dolf
2017-06-19 20:01:26 UTC
-- DOING THE ***@MPKIN MONO SYM-BULIMIA --
CY NO CU
OH YO MO
OF TU TU
OR MU MU
SO IN TO
YE LA LA
TA TA BI
YOUTUBE: "Justified And Ancient [All Bound For Mu Mu Land] - The KLF (MV)
1991"
-
#5 / #6: Say NO to anonymous fascist propaganda every time.
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.
- http://www.grapple369.com
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS."
CY NO CU
OH YO MO
OF TU TU
OR MU MU
SO IN TO
YE LA LA
TA TA BI
YOUTUBE: "Justified And Ancient [All Bound For Mu Mu Land] - The KLF (MV)
1991"
-
- a Frank Sinatra-ism for a woman's vagina;
- floozy available for throw away sex;
- an exclamation to be uttered in the presence of women of easy virtue.
[cf: www.urbandictionary.com]
YOUTUBE: "Vomit Everywhere - 3L Milk Challenge"
-
Sister FIONA
p.s.
I love you
— VALE HELMUT JOSEF MICHAEL KOHL (LUDWIGSHAFEN: 16 JUNE 2017)
(c) 2017 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 20 June, 2017
YOUTUBE: "Elton John - Sacrifice"
-
-
http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/eltonjohn/sacrifice.html
- http://www.grapple369.com?date:2017.6.20
-- STUBBORN DENIAL --
“OLD KING KOHL.
TWAS SUCH A MATE.
A MERRY OLD SOUL.
NOW CONFUSTICATE.
NO MORE CROISSANT 🥐.
LUNCH FILLET MINION.
HATRED SO POIGNANT.
NOTHING TO PISS ON.
THERE IS NO DENIAL.
SO ANGEL CHOIRS SING.
OVER HEAVEN'S TRIAL.
HE HATES NAZI BLING.
THE FRIDGE SITS COLD.
A LAGER CONCEIT FIRES.
GOODBYE FATHER BOLD.
AND LOVE FRENCH FRIES 🍟.”
*CONFUSTICATE*
- [Slang]: to confuse or perplex; bewilder.
- Word of the Day for 20 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
A minion's guide to the GRAPPLE fine ART (#369) of buggery in knowing the
ostentatious mustering dynamics of your free range HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]
pets.
YOUTUBE: "Old King Cole by Hooplakidz"
-
dolf
DIEU ET MON DROIT
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indNkFKVl84OHhvWTA
Initial Post 20 June 2017
..."
HOURS ON 27 FEBRUARY 2017: "Dolf, you've been living solo for too long now,
dear. You need a real man in your life."
got this thing going on...
"To whom will ye liken me, and make [me] equal, and compare me, that we may
be like?" [Isaiah 46:5 (KJV)]
Transgender boy from Texas wins controversial girls state title.
Normally I prefer my TS (ie. transexual) boys of Asian persuasion. This
one, seriously, is really not to my liking.
-
https://www.yahoo.com/news/transgender-boy-wins-controversial-girls-state-title-005123777.html
Discuss......"
post-war dysphasia, dyspraxia and dysphoria due to a lack of any coherent
Ding-Dong = MIND {#1 + #2 = #3}
Pooh-Pooh = SCIENCE {#3 + #4 = #7}
Bow-Wow = OPINION {#5 + #6 = #11}
Ta-Ta = SENSE {#7 + #8 = #15}
*GRUNT*
- to utter the deep, guttural sound characteristic of a hog.
- A guttural noise made for several different circumstances: happy, sad,
yes, Is no, oh yes, oh god yes, *during* *sex* taking a shit
- taking a grunt is also known as taking a shit.
- to grumble, as in discontent.
- [Slang]: a soldier, especially an infantryman.
- [Slang]: a common or unskilled worker; labourer.
The opposite of a 'grunt' is a 'pougue', which is a derogatory reference to
pretty much anyone who isn't a grunt, but normally reserved for Marines who
work in an office or some other rear-echelon job as part of their regular
duties ('In the rear with the gear'). Call a pougue a 'grunt' and they love
it, but call a grunt a 'pougue' and see what happens.
AN OVERVIEW OF DIFFERENT THEORIES ON LANGUAGE ORIGINS (FOUR IMITATION
HYPOTHESES)
1. DING-DONG: The "ding-dong" hypothesis bases the origins of language on
onomatopoeia. This idea states that language began when humans started
naming objects after a relevant sound that was already involved in their
everyday life. Examples include words such as "boom," "crash," and "oink."
These represent the sounds of certain objects, but it is unclear how to
provide onomatopoeia for silent objects such as a rock. It also does not
consider abstract ideas like love or justice, as there are no sounds for
these words. Also, this hypothesis does not supply words for grammar or
abstract items in the English language, so it is not hard to imagine that
these types of words are unusual and rare in most languages. Onomatopoeia
is such a small part of linguistics and varies greatly from language to
language. Because of these limitations it is considered a limited
hypothesis.
2. POOH-POOH: The basis for the "pooh-pooh" hypothesis holds true to the
involuntary nature of human speech. Through emotional response, language
and speech would have developed in tandem with human interaction and
primitive emotional reactions. Such sounds as "wa wa wa" or "ha ha ha,"
commonly used to denoted crying or pain and happiness or laughter,
respectively, would then develop into a more unique and case-specific
series of sounds in association with other emotions and interactions
(Vadja).
The problem with this hypothesis, however, is that exclamations, such as
the emotional responses that one might associate with these "pooh-pooh"
phrases, are in fact dependent on language instead of a basis through which
language can be created. For instance, the essence of emotional response
for pain is "ouch" in English, "oi" in Russian and "eee" in Cherokee
(Vadja). If there was a generalized emotional response that all people made
independently of each other, then perhaps there would be some legitimacy to
the argument. But those noises that we all do make based on the stimuli of
sneezes or hiccups cannot demonstrate a common linguistic nature between
peoples.
3. BOW-WOW: The "bow wow" hypothesis is the most popular but perhaps the
most far-fetched hypothesis of them all. Basically, it is the idea that
human language and vocabulary originated as a form of imitation. It is said
that language came from the imitation of animal sounds.
The problem that arises in this hypothesis is that a lot of words that
describe animal sounds in different languages are similar. For instance, in
English a pig makes the sound "oink-oink." In Russian the sound is
translated as "hyru-hyru" and in Chinese the sound is translated as
"oh-ee-oh-ee." As one can see, these words represent the sound of a single
animal in different languages. The sound and pronunciation of these words
are not similar. The overall idea is that one’s language determines how one
interprets a sound, and since we have may languages, one cannot prove that
human vocabulary comes from them.
4. TA-TA: As commonly seen in primates, hand gestures and body movement are
important aspects of interaction and cooperation within societies.
Originally hypothesized by Charles Darwin, though not necessarily supported
by him, the "ta-ta" hypothesis states that language and the development of
sound was generated to support the hand gestures and movements of the
individual. So as to better demonstrate the meaning behind the gestures,
these sounds progressed into more and more distinct words or combinations
of sounds inevitably leading to speech patterns.
Although plausible like many of the other hypothesis, the cultural roots of
varying hand gestures suggests that this is most likely not the reason
behind language. Where in some places nodding means "yes," in others
nodding means the opposite. Such distinct cultural differences implies that
this is not a sound hypothesis.
-
http://originsofhumanlanguage.blogspot.com.au/2011/04/ding-dong-pooh-pooh-bow-wow-and-ta-ta.html
- a Frank Sinatra-ism for a woman's vagina;
- floozy available for throw away sex;
- an exclamation to be uttered in the presence of women of easy virtue.
[cf: www.urbandictionary.com]
to swap oral with hung men."
certain propriety and dignity which is bestowed upon one's endowment of
manhood when it conforms by nature as in accord with its intention and
functional form.
See what I mean?"
HOURS ON 27 FEBRUARY 2017: "Dolf! If you won't get help at Charter
[Charter Mental Hospitals, Inc.], please get help somewhere!"
DOLF: "I take exception to your habitual indulgent indolent conduct as
narcissism (ie. deified ignorance) which fails to treat another person with
the dignity of a human being who is capable of sapient thinking unlike your
sensualism as defecation.
I actually ran this last statement made at 0429 HOURS this morning as an
assessment of your diseased mind (of which you are in denial), past my
older sister who is a registered nurse of some considerable years and my
independent backstop for any assessment and consideration of my own mental
health and vitality of being.
