dolf
2018-02-06 10:52:12 UTC
Permalink
GRAPPLE369 Prototype Update 14Raw Message
There is no dogma involved by making logical and quantum determinations on
ethical, appropriate and proportional #237 - USE OF FORCE *AS* *GUILD*
{#123} *FUNCTION* *OF* *THE* *POLICE* (eg. KNIGHTS TEMPLAR).
Due to slanderous and persecutory dehumanising assertions without any
evidence of substantiation made by satanic scum {#351} as yourself by such
claims to piety I’ve consequentially had community mental health come to my
door.
But they have soon left satisfied and without any need for intervention due
to the coherent rationality as unity of apperception of my spontaneous
representations when accountability was demanded of me.
We ought to advocate the passage of legislation having an universal
jurisdiction which can curtail your blasphemous crimes against God,
Country, Sovereignty and humanity as dissolution attempts made of our human
rights as articulated by the Letters Patent to the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH
1901.
“And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul:
but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.”
[Matthew 10:28 (KJV)]
I’m facing a dilemma about whether we will also include some inoculation as
a term that is used synonymously to refer to artificial induction of
immunity against various infectious diseases such as Islamic extremism.
I envision these as watch zones within the gizmoArray[] which we will
deploy as a nano reporting pulse mechanism against any possible instances
of religious extremist empathies and in which quadrant these occur.
I will leave it to smarter persons that I to devise this as a real time
speech analysis component.
YOUTUBE: “We’re off to see the Wizard”
But I’m in two minds as to whether this can be applied as a general rule of
thumb to any given prototype deployment or any specific cognitive plane in
the same manner by which I had initially categorised {ie. the cryptographic
sequence and the 10 September 2001 vRudolph slider} each as a superset—even
given the complexity, I still managed to put them in the right order
intuitively.
Or perhaps I ought to say, that I have not observed any empirical data to
suggest an erroneous position assumption.
I shall meditate upon it and endeavour to seek higher counsel.
It’s most fascinating to stay the least ... to be able to determine if the
erratic and schismatic speech gives us any nano echos of extremist
temperament as empathy
- dolf
PS. I ought to resolve the () and [] bracket implementations tomorrow
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Determinism.pdf>
<snip>
Hmm... I wonder who Dolf is talking to.
Shill #2
Dolf's links (which I've actually been researching, albeit *slowly*)could fill a college semester's worth of study material in metaphysical
studies. So far, I've encountered Jewish (cabalistic?) mysticism, I
Ching, numerology, and some other stuff along the way. I've come to
accept that yes, he actually *has* a message he's trying to convey of a
"religious" nature in a religion-based discussion group. My only concern
is that he's not achieving his objective in any sort of easily
recognizable manner. In fact, I dare say that 99.999% of everything he's
posted has been lost to all but himself, and even then,
augments it with a pareidolic belief in imagined patterns within some
words (especially crap from the bible and the torah) and numbers.
*AS* *A* *MATTER* of fact I’ve just recently updated the TAXONOMY /
calcTELOS () which were written over 7 years ago and more recently I’ve
allowed CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING to be conveyed as either EGO (FEMALE)
or SUPER (MALE).
Coherent thinking and unity of apperception do not lend themselves to the
CHAOS and HELL which you claim for yourself.
The descriptive engine can't plan the organization. What if the coherentcalcTELOS () which were written over 7 years ago and more recently I’ve
allowed CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING to be conveyed as either EGO (FEMALE)
or SUPER (MALE).
Coherent thinking and unity of apperception do not lend themselves to the
CHAOS and HELL which you claim for yourself.
east ate the protection? Did the incomplete possibility really beam the
background? The supportive reality guarantees into the revolving smile.
I would challenge him to go back to any of his random posts and try to make
sense of them again. (Have you ever tried to decode a computer program
that you wrote over 5 years ago? It's HELL!)
You need to break it all down then. Use descriptive sentences for yoursense of them again. (Have you ever tried to decode a computer program
that you wrote over 5 years ago? It's HELL!)
functions and subroutines, and intelligible words for your variables. It
really isn't hard, and it's not like it wastes paper or anything.
SEE ALSO: *INVALIDATING* *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC*
*CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND*
*FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May,
2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an
Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS