ego: 38 (#120),
@9: Sup: 44 (#337); Ego: 5 (#125),
@10: Sup: 20 (#357); Ego: 57 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@11: Sup: 21 (#378); Ego: 1 (#183),
@12: Sup: 31 (#409); Ego: 10 (#193),
Male: #409; Feme: #193
} // #598
UMBRA: #598 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
I lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.
#VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
#TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
#POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
#TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
#CANON: #181
@1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
@3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
@4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181
#598 as [#5, #20, #2, #30, #8, #9, #8, #200, #5, #300, #1, #10] =
ekballo (G1544): {UMBRA: #16 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1) to cast out, drive
out, to send out; 1a) with notion of violence; 1a1) to drive out (cast
out); 1a2) to cast out; 1a2a) of the world, i.e. be deprived of the
power and influence he exercises in the world; 1a2b) a thing: excrement
from the belly into the sink; 1a3) to expel a person from a society: to
banish from a family; 1a4) *to* *compel* *one* *to* *depart*; *to* *bid*
*one* *depart*, *in* *stern* *though* *not* *violent* *language*; 1a5)
so employed that the rapid motion of the one going is transferred to the
one sending forth; 1a51) to command or cause one to depart in haste;
1a6) to draw out with force, tear out; 1a7) with implication of force
overcoming opposite force; 1a7a) to cause a thing to move straight on
its intended goal; 1a8) to reject with contempt, to cast off or away;
1b) without the notion of violence; 1b1) to draw out, extract, one thing
inserted in another; 1b2) to bring out of, to draw or bring forth; 1b3)
to except, to leave out, i.e. not receive; 1b4) to lead one forth or
away somewhere with a force which he cannot resist;
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 30 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 30 (#111),
@4: Sup: 40 (#231); Ego: 10 (#121),
@5: Sup: 43 (#274); Ego: 3 (#124),
@6: Sup: 46 (#320); Ego: 3 (#127),
@7: Sup: 51 (#371); Ego: 5 (#132),
@8: Sup: 20 (#391); Ego: 50 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@9: Sup: 25 (#416); Ego: 5 (#187),
@10: Sup: 63 (#479); Ego: 38 (#225),
@11: Sup: 73 (#552); Ego: 10 (#235),
@12: Sup: 74 (#626); Ego: 1 (#236),
@13: Sup: 31 (#657); Ego: 38 (#274),
Male: #657; Feme: #274
} // #598
#598 as [#80, #1, #30, #10, #3, #3, #5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #1, #200] =
paliggenesia (G3824): {UMBRA: #21 as #598 % #41 = #24} 1) new birth,
reproduction, renewal, recreation, regeneration; 1a) hence renovation,
regeneration, the production of a new life consecrated to God, a radical
change of mind for the better. The word often used to denote the
restoration of a thing to its pristine state, its renovation, as a
renewal or restoration of life after death; 1b) the renovation of the
earth after the deluge; 1c) the renewal of the world to take place after
its destruction by fire, as the Stoics taught; 1d) the signal and
glorious change of all things (in heaven and earth) for the better, that
restoration of the primal and *perfect* condition of things which
existed before the fall of our first parents, which the Jews looked for
in connection with the advent of the Messiah, and which Christians
expected in connection with the visible return of Jesus from heaven.;
1e) other uses; 1e1) of Cicero's restoration to rank and fortune on his
recall from exile; 1e2) of the restoration of the Jewish nation after
exile; 1e3) of the recovery of knowledge by recollection;
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 19 (#37); Ego: 5 (#19),
@4: Sup: 38 (#75); Ego: 19 (#38),
@5: Sup: 78 (#153); Ego: 40 (#78),
@6: Sup: 5 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 8 (#86 - I AM
NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@7: Sup: 55 (#213); Ego: 50 (#136),
@8: Sup: 60 (#273); Ego: 5 (#141),
@9: Sup: 55 (#328); Ego: 76 (#217),
@10: Sup: 63 (#391); Ego: 8 (#225),
@11: Sup: 73 (#464); Ego: 10 (#235),
Male: #464; Feme: #235
} // #640
UMBRA: #640 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
Distortion;
THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; I am not boisterous in behaviour.
#VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
#TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
#TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
#CANON: #185
@1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
@2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
@3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
@4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
Male: #108; Feme: #185
} // #185
#640 as [#4, #10, #5, #100, #40, #8, #50, #5, #400, #8, #10] =
diermeneuo (G1329): {UMBRA: #51 as #640 % #41 = #25} 1) *to* *unfold*
*the* *meaning* *of* *what* *is* *said*, *explain*, *expound*; 2) to
translate into one's native language;
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-30 02:13:59 UTC
Permalink
— TREASON: NECESSITY {OBEDIENT: BREACHES OF PROBITY / DECORUM},
NORMATIVITY {AIDING: JUDICIAL DISCRETION ON PENALTY} AND APRIORITY
{ASSISTING: SECTION VIII COMPLIANCE ON DEATH PENALTY PROSCRIPTIONS}

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 30 August, 2018

That SOVEREIGNTY can also be viewed as being a metaphysical
philosophical derivation of moral or morality which is notionally a
DECOROUS DEMUR (E) where the PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC has an ONTOLOGICAL
REALITY which arbitrarily may have embodiment and is therefore a
normative presence of *ONTIC* necessity as then the factuality of being
so without being so.

It is not a personality but similarly has an opulent quality of a
tempered integrity from which all imperfection is dispelled: How else
can the monarchal French President occupy the Palace of Versailles?

YOUTUBE: "Let Them Eat Cake - The Pox"



Emmanuel Macron, increasingly compared with Louis XIV, on 10 July 2017
addressed both houses of parliament in a rare session at the Sun King’s
palace in Versailles. Where France’s popular new centrist president
charted his government’s course and set priorities at the joint session
of Congress — consisting of the National Assembly and the Senate.

'It is important that he [Macron] sets a direction,' said the spokesman.

The French media often refer to Mr Macron as 'Jupiter', the king {#34}
of the Roman deities and one of the names used by Louis XIV, who moved
the seat of power to Versailles in 1682.

Morale which is imbued from this transcendent principle, also known as
esprit de corps, is the capacity of a group's members to maintain belief
within the dictums of NECESSITY {LIBERTÉ}, NORMATIVITY {ÉGALITÉ} AND
APRIORITY {FRATERNITÉ} AS A CONTINGENT {OU LA MORT} REALITY RATHER THAN
A CONTINGENCY OF EXPEDIENCY.

The implied meaning is that there is no terrestrial king of all
humanity, you as a person have the ontological egalitarian entitlement
to your own body, life and destiny which is known as the rights of man
that is often quantified by a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE which is enamoured
as an institution or goal, particularly in the face of opposition or
hardship. Morale is often referenced by authority figures as a generic
value judgment of the willpower, obedience, and self-discipline of a
group tasked with performing duties assigned by a superior.

To those ends, we are building a capacity so as to propose the prudent
argument whereby criminal acts accompanying public slander as BOER /
ANZAC defamation may be viewed within the quantitative context of a
hedonism as pestilent and indolent lifestyle having a self bestowed
prerogative entitlement as an immutability of being which is ostensibly
obstinate ignorance facilitated by a delusional mind characteristic of
psychosis.

In terms of fiscal consequences, we see a greater benefit in the
circumstance that the resolution to this dilemma is not a bestowal of a
lengthy prison term as decadent outcome that is consequential to
protracted and torturous justice facilitated by an economy of the State
as sponsored legal aid which is accorded to persons whom have
categorically no intention in having any accountability for the *ONTIC*
necessity as the factuality of their actions being so.

Accordingly we are going to make an exemplar of those persons as a
cautionary action made against the predilection of others whom similarly
mistakenly believe in such viability of obstinate will as an alternative
ontological experience which is entirely absent or feigns any *DUTY* or
concern for civil regard as respect for the law.

By way of a non prejudiced example is the situational context as haughty
Islamic practice in refusing to stand before judicial officials and
judges exercising their powers and authority under the auspices of DIEU
ET MON DROIT as which according to my sensibilities is more adequately
addressed by a non contradictory and resolute penalty, an ex-judiciary
authority provisioned in the motherhood watch-care of ontological
principles which is prudently exercised by the office of GOVERNOR GENERAL.

Categorically such obstinate and adamant will as misnomered pretext to
piety ought not exist within the Federation as Commonwealth of Australia.

And under the auspices as gravitas of any indictment for TREASON then
proscribe as necessity a normative descriptive penalty as equivalent to
eradication of vermin by means of the apriority power and authority
accorded by prerogative of LETTERS PATENT, and furthermore that any
substantial costs of exorbitant corrective services such as imprisonment
which has no viability within the circumstance of a more direct penalty,
is then properly apportioned towards invigorating programs which
addresses indigenous disadvantage, their societal declension and
disenfranchised autonomy.

2.4 THE CENTRAL ARGUMENT IN THE PREFACE
In the central passage of the Preface on the indispensability of a pure
moral philosophy, Kant does not simply presuppose that from the
“*ABSOLUTE* *NECESSITY*” (GMS, 389,13) of moral laws the apriority of
moral philosophy follows. Rather he delivers a detailed, even if
difficult, line of argumentation. First of all, he announces his aim of
argumentation and designates his point of departure: “THAT IT IS OF THE
UTMOST NECESSITY TO WORK OUT ONCE A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” or “THAT
THERE MUST BE SUCH IS SELF--EVIDENT FROM THE COMMON IDEA OF DUTY AND OF
THE MORAL LAWS" (GMS, 389,7-11). The aim of his argumentation,
therefore, is the proof go the apriority of moral philosophy:

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. {#1 - MENTALISM}
I HEAR THE CLARION. {#2 - CORRESPONDENCE}
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. {#3 - VIBRATION}

STEADFAST MIGHT. {#4 - POLARITY}
MARCHING TO SION. {#5 - RHYTHM}
AGAINST THIS WHORE. {#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT}
ARREST THE BLIGHT." {#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE}

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

#2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2
- Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents}
/ #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

#3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson,
child, member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c)
children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young
(of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation)
(pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A*
*MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

#4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]

#5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
#287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO
ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

G316@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
@4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
@5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
@6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
@7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
@9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition:
VOLUNTĀTIS]

#1 - unwillingness
#2 - ill will, negative disposition (toward something) [LATIN
definition: NOLUNTĀTIS]

*VOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin voluntās f (genitive voluntātis).
- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
as mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
the natural world.

*NOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin nōluntās f (genitive nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
natural world.
- Robert Fludd was born at Milgate House, Bearsted and was the son of
Sir Thomas Fludd, a high-ranking governmental official (Queen Elizabeth
I's treasurer for war in Europe), and Member of Parliament.

} And his point of departure for the argumentation lies in the analysis
of our concept of *DUTY* or of our “idea” of moral laws. How can the
individual steps {ie. #41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your
parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against
autonomy ... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear no false witness ...
#287 - Covet Not ... #328 ... #369} of this very dense argumentation be
distinguished from each other and ordered?

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1)
a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT”
(GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is,
in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: #260) ...
#34 (@7: #175) ...
#65 (@2: #34) ...
#111 (@3: #65) ...
#175 (@4: #369) ...
#260 (@8: #111) ...
#369 (@9: #15)

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable. First of all, it will
become clear that in the passage of the text an argumentative
progression takes place from the givenness of a modal quality to the
proof of an epistemological quality distinguished from it. And secondly,
an argument not implausible even from a contemporary Viewpoint comes to
light for the intermediate thesis (1). For, as shown above, it is the
task of an ethical principle to guide our valuations even in the case of
counterfactual considerations. If this is correct, then an analysis of
our concept of morality can help bring to light the modal status that is
responsible for the capacity of meeting this task. The argumentative
progression from the point of departure to thesis (1), therefore,
appears well-motivated. Through the analysis of our concept of morality
we find that moral laws also apply to counterfactual situations, that
they consequently exhibit the modal status of necessity.

Kant distinguishes at this point between moral laws and moral duties.
From a moral law (“THE GROUND OF AN OBLIGATION”: GMS, 389,12) arises a
moral duty (“OBLIGATION”) to which our actions have to conform. As an
example of an obligation, Kant names “THE COMMAND 'YOU OUGHT NOT TO
LIE'” (GMS, 389,13 f.). It is interesting to observe that Kant ascribes
the decisive “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY” not to the duty, but rather to the law
{ie. IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial / bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER}
that is foundational to the duty. This, too, serves as an indication
that the term necessity is to be understood as a modal expression {@1,
@5, @6, @7, @2, @3, @4, @8, @9} and not in the sense of “NORMATIVITY” or
“PRESCRIPTIVITY.” Otherwise Kant would speak of the necessity of an
action instead of
the necessity of the law foundational for obligation.

The point of departure, “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY,” may be read therefore as a
modal status {#41 ... #82 ... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287
... #328 ... #369} of moral principles. How, then, are the other
intermediate steps to be understood? The basis in the text is extremely
narrow. One possibility of outlining the continued line of argumentatlon
is as follows:

In the next step, Kant seems to refer to a counterfactual thought
experiment. Among the counterfactual situations to which duties are
attributed are those in which not humans but other imaginable rational
beings have the possibility of acting. In such a thought experiment, we
imagine a world in which there are other beings capable of action.
Since the moral laws accepted by us first of all contain the modal
status of necessity — that is, they apply to all possible worlds — and
secondly, involve a proposition about all actions, it is to be concluded
that even those actions of these merely imagined rational beings fall
under these laws. The second intermediate thesis, therefore, states that
(2) the *DUTIES* arising from the moral laws are also relevant for the
action of these merely imagined rational beings. In Kant’s terms:
“EVERYONE MUST ADMIT THAT [...] THE COMMAND ‘YOU OUGHT NOT TO LIE’ IS
VALID NOT MERELY FOR HUMAN BEINGS, AS THOUGH OTHER RATIONAL BEINGS DID
NOT HAVE TO HEED IT” (GMS, 389,11-15).

At this juncture the decisive transition from necessity to apriority
takes place. Since the applicability of obligation is valid for all
imaginable rational beings, the cognition of these obligations or the
laws that are responsible for them cannot depend on contingent features
that arise from the fact that the thought experiment involves different
rational beings. The laws, therefore, may solely depend on
characteristics that all rational beings capable of action have in
common. What all imaginable rational beings have in common, however, is
solely the characteristic of being rational beings. Every other
characteristic is contingent. The cognition of laws cannot depend,
therefore, upon the empirical cognition of these contingent features.
Kant seems to assume that a cognition contains the characteristic of
apriority if it is not dependent upon empirical perceptions.
Consequently, according to the next intermediate thesis (3), the
cognition of moral laws must be a priori. Kant himself expresses this
decisive intermediate conclusion in the following terms: Among the
things to which everyone must admit is the fact that “THE GROUND OF AN
OBLIGATION,” that is, the moral law, “IS TO BE SOUGHT NOT IN THE NATURE
OF THE HUMAN BEING OR THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE WORLD IN WHICH HE IS
PLACED, BUT A PRIORI SOLELY IN CONCEPTS OF PURE REASON” (GMS, 389,16-19).

At the beginning of the ensuing paragraph, Kant reiterates this
intermediate conclusion: “THUS [...] ARE MORAL LAWS TOGETHER WITH THEIR
PRINCIPLES ESSENTIALLY DISTINGUISHED [...] FROM EVERYTHING ELSE IN WHICH
THERE IS ANYTHING EMPIRICAL” (GMS, 389,24-26). And he continues with his
last step of argumentation, which leads him to the concluding thesis (4)
that there has to be a pure moral philosophy. This step constituted
simply by the consequences drawn from the epistemological status of
moral laws for the construction of philosophical theories. If moral
laws can only be known a priori, then moral theory must have a
foundational part that proceeds purely a priori, that is, without
reference to anything empirical. In Kant’s words, “ALL MORAL PHILOSOPHY
RESTS ENTIRELY ON ITS PURE PART, AND WHEN APPLIED TO THE HUMAN BEING IT
BORROWS NOT THE LEAST BIT FROM KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HIM (ANTHROPOLOGY)” (GMS,
389,26-29).

This is one of the possible approaches for a systematic reconstruction
of the central argument in the Preface. Unfortunately, Kant offers very
few suggestions of how he can assume that the thesis that there has to
be a pure moral philosophy is self-evident. Consequently, much
interpretation is required. And much of the interpretive work revolves
around which systematic concept of necessity is implemented in the
interpretation. The interpretation presented here bases itself upon a
purely modal-logical concept of necessity, which entails neither an
epistemological meaning nor an equivalence of “NORMATIVITY” or
“PRESCRIPTIVITY.” If one chooses other systematic basic concepts, the
structure of argumentation also has to be interpreted in other ways.
However as noted a somewhat different interpretation is suggested by
SCHÖNECKER/WOOD whom see the [*ONTIC*] 'necessity' of moral laws
primarily as their CATEGORICAL character. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 12-15]

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 30 August 2018

#OPULENCE #DECORUS #DEMURE #SOVEREIGNTY
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-30 02:52:21 UTC
Permalink
— TREASON: NECESSITY {OBEDIENT: BREACHES OF PROBITY / DECORUM},
NORMATIVITY {AIDING: JUDICIAL DISCRETION ON PENALTY} AND APRIORITY
{ASSISTING: SECTION VIII COMPLIANCE ON DEATH PENALTY PROSCRIPTIONS}

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 30 August, 2018

That SOVEREIGNTY can also be viewed as being a metaphysical
philosophical derivation of moral or morality which is notionally a
DECOROUS DEMUR (E) where the PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC has an ONTOLOGICAL
REALITY which arbitrarily may have embodiment and is therefore a
normative presence of *ONTIC* necessity as then the factuality of being
so without being so.

It is not a personality but similarly has an opulent quality of a
tempered integrity from which all imperfection is dispelled: How else
can the monarchal French President occupy the Palace of Versailles?

YOUTUBE: "Let Them Eat Cake - The Pox"

http://youtu.be/0LCzi5kaAmE

Emmanuel Macron, increasingly compared with Louis XIV, on 10 July 2017
addressed both houses of parliament in a rare session at the Sun King’s
palace in Versailles. Where France’s popular new centrist president
charted his government’s course and set priorities at the joint session
of Congress — consisting of the National Assembly and the Senate.

'It is important that he [Macron] sets a direction,' said the spokesman.

The French media often refer to Mr Macron as 'Jupiter', the king {#34}
of the Roman deities and one of the names used by Louis XIV, who moved
the seat of power to Versailles in 1682.

Morale which is imbued from this transcendent principle, also known as
esprit de corps, is the capacity of a group's members to maintain belief
within the dictums of NECESSITY {LIBERTÉ}, NORMATIVITY {ÉGALITÉ} AND
APRIORITY {FRATERNITÉ} AS A CONTINGENT {OU LA MORT} REALITY RATHER THAN
A CONTINGENCY OF EXPEDIENCY.

The implied meaning is that there is no terrestrial king of all
humanity, you as a person have the ontological egalitarian entitlement
to your own body, life and destiny which is known as the rights of man
that is often quantified by a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE which is enamoured
as an institution or goal, particularly in the face of opposition or
hardship. Morale is often referenced by authority figures as a generic
value judgment of the willpower, obedience, and self-discipline of a
group tasked with performing duties assigned by a superior.

To those ends, we are building a capacity so as to propose the prudent
argument whereby criminal acts accompanying public slander as BOER /
ANZAC defamation may be viewed within the quantitative context of a
hedonism as pestilent and indolent lifestyle having a self bestowed
prerogative entitlement as an immutability of being which is ostensibly
obstinate ignorance facilitated by a delusional mind characteristic of
psychosis.

In terms of fiscal consequences, we see a greater benefit in the
circumstance that the resolution to this dilemma is not a bestowal of a
lengthy prison term as decadent outcome that is consequential to
protracted and torturous justice facilitated by an economy of the State
as sponsored legal aid which is accorded to persons whom have
categorically no intention in having any accountability for the *ONTIC*
necessity as the factuality of their actions being so.

Accordingly we are going to make an exemplar of those persons as a
cautionary action made against the predilection of others whom similarly
mistakenly believe in such viability of obstinate will as an alternative
ontological experience which is entirely absent or feigns any *DUTY* or
concern for civil regard as respect for the law.

By way of a non prejudiced example is the situational context as haughty
Islamic practice in refusing to stand before judicial officials and
judges exercising their powers and authority under the auspices of DIEU
ET MON DROIT as which according to my sensibilities is more adequately
addressed by a non contradictory and resolute penalty, an ex-judiciary
authority provisioned in the motherhood watch-care of ontological
principles which is prudently exercised by the office of GOVERNOR GENERAL.

Categorically such obstinate and adamant will as misnomered pretext to
piety ought not exist within the Federation as Commonwealth of Australia.

And under the auspices as gravitas of any indictment for TREASON then
proscribe as necessity a normative descriptive penalty as equivalent to
eradication of vermin by means of the apriority power and authority
accorded by prerogative of LETTERS PATENT, and furthermore that any
substantial costs of exorbitant corrective services such as imprisonment
which has no viability within the circumstance of a more direct penalty,
is then properly apportioned towards invigorating programs which
addresses indigenous disadvantage, their societal declension and
disenfranchised autonomy.

2.4 THE CENTRAL ARGUMENT IN THE PREFACE
In the central passage of the Preface on the indispensability of a pure
moral philosophy, Kant does not simply presuppose that from the
“*ABSOLUTE* *NECESSITY*” (GMS, 389,13) of moral laws the apriority of
moral philosophy follows. Rather he delivers a detailed, even if
difficult, line of argumentation. First of all, he announces his aim of
argumentation and designates his point of departure: “THAT IT IS OF THE
UTMOST NECESSITY TO WORK OUT ONCE A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” or “THAT
THERE MUST BE SUCH IS SELF--EVIDENT FROM THE COMMON IDEA OF DUTY AND OF
THE MORAL LAWS" (GMS, 389,7-11). The aim of his argumentation,
therefore, is the proof go the apriority of moral philosophy:

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. {#1 - MENTALISM}
I HEAR THE CLARION. {#2 - CORRESPONDENCE}
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. {#3 - VIBRATION}

STEADFAST MIGHT. {#4 - POLARITY}
MARCHING TO SION. {#5 - RHYTHM}
AGAINST THIS WHORE. {#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT}
ARREST THE BLIGHT." {#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE}

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

#2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2
- Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents}
/ #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

#3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson,
child, member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c)
children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young
(of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation)
(pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A*
*MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

#4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]

#5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
#287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO
ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

G316@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
@4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
@5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
@6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
@7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
@9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition:
VOLUNTĀTIS]

#1 - unwillingness
#2 - ill will, negative disposition (toward something) [LATIN
definition: NOLUNTĀTIS]

*VOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin voluntās f (genitive voluntātis).
- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
as mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
the natural world.

*NOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin nōluntās f (genitive nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
natural world.
- Robert Fludd was born at Milgate House, Bearsted and was the son of
Sir Thomas Fludd, a high-ranking governmental official (Queen Elizabeth
I's treasurer for war in Europe), and Member of Parliament.

} And his point of departure for the argumentation lies in the analysis
of our concept of *DUTY* or of our “idea” of moral laws. How can the
individual steps {ie. #41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your
parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against
autonomy ... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear no false witness ...
#287 - Covet Not ... #328 ... #369} of this very dense argumentation be
distinguished from each other and ordered?

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1)
a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT”
(GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is,
in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: #260) ...
#34 (@7: #175) ...
#65 (@2: #34) ...
#111 (@3: #65) ...
#175 (@4: #369) ...
#260 (@8: #111) ...
#369 (@9: #15)

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable. First of all, it will
become clear that in the passage of the text an argumentative
progression takes place from the givenness of a modal quality to the
proof of an epistemological quality distinguished from it. And secondly,
an argument not implausible even from a contemporary Viewpoint comes to
light for the intermediate thesis (1). For, as shown above, it is the
task of an ethical principle to guide our valuations even in the case of
counterfactual considerations. If this is correct, then an analysis of
our concept of morality can help bring to light the modal status that is
responsible for the capacity of meeting this task. The argumentative
progression from the point of departure to thesis (1), therefore,
appears well-motivated. Through the analysis of our concept of morality
we find that moral laws also apply to counterfactual situations, that
they consequently exhibit the modal status of necessity.

Kant distinguishes at this point between moral laws and moral duties.
From a moral law (“THE GROUND OF AN OBLIGATION”: GMS, 389,12) arises a
moral duty (“OBLIGATION”) to which our actions have to conform. As an
example of an obligation, Kant names “THE COMMAND '*YOU* *OUGHT* *NOT*
*TO* *LIE*'” (GMS, 389,13 f.). It is interesting to observe that Kant
ascribes the decisive “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY” not to the duty, but rather
to the law {ie. IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial / bifurcated) THEORY
OF NUMBER} that is foundational to the duty. This, too, serves as an
indication that the term necessity is to be understood as a modal
expression {@1, @5, @6, @7, @2, @3, @4, @8, @9} and not in the sense of
“NORMATIVITY” or “PRESCRIPTIVITY.” Otherwise Kant would speak of the
necessity of an action instead of the necessity of the law foundational
for obligation.

The point of departure, “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY,” may be read therefore as a
modal status {#41 ... #82 ... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287
... #328 ... #369} of moral principles. How, then, are the other
intermediate steps to be understood? The basis in the text is extremely
narrow. One possibility of outlining the continued line of argumentation
is as follows:

In the next step, Kant seems to refer to a counterfactual thought
experiment. Among the counterfactual situations to which duties are
attributed are those in which not humans but other imaginable rational
beings have the possibility of acting. In such a thought experiment, we
imagine a world in which there are other beings capable of action.
Since the moral laws accepted by us first of all contain the modal
status of necessity — that is, they apply to all possible worlds — and
secondly, involve a proposition about all actions, it is to be concluded
that even those actions of these merely imagined rational beings fall
under these laws. The second intermediate thesis, therefore, states that
(2) the *DUTIES* arising from the moral laws are also relevant for the
action of these merely imagined rational beings. In Kant’s terms:
“EVERYONE MUST ADMIT THAT [...] THE COMMAND ‘*YOU* *OUGHT* *NOT* *TO*
*LIE*’ IS VALID NOT MERELY FOR HUMAN BEINGS, AS THOUGH OTHER RATIONAL
BEINGS DID NOT HAVE TO HEED IT” (GMS, 389,11-15).

— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —

"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT.
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"

YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hotdog Commercial (1977)"



YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hot Dog 1990s Commercial Ad on Beach"



*CANT* (noun):
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious,
or political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded
with disparagement: thieves' cant.

ETHICAL_SPORTS_SELDGE@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
ITS FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,302}&idea:{f,546}>

H7022@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 25 (#31); Ego: 19 (#25),
@3: Sup: 35 (#66); Ego: 10 (#35),
@4: Sup: 54 (#120); Ego: 19 (#54),
@5: Sup: 3 (#123); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@6: Sup: 9 (#132); Ego: 6 (#90),
@7: Sup: 59 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #191; Feme: #140
} // #302

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #296 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA:
#5 as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;

"Thou art filled with shame for glory: drink thou also, and let thy
foreskin be uncovered: the cup of the LORD'S right hand shall be turned
unto thee, and shameful {#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] =
qiyqalown (H7022): shameful} spewing {#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30,
#6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): shameful} shall be on thy glory."
[Habakkuk 2:16 (KJV)]

H4687@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 49 (#89); Ego: 9 (#49),
@3: Sup: 55 (#144); Ego: 6 (#55),
@4: Sup: 50 (#194); Ego: 76 (#131),
@5: Sup: 60 (#254); Ego: 10 (#141),
Male: #254; Feme: #141
} // #546

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #546 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; *I* *HAVE* *NOT* *SLAUGHTERED* *THE* *SACRED* *ANIMALS*.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546
% #41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the
commandment (of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);

"Because that Abraham {FATHER OF A GREAT MULTITUDE} obeyed my voice, and
kept my charge, my commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] =
mitsvah (H4687): commandments}, my statutes, and my laws." [Genesis 26:5
(KJV)]

"And said, If thou wilt diligently hearken to the voice of the LORD thy
God, and wilt do that which is right in his sight, and wilt give ear to
his commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687):
commandments}, and keep all his statutes, I will put none of these
diseases upon thee, which I have brought upon the Egyptians {THAT
TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES; ANGUISH}: for I am the LORD that healeth thee."
[Exodus 15:26 (KJV)]

"And the LORD said unto Moses, How long refuse ye to keep my
commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687):
commandments} and my laws?" [Exodus 16:28 (KJV)]

"And God spake all these words, saying, I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES;
ANGUISH}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any
likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth
beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow
down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a
jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto
the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And showing mercy
unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments {#546 as
[#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): commandments}." [Exodus
20:1-6 (KJV)]

At this juncture the decisive transition from necessity to apriority
takes place. Since the applicability of obligation is valid for all
imaginable rational beings, the cognition of these obligations or the
laws that are responsible for them cannot depend on contingent features
that arise from the fact that the thought experiment involves different
rational beings. The laws, therefore, may solely depend on
characteristics that all rational beings capable of action have in
common. What all imaginable rational beings have in common, however, is
solely the characteristic of being rational beings. Every other
characteristic is contingent. The cognition of laws cannot depend,
therefore, upon the empirical cognition of these contingent features.
Kant seems to assume that a cognition contains the characteristic of
apriority if it is not dependent upon empirical perceptions.
Consequently, according to the next intermediate thesis (3), the
cognition of moral laws must be a priori. Kant himself expresses this
decisive intermediate conclusion in the following terms: Among the
things to which everyone must admit is the fact that “THE GROUND OF AN
OBLIGATION,” that is, the moral law, “IS TO BE SOUGHT NOT IN THE NATURE
OF THE HUMAN BEING OR THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE WORLD IN WHICH HE IS
PLACED, BUT A PRIORI SOLELY IN CONCEPTS OF PURE REASON” (GMS, 389,16-19).

At the beginning of the ensuing paragraph, Kant reiterates this
intermediate conclusion: “THUS [...] ARE MORAL LAWS TOGETHER WITH THEIR
PRINCIPLES ESSENTIALLY DISTINGUISHED [...] FROM EVERYTHING ELSE IN WHICH
THERE IS ANYTHING EMPIRICAL” (GMS, 389,24-26). And he continues with his
last step of argumentation, which leads him to the concluding thesis (4)
that there has to be a pure moral philosophy. This step constituted
simply by the consequences drawn from the epistemological status of
moral laws for the construction of philosophical theories. If moral
laws can only be known a priori, then moral theory must have a
foundational part that proceeds purely a priori, that is, without
reference to anything empirical. In Kant’s words, “ALL MORAL PHILOSOPHY
RESTS ENTIRELY ON ITS PURE PART, AND WHEN APPLIED TO THE HUMAN BEING IT
BORROWS NOT THE LEAST BIT FROM KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HIM (ANTHROPOLOGY)” (GMS,
389,26-29).

This is one of the possible approaches for a systematic reconstruction
of the central argument in the Preface. Unfortunately, Kant offers very
few suggestions of how he can assume that the thesis that there has to
be a pure moral philosophy is self-evident. Consequently, much
interpretation is required. And much of the interpretive work revolves
around which systematic concept of necessity is implemented in the
interpretation. The interpretation presented here bases itself upon a
purely modal-logical concept of necessity, which entails neither an
epistemological meaning nor an equivalence of “NORMATIVITY” or
“PRESCRIPTIVITY.” If one chooses other systematic basic concepts, the
structure of argumentation also has to be interpreted in other ways.
However as noted a somewhat different interpretation is suggested by
SCHÖNECKER/WOOD whom see the [*ONTIC*] 'necessity' of moral laws
primarily as their CATEGORICAL character. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 12-15]

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 30 August 2018

#OPULENCE #DECORUS #DEMURE #SOVEREIGNTY
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-30 04:33:34 UTC
Permalink
— TREASON: NECESSITY {OBEDIENT: BREACHES OF PROBITY / DECORUM},
NORMATIVITY {AIDING: JUDICIAL DISCRETION ON PENALTY} AND APRIORITY
{ASSISTING: SECTION VIII COMPLIANCE ON DEATH PENALTY PROSCRIPTIONS}

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 30 August, 2018

That SOVEREIGNTY can also be viewed as being a metaphysical
philosophical derivation of moral or morality which is notionally a
DECOROUS DEMUR (E) where the PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC has an ONTOLOGICAL
REALITY which arbitrarily may have embodiment and is therefore a
normative presence of *ONTIC* necessity as then the factuality of being
so without being so.

It is not a personality but similarly has an opulent quality of a
tempered integrity from which all imperfection is dispelled: How else
can the monarchal French President occupy the Palace of Versailles?

YOUTUBE: "Let Them Eat Cake - The Pox"

http://youtu.be/0LCzi5kaAmE

Emmanuel Macron, increasingly compared with Louis XIV, on 10 July 2017
addressed both houses of parliament in a rare session at the Sun King’s
palace in Versailles. Where France’s popular new centrist president
charted his government’s course and set priorities at the joint session
of Congress — consisting of the National Assembly and the Senate.

'It is important that he [Macron] sets a direction,' said the spokesman.

The French media often refer to Mr Macron as 'Jupiter', the king {#34}
of the Roman deities and one of the names used by Louis XIV, who moved
the seat of power to Versailles in 1682.

Morale which is imbued from this transcendent principle, also known as
esprit de corps, is the capacity of a group's members to maintain belief
within the dictums of NECESSITY {LIBERTÉ}, NORMATIVITY {ÉGALITÉ} AND
APRIORITY {FRATERNITÉ} AS A CONTINGENT {OU LA MORT} REALITY RATHER THAN
A CONTINGENCY OF EXPEDIENCY.

The implied meaning is that there is no terrestrial king of all
humanity, you as a person have the ontological egalitarian entitlement
to your own body, life and destiny which is known as the rights of man
that is often quantified by a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE which is enamoured
as an institution or goal, particularly in the face of opposition or
hardship. Morale is often referenced by authority figures as a generic
value judgment of the willpower, obedience, and self-discipline of a
group tasked with performing duties assigned by a superior.

To those ends, we are building a capacity so as to propose the prudent
argument whereby criminal acts accompanying public slander as BOER /
ANZAC defamation may be viewed within the quantitative context of a
hedonism as pestilent and indolent lifestyle having a self bestowed
prerogative entitlement as an immutability of being which is ostensibly
obstinate ignorance facilitated by a delusional mind characteristic of
psychosis.

In terms of fiscal consequences, we see a greater benefit in the
circumstance that the resolution to this dilemma is not a bestowal of a
lengthy prison term as decadent outcome that is consequential to
protracted and torturous justice facilitated by an economy of the State
as sponsored legal aid which is accorded to persons whom have
categorically no intention in having any accountability for the *ONTIC*
necessity as the factuality of their actions being so.

Accordingly we are going to make an exemplar of those persons as a
cautionary action made against the predilection of others whom similarly
mistakenly believe in such viability of obstinate will as an alternative
ontological experience which is entirely absent or feigns any *DUTY* or
concern for civil regard as respect for the law.

By way of a non prejudiced example is the situational context as haughty
Islamic practice in refusing to stand before judicial officials and
judges exercising their powers and authority under the auspices of DIEU
ET MON DROIT as which according to my sensibilities is more adequately
addressed by a non contradictory and resolute penalty, an ex-judiciary
authority provisioned in the motherhood watch-care of ontological
principles which is prudently exercised by the office of GOVERNOR GENERAL.

Categorically such obstinate and adamant will as misnomered pretext to
piety ought not exist within the Federation as Commonwealth of Australia.

And under the auspices as gravitas of any indictment for TREASON then
proscribe as necessity a normative descriptive penalty as equivalent to
eradication of vermin by means of the apriority power and authority
accorded by prerogative of LETTERS PATENT, and furthermore that any
substantial costs of exorbitant corrective services such as imprisonment
which has no viability within the circumstance of a more direct penalty,
is then properly apportioned towards invigorating programs which
addresses indigenous disadvantage, their societal declension and
disenfranchised autonomy.

2.4 THE CENTRAL ARGUMENT IN THE PREFACE
In the central passage of the Preface on the indispensability of a pure
moral philosophy, Kant does not simply presuppose that from the
“*ABSOLUTE* *NECESSITY*” (GMS, 389,13) of moral laws the apriority of
moral philosophy follows. Rather he delivers a detailed, even if
difficult, line of argumentation. First of all, he announces his aim of
argumentation and designates his point of departure: “THAT IT IS OF THE
UTMOST NECESSITY TO WORK OUT ONCE A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” or “THAT
THERE MUST BE SUCH IS SELF--EVIDENT FROM THE COMMON IDEA OF DUTY AND OF
THE MORAL LAWS" (GMS, 389,7-11). The aim of his argumentation,
therefore, is the proof go the apriority of moral philosophy:

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. {#1 - MENTALISM}
I HEAR THE CLARION. {#2 - CORRESPONDENCE}
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. {#3 - VIBRATION}
STEADFAST MIGHT. {#4 - POLARITY}
MARCHING TO SION. {#5 - RHYTHM}
AGAINST THIS WHORE. {#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT}
ARREST THE BLIGHT." {#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE}

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

#2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2
- Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents}
/ #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

#3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson,
child, member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c)
children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young
(of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation)
(pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A*
*MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

#4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]

#5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
#287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO
ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

G316@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
@4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
@5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
@6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
@7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
@9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition:
VOLUNTĀTIS]

#1 - unwillingness
#2 - ill will, negative disposition (toward something) [LATIN
definition: NOLUNTĀTIS]

*VOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin voluntās f (genitive voluntātis).
- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
as mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
the natural world.

*NOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin nōluntās f (genitive nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
natural world.
- Robert Fludd was born at Milgate House, Bearsted and was the son of
Sir Thomas Fludd, a high-ranking governmental official (Queen Elizabeth
I's treasurer for war in Europe), and Member of Parliament.

} And his point of departure for the argumentation lies in the analysis
of our concept of *DUTY* or of our “idea” of moral laws. How can the
individual steps {ie. #41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your
parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against
autonomy ... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear no false witness ...
#287 - Covet Not ... #328 ... #369} of this very dense argumentation be
distinguished from each other and ordered?

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1)
a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT”
(GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is,
in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: #260) ...
#34 (@7: #175) ...
#65 (@2: #34) ...
#111 (@3: #65) ...
#175 (@4: #369) ...
#260 (@8: #111) ...
#369 (@9: #15)

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable. First of all, it will
become clear that in the passage of the text an argumentative
progression takes place from the givenness of a modal quality to the
proof of an epistemological quality distinguished from it. And secondly,
an argument not implausible even from a contemporary Viewpoint comes to
light for the intermediate thesis (1). For, as shown above, it is the
task of an ethical principle to guide our valuations even in the case of
counterfactual considerations. If this is correct, then an analysis of
our concept of morality can help bring to light the modal status that is
responsible for the capacity of meeting this task. The argumentative
progression from the point of departure to thesis (1), therefore,
appears well-motivated. Through the analysis of our concept of morality
we find that moral laws also apply to counterfactual situations, that
they consequently exhibit the modal status of necessity.

Kant distinguishes at this point between moral laws and moral duties.
From a moral law (“THE GROUND OF AN OBLIGATION”: GMS, 389,12) arises a
moral duty (“OBLIGATION”) to which our actions have to conform. As an
example of an obligation, Kant names “THE COMMAND '*YOU* *OUGHT* *NOT*
*TO* *LIE*'” (GMS, 389,13 f.). It is interesting to observe that Kant
ascribes the decisive “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY” not to the duty, but rather
to the law {ie. IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial / bifurcated) THEORY
OF NUMBER} that is foundational to the duty. This, too, serves as an
indication that the term necessity is to be understood as a modal
expression {@1 - Nature Contains Nature, @5 - Act of Nature, @6 - Form
of Nature, @7 - Engendering Nature, @2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature,
@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature, @4 - Nature Amended in its Nature, @8 -
Transforming Nature, @9 - Autonomous Nature} and not in the sense of
“NORMATIVITY” or “PRESCRIPTIVITY.” Otherwise Kant would speak of the
necessity of an action instead of the necessity of the law foundational
for obligation.

The point of departure, “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY,” may be read therefore as a
modal status {#41 ... #82 ... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287
... #328 ... #369} of moral principles. How, then, are the other
intermediate steps to be understood? The basis in the text is extremely
narrow. One possibility of outlining the continued line of argumentation
is as follows:

YOUTUBE: "The Weirding Way - Dune (1984)"



In the next step, Kant seems to refer to a counterfactual thought
experiment. Among the counterfactual situations to which duties are
attributed are those in which not humans but other imaginable rational
beings have the possibility of acting. In such a thought experiment, we
imagine a world in which there are other beings capable of action.
Since the moral laws accepted by us first of all contain the modal
status of necessity — that is, they apply to all possible worlds — and
secondly, involve a proposition about all actions, it is to be concluded
that even those actions of these merely imagined rational beings fall
under these laws. The second intermediate thesis, therefore, states that
(2) the *DUTIES* arising from the moral laws are also relevant for the
action of these merely imagined rational beings. In Kant’s terms:
“EVERYONE MUST ADMIT THAT [...] THE COMMAND ‘*YOU* *OUGHT* *NOT* *TO*
*LIE*’ IS VALID NOT MERELY FOR HUMAN BEINGS, AS THOUGH OTHER RATIONAL
BEINGS DID NOT HAVE TO HEED IT” (GMS, 389,11-15).

— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
[PUBLISHED @ 0457 HOURS ON 1 OCTOBER 2017]

"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"

YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hotdog Commercial (1977)"

http://youtu.be/sOeJ4rmDTvg

YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hot Dog 1990s Commercial Ad on Beach"

http://youtu.be/OO2PYAnxQSo

*CANT* (noun):
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious,
or political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded
with disparagement: thieves' cant.

ETHICAL_SPORTS_SLEDGE@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
ITS FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 -
*ONTIC* VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION,
CONTRARINESS, ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,302}&idea:{f,546}>

H7022@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 25 (#31); Ego: 19 (#25),
@3: Sup: 35 (#66); Ego: 10 (#35),
@4: Sup: 54 (#120); Ego: 19 (#54),
@5: Sup: 3 (#123); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@6: Sup: 9 (#132); Ego: 6 (#90),
@7: Sup: 59 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #191; Feme: #140
} // #302

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #296 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA:
#5 as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;

"Thou art filled with shame for glory: drink thou also, and let thy
foreskin be uncovered: the cup of the LORD'S right hand shall be turned
unto thee, and shameful {#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] =
qiyqalown (H7022): shameful} spewing {#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30,
#6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): shameful} shall be on thy glory."
[Habakkuk 2:16 (KJV)]

H4687@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 49 (#89); Ego: 9 (#49),
@3: Sup: 55 (#144); Ego: 6 (#55),
@4: Sup: 50 (#194); Ego: 76 (#131),
@5: Sup: 60 (#254); Ego: 10 (#141),
Male: #254; Feme: #141
} // #546

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #546 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; *I* *HAVE* *NOT* *SLAUGHTERED* *THE* *SACRED* *ANIMALS*.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546
% #41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the
commandment (of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);

"Because that Abraham {FATHER OF A GREAT MULTITUDE} obeyed my voice, and
kept my charge, my commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] =
mitsvah (H4687): commandments}, my statutes, and my laws." [Genesis 26:5
(KJV)]

"And said, If thou wilt diligently hearken to the voice of the LORD thy
God, and wilt do that which is right in his sight, and wilt give ear to
his commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687):
commandments}, and keep all his statutes, I will put none of these
diseases upon thee, which I have brought upon the Egyptians {THAT
TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES; ANGUISH}: for I am the LORD that healeth thee."
[Exodus 15:26 (KJV)]

"And the LORD said unto Moses, How long refuse ye to keep my
commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687):
commandments} and my laws?" [Exodus 16:28 (KJV)]

"And God spake all these words, saying, I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES;
ANGUISH}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any
likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth
beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow
down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a
jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto
the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And showing mercy
unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments {#546 as
[#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): commandments}." [Exodus
20:1-6 (KJV)]

At this juncture the decisive transition from necessity to apriority
takes place. Since the applicability of obligation is valid for all
imaginable rational beings, the cognition of these obligations or the
laws that are responsible for them cannot depend on contingent features
that arise from the fact that the thought experiment involves different
rational beings. The laws, therefore, may solely depend on
characteristics that all rational beings capable of action have in
common. What all imaginable rational beings have in common, however, is
solely the characteristic of being rational beings. Every other
characteristic is contingent. The cognition of laws cannot depend,
therefore, upon the empirical cognition of these contingent features.
Kant seems to assume that a cognition contains the characteristic of
apriority if it is not dependent upon empirical perceptions.
Consequently, according to the next intermediate thesis (3), the
cognition of moral laws must be a priori. Kant himself expresses this
decisive intermediate conclusion in the following terms: Among the
things to which everyone must admit is the fact that “THE GROUND OF AN
OBLIGATION,” that is, the moral law, “IS TO BE SOUGHT NOT IN THE NATURE
OF THE HUMAN BEING OR THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE WORLD IN WHICH HE IS
PLACED, BUT A PRIORI SOLELY IN CONCEPTS OF PURE REASON” (GMS, 389,16-19).

At the beginning of the ensuing paragraph, Kant reiterates this
intermediate conclusion: “THUS [...] ARE MORAL LAWS TOGETHER WITH THEIR
PRINCIPLES ESSENTIALLY DISTINGUISHED [...] FROM EVERYTHING ELSE IN WHICH
THERE IS ANYTHING EMPIRICAL” (GMS, 389,24-26). And he continues with his
last step of argumentation, which leads him to the concluding thesis (4)
that there has to be a pure moral philosophy. This step constituted
simply by the consequences drawn from the epistemological status of
moral laws for the construction of philosophical theories. If moral
laws can only be known a priori, then moral theory must have a
foundational part that proceeds purely a priori, that is, without
reference to anything empirical. In Kant’s words, “ALL MORAL PHILOSOPHY
RESTS ENTIRELY ON ITS PURE PART, AND WHEN APPLIED TO THE HUMAN BEING IT
BORROWS NOT THE LEAST BIT FROM KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HIM (ANTHROPOLOGY)” (GMS,
389,26-29).

This is one of the possible approaches for a systematic reconstruction
of the central argument in the Preface. Unfortunately, Kant offers very
few suggestions of how he can assume that the thesis that there has to
be a pure moral philosophy is self-evident. Consequently, much
interpretation is required. And much of the interpretive work revolves
around which systematic concept of necessity is implemented in the
interpretation. The interpretation presented here bases itself upon a
purely modal-logical concept of necessity, which entails neither an
epistemological meaning nor an equivalence of “NORMATIVITY” or
“PRESCRIPTIVITY.” If one chooses other systematic basic concepts, the
structure of argumentation also has to be interpreted in other ways.
However as noted a somewhat different interpretation is suggested by
SCHÖNECKER/WOOD whom see the [*ONTIC*] 'necessity' of moral laws
primarily as their CATEGORICAL character. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 12-15]

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 30 August 2018

#OPULENCE #DECOROUS #DEMURE #SOVEREIGNTY
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-30 08:39:54 UTC
Permalink
— TREASON: NECESSITY {OBEDIENT: BREACHES OF PROBITY / DECORUM},
NORMATIVITY {AIDING: JUDICIAL DISCRETION ON PENALTY} AND APRIORITY
{ASSISTING: SECTION VIII COMPLIANCE ON DEATH PENALTY PROSCRIPTIONS}

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 30 August, 2018

That SOVEREIGNTY can also be viewed as being a metaphysical
philosophical derivation of moral or morality which is notionally a
DECOROUS DEMUR (E) where the PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC has an ONTOLOGICAL
REALITY which arbitrarily may have embodiment and is therefore a
normative presence of *ONTIC* necessity as then the factuality of being
so without being so.

It is not a personality but similarly has an opulent quality of a
tempered integrity from which all imperfection is dispelled: How else
can the monarchal French President occupy the Palace of Versailles?

YOUTUBE: "Let Them Eat Cake - The Pox"

http://youtu.be/0LCzi5kaAmE

Emmanuel Macron, increasingly compared with Louis XIV, on 10 July 2017
addressed both houses of parliament in a rare session at the Sun King’s
palace in Versailles. Where France’s popular new centrist president
charted his government’s course and set priorities at the joint session
of Congress — consisting of the National Assembly and the Senate.

'It is important that he [Macron] sets a direction,' said the spokesman.

The French media often refer to Mr Macron as 'Jupiter', the king {#34}
of the Roman deities and one of the names used by Louis XIV, who moved
the seat of power to Versailles in 1682.

Morale which is imbued from this transcendent principle, also known as
esprit de corps, is the capacity of a group's members to maintain belief
within the dictums of NECESSITY {LIBERTÉ}, NORMATIVITY {ÉGALITÉ} AND
APRIORITY {FRATERNITÉ} AS A CONTINGENT {OU LA MORT} REALITY RATHER THAN
A CONTINGENCY OF EXPEDIENCY.

The implied meaning is that there is no terrestrial king of all
humanity, you as a person have the ontological egalitarian entitlement
to your own body, life and destiny which is known as the rights of man
that is often quantified by a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE which is enamoured
as an institution or goal, particularly in the face of opposition or
hardship. Morale is often referenced by authority figures as a generic
value judgment of the willpower, obedience, and self-discipline of a
group tasked with performing duties assigned by a superior.

To those ends, we are building a capacity so as to propose the prudent
argument whereby criminal acts accompanying public slander as BOER /
ANZAC defamation may be viewed within the quantitative context of a
hedonism as pestilent and indolent lifestyle having a self bestowed
prerogative entitlement as an immutability of being which is ostensibly
obstinate ignorance facilitated by a delusional mind characteristic of
psychosis.

In terms of fiscal consequences, we see a greater benefit in the
circumstance that the resolution to this dilemma is not a bestowal of a
lengthy prison term as decadent outcome that is consequential to
protracted and torturous justice facilitated by an economy of the State
as sponsored legal aid which is accorded to persons whom have
categorically no intention in having any accountability for the *ONTIC*
necessity as the factuality of their actions being so.

Accordingly we are going to make an exemplar of those persons as a
cautionary action made against the predilection of others whom similarly
mistakenly believe in such viability of obstinate will as an alternative
ontological experience which is entirely absent or feigns any *DUTY* or
concern for civil regard as respect for the law.

By way of a non prejudiced example is the situational context as haughty
Islamic practice in refusing to stand before judicial officials and
judges exercising their powers and authority under the auspices of DIEU
ET MON DROIT as which according to my sensibilities is more adequately
addressed by a non contradictory and resolute penalty, an ex-judiciary
authority provisioned in the motherhood watch-care of ontological
principles which is prudently exercised by the office of GOVERNOR GENERAL.

Categorically such obstinate and adamant will as misnomered pretext to
piety ought not exist within the Federation as Commonwealth of Australia.

And under the auspices as gravitas of any indictment for TREASON then
proscribe as necessity a normative descriptive penalty as equivalent to
eradication of vermin by means of the apriority power and authority
accorded by prerogative of LETTERS PATENT, and furthermore that any
substantial costs of exorbitant corrective services such as imprisonment
which has no viability within the circumstance of a more direct penalty,
is then properly apportioned towards invigorating programs which
addresses indigenous disadvantage, their societal declension and
disenfranchised autonomy.

2.4 THE CENTRAL ARGUMENT IN THE PREFACE
In the central passage of the Preface on the indispensability of a pure
moral philosophy, Kant does not simply presuppose that from the
“*ABSOLUTE* *NECESSITY*” (GMS, 389,13) of moral laws the apriority of
moral philosophy follows. Rather he delivers a detailed, even if
difficult, line of argumentation. First of all, he announces his aim of
argumentation and designates his point of departure: “THAT IT IS OF THE
UTMOST NECESSITY TO WORK OUT ONCE A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” or “THAT
THERE MUST BE SUCH IS SELF--EVIDENT FROM THE COMMON IDEA OF DUTY AND OF
THE MORAL LAWS" (GMS, 389,7-11). The aim of his argumentation,
therefore, is the proof go the apriority of moral philosophy:

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. {#1 - MENTALISM}
I HEAR THE CLARION. {#2 - CORRESPONDENCE}
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. {#3 - VIBRATION}
STEADFAST MIGHT. {#4 - POLARITY}
MARCHING TO SION. {#5 - RHYTHM}
AGAINST THIS WHORE. {#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT}
ARREST THE BLIGHT." {#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE}

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

#2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2
- Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents}
/ #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

#3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson,
child, member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c)
children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young
(of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation)
(pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A*
*MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

#4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]

#5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
#287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO
ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

G316@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
@4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
@5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
@6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
@7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
@9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition:
VOLUNTĀTIS]

#1 - unwillingness
#2 - ill will, negative disposition (toward something) [LATIN
definition: NOLUNTĀTIS]

*VOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin voluntās f (genitive voluntātis).
- (obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love,
creation, etc.
- *YANG*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陽/阳 (yáng), originally in
reference to the sunny side of areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *GEMATRIA*} such
as mountains and dwellings.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with bright, hot, masculine, etc. elements of
the natural world.

*NOLUNTY* (noun):
[ETYMOLOGY]: coined by Robert Fludd (17 January 1574 – 8 September 1637)
from Latin nōluntās f (genitive nōluntātis).
- (obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
- *YIN*: From early romanizations of Chinese 陰/阴 (yīn), originally used
in reference to shaded areas {*IT* *IS* *NOT* *UMBRA* *AS* *GEMATRIA*
*MORPHOLOGICAL* *SUBSTITUTION*}, as of a mountain or home.
- (philosophy) A principle in Chinese and related East Asian
philosophies associated with dark, cool, female, etc. elements of the
natural world.
- Robert Fludd was born at Milgate House, Bearsted and was the son of
Sir Thomas Fludd, a high-ranking governmental official (Queen Elizabeth
I's treasurer for war in Europe), and Member of Parliament.

} And his point of departure for the argumentation lies in the analysis
of our concept of *DUTY* or of our “idea” of moral laws. How can the
individual steps {ie. #41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your
parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against
autonomy ... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear no false witness ...
#287 - Covet Not ... #328 - Transformative Prototype ... #369 - Reverse
Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 - Chronological Plane Mapping} of this
very dense argumentation be distinguished from each other and ordered?

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Autonomous Nature [#41 - Remember the
Sabbath]) ...
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
Honour your parents]) ...
#65 (@2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123
- Do not kill]) ...
#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
#175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- Do not steal]) ...
#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
Bear no false witness]) ...
#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - Covet Not])

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable. First of all, it will
become clear that in the passage of the text an argumentative
progression takes place from the givenness of a modal quality to the
proof of an epistemological quality distinguished from it. And secondly,
an argument not implausible even from a contemporary viewpoint comes to
light for the intermediate thesis (1). For, as shown above, it is the
task of an ethical principle to guide our valuations even in the case of
counterfactual considerations. If this is correct, then an analysis of
our concept of morality can help bring to light the modal status that is
responsible for the capacity of meeting this task. The argumentative
progression from the point of departure to thesis (1), therefore,
appears well-motivated. Through the analysis of our concept of morality
we find that moral laws also apply to counterfactual situations, that
they consequently exhibit the modal status of necessity.

Kant distinguishes at this point between moral laws and moral duties.
From a moral law (“THE GROUND OF AN OBLIGATION”: GMS, 389,12) arises a
moral duty (“OBLIGATION”) to which our actions have to conform. As an
example of an obligation, Kant names “THE COMMAND '*YOU* *OUGHT* *NOT*
*TO* *LIE*'” (GMS, 389,13 f.). It is interesting to observe that Kant
ascribes the decisive “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY” not to the duty, but rather
to the law {ie. #111 - IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial / bifurcated)
THEORY OF NUMBER} that is foundational to the duty. This, too, serves
as an indication that the term necessity is to be understood as a modal
expression {@1 - Nature Contains Nature, @5 - Act of Nature, @6 - Form
of Nature, @7 - Engendering Nature, @2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature,
@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature, @4 - Nature Amended in its Nature, @8 -
Transforming Nature, @9 - Autonomous Nature} and not in the sense of
“NORMATIVITY” or “PRESCRIPTIVITY.” Otherwise Kant would speak of the
necessity of an action instead of the necessity of the law foundational
for obligation.

The point of departure, “ABSOLUTE NECESSITY,” may be read therefore as a
modal status {#41 ... #82 ... #123 ... #164 ... #205 ... #246 ... #287
... #328 ... #369} of moral principles. How, then, are the other
intermediate steps to be understood? The basis in the text is extremely
narrow. One possibility of outlining the continued line of argumentation
is as follows:

YOUTUBE: "The Weirding Way - Dune (1984)"

http://youtu.be/_Twmc6jUrNw

In the next step, Kant seems to refer to a counterfactual thought
experiment. Among the counterfactual situations to which duties are
attributed are those in which not humans but other imaginable rational
beings have the possibility of acting. In such a thought experiment, we
imagine a world in which there are other beings capable of action.
Since the moral laws accepted by us first of all contain the modal
status of necessity — that is, they apply to all possible worlds — and
secondly, involve a proposition about all actions, it is to be concluded
that even those actions of these merely imagined rational beings fall
under these laws. The second intermediate thesis, therefore, states that
(2) the *DUTIES* arising from the moral laws are also relevant for the
action of these merely imagined [as #41 x n = *ONTIC* NECESSITY as
“NORMATIVITY” being measured / moderated categories or “PRESCRIPTIVITY”
by meta-descriptor prototype and ethical value statement by which
evaluative % (#41 x n) judgment can be made by] rational beings. In
Kant’s terms: “EVERYONE MUST ADMIT THAT [...] THE COMMAND ‘*YOU* *OUGHT*
*NOT* *TO* *LIE* [is normatively #41 x6 = #246 as NORMA OBLIGANS]’ IS
VALID NOT MERELY FOR HUMAN BEINGS, AS THOUGH OTHER RATIONAL BEINGS DID
NOT HAVE TO HEED IT” (GMS, 389,11-15).

— LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL —
[PUBLISHED @ 0457 HOURS ON 1 OCTOBER 2017]

"GRISTLE AND BUNT.
SNAGS 'N SIZZLE.
DRIZZLE ON SAUCE.
SABBATH DAY CANT. {#312 - *SEE* *EXPLANATION* *BELOW*}
MUSTARD WEASEL.
VALOUR DIVORCE.
DO TIGERS GRUNT?"

YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hotdog Commercial (1977)"

http://youtu.be/sOeJ4rmDTvg

YOUTUBE: "Hebrew National Hot Dog 1990s Commercial Ad on Beach"

http://youtu.be/OO2PYAnxQSo

*CANT* (noun):
- hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious,
or political nature: he had no time for the cant of the priests about sin.
- language specific to a particular group or profession and regarded
with disparagement: thieves' cant.

ETHICAL_SPORTS_SLEDGE@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 12 (#42); Ego: 76 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
@3: Sup: 18 (#60); Ego: 27 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN
ITS FLOW {%36}),
@4: Sup: 39 (#99); Ego: 70 (#254),
@5: Sup: 34 (#133); Ego: 58 (#312 - RESISTANCE / TERRORISM as [#2,
#100, #200, #10] = qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23 -
*ONTIC* VALUE {#158} FOR NOVICHOK POISONING} 1) OPPOSITION,
CONTRARINESS, ENCOUNTER, CONTRARY OR HOSTILE ENCOUNTER),
@6: Sup: 25 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 80 (#392),
@7: Sup: 71 (#229); Ego: 75 (#467),
@8: Sup: 73 (#302); Ego: 69 (#536),
Male: #302; Feme: #536
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:{m,302}&idea:{f,546}>

H7022@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 25 (#31); Ego: 19 (#25),
@3: Sup: 35 (#66); Ego: 10 (#35),
@4: Sup: 54 (#120); Ego: 19 (#54),
@5: Sup: 3 (#123); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@6: Sup: 9 (#132); Ego: 6 (#90),
@7: Sup: 59 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 50 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #191; Feme: #140
} // #302

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #296 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): {UMBRA:
#5 as #296 % #41 = #9} 1) *DISGRACE*, *SHAME*;

"Thou art filled with shame for glory: drink thou also, and let thy
foreskin be uncovered: the cup of the LORD'S right hand shall be turned
unto thee, and shameful {#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30, #6, #50] =
qiyqalown (H7022): shameful} spewing {#302 as [#6, #100, #10, #100, #30,
#6, #50] = qiyqalown (H7022): shameful} shall be on thy glory."
[Habakkuk 2:16 (KJV)]

H4687@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 49 (#89); Ego: 9 (#49),
@3: Sup: 55 (#144); Ego: 6 (#55),
@4: Sup: 50 (#194); Ego: 76 (#131),
@5: Sup: 60 (#254); Ego: 10 (#141),
Male: #254; Feme: #141
} // #546

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #546 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; *I* *HAVE* *NOT* *SLAUGHTERED* *THE* *SACRED* *ANIMALS*.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): {UMBRA: #5 as #546
% #41 = #13} 1) commandment; 1a) commandment (of man); 1b) the
commandment (of God); 1c) *COMMANDMENT* (*OF* *CODE* *OF* *WISDOM*);

"Because that Abraham {FATHER OF A GREAT MULTITUDE} obeyed my voice, and
kept my charge, my commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] =
mitsvah (H4687): commandments}, my statutes, and my laws." [Genesis 26:5
(KJV)]

"And said, If thou wilt diligently hearken to the voice of the LORD thy
God, and wilt do that which is right in his sight, and wilt give ear to
his commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687):
commandments}, and keep all his statutes, I will put none of these
diseases upon thee, which I have brought upon the Egyptians {THAT
TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES; ANGUISH}: for I am the LORD that healeth thee."
[Exodus 15:26 (KJV)]

"And the LORD said unto Moses, How long refuse ye to keep my
commandments {#546 as [#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687):
commandments} and my laws?" [Exodus 16:28 (KJV)]

"And God spake all these words, saying, I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES;
ANGUISH}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any
likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth
beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow
down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a
jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto
the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And showing mercy
unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments {#546 as
[#40, #90, #6, #400, #10] = mitsvah (H4687): commandments}." [Exodus
20:1-6 (KJV)]

At this juncture the decisive transition from necessity to apriority
takes place. Since the applicability of obligation is valid for all
imaginable rational beings, the cognition of these obligations or the
laws that are responsible for them cannot depend on contingent features
that arise from the fact that the thought experiment involves different
rational beings. The laws, therefore, may solely depend on
characteristics that all rational beings capable of action have in
common. What all imaginable rational beings have in common, however, is
solely the characteristic of being rational beings. Every other
characteristic is contingent. The cognition of laws cannot depend,
therefore, upon the empirical cognition of these contingent features.

Since Kant improperly states it is an impossibility for a human being
to accomplish this by transcendent sapiential thought and I am capably
able demonstrate it's temporal congruence as coherence by a mathematical
theoretical noumenon as being an Intellectual Property by which Immanuel
Kant himself calls noumena as the proof of a valid and rational concept
attained by pure thought. And theoretically it is technically possible
by an analysis of the TELOS HIERARCHY
<http://www.grapple369.com?telos:328&PROTOTYPE:HETEROS> to then make a
rational determinations upon the contingent characteristics such as to
the nature of the implicit #328 - Transformative Prototype or
propositions on what prototype might optimally be deployed.

Kant seems to assume that a cognition contains the characteristic of
apriority if it is not dependent upon empirical perceptions.
Consequently, according to the next intermediate thesis (3), the
cognition of moral laws must be a priori. Kant himself expresses this
decisive intermediate conclusion in the following terms: Among the
things to which everyone must admit is the fact that “THE GROUND OF AN
OBLIGATION,” that is, the moral law, “IS TO BE SOUGHT NOT IN THE NATURE
OF THE HUMAN BEING OR THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE WORLD IN WHICH HE IS
PLACED, BUT A PRIORI SOLELY IN CONCEPTS OF PURE REASON” (GMS, 389,16-19).

At the beginning of the ensuing paragraph, Kant reiterates this
intermediate conclusion: “THUS [...] ARE MORAL LAWS TOGETHER WITH THEIR
PRINCIPLES ESSENTIALLY DISTINGUISHED [...] FROM EVERYTHING ELSE IN WHICH
THERE IS ANYTHING EMPIRICAL” (GMS, 389,24-26). And he continues with his
last step of argumentation, which leads him to the concluding thesis (4)
that there has to be a pure moral philosophy. This step constituted
simply by the consequences drawn from the epistemological status of
moral laws for the construction of philosophical theories. If moral
laws can only be known a priori, then moral theory must have a
foundational part that proceeds purely a priori, that is, without
reference to anything empirical. In Kant’s words, “ALL MORAL PHILOSOPHY
RESTS ENTIRELY ON ITS PURE PART, AND WHEN APPLIED TO THE HUMAN BEING IT
BORROWS NOT THE LEAST BIT FROM KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HIM (ANTHROPOLOGY)” (GMS,
389,26-29).

This is one of the possible approaches for a systematic reconstruction
of the central argument in the Preface. Unfortunately, Kant offers very
few suggestions of how he can assume that the thesis that there has to
be a pure moral philosophy is self-evident. Consequently, much
interpretation is required. And much of the interpretive work revolves
around which systematic concept of necessity is implemented in the
interpretation. The interpretation presented here bases itself upon a
purely modal-logical concept of necessity, which entails neither an
epistemological meaning nor an equivalence of “NORMATIVITY” or
“PRESCRIPTIVITY.” If one chooses other systematic basic concepts, the
structure of argumentation also has to be interpreted in other ways.
However as noted a somewhat different interpretation is suggested by
SCHÖNECKER/WOOD whom see the [*ONTIC*] 'necessity' of moral laws
primarily as their CATEGORICAL character. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 12-15]

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 30 August 2018

#OPULENCE #DECOROUS #DEMURE #SOVEREIGNTY
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-30 13:27:43 UTC
Permalink
-- CHINESE DAOIST YANG HSIUNG (4 BCE) USE OF YANG CH’I / YIN BINOME *AS*
*REFLECTING* EQUIVALENCE TO 22 (HEBREW?) STOICHEION NAMED ELEMENTS
WITHIN CHAPTER #99 [#ONE MAGIC SQUARE PROTOTYPE] IN EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE
DEAD THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE BASIS OF
CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES

JUST SOME INFORMAL RESEARCH NOTES
Post by dolf
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...
Translation: but we do our best
Why say it twice? Repetition is a major problem with your writing,
together with your extensive parenthetic rambling.
Post by dolf
[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]
It's a phrase, not a "metempirical whatsit", whatever that means.
Such dictum which you advance concerning the permissibility of variation
as to the NATURE of noun, pronoun or adjective by which its grammatical
form is conveyed as acceptable binomial nomenclature usage is as “knit
one purl one” just ribbing and the of sowing discordant bi-conditionals
objectives {

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH
IS EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS
THE BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding
appropriately."

} with impetus of FOUL declension and has no intrinsic ontological
dignity worth emulating as pretence to any principled life: “Be not
deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.

Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of
God: I speak this to your shame.”

The garment which you are hodgepodging is a corruption of decency and is
barely capable to cover your paunch and bollocks: “For this corruptible
must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal
shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying
that is written, *Death* *Is* *swallowed* *up* *in* *victory*.

O death, where is thy sting? *O* *grave*, *where* *is* *thy* *victory*?

EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 which is the equivalent MAGIC ROW
SUM to the FIRST MAGIC SQUARE the Egyptian ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

The Patrol who goeth round, and who piloteth the Double Earth; Seb
abideth stably by means of their rudders: the divine Form which
revealeth the Solar Orb: and He who presideth over the Red ones.) [Text
corrupt.]

Let me be brought in as a distressed mariner, and let my Soul come to
me, which is my brother, and go to that place which thou knowest.

"Let me be told my name," say,

1. The Mooring-post. "Lord of the Double-Earth in the Shrine" is thy name.

#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: Scales of Merit}
AUTONOMOUS HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY: {ANIMUS: OBEDIENCE (#ALEPH to
#LAMED)}

2. The Blade of the Rudder. "Leg of Apis" is thy name.

#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: {DOUBLE: #1 - Nature Contains Nature
{#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature}}

3. The Hawser. "The Side-Lock which Anubis fastens on to the swathing
work" is thy name.

#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: {DOUBLE: #2 - Nature Rejoices in its
Nature {#5 - Act of Nature}}

4. The Stern or Stem Posts. "The two columns of the Nether-world" is thy
name.

#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature / #1 - Nature Contains Nature:
{DOUBLE: #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}

5. The Hold. "Akar" is thy name.

#5 - Act of Nature / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature

6. The Mast. "Bearer of the Great one whilst she passeth" is thy name.

#6 - Form of Nature / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature

7. The Keel. "Backbone of Apuat" is thy name.

#7 - Engendering Nature / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature

8. The Mast-head. "Throat of Emsta" is thy name.

#8 - Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature

9. The Sail. "Nut" is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature

10. The Leathers. "Made of the hide of Mnevis, which Sutu hath
scorched," is thy name.

#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature

11. The Oars. "Fingers of the elder" is your name.

#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7
- Engendering Nature}}

12. The Bracement. "Hand of Isis, stanching the blood of the Eye of
Horus," is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature

13. The Ribs. "Emsta, Hapi, Taumautef, Kebehsenuf, He who taketh
captive, He who taketh by force, He who seeth his Father, and He who
maketh himself," are your names.

#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: The Tongue of Decree Deciding
Between Them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]
TETRAD FOR ANY GENII THESIS: {SPIRITUS: AIDING (#MEM to #QOPH)}

14. The Look-out. "Master of the Grounds" is thy name.

#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

15. The Tiller. "Merit" is thy name.

#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 /#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature]

16. The Rudder. "The Umpire, beaming forth from the water," is thy name.

#4 - Nature Amended In Its Nature [#111 /#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature]

17. The Hull. "The Leg of Hathor, which Ra wounded, on lifting her into
the Sektit Boat," is thy name.

#5 - Act of Nature: {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming
Nature} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

18. The Boatman. "Off," is thy name.

#6 - Form Of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

19. The Breeze, since thou art conveyed by me: "The Northern Breeze
proceeding from Tmu to the Nose of Chent-Amenta," is thy name.

#7 - Engendering Nature: {*OATHS* OF DIEU ET MON DROIT} [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

20. The Stream, since thou sailest upon me: "Their Mirror" is thy name.

#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE

21. The Swallow. "Destroyer of the large-handed at the place of
purification" is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]
DEFINE THE @5 CANONICAL PRINCIPLE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTIC HERE

22. The Land. Since thou walkest upon me: "The Tip of Heaven, the Coming
forth from the swathings in the Garden of Aarru, and the Coming forth in
Exultation," is thy name.

#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 -
Totality of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]

To be said before them.

Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for
ever, and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to
me food and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the
Shensu-cake and the Kefen-cake: let my place be in the great hall in
presence of the mighty god.

I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course.

Let me not be stopped at the Meskat; let not the Sebau have mastery over
my limbs.

I have bread in Pu and beer in Tepu. Let your largesses of this day be
granted to me; offerings of wheat and barley, offerings of anta and of
vestments, offerings of oxen, and ducks, which are offerings for life,
health and strength, and also offerings for coming forth by day, in all
forms in which it pleaseth me to come forth in the Garden of Aarru.

If this chapter be known he will come forth at the Garden of Aarru;
there will be given to him the Shensu-cake, the measure of drink and the
persen-cake, and fields of wheat and barley of seven cubits (It is the
followers of Horus who reap them), for he eateth of that wheat and
barley, and he is made whole in his limbs through that wheat and barley,
and his limbs spring up even as with those gods. And he cometh forth in
the Garden of Aarru in all the forms in which it pleaseth him to come
forth.

The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law [of
metempirical contortions as normative deceptions such as yours]”

Matthew 23:27 (KJV)
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within
full of dead [men's] bones, and of all uncleanness.

Luke 11:52 (KJV)
Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye
entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

The fact that ethical principles carry in themselves the modal status of
necessity provides an important methodical starting point for the
construction of ethical theories. Thus, the execution of the commonly
performed counterfactual thought experiments in ethics is only possible
under the condition that the principles of valuation support such an
operation. Contingent principles are not in a position to do that, Kant
makes methodical use of this log1cal quality of moral principles
particularly in those places where he speaks of other “*RATIONAL*
*BEINGS*” (eg. GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). The central passage in the
Preface of the Groundwork in which he argues for the necessity of a pure
moral philosophy also belongs to this methodical usage {

}. It does not matter in these passages whether there actually are other
such beings as, for example, the inhabitants of other planets or also
God. For the Kantian argumentation it is sufficient that such beings
could exist, that their existence is thinkable. The corresponding
passages must be understood as methodically executed thought
experiments, which make use of the particular modal status of ethical
principles. Now it becomes clear why the “*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*” have a
comparable modal status to the “*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.” Laws of nature
support counterfactual arguments, too. In order to achieve this, they
also must have a modal status which is higher than simple contingency.
The connections formulated in them are also valid in all natural law
governed, possible worlds, and in this respect, they exhibit the modal
status of [*ONTIC*] necessity. The difference between laws of nature and
laws of freedom appears to consist primarily in the fact that the *LAWS*
*OF* *NATURE* {

#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] =
qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition,
contrariness, encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;

As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days

#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days

} are concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while
the laws of [*ONTOLOGICAL*] freedom are concerned with all-quantified,
normative bi-conditionals, each receiving the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity." [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]
Re: — I WOULD LIKE TO FIND COHERENT SENTENCES
Your rationalisation for your errors in writing, even if it were
coherent, is nonsense.
Your errors are errors because there are rules of language and of
writing and you are not following them.
Your "binomial" nonsense is just something in your own imagination
and it does not override the rules of language.
Post by dolf
Metempirics is the study of concepts and relationships conceived
as beyond
Post by dolf
and yet related to knowledge gained empirically
And yet the phrase you refer to is a simple declarative assertion,
nothing to do with metempiric whatsits.
Post by dolf
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 69 (#69),
@2: Sup: 81 (#118); Ego: 24 (#93),
@3: Sup: 18 (#136); Ego: 2 (#95),
4: Sup: 31 (#167); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 28 (#195); Ego: 81 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
@6: Sup: 16 (#211); Ego: 63 (#248),
Male: #211; Feme: #248
And that's just gobbledigook.
<SNIP gibberish>
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH
IS EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS
THE BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding
appropriately."

In the “*GOLDEN* *AGE*” of the past, communities purportedly served the
legitimate interests of all while maintaining the dignity of each.
Stable hierarchical relations wove elements of society together in a
complex web of mutual obligation, but reciprocity (implying not only
mutual obligation but also an empathetic “likening to oneself”) was also
needed to temper the possible ill effects of unmediated power relations.
The perfect community, therefore, was thought to be equally dependent
upon hierarchy and reciprocity. As such, the perfect community is
modelled upon the cosmos, where YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the
patterns of growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A*
*BINOME* *WHICH IS EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260
VIEW OF NUMBER], responding appropriately. This tetragram celebrates
such ideal contact, which, the Head text promises, makes the good
individual both resplendent as the sun [ie. CHAPTER #99 - *THE* *DIVINE*
*FORM* *WHICH* *REVEALETH* *THE* *SOLAR* *ORB* / CHAPTER #123 -- WHEREBY
ONE ENTERETH INTO THE GREAT HOUSE / CHAPTER #124 - WHEREBY ONE COMETH TO
THE DIVINE CIRCLE OF OSIRIS] and powerful as the king in his sacred
audience hall.

"Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for
ever, and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to
me food and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the
Shensu-cake and the Kefen-cake: *LET* *MY* *PLACE* *BE* *IN* *THE*
*GREAT* *HALL* *IN* *PRESENCE* *OF* *THE* *MIGHTY* *GOD*.

I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course." [CHAPTER #99,
EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD]

THE HALL OF LIGHT, ACCORDING TO EARLY COMMENTATORS, REFERS SIMPLY TO THE
REGION ABOVE GROUND IN THE LIGHT OF DAY, AS CONTRASTED WITH THE YELLOW
SPRINGS BELOW GROUND. BUT THE SAME *BINOME*

NOTE [Algebra]: an expression that is a sum of difference of two terms
such as the Pythagorean: c² (25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN)
+ b² (16 as #34 - JUPITER); Binominal nomenclature or binary
nomenclature is a formal system of naming species of living things by
giving each a name composed of two parts, both of which use Latin
grammatical forms, although they can be based on words from other languages

That the Roman Catholic nomenclature conforms ONLY to such Pythagorean:
c² (25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN) + b² (16 as #34 -
JUPITER); Binominal nomenclature or binary nomenclature which is reliant
upon its TETRAD (36 as #111 - SOL INVICTUS) as its Intellectual Proposition.

IS USED TO DESCRIBE THE SACRED SITE WHERE THE KING MAKES RITUAL CONTACT
WITH THE GODS. ITS USE SUGGESTS THAT ALL THINGS ARE SANCTIFIED BY
CONTACT WITH THE MYSTERY.

This tetragram #16 is correlated with the Rainfall solar period. Rain
symbolizes beneficent grace and germinating influence, whether the
reference is to *SEXUAL* *CONTACT* *OR* *TO* *POLITICAL* *RELATIONS*.
Consequently, the general tone of this tetragram is lucky, except in
those few cases where “stimulus and response” occurs between
categorically dissimilar partners, *PROMPTING* *REPULSION* *AND*
*DISASTER*. [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME
MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 16 - CONTACT, A translation with
Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993, p 165]

*THE* *CONSIDERATION* *OF* *LACK* *OF *SURNAMES* *WITHIN* *THE*
*NETHERLANDS* *SUGGESTS* *THAT* *THEY* *WERE* *NOT* *AS* *ONTOLOGICAL*
*NECESSITY* *SUBJECT* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *EMPIRE*
*GOVERNANCE*

Nous: #27
Time: 09:40 hrs
Date: 2018.8.18
Torah: [#40, #10, #5]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 50 (#90); Ego: 10 (#50),
@3: Sup: 55 (#145); Ego: 5 (#55),
Male: #145; Feme: #55
} // #55

Dao: Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes
Tetra: #74 - Closure
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite

Latin: Expetendus {God, rescuing Father} Alt: Chohvyal {Breathe the Woe
of God} {

1. HELPS PRESERVE CONJUGAL FIDELITY & FERTILITY BETWEEN SPOUSES
2. THE GENERATIONS
3. LOVE
4. Senciner
}

Shealtiel {Asked or lent of God}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#360 / #350} / HETEROS {#367 / #313} / TORAH {#319
/ #289}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:4,col:8,nous:27&idea:{m,27}&idea:{f,27}&idea:{m,360}&idea:{f,350}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 1, row: 4, col: 8, nous: 27 [Date: 2018.8.18, Time: 09:40
hrs, Super: #360 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure, Ego: #350 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure]

H4016@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 42 (#44); Ego: 40 (#42),
@3: Sup: 44 (#88); Ego: 2 (#44),
@4: Sup: 20 (#108); Ego: 57 (#101),
@5: Sup: 30 (#138); Ego: 10 (#111),
@6: Sup: 36 (#174); Ego: 6 (#117),
Male: #174; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #342 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 -
Branching Out;

THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
Mabit; I deal not fraudulently.

#VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
#TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
#POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
#TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
#CANON: #140

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
@2: Sup: 68 (#82); Ego: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 79 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 11 (#79),
@4: Sup: 59 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 61 (#140 - I DEAL
NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #220; Feme: #140
} // #140

#360 as [#2, #40, #2, #300, #10, #6] = mabush (H4016): {UMBRA: #4 as
#342 % #41 = #14} 1) private parts, his privates, male genitals; 1a)
literally - 'that excites shame';

H4828@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
@3: Sup: 27 (#127); Ego: 38 (#108),
@4: Sup: 16 (#143); Ego: 70 (#178),
@5: Sup: 36 (#179); Ego: 20 (#198),
Male: #179; Feme: #198
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
Tetra: 26 - Endeavour;

THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
appearance in Urit; I am not hot of speech.

#VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
#TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
#POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
#TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
#CANON: #158

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
@1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
@2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
@4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I
AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
Male: #156; Feme: #158
} // #158

#360 as [#30, #40, #200, #70, #20] = merea` (H4828): {UMBRA: #6 as #310
% #41 = #23} 1) companion, friend, confidential friend;

H3584@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 36 (#58); Ego: 20 (#36),
@4: Sup: 44 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 8 (#44),
@5: Sup: 20 (#122); Ego: 57 (#101),
@6: Sup: 26 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 6 (#107),
Male: #148; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #328 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.

#VIRTUE:
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#350 as [#6, #10, #20, #8, #300, #6] = kachash (H3584): {UMBRA: #4 as
#328 % #41 = #41} 1) to deceive, lie, fail, grow lean, be disappointing,
be untrue, be insufficient, be found liars, belie, deny, dissemble, deal
falsely; 1a) (Qal) to become lean; 1b) (Niphal) to cringe, feign
obedience; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to deceive, deny falsely; 1c2) to act
deceptively; 1c3) to cringe; 1c4) to disappoint, fail; 1d) (Hithpael) to
cringe, feign obedience;

H5237@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 57 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}); Ego: 38
(#138),
@5: Sup: 67 (#253); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 26 (#279); Ego: 40 (#188),
Male: #279; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #280 % #41 = #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has
been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;

THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in
Memphis; I am neither a liar nor a doer of mischief.

#VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
#TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
#POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
#TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
#CANON: #215

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_215@{
@1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
@2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
@3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
Male: #134; Feme: #215
} // #215

#350 as [#30, #50, #20, #200, #10, #40] = nokriy (H5237): {UMBRA: #8 as
#280 % #41 = #34} 1) foreign, alien; 1a) foreign; 1b) foreigner (subst);
1c) foreign woman, harlot; 1d) unknown, unfamiliar (fig.);

H6187@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 29 (#69); Ego: 70 (#110),
@3: Sup: 67 (#136); Ego: 38 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@4: Sup: 6 (#142); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
Ego: 20 (#188),
Male: #168; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #290 % #41 = #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46
- Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition;

THOTH MEASURE: #3 - Oh thou of the Nose, who makest thine appearance at
Chemunnu; I am not evil minded.

#VIRTUE: With Mired (no. #3), great woe.
#TOOLS: With Encounters (no. #43), small desire.
#POSITION: The ways of Purity (no. #37) and ...
#TIME: Pattern (no. #47) where some are simple and some are complex?
#CANON: #130

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_130@{
@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 46 (#49); Ego: 43 (#46),
@3: Sup: 2 (#51); Ego: 37 (#83),
@4: Sup: 49 (#100); Ego: 47 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #100; Feme: #130
} // #130

#350 as [#40, #70, #200, #20, #20] = `erek (H6187): {UMBRA: #10 as #290
% #41 = #3} 1) order, row, estimate, things that are set in order,
layer, pile; 1a) order, row; 1b) estimate, valuation;

H6735@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 19 (#28); Ego: 10 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#85); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 67 (#152); Ego: 10 (#67),
@5: Sup: 26 (#178); Ego: 40 (#107),
Male: #178; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#350 as [#90, #10, #200, #10, #40] = tsiyr (H6735): {UMBRA: #13 as #300
% #41 = #13} 1) envoy, messenger; 2) pivot of door, hinge; 3) pang,
distress;

H7386@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 48 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 10 (#48),
@3: Sup: 67 (#153); Ego: 19 (#67),
@4: Sup: 77 (#230); Ego: 10 (#77),
@5: Sup: 36 (#266); Ego: 40 (#117),
Male: #266; Feme: #117
} // #360

#360 as [#200, #10, #100, #10, #40] = reyq (H7386): {UMBRA: #15 as #310
% #41 = #23} 1) empty, vain; 1a) empty (of vessels); 1b) empty, idle,
worthless (ethically);

G155@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 11 (#12); Ego: 10 (#11),
@3: Sup: 68 (#80); Ego: 57 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 76 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 8 (#76),
@5: Sup: 35 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 40 (#116),
@6: Sup: 36 (#227); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #227; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #360 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching:
H44 - Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43
- Encounters;

THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit;
I do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
#TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
#POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
#TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
#CANON: #191

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
@1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
@2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
@4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191

#360 as [#1, #10, #300, #8, #40, #1] = aitema (G155): {UMBRA: #17 as
#360 % #41 = #32} 1) petition, request, required;

G1297@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 72 (#105); Ego: 57 (#72),
@5: Sup: 73 (#178); Ego: 1 (#73),
@6: Sup: 76 (#254); Ego: 3 (#76),
@7: Sup: 35 (#289); Ego: 40 (#116),
@8: Sup: 36 (#325); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #325; Feme: #117
} // #360

#360 as [#4, #10, #1, #300, #1, #3, #40, #1] = diatagma (G1297): {UMBRA:
#18 as #360 % #41 = #32} 1) an injunction, mandate;

G2519@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21),
@3: Sup: 30 (#71); Ego: 9 (#30),
@4: Sup: 38 (#109); Ego: 8 (#38),
@5: Sup: 41 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 3 (#41),
@6: Sup: 49 (#199); Ego: 8 (#49),
@7: Sup: 25 (#224); Ego: 57 (#106),
@8: Sup: 26 (#250); Ego: 1 (#107),
@9: Sup: 36 (#286); Ego: 10 (#117),
Male: #286; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #557 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;

THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
I lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.

#VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
#TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
#POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
#TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
#CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
@3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
@4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181

#360 as [#20, #1, #9, #8, #3, #8, #300, #1, #10] = kathegetes (G2519):
{UMBRA: #20 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) a guide; 2) a master, teacher;

G1924@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95),
@4: Sup: 17 (#40); Ego: 3 (#98),
@5: Sup: 22 (#62); Ego: 5 (#103),
@6: Sup: 25 (#87); Ego: 3 (#106),
@7: Sup: 44 (#131); Ego: 19 (#125),
@8: Sup: 45 (#176); Ego: 1 (#126),
@9: Sup: 4 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 40 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
@10: Sup: 44 (#224); Ego: 40 (#206),
@11: Sup: 49 (#273); Ego: 5 (#211),
@12: Sup: 18 (#291); Ego: 50 (#261),
@13: Sup: 26 (#317); Ego: 8 (#269),
Male: #317; Feme: #269
} // #350

#350 as [#5, #80, #10, #3, #5, #3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #5, #50, #8] =
epigrapho (G1924): {UMBRA: #23 as #1499 % #41 = #23} 1) to write upon,
inscribe; 2) metaph. to write upon the mind;

G3534@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 60 (#110); Ego: 10 (#60),
@3: Sup: 80 (#190); Ego: 20 (#80),
@4: Sup: 69 (#259); Ego: 70 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#285); Ego: 38 (#188),
Male: #285; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #350 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#350 as [#50, #10, #20, #70, #200] = nikos (G3534): {UMBRA: #26 as #350
% #41 = #22} 1) victory; 2) to utterly vanquish;

G5055@{
@1: Sup: 57 (#57); Ego: 57 (#57),
@2: Sup: 62 (#119); Ego: 5 (#62),
@3: Sup: 11 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 30 (#92),
@4: Sup: 16 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 5 (#97),
@5: Sup: 26 (#172); Ego: 10 (#107),
Male: #172; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1140 % #41 = #33 - Achievable Goals, Virtue of Discrimination;
I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint, Small Accumulating,
The taming power of the small, Small harvest; Tetra: 35 - Gathering;

THOTH MEASURE: #33 - Oh thou Horned one, who makest thine appearance at
Sais; I am not noisy in my speech.

#VIRTUE: With Closeness (no. #33), no possible gap, but
#TOOLS: With Completion (no. #73), no possible change.
#POSITION: With Massing (no. #59), affairs emptying.
#TIME: With Legion (no. #32), affairs filling.
#CANON: #197

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_197@{
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
@2: Sup: 25 (#58); Ego: 73 (#106),
@3: Sup: 3 (#61); Ego: 59 (#165),
@4: Sup: 35 (#96); Ego: 32 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
Male: #96; Feme: #197
} // #197

#350 as [#300, #5, #30, #5, #10] = teleo (G5055): {UMBRA: #30 as #1140 %
#41 = #33} 1) to bring to a close, to finish, to end; 2) to perform,
execute, complete, fulfil, (so that the thing done corresponds to what
has been said, the order, command etc.); 3) to pay; 1a) passed,
finished; 2a) with special reference to the subject matter, to carry out
the contents of a command; 2b) with reference also to the form, to do
just as commanded, and generally involving the notion of time, to
perform the last act which completes a process, to accomplish, fulfil;
3a) of tribute;

On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law,
regarding adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname
and those who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers
(naamsaanneming registers) were created to record the family names that
were adopted. These registers often assist you in your research when
moving from the civil registration period to the church registers.

The name adoption registers were maintained by each municipality and did
not follow a particular format. They vary from one municipality to the
next and were seldom indexed. Unfortunately, not all registers have
survived. Most registers provide the name and age of the registrant and
that of his living children and grand-children. If you are lucky, the
full date and place of birth was recorded. Many municipalities included
the registrant’s address.

Interestingly, a wife was not usually listed with her husband in the
name adoption registers. If her grandfather or father was alive at the
time, she would be listed under their entry. Often widows were listed
with their children and grandchildren.

Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands
were and are rare."

<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>

Within ancient Rome, Latin has {ie.

due to it's Pythagorean nomenclature @5 - PHALLUS / @1 - ENGENDERING
dynamic of MEMBRUM VIRILE / PUERILE as 'ACTIVE' male / 'PASSIVE' female
binomial construct which also applied to the naming of persons as
conveyed by Biblical narrative:

"And Simon he *SURNAMED* Peter; And James the son of Zebedee, and John
the brother of James; and he *SURNAMED* them Boanerges, which is, The
sons of thunder..." [Mark 3:16-17 (KJV)]

"I have *SURNAMED* thee, though thou hast not known me." [Isaiah 45:4
(KJV)] <-- *THIS* *IS* *NAMING* *CONVENTION* *IS* *NOT* *BINOMIAL* *BUT*
*TRINOMIAL* *BECAUSE* *OF* *THE* *SON* *OF* *MAN* *AS* *A* *NON*
*PROCREATIONAL* *CONSTRUCT*: "Thus saith the LORD, Keep ye judgment, and
do justice: for my salvation is near to come, and my righteousness to be
revealed.

Blessed is the man that doeth this, and the *SON* *OF* *MAN* that layeth
hold on it; that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and keepeth his
hand from doing any evil.

Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the
LORD, speak, saying, The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people:
neither let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree.

For thus saith the LORD unto the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths, and
choose the things that please me, and take hold of my covenant; Even
unto them will I give in mine #391 - *HOUSE* and within my walls a place
and *a* *name* *better* *than* *of* *sons* *and* *of* *daughters*: *I*
*will* *give* *them* *an* *everlasting* *name*, *that* *shall* *not*
*be* *cut* *off*.

Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the LORD, to
serve him, and to love the name of the LORD, to be his servants, every
one that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my
covenant;
Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my
house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be
accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called an house of
prayer for all people.

The Lord GOD which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I
gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him." [Isaiah
56:1-8 (KJV)]

} no equivalent translation for defining homosexuality, nor
heterosexuality as an individual’s sexual nature. Gay or straight, there
would be no distinction.

Sexuality instead is determined by behavioural mannerisms, whether
masculine or passive in both male and female roles. Roman society had a
patriarchal system in which the gender role of the male is the primary
authority, emphasized by the “active” masculinity as a premise of
governance, power and status.

In the case of the freeborn women of Rome, they were sometimes described
as “tribas fricatrix”, meaning “she who rubs” and “virago”, from the
latin word vir (virile man), a term used to describe a woman who
demonstrates exemplary and heroic qualities.

Roman religion supported acceptance of sexuality, as an aspect that
prospered religious practice for improving erotic lifestyle as well as
defining an individual’s power through the procreative force of the
male. Such traditions were a sign of active masculinity, but whether the
religious tolerance can be applicable to homosexual acts is unknown.

Men were free to have intercourse with men, but generally only
acceptable in instances where the masculinity of the freeborn Roman
citizen wasn't subject to the law as Lex Scantinia, otherwise bringing
his name and family reputation into dis-repute or infamia (infamia – A
loss of legal or social standing).

Lex Scantinia was a Roman law that historians believe was created to
penalise any male citizen of high standing that took a willing role in
passive sexual behaviour. From a societal perspective, to be “passive”
or “submissive”, threatened the very fabric of masculinity, with
feminine traits, submission and passive mannerisms being an act of the
lower class and slaves.

Same sex intercourse with prostitutes or slaves was actually acceptable,
not vitiating on a freeborn’s masculinity as long as the freeborn
citizen took the active role in penetration. In rare cases, freeborns
who bestowed their anal orifice or “scultima”, was in florid slang a
“Scultimidonus.” Translated as “asshole bestower,” mentioned in text
from the Roman Satirist, Gaius Lucilius (c.160s – 103/2 BC).

In the legions, the act of homosexuality amongst soldiers (as similarly
applied to the Dutch instance of male to male sexual activity upon
ships) was considered a violation of military discipline and subject to
harsh penalties. Polybius (ca. 200–118 BC), a Greek Historian reported
in his journals that same sex activity amongst soldiers was punishable
by the fustuarium, (clubbing to death).

As with any freeborn, Soldiers were allowed to engage in same-sex
relations with slaves, prostitutes and captives as a sign of inserting
their sexual authority and their (active) masculinity. An incident
related by Plutarch in his biography of Marius, illustrates the
soldier’s right to maintain his sexual integrity. In this instance, a
legionary named Trebonius was the object of sexual assaults by his
superior officer, Gaius Luscius. Trebonius was brought before a tribunal
for killing Luscius, but later acquitted and awarded a crown of bravery
for defending his masculinity and freeborn male purity.

In another case of same sex in the army, “De Bello Hispaniensi,” a book
believed to have been written by Julius Caesar (Although the authorship
is heavily disputed) details Caesar’s campaigns on the Iberian Peninsula
and mentions a Roman officer who engages in regular sexual acts with his
concubine (concubinus).

Although the Lex Scantinia and the enforcement of the law is mentioned
in several ancient sources, such as 227 BC where Gaius Scantinius
Capitolinus was put on a Lex trial for sexually molesting the son of
Marcus Claudius Marcellus; the full legality and provisions of the law
are still unclear. Lex Scantinia has never been proven as a direct
assault on homosexuality, nor penalising the general act within ancient
Rome as a crime. Instead, it was essentially a rule to police the
masculine nature of a Roman citizen by enforcing that a freeborn takes
the “top” or “active” role in sex.
[<https://www.heritagedaily.com/2018/01/roman-sex-sexuality-slaves-and-lex-scantinia/97996>]"

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #52 - MEASURES, uses the term
*BINOME* as a FOOTNOTE expansion within the context of "Without such
guides, the fragile seeds of morality innate in each person can never
develop along the lines of Heaven's manifest intentions for the world.

APPRAISAL #7: To draw guidelines without measuring
Brings down the instant ridicule of ghosts.
FATHOMING #7: Unmeasured guidelines
Mean: Those with keen insight only laugh. [WANG YA contrasts the BINOME
MING CH'A with ghosts {ie. the NETHERWORLD}]

Those who fail either to take the proper measure of a situation or apply
the guidelines of the sages to a problem deserve blame. Ghosts represent
the shadowy spirit world {ie. the NETHERWORLD}. With their special
insight Into human affairs, they are able to discern such failures more
quickly than ordinary individuals. As all perceptive persons withdraw
their support from the individual who refuses to reform, *DISASTER*
*SURELY* *FOLLOWS*.

APPRAISAL #8: *RED* from the stone cannot be pried apart.
Equally ingrained is the knight’s integrity.
FATHOMING #8: The indelible nature of the stone’s *RED*
Means: Covenants are possible with him. [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53
BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 52 -
MEASURE, A translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by
Michael Nylan 1993, p 322, 578]

He who presideth over the *Red* ones. [CHAPTER #99, EGYPTIAN BOOK OF
THE DEAD]

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #51 - CONSTANCY, conveys a similar
expansion within the context of, "In this auspicious APPRAISAL #7
aligned with DAY, the flowing water calls to mind the desirable
qualities of flood-like CH'I associated with integrity, a power at once
gentle and inexorable in its effect: "Anubis is my bearer, for he who
lulleth me to rest is the god in Lion form.

Do thou save me!

I am He who cometh forth as one who breaketh through the door; and
everlasting is the Daylight which his will hath created.

"I know the deep waters" is my name.

I satisfy the desires of the Glorified, who are by millions and hundreds
of thousands [Text corrupt.] I am the guardian of their interests,
actively working at the hours of the day adjusting the arms of Sahu;
twelve in the circling round, uniting hands, each of them with another.
But the Sixth of them in the Tuat is the
dolf
2018-08-30 14:13:31 UTC
Permalink
-- CHINESE DAOIST YANG HSIUNG (4 BCE) USE OF YANG CH’I / YIN BINOME *AS*
*REFLECTING* EQUIVALENCE TO 22 (HEBREW?) STOICHEION NAMED ELEMENTS WITHIN
CHAPTER #99 [#ONE MAGIC SQUARE PROTOTYPE] IN EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD THE
PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE BASIS OF CONVENTION
FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES
Post by dolf
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...
Translation: but we do our best
Why say it twice? Repetition is a major problem with your writing,
together with your extensive parenthetic rambling.
Post by dolf
[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]
It's a phrase, not a "metempirical whatsit", whatever that means.
Such dictum which you advance concerning the permissibility of variation as
to the NATURE of noun, pronoun or adjective by which its grammatical form
is conveyed as acceptable binomial nomenclature usage is as “knit one purl
one” just ribbing and the of sowing discordant bi-conditionals objectives {

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH IS
EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE
BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding appropriately."

} with impetus of FOUL declension and has no intrinsic ontological dignity
worth emulating as pretence to any principled life: “Be not deceived: evil
communications corrupt good manners.

Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of
God: I speak this to your shame.”

The garment which you are hodgepodging is a corruption of decency and is
barely capable to cover your paunch and bollocks: “For this corruptible
must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal
shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying
that is written, *Death* *Is* *swallowed* *up* *in* *victory*.

O death, where is thy sting? *O* *grave*, *where* *is* *thy* *victory*?

EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 which is the equivalent MAGIC ROW SUM
to the FIRST MAGIC SQUARE the Egyptian ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

The Patrol who goeth round, and who piloteth the Double Earth; Seb abideth
stably by means of their rudders: the divine Form which revealeth the Solar
Orb: and He who presideth over the Red ones.) [Text corrupt.]

Let me be brought in as a distressed mariner, and let my Soul come to me,
which is my brother, and go to that place which thou knowest.

"Let me be told my name," say,

1. The Mooring-post. "Lord of the Double-Earth in the Shrine" is thy name.

#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: Scales of Merit}
AUTONOMOUS HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY: {ANIMUS: OBEDIENCE (#ALEPH to
#LAMED)}

2. The Blade of the Rudder. "Leg of Apis" is thy name.

#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: {DOUBLE: #1 - Nature Contains Nature
{#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature}}

3. The Hawser. "The Side-Lock which Anubis fastens on to the swathing work"
is thy name.

#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: {DOUBLE: #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
{#5 - Act of Nature}}

4. The Stern or Stem Posts. "The two columns of the Nether-world" is thy
name.

#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature / #1 - Nature Contains Nature: {DOUBLE:
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}

5. The Hold. "Akar" is thy name.

#5 - Act of Nature / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature

6. The Mast. "Bearer of the Great one whilst she passeth" is thy name.

#6 - Form of Nature / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature

7. The Keel. "Backbone of Apuat" is thy name.

#7 - Engendering Nature / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature

8. The Mast-head. "Throat of Emsta" is thy name.

#8 - Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature

9. The Sail. "Nut" is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature

10. The Leathers. "Made of the hide of Mnevis, which Sutu hath scorched,"
is thy name.

#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature

11. The Oars. "Fingers of the elder" is your name.

#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 -
Engendering Nature}}

12. The Bracement. "Hand of Isis, stanching the blood of the Eye of Horus,"
is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature

13. The Ribs. "Emsta, Hapi, Taumautef, Kebehsenuf, He who taketh captive,
He who taketh by force, He who seeth his Father, and He who maketh
himself," are your names.

#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: The Tongue of Decree Deciding Between
Them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]
TETRAD FOR ANY GENII THESIS: {SPIRITUS: AIDING (#MEM to #QOPH)}

14. The Look-out. "Master of the Grounds" is thy name.

#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

15. The Tiller. "Merit" is thy name.

#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 /#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature]

16. The Rudder. "The Umpire, beaming forth from the water," is thy name.

#4 - Nature Amended In Its Nature [#111 /#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature]

17. The Hull. "The Leg of Hathor, which Ra wounded, on lifting her into
the Sektit Boat," is thy name.

#5 - Act of Nature: {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming Nature}
[#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

18. The Boatman. "Off," is thy name.

#6 - Form Of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

19. The Breeze, since thou art conveyed by me: "The Northern Breeze
proceeding from Tmu to the Nose of Chent-Amenta," is thy name.

#7 - Engendering Nature: {*OATHS* OF DIEU ET MON DROIT} [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

20. The Stream, since thou sailest upon me: "Their Mirror" is thy name.

#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE

21. The Swallow. "Destroyer of the large-handed at the place of
purification" is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]
DEFINE THE @5 CANONICAL PRINCIPLE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTIC HERE

22. The Land. Since thou walkest upon me: "The Tip of Heaven, the Coming
forth from the swathings in the Garden of Aarru, and the Coming forth in
Exultation," is thy name.

#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 - Totality
of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]

To be said before them.

Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for ever,
and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to me food
and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the Shensu-cake and
the Kefen-cake: let my place be in the great hall in presence of the mighty
god.

I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course.

Let me not be stopped at the Meskat; let not the Sebau have mastery over my
limbs.

I have bread in Pu and beer in Tepu. Let your largesses of this day be
granted to me; offerings of wheat and barley, offerings of anta and of
vestments, offerings of oxen, and ducks, which are offerings for life,
health and strength, and also offerings for coming forth by day, in all
forms in which it pleaseth me to come forth in the Garden of Aarru.

If this chapter be known he will come forth at the Garden of Aarru; there
will be given to him the Shensu-cake, the measure of drink and the
persen-cake, and fields of wheat and barley of seven cubits (It is the
followers of Horus who reap them), for he eateth of that wheat and barley,
and he is made whole in his limbs through that wheat and barley, and his
limbs spring up even as with those gods. And he cometh forth in the Garden
of Aarru in all the forms in which it pleaseth him to come forth.

The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law [of
metempirical contortions as normative deceptions such as yours]”

Matthew 23:27 (KJV)
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within
full of dead [men's] bones, and of all uncleanness.

Luke 11:52 (KJV)
Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye
entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

The fact that ethical principles carry in themselves the modal status of
necessity provides an important methodical starting point for the
construction of ethical theories. Thus, the execution of the commonly
performed counterfactual thought experiments in ethics is only possible
under the condition that the principles of valuation support such an
operation. Contingent principles are not in a position to do that, Kant
makes methodical use of this log1cal quality of moral principles
particularly in those places where he speaks of other “*RATIONAL* *BEINGS*”
(eg. GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). The central passage in the Preface of
the Groundwork in which he argues for the necessity of a pure moral
philosophy also belongs to this methodical usage {

}. It does not matter in these passages whether there actually are other
such beings as, for example, the inhabitants of other planets or also God.
For the Kantian argumentation it is sufficient that such beings could
exist, that their existence is thinkable. The corresponding passages must
be understood as methodically executed thought experiments, which make use
of the particular modal status of ethical principles. Now it becomes clear
why the “*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*” have a comparable modal status to the
“*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.” Laws of nature support counterfactual arguments,
too. In order to achieve this, they also must have a modal status which is
higher than simple contingency. The connections formulated in them are also
valid in all natural law governed, possible worlds, and in this respect,
they exhibit the modal status of [*ONTIC*] necessity. The difference
between laws of nature and laws of freedom appears to consist primarily in
the fact that the *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* {

#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy
(H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition, contrariness,
encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;

As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days

#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days

} are concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while the
laws of [*ONTOLOGICAL*] freedom are concerned with all-quantified,
normative bi-conditionals, each receiving the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity." [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]
Your rationalisation for your errors in writing, even if it were coherent, is nonsense.
Your errors are errors because there are rules of language and of writing
and you are not following them.
Your "binomial" nonsense is just something in your own imagination and it
does not override the rules of language.
Post by dolf
Metempirics is the study of concepts and relationships conceived as beyond
and yet related to knowledge gained empirically
And yet the phrase you refer to is a simple declarative assertion,
nothing to do with metempiric whatsits.
Post by dolf
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 69 (#69),
@2: Sup: 81 (#118); Ego: 24 (#93),
@3: Sup: 18 (#136); Ego: 2 (#95),
4: Sup: 31 (#167); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 28 (#195); Ego: 81 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
@6: Sup: 16 (#211); Ego: 63 (#248),
Male: #211; Feme: #248
And that's just gobbledigook.
<SNIP gibberish>
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH IS
EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE
BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding appropriately."

In the “*GOLDEN* *AGE*” of the past, communities purportedly served the
legitimate interests of all while maintaining the dignity of each. Stable
hierarchical relations wove elements of society together in a complex web
of mutual obligation, but reciprocity (implying not only mutual obligation
but also an empathetic “likening to oneself”) was also needed to temper the
possible ill effects of unmediated power relations. The perfect community,
therefore, was thought to be equally dependent upon hierarchy and
reciprocity. As such, the perfect community is modelled upon the cosmos,
where YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of growth, while YIN
acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH IS EQUIVALENT TO THE
PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER], responding appropriately.
This tetragram celebrates such ideal contact, which, the Head text
promises, makes the good individual both resplendent as the sun [ie.
CHAPTER #99 - *THE* *DIVINE* *FORM* *WHICH* *REVEALETH* *THE* *SOLAR* *ORB*
/ CHAPTER #123 -- WHEREBY ONE ENTERETH INTO THE GREAT HOUSE / CHAPTER #124
- WHEREBY ONE COMETH TO THE DIVINE CIRCLE OF OSIRIS] and powerful as the
king in his sacred audience hall.

"Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for ever,
and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to me food
and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the Shensu-cake and
the Kefen-cake: *LET* *MY* *PLACE* *BE* *IN* *THE* *GREAT* *HALL* *IN*
*PRESENCE* *OF* *THE* *MIGHTY* *GOD*.

I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course." [CHAPTER #99, EGYPTIAN
BOOK OF THE DEAD]

THE HALL OF LIGHT, ACCORDING TO EARLY COMMENTATORS, REFERS SIMPLY TO THE
REGION ABOVE GROUND IN THE LIGHT OF DAY, AS CONTRASTED WITH THE YELLOW
SPRINGS BELOW GROUND. BUT THE SAME *BINOME*

NOTE [Algebra]: an expression that is a sum of difference of two terms such
as the Pythagorean: c² (25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN) + b² (16
as #34 - JUPITER); Binominal nomenclature or binary nomenclature is a
formal system of naming species of living things by giving each a name
composed of two parts, both of which use Latin grammatical forms, although
they can be based on words from other languages

That the Roman Catholic nomenclature conforms ONLY to such Pythagorean: c²
(25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN) + b² (16 as #34 - JUPITER);
Binominal nomenclature or binary nomenclature which is reliant upon its
TETRAD (36 as #111 - SOL INVICTUS) as its Intellectual Proposition.

IS USED TO DESCRIBE THE SACRED SITE WHERE THE KING MAKES RITUAL CONTACT
WITH THE GODS. ITS USE SUGGESTS THAT ALL THINGS ARE SANCTIFIED BY CONTACT
WITH THE MYSTERY.

This tetragram #16 is correlated with the Rainfall solar period. Rain
symbolizes beneficent grace and germinating influence, whether the
reference is to *SEXUAL* *CONTACT* *OR* *TO* *POLITICAL* *RELATIONS*.
Consequently, the general tone of this tetragram is lucky, except in those
few cases where “stimulus and response” occurs between categorically
dissimilar partners, *PROMPTING* *REPULSION* *AND* *DISASTER*. [SOURCE:
YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON
TETRA: 16 - CONTACT, A translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING
by Michael Nylan 1993, p 165]

*THE* *CONSIDERATION* *OF* *LACK* *OF *SURNAMES* *WITHIN* *THE*
*NETHERLANDS* *SUGGESTS* *THAT* *THEY* *WERE* *NOT* *AS* *ONTOLOGICAL*
*NECESSITY* *SUBJECT* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *EMPIRE*
*GOVERNANCE*

Nous: #27
Time: 09:40 hrs
Date: 2018.8.18
Torah: [#40, #10, #5]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 50 (#90); Ego: 10 (#50),
@3: Sup: 55 (#145); Ego: 5 (#55),
Male: #145; Feme: #55
} // #55

Dao: Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes
Tetra: #74 - Closure
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite

Latin: Expetendus {God, rescuing Father} Alt: Chohvyal {Breathe the Woe of
God} {

1. HELPS PRESERVE CONJUGAL FIDELITY & FERTILITY BETWEEN SPOUSES
2. THE GENERATIONS
3. LOVE
4. Senciner
}

Shealtiel {Asked or lent of God}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#360 / #350} / HETEROS {#367 / #313} / TORAH {#319 /
#289}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:4,col:8,nous:27&idea:{m,27}&idea:{f,27}&idea:{m,360}&idea:{f,350}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 1, row: 4, col: 8, nous: 27 [Date: 2018.8.18, Time: 09:40
hrs, Super: #360 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes; I-Ching:
H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 - Closure,
Ego: #350 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes; I-Ching: H21 -
Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 - Closure]

H4016@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 42 (#44); Ego: 40 (#42),
@3: Sup: 44 (#88); Ego: 2 (#44),
@4: Sup: 20 (#108); Ego: 57 (#101),
@5: Sup: 30 (#138); Ego: 10 (#111),
@6: Sup: 36 (#174); Ego: 6 (#117),
Male: #174; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #342 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics); I-Ching:
H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 - Branching
Out;

THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
Mabit; I deal not fraudulently.

#VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
#TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
#POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
#TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
#CANON: #140

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
@2: Sup: 68 (#82); Ego: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 79 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 11 (#79),
@4: Sup: 59 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 61 (#140 - I DEAL NOT
FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #220; Feme: #140
} // #140

#360 as [#2, #40, #2, #300, #10, #6] = mabush (H4016): {UMBRA: #4 as #342 %
#41 = #14} 1) private parts, his privates, male genitals; 1a) literally -
'that excites shame';

H4828@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
@3: Sup: 27 (#127); Ego: 38 (#108),
@4: Sup: 16 (#143); Ego: 70 (#178),
@5: Sup: 36 (#179); Ego: 20 (#198),
Male: #179; Feme: #198
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra:
26 - Endeavour;

THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
appearance in Urit; I am not hot of speech.

#VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
#TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
#POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
#TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
#CANON: #158

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
@1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
@2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
@4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I AM
NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
Male: #156; Feme: #158
} // #158

#360 as [#30, #40, #200, #70, #20] = merea` (H4828): {UMBRA: #6 as #310 %
#41 = #23} 1) companion, friend, confidential friend;

H3584@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 36 (#58); Ego: 20 (#36),
@4: Sup: 44 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 8 (#44),
@5: Sup: 20 (#122); Ego: 57 (#101),
@6: Sup: 26 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 6 (#107),
Male: #148; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #328 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.

#VIRTUE:
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#350 as [#6, #10, #20, #8, #300, #6] = kachash (H3584): {UMBRA: #4 as #328
% #41 = #41} 1) to deceive, lie, fail, grow lean, be disappointing, be
untrue, be insufficient, be found liars, belie, deny, dissemble, deal
falsely; 1a) (Qal) to become lean; 1b) (Niphal) to cringe, feign obedience;
1c) (Piel); 1c1) to deceive, deny falsely; 1c2) to act deceptively; 1c3) to
cringe; 1c4) to disappoint, fail; 1d) (Hithpael) to cringe, feign
obedience;

H5237@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 57 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}); Ego: 38
(#138),
@5: Sup: 67 (#253); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 26 (#279); Ego: 40 (#188),
Male: #279; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #280 % #41 = #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been
spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;

THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in Memphis; I
am neither a liar nor a doer of mischief.

#VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
#TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
#POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
#TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
#CANON: #215

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_215@{
@1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
@2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
@3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}),
@4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF
MISCHIEF {%34}),
Male: #134; Feme: #215
} // #215

#350 as [#30, #50, #20, #200, #10, #40] = nokriy (H5237): {UMBRA: #8 as
#280 % #41 = #34} 1) foreign, alien; 1a) foreign; 1b) foreigner (subst);
1c) foreign woman, harlot; 1d) unknown, unfamiliar (fig.);

H6187@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 29 (#69); Ego: 70 (#110),
@3: Sup: 67 (#136); Ego: 38 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@4: Sup: 6 (#142); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 20
(#188),
Male: #168; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #290 % #41 = #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition;

THOTH MEASURE: #3 - Oh thou of the Nose, who makest thine appearance at
Chemunnu; I am not evil minded.

#VIRTUE: With Mired (no. #3), great woe.
#TOOLS: With Encounters (no. #43), small desire.
#POSITION: The ways of Purity (no. #37) and ...
#TIME: Pattern (no. #47) where some are simple and some are complex?
#CANON: #130

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_130@{
@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 46 (#49); Ego: 43 (#46),
@3: Sup: 2 (#51); Ego: 37 (#83),
@4: Sup: 49 (#100); Ego: 47 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #100; Feme: #130
} // #130

#350 as [#40, #70, #200, #20, #20] = `erek (H6187): {UMBRA: #10 as #290 %
#41 = #3} 1) order, row, estimate, things that are set in order, layer,
pile; 1a) order, row; 1b) estimate, valuation;

H6735@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 19 (#28); Ego: 10 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#85); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 67 (#152); Ego: 10 (#67),
@5: Sup: 26 (#178); Ego: 40 (#107),
Male: #178; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#350 as [#90, #10, #200, #10, #40] = tsiyr (H6735): {UMBRA: #13 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) envoy, messenger; 2) pivot of door, hinge; 3) pang, distress;


H7386@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 48 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 10 (#48),
@3: Sup: 67 (#153); Ego: 19 (#67),
@4: Sup: 77 (#230); Ego: 10 (#77),
@5: Sup: 36 (#266); Ego: 40 (#117),
Male: #266; Feme: #117
} // #360

#360 as [#200, #10, #100, #10, #40] = reyq (H7386): {UMBRA: #15 as #310 %
#41 = #23} 1) empty, vain; 1a) empty (of vessels); 1b) empty, idle,
worthless (ethically);

G155@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 11 (#12); Ego: 10 (#11),
@3: Sup: 68 (#80); Ego: 57 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 76 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 8 (#76),
@5: Sup: 35 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 40 (#116),
@6: Sup: 36 (#227); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #227; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #360 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 -
Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 -
Encounters;

THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit; I
do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
#TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
#POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
#TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
#CANON: #191

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
@1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
@2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
@4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191

#360 as [#1, #10, #300, #8, #40, #1] = aitema (G155): {UMBRA: #17 as #360 %
#41 = #32} 1) petition, request, required;

G1297@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 72 (#105); Ego: 57 (#72),
@5: Sup: 73 (#178); Ego: 1 (#73),
@6: Sup: 76 (#254); Ego: 3 (#76),
@7: Sup: 35 (#289); Ego: 40 (#116),
@8: Sup: 36 (#325); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #325; Feme: #117
} // #360

#360 as [#4, #10, #1, #300, #1, #3, #40, #1] = diatagma (G1297): {UMBRA:
#18 as #360 % #41 = #32} 1) an injunction, mandate;

G2519@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21),
@3: Sup: 30 (#71); Ego: 9 (#30),
@4: Sup: 38 (#109); Ego: 8 (#38),
@5: Sup: 41 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 3 (#41),
@6: Sup: 49 (#199); Ego: 8 (#49),
@7: Sup: 25 (#224); Ego: 57 (#106),
@8: Sup: 26 (#250); Ego: 1 (#107),
@9: Sup: 36 (#286); Ego: 10 (#117),
Male: #286; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #557 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence;
I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving;
Tetra: 18 - Waiting;

THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu; I
lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.

#VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
#TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
#POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
#TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
#CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
@3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
@4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181

#360 as [#20, #1, #9, #8, #3, #8, #300, #1, #10] = kathegetes (G2519):
{UMBRA: #20 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) a guide; 2) a master, teacher;

G1924@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95),
@4: Sup: 17 (#40); Ego: 3 (#98),
@5: Sup: 22 (#62); Ego: 5 (#103),
@6: Sup: 25 (#87); Ego: 3 (#106),
@7: Sup: 44 (#131); Ego: 19 (#125),
@8: Sup: 45 (#176); Ego: 1 (#126),
@9: Sup: 4 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 40 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
@10: Sup: 44 (#224); Ego: 40 (#206),
@11: Sup: 49 (#273); Ego: 5 (#211),
@12: Sup: 18 (#291); Ego: 50 (#261),
@13: Sup: 26 (#317); Ego: 8 (#269),
Male: #317; Feme: #269
} // #350

#350 as [#5, #80, #10, #3, #5, #3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #5, #50, #8] =
epigrapho (G1924): {UMBRA: #23 as #1499 % #41 = #23} 1) to write upon,
inscribe; 2) metaph. to write upon the mind;

G3534@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 60 (#110); Ego: 10 (#60),
@3: Sup: 80 (#190); Ego: 20 (#80),
@4: Sup: 69 (#259); Ego: 70 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#285); Ego: 38 (#188),
Male: #285; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #350 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra:
34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#350 as [#50, #10, #20, #70, #200] = nikos (G3534): {UMBRA: #26 as #350 %
#41 = #22} 1) victory; 2) to utterly vanquish;

G5055@{
@1: Sup: 57 (#57); Ego: 57 (#57),
@2: Sup: 62 (#119); Ego: 5 (#62),
@3: Sup: 11 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 30 (#92),
@4: Sup: 16 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 5 (#97),
@5: Sup: 26 (#172); Ego: 10 (#107),
Male: #172; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1140 % #41 = #33 - Achievable Goals, Virtue of Discrimination;
I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint, Small Accumulating,
The taming power of the small, Small harvest; Tetra: 35 - Gathering;

THOTH MEASURE: #33 - Oh thou Horned one, who makest thine appearance at
Sais; I am not noisy in my speech.

#VIRTUE: With Closeness (no. #33), no possible gap, but
#TOOLS: With Completion (no. #73), no possible change.
#POSITION: With Massing (no. #59), affairs emptying.
#TIME: With Legion (no. #32), affairs filling.
#CANON: #197

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_197@{
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
@2: Sup: 25 (#58); Ego: 73 (#106),
@3: Sup: 3 (#61); Ego: 59 (#165),
@4: Sup: 35 (#96); Ego: 32 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
Male: #96; Feme: #197
} // #197

#350 as [#300, #5, #30, #5, #10] = teleo (G5055): {UMBRA: #30 as #1140 %
#41 = #33} 1) to bring to a close, to finish, to end; 2) to perform,
execute, complete, fulfil, (so that the thing done corresponds to what has
been said, the order, command etc.); 3) to pay; 1a) passed, finished; 2a)
with special reference to the subject matter, to carry out the contents of
a command; 2b) with reference also to the form, to do just as commanded,
and generally involving the notion of time, to perform the last act which
completes a process, to accomplish, fulfil; 3a) of tribute;

On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.

The name adoption registers were maintained by each municipality and did
not follow a particular format. They vary from one municipality to the next
and were seldom indexed. Unfortunately, not all registers have survived.
Most registers provide the name and age of the registrant and that of his
living children and grand-children. If you are lucky, the full date and
place of birth was recorded. Many municipalities included the registrant’s
address.

Interestingly, a wife was not usually listed with her husband in the name
adoption registers. If her grandfather or father was alive at the time, she
would be listed under their entry. Often widows were listed with their
children and grandchildren.

Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."

<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>

Within ancient Rome, Latin has {ie.

due to it's Pythagorean nomenclature @5 - PHALLUS / @1 - ENGENDERING
dynamic of MEMBRUM VIRILE / PUERILE as 'ACTIVE' male / 'PASSIVE' female
binomial construct which also applied to the naming of persons as conveyed
by Biblical narrative:

"And Simon he *SURNAMED* Peter; And James the son of Zebedee, and John the
brother of James; and he *SURNAMED* them Boanerges, which is, The sons of
thunder..." [Mark 3:16-17 (KJV)]

"I have *SURNAMED* thee, though thou hast not known me." [Isaiah 45:4
(KJV)] <-- *THIS* *AS* *NAMING* *CONVENTION* *IS* *NOT* *BINOMIAL* *BUT*
*TRINOMIAL* *BECAUSE* *OF* *THE* *SON* *OF* *MAN* *AS* *A* *PROCREATIONAL*
*CONSTRUCT*: "Thus saith the LORD, Keep ye judgment, and do justice: for my
salvation is near to come, and my righteousness to be revealed.

Blessed is the man that doeth this, and the *SON* *OF* *MAN* that layeth
hold on it; that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and keepeth his
hand from doing any evil.

Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the LORD,
speak, saying, The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people: neither
let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree.

For thus saith the LORD unto the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths, and choose
the things that please me, and take hold of my covenant; Even unto them
will I give in mine #391 - *HOUSE* and within my walls a place and *a*
*name* *better* *than* *of* *sons* *and* *of* *daughters*: *I* *will*
*give* *them* *an* *everlasting* *name*, *that* *shall* *not* *be* *cut*
*off*.

Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the LORD, to serve
him, and to love the name of the LORD, to be his servants, every one that
keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my covenant;
Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my
house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be
accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called an house of prayer
for all people.

The Lord GOD which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I
gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him." [Isaiah
56:1-8 (KJV)]

} no equivalent translation for defining homosexuality, nor heterosexuality
as an individual’s sexual nature. Gay or straight, there would be no
distinction.

Sexuality instead is determined by behavioural mannerisms, whether
masculine or passive in both male and female roles. Roman society had a
patriarchal system in which the gender role of the male is the primary
authority, emphasized by the “active” masculinity as a premise of
governance, power and status.

In the case of the freeborn women of Rome, they were sometimes described as
“tribas fricatrix”, meaning “she who rubs” and “virago”, from the latin
word vir (virile man), a term used to describe a woman who demonstrates
exemplary and heroic qualities.

Roman religion supported acceptance of sexuality, as an aspect that
prospered religious practice for improving erotic lifestyle as well as
defining an individual’s power through the procreative force of the male.
Such traditions were a sign of active masculinity, but whether the
religious tolerance can be applicable to homosexual acts is unknown.

Men were free to have intercourse with men, but generally only acceptable
in instances where the masculinity of the freeborn Roman citizen wasn't
subject to the law as Lex Scantinia, otherwise bringing his name and family
reputation into dis-repute or infamia (infamia – A loss of legal or social
standing).

Lex Scantinia was a Roman law that historians believe was created to
penalise any male citizen of high standing that took a willing role in
passive sexual behaviour. From a societal perspective, to be “passive” or
“submissive”, threatened the very fabric of masculinity, with feminine
traits, submission and passive mannerisms being an act of the lower class
and slaves.

Same sex intercourse with prostitutes or slaves was actually acceptable,
not vitiating on a freeborn’s masculinity as long as the freeborn citizen
took the active role in penetration. In rare cases, freeborns who bestowed
their anal orifice or “scultima”, was in florid slang a “Scultimidonus.”
Translated as “asshole bestower,” mentioned in text from the Roman
Satirist, Gaius Lucilius (c.160s – 103/2 BC).

In the legions, the act of homosexuality amongst soldiers (as similarly
applied to the Dutch instance of male to male sexual activity upon ships)
was considered a violation of military discipline and subject to harsh
penalties. Polybius (ca. 200–118 BC), a Greek Historian reported in his
journals that same sex activity amongst soldiers was punishable by the
fustuarium, (clubbing to death).

As with any freeborn, Soldiers were allowed to engage in same-sex relations
with slaves, prostitutes and captives as a sign of inserting their sexual
authority and their (active) masculinity. An incident related by Plutarch
in his biography of Marius, illustrates the soldier’s right to maintain his
sexual integrity. In this instance, a legionary named Trebonius was the
object of sexual assaults by his superior officer, Gaius Luscius. Trebonius
was brought before a tribunal for killing Luscius, but later acquitted and
awarded a crown of bravery for defending his masculinity and freeborn male
purity.

In another case of same sex in the army, “De Bello Hispaniensi,” a book
believed to have been written by Julius Caesar (Although the authorship is
heavily disputed) details Caesar’s campaigns on the Iberian Peninsula and
mentions a Roman officer who engages in regular sexual acts with his
concubine (concubinus).

Although the Lex Scantinia and the enforcement of the law is mentioned in
several ancient sources, such as 227 BC where Gaius Scantinius Capitolinus
was put on a Lex trial for sexually molesting the son of Marcus Claudius
Marcellus; the full legality and provisions of the law are still unclear.
Lex Scantinia has never been proven as a direct assault on homosexuality,
nor penalising the general act within ancient Rome as a crime. Instead, it
was essentially a rule to police the masculine nature of a Roman citizen by
enforcing that a freeborn takes the “top” or “active” role in sex.
[<https://www.heritagedaily.com/2018/01/roman-sex-sexuality-slaves-and-lex-scantinia/97996>]"

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #52 - MEASURES, uses the term *BINOME*
as a FOOTNOTE expansion within the context of "Without such guides, the
fragile seeds of morality innate in each person can never develop along the
lines of Heaven's manifest intentions for the world.

APPRAISAL #7: To draw guidelines without measuring
Brings down the instant ridicule of ghosts.
FATHOMING #7: Unmeasured guidelines
Mean: Those with keen insight only laugh. [WANG YA contrasts the BINOME
MING CH'A with ghosts {ie. the NETHERWORLD}]

Those who fail either to take the proper measure of a situation or apply
the guidelines of the sages to a problem deserve blame. Ghosts represent
the shadowy spirit world {ie. the NETHERWORLD}. With their special insight
Into human affairs, they are able to discern such failures more quickly
than ordinary individuals. As all perceptive persons withdraw their support
from the individual who refuses to reform, *DISASTER* *SURELY* *FOLLOWS*.

APPRAISAL #8: *RED* from the stone cannot be pried apart.
Equally ingrained is the knight’s integrity.
FATHOMING #8: The indelible nature of the stone’s *RED*
Means: Covenants are possible with him. [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18
CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 52 - MEASURE, A
translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993,
p 322, 578]

He who presideth over the *Red* ones. [CHAPTER #99, EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE
DEAD]

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #51 - CONSTANCY, conveys a similar
expansion within the context of, "In this auspicious APPRAISAL #7 aligned
with DAY, the flowing water calls to mind the desirable qualities of
flood-like CH'I associated with integrity, a power at once gentle and
inexorable in its effect: "Anubis is my bearer, for he who lulleth me to
rest is the god in Lion form.

Do thou save me!

I am He who cometh forth as one who breaketh through the door; and
everlasting is the Daylight which his will hath created.

"I know the deep waters" is my name.

I satisfy the desires of the Glorified, who are by millions and hundreds of
thousands I am the guardian of their interests, actively working at the
hours of the day adjusting the arms of Sahu; twelve in the circling round,
uniting hands, each of them with another.

But the Sixth of them in the Tuat is the Hour of the overthrow of the
Sebau." [EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #64]

At the same time, *THE* *FLOW* SUGGESTS* *THE* *PASSAGE* *OF* *TIME*. When
good men come together, early errors give way to rectitude.

APPRAISAL #8: Constant illness not seen as ill:
Blame is complete, yet uncondemned.
FATHOMING #8: Chronic illness not seen as such
Means: He is unable to cure himself.

The individual's persistent evil doing is likened to a chronic illness.
The individual who has grown accustomed to *MORAL* or physical disease
forgets what health was like. No cure is possible if the individual fails
to see himself as sick. As LAO TZU advises:

One must be sick of illness
If one is to recover from illness.

APPRAISAL #9: Seeing his illness,
Magician-healers will not fail.
FATHOMING #9: Seeing the illness for what it is
Means: He can serve as his own doctor.

In contrast APPRAISAL #8, this individual does not gloss over the serious
nature of his chronic lapses. Once he has diagnosed himself correctly, he
can certainly effect a cure. Good advisers and the Confucian Classics,
after all, exist to help in the process of healing the soul."

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #50 - VASTNESS OR WASTING, again uses
the term BINOME as a FOOTNOTE expansion within the context of GHOST (ie.
NETHERWORLD}: "The verse demonstrate the utter uselessness or unfocussed or
misguided activity. Though an entire *DAY* has been spent in frenzied
pursuit of a goal, no obvious gain results, despite many opportunities.
Alternatively, the same lines can describe a hunter who loses himself in
the pleasure of the chase. Far better '*TO* *CONCENTRATE* THE MIND AND
UNIFY THE WILL' in a single-minded search of the WAY, since this holds out
the promise of success.

APPRAISAL #8: The great accept official posts, . .
Ghosts at the shrine cease wailing.
Some gain their blessings.
FATHOMING #8: That the great accept posts
Means: They restore what had been lost.

The main theme of the verses is clear, though the identity of “the great”
is open to question. Once good leaders take up (or, are restored to)
office, the local patron gods cease their weeping and wailing, in
expectation of renewed good rule and the reinstitution of regular
sacrifices. The common people also expect to benefit from their
administration, and so “some gain their blessings.” Both the gods above and
the people below rejoice in the ability of the truly great to restore what
had been lost.

APPRAISAL #9: Bright pearls used for birdshot.
Even if flesh by chance is struck,
It will not repay the outlay. [Literally: 'the gain, no return' takes FEI
JOU as a BINOME]

FATHOMING #9: Lustrous pearls used for shot
Means: The expense is not recouped.

Pebbles would work as well as pearls in shooting game birds. What’s more,
pebbles, when compared with pearls, are of relatively little value.
Therefore, the hunter can afford to lose a certain number of pebbles,
though he can’t afford to lose a single pearl. Once again, the reader is
urged to carefully consider which acts are truly worthwhile. The Mystery
suggests that when precious human life is to be employed, only the Way
represents a goal sufficiency great to aim for. Unfortunately, the petty
person typically pursues the vastly inferior goals of fame, fortune, and
sex." [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY
OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 50 - VASTING AND WASTING, A translation with
Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993, p 313-314]

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #26 - ENDEAVOUR, again uses the concept
of BINOME within the context of *MORAL* *DIRECTION*: "By analogy, the
person of truth culture gives off a kind of fragrance because he is both
"REFINED AND OF SUBSTANCE" (a pun in Chines for the *BINOME* translated
"BLOSSOM AND FRUIT"). He also should be put to immediate use by his
superiors .

APPRAISAL #7: Once its fragrance is lost,
There in no place to go.
FATHOMING: Losing his fragrance
Mean: Virtue thereby fades.

Here the fragrance of self-cultivation is destroyed. The individual lacks
all sense of *MORAL* *DIRECTION*, as in APPRAISAL #1. But since the time
is later, this now matters more. Decay proceeds from the INNER CORE. Its
equally distressing to watch this is an exquisite flower or in human being.

APPRAISAL #8: Yellow Centre: he escapes calamity
Because he is properly aligned.
FATHOMING #8: Yellow Centre, avoiding calamity,
Means: He is attuned and thus upright." [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18
CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 26 - ENDEAVOUR, A
translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993,
p 209]

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #42 - GOING TO MEET (which is the
*ONTIC* terminus and conforms to THOTH entering the Great Hall knowing the
#42 NAMES of the EGYPTIAN GODS], again uses the concept of BINOME within
the context of *IMMORAL* *CONDUCT* *OF* *BULLYING*: "Chinese traditions
reflect the notion of mutual interaction by *CATEGORY*, by which
transformations over time and space take place by laws of mutual sympathy,
rather than Newtonian law
of cause- and-effect.

The dragon, of course, stands for the moral superior, especially the:
*RULER*; the egg, for the less developed human being. Though both parties
seem to inhabit entirely different spheres, the moral superior miraculously
affects others, who learn by suasive influence to develop properly into
full human beings.

APPRAISAL #3: The quintessential stuff of things
Travels subtly back and forth.
Ill omens precede the quickest senses.
FATHOMING #3: The essence, all unseen, goes back and forth.
Meaning: Evil omens are proof of blame.

[Footnote: Taking CHING as the subject and WEI as the adverb 'subtly',
however others take CHING WEI as a *BINOME*, meaning 'FINEST EMANATIONS';
CHING CHIN as 'the smallest, finest part' of things that respond with
extreme sensitivity and YAO FEN as 'OMINOUS EXALTATIONS']

Since each of the myriad things is composed of numinous CH'I, in some sense
all parts of the cosmos can resonate with others because of their
underlying sympathy. The gods and spirits are only the most exquisitely
sensitive (and therefore, reactive) members of the universe since their
constitutive CH'I is particularly subtle and concentrated
(“quintessential”). By definition, the sage has acquired similar divine
powers of perception. Omen theory tells us that the gods, spirits, and
sages react immediately to the slightest *MORAL* shift on the part of other
human beings. Even such swift reactions, however, lag behind the
spontaneous,
production of portents in the cosmos. The merest inclination towards evil
on the part of those in power, for example, produces serious dislocations
in the starry heavens. In this Appraisal, dedicated to the transition from
thought to action, we are reminded that our innermost thoughts soon prompt
visible reactions. We must take special care, hen, not to depart from the
Way, lest we disorder the entire cosmic fabric.

...

Yellow as the colour assigned to the centre is usually auspicious. Here
the, the problem is that yellow mounts to the top position. (This may
refer to the increasing ascendency of YIN CH'I following the summer
solstice.) Yellow no longer knows its placer, so its characteristic virtues
of self-abnegation, *LOYALTY*, and of good faith fail utterly. Perhaps a
trusted sub-ordinate intends to usurp his superior's position for the word
'RISES' also means 'TO BULLY.' Those with great ambition make the worst
allies.

APPRAISAL #6: Black Heaven meets Yellow Earth.
Their ideas interact, one upon the other.
FATHOMING #6: Black and yellow meeting
Means: They respond by type.

Black is the colour of Heaven; yellow, that of Earth. The interaction of
these two cosmic powers is said to produce timely wind and rain, which all
the myriad things depends depend upon for life. As the CHANGES says:

HEAVEN AND EARTH COME TOGETHER, AND THE MYRIAD THING ARE TRANSFORMED IN
PRISTINE FORM. *MALE* *AND* *FEMALE* *BLEND* *THEIR* *ESSENCES*, *AND*
*THE* *MYRIAD* *THINGS* *ARE* *TRANSFORMED* *AND* *ENGENDERED* [SOURCE:
YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON
TETRA: 42 - GOING TO MEET, A translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN
CHING by Michael Nylan 1993, p 274, 275]

THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/ *MALE* /FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of* *priests*
x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the
'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation =
1092 days x 2 = #2184 days;

THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/ *FEMALE* /MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the law,
that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364
days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of 20 March 1996
/ New Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;

THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ *ENUMERATE* /OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as
right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with
Septet #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.

As I sated within an earlier chapter, that an alternative canonical
approach to expressing these normative {ie. YANG CH'I as MALE / YIN as FEME
are considered a BINOME as IDENTICAL TO THE PYTHAGOREAN AND LATIN BINOMIAL
NOMENCLATURE} bi-conditionals:

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the same
ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the same
light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 - TORAH} - Keep a common
way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.
 
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:

Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).

*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage / sovereign
dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus} Empire
Governance] 
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-30 21:28:16 UTC
Permalink
YOUTUBE: "Dubstep Gaming Music ⛔ Best Dubstep, Drum n Bass, Drumstep ✔ It's
Gaming Time"



"49J1W2D - 4. Wherefore I have ordained for thee the year-weeks and the
years and the jubilees: there are forty-nine jubilees from the days of Adam
{earthy; red} until this day, and one week and two years and there are yet
*FORTY* *YEARS* (49J1W2D + 5W5D = 50J) *TO* *COME* (*LITERALLY*
“*DISTANT*”) *FOR* *LEARNING* *THE* *COMMANDMENTS* *OF* *THE* *LORD*,
*UNTIL* *THEY* *PASS* *OVER* *INTO* *THE* *LAND* *OF* *CANAAN* {merchant;
trader; or that humbles and subdues}, crossing the Jordan {the river of
judgment} to the west.”

Nous: #48
Time: 10:30 hrs
Date: 2018.8.31
Torah: [#40, #6, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 46 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 6 (#46),
@3: Sup: 5 (#91); Ego: 40 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
Male: #91; Feme: #86
} // #86

Dao: Forgetting Knowledge
Tetra: #20 - Advance
I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering, Aquas

Latin: Revalator {God the end of all things} Alt: Mihael {The Who & What of
God} {

1. PROTECTS IN MYSTERIOUS OPERATIONS, BRINGS EVERY EXPERIENCE TO A HAPPY
CONCLUSION
2. SCIENCE OF PHYSICS & MEDICINE
3. HEALTH & LONGEVITY
4. Atembui
}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#226 / #372} / HETEROS {#235 / #336} / TORAH {#235 /
#336}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:4,col:2,nous:48&idea:{m,60}&idea:{f,85}&idea:{m,226}&idea:{f,372}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 3, row: 4, col: 2, nous: 48 [Date: 2018.8.31, Time: 10:30
hrs, Super: #226 / #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 -
Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering,
Ego: #372 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress,
Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance]

H6175@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 76 (#82); Ego: 70 (#76),
@3: Sup: 33 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 38 (#114),
@4: Sup: 39 (#154); Ego: 6 (#120),
@5: Sup: 79 (#233); Ego: 40 (#160),
@6: Sup: 8 (#241); Ego: 10 (#170),
@7: Sup: 48 (#289); Ego: 40 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
Male: #289; Feme: #210
} // #372

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #316 % #41 = #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening;

THOTH MEASURE: #29 - Oh Kenemtu, who makest thine appearance in Kenemit; I
am not given to cursing.

#VIRTUE: With Decisiveness (no. #29), numerous affairs, but
#TOOLS: With Exhaustion (no. #69), not a single happiness.
#POSITION: With Change (no. #28), creating the new.
#TIME: With Constancy (no. #51), cleaving to the old.
#CANON: #177

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_177@{
@1: Sup: 29 (#29); Ego: 29 (#29),
@2: Sup: 17 (#46); Ego: 69 (#98),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 28 (#126),
@4: Sup: 15 (#106); Ego: 51 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
Male: #106; Feme: #177
} // #177

#372 as [#6, #70, #200, #6, #40, #10, #40] = `aruwm (H6175): {UMBRA: #7 as
#316 % #41 = #29} 1) subtle, shrewd, crafty, sly, sensible; 1a) crafty; 1b)
shrewd, sensible, prudent;

H7585@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 6 (#36); Ego: 57 (#87),
@3: Sup: 7 (#43); Ego: 1 (#88),
@4: Sup: 13 (#56); Ego: 6 (#94),
@5: Sup: 43 (#99); Ego: 30 (#124),
@6: Sup: 48 (#147); Ego: 5 (#129),
Male: #147; Feme: #129
} // #372

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #337 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity;
I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; I am not a teller of lies.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#372 as [#30, #300, #1, #6, #30, #5] = she'owl (H7585): {UMBRA: #9 as #337
% #41 = #9} 1) sheol, *underworld*, *grave*, *hell*, pit; 1a) the
underworld; 1b) Sheol - the OT designation for the abode of the dead; 1b1)
place of no return; 1b2) without praise of God; 1b3) wicked sent there for
punishment; 1b4) righteous not abandoned to it; 1b5) of the place of exile
(fig); 1b6) of extreme degradation in sin;

H6466@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
@3: Sup: 35 (#77); Ego: 80 (#116),
@4: Sup: 24 (#101); Ego: 70 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
@5: Sup: 54 (#155); Ego: 30 (#216),
@6: Sup: 64 (#219); Ego: 10 (#226),
Male: #219; Feme: #226
} // #226

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #180 % #41 = #16 - Being a Guide, Returning to the Root; I-Ching:
H28 - Major Superiority, Excess, Great Exceeding, Preponderance of the
great, Critical mass; Tetra: 75 - Failure;

THOTH MEASURE: #16 - Oh thou who turnest backwards, who makest thine
appearance in Bubastis; I am not an eaves-dropper.

#VIRTUE: Contact (no. #16) means mutual compliance.
#TOOLS: Closed Mouth (no. #56) means no contact.
#POSITION: With Increase (no. #13), daily additions, but
#TIME: With Diminishment (no. #55), daily reductions.
#CANON: #140

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 16 (#16); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 72 (#88); Ego: 56 (#72),
@3: Sup: 4 (#92); Ego: 13 (#85),
@4: Sup: 59 (#151); Ego: 55 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM
NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #151; Feme: #140
} // #140

#226 as [#6, #30, #80, #70, #30, #10] = pa`al (H6466): {UMBRA: #9 as #180 %
#41 = #16} 1) to do, make; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to do; 1a2) to make;

G1963@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95),
@4: Sup: 64 (#87); Ego: 50 (#145),
@5: Sup: 53 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 70 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF
MISCHIEF {%34}),
@6: Sup: 63 (#203); Ego: 10 (#225),
@7: Sup: 64 (#267); Ego: 1 (#226),
Male: #267; Feme: #226
} // #226

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #226 % #41 = #21 - Guiding the Physical, Emptying the Heart;
I-Ching: H31 - Reciprocity, Conjoining, Influence (wooing), Feelings;
Tetra: 42 - Going to Meet;

THOTH MEASURE: #21 - Oh thou who art above Princes, and who makest thine
appearance in Amu; I do not cause terrors.

#VIRTUE: Release (no. #21) means a push forward.
#TOOLS: Embellishment (no. #61) means a decline.
#POSITION: With Flight (no. #49), there is what one avoids.
#TIME: With Contention (no. #25), there is what one hastens towards.
#CANON: #156

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_156@{
@1: Sup: 21 (#21); Ego: 21 (#21),
@2: Sup: 1 (#22); Ego: 61 (#82),
@3: Sup: 50 (#72); Ego: 49 (#131),
@4: Sup: 75 (#147); Ego: 25 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
Male: #147; Feme: #156
} // #156

#226 as [#5, #80, #10, #50, #70, #10, #1] = epinoia (G1963): {UMBRA: #15 as
#226 % #41 = #21} 1) thought, purpose;

H6006@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 76 (#82); Ego: 70 (#76),
@3: Sup: 35 (#117); Ego: 40 (#116),
@4: Sup: 14 (#131); Ego: 60 (#176),
@5: Sup: 24 (#155); Ego: 10 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
@6: Sup: 64 (#219); Ego: 40 (#226),
Male: #219; Feme: #226
} // #226

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #170 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching:
H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 -
Departure;

THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; I am not fraudulent in measures of grain.

#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_182@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 52 (#58); Ego: 46 (#52),
@3: Sup: 34 (#92); Ego: 63 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@4: Sup: 20 (#112); Ego: 67 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}),
Male: #112; Feme: #182
} // #182

#226 as [#6, #70, #40, #60, #10, #40] = `amac (H6006): {UMBRA: #6 as #170 %
#41 = #6} 1) to load, carry, carry a load; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to load; 1a2) to
carry a load; 1b) (Hiphil) to lay a load on;

H5946@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 19 (#89); Ego: 30 (#100),
@3: Sup: 29 (#118); Ego: 10 (#110),
@4: Sup: 35 (#153); Ego: 6 (#116),
@5: Sup: 4 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 50 (#166 - I AM NOT
SLUGGISH {%11}),
@6: Sup: 14 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 10
(#176),
@7: Sup: 64 (#235); Ego: 50 (#226),
Male: #235; Feme: #226
} // #226

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #166 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;

THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.

#VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
#TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
#TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
#CANON: #84

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
@4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84

#226 as [#70, #30, #10, #6, #50, #10, #50] = `elyown (Aramaic) (H5946):
{UMBRA: #5 as #166 % #41 = #2} 1) *the* *Most* *High*; 1a) *of* *God*;

YOUTUBE: “The Rains Are Coming”


Post by dolf
-- CHINESE DAOIST YANG HSIUNG (4 BCE) USE OF YANG CH’I / YIN BINOME *AS*
*REFLECTING* EQUIVALENCE TO 22 (HEBREW?) STOICHEION NAMED ELEMENTS WITHIN
CHAPTER #99 [#ONE MAGIC SQUARE PROTOTYPE] IN EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD THE
PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE BASIS OF CONVENTION
FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES
Post by dolf
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...
Translation: but we do our best
Why say it twice? Repetition is a major problem with your writing,
together with your extensive parenthetic rambling.
Post by dolf
[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]
It's a phrase, not a "metempirical whatsit", whatever that means.
Such dictum which you advance concerning the permissibility of variation as
to the NATURE of noun, pronoun or adjective by which its grammatical form
is conveyed as acceptable binomial nomenclature usage is as “knit one purl
one” just ribbing and the of sowing discordant bi-conditionals objectives {
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH IS
EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE
BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding appropriately."
} with impetus of FOUL declension and has no intrinsic ontological dignity
worth emulating as pretence to any principled life: “Be not deceived: evil
communications corrupt good manners.
Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of
God: I speak this to your shame.”
The garment which you are hodgepodging is a corruption of decency and is
barely capable to cover your paunch and bollocks: “For this corruptible
must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.
So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal
shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying
that is written, *Death* *Is* *swallowed* *up* *in* *victory*.
O death, where is thy sting? *O* *grave*, *where* *is* *thy* *victory*?
EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 which is the equivalent MAGIC ROW SUM
to the FIRST MAGIC SQUARE the Egyptian ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE
41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}
The Patrol who goeth round, and who piloteth the Double Earth; Seb abideth
stably by means of their rudders: the divine Form which revealeth the Solar
Orb: and He who presideth over the Red ones.) [Text corrupt.]

Let me be brought in as a distressed mariner, and let my Soul come to me,
which is my brother, and go to that place which thou knowest.
"Let me be told my name," say,
1. The Mooring-post. "Lord of the Double-Earth in the Shrine" is thy name.
#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: Scales of Merit}
AUTONOMOUS HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY: {ANIMUS: OBEDIENCE (#ALEPH to
#LAMED)}
2. The Blade of the Rudder. "Leg of Apis" is thy name.
#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: {DOUBLE: #1 - Nature Contains Nature
{#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature}}
3. The Hawser. "The Side-Lock which Anubis fastens on to the swathing work"
is thy name.
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: {DOUBLE: #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
{#5 - Act of Nature}}
4. The Stern or Stem Posts. "The two columns of the Nether-world" is thy
name.
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}
5. The Hold. "Akar" is thy name.
#5 - Act of Nature / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
6. The Mast. "Bearer of the Great one whilst she passeth" is thy name.
#6 - Form of Nature / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature
7. The Keel. "Backbone of Apuat" is thy name.
#7 - Engendering Nature / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature
8. The Mast-head. "Throat of Emsta" is thy name.
#8 - Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature
9. The Sail. "Nut" is thy name.
#9 - Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature
10. The Leathers. "Made of the hide of Mnevis, which Sutu hath scorched,"
is thy name.
#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature
11. The Oars. "Fingers of the elder" is your name.
#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 -
Engendering Nature}}
12. The Bracement. "Hand of Isis, stanching the blood of the Eye of Horus,"
is thy name.
#9 - Autonomous Nature
13. The Ribs. "Emsta, Hapi, Taumautef, Kebehsenuf, He who taketh captive,
He who taketh by force, He who seeth his Father, and He who maketh
himself," are your names.
#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: The Tongue of Decree Deciding Between
Them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]
TETRAD FOR ANY GENII THESIS: {SPIRITUS: AIDING (#MEM to #QOPH)}
14. The Look-out. "Master of the Grounds" is thy name.
#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

15. The Tiller. "Merit" is thy name.
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 /#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature]

16. The Rudder. "The Umpire, beaming forth from the water," is thy name.
#4 - Nature Amended In Its Nature [#111 /#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature]

17. The Hull. "The Leg of Hathor, which Ra wounded, on lifting her into
the Sektit Boat," is thy name.
#5 - Act of Nature: {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming Nature}
[#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]
18. The Boatman. "Off," is thy name.
#6 - Form Of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

19. The Breeze, since thou art conveyed by me: "The Northern Breeze
proceeding from Tmu to the Nose of Chent-Amenta," is thy name.
#7 - Engendering Nature: {*OATHS* OF DIEU ET MON DROIT} [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]
20. The Stream, since thou sailest upon me: "Their Mirror" is thy name.
#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
21. The Swallow. "Destroyer of the large-handed at the place of
purification" is thy name.
#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]
22. The Land. Since thou walkest upon me: "The Tip of Heaven, the Coming
forth from the swathings in the Garden of Aarru, and the Coming forth in
Exultation," is thy name.
#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 - Totality
of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]
To be said before them.
Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for ever,
and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to me food
and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the Shensu-cake and
the Kefen-cake: let my place be in the great hall in presence of the mighty
god.
I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course.
Let me not be stopped at the Meskat; let not the Sebau have mastery over my
limbs.
I have bread in Pu and beer in Tepu. Let your largesses of this day be
granted to me; offerings of wheat and barley, offerings of anta and of
vestments, offerings of oxen, and ducks, which are offerings for life,
health and strength, and also offerings for coming forth by day, in all
forms in which it pleaseth me to come forth in the Garden of Aarru.
If this chapter be known he will come forth at the Garden of Aarru; there
will be given to him the Shensu-cake, the measure of drink and the
persen-cake, and fields of wheat and barley of seven cubits (It is the
followers of Horus who reap them), for he eateth of that wheat and barley,
and he is made whole in his limbs through that wheat and barley, and his
limbs spring up even as with those gods. And he cometh forth in the Garden
of Aarru in all the forms in which it pleaseth him to come forth.
The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law [of
metempirical contortions as normative deceptions such as yours]”
Matthew 23:27 (KJV)
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within
full of dead [men's] bones, and of all uncleanness.
Luke 11:52 (KJV)
Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye
entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.
The fact that ethical principles carry in themselves the modal status of
necessity provides an important methodical starting point for the
construction of ethical theories. Thus, the execution of the commonly
performed counterfactual thought experiments in ethics is only possible
under the condition that the principles of valuation support such an
operation. Contingent principles are not in a position to do that, Kant
makes methodical use of this log1cal quality of moral principles
particularly in those places where he speaks of other “*RATIONAL* *BEINGS*”
(eg. GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). The central passage in the Preface of
the Groundwork in which he argues for the necessity of a pure moral
philosophy also belongs to this methodical usage {
}. It does not matter in these passages whether there actually are other
such beings as, for example, the inhabitants of other planets or also God.
For the Kantian argumentation it is sufficient that such beings could
exist, that their existence is thinkable. The corresponding passages must
be understood as methodically executed thought experiments, which make use
of the particular modal status of ethical principles. Now it becomes clear
why the “*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*” have a comparable modal status to the
“*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.” Laws of nature support counterfactual arguments,
too. In order to achieve this, they also must have a modal status which is
higher than simple contingency. The connections formulated in them are also
valid in all natural law governed, possible worlds, and in this respect,
they exhibit the modal status of [*ONTIC*] necessity. The difference
between laws of nature and laws of freedom appears to consist primarily in
the fact that the *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* {
#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] = qeriy
(H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition, contrariness,
encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;
As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days
#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days
} are concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while the
laws of [*ONTOLOGICAL*] freedom are concerned with all-quantified,
normative bi-conditionals, each receiving the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity." [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]
Your rationalisation for your errors in writing, even if it were coherent, is nonsense.
Your errors are errors because there are rules of language and of writing
and you are not following them.
Your "binomial" nonsense is just something in your own imagination and it
does not override the rules of language.
Post by dolf
Metempirics is the study of concepts and relationships conceived as beyond
and yet related to knowledge gained empirically
And yet the phrase you refer to is a simple declarative assertion,
nothing to do with metempiric whatsits.
Post by dolf
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 69 (#69),
@2: Sup: 81 (#118); Ego: 24 (#93),
@3: Sup: 18 (#136); Ego: 2 (#95),
4: Sup: 31 (#167); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 28 (#195); Ego: 81 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
@6: Sup: 16 (#211); Ego: 63 (#248),
Male: #211; Feme: #248
And that's just gobbledigook.
<SNIP gibberish>
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH IS
EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE
BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding appropriately."
In the “*GOLDEN* *AGE*” of the past, communities purportedly served the
legitimate interests of all while maintaining the dignity of each. Stable
hierarchical relations wove elements of society together in a complex web
of mutual obligation, but reciprocity (implying not only mutual obligation
but also an empathetic “likening to oneself”) was also needed to temper the
possible ill effects of unmediated power relations. The perfect community,
therefore, was thought to be equally dependent upon hierarchy and
reciprocity. As such, the perfect community is modelled upon the cosmos,
where YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of growth, while YIN
acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH IS EQUIVALENT TO THE
PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER], responding appropriately.
This tetragram celebrates such ideal contact, which, the Head text
promises, makes the good individual both resplendent as the sun [ie.
CHAPTER #99 - *THE* *DIVINE* *FORM* *WHICH* *REVEALETH* *THE* *SOLAR* *ORB*
/ CHAPTER #123 -- WHEREBY ONE ENTERETH INTO THE GREAT HOUSE / CHAPTER #124
- WHEREBY ONE COMETH TO THE DIVINE CIRCLE OF OSIRIS] and powerful as the
king in his sacred audience hall.
"Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for ever,
and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to me food
and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the Shensu-cake and
the Kefen-cake: *LET* *MY* *PLACE* *BE* *IN* *THE* *GREAT* *HALL* *IN*
*PRESENCE* *OF* *THE* *MIGHTY* *GOD*.
I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course." [CHAPTER #99, EGYPTIAN
BOOK OF THE DEAD]
THE HALL OF LIGHT, ACCORDING TO EARLY COMMENTATORS, REFERS SIMPLY TO THE
REGION ABOVE GROUND IN THE LIGHT OF DAY, AS CONTRASTED WITH THE YELLOW
SPRINGS BELOW GROUND. BUT THE SAME *BINOME*
NOTE [Algebra]: an expression that is a sum of difference of two terms such
as the Pythagorean: c² (25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN) + b² (16
as #34 - JUPITER); Binominal nomenclature or binary nomenclature is a
formal system of naming species of living things by giving each a name
composed of two parts, both of which use Latin grammatical forms, although
they can be based on words from other languages
That the Roman Catholic nomenclature conforms ONLY to such Pythagorean: c²
(25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN) + b² (16 as #34 - JUPITER);
Binominal nomenclature or binary nomenclature which is reliant upon its
TETRAD (36 as #111 - SOL INVICTUS) as its Intellectual Proposition.
IS USED TO DESCRIBE THE SACRED SITE WHERE THE KING MAKES RITUAL CONTACT
WITH THE GODS. ITS USE SUGGESTS THAT ALL THINGS ARE SANCTIFIED BY CONTACT
WITH THE MYSTERY.
This tetragram #16 is correlated with the Rainfall solar period. Rain
symbolizes beneficent grace and germinating influence, whether the
reference is to *SEXUAL* *CONTACT* *OR* *TO* *POLITICAL* *RELATIONS*.
Consequently, the general tone of this tetragram is lucky, except in those
few cases where “stimulus and response” occurs between categorically
YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON
TETRA: 16 - CONTACT, A translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING
by Michael Nylan 1993, p 165]
*THE* *CONSIDERATION* *OF* *LACK* *OF *SURNAMES* *WITHIN* *THE*
*NETHERLANDS* *SUGGESTS* *THAT* *THEY* *WERE* *NOT* *AS* *ONTOLOGICAL*
*NECESSITY* *SUBJECT* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *EMPIRE*
*GOVERNANCE*
Nous: #27
Time: 09:40 hrs
Date: 2018.8.18
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 50 (#90); Ego: 10 (#50),
@3: Sup: 55 (#145); Ego: 5 (#55),
Male: #145; Feme: #55
} // #55
Dao: Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes
Tetra: #74 - Closure
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite
Latin: Expetendus {God, rescuing Father} Alt: Chohvyal {Breathe the Woe of
God} {
1. HELPS PRESERVE CONJUGAL FIDELITY & FERTILITY BETWEEN SPOUSES
2. THE GENERATIONS
3. LOVE
4. Senciner
}
Shealtiel {Asked or lent of God}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#360 / #350} / HETEROS {#367 / #313} / TORAH {#319 /
#289}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:4,col:8,nous:27&idea:{m,27}&idea:{f,27}&idea:{m,360}&idea:{f,350}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 - Closure,
Ego: #350 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes; I-Ching: H21 -
Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 - Closure]
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 42 (#44); Ego: 40 (#42),
@3: Sup: 44 (#88); Ego: 2 (#44),
@4: Sup: 20 (#108); Ego: 57 (#101),
@5: Sup: 30 (#138); Ego: 10 (#111),
@6: Sup: 36 (#174); Ego: 6 (#117),
Male: #174; Feme: #117
} // #360
H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 - Branching
Out;
THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
Mabit; I deal not fraudulently.
#VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
#TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
#POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
#TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
#CANON: #140
@1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
@2: Sup: 68 (#82); Ego: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 79 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 11 (#79),
@4: Sup: 59 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 61 (#140 - I DEAL NOT
FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #220; Feme: #140
} // #140
#360 as [#2, #40, #2, #300, #10, #6] = mabush (H4016): {UMBRA: #4 as #342 %
#41 = #14} 1) private parts, his privates, male genitals; 1a) literally -
'that excites shame';
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
@3: Sup: 27 (#127); Ego: 38 (#108),
@4: Sup: 16 (#143); Ego: 70 (#178),
@5: Sup: 36 (#179); Ego: 20 (#198),
Male: #179; Feme: #198
} // #360
UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
26 - Endeavour;
THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
appearance in Urit; I am not hot of speech.
#VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
#TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
#POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
#TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
#CANON: #158
@1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
@2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
@4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I AM
NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
Male: #156; Feme: #158
} // #158
#360 as [#30, #40, #200, #70, #20] = merea` (H4828): {UMBRA: #6 as #310 %
#41 = #23} 1) companion, friend, confidential friend;
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 36 (#58); Ego: 20 (#36),
@4: Sup: 44 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 8 (#44),
@5: Sup: 20 (#122); Ego: 57 (#101),
@6: Sup: 26 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 6 (#107),
Male: #148; Feme: #107
} // #350
UMBRA: #328 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great Accumulating,
The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential energy; Tetra: 60 -
Accumulation;
THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance at
thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17}
/ I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157
#350 as [#6, #10, #20, #8, #300, #6] = kachash (H3584): {UMBRA: #4 as #328
% #41 = #41} 1) to deceive, lie, fail, grow lean, be disappointing, be
untrue, be insufficient, be found liars, belie, deny, dissemble, deal
falsely; 1a) (Qal) to become lean; 1b) (Niphal) to cringe, feign obedience;
1c) (Piel); 1c1) to deceive, deny falsely; 1c2) to act deceptively; 1c3) to
cringe; 1c4) to disappoint, fail; 1d) (Hithpael) to cringe, feign
obedience;
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 57 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}); Ego: 38
(#138),
@5: Sup: 67 (#253); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 26 (#279); Ego: 40 (#188),
Male: #279; Feme: #188
} // #350
H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been
spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;
THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in Memphis; I
am neither a liar nor a doer of mischief.
#VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
#TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
#POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
#TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
#CANON: #215
@1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
@2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
@3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}),
@4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF
MISCHIEF {%34}),
Male: #134; Feme: #215
} // #215
#350 as [#30, #50, #20, #200, #10, #40] = nokriy (H5237): {UMBRA: #8 as
#280 % #41 = #34} 1) foreign, alien; 1a) foreign; 1b) foreigner (subst);
1c) foreign woman, harlot; 1d) unknown, unfamiliar (fig.);
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 29 (#69); Ego: 70 (#110),
@3: Sup: 67 (#136); Ego: 38 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@4: Sup: 6 (#142); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 20
(#188),
Male: #168; Feme: #188
} // #350
UMBRA: #290 % #41 = #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46 -
Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition;
THOTH MEASURE: #3 - Oh thou of the Nose, who makest thine appearance at
Chemunnu; I am not evil minded.
#VIRTUE: With Mired (no. #3), great woe.
#TOOLS: With Encounters (no. #43), small desire.
#POSITION: The ways of Purity (no. #37) and ...
#TIME: Pattern (no. #47) where some are simple and some are complex?
#CANON: #130
@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 46 (#49); Ego: 43 (#46),
@3: Sup: 2 (#51); Ego: 37 (#83),
@4: Sup: 49 (#100); Ego: 47 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #100; Feme: #130
} // #130
#350 as [#40, #70, #200, #20, #20] = `erek (H6187): {UMBRA: #10 as #290 %
#41 = #3} 1) order, row, estimate, things that are set in order, layer,
pile; 1a) order, row; 1b) estimate, valuation;
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 19 (#28); Ego: 10 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#85); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 67 (#152); Ego: 10 (#67),
@5: Sup: 26 (#178); Ego: 40 (#107),
Male: #178; Feme: #107
} // #350
UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED
ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139
#350 as [#90, #10, #200, #10, #40] = tsiyr (H6735): {UMBRA: #13 as #300 %
#41 = #13} 1) envoy, messenger; 2) pivot of door, hinge; 3) pang, distress;
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 48 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 10 (#48),
@3: Sup: 67 (#153); Ego: 19 (#67),
@4: Sup: 77 (#230); Ego: 10 (#77),
@5: Sup: 36 (#266); Ego: 40 (#117),
Male: #266; Feme: #117
} // #360
#360 as [#200, #10, #100, #10, #40] = reyq (H7386): {UMBRA: #15 as #310 %
#41 = #23} 1) empty, vain; 1a) empty (of vessels); 1b) empty, idle,
worthless (ethically);
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 11 (#12); Ego: 10 (#11),
@3: Sup: 68 (#80); Ego: 57 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 76 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 8 (#76),
@5: Sup: 35 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 40 (#116),
@6: Sup: 36 (#227); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #227; Feme: #117
} // #360
UMBRA: #360 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 -
Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 -
Encounters;
THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit; I
do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.
#VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
#TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
#POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
#TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
#CANON: #191
@1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
@2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
@4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191
#360 as [#1, #10, #300, #8, #40, #1] = aitema (G155): {UMBRA: #17 as #360 %
#41 = #32} 1) petition, request, required;
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 72 (#105); Ego: 57 (#72),
@5: Sup: 73 (#178); Ego: 1 (#73),
@6: Sup: 76 (#254); Ego: 3 (#76),
@7: Sup: 35 (#289); Ego: 40 (#116),
@8: Sup: 36 (#325); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #325; Feme: #117
} // #360
#18 as #360 % #41 = #32} 1) an injunction, mandate;
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21),
@3: Sup: 30 (#71); Ego: 9 (#30),
@4: Sup: 38 (#109); Ego: 8 (#38),
@5: Sup: 41 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 3 (#41),
@6: Sup: 49 (#199); Ego: 8 (#49),
@7: Sup: 25 (#224); Ego: 57 (#106),
@8: Sup: 26 (#250); Ego: 1 (#107),
@9: Sup: 36 (#286); Ego: 10 (#117),
Male: #286; Feme: #117
} // #360
UMBRA: #557 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence;
I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving;
Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu; I
lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.
#VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
#TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
#POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
#TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
#CANON: #181
@1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
@3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
@4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181
{UMBRA: #20 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) a guide; 2) a master, teacher;
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95),
@4: Sup: 17 (#40); Ego: 3 (#98),
@5: Sup: 22 (#62); Ego: 5 (#103),
@6: Sup: 25 (#87); Ego: 3 (#106),
@7: Sup: 44 (#131); Ego: 19 (#125),
@8: Sup: 45 (#176); Ego: 1 (#126),
@9: Sup: 4 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 40 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
@10: Sup: 44 (#224); Ego: 40 (#206),
@11: Sup: 49 (#273); Ego: 5 (#211),
@12: Sup: 18 (#291); Ego: 50 (#261),
@13: Sup: 26 (#317); Ego: 8 (#269),
Male: #317; Feme: #269
} // #350
#350 as [#5, #80, #10, #3, #5, #3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #5, #50, #8] =
epigrapho (G1924): {UMBRA: #23 as #1499 % #41 = #23} 1) to write upon,
inscribe; 2) metaph. to write upon the mind;
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 60 (#110); Ego: 10 (#60),
@3: Sup: 80 (#190); Ego: 20 (#80),
@4: Sup: 69 (#259); Ego: 70 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#285); Ego: 38 (#188),
Male: #285; Feme: #188
} // #350
34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#350 as [#50, #10, #20, #70, #200] = nikos (G3534): {UMBRA: #26 as #350 %
#41 = #22} 1) victory; 2) to utterly vanquish;
@1: Sup: 57 (#57); Ego: 57 (#57),
@2: Sup: 62 (#119); Ego: 5 (#62),
@3: Sup: 11 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 30 (#92),
@4: Sup: 16 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 5 (#97),
@5: Sup: 26 (#172); Ego: 10 (#107),
Male: #172; Feme: #107
} // #350
UMBRA: #1140 % #41 = #33 - Achievable Goals, Virtue of Discrimination;
I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint, Small Accumulating,
The taming power of the small, Small harvest; Tetra: 35 - Gathering;
THOTH MEASURE: #33 - Oh thou Horned one, who makest thine appearance at
Sais; I am not noisy in my speech.
#VIRTUE: With Closeness (no. #33), no possible gap, but
#TOOLS: With Completion (no. #73), no possible change.
#POSITION: With Massing (no. #59), affairs emptying.
#TIME: With Legion (no. #32), affairs filling.
#CANON: #197
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
@2: Sup: 25 (#58); Ego: 73 (#106),
@3: Sup: 3 (#61); Ego: 59 (#165),
@4: Sup: 35 (#96); Ego: 32 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
Male: #96; Feme: #197
} // #197
#350 as [#300, #5, #30, #5, #10] = teleo (G5055): {UMBRA: #30 as #1140 %
#41 = #33} 1) to bring to a close, to finish, to end; 2) to perform,
execute, complete, fulfil, (so that the thing done corresponds to what has
been said, the order, command etc.); 3) to pay; 1a) passed, finished; 2a)
with special reference to the subject matter, to carry out the contents of
a command; 2b) with reference also to the form, to do just as commanded,
and generally involving the notion of time, to perform the last act which
completes a process, to accomplish, fulfil; 3a) of tribute;
On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law, regarding
adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname and those
who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers (naamsaanneming
registers) were created to record the family names that were adopted. These
registers often assist you in your research when moving from the civil
registration period to the church registers.
The name adoption registers were maintained by each municipality and did
not follow a particular format. They vary from one municipality to the next
and were seldom indexed. Unfortunately, not all registers have survived.
Most registers provide the name and age of the registrant and that of his
living children and grand-children. If you are lucky, the full date and
place of birth was recorded. Many municipalities included the registrant’s
address.
Interestingly, a wife was not usually listed with her husband in the name
adoption registers. If her grandfather or father was alive at the time, she
would be listed under their entry. Often widows were listed with their
children and grandchildren.
Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands were
and are rare."
<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>
Within ancient Rome, Latin has {ie.
dynamic of MEMBRUM VIRILE / PUERILE as 'ACTIVE' male / 'PASSIVE' female
binomial construct which also applied to the naming of persons as conveyed
"And Simon he *SURNAMED* Peter; And James the son of Zebedee, and John the
brother of James; and he *SURNAMED* them Boanerges, which is, The sons of
thunder..." [Mark 3:16-17 (KJV)]
"I have *SURNAMED* thee, though thou hast not known me." [Isaiah 45:4
(KJV)] <-- *THIS* *AS* *NAMING* *CONVENTION* *IS* *NOT* *BINOMIAL* *BUT*
*TRINOMIAL* *BECAUSE* *OF* *THE* *SON* *OF* *MAN* *AS* *A* *PROCREATIONAL*
*CONSTRUCT*: "Thus saith the LORD, Keep ye judgment, and do justice: for my
salvation is near to come, and my righteousness to be revealed.
Blessed is the man that doeth this, and the *SON* *OF* *MAN* that layeth
hold on it; that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and keepeth his
hand from doing any evil.
Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the LORD,
speak, saying, The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people: neither
let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree.
For thus saith the LORD unto the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths, and choose
the things that please me, and take hold of my covenant; Even unto them
will I give in mine #391 - *HOUSE* and within my walls a place and *a*
*name* *better* *than* *of* *sons* *and* *of* *daughters*: *I* *will*
*give* *them* *an* *everlasting* *name*, *that* *shall* *not* *be* *cut*
*off*.
Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the LORD, to serve
him, and to love the name of the LORD, to be his servants, every one that
keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my covenant;
Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my
house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be
accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called an house of prayer
for all people.
The Lord GOD which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I
gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him." [Isaiah
56:1-8 (KJV)]
} no equivalent translation for defining homosexuality, nor heterosexuality
as an individual’s sexual nature. Gay or straight, there would be no
distinction.
Sexuality instead is determined by behavioural mannerisms, whether
masculine or passive in both male and female roles. Roman society had a
patriarchal system in which the gender role of the male is the primary
authority, emphasized by the “active” masculinity as a premise of
governance, power and status.
In the case of the freeborn women of Rome, they were sometimes described as
“tribas fricatrix”, meaning “she who rubs” and “virago”, from the latin
word vir (virile man), a term used to describe a woman who demonstrates
exemplary and heroic qualities.
Roman religion supported acceptance of sexuality, as an aspect that
prospered religious practice for improving erotic lifestyle as well as
defining an individual’s power through the procreative force of the male.
Such traditions were a sign of active masculinity, but whether the
religious tolerance can be applicable to homosexual acts is unknown.
Men were free to have intercourse with men, but generally only acceptable
in instances where the masculinity of the freeborn Roman citizen wasn't
subject to the law as Lex Scantinia, otherwise bringing his name and family
reputation into dis-repute or infamia (infamia – A loss of legal or social
standing).
Lex Scantinia was a Roman law that historians believe was created to
penalise any male citizen of high standing that took a willing role in
passive sexual behaviour. From a societal perspective, to be “passive” or
“submissive”, threatened the very fabric of masculinity, with feminine
traits, submission and passive mannerisms being an act of the lower class
and slaves.
Same sex intercourse with prostitutes or slaves was actually acceptable,
not vitiating on a freeborn’s masculinity as long as the freeborn citizen
took the active role in penetration. In rare cases, freeborns who bestowed
their anal orifice or “scultima”, was in florid slang a “Scultimidonus.”
Translated as “asshole bestower,” mentioned in text from the Roman
Satirist, Gaius Lucilius (c.160s – 103/2 BC).
In the legions, the act of homosexuality amongst soldiers (as similarly
applied to the Dutch instance of male to male sexual activity upon ships)
was considered a violation of military discipline and subject to harsh
penalties. Polybius (ca. 200–118 BC), a Greek Historian reported in his
journals that same sex activity amongst soldiers was punishable by the
fustuarium, (clubbing to death).
As with any freeborn, Soldiers were allowed to engage in same-sex relations
with slaves, prostitutes and captives as a sign of inserting their sexual
authority and their (active) masculinity. An incident related by Plutarch
in his biography of Marius, illustrates the soldier’s right to maintain his
sexual integrity. In this instance, a legionary named Trebonius was the
object of sexual assaults by his superior officer, Gaius Luscius. Trebonius
was brought before a tribunal for killing Luscius, but later acquitted and
awarded a crown of bravery for defending his masculinity and freeborn male
purity.
In another case of same sex in the army, “De Bello Hispaniensi,” a book
believed to have been written by Julius Caesar (Although the authorship is
heavily disputed) details Caesar’s campaigns on the Iberian Peninsula and
mentions a Roman officer who engages in regular sexual acts with his
concubine (concubinus).
Although the Lex Scantinia and the enforcement of the law is mentioned in
several ancient sources, such as 227 BC where Gaius Scantinius Capitolinus
was put on a Lex trial for sexually molesting the son of Marcus Claudius
Marcellus; the full legality and provisions of the law are still unclear.
Lex Scantinia has never been proven as a direct assault on homosexuality,
nor penalising the general act within ancient Rome as a crime. Instead, it
was essentially a rule to police the masculine nature of a Roman citizen by
enforcing that a freeborn takes the “top” or “active” role in sex.
[<https://www.heritagedaily.com/2018/01/roman-sex-sexuality-slaves-and-lex-scantinia/97996>]"
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #52 - MEASURES, uses the term *BINOME*
as a FOOTNOTE expansion within the context of "Without such guides, the
fragile seeds of morality innate in each person can never develop along the
lines of Heaven's manifest intentions for the world.
APPRAISAL #7: To draw guidelines without measuring
Brings down the instant ridicule of ghosts.
FATHOMING #7: Unmeasured guidelines
Mean: Those with keen insight only laugh. [WANG YA contrasts the BINOME
MING CH'A with ghosts {ie. the NETHERWORLD}]
Those who fail either to take the proper measure of a situation or apply
the guidelines of the sages to a problem deserve blame. Ghosts represent
the shadowy spirit world {ie. the NETHERWORLD}. With their special insight
Into human affairs, they are able to discern such failures more quickly
than ordinary individuals. As all perceptive persons withdraw their support
from the individual who refuses to reform, *DISASTER* *SURELY* *FOLLOWS*.
APPRAISAL #8: *RED* from the stone cannot be pried apart.
Equally ingrained is the knight’s integrity.
FATHOMING #8: The indelible nature of the stone’s *RED*
Means: Covenants are possible with him. [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18
CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 52 - MEASURE, A
translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993,
p 322, 578]
He who presideth over the *Red* ones. [CHAPTER #99, EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE
DEAD]
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #51 - CONSTANCY, conveys a similar
expansion within the context of, "In this auspicious APPRAISAL #7 aligned
with DAY, the flowing water calls to mind the desirable qualities of
flood-like CH'I associated with integrity, a power at once gentle and
inexorable in its effect: "Anubis is my bearer, for he who lulleth me to
rest is the god in Lion form.
Do thou save me!
I am He who cometh forth as one who breaketh through the door; and
everlasting is the Daylight which his will hath created.
"I know the deep waters" is my name.
I satisfy the desires of the Glorified, who are by millions and hundreds of
thousands I am the guardian of their interests, actively working at the
hours of the day adjusting the arms of Sahu; twelve in the circling round,
uniting hands, each of them with another.
But the Sixth of them in the Tuat is the Hour of the overthrow of the
Sebau." [EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #64]
At the same time, *THE* *FLOW* SUGGESTS* *THE* *PASSAGE* *OF* *TIME*. When
good men come together, early errors give way to rectitude.
Blame is complete, yet uncondemned.
FATHOMING #8: Chronic illness not seen as such
Means: He is unable to cure himself.
The individual's persistent evil doing is likened to a chronic illness.
The individual who has grown accustomed to *MORAL* or physical disease
forgets what health was like. No cure is possible if the individual fails
One must be sick of illness
If one is to recover from illness.
APPRAISAL #9: Seeing his illness,
Magician-healers will not fail.
FATHOMING #9: Seeing the illness for what it is
Means: He can serve as his own doctor.
In contrast APPRAISAL #8, this individual does not gloss over the serious
nature of his chronic lapses. Once he has diagnosed himself correctly, he
can certainly effect a cure. Good advisers and the Confucian Classics,
after all, exist to help in the process of healing the soul."
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #50 - VASTNESS OR WASTING, again uses
the term BINOME as a FOOTNOTE expansion within the context of GHOST (ie.
NETHERWORLD}: "The verse demonstrate the utter uselessness or unfocussed or
misguided activity. Though an entire *DAY* has been spent in frenzied
pursuit of a goal, no obvious gain results, despite many opportunities.
Alternatively, the same lines can describe a hunter who loses himself in
the pleasure of the chase. Far better '*TO* *CONCENTRATE* THE MIND AND
UNIFY THE WILL' in a single-minded search of the WAY, since this holds out
the promise of success.
APPRAISAL #8: The great accept official posts, . .
Ghosts at the shrine cease wailing.
Some gain their blessings.
FATHOMING #8: That the great accept posts
Means: They restore what had been lost.
The main theme of the verses is clear, though the identity of “the great”
is open to question. Once good leaders take up (or, are restored to)
office, the local patron gods cease their weeping and wailing, in
expectation of renewed good rule and the reinstitution of regular
sacrifices. The common people also expect to benefit from their
administration, and so “some gain their blessings.” Both the gods above and
the people below rejoice in the ability of the truly great to restore what
had been lost.
APPRAISAL #9: Bright pearls used for birdshot.
Even if flesh by chance is struck,
It will not repay the outlay. [Literally: 'the gain, no return' takes FEI
JOU as a BINOME]
FATHOMING #9: Lustrous pearls used for shot
Means: The expense is not recouped.
Pebbles would work as well as pearls in shooting game birds. What’s more,
pebbles, when compared with pearls, are of relatively little value.
Therefore, the hunter can afford to lose a certain number of pebbles,
though he can’t afford to lose a single pearl. Once again, the reader is
urged to carefully consider which acts are truly worthwhile. The Mystery
suggests that when precious human life is to be employed, only the Way
represents a goal sufficiency great to aim for. Unfortunately, the petty
person typically pursues the vastly inferior goals of fame, fortune, and
sex." [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY
OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 50 - VASTING AND WASTING, A translation with
Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993, p 313-314]
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #26 - ENDEAVOUR, again uses the concept
of BINOME within the context of *MORAL* *DIRECTION*: "By analogy, the
person of truth culture gives off a kind of fragrance because he is both
"REFINED AND OF SUBSTANCE" (a pun in Chines for the *BINOME* translated
"BLOSSOM AND FRUIT"). He also should be put to immediate use by his
superiors .
APPRAISAL #7: Once its fragrance is lost,
There in no place to go.
FATHOMING: Losing his fragrance
Mean: Virtue thereby fades.
Here the fragrance of self-cultivation is destroyed. The individual lacks
all sense of *MORAL* *DIRECTION*, as in APPRAISAL #1. But since the time
is later, this now matters more. Decay proceeds from the INNER CORE. Its
equally distressing to watch this is an exquisite flower or in human being.
APPRAISAL #8: Yellow Centre: he escapes calamity
Because he is properly aligned.
FATHOMING #8: Yellow Centre, avoiding calamity,
Means: He is attuned and thus upright." [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18
CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 26 - ENDEAVOUR, A
translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993,
p 209]
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #42 - GOING TO MEET (which is the
*ONTIC* terminus and conforms to THOTH entering the Great Hall knowing the
#42 NAMES of the EGYPTIAN GODS], again uses the concept of BINOME within
the context of *IMMORAL* *CONDUCT* *OF* *BULLYING*: "Chinese traditions
reflect the notion of mutual interaction by *CATEGORY*, by which
transformations over time and space take place by laws of mutual sympathy,
rather than Newtonian law
of cause- and-effect.
*RULER*; the egg, for the less developed human being. Though both parties
seem to inhabit entirely different spheres, the moral superior miraculously
affects others, who learn by suasive influence to develop properly into
full human beings.
APPRAISAL #3: The quintessential stuff of things
Travels subtly back and forth.
Ill omens precede the quickest senses.
FATHOMING #3: The essence, all unseen, goes back and forth.
Meaning: Evil omens are proof of blame.
[Footnote: Taking CHING as the subject and WEI as the adverb 'subtly',
however others take CHING WEI as a *BINOME*, meaning 'FINEST EMANATIONS';
CHING CHIN as 'the smallest, finest part' of things that respond with
extreme sensitivity and YAO FEN as 'OMINOUS EXALTATIONS']
Since each of the myriad things is composed of numinous CH'I, in some sense
all parts of the cosmos can resonate with others because of their
underlying sympathy. The gods and spirits are only the most exquisitely
sensitive (and therefore, reactive) members of the universe since their
constitutive CH'I is particularly subtle and concentrated
(“quintessential”). By definition, the sage has acquired similar divine
powers of perception. Omen theory tells us that the gods, spirits, and
sages react immediately to the slightest *MORAL* shift on the part of other
human beings. Even such swift reactions, however, lag behind the
spontaneous,
production of portents in the cosmos. The merest inclination towards evil
on the part of those in power, for example, produces serious dislocations
in the starry heavens. In this Appraisal, dedicated to the transition from
thought to action, we are reminded that our innermost thoughts soon prompt
visible reactions. We must take special care, hen, not to depart from the
Way, lest we disorder the entire cosmic fabric.
...
Yellow as the colour assigned to the centre is usually auspicious. Here
the, the problem is that yellow mounts to the top position. (This may
refer to the increasing ascendency of YIN CH'I following the summer
solstice.) Yellow no longer knows its placer, so its characteristic virtues
of self-abnegation, *LOYALTY*, and of good faith fail utterly. Perhaps a
trusted sub-ordinate intends to usurp his superior's position for the word
'RISES' also means 'TO BULLY.' Those with great ambition make the worst
allies.
APPRAISAL #6: Black Heaven meets Yellow Earth.
Their ideas interact, one upon the other.
FATHOMING #6: Black and yellow meeting
Means: They respond by type.
Black is the colour of Heaven; yellow, that of Earth. The interaction of
these two cosmic powers is said to produce timely wind and rain, which all
HEAVEN AND EARTH COME TOGETHER, AND THE MYRIAD THING ARE TRANSFORMED IN
PRISTINE FORM. *MALE* *AND* *FEMALE* *BLEND* *THEIR* *ESSENCES*, *AND*
YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON
TETRA: 42 - GOING TO MEET, A translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN
CHING by Michael Nylan 1993, p 274, 275]
THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/ *MALE* /FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of* *priests*
x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the
'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation =
1092 days x 2 = #2184 days;
THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/ *FEMALE* /MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the law,
that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364
days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of 20 March 1996
/ New Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ *ENUMERATE* /OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as
right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with
Septet #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
As I sated within an earlier chapter, that an alternative canonical
approach to expressing these normative {ie. YANG CH'I as MALE / YIN as FEME
are considered a BINOME as IDENTICAL TO THE PYTHAGOREAN AND LATIN BINOMIAL
#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the same
ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the same
light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 - TORAH} - Keep a common
way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.
 
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).
*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage / sovereign
dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus} Empire
Governance] 
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-31 04:18:10 UTC
Permalink
In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually given, at
least when it is first mentioned, and the date of publication may be
specified:

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - Remember the
Sabbath]) ...
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
Honour your parents]) ...
#65 (@2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#123 -
Do not kill]) ...
#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
#175 (@4 - Nature Amended in its Nature: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205 -
Do not steal]) ...
#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 - Bear
no false witness]) ...
#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - Covet Not])

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Chinese naming conventions such as is exemplar by:

Mao Ze Dong

or

XI Jin Pin

Binomial nomenclature ("two-term naming system") also called binominal
nomenclature ("two-name naming system") or binary nomenclature, is a formal
system of naming species of living things by giving each a name composed of
two parts, both of which use Latin grammatical forms, although they can be
based on words from other languages. Such a name is called a binomial name
(which may be shortened to just "binomial"), a binomen, binominal name or a
scientific name; more informally it is also called a Latin name. The first
part of the name identifies the genus to which the species belongs; the
second part – the specific name or specific epithet – identifies the
species within the genus. For example, humans belong to the genus Homo and
within this genus to the species Homo sapiens.

Tyrannosaurus rex is probably the most widely known binomial.

<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_nomenclature>

Thus the provisional proposition is that the evolutionary transition to a
trinomial nomenclature can be as an accommodation of the historicist
oriental / occidental perspectives:

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype:

HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH

] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
@9 - Providence of ontic necessity as Faculty [#41 x n]

I really don’t have time for any more or your self justifications and
suggest that you better conceptualised your specious retorts with
specificity to the groundwork to the framework of discourse already
published.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

- dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...
Translation: but we do our best
Why say it twice? Repetition is a major problem with your writing,
together with your extensive parenthetic rambling.
Post by dolf
[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]
It's a phrase, not a "metempirical whatsit", whatever that means.
Such dictum which you advance concerning the permissibility of variation
as to the NATURE of noun, pronoun or adjective by which its grammatical
form is conveyed as acceptable binomial nomenclature usage
<SNIP>
By associating the word "binomial" with the word "nomenclature" you make
it obvious that you are using the word "binomial" in its non-mathematical sense.
I'm not sure what "binomial nomenclature" is supposed to mean, all the
more so because "binomial" is obviously a form of nomenclature, making
the additional word "nomenclature" that you have used completely
redundant if not downright tautological.
By removing the redundancy and de-synonymising what you have written and
Post by dolf
Such dictum which you advance
TRANSLATION: "What you said"
Post by dolf
concerning the permissibility of variation
as to the NATURE of noun, pronoun or adjective
TRANSLATION: "About correct grammatical usage"
Post by dolf
by which its grammatical
form is conveyed as acceptable binomial nomenclature usage is as
“knit one purl one” just ribbing and the of sowing discordant
bi-conditionals objectives
TRANSLATION: !ERROR! !GIBBERISH DETECTED!
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-31 05:28:34 UTC
Permalink
That this approach to the quantum of sapient knowledge pragmatics and data
aggregation is then the seminal cause for electronic books which are as
encapsulated knowledge spheres the core logic as building blocks (vis a vis
lego) for artificial intellectual cognitive services.

- dolf
Post by dolf
In scientific works, the authority for a binomial name is usually given, at
least when it is first mentioned, and the date of publication may be
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral concepts
{#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis, that (1) a
moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS,
389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted, that is, in the
sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - Transformative Prototype] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
Sabbath]) ...
Honour your parents]) ...
Do not kill]) ...
[#164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy]) ...
Do not steal]) ...
no false witness]) ...
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature such as is historically implicit within
Mao Ze Dong
or
XI Jin Pin
Binomial nomenclature ("two-term naming system") also called binominal
nomenclature ("two-name naming system") or binary nomenclature, is a formal
system of naming species of living things by giving each a name composed of
two parts, both of which use Latin grammatical forms, although they can be
based on words from other languages. Such a name is called a binomial name
(which may be shortened to just "binomial"), a binomen, binominal name or a
scientific name; more informally it is also called a Latin name. The first
part of the name identifies the genus to which the species belongs; the
second part – the specific name or specific epithet – identifies the
species within the genus. For example, humans belong to the genus Homo and
within this genus to the species Homo sapiens.
Tyrannosaurus rex is probably the most widely known binomial.
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_nomenclature>
Thus the provisional proposition is that the evolutionary transition to a
trinomial nomenclature can be as an accommodation of the historicist
HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH
] ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor with #164 -
Chronological Plane Mapping] ...
@9 - Providence of ontic necessity as Faculty [#41 x n]
I really don’t have time for any more or your self justifications and
suggest that you better conceptualised your specious retorts with
specificity to the groundwork as the framework of discourse already
published.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
- dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...
Translation: but we do our best
Why say it twice? Repetition is a major problem with your writing,
together with your extensive parenthetic rambling.
Post by dolf
[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]
It's a phrase, not a "metempirical whatsit", whatever that means.
Such dictum which you advance concerning the permissibility of variation
as to the NATURE of noun, pronoun or adjective by which its grammatical
form is conveyed as acceptable binomial nomenclature usage
<SNIP>
By associating the word "binomial" with the word "nomenclature" you make
it obvious that you are using the word "binomial" in its non-mathematical sense.
I'm not sure what "binomial nomenclature" is supposed to mean, all the
more so because "binomial" is obviously a form of nomenclature, making
the additional word "nomenclature" that you have used completely
redundant if not downright tautological.
By removing the redundancy and de-synonymising what you have written and
Post by dolf
Such dictum which you advance
TRANSLATION: "What you said"
Post by dolf
concerning the permissibility of variation
as to the NATURE of noun, pronoun or adjective
TRANSLATION: "About correct grammatical usage"
Post by dolf
by which its grammatical
form is conveyed as acceptable binomial nomenclature usage is as
“knit one purl one” just ribbing and the of sowing discordant
bi-conditionals objectives
TRANSLATION: !ERROR! !GIBBERISH DETECTED!
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-30 13:39:25 UTC
Permalink
-- CHINESE DAOIST YANG HSIUNG (4 BCE) USE OF YANG CH’I / YIN BINOME *AS*
*REFLECTING* EQUIVALENCE TO 22 (HEBREW?) STOICHEION NAMED ELEMENTS
WITHIN CHAPTER #99 [#ONE MAGIC SQUARE PROTOTYPE] IN EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE
DEAD THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS THE BASIS OF
CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES

On 30/8/18 7:46 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul wrote:> On Thursday,
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
mais nous faisons de notre mieux...
Translation: but we do our best
Why say it twice? Repetition is a major problem with your writing,
together with your extensive parenthetic rambling.
Post by dolf
[mais, nous, faisons, de, notre, mieux]
It's a phrase, not a "metempirical whatsit", whatever that means.
Such dictum which you advance concerning the permissibility of
variation as to the NATURE of noun, pronoun or adjective by which its
grammatical form is conveyed as acceptable binomial nomenclature usage
is as “knit one purl one” just ribbing and the of sowing discordant
bi-conditionals objectives {

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH
IS EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS
THE BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding
appropriately."

} with impetus of FOUL declension and has no intrinsic ontological
dignity worth emulating as pretence to any principled life: “Be not
deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.

Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of
God: I speak this to your shame.”

The garment which you are hodgepodging is a corruption of decency and is
barely capable to cover your paunch and bollocks: “For this corruptible
must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal
shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying
that is written, *Death* *Is* *swallowed* *up* *in* *victory*.

O death, where is thy sting? *O* *grave*, *where* *is* *thy* *victory*?

EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 which is the equivalent MAGIC ROW
SUM to the FIRST MAGIC SQUARE the Egyptian ANKH / ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

The Patrol who goeth round, and who piloteth the Double Earth; Seb
abideth stably by means of their rudders: the divine Form which
revealeth the Solar Orb: and He who presideth over the Red ones.) [Text
corrupt.]

Let me be brought in as a distressed mariner, and let my Soul come to
me, which is my brother, and go to that place which thou knowest.

"Let me be told my name," say,

1. The Mooring-post. "Lord of the Double-Earth in the Shrine" is thy name.

#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: Scales of Merit}
AUTONOMOUS HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY: {ANIMUS: OBEDIENCE (#ALEPH to
#LAMED)}

2. The Blade of the Rudder. "Leg of Apis" is thy name.

#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature: {DOUBLE: #1 - Nature Contains Nature
{#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature}}

3. The Hawser. "The Side-Lock which Anubis fastens on to the swathing
work" is thy name.

#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: {DOUBLE: #2 - Nature Rejoices in its
Nature {#5 - Act of Nature}}

4. The Stern or Stem Posts. "The two columns of the Nether-world" is thy
name.

#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature / #1 - Nature Contains Nature:
{DOUBLE: #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}

5. The Hold. "Akar" is thy name.

#5 - Act of Nature / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature

6. The Mast. "Bearer of the Great one whilst she passeth" is thy name.

#6 - Form of Nature / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature

7. The Keel. "Backbone of Apuat" is thy name.

#7 - Engendering Nature / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature

8. The Mast-head. "Throat of Emsta" is thy name.

#8 - Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature

9. The Sail. "Nut" is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature

10. The Leathers. "Made of the hide of Mnevis, which Sutu hath
scorched," is thy name.

#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature

11. The Oars. "Fingers of the elder" is your name.

#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7
- Engendering Nature}}

12. The Bracement. "Hand of Isis, stanching the blood of the Eye of
Horus," is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature

13. The Ribs. "Emsta, Hapi, Taumautef, Kebehsenuf, He who taketh
captive, He who taketh by force, He who seeth his Father, and He who
maketh himself," are your names.

#1 - Nature Contains Nature: {MOTHER: The Tongue of Decree Deciding
Between Them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]
TETRAD FOR ANY GENII THESIS: {SPIRITUS: AIDING (#MEM to #QOPH)}

14. The Look-out. "Master of the Grounds" is thy name.

#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

15. The Tiller. "Merit" is thy name.

#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 /#2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature]

16. The Rudder. "The Umpire, beaming forth from the water," is thy name.

#4 - Nature Amended In Its Nature [#111 /#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature]

17. The Hull. "The Leg of Hathor, which Ra wounded, on lifting her into
the Sektit Boat," is thy name.

#5 - Act of Nature: {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 - Transforming
Nature} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

18. The Boatman. "Off," is thy name.

#6 - Form Of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

19. The Breeze, since thou art conveyed by me: "The Northern Breeze
proceeding from Tmu to the Nose of Chent-Amenta," is thy name.

#7 - Engendering Nature: {*OATHS* OF DIEU ET MON DROIT} [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

20. The Stream, since thou sailest upon me: "Their Mirror" is thy name.

#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]
IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}
DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE

21. The Swallow. "Destroyer of the large-handed at the place of
purification" is thy name.

#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]
DEFINE THE @5 CANONICAL PRINCIPLE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTIC HERE

22. The Land. Since thou walkest upon me: "The Tip of Heaven, the Coming
forth from the swathings in the Garden of Aarru, and the Coming forth in
Exultation," is thy name.

#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 -
Totality of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]

To be said before them.

Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for
ever, and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to
me food and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the
Shensu-cake and the Kefen-cake: let my place be in the great hall in
presence of the mighty god.

I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course.

Let me not be stopped at the Meskat; let not the Sebau have mastery over
my limbs.

I have bread in Pu and beer in Tepu. Let your largesses of this day be
granted to me; offerings of wheat and barley, offerings of anta and of
vestments, offerings of oxen, and ducks, which are offerings for life,
health and strength, and also offerings for coming forth by day, in all
forms in which it pleaseth me to come forth in the Garden of Aarru.

If this chapter be known he will come forth at the Garden of Aarru;
there will be given to him the Shensu-cake, the measure of drink and the
persen-cake, and fields of wheat and barley of seven cubits (It is the
followers of Horus who reap them), for he eateth of that wheat and
barley, and he is made whole in his limbs through that wheat and barley,
and his limbs spring up even as with those gods. And he cometh forth in
the Garden of Aarru in all the forms in which it pleaseth him to come forth.

The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law [of
metempirical contortions as normative deceptions such as yours]”

Matthew 23:27 (KJV)
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within
full of dead [men's] bones, and of all uncleanness.

Luke 11:52 (KJV)
Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye
entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

The fact that ethical principles carry in themselves the modal status of
necessity provides an important methodical starting point for the
construction of ethical theories. Thus, the execution of the commonly
performed counterfactual thought experiments in ethics is only possible
under the condition that the principles of valuation support such an
operation. Contingent principles are not in a position to do that, Kant
makes methodical use of this log1cal quality of moral principles
particularly in those places where he speaks of other “*RATIONAL*
*BEINGS*” (eg. GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). The central passage in the
Preface of the Groundwork in which he argues for the necessity of a pure
moral philosophy also belongs to this methodical usage {

}. It does not matter in these passages whether there actually are other
such beings as, for example, the inhabitants of other planets or also
God. For the Kantian argumentation it is sufficient that such beings
could exist, that their existence is thinkable. The corresponding
passages must be understood as methodically executed thought
experiments, which make use of the particular modal status of ethical
principles. Now it becomes clear why the “*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*” have a
comparable modal status to the “*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.” Laws of nature
support counterfactual arguments, too. In order to achieve this, they
also must have a modal status which is higher than simple contingency.
The connections formulated in them are also valid in all natural law
governed, possible worlds, and in this respect, they exhibit the modal
status of [*ONTIC*] necessity. The difference between laws of nature and
laws of freedom appears to consist primarily in the fact that the *LAWS*
*OF* *NATURE* {

#364 {#52 x #7} x 6D = #2184 / #7 = #312 as [#2, #100, #200, #10] =
qeriy (H7147): {UMBRA: #9 as #310 % #41 = #23} 1) opposition,
contrariness, encounter, contrary or hostile encounter;

As ‘OTH x #49 {#7 x #7) = #107,016 days

#107,016 days / 293 TROPICAL YEARS = 365.2423208191126 AS BETTER THAN
JULIAN YEAR AS 365.25 days

} are concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while
the laws of [*ONTOLOGICAL*] freedom are concerned with all-quantified,
normative bi-conditionals, each receiving the modal status of [*ONTIC*]
necessity." [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]

Re: — I WOULD LIKE TO FIND COHERENT SENTENCES
Your rationalisation for your errors in writing, even if it were
coherent, is nonsense.
Your errors are errors because there are rules of language and of
writing and you are not following them.
Your "binomial" nonsense is just something in your own imagination
and it does not override the rules of language.
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Metempirics is the study of concepts and relationships conceived
as beyond
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
and yet related to knowledge gained empirically
And yet the phrase you refer to is a simple declarative assertion,
nothing to do with metempiric whatsits.
Post by dolf
@1: Sup: 37 (#37); Ego: 69 (#69),
@2: Sup: 81 (#118); Ego: 24 (#93),
@3: Sup: 18 (#136); Ego: 2 (#95),
4: Sup: 31 (#167); Ego: 9 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@5: Sup: 28 (#195); Ego: 81 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
@6: Sup: 16 (#211); Ego: 63 (#248),
Male: #211; Feme: #248
And that's just gobbledigook.
<SNIP gibberish>
YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #16 - CONTACT, uses the term *BINOME*
within the context of "YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the patterns of
growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A* *BINOME* *WHICH
IS EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260 VIEW OF NUMBER AS
THE BASIS OF CONVENTION FOR ADOPTION OF SURNAMES], responding
appropriately."

In the “*GOLDEN* *AGE*” of the past, communities purportedly served the
legitimate interests of all while maintaining the dignity of each.
Stable hierarchical relations wove elements of society together in a
complex web of mutual obligation, but reciprocity (implying not only
mutual obligation but also an empathetic “likening to oneself”) was also
needed to temper the possible ill effects of unmediated power relations.
The perfect community, therefore, was thought to be equally dependent
upon hierarchy and reciprocity. As such, the perfect community is
modelled upon the cosmos, where YANG CH’I acts as ruler, defining the
patterns of growth, while YIN acts as subject [*AS* *REFLECTING* *A*
*BINOME* *WHICH IS EQUIVALENT TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL 8x8 = #260
VIEW OF NUMBER], responding appropriately. This tetragram celebrates
such ideal contact, which, the Head text promises, makes the good
individual both resplendent as the sun [ie. CHAPTER #99 - *THE* *DIVINE*
*FORM* *WHICH* *REVEALETH* *THE* *SOLAR* *ORB* / CHAPTER #123 -- WHEREBY
ONE ENTERETH INTO THE GREAT HOUSE / CHAPTER #124 - WHEREBY ONE COMETH TO
THE DIVINE CIRCLE OF OSIRIS] and powerful as the king in his sacred
audience hall.

"Hail to you, Fair in Form, Lord of issues, who are springing up for
ever, and whose double goal is eternity: turn to me your hands, give to
me food and offerings for my mouth; let me eat the Bat-bread, the
Shensu-cake and the Kefen-cake: *LET* *MY* *PLACE* *BE* *IN* *THE*
*GREAT* *HALL* *IN* *PRESENCE* *OF* *THE* *MIGHTY* *GOD*.

I know that mighty god to whose nostrils ye present delicacies. Tekmu is
his name: and whether he, whose name is Tekmu, turneth from the East or
advanceth to the West, let his course be my course." [CHAPTER #99,
EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD]

THE HALL OF LIGHT, ACCORDING TO EARLY COMMENTATORS, REFERS SIMPLY TO THE
REGION ABOVE GROUND IN THE LIGHT OF DAY, AS CONTRASTED WITH THE YELLOW
SPRINGS BELOW GROUND. BUT THE SAME *BINOME*

NOTE [Algebra]: an expression that is a sum of difference of two terms
such as the Pythagorean: c² (25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN)
+ b² (16 as #34 - JUPITER); Binominal nomenclature or binary
nomenclature is a formal system of naming species of living things by
giving each a name composed of two parts, both of which use Latin
grammatical forms, although they can be based on words from other languages

That the Roman Catholic nomenclature conforms ONLY to such Pythagorean:
c² (25 as #65 - MARS) = a² (9 as #15 - SATURN) + b² (16 as #34 -
JUPITER); Binominal nomenclature or binary nomenclature which is reliant
upon its TETRAD (36 as #111 - SOL INVICTUS) as its Intellectual Proposition.

IS USED TO DESCRIBE THE SACRED SITE WHERE THE KING MAKES RITUAL CONTACT
WITH THE GODS. ITS USE SUGGESTS THAT ALL THINGS ARE SANCTIFIED BY
CONTACT WITH THE MYSTERY.

This tetragram #16 is correlated with the Rainfall solar period. Rain
symbolizes beneficent grace and germinating influence, whether the
reference is to *SEXUAL* *CONTACT* *OR* *TO* *POLITICAL* *RELATIONS*.
Consequently, the general tone of this tetragram is lucky, except in
those few cases where “stimulus and response” occurs between
categorically dissimilar partners, *PROMPTING* *REPULSION* *AND*
*DISASTER*. [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53 BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME
MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 16 - CONTACT, A translation with
Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by Michael Nylan 1993, p 165]

*THE* *CONSIDERATION* *OF* *LACK* *OF *SURNAMES* *WITHIN* *THE*
*NETHERLANDS* *SUGGESTS* *THAT* *THEY* *WERE* *NOT* *AS* *ONTOLOGICAL*
*NECESSITY* *SUBJECT* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *EMPIRE*
*GOVERNANCE*

Nous: #27
Time: 09:40 hrs
Date: 2018.8.18
Torah: [#40, #10, #5]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 50 (#90); Ego: 10 (#50),
@3: Sup: 55 (#145); Ego: 5 (#55),
Male: #145; Feme: #55
} // #55

Dao: Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes
Tetra: #74 - Closure
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite

Latin: Expetendus {God, rescuing Father} Alt: Chohvyal {Breathe the Woe
of God} {

1. HELPS PRESERVE CONJUGAL FIDELITY & FERTILITY BETWEEN SPOUSES
2. THE GENERATIONS
3. LOVE
4. Senciner
}

Shealtiel {Asked or lent of God}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#360 / #350} / HETEROS {#367 / #313} / TORAH {#319
/ #289}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:4,col:8,nous:27&idea:{m,27}&idea:{f,27}&idea:{m,360}&idea:{f,350}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 1, row: 4, col: 8, nous: 27 [Date: 2018.8.18, Time: 09:40
hrs, Super: #360 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure, Ego: #350 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure]

H4016@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 42 (#44); Ego: 40 (#42),
@3: Sup: 44 (#88); Ego: 2 (#44),
@4: Sup: 20 (#108); Ego: 57 (#101),
@5: Sup: 30 (#138); Ego: 10 (#111),
@6: Sup: 36 (#174); Ego: 6 (#117),
Male: #174; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #342 % #41 = #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics);
I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 -
Branching Out;

THOTH MEASURE: #14 - Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at
Mabit; I deal not fraudulently.

#VIRTUE: With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but
#TOOLS: With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord.
#POSITION: With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing.
#TIME: With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love.
#CANON: #140

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_140@{
@1: Sup: 14 (#14); Ego: 14 (#14),
@2: Sup: 68 (#82); Ego: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 79 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 11 (#79),
@4: Sup: 59 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}); Ego: 61 (#140 - I DEAL
NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
Male: #220; Feme: #140
} // #140

#360 as [#2, #40, #2, #300, #10, #6] = mabush (H4016): {UMBRA: #4 as
#342 % #41 = #14} 1) private parts, his privates, male genitals; 1a)
literally - 'that excites shame';

H4828@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 70 (#100); Ego: 40 (#70),
@3: Sup: 27 (#127); Ego: 38 (#108),
@4: Sup: 16 (#143); Ego: 70 (#178),
@5: Sup: 36 (#179); Ego: 20 (#198),
Male: #179; Feme: #198
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
Tetra: 26 - Endeavour;

THOTH MEASURE: #23 - Oh thou who raisest thy voice, and makest thine
appearance in Urit; I am not hot of speech.

#VIRTUE: With Ease (no. #23), a leveling, but
#TOOLS: With Watch (no. #63), a collapse.
#POSITION: With Enlargement (no. #46), no bounds.
#TIME: With Endeavor (no. #26), no duplicity.
#CANON: #158

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_158@{
@1: Sup: 23 (#23); Ego: 23 (#23),
@2: Sup: 5 (#28); Ego: 63 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@3: Sup: 51 (#79); Ego: 46 (#132),
@4: Sup: 77 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 26 (#158 - I
AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
Male: #156; Feme: #158
} // #158

#360 as [#30, #40, #200, #70, #20] = merea` (H4828): {UMBRA: #6 as #310
% #41 = #23} 1) companion, friend, confidential friend;

H3584@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 36 (#58); Ego: 20 (#36),
@4: Sup: 44 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 8 (#44),
@5: Sup: 20 (#122); Ego: 57 (#101),
@6: Sup: 26 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 6 (#107),
Male: #148; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #328 % #41 = #41 - Playing with Reversal, Sameness in Difference;
I-Ching: H26 - Great Domestication, Restraining Force, Great
Accumulating, The taming power of the great, Great storage, Potential
energy; Tetra: 60 - Accumulation;

THOTH MEASURE: #41 - Oh thou of raised head, who makest thine appearance
at thy cavern; I have no strong desire except for my own property.

#VIRTUE:
#TOOLS: Fostering (no. #81) receives all the rest.
#POSITION: As to Resistance (no. #22), it is contradiction, but
#TIME: As to Unity (no. #54), it is conforming.
#CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 22 (#103); Ego: 22 (#103),
@3: Sup: 76 (#179); Ego: 54 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #179; Feme: #157
} // #157

#350 as [#6, #10, #20, #8, #300, #6] = kachash (H3584): {UMBRA: #4 as
#328 % #41 = #41} 1) to deceive, lie, fail, grow lean, be disappointing,
be untrue, be insufficient, be found liars, belie, deny, dissemble, deal
falsely; 1a) (Qal) to become lean; 1b) (Niphal) to cringe, feign
obedience; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to deceive, deny falsely; 1c2) to act
deceptively; 1c3) to cringe; 1c4) to disappoint, fail; 1d) (Hithpael) to
cringe, feign obedience;

H5237@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#129); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 57 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31}); Ego: 38
(#138),
@5: Sup: 67 (#253); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@6: Sup: 26 (#279); Ego: 40 (#188),
Male: #279; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #280 % #41 = #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has
been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;

THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in
Memphis; I am neither a liar nor a doer of mischief.

#VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
#TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
#POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
#TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
#CANON: #215

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_215@{
@1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
@2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
@3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
@4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
Male: #134; Feme: #215
} // #215

#350 as [#30, #50, #20, #200, #10, #40] = nokriy (H5237): {UMBRA: #8 as
#280 % #41 = #34} 1) foreign, alien; 1a) foreign; 1b) foreigner (subst);
1c) foreign woman, harlot; 1d) unknown, unfamiliar (fig.);

H6187@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 29 (#69); Ego: 70 (#110),
@3: Sup: 67 (#136); Ego: 38 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@4: Sup: 6 (#142); Ego: 20 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26});
Ego: 20 (#188),
Male: #168; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #290 % #41 = #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching: H46
- Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition;

THOTH MEASURE: #3 - Oh thou of the Nose, who makest thine appearance at
Chemunnu; I am not evil minded.

#VIRTUE: With Mired (no. #3), great woe.
#TOOLS: With Encounters (no. #43), small desire.
#POSITION: The ways of Purity (no. #37) and ...
#TIME: Pattern (no. #47) where some are simple and some are complex?
#CANON: #130

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_130@{
@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 46 (#49); Ego: 43 (#46),
@3: Sup: 2 (#51); Ego: 37 (#83),
@4: Sup: 49 (#100); Ego: 47 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #100; Feme: #130
} // #130

#350 as [#40, #70, #200, #20, #20] = `erek (H6187): {UMBRA: #10 as #290
% #41 = #3} 1) order, row, estimate, things that are set in order,
layer, pile; 1a) order, row; 1b) estimate, valuation;

H6735@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 19 (#28); Ego: 10 (#19),
@3: Sup: 57 (#85); Ego: 38 (#57),
@4: Sup: 67 (#152); Ego: 10 (#67),
@5: Sup: 26 (#178); Ego: 40 (#107),
Male: #178; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #300 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;

THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at
the Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
#TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
#POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
#TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the sleeping mat
#CANON: #139

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
@1: Sup: 13 (#13); Ego: 13 (#13),
@2: Sup: 66 (#79); Ego: 53 (#66),
@3: Sup: 74 (#153); Ego: 8 (#74),
@4: Sup: 58 (#211); Ego: 65 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

#350 as [#90, #10, #200, #10, #40] = tsiyr (H6735): {UMBRA: #13 as #300
% #41 = #13} 1) envoy, messenger; 2) pivot of door, hinge; 3) pang,
distress;

H7386@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 48 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 10 (#48),
@3: Sup: 67 (#153); Ego: 19 (#67),
@4: Sup: 77 (#230); Ego: 10 (#77),
@5: Sup: 36 (#266); Ego: 40 (#117),
Male: #266; Feme: #117
} // #360

#360 as [#200, #10, #100, #10, #40] = reyq (H7386): {UMBRA: #15 as #310
% #41 = #23} 1) empty, vain; 1a) empty (of vessels); 1b) empty, idle,
worthless (ethically);

G155@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 11 (#12); Ego: 10 (#11),
@3: Sup: 68 (#80); Ego: 57 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 76 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 8 (#76),
@5: Sup: 35 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 40 (#116),
@6: Sup: 36 (#227); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #227; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #360 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching:
H44 - Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43
- Encounters;

THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit;
I do not steal the skins of the sacred animals.

#VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
#TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
#POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
#TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
#CANON: #191

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
@1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
@2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
@4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191

#360 as [#1, #10, #300, #8, #40, #1] = aitema (G155): {UMBRA: #17 as
#360 % #41 = #32} 1) petition, request, required;

G1297@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
@3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
@4: Sup: 72 (#105); Ego: 57 (#72),
@5: Sup: 73 (#178); Ego: 1 (#73),
@6: Sup: 76 (#254); Ego: 3 (#76),
@7: Sup: 35 (#289); Ego: 40 (#116),
@8: Sup: 36 (#325); Ego: 1 (#117),
Male: #325; Feme: #117
} // #360

#360 as [#4, #10, #1, #300, #1, #3, #40, #1] = diatagma (G1297): {UMBRA:
#18 as #360 % #41 = #32} 1) an injunction, mandate;

G2519@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21),
@3: Sup: 30 (#71); Ego: 9 (#30),
@4: Sup: 38 (#109); Ego: 8 (#38),
@5: Sup: 41 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 3 (#41),
@6: Sup: 49 (#199); Ego: 8 (#49),
@7: Sup: 25 (#224); Ego: 57 (#106),
@8: Sup: 26 (#250); Ego: 1 (#107),
@9: Sup: 36 (#286); Ego: 10 (#117),
Male: #286; Feme: #117
} // #360

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #557 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;

THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
I lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.

#VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
#TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
#POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
#TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
#CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
@2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
@3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
@4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181

#360 as [#20, #1, #9, #8, #3, #8, #300, #1, #10] = kathegetes (G2519):
{UMBRA: #20 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) a guide; 2) a master, teacher;

G1924@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95),
@4: Sup: 17 (#40); Ego: 3 (#98),
@5: Sup: 22 (#62); Ego: 5 (#103),
@6: Sup: 25 (#87); Ego: 3 (#106),
@7: Sup: 44 (#131); Ego: 19 (#125),
@8: Sup: 45 (#176); Ego: 1 (#126),
@9: Sup: 4 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 40 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
@10: Sup: 44 (#224); Ego: 40 (#206),
@11: Sup: 49 (#273); Ego: 5 (#211),
@12: Sup: 18 (#291); Ego: 50 (#261),
@13: Sup: 26 (#317); Ego: 8 (#269),
Male: #317; Feme: #269
} // #350

#350 as [#5, #80, #10, #3, #5, #3, #100, #1, #40, #40, #5, #50, #8] =
epigrapho (G1924): {UMBRA: #23 as #1499 % #41 = #23} 1) to write upon,
inscribe; 2) metaph. to write upon the mind;

G3534@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 60 (#110); Ego: 10 (#60),
@3: Sup: 80 (#190); Ego: 20 (#80),
@4: Sup: 69 (#259); Ego: 70 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@5: Sup: 26 (#285); Ego: 38 (#188),
Male: #285; Feme: #188
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #350 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#350 as [#50, #10, #20, #70, #200] = nikos (G3534): {UMBRA: #26 as #350
% #41 = #22} 1) victory; 2) to utterly vanquish;

G5055@{
@1: Sup: 57 (#57); Ego: 57 (#57),
@2: Sup: 62 (#119); Ego: 5 (#62),
@3: Sup: 11 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 30 (#92),
@4: Sup: 16 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 5 (#97),
@5: Sup: 26 (#172); Ego: 10 (#107),
Male: #172; Feme: #107
} // #350

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1140 % #41 = #33 - Achievable Goals, Virtue of Discrimination;
I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint, Small Accumulating,
The taming power of the small, Small harvest; Tetra: 35 - Gathering;

THOTH MEASURE: #33 - Oh thou Horned one, who makest thine appearance at
Sais; I am not noisy in my speech.

#VIRTUE: With Closeness (no. #33), no possible gap, but
#TOOLS: With Completion (no. #73), no possible change.
#POSITION: With Massing (no. #59), affairs emptying.
#TIME: With Legion (no. #32), affairs filling.
#CANON: #197

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_197@{
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
@2: Sup: 25 (#58); Ego: 73 (#106),
@3: Sup: 3 (#61); Ego: 59 (#165),
@4: Sup: 35 (#96); Ego: 32 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
Male: #96; Feme: #197
} // #197

#350 as [#300, #5, #30, #5, #10] = teleo (G5055): {UMBRA: #30 as #1140 %
#41 = #33} 1) to bring to a close, to finish, to end; 2) to perform,
execute, complete, fulfil, (so that the thing done corresponds to what
has been said, the order, command etc.); 3) to pay; 1a) passed,
finished; 2a) with special reference to the subject matter, to carry out
the contents of a command; 2b) with reference also to the form, to do
just as commanded, and generally involving the notion of time, to
perform the last act which completes a process, to accomplish, fulfil;
3a) of tribute;

On 18 August 1811, Napoleon issued a decree, based on French law,
regarding adoption of surnames. Everyone was required to adopt a surname
and those who did not comply were fined. Name adoption registers
(naamsaanneming registers) were created to record the family names that
were adopted. These registers often assist you in your research when
moving from the civil registration period to the church registers.

The name adoption registers were maintained by each municipality and did
not follow a particular format. They vary from one municipality to the
next and were seldom indexed. Unfortunately, not all registers have
survived. Most registers provide the name and age of the registrant and
that of his living children and grand-children. If you are lucky, the
full date and place of birth was recorded. Many municipalities included
the registrant’s address.

Interestingly, a wife was not usually listed with her husband in the
name adoption registers. If her grandfather or father was alive at the
time, she would be listed under their entry. Often widows were listed
with their children and grandchildren.

Other than this time period, surname changes made in the Netherlands
were and are rare."

<https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Netherlands_-_Dutch_Research_Introduction_(National_Institute)>

Within ancient Rome, Latin has {ie.

due to it's Pythagorean nomenclature @5 - PHALLUS / @1 - ENGENDERING
dynamic of MEMBRUM VIRILE / PUERILE as 'ACTIVE' male / 'PASSIVE' female
binomial construct which also applied to the naming of persons as
conveyed by Biblical narrative:

"And Simon he *SURNAMED* Peter; And James the son of Zebedee, and John
the brother of James; and he *SURNAMED* them Boanerges, which is, The
sons of thunder..." [Mark 3:16-17 (KJV)]

"I have *SURNAMED* thee, though thou hast not known me." [Isaiah 45:4
(KJV)] <-- *THIS* *IS* *NAMING* *CONVENTION* *IS* *NOT* *BINOMIAL* *BUT*
*TRINOMIAL* *BECAUSE* *OF* *THE* *SON* *OF* *MAN* *AS* *A* *NON*
*PROCREATIONAL* *CONSTRUCT*: "Thus saith the LORD, Keep ye judgment, and
do justice: for my salvation is near to come, and my righteousness to be
revealed.

Blessed is the man that doeth this, and the *SON* *OF* *MAN* that layeth
hold on it; that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and keepeth his
hand from doing any evil.

Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the
LORD, speak, saying, The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people:
neither let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree.

For thus saith the LORD unto the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths, and
choose the things that please me, and take hold of my covenant; Even
unto them will I give in mine #391 - *HOUSE* and within my walls a place
and *a* *name* *better* *than* *of* *sons* *and* *of* *daughters*: *I*
*will* *give* *them* *an* *everlasting* *name*, *that* *shall* *not*
*be* *cut* *off*.

Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the LORD, to
serve him, and to love the name of the LORD, to be his servants, every
one that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my
covenant;
Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my
house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be
accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called an house of
prayer for all people.

The Lord GOD which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I
gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him." [Isaiah
56:1-8 (KJV)]

} no equivalent translation for defining homosexuality, nor
heterosexuality as an individual’s sexual nature. Gay or straight, there
would be no distinction.

Sexuality instead is determined by behavioural mannerisms, whether
masculine or passive in both male and female roles. Roman society had a
patriarchal system in which the gender role of the male is the primary
authority, emphasized by the “active” masculinity as a premise of
governance, power and status.

In the case of the freeborn women of Rome, they were sometimes described
as “tribas fricatrix”, meaning “she who rubs” and “virago”, from the
latin word vir (virile man), a term used to describe a woman who
demonstrates exemplary and heroic qualities.

Roman religion supported acceptance of sexuality, as an aspect that
prospered religious practice for improving erotic lifestyle as well as
defining an individual’s power through the procreative force of the
male. Such traditions were a sign of active masculinity, but whether the
religious tolerance can be applicable to homosexual acts is unknown.

Men were free to have intercourse with men, but generally only
acceptable in instances where the masculinity of the freeborn Roman
citizen wasn't subject to the law as Lex Scantinia, otherwise bringing
his name and family reputation into dis-repute or infamia (infamia – A
loss of legal or social standing).

Lex Scantinia was a Roman law that historians believe was created to
penalise any male citizen of high standing that took a willing role in
passive sexual behaviour. From a societal perspective, to be “passive”
or “submissive”, threatened the very fabric of masculinity, with
feminine traits, submission and passive mannerisms being an act of the
lower class and slaves.

Same sex intercourse with prostitutes or slaves was actually acceptable,
not vitiating on a freeborn’s masculinity as long as the freeborn
citizen took the active role in penetration. In rare cases, freeborns
who bestowed their anal orifice or “scultima”, was in florid slang a
“Scultimidonus.” Translated as “asshole bestower,” mentioned in text
from the Roman Satirist, Gaius Lucilius (c.160s – 103/2 BC).

In the legions, the act of homosexuality amongst soldiers (as similarly
applied to the Dutch instance of male to male sexual activity upon
ships) was considered a violation of military discipline and subject to
harsh penalties. Polybius (ca. 200–118 BC), a Greek Historian reported
in his journals that same sex activity amongst soldiers was punishable
by the fustuarium, (clubbing to death).

As with any freeborn, Soldiers were allowed to engage in same-sex
relations with slaves, prostitutes and captives as a sign of inserting
their sexual authority and their (active) masculinity. An incident
related by Plutarch in his biography of Marius, illustrates the
soldier’s right to maintain his sexual integrity. In this instance, a
legionary named Trebonius was the object of sexual assaults by his
superior officer, Gaius Luscius. Trebonius was brought before a tribunal
for killing Luscius, but later acquitted and awarded a crown of bravery
for defending his masculinity and freeborn male purity.

In another case of same sex in the army, “De Bello Hispaniensi,” a book
believed to have been written by Julius Caesar (Although the authorship
is heavily disputed) details Caesar’s campaigns on the Iberian Peninsula
and mentions a Roman officer who engages in regular sexual acts with his
concubine (concubinus).

Although the Lex Scantinia and the enforcement of the law is mentioned
in several ancient sources, such as 227 BC where Gaius Scantinius
Capitolinus was put on a Lex trial for sexually molesting the son of
Marcus Claudius Marcellus; the full legality and provisions of the law
are still unclear. Lex Scantinia has never been proven as a direct
assault on homosexuality, nor penalising the general act within ancient
Rome as a crime. Instead, it was essentially a rule to police the
masculine nature of a Roman citizen by enforcing that a freeborn takes
the “top” or “active” role in sex.
[<https://www.heritagedaily.com/2018/01/roman-sex-sexuality-slaves-and-lex-scantinia/97996>]"

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #52 - MEASURES, uses the term
*BINOME* as a FOOTNOTE expansion within the context of "Without such
guides, the fragile seeds of morality innate in each person can never
develop along the lines of Heaven's manifest intentions for the world.

APPRAISAL #7: To draw guidelines without measuring
Brings down the instant ridicule of ghosts.
FATHOMING #7: Unmeasured guidelines
Mean: Those with keen insight only laugh. [WANG YA contrasts the BINOME
MING CH'A with ghosts {ie. the NETHERWORLD}]

Those who fail either to take the proper measure of a situation or apply
the guidelines of the sages to a problem deserve blame. Ghosts represent
the shadowy spirit world {ie. the NETHERWORLD}. With their special
insight Into human affairs, they are able to discern such failures more
quickly than ordinary individuals. As all perceptive persons withdraw
their support from the individual who refuses to reform, *DISASTER*
*SURELY* *FOLLOWS*.

APPRAISAL #8: *RED* from the stone cannot be pried apart.
Equally ingrained is the knight’s integrity.
FATHOMING #8: The indelible nature of the stone’s *RED*
Means: Covenants are possible with him. [SOURCE: YANG HSIUNG’S (53
BCE-18 CE) THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY OF 4 / 2 BCE ON TETRA: 52 -
MEASURE, A translation with Commentary of the T’AI HSUAN CHING by
Michael Nylan 1993, p 322, 578]

He who presideth over the *Red* ones. [CHAPTER #99, EGYPTIAN BOOK OF
THE DEAD]

YANG HSIUNG's commentary on TETRA: #51 - CONSTANCY, conveys a similar
expansion within the context of, "In this auspicious APPRAISAL #7
aligned with DAY, the flowing water calls to mind the desirable
qualities of flood-like CH'I associated with integrity, a power at once
gentle and inexorable in its effect: "Anubis is my bearer, for he who
lulleth me to rest is the god in Lion form.

Do thou save me!

I am He who cometh forth as one who breaketh through the door; and
everlasting is the Daylight which his will hath created.

"I know the deep waters" is my name.

I satisfy the desires of the Glorified, who are by millions and hundreds
of thousands [Text corrupt.] I am the guardian of their interests,
actively working at the hours of the day adjusting the arms of Sahu;
twelve in the circling round, uniting hands, each of them with another.
But the Sixth of them in the Tuat is the
dolf
2018-08-31 00:45:11 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT: 31 AUGUST 2018) ACKNOWLEDGED RECEIPT OF THE LAMINATED A2 (420
X 594 MM) PRELIMINARY GRAPPLE PARADIGM WITHIN 1998

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 31 August, 2018

Thank-you for your courtesy as letter dated 7 August 2018 as made in
reply to my request of 20 July 2018 wherein you state as confirmation:
"However, luckily we {#334 as [#6, #80, #200, #8, #40] = perach (H6525):
{UMBRA: #10 as #288 % #41 = #1} 1) bud, *SPROUT*} remembered that you
gave the 4 of us a laminated A2 (420 x 594 mm) Preliminary Grapple
Paradigm. You gave it to us in 1998 at the end of your visit."

I would however dispute the clarity of such a recollection, since it
would have been from my perspective, surface mailed to yourselves within
a tube container around 2000 as being within proximity to the
millennium. However such a statement would be substantive enough to
sustain my $154 million damages claims which will be pursued once the
Financial Services Royal Commission (not Social Services as you contend)
at least produce their Interim Report to the Governor General by 30
September 2018.

2.5. THE PRACTICAL USE OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY (GMS, 389,36-390,18)
Although the aim of the argumentation appears to be complete, Kant, in
the ensuing paragraph, suggests another form of reasoning for the
“NECESSITY” of a pure moral philosophy. This second argument, however,
takes a completely different direction. Kant’s original question
concerning the necessity of a moral philosophy is not free of ambiguity.
For him, it was at first a matter of a necessity that referred to
cognition (“SPECULATION”: GMS, 389,37) as its goal. It could be
SUMMARIZED as follows: ‘*IF* *ONE* *WANTS* *TO* *OBTAIN* *KNOWLEDGE*
*OF* *MORAL* *PRINCIPLES*, *THEN* *A* *PURE* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY* *IS*
*AN* *INDISPENSABLE* *MEANS*.’

In Kant’s second argument, a pure moral philosophy is “INDISPENSABLY
NECESSARY” (GMS, 389,36) not only for the correct cognition but also for
the correct action. It could be said, ‘*IF* *ONE* *WANTS* *TO*
*CORRECTLY*, *THEN* *ONE* *NEEDS* *A* *PURE* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY*.’ Kant
argues thesis: “BECAUSE MORALS THEMSELVES REMAIN SUBJECT TO ALL SORTS OF
CORRUPTION AS LONG AS THAT GUIDING THREAD AND SUPREME NORM OF THEIR
CORRECT JUDGMENT IS LACKING” (GMS, 390,2f.). The implication contained
in this argument seems, at first sight, quite strong, but it is not
clear whether Kant actually advocates it so strongly. Do we really need a
philosophical moral theory in order to act correctly? Are we compelled
to rely on a kind of philosophical expertise when dealing with moral
questions?

“THANK YOU FOR YOUR LETTER. I MUST ADMIT THAT WE DON’T UNDERSTAND A LOT
OF IT AND WOULD BE SURPRISED IF THE SOCIAL SERVICES DO!”

RESPONSE@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 46 (#87); Ego: 33 (#49),
Male: #87; Feme: #49
}

What is essential to such a claim, is that your response was made
VOLUNTARILY and it can then be validated as authenticity by an appraisal
made against the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS as conveying both a
lack of SENSIBILITY {

H5039@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 52 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 2 (#52),
@3: Sup: 1 (#103); Ego: 30 (#82),
@4: Sup: 6 (#109); Ego: 5 (#87),
Male: #109; Feme: #87
} // #87

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #87 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;

THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
at Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.

#VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
#TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
#POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
#TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
#CANON: #115

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
@3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
@4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
Male: #118; Feme: #115
} // #115

#87 as [#50, #2, #30, #5] = nebalah (H5039): {UMBRA: #11 as #87 % #41 =
#5} 1) *SENSELESSNESS*, folly; 1a) disgraceful folly; 1a1) of
immorality, profane actions; 1b) disgrace, contumely disgrace;

} about any importance associated with such artefact (as you rightfully
say it was 20 years ago) as having any intrinsic worth, and that
rightfully I had conveyed it to yourselves for purposes of SECURITY /
SAFETY {



H983@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 32 (#62); Ego: 2 (#32),
@3: Sup: 41 (#103); Ego: 9 (#41),
@4: Sup: 49 (#152); Ego: 8 (#49),
Male: #152; Feme: #49
} // #49

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #19 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;

THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.

#VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
#TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
#POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
#TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
#CANON: #180

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
@3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
@4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180

#49 as [#30, #2, #9, #8] = betach (H983): {UMBRA: #5 as #19 % #41 = #19}
1) *SECURITY*, *SAFETY* adverb; 2) securely;

} which is not then reliant upon yourselves retaining any possession of
the OBJECT but rather, that the incongruity of the EVENT disclosure
causes you to have some recollection of it having occurred. Which is
sufficient for my purposes.

Such an implication seems hardly congruent with the rest of Kant’s
remarks. There remains nonetheless the possibility of a weaker
interpretation. In this context, the expression “MORAL PHILOSOPHY” does
not entail only the explicit theory, whose formulation the scientific
discipline of philosophy has as one of its tasks. Rather every human or
rational being possesses a “MORAL PHILOSOPHY” if she has the capacity to
act from principle (“FOR THE SAKE OF”: GMS, 390,5). Accordingly, every
being capable of action carries at least implicitly a moral philosophy
in itself.

In the history analytical philosophy the prevailing interpretation of
the meaning of the terms such as 'BEING' or 'EXISTENCE' are as
UNIVERSALS usually defined by NUMBER and specifically the Pythagorean
HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER and were affirmed with different meanings,
respectively equivalent to being in space and time (ie. MY INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY as a universal statement which is a singularity compliant with
a DIVINE FIAT and potentiality as a cosmological / language
consideration of the chronological circumscribing given to the 10
commandments as then defining human consciousness by a cosmological
anthropic principle) and being not in space and time (ie. MY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as encapsulated by the knowledge of a ternary
HOMOIOS rather than the binary HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER consideration).

Thus we can consider this process of motion by impetus to act in
accordance with KINETIC principles which can be expressed a having
utility by a combining form with the general sense “movement, activity,”
where it is used in the formation of compound words, often with the
particular senses such as:

PHOTOKINESIS: “reaction to a stimulus”,
TELEKINESIS: “movement without an apparent physical cause”,
KARYOKINESIS: “activity within a cell”.

As primarily concerned with potentiality and actuality which are
principles of a dichotomy which Aristotle used to analyze motion,
causality, ethics, and physiology in his Physics, Metaphysics,
Nicomachean Ethics and De Anima, which is about the human psyche.

The concept of potentiality, in this context, generally refers to any
"POSSIBILITY" that a thing can be said to have. Aristotle did not
consider all possibilities the same, and emphasized the importance of
those that become real of their own accord when conditions are right and
nothing stops them. Actuality, in contrast to potentiality, is the
motion, change or activity that represents an exercise or fulfilment of
a possibility, when a possibility becomes real in the fullest sense.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Potentiality_and_actuality>

The hypothetical postulation is that the cognitive proposition itself is
broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of
sensibilities, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches
a prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only
then a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that
conveys a disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make
something distinctive or attractive.

But which must then be assayed before either ignominy as disgrace or
ingenuity and virtuosity as its relative perfection is attributed to it
as quintessentially capable of an instantiation (voilà) within its own
entitlement and a permeability to forestall the ravages of time as being
a declarative truth and manifest of agreement.

Within the basic philosophical sense of inner TELOS, or guiding form,
the entelecheia is that which mediates between #1 - MATTER {ATZILUTH:
World of Emanation / #VIRTUE} and #2 - FORM {BRIYAH: World of Creation /
#TOOLS}, #3 - POTENCY {YETZIRAH: World of Formation / #POSITION} and #4
- ACTUALITY {ASSIYAH: World of Action / #TIME}, the matter or substance
of thing (materia, substantia), as such, convey the essence of a thing
(essentia, ousia) only potentiality, whereas the form, as considered in
itself as actuality, requires embodiment. The actualization of the
thing, the union of matter and form in development and occurrence, the
movement from potency to act, rests upon the inner TELOS, the inward
principle of self-realization; the motive force of the development is
kinesis or metabole, the activity or transition from potency to
actuality. Description of the soul as entelechy marks an important
counter; both for philosophy and for scholastic theology, to Platonic
dualism of soul and body.

Potentiality and potency are translations of the Ancient Greek word
dunamis (δύναμις) as it is used by Aristotle as a concept contrasting
with actuality. Its Latin translation is "potentia", root of the English
word potential, and used by some scholars instead of the Greek or
English variants.

In his philosophy, Aristotle distinguished two meanings of the word
dunamis. According to his understanding of nature there was both a weak
sense of potential {YIN CH'I as MALE}, meaning simply that something
"might chance to happen or not to happen", and a stronger sense {YANG
CH'I as FEME}, to indicate how something could be done well.

Dunamis is an ordinary Greek word for possibility or capability.
Depending on context, it could be translated "potency", "potential",
"capacity", "ability", "power", "capability", "strength", "possibility",
"force" and is the root of modern English words "dynamic", "dynamite",
and "dynamo". In early modern philosophy, English authors like Hobbes
and Locke used the English word "power" as their translation of Latin
potentia.

Just as Aristotelianism allows no separation of form and matter and no
independent, extra-mental existence of universalia, so does it deny the
dualism or separability of soul and body. The body, in Aristotelianism,
is not regarded as the tomb of the soul, but as the natural place of the
soul's existence where alone it can exercise its faculties of
*INTELLECTUS* and *VOLUNTAS* and in which alone it can perform its
formal *GENITIVE* function.

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. {#1 - MENTALISM}
I HEAR THE CLARION. {#2 - CORRESPONDENCE}
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. {#3 - VIBRATION}
STEADFAST MIGHT. {#4 - POLARITY}
MARCHING TO SION. {#5 - RHYTHM}
AGAINST THIS WHORE. {#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT}
ARREST THE BLIGHT." {#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE}

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

#2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2
- Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents}
/ #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

#3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson,
child, member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c)
children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young
(of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation)
(pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A*
*MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

#4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]

#5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
#287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO
ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

G316@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
@4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
@5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
@6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
@7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
@9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition:
VOLUNTĀTIS]

The Sovereign Authority which is bequeathed to the AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH by Queen Victoria through the LETTERS PATENT *BY* *THESE*
*PRESENTS* and according to the good word of God as Divine Graciousness,
in the bestowal of a "HEAVENLY (EPOURANIOS) GIFT (DŌREA)" which is a
DUNAMIS a POTENTIALITY requiring EXOUSIA means ‘bearer of ruling
authority' as ACTUALITY which conveys all the necessary "POWERS
(DUNAMIS) of the WORLD (AIŌN)" [Ephesians 3:1-21 (KV); Hebrews 6:4-12
(KJV)] as expressing the totality of the AUTONOMY OF WILL being the
MATERIA PRIMA to the "Sovereign and Autonomous Right", the "Power to
Rule" and "Dispense Justice" by "Edict as a Divine Authority" being
PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY which can be understood in our
knowledge of God (GODHEAD/DIVINE NATURE AS MIND), and having thereby,
invalidated those Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth
of Australia of 1901, as to be then declared, apparent and permitted the
status as authority, powers and privilege accorded within it's own
entitlement as Sovereignty implicit to the Federation as Commonwealth of
Australia.

YOUTUBE: "I am, you are, we are Australian"



#6 - FORM OF NATURE / #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {VAV / *POWERS* (Gk.
Arche - a commencement, or (concrete) *chief* (*in* *various*
*applications* *of* *order*, *time*, *place* *or* *rank*):--beginning,
corner, (at the, the) first (estate), *magistrate*, power, principality,
principle, rule)}

VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
*OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
*PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
*GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.

#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {ZAYIN /
*PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. Exousia - (in the sense of ability); privilege,
that is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity, competency, freedom, or
(objectively) mastery (concretely magistrate, superhuman, potentate,
*token* *of* *control*), delegated influence:--authority, jurisdiction,
liberty, power, right, strength)}

IX - AUTHORITY "TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS
TO SHALL SEEM MEET" IS GIVEN BY THE "*TIME* *TO* *TIME*" AND "GOVERNOR
GENERAL'S *INCAPACITY*" PROVISIONS OF THE CLAUSE RELATING TO THE ENNEAD
- #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF NATURE
(#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)} *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR*
*LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our said
Commonwealth.

*NO* *SUCH* *POWERS* *OR* *AUTHORITIES* *SHALL* *VEST* IN SUCH
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, OR SUCH OTHER PERSON OR PERSONS, *UNTIL* *HE* *OR*
*THEY* *SHALL* *HAVE* *TAKEN* *THE* *OATHS* *APPOINTED* WHICH IS NOT
REQUIRED BECAUSE WE ARE DRAWING DISTINCTION BETWEEN WHAT GOD IS AN OATH
MADE AS GODHEAD/DIVINE MIND DEFINED BY EITHER THE HETEROS OR HOMOIOS
THEORY OF NUMBER AND SUPERSEDING THE PATENTS BY THE LATER?

In this ontological view, the human being is termed a composite
substance (substantia compositiva) and the soul in itself termed
spiritus incompletus. Thus the Protestant scholastics can call the soul
the #6 - FORMA CORPORIS, or form of the body, defining the body itself
as the formata, or thing formed." [(c) 1985, Richard A. Muller,
Dictionary of Latin and Greek Theological Terms, p 104]

Therefore, fleshed—out scientific theories can help us make explicit the
implicit philosophical knowledge that is present in every person and
therewith isolate the a priori part from the empirical part. Such an
explicit knowledge can serve as a reliable “GUIDING THREAD” for action.
According to Kant, one can speak of a “PURITY OF MORALS” (GMS, 390,17)
only if the normative principles with which we ground our actions are
“PURE” and contain no “empirical” elements.

Thus, the scientific discipline of philosophy has a supporting but not a
constitutive function for the morality of our conduct. A metaphysics of
morals, as an explicitly fleshed-out philosophical theory, can, however,
offer a supporting contribution in making the “IDEA OF A PURE PRACTICAL
REASON,” which, according to Kant, lies in each of us, “EFFECTIVE IN
CONCRETO” (GMS, 389,35).

As you may observe still rather busy with my workload after 24 years of
informal research into the obtuse province of metempiricial /
metaphysical perennialist philosophy having a specialist expertise in
Queen Victoria's Letters Patent to the Federation of the Australian
Commonwealth in 1901, and have subsequently begun a syncretism of
Immanuel Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) and the
Critique of Pure Reason (1781 / 1787), which ware enormous works and one
of the most important on Western thought.

It perhaps presumptuous of me at only page #16 of #323 pages to already
be taking issue with the robustness of Kant's otherwise cogent thesis
that there must be a “PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” which is “SELF EVIDENT"
given that there are seven day designates within our understanding of
the cosmology which is understood universally as an implicit law of
nature. And that the subject we are contending with is a consideration
of profound intellectual accomplishments conveyed by a book which
articulates the merit as collective mind of no fewer than 14 eminent
university professors.

It has been my task to have commenced reading it on weekend of 25 August
2018 in the hope that probity and decorum will return (ie. I NOTE THAT
ON THE MONDAY FOLLOWING THE PRIME MINISTER LEADERSHIP SPILL OCCURRING
UPON 23 AUGUST 2018 THAT THE SWEARING OF OATHS OF OFFICE ARE NOW MADE TO
THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMONWEALTH AND NOT TO THE SOVEREIGN) to the
governance of this Commonwealth given its CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE:

DIEU ET MON DROIT

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

- IMPUGNING AS CURSING THE SOVEREIGN;

+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

- IMPUGNING OUR ENTITLEMENT TO FAIR JUSTICE;

+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - *FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI*
*JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

- AS A BATTLE CRY THEN IMPUGNING OUR BOER / ANZAC TRADITION WHOM HAVE
ENGAGED WITHIN THEATRES OF WAR;

+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* of individual phenomena}

- IMPUGNING OUR RIGHT TO RELIGIOUS BELIEF IN THE EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY
WILL WITHOUT COERCION;

H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE

H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU {*LOGICAL* *FALLACY* *WITHIN*
*BINOMIAL* *PYTHAGOREAN* *HETEROS* *THEORY* *OF* *NUMBER* *DERIVED*
*BELIEF* *SYSTEMS* *AND* *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*}

= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE AS HUMAN NATURE BEING THE
DISCRIMINATING NORM}

Although I have already within 6 days, as written some 100 pages as
substantive and reasonable argumentation, was indeed prudent to firstly
have established the starting point of necessity as to any premises for
the continuity of enquiry, in doing so I recognise as my ignorance with
respect to the learned as the educated and the gravitas of the subject
matter to say nothing of those whom may have given their lives as
something other than marsupial roadkill as RECTUS for the foundational
cause—it is best to proceed with caution and in a sturdy and thoughtful
manner rather than with the intoxication of self-entitlement which
others might bestow.

Whereby the dialectical method is itself an anthropological construct,
which is at base an OPINE {ie. hold and state as one's opinion; origin
late Middle English: from Latin opinari think, believe} as
existentialism purveying a characteristic mode of quantitative
expression in being essentially idiomatic:

'I THINK THEREFORE I AM'

But when, as occurs in the distillation of vodka which at a high proof
is devoid of SENSIBILITY where all taste and odour has been eliminated
making vodka a neutral spirit begging for self-entitlement, it is then
sublimated into its superlative form as substantially an epitaph of
merit in valedictory acceptability by an occasion of agreeability as an
opportune expression of a truism, where it is formerly inducted into a
Hall of Fame as a maxim life. As OSTENSIBLY being a discourse between
two or more people holding different points of view about a subject but
wishing to establish the truth through reasoned arguments as its imperative:

#1 - PROGRESS
#2 - SYNTHESIS
#3 - ANTI-THESIS
#4 - THESIS

Nevertheless when this trinomial HOMOIOS {#81 bits} ontological
conception of #NUMBER deploys a binomial {64 bits} encapsulation as
artifice it then introduces a logical contradiction {H54 + H18 + H6 + H3
= #81} within it’s DISCRIMINATING NORM and the SOCIETAL ORDER of things
by an incommensurability made against the proprietary, propriety and
probity as the viability of SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE which properly is
the paradigmatic providence and *ONTIC* necessity {H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 =
#41} as their SOVEREIGN and central characteristic within the Formula of
Autonomy by its purveyance of permissibility only within the construct
of an INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMY in deployment of a TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE
AS CANON OF TRANSPOSITION within the bifurcated HETEROS {@1 - GENDER
{MARRIAGE} / @5 - PHALLUS {HERITAGE} conception of #NUMBER as the
philosophical basis to its methodology since the MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF
PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED is not homoiotic as
anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”.



[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D /
#0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY
FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]

Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between such Formula of Universal Law descriptive statements
made against the Formula of Humanity which present an account on how the
cosmology of world is being similarly analogous to the LIMITED {#9 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS /
SEMINAL REASON GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative
statements presenting an evaluative account, or an account of how the
syncretic world should be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in being optimally something that should be
lived up to; or that should be pursued.

Thusly, having given a preliminary definition to our anthropocentric
criteria as impetus for enquiry, we will now consider the practicality
of Kant's reasoning and whether his Categorical Imperative is truly free
of the strictures which is the Latin worldview of perennial biological
duality as the HETEROS viability of things "independently of their
appearing to us" and whether there is to be deduced by a HOMOIOS noumena
modality as the vital basis for a singularity of existence by which
humanity is rationally capable of conceiving "things as they are
understood by pure thought."

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 30 August 2018

#SENSIBILITY #ALTRUISM #SELF #JUSTIFICATION
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-31 01:13:32 UTC
Permalink
-- (DRAFT: 31 AUGUST 2018) ACKNOWLEDGED RECEIPT OF THE LAMINATED A2 (420
X 594 MM) PRELIMINARY GRAPPLE PARADIGM WITHIN 1998

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 31 August, 2018

Thank-you for your courtesy as letter dated 7 August 2018 as made in
reply to my request of 20 July 2018 wherein you state as confirmation:
"However, luckily we {#334 as [#6, #80, #200, #8, #40] = perach (H6525):
{UMBRA: #10 as #288 % #41 = #1} 1) bud, *SPROUT*} remembered that you
gave the 4 of us a laminated A2 (420 x 594 mm) Preliminary Grapple
Paradigm. You gave it to us in 1998 at the end of your visit."

I would however dispute the clarity of such a recollection, since it
would have been from my perspective, surface mailed to yourselves within
a tube container around 2000 as being within proximity to the
millennium. However such a statement would be substantive enough to
sustain my $154 million damages claims which will be pursued once the
Financial Services Royal Commission (not Social Services as you contend)
at least produce their Interim Report to the Governor General by 30
September 2018.

2.5. THE PRACTICAL USE OF A PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY (GMS, 389,36-390,18)
Although the aim of the argumentation appears to be complete, Kant, in
the ensuing paragraph, suggests another form of reasoning for the
“NECESSITY” of a pure moral philosophy. This second argument, however,
takes a completely different direction. Kant’s original question
concerning the necessity of a moral philosophy is not free of ambiguity.
For him, it was at first a matter of a necessity that referred to
cognition (“SPECULATION”: GMS, 389,37) as its goal. It could be
SUMMARIZED as follows: ‘*IF* *ONE* *WANTS* *TO* *OBTAIN* *KNOWLEDGE*
*OF* *MORAL* *PRINCIPLES*, *THEN* *A* *PURE* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY* *IS*
*AN* *INDISPENSABLE* *MEANS*.’

In Kant’s second argument, a pure moral philosophy is “INDISPENSABLY
NECESSARY” (GMS, 389,36) not only for the correct cognition but also for
the correct action. It could be said, ‘*IF* *ONE* *WANTS* *TO*
*CORRECTLY*, *THEN* *ONE* *NEEDS* *A* *PURE* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY*.’ Kant
argues thesis: “BECAUSE MORALS THEMSELVES REMAIN SUBJECT TO ALL SORTS OF
CORRUPTION AS LONG AS THAT GUIDING THREAD AND SUPREME NORM OF THEIR
CORRECT JUDGMENT IS LACKING” (GMS, 390,2f.). The implication contained
in this argument seems, at first sight, quite strong, but it is not
clear whether Kant actually advocates it so strongly. Do we really need
a philosophical moral theory in order to act correctly? Are we compelled
to rely on a kind of philosophical expertise when dealing with moral
questions?

“THANK YOU FOR YOUR LETTER. I MUST ADMIT THAT WE DON’T UNDERSTAND A LOT
OF IT AND WOULD BE SURPRISED IF THE SOCIAL SERVICES DO!”

RESPONSE@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 46 (#87); Ego: 33 (#49),
Male: #87; Feme: #49
}

What is essential to such a claim, is that your response was made
VOLUNTARILY and it can then be validated as authenticity by an appraisal
made against the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS as conveying both a
lack of SENSIBILITY {

H5039@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 52 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 2 (#52),
@3: Sup: 1 (#103); Ego: 30 (#82),
@4: Sup: 6 (#109); Ego: 5 (#87),
Male: #109; Feme: #87
} // #87

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #87 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;

THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance
at Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.

#VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
#TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
#POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
#TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
#CANON: #115

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
@3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
@4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
Male: #118; Feme: #115
} // #115

#87 as [#50, #2, #30, #5] = nebalah (H5039): {UMBRA: #11 as #87 % #41 =
#5} 1) *SENSELESSNESS*, folly; 1a) disgraceful folly; 1a1) of
immorality, profane actions; 1b) disgrace, contumely disgrace;

} about any importance associated with such artefact (as you rightfully
say it was 20 years ago) as having any intrinsic worth, and that
rightfully I had conveyed it to yourselves for purposes of SECURITY /
SAFETY {

H983@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 32 (#62); Ego: 2 (#32),
@3: Sup: 41 (#103); Ego: 9 (#41),
@4: Sup: 49 (#152); Ego: 8 (#49),
Male: #152; Feme: #49
} // #49

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #19 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;

THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.

#VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
#TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
#POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
#TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
#CANON: #180

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
@3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
@4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180

#49 as [#30, #2, #9, #8] = betach (H983): {UMBRA: #5 as #19 % #41 = #19}
1) *SECURITY*, *SAFETY* adverb; 2) securely;

} which is not then reliant upon yourselves retaining any possession of
the OBJECT but rather, that the incongruity of the EVENT disclosure
causes you to have some recollection of it having occurred. Which is
sufficient for my purposes.

Such an implication seems hardly congruent with the rest of Kant’s
remarks. There remains nonetheless the possibility of a weaker
interpretation. In this context, the expression “MORAL PHILOSOPHY” does
not entail only the explicit theory, whose formulation the scientific
discipline of philosophy has as one of its tasks. Rather every human or
rational being possesses a “MORAL PHILOSOPHY” if she has the capacity to
act from principle (“FOR THE SAKE OF”: GMS, 390,5). Accordingly, every
being capable of action carries at least implicitly a moral philosophy
in itself.

In the history analytical philosophy the prevailing interpretation of
the meaning of the terms such as 'BEING' or 'EXISTENCE' are as
UNIVERSALS usually defined by NUMBER and specifically the Pythagorean
HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER and were affirmed with different meanings,
respectively equivalent to being in space and time (ie. MY INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY as a universal statement which is a singularity compliant with
a DIVINE FIAT and potentiality as a cosmological / language
consideration of the chronological circumscribing given to the 10
commandments as then defining human consciousness by a cosmological
anthropic principle) and being not in space and time (ie. MY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY as encapsulated by the knowledge of a ternary
HOMOIOS rather than the binary HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER consideration).

Thus we can consider this process of motion by impetus to act in
accordance with KINETIC principles which can be expressed a having
utility by a combining form with the general sense “movement, activity,”
where it is used in the formation of compound words, often with the
particular senses such as:

PHOTOKINESIS: “reaction to a stimulus”,
TELEKINESIS: “movement without an apparent physical cause”,
KARYOKINESIS: “activity within a cell”.

As primarily concerned with potentiality and actuality which are
principles of a dichotomy which Aristotle used to analyze motion,
causality, ethics, and physiology in his Physics, Metaphysics,
Nicomachean Ethics and De Anima, which is about the human psyche.

The concept of potentiality, in this context, generally refers to any
"POSSIBILITY" that a thing can be said to have. Aristotle did not
consider all possibilities the same, and emphasized the importance of
those that become real of their own accord when conditions are right and
nothing stops them. Actuality, in contrast to potentiality, is the
motion, change or activity that represents an exercise or fulfilment of
a possibility, when a possibility becomes real in the fullest sense.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Potentiality_and_actuality>

The hypothetical postulation is that the cognitive proposition itself is
broadly a consideration of faculty as to the functional role of
sensibilities, both in terms of an initial focal apprehension, and it’s
subsequent clarity by any process of sublimation as essential for the
determinism to the extent of reality, as to the reluctance of ego and
incapacity of altruism which is impotent when tempered by self
justification within the syncretic process of consensus until it reaches
a prefectural acceptability as je ne sais quoi (uncountability) in only
then a nuance of perfection which has an indefinable quality that
conveys a disjunctional potentiality as latent capacity to make
something distinctive or attractive.

But which must then be assayed before either ignominy as disgrace or
ingenuity and virtuosity as its relative perfection is attributed to it
as quintessentially capable of an instantiation (voilà) within its own
entitlement and a permeability to forestall the ravages of time as being
a declarative truth and manifest of agreement.

Within the basic philosophical sense of inner TELOS, or guiding form,
the entelecheia is that which mediates between #1 - MATTER {ATZILUTH:
World of Emanation / #VIRTUE} and #2 - FORM {BRIYAH: World of Creation /
#TOOLS}, #3 - POTENCY {YETZIRAH: World of Formation / #POSITION} and #4
- ACTUALITY {ASSIYAH: World of Action / #TIME}, the matter or substance
of thing (materia, substantia), as such, convey the essence of a thing
(essentia, ousia) only potentiality, whereas the form, as considered in
itself as actuality, requires embodiment. The actualization of the
thing, the union of matter and form in development and occurrence, the
movement from potency to act, rests upon the inner TELOS, the inward
principle of self-realization; the motive force of the development is
kinesis or metabole, the activity or transition from potency to
actuality. Description of the soul as entelechy marks an important
counter; both for philosophy and for scholastic theology, to Platonic
dualism of soul and body.

Potentiality and potency are translations of the Ancient Greek word
dunamis (δύναμις) as it is used by Aristotle as a concept contrasting
with actuality. Its Latin translation is "potentia", root of the English
word potential, and used by some scholars instead of the Greek or
English variants.

In his philosophy, Aristotle distinguished two meanings of the word
dunamis. According to his understanding of nature there was both a weak
sense of potential {YIN CH'I as FEME}, meaning simply that something
"might chance to happen or not to happen", and a stronger sense {YANG
CH'I as A MALE}, to indicate how something could be done well.

Dunamis is an ordinary Greek word for possibility or capability.
Depending on context, it could be translated "potency", "potential",
"capacity", "ability", "power", "capability", "strength", "possibility",
"force" and is the root of modern English words "dynamic", "dynamite",
and "dynamo". In early modern philosophy, English authors like Hobbes
and Locke used the English word "power" as their translation of Latin
potentia.

Just as Aristotelianism allows no separation of form and matter and no
independent, extra-mental existence of universalia, so does it deny the
dualism or separability of soul and body. The body, in Aristotelianism,
is not regarded as the tomb of the soul, but as the natural place of the
soul's existence where alone it can exercise its faculties of
*INTELLECTUS* and *VOLUNTAS* and in which alone it can perform its
formal *GENITIVE* function.

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT. {#1 - MENTALISM}
I HEAR THE CLARION. {#2 - CORRESPONDENCE}
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR. {#3 - VIBRATION}
STEADFAST MIGHT. {#4 - POLARITY}
MARCHING TO SION. {#5 - RHYTHM}
AGAINST THIS WHORE. {#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT}
ARREST THE BLIGHT." {#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE}

#1 - MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

#2 - CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2
- Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents}
/ #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

#3 - VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123 % #41 = #41} 1) son, grandson,
child, member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c)
children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young
(of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation)
(pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A*
*MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

#4 - POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]

#5 - RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

#6 - CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

#7 - ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
#287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO
ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]

G316@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 51 (#52); Ego: 50 (#51),
@3: Sup: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 (#52),
@4: Sup: 55 (#159); Ego: 3 (#55),
@5: Sup: 75 (#234); Ego: 20 (#75),
@6: Sup: 76 (#310); Ego: 1 (#76),
@7: Sup: 5 (#315); Ego: 10 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@8: Sup: 6 (#321); Ego: 1 (#87),
@9: Sup: 44 (#365); Ego: 38 (#125),
Male: #365; Feme: #125
} // #287

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #356 % #41 = #28 - Opposites and Primitivism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 - Return, The turning point; Tetra: 2 - Full
Circle;

THOTH MEASURE: #28 - Oh thou, hot of foot, who makest thy appearance at
even; *I* *INDULGE* *NOT* *IN* *ANGER*.

#VIRTUE: With Change (no. #28), alterations but sharing smiles.
#TOOLS: With Dimming (no. #68), over a long time, increasing troubles.
#POSITION: With Vastness (no. #50), the infinitely great, but
#TIME: With Barrier (no. #4), the buried and blocked.
#CANON: #150

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 (#28); Ego: 28 (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 (#43); Ego: 68 (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 (#108); Ego: 50 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 4 (#150 -
I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150

7 x #41 = #287 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356 % #41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship;
1c) *WHAT* *OUGHT* *ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* *BE* *DONE*,
*WHAT* *IS* *REQUIRED* *BY* *THE* *CIRCUMSTANCES*; [LATIN definition:
VOLUNTĀTIS]

The Sovereign Authority which is bequeathed to the AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH by Queen Victoria through the LETTERS PATENT *BY* *THESE*
*PRESENTS* and according to the good word of God as Divine Graciousness,
in the bestowal of a "HEAVENLY (EPOURANIOS) GIFT (DŌREA)" which is a
DUNAMIS a POTENTIALITY requiring EXOUSIA means ‘bearer of ruling
authority' as ACTUALITY which conveys all the necessary "POWERS
(DUNAMIS) of the WORLD (AIŌN)" [Ephesians 3:1-21 (KV); Hebrews 6:4-12
(KJV)] as expressing the totality of the AUTONOMY OF WILL being the
MATERIA PRIMA to the "Sovereign and Autonomous Right", the "Power to
Rule" and "Dispense Justice" by "Edict as a Divine Authority" being
PRINCIPLES OF THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY which can be understood in our
knowledge of God (GODHEAD/DIVINE NATURE AS MIND), and having thereby,
invalidated those Letters Patent to the Federation of the Commonwealth
of Australia of 1901, as to be then declared, apparent and permitted the
status as authority, powers and privilege accorded within it's own
entitlement as Sovereignty implicit to the Federation as Commonwealth of
Australia.

YOUTUBE: "I am, you are, we are Australian"

http://youtu.be/rjkrjYitgeA

#6 - FORM OF NATURE / #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {VAV / *POWERS* (Gk.
Arche - a commencement, or (concrete) *chief* (*in* *various*
*applications* *of* *order*, *time*, *place* *or* *rank*):--beginning,
corner, (at the, the) first (estate), *magistrate*, power, principality,
principle, rule)}

VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
*OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
*PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
*GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.

#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {ZAYIN /
*PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. Exousia - (in the sense of ability); privilege,
that is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity, competency, freedom, or
(objectively) mastery (concretely magistrate, superhuman, potentate,
*token* *of* *control*), delegated influence:--authority, jurisdiction,
liberty, power, right, strength)}

IX - AUTHORITY "TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS
TO SHALL SEEM MEET" IS GIVEN BY THE "*TIME* *TO* *TIME*" AND "GOVERNOR
GENERAL'S *INCAPACITY*" PROVISIONS OF THE CLAUSE RELATING TO THE ENNEAD
- #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF NATURE
(#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)} *under* *the* *PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR*
*LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE* *GOVERNMENT* of Our said
Commonwealth.

*NO* *SUCH* *POWERS* *OR* *AUTHORITIES* *SHALL* *VEST* IN SUCH
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, OR SUCH OTHER PERSON OR PERSONS, *UNTIL* *HE* *OR*
*THEY* *SHALL* *HAVE* *TAKEN* *THE* *OATHS* *APPOINTED* WHICH IS NOT
REQUIRED BECAUSE WE ARE DRAWING DISTINCTION BETWEEN WHAT GOD IS AN OATH
MADE AS GODHEAD/DIVINE MIND DEFINED BY EITHER THE HETEROS OR HOMOIOS
THEORY OF NUMBER AND SUPERSEDING THE PATENTS BY THE LATER?

In this ontological view, the human being is termed a composite
substance (substantia compositiva) and the soul in itself termed
spiritus incompletus. Thus the Protestant scholastics can call the soul
the #6 - FORMA CORPORIS, or form of the body, defining the body itself
as the formata, or thing formed." [(c) 1985, Richard A. Muller,
Dictionary of Latin and Greek Theological Terms, p 104]

Therefore, fleshed—out scientific theories can help us make explicit the
implicit philosophical knowledge that is present in every person and
therewith isolate the a priori part from the empirical part. Such an
explicit knowledge can serve as a reliable “GUIDING THREAD” for action.
According to Kant, one can speak of a “PURITY OF MORALS” (GMS, 390,17)
only if the normative principles with which we ground our actions are
“PURE” and contain no “empirical” elements.

Thus, the scientific discipline of philosophy has a supporting but not a
constitutive function for the morality of our conduct. A metaphysics of
morals, as an explicitly fleshed-out philosophical theory, can, however,
offer a supporting contribution in making the “IDEA OF A PURE PRACTICAL
REASON,” which, according to Kant, lies in each of us, “EFFECTIVE IN
CONCRETO” (GMS, 389,35).

As you may observe still rather busy with my workload after 24 years of
informal research into the obtuse province of metempiricial /
metaphysical perennialist philosophy having a specialist expertise in
Queen Victoria's Letters Patent to the Federation of the Australian
Commonwealth in 1901, and have subsequently begun a syncretism of
Immanuel Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) and the
Critique of Pure Reason (1781 / 1787), which ware enormous works and one
of the most important on Western thought.

It perhaps presumptuous of me at only page #16 of #323 pages to already
be taking issue with the robustness of Kant's otherwise cogent thesis
that there must be a “PURE MORAL PHILOSOPHY” which is “SELF EVIDENT"
given that there are seven day designates within our understanding of
the cosmology which is understood universally as an implicit law of
nature. And that the subject we are contending with is a consideration
of profound intellectual accomplishments conveyed by a book which
articulates the merit as collective mind of no fewer than 14 eminent
university professors.

It has been my task to have commenced reading it on weekend of 25 August
2018 in the hope that probity and decorum will return (ie. I NOTE THAT
ON THE MONDAY FOLLOWING THE PRIME MINISTER LEADERSHIP SPILL OCCURRING
UPON 23 AUGUST 2018 THAT THE SWEARING OF OATHS OF OFFICE ARE NOW MADE TO
THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMONWEALTH AND NOT TO THE SOVEREIGN) to the
governance of this Commonwealth given its CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE:

DIEU ET MON DROIT

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

- IMPUGNING AS CURSING THE SOVEREIGN;

+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

- IMPUGNING OUR ENTITLEMENT TO FAIR JUSTICE;

+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - *FORMULA* *OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI*
*JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

- AS A BATTLE CRY THEN IMPUGNING OUR BOER / ANZAC TRADITION WHOM HAVE
ENGAGED WITHIN THEATRES OF WAR;

+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* of individual phenomena}

- IMPUGNING OUR RIGHT TO RELIGIOUS BELIEF IN THE EXERCISE OF VOLUNTARY
WILL WITHOUT COERCION;

H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE

H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU {*LOGICAL* *FALLACY* *WITHIN*
*BINOMIAL* *PYTHAGOREAN* *HETEROS* *THEORY* *OF* *NUMBER* *DERIVED*
*BELIEF* *SYSTEMS* *AND* *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*}

= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE AS HUMAN NATURE BEING THE
DISCRIMINATING NORM}

Although I have already within 6 days, as written some 100 pages as
substantive and reasonable argumentation, was indeed prudent to firstly
have established the starting point of necessity as to any premises for
the continuity of enquiry, in doing so I recognise as my ignorance with
respect to the learned as the educated and the gravitas of the subject
matter to say nothing of those whom may have given their lives as
something other than marsupial roadkill as RECTUS for the foundational
cause—it is best to proceed with caution and in a sturdy and thoughtful
manner rather than with the intoxication of self-entitlement which
others might bestow.

Whereby the dialectical method is itself an anthropological construct,
which is at base an OPINE {ie. hold and state as one's opinion; origin
late Middle English: from Latin opinari think, believe} as
existentialism purveying a characteristic mode of quantitative
expression in being essentially idiomatic:

'I THINK THEREFORE I AM'

But when, as occurs in the distillation of vodka which at a high proof
is devoid of SENSIBILITY where all taste and odour has been eliminated
making vodka a neutral spirit begging for self-entitlement, it is then
sublimated into its superlative form as substantially an epitaph of
merit in valedictory acceptability by an occasion of agreeability as an
opportune expression of a truism, where it is formerly inducted into a
Hall of Fame as a maxim life. As OSTENSIBLY being a discourse between
two or more people holding different points of view about a subject but
wishing to establish the truth through reasoned arguments as its imperative:

#1 - PROGRESS
#2 - SYNTHESIS
#3 - ANTI-THESIS
#4 - THESIS

Nevertheless when this trinomial HOMOIOS {#81 bits} ontological
conception of #NUMBER deploys a binomial {64 bits} encapsulation as
artifice it then introduces a logical contradiction {H54 + H18 + H6 + H3
= #81} within it’s DISCRIMINATING NORM and the SOCIETAL ORDER of things
by an incommensurability made against the proprietary, propriety and
probity as the viability of SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE which properly is
the paradigmatic providence and *ONTIC* necessity {H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 =
#41} as their SOVEREIGN and central characteristic within the Formula of
Autonomy by its purveyance of permissibility only within the construct
of an INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMY in deployment of a TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE
AS CANON OF TRANSPOSITION within the bifurcated HETEROS {@1 - GENDER
{MARRIAGE} / @5 - PHALLUS {HERITAGE} conception of #NUMBER as the
philosophical basis to its methodology since the MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF
PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED is not homoiotic as
anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”.



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/thoth9.gif>

[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D /
#0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY
FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]

Obviously, one can draw the parallel here to the modern terminological
distinction between such Formula of Universal Law descriptive statements
made against the Formula of Humanity which present an account on how the
cosmology of world is being similarly analogous to the LIMITED {#9 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL AS DAEMONIC IMPERATIVE OF GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS /
SEMINAL REASON GENERALLY DETERMINED FROM BIRTH} and the normative
statements presenting an evaluative account, or an account of how the
syncretic world should be as existentially the UNLIMITED {#72 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE} in being optimally something that should be
lived up to; or that should be pursued.

Thusly, having given a preliminary definition to our anthropocentric
criteria as impetus for enquiry, we will now consider the practicality
of Kant's reasoning and whether his Categorical Imperative is truly free
of the strictures which is the Latin worldview of perennial biological
duality as the HETEROS viability of things "independently of their
appearing to us" and whether there is to be deduced by a HOMOIOS noumena
modality as the vital basis for a singularity of existence by which
humanity is rationally capable of conceiving "things as they are
understood by pure thought."

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 30 August 2018

#SENSIBILITY #ALTRUISM #SELF #JUSTIFICATION
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-28 18:45:13 UTC
Permalink
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 August 2108) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)

Note that the signs-‘OTH {#2184 / #364 - ADMITTANCE {

#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]

IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}

DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE

} v’s #2184 / #312 - RESISTANCE {

#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 - Totality
of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]

} of ‘OTH {#2184 / #728 - REACTANCE {

#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature / #1 - Nature Contains Nature: {DOUBLE:
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}

} become reversed in the admittance domain; ie. capacitive susceptance is
positive and inductive susceptance is negative.

As being a hypothetical and conjectural postulate of the cognitive reality
I desire to grasp (ie. there may be semantical misapprehensions: mais nous
faisons de notre mieux) is a notion of contingency as a quantum sensibility
within the context of a metaphysical philosophical derivation where there
is a normative absence or a substitution of *ONTIC* necessity as the
factuality of being so without being so and which whilst absent of
quantitative certainty yet has a provisional possibility for occurrence or
eventuality.

ADMITTANCE {YANG CH'I AS MALE} AND RESISTANCE {YIN AS FEME}
Within electrical engineering, admittance is a measure of how easily a
circuit or device will allow a current to flow. It is defined as the
reciprocal of impedance.

Resistance is a measure of the opposition of a circuit to the flow of a
steady current, while impedance takes into account not only the resistance
but also dynamic effects which are known as ‘OTH {#2184 / #3}: #728 -
REACTANCE {

#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]

DEFINE THE @5 CANONICAL PRINCIPLE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTIC HERE

) as here conveyed as substantial form (forma substantialis) as liability.
Likewise, admittance is not only a measure of the ease with which a steady
current can flow, but also the dynamic effects of the material's
susceptance to polarisation.

Within electrical and electronic systems, reactance is the opposition of a
circuit element to a change in current or voltage, due to that element's
inductance or capacitance. The notion of reactance is similar to electrical
resistance, but it differs in several respects.

Thus I wish to obtain as semantical construct some philosophical conception
about the notion of contingency as to the dynamic effect of reactance and
the materia prima susceptibility to eventuality of polarisation as materia
secunda as an alternative canonical approach to mathematically expressing
these normative {ie. YANG CH'I as MALE / YIN as FEME} bi-conditionals in
terms of an electrical circuit:

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the same
ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the same
light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 - TORAH} -
Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

As to what constitutes the substantial form (forma substantialis) of the
formal cause (causa formalis) as to the quintessential first material
(materia prima: Anthropic Cosmological Principle as the absolute
generalized basis of all subsequent individualization that is utterly
potential and is devoid of all attributes or qualities) which is then the
*MIND* as intellectualised universal form (universalia forma), idea, shape
or pattern of the essential or natural image of God (imago Dei essentialis
sive naturalis: that archetypal principal perfections of righteousness,
holiness and wisdom as the likeness or resemblance to God in which man was
originally created).

H5674@{
   @1: Sup: 76 (#76); Ego: 76 (#76),
   @2: Sup: 65 (#141); Ego: 70 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @3: Sup: 67 (#208); Ego: 2 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#232); Ego: 38 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   @5: Sup: 74 (#306); Ego: 50 (#236),
   @6: Sup: 80 (#386); Ego: 6 (#242),
   Male: #386; Feme: #242
} // #728

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #728 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;

THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; I am not one of inconstant mind.

    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
   @1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
   @2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186

#728 as [#400, #70, #2, #200, #50, #6] = `abar (H5674): {UMBRA: #5 as #728
% #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *PASS* *OVER* *OR* *BY* *OR* *THROUGH*, alienate,
bring, carry, do away, take, take away, transgress; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to pass
over, cross, cross over, pass over, march over, overflow, go over; 1a2) to
pass beyond; 1a3) to pass through, traverse; 1a3a) passers-through
(participle); 1a3b) to pass through (the parts of victim in covenant); 1a4)
to pass along, pass by, overtake and pass, sweep by; 1a4a) passer-by
(participle); 1a4b) to be past, be over; 1a5) to pass on, go on, pass on
before, go in advance of, pass along, travel, advance; 1a6) to pass away;
1a6a) to emigrate, leave (one's territory); 1a6b) to vanish; 1a6c) to
perish, cease to exist; 1a6d) to become invalid, become obsolete (of law,
decree); 1a6e) to be alienated, pass into other hands; 1b) (Niphal) to be
crossed; 1c) (Piel) to impregnate, cause to cross; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to
cause to pass over, cause to bring over, cause to cross over, make over to,
dedicate, devote; 1d2) to cause to pass through; 1d3) to cause to pass by
or beyond or under, let pass by; 1d4) to cause to pass away, cause to take
away; 1e) (Hithpael) to pass over;

Which then results in the second matter (materia secunda) as the basis for
all material existence (essentia: indicates the entire whatness of a thing
including the materiality or spirituality as its substantia) as the
integrity and authenticity of being within the world and living in
compliance (status integritatis) as obedience with the terms of the innate
*MORAL* (lex moralis primordialis).

Which as a habit and capacity of will by its exercise of intellect as being
primarily intentioned to be regulated by the innate understanding which
grasps the basic principles of the *MORAL* law and spontaneously acts
according to the dictates as wants and desires of conscientia) and the
natural law (ie. the universal *MORAL* law either impresses by God upon the
*MIND* of all the people or immediately discerned by the reason in its
encounter with the order of nature) as a covenant of nature (foedus
naturae: predicated on the original integrity of human nature and its
capacity for obedience under the terms if the innate *MORAL* or natural
law) bestowed upon us by the graciousness of God.

Thanks for your assistance!

- dolf
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-28 21:39:15 UTC
Permalink
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 August 2108) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 29 August, 2018

Note that the signs-‘OTH {#2184 / #364 - ADMITTANCE {

#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]

IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}

DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE

} v’s #2184 / #312 - RESISTANCE {

#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 - Totality
of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]

} of ‘OTH {#2184 / #728 - REACTANCE {

#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature / #1 - Nature Contains Nature: {DOUBLE:
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}

} become reversed in the admittance domain; ie. capacitive susceptance is
positive and inductive susceptance is negative.

As being a hypothetical and conjectural postulate of the cognitive reality
I desire to grasp (ie. there may be semantical misapprehensions: mais nous
faisons de notre mieux) is a notion of contingency as a quantum sensibility
within the context of a metaphysical philosophical derivation where there
is a normative absence or a substitution of *ONTIC* necessity as the
factuality of being so without being so and which whilst absent of
quantitative certainty yet has a provisional possibility for occurrence or
eventuality.

ADMITTANCE {YANG CH'I AS MALE} AND RESISTANCE {YIN AS FEME}
Within electrical engineering, admittance is a measure of how easily a
circuit or device will allow a current to flow. It is defined as the
reciprocal of impedance.

Resistance is a measure of the opposition of a circuit to the flow of a
steady current, while impedance takes into account not only the resistance
but also dynamic effects which are known as ‘OTH {#2184 / #3}: #728 -
REACTANCE {

#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]

DEFINE THE @5 CANONICAL PRINCIPLE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTIC HERE

) as here conveyed as substantial form (forma substantialis) by liability.
Likewise, admittance is not only a measure of the ease with which a steady
current can flow, but also the dynamic effects of the material's
susceptance to the contingent eventuality of polarisation.

Within electrical and electronic systems, reactance is the opposition of a
circuit element to a change in current or voltage, due to that element's
inductance or capacitance. The notion of reactance is similar to electrical
resistance, but it differs in several respects.

Thus I wish to obtain as semantical construct some philosophical conception
about the notion of contingency as to the dynamic effect of reactance and
the materia prima susceptibility to eventuality of polarisation as materia
secunda as an alternative canonical approach to mathematically expressing
these normative {ie. YANG CH'I as MALE / YIN as FEME} bi-conditionals in
terms of an electrical circuit:

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the same
ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the same
light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 - TORAH} -
Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

As to what constitutes the substantial form (forma substantialis) of the
formal cause (causa formalis) as to the quintessential first material
(materia prima: Anthropic Cosmological Principle as the absolute
generalized basis of all subsequent individualization that is utterly
potential and is devoid of all attributes or qualities) which is then the
*MIND* as intellectualised universal form (universalia forma), idea, shape
or pattern of the essential or natural image of God (imago Dei essentialis
sive naturalis: that archetypal principal perfections of righteousness,
holiness and wisdom as the likeness or resemblance to God in which man was
originally created).

H5674@{
   @1: Sup: 76 (#76); Ego: 76 (#76),
   @2: Sup: 65 (#141); Ego: 70 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @3: Sup: 67 (#208); Ego: 2 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#232); Ego: 38 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   @5: Sup: 74 (#306); Ego: 50 (#236),
   @6: Sup: 80 (#386); Ego: 6 (#242),
   Male: #386; Feme: #242
} // #728

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #728 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;

THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *INCONSTANT* *MIND*.

    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
   @1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
   @2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186

#728 as [#400, #70, #2, #200, #50, #6] = `abar (H5674): {UMBRA: #5 as #728
% #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *PASS* *OVER* *OR* *BY* *OR* *THROUGH*, alienate,
bring, carry, do away, take, take away, transgress; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to pass
over, cross, cross over, pass over, march over, overflow, go over; 1a2) to
pass beyond; 1a3) to pass through, traverse; 1a3a) passers-through
(participle); 1a3b) *TO* *PASS* *THROUGH* (*THE* *PARTS* *OF* *VICTIM* *IN*
*COVENANT*);

“Then gathered the chief priests and the Pharisees {set apart} a council,
and said, What do we? for this man doeth many miracles.

If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: {

“[Ye] #351 - serpents, [ye] #33 - generation of vipers, how can ye escape
the #312 - damnation of hell?” [Matthew 23:33 (KJV)]

“Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O #33
- generation of #351 - vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the #312 -
wrath to come?” [Luke 3:7 (KJV)]

} and the Romans {strength; power} shall come and take away both our place
and nation.

And one of them, named Caiaphas {he that seeks with diligence; one that
vomiteth}, being the high priest that same year, said unto them, Ye know
nothing at all,

Nor consider that it is expedient for us, *THAT* *ONE* *MAN* *SHOULD* *DIE*
*FOR* *THE* *PEOPLE*, and that the whole nation perish not.

And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he
prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation;

And not for that nation only, but that also he should gather together in
one the children of God that were scattered abroad.

Then from that day forth they took counsel together for to put him to death
{

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

The 33 #CENTRE of the first square is the KING as SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE
dynamic which corresponds to the historic reality of the crucifixion of
Christ on AROUND 1500 HOURS ON FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.

} Jesus therefore walked no more openly among the Jews; but went thence
unto a country near to the wilderness, into a city called Ephraim
{fruitful; increasing}, and there continued with his disciples.

And the Jews' passover was nigh at hand: and many went out of the country
up to Jerusalem before the passover, to purify themselves.” [John 11:47-55
(KJV}

1a4) to pass along, pass by, overtake and pass, sweep by; 1a4a) passer-by
(participle); 1a4b) to be past, be over; 1a5) to pass on, go on, pass on
before, go in advance of, pass along, travel, advance; 1a6) to pass away;
1a6a) to emigrate, leave (one's territory); 1a6b) to vanish; 1a6c) to
perish, cease to exist; 1a6d) to become invalid, become obsolete (of law,
decree); 1a6e) to be alienated, pass into other hands; 1b) (Niphal) to be
crossed; 1c) (Piel) to impregnate, cause to cross; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to
cause to pass over, cause to bring over, cause to cross over, make over to,
dedicate, devote; 1d2) to cause to pass through; 1d3) to cause to pass by
or beyond or under, let pass by; 1d4) to cause to pass away, cause to take
away; 1e) (Hithpael) to pass over;

Which then results in the second matter (materia secunda) as the basis for
all material existence (essentia: indicates the entire whatness of a thing
including the materiality or spirituality as its substantia) as the
integrity and authenticity of being within the world and living in
compliance (status integritatis) as obedience with the terms of the innate
*MORAL* (lex moralis primordialis).

Which as a habit and capacity of will by its exercise of intellect as being
primarily intentioned to be regulated by the innate understanding which
grasps the basic principles of the *MORAL* law and spontaneously acts
according to the dictates as wants and desires of conscientia) and the
natural law (ie. the universal *MORAL* law either impresses by God upon the
*MIND* of all the people or immediately discerned by the reason in its
encounter with the order of nature) as a covenant of nature (foedus
naturae: predicated on the original integrity of human nature and its
capacity for obedience under the terms if the innate *MORAL* or natural
law) bestowed upon us by the graciousness of God.

STRATEGIC: SUCCESS AND MATERIAL GAIN
VIII - And We do hereby REQUIRE and COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS,
CIVIL AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS of Our said Commonwealth
TO BE OBEDIENT, AIDING, AND ASSISTING unto Our said Governor General, or,
in the event of his death, INCAPACITY, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, FROM TIME TO TIME, under the PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR
LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER THE GOVERNMENT of Our said Commonwealth.

Thanks for your assistance!

- dolf

Initial Post: 29 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-29 02:12:09 UTC
Permalink
— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY
AS A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 29 August, 2018

For necessary purposes of contextualisation, we convey Nick Scarano's
(Assistant Professor at University of Tübingen, Germany) earlier prudent
meta-ethical, moral / political philosophical observation on "why the
[*ONOTOLOGICAL*] '*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*' have a comparable modal {

THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of*
*priests* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = #2184 days;

THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of
20 March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;

THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.

THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: REMEMBER
THE SABBATH DAY TO KEEP IT HOLY

} status to the '*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.' Laws of nature support
counterfactual arguments, too. In order to achieve this, they also must
have a modal status which is higher than simple contingency. The
connections formulated in them are also valid in all natural law
governed, possible worlds, and in this respect, they exhibit the modal
status of necessity. The difference between laws of nature and laws of
freedom appears to consist primarily in the fact that the laws of nature
are concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while
the laws of freedom are concerned with all-quantified, normative
bi-conditionals, each receiving the modal status of necessity.

Actually, the type of necessity spoken of here has to be further
specified. Is it a matter of “logical,” “conceptual,” “nomological,” or
“metaphysical” possible worlds? Scarano (2001, chapter 3.2), argues that
our moral principles have a comparable status to the “metaphysical
necessity”. To Kant has to be ascribed the view that it is herewith a
matter of “conceptual necessity." Scarano sees an indication of this
interpretation in the method he applies in the first and sections. He
presupposes that the content or the formula of the CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE can be found solely through the means of the conceptual
analysis of our *MORAL* *CONCEPTS*. At the beginning of the decisive
argumentation, he writes, “Regarding this problem we will first try to
see whether perhaps the mere concept of a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE does
not also provide us with its formula” (GMS, 420,18—20). And
approximately twenty pages later, he asserts in retrospect: "Yet that
the specified principle of autonomy is the sole principle of morals may
well be established through the mere analysis of the concepts of
morality” (GMS,
5%}514028-30). He, therefore, assumes that he actually was able to
extract the formula of the supreme moral principle solely through a
conceptual analysis.

In my opinion, such a proceeding allows only one conclusion: *IF* *THE*
*MORAL* *PRINCIPLE* *CAN* *BE* *PRODUCED* *SOLELY* *THROUGH* *AN*
*ANALYTICAL* *PROCEDURE* *ON* *OUR* *CONCEPT* *OF* *MORALITY*, *THEN*
*IT* *WOULD* *HAVE* *THE* *STATUS* *OF* *CONCEPTUAL* *NECESSITY*.
According to Kant, the founding law of the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE is
valid in all conceptually possible worlds. The queson of which type of
necessity moral principles exhibit, however, is not essential for the
ensuing reflections. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]

2.3 NECESSITY {OBEDIENT}, NORMATIVITY {AIDING} AND APRIORITY {ASSISTING}
A possible but easily avoidable equivocation in the expression [*ONTIC*]
necessity can be cleared up at this juncture. Sometimes the expression
is used in the realm of morality as a synonym of normativity or
prescriptivity. Consequently, actions are necessary if they connote a
“should” or if it is our *DUTY* {

VIS-A-VIS the prescription conveyed by SECTION VIII to Queen Victoria's
Letters Patent of 29 October 1900 as instrumentation to the Federation
of the Australian Commonwealth of 1901: And We do hereby REQUIRE and
COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL AND MILITARY, AND ALL
OTHER THE INHABITANTS of Our said Commonwealth TO BE *OBEDIENT*,
*AIDING*, AND *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General

} to carry them out. This type of usage is also found in Kant. In the
central “third proposition” of the first part of the Groundwork, this
usage is clearly expressed: “*DUTY* *IS* *THE* *NECESSITY* *OF* *AN*
*ACTION* *FROM* *RESPECT* *FOR* *THE* *LAW*” (GMS, 400,18 f.). While the
[*ONTIC*] necessity analyzed previously refers to the moral principles,
it is here a matter of the necessity of the action itself. However this
aspect is terminologically classified, whether as “normative,”
“prescriptive,” “evaluative,” or whether one speaks of the imperative
character of moral judgments, it may be distinctly distinguished from
the modal-logical concept of necessity responsible for the
counterfactual variations.

In the preliminary formulations (P1) through (P3), this logical quality
has yet to be expressed. In (Pl') the modal status of necessity,
therefore, is explicitly taken up into the formulation:

(P1') Necessarily, for all objects x:
if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion C, does x have the moral
quality M.

Applied to Kantian ethics, this thought results in the following
formulation of Kant’s fundamental principle:

(P2') Necessarily, for all actions x: .
if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion CI, does x satisfy the demand
of morality.

The proposition (P3) is also to be completed accordingly:

(P3') Necessarily, for all maxims x and all actions y:
if, and only if, the underlying maxim x of the action y has the quality
that the actor of y can will at the same time that x becomes a general
law, does y satisfy the demand of morality.

In the propositions (Pl') through (P3') this aspect — that is, necessity
in the sense of “normative,” “prescriptive,” or “evaluative” — is indeed
contained. There it is connected, however, to the moral predicate, not
the operator of necessity. When I speak of necessity in the following
sections, I mean a modal quality of judgments and not the specificum of
normativity.

Kant uses the expression necessity with yet other meanings. Every
interpretation depends on the clarification in each particular context
of what Kant exactly intends in those corresponding places and of how
each particular argument is to be reconstructed. Next to

(a) the type of usage as a modal operator that makes counterfactual
considerations possible and
(b) the usage in the sense of an imperative character, thus in the sense
of “normativity” or “prescriptivity,” there is
(c) an often encountered usage with an epistemological meaning.

If expression is used in this sense, then it means as much as “necessary
know-ability,” that is, the independence of knowledge from contingent,
empirical factors. Typically, Kant uses the expression a priori for
judgments that exhibit this characteristic. Since this type of usage
also can be clearly distinguished from the modal one, I will speak of
apriority to designate this epistemological aspect. I will use necessity
solely in the first sense (a).

Kant doubtlessly sees a close connection between necessity and
apriority. He often moves quickly from the one concept to the other
without grounding the transition. The two concepts, however, originate
from varying spheres. While necessity is a matter of the modal status of
judgments, apriority is an epistemological concept. In the former case,
the concern is the application of predicates to objects of
other possible worlds. In the later case, it is a matter of the
knowability of the relevant judgments. Between the two concepts there
does not seem to be a close conceptual connection. In particular cases it
must be explicitly argued for that apriority follows from necessity.

Even if Kant sees a very close connection between the two concepts, he
does not appear to assume that necessity and apriority are exchangeable
concepts. In the central passage of the Preface. he formulates rather an
argument for their connection. In the following section, Scarano
sketches out a possible reconstruction of the argumentation's structure
on the basis of the conceptual differences just worked out. [Horn &
Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 11-12]

As there being a prerequisite for hypothetical and conjectural postulate
of such cognitive reality which I have desire to grasp (ie. there may be
semantical misapprehensions: mais nous faisons de notre mieux) is a
notion of contingency as a quantum sensibility within the context of a
metaphysical philosophical derivation where there is a normative absence
or a substitution of *ONTIC* necessity as the factuality of being so
without being so and which whilst absent of quantitative certainty yet
has a provisional possibility for occurrence or eventuality.

And we note at this juncture that the signs-‘OTH {#2184 / #364 -
ADMITTANCE {

#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]

IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}

DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE

} v’s #2184 / #312 - RESISTANCE {

#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 -
Totality of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]

} #2184 / #728 - REACTANCE {

#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature / #1 - Nature Contains Nature:
{DOUBLE: #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}

}} become reversed in the admittance domain; ie. capacitive susceptance
is positive and inductive susceptance is negative.

ADMITTANCE {YANG CH'I AS MALE} AND RESISTANCE {YIN AS FEME}
Within electrical engineering, admittance is a measure of how easily a
circuit or device will allow a current to flow. It is defined as the
reciprocal of impedance.

Resistance is a measure of the opposition of a circuit to the flow of a
steady current, while impedance takes into account not only the
resistance but also dynamic effects which are known as ‘OTH {#2184 /
#3}: #728 - REACTANCE {

#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]

DEFINE THE @5 CANONICAL PRINCIPLE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTIC HERE

) as here conveyed as substantial form (forma substantialis) by
liability. Likewise, admittance is not only a measure of the ease with
which a steady current can flow, but also the dynamic effects of the
material's susceptance to the contingent eventuality of polarisation.

Within electrical and electronic systems, reactance is the opposition of
a circuit element to a change in current or voltage, due to that
element's inductance or capacitance. The notion of reactance is similar
to electrical resistance, but it differs in several respects.

Thus I wish to obtain as semantical construct some philosophical
conception about the notion of contingency as to the dynamic effect of
reactance and the materia prima susceptibility to eventuality of
polarisation as materia secunda as an alternative canonical approach to
mathematically expressing these normative {ie. YANG CH'I as MALE / YIN
as FEME} bi-conditionals in terms of an electrical circuit:

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the
same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the
same light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 -
TORAH} - Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect
each other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:

Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).

*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage /
sovereign dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus}
Empire Governance]

As to what constitutes the substantial form (forma substantialis) of the
formal cause (causa formalis) as to the quintessential first material
(materia prima: Anthropic Cosmological Principle as the absolute
generalized basis of all subsequent individualization that is utterly
potential and is devoid of all attributes or qualities) which is then
the *MIND* as intellectualised universal form (universalia forma), idea,
shape or pattern of the essential or natural image of God (imago Dei
essentialis sive naturalis: that archetypal principal perfections of
righteousness, holiness and wisdom as the likeness or resemblance to God
in which man was originally created).

H5674@{
@1: Sup: 76 (#76); Ego: 76 (#76),
@2: Sup: 65 (#141); Ego: 70 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@3: Sup: 67 (#208); Ego: 2 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
@4: Sup: 24 (#232); Ego: 38 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
@5: Sup: 74 (#306); Ego: 50 (#236),
@6: Sup: 80 (#386); Ego: 6 (#242),
Male: #386; Feme: #242
} // #728

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #728 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32
- Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;

THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *INCONSTANT* *MIND*.

#VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
#TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
#POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
#TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
#CANON: #186

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
@1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
@2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
@3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186

#728 as [#400, #70, #2, #200, #50, #6] = `abar (H5674): {UMBRA: #5 as
#728 % #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *PASS* *OVER* *OR* *BY* *OR* *THROUGH*,
alienate, bring, carry, do away, take, take away, transgress; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to pass over, cross, cross over, pass over, march over, overflow,
go over; 1a2) to pass beyond; 1a3) to pass through, traverse; 1a3a)
passers-through (participle); 1a3b) *TO* *PASS* *THROUGH* (*THE* *PARTS*
*OF* *VICTIM* *IN* *COVENANT*);

“Then gathered the chief priests and the Pharisees {set apart} a
council, and said, What do we? For this man doeth many miracles.

If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: {

“[Ye] #351 - serpents, [ye] #33 - generation of vipers, how can ye
escape the #312 - damnation of hell?” [Matthew 23:33 (KJV)]

“Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O
#33 - generation of #351 - vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the
#312 - wrath to come?” [Luke 3:7 (KJV)]

} and the Romans {strength; power} shall come and take away both our
place and nation.

And one of them, named Caiaphas {he that seeks with diligence; one that
vomiteth}, being the high priest that same year, said unto them, Ye know
nothing at all,

Nor consider that it is expedient for us, *THAT* *ONE* *MAN* *SHOULD*
*DIE* *FOR* *THE* *PEOPLE*, and that the whole nation perish not.

And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he
prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation;

And not for that nation only, but that also he should gather together in
one the children of God that were scattered abroad.

Then from that day forth they took counsel together for to put him to
death {

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"

http://youtu.be/Jy6AOGRsR80

The 33 #CENTRE of the first square is the KING as SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE
dynamic which corresponds to the historic reality of the crucifixion of
Christ on AROUND 1500 HOURS ON FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.

} Jesus therefore walked no more openly among the Jews; but went thence
unto a country near to the wilderness, into a city called Ephraim
{fruitful; increasing: #15 CE ... #34 CE ... #65 CE ... #111 CE ... #175
CE ... 260 CE ... #369 CE}, and there continued with his disciples.

And the Jews' passover was nigh at hand: and many went out of the
country up to Jerusalem {vision of peace / Jerusha: banished;
possession; inheritance} before the passover, to purify themselves.”
[John 11:47-55 (KJV}

1a4) to pass along, pass by, overtake and pass, sweep by; 1a4a)
passer-by (participle); 1a4b) to be past, be over; 1a5) to pass on, go
on, pass on before, go in advance of, pass along, travel, advance; 1a6)
to pass away; 1a6a) to emigrate, leave (one's territory); 1a6b) to
vanish; 1a6c) to perish, cease to exist; 1a6d) to become invalid, become
obsolete (of law, decree); 1a6e) to be alienated, pass into other hands;
1b) (Niphal) to be crossed; 1c) (Piel) to impregnate, cause to cross;
1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to cause to pass over, cause to bring over, cause to
cross over, make over to, dedicate, devote; 1d2) to cause to pass
through; 1d3) to cause to pass by or beyond or under, let pass by; 1d4)
to cause to pass away, cause to take away; 1e) (Hithpael) to pass over;

Which then results in the second matter (materia secunda) as the basis
for all material existence (essentia: indicates the entire whatness of a
thing including the materiality or spirituality as its substantia) as
the integrity and authenticity of being within the world and living in
compliance (status integritatis) as obedience with the terms of the
innate *MORAL* (lex moralis primordialis).

“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]

"I AM FROM ABOVE {#41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your
parents ... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against
autonomy ... #205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear false witness ... #287
- Covet Not ... #328 ... #369}: YE ARE OF THIS WORLD {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: #260) ...
#34 (@7: #175) ...
#65 (@2: #34) ...
#111 (@3: #65) ...
#175 (@4: #369) ...
#260 (@8: #111) ...
#369 (@9: #15)

}; I AM NOT OF THIS WORLD.” [John 8:23 (KJV)]

"AND JESUS ANSWERING SAID UNTO THEM, THE CHILDREN {#SEVEN: #117 / #351
as BELIAL - ANKH / ROMAN} OF THIS WORLD MARRY {#ONE: #99 / #297 <-- *AS*
*THE* *FOUNDATION* *STONE* (*USURPING* @1 = *SOVEREIGN* / #CENTRE @5 =
*LAST* *WILL*, *TESTAMENT* *OF* #INR *BEING* *THE* *BINDING* *NORM*
(*NORMA* *OBLIGANS* ) *ON* #33 AD) *MAGIC* *SQUARE

@1 - #17 - 2017
@2 - #33 - #INR
@3 - #65 - SOLDIER
@4 - #390 - WREATHS / CROWN / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776

@5 - #288 - UMBRA / BEERSHEBA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
@6 - #419 - SLAUGHTER
@7 - #391 - HOMOIOS
@8 - #13 - Letters Patent
@9 - #21 - Bequeathed to Sovereign Heirs in perpetuity

@10 - #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration; I-Ching: H40
- Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21 - Release;

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE}

#1 (9) - OUHOUYAH (King-Seraphim) = #1
#9 (8) - HAZIEL (King-Cherubim) = #10
#17 (7) - LEVYAH (King-Throne) = #27 <-- SOVEREIGNTY / PYTHAGOREAN
TERNIO ANAGRAM TO #INR
#25 (6) - NETEHYAH (King-Dominion) = #52 <-- *THEY* *ARE* *AS* *THE*
*SONS* *OF* *DARKNESS* *NOT* *THE* *SONS* *OF* *LIGHT* / *GOD* *AS* #123

#33 (5) - YHOUYAH (King-Powers) = #85 <-- ADAMANT {ie. fixed mind /
dogmatic} / DIAMOND 💍
#41 (4) - HEHAHEL (King-Virtues) = #126
#49 (3) - OHOUEL (King-Principalities) = #175 <-- *VENUS* (7x7 = #49 /
#175) *USE* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *AS* *AN* *ANTHROPIC* *PROTOTYPE*

#57 (2) - NEMAMYAH (King-Archangels) = #232
#65 - *SOLDIER* (1) - DAMBYAN (King-Angels) = #297

VIRTUE as MIND: {#1 + #2 = #3} +
TOOLS as SCIENCE: {#3 + #4 = #7} +
POSITION as OPINION: {#5 + #6 = #11 as Collegium of Pontiffs from 510
BCE as AS PONTIFICATED DEIFIED IGNORANCE BEING NARCISSISM} +
TIME as SENSE: {#7 + #8 = #15}

= #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal
Law + H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity)

6x6 = #36 / #111 / #666 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}

45 5 61
53 37 21
13 69 29

= #111 / #333 {#FIVE}

Whilst it may continue to function as an acceptable METHODOLOGY {ARCH
KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} with an encapsulated sphere of
operation, it is entirely a specious notion to declare it is the root
and causal basis of the perennialist philosophical tradition:

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE}

42 2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}

43 3 59
51 35 19
11 67 27 = #105 / #315 {#THREE}

#419 as [#9, #2, #8, #400] = tabach (H2873): {#2 as #19 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE*
*GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315} 1) to slaughter, slay,
butcher, kill ruthlessly; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter, butcher; 1a2) to
slay, kill ruthlessly (figurative);

44 4 60
52 36 20
12 68 28 = #108 / #324 {#FOUR}

#419 as [#2, #1, #6, #400, #10] = 'avvah (H185): {#0 as #12
*INTERFERENCE* *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH*/ *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPE* #FOUR: #108 / #324} 1) desire, lust,
will (not necessarily evil);

49 9 65
57 41 25
17 73 33 = #123 / #369 {#NINE} AS IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73
SUBSTITUTION}

74 81 76
79 77 75
78 73 80 = #231 - #108 = #123 / #693 - #369 = #324 {#TEN} AS RETURN TO
GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE BEING ITSELF

My objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17
/ #33 - #INR / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 - substituted HETEROS ethic upon our
{#390 / #288 / #419} war dead and usurping the @1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the
#391 - HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth’s Governance which is defined
as a PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37} by Queen
Victoria’s Letters Patent of 17 September 1900 as the instrumentation of
Federation into a nation.

}, AND ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE {#175 AS ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE}: BUT THEY
WHICH SHALL BE ACCOUNTED WORTHY TO OBTAIN THAT WORLD, AND THE
RESURRECTION FROM THE DEAD, NEITHER MARRY, NOR ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE:
NEITHER CAN THEY DIE ANY MORE: FOR THEY ARE EQUAL UNTO THE ANGELS; AND
ARE THE CHILDREN OF GOD {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123
% #41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth,
young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation,
ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] *OR* *SONS* *OF* *GOD*
[*FOR* *ANGELS*]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless
things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A*
*GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

}, BEING THE CHILDREN OF THE RESURRECTION." [Luke 20:34-36 (KJV)]

Which as a habit and capacity of will by its exercise of intellect as
being primarily intentioned to be regulated by the innate understanding
which grasps the basic principles of the *MORAL* law and spontaneously
acts according to the dictates as wants and desires of conscientia) and
the natural law (ie. the universal *MORAL* law either impresses by God
upon the *MIND* of all the people or immediately discerned by the reason
in its encounter with the order of nature) as a covenant of nature
(foedus naturae: predicated on the original integrity of human nature
and its capacity for obedience under the terms if the innate *MORAL* or
natural law) bestowed upon us by the graciousness of God.

STRATEGIC: SUCCESS AND MATERIAL GAIN
VIII - And We do hereby REQUIRE and COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND
MINISTERS, CIVIL AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS of Our said
Commonwealth TO BE OBEDIENT, AIDING, AND ASSISTING unto Our said
Governor General, or, in the event of his death, INCAPACITY, or absence,
to such person or persons as may, FROM TIME TO TIME, under the
PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER THE GOVERNMENT of Our
said Commonwealth.

Thanks for your assistance!

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 29 August 2018

#CONTINGENCY #DEATH #INCAPACITY
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Loading...