Not only did she not have any issue with the mental disturbances which you
improperly project upon me, but she validated the accuracy of the
terminology which I had utilized in a coherent manner and against which you
make your unfounded objections as systematic and targeted de-humanization
by stalking and slander, and was immediately cognizant of the
psycho-medical issues related to each of the terms.
--- floozy available for throw away sex;
- an exclamation to be uttered in the presence of women of easy virtue.
[cf: www.urbandictionary.com]
YOUTUBE: "Vomit Everywhere - 3L Milk Challenge"
-
Isn't that against god's rule?
Whatever fits COLONELSister FIONA
p.s.
I love you
(c) 2017 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 20 June, 2017
YOUTUBE: "Elton John - Sacrifice"
-
-
http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/eltonjohn/sacrifice.html
- http://www.grapple369.com?date:2017.6.20
-- STUBBORN DENIAL --
“OLD KING KOHL.
TWAS SUCH A MATE.
A MERRY OLD SOUL.
NOW CONFUSTICATE.
NO MORE CROISSANT 🥐.
LUNCH FILLET MINION.
HATRED SO POIGNANT.
NOTHING TO PISS ON.
THERE IS NO DENIAL.
SO ANGEL CHOIRS SING.
OVER HEAVEN'S TRIAL.
HE HATES NAZI BLING.
THE FRIDGE SITS COLD.
A LAGER CONCEIT FIRES.
GOODBYE FATHER BOLD.
AND LOVE FRENCH FRIES 🍟.”
*CONFUSTICATE*
- [Slang]: to confuse or perplex; bewilder.
- Word of the Day for 20 June 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com
A minion's guide to the GRAPPLE fine ART (#369) of buggery in knowing the
ostentatious mustering dynamics of your free range HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T]
pets.
YOUTUBE: "Old King Cole by Hooplakidz"
-
dolf
DIEU ET MON DROIT
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indNkFKVl84OHhvWTA
Initial Post 20 June 2017
Isn't that against god's rule?
HOURS ON 27 FEBRUARY 2017: "Are you coming on to me, Dolf?"..."
HOURS ON 27 FEBRUARY 2017: "Dolf, you've been living solo for too long now,
dear. You need a real man in your life."
got this thing going on...
"To whom will ye liken me, and make [me] equal, and compare me, that we may
be like?" [Isaiah 46:5 (KJV)]
Transgender boy from Texas wins controversial girls state title.
Normally I prefer my TS (ie. transexual) boys of Asian persuasion. This
one, seriously, is really not to my liking.
-
https://www.yahoo.com/news/transgender-boy-wins-controversial-girls-state-title-005123777.html
Discuss......"
post-war dysphasia, dyspraxia and dysphoria due to a lack of any coherent
Ding-Dong = MIND {#1 + #2 = #3}
Pooh-Pooh = SCIENCE {#3 + #4 = #7}
Bow-Wow = OPINION {#5 + #6 = #11}
Ta-Ta = SENSE {#7 + #8 = #15}
*GRUNT*
- to utter the deep, guttural sound characteristic of a hog.
- A guttural noise made for several different circumstances: happy, sad,
yes, Is no, oh yes, oh god yes, *during* *sex* taking a shit
- taking a grunt is also known as taking a shit.
- to grumble, as in discontent.
- [Slang]: a soldier, especially an infantryman.
- [Slang]: a common or unskilled worker; labourer.
The opposite of a 'grunt' is a 'pougue', which is a derogatory reference to
pretty much anyone who isn't a grunt, but normally reserved for Marines who
work in an office or some other rear-echelon job as part of their regular
duties ('In the rear with the gear'). Call a pougue a 'grunt' and they love
it, but call a grunt a 'pougue' and see what happens.
AN OVERVIEW OF DIFFERENT THEORIES ON LANGUAGE ORIGINS (FOUR IMITATION
HYPOTHESES)
1. DING-DONG: The "ding-dong" hypothesis bases the origins of language on
onomatopoeia. This idea states that language began when humans started
naming objects after a relevant sound that was already involved in their
everyday life. Examples include words such as "boom," "crash," and "oink."
These represent the sounds of certain objects, but it is unclear how to
provide onomatopoeia for silent objects such as a rock. It also does not
consider abstract ideas like love or justice, as there are no sounds for
these words. Also, this hypothesis does not supply words for grammar or
abstract items in the English language, so it is not hard to imagine that
these types of words are unusual and rare in most languages. Onomatopoeia
is such a small part of linguistics and varies greatly from language to
language. Because of these limitations it is considered a limited
hypothesis.
2. POOH-POOH: The basis for the "pooh-pooh" hypothesis holds true to the
involuntary nature of human speech. Through emotional response, language
and speech would have developed in tandem with human interaction and
primitive emotional reactions. Such sounds as "wa wa wa" or "ha ha ha,"
commonly used to denoted crying or pain and happiness or laughter,
respectively, would then develop into a more unique and case-specific
series of sounds in association with other emotions and interactions
(Vadja).
The problem with this hypothesis, however, is that exclamations, such as
the emotional responses that one might associate with these "pooh-pooh"
phrases, are in fact dependent on language instead of a basis through which
language can be created. For instance, the essence of emotional response
for pain is "ouch" in English, "oi" in Russian and "eee" in Cherokee
(Vadja). If there was a generalized emotional response that all people made
independently of each other, then perhaps there would be some legitimacy to
the argument. But those noises that we all do make based on the stimuli of
sneezes or hiccups cannot demonstrate a common linguistic nature between
peoples.
3. BOW-WOW: The "bow wow" hypothesis is the most popular but perhaps the
most far-fetched hypothesis of them all. Basically, it is the idea that
human language and vocabulary originated as a form of imitation. It is said
that language came from the imitation of animal sounds.
The problem that arises in this hypothesis is that a lot of words that
describe animal sounds in different languages are similar. For instance, in
English a pig makes the sound "oink-oink." In Russian the sound is
translated as "hyru-hyru" and in Chinese the sound is translated as
"oh-ee-oh-ee." As one can see, these words represent the sound of a single
animal in different languages. The sound and pronunciation of these words
are not similar. The overall idea is that one’s language determines how one
interprets a sound, and since we have may languages, one cannot prove that
human vocabulary comes from them.
4. TA-TA: As commonly seen in primates, hand gestures and body movement are
important aspects of interaction and cooperation within societies.
Originally hypothesized by Charles Darwin, though not necessarily supported
by him, the "ta-ta" hypothesis states that language and the development of
sound was generated to support the hand gestures and movements of the
individual. So as to better demonstrate the meaning behind the gestures,
these sounds progressed into more and more distinct words or combinations
of sounds inevitably leading to speech patterns.
Although plausible like many of the other hypothesis, the cultural roots of
varying hand gestures suggests that this is most likely not the reason
behind language. Where in some places nodding means "yes," in others
nodding means the opposite. Such distinct cultural differences implies that
this is not a sound hypothesis.
-
http://originsofhumanlanguage.blogspot.com.au/2011/04/ding-dong-pooh-pooh-bow-wow-and-ta-ta.html
- a Frank Sinatra-ism for a woman's vagina;
- floozy available for throw away sex;
- an exclamation to be uttered in the presence of women of easy virtue.
[cf: www.urbandictionary.com]
to swap oral with hung men."
certain propriety and dignity which is bestowed upon one's endowment of
manhood when it conforms by nature as in accord with its intention and
functional form.
See what I mean?"
HOURS ON 27 FEBRUARY 2017: "Dolf! If you won't get help at Charter
[Charter Mental Hospitals, Inc.], please get help somewhere!"
DOLF: "I take exception to your habitual indulgent indolent conduct as
narcissism (ie. deified ignorance) which fails to treat another person with
the dignity of a human being who is capable of sapient thinking unlike your
sensualism as defecation.
I actually ran this last statement made at 0429 HOURS this morning as an
assessment of your diseased mind (of which you are in denial), past my
older sister who is a registered nurse of some considerable years and my
independent backstop for any assessment and consideration of my own mental
health and vitality of being.
Not only did she not have any issue with the mental disturbances which you
improperly project upon me, but she validated the accuracy of the
terminology which I had utilized in a coherent manner and against which you
make your unfounded objections as systematic and targeted de-humanization
by stalking and slander, and was immediately cognizant of the
psycho-medical issues related to each of the terms.
#5 / #6: Say NO to anonymous fascist propaganda every time.
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.
- http://www.grapple369.com
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS."