Discussion:
-- CBI URGES UK TO AVOID LOSS OF UP TO €1BN A YEAR IN EU RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FUNDING
(zu alt für eine Antwort)
dolf
2018-03-18 18:06:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
-- CBI URGES UK TO AVOID LOSS OF UP TO €1BN A YEAR IN EU RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT FUNDING

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 19 March 2018

<https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/mar/18/brexit-cbi-urges-uk-to-avoid-loss-of-1bn-a-year-in-eu-rd-funding>

I once had a most precious friend whose name was Robert Schmittat and he
held a lab assistance position in Phonetics Laboratory (Babel Building) at
the University of Melbourne.

One day I asked him a technical question at the very early stages as
relating to my informal research into a gematria focussed knowledge
pragmatics and he took it to the German speaking head of the linguistics
faculty situated at Melbourne University whom was singularly scathing (ie.
he thought it little better than superstition) of my informal research
approach into a trinomial mathematical theoretical noumenon and the
distillation of the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction set.

So contemptuous of my life work was the Melbourne University’s head of the
linguistics faculty as exhibiting an incontrovertible ‘lack of any
intellectual honesty’ that my friend’s sensibilities were confronted and
such opinion by an academic was then the cause for the rift between us—I
had lost all esteem in his eyes.

Our friendship was over.

So thank-you to the ‘low-life scum’ whom was the head of the linguistics
faculty situated at Melbourne University and I hope that you will burn in
hell, because I have climbed to the highest ontological pinnacle of
existential epistemology: "*YE* *SHALL* *BE* *AS* *GODS*, *KNOWING* *GOOD*
*AND* *EVIL*" and can now with my patent worthy approach to the GNOMIC
IMPERATIVE instruction set, make determinations of deception and the verity
of truth.

I ought to note that we now have a technical capability to further redefine
the granularity of our hypothetical proposition of the "AUTONOMOUS
HYPOTHETICAL FLUIDITY THEORY" which was articulated some months ago.

And that is the capability of reducing each conceptual word of our
functional dialectic by which one can readily cognize a poem or propose
into its own dialectic and obtain thereby the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction
set.

For example our first dialectic element is:

#1 = Position {#558}

And if written thusly:

[P, o, s, i, t, i, o, n]

Then is numerically as gematria equivalent to:

[70, 60, 100, 9, 200, 9, 60, 50] = #558

But as a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction set it is expressed as:

Event: POSITION@{
#1: Sup: 70; Ego: 70,
#2: Sup: 49; Ego: 60,
#3: Sup: 68; Ego: 19,
#4: Sup: 77; Ego: 9,
#5: Sup: 34; Ego: 38,
#6: Sup: 43; Ego: 9,
#7: Sup: 22; Ego: 60,
#8: Sup: 72; Ego: 50,
Male: 435; Female: 315
}

#315 as [#5, #300, #10] = eti (G2089): {#14 as #315} 1) yet, still; 1a) of
time; 1a1) of a thing which went on formerly, whereas now a different state
of things exists or has begun to exist; 1a2) of a thing which continues at
present; 1a2a) even, now; 1a3) with negatives; 1a3a) no longer, no more;
1b) of degree and increase; 1b1) even, yet; 1b2) besides, more, further;

"Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet {eti-yet [G2089]: #315} find
fault? For who hath resisted his will?" [Romans 9:19 (KJV)]

So therefore the hypothetical consideration is then, that any theoretical
notion has a conceptional reality when the probability threshold of the
individual elements as either SUPER(MALE) or EGO(FEMALE) conveying the
GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction set to that Event: POSITION@{} array has an
hot-zone empathy with any meta-data descriptors or narrative.

[L, i, a, r] or [30, 9, 1, 90] = #130

The logical proposition of a *LIAR* is expressed as the following GNOMIC
IMPERATIVE instruction set:

Event: LIAR@{
#1: Sup: 30; Ego: 30,
#2: Sup: 39; Ego: 9,
#3: Sup: 40; Ego: 1, // #109
#4: Sup: 49; Ego: 9,
Male: 158; Female: 49
}

#109 as [#10, #20, #7, #10, #2, #50, #10] = kazab (H3576): {#59 as #109} 1)
to lie, tell a lie, be a liar, be found a liar, be in vain, fail; 1a) (Qal)
liar (participle); 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *BE* *PROVEN* *TO* *BE* *LYING*; 1c)
(Piel); 1c1) to lie, tell a lie, tell a lie with, deceive; 1c2) to
disappoint, fail; 1d) (Hiphil) to make a liar, prove to be a liar;

Event: LIAR@{
#1: Sup: 10; Ego: 10,
#2: Sup: 30; Ego: 20,
#3: Sup: 37; Ego: 7,
#4: Sup: 47; Ego: 10,
#5: Sup: 49; Ego: 2,
#6: Sup: 18; Ego: 50,
#7: Sup: 28; Ego: 10,
Male: 219; Female: 109
}

Thus if #30 + #39 + #40 occurs, they could be said to have a propensity for
*LYING*.

#158 as [#50, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] = biyn (H995): {#55 as #158} 1) to
discern, understand, consider; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to perceive, discern; 1a2) *TO* *UNDERSTAND*, *KNOW* (*WITH* *THE* *MIND*);
1a3) to observe, mark, give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have
discernment, insight, understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning,
intelligent, discreet, have understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to
understand; 1c2) to cause to understand, give understanding, teach; 1d)
(Hithpolel) to show oneself discerning or attentive, consider diligently;
1e) (Polel) to teach, instruct;

Event: UNDERSTANDING@{
#1: Sup: 50; Ego: 50,
#2: Sup: 52; Ego: 2,
#3: Sup: 58; Ego: 6,
#4: Sup: 27; Ego: 50,
#5: Sup: 37; Ego: 10,
#6: Sup: 70; Ego: 33,
Male: 294; Female: 151
}

Thus if #30 + #39 + #40 + #49 occurs, they could be said to have a
propensity for being *DECEITFUL*;

#158 as [#5, #8, #30, #10, #100, #5] = chalaq (H2505): {#46 as #158} 1) to
divide, share, plunder, allot, apportion, assign; 2) *TO* *BE* *SMOOTH*,
*SLIPPERY*, *DECEITFUL*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to divide, apportion; 1a2) to
assign, distribute; 1a3) to assign, impart; 1a4) to share; 1a5) to divide
up, plunder; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to divide oneself; 1b2) to be divided; 1b3)
to assign, distribute; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to divide, apportion; 1c2) to
assign, distribute; 1c3) to scatter; 1d) (Pual) to be divided; 1e) (Hiphil)
to receive a portion or part; 1f) (Hithpael) to divide among themselves;
2a) (Qal) to be smooth, slippery; 2b) (Hiphil); 2b1) to be smooth; 2b2) to
flatter;

Event: DECEITFUL@{
#1: Sup: 5; Ego: 5,
#2: Sup: 13; Ego: 8,
#3: Sup: 43; Ego: 30,
#4: Sup: 53; Ego: 10,
#5: Sup: 72; Ego: 19,
#6: Sup: 77; Ego: 5,
Male: 263; Female: 77
}

"For he flattereth {chalaq-divide [H2505]: #158} himself in his own eyes,
until his iniquity be found to be hateful." [Psalm 36:2 (KJV)]

#263 as [#1, #30, #8, #9, #5, #10, #200] = alethes (G227): {#8 as #256} 1)
true; 2) loving the truth, speaking the truth, truthful;

Event: TRUTHFUL@{
#1: Sup: 1; Ego: 1,
#2: Sup: 31; Ego: 30,
#3: Sup: 39; Ego: 8,
#4: Sup: 48; Ego: 9,
#5: Sup: 53; Ego: 5,
#6: Sup: 63; Ego: 10,
#7: Sup: 20; Ego: 38,
Male: 255; Female: 101
}

10, #1, #40, #700 = 'aman (H539): {#47 as #101} 1) to support, confirm, be
faithful; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to support, confirm, be faithful, uphold,
nourish; 1a1a) foster-father (subst.); 1a1b) foster-mother, nurse; 1a1c)
pillars, supporters of the door; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be established, be
faithful, be carried, make firm; 1b1a) to be carried by a nurse; 1b1b) made
firm, sure, lasting; 1b1c) confirmed, established, sure; 1b1d) verified,
confirmed; 1b1e) *RELIABLE*, *FAITHFUL*, *TRUSTY*; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to
stand firm, to trust, to be certain, to believe in; 1c1a) stand firm; 1c1b)
*TRUST*, *BELIEVE*;

- Dolf

Initial Post: 19 March 2018

#MELBOURNE #UNIVERSITY #BABEL #LACKING #INTELLECTUAL #HONESTY
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May,
2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an
Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-03-18 18:28:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
-- CBI URGES UK TO AVOID LOSS OF UP TO €1BN A YEAR IN EU RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT FUNDING

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 19 March 2018

<https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/mar/18/brexit-cbi-urges-uk-to-avoid-loss-of-1bn-a-year-in-eu-rd-funding>

I once had a most precious friend whose name was Robert Schmittat and he
held a lab assistance position in Phonetics Laboratory (Babel Building) at
the University of Melbourne.

One day I asked him a technical question at the very early stages as
relating to my informal research into a gematria focussed knowledge
pragmatics and he took it to the German speaking head of the linguistics
faculty situated at Melbourne University whom was singularly scathing (ie.
he thought it little better than superstition) of my informal research
approach into a trinomial mathematical theoretical noumenon and the
distillation of the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction set.

I think in the primordial language idiom of Hebrew {

#423 as [#6, #400, #7, #4, #6] = zuwd (H2102): 1) to boil, boil up, seethe,
act proudly, act presumptuously, act rebelliously, be presumptuous, be
arrogant, be rebelliously proud; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to act presumptuously;
1a2) to deal arrogantly (with 'al'); 1a3) to defy proudly (with 'el'); 1b)
(Hiphil); 1b1) to boil, seethe, act proudly; 1b2) to act presumptuously,
act insolently;

} and the later Helios tongue of the Greeks {

#364 as [#1, #30, #1, #7, #70, #50, #5, #200] = alazon (G213): 1) an empty
pretender, a boaster;

#364 as [#7, #8, #300, #8, #40, #1] = zetema (G2213): 1) a question,
debate; 1a) about the law;

#364 as [#30, #70, #10, #4, #70, #100, #70, #10] = loidoros (G3060): 1) a
railer, reviler;

#364 as [#5, #9, #50, #10, #20, #70, #200] = ethnikos (G1482): 1) adapted
to the genius or customs of a people, peculiar to a people, national; 2)
suited to the manners or language of foreigners, strange, foreign; 3) in
the New Testament savouring of the nature of pagans, alien to the worship
of the true God, heathenish; 3a) of the pagan, the Gentile;

}, am fluent within Chinese DAOist meta-descriptor prototypes that are then
the basis for my dialectic use of the English language.

GIVEN THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law} of circa 1550 BCE, which contains the law of that will: 7 x
24 *COURSES* *OF* *PRIESTLY* *DIVISIONS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle
= 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as
354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days

<— RATIONAL PI AS THE BASIS FOR RATIOCINATION IS IMPLICIT WITHIN THIS
COSMOLOGICAL COMPREHENSION

We ought then to be able to deploy Hebrew (22) / Greek (24) Categories of
Understanding interchangeably and we also can use English.

BECAUSE THE ENGLISH VOWELS: A-E-I-O-U APPEAR TO BE DERIVED FROM THE HEBREW:

#A (#1) = {Inner?} - #SOUTH
#E (#5) = {Totality?} - #CENTRE
#I (#9) = {Sphere?} - #NORTH
#O (#60) = {Polarity?} - #WEST? {#SAMEK as the 15th Hebrew Letter}
#U (#300) = {Harmony?} - #EAST {ie. determined as such by Pythagorean
redaction method using the Greco-Roman magic square as frame of reference}

The metempirical consideration is then whether the English language itself
is an extrusion of the INTELLECTUS par excellence.

So contemptuous of my life work was the Melbourne University’s head of the
linguistics faculty as exhibiting an incontrovertible ‘lack of any
intellectual honesty’ that my friend’s sensibilities were confronted and
such opinion by an academic was then the cause for the rift between us—I
had lost all esteem in his eyes.

Our friendship was over.

So thank-you to the ‘low-life scum’ whom was the head of the linguistics
faculty situated at Melbourne University and I hope that you will burn in
hell, because I have climbed to the highest ontological pinnacle of
existential epistemology: "*YE* *SHALL* *BE* *AS* *GODS*, *KNOWING* *GOOD*
*AND* *EVIL*" and can now with my patent worthy approach to the GNOMIC
IMPERATIVE instruction set, make determinations of deception and the verity
of truth.

I ought to note that we now have a technical capability to further redefine
the granularity of our hypothetical proposition: 'AUTONOMOUS HYPOTHETICAL
FLUIDITY THEORY' which was articulated some months ago. And that is the
capability of reducing each conceptual word of our functional dialectic by
which one can readily cognize a poem or propose into its own sub-dialectic
stratum and obtain thereby the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction set.

For example our first dialectic element is:

#1 = Position {#558}

And if written thusly:

[P, o, s, i, t, i, o, n]

Then is numerically as gematria equivalent to:

[70, 60, 100, 9, 200, 9, 60, 50] = #558

But as a GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction set it is expressed as:

Event: POSITION@{
#1: Sup: 70; Ego: 70,
#2: Sup: 49; Ego: 60,
#3: Sup: 68; Ego: 19,
#4: Sup: 77; Ego: 9,
#5: Sup: 34; Ego: 38,
#6: Sup: 43; Ego: 9,
#7: Sup: 22; Ego: 60,
#8: Sup: 72; Ego: 50,
Male: 435; Female: 315
}

#315 as [#5, #300, #10] = eti (G2089): {#14 as #315} 1) yet, still; 1a) of
time; 1a1) of a thing which went on formerly, whereas now a different state
of things exists or has begun to exist; 1a2) of a thing which continues at
present; 1a2a) even, now; 1a3) with negatives; 1a3a) no longer, no more;
1b) of degree and increase; 1b1) even, yet; 1b2) besides, more, further;

"Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet {eti-yet [G2089]: #315} find
fault? For who hath resisted his will?" [Romans 9:19 (KJV)]

So therefore the hypothetical consideration is then, that any theoretical
notion has a conceptional reality when the probability threshold of the
individual elements as either SUPER(MALE) or EGO(FEMALE) conveying the
GNOMIC IMPERATIVE instruction set to that Event: POSITION@{} array has an
hot-zone empathy with any meta-data descriptors or narrative.

[L, i, a, r] or [30, 9, 1, 90] = #130

The logical proposition of a *LIAR* is expressed as the following GNOMIC
IMPERATIVE instruction set:

Event: LIAR@{
#1: Sup: 30; Ego: 30,
#2: Sup: 39; Ego: 9,
#3: Sup: 40; Ego: 1, // #109
#4: Sup: 49; Ego: 9,
Male: 158; Female: 49
}

#109 as [#10, #20, #7, #10, #2, #50, #10] = kazab (H3576): {#59 as #109} 1)
to lie, tell a lie, be a liar, be found a liar, be in vain, fail; 1a) (Qal)
liar (participle); 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *BE* *PROVEN* *TO* *BE* *LYING*; 1c)
(Piel); 1c1) to lie, tell a lie, tell a lie with, deceive; 1c2) to
disappoint, fail; 1d) (Hiphil) to make a liar, prove to be a liar;

Event: LIAR@{
#1: Sup: 10; Ego: 10,
#2: Sup: 30; Ego: 20,
#3: Sup: 37; Ego: 7,
#4: Sup: 47; Ego: 10,
#5: Sup: 49; Ego: 2,
#6: Sup: 18; Ego: 50,
#7: Sup: 28; Ego: 10,
Male: 219; Female: 109
}

Thus if #30 + #39 + #40 occurs, they could be said to have a propensity for
*LYING*.

#158 as [#50, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] = biyn (H995): {#55 as #158} 1) to
discern, understand, consider; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to perceive, discern; 1a2) *TO* *UNDERSTAND*, *KNOW* (*WITH* *THE* *MIND*);
1a3) to observe, mark, give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have
discernment, insight, understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning,
intelligent, discreet, have understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to
understand; 1c2) to cause to understand, give understanding, teach; 1d)
(Hithpolel) to show oneself discerning or attentive, consider diligently;
1e) (Polel) to teach, instruct;

Event: UNDERSTANDING@{
#1: Sup: 50; Ego: 50,
#2: Sup: 52; Ego: 2,
#3: Sup: 58; Ego: 6,
#4: Sup: 27; Ego: 50,
#5: Sup: 37; Ego: 10,
#6: Sup: 70; Ego: 33,
Male: 294; Female: 151
}

Thus if #30 + #39 + #40 + #49 occurs, they could be said to have a
propensity for being *DECEITFUL*;

#158 as [#5, #8, #30, #10, #100, #5] = chalaq (H2505): {#46 as #158} 1) to
divide, share, plunder, allot, apportion, assign; 2) *TO* *BE* *SMOOTH*,
*SLIPPERY*, *DECEITFUL*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to divide, apportion; 1a2) to
assign, distribute; 1a3) to assign, impart; 1a4) to share; 1a5) to divide
up, plunder; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to divide oneself; 1b2) to be divided; 1b3)
to assign, distribute; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to divide, apportion; 1c2) to
assign, distribute; 1c3) to scatter; 1d) (Pual) to be divided; 1e) (Hiphil)
to receive a portion or part; 1f) (Hithpael) to divide among themselves;
2a) (Qal) to be smooth, slippery; 2b) (Hiphil); 2b1) to be smooth; 2b2) to
flatter;

Event: DECEITFUL@{
#1: Sup: 5; Ego: 5,
#2: Sup: 13; Ego: 8,
#3: Sup: 43; Ego: 30,
#4: Sup: 53; Ego: 10,
#5: Sup: 72; Ego: 19,
#6: Sup: 77; Ego: 5,
Male: 263; Female: 77
}

"For he flattereth {chalaq-divide [H2505]: #158} himself in his own eyes,
until his iniquity be found to be hateful." [Psalm 36:2 (KJV)]

#263 as [#1, #30, #8, #9, #5, #10, #200] = alethes (G227): {#8 as #256} 1)
true; 2) loving the truth, speaking the truth, truthful;

Event: TRUTHFUL@{
#1: Sup: 1; Ego: 1,
#2: Sup: 31; Ego: 30,
#3: Sup: 39; Ego: 8,
#4: Sup: 48; Ego: 9,
#5: Sup: 53; Ego: 5,
#6: Sup: 63; Ego: 10,
#7: Sup: 20; Ego: 38,
Male: 255; Female: 101
}

10, #1, #40, #700 = 'aman (H539): {#47 as #101} 1) to support, confirm, be
faithful; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to support, confirm, be faithful, uphold,
nourish; 1a1a) foster-father (subst.); 1a1b) foster-mother, nurse; 1a1c)
pillars, supporters of the door; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be established, be
faithful, be carried, make firm; 1b1a) to be carried by a nurse; 1b1b) made
firm, sure, lasting; 1b1c) confirmed, established, sure; 1b1d) verified,
confirmed; 1b1e) *RELIABLE*, *FAITHFUL*, *TRUSTY*; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to
stand firm, to trust, to be certain, to believe in; 1c1a) stand firm; 1c1b)
*TRUST*, *BELIEVE*;

- Dolf

Initial Post: 19 March 2018

#MELBOURNE #UNIVERSITY #BABEL #LACKING #INTELLECTUAL #HONESTY
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May,
2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an
Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTATIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Loading...